20-F 1 a18-12212_120f.htm 20-F

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

o	REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

o	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

OR

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

o	SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 000-14740

North American Nickel Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Province of British Columbia, Canada

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

1055 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6E 2E9

(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered

None		None

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. Common Shares, no par value

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common shares as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

554,598,167 inclusive of the conversion of the outstanding Series 1 Convertible Preferred Shares

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer.

o Yes x No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

o Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer x

Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

x Item 17 o Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

o Yes x No

Unless otherwise indicated, all references herein are expressed in Canadian dollars and United States currency is stated as “U.S. $ .”

THIS SUBMISSION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN CONJUNCTION WITH PREVIOUSLY FILED FORMS 20-F AND 6-K. THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO ATTACHED ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS SUBMISSION.

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not required

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not required

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. Selected financial data.

The following financial data summarizes selected financial data for our company prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) for the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013. The information presented below for the five year period ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is derived from our financial statements which were examined by our independent auditors. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with our audited annual financial statements and related notes thereto included in this annual report, and with the information appearing under the heading “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”. Al financial information is expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars and in thousands of Danish Krones (“DKK”), except per share amounts and except as otherwise indicated.

North American Nickel Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on September 23, 1983. The Company changed its name from Widescope Resources Inc. to North American Nickel Inc. effective April 19, 2010. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration of natural resource properties.

Effective April 19, 2010 the Company’s shareholders approved a special resolution to reorganize the Company’s capital structure by consolidating in a reverse stock split the existing common shares on the basis of each two (2) old shares being equal to one (1) new share and concurrently increasing the authorized capital of the Company from 100,000,000 common shares without par value to an unlimited number of common shares without par value. All references to common shares, stock options, warrants and weighted average number of shares outstanding in this Form 20-F retroactively reflect the share consolidation unless otherwise noted. The net effect of the above was to reduce the existing outstanding common shares from 10,883,452 to 5,441,730.

North American Nickel Inc.

Selected Financial Data in accordance with IFRS for the years 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)

	Years Ended December 31
	2017			2016		2015		2014		2013
Net operating revenues	$	0		0		0		0		0

Loss from operations	$	0		0		0		0		0

Net loss	$	(2,879	)	(2,877	)	(2,389	)	(3,741	)	(1,260	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(2,879	)	(2,877	)	(2,389	)	(3,74	)	(1,260	)

Loss per share from operations	$	(0.01	)	(0.01	)	(0.01	)	(0.02	)	(0.01	)

Share capital	$	74,189		62,906		51,165		43,268		33,631
Common shares issued	554,598,167			368,581,886		207,629,506		169,964,679		140,576,584
Weighted average shares outstanding	465,929,638			269,778,932		188,384,506		157,986,561		111,753,433

Total assets	$	53,697		41,882		32,729		27,050		18,716

Net assets (liabilities)	$	52,728		41,700		32,480		26,753		18,680

Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0		0		0		0		0
Exchange rates (CAD$ to U.S.$) period average	$	1.2980		1.2785		1.2785		1.1046		1.0298

Exchange rates (CAD$ to U.S.$) for most recent six months	Period High		Period Low
October 2017	$	0.8018	0.7756
November 2017	$	0.7885	0.7759
December 2017	$	0.7971	0.7760
January 2017	$	0.8135	0.7978
February 2018	$	0.8138	0.7807
March 2018	$	0.7794	0.7641
Exchange rate (CAD$ to U.S.$) April 24, 2018	$	0.7805	0.7775

B. Not required

C. Not required

D. Risk factors.

The business of the Company entails significant risks, and an investment in the securities of the Company should be considered highly speculative. An investment in the securities of the Company should only be undertaken by persons who have sufficient financial resources to enable them to assume such risks. The following is a general description of all material risks, which can adversely affect the business and in turn the financial results, ultimately affecting the value of an investment the Company.

The Company has no viable commercial business.

Having no viable business it is difficult to determine a price for the common shares. That price must therefore be dependent on the value that each individual buyer and seller place on the future prospects of the company, rather than any objective measurement. This is a very risk position for shareholders, as the majority perception may turn negative and price decline severely.

The Company has limited funds.

Funds are the fuel needed to drive the company. Should current funds be consumed, and the company not be able to attract more capital, prospects for shareholders would become extremely negative, and shareholder losses will inevitably occur.

There is no assurance that the Company can access additional capital.

The company will need to demonstrate performance in order to attract additional capital. As the mineral exploration business has a high element of chance associated with it, it is possible that none of the current properties will have any value. The capital markets could perceive this to be a demonstration of poor performance, and be unwilling to provide additional funds. Should this happen, shareholders will incur significant losses.

There is no assurance that the transactions disclosed herein will be successful in its quest to find a commercially viable quantity of mineral resources.

Unless the Company is able to secure other more viable projects, providing better future prospects, buyer interest for common shares will decline severely, resulting in lower prices and significant shareholder losses.

There is no assurance that other prospective mineral properties or other assets can be acquired, and if acquired that the necessary additional capital can be attracted.

Either of these is possible. Either occurring will have the same inevitable outcome. Demand for the common shares will decline severely, resulting in a drop in trading price, and significant shareholder losses.

The Company has a history of operating losses and may have operating losses and a negative cash flow in the future.

This will mean that additional shares will need to be sold to fund operations. Without a concurrent improvement in future prospects, this will result in supply of stock exceeding demand, and much lower prices. This will cause shareholders to lose money.

The Company’s auditors have indicated that U.S. reporting standards would require them to raise a concern about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Additional capital will need to be raised. This could result in the perception of lowered future prospects, lower demand for the Company’s common share, lower stock prices, and shareholder losses.

There can be no assurance that a liquid market will develop for the Company’s shares and therefore no assurance that shareholders will be able to sell their shares. Lack of liquidity that prevents shareholders from selling, or limits their abilities to sell, will all too likely lead to significant losses for shareholders.

Management has little expertise in mining, which may ultimately cause shareholders to lose money.

Management may waste the Company’s limited capital on worthless properties, or it may do the wrong things with properties that could have value. Either way, the outcome will be the same. Money will have been wasted without any corresponding creation of value. This will cause shareholders to lose patience and lose interest. This could lead to significantly increased selling of shares, driving down the price, and leading to losses for investors.

The Company’s common stock is thinly traded so it is more susceptible to extreme rises or declines in price, and you may not be able to sell your shares at or above the price paid.

You may have difficulty reselling shares of our common stock, either at or above the price paid, or even at fair market value. The stock market often experiences significant price and volume changes that are not related to the operating performance of individual companies, and because our common stock is thinly traded it is particularly susceptible to such changes. These broad market changes may cause the market price of our common shares to decline, regardless of how well the company performs. This may be exaggerated by the fact that the shares trade on the over-the-counter bulletin board (“OTCBB”), which is owned and operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). Trading on the OTCBB is often extremely sporadic, and subject to manipulation by market-makers, and short sellers. This may cause you to lose money as you may have difficulty selling the shares that you own.

The Company’s common stock is subject to the “penny stock” regulations, which are likely to make it more difficult to sell.

A “penny stock” is generally a stock trading under $5.00 per share, and not registered on a national securities exchange or quoted on the NASDAQ national market. The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. These rules, intended to protect investors, generally have the result of reducing trading in such stocks, restricting the pool of potential investors, and making it more difficult for investors to sell their shares once acquired. Since our common shares are subject to the “penny stock” rules, you may find it more difficult to sell your shares.

As a foreign issuer, the Company is exempt from certain informational requirements of the Exchange Act to which domestic issuers are subject.

As a foreign issuer we are not required to comply with all of the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. As a result, there may be less information concerning our company publicly available than if we were a domestic United States issuer. In addition, our officers, directors, and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short profit provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and the rules promulgated thereunder. Therefore, our shareholders may not know on a timely basis when our officers, directors, and principal shareholders purchase or sell shares of our common stock.

As a Canadian company with most assets and key personnel located outside the United States, you may have difficulty in acquiring United States jurisdiction, or enforcing a United States judgment against us, our key personnel, or assets.

As a Canadian company many of our assets and key personnel, including directors and officers, reside outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to effect service of process within the United States upon us or any of our key personnel or to enforce against us or any of our key personnel judgments obtained in United States’ courts, including judgments relating to United States federal securities laws. Canadian courts may not permit you to bring an original action in Canada, or recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of federal securities laws of the United States, or of any state thereof. Furthermore, because many of our assets are located in Canada, it would be extremely difficult to access these assets to satisfy any award entered against us in a United States court. Accordingly, you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the face of actions taken by our management, members of our board of directors, or our controlling shareholders than you would otherwise as shareholders of a United States public company.

The Company does not intend to pay any common stock dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid a dividend on our common stock, and, because we have very limited resources, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. It is unlikely that the holders of our common shares will have an opportunity to profit from anything other than potential appreciation in the value of our common shares. If you require dividend income, you should not rely in an investment in our common shares to provide it.

Future issuances of common stock may depress stock prices and dilute your interest.

We may issue additional shares of our common stock in future financings, or grant stock options to our employees, officers, directors, and consultants under our stock incentive plan. Any such issuances could have the effect of depressing the market price of our common stock, and, in any case, would dilute the percentage ownership interests in our company of our shareholders. In addition we could issue securities having rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common shares. This could depress the value of our common shares.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. History and development of the Company.

North American Nickel Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, by filing of Memorandum and Articles of Association on September 20, 1983, under the name Rainbow Resources Ltd. The company’s name was changed to Widescope Resources Ltd. on May 1, 1984, and to Gemini Technology Inc. on September 17, 1985. In conjunction with a reverse split of its common shares on a five-old for one-new basis, the Company adopted the name International Gemini Technology Inc., effective September 23, 1993. The Company’s name was changed to Widescope Resources Inc., effective July 12, 2006. Effective April 19, 2010, the Company’s shareholders approved a special resolution to reorganize the Company’s capital structure by consolidating in a reverse stock split the existing common shares on the basis of every 2 old shares being equal to 1 new share and concurrently increasing the authorized capital of the Company from 100,000,000 common shares without par value to an unlimited number of common shares without par value. Also effective this date, the Company’s name was changed to North American Nickel Inc. to reflect its new focus. All references to common shares, stock options, warrants and weighted average number of shares outstanding in this discussion and the accompanying consolidated financial statements retroactively reflect the share consolidation unless otherwise noted.

In April 2010, the Company initiated a series of actions to realign its focus into the field of nickel exploration in the prolific nickel belts around Sudbury, Ontario and Thompson, Manitoba. Concurrently, the directors of the Company appointed new senior management to oversee the daily operations of the Company.

On May 3, 2011, the Company’s listing application was conditionally accepted by the TSX-V Venture Exchange. On May 30, 2011, the common shares of the Company began trading under the symbol “NAN”.

On August 15, 2011, the Company was granted an exploration license by the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights over an area totalling 4,841 square kilometres located near Sulussugut, Greenland.

On March 4, 2012, the Company was granted an additional exploration license by the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights over an area covering a total of 142 square kilometres license and located near Ininngui, Greenland.

On January 19, 2015, the Company signed an exclusivity agreement with Minelco AS (“Minelco”) to acquire the deep water Seqi Port (the “Port”). A report was prepared summarizing environmental due diligence and preliminary assessment of reindeer by Golder Associates — INUPLAN in and around the Port and upon further review, the decided to not pursue the Seqi Port assignment.

On March 29, 2017, the Company announced the grant of a watershed prospecting licence for the assessment and development of potential hydropower resources on its wholly-owned Maniitsoq nickel sulphide project in southwest Greenland. The Company intends to assess the watershed as a potential source of power for its Maniitsoq project consistent with the emphasis by the Greenland Government on securing environmentally friendly energy sources for any industrial development, including mining.

On July 13, 2017, the Company announced that it has finalized the details for the acquisition of a watershed (“0.6H”) prospecting licence that overlaps the eastern boundary of its 100% owned Maniitsoq nickel sulphide project in southwest Greenland.

On March 1, 2018, the Company announced that it had received the final Hydropower Feasibility Assessment Study within watershed 06.H located on the eastern flank of the Company’s 100% owned Maniitsoq nickel sulphide project in Southwest Greenland.

On April 5, 2018, the Company acquired new properties, Ikertoq, mineral licence No. 2018/31 and Carbonatite, mineral licence No. 2018/21 located on the Company’s 100% owned Maniitsoq nickel sulphide project in Southwest Greenland.

B. Business overview

In conjunction with the April 2010 refocusing of the Company on nickel exploration, as of April 23, 2010 the Company entered into an agreement with an independent third party that resulted in divesting its interest in Outback Capital Inc., and its remaining interest in the Rice Lake properties. The sale was completed as of May 31, 2010, and the proceeds from the sale were $53.

In conducting its business operations, the Company is not dependent on any patented or license processes, technology, industrial, commercial or financial contract or new manufacturing processes.

With the dramatic and possibly unprecedented contraction of global financial markets experienced in 2008, a tidal wave of qualified people became available. Suddenly, capital became unavailable. Exploration companies everywhere reduced overhead.

Access to capital eased marginally toward the latter part of 2009 and beyond. More capital became available, and enthusiasm for mining projects increased at much the same time. The latter, because of expectations of increased inflation, brought increased demand for precious metals and because of the expectation of an increasing demand for base metals from Asia.

To focus on the expected increased demand for base metals, the Company entered into agreements to acquire rights to four properties in the Sudbury Ontario nickel belt, and one agreement to acquire 100% ownership of another property in the area of the Thompson Manitoba nickel belt. As part of this change in focus, the Company entered into an arm’s length agreement to divest its interest in Outback Capital Inc., and through this, its interest in the Pine Falls Manitoba gold properties.

Concurrent with the refocusing of the Company in April 2010, the Company arranged two non-brokered private placements to finance working capital and the first exploration work at Post Creek and Bell Lake in the Sudbury nickel belt. It also attracted four new directors, each with significant experience in mineral exploration, to replace three previous directors, and add one additional director.

Effective August 15, 2011, the Company was granted an exploration license (the “Sulussugut License”) by the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum (“BMP”) of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights of an area located near Sulussugut, Greenland. The Company paid a license fee of $6 (Danish Krones (“DKK”) 31) upon granting of the Sulussugut License. The Sulussugut License was valid for 5 years until December 31, 2015, with December 31, 2011 being the first year providing the Company meets the terms of the license, which includes that specified eligible exploration expenditures must be made. The application for another 5 year term on the Sulussugut License was submitted to the Greenland Mineral Licence & Safety Authority (MLSA) which was effective on April 11, 2016, with December 31, 2017 being the seventh year.

On the first 5 year license, the Company completed the exploration requirements of an estimated minimum of DKK 83,809 (approximately $15,808) between the years ended December 31, 2011 to 2015 by incurring $26,111 on the Sulussugut License. The accumulated exploration credits held at the end to December 31, 2015, of DKK 100,304 can be carried forward until 2019. Under the terms of the second license period, the Company had no minimum required exploration for the year ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has spent $44,937 on exploration costs for the Sulussugut License.

To December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has completed all obligations with respect to required reduction of the area of the license.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had approved exploration expenditures of DKK 85,094 (approximately $16,746) which results in the total carried credits for the Sulussugut License at DKK 246,507 (approximately $48,513).

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company spent a total of $11,079 in exploration and license related expenditures on the Sulussugut License.

Effective March 4, 2012, the Company was granted an additional exploration license (the “Ininngui License”) by the BMP of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights over an area covering a total of 142 square kilometres. The license is located near Ininngui, Greenland. The Company paid a license fee of DKK 32 upon granting of the Ininngui License. The Ininngui License is valid for 5 years until December 31, 2016, with December 31, 2012 being the first year. The Ininngui License is contiguous with the Sulussugut License.

On the first 5 year license, the Company completed the exploration requirements of an estimated minimum of DKK 8,697 (approximately $1,635) between the years ended December 31, 2012 to 2016 by incurring $2,722 on the Ininngui License. To December 31, 2016, the Company’s expenditures exceeded the minimum requirement and the Company has a surplus of DKK 15,677 (approximately $3,044) and the Company was granted a credit for the excess, which may be used towards future expense requirements on the Ininngui License until the following years; year 2018 - DKK 2,276, year 2019 - DKK 6,790 and year 2020 - DKK 9,367, should the Company be granted an extension on the exploration license.

The required minimum exploration expenditures on the Ininngui License for year 5, ending December 31, 2016 was DKK 2,715 (approximately $535). As of December 31, 2017, the Company has spent $3,698 on exploration costs for the Ininngui License.

The Company may terminate the licenses at any time; however any unfulfilled obligations according to the license will remain in force, regardless of the termination.

In April, 2013 the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of 41,494,692 units at a price of $0.17 per unit for aggregate proceeds of $7,054.

On May 29, 2014, the Company closed a private placement of 28,424,152 shares at a price of $0.33 per share for proceeds of $9,380.

On July 20, 2015, the Company closed a private placement of 29,054,079 units at a price of $0.22 per unit for proceeds of $6,392.

On January 4, 2016, the Company made and entered into a 10 year Metallic Minerals Lease with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for an area covering approximately 320 acres. Under the terms of the lease, an annual rental fee will be required at a rate of US $3.00 per acre per lease for years 1-5 and US $6.00 per acre per lease year for the years 6-10. A minimum royalty of US $10 per acre is due for the eleventh year of the lease and increases by $US 5 per acre through to the twentieth year. For the twentieth year of the lease and thereafter for the life of the lease, the minimum royalty is US $55 per acre per year.

