-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, GXDpB4Y5HuGIL+7PAjk3dK+9zkj3V35GdRV2lsWaH7eZfolQzap4OpMM8JtkFpHc gLs9/FUJwGxriEsp/CrW/g== 0001108890-10-000071.txt : 20100521 0001108890-10-000071.hdr.sgml : 20100521 20100521152447 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001108890-10-000071 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20100228 FILED AS OF DATE: 20100521 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20100521 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Oncologix Tech Inc. CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000799694 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SURGICAL & MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS & APPARATUS [3841] IRS NUMBER: 861006416 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NV FISCAL YEAR END: 0831 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-15482 FILM NUMBER: 10850922 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: P.O. BOX 8832 CITY: KENTWOOD STATE: MI ZIP: 49518-8832 BUSINESS PHONE: 616-977-9933 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: P.O. BOX 8832 CITY: KENTWOOD STATE: MI ZIP: 49518-8832 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: BESTNET COMMUNICATIONS CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 20001219 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: WAVETECH INTERNATIONAL INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19980225 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: WAVETECH INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19920703 10-Q 1 oncologix10q022810.htm PERIOD ENDED 02-28-10 oncologix10q022810.htm
 
 

 




 

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x           QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934.
 
For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2010.
 
 o
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
 
ACT OF 1934.
 
For the transition period from ____________________ to ___________________.
 
Commission File Number 0-15482
 
ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC.
(Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)
 
Nevada                                                                                                                                    0;                                                                                                              86-1006416
(State or other jurisdiction of                                                                                                                                         60;                                                                                   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                                                                                                                                         0;                                                                                  Identification No.)
 
P.O. Box 8832
Grand Rapids, MI  49518-8832
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(616) 977-9933
(Issuer’s telephone number)
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes      o   No     x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated Filer      o                                                                                       Accelerated Filer                              o
 
Non-accelerated Filer        o                                                                                       Smaller Reporting Company           x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes       o  No     x
 
As of April 21, 2010, there were 183,554,126 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding.
 
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One):   Yes      o     No     x
 
 
 




 
 
 

 

 
ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
     
     
                            PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   
     
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
3
 
     
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
   
     
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 28, 2010 (Unaudited) and August 31, 2009
4
 
     
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and six month periods
   
     ended February 28, 2010 and 2009
5
 
     
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit for the period from
   
     August 31, 2008 through February 28, 2010 (Unaudited)
6
 
     
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the six month period
   
     ended February 28, 2010 and 2009
7
 
     
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
8
 
     
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
24
 
     
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
29
 
     
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
30
 
     
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
   
     
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
31
 
     
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
31
 
     
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
31
 
     
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
31
 
     
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
31
 
     
ITEM 5. Other Information
32
 
     
ITEM 6. Exhibits
32
 
     
 
2

 
 

 

               IMPORTANT NOTICE

This Report was required to be filed on April 14, 2010. We were unable to meet that requirement because we lacked funds to pay independent auditors to perform the necessary examination and reviews of our financial statements as required by law. We are now engaged in an effort to return to full compliance by the filing of this Report on Form 10-Q.
 
3

 
 

 

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.  Financial Statements
ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 


   
February 28,
   
August 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
                                       ASSETS
           
Current Assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 672     $ 743  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    17,936       7,092  
Prepaid commissions
    -       2,691  
Current assets of discontinued operations
    -       -  
                 
Total current assets
    18,608       10,526  
                 
Property and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation
               
of $19,482 and $18,793)
    2,290       2,709  
Investment in IUTM
    3,186       3,186  
Marketing rights
    212       212  
Long-term assets of discontinued operations
    -       4,795  
                 
Total assets
  $ 24,296     $ 21,428  
                 
                                                       LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
               
Current liabilities:
               
Convertible notes payable (net of discount of $0 and $12,425)
  $ 25,000     $ 1,107,575  
Notes payable
    28,826       -  
Notes payable - related parties
    50,000       -  
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses
    141,354       263,736  
Accrued interest payable
    31,903       102,735  
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
    -       2,000  
                 
Total current liabilities
    277,083       1,476,046  
                 
Long-term liabilities:
               
Convertible notes payable
    127,712       127,712  
Convertible notes payable - related parties
    235,025       235,025  
                 
Total long-term liabilities
    362,737       362,737  
                 
Total liabilities
    639,820       1,838,783  
                 
Stockholders' Deficit:
               
Preferred stock, par value $.001 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized
         
295,862 and 295,862 shares issued and outstanding at
               
February 28, 2010 and August 31, 2009, respectively
    296       296  
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized;
         
182,877,193 and 178,282,995 shares issued at February 28, 2010 and
         
August 31, 2009, respectively; 182,877,193 and 155,900,627 shares
         
outstanding at February 28, 2010 and August 31, 2009, respectively
    182,877       155,901  
Additional paid-in capital
    56,752,276       55,104,084  
Accumulated deficit
    (57,581,400 )     (57,074,502 )
Common stock subscribed, underlying common shares of 676,933 and 0
    33,847       -  
Noncontrolling interest
    (3,420 )     (3,134 )
                 
Total stockholders' deficit
    (615,524 )     (1,817,355 )
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
  $ 24,296     $ 21,428  
                 
                 
 
             
 
 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
4

 
 

 

ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2010 AND 2009

 
 

   
Three Months Ended
   
For the Six Months Ended
 
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
                         
Revenue
  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
                                 
Cost of Revenues
    -       -       -       -  
                                 
Gross margin
    -       -       -       -  
                                 
Operating expenses:
                               
General and administrative
  $ 45,495     $ 99,921       109,795       322,433  
Depreciation and amortization
    361       426       689       843  
                                 
Total operating expenses
    45,856       100,347       110,484       323,276  
                                 
Loss from operations
    (45,856 )     (100,347 )     (110,484 )     (323,276 )
                                 
Other income (expense):
                               
Interest income
    -       -       -       -  
Interest and finance charges
    (22,279 )     (128,792 )     (52,452 )     (387,932 )
Conversion expense
    (22,564 )     -       (413,841 )     (26,457 )
Loss on disposal of assets
    -       -       -       (382 )
Cancellation of debt
    -       -       73,000       -  
Other income (expense)
    (493 )     (1,129 )     (553 )     (4,594 )
                                 
Total other income (expense)
    (45,336 )     (129,921 )     (393,846 )     (419,365 )
                                 
Net loss from continuing operations
    (91,192 )     (230,268 )     (504,330 )     (742,641 )
                                 
Discontinued operations:
                               
Operating loss from discontinued operations
    (30 )     (11,111 )     (2,854 )     (24,586 )
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
    -       22,116       -       22,116  
                                 
Loss from discontinued operations
    (30 )     11,005       (2,854 )     (2,470 )
                                 
Less loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (3 )     -       (286 )     -  
                                 
Net loss from discontinued operations
    (27 )     11,005       (2,568 )     (2,470 )
                                 
                                 
Net loss before income taxes
    (91,219 )     (219,263 )     (506,898 )     (745,111 )
                                 
Income taxes
    -       -       -       -  
                                 
Net loss
  $ (91,219 )   $ (219,263 )   $ (506,898 )   $ (745,111 )
                                 
Loss per common share, basic and diluted:
                               
Continuing operations
  $ (0.00 )   $ (0.00 )   $ (0.00 )   $ (0.01 )
Discontinued operations
    (0.00 )     (0.00 )     (0.00 )     (0.00 )
                                 
    $ (0.00 )   $ (0.00 )   $ (0.00 )   $ (0.01 )
Weighted average number of shares
                               
outstanding - basic and diluted
    182,252,408       121,313,664       179,209,611       119,109,641  
                                 


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
5

 
 

 

ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 31, 2008 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2010
 
 
 

                                                       
                           
Additional
         
Common
   
Non-
       
   
Preferred Stock
   
 Common Stock
 
Paid-in
   
Accumulated
   
Stock
   
Controlling
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Deficit
   
Subscribed
   
Interest
   
Total
 
                                                       
Balance, August 31, 2008
    295,862     $ 296       113,734,946     $ 113,735     $ 51,889,552     $ (54,499,370 )   $ -     $ -     $ (2,495,787 )
                                                                         
Stock based compensation
    -       -       -       -       1,030       -       -       -       1,030  
Issuance of stock for services
    -       -       150,000       150       1,350       -       -       -       1,500  
Issuance of stock for interest
    -       -       793,720       794       38,892       -       -       -       39,686  
Issuance of stock purchased for cash
    -       -       10,300,000       10,300       127,700       -       -       -       138,000  
Induced conversion expense - interest
                                                                       
paid with stock
    -       -       -       -       26,457       -       -       -       26,457  
Induced conversion expense - conversion
                                                                       
notes payable
    -       -       -       -       1,503,927       -       -       -       1,503,927  
Conversion of notes payable
    -       -       29,505,289       29,506       1,445,758       -       -       -       1,475,264  
Conversion of notes payable - related parties
    -       -       1,416,672       1,416       69,418       -       -       -       70,834  
Sale of noncontrolling interest
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       212       212  
Net loss
    -       -       -       -       -       (2,575,132 )     -       (3,346 )     (2,578,478 )
                                                                         
