XML 55 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	12 Months Ended
Feb. 02, 2013
Impairment Of Long- Lived Assets [Text Block]	Note 4. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets During Fiscal 2010, the Company concluded, based on a significant decline in sales and earnings during the fourth quarter of that year, that triggering events had occurred requiring a test of long-lived assets for impairment at its retail stores and consolidated subsidiaries. Long-lived assets at locations where impairment was determined to exist were written down to their estimated fair values as of the end of the period, resulting in the recording of an asset impairment charge of $2.0 million. Estimated fair values for long-lived assets at these locations, including store fixtures and equipment and leasehold improvements, were determined based on a measure of discounted future cash flows over the remaining lease terms at the respective locations. Future cash flows were estimated based on store operating plans and were discounted at a rate approximating the Company’s cost of capital without reference to market transactions. Management believes its assumptions were reasonable and consistently applied. The Company did not recognize an impairment charge during Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

12 Months Ended

Feb. 02, 2013

Impairment Of Long- Lived Assets [Text Block]

Note 4. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

During Fiscal 2010, the Company concluded, based on a significant decline in sales and earnings during the fourth quarter of that year, that triggering events had occurred requiring a test of long-lived assets for impairment at its retail stores and consolidated subsidiaries. Long-lived assets at locations where impairment was determined to exist were written down to their estimated fair values as of the end of the period, resulting in the recording of an asset impairment charge of $2.0 million. Estimated fair values for long-lived assets at these locations, including store fixtures and equipment and leasehold improvements, were determined based on a measure of discounted future cash flows over the remaining lease terms at the respective locations. Future cash flows were estimated based on store operating plans and were discounted at a rate approximating the Company’s cost of capital without reference to market transactions. Management believes its assumptions were reasonable and consistently applied. The Company did not recognize an impairment charge during Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011.