On April 28, 2016 the Company issued to Sentient Executive GP IV Limited 952,380 common shares for a fee on the advance of the loan. The shares were booked at a fair value of $95.

On April 22, 2016, the Company entered into a term loan with Sentient Executive GP IV Limited (“Sentient”) and received an advance of $4,500. The loan is due on April 30, 2017 and has been made on an interest free basis. Sentient is to be paid 952,380 common shares, which is the equivalent value of 2.2% of the principal amount of the loan, as a fee for advancing the loan. The fee was booked at a fair value of $95. The loan is subject to early pre-payment in the event that, during the term of the loan, the Company completes a private placement of gross proceeds of $2,000 or more. On July 21, 2016, the Company closed its market offering of units of the Company for total gross proceeds of $6,950 and on September 12, 2016, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement for gross proceeds of $5,050 which being the maximum offering amount raised, Sentient was repaid the full loan of $4.5 million.

On July 21, 2016 the Company issued 92,668,908 units at a price of $0.075 per unit in a market offering for gross proceeds of $6,950. The Company reported $458 in issuance costs against the raised funds.

On July 21, 2016 the Company issued 1,203,695 warrants at a price of $0.075 per unit for an agent fee to Paradigm as per the Company’s amended and restated short form prospectus.

On September 12, 2016 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement and issued 67,331,093 units at a price of $0.075 per unit for gross proceeds of $5,050.

On August 15, 2017 the Company closed a non-brokered private placement and issued 40,982,448 units at a price of $0.075 per unit for gross proceeds of $3,074.

On June 8, 2017 the Company closed a brokered placement through a prospectus and issued 145,030,833 units at a price of $0.075 per unit for gross proceeds of $10,877. The Company also issued 1,965,093 warrants at a price of $0.075 per unit for an agent fee to Paradigm as per the Company’s prospectus.

Organizational structure.

The Company is part of no other group. During the year ended June 30, 2006 Outback Capital Inc. dba Pinefalls Gold (“PFG”) a private Alberta corporation became a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company. PFG was incorporated under the Alberta Business Corporations Act on February 6, 2001. Effective May 31, 2010, the Company completed an agreement with an arm’s length entity that resulted in it divesting of its interest in Outback Capital Inc. In June 2015 the Company incorporated North American Nickel (US) Inc. to hold a mineral lease in Michigan, which was granted in January 2016.

C. Property, plants and equipment.

The Company has a large land package in southwest Greenland, collectively known at the Maniitsoq property. In addition, the Company has two properties, Post Creek and Halcyon, in Sudbury nickel district of Ontario and a small property, Section 35, in the Mid-Continental Rift setting of Michigan. A figure showing the locations of all of the company’s properties is displayed below.

Maniitsoq (Greenland Mineral Exploration Licenses 2011/54 and 2012/28)

The Greenland properties currently being explored for nickel-copper-copper-PGM sulphides by North American Nickel are exploration properties without mineral resources or reserves. The Maniitsoq project is centered 100 kilometres north of Nuuk, the capital of Greenland which is a safe, stable, mining-friendly jurisdiction. The centre of the project is located at 65 degrees 18 minutes north and 51 degrees 43 minutes west and has an artic climate. It is accessible year-round either by helicopter or by boat from Nuuk or Maniitsoq, the latter located on the coast approximately 15 kilometres to the west. The deepwater coastline adjacent to Maniitsoq is typical of Greenland’s southwest coast which is free of pack ice with a year-round shipping season. The optimum shipping conditions are due to the Irminger current, a tributary of the warming Gulf Stream flowing continuously past the south west coastline of Greenland. There is no infrastructure on the property; however, the Seqi deepwater pier and a quantified watershed for hydropower are located peripheral to the project. A location map for the property is given below.

The Maniitsoq property consists of four exploration licences, No. 2011/54 (2,689 km2), No. 2012/28 (296 km2), No. 2018/21 (63 km2) and No 2018/31 (33 km2). The property is centered on the 75 kilometre by 15 kilometre Greenland Norite Belt which hosts numerous high-grade nickel-copper sulphide occurrences associated with mafic and ultramafic intrusions.

Between 1995 and 2011, various companies carried out exploration over portions of the project area. The most extensive work was carried out by Kryolitselskabet Øresund A/S Company (KØ) who explored the project area from 1959 to 1973. KØ discovered a number of surface and near surface nickel-copper sulphide occurrences and this work was instrumental in proving the nickel prospectivity of the Greenland Norite Belt.

The Company acquired the Maniitsoq project because it believed that modern, time-domain, helicopter-borne electromagnetic (EM) systems would be more effective at detecting nickel sulphide deposits in the rugged terrain of Maniitsoq than previous, older airborne fixed wing geophysical surveys available to previous explorers. In addition, modern, time domain surface and borehole EM systems could be used to target mineralization in the sub-surface.

Effective August 15, 2011, the Company was granted an exploration license, No. 2011/54(the “Sulussugut License”), by the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum (“BMP”) of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights of an area located near Sulussugut, Greenland. The Company paid a license fee of $6 (Danish Krones (“DKK”) 31) upon granting of the Sulussugut License. The Sulussugut License was valid for 5 years until December 31, 2015, with December 31, 2011 being the first year providing the Company meets the terms of the license, which includes that specified eligible exploration expenditures must be made. The application for another 5 year term on the Sulussugut License was submitted to the Greenland Mineral Licence & Safety Authority (MLSA) which was effective on April 11, 2016, with December 31, 2017 being the seventh year.

Under the terms of the Sulussugut License the Company was obligated to reduce the area of the license by at least 30% (1,452 square kilometres) by December 31, 2013. The Company completed this prior to year-end 2013

The Greenland MLSA for the years 2017 and 2016 has adjusted the minimum required exploration expenditures to zero. The accumulated exploration credits held at the end of 2017, DKK 246,507 (approximately $48,513) can be carried forward until 2020 DKK 85,094, until 2019 DKK 61,109 and until 2018 DKK 59,150. There will be an annual licence fee on the Sulussugut License for year 7 and forward of approximately DKK 41. Details of required work expenditures and accrued work credits are tabulated and given below.

Sulussugut License — 2011/54 (All amounts in table are expressed in thousands of DKK)

Exploration Commitment		2012		2013		2014		2015		2016	2017
Fixed amount		149		310		313		317		—	650
4841 km2 of DKK 1.460 per km2
4841 km2 of DKK 1.490 per km2		7,213
3336 km2 of DKK 7.760 per km2				25,887
2689 km2 of DKK 7.830 per km2						21,055		—		—
2689 km2 of DKK 7.940 per km2								21,351		—
2689 km2 of DKK 16.260 per km2											43,723

Exploration obligation		7,362		26,197		21,368		21,668		—	44,374
Approved exploration expenditures		23,616		37,349		55,509		59,150		61,109	85,094
Exploration obligation		(7,362	)	(26,198	)	(21,368	)	(21,668	)	—	—
Credit from previous year		1,276		17,530		28,681		62,822		100,304	161,413

Total Credit	DDK	17,530		28,681		62,822		100,304		161,413	246,507

Average Annual Rate DDK to CAD		0.1726		0.1834		0.1968		0.1901		0.1969	0.1968

The accumulated exploration credits held at the end of 2017, DKK 246,507 (approximately $48,513) can be carried forward as follows:

Carry forward period:

a) DKK 59,150 from 2015 until December 31, 2018

b) DKK 61,109 from 2016 until December 31, 2019

c) DKK 85,094 from 2017 until December 31, 2020

In 2016, there was no exploration commitment. The Company completed approved expenditures for 2017 DKK 85,094, for 2016, DKK 61,109 (approximately, $16,746 and $12,032, respectively). With a credit from 2015 of DKK 59,150 (approximately $11,250) and credit from 2016 of DKK 61,109 (approximately $12,032), and a commitment of $nil left the Company with excess credits of DKK 246,507 (approximately $48,513). The Sulussugut License area was not reduced in 2017.

Effective March 4, 2012, the Company was granted an additional exploration license, No. 2012/28 (the “Ininngui License”), by the BMP of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights over an area covering a total of 142 square kilometres near Ininngui, Greenland. The Ininngui License is contiguous with the Sulussugut License. The Company paid a license fee of DKK 32 upon granting of the Ininngui License. The Ininngui License was valid for 5 years until December 31, 2016, with December 31, 2012 being the first year. The application for another 5 year term on the Ininngui License was submitted to the Greenland Mineral Licence & Safety Authority (MLSA) which was effective March 3, 2017, with December 31, 2017 being the sixth year.

Details of required work expenditures and accrued work credits are tabulated and given below.

Ininngui License - 2012/28 (All amounts in table are expressed in thousands of DKK)

Exploration Commitment		2012		2013		2014		2015		2016		2017
Fixed amount		149		155		313		318		323		—
142 km2 of DKK 1.490 per km2		211
265 km2 of DKK 1.550 per km2				411
265 km2 of DKK 7.830 per km2						2,075
296 km2 of DKK 7.940 per km2								2,350
296 km2 of DKK 8.080 per km2										2,392
296 km2 of DKK 8.080 per km2												—

Exploration obligation		360		566		2,388		2,668		2,715		—
Total Credits Available
Approved exploration expenditures		2,872		2,966		5,470		6,276		6,790		9,367
Exploration obligation		(360	)	(576	)	(2,388	)	(2,668	)	(2,715	)	—
Credit from previous year		—		2,512		4,902		7,984		11,592		15,667

Total Credit	DDK	2,512		4,902		7,984		11,592		15,667		25,044

Average Annual Rate DDK to CAD		0.1726		0.1834		0.1968		0.1901		0.1969		0.1968

Carry forward period:

a) DKK 6,276 from 2015 until December 31, 2018

b) DKK 6,790 from 2016 until December 31, 2019

c) DKK 9,367 from 2017 until December 31, 2020

In 2016 (year 5 of the Ininngui License), there was an exploration commitment of DKK 2,715 (approximately $535). The Company completed approved expenditures for 2016 of DKK 6,790 (approximately $1,337). With a credit from 2015 of DKK 2,276 and 2016 of DKK 6,790 (approximately $433 and $1,337, respectively) and a commitment of DKK Nil for 2017, resulting in excess credits of DKK 25,044 (approximately $4,929). The Ininngui License area was not reduced in 2017.

The required minimum exploration expenditures on the Ininngui License for year 5, ending December 31, 2016 was based on an annual approximation of DKK 2,715 (approximately CDN $535).

For both licenses, future required minimum eligible exploration expenses will be adjusted each year on the basis of the change to the Danish Consumer Price Index.

Should the Company not incur the minimum eligible exploration expenses on either license in any one year from years 2-5, the Company may pay 50% of the difference in cash to BMP as full compensation for that year. This procedure may not be used for more than 2 consecutive calendar years and to December 31, 2012, the Company has not used the procedure for either license.

The Company may terminate the licenses at any time; however any unfulfilled obligations according to the licenses will remain in force, regardless of the termination.

For both licenses, at the expiration of the second licence period (years 6-10), the Company may apply for a new 3-year licence for years 11 to 13. Thereafter, the Company may apply for additional 3-year licences for years 14 to 16, 17 to 19 and 20 to 22. The Company will be required to pay additional license fees and will be obligated to incur minimum eligible exploration expenses for such years.

The Company may terminate the licenses at any time; however any unfulfilled obligations according to the licenses will remain in force, regardless of the termination.

In conjunction with the granting of the Sulussugut License, on August 12, 2011, the Company entered into an arm’s length Intellectual Property and Data Acquisition Agreement (the “IP Acquisition Agreement”) with Hunter Minerals Pty Limited (“Hunter”) and Spar Resources Pty Limited (“Spar”). Pursuant to the IP Acquisition Agreement, Hunter and Spar agreed to sell the IP Rights to the Company in consideration for the Company paying $300 in cash ($150 to each of Hunter and Spar which is paid) and the issuing of 12,960,000 share purchase warrants, 6,480,000 to each of Hunter and Spar exercisable for a period of five years expiring on August 30, 2016. The warrants were exercisable at the following prices, 4,750,000 of the warrants are at a price of $0.50 per share, 4,750,000 of the warrants are at a price of $0.70 per share and 3,460,000 of the warrants are at a price of $1.00 per share. The warrants were subject to an accelerated exercise provision in the event the Company relinquished its interests in the Maniitsoq Licenses or any other mineral titles held within a defined area of interest without receiving consideration for such relinquishment. The granted warrants were recorded at a fair value of $1,813 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. As of August 30, 2016 the warrants expired unexercised and the Company has reversed the fair value of $1,813 to deficit. The Company also granted to each of Hunter and Spar or their designates a 1.25% net smelter returns royalty, subject to rights of the Company to reduce both royalties to a 0.5% net smelter returns royalty upon payment to each of Hunter and Spar (or their designates) of $1,000 on or

before the 60th day following a decision to commence commercial production on the mineral properties. On August 30, 2011 the Company issued 200,000 common shares at $0.14 per share for a value of $28 as a finder’s fee on the Greenland project.

A NI 43-101 compliant Technical Report and updated 43-101 compliant Technical Report, both completed by J. F. Ravenelle and L. Weiershäuser, were completed in March 2016 and March 2017, respectively. Both reports were filed on SEDAR.

During the period 2011 to 2017, the Company has carried out extensive exploration drilling programs on the Maniitsoq property to search for Ni-Cu-Co-PGM sulphide deposits. Cumulative exploration expenditures totaled C$48.6 million as of December 31, 2017.

In 2017, the Company implemented an $11.1M exploration program consisting of 8,767 metres of diamond drilling in 23 holes, two regional and four detailed induced polarisation (IP) surveys covering 13km2, surface and borehole electromagnetic (EM) surveys, borehole gyro, optical televiewer and physical properties surveys, a comprehensive review of geochemistry and petrology of the noritic intrusions, a surface geology sampling and mapping program, and 3D modeling of the mineral zones.

The Company’s exploration efforts have been focused on defining in three dimensions the extent of nickel sulphide mineralization and attaining a greater understanding of the geological environment hosting the high grade nickel mineralization. This work has been successful and resulted in the following:

The Company continued its systematic evaluation of the depth extent of known mineral zones to identify thicker and more extensive sheets of breccia-style mineralization. This work continues to advance the understanding of the host intrusions and refine geophysical targeting tools. The result has been the intersection of significant nickel-copper sulphide mineralization at multiple locations.

The Mikissoq zone was extended by 60 meters down plunge; the P-013 SE mineral zone was extended for 140m down-plunge and the P-058 zone at Fossilik was extended to a vertical depth of 650 m. Extensive zones of melanorite were mapped in the footprint of the mineral zones of the Imiak Hill Complex (IHC) as well as Fossilik.

Petrological and geochemical studies of the differentiated mafic intrusions underscores the importance of melanorite as a host to high grade semi-massive breccia style nickel-copper sulphides enveloped in a halo of lower grade mineralization.

Interpretation of IP and gravity data coupled with petrology and geochemistry highlights the potential for the known mineral zones to expand in width within the adjacent melanorite intrusions.

The figure and table below, respectively, show the location of significant mineralized targets and drill intersections on the property.