Balance, August 31, 2009
    295,862     $ 296       155,900,627     $ 155,901     $ 55,104,084     $ (57,074,502 )   $ -     $ (3,134 )   $ (1,817,355 )
                                                                         
Issuance of stock purchased for cash
    -       -       3,500,000       3,500       71,500       -       -       -       75,000  
Issuance of subscribed stock
    -       -       670,719       671       32,865       -       (33,536 )     -       -  
Induced conversion expense - conversion
                                                                       
notes payable
    -       -       -       -       413,840       -       -       -       413,840  
Conversion of notes payable
    -       -       22,805,847       22,805       1,117,487       -       67,383       -       1,207,675  
Beneficial conversion feature notes payable
    -       -       -       -       12,500       -       -       -       12,500  
Net loss
    -       -       -       -       -       (506,898 )     -       (286 )     (507,184 )
                                                                         
Balance, February 28, 2010 (Unaudited)
    295,862     $ 296       182,877,193     $ 182,877     $ 56,752,276     $ (57,581,400 )   $ 33,847     $ (3,420 )   $ (615,524 )
                                                                         


 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
6

 
 

 

ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2010 AND 2009
 
 

   
For the Six Months Ended
 
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Operating activities:
           
        Net Loss    $               (506,898  )    $               (745,111 )
Net loss from discontinued operations
    2,568       2,470  
                 
Net loss from continuing operations
    (504,330 )     (742,641 )
                 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
               
  in operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    689       843  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    -       382  
Stock based compensation expense
    -       3,410  
Amortization of discount on notes payable and warrants
    12,425       257,298  
Induced conversion expense notes payable
    413,840       26,457  
Issuance of stock and warrants for services
    -       81,500  
Beneficial conversion feature - notes payable
    12,500       -  
Beneficial conversion feature - stock issued for interest
    -       39,686  
                 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    8,356       8,480  
Prepaid commissions
    2,691       43,694  
Deposits and other assets
    -       2,691  
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses
    (95,382 )     183,230  
Accrued interest payable
    16,843       42,537  
                 
Net operating cash flows - continuing operations
    (132,368 )     (52,433 )
                 
Net operating cash flows - discontinued operations
    (185 )     (246 )
                 
Net cash used in operating activities
    (132,553 )     (52,679 )
                 
Investing activities:
               
Purchase of property and equipment
    (294 )     -  
Investment in joint venture
    -       (3,186 )
                 
Net investing cash flows - continuing operations
    (294 )     (3,186 )
                 
Net investing cash flows - discontinued operations
    150       6,990  
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (144 )     3,804  
                 
Financing activities:
               
 Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable
    25,000       -  
 Proceeds from issuance of notes payable - related parties
    50,000       -  
 Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
    75,000       48,000  
 Repayment of notes payable     (17,374   )     (8,785   )
                 
Net cash provided by financing activities - continuing operations
    132,626       39,215  
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (71 )     (9,660 )
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    743       9,912  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 672     $ 252  
                 


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
7
 
 
 
 

 

ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY

We were originally formed in 1995 as "Wavetech, Inc." a New Jersey corporation and changed our corporate domicile to Nevada in December 1997, by merging into a Nevada corporation named, "Interpretel International, Inc." We subsequently changed our name, first to "Wavetech International, Inc." and then, in 2000, to "BestNet Communications Corp." Our business at the time was to provide worldwide long distance telephone communication and teleconferencing services to commercial and residential consumers through the internet. That business was never profitable and we were able to continue it only by repeated equity and debt financings. Accordingly, during December 2006, we determined to dispose of that business and sold it during February 2007.

We entered the medical device business at the end of July 2006 through the acquisition of JDA Medical Technologies, Inc. ("JDA"), a development stage company, which was merged into our wholly owned subsidiary, Oncologix Corporation. On January 22, 2007, we changed our name to Oncologix Tech, Inc., to reflect this new business. During June 2007, we moved our principal offices from Grand Rapids, Michigan, to our offices at 3725 Lawrenceville-Suwanee Road, Suite B-4, Suwanee, Georgia, 30024, telephone (770) 831-8818.  At that address, our business was the development of a medical device for brachytherapy (radiation therapy), called the “Oncosphere” (or “Oncosphere System”), for the advanced medical treatment of soft tissue cancers. It is a radioactive micro-particle designed to deliver therapeutic radiat ion directly to a tumor site by introducing the micro-particles into the artery that feeds the tumor tissue. Its first application is expected to be the treatment of liver cancer. Due to a lack of funding, we suspended these activities on December 31, 2007, whereupon we closed the offices in Suwanee Georgia.

Our new mailing address is P.O. Box 8832, Grand Rapids, MI  49518-8832, telephone (616) 977-9933.

During May 2008, we determined to dispose of most of the assets of the Oncosphere project.  This information is being presented as discontinued operations for all periods shown.

In February 2009, we entered into a Technology Agreement with Institut für Umwelttechnologien GmbH, a German Company (“IUT”) whereunder the parties have agreed that:

(a)  
The Company has granted an exclusive license to a new IUT subsidiary, called “IUTM”, to develop and manufacture products based on the Company’s proprietary information. This proprietary information is not based on the technology that had been subject to the Master License Agreement with the University of Maryland – Baltimore. The Company has also transferred to IUTM a number of items of laboratory equipment and inventory useful in connection with the licensed information.
(b)  
The Company retains rights to market products based on such information as well as first consideration for marketing rights for other possible IUTM products.
(c)  
In consideration of the license, the Company has received a 10% equity interest in IUTM, which is organized as a private German limited liability company and IUT has assumed approximately $82,000 of the Company’s indebtedness.
(d)  
The Company’s marketing rights have been transferred to its subsidiary, Oncologix Corporation and the Company has issued IUTM 10% of the equity ownership of that subsidiary.

In addition, on April 7, 2009, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement with the University of Maryland – Baltimore, The Master License Agreement between the Company and the University has been formally terminated and each party has released the other from all liabilities arising under the Master License Agreement.

We have been advised that IUTM is continuing the development of a brachytherapy device generally as described above but based on proprietary technology not developed by the University of Maryland. We have begun discussions with IUTM to determine our future business and financial relationships and plans, including the possibility of developing and commercializing other radiation-based medical products.  Our plan is then to seek financing for the implementation of those plans. While our Management is optimistic as to the outcome of those discussions and future success in financing, it is not possible to predict the probabilities of success with any degree of certainty.
 
8
 
 
 
 

 

By letter dated August 12, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) notified us that unless we become current with our required public filings by August 27, 2009, the SEC may cause the Company to be de-registered under the securities laws and that the SEC may issue an order suspending public trading of the Company’s securities.  As a result of preliminary conversations with the staff of the SEC, the Company believes that additional time may be granted that will be sufficient for the Company to be compliant with its filings.  However, there is no assurance of that outcome.  Such de-registration and suspension of trading will seriously limit the ability of investors to re-sell any of our shares held by them.  In June, 2009, we began an effort to achieve compliance wit h all reporting requirements and our independent auditors began the process of examining our financial statements with a view to certifying them as required by law.


NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

PRINCIPALS OF CONSOLIDATION

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of its 90% owned subsidiary Oncologix Corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries Interpretel Inc, Telplex International and International Environment Corporation.  All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and, pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, do not include all information and footnote disclosures normally included in audited financial statements.  However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the results of operations, financial position and cash flows have been made.  For further information, these statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

INCOME TAXES

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued FASB ASC 740-10 (Prior authoritative literature: Financial Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48)).  FASB ASC 740-10 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with prior literature FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.  This standard requires a company to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained will be sustained upon examination based upon the technical merits of the position.  If the more-likely-than- not threshold is met, a company must measure the tax position to determine the amount to recognize in the financial statements.  As a result of the implementation of this standard, the Company performed a review of its material tax positions in accordance with recognition and measurement standards established by FASB ASC 740-10.

The Company has adopted FASB ASC 740-10 to account for income taxes. The Company currently has no issues creating timing differences that would mandate deferred tax expense. Net operating losses would create possible tax assets in future years. Due to the uncertainty of the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards, an evaluation allowance has been made to the extent of any tax benefit that net operating losses may generate.  A provision for income taxes has not been made due to net operating loss carry-forwards in excess of $30,000,000 as of February 28, 2010 and 2009 which may be offset against future taxable income through 2029. No tax benefit has been reported in the financial statements.
 
9
 
 
 
 

 



NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC 810, Consolidation, Non-Controlling Interests (“ASC 810”) (formerly referenced as SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51). ASC 810 addresses the accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. ASC 810 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly id entify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. ASC 810 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. During fiscal 2009, the Company issued a ten percent interest in its subsidiary, Oncologix Corporation, to IUTM as required in a technology agreement.  The Company valued this interest at $212.  Through February 28, 2010, the Company has allocated $3,632 losses to its noncontrolling interest.  The Company has adopted ASC 810 to account for this noncontrolling interest.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10-50, “Fair Value Measurements. This guidance defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:

·  
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
·  
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
·  
Level 3 inputs to valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair measurement.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for the cash and cash equivalents, receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The carrying value of notes payable approximates fair value because negotiated terms and conditions are consistent with current market rates as of February 28, 2010 and August 31, 2009.

