N-CSR

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

Investment Company Act file number   811-04760

DWS Advisor Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (201) 593-6408

Paul Schubert

100 Plaza One

Jersey City, NJ 07311

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

Date of fiscal year end:	12/31
Date of reporting period:	12/31/2010

ITEM 1. REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS

ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

NY Tax Free Money Fund

Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund

December 31, 2010

Contents

4 Portfolio Management Review

7 Information About Your Fund's Expenses

9 Portfolio Summary

10 Investment Portfolio

13 Statement of Assets and Liabilities

14 Statement of Operations

15 Statement of Changes in Net Assets

17 Financial Highlights

18 Notes to Financial Statements

23 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

24 Tax Information

25 Other Information

26 Investment Management Agreement Approval

31 Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant

35 Summary of Administrative Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant

36 Board Members and Officers

This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. To obtain a summary prospectus, if available, or prospectus for any of our funds, visit www.dws-investments.com. We advise you to consider the fund's objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The summary prospectus and prospectus contain this and other important information about the fund. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.

An investment in this fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or by any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund. The share price of money market funds can fall below the $1.00 share price. You should not rely on or expect the Advisor to enter into support agreements or take other actions to maintain the fund's $1.00 share price. The credit quality of the fund's holdings can change rapidly in certain markets, and the default of a single holding could have an adverse impact on the fund's share price. The fund's share price can also be negatively affected during periods of high redemption pressures and/or illiquid markets. The actions of a few large investors in one class of shares of the fund may have a significant adverse effect on the share prices of all classes of shares of the fund. See the prospectus for specific details regarding the fund's risk profile.

DWS Investments is part of Deutsche Bank's Asset Management division and, within the US, represents the retail asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. and DWS Trust Company.

NOT FDIC/NCUA INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE NOT A DEPOSIT NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY

Portfolio Management Review

NY Tax Free Money Fund: A Team Approach to Investing

Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA" or the "Advisor"), which is part of Deutsche Asset Management, is the investment advisor for NY Tax Free Money Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds (the "Trust''). DIMA and its predecessors have more than 90 years of experience managing mutual funds and DIMA provides a full range of investment advisory services to both institutional and retail clients.

DIMA is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG. Deutsche Bank AG is a major global banking institution engaged in a wide variety of financial services, including investment management, retail, private and commercial banking, investment banking and insurance.

DWS Investments is the retail brand name in the US for the asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG and DIMA. As such, DWS is committed to delivering the investing expertise, insight and resources of this global investment platform to American investors.

Portfolio Management Team

A group of investment professionals is responsible for the day-to-day management of the fund. These investment professionals have a broad range of experience managing money market funds.

Market Overview

The views expressed in the following discussion reflect those of the portfolio management team only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. The management team's views are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.

At the start of 2010, the money market yield curve began to change configuration as — for the first time in 12 months — short-term money market rates rose somewhat.1 The slight increase in rates came in response to several market dynamics, including Congress' raising of the nation's debt ceiling and political and budgetary concerns within peripheral countries in the Eurozone.2 By mid-June, the crisis in Europe had eased somewhat as the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund collaborated in order to offer loans and liquidity facilities to banks in fiscally troubled countries such as Greece, Spain and Italy. In September, investors responded positively to US Federal Reserve Board (the Fed) Chairman Bernanke's statement that the Fed would take additional steps in the form of "quantitative easing" to prop up the US economy as needed. By the close of the year, the yield curve began to steepen — as fixed-income issues sold off — in response to improved economic data and investor anxiety over possible inflationary pressures.

Positive Contributors to Fund Performance

We were able to maintain a competitive tax-free yield for the fund during the period. (All performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. Yields fluctuate and are not guaranteed.)

During the 12-month period, we sought to balance higher yield with top quality by maintaining a strong position in floating-rate securities as we took advantage of comparatively higher floating-rate interest coupons. The interest rate of floating-rate securities adjusts periodically based on indices such as the Securities Industry and Financial Market Association Index of Variable Rate Demand Notes.3 Because the interest rates of these instruments adjust as market conditions change, they provide flexibility in an uncertain interest rate environment. We also purchased one- and seven-day tax-exempt commercial paper during the period, and avoided investing in any securities that lacked a letter of credit or a similar guarantee/credit enhancement. Over time, we took advantage of some opportunities farther out on the yield curve in order to enhance performance.

Negative Contributors to Fund Performance

The types of securities that we were investing in tended to have lower tax-exempt yields than issues carrying more risk. We preferred to be cautious during a time of market fluctuation. In the end this cost the fund some yield, but we believe that this represented a prudent approach to preserving principal.

Outlook and Positioning

Despite a slight rise in rates early in 2010, we continue to foresee an artificially low interest rate environment going forward because of declining money market instrument supply, a large number of money market issues maturing with principal needing to be reinvested, and continued demand from investors seeking principal stability and safety.

Regarding New York's finances, though we believe the state's fiscal situation will remain under stress in 2011, we look for increasing financial stability there over the coming months. There are certainly a number of municipalities where tax receipts are and will remain severely curtailed for the foreseeable future, and we will avoid investing in those credits. However, we think that on the whole New York State is entering a period of healing and restoration. A lot of the anticipated improvement should be driven by better conditions for Wall Street and New York City. Overall, we believe that municipalities throughout the state are making the tough decisions to balance their books. We will continue to closely monitor New York's budget situation in the coming months.

We continue our insistence on the highest credit quality within the fund. We continue to apply a careful approach to investing on behalf of the fund and to seek competitive tax-free yield for our shareholders.

Fund Performance

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted.

7-Day Current Yield — NY Tax Free Money Fund — Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund
December 31, 2010	.01%*
December 31, 2009	.01%*

* The investment advisor has agreed to waive fees/reimburse expenses. Without such fee waivers/expense reimbursements, the 7-day current yield would have been -0.60% as of December 31, 2010 and -0.55% as of December 31, 2009.

Yields are historical, will fluctuate and do not guarantee future performance. The 7-day current yield refers to the income paid by the portfolio over a 7-day period expressed as an annual percentage rate of the fund's shares outstanding. For the most current yield information, visit our Web site at www.dws-investments.com.

1The yield curve is a graphical representation of how yields on bonds of different maturities compare. Normally, yield curves slant up, as bonds with longer maturities typically offer higher yields than short-term bonds.

2The Eurozone refers to a currency union among the European Union member states that have adopted the euro as their sole currency.

3 The Securities Industry and Financial Market Association Index of Variable Rate Demand Notes is a weekly high-grade market index consisting of seven-day, tax-exempt, variable-rate demand notes produced by Municipal Market Data Group. Actual issues are selected from Municipal Market Data's database of more than 10,000 active issues.

Information About Your Fund's Expenses

As an investor, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees and other Fund expenses. Examples of transaction costs include account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, the Fund limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010).

The tables illustrate your Fund's expenses in two ways:

•Actual Fund Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Fund using the Fund's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.

• Hypothetical 5% Fund Return. This helps you to compare your Fund's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Fund's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical fund return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.

Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2010
Actual Fund Return	Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund
Beginning Account Value 7/1/10	$	1,000.00
Ending Account Value 12/31/10	$	1,000.50
Expenses Paid per $1,000*	$	1.92
Hypothetical 5% Fund Return	Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund
Beginning Account Value 7/1/10	$	1,000.00
Ending Account Value 12/31/10	$	1,023.29
Expenses Paid per $1,000*	$	1.94

* Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.

Annualized Expense Ratio	Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund
NY Tax Free Money Fund	.38%

For more information, please refer to the Fund's prospectus.

Portfolio Summary

NY Tax Free Money Fund

Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio)	12/31/10	12/31/09
Municipal Investments Municipal Variable Rate Demand Notes	75%	89%
Municipal Bonds and Notes	25%	11%
	100%	100%

Weighted Average Maturity
NY Tax Free Money Fund	47 days	39 days
iMoneyNet State Specific Retail Money Funds Average*	32 days	30 days

* The Fund is compared to its respective iMoneyNet Category: State Specific Retail Money Funds Average — Category consists of all retail and institutional state-specific money funds. Portfolio holdings of tax-free funds include Rated and Unrated Demand Notes, Rated and Unrated General Market Notes, Commercial Paper, Put Bonds — 6 months and less, Put Bonds — over 6 months, AMT Paper, and Other Tax-Free holdings. Consists of all funds in the Retail and State-Specific Retail categories.

Weighted average maturity, also known as effective maturity, is the weighted average of the bonds held by the Fund taking into consideration any available maturity shortening features.

Asset allocation and weighted average maturity are subject to change.

For more complete details about the Fund's holdings, see page 10. A quarterly Fact Sheet is available upon request. Please see the Account Management Resources section for more contact information.

Following the Fund's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. In addition, each month, information about the Fund and its portfolio holdings is filed with the SEC on Form N-MFP. The SEC delays the public availability of the information filed on Form N-MFP for 60 days after the end of the reporting period included in the filing. These forms will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and they may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. The Fund's portfolio holdings are also posted on www.dws-investments.com from time to time. Please see the Fund's current prospectus for more information.

