Income Taxes	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	NOTE 4—INCOME TAXES The Company’s effective income tax rate is based on expected income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. For interim financial reporting, the Company estimates the annual income tax rate based on projected taxable income for the full year and records a quarterly income tax provision or benefit in accordance with the anticipated annual rate. The Company refines the estimates of the year’s taxable income as new information becomes available, including actual year-to-date financial results. Included in the Company’s estimates are the effects of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (“ATRA 2012”) which did not have a significant impact on the Company’s income tax provision. However, our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 2013 was decreased by the tax benefit of certain employment credits reinstated by ATRA 2012 that were recognized during the period, as measured against our year-to-date income.” This continual estimation process often results in a change to the expected effective income tax rate for the year. When this occurs, the Company adjusts the income tax provision during the quarter in which the change in estimate occurs so that the year-to-date provision reflects the expected annual income tax rate. Significant judgment is required in determining the effective tax rate and in evaluating the tax positions. The effective tax rate from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 41.8% and 44.8%, respectively. The effective tax rate from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 33.7% and 42.8%, respectively. The Company’s tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2013 differs from the statutory tax rate primarily due to state income taxes, permanent tax items and changes in uncertain tax positions. The Company’s tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2013 differs from the statutory tax rate primarily due to federal employment credits partially offset by state income taxes, permanent tax items and changes in uncertain tax positions. The Company’s tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 differ from the statutory tax rate primarily due to temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of its assets and liabilities and the inability to recognize an associated deferred tax benefit, due to the Company’s assessment that the realization of its deferred tax assets was unlikely. The Company released its valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2012. The Company believes that the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and future periods will more closely reflect the statutory tax rate. The Company experienced an “ownership change” within the meaning of Section 382(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”), during the fourth quarter of 2008. The ownership change has and will continue to subject the Company’s pre-ownership change net operating loss carryforwards to an annual limitation, which will significantly restrict its ability to use them to offset taxable income in periods following the ownership change. In general, the annual use limitation equals the aggregate value of the Company’s stock at the time of the ownership change multiplied by a specified tax-exempt interest rate. The Company determined that at the date of the ownership change, it had a net unrealized built-in loss (“NUBIL”). The NUBIL is determined based on the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s assets and their tax basis at the ownership change. Because of the NUBIL, certain deductions recognized during the five-year period beginning on the date of the IRC Section 382 ownership change (the “recognition period”) are subjected to the same limitation as the net operating loss carryforwards. Because the annual limitation is applied first against the realized built-in losses (“RBILs”), the Company does not expect to utilize any of its net operating loss carryforwards during the five year recognition period. The amount of the disallowed RBILs could increase if the Company disposes of assets with built-in losses at the date of the ownership change during the recognition period. As a result of the 2008 ownership change, the Company is limited to an approximate $1.7 million annual limitation on its ability to utilize its pre-change net operating loss (“NOLs”) and recognized built-in losses. The recognition period ends at October 15, 2013. An ownership change was also deemed to have occurred during the second quarter of 2012. The Company does not believe this change will further limit its ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards or certain other deductions. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s total deferred tax assets, net of both deferred tax liabilities and IRC Section 382 limitations, were $105,383 and $102,908, respectively. As of each reporting date, the Company assesses whether it is more likely than not that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, taking into account such factors as earnings history, taxable income in the carryback period, reversing temporary differences, projections of future taxable income, the finite lives of certain deferred tax assets, tax planning strategies and the impact of IRC Section 382 limitations. Both positive and negative evidence, as well as the objectivity and verifiability of that evidence, is considered in determining the appropriateness of recording a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. When sufficient evidence exists that indicates that recovery is not more likely than not, a valuation allowance is established against the deferred tax assets, increasing the Company’s income tax expense in the period that such conclusion is made. After reviewing all positive and negative evidence at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax asset balance would be recovered from future taxable income. The Company’s determination not to record a valuation allowance involves significant estimates and judgments. If future results are significantly different from these estimates and judgments, the Company may be required to record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $2,678, all of which would affect the Company’s annual effective tax rate, if recognized. This unrecognized tax benefit is primarily associated with the Company’s non-forfeitable ownership interest in SV Holdco, LLC (see Note 9 – Screenvision Exhibition, Inc.). The Company has recognized a tax basis for these units that is lower than their carrying value for financial statement purposes. However, as this tax position may not be sustained upon examination, the Company has recorded a related liability for this uncertain tax position.