CONVERTIBLE DEBT

Interest on convertible debt is calculated using the simple interest method.  The company recognizes a beneficial conversion feature to the extent the conversion price is less than the closing stock price on the issuance of the convertible notes.  The Company has adopted ASC 470-20-35 regarding changes in the terms of the convertible notes also follows ASC 470-50 regarding changes in the terms of the convertible notes.  The Company has adopted ASC 470-20-40 regarding induced conversion of its convertible debt.

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

Effective September 1, 2006, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718 Compensation – Stock Based Compensation (formerly SFAS 123(R)), using the modified prospective transition method.  Under that transition method, employee compensation cost recognized for fiscal 2007 includes: (i) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but net yet vested as of September 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of ASC 718 and (ii) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to September 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.  Results for prior periods have not been restated.  Stock-based compensation expense is recognized as a componen t of general and administrative expense in the Statement of Operations.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to its employees and directors and measures of the amount of compensation expense for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation expense over the service period for awards expected to vest.  Restricted stock awards issued to employees and directors are measured based on the fair market values of the underlying stock on the dates of grant.
 
10
 
 
 
 

 

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Based on ASC 260 (formerly SFAS128 “Earnings Per Share”), basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effect of common stock purchase warrants and stock options using the treasury stock method and the dilutive effects of convertible notes payable and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method.

Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
 
 
 

 
 

   
For the Three Months Ended
   
For the Six Months Ended
 
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
                         
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
                       
Continuing operations
  $ (91,192 )   $ (230,268 )   $ (504,330 )   $ (742,641 )
Discontinued operations
    (27 )     11,005       (2,568 )     (2,470 )
                                 
    $ (91,219 )   $ (219,263 )   $ (506,898 )   $ (745,111 )
                                 
Weighted average shares outstanding
    182,252,408       121,313,664       179,209,611       119,109,641  
                                 
Loss per common share, basic and diluted:
                               
Continuing operations
  $ (0.00 )   $ -     $ (0.00 )   $ (0.01 )
Discontinued operations
    (0.00 )     0.00     $ (0.00 )   $ (0.00 )
                                 
    $ (0.00 )   $ 0.00     $ (0.00 )   $ (0.01 )
                                 


Due to the net losses in fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, basic and diluted loss per share was the same, as the effect of potentially dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive. Shares attributable to convertible notes not included the diluted loss per share calculation for the six months ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 were 2,693,140 and 9,726,895, respectively.
 
11

 
 
 

 

NOTE 3 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

We entered the medical device business at the end of July 2006 through the acquisition of JDA Medical Technologies, Inc. ("JDA"), a development stage company, which was merged into our wholly owned subsidiary, Oncologix Corporation. On January 22, 2007, we changed our name to Oncologix Tech, Inc., to reflect this new business. During June 2007, we moved our principal offices from Grand Rapids, Michigan, to our offices at 3725 Lawrenceville-Suwanee Road, Suite B-4, Suwanee, Georgia, 30024, telephone (770) 831-8818.  At that address, our business was the development of a medical device for brachytherapy (radiation therapy), called the “Oncosphere” (or “Oncosphere System”), for the advanced medical treatment of soft tissue cancers. It is a radioactive micro-particle designed to deliver therapeutic radiat ion directly to a tumor site by introducing the micro-particles into the artery that feeds the tumor tissue. Its first application is expected to be the treatment of liver cancer. Due to a lack of funding, we had to suspend these activities on December 31, 2007, whereupon we closed the offices in Suwanee Georgia.

Net assets related to discontinued operations of our Oncosphere assets are as follows:
 
 
   
February 28,
   
August 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Current assets of discontinued operations:
           
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
  $ -     $ -  
                 
Total current assets of discontinued operations
    -       -  
                 
Long-term assets of discontinued operations:
               
Property and equipment
    -       4,795  
Investment in joint venture………………………………………………………………………………..
    -       -  
                 
Total long-term assets of discontinued operations
    -       4,795  
                 
Total assets of discontinued operations
  $ -     $ 4,795  
                 
Current liabilities of discontinued operations:
               
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses
  $ -     $ 2,000  
                 
Total liabilities of discontinued operations
  $ -     $ 2,000  
                 
Net assets of discontinued operations
  $ -     $ 2,795  
                 


12
 

 
 
 

 

The expenses shown below are part of the discontinued operations of our Oncosphere business.
 
 

   
For the Three Months Ended
   
For the Six Months Ended
 
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Operating expenses:
                       
General and administrative
  $ 30     $ 1,404     $ 185     $ 1,404  
Depreciation and amortization
    -       9,081       2,669       18,689  
                                 
Total operating expenses
    30       10,485       2,854       20,093  
                                 
Loss from operations
    (30 )     (10,485 )     (2,854 )     (20,093 )
                                 
Other income (expense):
                               
Loss on disposal of assets
    -       (626 )     -       (4,463 )
Other income (expense)
    -       -       -       (30 )
                                 
Total other income (expense)
    -       (626 )     -       (4,493 )
                                 
Loss from discontinued operations
    (30 )     (11,111 )     (2,854 )     (24,586 )
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
    -       22,116       -       22,116  
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations………………………………..
    -       -       -       22,116  
                                 
Loss from discontinued operations
    (30 )     11,005       (2,854 )     19,646  
                                 
Less loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (3 )     -       (286 )     -  
                                 
Net loss from discontinued operations
  $ (27 )   $ 11,005     $ (2,568 )   $ 19,646  
                                 

 
NOTE 4 — STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
 
PREFERRED STOCK:

The Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, in one or more series, and to determine the price, rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each such series without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any shares of preferred stock that may be issued in the future.  As of the date of this report, the Company has 295,862 Preferred Series A shares outstanding.  These shareholders do not have any voting rights in the Company.  Each Series A Preferred share is convertible into two shares of common stock at a price of $0.10 per common share.

UNITS:

On March 30, 2003, the Company completed the private placement of Units pursuant to the terms of a Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Units”) with accredited investors.  Each Unit consists of the following underlying securities:  (i) three shares of the Company’s common stock;  (ii) one share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share;  and (iii) one three-year warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a per share price of $0.30.  The warrants expired on March 31, 2006.  Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into two shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for $0.10 per common share ($.20 for each Series A Convertible Preferred share converted).  The securities underlying the Unit s are not to be separately tradable or transferable apart from the Units until such time as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors.  Our Board of Directors authorized the separation of the Units into their component parts twice, once in July 2004 and again in February 2005.  Our Board of Directors again authorized the separation of the Units again in April 2008.  On April 11, 2008 holders of 100,300 Units contributed $20,060 to convert 100,300 shares of preferred stock into 200,600 shares of common stock.  On June 27, 2008, holders of 47,000 Units contributed $9,400 to convert 47,000 shares of preferred stock into 94,000 shares of common stock. As of February 28, 2010 and August 31, 2009, there were 295,862 and 295,862 Units outstanding that had not been separated, respectively.  These units are presented as their underlying securities on our balance sheet and consist of 295,862 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 887,586 shares of common sto ck which is included in the issued and outstanding shares.
 
13


 
 

 


SUBSCRIBED COMMON STOCK:

As of February 28, 2010, we have 676,933 shares of subscribed stock that are issuable for the conversion of $33,847 in principal and accrued interest in convertible notes at a conversion price of $0.05 per share.  There were 0 shares issuable as of August 31, 2009.

 
For the period Ended February 28, 2010
           
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes payable
    676,933     $ 33,847  
                 
Total subscribed stock
    676,933     $ 33,847  
                 
For the year Ended August 31, 2009
               
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
Shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes payable
    -     $ -  
                 
Total subscribed stock
    -     $ -  
                 

 
 

 



COMMON STOCK:

Under the terms of our acquisition of JDA, we issued 43,000,000 shares of our common stock to the previous owners of JDA.  Of these shares, 29,843,160 were placed into escrow pending the achievement of certain development and operating goals.  These escrowed shares were not included in the calculation of the purchase price of JDA and will be included in that calculation if and to the extent that the applicable contingencies are resolved and the shares are released from escrow.  The development and operating goals that relate to the release of these shares, and the number of shares to be released at the time the goal is achieved are as follows:  (i) 7,460,790 shares upon the completion of the “Development Phase”, as defined in the Merger Agreement between the Company and JDA (already released); (ii) 9,325,986 shares upon the completion of the “Pre-Clinical Testing Phase as defined in the merger agreement; and (iii) 13,056,382 shares upon the completion of the Clinical Approval Phase.   On September 10, 2009, the remaining 22,382,368 shares in escrow were released back to the Company and subsequently retired.  Below is a listing of recent stock sales:

Date of Sale
Proceeds from Sale
Further Description and Remarks
October 13, 2008
$15,000
On October 13, 2008, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.01 per share.
October 13, 2008
$15,000
On October 13, 2008, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock to its CEO, Anthony Silverman at a price of $0.01 per share.
December 1, 2008
$15,000
On December 1, 2008, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.01 per share.
January 13, 2009
$3,000
On January 13, 2009, the Company sold 300,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.01 per share.
March 17, 2009
$15,000
On March 17, 2009, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.015 per share.
May 13, 2009
$30,000
On May 13, 2009, the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of common stock to three accredited investors at $0.015 per share.
May 22, 2009
$15,000
On May 22, 2009, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.015 per share.
June 13, 2009
$30,000
On June 13, 2009, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.02 per share.
September 30, 2009
$25,000
On September 30, 2009, the Company sold 1,250,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.02 per share.
November 3, 2009
$25,000
On November 3, 2009, the Company sold 1,250,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.02 per share.
February 1, 2010
$25,000
On February 1, 2010, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.025 per share.
 