Location of Significant Mineralized Targets:

Summary of

Drilling Assay Highlights

Target	Drillhole	Zone	From (m)	To (m)	Core Length (m)	True Width (m)	Ni %	Cu %	Co %	Pt+Pd+Au g/t
Imiak Hill Complex
Imiak Hill	MQ-12-001		56.10	59.94	3.84	2.07	1.19	0.14	0.04	0.01
	MQ-12-002		55.90	70.08	14.18	7.14	1.33	0.38	0.04	0.01
	MQ-13-024		135.70	150.90	15.20	8.80	2.62	0.43	0.09	0.02
	Incl.		136.75	141.98	5.23	3.02	5.03	0.30	0.16	0.03
	MQ-13-026		156.70	175.32	18.62	12.35	4.31	0.62	0.14	0.02
	MQ-13-028		182.09	206.84	24.75	13.65	3.19	1.14	0.11	0.01
	MQ-14-037		220.51	231.54	11.03	6.65	3.07	0.53	0.08	0.02
	Incl.		220.51	223.76	3.25	1.96	6.48	0.29	0.17	0.02
	MQ-14-072		173.75	190.10	16.35	7.92	2.51	0.77	0.08	0.02
	Incl.		179.90	186.25	6.35	3.08	3.14	1.05	0.10	0.02
Spotty Hill	MQ-12-005		63.00	157.00	94.00	28.69	0.94	0.24	0.03	0.30
	Incl.		113.00	136.87	23.87	6.83	1.70	0.42	0.05	0.52
	MQ-14-009		79.00	96.50	17.50	6.43	0.27	0.06	0.01	0.08
	MQ-14-052		55.70	64.00	8.30	3.81	0.25	0.06	0.01	0.08
	MQ-14-058		167.32	202.05	34.73	18.73	0.53	0.17	0.02	0.18
	MQ-14-062		45.20	72.12	26.92	11.08	1.16	0.28	0.04	0.41
	Incl.		62.65	71.20	8.55	3.39	2.98	0.59	0.10	0.86
	MQ-14-065		50.00	111.29	61.29	20.54	0.66	0.17	0.02	0.25
	Incl.		79.50	90.10	10.60	3.38	1.69	0.34	0.05	0.50
	MQ-15-075		236.45	255.70	19.25	8.03	0.92	0.21	0.03	0.28
	Incl.		236.45	252.00	15.55	6.73	1.06	0.24	0.04	0.31
	MQ-16-121		382.25	387.00	4.75	2.84	1.59	0.30	0.04	0.66
	MQ-17-143		381.00	388.80	7.80		1.35	0.26	0.04	1.85
	Incl		381.00	386.00	5.00		1.69	0.33	0.05	2.71
	Incl		381.00	382.00	1.00		1.62	0.93	0.04	10.71
Mikissoq	MQ-13-027	HW	33.84	58.82	24.98	20.02	0.71	0.31	0.02	0.06
		Central	66.99	70.09	3.10	2.48	0.53	0.18	0.02	0.02
		FW	88.25	96.00	7.75	6.21	0.76	0.28	0.02	0.07
	MQ-13-029	HW	45.00	71.22	26.22	18.02	0.48	0.22	0.02	0.04
		Central	82.01	103.51	21.50	14.90	0.68	0.48	0.02	0.05
		FW	103.51	113.50	9.99	6.96	4.65	0.33	0.12	0.14
	MQ-14-073	HW	57.75	77.58	19.83	12.65	0.76	0.26	0.02	0.04
		Central	88.50	101.40	12.90	8.27	0.83	0.24	0.02	0.05

Target	Drillhole	Zone	From (m)	To (m)	Core Length (m)	True Width (m)	Ni %	Cu %	Co %	Pt+Pd+Au g/t
		FW	112.54	117.34	4.80	3.10	2.10	0.27	0.05	0.04
	MQ-16-113	New	233.75	287.00	53.25	32.36	0.81	0.36	0.02	0.05
	Incl.		233.75	238.90	5.15	3.12	2.56	0.38	0.05	0.12
	And		256.00	261.00	5.00	3.04	1.10	0.57	0.03	0.10
	And		275.85	279.65	3.80	2.32	1.87	0.28	0.05	0.06
	MQ-16-117	New	268.70	342.75	74.05	37.59	1.08	0.54	0.03	0.11
	Incl.		285.70	291.00	5.30	2.67	2.10	0.44	0.04	0.08
	And		309.25	322.90	13.65	6.96	1.84	0.64	0.05	0.10
	And		329.85	335.40	5.55	2.84	1.26	0.45	0.03	0.39
	MQ-16-118	New	322.00	369.00	47.00	21.40	0.51	0.25	0.01	0.15
	Incl.		323.00	338.00	15.00	6.80	1.03	0.32	0.02	0.17
	MQ-17-135		359.85	435.60	75.75		1.10	0.43	0.03	0.12
	Incl		359.85	370.10	10.25		2.29	1.33	0.05	0.27
	Incl		416.35	435.60	19.25		1.89	0.26	0.04	0.07
	Incl		417.00	423.00	6.00		2.94	0.29	0.07	0.05
	Incl		425.90	426.20	0.30		9.55	0.80	0.24	0.61
Fossilik Area
P-058	MQ-12-007		78.24	82.31	4.07	2.03	0.30	0.13	0.01	0.02
	MQ-14-054		70.60	76.18	5.58	3.01	1.72	0.26	0.04	0.08
	Incl.		70.60	71.22	0.62	0.33	6.18	0.56	0.16	0.08
	And		73.65	74.46	0.81	0.44	5.23	0.07	0.11	0.35
	MQ-14-059		22.26	24.00	1.74	0.44	2.54	2.75	0.07	0.09
	Incl.		23.55	24.00	0.45	0.11	4.19	7.73	0.12	0.10
	MQ-15-077		149.00	170.50	21.50	7.04	0.55	0.27	0.02	0.08
	MQ-16-105		323.55	333.75	10.20	4.43	3.41	0.28	0.10	0.13
	Incl.		324.20	328.30	4.10	1.78	4.85	0.29	0.14	0.13
	And		330.90	331.85	0.95	0.41	6.31	0.12	0.18	0.07
	MQ-16-111		392.09	395.15	3.06	1.04	3.93	0.25	0.10	0.09
	MQ-17-146		408.30	410.20	1.90		2.51	0.15	0.08	0.03
	Incl		408.30	408.90	0.60		4.70	0.40	0.18	0.06
	Incl		409.80	410.20	0.40		4.73	0.07	0.12	0.06
			451.50	462.20	10.70		2.53	1.26	0.07	0.11
	Incl		452.50	456.00	3.50		4.97	2.30	0.13	0.20
	Incl		458.00	460.20	2.20		3.35	1.31	0.10	0.16
P-059	MQ-15-078		79.25	91.40	12.15	NC	1.16	1.00	0.03	0.27
P-004	MQ-13-018		40.24	72.43	32.19	NC	0.59	0.18	0.02	0.21
	Incl.		51.75	56.28	4.53	NC	1.06	0.23	0.04	0.33

Target	Drillhole	Zone	From (m)	To (m)	Core Length (m)	True Width (m)	Ni %	Cu %	Co %	Pt+Pd+Au g/t
	MQ-14-051		231.14	235.45	4.31	NC	0.94	0.17	0.03	0.99
P-013 Area
P-013	MQ-14-066		157.00	168.00	11.00	6.68	1.31	0.15	0.04	0.07
	Incl.		158.43	164.28	5.85	3.55	2.07	0.12	0.05	0.07
	MQ-14-068		126.70	142.55	15.85	12.06	0.87	0.27	0.03	0.09
	Incl.		130.85	134.25	3.40	2.59	2.07	0.34	0.06	0.15
	MQ-15-079		185.05	195.70	10.65	2.93	1.03	0.39	0.04	0.06
			200.75	206.00	5.25	1.43	1.15	0.18	0.03	0.07
	MQ-15-094		212.75	224.70	11.95	5.66	0.94	0.44	0.02	0.10
	Incl.		215.10	217.00	1.90	0.90	1.63	0.37	0.05	0.08
	And		220.20	224.70	4.50	2.13	1.23	0.22	0.03	0.08
P-013 SE	MQ-16-109		166.90	205.65	38.75	NC	1.19	0.43	0.03	0.23
	Incl.		166.90	180.25	13.35	NC	2.88	0.80	0.06	0.47
	MQ-17-140		247.35	268.20	20.85	NC	0.65	0.47	0.02	0.38
	Incl		247.35	261.60	14.25	NC	0.75	0.64	0.02	0.52
	Incl		267.00	268.20	1.20	NC	1.65	0.12	0.04	0.19
	MQ-17-142		298.00	303.70	5.70	NC	0.50	0.51	0.02	0.79
			316.91	317.50	0.59	NC	0.72	0.27	0.02	0.30
			431.30	438.45	7.15	NC	0.23	0.09	0.01	0.13
	Incl		431.55	432.45	0.90	NC	0.59	0.29	0.02	0.39
P-030-032-094 Area
P-030	MQ-14-070		40.75	60.85	20.10	NC	0.63	0.20	0.02	0.18
	Incl.		53.30	54.50	1.20	NC	1.86	0.52	0.06	0.49
P-032	MQ-15-090		71.90	85.70	13.80	NC	0.79	0.27	0.02	0.07
	Incl.		71.90	77.00	5.10	NC	1.06	0.37	0.03	0.09
	And		84.20	85.70	1.50	NC	2.47	0.69	0.08	0.23
	MQ-15-100		122.50	130.50	8.00	NC	0.58	0.14	0.02	0.06
	Incl.		125.90	126.90	1.00	NC	1.60	0.34	0.05	0.19
P-094	MQ-16-124		55.00	63.00	8.00	NC	0.54	0.16	0.02	0.07
P-053 Area
P-053	MQ-15-082	HW	93.00	116.70	23.70	16.12	1.98	0.62	0.09	0.19
	Incl.		93.00	104.50	11.50	7.84	1.12	0.91	0.05	0.12
	And		104.50	116.70	12.20	8.28	2.78	0.36	0.13	0.26
	MQ-15-084	HW	196.00	201.60	5.60	4.73	1.03	0.34	0.05	0.12
	Incl.		199.15	201.05	1.90	1.61	1.70	0.20	0.09	0.17
	MQ-16-106	HW	97.45	117.50	20.05	13.95	0.64	0.25	0.03	0.08
	Incl.		110.95	117.50	6.55	4.56	1.14	0.33	0.04	0.12

Target	Drillhole	Zone	From (m)	To (m)	Core Length (m)	True Width (m)	Ni %	Cu %	Co %	Pt+Pd+Au g/t
	And		111.65	113.60	1.95	1.36	2.12	0.42	0.08	0.18
	MQ-16-107	HW	192.70	196.15	3.45	2.30	1.10	0.19	0.04	0.11
	MQ-15-085	FW	229.50	230.85	1.35	1.10	0.98	0.45	0.05	0.14
	MQ-16-104	FW	294.45	295.70	1.25	0.83	2.42	0.09	0.09	0.12
	Incl.		295.20	295.70	0.50	0.33	4.39	0.05	0.15	0.19
P-149 (Pingo) Area
P-149	MQ-14-041		85.35	108.55	23.20	NC	0.36	0.17	0.01	0.15
			107.35	107.85	0.50	NC	3.31	0.61	0.05	0.27
Fossilik	MQ-17-153		201.60	216.70	15.10	NC	0.51	0.13	0.02	0.13
	Incl		208.00	216.00	8.00	NC	0.76	0.18	0.03	0.17
			246.20	246.90	0.70	NC	0.53	0.13	0.03	0.14
			252.00	252.65	0.65	NC	0.65	0.09	0.02	0.11
			388.10	405.20	17.10	NC	0.35	0.10	0.03	0.09

Abbreviations:

Ni = nickel	Cu = copper	Co = cobalt	Pt = platinum	Pd = palladium	Au = gold
g/t = grams/tonne	NC = not calculated

Sudbury nickel properties:

The Sudbury properties currently being explored by North American Nickel are exploration properties without mineral resources or reserves. All properties can be readily accessed by paved and/or all-weather gravel roads and have access to water and diesel-power for exploration purposes. Sudbury is considered a world class nickel district. Multiple Ni-Cu-PGM deposits and past and currently producing mines are associated with the Sudbury Igneous Complex. Global nickel resources have been estimated at 1648 million tonnes at a grade of 1.20% nickel. The Sudbury properties have unique geologic characteristics of the Sudbury Basin. Quart Diorite and Sudbury Breccia, two lithologies that commonly host Sudbury nickel-copper-PGM (platinum group metal) mineralization, have been identified on the Post Creek property. The Sudbury properties are strategically located near the Whistle Offset Dyke structure hosting the past-producing Podolsky Cu-Ni-PGM mine owned by KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. (KGHM). A location map for the properties is given below.

Post Creek: The property is located 35 kilometres east of Sudbury in Norman, Parkin, Alymer and Rathburn townships and consists of 39 unpatented mining claims in two separate blocks, covering a total area of 912 hectares held by the Company. The center of the property occurs at UTM coordinates 513000mE, 5184500mN (WGS84, UTM Zone 17N). The Post Creek property lies adjacent to the Whistle Offset Dyke Structure which hosts the past—producing Whistle Offset and Podolsky Cu-Ni-PGM mines. Post Creek lies along an interpreted northeast extension of the Whistle Offset Dyke trend. Offset Dykes and Footwall deposits account for a significant portion of all ore mined in the Sudbury nickel district and, as such, represent favorable exploration targets. Key lithologies are Quartz Diorite related to Offset Dykes and Sudbury Breccia associated with Footwall deposits.

Previous operators completed geological, geophysical and Mobile Metal Ion soil geochemical surveys. Highlights of this work included:

· A drill intersection returning 0.48% copper, 0.08% nickel, 0.054 grams/tonne palladium, 0.034 grams/tonne platinum and 0.020 grams/tonne gold over a core length of 0.66 metres; and

· A grab sample from broken outcrop which returned 0.83% nickel, 0.74% copper, 0.07% cobalt, 2.24 grams/tonne Pt and 1.05 grams/tonne Pd.

A NI 43-101 compliant Technical Report was completed by Dr. Walter Peredery, formerly of INCO, in 2011 and subsequently accepted by the Securities Commission.

During the period 2011 to 2017, the Company carried out exploration programs comprising ground geophysics (magnetics and electromagnetics), diamond drilling (1,533 metres in 7 drillholes), borehole electromagnetic surveys, georeferencing of selected claim posts, prospecting, trenching, geological mapping, sampling and petrographic studies. This work has identified new occurrences of Quartz Diorite (dyke and Sudbury Breccia, both of which are geologically significant lithologies known to host ore deposits associated with the Sudbury structure. Ground traverses, trenching and mapping carried out in 2016 outlined a Sudbury Breccia belt of at least 300 metres by 300 metres in size which lies along the same trend at the Whistle Offset Dyke located on KGHM property to the southwest. These findings support the potential for the Post Creek property to host both Footwall and Offset Dyke type deposits.

An Option Agreement dated April 5, 2010 and amended on March 12, 2013, was struck between John and Marie Brady and Widescope Resources Inc., now known as North American Nickel Inc. pursuant to a corporate name change dated April 19, 2010. North American Nickel now holds a 100% interest in the property having achieved certain Option Agreement requirements.

As per the Option Agreement Brady will retain a 2.5% NSR. Work commitments on the claims are set out at $400.00 per unit (16 hectares) per year and are due to the Ontario Ministry of Development and Mines. Field work is completed and compiled, along with a statement of expenditures, and filed with the Ontario Ministry of Development and Mines by North American Nickel employees. The required work commitments are submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Development and Mines, on a form supplied by the Ministry. Expenditures, filed in excess of the annual work commitment, are banked and can be used towards future work requirements.

Halcyon: The property is located 35 Km NNE of Sudbury in the Parkin and Alymer townships and consists of 53 unpatented mining claims covering an area of approximately 864 hectares. Halcyon is adjacent to the Post Creek property and is located approximately 2 kilometers north of the Whistle Offset Dyke structure and the past-producing Podolsky mine of KGHM. Previous operators on the property defined numerous conductive zones based on induced polarization (IP) surveys with coincident anomalous soil geochemistry. Base and precious metal mineralization have been found in multiple locations on the property but follow-up work was never done. The former producing Milnet Mine (nickel-copper-cobalt-platinum) is situated 1 kilometre north of the property.

During the period 2011 to 2017, the Company carried out a small amount of exploration including ground geophysics (magnetics and electromagnetics), diamond drilling (301 metres in 1 drillhole), a borehole electromagnetic survey, georeferencing of selected claim posts, prospecting, geological mapping, sampling and petrographic studies. The single hole located on the southeast corner of the property was drilled with the purpose of providing geological information and to provide a platform for bore hole pulse EM (“BHPEM”). No anomalies were detected although quartz diorite breccia and partial melt material with 2-3% disseminated pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite was intersected over short core lengths. The property is strategically located adjacent to the Company’s Post Creek property, located immediately to the south, where new occurrences of both Quartz Diorite and Sudbury Breccia have been identified.

An Option Agreement dated April 5, 2010 and amended on September 27, 2010 and March 12, 2013, was struck between John and Marie Brady and Widescope Resources Inc., now known as North American Nickel Inc. pursuant to a corporate name change dated April 19, 2010. North American Nickel now holds a100% interest in the property having achieved certain Option Agreement requirements.

Section 35 Property —

On January 4, 2016, the Company made and entered into a 10 year Metallic Minerals Lease (the “Lease”) with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for an area covering approximately 320 acres. The terms of the Lease require an annual rental fee at a rate of US $3.00 per acre for years 1-5 and at a rate of US $6.00 per acre for years 6-10. The Company shall pay a minimum royalty at a rate of US $10.00 per acre for the 11th year onwards, with an increase of an additional US $5.00 per acre per year up to a maximum of US $55.00 per acre per year. A production royalty of between 2% - 2.5% is payable from production of minerals and/or mineral products from an established mining operation area. The Company paid the first year rental fee and the required reclamation deposit of $14 (US $10). The Department of Natural Resources shall annually review the level of the reclamation deposit and shall require the amount to be increased or decreased to reflect changes in the cost of future reclamation of the leased premises.

The Section 35 property is strategically located 6 kilometres northwest of the Lundin Mining Corporation’s Eagle Ni-Cu-PGM mine. The property was acquired due to its position over a portion of the North Sill which is an ultramafic intrusion interpreted to be of a similar age and geochemical signature to the intrusion hosting the Eagle Mine. The Company has not yet carried out any exploration on the property.

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included herein (see also “Selected Financial Data”). The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).

Overview

With the acquisition of PFG effective June 30, 2006, the Company’s primary focus shifted to mineral resource exploration operations rather than acquisitions. In April 2010, base metals became the main target commodity. The Company’s management team, affiliates and directors have special expertise in the areas of operations, due diligence, financial analysis and corporate finance strategy with respect to emerging growth enterprises.

A. Operating Results

Historically, the Company has shown losses for the past several years. These losses result largely from having no revenue and significant exploration and administrative expenses related to operations. Prior to the 2006 completion of the PFG acquisition, the expenses of the Company were almost completely related to satisfying regulatory requirements, including the annual meeting, financial reporting, communications with shareholders; and seeking and evaluating acquisition prospects for suitability and ability to attract financing.

The Company will continue in the exploration business. The Company in December 2013 decided not to further pursue the 100% owned Thompson North Property which is part of the Thompson Nickel Belt and will allow the claims to lapse in 2014. The Company will also continue in the exploration on the acquired a large Ni-Cu-PGE land package in Greenland.

As a result of initiatives that were commenced on April 6, 2010, activities shifted from the Bissett area and precious metals, to base metals in and around Sudbury Ontario. As of August 15, 2011, activities also included work on an exploration program on the Sulussugut License in Greenland and as of March 4, 2012, activities also included work on an exploration program on the Ininngui License in Greenland. As of January 4, 2016, the Company entered into a 10 year Metallic Minerals Lease with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for an area covering approximately 320 acres on the Section 35 Property.