Investment Portfolio as of December 31, 2010

NY Tax Free Money Fund

	Principal Amount ($)		Value ($)
Municipal Investments 100.0%
New York 84.9%
Albany, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue,The College of Saint Rose, Series A, 0.55%*, 7/1/2037, INS: NATL, LOC: Bank of America NA		2,000,000		2,000,000
Amherst, NY, Central School District, Bond Anticipation Notes, 1.5%, 8/4/2011		4,000,000		4,023,437
Bethlehem, NY, Industrial Development Agency Housing Revenue, 467 Delware Ave. LLC Project, Series A, AMT, 0.4%*, 9/1/2033, LOC: Hudson River Bank & Trust Co.		3,945,000		3,945,000
Broome County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue, Elizabeth Church Manor, 0.65%*, 2/1/2029, LOC: Sovereign Bank FSB		3,250,000		3,250,000
Hempstead, NY, Industrial Development Agency Revenue, Series 92G, 144A, AMT, 0.5%*, 10/1/2045, GTY: The Goldman Sachs & Co., LIQ: The Goldman Sachs & Co.		3,295,000		3,295,000
Long Island, NY, Power Authority, Electric Systems Revenue, Series 3A, 0.35%*, 5/1/2033, LOC: JPMorgan Chase Bank & Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg		2,020,000		2,020,000
Nassau County, NY, Industrial Development Agency Revenue, Series 75G, 144A, AMT, 0.26%*, 12/1/2033, GTY: The Goldman Sachs & Co., LIQ: The Goldman Sachs & Co.		1,095,000		1,095,000
New York, Liberty Development Corp. Revenue, World Trade Center, Series A-2, 144A, 0.32%, Mandatory Put 5/5/2011@100, 12/1/2049		4,000,000		4,000,000
New York, Metropolitan Transportation Authority Revenue, Series 2-B, 0.33%*, 2/4/2011, LOC: Barclays Bank PLC		3,500,000		3,500,000
New York, Metropolitan Transpotation Authority, 0.32%, 1/6/2011		3,000,000		3,000,000
New York, Nassau Health Care Corp. Revenue, 0.32%*, 8/1/2029, LOC: Wachovia Bank NA		2,900,000		2,900,000
New York, State Dormitory Authority Revenues, Secondary Issues, Series R-11722, 144A, 0.34%*, 7/1/2016, LIQ: Citibank NA		1,000,000		1,000,000
New York, State Dormitory Authority Revenues, State Supported Debt, City University of New York, Series C, 0.38%*, 7/1/2031, LOC: Bank of America NA		1,175,000		1,175,000
New York, State Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax Revenue, Series A, 4.0%, 3/15/2011		350,000		352,525
New York, State Housing Finance Agency Revenue, Capitol Green Apartments, Series A, AMT, 0.33%*, 5/15/2036, INS: Fannie Mae, LIQ: Fannie Mae		2,300,000		2,300,000
New York, State Housing Finance Agency Revenue, Helena Housing, Series A, AMT, 0.36%*, 5/15/2036, INS: Fannie Mae, LIQ: Fannie Mae		1,250,000		1,250,000
New York, State Mortgage Agency, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue, Series 157, 0.45%*, 4/1/2047, SPA: Dexia Credit Local		3,300,000		3,300,000
New York City, NY, Industrial Development Agency Revenue, Empowerment Zone, Tiago, AMT, 0.38%*, 1/1/2037, LOC: ING Bank NV		1,600,000		1,600,000
New York City, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water & Sewer Systems Revenue, Second Generation Resolution, Series AA-3, 0.41%*, 6/15/2032, SPA: Dexia Credit Local		1,600,000		1,600,000
Otsego County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue, Noonan Community Service Corp. Project, Series A, 0.39%*, 3/1/2025, LOC: Wilber National Bank		475,000		475,000
Rockland County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue, Dominican College Project, Series B, 0.33%*, 5/1/2035, LOC: TD Bank NA		2,870,000		2,870,000
Suffolk County, NY, Tax Anticipation Notes:
2.0%, 9/13/2011		2,750,000		2,781,127
3.0%, 8/11/2011		2,200,000		2,231,999
Ulster County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue, Kingston Regional Senior Living Corp., Series C, 0.78%*, 9/15/2037, GTY: Kingston Regional Senior Living Corp., LOC: Sovereign Bank FSB		2,850,000		2,850,000
				56,814,088
Puerto Rico 15.1%
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Public Improvement, Series A, Prerefunded 7/1/2011 @ 100, 5.125%, 7/1/2031		500,000		511,933
Puerto Rico, Commonwealth Highway & Transportation Authority Revenue:
Series DCL 019, 144A, 0.43%*, 1/1/2029, INS: AGMC, LIQ: Dexia Credit Local, LOC: Dexia Credit Local		2,500,000		2,500,000
Series PT 3189, 144A, 0.47%*, 7/1/2041, GTY: Dexia Credit Local, INS: AMBAC & CIFG, LIQ: Dexia Credit Local		1,945,000		1,945,000
Puerto Rico, Industrial Tourist Educational, Medical & Environmental Control Facilities, Bristol-Myers Squibb Project, AMT, 0.44%*, 12/1/2030		1,800,000		1,800,000
Puerto Rico, Municipal Finance Agency, Series PT 3326, 144A, 0.47%*, 8/1/2021, INS: CIFG, GTY: Dexia Credit Local, LIQ: Dexia Credit Local		3,320,000		3,320,000
				10,076,933

	% of Net Assets			Value ($)
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $66,891,021)+		100.0			66,891,021
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net		(0.0	)		(5,371	)
Net Assets		100.0			66,885,650

* Variable rate demand notes are securities whose interest rates are reset periodically at market levels. These securities are often payable on demand and shown at their current rates as of December 31, 2010.

+The cost for federal income tax purposes was $66,891,021.

144A: Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.

AGMC: Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.

AMBAC: Ambac Financial Group, Inc.

AMT: Subject to alternative minimum tax.

CIFG: CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.

FSB: Federal Savings Bank

GTY: Guaranty Agreement

INS: Insured

LIQ: Liquidity Facility

LOC: Letter of Credit

NATL: National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.

Prerefunded: Bonds which are prerefunded are collateralized usually by US Treasury securities which are held in escrow and used to pay principal and interest on tax-exempt issues and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date.

SPA: Standby Bond Purchase Agreement

Fair Value Measurements

Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit risk). Level 3 includes significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. Securities held by a money market fund are reflected as Level 2 because the securities are valued at amortized cost (which approximates fair value) and, accordingly, the inputs used to determine value are not quoted prices in an active market.

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2010 in valuing the Fund's investments. For information on the Fund's policy regarding the valuation of investments, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.

Assets	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Municipal Investments (a)	$	—	$	66,891,021	$	—	$	66,891,021
Total	$	—	$	66,891,021	$	—	$	66,891,021

There have been no transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the year ended December 31, 2010.

(a) See Investment Portfolio for additional detailed categorizations.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

as of December 31, 2010
Assets	NY Tax Free Money Fund
Investment in securities, valued at amortized cost	$	66,891,021
Receivable for investments sold		20,000
Receivable for Fund shares sold		7,296
Interest receivable		99,560
Due from Advisor		1,922
Other assets		18,772
Total assets		67,038,571
Liabilities
Cash overdraft		24,386
Payable for Fund shares redeemed		6,954
Distributions payable		249
Other accrued expenses and payables		121,332
Total liabilities		152,921
Net assets, at value	$	66,885,650
Net Assets Consist of
Undistributed net investment income		6,122
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)		(1,458	)
Paid-in capital		66,880,986
Net assets, at value	$	66,885,650
Net Asset Value
Investment Class Net Asset Value, offering and redemption priceper share ($52,220,359 ÷ 52,234,473 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.001 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)	$	1.00
Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund Net Asset Value, offering and redemption priceper share ($14,665,291 ÷ 14,669,255 shares of capital stock outstanding, $.001 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)	$	1.00

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Statement of Operations

for the year ended December 31, 2010
Investment Income	NY Tax Free Money Fund
Income: Interest	$	296,601
Expenses: Management fee		107,329
Administration fee		89,441
Services to shareholders		141,770
Distribution and service fees		205,104
Custodian fee		6,857
Legal fees		9,955
Audit and tax fees		48,741
Trustees' fees and expenses		3,781
Reports to shareholders		42,384
Registration fees		64,293
Total expenses before expense reductions		719,655
Expense reductions		(431,616	)
Total expenses after expense reductions		288,039
Net investment income		8,562
Net realized gain (loss) from investments		(1,458	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	7,104

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

NY Tax Free Money Fund
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009
Operations: Net investment income	$	8,562		$	468,992
Net realized gain (loss) from investments		(1,458	)		1,216
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations		7,104			470,208
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income: Investment Class		(34,640	)		(239,591	)
Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund		(11,424	)		(235,456	)
Total distributions		(46,064	)		(475,047	)
Fund share transactions: Investment Class Proceeds from shares sold		152,063,298			245,632,545
Reinvestment of distributions		13,479			74,528
Cost of shares redeemed		(181,024,504	)		(281,941,093	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Investment Class share transactions		(28,947,727	)		(36,234,020	)
Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund Proceeds from shares sold		52,678,839			199,311,896
Reinvestment of distributions		11,412			234,913
Cost of shares redeemed		(66,083,450	)		(354,331,113	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund share transactions		(13,393,199	)		(154,784,304	)
Increase (decrease) in net assets		(42,379,886	)		(191,023,163	)
Net assets at beginning of period		109,265,536			300,288,699
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $6,122 and $43,624, respectively)	$	66,885,650		$	109,265,536