 
14

 
 
 

 

WARRANTS:
 
Details relative to the 0 and 3,690,832 outstanding warrants at February 28, 2010 and August 31, 2009, respectively are as follows:
 
 
         
Weighted
         
         
Average
         
Date of
 
Number
   
Exercise
   
Remaining
 
Expiration
Grant
 
of Shares
   
Price
   
Exercise Life
 
Date
First quarter of fiscal 2002
    25,000     $ 2.90       -  
October 17, 2007
Second quarter of fiscal 2002
    5,751       1.19       -  
January 30, 2008
Third quarter of fiscal 2002
    1,100,000       0.50       -  
April 23, 2007
Second quarter of fiscal 2004
    100,000       0.32       -  
January 8, 2007
Third quarter of fiscal 2004
    40,000       0.27       -  
May 31, 2009
Fourth quarter of fiscal 2004
    10,000       0.29       -  
June 4, 2009
Third quarter of fiscal 2006
    200,000       0.35       -  
March 13, 2008
                           
Outstanding, August 31, 2006
    1,480,751                    
                           
Second quarter of fiscal 2007
    (100,000 )     0.32       -  
January 8, 2007
Second quarter of fiscal 2007
    2,158,327       0.50       -  
December 4, 2008
Third quarter of fiscal 2007
    (1,100,000 )     0.50       -  
April 23, 2007
                           
Outstanding, August 31, 2007
    2,439,078                    
                           
First quarter of fiscal 2008
    (25,000 )     2.90       -  
October 17, 2007
First quarter of fiscal 2008
    3,633,332       0.50       -  
September 17, 2009
Second quarter of fiscal 2008
    (5,751 )     1.19       -  
January 30, 2008
Second quarter of fiscal 2008
    57,500       0.40       -  
December 3, 2009
Third quarter of fiscal 2008
    (200,000 )     0.35       -  
March 13, 2008
                           
Outstanding, August 31, 2008
    5,899,159                    
                           
Second quarter of fiscal 2009
    (2,158,327 )     0.50       -  
December 4, 2008
Third quarter of fiscal 2009
    (40,000 )     0.27       -  
May 31, 2009
Fourth quarter of fiscal 2009
    (10,000 )     0.29       -  
June 4, 2009
                           
Outstanding, August 31, 2009
    3,690,832                    
                           
First quarter of fiscal 2010
    (3,633,332 )     0.50       -  
September 17, 2009
Second quarter of fiscal 2010
    (57,500 )     0.40       -  
December 3, 2009
                           
Outstanding, February 28, 2010
    -       -       -    
                           


Additional information relative to our warrants outstanding at February 28, 2010 is summarized as follows:
           
Weighted Avg.
   
     
Number
   
Exercise Price
   
 
Outstanding, August 31, 2008
    5,899,159     $ 0.50    
 
Expired/Retired
    (2,208,327 )   $ 0.49    
 
Exercised
    -     $ -    
 
Issued
    -     $ -    
 
Outstanding, August 31, 2009
    3,690,832     $ 0.50    
                     
 
Expired/Retired
    (3,690,832 )   $ 0.50    
 
Exercised
    -     $ -    
 
Issued
    -     $ -    
 
Outstanding, February 28, 2010
    -     $ -    
                     
 
 
15

 
 

 

STOCK OPTIONS:

The Company is authorized to issue up to 4,600,000 shares of common stock under its 1997 Stock Incentive Plan. Shares may be issued as incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, deferred shares or restricted shares. Options are granted at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant and have terms of up to ten years.

The Company is authorized to issue up to 7,500,000 shares of common stock under its 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. Shares may be issued as incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, deferred shares or restricted shares. Options are granted at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant and have terms of up to ten years.

ASC 718 requires the estimation of forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and that this estimate of forfeitures be adjusted over the requisite service period should actual forfeitures differ from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change and which impacts the amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.

During the three month period ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 zero employee options were exercised, respectively, zero options were forfeited, and 20,000 and 8,333 options expired, respectively.  During the six month period ended February 28, 2010 and 2009 zero employee options were exercised, respectively, zero options were forfeited, and 25,000 and 33,333 options expired, respectively.  As of February 28, 2010, $0 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to employee stock options is expected to be recognized.  Additional information relative to our employee options outstanding at February 28, 2010 is summarized as follows:

 
               
Weighted Average
 
   
Number of
   
Option Price
   
Exercise Price
 
   
Options Granted
   
Per Share
   
Per Share
 
                   
Outstanding, August 31, 2008
    4,402,526     $ 0.17 - $7.38     $ 0.64  
Granted
    -       -       -  
Exercised
    -       -       -  
Cancelled
    (1,388,334 )   $ 0.24 - $3.00       0.99  
Outstanding, August 31, 2009
    3,014,192     $ 0.17 - $7.38     $ 0.55  
Granted
    -       -       -  
Exercised
    -       -       -  
Cancelled
    (25,000 )   $ 2.94 - $7.38       6.49  
Outstanding, February 28, 2010
    2,989,192     $ 0.17 - $7.38     $ 0.50  
                         

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between our closing stock price on the last trading day of the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on February 28, 2010.


   
Options
   
Options
 
   
Outstanding
   
Exercisable
 
Number of options
    2,989,192       2,989,192  
Aggregate intrinsic value of options
  $ -     $ -  
Weighted average remaining contractual term (years)
    2.69       2.69  
Weighted average exercise price
  $ 0.50     $ 0.50  
                 


16
 
 
 
 

 

NOTE 5 — NOTES PAYABLE

CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE:

Convertible notes payable consist of the following as of February 28, 2010 and August 31, 2009:


   
February 28,
   
August 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
             
12.0% convertible note due March 31, 2012
  $ 2,712     $ 2,712  
                 
8.0% convertible notes due March 31, 2012
    125,000       125,000  
                 
6% convertible note due May 28, 2010
    25,000       0  
                 
6.0% convertible note due January 22, 2010, net of a discount of
               
$0 and $0 as of February 28, 2010 and August 31, 2009 (1)
    -       30,000  
                 
6.0% convertible notes due September 17, 2009, net of a discount of
               
$0 and $12,425 as of February 28, 2010 and August 31, 2009 (2)
    -       1,077,575  
                 
Total unsecured convertible notes payable
    152,712       1,235,287  
Less:  Current portion
    (25,000 )     (1,107,575 )
                 
Long-term portion
  $ 127,712     $ 127,712  
                 
(1) This note was converted into common stock in February 2010.
               
(2) These notes were converted into common stock in September 2009.
               
                 

During December 2006, we issued seven Convertible Promissory Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $480,000.  These Convertible Promissory Notes are due December 4, 2008, bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum and are convertible into our common stock at a rate of $0.30.  The Convertible Promissory Notes were issued in a private offering of Units, each consisting of a Convertible Promissory Note and a warrant for the purchase of one half the number of common shares into which each Convertible Promissory Note is convertible.  The warrants expire on December 4, 2008 and have an exercise price of $0.50 per share.  We recognized a discount of $58,708 related to the warrants and a beneficial conversion feature of $269,541 related to these notes.  During fiscal 2009, $43,073 was expen sed as interest and finance charges as a result of amortizing the discount and beneficial conversion feature.  In July 2009, $480,000 of principal plus $46,475 in accrued interest was converted into 10,529,493 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share.  The Company recognized $522,924 in conversion expense in fiscal 2009 as a result of the reduction of the conversion price from $0.30 to $0.05 to induce the conversion.

During January 2007, we issued fourteen additional Convertible Promissory Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $485,000 as a continuation of the private offering of Units that commenced in December, 2006.  We recognized a discount of $55,446 related to the warrants and a beneficial conversion feature of $300,197 related to these notes.  During fiscal 2009, $49,317 was expensed as interest and finance charges as a result of amortizing the discount and beneficial conversion feature.  In July 2009, $455,000 of principal plus $44,054 in accrued interest was converted into 9,981,091 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share.  The Company recognized $495,689 in conversion expense in fiscal 2009 as a result of the reduction of the conversion price from $0.30 to $0.05 to induce the conversion.  The remaining Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $30,000 was extended to January 22, 2010.  The remaining principal amount of $30,000 plus accrued interest of $3,847 was converted into 670,719 shares of common stock at a exercise price of $0.05 per share during February 2010. The Company recognized $22,564 in conversion expense as a result of the reduction of the conversion price from $0.30 to $0.05 to induce the conversion.

During February 2007, we issued eight additional Convertible Promissory Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $330,000 as a continuation of the private offering of Units described above.  We recognized a discount of $35,487 related to the warrants and a beneficial conversion feature of $192,820 related to these notes.  During fiscal 2009, $32,611 was expensed as interest and finance charges as a result of amortizing the discount and beneficial conversion feature.  In July 2009, $330,000 of principal plus $31,951 in accrued interest was converted into 7,239,032 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share.  The Company recognized $359,510 in conversion expense in fiscal 2009 as a result of the reduction of the conversion price from $0.30 to $0.05 to induce the conversion.
 