Business overview

With the April 2010 entry into base metal exploration the Company is effectively a new company with its first focus on its Sudbury and Greenland properties. The Post Creek property is strategically located adjacent to the producing Podolsky copper-nickel-platinum group metal deposit of FNX Mining. The center of the property occurs at UTM coordinates 510217m E, 5182584m N (NAD83 UTM Zone 17N. The property lies along the extension of the Whistle Offset dike structure, which is a major geological control for Ni-Cu-PGM mineralization. The Company also has rights to explore the Halcyon property in the Sudbury area. The Company also was granted an exploration licence (the “Sulussugut Licence”) by the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum (“BMP”) of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights of an area located near Sulussugut, Greeland and in 2012 the Company applied for and received a mineral exploration licence covering approximately 142 square kilometers contiguous with its original licence (2011/54). The two Greenland licences give the Company the exclusive right to explore for any commodity except for radioactive minerals and hydrocarbons over a 4,983 km2 area on the southwest coast of Greenland centered at 65° 52 ‘ N latitude and 51° 52 ‘ W longitude.

The area contains numerous historical nickel-copper sulphide occurrences associated with mafic-ultramafic intrusions. In 2018 the Company acquired two new properties that comprise the Ikertok project (33 km2) and the Carbonatite project at 63 km2.

Fluctuations in Results

The Company’s annual operating results fluctuate, a little and revenues at this point are not generated. Expenses fluctuate on the basis of costs for exploration and related activities, and the ever increasing administrative and other costs of complying with the various regulatory requirements of a public company. We expect that these regulatory related expenses will continue to increase due to the upward pressure on professional fees charged to reporting companies, resulting from changes to securities legislation throughout North America.

With the April 2010 entry into the arena of base metal exploration the Company expects to report significant additional expenses in the future related to the exploration activities undertaken in the Sudbury area of Ontario, and the Maniitsoq Property in Greenland. Following the sale of Outback Capital Inc., the Company has no further expenses related to exploration in the Bissett area.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since the Company is organized in Canada, the Company’s December 31, 2017 financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS”).

As at December 31, 2017, the Company had accumulated losses totaling $26,550 and a working capital of $2,171. The continuation of the Company is dependent upon the continued financial support of shareholders as well as obtaining additional financing for the current and subsequent resource projects.

As noted, these conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might arise from uncertainty. The auditors’ report includes an explanatory paragraph disclosing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

As at December 31, 2017 the Company had cash of $398, short-term investments of $2,500.

C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.

Not applicable

D. Trend information

The major trends impacting the company and its industry are lack of access to capital, caused by the severe global financial contraction, and the corresponding contraction of demand for most commodities. Only precious metals seem to have continuing and possibly increasing demand.

Impact of Inflation

The Company believes that inflation had minimal effect on costs related to its exploration activities in the 12 months ending December 31, 2017.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable to the Company.

E. Off-balance sheet arrangements

Not applicable

F. Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations

Not applicable

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Basis of preparation and accounting policies

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”).

These financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis and are based on historical costs, modified where applicable. The financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted, which, is the Company’s functional currency.

Significant estimates and assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The Company’s management reviews these estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis, based on experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to estimates are adjusted for prospectively in the period in which the estimates are revised.

Estimates and assumptions where there is significant risk of material adjustments to assets and liabilities in future accounting periods include the useful lives of equipment, the recoverability of the carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets, fair value measurements for financial instruments, the recoverability and measurement of deferred tax assets and provisions for restoration and environmental obligations.

Significant judgments

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make judgments, apart from those involving estimates, in applying accounting policies. The most significant judgments in applying the Company’s financial statements include:

the assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and whether there are events or conditions that may give rise to significant uncertainty;

· the classification / allocation of expenditures as exploration and evaluation expenditures or operating expenses;

· the classification of financial instruments; and

· the determination of the functional currency of the Company.

Foreign currency translation

Foreign currency transactions are translated into functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value are reported at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were determined.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items or on settlement of monetary items are recognized in profit or loss in the statement of comprehensive income in the period in which they arise, except where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of non-monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income in the statement of comprehensive income to the extent that gains and losses arising on those non-monetary items are also recognized in other comprehensive income. Where the non-monetary gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss, the exchange component is also recognized in profit or loss.

Exploration and evaluation assets

Exploration and evaluation assets include the costs of acquiring licenses, costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity, and the fair value (at acquisition date) of exploration and evaluation assets acquired in a business combination. Exploration and evaluation expenditures are initially capitalized. Costs incurred before the Company has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are recognized in profit or loss.

Government tax credits received are recorded as a reduction to the cumulative costs incurred and capitalized on the related property.

Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment if (i) sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, and (ii) facts, events and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.

Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral resources in an area of interest are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets attributable to that area of interest are first tested for impairment and then reclassified to mining property and development assets within equipment.

Recoverability of the carrying amount of any exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.

The Company may occasionally enter into farm-out arrangements, whereby it will transfer part of the interest, as consideration, for an agreement by the farmee to meet certain exploration and evaluation expenditures which would have otherwise been undertaken by the Company. The Company does not record any expenditures made by the farmee on its behalf. Any cash consideration received from the agreement is credited against the costs previously capitalized to the mineral interest given up by the Company, with any excess consideration accounted for in profit.

When a project is deemed to no longer have commercially viable prospects to the Company, exploration and evaluation expenditures in respect of that project are deemed to be impaired. As a result, those exploration and evaluation expenditure costs, in excess of estimated recoveries, are written off to the statement of comprehensive loss/income.

Restoration and environmental obligations

The Company recognizes liabilities for statutory, contractual, constructive or legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-term assets, when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the assets. The net present value of future restoration cost estimates is capitalized to exploration and evaluation assets along with a corresponding increase in the restoration provision in the period incurred. Discount rates using a pre-tax rate that reflect the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value. The restoration asset will be depreciated on the same basis as other mining assets.

These changes are recorded directly to mining assets with a corresponding entry to the restoration provision. The Company’s estimates are reviewed annually for changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates, effects of inflation and changes in estimates.

Changes in the net present value, excluding changes in the Company’s estimates of reclamation costs, are charged to profit and loss for the period.

The net present value of restoration costs arising from subsequent site damage that is incurred on an ongoing basis during production are charged to profit or loss in the period incurred.

The costs of restoration projects included in the provision are recorded against the provision as incurred. The costs to prevent and control environmental impacts at specific properties are capitalized in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation assets.

Impairment of assets

Impairment tests on intangible assets with indefinite useful economic lives are undertaken annually at the financial year-end. Other non-financial assets, including exploration and evaluation assets are subject to impairment tests whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Where the carrying value of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell, the asset is written down accordingly.

Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the impairment test is carried out on the asset’s cash-generating unit, which is the lowest group of assets in which the asset belongs for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets.

An impairment loss is charged to the profit or loss, except to the extent they reverse gains previously recognized in other comprehensive loss/income.

Financial instruments

The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale and financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial instruments at initial recognition.

Financial assets are classified at fair value through profit or loss when they are either held for trading for the purpose of short-term profit taking, derivatives not held for hedging purposes, or when they are designated as such to avoid an accounting mismatch or to enable performance evaluation where a group of financial assets is managed by key management personnel on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy. Such assets are subsequently measured at fair value with changes in carrying value being included in profit or loss.

The Company has classified cash, short-term investments and receivables as loans and receivables. Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortized cost. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the end of the reporting period. These are classified as non-current assets.

Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets that have fixed maturities and fixed or determinable payments, and it is the Company’s intention to hold these investments to maturity. They are subsequently measured at amortized cost. Held-to-maturity investments are included in non-current assets, except for those which are expected to mature within 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not suitable to be classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables or held-to-maturity investments and are subsequently measured at fair value. These are included in current assets. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses.

The Company has classified its trade payable as other financial liabilities. Subsequent to initial recognition, trade payable and are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.

Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date — the date on which the group commits to purchase the asset.

Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial instrument has been impaired. In the case of available-for-sale financial instruments, a significant and prolonged decline in the value of the instrument is considered to determine whether an impairment has arisen.

Loss per share

The Company uses the treasury stock method to compute the dilutive effect of options, warrants and similar instruments. Under this method the dilutive effect on loss per common share is recognized on the use of the proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options, warrants and similar instruments. It assumes that the proceeds would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period.

Basic loss per common share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and does not include outstanding options and warrants. Dilutive loss per common share is not presented differently from basic loss per share as the conversion of outstanding stock options and warrants into common shares would be anti-dilutive.

Income taxes

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax are recognized in net income except to the extent that it arises in a business combination, or from items recognized directly in equity or other comprehensive loss/income.

Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current period are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted, at the reporting date, in the countries where the Company operates and generates taxable income.

Current income tax relating to items recognized directly in other comprehensive income or equity is recognized in other comprehensive income or equity and not in profit or loss. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

Deferred income tax is provided using the asset and liability method of temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and recognized only to the extent that it is probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset, only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Share-based payments

Where equity-settled share options are awarded to employees, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is recognized over the vesting period. Performance vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each reporting date so that, ultimately, the cumulative amount recognized over the vesting period is based on the number of options that eventually vest. Non-vesting conditions and market vesting conditions are factored into the fair value of the options granted. As long as all other vesting conditions are satisfied, a charge is made irrespective of whether these non-vesting and market vesting conditions are satisfied. The cumulative expense is not adjusted for failure to achieve a market vesting condition or where a non-vesting condition is not satisfied.

Where the terms and conditions of options are modified, the increase in the fair value of the options, measured immediately before and after the modification, is also recognized over the remaining vesting period.

Where equity instruments are granted to non-employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the goods or services received. Amounts related to the issuance of shares are recorded as a reduction of share capital.

When the value of goods and services received in exchange for the share-based payment cannot be reliably estimated, the fair value is measured by use of a valuation model. The expected life used in the model is adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.

All equity-settled share-based payments are reflected in share-based payments reserve, until exercised. Upon exercise shares are issued from treasury and the amount reflected in share-based payments reserve is credited to share capital along with any consideration paid.

Share capital

The Company’s common shares, preferred shares, share warrants and flow-through shares are classified as equity instruments.

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction from the proceeds.

Proceeds received on the issuance of units, consisting of common shares and warrants are allocated to share capital.

Future Accounting Changes

The Company has not early adopted these revised standards and is currently assessing the impact that these standards will have on its financial statements.

Other accounting standards or amendments to existing accounting standards that have been issued but have future effective dates are either not applicable or are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

New standard IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”

This new standard is a partial replacement of IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. IFRS 9 introduces new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets, additional changes relating to financial liabilities, a new general hedge accounting standard which will align hedge accounting more closely with risk management. The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted.

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

It should be noted that the management discussed below is primarily involved with the Company’s current activities. As the Company concludes an acquisition or merger, or embarks on any other type of project, additional personnel with differing areas of expertise will be utilized. Directors are elected annually by a majority vote of the shareholders and hold office until the next general meeting of the shareholders. Officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, the board of directors. The names, place of residence, positions within the Company and the principal occupations of the directors and senior officers of the Company are set out below.

A. Directors and senior management.

Name, Municipality of Residence Principal Occupation and Position and Position with the Corporation	Age	During the Past Five Years

Douglas E. Ford West Vancouver, B.C. Director	54	Director since September 10, 1992; General Manager of Dockside Capital, a private merchant banking and venture capital firm, from 1987 to present.

Keith Morrison Oakville, On Director, Chief Executive Officer	58	Director and CEO of Gedex Inc. 2008-2014, Director of Era Resources Inc. 2011-Present, Non-Executive Chairman of Security Devices International Inc. 2014-Present, Non-Executive Chairman of Osgood Mountain Gold Ltd. August 2016 — Present.

Mark Fedikow Winnipeg, MB President	65	President of Mount Morgan Resources Ltd. 2001 — present Director and VP of Exploration Services for VMS Ventures Inc. 2008 — April 2015, Director and VP of Exploration IMetal Resources Inc. 2004-Present.

James Clucas North Vancouver, BC Director	75	Director of Search Minerals Inc. from June 2009 — present; Director of INV Metals

Gilbert Clark Le Rouret, France Director	48	Managing Director 2003 - 2014 of European Mining Services, Private Mining Consultancy, Consultant Geologist with The Sentient Group 2010 - 2013, Senior Investment Advisor and Director of Sentient Asset Management Canada September 2013-2016, Director of North American Nickel May 2012 - Present, Private Mining & Mining Finance Consultant January 2017 — Present.

John Sabine Toronto, On Director, Chairman	72	Counsel to Bennett Jones LLP 2013-Present, Counsel to Dentons LLP 2001-2013, Director of Lipari Energy Inc. 2011-2013, Uranium One Inc. 2013-2015, Algold Resources 2013-Present, and Seabridge Gold Inc. 2014-Present, Chairman, North American Nickel Inc. 2014-Present.

Alex Dann Ontario, Canada Chief Financial Officer	52	CFO from March 1, 2017 to November 15, 2017, North American Nickel Inc., CFO since January 1, 2014 of Era Resources Inc. Prior appointments: CFO of Avion Gold Corporation, CFO of AXMIN Inc., and consultant to various mining companies. Ceased to be CFO on November 15, 2017.

Christopher Messina New York, NY Director	46	Advisor to a number of technology companies in the big data analytics, artificial intelligence, shipping, commodities and cyber security industries.

Chris Hopkins Ontario, Canada Chief Financial Officer	55	CFO since November 15, 2017, North American Nickel Inc., CFO since March 2018, Stina Resources Ltd. Prior appointments: CEO of Takara Resources Inc., CFO of US Silver Corporation, CFO of Excellon Resources Inc., and consultant to various mining companies.

B. Compensation.

Management compensation is determined by the board of directors based on competitive prices for services provided. During the year ended December 31, 2017, directors and officers, including private companies controlled by directors and officers, as a group, paid or accrued a total of $749 in management fees, paid or accrued a total of $128 in salaries. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions” for more detail on fees paid to members of management or to entities owned by them.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company paid $138 in compensation to Directors for acting as Directors. The Company does not have any pension or retirement plans, nor does the Company compensate its directors and officers by way of any material bonus or profit sharing plans. Directors, officers, employees and other key personnel of the Company may be compensated by way of stock options.

C. Board practices.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Company Act (BC), the Company’s directors are elected annually at the regularly schedules annual general meeting of shareholders. Each elected director is elected for a one-year term unless he resigns prior to the expiry of his term.

The Company has no arrangements in place for provision of benefits to its directors or upon their termination.

The Board has five committees in place, four of which have been recently implemented:

Audit Committee is made-up of Christopher Messina, James Clucas and Douglas Ford. The Audit Committee is an operating committee of the board of directors responsible for the oversight of financial reporting and disclosure. On May 2, 2006, the Company’s board of directors adopted a new charter for the Audit Committee.

Corporate Governance Committee is made up of James Clucas, Douglas Ford, Gilbert Clark. The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and specifying the rules and procedures for making decisions in corporate affairs and establishing a complete Handbook for the company.

Compensation Committee is made up of Christopher Messina, James Clucas and Gilbert Clark.. In addition to salary, the compensation committee determines the level of stock option compensation and stock warrants granted within the corporation.

Compliance Committee is made up of Mark Fedikow and Christopher Messina. The purpose of the Compliance Committee is to oversee the Company’s implementation of programs, policies and procedures that are designed to respond to the various compliance and regulatory risks facing the Company. The Compliance Committee meet on a regular basis to oversee the dissemination of all corporate material.

Technical Oversight Committee is made up of Mark Fedikow. The Technical Oversight Committee provides general oversight and support to the Geological team and identifies technical issues and tasks necessary to support the activities of the Company.

D. Employees.

Effective at December 31, 2017 the Company had eight salaried employees.

E. Share ownership.

A total of ten percent (10%) of the common shares of the Company, outstanding from time to time, are reserved for the issuance of stock options pursuant to the Company’s Incentive Stock Option Plan. During the year 9,137,500 stock options were granted to directors, consultants and employees. Other information on ownership is contained in the table below.

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.

A. Major shareholders.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of the Company’s shares at December 31, 2017 by (i) each person who is known to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each of the Company’s directors and executive officers and (iii) all current directors and executive officers as a group. The table does not reflect common shares held of record by depositories, but does include currently exercisable options and warrants which are included in the calculation of percentage of class ownership for each individual holder. As of December 31, 2017 there were 554,598,167 common shares issued and outstanding, 590,931 preferred shares outstanding, 20,720,500 exercisable options, 176,175,413 warrants which fully diluted is 752,082,011.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount of Shares		Percent
*Principal Holders*
Sentient Group GP IV	356,476,487		64.27	%

*Officers and Directors*
Douglas Ford	557,600	(1)
Keith Morrison	533,333
Mark Fedikow	2,384,333	(2)
James Clucas	358,000
Cheryl Messier	162,500
Gilbert Clark	86,546
John Sabine	893,942
Christopher Messina	160,000
All Officers and Directors as a Group (8 persons)	5,136,254		1.39	%

(1) Includes 422,000 shares held through B.W.N. Oil Technologies Inc., 135,600 shares held through Dockside Capital Group Inc.

(2) Includes 1,910,000 shares held through Lee River Resources Ltd.

During 2017, the Company issued 186,016,281 units for two financings one done through a prospectus and the other through a private placement at $0.075 per share, for proceeds of $13,951. The Company issued 1,965,093 warrants in lieu of cash, for an agency fee with a fair value of $61. Share issuance costs of $549 were incurred in relation to the financings.