NOTE 4—INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective income tax rate is based on expected income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. For interim financial reporting, the Company estimates the annual income tax rate based on projected taxable income for the full year and records a quarterly income tax provision or benefit in accordance with the anticipated annual rate. The Company refines the estimates of the year’s taxable income as new information becomes available, including actual year-to-date financial results. Included in the Company’s estimates are the effects of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (“ATRA 2012”) which did not have a significant impact on the Company’s income tax provision. However, our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 2013 was decreased by the tax benefit of certain employment credits reinstated by ATRA 2012 that were recognized during the period, as measured against our year-to-date income.” This continual estimation process often results in a change to the expected effective income tax rate for the year. When this occurs, the Company adjusts the income tax provision during the quarter in which the change in estimate occurs so that the year-to-date provision reflects the expected annual income tax rate. Significant judgment is required in determining the effective tax rate and in evaluating the tax positions.

The effective tax rate from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 41.8% and 44.8%, respectively. The effective tax rate from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 33.7% and 42.8%, respectively. The Company’s tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2013 differs from the statutory tax rate primarily due to state income taxes, permanent tax items and changes in uncertain tax positions. The Company’s tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2013 differs from the statutory tax rate primarily due to federal employment credits partially offset by state income taxes, permanent tax items and changes in uncertain tax positions. The Company’s tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 differ from the statutory tax rate primarily due to temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of its assets and liabilities and the inability to recognize an associated deferred tax benefit, due to the Company’s assessment that the realization of its deferred tax assets was unlikely. The Company released its valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2012. The Company believes that the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and future periods will more closely reflect the statutory tax rate.

The Company experienced an “ownership change” within the meaning of Section 382(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”), during the fourth quarter of 2008. The ownership change has and will continue to subject the Company’s pre-ownership change net operating loss carryforwards to an annual limitation, which will significantly restrict its ability to use them to offset taxable income in periods following the ownership change. In general, the annual use limitation equals the aggregate value of the Company’s stock at the time of the ownership change multiplied by a specified tax-exempt interest rate.

The Company determined that at the date of the ownership change, it had a net unrealized built-in loss (“NUBIL”). The NUBIL is determined based on the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s assets and their tax basis at the ownership change. Because of the NUBIL, certain deductions recognized during the five-year period beginning on the date of the IRC Section 382 ownership change (the “recognition period”) are subjected to the same limitation as the net operating loss carryforwards. Because the annual limitation is applied first against the realized built-in losses (“RBILs”), the Company does not expect to utilize any of its net operating loss carryforwards during the five year recognition period. The amount of the disallowed RBILs could increase if the Company disposes of assets with built-in losses at the date of the ownership change during the recognition period. As a result of the 2008 ownership change, the Company is limited to an approximate $1.7 million annual limitation on its ability to utilize its pre-change net operating loss (“NOLs”) and recognized built-in losses. The recognition period ends at October 15, 2013.

An ownership change was also deemed to have occurred during the second quarter of 2012. The Company does not believe this change will further limit its ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards or certain other deductions.

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s total deferred tax assets, net of both deferred tax liabilities and IRC Section 382 limitations, were $105,383 and $102,908, respectively. As of each reporting date, the Company assesses whether it is more likely than not that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, taking into account such factors as earnings history, taxable income in the carryback period, reversing temporary differences, projections of future taxable income, the finite lives of certain deferred tax assets, tax planning strategies and the impact of IRC Section 382 limitations. Both positive and negative evidence, as well as the objectivity and verifiability of that evidence, is considered in determining the appropriateness of recording a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. When sufficient evidence exists that indicates that recovery is not more likely than not, a valuation allowance is established against the deferred tax assets, increasing the Company’s income tax expense in the period that such conclusion is made. After reviewing all positive and negative evidence at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax asset balance would be recovered from future taxable income. The Company’s determination not to record a valuation allowance involves significant estimates and judgments. If future results are significantly different from these estimates and judgments, the Company may be required to record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $2,678, all of which would affect the Company’s annual effective tax rate, if recognized. This unrecognized tax benefit is primarily associated with the Company’s non-forfeitable ownership interest in SV Holdco, LLC (see Note 9 – Screenvision Exhibition, Inc.). The Company has recognized a tax basis for these units that is lower than their carrying value for financial statement purposes. However, as this tax position may not be sustained upon examination, the Company has recorded a related liability for this uncertain tax position.