17
 
 
 
 

 

During May and June 2007, we issued nine Convertible Promissory Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $700,000.  These Convertible Promissory Notes are due May 7, 2008, bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum and are convertible into our common stock at a rate of $0.25.  We recognized a beneficial conversion feature of $501,000 related to these notes.  During fiscal 2008, $349,857 was expensed as interest and finance charges as a result of amortizing the beneficial conversion feature.  During May 2008, the investors entered into agreements whereunder the dates on which payment is due is extended until December 4, 2008, the price at which amounts due under the notes may be converted to shares of common stock was reduced to $0.15 per share; provided that any conversion effected on or before June 16, 2008 would be at a price of $0.05 per share.  On May 30, 2008, holders of two $25,000 notes elected to convert $54,126 in principal and accrued interest into 1,082,522 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share.  During June 2008, the three investors holding $450,000 in notes elected to convert $499,479 in principal and accrued interest into 9,989,589 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share. The Company recognized $434,201 in conversion expense as a result of the reduction of the conversion price to induce conversion.  Four investors holding the remaining $200,000 in principal notes have extended until December 4, 2008.  In June and July 2009, $75,000 of principal plus $12,784 in accrued interest was converted into 1,755,673 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share.  The Company recognized $69,767 in conversion expense in fiscal 2009 as a result of the reduction of the conversion price to induce the conversion.  The remaining Convertible Promissory Note, in the principal amount of $125,000, was extended on January 28, 2010 to March 31, 2012.

On September 7, 2007, the Company issued to Stanley Schloz, a former member of the Company’s Board of Directors, a convertible promissory note for bridge financing in the principal amount of $150,000.  This note bears interest at a rate of 12% and is payable monthly.  The principal is due in full on December 15, 2007.  On November 30, 2007, the Company repaid $100,000 of the principal.  In connection with this repayment, Mr. Schloz agreed to extend the remaining principal until January 14, 2008.  The note is convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.20 per common share.  During May 2008, Mr. Schloz entered into an agreement whereunder the date on which payment is due is extended until December 4, 2008, the price at which amounts due u nder the notes may be converted to shares of common stock was reduced to $0.15 per share; provided that any conversion effected on or before June 16, 2008 would be at a price of $0.05 per share.  On June 9, 2008, the investor elected to convert $50,000 in principal into 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share.  The Company recognized $33,333 in conversion expense as a result of the reduction of the conversion price to induce the conversion.  Mr. Schloz elected to extend $2,712 in accrued interest until March 31, 2012 which is convertible at $0.15 per share.

During September through November 2007, we issued thirty-four Convertible Promissory Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $1,090,000.  These Convertible Promissory Notes are due September 17, 2009, bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum and are convertible into our common stock at a rate of $0.30.  The Convertible Promissory Notes were issued in a private offering of Units, each consisting of a Convertible Promissory Note and a warrant for the purchase of the number of common shares into which each Convertible Promissory Note is convertible.  The warrants expire on September 17, 2009 and have an exercise price of $0.50 per share.  We recognized a discount of $180,330 related to the warrants and a beneficial conversion feature of $318,330 related to these notes.  During the firs t quarter of fiscal 2010, $12,425 was expensed as interest and finance charges as a result of amortizing the discount and beneficial conversion feature.  During the fiscal 2009, $266,786 was expensed as interest and finance charges as a result of amortizing the discount and beneficial conversion feature.  On October 29, 2008, the Company issued 793,720 shares of its common stock to holders of convertible promissory notes in lieu of an annual cash interest payment of $39,686.  The company also recorded $26,457 in conversion expense as a result of reducing the conversion price from $0.30 to $0.05 per share for this conversion.  In September 2009, holders of $1,090,000 in principal and $83,828 in accrued interest converted their notes into 23,476,566 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.05. These shares were issued in November 2009.  The Company recognized $391,276 in conversion expense in fiscal 2010 as a result of the reduction of the conversion price from $0.30 to $0.05 to induce the conversion.
 
On December 29, 2009, the Company issued a 60-Day Convertible Promissory Note to an accredited investor in the amount of $25,000.  The note is convertible at $0.02 per share and bears an interest rate of 6%.  This note was extended to May 28, 2010.
 
18
 

 
 

 

CONVERTIBLE RELATED PARTY NOTES PAYABLE:
   
February 28,
   
August 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
             
6.0% convertible note due March 31, 2012 (1)
  $ 235,025     $ 235,025  
                 
                 
Outstanding unsecured related party convertible notes payable
  $ 235,025     $ 235,025  
                 
(1)  Note Due 3/31/12 payable to former CEO who resigned 4/1/09.
               
                 

On April 1, 2009, we issued to Ms. Lindstrom, our former Chief Executive Officer, a convertible promissory note in lieu of payment of $235,025 in accrued salary owed to Ms. Lindstrom.  This note accrues interest at a rate of 6% per annum and is due on March 31, 2012.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.05 per common share.  Ms. Lindstrom signed an abstention to convert this note until June 1, 2010.

 
RELATED PARTY NOTES PAYABLE:

On September 11, 2009, the Company issued a 90-Day promissory note to Anthony Silverman, its President and CEO, in the principal amount of $25,000.  The note bears an interest rate of 6%.  This note has been subsequently extended to July 11, 2010.

On February 22, 2010, the Company issued a 60-Day promissory note to Anthony Silverman, its President and CEO, in the principal amount of $25,000.  The note bears an interest rate of 6%.  This note has been subsequently extended to July 22, 2010.


   
February 28,
   
August 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
6.00% note payable due July 11, 2010 (1)
  $ 25,000     $ -  
6.00% note payable due July 22, 2010 (1)
  $ 25,000        
                 
                 
Outstanding unsecured related party convertible notes payable
  $ 50,000     $ -  
                 
(1) Note payable to Anthony Silverman, the Company's President and CEO.
         
                 
 
 
OTHER NOTES PAYABLE:

On September 15, 2009, the Company settled its $119,000 debt with its prior accountant, Semple, Marchal & Cooper LLP. for $46,000.  In connection with this settlement, the Company paid $13,000 down and signed a promissory note in the amount of $33,000 with monthly payments of $3,000 beginning October 1, 2009.

On October 31, 2009, the Company entered into a note payable agreement to finance $19,200 of directors and officer’s insurance premiums.  The note bears interest at a rate of 8.99% per annum and is due in nine monthly installments of $2,214, including principal and interest, beginning on November 30, 2009.
 

   
February 28,
   
August 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
8.99% note payable due July 31, 2010
  $ 10,826     $ -  
Note payable to former Accountants
    18,000       -  
                 
                 
Outstanding unsecured related party convertible notes payable
  $ 28,826     $ -  
                 
 
 
19
 
 
 
 

 

NOTE 6 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

CONSULTING CONTRACT

In September 2008, the company entered into a six month consulting agreement with its Chief Financial Officer, Michael Kramarz.  Mr. Kramarz is to perform all his regular duties he had previously performed as Chief Financial Officer including the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, SEC Filings, maintenance of corporate records, etc.  Mr. Kramarz is to be compensated $50 per hour worked and will turn in weekly time sheets for approval.  The Company entered into another six month consulting contract with Mr. Kramarz on March 1, 2009 at an hourly rate of $90. During the fiscal 2009, we incurred an expense of $85,928 under these agreements.  On September 1, 2009, the Company entered into another six month consulting agreement with Mr. Kramarz at a hourly rate of $70. The March 1 , 2010, the Company entered into another six month consulting agreement with Mr. Kramarz at a hourly rate of $70.  During fiscal 2010, we incurred an expense of $35,420 under this agreement.

NOTE 7 – LICENSE AGREEMENT

The technology underlying the medical device that was formerly being developed by the Company was subject to a certain Master License Agreement ("License"), effective September 16, 2003, between Oncologix's predecessor, JDA, as Licensee, and the University of Maryland (the “University” as Licensor. We assumed JDA’s position in our acquisition of JDA.

On April 7, 2009, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement with the University of Maryland – Baltimore, The Master License Agreement between the Company and the University has been formally terminated and each party has released the other from all liabilities arising under the Master License Agreement.

NOTE 8 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In September 2009, the Company issued a 90-day promissory note to Anthony Silverman, it’s CEO, in the amount of $25,000 and bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum.  The note was subsequently extended to May 12, 2010.

  In February 2010, the Company issued a 60-day promissory note to Anthony Silverman, it’s CEO, in the amount of $25,000 and bears interest at a rate of 6% per annum.  The note was subsequently extended to May 23, 2010.

NOTE 9 – JOINT VENTURE

In February 2009, we entered into a Technology Agreement with Institut für Umwelttechnologien GmbH, a German Company (“IUT”) whereunder the parties have agreed that:

(a)  
The Company has granted an exclusive license to a new IUT subsidiary, called “IUTM”, to develop and manufacture products based on the Company’s proprietary information. This proprietary information is not based on the technology that had been subject to the Master License Agreement with the University of Maryland – Baltimore. The Company has also transferred to IUTM a number of items of laboratory equipment and inventory useful in connection with the licensed information.
(b)  
The Company retains rights to market products based on such information as well as first consideration for marketing rights for other possible IUTM products.
(c)  
In consideration of the license, the Company has received a 10% equity interest in IUTM, which is organized as a private German limited liability company and IUT has assumed approximately $82,000 of the Company’s indebtedness.
(d)  
The Company will transfer its marketing rights to its subsidiary, Oncologix Corporation and issued IUTM 10% of the equity ownership of that subsidiary.