B. Related party transactions.

Related party transactions were in the normal course of business and have been recorded at the exchange amount which is the fair value agreed to between the parties. Amounts due to related parties are unsecured, non-interest bearing and without specific terms of repayment.

Related party balances - The following amounts due to related parties are included in trade payables and accrued liabilities

	December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016		2015
Directors and officers of the Company	$	42	$	2	$	8
Companies controlled by directors of the Company	—		—		—
	$	42	$	2	$	8

These amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and have no fixed terms of repayment.

Related party transactions —

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $244 (2016 - $347) (2015 - $217) in fees charged by a legal firm in which the Company’s chairman is a consultant.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $Nil (2016 - $16) (2015 - $35) in rent and utilities expense to VMS Ventures Inc. a company that was a significant shareholder and related through common directors, which was included in general and administrative expense.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded $217 in fees charged by a legal firm in which the Company’s chairman is a consultant. The fees have been allocated as $182 in legal fees and $35 in share issuance costs.

(a) Key management personnel are defined as members of the Board of Directors and senior officers.

Key management compensation was:

	December 31, 2017	December 31, 2016	December 31, 2015
Geological consulting fees — expensed	35	6	72
Geological consulting fees — capitalized	178	44	94
Management fees — expensed	749	756	547
Salaries - expensed	128	103	77
Share-based payments	358	186	36
Total	1,448	1,095	826

a) Transactions with Sentient

On August 15, 2017, Sentient subscribed for a total of 38,666,666 units under the private placement equity financing transaction described in Note 10 for a total net proceeds of $2,900. As part of the subscription, Sentient was granted 19,333,333 common share purchase warrants exercisable at $0.12 until August 15, 2019.

On June 8, 2017, Sentient acquired 94,666,666 units in the equity financing as described in Note 10 for net proceeds of $7,100. As part of the Offering, Sentient was granted 47,333,333 common share purchase warrants exercisable at $0.12 until June 8, 2019.

As of December 31, 2017, Sentient beneficially owns 356,476,487 common shares constituting approximately 64.27% of the currently issued and outstanding Common Shares.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 952,380 common shares to Sentient for a fee for advancing the loan of $4,500 at a fair value of $95. The Company discounted the loan with the interest not being charged by Sentient using an interest rate of 15% per annum and an amount of $265 was booked to capital contribution reserve.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, Sentient acquired 120,428,939 (2015 – 25,448,503) common shares. The common shares were acquired as to 952,380 common shares (2015 – Nil) at a fair value of $95 (2015 – $Nil) as a finance fee and 119,476,559 (2015 – 25,448,503) common shares as part of the private placements at a price of $8,960 (2015 - $5,124).

C. Interests of experts and counsel

Not required.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

See Item 17 and our financial statements and accompanying notes beginning on page F-1.

B. Significant Changes

The Company is not aware of any significant change since December 31, 2017 that is not otherwise reported in this filing.

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING

Effective December 21, 2006 our common shares became quoted on the United States OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “WSCRF”. On May 30, 2011 the common shares of the Company began trading under the symbol “NAN” on the TSX-V Venture Exchange. The table below sets forth the high and low prices expressed in Canadian dollars on the TSX-V and in United States dollars on the OTC in the United States for the Company’s common shares for the past five years, for each quarter for the last two fiscal years, and for the last six months. Note this trading data does not take into effect the 2-old for 1-new reverse split effected on April 20, 2010.

	High	Low	High	Low
	(Canadian Dollars)		(United States Dollars)

Last Five Fiscal Years
2017	0.095	0.065	0.076	0.043
2016	0.145	0.065	0.11	0.05
2015	0.28	0.08	0.23	0.06
2014	0.23	0.22	0.209	0.209
2013	0.25	0.25	0.226	0.22

2017
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2017	0.095	0.065	0.076	0.050
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2017	0.085	0.065	0.071	0.050
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2017	0.085	0.065	0.066	0.043
First Quarter ended March 31, 2017	0.095	0.075	0.071	0.054

2016
Fourth Quarter ended December 31, 2016	0.145	0.075	0.11	0.06
Third Quarter ended September 30, 2016	0.095	0.07	0.07	0.06
Second Quarter ended June 30, 2016	0.11	0.065	0.08	0.05
First Quarter ended March 31, 2016	0.10	0.065	0.07	0.05

Last Six Months
February 2018	0.080	0.065	0.062	0.055
January 2018	0.085	0.075	0.075	0.057
December 2017	0.090	0.075	0.072	0.057
November 2017	0.095	0.080	0.076	0.060
October 2017	0.080	0.070	0.068	0.050
September 2017	0.085	0.070	0.071	0.058

The closing price of the Company’s common shares as reported by the TSX-V on December 31, 2017 was C$0.08. The closing price of the Company’s common shares as reported by the OTCbb on December 31, 2017 was US$0.07.

The Company’s common shares are issued in registered form. Computershare Investor Services Inc. is the registrar and transfer agent for the Company’s common shares.

The Company has no outstanding securities not listed on a marketplace other than incentive stock options and warrants. Since the beginning of the most recently completed financial year, stock options to purchase an aggregate 9,137,500 common shares were granted. The following table outlines the detail of each grant:

Number of Options	Exercise Price		Grant Date
	(CDN $)

8,137,500	$	0.12	February 21, 2022
1,000,000	$	0.12	December 20, 2022

Since the beginning of the most recently completed financial year, warrants issued to purchase an aggregate 94,971,721 common shares were issued. The following table outlines the detail of each issuance:

Number of Warrants	Exercise Price		Grant Date
	(CDN $)

72,515,414	$	0.12	June 8, 2017
1,965,083	$	0.075	June 8, 2017
20,491,224	$	0.12	August 15, 2017

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. Share capital

Not required

B. Memorandum and articles of association

1. The Company was incorporated as Rainbow Resources Ltd. September 20, 1983 under certificate of incorporation no. 268952 in the Province of British Columbia Canada. The name was changed to Widescope Resources Ltd. May 1 1984, to Gemini Technology Inc. September 13 1985, to International Gemini Technology Inc. September 23 1993, and to Widescope Resources Inc., effective July 12, 2006. The name was subsequently changed to North American Nickel Inc., effective April 19, 2010. No objects and purposes are described.

2. If a director has a material interest in a matter subject to a vote, he must declare it and abstain from voting, or have his vote not counted, except for certain specific exclusions which include setting director compensation. There are no restrictions on directors issuing debt however shareholder approval may be required in connection with convertible debt or other debt driven requirements to issue shares. There is no retirement age or share ownership requirement for directors.

3. Dividends are declared by directors and subject to any special rights, paid to all holders of shares in a class according to the number of shares held. Voting rights are one vote per share. Directors stand for election every year at the annual meeting. Shareholders have no rights to share directly in the company’s profits. Subject to prior claims of creditors and preferred shareholders, common shareholders participate in any surplus in the event of liquidation according to the number of shares held. The Company may redeem shares by directors’ resolution in compliance with applicable law unless the company is insolvent or may become insolvent by doing so. It must make its offer pro rata to every member who holds a class, subject to applicable stock exchange rules or company act provisions. The directors have wide discretion. Shareholders have no liability for further capital calls. No discriminatory provisions, against an existing or prospective shareholder of a substantial number of shares, are imposed by the articles.

4. Rights of holders of any class of shares can only be changed with their consent, and in accordance with the company act. Consent must be in writing by the holders or by a three fourths majority of a vote of the holders, and by the consent of the British Columbia Securities Commission.

5. A notice convening an annual general or special meeting must specify the place, date, hour, and in the case of a special meeting, the general nature of the special business, and must be given in accordance with the company act. There are no special conditions outlining rights of admission.

6. There are no limitations on rights to own securities.

7. There are no provisions to delay, defer, or prevent a change in control.

8. Nothing in the articles requires ownership disclosure.

9. Not applicable.

10. Not applicable.

C. Material contracts

On December 23, 2009, the Company executed a letter of intent whereby the Company has an option to acquire the mineral claim known as the Post Creek Property located within the Sudbury Mining District of Ontario. The Company paid a non-refundable deposit of $8. On April 5, 2010, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire rights to Post Creek Property. On March 12, 2013, the Post Creek Property Option Agreement was amended, in order to acquire 100% working interests in the property, subject to certain net smelter return royalties (“NSR”) and advance royalty payments the Company agreed to the following amended consideration, which has been met, cash payments totalling $138 and the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares. The Company has exercised its option on Post Creek and as of August 1, 2015, the Company is obligated to pay advances on the NSR of $10 per annum, which will be deducted from any payments to be made under the NSR

On April 5, 2010, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire rights to Halcyon Property. On March 12, 2013, the Halcyon Property Option Agreement was amended. In order to acquire up to a 100% working interest in the property, subject to certain net smelter return royalties (“NSR”) and advance royalty payments the Company agreed to the following amended consideration, which has been met, cash payments totalling $120 and the issuance of 700,000 common shares. Further, commencing on the amended date of August 1, 2015, if the Company exercises its option, the Company will be obligated to pay advances on the NSR of $8 per annum, which will be deducted from any payments to be made under the NSR.

On August 15, 2011, the Company was granted an exploration license (the “Sulussugut License”) by the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum (“BMP”) of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights of an area located near Sulussugut, Greenland. The Company paid a license fee of $5,742 (Danish Krones (“DKK”) 31) upon granting of the Sulussugut License. The Sulussugut License was valid for 5 years until December 31, 2015, with December 31, 2011 being the first year providing the Company meets the terms of the license, which includes that specified eligible exploration expenditures must be made. The application for another 5-year term on the Sulussugut License was submitted to the Greenland Mineral Licence & Safety Authority (MLSA) which was effective on April 11, 2016, with December 31, 2017 being the seventh year.

On March 4, 2012, the Company was granted an additional exploration license (the “Ininngui License”) by the BMP of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights over an area covering a total of 142 square kilometres. The license is located near Ininngui, Greenland. The Company paid a license fee of DKK 32 upon granting of the Ininngui License. The Ininngui License is valid for 5 years until December 31, 2016, with December 31, 2012 being the first year. The Ininngui License is contiguous with the Sulussugut License.The application for another 5-year term on the Ininngui License was submitted to the Greenland Mineral Licence & Safety Authority (MLSA), which was effective March 14, 2017, with December 31, 2017 being the sixth year.

In conjunction with the granting of the Sulussugut License, on August 12, 2011, the Company entered into an arm’s length Intellectual Property and Data Acquisition Agreement (the “IP Acquisition Agreement”) with Hunter Minerals Pty Limited (“Hunter”) and Spar Resources Pty Limited (“Spar”). Pursuant to the IP Acquisition Agreement, Hunter and Spar agreed to sell the IP Rights to the Company in consideration for the Company paying $300 in cash ($150 to each of Hunter and Spar which is paid) and the issuing of 12,960,000 share purchase warrants, 6,480,000 to each of Hunter and Spar exercisable for a period of five years expiring on August 30, 2016. The warrants were exercisable at the following prices, 4,750,000 of the warrants are at a price of $0.50 per share, 4,750,000 of the warrants are at a price of $0.70 per share and 3,460,000 of the warrants are at a price of $1.00 per share. The warrants were subject to an accelerated exercise provision in the event the Company relinquished its interests in the Maniitsoq Licenses or any other mineral titles held within a defined area of interest without receiving consideration for such relinquishment. The granted warrants were recorded at a fair value of $1,813 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. As of August 30, 2016 the warrants expired unexercised and the Company has reversed the fair value of $1,813 to deficit. Granting to each of Hunter and Spar or their designates a 1.25% net smelter returns royalty, subject to rights of NAN to reduce both royalties to a 0.5% net smelter returns royalty upon payment to each of Hunter and Spar (or their designates) of $1,000 on or before the 60th day following a decision to commence commercial production on the mineral properties. On August 30, 2011 the Company issued 200,000 common shares at $0.14 per share for a value of $28 as a finder’s fee on the Greenland project.

The Company paid the first-year rental fee and the required bond of US $10. The Department of Natural Resources shall annually review the level of the performance bond and shall require the amount of the bond to be increased or decreased to reflect changes in the cost of future reclamation of the leased premises.

D. Exchange Controls

This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, legal advice to any prospective purchaser. Accordingly, prospective purchasers of the Company’s shares should consult with their own advisors with respect to their individual circumstances.

There are no laws or governmental decrees or regulations in Canada that restrict the export or import of capital, or which affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to holders of the Company’s securities who are not residents of Canada, other than withholding tax requirements. Reference is made to “Item 7. Taxation”.

There are no limitations imposed by the laws of Canada, the laws of Alberta or by the charter or other governing documents of the Company on the right of a non-resident to hold or vote common shares of the Company, other than as provided in the Investment Canada Act (the “Investment Act”) and the potential requirement for a Competition Act Review.

The following summarizes the principal features of the Investment Act and the Competition Act Review for a non-resident who proposes to acquire common shares. This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor is it, a substitute for independent advice from an investor’s own advisor. This summary does not anticipate statutory or regulatory amendments.

The Canadian Investment Act

The Canadian Investment Act generally prohibits implementation of a reviewable investment by an individual, government or agency thereof, corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is not a “Canadian” as defined in the Investment Act (a “non-Canadian”), unless, after review, the minister responsible for the Investment Act (the “Minister”) is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of a net benefit to Canada. Under the Investment Act, a United States citizen qualifies as a “World Trade Organization Investor.” Subject to the restrictions noted below, an investment in a Canadian business by a World Trade Organization Investor would be reviewable under the Investment Act only if it is an investment to acquire control of such Canadian business and the value of the assets of the Canadian business as shown on its financial statements is not less than a specified amount, which for 1999 was $184 million. An investment in the shares of a Canadian business by a non-Canadian other than a “World Trade Organization Investor” when the Company is not controlled by a World Trade Organization Investor, would be reviewable under the Investment Act if it is an investment to acquire control of the Canadian business and the value of the assets of the Canadian business as shown on its financial statements is $5 million or more, or if an order for review is made by the federal cabinet on the grounds that the investment relates to Canada’s cultural heritage or national identity.

The acquisition by a World Trade Organization Investor of control of a Canadian business in any of the following sectors is also subject to review if the value of the assets of the Canadian business exceeds $5 million (as shown on its financial statements): uranium, financial services (except insurance), transportation services and cultural businesses, which include broadcast media (publication, distribution or sale of books, magazines, periodicals, newspapers, music, film and video products and the exhibition of film and video products), television and radio services. As the Company’s business does not fall under any of the aforementioned categories, the acquisition of control of the Company, in excess of the $5 million threshold, by a World Trade Organization Investor would not be subject to such review.

A non-Canadian would acquire control of the Company for purposes of the Investment Act if the non-Canadian acquired a majority of the common shares.

The acquisition of less than a majority but one-third or more of the common shares would be presumed to be an acquisition of control of the Company unless it could be established that, on acquisition, the Company was not controlled in fact by the acquirer through the ownership of common shares. Notwithstanding the review provisions, any transaction involving the acquisition of control of a Canadian business or the establishment of a new business in Canada by a non-Canadian is a notifiable transaction and must be reported to Industry Canada by the non-Canadian making the investment either before or within thirty days after the investment.

Certain transactions relating to common shares are exempt from the Investment Act, including:

· an acquisition of common shares by a person in the ordinary course of that person’s business as a trader or dealer in securities;

· an acquisition of control of the Company in connection with the realization of security granted for a loan or other financial assistance and not for a purpose related to the provisions of the Investment Act; and

· an acquisition of control of the Company by reason of an amalgamation, merger, consolidation or corporate reorganization, following which the ultimate direct or indirect control in fact of the Company, through the ownership of common shares, remained unchanged.

Canadian Competition Act Review

Investments giving rise to the acquisition or establishment, directly or indirectly, by one or more persons of control over, or a significant interest in the whole or part of a business of a competitor, supplier, customer or other person are subject to substantive review by Canada’s Competition Law Authority, the Director of Investigation and Research (the “Director”). If or when the Director concludes that a merger, whether by purchase or lease of shares or assets, by amalgamation or by combination, or otherwise, prevents or lessens, or is likely to prevent or lessen competition substantially, he may apply as may be necessary to eliminate the substantial lessening or prevention of competition. Such substantive merger review power applies to all mergers, whether or not they meet limits for pre-notification under the Competition Act.

In addition to substantive merger review, the Competition Act provides for a pre-notification regime respecting mergers of a certain size. The regime applies in respect of share acquisitions, asset acquisitions, amalgamations and combinations. For ease of reference, this filing refers specifically to share acquisition, although the pre-notification regime applies, with the appropriate modification, to other types of acquisition of control as well.

In order for a share acquisition transaction to be pre-notifiable, the parties to the transaction (being the person or persons who proposed to acquire shares, and the corporation the shares of which are to be acquired), together with their affiliates (being all firms with a 50% or more voting shares linkage up and down the chain) must have:

(i) aggregate gross assets in Canada that exceed $400 million in value, as shown on their audited financial statements for the most recently completed fiscal year (which must be within the last fifteen (15) months); or

(ii) aggregate gross revenue from sales in, from or into Canada that exceed $400 million for the most recently completed fiscal year shown on the said financial statements; and

(iii) the party being acquired or corporations controlled by that party must have gross assets in Canada, or gross revenues from sales in or from Canada, exceeding $35 million as shown on the said financial statements. Acquisition of shares carrying up to 20% of the votes of a publicly-traded corporation, or 35% of the votes in a private corporation, will not be subject to pre-notification, regardless of the above thresholds. However, exceeding the 20% or the 35% threshold, and again exceeding the 50% threshold, gives rise to an obligation of notification if the size threshold is met.