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Statement of Changes in Net Assets — NY Tax Free Money Fund (continued)
Other Information	Years Ended December 31,
	2010			2009
Investment Class
Shares outstanding at beginning of period		81,182,200			117,416,220
Shares sold		152,063,298			245,632,545
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions		13,479			74,528
Shares redeemed		(181,024,504	)		(281,941,093	)
Net increase (decrease) in Fund shares from Investment Class share transactions		(28,947,727	)		(36,234,020	)
Shares outstanding at end of period		52,234,473			81,182,200
Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund
Shares outstanding at beginning of period		28,062,454			182,846,758
Shares sold		52,678,839			199,311,896
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions		11,412			234,913
Shares redeemed		(66,083,450	)		(354,331,113	)
Net increase (decrease) in Fund shares from Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund share transactions		(13,393,199	)		(154,784,304	)
Shares outstanding at end of period		14,669,255			28,062,454

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Financial Highlights

Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund
Years Ended December 31,	2010			2009			2008				2007	a
Selected Per Share Data
Net asset value, beginning of period	$	1.00		$	1.00		$	1.00		$	1.00
Income from investment operations: Net investment income		.000	***		.001			.016			.021
Net realized gain (loss)		(.000	)***		.000	***		.000	***		.000	***
Total from investment operations		.000	***		.001			.016			.021
Less distributions from: Net investment income		(.001	)		(.001	)		(.016	)		(.021	)
Net asset value, end of period	$	1.00		$	1.00		$	1.00		$	1.00
Total Return (%)		.06	b		.13	b		1.57			2.16	**
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)		15			28			183			112
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)		.88			.98			.89			.91	*
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)		.32			.58			.89			.91	*
Ratio of net investment income (%)		.01			.14			1.51			2.71	*
aFor the period from March 22, 2007 (commencement of operations of Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund) to December 31, 2007. bTotal return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. *Annualized **Not annualized ***Amount is less than $.0005 per share.

Notes to Financial Statements

A. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

DWS Advisor Funds (the "Trust'') is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act''), as a Massachusetts business trust. NY Tax Free Money Fund (the "Fund") is one of the funds in the Trust. The Fund is an open-end, diversified management investment company. NY Tax Free Money Fund offers two classes of shares: Investment Class and Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund. The financial highlights for Investment Class are provided separately and are available upon request.

Investment income, realized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses and expense reductions, if any, are borne pro rata on the basis of relative net assets by the holders of all classes of shares, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as distribution and service fees, services to shareholders and certain other class-specific expenses. Differences in class-level expenses may result in payment of different per share dividends by class. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting subject to class-specific arrangements.

The Fund's financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which require the use of management estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The policies described below are followed consistently by the Funds in the preparation of its financial statements.

Security Valuation. Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, and credit risk). Level 3 includes significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

The Fund values all securities utilizing the amortized cost method permitted in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act and certain conditions therein. Under this method, which does not take into account unrealized capital gains or losses on securities, an instrument is initially valued at its cost and thereafter assumes a constant accretion/amortization rate to maturity of any discount or premium. Securities held by a money market portfolio are reflected as Level 2 because the securities are valued at amortized cost (which approximates fair value) and, accordingly, the inputs used to determine value are not quoted prices in an active market.

Disclosure about the classification of fair value measurements is included in a table following the Fund's Investment Portfolio.

Federal Income Taxes. The Fund's policy is to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which are applicable to regulated investment companies, and to distribute all of its taxable and tax-exempt income to its shareholders.

At December 31, 2010, the Fund had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $1,500, which may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until December 31, 2018, the expiration date, whichever occurs first.

The Fund has reviewed the tax positions for the open tax years as of December 31, 2010 and has determined that no provision for income tax is required in the Fund's financial statements. The Fund's federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain open subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

Distributions of Income and Gains. Net investment income of the Fund is declared as a daily dividend and is distributed to shareholders monthly. The Fund may take into account capital gains and losses in its daily dividend declarations. The Fund may also make additional distributions for tax purposes if necessary.

Permanent book and tax differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in capital. Temporary book and tax differences will reverse in a subsequent period. There were no significant book to tax differences for the Fund.

At December 31, 2010, the Fund's components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income*	$	6,122
Capital loss carryforwards	$	(1,500	)

In addition, the tax character of distributions paid to shareholders by the Fund is summarized as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009
Distributions from tax-exempt income	$	46,064	$	473,831
Distributions from ordinary income*	$	—	$	1,216

* For tax purposes, short-term capital gains distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

Expenses. Expenses of the Trust arising in connection with a specific fund are allocated to that fund. Other Trust expenses which cannot be directly attributed to a fund are apportioned among the funds in the Trust.

Contingencies. In the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet been made. However, based on experience, the Fund expect the risk of loss to be remote.

Other. Investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis. All discounts and premiums are accreted/amortized for both tax and financial reporting purposes.

B. Related Parties

Management Agreement. Under the Investment Management Agreement with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA" or the "Advisor"), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, the Advisor directs the investments of the Fund in accordance with its investment objectives, policies and restrictions. The Advisor determines the securities, instruments and other contracts relating to investments to be purchased, sold or entered into by the Funds.

Under the Investment Management Agreement with the Advisor, the Fund pays an annualized management fee of 0.12% based on the Fund's average daily assets, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly.

For the period from January 1, 2010 through March 21, 2010, the Advisor had contractually agreed to waive its fees and/or reimburse certain operating expenses of Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest) at 1.00% of its average daily net assets.

In addition, the Advisor has agreed to voluntarily waive additional expenses. The waiver may be changed or terminated at any time without notice. Under this arrangement, the Advisor waived certain expenses of the Fund.

Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Advisor waived a portion of its management fee pursuant to the Investment Management Agreement aggregating $94,550 and the amount charged aggregated $12,779, which was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.01% of the Fund's average daily net assets.

Administration Fee. Pursuant to an Administrative Services Agreement, DIMA provides most administrative services to the Fund. For all services provided under the Administrative Services Agreement, the Fund pays the Advisor an annual fee ("Administration Fee") of 0.10% of the Fund's average daily net assets, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Administration Fee for the Fund was $89,441, of which $5,664 is unpaid.

Service Provider Fees. DWS Investments Service Company ("DISC"), an affiliate of the Advisor, is the transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent for the Fund. Pursuant to a sub-transfer agency agreement between DISC and DST Systems, Inc. ("DST"), DISC has delegated certain transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent functions to DST. DISC compensates DST out of the shareholder servicing fee it receives from the Fund. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the amount charged to the Fund by DISC was as follows:

Services to Shareholders	Total Aggregated		Waived
Investment Class	$	141,770	$	141,770
Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund	$	—	$	—

Distribution and Service Fees. DWS Investments Distributors, Inc. ("DIDI") is the Fund's Distributor. The Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund pays the Distributor an annual fee, pursuant to Rule 12b-1, based on an annual rate of 0.50% of the Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund's average daily net assets, which is calculated daily and payable monthly. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Distribution Fee was as follows:

Distribution Fee	Total Aggregated		Waived		Unpaid at December 31, 2010
Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund	$	101,237	$	91,429	$	3,363

In addition, DIDI provides information and administrative services for a fee ("Service Fee") to the Investment Class of the Fund at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of average daily net assets of the Investment Class. DIDI in turn has various agreements with financial services firms that provide these services and pays these fees based upon the assets of the shareholder accounts the firms service. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Service Fee was as follows:

Service Fee	Total Aggregated		Waived		Annual Effective Rate
Investment Class	$	103,867	$	103,867		.00	%

Typesetting and Filing Service Fees. Under an agreement with DIMA, DIMA is compensated for providing typesetting and certain regulatory filing services to the Fund. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the amount charged to the Fund by DIMA included in the Statement of Operations under "reports to shareholders" aggregated $19,994, of which $7,617 is unpaid.

Trustees' Fees and Expenses. The Fund paid each Trustee not affiliated with the Advisor retainer fees plus specified amounts for various committee services and for the Board Chairperson.

C. Line of Credit

The Fund and other affiliated funds (the "Participants") share in a $450 million revolving credit facility provided by a syndication of banks. The Fund may borrow for temporary or emergency purposes, including the meeting of redemption requests that otherwise might require the untimely disposition of securities. The Participants are charged an annual commitment fee which is allocated based on net assets, among each of the Participants. Interest is calculated at a rate per annum equal to the sum of the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.25 percent plus if LIBOR exceeds the Federal Funds Rate the amount of such excess. The Fund may borrow up to a maximum of 33 percent of its net assets under the agreement.

D. Concentration of Ownership

From time to time, the Fund may have a concentration of several shareholder accounts holding a significant percentage of shares outstanding. Investment activities of these shareholder accounts could have a material impact on the Fund.

At December 31, 2010, two shareholder accounts held approximately 45% and 25% of the outstanding shares of the Fund.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees of DWS Advisor Funds and Shareholders of NY Tax Free Money Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the investment portfolio, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NY Tax Free Money Fund (the ``Fund'') at December 31, 2010, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as ``financial statements'') are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2010 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Boston, Massachusetts February 24, 2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tax Information (Unaudited)

Of the dividends paid from net investment income for the taxable year ended December 31, 2010, 100% are designated as exempt interest dividends for federal income tax purposes.