We have been advised that the group of German companies of which IUTM is a part (“Group”) is continuing the development of a brachytherapy device generally as described above but based on proprietary technology not developed by the University of Maryland. We have begun discussions with the Group to determine our future business and financial relationships and plans, including the possibility of developing and commercializing other radiation-based medical products.  Our plan is then to seek financing for the implementation of those plans. While our Management is optimistic as to the outcome of those discussions and future success in financing, it is not possible to predict the probabilities of success with any degree of certainty.
 
20
 
 
 
 

 

NOTE 10 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2009, FASB issued ASC 105-10 (Prior authoritative literature:  SFAS No. 168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162").FASB ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (Codification) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. FASB ASC 105-10 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods ending after September 15, 2009. As such, the Company is required to adopt these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.  Ad option of FASB ASC 105-10 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements

In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, FASB issued FASB ASC 470-20 which specifies that issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. We do expect the adoption of ASC 470-20 to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure requirements.  ASU 2010-09 requires an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are available to be issued.  ASU 2010-09 also amends the definition of an SEC filer to include any entity that is required to file or furnish its financial statements with either the SEC or, with respect to an entity subject to Section 12(i) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  This update also removed the definition of public entity.  Further, the scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements is refined to include revised financial statements only.  The amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010.  We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-09 to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 provides new disclosure requirements and clarification for existing disclosures requirements. More specifically, this update will require (a) an entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers; and (b) information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements to be presented separately (i.e. present the activity on a gross basis rather than net) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). This guidance clarifies existing d isclosure requirements for the level of disaggregation used for classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value and requires disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosure are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure requirements related to the purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward activity of Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosure requirements are effective for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2010. We do expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 860): Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification.  The objective ASU 2010-02 is to address implementation issued related to changes in ownership provisions in the Consolidation – Overall Subtopic 810-10, formerly FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements.  Subtopic 810-10 established the accounting and reporting guidance for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary.  ASU 2010-02 affects accounting and reporting by an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership in a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity.  This guidance applies to the following: 1.  A subsidiary or gr oup of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity; 2. A subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture; 3. An exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in a entity.  The amendment is effective in the first interim or annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2009.
 
21
 
 
 
 

 

In September 2009, the FASB amended the ASC as summarized in Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2009-14, Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, and ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. As summarized in ASU 2009-14, ASC Topic 985 has been amended to remove from the scope of industry specific revenue accounting guidance for software and software related transactions, tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality. As summarized in ASU 2009-13, ASC Topic 605 has been amended (1) to provide updated guidan ce on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables in an arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated; (2) to require an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) or third-party evidence of selling price; and (3) to eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. The accounting changes summarized in ASU 2009-14 and ASU 2009-13 are both effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. Adoption may either be on a prospective basis or by retrospective application. The Company believes the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing (“ASC 860”) (formerly referenced as SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities). The FASB’s objective in issuing ASC 860 was to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continu ing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. ASC 860 must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. ASC 860 must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of ASC 860 on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 855, Subsequent Events (“ASC 855”) (formerly referenced as SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events). ASC 855 requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet. For nonrecognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, an entity will be required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. In addition, ASC 855 requires an entity to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. ASC 855 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and is required to be applied prospectively. We do expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC 810, Consolidation, Non-Controlling Interests (“ASC 810”) (formerly referenced as SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51). ASC 810 addresses the accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. ASC 810 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly id entify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. ASC 810 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We do expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”) (formerly referenced as SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations) which established principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statement to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. ASC 805 is effective for financi al statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, any business combinations the Company engages in subsequent to May 1, 2009 will be accounted for in accordance with ASC 805. The Company expects ASC 805 will have an impact on its consolidated financial statements but the nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend upon the nature, terms and size of any acquisitions it may consummate after the effective date. We do expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
 
22
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
NOTE 11 — GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred losses from operations over the past several years and anticipates additional losses in fiscal 2010 and prior to achieving breakeven.  Originally, as a result of the acquisition of JDA and the associated License Agreement with the University, the Company was required, under the terms of the amended license agreement to raise substantial funds for the development of the technology associated with the License Agreement.  Due to the termination of the License Agreement in April 2009, we will not be required to raise these funds.

As of the date of this report, we will need approximately $250,000 to fund operations for the next twelve (12) months, without regard to repaying any short-term convertible or non-convertible notes payable.  This funding will allow us to maintain basic operations and to bring our public filings current and keep them current.  Our Company has never been profitable and we have had to rely on debt and equity financings to fund operations.  Significant delays in the implementation of our plans could affect the ability to obtain future debt and equity funding which may affect or ability to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In accordance with ASC 855-10, Company management reviewed all material events through the date of this report and there are no other material subsequent events to report except the following:

On March 17, 2010, our Board of Directors again authorized the separation of the Units provided the Unit holders converted the Series A Preferred Stock into two shares of Common Stock at a conversion rate of $0.10 per common share.  During March and April 2010,  holders of 34,100 Units contributed $6,820 to convert 34,100 shares of preferred stock into 68,200 shares of common stock.

On April 1, 2010, Oncologix Tech Inc. announced today that it had entered into a non-binding agreement with AirWare® International Corp., the manufacturer of the popular new nasal breathing aid, Brez®, for the purpose of launching a version of the Brez product that will be infused with essential oils in the Asian market including China.  This non-binding letter of intent extends to May 15, 2010.  On May 17, 2010, the Company determined that discussions with AirWave International Corp. for the purposes of the formation of a joint venture have been terminated.  No further action is contemplated at this time.
 
On April 16, 2010, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor to sell 1,666,667 shares of common stock at $0.03 per share resulting in proceeds of $50,000.  The shares were issued in April 2010.
 
On May 17, 2010, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor to sell 833,333 shares of common stock at $0.03 per share resulting in proceeds of $25,000.  The shares were issued in May 2010.

 
23


 
 

 

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
 
THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB CONTAINS CERTAIN STATEMENTS WHICH ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1993, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. THESE STATEMENTS RELATE TO FUTURE EVENTS, INCLUDING THE FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF ONCOLOGIX. IN SOME CASES, YOU CAN IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BY TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS “MAY,” “WILL,” “SHOULD,” “EXPECTS,” “PLANS,” “ANTICIPATES,” “BELIEVES,” “ESTIMATES,” “PREDICTS,” “POTENTIAL,” OR “CONTINUE” OR THE NEGATIVE OF SUCH TERMS AND OTHER COMPARABLE TERMINOLOGY. THESE STATEMENTS ONLY REFLECT MANAGEMENT’S EXPECTATIONS AND ESTIMATES AS OF THE DATE OF THIS REPORT. ACTUAL EVENTS OR RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THESE EXPECTATIONS. IN EVALUATING THOSE STATEMENTS, YOU SHOULD SPECIFICALLY CONSIDER VARIOUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THE RISKS INCLUDED IN THE REPORTS FILED BY ONCOLOGIX WITH THE SEC. THESE FACTORS MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. ONCOLOGIX IS NOT UNDERTAKING ANY OBLIGATION TO UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT.
 
This report should be read in conjunction with our Annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009.
 
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Current Report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. These statements relate to future events or future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Such statements are based on currently available financial and competitive information and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience and present expectations. Undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements as such statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are predictions and not guarantees of future performance or events. The forward-looking statements are based on current industry, financial and economic information, which we have assessed but which by its nature, is dynamic and subject to rapid and possibly abrupt changes. Our actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. We hereby qualify all our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. We undertake no obligation to amend this report or revise publicly these forward looking statements (other than pursuant to reporting obligations imposed on registrants pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

These forward-looking statements speak only as of their dates and should not be unduly relied upon. We undertake no obligation to amend this report or revise publicly these forward-looking statements (other than pursuant to reporting obligations imposed on registrants pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) to reflect subsequent events or circumstances, whether as the result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Throughout this report, unless otherwise indicated by the context, references herein to the “Company”, “Oncologix”, “we”, our” or “us” means Oncologix Tech, Inc.., a Nevada corporation and its corporate subsidiaries and predecessors.
 
24
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
GENERAL DISCUSSION
 
We were originally formed in 1995 as "Wavetech, Inc." a New Jersey corporation and changed our corporate domicile to Nevada in December 1997, by merging into a Nevada corporation named, "Interpretel International, Inc." We subsequently changed our name, first to "Wavetech International, Inc." and then, in 2000, to "BestNet Communications Corp." Our business at the time was to provide worldwide long distance telephone communication and teleconferencing services to commercial and residential consumers through the internet. That business was never profitable and we were able to continue it only by repeated equity and debt financings. Accordingly, during December 2006, we determined to dispose of that business and sold it during February 2007.