If a transaction is pre-notifiable, a filing must be made with the Director containing the prescribed information with respect to the parties, and a waiting period (either seven or twenty-one days, depending on whether a long or short form filing is chosen) must expire prior to closing.

As an alternative to pre-notification, the Director may grant an Advance Ruling Certificate, which exempts the transaction from pre-notification. Advance Ruling Certificates are granted where the Director concludes, based on the information provided to him, that he would not have sufficient grounds on which to apply to the Competition Tribunal to challenge the Merger.

E. Taxation

This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, legal or tax advice to any prospective purchaser or holder of the Company’s shares and no representation with respect to the Canadian federal income tax consequences to any such prospective purchaser is made. Accordingly, prospective purchasers of the Company’s shares should consult with their own tax advisors with respect to their individual circumstances.

The following summary describes the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable to a holder of the Company’s shares who, for purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Canadian Tax Act”) and the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention, 1980 (the “Convention”) and at all relevant times is resident in the United States and not resident in Canada, deals at arm’s length with the Company, holds the Company’s shares as capital property, and does not use or hold and is not deemed to use or hold the Company’s shares in or in the course of carrying on business in Canada (a “United States Holder”).

This following summary is based upon the current provisions of the Canadian Income Tax Act, the regulations thereunder, all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act and the regulations announced by the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof and the Company’s understanding of the published administrative practices of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (formerly Revenue Canada, Customs, Excise and Taxation). This summary does not take into account or anticipate any other changes in the governing law, whether by judicial, governmental or legislative decision or action, nor does it take into account the tax legislation or considerations of any province, territory or non-Canadian jurisdiction (including the United States), which legislation or considerations may differ significantly from those described herein.

Disposition of the Company’s Shares

In general, a United States shareholder will not be subject to Canadian income tax on capital gains arising on the disposition of the Company’s shares, unless such shares are “taxable Canadian property” within the meaning of the Canadian Income Tax Act and no relief is afforded under any applicable tax treaty. The shares of the Company would be taxable Canadian property of a non-resident if at any time during the five-year period immediately preceding a disposition by the non-resident of such shares, not less than 25% of the issued shares of any class or series of all classes of shares of the Company belonged to the non-resident, to persons with whom the non-resident did not deal at arm’s length, or to the nonresident and persons with whom the non-resident did not deal at arm’s length for purposes of the Canadian Income Tax Act. For this purpose, issued shares include options to acquire such shares (including conversion rights) held by such persons. Under the Convention, a capital gain realized by a resident of the United States will not be subject to Canadian tax unless the value of the shares of the Company is derived principally from real estate (as defined in the Convention) situated in Canada.

F. Dividends and Paying Agents

Not required

G. Statement by Experts

Not required

H. Documents on display

All documents referenced in this Form 20-F may be viewed at the offices of the Company during business hours 1055 West Hastings, Vancouver BC V6E 2E9, Canada, Telephone 604-770-4334.

I. Subsidiary Information

As of June 30, 2006 Outback Capital Inc. dba Pinefalls Gold (“PFG”) a private Alberta corporation become a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company. PFG was incorporated under the Alberta Business Corporations Act on February 6, 2001. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with an independent third party whereby this party acquired Outback Capital Inc.

In June 2015 the Company incorporated North American Nickel (US) Inc. to hold a mineral lease in Michigan, which was granted in January 2016.

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not required

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

Not applicable

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2017. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded as of December 31, 2017 that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of a company’s assets,

(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that a company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of a company’s management and directors, and

(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of a company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company.

Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control—Integrated Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, known as COSO, to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.

Our management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only our management’s report in this annual report on Form 20-F.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report on Form 20-F that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

ITEM 16.

A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

Mr. Messina serves on the Audit Committee as a financial expert. Mr. Messina has worked in the capital markets as an investment banker, asset manager and entrepreneur in financial technology for 22+ years. He has an MBA in finance and strategy from the Australian Graduate School of Management, and over the years has worked on data services involved in corporate governance ratings, derivatives and fixed income markets and has extensive knowledge of valuation norms and accepted pricing conventions for a range of assets from the most liquid to the most illiquid.

Mr. Clucas also serves on the Audit Committee. He qualified as a CMA in the United Kingdom and immigrated to Canada in 1970 to work for INCO Ltd where he rose to CFO of its Canadian Operations .In 1984 he left INCO and became involved in various public Exploration and Mine Development Companies. In 2006 he co-founded International Nickel Ventures and raised $30 million and was and still listed on the Toronto Senior Exchange .In 2009 he became Chairman of Search Minerals and serves on the Audit Committee. He is familiar with all financial aspects of publicly listed companies including internal financial controls, corporate governance, compliance and financial reporting.

Mr. Douglas Ford. Mr. Ford has over thirty-years’ experience as a venture capitalist and merchant banker. In his business background he has operated in senior operations roles and as a Chief Financial Officer of several publicly traded companies and private enterprises. In such roles, he has been responsible for all financial aspects of the entities including, internal financial controls, governance, compliance and financial reporting. He currently is CFO and Secretary of two companies listed on Canadian stock exchanges.”

B. Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting procedures, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics will be made available to anyone who requests it in writing from the Company’s head office.

C. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

(a) Audit Fees

Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte, Chartered Accountants (“DMCL”) billed the Corporation $30 in the year ended December 31, 2017 ($26 in the year ended December 31, 2016 ($31 in the year ended December 31, 2015, $23 in the year ended December 31, 2014, $24 in the year ended December 31, 2013 $19 in the year ended December 31, 2012, $32 in the year ended December 31, 2011, $29 in the year ended December 31, 2010; $20 in 2009, $12 in 2008, $15 in 2007; $13 in 2006; $9 in 2005; and $6 in 2004.

(b) Audit Related Fees

DMCL billed the $2 - $3 for audit related services in the year ended December 31, 2010; $3 in 2009; $nil in 2008; $1 in 2007; $nil in 2006, $nil in 2005 and $nil in 2004.

(c) Tax Fees

DMCL billed the Company $1 for the tax year 2017, $1 for the tax year 2016, $1 for the tax year 2015, $2 for the tax year 2014, $2 for the tax year 2013, $2 for the tax year 2012, $2 for the tax year 2011, and did not provide the Corporation with any professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning in the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

(d) All Other Fees

DMCL billed the Corporation $15 for services in the year ended December 31, 2017, $15 for services in the year ended December 31, 2016, and nil in previous years.

(e) Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

To ensure continuing auditor objectivity and to safeguard the independence of our auditors, our audit committee has determined a framework for the type and authorization of non-audit services which our auditors may provide. The audit committee has adopted policies for the pre-approval of specific services that may be provided by our auditors. The dual objectives of these policies are to ensure that we benefit in a cost effective manner from the cumulative knowledge and experience of our auditors, while also ensuring that the auditors maintain the necessary degree of independence and objectivity.

Our audit committee approved the engagement of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte to render audit and non-audit services before they were engaged by us.

D. Exemption From the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not Applicable

E Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Not Applicable

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The financial statements and notes thereto as required by Item 17 are attached hereto and found immediately after the text of this Registration Statement. The auditors’ report of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP, independent registered public accountants, on the audited financial statements and notes thereto is included immediately preceding the audited financial statements.

Independent Auditors’ Report.

Statements of financial position as at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Statements of comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Statement of changes in shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Notes to the financial statements.

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable. See “Item 17. Financial Statements” above.

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

12.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to s.302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

12.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to s.302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

13.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

13.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

19.1 Management Discussion & Analysis as of April 24, 2018.

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

	NORTH AMERICAN NICKEL INC


Date: April 24, 2018	By:	/s/ Keith Morrison
	Name: Keith Morrison
	Title: CEO as duly authorized signatory

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the year ended December 31, 2017

(In accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and stated in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

INDEX

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

Independent Auditor’s Report

Consolidated Financial Statements

· Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

· Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

· Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

· Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

· Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

The consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, of North American Nickel Inc., and its subsidiary have been prepared by management in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Management acknowledges responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial statements, including responsibility for significant accounting judgments and estimates and the choice of accounting principles and methods that are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances.

Management, in discharging these responsibilities, maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that its assets are safeguarded, only valid and authorized transactions are executed and accurate, timely and comprehensive financial information is prepared. However, any system of internal controls over financial reporting, no matter how well designed and implemented, has inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect all misstatements.

The Board of Directors, principally through the Audit and Risk Committee, is responsible for reviewing and approving the consolidated financial statements together with other financial information of the Company and for ensuring that management fulfils its financial reporting responsibilities.

The consolidated financial statements have been audited by Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants, who were appointed by the shareholders to examine the consolidated financial statements and provide an independent auditor’s opinion thereon. The auditor’s report outlines the scope of their examination and their opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP has full and free access to the Board of Directors.

“signed”		“signed”
Keith Morrison		Chris Hopkins
President and Chief Executive Officer		Chief Financial Officer


April 24, 2018

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the shareholders and the board of directors of North American Nickel Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of North American Nickel Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has not generated revenues since inception, has incurred losses in developing its business, and further losses are anticipated. The Company requires additional funds to meet its obligations and the costs of its operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in this regard are described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP

CHARTERED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2005.

Vancouver, Canada

April 24, 2018

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars)

	Notes	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		398		630
Short term investments	4	2,500		2,700
Receivables and other current assets	5	242		142
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		3,140		3,472

NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment	6	49		54
Exploration and evaluation assets	7	50,494		38,342
Reclamation of deposit	7	14		14
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS		50,557		38,410
TOTAL ASSETS		53,697		41,882

LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade payables and accrued liabilities	8, 11	969		181
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		969		181
TOTAL LIABILITIES		969		181

EQUITY
Share capital – preferred	10	591		591
Share capital – common	10	73,598		62,315
Reserve	10	5,089		2,767
Deficit		(26,550	)	(23,972	)
TOTAL EQUITY		52,728		41,701
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY		53,697		41,882

Nature of Operations (Note 1)

Subsequent Events (Note 18)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Approved by the Board of Directors on April 24, 2018

“signed”		“signed”

Keith Morrison		Doug Ford
Director		Audit Committee Chair

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except loss per share)

		Year Ended December 31,		Year Ended December 31,		Year Ended December 31,
	Notes	2017		2016		2015

EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses	11	(2,375	)	(2,021	)	(1,789	)
Property investigation and port development		—		(15	)	(164	)
Amortization	6	(25	)	(42	)	(73	)
Share-based payments	10	(504	)	(309	)	(258	)
		(2,904	)	(2,387	)	(2,284	)
OTHER ITEMS
Interest income		32		28		37
Finance fee	9	—		(95	)	—
Interest on capital contribution loan	9	—		(265	)	—
Foreign exchange loss		(7	)	(158	)	(142	)
		25		(490	)	(105	)

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR		(2,879	)	(2,877	)	(2,389	)

Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding		465,929,638		269,778,932		188,384,506

Basic and diluted loss per share		(0.01	)	(0.01	)	(0.01	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

	Notes	Number Shares	Share Capital		Preferred Stock	Reserve		Deficit		Total Equity
			$		$	$		$		$
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2014		169,964,679	42,677		591	5,200		(21,715	)	26,753
Net and comprehensive loss		—	—		—	—		(2,389	)	(2,389	)
Share capital issued through private placement	10	29,054,079	6,392		—	—		—		6,392
Share-based payments	10	—	—		—	258		—		258
Forfeited/expired options	10	—	—		—	(284	)	284		—
Stock options exercised	10	1,149,000	172		—	(57	)	—		115
Warrants exercised	10	7,461,748	1,567		—	—		—		1,567
Share issue costs	10	—	(234	)	—	18		—		(216	)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2015		207,629,506	50,574		591	5,135		(23.820	)	32,480

Net and comprehensive loss		—	—		—	—		(2,877	)	(2,877	)
Share capital issued through private placement	10	160,000,000	12,000		—	—		—		12,000
Shares issued for fee on loan	9	952,380	95		—	—		—		95
Capital contribution interest on loan	9	—	—		—	265		—		265
Capital contribution reallocation on loan settlement	9	—	265			(265	)	—		—
Forfeited/expired options	10	—	—		—	(912	)	912		—
Expired warrants	10	—	—		—	(1,813	)	1,813		—
Share-based payments	10	—	—		—	309		—		309
Share issue costs	10	—	(619	)	—	48		—		(571	)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2016		368,581,886	62,315		591	2,767		(23,972	)	41,701

Net and comprehensive loss		—	—		—	—		(2,879	)	(2,879	)
Share capital issued through prospectus	10	145,030,833	10,877		—	—		—		10,877
Share capital issued through private placement	10	40,982,448	3,074		—	—		—		3,074
Share issue costs	10	—	(588	)	—	39		—		(549	)
Value allocated to warrants issued	10	—	(2,080	)	—	2,080		—		—
Forfeited/expired stock options	10	—	—		—	(283	)	283		—
Expired warrants	10	—	—		—	(18	)	18		—
Share-based payments	10	—	—		—	504		—		504
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2017		554,598,167	73,598		591	5,089		(26,550	)	52,728

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars)

		Year Ended
	Notes	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Loss for the year		(2,879	)	(2,877	)	(2,389	)
Items not affecting cash:
Amortization		25		42		73
Share based payments		504		309		258
Interest income		(16	)	(28	)	(37	)
Changes in working capital	12	(95	)	(52	)	(168	)
Other:
Interest received		32		30		65
Finance fee		—		95		—
Interest expense on loan		—		265		—
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,429	)	(2,216	)	(2,198	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets		(11,385	)	(8,604	)	(9,023	)
Prior year payables for exploration and evaluation assets		—		(87	)	—

Reclamation deposit		—		(14	)	—

Short-term investments		200		(400	)	3,700

Purchase of equipment		(20	)	(3	)	(138	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(11,205	)	(9,108	)	(5,461	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common shares		13,951		12,000		6,392
Direct financing costs		(549	)	(571	)	(216	)
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		—		—		1,567
Proceeds from exercise of options		—		—		115
Net cash provided by financing activities		13,402		11,429		7,858

Change in cash equivalents for the year		(232	)	105		199
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year		630		525		326
Cash and cash equivalents, at the end of the year		398		630		525

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

1. NATURE AND CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

North American Nickel Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on September 23, 1983, under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. The head office and principal address is located at 3400 — 100 King Street West, PO Box 130, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1A4 and the records office of the Company is located at PO Box 63623 Capilano, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7P 3P1. The Company’s common shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”) under the symbol “NAN”.

The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration and development of mineral properties in Greenland, Canada and United States. The Company has not yet determined whether any of these properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. The recoverability of carrying amounts shown for exploration and evaluation assets is dependent upon a number of factors including environmental risk, legal and political risk, the existence of economically recoverable mineral reserves, confirmation of the Company’s interests in the underlying mineral claims, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to complete exploration and development, and to attain sufficient net cash flow from future profitable production or disposition proceeds.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern, meaning it will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of operations. The ability of the Company to continue operations as a going concern is ultimately dependent upon achieving profitable operations. To date, the Company has not generated profitable operations from its resource activities and will need to invest additional funds in carrying out its planned exploration, development and operational activities. These uncertainties cast substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The exploration and evaluation properties in which the Company currently has an interest are in the exploration stage. As such, the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its activities. In order to carry out the planned exploration and cover administrative costs, the Company will use its existing working capital and raise additional amounts as needed. Although the Company has been successful in its past fundraising activities, there is no assurance as to the success of future fundraising efforts or as to the sufficiency of funds raised in the future. The Company will continue to assess new properties and seek to acquire interests in additional properties if there is sufficient geologic or economic potential and if adequate financial resources are available to do so.

The consolidated financial statements were approved and authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors of the Company on April 24, 2018.

2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Statement of Compliance

The Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).

(b) Basis of Preparation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, modified by the revaluation of any financial assets and financial liabilities where applicable. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. These areas involving a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements, are disclosed in Note 3.

(c) Basis of consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, North American Nickel (US) Inc. which was incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 22, 2015. Consolidation is required when the Company is exposed, or has rights to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. All intercompany transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated upon consolidation.

(d) Foreign currency translation

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary items measured at

historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value are reported at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were determined.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items or on settlement of monetary items are recognized in profit or loss in the statement of comprehensive loss in the period in which they arise, except where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of non-monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income in the statement of comprehensive loss to the extent that gains and losses arising on those non-monetary items are also recognized in other comprehensive income. Where the non-monetary gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss, the exchange component is also recognized in profit or loss.

(e) Exploration and evaluation assets

Government tax credits received are generally recorded as a reduction to the cumulative costs incurred and capitalized on the related property.

The Company may occasionally enter into farm-out arrangements, whereby it will transfer part of an interest, as consideration, for an agreement by the farmee to meet certain exploration and evaluation expenditures which would have otherwise been undertaken by the Company. The Company does not record any expenditures made by the farmee on its behalf. Any cash consideration received from the agreement is credited against the costs previously capitalized to the mineral interest given up by the Company, with any excess consideration accounted for in profit.

(f) Restoration and environmental obligations

The Company recognizes liabilities for statutory, contractual, constructive or legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-term assets, when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the assets. The net present value of future restoration cost estimates arising from the decommissioning of plant and other site preparation work is capitalized to exploration and evaluation assets along with a corresponding increase in the restoration provision in the period incurred. Discount rates using a pre-tax rate that reflect the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value. The restoration asset will be depreciated on the same basis as other mining assets.