Please contact a tax advisor if you have questions about federal or state income tax laws, or on how to prepare your tax returns. If you have specific questions about your account, please call (800) 621-1048.

Other Information

Proxy Voting

The fund's policies and procedures for voting proxies for portfolio securities and information about how the fund voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30 are available on our Web site — www.dws-investments.com (click on "proxy voting" at the bottom of the page) — or on the SEC's Web site — www.sec.gov. To obtain a written copy of the fund's policies and procedures without charge, upon request, call us toll free at (800) 621-1048.

Investment Management Agreement Approval

The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of your Fund's investment management agreement (the "Agreement") with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DWS") in September 2010.

In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreement, shareholders should know that:

• In September 2010, all of the Fund's Trustees were independent of DWS and its affiliates.

• The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate substantial time to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board's Contract Committee, in coordination with the Board's Fixed Income and Quant Oversight Committee, reviewed comprehensive materials received from DWS, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund's performance, fees and expenses, and profitability compiled by the Fund's independent fee consultant. The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund.

• The Independent Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Independent Trustees were also advised by the Fund's independent fee consultant in the course of their review of the Fund's contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations (the "IFC Report").

• In connection with reviewing the Agreement, the Board also reviewed the terms of the Fund's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administrative services agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.

• Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Independent Trustees as a group. The Independent Trustees reviewed the Contract Committee's findings and recommendations and presented their recommendations to the full Board.

In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DWS and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DWS managed the Fund, and that the Agreement was approved by the Fund's shareholders. DWS is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Board believes that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.

While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund's Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DWS's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.

Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreement, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, DWS provides portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DWS provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel, the resources made available to such personnel, the ability of DWS to attract and retain high-quality personnel, and the organizational depth and stability of DWS. The Board reviewed the Fund's performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including a peer universe compiled by the independent fee consultant using information supplied by iMoneyNet Inc. ("iMoneyNet"). The Board also noted that it has put into place a process of identifying "Focus Funds" (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to their benchmark or a peer universe compiled by iMoneyNet), and receives more frequent reporting and information from DWS regarding such funds, along with DWS's remedial plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that for the one- and three-year periods ended December 31, 2009, the Fund's gross performance (Investment Class shares) was in the 1st quartile of the applicable iMoneyNet universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers).

On the basis of this evaluation and the ongoing review of investment results by the Board, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DWS historically have been and continue to be satisfactory.

Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's investment management fee schedule, operating expenses, and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper") and the independent fee consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund, which include the 0.10% fee paid to DWS under the Fund's administrative services agreement, were lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2009). Based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2009, the Board noted that the Fund's total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees and/or shareholder administration fees) were expected to be higher than the median of the applicable Lipper expense universe for Investment Class shares (4th quartile) and Tax-Exempt New York Money Market Fund shares (4th quartile). The Board considered the Fund's management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DWS and certain of its affiliates for comparable mutual funds and considered differences in fund and fee structures between the DWS Funds. The Board also considered how the Fund's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitation agreed to by DWS helped to ensure that the Fund's total (net) operating expenses would remain competitive.

The information considered by the Board as part of its review of management fees included information regarding fees charged by DWS and its affiliates to similar institutional accounts and to similar funds but offered primarily to European investors ("DWS Europe funds"), in each case as applicable. The Board observed that advisory fee rates for institutional accounts generally were lower than the management fees charged by similarly managed DWS US mutual funds ("DWS Funds"), but also took note of the differences in services provided to DWS Funds as compared to institutional accounts. In the case of DWS Europe funds, the Board observed that fee rates for DWS Europe funds generally were higher than for similarly managed DWS Funds, but noted that differences in the types of services provided to DWS Funds relative to DWS Europe funds made it difficult to compare such fees.

On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DWS.

Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DWS under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs and pre-tax profits realized by DWS from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DWS and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board reviewed DWS's methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by DWS in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DWS and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DWS and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.

Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board concluded that the Fund's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DWS of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.

Other Benefits to DWS and Its Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DWS and its affiliates, including any fees received by DWS for administrative services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DWS for distribution services. The Board also considered benefits to DWS related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities, along with the incidental public relations benefits to DWS related to DWS Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS products and services. The Board concluded that management fees were reasonable in light of these fallout benefits.

Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DWS to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of both DWS's chief compliance officer and the Fund's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of DWS compliance personnel; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DWS and its affiliates to compliance matters.

Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board unanimously determined that the continuation of the Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination, the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreement.

Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant

October 3, 2010

Pursuant to an Order entered into by Deutsche Investment Management Americas and affiliates (collectively, "DeAM") with the Attorney General of New York, I, Thomas H. Mack, have been appointed the Independent Fee Consultant for the DWS Funds (formerly the DWS Scudder Funds). My duties include preparing an annual written evaluation of the management fees DeAM charges the Funds, considering among other factors the management fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services, management fees DeAM charges other clients for like services, DeAM's costs of supplying services under the management agreements and related profit margins, possible economies of scale if a Fund grows larger, and the nature and quality of DeAM's services, including fund performance. This report summarizes my evaluation for 2010, including my qualifications, the evaluation process for each of the DWS Funds, consideration of certain complex-level factors, and my conclusions. I served in substantially the same capacity in 2007, 2008, and 2009.

Qualifications

For more than 35 years I have served in various professional capacities within the investment management business. I have held investment analysis and advisory positions, including securities analyst, portfolio strategist and director of investment policy with a large investment firm. I have also performed business management functions, including business development, financial management and marketing research and analysis.

Since 1991, I have been an independent consultant within the asset management industry. I have provided services to over 125 client organizations, including investment managers, mutual fund boards, product distributors and related organizations. Over the past ten years I have completed a number of assignments for mutual fund boards, specifically including assisting boards with management contract renewal.

I hold a Master of Business Administration degree, with highest honors, from Harvard University and Master of Science and Bachelor of Science (highest honors) degrees from the University of California at Berkeley. I am an independent director and audit committee financial expert for two closed-end mutual funds and have served in various leadership and financial oversight capacities with non-profit organizations.

Evaluation of Fees for each DWS Fund

My work focused primarily on evaluating, fund-by-fund, the fees charged to each of the 118 publicly offered Fund portfolios in the DWS Fund family. For each Fund, I considered each of the key factors mentioned above, as well as any other relevant information. In doing so I worked closely with the Funds' Independent Directors in their annual contract renewal process, as well as in their approval of contracts for several new funds (documented separately).

In evaluating each Fund's fees, I reviewed comprehensive materials provided by or on behalf of DeAM, including expense information prepared by Lipper Analytical, comparative performance information, profitability data, manager histories, and other materials. I also accessed certain additional information from the Lipper and Morningstar databases and drew on my industry knowledge and experience.

To facilitate evaluating this considerable body of information, I prepared for each Fund a document summarizing the key data elements in each area as well as additional analytics discussed below. This made it possible to consider each key data element in the context of the others.

In the course of contract renewal, DeAM agreed to implement a number of fee and expense adjustments requested by the Independent Directors which will favorably impact future fees and expenses, and my evaluation includes the effects of these changes.

Fees and Expenses Compared with Other Funds

The competitive fee and expense evaluation for each fund focused on two primary comparisons:

The Fund's contractual management fee (the advisory fee plus the administration fee where applicable) compared with those of a group of typically 12-15 funds in the same Lipper investment category (e.g. Large Capitalization Growth) having similar distribution arrangements and being of similar size.

The Fund's total expenses compared with a broader universe of funds from the same Lipper investment category and having similar distribution arrangements.

These two comparisons provide a view of not only the level of the fee compared with funds of similar scale but also the total expense the Fund bears for all the services it receives, in comparison with the investment choices available in the Fund's investment category and distribution channel. The principal figure-of-merit used in these comparisons was the subject Fund's percentile ranking against peers.

DeAM's Fees for Similar Services to Others

DeAM provided management fee schedules for all of its US domiciled fund and non-fund investment management accounts in any of the investment categories where there is a DWS Fund. These similar products included the other DWS Funds, non-fund pooled accounts, institutional accounts and sub-advisory accounts. Using this information, I calculated for each Fund the fee that would be charged to each similar product, at the subject Fund's asset level.

Evaluating information regarding non-fund products is difficult because there are varying levels of services required for different types of accounts, with mutual funds generally requiring considerably more regulatory and administrative types of service as well as having more frequent cash flows than other types of accounts. Also, while mutual fund fees for similar fund products can be expected to be similar, there will be some differences due to different pricing conditions in different distribution channels (e.g. retail funds versus those used in variable insurance products), differences in underlying investment processes and other factors.

Costs and Profit Margins

DeAM provided a detailed profitability analysis for each Fund. After making some adjustments so that the presentation would be more comparable to the available industry figures, I reviewed profit margins from investment management alone, from investment management plus other fund services (excluding distribution) provided to the Funds by DeAM (principally shareholder services), and DeAM profits from all sources, including distribution. A later section comments on overall profitability.