We entered the medical device business at the end of July 2006 through the acquisition of JDA Medical Technologies, Inc. ("JDA"), a development stage company, which was merged into our wholly owned subsidiary, Oncologix Corporation. On January 22, 2007, we changed our name to Oncologix Tech, Inc., to reflect this new business. During June 2007, we moved our principal offices from Grand Rapids, Michigan, to our offices at 3725 Lawrenceville-Suwanee Road, Suite B-4, Suwanee, Georgia, 30024, telephone (770) 831-8818.  At that address, our business was the development of a medical device for brachytherapy (radiation therapy), called the “Oncosphere” (or “Oncosphere System”), for the advanced medical treatment of soft tissue cancers. It is a radioactive micro-particle designed to deliver therapeutic radiat ion directly to a tumor site by introducing the micro-particles into the artery that feeds the tumor tissue. Its first application is expected to be the treatment of liver cancer. Due to a lack of funding, we  suspended these activities on December 31, 2007, whereupon we closed the offices in Suwanee Georgia.

Our new mailing address is P.O. Box 8832, Grand Rapids, MI  49518-8832, telephone (616) 977-9933.

During May 2008, we determined to dispose of most of the assets of the Oncosphere project.  This information is being presented as discontinued operations for all periods shown.

In February 2009, we entered into a Technology Agreement with Institut für Umwelttechnologien GmbH, a German Company (“IUT”) whereunder the parties have agreed that:

(e)  
The Company has granted an exclusive license to a new IUT subsidiary, called “IUTM”, to develop and manufacture products based on the Company’s proprietary information. This proprietary information is not based on the technology that had been subject to the Master License Agreement with the University of Maryland – Baltimore. The Company has also transferred to IUTM a number of items of laboratory equipment and inventory useful in connection with the licensed information.
(f)  
The Company retains rights to market products based on such information as well as first consideration for marketing rights for other possible IUTM products.
(g)  
In consideration of the license, the Company has received a 10% equity interest in IUTM, which is organized as a private German limited liability company and IUT has assumed approximately $82,000 of the Company’s indebtedness.
(h)  
The Company’s marketing rights have been transferred to its subsidiary, Oncologix Corporation and has issued IUTM 10% of the equity ownership of that subsidiary.

In addition, on April 7, 2009, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement with the University of Maryland – Baltimore, The Master License Agreement between the Company and the University has been formally terminated and each party has released the other from all liabilities arising under the Master License Agreement.

We have been advised that IUTM is continuing the development of a brachytherapy device generally as described above but based on proprietary technology not developed by the University of Maryland. We have begun discussions with IUTM to determine our future business and financial relationships and plans, including the possibility of developing and commercializing other radiation-based medical products.  Our plan is then to seek financing for the implementation of those plans. While our Management is optimistic as to the outcome of those discussions and future success in financing, it is not possible to predict the probabilities of success with any degree of certainty.

By letter dated August 12, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) notified us that unless we become current with our required public filings by August 27, 2009, the SEC may cause the Company to be de-registered under the securities laws and that the SEC may issue an order suspending public trading of the Company’s securities.  As a result of preliminary conversations with the staff of the SEC, the Company believes that additional time may be granted that will be sufficient for the Company to be compliant with its filings.  However, there is no assurance of that outcome.  Such de-registration and suspension of trading will seriously limit the ability of investors to re-sell any of our shares held by them.  In June, 2009, we began an effort to achieve compliance wit h all reporting requirements and our independent auditors began the process of examining our financial statements with a view to certifying them as required by law.
 
25
 
 
 
 

 


 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

“Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” (“MDA”) discusses our condensed consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to research and development costs, deferred income taxes and the carrying value of long-lived assets.
 
We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The result of these estimates and judgments form the basis for making conclusions about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions; changes in these estimates as a result of future events may have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition.

For a summary of all our significant accounting policies, including the critical accounting policies discussed above, see Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this quarterly report.

COMPARISON OF THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2010 TO THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2009

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expenses included in our results from continuing operations include legal and accounting fees, license fees, travel, payroll and related expenses, directors and officers insurance, and public relations expenses.  These expenses relate primarily to general corporate overhead and accordingly are segregated from general and administrative expenses that related directly to our medical device business, which are included in the results from discontinued operations.  General and administrative expenses that are specific to our medical device business include salaries, press releases, office expense, legal and accounting expense, telephone expense, rent expense  and licenses and fees.

General and administrative expense decreased to $45,495 during the three-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $99,921, a decrease of 54% or $54,426 from the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  Legal and accounting expense decreased to $12,563 during the three-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $18,202 during the comparable period in fiscal 2009 due primarily to the switch of public accounting firms.  Payroll and related expenses decreased to $18,598 during the three-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $62,560 during the comparable period in fiscal 2009 due to the stopping the accrual of salary for our former Chief Executive Officer as of April 1, 2009.    Stock based compensation decreased to $0 during the three-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $1,173 during the com parable period in fiscal 2009 as a result of not issuing any stock options in the previous 12 months.  Travel and entertainment decreased to $0 during the three-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $1,825 during the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  This decrease was due to no travel for our board members during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.

General and administrative expense decreased to $109,795 during the six-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $322,433, a decrease of 66% or $212,638 from the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  Legal and accounting expense decreased to $42,220 during the six-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $56,592 during the comparable period in fiscal 2009 due primarily to the switch of public accounting firms.  Payroll and related expenses decreased to $39,170 during the six-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $112,560 during the comparable period in fiscal 2009 due to the stopping the accrual of salary for our former Chief Executive Officer as of April 1, 2009.  Outside services decreased to $4,572 during the six-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $28,057 during the comparable period in f iscal 2009 as a result of shifting of consulting fees to payroll for the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Licenses and fees expense decreased to $6,968 during the six month period ended February 28, 2010, from $87,132 during the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  This decrease was a result of the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of common stock to the University of Maryland to extend our License Agreement.  This License Agreement was terminated in April 2009 and the shares were returned.  Travel and entertainment decreased to $0 during the six-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $14,070 during the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  This decrease was due to no travel for our board members during the fiscal 2010.
 
26
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization decreased to $361 during the three-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $426 in the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  The decrease in depreciation and amortization from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was the result of assets becoming fully depreciated during fiscal 2009.

Depreciation and amortization decreased to $689 during the six-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $843 in the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  The decrease in depreciation and amortization from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was the result of assets becoming fully depreciated during fiscal 2009.

Interest Income

There was no reportable interest income during fiscal 2010 or 2009 due to lower cash balances maintained by the Company.

Interest and Finance Charges

Interest and finance charges decreased to $22,279 for the three-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $128,792, a decrease of 83% or $106,513 for the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  The decrease is primarily attributable to conversions of convertible promissory notes in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009.

Interest and finance charges decreased to $52,452 for the six-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $387,932, a decrease of 86% or $335,480 for the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  The decrease is primarily attributable to conversions of convertible promissory notes in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009.

A summary of interest and finance charges is as follows:

 
   
For the Three Months Ended
   
For the Six Months Ended
 
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Interest expense on non-convertible notes
  $ 744     $ 369     $ 1,217     $ 526  
Interest expense on convertible notes payable
    6,535       40,884       16,120       82,223  
Amortization of note payable discounts
    12,500       71,046       24,925       257,298  
Other interest and finance charges
    2,500       16,493       10,190       47,885  
                                 
Total interest and finance charges
  $ 22,279     $ 128,792     $ 52,452     $ 387,932  
                                 


Conversion Expense

Conversion expense increased to $22,564 for the three-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $0, an increase of more than 100% for the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  The increase was due to the issuance of shares of common stock for the conversion of convertible promissory notes during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, as a result of reducing the conversion price from $0.30 to $0.05 per share for these conversions.  See Note 5 for more information on these conversions.

Conversion expense increased to $413,841 for the six-month period ended February 28, 2010, from $26,457, an increase of more than 100% for the comparable period in fiscal 2009.  The increase was due to the issuance of shares of common stock for the conversion of convertible promissory notes during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2010, as a result of reducing the conversion price from $0.30 to $0.05 per share for these conversions.  See Note 5 for more information on these conversions.
 
27
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations for our medical device business decreased to $2,541 for the three month period ended November 30, 2009, from $13,475 during the comparable period during fiscal 2009.  The decrease was due to the disposal of discontinued assets during fiscal 2009.

 
   
For the Three Months Ended
   
For the Six Months Ended
 
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
   
February 28,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Operating expenses:
                       
General and administrative
  $ 30     $ 1,404     $ 185     $ 1,404  
Research and development
    -       -       -       -  
Depreciation and amortization
    -       9,081       2,669       18,689  
                                 
Total operating expenses
    30       10,485       2,854       20,093  
                                 
Loss from operations
    (30 )     (10,485 )     (2,854 )     (20,093 )
                                 
Other income (expense):
                               
Loss on disposal of assets
    -       (626 )     -       (4,463 )
Other income (expense)
    -       -       -       (30 )
                                 
Total other income (expense)
    -       (626 )     -       (4,493 )
                                 
Loss from discontinued operations
    (30 )     (11,111 )     (2,854 )     (24,586 )
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
    -       22,116       -       22,116  
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
    -       -       -       22,116  
                                 
Loss from discontinued operations
    (30 )     11,005       (2,854 )     19,646  
                                 
Less loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
    (3 )     -       (286 )     -  
                                 
Net loss from discontinued operations
  $ (27 )   $ 11,005     $ (2,568 )   $ 19,646  
                                 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We were unable to obtain the financing necessary to continue operations after December 31, 2007. Consequently, we terminated the employment of all of our personnel, effective as of that date.  We anticipate that we will require $250,000 to operate for the next twelve months.  These funds are expected to be raised through small private placements, although there is no assurance of any success in doing so.  We plan to engage in discussions with IUTM in the next two months with a view to establishing the nature of our future relationships and to develop detailed plans for future operations and for obtaining the necessary financing. Any future operations will depend on our ability to raise sufficient funds from investors.

