XML 42 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2014
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES [Abstract]  
Development. Expansion and Renovation Projects
Development, Expansion and Renovation Projects.  As of January 31, 2014, the Company had several development, expansion and renovation projects underway or recently completed, the costs for which have been capitalized, as follows:
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Final or Anticipated Construction Completion
Project Name and Location
Planned Segment
Total Rentable
Square Feet
or Number of Units
Anticipated
Total Cost
Costs as of
January 31, 2014
 
Quarter
Fiscal
Year
River Ridge - Bismarck, ND(1)
Multi-Family Residential
146 units
$
25,863
$
24,818
 
3
2014
Cypress Court - St. Cloud, MN(2)
Multi-Family Residential
132 units
 
14,322
 
13,583
 
3
2014
Dakota Commons - Williston, ND
Multi-Family Residential
44 units
 
10,736
 
6,139
 
1
2015
Commons at Southgate - Minot, ND(3)
Multi-Family Residential
233 units
 
37,201
 
23,492
 
2
2015
Renaissance Heights I - Williston, ND(4)
Multi-Family Residential
288 units
 
62,362
 
33,934
 
2
2015
Arcata - Golden Valley, MN
Multi-Family Residential
165 units
 
33,151
 
9,250
 
2
2015
RED 20 - Minneapolis, MN(5)
Multi-Family Residential and Commercial
130 units and 10,625 sq ft
 
29,462
 
9,333
 
2
2015
Chateau II - Minot, ND(6)
Multi-Family Residential
72 units
 
14,711
 
1,741
 
4
2015
Cardinal Point - Grand Forks, ND
Multi-Family Residential
251 units
 
40,042
 
4,986
 
4
2015
 
 
 
$
267,850
$
127,276
 
 
 
(1)
The project was substantially completed in the third quarter of the Company's fiscal year 2014.
(2)
The project was substantially completed in the third quarter of the Company's fiscal year 2014.The Company is an approximately 86% partner in the joint venture entity constructing this project; the anticipated total cost amount given is the total cost to the joint venture entity. The joint venture's results are consolidated in the Company's financial statements.
(3)
The Company is an approximately 51% partner in the joint venture entity constructing this project; the anticipated total cost amount given is the total cost to the joint venture entity. The joint venture's results are consolidated in the Company's financial statements.
(4)
The Company is an approximately 70% partner in the joint venture entity constructing this project; the anticipated total cost amount given is the total cost to the joint venture entity. The joint venture's results are consolidated in the Company's financial statements.
(5)
The Company is an approximately 58.6% partner in the joint venture entity constructing this project; the anticipated total cost amount given is the total cost to the joint venture entity. The joint venture's results are consolidated in the Company's financial statements.
(6)
On December 5, 2013, this development project was destroyed by fire. See Note 2 for additional information.