The Company’s estimates of restoration costs could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates and assumptions regarding the amount and timing of the future expenditures. These changes are recorded directly to exploration and evaluation assets with a corresponding entry to the restoration provision. The Company’s estimates are reviewed annually for changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates, effects of inflation and changes in estimates.

Changes in the net present value, excluding changes in the Company’s estimates of reclamation costs, are charged to profit and loss for the period.

(g) Impairment of assets

Impairment tests on intangible assets with indefinite useful economic lives are undertaken annually at the financial year-end. Other non-financial assets, including exploration and evaluation assets, are subject to impairment tests whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Where the carrying value of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use and fair value less costs to sell, the asset is written down accordingly.

Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the impairment test is carried out on the asset’s cash-generating unit, which is the lowest group of assets in which the asset belongs and for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets.

An impairment loss is charged to the profit or loss, except to the extent the loss reverses gains previously recognized in other comprehensive loss/income.

(h) Financial instruments

The Company has classified its trade payables as other financial liabilities. Subsequent to initial recognition, trades payable are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method.

Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date — the date on which the Company commits to purchase the asset.

(i) Loss per share

The Company uses the treasury stock method to compute the dilutive effect of options, warrants and similar instruments. Under this method, the dilutive effect on loss per common share is recognized on the use of the proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options, warrants and similar instruments. It assumes that the proceeds would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period.

(j) Income taxes

(k) Share-based payments

(l) Share capital

The Company’s common shares, preferred shares and share warrants shares are classified as equity instruments.

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction from the proceeds.

Proceeds received on the issuance of units, consisting of common shares and warrants are allocated to share capital.

(m) Equipment

Equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of a significant replaced part is derecognized. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of income and comprehensive income during the financial period in which they are incurred. Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognized in profit or loss.

Depreciation and amortization are calculated on a straight-line method to charge the cost, less residual value, of the assets to their residual values over their estimated useful lives. The depreciation and amortization rate applicable to each category of equipment is as follows:

Equipment	Depreciation rate

Exploration equipment	20	%

Computer software	50	%

Computer equipment	55	%

New standards adopted during the year ended December 31, 2017:

IAS 7 “Statement of Cash Flows”

Disclosures related to financing activities were amended to require disclosures about changes in liabilities arising from financing activities, including both changes arising from cash flows and non-cash changes. This amendment is effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2017. The adoption of these amendments did not result in any impact to the Company’s financial statements.

IAS 12 “Income Taxes”

Deferred tax was amended to clarify (i) the requirements for recognizing deferred tax assets on unrealized losses; (ii) deferred tax where an asset is measured at a fair value below the asset’s tax base, and (iii) certain other aspects of accounting for deferred tax assets. This amendment is effective for years beginning on or after January 1, 2017. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of this standard. The adoption of these amendments did not result in any impact to the Company’s financial statements.

Standards, Interpretations and Amendments Not Yet Effective:

IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments” (IFRS 9)

IFRS 9 addresses classification and measurement of financial assets. It replaces the multiple category and measurement models in IAS 39 for debt instruments with a new mixed measurement model having only two categories: amortized cost and fair value through profit and loss. IFRS 9 also replaces the models for measuring equity instruments. Such instruments are either recognized at fair value through profit or loss or at fair value through other comprehensive income. Where equity instruments are measured at fair value through other

comprehensive income, dividends are recognized in the statement of earnings to the extent that they do not clearly represent a return of investment; however, other gains and losses (including impairments) associated with such instruments remain in accumulated comprehensive income indefinitely. Requirements for financial liabilities were added to IFRS 9 in October 2010 and they largely carried forward existing requirements in IAS 39 except that fair value changes due to credit risk for liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss are generally recorded in other comprehensive income. This standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of this standard.

IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”

IFRS 15 was issued in May 2014 to replace IAS 18, Revenue, IAS 11, Construction Contracts, and related interpretations on revenue. IFRS 15 establishes principles to address the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers. IFRS 15 will also result in enhanced disclosures about revenue, provide guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively and improve guidance for multiple element arrangements. Companies can elect to use either a full or modified retrospective approach when adopting this standard and it is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of this standard.

IFRS 16 “Leases”

IFRS 16 replaces current guidance in IAS 17. Under IAS 17, lessees were required to make a distinction between a finance lease (on the balance sheet) and an operating lease (off balance sheet). IFRS 16 now requires lessees to recognize a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a “right-of-use asset” for virtually all lease contracts. The IASB has included an optional exemption for certain short-term leases and leases of low value assets, however this exemption can only be applied by lessees. The standard applies to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019, with earlier application permitted if IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, is also applied. The Company has not yet assessed the impact of this standard.

3. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that can affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities revenues and expenses and the accompanying disclosures. Estimates and assumptions are continuously evaluated and are based on management’s historical experience and on other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, different judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in outcomes that require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets or liabilities affected in future periods.

The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are:

(a) Recoverability of Exploration and Evaluation Assets

The ultimate recoverability of the exploration and evaluation assets of $50,494 carrying value at December 31, 2017, is dependent upon the Company’s ability to obtain the necessary financing and permits to complete the development and commence profitable production at the Manniitsoq Project, or alternatively, upon the Company’s ability to dispose of its interest therein on an advantageous basis. A review of the indicators of potential impairment is carried out at least at each period end.

Management undertakes a periodic review of these assets to determine whether any indication of impairment exists. Where an indicator of impairment exists, a formal estimate of the recoverable amount of the assets is made. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying value of the assets is higher than the recoverable amount and when mineral license tenements are relinquished or have lapsed. In undertaking this review, management of the Company is required to make significant estimates of, among other things, discount rates, commodity prices, availability of financing, future operating and capital costs and all aspects of project advancement. These estimates are subject to various risks and uncertainties, which may ultimately have an effect on the expected recoverability of the carrying values of the assets.

(b) Restoration Provisions

Management’s best estimates regarding the restoration provisions are based on the current economic environment. Changes in estimates of contamination, restoration standards and restoration activities result in changes to provisions from period to period. Actual restoration

provisions will ultimately depend on future market prices for future restoration obligations. Management has determined that the Company does not have any significant restoration obligations as at December 31, 2017.

(c) Valuation of Share-Based Compensation

The Company estimates the fair value of convertible securities such as warrants and options using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model which requires significant estimation around assumptions and inputs such as expected term to maturity, expected volatility and expected forfeiture rates. The accounting policies in Note 2(k) and Note 10 of the financial statements contain further details of significant assumptions applied to these areas of estimation.

(d) Going Concern

Financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease trading, or has no realistic alternative to do so. Assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern requires the consideration of all available information about the future, which is at least, but not limited to, twelve months from the end of the reporting period. This information includes estimates of future cash flows and other factors, the outcome of which is uncertain. When management is aware, in making its assessment, of material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast substantial doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern those uncertainties are disclosed.

4. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

Short-term investments are comprised of a highly liquid Canadian dollar denominated guaranteed investment certificate with an initial term to maturity greater than ninety days, but not more than one year, that is readily convertible to a contracted amount of cash. The counter-party is a Canadian financial institution. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the instrument was yielding an annual interest rate range of 1.10% (December 31, 2016 - 1.10% - 1.20%).

5. RECEIVABLES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

A summary of the receivables and other current assets as of December 31, 2017 is detailed in the table below:

	December 31, 2017	December 31, 2016
Sales taxes receivable	143	17
Interest receivable	16	9
Other current assets	83	116
	242	142

Other current assets is comprised of prepaid expenses.

6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

The table below sets out costs and accumulated depreciation as at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	Exploration Equipment	Computer Equipment	Computer Software	Total
Cost
Balance – December 31, 2015	47	7	136	190
Additions	—	3	—	3
Balance – December 31, 2016	47	10	136	193
Additions	20	—	—	20
Balance – December 31, 2017	67	10	136	213

Accumulated Depreciation
Balance – December 31, 2015	28	4	65	97
Depreciation	4	3	35	42
Balance – December 31, 2016	32	7	100	139
Depreciation	6	1	18	25
Balance – December 31, 2017	38	8	118	164

Carrying Amount
As at December 31, 2015	19	3	71	93
As at December 31, 2016	15	3	36	54
As at December 31, 2017	29	2	18	49

7. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION ASSETS

	Canada		US	Greenland
	Post Creek Property	Halcyon Property	Section 35 Property	Maniitsoq Property		Total
Acquisition
Balance, December 31, 2016	268	206	3	20		497
Acquisition costs – cash	10	8	3	16		37
Balance, December 31, 2017	278	214	6	36		534

Exploration
Balance, December 31, 2016	1,085	173	—	36,587		37,845
Administration	2	—	—	516		518
Camp operations	—	—	—	3,004		3,004
Corporate social responsibility	—	—	—	37		37
Drilling expenses	—	—	—	3,337		3,337
Environment, health and safety	—	—	—	99		99
Geology	48	14	—	691		753
Geophysics	2	—	—	1,014		1,016
Infrastructure	—	—	—	255		255
Helicopter charter aircraft	—	—	—	3,058		3,058
Property maintenance	—	—	—	7		7
Technical studies	1	—	—	30		31
	53	14	—	12,048		12,115
Balance, December 31, 2017	1,138	187	—	48,635		49,960
Total, December 31, 2017	1,416	401	6	48,671		50,494

	Canada		US	Greenland
	Post Creek Property	Halcyon Property	Section 35 Property	Maniitsoq Property		Total
Acquisition
Balance, December 31, 2015	258	198	—	11		467
Acquisition costs – cash	10	8	3	9		30
Balance, December 31, 2016	268	206	3	20		497

Exploration
Balance, December 31, 2015	1,005	148	—	28,083		29,236
Administration	—	—	—	132		132
Corporate social responsibility	—	—	—	63		63
Drilling expenses	1	—	—	1,799		1,800
Environment, health and safety	—	—	—	2		2
Camp operations	—	—	—	2,160		2,160
Helicopter charter aircraft	—	—	—	2,472		2,472
Geology	78	25	—	858		961
Geophysics	—	—	—	954		954
Remote sensing	—	—	—	68		68
Technical studies (recovery)	1	—	—	(4	)	(3	)
	80	25	—	8,504		8,609
Balance, December 31,2016	1,085	173	—	36,587		37,845
Total, December 31, 2016	1,353	379	3	36,607		38,342

The following is a description of the Company’s exploration and evaluation assets and the related spending commitments:

Post Creek

On December 23, 2009, the Company executed a letter of intent whereby the Company has an option to acquire a mineral claim known as the Post Creek Property located within the Sudbury Mining District of Ontario.

On April 5, 2010 and as amended on March 12, 2013, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire a 100% interest in the Post Creek Property, subject to certain net smelter return royalties (“NSR”) and advance royalty payments. To December 31, 2015, the Company has completed the required consideration and acquired its interest in the Post Creek Property. Commencing August 1, 2015, the Company is obligated to pay advances on the NSR of $10 per annum, totalling $10 during the year ended December 31, 2017 (December 31, 2016 - $10), the total of which will be deducted from any payments to be made under the NSR.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred exploration expenditures totalling $53 (December 31, 2016 - $80) on the Post Creek Property.

Halcyon

On April 5, 2010 and as amended on March 12, 2013, the Company entered into an option agreement to acquire rights to Halcyon Property, subject to certain NSR and advance royalty payments. To December 31, 2015, the Company has completed the required consideration and acquired its interest in the Halcyon Property. Commencing August 1, 2015, the Company is obligated to pay advances on the NSR of $8 per annum, totalling $8 during the year ended December 31, 2017, (December 31, 2016 - $8), the total of which will be deducted from any payments to be made under the NSR arrangement.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred $14 (December 31, 2016 - $25) in exploration and license related expenditures on the Halcyon Property.

Section 35 Property

On January 4, 2016, the Company entered into a 10 year Metallic Minerals Lease (the “Lease”) with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for an area covering approximately 320 acres. The terms of the Lease require an annual rental fee at a rate of US $3.00 per acre for years 1-5 and at a rate of US $6.00 per acre for years 6-10. The Company shall pay a minimum royalty at a rate of US $10.00 per acre for the 11th year onwards, with an increase of an additional US $5.00 per acre per year up to a maximum of US $55.00 per acre per year. A production royalty of between 2% - 2.5% is payable from production of minerals and/or mineral products from an established mining operation area. The Company paid the first year rental fee and the required reclamation deposit of $14 (US $10,000). The Department of Natural Resources shall annually review the level of the reclamation deposit and shall require the amount to be increased or decreased to reflect changes in the cost of future reclamation of the leased premises.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company spent a total of $3 (December 31, 2016 - $3) in license related expenditures on the Section 35 Property.

Maniitsoq

The Company has been granted certain exploration licenses, by the Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum (“BMP”) of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights of an area comprising the Maniitsoq Property, located near Ininngui, Greenland. The Property is subject to a 2.5% NSR. The Company can reduce the NSR to 1% by paying $2,000 on or before 60 days from the decision to commence commercial production.

At the expiration of the first license period, the Company may apply for a second license period (years 6-10), and the Company may apply for a further 3-year license for years 11 to 13. Thereafter, the Company may apply for additional 3-year licenses for years 14 to 16, 17 to 19 and 20 to 22. The Company will be required to pay additional license fees and will be obligated to incur minimum eligible exploration expenses for such years.

The Company may terminate the licenses at any time; however any unfulfilled obligations according to the licenses will remain in force, regardless of the termination.

Future required minimum exploration expenditures will be adjusted each year on the basis of the change to the Danish Consumer Price Index.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company spent an aggregate of $12,064 (December 31, 2016 - $8,513) in exploration and license related expenditures on the Maniitsoq Property, which is comprised of the Sulussugut and Ininngui Licenses. Further details on the licenses and related expenditures are outlined below.

Sulussugut License

(All references to amounts in Danish Kroners, “DKK” are in thousands of DKK)

Effective August 15, 2011, the Company was granted an exploration license (the “Sulussugut License”) by the BMP of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights of an area located near Sulussugut, Greenland. The Company paid a license fee of $6 (DKK 31) upon granting of the Sulussugut License. The application for another 5 year term on the Sulussugut License was submitted to the Greenland Mineral Licence & Safety Authority which was effective on April 11, 2016, with December 31, 2017 being the seventh year. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid a license fee of $8 (DKK 40) which provides for renewal of the Sulussugut License until 2020.

To December 31, 2015, under the terms of a preliminary license, the Company completed the exploration requirements of an estimated minimum of DKK 83,809 (approximately $15,808) between the years ended December 31, 2011 to 2015 by incurring $26,116 on the Sulussugut License. The accumulated exploration credits held at the end to December 31, 2015, of DKK 100,304 can be carried forward until 2019. Under the terms of the second license period, the Company had no minimum required exploration for the year ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has spent $44,937 on exploration costs for the Sulussugut License.

To December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has completed all obligations with respect to required reduction of the area of the license.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company spent a total of $11,079 (December 31, 2016 - $7,755) in exploration and license related expenditures on the Sulussugut License.

Ininngui License

Effective March 4, 2012, the Company was granted an exploration license (the “Ininngui License”) by the BMP of Greenland for exclusive exploration rights of an area located near Ininngui, Greenland. The Company paid a license fee of $6 (DKK 32) upon granting of the Ininngui License. The Ininngui License was valid for 5 years until December 31, 2016, with December 31, 2012 being the first year. The Ininngui License is contiguous with the Sulussugut License.

To December 31, 2016, the Company’s expenditures exceeded the minimum requirement and the Company has a surplus of DKK 15,677 (approximately $3,044) and the Company was granted a credit for the excess, which may be used towards future expense requirements on the Ininngui License until the following years; year 2018 - DKK 2,276, year 2019 - DKK 6,790 and year 2020 - DKK 9,367, should the Company be granted an extension on the exploration license.

Should the Company not incur the minimum exploration expenditures on the license in any one year from years 2-5, the Company may pay 50% of the difference in cash to BMP as full compensation for that year. This procedure may not be used for more than 2 consecutive calendar years and as at December 31, 2017, the Company has not used the procedure for the license.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company spent a total of $985 (December 31, 2016 - $758) in exploration and license related expenditures on the Ininngui License.

8. TRADE PAYABLES AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

	December 31, 2017	December 31, 2016
Trade payables	813	133
Amounts due to related parties (Note 11)	42	2
Accrued liabilities	114	46
	969	181

9. LOAN PAYABLE

On April 22, 2016, the Company issued a term note to Sentient Executive GP IV Limited (“Sentient”) and received a loan of $4,500 (the “Loan”). The Loan was due on April 30, 2017 and was made on an interest free basis. Sentient is a significant shareholder of the Company.

Following the guidance of IFRS 13 “Fair Value Measurements” and IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement,” the Company discounted the Loan at an interest rate of 15% per annum, being the estimated market rate. Accordingly, upon issuance, the Company recorded an amount of $265 to reserves, which was to be amortized as interest expense over the term of the Loan.

Under the terms of the Loan, Sentient had the right, at its option, to require early pre-payment in the event that, during the term of the Loan, the Company successfully completed an issuance of common shares to third parties for gross proceeds of not less than $2,000. In the event the maximum offering amount is raised, being $12,000, Sentient was required to be repaid the full loan of $4,500. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company closed private placements (Note 10), which triggered full repayment of the Loan. The Company repaid the Loan and, accordingly, the full amount of $265 was reallocated to share capital on settlement and recorded on the statement of comprehensive loss as interest expense.