Our operating losses to date have been covered by equity and debt financing obtained from private investors, including certain present and former members of our Board of Directors. We never achieved positive cash flow or profitability in our telephone business because we did not generate a volume of business sufficient to cover our overhead costs.  Our financial statements contain explanatory language related to our ability to continue as a going concern and our auditors have qualified their opinion on our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended August 31, 2009, included as a part of this Report, reflecting uncertainty as to our ability to continue in business as a going concern.

As of February 28, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $672. We have historically relied upon the issuance of debt or equity in order to finance our operations.  Our operating losses to date have been covered by equity and debt financing obtained from private investors, including certain current and former members of our Board of Directors.
 
28
 
 
 

 
 

 
Below is a summary listing for the next 12 months, as of November 30, 2009, of our required minimum cash payments including our short-term notes payable, short-term convertible notes payable and their respective due dates.  To the extent the convertible notes are not converted, funds for repayment will have to be raised through additional debt or equity financings.
Due Date
 
Interest Rate
   
Amount
   
Accrued Interest***
   
Total Owed
 
Convertible/Non-Convertible
                           
5/12/2010 (1)
    6.00 %   $ 25,000     $ 699     $ 25,699  
Non-convertible
5/23/2010 (1)
    6.00 %     25,000       25       25,025  
Non-convertible
5/28/2010
    6.00 %     25,000       251       25,251  
Convertible at $0.02 per share
7/31/10 (3)
    8.99 %     10,826       -       10,826  
Non-convertible, interest paid monthly
                                   
                                   
            $ 85,826     $ 975     $ 86,801    
                                   
(1) Note payable to Anthony Silverman, our President and CEO.
           
(3) Note payable to AICCO Inc. for D & O insurance financing.
           
*** Interest calculated to maturity or conversion
                   
                                   

 
INFLATION AND OTHER FACTORS
 
The Company’s operations are influenced by general economic trends and technology advances in the medical industries.

Our activities in the development, manufacture and sale of cancer therapy products are, and will be subject to extensive laws, regulations, regulatory approvals and guidelines. Within the United States, therapeutic radiological devices must comply with the U.S. Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which is enforced by the FDA. We are also required to adhere to applicable FDA regulations for Good Manufacturing Practices, including extensive record keeping and periodic inspections of manufacturing facilities. Medical devices such as the Oncosphere cannot be used or sold unless they are approved for specified purposes by the FDA. There are two levels of FDA approval. The first is the granting of approval to evaluate use of the device in human subjects (through an IDE); the second is obtaining approval to market the device to the public f or the treatment of specified diseases (PMA).

Our business involves the importing, exporting, design, manufacture, distribution, use and storage of beta and gamma emitting radioisotopes. These activities in the United States are subject to federal, state and local rules relating to radioactive material promulgated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC"), and states that have subscribed to certain standards and local authorities, known as “Agreement States” In addition, we must comply with NRC, state and U.S. Department of Transportation requirements for labeling and packaging shipments of radiation sources to hospitals or others users of our devices. In order to market our devices commercially, we will be required to obtain a sealed source device registration from Agreement States and/or the NRC, depending on the states in which the device will be distributed.

Additionally, hospitals in the United States are required to have radiation licenses to hold, handle and use radiation. Many hospitals and/or physicians in the United States will be required to amend their radiation licenses to include our isotopes before receiving and using them. Depending on the state in which the hospital is located, the license amendment will be processed by the responsible subscribing state department or agency or by the NRC.

Obtaining such registration, approvals, and licenses can be complicated and time consuming and there is no assurance that any of them can be obtained.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

We are a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and accordingly, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
 
29
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
 
 
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
 
 
 
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
 
 
 
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
As of February 28, 2010 we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, we determined that there are material weaknesses affecting our internal control over financial reporting.
 
The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considers to be material weaknesses under COSO and SEC rules are: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of independent directors on our board of directors, resulting in potentially ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives.. The aforementioned potential material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Financial Officer in connection with the preparation of our financial statements as of February 28, 2010 who communicated the matters to our management and board of directors.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2) above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, the lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of independent directors on our board of directors, resulting in potentially ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, can impact our financial statements.
 
Management’s Remediation Initiatives
 
Although we are unable to meet the standards under COSO because of the limited funds available to a company of our size, we are committed to improving our financial organization. As funds become available, we will undertake to: (1) create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives, and (2) appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to a Company audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures.  
 
30
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.  However, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.  These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the l ikelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.  Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks.

 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
 
None
 
 
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
 
No changes since filing of our Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2009.

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
Date of Sale
 
Proceeds from Sale
 
Further Description and Remarks
October 13, 2008
  $ 15,000  
On October 13, 2008, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.01 per share.
October 13, 2008
  $ 15,000  
On October 13, 2008, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock to its CEO, Anthony Silverman at a price of $0.01 per share.
December 1, 2008
  $ 15,000  
On December 1, 2008, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.01 per share.
January 13, 2009
  $ 3,000  
On January 13, 2009, the Company sold 300,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.01 per share.
March 17, 2009
  $ 15,000  
On March 17, 2009, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.015 per share.
May 13, 2009
  $ 30,000  
On May 13, 2009, the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of common stock to three accredited investors at $0.015 per share.
May 22, 2009
  $ 15,000  
On May 22, 2009, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.015 per share.
June 13, 2009
  $ 30,000  
On June 13, 2009, the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.02 per share.
September 30, 2009
  $ 25,000  
On September 30, 2009, the Company sold 1,250,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.02 per share.
November 3, 2009
  $ 25,000  
On November 3, 2009, the Company sold 1,250,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.02 per share.
February 1, 2010
  $ 25,000  
On February 1, 2010, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.025 per share.
April 16, 2010
  $ 50,000  
On April 16, 2010, the Company sold 1,666,667 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.03 per share.
 May 17, 2010    $ 25,000    On May 17, 2010, the Company sold 833,333 shares of common stock to an accredited investor at $0.03 per share.


ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
None.
 
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
None.
 
31
 

 
 

 

ITEM 5. Other Information
 
None.
 
ITEM 6. Exhibits
 
Exhibits.                                                      Description
 
  31.1                       Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
31.2                       Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
32.1                       Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

            32.2  
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Dated: May 20, 2010
ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC.
   
   
 
By:   /s/ Anthony Silverman
 
       Anthony Silverman, President and Chief Executive Officer
   
 
By:   /s/ Michael A. Kramarz
 
       Michael A. Kramarz, Chief Financial Officer


32



EX-31.1 2 oncologixexhibit311-022810.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO PER SECTION 302 oncologixexhibit311-022810.htm

 



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
I, Anthony Silverman, Chief Executive Officer of Oncologix Tech, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:
 
 
(1)
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Oncologix Tech, Inc. the quarter ended February 28, 2010 (the “Report”);
 
 
(2)
Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report;
 
 
(3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods represented in the Report;
 
 
(4)
The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
 
(a)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others with these entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
 
(b)  
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
(d)
Disclosed in this Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (i.e., the quarter ended February 28, 2010) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
(5)  
The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
(a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Dated:           May 20, 2010
 

By:           /s/ Anthony Silverman
Anthony Silverman
Chief Executive Officer and President


EX-31.2 3 oncologixexhibit312-022810.htm CERTIFICATION OF CFO PER SECTION 302 oncologixexhibit312-022810.htm

 
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL  FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
I, Michael A. Kramarz, Chief Financial Officer of Oncologix Tech, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:
 
 
(1)
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Oncologix Tech, Inc. the quarter ended February 28, 2010 (the “Report”);
 
 
(2)
Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report;
 
 
(3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods represented in the Report;
 
 
(4)
The Company’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
 
(c)  
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others with these entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;
 
(d)  
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
(d)
Disclosed in this Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (i.e., the quarter ended February 28, 2010) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
(6)  
The Company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
(a)  
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
(b)  
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Dated:           May 20, 2010
 

By:           /s/ Michael A. Kramarz
Michael A. Kramarz
Chief Financial Officer


EX-32.1 4 oncologixexhibit321-022810.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO PER SECTION 906 oncologixexhibit321-022810.htm


Exhibit 32.1


ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Oncologix Tech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Anthony Silverman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Anthony Silverman                                           
Anthony Silverman
Chief Executive Officer and President
May 20, 2010


EX-32.2 5 oncologixexhibit32-022810.htm CERTIFICATION OF CFO PER SECTION 906 oncologixexhibit32-022810.htm

Exhibit 32.2

ONCOLOGIX TECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Oncologix Tech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Michael A. Kramarz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael A. Kramarz                                           
Michael A. Kramarz
Chief Financial Officer
May 20, 2010
 



-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----