Economies of Scale

Economies of scale — an expected decline in management cost per dollar of fund assets as fund assets grow — are very rarely quantified and documented because of inherent difficulties in collecting and analyzing relevant data. However, in virtually every investment category that I reviewed, larger funds tend to have lower fees and lower total expenses than smaller funds. To see how each DWS Fund compares with this industry observation, I reviewed:

The trend in Fund assets over the last five years and the accompanying trend in total expenses. This shows if the Fund has grown and, if so, whether total expense (management fees as well as other expenses) have declined as a percent of assets.

Whether the Fund has break-points in its management fee schedule, the extent of the fee reduction built into the schedule and the asset levels where the breaks take effect, and in the case of a sub-advised Fund how the Fund's break-points compare with those of the sub-advisory fee schedule.

How the Fund's contractual fee schedule compares with trends in the industry data. To accomplish this, I constructed a chart showing how actual latest-fiscal-year contractual fees of the Fund and of other similar funds relate to average fund assets, with the subject Fund's contractual fee schedule superimposed.

Quality of Service — Performance

The quality-of-service evaluation focused on investment performance, which is the principal result of the investment management service. Each Fund's performance was reviewed over the past 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, as applicable, and compared with that of other funds in the same investment category and with a suitable market index.

In addition, I calculated and reviewed risk-adjusted returns relative to an index of similar mutual funds' returns and a suitable market index. The risk-adjusted returns analysis provides a way of determining the extent to which the Fund's return comparisons are mainly the product of investment value-added (or lack thereof) or alternatively taking considerably more or less risk than is typical in its investment category.

I also received and considered the history of portfolio manager changes for each Fund, as this provided an important context for evaluating the performance results.

Complex-Level Considerations

While this evaluation was conducted mainly at the individual fund level, there are some issues relating to the reasonableness of fees that can alternatively be considered across the whole fund complex:

I reviewed DeAM's profitability analysis for all DWS Funds, with a view toward determining if the allocation procedures used were reasonable and how profit levels compared with public data for other investment managers.

I considered whether DeAM and affiliates receive any significant ancillary or "fall-out" benefits that should be considered in interpreting the direct profitability results. These would be situations where serving as the investment manager of the Funds is beneficial to another part of the Deutsche Bank organization.

I considered how aggregated DWS Fund expenses had varied over the years, by asset class and in the context of trends in asset levels.

I reviewed the structure of the DeAM organization, trends in staffing levels, and information on compensation of investment management and other professionals compared with industry data.

Findings

Based on the process and analysis discussed above, which included reviewing a wide range of information from management and external data sources and considering among other factors the fees DeAM charges other clients, the fees charged by other fund managers, DeAM's costs and profits associated with managing the Funds, economies of scale, possible fall-out benefits, and the nature and quality of services provided, in my opinion the management fees charged the DWS Funds are reasonable.

Thomas H. Mack

Summary of Administrative Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant

October 4, 2010

Pursuant to an Order entered into by Deutsche Asset Management (DeAM) with the Attorney General of New York, I, Thomas H. Mack, have been appointed the Independent Fee Consultant for the DWS Funds and have as part of my duties evaluated the reasonableness of a proposed pass-through to the funds of certain reporting costs associated with new regulations for money funds. My evaluation considered the following:

• My recently completed annual evaluation (please see my summary report of October 3, 2010), concluding that the prospective fees and expenses of all the DWS-sponsored money funds are reasonable.

• The fact that in my opinion the services DWS would provide under the combination of the Advisory and proposed Administration Agreements continues to be comparable with those typically provided to competitive funds under their management agreements.

• Management's analysis showing that the maximum total expense ratio impact of this change on any fund share class would be 1.3 basis points, which in my opinion is not material to my conclusions about the reasonableness of expenses.

Based on the foregoing considerations, in my opinion the proposed fees and expenses for the affected DWS-sponsored money funds are reasonable.

Thomas H. Mack

Board Members and Officers

The following table presents certain information regarding the Board Members and Officers of the Trust as of December 31, 2010. Each Board Member's year of birth is set forth in parentheses after his or her name. Unless otherwise noted, (i) each Board Member has engaged in the principal occupation(s) noted in the table for at least the most recent five years, although not necessarily in the same capacity; and (ii) the address of each Independent Board Member is c/o Paul K. Freeman, Independent Chairman, DWS Funds, PO Box 101833, Denver, CO 80250-1833. Except as otherwise noted below, the term of office for each Board Member is until the election and qualification of a successor, or until such Board Member sooner dies, resigns, is removed or as otherwise provided in the governing documents of the fund. Because the fund does not hold an annual meeting of shareholders, each Board Member will hold office for an indeterminate period. The Board Members may also serve in similar capacities with other funds in the fund complex. The Length of Time Served represents the year in which the Board Member joined the board of one or more DWS funds now overseen by the Board.

Independent Board Members
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served1	Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years	Number of Funds in DWS Fund Complex Overseen
Paul K. Freeman (1950) Chairperson since 2009 Board Member since 1993	Consultant, World Bank/Inter-American Development Bank; Executive and Governing Council of the Independent Directors Council (education committees); formerly, Project Leader, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (1998-2001); Chief Executive Officer, The Eric Group, Inc. (environmental insurance) (1986-1998)	122
John W. Ballantine (1946) Board Member since 1999	Retired; formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Management Officer, First Chicago NBD Corporation/The First National Bank of Chicago (1996-1998); Executive Vice President and Head of International Banking (1995-1996). Directorships: Healthways, Inc. (provider of disease and care management services); Portland General Electric (utility company); Stockwell Capital Investments PLC (private equity). Former Directorships: First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. and Oak Brook Bank; Prisma Energy International	122
Henry P. Becton, Jr. (1943) Board Member since 1990	Vice Chair and former President, WGBH Educational Foundation. Directorships: Association of Public Television Stations; Lead Director, Becton Dickinson and Company3 (medical technology company); Lead Director, Belo Corporation3 (media company); Public Radio International; Public Radio Exchange (PRX); The PBS Foundation. Former Directorships: Boston Museum of Science; American Public Television; Concord Academy; New England Aquarium; Mass. Corporation for Educational Telecommunications; Committee for Economic Development; Public Broadcasting Service	122
Dawn-Marie Driscoll (1946) Board Member since 1987	President, Driscoll Associates (consulting firm); Executive Fellow, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University; formerly, Partner, Palmer & Dodge (1988-1990); Vice President of Corporate Affairs and General Counsel, Filene's (1978-1988). Directorships: Trustee of 22 open-end mutual funds managed by Sun Capital Advisers, Inc. (since 2007); Director of ICI Mutual Insurance Company (since 2007); Advisory Board, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University; Trustee, Southwest Florida Community Foundation (charitable organization). Former Directorships: Investment Company Institute (audit, executive, nominating committees) and Independent Directors Council (governance, executive committees)	122
Keith R. Fox (1954) Board Member since 1996	Managing General Partner, Exeter Capital Partners (a series of private investment funds). Directorships: Progressive International Corporation (kitchen goods importer and distributor); BoxTop Media Inc. (advertising); The Kennel Shop (retailer); former Chairman, National Association of Small Business Investment Companies	122
Kenneth C. Froewiss (1945) Board Member since 2001	Adjunct Professor of Finance, NYU Stern School of Business (September 2009-present; Clinical Professor from 1997-September 2009); Member, Finance Committee, Association for Asian Studies (2002-present); Director, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group (US) (2004-present); prior thereto, Managing Director, J.P. Morgan (investment banking firm) (until 1996)	122
Richard J. Herring (1946) Board Member since 1990	Jacob Safra Professor of International Banking and Professor, Finance Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (since July 1972); Co-Director, Wharton Financial Institutions Center (since July 2000); Co-Chair, U.S. Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee; Executive Director, Financial Economists Roundtable; Director, Japan Equity Fund, Inc. (since September 2007), Thai Capital Fund, Inc. (since September 2007), Singapore Fund, Inc. (since September 2007); Independent Director of Barclays Bank Delaware (since September 2010). Formerly, Vice Dean and Director, Wharton Undergraduate Division (July 1995-June 2000); Director, Lauder Institute of International Management Studies (July 2000-June 2006)	122
William McClayton (1944) Board Member since 2004+	Private equity investor (since October 2009); previously, Managing Director, Diamond Management & Technology Consultants, Inc. (global consulting firm) (2001-2009); Directorship: Board of Managers, YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago; formerly: Senior Partner, Arthur Andersen LLP (accounting) (1966-2001); Trustee, Ravinia Festival	122
Rebecca W. Rimel (1951) Board Member since 1995	President and Chief Executive Officer, The Pew Charitable Trusts (charitable organization) (1994 to present); Trustee, Thomas Jefferson Foundation (charitable organization) (1994 to present); Trustee, Executive Committee, Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce (2001-2007); Director, CardioNet, Inc.2 (2009-present) (health care). Formerly, Executive Vice President, The Glenmede Trust Company (investment trust and wealth management) (1983-2004); Board Member, Investor Education (charitable organization) (2004-2005); Director, Viasys Health Care2 (January 2007-June 2007); Trustee, Pro Publica (charitable organization) (2007-2010)	122
William N. Searcy, Jr. (1946) Board Member since 1993	Private investor since October 2003; Trustee of 22 open-end mutual funds managed by Sun Capital Advisers, Inc. (since October 1998). Formerly, Pension & Savings Trust Officer, Sprint Corporation2 (telecommunications) (November 1989-September 2003)	122
Jean Gleason Stromberg (1943) Board Member since 1997	Retired. Formerly, Consultant (1997-2001); Director, Financial Markets US Government Accountability Office (1996-1997); Partner, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. (law firm) (1978-1996). Directorships: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Former Directorships: Service Source, Inc., Mutual Fund Directors Forum (2002-2004), American Bar Retirement Association (funding vehicle for retirement plans) (1987-1990 and 1994-1996)	122
Robert H. Wadsworth (1940) Board Member since 1999	President, Robert H. Wadsworth & Associates, Inc. (consulting firm) (1983 to present); Director, The Phoenix Boys Choir Association	125