The Company also issued Sentient 952,380 common shares, at a fair value of $95, as a finance fee for advancing the Loan.

10. SHARE CAPITAL, WARRANTS AND OPTIONS

The authorized capital of the Company comprises an unlimited number of common shares without par value and 100,000,000 Series 1 convertible preferred shares without par value.

a) Common shares issued and outstanding

2017

On June 8, 2017, the Company closed a brokered placement, through a prospectus, of units for total gross proceeds of $10,877. The Company issued 145,030,833 units at a price of $0.075 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share in the capital of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one common share at an exercise price of $0.12 until June 8, 2019. The Company paid share issuance costs of $533 and also issued 1,965,093 agent’s warrants, exercisable at $0.075 per warrant until June 8, 2019. The Company allocated a $1,500 fair value to the warrants issued in conjunction with the private placement and $61 to agent’s warrants. The fair value of warrants was determined on a pro-rata basis using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions; expected life of 2 years, expected dividend yield of 0%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.71% and an expected volatility of 98.60%. The Company also granted the agent an overallotment option for a period of 30 days, which expired unexercised. The fair value of overallotment option of $39 was recorded as a share issuance cost and was determined on a pro-rata basis using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions; expected life of 30 days, expected dividend yield of 0%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.71% and an expected volatility of 66.6%.

On August 15, 2017, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of units for total proceeds of $3,074. The Company issued 40,982,448 units at a price of $0.075 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share in the capital of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder thereof to acquire one common share at an exercise price of $0.12 until August 15, 2019. The Company allocated a $519 fair value to the warrants issued from the private placement. Direct financing costs totalled $16 resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $3,058. The fair value of warrants was determined on a pro-rata basis using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions; expected life of 2 years, expected dividend yield of 0%, a risk-free interest rate of 1.23% and an expected volatility of 98.64%.

2016

On April 28, 2016, the Company issued 952,380 common shares at a fair value of $95 as a finance fee.

On July 21, 2016, the Company closed a private placement of 92,668,907 units at a price of $0.075 per unit for gross proceeds of $6,950. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase an additional common share at a price of $0.12 per share until July 21, 2018. Share issuance costs of $571 were incurred in connection with the private placement. The Company also issued 1,203,695 agent’s warrants, exercisable at $0.075 per warrant until July 21, 2018. The Company allocated a fair value of $48 to the agent’s warrants under the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: expected life of 2 years, expected dividend yield of 0%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.57% and an expected volatility of 91.06%. The Company also granted the agent an overallotment option, which expired unexercised.

On September 12, 2016, the Company closed a private placement and issued 67,331,093 units at a price of $0.075 per unit for gross proceeds of $5,050. Each unit consists of one common share of the Company and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase an additional common share at a price of $0.12 per share until September 12, 2018.

2015

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 1,149,000 common shares for stock options exercised at $0.10 per share for proceeds of $115. The Company reallocated $57 from share-based payments reserve to share capital upon exercise.

The Company issued 7,461,748 common shares for warrant exercises at $0.21 per share for proceeds of $1,567.

On July 20, 2015, the Company closed a private placement of 29,054,079 units at a price of $0.22 per unit for proceeds of $6,392. Each unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitled the purchaser to purchase an additional common share at a price of $0.30 per share until July 20, 2017. Share issuance costs of $216 were incurred in connection with the private placement. The Company also issued 251,370 broker’s warrants, exercisable at $0.30 per warrant until July 20, 2017. The Company allocated a fair value of $18 to the broker’s warrants under the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: expected life of 2 years, expected dividend yield of 0%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.42% and an expected volatility of 89.61%.

b) Preferred shares issued and outstanding

As at December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there are 590,931 series 1 preferred shares outstanding.

The rights and restrictions of the preferred shares are as follows:

i) dividends shall be paid at the discretion of the directors;

ii) the holders of the preferred shares are not entitled to vote except at meetings of the holders of the preferred shares, where they are entitled to one vote for each preferred share held;

iii) the shares are convertible at any time after 6 months from the date of issuance, upon the holder serving the Company with 10 days written notice; and

iv) the number of the common shares to be received on conversion of the preferred shares is to be determined by dividing the conversion value of the share, $1 per share, by $0.90.

c) Warrants

A summary of common share purchase warrants activity during the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is as follows:

	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
	Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)	Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)	Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)
Outstanding, beginning of year	95,982,036		0.15	27,738,344		0.49	25,137,030		0.47
Issued	94,971,721		0.12	81,203,692		0.12	14,778,344		0.12
Cancelled / Expired	(14,778,344	)	0.30	(12,960,000	)	0.71	(4,715,282	)	0.21
Exercised	—		—	—		—	(7,461,748	)	0.21
Outstanding, end of year	176,175,413		0.12	95,982,036		0.15	27,738,344		0.49

At December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding common share purchase warrants exercisable to acquire common shares of the Company as follows:

Warrants Outstanding	Expiry Date	Exercise Price ($)	Weighted Average remaining contractual life (years)
46,334,451	Jul 21, 20181	0.12	0.15
1,203,695	Jul 21, 2018	0.075	0.00
33,665,546	Sep 12, 20181	0.12	0.13
72,515,414	June 8, 2019	0.12	0.59
1,965,083	June 8, 2019	0.075	0.02
20,491,224	August 15, 2019	0.12	0.19
176,175,413			1.08

1 The warrants are subject to an acceleration clause such that if the volume-weighted average trading price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX-V exceeds $0.18 per common share for a period of 10 consecutive trading days at any date before the expiration date of such warrants, the Company may, at its option, accelerate the warrant expiry date to within 30 days. To December 31, 2017, the Company’s common shares have not met the criterion for acceleration.

d) Stock options

The Company adopted a Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), providing the authority to grant options to directors, officers, employees and consultants enabling them to acquire up to 10% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Under the Plan, the exercise price of each option equals the market price or a discounted price of the Company’s stock as calculated on the date of grant. The options can be granted for a maximum term of 10 years.

A summary of option activity under the Plan during the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is as follows:

	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
	Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price	Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price	Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year	12,823,000		0.30	9,872,500		0.37	12,548,000		0.31
Issued	9,137,500		0.12	6,058,000		0.21	1,350,000		0.25
Cancelled / Expired	(1,240,000	)	0.24	(3,107,500	)	0.34	(2,876,500	)	0.11
Exercised	—		—	—		—	(1,149,000	)	0.10
Outstanding, end of year	20,720,500		0.23	12,823,000		0.30	9,872,500		0.37

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted 9,137,500 incentive stock options to employees, directors and consultants with a maximum term of 5 years. All stock options vest immediately and are exercisable at $0.12 per common share. The Company calculates the fair value of all stock options using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The fair value of this grant amounted to $504 and was recorded as a share-based payments expense.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 6,058,000 incentive stock options to employees, directors and consultants with a maximum term of 5 years. The granting of these options resulted in a share-based payments expense of $278.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a further $31 in stock-based compensation for previously issued stock options that vested during the year.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted 1,350,000 incentive stock options to employees, directors and consultants with a maximum term of 5 years. Of the total, 200,000 options granted to a consultant vest 25% every 3 months and all other options vested immediately. The granting of these options resulted in a stock-based compensation expense of $232. The Company recorded a further $26 in stock-based compensation for previously issued stock options that vested during the year.

The fair value of stock options granted and vested during the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was calculated using the following assumptions:

	December 31, 2017	December 31, 2016	December 31, 2015
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%	0%
Expected share price volatility	66.6% - 100.6%	111% - 113%	157.9% - 170.5%
Risk free interest rate	1.17% – 1.80%	0.68% – 0.79%	0.64% - 0.79%
Expected life of options	5 years	5 years	5years

Details of options outstanding as at December 31, 2017 are as follows:

Options Outstanding	Options Exercisable	Expiry Date		Exercise Price ($)	Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)
150,000	150,000	Jan 15, 2018	*	0.15	0.00
200,000	200,000	Apr 22, 2018		0.15	0.00
150,000	150,000	Jul 29, 2018		0.20	0.00
200,000	200,000	Sep 30, 2018		0.37	0.01
2,440,000	2,440,000	Jul 9, 2019		0.62	0.18
200,000	200,000	Aug 27, 2019		0.37	0.02
100,000	100,000	Sep 26, 2019		0.26	0.01
350,000	350,000	Nov 5, 2019		0.21	0.03
1,000,000	1,000,000	Dec 19, 2019		0.22	0.09
900,000	900,000	Feb 3, 2020		0.275	0.09
450,000	450,000	Oct 5, 2020		0.20	0.06
5,443,000	5,443,000	Jan 28, 2021		0.21	0.81
8,137,500	8,137,500	Feb 21, 2022		0.12	1.63
1,000,000	1,000,000	Dec 20, 2022		0.12	0.24
20,720,500	20,720,500				3.17

* Subsequently expired, unexercised.

e) Reserve

The reserve records items recognized as stock-based compensation expense and other share-based payments until such time that the stock options or warrants are exercised, at which time the corresponding amount will be transferred to share capital. Amounts recorded for forfeited or expired unexercised options and warrants are transferred to deficit. During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company recorded $504 of share-based payments to reserve, (December 31, 2016 - $309) (December

31, 2015 - $276). During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company transferred $301 (December 31, 2016 - $2,725) (December 31, 2015 - $284) to deficit for expired options and warrants.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company initially recorded an amount of $265 to the reserve, which was amortized as interest expense over the term of the Loan and reallocated to share capital upon settlement.

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The following amounts due to related parties are included in trade payables and accrued liabilities (Note 8):

	December 31, 2017	December 31, 2016
Directors and officers of the Company	42	2

Total	42	2

These amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and have no fixed terms of repayment.

(b) Related party transactions

As of December 31, 2017, Sentient beneficially owns 356,476,487 common shares constituting approximately 64.27% of the currently issued and outstanding Common Shares.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $244 (2016 - $347) (2015 - $217) in fees charged by a legal firm in which the Company’s chairman is a consultant.

Key management compensation was:

	December 31, 2017	December 31, 2016	December 31, 2015
Geological consulting fees – expensed	35	6	72
Geological consulting fees – capitalized	178	44	94
Management fees – expensed	749	756	547
Salaries – expensed	128	103	77
Share-based payments	358	186	36
Total	1,448	1,095	826

12. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Changes in working capital for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivables and current assets	(162	)	36		(9	)
Increase (decrease) in prepaid expenses	46		(73	)	21
Increase (decrease) in trade payables and accrued liabilities	21		(15	)	(180	)
Total changes in working capital	(95	)	(52	)	(168	)

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company:

i) transferred $301 from reserve to deficit;

ii) recorded $39 in fair value of options to share issuance costs;

iii) recorded $2,080 in fair value of agent’s warrants to share issuance costs; and

iv) recorded $767 in accrued exploration and evaluation expenditures.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company:

i) recorded $265 to reserves, which was subsequently reallocated to share capital and amortized as interest expense over the term of the Loan;

ii) transferred $2,725 from reserve to deficit;

iii) recorded $48 in fair value of agent’s warrants to share issuance costs; and

iv) recorded $34 in accrued exploration and evaluation expenditures.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company:

i) transferred $284 from reserve to deficit; and

ii) recorded $86 in accrued exploration and evaluation expenditures.

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company has certain commitments to meet the minimum expenditures requirements on its mineral exploration assets it has interest in.

Effective July 1, 2014, the Company had changes to management and entered into the following agreements for services with directors of the Company and a company in which a director has an interest:

i) Management fees: $27 per month effective December 2014.

ii) Directors’ fees: $2 stipend per month for independent directors and $3 stipend per month for the chairman of the board.

Each of the agreements shall be continuous and may only be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties, subject to the provisions that in the event there is a change of effective control of the Company, the party shall have the right to terminate the agreement, within sixty days from the date of such change of effective control, upon written notice to the Company. Within thirty days from the date of delivery of such notice, the Company shall forward to the party the amount of money due and owing to the party hereunder to the extent accrued to the effective date of termination.

14. RISK MANAGEMENT

The Company’s exposure to market risk includes, but is not limited to, the following risks:

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is the risk that the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Convertible Debentures with Sentient no longer bear interest and therefore are not subject to changes in interest payments. The short term investments are held at highly-rated financial institutions and earn guaranteed fixed interest rate and thus are not subject to significant changes in interest payments.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Currency risk is risk that the fair value of future cash flows will fluctuate because of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, the value of cash and cash equivalents and other financial assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies can fluctuate with changes in currency exchange rates.

The Company operates in Canada and Greenland and undertakes transactions denominated in foreign currencies such as United States dollar, Euros and Danish Krones, and consequently is exposed to exchange rate risks. Exchange risks are managed by matching levels of foreign currency balances and related obligations and by maintaining operating cash accounts in non-Canadian dollar currencies. The rate published by the Bank of Canada at the close of business on December 31, 2017 was 1.2550 USD to CAD, 0.6649 EUR to CAD and 0.2018 DKK to CAD.

The Company’s Canadian dollar equivalent of financial assets and liabilities that are denominated in Danish Krones consist of accounts payable of $571 (2016 - $23) and $56 in USD currency (2016 - $Nil).

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to discharge an obligation. The credit risk is primarily associated with liquid financial assets. The Company limits exposure to credit risk on liquid financial assets by holding cash and cash equivalents and short term investments at highly-rated financial institutions.

Price Risk

The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to commodity prices. Commodity price risk is defined as the potential adverse impact on earnings and economic value due to commodity price movements and volatilities. To mitigate price risk, the Company closely monitors commodity prices of precious metals and the stock market to determine the appropriate course of action to be taken by the Company.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. The Company manages the liquidity risk inherent in these financial obligations by regularly monitoring actual cash flows to annual budget which forecast cash needs and expected cash availability to meet future obligations. The financing transactions completed during the year ended December 31, 2017 improved the liquidity position of the Company.

The Company will defer discretionary expenditures, as required, in order to manage and conserve cash required for current liabilities.

The following table shows the Company’s contractual obligations as at December 31, 2017:

As at December 31, 2017	Less than 1 year	1 - 2 years	2 - 5 years	Total
Trade and accrued liabilities	969	—	—	969
	969	—	—	969

Capital Risk Management

The Company manages its capital to ensure that it will be able to continue as a going concern, so that adequate funds are available or are scheduled to be raised to carry out the Company’s exploration program and to meet its ongoing administrative and operating costs and obligations. This is achieved by the Board of Directors’ review and ultimate approval of budgets that are achievable within existing resources, and the timely matching and release of the next stage of expenditures with the resources made available from capital raisings and debt funding from related or other parties. In doing so, the Company may issue new shares, restructure or issue new debt.

The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements imposed by a regulator or a lending institution.

In the management of capital, the Company includes the components of equity, loans and borrowings, other current liabilities, net of cash and cash equivalents.

	As at December 31,
	2017		2016
Equity	52,728		41,701
Current liabilities	969		181
	53,697		41,882
Cash and cash equivalents	(398	)	(630	)
Short term investments	(2,500	)	(2,700	)
	50,799		38,552

15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy establishes six levels to classify the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure the fair value.

The six levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly

Level 3 — Inputs that are not based on observable market data

16. SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company operates in one reportable operating segment being that of the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in three geographic segments being Canada, Greenland and United States (Note 7). The Company’s geographic segments are as follows:

	December 31, 2017	December 31, 2016
Equipment
Canada	19	39
Greenland	30	15
Total	49	54

	December 31, 2017	December 31, 2016
Exploration and evaluation assets
Canada	1,817	1,732
Greenland	48,671	36,607
United States	6	3
Total	50,494	38,342

17. INCOME TAXES

A reconciliation of the expected income tax recovery to the actual income tax recovery is as follows:

	Year ended December 31, 2017			Year ended December 31, 2016
Net loss	$	(2,879	)	$	(2,877	)
Statutory tax rate	26.0		%	26.0		%
Expected income tax recovery at the statutory tax rate	(749		)	(748		)
Permanent differences and other	(2		)	(80		)
Change in valuation allowance	751			828
Net deferred Income tax recovery	$	—		$	—

The significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Exploration and evaluation assets	$	18		$	14
Loss carry-forwards	3,048			2,366
Share issuance costs	237			175
Cumulative eligible capital	32			32
Equipment	93			91
	3,428			2,678
Valuation allowance	(3,428		)	(2,678		)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

The tax pools relating to these deductible temporary differences expire as follows:

	Canadian non-capital losses		Canadian net-capital losses		Canadian resource pools		Canadian share issue costs
2030	$	696	$	—	$	—	$	—
2031	517		—		—		—
2032	645		—		—		—
2033	847		—		—		—
2034	1,484		—		—		—
2035	2,141		—		—		—
2036	2,712		—		—		—
2037	2,622
No expiry	—		57		50,575		912
	$	11,664	$	57	$	50,575	$	912

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

The Company entered into agreements to complete a non-brokered private placement of up to 233,333,333 units at a price of $0.075 cents unit for gross proceeds of $17.5 million. Each unit will consist of one common share and one-half of one common share purchase warrant of the Company. Each warrant will entitle the holder to acquire one common share of the Company at $0.12 on the date that is 24 months following its issuance date.

On April 19, 2018, the Company announced closing of the non-brokered private placement and raised an aggregate gross proceeds of $17.5 million through the issuance of 233,333,333 units at a price of $0.075 per unit.

On March 1, 2018, the Company granted incentive stock options to certain directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company to purchase up to 5,725,000 common shares in the capital of the Company. All options are exercisable for a period of five years at an exercise price of $0.12 per share.