Officers4
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served5	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years and Other Directorships Held
Michael G. Clark6 (1965) President, 2006-present	Managing Director3, Deutsche Asset Management (2006-present); President of DWS family of funds; Director, ICI Mutual Insurance Company (since October 2007); formerly, Director of Fund Board Relations (2004-2006) and Director of Product Development (2000-2004), Merrill Lynch Investment Managers; Senior Vice President Operations, Merrill Lynch Asset Management (1999-2000)
Ingo Gefeke7 (1967) Executive Vice President since 2010	Managing Director3, Deutsche Asset Management; Global Head of Distribution and Product Management, DWS Global Head of Trading and Securities Lending. Member of the Board of Directors of DWS Investment GmbH Frankfurt (since July 2009) and DWS Holding & Service GmbH Frankfurt (since January 2010); formerly, Global Chief Administrative Officer, Deutsche Asset Management (2004-2009); Global Chief Operating Officer, Global Transaction Banking, Deutsche Bank AG, New York (2001-2004); Chief Operating Officer, Global Banking Division Americas, Deutsche Bank AG, New York (1999-2001); Central Management, Global Banking Services, Deutsche Bank AG, Frankfurt (1998-1999); Relationship Management, Deutsche Bank AG, Tokyo, Japan (1997-1998)
John Millette8 (1962) Vice President and Secretary, 1999-present	Director3, Deutsche Asset Management
Paul H. Schubert6 (1963) Chief Financial Officer, 2004-present Treasurer, 2005-present	Managing Director3, Deutsche Asset Management (since July 2004); formerly, Executive Director, Head of Mutual Fund Services and Treasurer for UBS Family of Funds (1998-2004); Vice President and Director of Mutual Fund Finance at UBS Global Asset Management (1994-1998)
Caroline Pearson8 (1962) Chief Legal Officer, April 2010-present	Managing Director3, Deutsche Asset Management; formerly, Assistant Secretary for DWS family of funds (1997-2010)
Rita Rubin9 (1970) Assistant Secretary, 2009-present	Vice President and Counsel, Deutsche Asset Management (since October 2007); formerly, Vice President, Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2004-2007)
Paul Antosca8 (1957) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present	Director3, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2006); Vice President, The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) (1990-2006)
Jack Clark8 (1967) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present	Director3, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2007); formerly, Vice President, State Street Corporation (2002-2007)
Diane Kenneally8 (1966) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present	Director3, Deutsche Asset Management
John Caruso9 (1965) Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, 2010-present	Managing Director3, Deutsche Asset Management
Robert Kloby9 (1962) Chief Compliance Officer, 2006-present	Managing Director3, Deutsche Asset Management

1The length of time served represents the year in which the Board Member joined the board of one or more DWS funds currently overseen by the Board.

2A publicly held company with securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

3Executive title, not a board directorship.

4As a result of their respective positions held with the Advisor, these individuals are considered "interested persons" of the Advisor within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Interested persons receive no compensation from the fund.

5The length of time served represents the year in which the officer was first elected in such capacity for one or more DWS funds.

6Address: 100 Plaza One, Jersey City, NJ 07311.

7Effective January 11, 2011, Mr. Gefeke, Executive Vice President, resigned as an officer of the fund.

The mailing address of Mr. Gefeke is 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154. Mr. Gefeke was an interested Board Member of certain DWS funds by virtue of his positions with Deutsche Asset Management. As an interested person, Mr. Gefeke received no compensation from the fund.

8Address: One Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108.

9Address: 60 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005.

The fund's Statement of Additional Information ("SAI") includes additional information about the Board Members. The SAI is available, without charge, upon request. If you would like to request a copy of the SAI, you may do so by calling the following toll-free number: (800) 621-1048.

ITEM 2.	CODE OF ETHICS
	As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. There have been no amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the code of ethics during the period covered by this report that would require disclosure under Item 2. A copy of the code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 3.	AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
	The fund’s audit committee is comprised solely of trustees who are "independent" (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Regulations")). The fund’s Board of Trustees has determined that there are several "audit committee financial experts" (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) serving on the fund’s audit committee including Mr. William McClayton, the chair of the fund’s audit committee. An “audit committee financial expert” is not an “expert” for any purpose, including for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and the designation or identification of a person as an “audit committee financial expert” does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification.
ITEM 4.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

NY TAX FREE MONEY

FORM N-CSR DISCLOSURE RE: AUDIT FEES

The following table shows the amount of fees that PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (“PWC”), the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm, billed to the Fund during the Fund’s last two fiscal years.  The Audit Committee approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that PWC provided to the Fund.

Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Fund

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,	Audit Fees Billed to Fund		Audit-Related Fees Billed to Fund		Tax Fees Billed to Fund		All Other Fees Billed to Fund
2010	$	44,129	$	0	$	0	$	0
2009	$	43,264	$	0	$	0	$	0

Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers

The following table shows the amount of fees billed by PWC to Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (“DeIM” or the “Adviser”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with DeIM (“Control Affiliate”) that provides ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Fund Service Provider”), for engagements directly related to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting, during the Fund’s last two fiscal years.

Fiscal Year December 31,	Audit-Related Fees Billedto Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers		Tax Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers		All Other Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers
2010	$	7,500	$	0	$	0
2009	$	2,000	$	0	$	0

The “Audit-Related Fees” were billed for services in connection with the agreed-upon procedures.

Non-Audit Services

The following table shows the amount of fees that PWC billed during the Fund’s last two fiscal years for non-audit services. The Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services that PWC provided to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider that related directly to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting. The Audit Committee requested and received information from PWC about any non-audit services that PWC rendered during the Fund’s last fiscal year to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider.  The Committee considered this information in evaluating PWC’s independence.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,	Total Non-Audit Fees Billed to Fund (A)		Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (engagements related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund) (B)		Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (all other engagements) (C)		Total of (A), (B) and (C)
2010	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
2009	$	0	$	0	$	100,000	$	100,000

All other engagement fees were billed for services in connection with an internal control review of a subadvisor.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.  Generally, each Fund’s Audit Committee must pre approve (i) all services to be performed for a Fund by a Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and (ii) all non-audit services to be performed by a Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the DIMA Entities with respect to operations and financial reporting of the Fund, except that the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson of each Fund’s Audit Committee may grant the pre-approval for non-audit services described in items (i) and (ii) above for non-prohibited services for engagements of less than $100,000.  All such delegated pre approvals shall be presented to each Fund’s Audit Committee no later than the next Audit Committee meeting.

There were no amounts that were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minimis exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

According to the registrant’s principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, all of the principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm's hours spent on auditing the registrant's financial statements were attributed to work performed by full-time permanent employees of the principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

***

ITEM 5.	AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS
	Not applicable
ITEM 6.	SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
	Not applicable
ITEM 7.	DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
	Not applicable
ITEM 8.	PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
	Not applicable
ITEM 9.	PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
	Not applicable
ITEM 10.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
	There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Fund’s Board.  The primary function of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to identify and recommend individuals for membership on the Board and oversee the administration of the Board Governance Guidelines. Shareholders may recommend candidates for Board positions by forwarding their correspondence by U.S. mail or courier service to Paul K. Freeman, Independent Chairman, DWS Funds, P.O. Box 101833, Denver, CO 80250-1833.
ITEM 11.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
	(a)	The Chief Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on the evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
	(b)	There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
ITEM 12.	EXHIBITS
	(a)(1)	Code of Ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CODE ETH.
	(a)(2)	Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) is filed and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT.
	(b)	Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) is furnished and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT.

Form N-CSR Item F

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant:	NY Tax Free Money Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds
By:	/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark President
Date:	March 1, 2011

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:	/s/Michael G. Clark Michael G. Clark President
Date:	March 1, 2011
By:	/s/Paul Schubert Paul Schubert Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Date:	March 1, 2011

EX-99.CODE ETH

DWS Investments

Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer Code of Ethics

For the Registered Management Investment Companies Listed on Appendix A

Effective Date

[January 31, 2005]

Table of Contents

Page Number

I.Overview 3

II.Purposes of the Officer Code 3

III.Responsibilities of Covered Officers 4

A.Honest and Ethical Conduct 4

B.Conflicts of Interest 4

C.Use of Personal Fund Shareholder Information 6

D.Public Communications 6

E.Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations 6

IV.Violation Reporting 7

A.Overview 7

B.How to Report 7

C.Process for Violation Reporting to the Fund Board 7

D.Sanctions for Code Violations 7

V.Waivers from the Officer Code 8

VI.Amendments to the Code 8

VII.Acknowledgement and Certification of Adherence to the Officer Code 8

IX.Recordkeeping 9

X.Confidentiality 9

Appendices 10

Appendix A: List of Officers Covered under the Code, by Board 10

Appendix B: Officer Code Acknowledgement and Certification Form 11

Appendix C: Definitions 13

I.

Overview

This Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Code of Ethics (“Officer Code”) sets forth the policies, practices, and values expected to be exhibited in the conduct of the Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial Officers of the investment companies (“Funds”) they serve (“Covered Officers”). A list of Covered Officers and Funds is included on Appendix A. The Boards of the Funds listed on Appendix A have elected to implement the Officer Code, pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the SEC’s rules thereunder, to promote and demonstrate honest and ethical conduct in their Covered Officers. Deutsche Asset Management, Inc. or its affiliates (“DeAM”) serves as the investment adviser to each Fund. All Covered Officers are also employees of DeAM or an affiliate. Thus, in addition to adhering to the Officer Code, these individuals must comply with DeAM policies and procedures, such as the DeAM Code of Ethics governing personal trading activities, as adopted pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.1 In addition, such individuals also must comply with other applicable Fund policies and procedures. The DeAM Compliance Officer, who shall not be a Covered Officer and who shall serve as such subject to the approval of the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof), is primarily responsible for implementing and enforcing this Code. The Compliance Officer has the authority to interpret this Officer Code and its applicability to particular circumstances. Any questions about the Officer Code should be directed to the DeAM Compliance Officer. The DeAM Compliance Officer and his or her contact information can be found in Appendix A.

_________________________

1 The obligations imposed by the Officer Code are separate from, and in addition to, any obligations imposed under codes of ethics adopted pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and any other code of conduct applicable to Covered Officers in whatever capacity they serve. The Officer Code does not incorporate any of those other codes and, accordingly, violations of those codes will not necessarily be considered violations of the Officer Code and waivers granted under those codes would not necessarily require a waiver to be granted under this Code. Sanctions imposed under those codes may be considered in determining appropriate sanctions for any violation of this Code.

II. Purposes of the Officer Code

The purposes of the Officer Code are to deter wrongdoing and to:
•	promote honest and ethical conduct among Covered Officers, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

• promote full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosures in reports and documents that the Funds file with or submit to the SEC (and in other public communications from the Funds) and that are within the Covered Officer’s responsibilities;

• promote compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

• encourage the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Officer Code to the DeAM Compliance Officer; and

•	establish accountability for adherence to the Officer Code.
Any questions about the Officer Code should be referred to DeAM’s Compliance Officer.

III. Responsibilities of Covered Officers

A.

Honest and Ethical Conduct

It is the duty of every Covered Officer to encourage and demonstrate honest and ethical conduct, as well as adhere to and require adherence to the Officer Code and any other applicable policies and procedures designed to promote this behavior. Covered Officers must at all times conduct themselves with integrity and distinction, putting first the interests of the Fund(s) they serve. Covered Officers must be honest and candid while maintaining confidentiality of information where required by law, DeAM policy or Fund policy. Covered Officers also must, at all times, act in good faith, responsibly and with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting or being misleading about material facts or allowing their independent judgment to be subordinated. Covered Officers also should maintain skills appropriate and necessary for the performance of their duties for the Fund(s). Covered Officers also must responsibly use and control all Fund assets and resources entrusted to them. Covered Officers may not retaliate against others for, or otherwise discourage the reporting of, actual or apparent violations of the Officer Code or applicable laws or regulations. Covered Officers should create an environment that encourages the exchange of information, including concerns of the type that this Code is designed to address.

B.

Conflicts of Interest

A “conflict of interest” occurs when a Covered Officer’s personal interests interfere with the interests of the Fund for which he or she serves as an officer. Covered Officers may not improperly use their position with a Fund for personal or private gain to themselves, their family, or any other person. Similarly, Covered Officers may not use their personal influence or personal relationships to influence decisions or other Fund business or operational matters where they would benefit personally at the Fund’s expense or to the Fund’s detriment. Covered Officers may not cause the Fund to take action, or refrain from taking action, for their personal benefit at the Fund’s expense or to the Fund’s detriment. Some examples of conflicts of interest follow (this is not an all-inclusive list): being in the position of supervising, reviewing or having any influence on the job evaluation, pay or benefit of any immediate family member who is an employee of a Fund service provider or is otherwise associated with the Fund; or having an ownership interest in, or having any consulting or employment relationship with, any Fund service provider other than DeAM or its affiliates. Certain conflicts of interest covered by this Code arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Fund that already are subject to conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act. For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property) with the Fund because of their status as “affiliated persons” of the Fund. Covered Officers must comply with applicable laws and regulations. Therefore, any violations of existing statutory and regulatory prohibitions on individual behavior could be considered a violation of this Code. As to conflicts arising from, or as a result of the advisory relationship (or any other relationships) between the Fund and DeAM, of which the Covered Officers are also officers or employees, it is recognized by the Board that, subject to DeAM’s fiduciary duties to the Fund, the Covered Officers will in the normal course of their duties (whether formally for the Fund or for DeAM, or for both) be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions which will have different effects on DeAM and the Fund. The Board recognizes that the participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contract relationship between the Fund and DeAM, and is consistent with the expectation of the Board of the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Fund. Covered Officers should avoid actual conflicts of interest, and appearances of conflicts of interest, between the Covered Officer’s duties to the Fund and his or her personal interests beyond those contemplated or anticipated by applicable regulatory schemes. If a Covered Officer suspects or knows of a conflict or an appearance of one, the Covered Officer must immediately report the matter to the DeAM Compliance Officer. If a Covered Officer, in lieu of reporting such a matter to the DeAM Compliance Officer, may report the matter directly to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof), as appropriate (e.g., if the conflict involves the DeAM Compliance Officer or the Covered Officer reasonably believes it would be futile to report the matter to the DeAM Compliance Officer). When actual, apparent or suspected conflicts of interest arise in connection with a Covered Officer, DeAM personnel aware of the matter should promptly contact the DeAM Compliance Officer. There will be no reprisal or retaliation against the person reporting the matter. Upon receipt of a report of a possible conflict, the DeAM Compliance Officer will take steps to determine whether a conflict exists. In so doing, the DeAM Compliance Officer may take any actions he or she determines to be appropriate in his or her sole discretion and may use all reasonable resources, including retaining or engaging legal counsel, accounting firms or other consultants, subject to applicable law.2 The costs associated with such actions may be borne by the Fund, if appropriate, after consultation with the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof). Otherwise, such costs will be borne by DeAM or other appropriate Fund service provider. After full review of a report of a possible conflict of interest, the DeAM Compliance Officer may determine that no conflict or reasonable appearance of a conflict exists. If, however, the DeAM Compliance Officer determines that an actual conflict exists, the Compliance Officer will resolve the conflict solely in the interests of the Fund, and will report the conflict and its resolution to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof). If the DeAM Compliance Officer determines that the appearance of a conflict exists, the DeAM Compliance Officer will take appropriate steps to remedy such appearance. In lieu of determining whether a conflict exists and/or resolving a conflict, the DeAM Compliance Officer instead may refer the matter to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof), as appropriate. However, the DeAM Compliance Officer must refer the matter to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof) if the DeAM Compliance Officer is directly involved in the conflict or under similar appropriate circumstances. After responding to a report of a possible conflict of interest, the DeAM Compliance Officer will discuss the matter with the person reporting it (and with the Covered Officer at issue, if different) for purposes of educating those involved on conflicts of interests (including how to detect and avoid them, if appropriate). Appropriate resolution of conflicts may restrict the personal activities of the Covered Officer and/or his family, friends or other persons. Solely because a conflict is disclosed to the DeAM Compliance Officer (and/or the Board or Committee thereof) and/or resolved by the DeAM Compliance Officer does not mean that the conflict or its resolution constitutes a waiver from the Code’s requirements. Any questions about conflicts of interests, including whether a particular situation might be a conflict or an appearance of one, should be directed to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

_________________________

2 For example, retaining a Fund’s independent accounting firm may require pre-approval by the Fund’s audit committee.

C.	Use of Personal Fund Shareholder Information
	A Covered Officer may not use or disclose personal information about Fund shareholders, except in the performance of his or her duties for the Fund. Each Covered Officer also must abide by the Funds’ and DeAM’s privacy policies under SEC Regulation S-P.

D.

Public Communications

In connection with his or her responsibilities for or involvement with a Fund’s public communications and disclosure documents (e.g., shareholder reports, registration statements, press releases), each Covered Officer must provide information to Fund service providers (within the DeAM organization or otherwise) and to the Fund’s Board (and any committees thereof), independent auditors, government regulators and self-regulatory organizations that is fair, accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable. Further, within the scope of their duties, Covered Officers having direct or supervisory authority over Fund disclosure documents or other public Fund communications will, to the extent appropriate within their area of responsibility, endeavor to ensure full, fair, timely, accurate and understandable disclosure in Fund disclosure documents. Such Covered Officers will oversee, or appoint others to oversee, processes for the timely and accurate creation and review of all public reports and regulatory filings. Within the scope of his or her responsibilities as a Covered Officer, each Covered Officer also will familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements applicable to the Fund, as well as the business and financial operations of the Fund. Each Covered Officer also will adhere to, and will promote adherence to, applicable disclosure controls, processes and procedures, including DeAM’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures, which govern the process by which Fund disclosure documents are created and reviewed. To the extent that Covered Officers participate in the creation of a Fund’s books or records, they must do so in a way that promotes the accuracy, fairness and timeliness of those records.

E.

Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations

In connection with his or her duties and within the scope of his or her responsibilities as a Covered Officer, each Covered Officer must comply with governmental laws, rules and regulations, accounting standards, and Fund policies/procedures that apply to his or her role, responsibilities and duties with respect to the Funds (“Applicable Laws”). These requirements do not impose on Covered Officers any additional substantive duties. Additionally, Covered Officers should promote compliance with Applicable Laws. If a Covered Officer knows of any material violations of Applicable Laws or suspects that such a violation may have occurred, the Covered Officer is expected to promptly report the matter to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

IV. Violation Reporting

A.	Overview
	Each Covered Officer must promptly report to the DeAM Compliance Officer, and promote the reporting of, any known or suspected violations of the Officer Code. Failure to report a violation may be a violation of the Officer Code.

Examples of violations of the Officer Code include, but are not limited to, the following:
•	Unethical or dishonest behavior

• Obvious lack of adherence to policies surrounding review and approval of public communications and regulatory filings

• Failure to report violations of the Officer Code

• Known or obvious deviations from Applicable Laws

• Failure to acknowledge and certify adherence to the Officer Code

 The DeAM Compliance Officer has the authority to take any and all action he or she considers appropriate in his or her sole discretion to investigate known or suspected Code violations, including consulting with the Fund’s Board, the independent Board members, a Board committee, the Fund’s legal counsel and/or counsel to the independent Board members. The Compliance Officer also has the authority to use all reasonable resources to investigate violations, including retaining or engaging legal counsel, accounting firms or other consultants, subject to applicable law.3 The costs associated with such actions may be borne by the Fund, if appropriate, after consultation with the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof). Otherwise, such costs will be borne by DeAM.

B.	How to Report
	Any known or suspected violations of the Officer Code must be promptly reported to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

C.	Process for Violation Reporting to the Fund Board
	The DeAM Compliance Officer will promptly report any violations of the Code to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof).

D.	Sanctions for Code Violations
	Violations of the Code will be taken seriously. In response to reported or otherwise known violations, DeAM and the relevant Fund’s Board may impose sanctions within the scope of their respective authority over the Covered Officer at issue. Sanctions imposed by DeAM could include termination of employment. Sanctions imposed by a Fund’s Board could include termination of association with the Fund.

_________________________

3 For example, retaining a Fund’s independent accounting firm may require pre-approval by the Fund’s audit committee.

V.

Waivers from the Officer Code

A Covered Officer may request a waiver from the Officer Code by transmitting a written request for a waiver to the DeAM Compliance Officer.4 The request must include the rationale for the request and must explain how the waiver would be in furtherance of the standards of conduct described in and underlying purposes of the Officer Code. The DeAM Compliance Officer will present this information to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof). The Board (or committee) will determine whether to grant the requested waiver. If the Board (or committee) grants the requested waiver, the DeAM Compliance Officer thereafter will monitor the activities subject to the waiver, as appropriate, and will promptly report to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof) regarding such activities, as appropriate. The DeAM Compliance Officer will coordinate and facilitate any required public disclosures of any waivers granted or any implicit waivers.

_________________________

4 Of course, it is not a waiver of the Officer Code if the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof) determines that a matter is not a deviation from the Officer Code’s requirements or is otherwise not covered by the Code.

VI.

Amendments to the Code

The DeAM Compliance Officer will review the Officer Code from time to time for its continued appropriateness and will propose any amendments to the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof) on a timely basis. In addition, the Board (or committee thereof) will review the Officer Code at least annually for its continued appropriateness and may amend the Code as necessary or appropriate. The DeAM Compliance Officer will coordinate and facilitate any required public disclosures of Code amendments.

VII.

Acknowledgement and Certification of Adherence to the Officer Code

Each Covered Officer must sign a statement upon appointment as a Covered Officer and annually thereafter acknowledging that he or she has received and read the Officer Code, as amended or updated, and confirming that he or she has complied with it (see Appendix B: Acknowledgement and Certification of Obligations Under the Officer Code). Understanding and complying with the Officer Code and truthfully completing the Acknowledgement and Certification Form is each Covered Officer’s obligation. The DeAM Compliance Officer will maintain such Acknowledgements in the Fund’s books and records.

VIII.	Scope of Responsibilities
	A Covered Officer’s responsibilities under the Officer Code are limited to:

(1) Fund matters over which the Officer has direct responsibility or control, matters in which the Officer routinely participates, and matters with which the Officer is otherwise involved (i.e., matters within the scope of the Covered Officer’s responsibilities as a Fund officer); and

(2) Fund matters of which the Officer has actual knowledge.

IX.	Recordkeeping
	The DeAM Compliance Officer will create and maintain appropriate records regarding the implementation and operation of the Officer Code, including records relating to conflicts of interest determinations and investigations of possible Code violations.

X.

Confidentiality

All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to this Officer Code shall be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law or this Officer Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the DeAM Compliance Officer, the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof), legal counsel, independent auditors, and any consultants engaged by the Compliance Officer.

Appendices

Appendix A:

List of Officers Covered under the Code, by Board:

Fund Board	Principal Executive Officers	Principal Financial Officers	Treasurer
DWS Funds	Michael Clark	Paul Schubert	Paul Schubert
Germany*	Michael Clark	Paul Schubert	Paul Schubert

* Central Europe and Russia, European Equity, and New Germany Funds

DeAM Compliance Officer:

Joseph S. Yuen

Code of Ethics Compliance

212-454-7443

212-454-4703 fax

As of: Jan 1, 2009

Appendix B: Acknowledgement and Certification

Initial Acknowledgement and Certification

of Obligations Under the Officer Code

Print Name Department Location Telephone

1. I acknowledge and certify that I am a Covered Officer under the DWS Investments Principal Executive and Financial Officer Code of Ethics (“Officer Code”), and therefore subject to all of its requirements and provisions.

2. I have received and read the Officer Code and I understand the requirements and provisions set forth in the Officer Code.

3. I have disclosed any conflicts of interest of which I am aware to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

4. I will act in the best interest of the Funds for which I serve as an officer and have maintained the confidentiality of personal information about Fund shareholders.

5. I will report any known or suspected violations of the Officer Code in a timely manner to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

 Signature  Date

Annual Acknowledgement and Certification

of Obligations Under the Officer Code

Print Name Department Location Telephone

1. I acknowledge and certify that I am a Covered Officer under the DWS Investments Principal Executive and Financial Officer Code of Ethics (“Officer Code”), and therefore subject to all of its requirements and provisions.

2. I have received and read the Officer Code, and I understand the requirements and provisions set forth in the Officer Code.

3. I have adhered to the Officer Code.

4. I have not knowingly been a party to any conflict of interest, nor have I had actual knowledge about actual or apparent conflicts of interest that I did not report to the DeAM Compliance Officer in accordance with the Officer Code’s requirements.

5. I have acted in the best interest of the Funds for which I serve as an officer and have maintained the confidentiality of personal information about Fund shareholders.

6. With respect to the duties I perform for the Fund as a Fund officer, I believe that effective processes are in place to create and file public reports and documents in accordance with applicable regulations.

7. With respect to the duties I perform for the Fund as a Fund officer, I have complied to the best of my knowledge with all Applicable Laws (as that term is defined in the Officer Code) and have appropriately monitored those persons under my supervision for compliance with Applicable Laws.

8. I have reported any known or suspected violations of the Officer Code in a timely manner to the DeAM Compliance Officer.

 Signature  Date

Appendix C: Definitions

Principal Executive Officer

Individual holding the office of President of the Fund or series of Funds, or a person performing a similar function.

Principal Financial Officer

Individual holding the office of Treasurer of the Fund or series of Funds, or a person performing a similar function.

Registered Investment Management Investment Company

Registered investment companies other than a face-amount certificate company or a unit investment trust.

Waiver

A waiver is an approval of an exemption from a Code requirement.

Implicit Waiver

An implicit waiver is the failure to take action within a reasonable period of time regarding a material departure from a requirement or provision of the Officer Code that has been made known to the DeAM Compliance Officer or the Fund’s Board (or committee thereof).

EX-99.CERT

President

Form N-CSR Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of  NY Tax Free Money Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds, on Form N-CSR;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

March 1, 2011	/s/Michael G. Clark
	Michael G. Clark
	President

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Form N-CSR Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act

I, Paul Schubert, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of  NY Tax Free Money Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds, on Form N-CSR;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

March 1, 2011	/s/Paul Schubert
	Paul Schubert
	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

EX-99.906 CERT

President

Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of NY Tax Free Money Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds, on Form N-CSR;

2.   Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 1, 2011	/s/Michael G. Clark
	Michael G. Clark
	President

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act

I, Paul Schubert, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of NY Tax Free Money Fund, a series of DWS Advisor Funds, on Form N-CSR;

2.   Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 1, 2011	/s/Paul Schubert
	Paul Schubert
	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer