-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, NyXUzOmJ68TmAy019tWK6ZOconaVQyb8HomarKcUYmbEx060qsirGQ3Od4vui43N W4t8RYo0Kqd/KxrRIZacRg== 0001058809-02-000019.txt : 20020903 0001058809-02-000019.hdr.sgml : 20020902 20020903105721 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001058809-02-000019 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: DEF 14A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20011130 FILED AS OF DATE: 20020903 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000794927 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-EDUCATIONAL SERVICES [8200] IRS NUMBER: 232170505 STATE OF INCORPORATION: PA FISCAL YEAR END: 1130 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: DEF 14A SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-15588 FILM NUMBER: 02754905 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1600 MEDFORD PLZ STREET 2: RTE 70 & HARTFORD RD CITY: MEDFORD STATE: NJ ZIP: 08055 BUSINESS PHONE: 6099530044 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1600 MEDFORD PLZ CITY: MEDFORD STATE: NJ ZIP: 08055 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: CANTERBURY CORPORATE SERVICES INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19940323 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: CANTERBURY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC /PA/ DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19920703 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: CANTERBURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19970620 DEF 14A 1 ccgprxy02.txt DEFINITIVE PROXY Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. 1600 Medford Plaza, 128 Route 70 Medford, New Jersey 08055 P R O X Y S T A T E M E N T Proxies, enclosed with this Proxy Statement, are requested by the Board of Directors of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The meeting is to be held on Wednesday, October 2, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. at The Mansion on Main Street, Plaza 3000, Voorhees, New Jersey. Stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 6, 2002 will be entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournment of that meeting. As of that date, 12,130,712 shares of common stock of Canterbury were outstanding and entitled to one vote each. Execution of a proxy will not in any way affect a stockholder's right to attend the meeting and vote in person. Any shareholder submitting a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time before it is exercised. Any proxies that are sent in by stockholders may be revoked before October 2, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. by mail or other deliveries in writing, or by voice vote if the shareholder attends the Annual Meeting in person. The people named as attorneys in the proxies are either Officers or Directors of Canterbury. With respect to the election of a Board of Directors, shares represented by proxies in the enclosed form, which are received, will be voted as explained below under the heading Election of Directors. Where a choice has been specified on the proxy with respect to a proposal, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with the choice selected and will be votes FOR that proposal if no specification is indicated. Under Pennsylvania law, the presence of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all stockholders are entitled to cast on a particular matter to be acted upon at a meeting, constitutes a quorum for purposes of consideration and action on a matter. Only stockholders indicating affirmative or negative decision on a matter are treated as voting. Abstentions, broker non-votes or mere absence or failure to vote is not equivalent to a negative decision and will not count towards a quorum, and if a quorum is otherwise present, effect the outcome of a vote. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker submits a proxy but does not have authority to vote a customer's shares on one or more matters. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required for approval of each of the actions proposed to be taken at the Annual Meeting. If a stockholders' meeting is called for the election of Directors and is adjourned for lack of a quorum and another stockholders' meeting is called, those stockholders entitled to vote who attend the adjourned meeting, although less than a quorum as fixed under Pennsylvania law or in the by-laws, shall be a quorum for the purpose of electing Directors. If a meeting called to vote upon any other matter than the election of Directors has been adjourned for at least 15 days because of the absence of a quorum, those stockholders entitled to vote who attend such meeting, although less than a quorum as fixed under Pennsylvania law or in the by-laws shall still constitute a quorum for purpose of acting upon any matter set forth in the notice of meeting. If the notice actually states that those stockholders who attend the adjourned meeting shall nevertheless constitute a quorum for the purpose upon acting on the matter, then the vote would be binding. Canterbury is not aware of any other matters to be presented at the meeting. If any other matters are presented at the meeting upon which it is proper to take a vote, shares represented by all proxies received will be voted by and in the judgment of the persons named as proxies. An Annual Report containing the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2001 as filed with the SEC including complete financial statements audited by Baratz & Associates, P.A. is enclosed with, but not as a part of, this Proxy Statement. Canterbury's Form 10-Q report for the period ended May 31, 2002 are available upon request from the Company's Investor Relations Department or online at www.sec.gov. The date that this Proxy Statement and proxy material are being sent to the stockholders is on or about August 30, 2002. Proposal No. 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS - -------------------------------------- Seven Directors are to be elected at the meeting, each to serve until the next Annual Meeting and until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified. Each of the nominees named in the following pages is presently a member of the Board of Directors. If at the time of election any of the nominees are unable or unwilling to serve, for any reason not presently known or contemplated, the persons named on the proxy card will have discretionary authority to vote for the balance of those named and, if they deem it advisable, for a substitute nominee. NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS - ---------------------- Director Name Age Since Principal Occupation - ---- --- ----- -------------------- Stanton M. Pikus 62 1981 Chairman of the Board of Directors Kevin J. McAndrew 44 1990 President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer Jean Zwerlein Pikus 49 1984 Vice President, Secretary Alan B. Manin(1) 65 1981 President, Atlantis, Inc. Stephen M. Vineberg(1)(2)(3) 61 1988 President, CMQ, Inc. Paul L. Shapiro(1)(2)(3) 51 1992 Manager, McKesson Drug Co. Frank A. Cappiello(1)(4) 76 1995 President, McCullough, Andrews & Cappiello, Inc. (1) Independent Board of Directors Member (2) Member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. (3) Member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. (4) Chairman and Member of the Audit and Compensation Committees of the Board of Directors. BIOGRAPHIES OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS STANTON M. PIKUS, Chairman of the Board of Directors, was a founder of Canterbury (1981). In June 2001 he resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. but remains an employee of the Company. He graduated from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (B.S., Economics and Accounting) in 1962. From 1968 until 1984 he worked full-time as President and majority stockholder of Brown, Bailey and Pikus, Inc., a mergers and acquisitions consulting firm that had completed more than twenty transactions. In addition, Mr. Pikus has been retained in the past by various small to medium-sized public and private companies in the capacity of an independent financial consultant. Mr. Pikus is the spouse of Jean Z. Pikus, who is a Director, a Vice President and the Secretary of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. KEVIN J. McANDREW, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer as of June 1, 2001. He was Chief Operating Officer since December, 1993; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Canterbury since June 21, 1987; Treasurer since January, 1988; and Director since 1990. He is a graduate of the University of Delaware (B.S. Accounting, 1980) and has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1982. From 1980 to 1983 he was an Auditor with the public accounting firm of Coopers & Lybrand in Philadelphia. From 1984 to 1986 Mr. McAndrew was employed as a Controller for a New Jersey based division of Allied Signal, Inc. JEAN ZWERLEIN PIKUS, Vice President, Secretary, and Director since December 1, 1984. She was employed by J. B. Lippincott Company, a publishing company, from 1974 to 1983, where she was Assistant Personnel Manager and also created its word processing center, and was responsible for the day-to- day control of word processing and graphic services. In 1984, Ms. Pikus graduated from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (B.S., Accounting and Management, cum laude). Ms. Pikus is the spouse of Stanton M. Pikus, who is the Chairman of the Board of Directors and an employee of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. ALAN B. MANIN, Founder and a Director of Canterbury since its inception in 1981. He is currently the President of Atlantis, Inc., a company which provides motivational training to employees of Fortune 1000 companies. He is a graduate of Temple University (B.S., 1960; M.Ed., 1966). He was a teacher and Department Chairman in the Philadelphia School System (1960-1966); a former Vice President and Director of Education for Evelyn Wood Reading Dynamics (1966-1972); a former Director of Northeast Preparatory School (1973); and President, Chief Operating Officer and founder of Health Careers Academy, a federally accredited (National Association of Trade and Technical Schools) vocational school (1974-1979). STEPHEN M. VINEBERG, a Director since 1988, is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of CMQ, Inc. Previously he was a Vice President of Fidelity Bank, Philadelphia, where he was Chief Operating Officer of the Data Processing, Systems and Programming Divisions. Mr. Vineberg also directed a wholly owned subsidiary of the bank that developed and marketed computer software, operated a service bureau and coordinated all electronic funds transfer activities. PAUL L. SHAPIRO, a Director since December, 1992, has worked for McKesson Drug Company for the past 25 years. Recipient of the McKesson President's Award for 2002. From 1973 through 1975 he was Director of the Pennsylvania Security Officers' Training Academy. In 1973, he graduated from York College of Pennsylvania with a B.S. Degree in Police Administration. FRANK A. CAPPIELLO, a Director since 1995, Frank Cappiello is one of the country's leading financial analysts. He is an expert on the national economy and a recognized authority on investments. His background includes: formerly the Chief Investment Officer for an insurance holding company, Research Director of a major stock brokerage firm, and presently President of an investment counseling firm: McCullough, Andrews & Cappiello, Inc. He helped found and served as a Director/Advisor to a successful venture capital fund and is also a founder and past director of a small business commercial bank, The Bank of Maryland which eventually became part of BB&T Corp, a $44 billion bank holding company. He is the author of four books. Mr. Cappiello has been a faculty member at Johns Hopkins University and is currently Distinguished Visiting Professor of Finance at Loyola College in Maryland. Frank Cappiello is best known to television viewers as a regular panelist of the former PBS television series "Wall $treet Week With Louis Rukeyser". This nationally telecasted program was shown weekly on 250 stations with a viewing audience of nearly 3 million people. A panelist for 32 years, he was on the first show in November 1970 and on the last show, March 22, 2002. He is now a regular panelist on Mr. Rukeyser's successor show: "Lou Rukeyser's Wall Street" airing weekly on CNBC Fridays at 8:30 p.m. He has been a frequent guest on the ABC network television program, "Good Morning, America" as well as CNN's "Money Line", CNN Financial's "Market Sweep", and CNBC. He is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame and Harvard University's Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Cappiello served in the Marine Corps as a Lieutenant in an automatic weapons battalion. He is a recipient of the Navy Combat Ribbon. MANAGEMENT INDEBTEDNESS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS - ------------------------------------------------ The present Officers and Directors have the following related transactions with the Company. On April 10, 2001, the Company sold 550,000 restricted shares of Canterbury common stock to the following Officers and Directors as an incentive to continue and increase their efforts on behalf of the Company: Stanton M. Pikus 200,000 Frank A. Cappiello 50,000 Kevin J. McAndrew 150,000 Alan Manin 25,000 Jean Z. Pikus 100,000 Stephen Vineberg 25,000 These shares of restricted common stock were purchased at $1.04 (the National Market Nasdaq closing price at the time of purchase) with interest bearing, recourse notes made payable to the Company. The notes carried an interest rate of 4.0% and were due and payable on or before April, 2006. These notes and accrued interest were collateralized by the issued shares. Interest was accrued and payable quarterly. Each recipient also has granted the Company a 15-day right of first refusal, in any sale of these shares. On May 16, 2001, the Company sold 700,000 restricted shares of Canterbury common stock to the following Officers and Directors for various services: Stanton M. Pikus 250,000 Jean Z. Pikus 75,000 Kevin J. McAndrew 150,000 Stephen Vineberg 50,000 Frank A. Cappiello 135,000 Alan Manin 40,000 These shares of restricted common stock were purchased at $1.15 (the National Market Nasdaq closing price at the time of purchase) with interest bearing, recourse notes made payable to the Company. The notes carried an interest rate of 4.0% and were due and payable on or before May, 2006. These notes and accrued interest were collateralized by the issued shares. Interest was accrued and payable quarterly. Each recipient also has granted the Company a 15-day right of first refusal, in any sale of these shares. On July 17, 2002 the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved a modification of the April 10, 2001 and the May 16, 2001 notes. The notes shall become non-recourse as to principal and interest as of September 1, 2002 with the issued shares continuing to collateralize the notes. Principal and interest must be paid by recipient before they are entitled to sell their respective shares. If principal and interest have not been paid by the maturity date of the recipient notes, then recipients' sole obligation shall be that any shares relating to this nonpayment will be forfeited and returned to the Company. In consideration for this modification the term of these notes was reduced and shortened from April and May, 2006 to December 31, 2004. The Board also prohibited the issuance of any stock options, stock or any other form of equity for all of Fiscal 2002 to the recipients. In the past, the Board has issued and/or granted significant amounts of equity (in the form of stock options or stock purchases) to these recipients on an annual basis. The Compensation Committee did not wish any additional dilution of Company stock at the current low prices. Also by reducing the term of the notes the Compensation Committee believes that management would have a further inducement to accelerate their efforts to increase shareholder value or risk the loss of their shares. The principal and interest for both sales may be paid in cash or the transfer of stock valued at 100% of the then current market price of any publicly traded company. There is no prepayment penalty on either principal or interest payments. For information regarding stock option grants to Directors and Officers please refer to the sections Option Grants and Directors' Remuneration. EXECUTIVE CASH COMPENSATION - --------------------------- The following table is a summary of cash compensation paid by Canterbury for services rendered in Fiscal 1999, 2000 and 2001 to the Chief Executive Officer and each of the other four most highly-compensated Officers of Canterbury who received at least $100,000 in total annual compensation. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE Long-Term Compensation Annual Compensation Award Payouts ------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- Other Annual Restricted Securities LTIP All Other Name and Salary Bonus Compensation Stock Awards Underlying Payouts Compensation Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) Options/SAR(#) ($) ($) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stanton M. Pikus(1) 2001 $254,000 $- $- $- 175,000 $- $- Chairman 2000 210,000 - - - 100,000 - - 1999 195,000 - - - 240,000 - - Kevin J. McAndrew(2) 2001 $218,000 $- $- $- 150,000 $- $- President, Chief 2000 149,000 - - - 70,000 - - Executive Officer, and 1999 135,000 - - - 180,000 - - Chief Financial Officer Jean Z. Pikus 2001 $112,000 $- $- $- 85,000 $- $- Vice President 2000 92,000 - - - 40,000 - - 1999 90,000 - - - 108,000 - -
(1) Prior to June 1, 2001 Stanton M. Pikus held the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer. (2) Prior to June 1, 2001, Kevin J. McAndrew held the positions of Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. OPTION GRANTS - ------------- The following Executive Officers were granted five-year stock options during Fiscal 2001 from the 1995 Stock Option Plan as Incentive Option Awards. As of this date, no stock options have been awarded during Fiscal 2002 to Executive Officers. Number of Percentage of Securities Total Options Underlying Granted to Grant Date Options Employees in Exercise Expiration Black-Scholes Name Granted Fiscal Year Price Date Value - ---- ------- ----------- ----- ---- ----- Stanton M. Pikus* 75,000 $1.50 01/09/06 $75,744(a) 100,000 28.8% $0.69 11/12/06 $40,934(a) Kevin J. McAndrew 50,000 $1.50 01/08/06 $50,496(a) 100,000 24.7% $0.69 11/12/06 $40,934(a) Jean Z. Pikus 25,000 $1.50 01/09/06 $25,248(a) 60,000 14.0% $0.69 11/12/06 $24,560(a) * Prior to June 1, 2001 Stanton M. Pikus held the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer. (a) Grant date values reflect Black-Scholes model output for options. The assumptions used in the model were expected volatility of 1.19, risk free rate of return of 3.55%, dividend yield of 0%, and time to exercise of 2.5 years. Black-Scholes valuation is measured at the date of grant only and does not change throughout the life of the option. AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES AND FISCAL YEAR-END 2001 OPTION VALUES - -------------------------------------- The following table provides information on option exercises in Fiscal 2001 by the Executive Officers and on the Executive Officers' unexercised options at November 30, 2001. Included are options granted under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Number of Securities Value of Unexercised | | Shares Underlying Unexercised In-The-Money Options | | Acquired on Value Options at Year-End at Fiscal Year-End | | Exercise Realized 2001(#) 2001($) | | Name (#) ($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable | |---------------------+------------+----------+-------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+ | | | | | | | | | Stanton M. Pikus | 0 | 0 | 565,000 | 0 | $47,900 | 0 | |---------------------+------------+----------+-------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+ | Kevin J. McAndrew | 0 | 0 | 443,334 | 0 | $39,925 | 0 | |---------------------+------------+----------+-------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+ | Jean Z. Pikus | 0 | 0 | 259,667 | 0 | $23,955 | 0 | +---------------------+------------+----------+-------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+
The table below delineates information on stock option exercises and unexercised stock options for the current fiscal year by the Executive Officers at August 12, 2002 (date of this Proxy Statement). Included are options granted under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Number of Securities Value of Unexercised | | Shares Underlying Unexercised In-The-Money Options | | Acquired on Value Options at August 12, at August 12, 2002 | | Exercise Realized 2002 (#) ($) | | Name (#) ($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable | |---------------------+------------+----------+-------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+ | | | | | | | | | Stanton M. Pikus | 0 | 0 | 565,000 | 0 | $0 | 0 | |---------------------+------------+----------+-------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+ | Kevin J. McAndrew | 0 | 0 | 443,334 | 0 | $0 | 0 | |---------------------+------------+----------+-------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+ | Jean Z. Pikus | 0 | 0 | 259,667 | 0 | $0 | 0 | +---------------------+------------+----------+-------------+--------------+-----------+----------------+
Option holders have five years from the date of grant to exercise any or all of their options, and upon leaving Canterbury the option holders must exercise within 30 days or lose the options. These options exercise into restricted shares of company stock. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS - -------------------- The Company executed new employment agreements dated June 1, 2001 between the Company and Mr. Kevin J. McAndrew and the Company and Mr. Stanton M. Pikus, reflecting their new employment arrangements. Each employment agreement is for a period of five years. Each sets forth various services to be performed. Each employee shall receive an annual salary of $245,000 with annual cost of living increases tied to a nationally recognized index, as set forth by the Board of Directors from time to time. These employment agreements supercede and replace the current employment agreements, including the cancellation of bonus opportunities which were to be payable through December 1, 2003. These agreements also include a non-competition prohibition for a period of three years after employment has been terminated. Subsequent to November 30, 2001, the Company executed a five-year employment agreement dated December 1, 2001 between the Company and Ms. Jean Pikus. Ms. Pikus shall receive an annual salary of $150,000 with annual cost of living increases tied to a nationally recognized index, as set forth by the Board of Directors from time to time. The agreement also includes a non- competition prohibition for a period of three years after employment has been terminated. COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD AND MEETING ATTENDANCE - ---------------------------------------------- The Board has established an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee. The two committees are currently composed entirely of Independent Directors (Frank A. Cappiello, Paul Shapiro and Stephen Vineberg). The Company had 21 meetings of the Board of Directors during the last full fiscal year. There was no incumbent who, during the last full fiscal year, attended fewer than 91% of said meetings. The Compensation Committee, met 9 times during the last fiscal year. The Audit Committee met 6 times during the last fiscal year. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation - -------------------------------------------------------------- Overview and Philosophy The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing the compensation of, and the compensation policies with respect to, the Company's executive officers, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer, and administering certain of the Company's stock benefit plans. The Compensation Committee is composed of three of the Company's Independent Directors - Frank Cappiello (Chairman), Paul Shapiro and Stephen Vineberg. The objectives of the Company's executive compensation program are to: * Attract and retain key executives critical to the long-term success of the Company; * Align the interests of executive officers with the interests of stockholders and the success of the Company; and * Recognize and reward individual performance and responsibility. Executive Compensation Program General. The Company's executive compensation program consists of base salary and long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options or other incentives such as stock loans. In addition, executive officers participate in benefit programs that are available to the Company's employees, generally. These benefit programs include medical benefits and the 401(k) Plan. Base Compensation. Mr. Stanton M. Pikus, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer until June 1, 2001 and Mr. Kevin J. McAndrew, the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer until June 1, 2001 and then the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, entered into new multi-year employment agreements with the Company during Fiscal 2001. During 2001, compensation for Mr. Pikus and Mr. McAndrew were set within the range of compensation for chief executives with comparable qualifications, experience, length of service and responsibilities at other companies in the same or similar businesses, based on the determination of and approved by the Compensation Committee. Subsequent to November 30, 2001, Jean Z. Pikus, the Company's Vice President entered into a multi-year employment agreement with the Company. During 2001 and subsequently, compensation for Ms. Pikus was set within the range of compensation for executives with comparable qualifications, experience, length of service and responsibilities at other companies in the same or similar businesses, based on the determination of and approved by the Compensation Committee. During the Year 2001, compensation for other officers and/or key employees was set within the range of compensation for executives and/or key employees with comparable qualifications, experience and responsibilities at other companies in the same or similar businesses, based on the determination of management. In addition, base compensation for each officer and/or key employee was determined on a case-by-case basis in light of each individual's contribution to the Company as a whole, including the ability to motivate others, develop the necessary skills to grow as the Company matures, recognize and pursue new business opportunities and initiate programs to enhance the Company's growth and success. Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Company provides long-term incentives to its executive officers and key employees in the form of stock options and/or the opportunity to purchase restricted common stock of the Company by promissory notes. The objectives of this program are to align executive and stockholder long-term interests by creating a strong and direct link between executive compensation and stockholder return, and to enable executives to develop and maintain a significant, long-term stock ownership position in the common stock. Stock options are granted at an option exercise price that is determined by the Board as of the date of grant. However, the option exercise price nor the stock sale price may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock at the time the option is granted. Accordingly, the stock options will only have value if the Company's stock price increases above the fair market value of the common stock at the time they were granted. In selecting executives eligible to receive option grants and determining the amount and frequency of such grants, the Company evaluates a variety of factors, including (i) the job level of the executive and/or key employee, (ii) option grants awarded by competitors to executives and/or key employees at comparable job levels and (iii) past, current and prospective service to the Company rendered, or to be rendered, by the executive and/or key employee. Please refer to the table labeled Options Granted to see options granted in Fiscal 2001. Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. Frank Cappiello, Chairman Paul Shapiro Stephen Vineberg Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors The Audit Committee reviewed the Company's audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2001 and discussed these financial statements with the Company's management. Management is responsible for the Company's internal controls and the financial reporting process. The Company's independent accountants are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company's financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and to issue a report on those financial statements. The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and overseeing these processes. As appropriate, the Audit Committee reviews and evaluates, and discusses with the Company's management, internal accounting, financial and auditing personnel and the independent accountants, the following: * the plan for, and the independent accountants' report on, each audit of the Company's financial statements; * the Company's financial disclosure documents, including all financial statements and reports filed with the SEC or sent to stockholders; * changes in the Company's accounting practices, principles, controls or methodologies; * significant developments or changes in accounting rules applicable to the Company; and * the adequacy of the Company's internal controls and accounting, financial and auditing personnel. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements and the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards 61 (Communication with Audit Committees) with Baratz & Associates, PA, the Company's independent auditors. SAS 61 requires the Company's independent auditors to discuss with the Company's Audit Committee, among other things, the following: * methods to account for significant unusual transactions; * the effect of significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus; * the process used by management in formulating particularly sensitive accounting estimates and the basis for the accountants' conclusions regarding the reasonableness of those estimates; and * disagreements with management over the application of accounting principles, the basis for management's accounting estimates and the disclosures in the financial statements. The Company's independent auditors also provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees). Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 requires auditors annually to disclose in writing all relationships that in the auditors' professional opinion may reasonably be thought to bear on independence, confirm their perceived independence and engage in a discussion of independence. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors their independence from the Company. The Audit Committee also considered whether the independent auditors' provision of certain other, non-audit related services to the Company was compatible with maintaining such auditors' independence. Based on its discussions with management and the independent auditors, and its review of the representations and information provided by management and the independent auditors, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2001. Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. Frank Cappiello, Chairman Paul Shapiro Stephen Vineberg DIRECTORS' REMUNERATION - ----------------------- Directors received no cash compensation for services as Directors and the following Directors received five-year stock options at market value during the 2001 fiscal year. Name Stock Option Amount Stock Option Price - ---- ------------------- ------------------ Stanton M. Pikus* 75,000** $1.50** 100,000** $0.69** Kevin J. McAndrew* 50,000** $1.50** 100,000** $0.69** Jean Z. Pikus* 25,000** $1.50** 60,000** $0.69** Frank A. Cappiello 40,000 $0.69 Name Stock Option Amount Stock Option Price - ---- ------------------- ------------------ Alan Manin 20,000 $0.69 Paul Shapiro 20,000 $0.69 Stephen Vineberg 20,000 $0.69 * The Executive Officers of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. stock options have been previously noted in the table Option Grants on page 5. ** As previously noted, these five-year stock option grants are part of the 1995 Stock Option Plan as Incentive Option Awards. The Company had 21 meetings of the Board of Directors during the last full fiscal year. There was no incumbent who, during the last full fiscal year, attended fewer than 91% of said meetings. PERFORMANCE GRAPH - ----------------- The following graph demonstrates a comparison of Canterbury's stockholder returns at each fiscal year end as of November 30 with shareholder returns on a broad market index, the Nasdaq Stock Market (US), and a industry index, Nasdaq Computer & Data Processing Services Stock. The comparison assumes $100.00 was invested on November 30, 1996 in the Company's common stock, the Nasdaq Stock Market (US) and the Nasdaq Computer & Data Processing Services Stocks. COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN 500 -| +-------------------------------+ | | N - Nasdaq National (US) | 450 -| | NC - Nasdaq Computer & Data | | | Processing Services | D 400 -| | C - Canterbury Consulting | | | Group, Inc. | O 350 -| +-------------------------------+ NC | L 300 -| | L 250 -| N | NC A 200 -| | N NC R 150 -| NC N | N,NC N C S 100 -N,NC,C C C | 50 -| | C C 0 -+---------+------------|------------|-------------|----------| 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Y E A R S THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ENTIRE SLATE OF NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL NO. 1. A majority vote of over 50% will be necessary to carry this proposal. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS - ----------------------------------------------------------- The following table sets forth as of August 6, 2002 certain information with regard to the record and beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock by (i) each shareholder, owner of record or beneficial owner of 5% or more of the Company's common stock (ii) each Officer or Director individually and (iii) all Officers and Directors of the Company as a group: Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Shares Shares Acquirable % Owned of Currently Within 60 Days By Company's Name of Beneficial Owner Owned Option Exercise Shares(*) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stanton M. Pikus (2) 1,019,581 565,000 11.14% Kevin J. McAndrew (1) 509,637 443,334 6.70% Jean Zwerlein Pikus(1)(2) 311,473 259,667 4.02% Alan Manin (1)(3) 204,054 87,000 2.05% Stephen M. Vineberg (1) 108,629 79,500 1.32% Paul L. Shapiro (1) 25,667 79,500 0.74% Frank A. Cappiello (1) 321,667 156,500 3.36% - -------------------------- --------- --------- ----- All Officers, Directors and 5% Stockholders as a group (7 in number) 2,500,708 1,670,501 29.33% ========= ========= ===== ___________________________________________ (*) These percentages are calculated using total outstanding shares and options exercisable. (1) All of said individuals have given a Voting Agreement and First Right of Refusal to Stanton M. Pikus, Board Chairman of the Company. (2) Stanton M. Pikus and Jean Zwerlein Pikus are married to each other and, therefore, are deemed to have beneficial ownership in each other's shares. 72,002 shares of Canterbury common stock owned in the name of Matthew Zane Pikus Trust are not included in their totals. (3) 73,228 shares owned by Atlantis Family L.C. of which Mr. Manin is the sole beneficiary, are included in his total. Listed below is a table setting forth the stock options included in the Shares Acquirable Within 60 Days By Option Exercise column: Capacity in Date Exercise Name of Individual Which Served Options Granted Price ============================================================================= Stanton M. Pikus Chairman of the 50,000 05/18/98 $1.38 Board of Directors 100,000 12/04/98 $0.53 40,000 08/27/99 $1.56 100,000 11/04/99 $2.40 25,000 08/02/00 $3.00 75,000(1) 11/28/00(1) $2.78(1) 75,000(1) 01/09/01(1) $1.50(1) 100,000(1) 11/21/01(1) $0.69(1) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Capacity in Date Exercise Name of Individual Which Served Options Granted Price ============================================================================= Kevin J. McAndrew President, Chief 8,334 10/16/97 $3.56 Executive Officer, 35,000 05/18/98 $1.38 Chief Financial 75,000 12/04/98 $0.53 Officer, Treasurer, 30,000 08/27/99 $1.56 Director 75,000 11/04/99 $2.40 20,000 08/02/00 $3.00 50,000(1) 11/28/00(1) $2.78(1) 50,000(1) 01/09/01(1) $1.50(1) 100,000(1) 11/21/01(1) $0.69(1) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jean Zwerlein Pikus Vice President, 6,667 10/16/97 $3.56 Secretary, Director 20,000 05/18/98 $1.38 45,000 12/04/98 $0.53 18,000 08/27/99 $1.56 45,000 11/04/99 $2.40 15,000 08/02/00 $3.00 25,000(1) 11/28/00(1) $2.78(1) 25,000(1) 01/09/01(1) $1.50(1) 60,000(1) 11/21/01(1) $0.69(1) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alan Manin Director 10,000 05/18/98 $1.38 17,500 12/04/98 $0.53 7,000 08/27/99 $1.56 17,500 11/04/99 $2.40 10,000 01/11/00 $3.67 5,000 08/02/00 $3.00 20,000 11/21/01 $0.69 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen Vineberg Director 2,500 10/16/97 $3.56 10,000 05/18/98 $1.38 17,500 12/04/98 $0.53 7,000 08/27/99 $1.56 17,500 11/04/99 $2.40 5,000 08/02/00 $3.00 20,000 11/21/01 $0.69 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Shapiro Director 2,500 10/16/97 $3.56 10,000 05/18/98 $1.38 17,500 12/04/98 $0.53 7,000 08/27/99 $1.56 17,500 11/04/99 $2.40 5,000 08/02/00 $3.00 20,000 11/21/01 $0.69 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Frank A. Cappiello Director 20,000 05/18/98 $1.38 35,000 12/04/98 $0.53 14,000 08/27/99 $1.56 35,000 11/04/99 $2.40 12,500 08/02/00 $3.00 40,000 11/21/01 $0.69 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) These five-year stock option grants are part of the 1995 Stock Option Plan as Incentive Option Awards. Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Canterbury's Executive Officers, Directors, and affiliates file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership of Canterbury's common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These Executive Officers, Directors, and affiliates are required to furnish Canterbury with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. Based solely on Canterbury's review of Securities and Exchange Commission Forms 3, 4, and 5 submitted to Canterbury, and written representations from these Officers, Directors, and affiliates that no other reports were required, the Company believes that all required forms were filed on time except for amended Form 4's for Paul Shapiro for the months of April and May 2001. Proposal No. 2 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The Board of Directors has appointed Baratz & Associates, P.A. (Baratz), independent auditors, to audit the Company's consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2002. Baratz audited the Company's consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended November 20, 2001. The firm of Ernst & Young LLP ("Ernst & Young") served as independent auditors for the Company for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2000 and November 30, 1999. The decision to change auditors was based on the fact that the Company experienced significant cost savings by having the audit performed by Baratz & Associates, a New Jersey based regional public accounting firm, since Baratz had already been doing all of the tax compliance and filing work. The consolidation of efforts also contributed to the overall cost effectiveness of their engagement. During the Company's fiscal years ended November 30, 2000 and 1999, as well as the subsequent interim period through August 8, 2001, there were no disagreements between the Company and Ernst & Young LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to their satisfaction would have caused them to make reference in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement, except for the valuation of an investment for which the auditors believed there was evidence of permanent impairment and therefore required adjustment in the Statement of Operations for the year ended November 30, 2000. The adjustment was subsequently recorded. There were no other "reportable events" described under Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K occurring within the Company's two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through August 8, 2001. The audit reports of Ernst & Young LLP on the consolidated financial statements of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of and for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2000 and 1999, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the Company's fiscal years ended November 30, 2000 and November 30, 1999, as well as the subsequent interim period through August 8, 2001, the Company did not consult with Baratz & Associates regarding any of the matters or events set forth in Item 304 (a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K. At the Annual Meeting, shareholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Baratz as the Company's independent auditors for fiscal year 2002. Representatives of Baratz are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to respond to appropriate questions. Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Baratz for the audit of our annual financial statements for the 2001 fiscal year and the reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the 2001 fiscal year were $73,000. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young for the audit of our annual financial statements for the 2001 fiscal year and the reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the 2001 fiscal year were $18,449. Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees. Baratz and Ernst & Young did not render any professional services to the Company of the type described in Rule 2-01(C)(4)(ii) of Regulations S-X during the 2001 fiscal year. All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Baratz, other than fees for the services referenced under the captions "Audit Fees" and "Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees" during the 2001 fiscal year were $18,000 for tax compliance services and $49,500 for other non-consulting services. The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young, other than fees for the services referenced under the captions "Audit Fees" and "Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees" during the 2001 fiscal year were $10,301.00, which were non-consulting services. Canterbury understands the need for Baratz to maintain objectivity and independence in its audit of the Company's financial statements. Therefore, Canterbury only uses Baratz for non-audit work when it concludes that Baratz is the most appropriate provider of that service such as tax compliance services. The Audit Committee has begun annually evaluating whether the Company's use of Baratz for non-audit services is compatible with Baratz's independence. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" PROPOSAL NO. 2. A majority vote of over 50% will be necessary to carry this proposal. EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION - ------------------------ The cost of the solicitation of proxies will be borne by Canterbury. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by regular employees of Canterbury, either personally or by telephone or telegraph. Canterbury does not expect to pay any compensation for the solicitation of proxies, but may reimburse brokers and other persons holding shares in their names or in the names of nominees for expenses in sending proxy materials to beneficial owners and obtaining proxies from such owners. OTHER MATTERS - ------------- This proxy contains forward looking statements. The actual results might differ materially from those projected in the forward looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in forward looking statements is contained in Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc.'s SEC filings, including periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, copies of which are available upon request from Canterbury's Investor Relations Department. Respectfully submitted, By:/s/Jean Zwerlein Pikus ---------------------------- Jean Zwerlein Pikus Vice President and Secretary Dated: August 12, 2002 Stockholders who do not expect to be present at the meeting and who wish to have their shares voted, are requested to make, date and sign the enclosed proxy and return it in the enclosed envelope. No postage is required if it is mailed in the United States. EX-1 3 ccgprxy02cd.txt PROXY CARD CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC. PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING FISCAL 2001 Please sign and return immediately KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that I, the undersigned being a stockholder of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc., Medford, New Jersey do hereby constitute and appoint Kevin J. McAndrew and Stanton M. Pikus, or either one of them (with full power to act alone), my true and lawful attorney(s) with full power of substitution to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of said Corporation to be held at The Mansion on Main Street, Plaza 3000 at Main Street, Voorhees, New Jersey on October 2, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. or any and all adjournment thereof, and to vote all stock owned by me or standing in my name, place and stead on the proposals specified in the notice of meeting dated August 30, 2002 or any and all adjournments thereof, with all the power I possess if I were personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my said proxy or proxies may be in my name, place and stead as follows: IMPORTANT: SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON REVERSE SIDE 1. Election of Directors To elect seven (7) Directors, each for a term of one (1) year or until the next Annual Meeting: Stanton M. Pikus, Kevin J. McAndrew, Jean Zwerlein Pikus, Alan B. Manin, Stephen M. Vineberg, Paul L. Shapiro and Frank A. Cappiello It is specifically directed that this Proxy be voted: FOR ALL NOMINEES [ ] WITHHOLD ALL NOMINEES [ ] INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write that nominee's name in the space provided below: 2. Proposal to ratify the appointment of Baratz & Associates, P.A. as the Company's Independent Public Auditors. FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN [ ] In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. IF NO DESIGNATIONS ARE MADE IN THE SPACES PROVIDED ABOVE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE ABOVE PROPOSALS. The shares represented by a properly executed Proxy will be voted as directed. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS; IT MAY BE REVOKED PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISE. _________________________________________________(L.S.) DATE: _______, 2002 (Print Name) _________________________________________________(L.S.) DATE: _______, 2002 (Signature of Stockholder) NOTE: ALL JOINT OWNERS MUST SIGN INDIVIDUALLY. WHEN SIGNING AS ATTORNEY, EXECUTOR, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE, GUARDIAN OR CUSTODIAN, PLEASE GIVE FULL TITLE. IF MORE THAN ONE TRUSTEE, ALL SHOULD SIGN. Please date, sign and mail your proxy card back as soon as possible! Annual Meeting of Stockholders Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. October 2, 2002 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS October 2, 2002 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To the Stockholders Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. August 12, 2002 The Fiscal 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. (the "Company") will be held at The Mansion on Main Street, Voorhees, New Jersey on October 2, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time) for the following purposes: 1. To elect seven (7) Directors for the ensuing year, and until their successors are duly elected and qualified (Proposal No.1); 2. To ratify the appointment of Baratz & Associates, P.A. as the Company's independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2002 (Proposal No. 2); and 3. To transact any other business as may properly be brought before the meeting, or any adjournment thereof. Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 6, 2002 (record date) are eligible to vote at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any adjournment thereof. However, so that we may be sure your vote will be counted, we invite you to sign and date this proxy card and return it as soon as possible in the envelope provided. If you attend the meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote in person. STOCKHOLDERS UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON ARE ASKED TO VOTE, SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THIS PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE, WHICH DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY UNITED STATES POSTAGE. By order of the Board of Directors, By:/s/Jean Zwerlein Pikus ---------------------- Jean Zwerlein Pikus Vice President and Secretary August 12, 2002, Medford, NJ An Annual Report containing the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission including complete financial statements audited by Baratz & Associates, P.A. is enclosed herewith. The Company's 10-Q Report for the three months ended May 31, 2002 is available free of charge upon written request to: Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc., 1600 Medford Plaza, Medford, NJ 08055, and is available on the Internet directly from the Securities and Exchange Commission's web site: www.sec.gov. EX-99.B2 ANRPT/SHLDR 7 ccg10k01.txt ANNUAL REPORT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ----------------------- FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934: For the fiscal year ended: November 30, 2001 Commission File Number: 0-15588 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC. --------------------------------- FORMERLY CANTERBURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. Pennsylvania 23-2170505 - ------------------------------- --------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 1600 Medford Plaza, Rt. 70 & Hartford Road Medford, New Jersey 08055 - ------------------------------------------ --------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Issuer's telephone number (609) 953-0044 -------------- Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $.001 par value ----------------------------- (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO ----- Indicate by check mark if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this 10-K. X ----- Revenues for the most recent fiscal year were $29,043,842. The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing price of such stock on National Market NASDAQ for February 22, 2002 was $5,053,385. The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's class of common equity, as of February 22, 2002 was 12,335,424. Documents Incorporated by Reference - Various exhibits from the Company's Registration Statements and such other documents contained in Item 14. CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 PART I ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS INTRODUCTION - ------------ Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc., formerly Canterbury Information Technology, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as "the Registrant" or "the Company") is engaged in the business of providing information technology products and services to both commercial and government clients. Canterbury is comprised of six operating subsidiaries with offices located in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Maryland, Ohio, Minnesota, Georgia and Texas. The focus of the Canterbury companies is to become an integral part of our clients IT solution, designing and applying the best products and services to help them achieve a competitive advantage and helping their employees to succeed. Our subsidiaries offer the following technology solutions: * distance learning solutions * hardware sales and support * customized learning solutions * software development for ERP and CRM * web development * systems engineering and * technical and desktop applications consulting training * IT contractors and permanent * records and asset management systems staffing * industry specific portals * management training programs * help desk and service center support The Company was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on March 19, 1981 and later qualified to do business in the State of New Jersey in April, 1985. The Company became a Registrant by filing and registering with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Form S-18 which became effective on August 20, 1986. The Company is organized into four operating segments and the corporate office. The operating segments are: training and consulting, value added hardware reseller, technical staffing and software development. The Executive Management, Board of Directors and Shareholders voted to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from Canterbury Information Technology, Inc. to Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. which better describes the Company's current and future business activities and allows for a more synergistic approach to marketing all of its subsidiaries under one umbrella. This name change became effective April 30, 2001. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - TRAINING AND CONSULTING - ----------------------------------------------------------- CUSTOMIZED ERP AND CRM LEARNING SOLUTIONS ----------------------------------------- In September, 2001 the Company acquired User Technology Services, Inc. (Usertech), a twenty-two year old technology consulting organization specializing in custom learning solutions for major domestic corporations. The 2 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 business is headquartered in the Northeast, but Usertech has consultants and account managers throughout the United States. Usertech designs, develops and delivers customized employee training programs in support of client systems implementations using a blend of traditional (instructor-led) and electronic (WBT and CBT) delivery modes. The Company's primary expertise is in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) application systems. Customized training for PeopleSoft, Oracle, SAP and Seibel software installations are the cornerstone of the business. Usertech's consultants are also proficient in various proprietary software applications that their clients deploy. Usertech's alliance relationships are an important component of the company's sales and marketing program. Product and software manufacturers' alliances speed target market penetration, improve competitive position and generate new sales leads. With their significant resources and expertise in e- learning delivery platforms, Canterbury's goal is to increase its distance learning offerings in all of its corporate training business. In 2001, after the acquisition, the Company changed the name of User Technology Services, Inc. to Usertech/Canterbury Corp. to properly reflect its role in the Canterbury family of training and technology businesses. Future Plans ------------ The Company intends to expand this segment of the business in a number of ways. First, additional sales personnel may be deployed in selected key markets throughout the country where there is currently no Usertech/Canterbury representation. Also, as e-learning and blended training solutions continue to grow in popularity, Usertech/Canterbury will work to stay ahead of the curve in its ability to design and deliver such training to its customers. In conjunction with the expansion plans outlined above, the Company will also be cross-marketing Usertech/Canterbury's services with its other operating subsidiaries. COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING/SERVICES ----------------------------------- In June 1994, the Company acquired Computer Applications Learning Center (CALC), a New Jersey based computer software training company. Since 1983, CALC has trained corporate workers and managers at its training centers in New York and New Jersey and on site at Fortune 1000 corporations. During 1995, the Company changed the name of CALC to CALC/Canterbury Corp. to more appropriately reflect Canterbury's role in the corporate training industry. CALC/Canterbury is a Microsoft Certified Technical Education Center, Lotus Authorized Education Center and an authorized center for CISCO certified training as well as CAT and VUE testing. CALC/Canterbury is authorized to provide continuing education units (CEU's) and is an approved sponsor of Continuing Professional Education (CPE) for CPA's in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. CALC/Canterbury's technical services division offers technology project management, software development, hardware and software installations, web and industry specific web site development. Through CALC Web University, CALC/Canterbury offers e- commerce enabled, Internet-based training as well as custom designed web delivered courses and instruction. 3 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Future Plans ------------ Although CALC/Canterbury is currently experiencing the downturn along with other businesses in their industry, Canterbury plans to expand this line of the business by: making specific acquisitions in the information technology market of companies that provide complementary products and services (such as technical services and Web-based training) to its significant customer base established over the past eighteen years of operations; and by entering into strategic business partnerships to allow the existing sales force to offer multiple information technology related services and products. Over time, as the Company's market penetration increases, the services that were subcontracted in the past, will be developed and expanded internally. At the same time, the Company is focused on introducing and promoting all of Canterbury's subsidiaries' products and services to the existing client base of CALC/Canterbury. MANAGEMENT TRAINING - ------------------- In September of 1993, the Company acquired Motivational Systems, Inc., a New Jersey-based management and sales training company. Motivational Systems, since 1970, has trained managers and sales professionals from many Fortune 1000 companies, on a national and international basis. Motivational Systems conducts a wide variety of seminars in management and team development, selling and negotiating, interpersonal communication, executive development, organizational problem solving and project management. During 1995, the Company changed the name of Motivational Systems, Inc. to MSI/Canterbury Corp. to more appropriately reflect Canterbury's presence and role in the corporate training industry. Future Plans ------------ This division's planned expansion is projected to occur by extending its current sales effort into contiguous markets adjacent to its corporate headquarters in Northern New Jersey. MSI/Canterbury also plans to develop, internally, new product offerings, both consultative and on-line, for existing and potential customers, based on their specific needs. With several consultants who are exceptional course developers on staff, this process has already resulted in additional product revenue streams. It is also intended to continue to introduce MSI/Canterbury's services into our operating subsidiaries. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - -------------------------------------------------------- In May of 1997, the Company acquired ATM Technologies, Inc. ("ATM"), a Texas-based software consulting and development company, serving clients in national and international markets. ATM has been in business since 1984, specializing in PC-based tracking systems. The Company changed the name of ATM Technologies, Inc. to ATM/Canterbury Corp. to more appropriately reflect Canterbury's presence and role in the information technology industry. 4 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Future Plans ------------ ATM/Canterbury plans to expand by promoting and selling its document imaging and PC-based retrieval program integrated into its MasterTrak(TM) document tracking program using barcoding as well as rolling out Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) software technology. The document imaging product is equipped with a touch screen PC and will allow clients with large file rooms to utilize this hardware/software solution to reduce labor costs and increase efficiencies. RFID is a very advanced automated data capture technology. It speeds the collection of data and eliminates the need to read individual barcodes. With RFID technology, no line of sight or direct contact is required between the reader and the tag. This product has application potential in many industries for a variety of uses. Multiple records, files or products can be traced simultaneously. ATM has established several technology and distribution alliances in order to get more broadband client exposure to this product. The Company is investing in the marketing and sales of ATM's software products both internally and externally. USC/Canterbury, our value added reseller, is actively promoting the ATM products in the Mid-Atlantic region as a vital technological solution to many of their clients record tracking and recording needs. ATM is also working to expand its base of national and international dealers and to facilitate increased awareness of the tracking system's new imaging software developed by the company. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - VALUE ADDED HARDWARE RESELLER - ----------------------------------------------------------------- In October, 1999, the Company acquired U.S. Communications, Inc. (USC), an Annapolis, Maryland based value added reseller of desktop and server computer systems to state and local governments as well as commercial private sector companies in the mid-Atlantic market. USC provides a broad range of information technology services other than hardware procurement and installation. Other products and services include software, consulting and network design and management. After the acquisition, the Company changed the name of U.S. Communications to USC/Canterbury Corp. The Company predominately resells Hewlett-Packard personal computers and servers as stand alone desktops, workstations and complete networks. Virtually no inventory is maintained on site as most equipment is drop shipped to the customer location. The consulting and network design services are becoming a more important value added product to the customer base, as they look for a complete solution to their information technology needs. Future Plans ------------ This division's expansion forecast includes additional penetration into existing governmental installations as well as pursuing governmental municipalities in other states. USC has also expanded its sales focus to include commercial clients. The Company is also reviewing possible acquisition candidates in this market as well as introducing other subsidiary products and services into their existing client base. 5 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS - TECHNICAL STAFFING - ------------------------------------------------------ In August, 2000, the Company acquired DataMosaic International, Inc., an Atlanta, Georgia based management and systems consulting company, which provides staffing augmentation solutions and consulting services to the information technology industry. Short term and long term contracting along with permanent placement and project management of IT professionals is provided to mid-sized and Fortune 1000 corporations for: technical leaders and specialists, senior programming analysts, programmers, systems support and administration specialists experienced in networking, data communications, LAN/WAN, SQA/testing and technical writing. After the acquisition, the Company changed the name of DataMosaic International to DMI/Canterbury Corp. (DMI). DMI has also expanded its office presence to Parsippany, New Jersey. Both offices work together in offering technical recruitment and contracting on a national basis both over the Internet and in conjunction with existing Canterbury subsidiaries and affiliates. DMI is also an internal resource, assisting all Canterbury subsidiaries in recruitment of potential employees. MERGER/ACQUISITION PROGRAM - -------------------------- Canterbury is actively seeking acquisitions of other profitable technology companies within our core competencies: * Distance learning development * Technical systems design, development, integration and consulting * Hardware sales and support * Technical recruitment and staff augmentation * Internet and intranet consulting, development and implementation BUSINESS MODEL - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Computer and | Systems | | Internet and | | Software | Integrators | Network and | Intranet | | Consulting | --- | Systems Developers | Consultants, | | CALC/Canterbury | Hardware/ | and Installers | Developers and | | USC/Canterbury | Software Sales | CALC/Canterbury | Providers | | ATM/Canterbury | CALC/Canterbury | USC/Canterbury | CALC/Canterbury | | Usertech/Canterbury | USC/Canterbury | | USC/Canterbury | | | ATM/Canterbury | | Usertech/Canterbury | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical | Training | Technical | Business to Business | | Training | Companies | Staffing and | Portal | | Companies | MSI/Canterbury | Recruiting | Global Online Training | | CALC/Canterbury | CALC/Canterbury | DMI/Canterbury | Usertech/Canterbury | | | Usertech/Canterbury | | CALC Web University | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
6 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 EMPLOYEES - --------- As of November 30, 2001, the Company, including all subsidiaries, had 218 employees: 170 full-time employees and 48 part-time employees. The Company believes that the relationship with its employees is satisfactory. ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES All facilities, including its administrative offices, branch locations and sales offices, are leased. The aggregate annual rental payments under leases will approximate $1,372,000 in Fiscal 2002. The following table sets forth the locations of the Company including square footage: Square Location Footage - -------- ------- Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. 4,200 1600 Medford Plaza Medford, NJ 08055 ATM/Canterbury Corp. 3,700 16840 Barker Springs, Suite C300 Houston, TX 77084 CALC/Canterbury Corp. 23,000 500 Lanid Drive Parsippany, NJ 07054 CALC/Canterbury Corp. 10,000 780 Third Avenue, Concourse Level One New York, NY 10017 CALC/Canterbury Corp. 3,000 Woodbridge Place, Gill Lane at Route 1 Iselin, NJ 08830 CALC/Canterbury Corp. 7,000 55 Broadway New York, NY 10006 DMI/Canterbury Corp. 500 2 Sun Court, Suite 300 Norcross, GA 30092 DMI/Canterbury Corp. 600 500 Lanid Drive Parsippany, NJ 07054 MSI/Canterbury Corp. 1,800 400 Lanid Drive Parsippany, NJ 07054 7 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Square Location Footage - -------- ------- USC/Canterbury Corp. 2,500 801 Compass Way, Suite 205 Annapolis, MD 21401 Usertech/Canterbury Corp. 2,400 Shore Pointe, One Selleck Street East Norwalk, CT 06855 Usertech/Canterbury Corp. 6,700 Park 80 West, Plaza Two Saddlebrook, NJ 07663 Usertech/Canterbury Corp. 800 8935 Old Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55425 Usertech/Canterbury Corp. 1,100 100 E. Campus View Blvd, Suite 155 Columbus, OH 43235 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS As previously disclosed in prior filings, the Company filed a complaint against Allied Consultants, Inc. and its three principals in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey Civil Action No. 01 CV-0070 for damages allegedly caused by these defendants in a failed acquisition negotiation based on over $85,000 spent on due diligence expenses expended on reliance of defendants' promise to abide by certain terms and conditions, which they failed to honor. In December, 2001 the Company accepted a cash settlement which it believes fairly compensated them for damages incurred. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF STOCKHOLDERS A Special Meeting of Shareholders was held on April 6, 2001 at which time the shareholders voted to amend the Certificate of Incorporation to change the Company name from Canterbury Information Technology, Inc. to Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. At March 6, 2001, the shareholder of record date, the number of shares outstanding was 10,673,832 and by April 6, 2001 8,342,010 votes were cast. 98% of the votes approved the proposal to change the Company's name. The Company's Annual Meeting was held on October 24, 2001, at which time two matters were submitted to the Company's stockholders for a vote. The majority of the stockholders voted for the appointment of Baratz & Associates, P.A. as the Company's independent auditors (replacing the Company's previous auditors) and the election of the following Directors: Stanton M. Pikus, Kevin J. McAndrew, Alan Manin, Jean Zwerlein Pikus, Stephen M. Vineberg, Paul L. Shapiro and Frank A. Cappiello. 8 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 At August 31, 2001, the shareholder of record date, the number of shares outstanding was 12,418,549 and by October 24, 2001 9,984,232 votes were cast. The proposal for the slate of directors and the proposal for the appointment of Baratz & Associates, P.A. were approved by 99.8% of the votes. 9 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The Company trades on the Nasdaq National Market. The high and low prices of the Company's common stock from December 1, 1999 through February 22, 2002 were as follows: MARKET FOR EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ================================================================================ 2000 | 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | ----------- | ----------- | ----------- | ----------- | High Low | High Low | High Low | High Low Common | ---- --- | ---- --- | ---- --- | ---- --- Stock | $5.69 $2.81 | $4.88 $2.50 | $4.06 $1.94 | $4.63 $2.66 ================================================================================ 2001 | 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | ----------- | ----------- | ----------- | ----------- | High Low | High Low | High Low | High Low Common | ---- --- | ---- --- | ---- --- | ---- --- Stock | $4.44 $1.50 | $1.88 $0.97 | $2.27 $1.07 | $1.15 $0.60 ================================================================================ 2002 | 1st Quarter | | ----------- | | High Low | Common | ---- --- | Stock | $0.90 $0.52 | ========================== The approximate number of record holders of the Company's common stock as of November 30, 2001 as determined from the Company's transfer agent's list of record holders was 353. Such list does not include beneficial owners of securities whose shares are held in the names of various dealers and clearing agencies. The Company believes that there are in excess of 5,000 beneficial holders. On February 15, 2002 the Company was notified by Nasdaq that it had until May 15, 2002 to come into compliance with their minimum $1.00 per share requirement for continued inclusion on their National Market listing. The Company is in full compliance with the remaining listing requirements of Nasdaq's Maintenance Standard #1. If the Company fails to comply with the minimum price requirements by not trading at a $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days before May 15, 2002, the Company will either file an appeal or will apply to transfer its securities to the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. The Company has never declared a dividend on its common stock and does not plan to do so in the near future. 10 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Operating data: Net revenues $29,043,842 $29,734,589 $14,209,526 $12,122,879 $12,423,452 Income (loss) from continuing operations (7,159,855) 1,058,215 620,768 581,503 (931,870) Income (loss) from and gain on sale of discontinued operations - - - - (1,536,047) Basic per share data: Income (loss) from continuing operations $(.61) $.11 $.08 $.10 $(.22) Discontinued Operations - - - - (.29) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) $(.61) $.11 $.08 $.10 $(.51) =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== Balance sheet data: Total assets $25,044,122 $31,184,412 $27,811,971 $25,700,415 $25,787,101 Long-term debt $2,145,183 $678,303 $1,989,031 $2,640,075 $3,856,956 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Cautionary Statement -------------------- When used in this Report on Form 10-K and in other public statements, both oral and written, by the Company and Company officers, the word "estimates," "project," "intend," "believe," "anticipate," and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements regarding events and financial trends that may affect the Company's future operating results and financial position. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company's actual results and financial position to differ materially. Such factors include, among others: (1) the Company's success in attracting new business and success of its mergers and acquisitions program; (2) the competition in the industry in which the Company competes; (3) the sensitivity of the Company's business to general economic conditions; and (4) other economic, competitive, governmental and technological 11 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 factors affecting the Company's operations, markets, products, services and prices. The Company undertakes no obligations to publicly release the result of any revision of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Working capital at November 30, 2001, was $2,442,000. This was an increase of $622,000 over the previous year. Accounts receivable increased by $895,000, due primarily to the addition of receivables from the September, 2001 acquisition of Usertech. Inventory increased by $625,000 in Fiscal 2001 over Fiscal 2000 due to several significant hardware orders that were in transit to customers as of November 30, 2001. The amount of inventory related to these shipments totaled $653,000. In conjunction with these transactions approximately $775,000 in deferred revenue was also recorded. All of these shipments were received by customers in early December, 2001 and were recorded as revenue in that month (Fiscal 2002). The Company's outstanding amount owed under the revolving credit line with Chase Bank was refinanced in May, 2001 by establishing a commercial lending relationship with Commerce Bank, N.A. (the Bank). As of the date of the refinancing, approximately $883,000 was paid to Chase in full satisfaction of the Company's outstanding obligations, out of the proceeds of a $1,500,000 five-year term loan from Commerce. As part of the refinancing, the Company also secured a two-year $2,500,000 working capital line of credit with the Bank collateralized by trade accounts receivable and inventory. $1,500,000 was borrowed from this line in conjunction with the acquisition of User Technology Services, Inc. ("Usertech") on September 28, 2001, and through the date of this filing has been repaid in full. Both loans carry an interest rate of the prime rate plus 1%. The Bank's long term debt is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and requires compliance with covenants which include the maintenance of certain financial ratios and amounts. The Company is restricted by its bank from paying cash dividends on its common stock. The Company remains in full compliance with all of the financial covenants of its loan agreement with the Bank. As part of the purchase price paid for the acquisition of Usertech in September, 2001, the Company agreed to pay $1,200,000 to the seller over the next three years at an annual amount of $400,000 plus accrued interest at 7% per annum on the outstanding balance. Also as part of the purchase agreement, the seller agreed to guarantee the collection of the acquired accounts receivable with a 10% risk sharing threshold by Canterbury. The Company has the right in the first year after the acquisition to offset the guaranteed portion of any uncollectible receivable against the first $400,000 payment scheduled to be made during September, 2002. As of February 22, 2002 the Company has notified the seller and "put back" $30,344 against the note payment. The Company has until March 31, 2002 to finalize the total amount of the receivable "put backs". 12 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Management believes that continued positive cash flow contributions from the Company's operating subsidiaries will be sufficient to cover cash flow requirements for Fiscal 2002. There was no material commitment for capital expenditures as of November 30, 2001. Inflation was not a significant factor in the Company's financial statements. Cash flow from operating activities for the year ended November 30, 2001 was $1,941,000, an increase of $1,066,000 (122%) over Fiscal 2000. The Fiscal 2001 operating cash flow results were the best for the Company since 1996. Strong collections, company-wide cost containment measures and the excellent operating performance of USC/Canterbury all contributed to the solid cash flow results. Fiscal 2001 was the seventh consecutive year of positive cash flow from continuing operations. The Company's November 30, 2001 current ratio improved to 1.43:1.00 in Fiscal 2001 versus 1.34:1.0 at November 30, 2000. As a result of the debt refinancing which was completed during May, 2001, the Company was able to restructure its long term debt, shifting approximately $500,000 from current maturities to long term. As of the date of this report, the Company has $2,500,000 availability on its revolving line of credit, subject to its receivable and inventory levels. With anticipated strong operating cash results, the Company intends to continue to reduce long term bank debt, help fund acquisitions and invest in secure interest bearing investments. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Fiscal 2001 Compared to Fiscal 2000 Revenues -------- Overall revenues decreased by $691,000 (2%) in Fiscal 2001 over Fiscal 2000. Revenues in the training and consulting segment reflected a net decrease of $492,000 (4%). This decrease however was the result of a significant reduction in revenues from existing subsidiaries of $3,107,000 (27%) (primarily CALC/Canterbury), offset by the addition of revenues from the newly acquired Usertech subsidiary totaling $2,615,000 during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2001. There were a number of factors which contributed to the revenue reduction from existing subsidiaries (primarily CALC/Canterbury) in this business segment. The events of September 11, 2001 in New York City had a significant effect on total revenues in the fourth quarter of the year. Training in the Metro New York City area came to a virtual standstill while the businesses affected by the tragedy struggled to cope with the devastation. Many classes were cancelled, and there was very little sales activity for the last three months of the year. Several of our largest customers were located at Ground Zero. Consulting assignments were delayed or cancelled due to the chaos in and around New York City. The Company's business interruption insurance policy provided limited relief to the economic impact of the terrorist attacks. Proceeds from the policy netted the Company approximately $85,000, which was received in the first quarter of Fiscal 2002. Even prior to September 11, 2001, the economic downturn in the technology sector had softened demand for certain training and consulting products during 2001. Several large clients had reduced their training budgets in the second 13 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 half of the year in response to their own fiscal situations. New software rollouts were delayed and application and technical training revenues suffered during the year as a result. As the first quarter of Fiscal 2002 progresses, the Company is seeing signs that the level of activity by our customers is beginning to improve. The New York City client base is regrouping and the amount of training and consulting opportunities are increasing. The Company is working to expand its sales presence in this market to capture the apparent pent up demand caused by the soft fourth quarter of Fiscal 2001. Also, the acquisition of Usertech provides the Company with even more expertise in distance learning. All of the Company's training subsidiaries are beginning to work together to blend existing course content with e-learning delivery capabilities. For clients in and around New York City, as well as the rest of the world, the Company will have the capacity to provide a distance learning solution to those who may choose not to attend classroom training in the future. Revenues in the value added hardware reseller segment decreased by $704,000 (4%) in Fiscal 2001 versus 2000. Again much of this shortfall occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter of the year as overall technology spending slowed. The reduction in sales volume was more than offset by a significant increase in gross profit from these sales. Margins increased to 20% in Fiscal 2001 from 13% in 2000, as the sales staff was more selective in making proposals coupled with very strong manufacturer rebate program participation. Revenues in the technical staffing segment increased by $523,000 (55%) in Fiscal 2001 due to the fact that the acquisition of DMI/Canterbury occurred part way through Fiscal 2000, and did not contribute for a full year. Costs and Expenses ------------------ Total costs and expenses decreased by $1,277,000 (6%) in Fiscal 2001 versus 2000. Gross profit on service revenue declined from 43% in Fiscal 2000 to 39% in 2001 due to the effects of the revenue decline from training and consulting coupled with a fairly high fixed cost delivery component. Product margins, which include hardware and software sales of the Company increased to 21% in 2001 from a level of 15% in Fiscal 2000. Consolidated gross margins for the Company increased to 29% in 2001 versus 27% in Fiscal 2000. Selling expense increased by $563,000 (24%) in Fiscal 2001 over 2000. $270,000 of the increase was due to selling expense incurred by Usertech after the September, 2001 acquisition. The balance of the difference can be attributed to the fact that DMI, which was acquired in August, 2000, had a full year of operations in Fiscal 2001 versus only four months in 2001. General and administrative expense increased by $1,750,000 (39%). Again a portion of the increase can be accounted for by the 2001 addition of Usertech ($649,000) and the incremental cost associated with a full year of operations for DMI ($155,000). Other components of the increase include increased provision for bad debt of $315,000; increased salaries of $397,000 and other miscellaneous non-cash corporate write-offs approximating $175,000 (which were recorded in the second quarter of Fiscal 2001). 14 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Also during Fiscal 2001 the Company recorded $5,958,000 of goodwill impairment charges. $500,000 of this charge was reflected in the second quarter of the year and the balance was recorded in the fourth quarter. Management made the decision to treat the carrying value of goodwill conservatively. DMI/Canterbury goodwill was written down to $0 (total charge of $843,000) due to the uncertainty in the technical staffing marketplace caused by the dot com bust and the softening of spending in this business segment. The net goodwill related to the 1994 acquisition of CALC/Canterbury (Training and Consulting Segment) totaling $4,397,000 was also written off. The lingering current effects of September 11, as well as the uncertainty of future business growth due to the change in business climate surrounding New York City are the major reasons for this impairment charge. Finally, the net goodwill of $718,000 resulting from the 1997 acquisition of ATM/Canterbury (Software Development Segment) was also written off. Recent operating results may be indicative that the book value of the goodwill may not be recoverable. Management believes that these impairment charges reflect the net carrying value of goodwill on the November 30, 2001 Balance Sheet under a conservative valuation approach due to the current operating losses and uncertain business environment of CALC/Canterbury, DMI/Canterbury and ATM/Canterbury. All goodwill impairment expense is reflected under Corporate in the segment reporting footnote. Interest expense was reduced by $160,000 (46%) in Fiscal 2001 as compared to Fiscal 2000. Strong operating cash flow allowed for reductions in borrowings related to the Usertech acquisition and lower floating interest rates provided expense relief during the year. Other expense of $2,889,000 was comprised of two components. First a charge of $2,562,000 was recorded during the fourth quarter related to the impairment of an investment available for sale. The approximately 1,400,000 shares of the publicly traded company were accepted by the Company from 1999 until early 2001 as payment for services delivered to this start-up organization. Current market value coupled with the organization's poor balance sheet gave rise to the need for this charge in the fourth quarter of 2001. During the first quarter of 2001 the Company also recorded an investment impairment charge of $75,000 for another security held for sale. Also reflected in other expenses for Fiscal 2001 is a loss of $324,000 related to the sale of real estate during the second quarter of the year. Fiscal 2001 results of operations included many non-cash, non-recurring charges to the income statement. The following list will summarize these charges: Goodwill impairment $5,958,000 Investment impairment 2,637,000 Loss on sale of land 326,000 Reserve for uncollectible accounts 533,000 Debt issuance cost write off 71,000 ---------- Total $9,525,000 ========== If these non-cash, non-recurring charges were eliminated from the Fiscal 15 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 2001 Statement of Operation, the Company would have shown a pretax profit of approximately $500,000, before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. Fiscal 2000 Compared to Fiscal 1999 Revenues -------- Revenues increased by $15,525,000 (109%) in Fiscal 2000 over Fiscal 1999. The majority ($15,222,000) of this increase is attributable to the revenues generated for a full fiscal year by USC/Canterbury, which was acquired in October, 1999. The revenues for the other existing subsidiaries remained fairly constant with technical services consulting revenues making up the difference in revenue increase for Fiscal 2000 over the previous year. The Company continues to develop alternative revenue streams such as on-line learning, technical staffing, technical services and web development. It is believed that these additional revenue streams will become more significant in Fiscal 2001 and beyond. Costs and Expenses ------------------ Costs and expenses increased by $13,360,000 (158%) in Fiscal 2000 over the previous year. Again, the most significant portion of this increase ($13,254,000) is attributable to costs associated with USC/Canterbury. While gross profit increased from $5,741,000 in Fiscal 1999 to $7,906,000 (38%), gross profit percentage declined from 40% in Fiscal 1999 to 27% in Fiscal 2000. This was due to the change in product mix from year to year. Product revenue, as a percent of total revenue, increased from 18% in 1999 to 57% in Fiscal 2000. Product revenue had an associated gross profit of 15%, while service revenue gross profit for Fiscal 2000 was 43%. The full year contribution of USC/Canterbury, a value added reseller, again contributed to this shift. Selling expense increased by $569,000 (31%). The increase was a result of the increase in selling expense for a full year of USC/Canterbury activity ($570,000), as compared to only one and a half months in Fiscal 1999. General and administrative expense increased by $841,000 (23%) in Fiscal 2000 over Fiscal 1999. $391,000 of the increase was due to the additional expense of USC/Canterbury for a full year. $155,000 related to the expense for DMI, which was added to the business during the third quarter of Fiscal 2000. Other income for Fiscal 2000 increased by $492,000 over Fiscal 1999. The net increase was primarily due to recognized other income of $461,000 related to the receipt of stock for assisting in raising capital for a related party. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS & SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The financial statements and supplementary data are as set forth in the Index on page 18. 16 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES There were no disagreements with the Company's independent auditors on matters of accounting or financial disclosure. 17 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF EXCHANGE ACT The directors, executive officers and control persons of the Company as of November 30, 2001 were as follows: Name Age Position Held with Company(1) - ---- --- ----------------------------- Kevin J. McAndrew 43 President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Director Stanton M. Pikus 61 Chairman of the Board of Directors Jean Zwerlein Pikus 48 Vice President - Operations, Secretary, Director Stephen M. Vineberg 60 Director Paul L. Shapiro 50 Director Frank A. Cappiello 76 Director (1) All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Company and thereafter until their successors are chosen and qualified. All officers hold office at the selection and choice of the Board of Directors of the Company. KEVIN J. McANDREW, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer as of June 1, 2001. He was Chief Operating Officer since December, 1993; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Canterbury since June 21, 1987; Treasurer since January, 1988; and Director since 1990. Mr. McAndrew is also a Director, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of e*machinery.net, inc., a public company traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. He is a graduate of the University of Delaware (B.S. Accounting, 1980) and has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1982. From 1980 to 1983 he was an Auditor with the public accounting firm of Coopers & Lybrand in Philadelphia. From 1984 to 1986 Mr. McAndrew was employed as a Controller for a New Jersey based division of Allied Signal, Inc. STANTON M. PIKUS, Chairman of the Board of Directors, was a founder of Canterbury (1981). In June 2001 he resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. but remains an employee and Director of the Company. He graduated from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (B.S., Economics and Accounting) in 1962. Mr. Pikus is also a Director of e*machinery.net, inc., a public company traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. From 1968 until 1984 he worked full-time as President and majority stockholder of Brown, Bailey and Pikus, Inc., a mergers and acquisitions consulting firm that had completed more than twenty transactions. In addition, Mr. Pikus has been retained in the past by various small to medium-sized public and private companies in the capacity of an independent financial consultant. Mr. Pikus is the spouse of Jean Z. Pikus, who is a Director, a Vice President of Operations and the Secretary of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. JEAN ZWERLEIN PIKUS, Vice President of Human Resources and Operations, Secretary, and Director since December 1, 1984. She was employed by J. B. 18 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Lippincott Company, a publishing company, from 1974 to 1983, where she was Assistant Personnel Manager and also created its word processing center, and was responsible for the day-to-day control of word processing and graphic services. In 1984, Ms. Pikus graduated from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (B.S., Accounting and Management, cum laude). Ms. Pikus is the spouse of Stanton M. Pikus, who is the Chairman of the Board of Directors and an employee of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. ALAN MANIN, Director and Founder of the Company (1981). He is a graduate of Temple University (B.S., 1960, M.Ed., 1966); a former teacher and department chairman in the Philadelphia School System (1960-1966); a former Vice President and Director of Education for Evelyn Wood Reading Dynamics (1966-1972); a former Director of Northeast Preparatory School (1973); President, Chief Operating Officer and founder of Health Careers Academy, a federally accredited (National Association of Trade and Technical Schools) vocational school (1974- 1979) and a founder of the Company (1981). He is currently the President of Atlantis, a company which provides motivational training to employees of Fortune 1000 companies. STEPHEN M. VINEBERG, a Director since 1988, is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of CMQ, Inc. Previously, he was a Vice President of Fidelity Bank, Philadelphia, where he was Chief Operating Officer of the Data Processing and Systems and Programming Divisions. Mr. Vineberg also directed a wholly-owned subsidiary of the bank that developed and marketed computer software, operated a service bureau and coordinated all electronic funds transfer activities. PAUL L. SHAPIRO, a Director since December, 1992 has worked for McKesson Drug Company for the past 16 years. From 1973 through 1975 he was Director of the Pennsylvania Security Officers' Training Academy. In 1973 he graduated from York College of Pennsylvania with a B.S. Degree in Police Administration. FRANK A. CAPPIELLO, a Director since 1995, is President of the investment advisory firm, McCullough, Andrews & Cappiello, Inc. He is also the author of several books and a regular panelist on "Wall $treet Week with Louis Rukeyser", a regular quest on CNN's "Money Line," CNN Financial's "Market Sweep," a frequent guest on CNBC, and a monthly columnist on the website of CBS's "MarketWatch." Until their sale, he was the Chairman of three no-load mutual funds. For more than 12 years Mr. Cappiello was Chief Investment Officer for an insurance holding company with overall responsibility for managing assets of $800 million. Before that, he was the Research Director of a major stock brokerage firm. He is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame and Harvard University's Graduate School of Business Administration. Mr. Cappiello is also a Director of e*machinery.net, inc., a public company traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION CASH COMPENSATION The Company had 170 full-time employees as of November 30, 2001. There were no cash directors' fees paid during this period. 19 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Summary Compensation Table -------------------------- Long-Term Compensation Annual Compensation Award Payouts --------------------- -------------------------------------- Other Securities All Annual Restricted Underlying Other Name & Compen- Stock Options/ LTIP Compen- Principal Salary Bonus sation Awards SAR Payouts sation Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) (#) ($) ($) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stanton M. 2001 $254,000 $ - $ - $ - 175,000 $ - $ - Pikus(1) 2000 210,000 - - - 100,000 - - Chairman 1999 195,000 - - - 240,000 - - Kevin J. 2001 $218,000 - - - 150,000 $ - $ - McAndrew(2)2000 149,000 $ - $ - $ - 70,000 - - President, 1999 135,000 - - - 180,000 - - Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer Jean Z. 2001 $112,000 $ - $ - $ - 85,000 $ - $ - Pikus 2000 92,000 - - - 40,000 - - Vice 1999 90,000 - - - 108,000 - - President (1) Prior to June 1, 2001 Stanton M. Pikus held the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer. (2) Prior to June 1, 2001, Kevin J. McAndrew held the positions of Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. No other Executive Officers received in excess of $100,000 in total annual compensation for the three-year period. The following Executive Officers were granted five-year stock options during fiscal 2001 from the 1995 Stock Option Plan as Incentive Option Awards. Number of Percentage of Securities Total Options Underlying Granted to Grant Date Options Employees in Exercise Expiration Present Name Granted Fiscal Year Price Date Value - ---- ------- ----------- ----- ---- ----- Stanton M. Pikus(1) 75,000 $1.50 01/09/06 $75,744(a) 100,000 28.81% $0.69 11/21/06 $40,934(a) Kevin J. McAndrew(2) 50,000 $1.50 01/09/06 $50,496(a) 100,000 24.69% $0.69 11/21/06 $40,934(a) Jean Z. Pikus 25,000 $1.50 01/09/06 $25,248(a) 60,000 13.99% $0.69 11/21/06 $24,560(a) 20 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 (a) Option values reflect Black-Scholes model output for options. The assumptions used in the model were expected volatility of 1.19, risk free rate of return of 3.55%, dividend yield of 0%, and time to exercise of 2.5 years. (1) Prior to June 1, 2001 Stanton M. Pikus held the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer. (2) Prior to June 1, 2001, Kevin J. McAndrew held the positions of Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Company executed new employment agreements dated June 1, 2001 between the Company and Mr. Kevin J. McAndrew and the Company and Mr. Stanton M. Pikus, reflecting their new employment arrangements. Each employment agreement is for a period of five years. Each sets forth various services to be performed. Each employee shall receive an annual salary of $245,000 with annual cost of living increases tied to a nationally recognized index, as set forth by the Board of Directors from time to time. These employment agreements supercede and replace the current employment agreements, including the cancellation of bonus opportunities which were to be payable through December 1, 2003. These agreements also include a non-competition prohibition for a period of three years after employment has been terminated. Subsequent to November 30, 2001, The Company executed a five-year employment agreement dated December 1, 2001 between the Company and Ms. Jean Pikus. Ms. Pikus shall receive an annual salary of $150,000 with annual cost of living increases tied to a nationally recognized index, as set forth by the Board of Directors from time to time. The agreement also includes a non- competition prohibition for a period of three years after employment has been terminated. COMPENSATION PURSUANT TO PLAN The following qualified(1) and non-qualified options were granted to executive officers and directors of the Company on the following dates (officers, directors, and more than 5% holders of the Company's common stock received stock options at 100% of the market value on date of grant) as of February 22, 2002. Name of Capacity in Date Exercise Individual Which Served Options Granted Price ============================================================================= Stanton M. Pikus Chairman of the Board 50,000 05/18/98 $1.38 of Directors 100,000 12/04/98 $ .53 40,000 08/27/99 $1.56 100,000 11/04/99 $2.40 25,000 08/02/00 $3.00 75,000(1) 11/28/00(1) $2.78(1) 75,000(1) 01/09/01(1) $1.50(1) 100,000(1) 11/21/01(1) $0.69(1) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Name of Capacity in Date Exercise Individual Which Served Options Granted Price ============================================================================= Kevin J. McAndrew President, Chief 8,334 10/16/97 $3.56 Financial Officer, 35,000 05/18/98 $1.38 Treasurer, Director 75,000 12/04/98 $ .53 30,000 08/27/99 $1.56 75,000 11/04/99 $2.40 20,000 08/02/00 $3.00 50,000(1) 11/28/00(1) $2.78(1) 50,000(1) 01/09/01(1) $1.50(1) 100,000(1) 11/21/01(1) $0.69(1) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jean Zwerlein Pikus Vice President-Operations, 6,667 10/16/97 $3.56 Secretary, Director 20,000 05/18/98 $1.38 45,000 12/04/98 $ .53 18,000 08/27/99 $1.56 45,000 11/04/99 $2.40 15,000 08/02/00 $3.00 25,000(1) 11/28/00(1) $2.78(1) 25,000(1) 01/09/01(1) $1.50(1) 60,000(1) 11/21/01(1) $0.69(1) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alan Manin Director 10,000 05/18/98 $1.38 17,500 12/04/98 $ .53 7,000 08/27/99 $1.56 17,500 11/04/99 $2.40 10,000 01/11/00 $3.67 5,000 08/02/00 $3.00 20,000 11/21/01 $0.69 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen Vineberg Director 2,500 10/16/97 $3.56 10,000 05/18/98 $1.38 17,500 12/04/98 $ .53 7,000 08/27/99 $1.56 17,500 11/04/99 $2.40 5,000 08/02/00 $3.00 20,000 11/21/01 $0.69 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Shapiro Director 2,500 10/16/97 $3.56 10,000 05/18/98 $1.38 17,500 12/04/98 $ .53 7,000 08/27/99 $1.56 17,500 11/04/99 $2.40 5,000 08/02/00 $3.00 20,000 11/21/01 $0.69 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Frank A. Cappiello Director 20,000 05/18/98 $1.38 35,000 12/04/98 $ .53 14,000 08/27/99 $1.56 35,000 11/04/99 $2.40 12,500 08/02/00 $3.00 40,000 11/21/01 $0.69 - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 (1) These options are part of the 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan; however they are incentive stock options. All other options issued as part of the 1995 Stock Option Plan are non-qualified stock options. Employee stock option holders have five years from the date of grant to exercise any or all of their options, and upon leaving the Company the option holders (but not consultants) must exercise within 30 days. These options exercise into restricted shares of Company common stock and absent registration, or any exemption from registration, must be held for the applicable Rule 144 holding period before the restriction can be removed. OTHER COMPENSATION No material other compensation. However, see "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" for key-man life insurance arrangements. COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS No additional compensation, other than Company stock options issued at 100% of market value to all Directors who are not otherwise salaried employees. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS Not Applicable. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT (A)(B) The following table sets forth as of February 22, 2002 certain information with regard to the record and beneficial ownership of the Company's common stock by (i) each shareholder, owner of record or beneficial owner of 5% or more of the Company's common stock (ii) each Director individually and (iii) all Officers and Directors of the Company as a group: Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Shares Acquirable Name of Shares Within 60 Days By % Owned of Beneficial Owner Currently Owned Option Exercise(+) Company's Shares(*) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stanton M. Pikus(2) 1,061,248 565,000 11.6% Kevin J. McAndrew(1) 509,637 443,334 6.8% Jean Zwerlein Pikus(1)(2) 311,473 259,667 4.1% Alan Manin(1)(3) 204,054 87,000 2.0% Stephen M. Vineberg(1) 108,629 79,500 1.4% Paul L. Shapiro(1) 100,667 79,500 1.3% Frank A. Cappiello(1) 321,667 156,500 3.4% --------- --------- ----- All Officers, Directors and 5% Stockholders as a group (7 in number) 2,617,375 1,670,501 30.6% ========= ========= ===== 23 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 ____________________________ (+) Stock Options are delineated in the Compensation Pursuant To Plan table in Item 11. (*) These percentages are calculated using total outstanding shares and options exercisable. (1) All of said individuals have given a Voting Agreement and First Right of Refusal to Stanton M. Pikus, Board Chairman of the Company. (2) Stanton M. Pikus and Jean Zwerlein Pikus are married to each other and, therefore, are deemed to have beneficial ownership in each other's shares. 30,335 shares of Canterbury common stock owned in the name of Matthew Zane Pikus Trust are not included in their totals. (3) 73,228 shares owned by Atlantis Family L.C. of which Mr. Manin is the sole beneficiary, are included in his total. CHANGE IN CONTROL There has been no change in control of the Company. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The Company has secured key-person life insurance policies for its Corporate Officers. The amount and beneficiary of the key-person life insurance policies are as follows: Corporate Officers Amount of Policy Beneficiary - ------------------ ---------------- ----------- Kevin J. McAndrew $1,000,000 Company Jean Z. Pikus $ 500,000 Company The Company has secured key-person life insurance policies for Officers of its subsidiaries. The amount and beneficiary of the key-person life insurance policies are as follows: Corporate Officers Amount of Policy Beneficiary - ------------------ ---------------- ----------- Alan McGaffin $1,000,000 ATM/Canterbury Corp. Glen Hukins $1,000,000 CALC/Canterbury Corp. Gregory Lantz $1,000,000 MSI/Canterbury Corp. Patricia Bednarik $1,000,000 USC/Canterbury Corp. E. Paul Cooke $1,000,000 Usertech/Canterbury Corp. The Company is in the process of researching a key-person life insurance policy on the President of DMI/Canterbury Corp. During 1999, the Company performed consulting and web development services for a start-up, non-public company in which certain officers are members of the Board of Directors and 18% shareholders. The services billed during the year totaled $521,500. In March, 2000 the company went public through a reverse merger. Settlement of this receivable was subsequently paid during Fiscal 2000 with stock of the public company. 24 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 During 2000, the Company performed consulting and web development services for the same publicly traded organization. The value of the services provided during the year totaled $1,108,250. These services were paid for with stock of the public company client. As of November 30, 2000 the Company owned 1,013,617 shares of this organization. During 2001, the Company received an additional 233,962 shares in satisfaction of a $372,000 receivable at November 30, 2000 and an additional 187,722 shares for services provided in Fiscal 2001 valued at $421,240. A $2,562,000 impairment charge attributable to the Company's investment in this stock is discussed in Note 16. At November 30, 2001 and 2000, the total notes receivable plus accrued interest for issuances of Company common stock to corporate officers, corporate counsel and certain consultants totaled $4,002,000 and $2,002,000, respectively. The notes are collateralized by common stock of the Company and are reported as a contra-equity account. Interest rates range from 4% to 6.6%. At November 30, 2001, $2,000,000 of the notes were recourse and $2,002,000 were non-recourse. During Fiscal 2001, certain officers and directors of the Company purchased a 33% ownership interest in a corporation which owns 100% of the stock of a corporation which has notes payable to the Company in the amount of $4,774,269 at November 30, 2001 from an owner group who purchased the business from the Company in1996. The Company maintained the same level of security interest protection and the same debt amortization schedule. The Company earned $408,000 of interest income from these notes in Fiscal 2001. 25 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K Consolidated Financial Statements filed here include: Balance Sheets at November 30, 2001 and 2000 and Statements of Operations, Stockholders Equity and Cash Flows for the years ended November 30, 2001, 2000, and 1999. All other schedules for which provision is made in Regulation S-K of the Commission are not required under the related instruction or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted. Consolidated Financial Statements Page No. --------------------------------- -------- Report of Independent Auditors for Fiscal Year 2001-----------------------F-0 Consolidated Balance Sheets - November 30, 2001 and 2000------------------F-2 Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years ended November 30, 2001, 2000, and 1999-----------------------------------------------------------F-4 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - Years ended November 30, 2001, 2000, and 1999-----------------------------------------------------F-6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended November 30, 2001, 2000, and 1999-----------------------------------------------------------F-7 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements--------------------------------F-9 Valuation and Qualifying Accounts-----------------------------------------F-24 Exhibits Sequential Page No. -------- ------------------- 3(a) Articles of Incorporation of Canterbury Press, Inc. * 3(b) By-Laws of the Registrant * 3(c) Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation changing the name to Canterbury Education Services, Inc. * 3(d) Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation changing the name to Canterbury Corporate Services, Inc. ** 3(e) Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation changing the name to Canterbury Information Technology, Inc. *** 3(f) Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation changing the name to Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. **** 4(g) Asset Purchase Agreement between Ceridian Corporation and the Registrant ***** 21 Subsidiaries of Registrant 29 22 Annual Report and Proxy Statement for 2000 Annual Shareholders Meeting ****** * Incorporated by reference from the like-numbered exhibit to Form S18 Registration Statement, SEC. File No. 33-6381 filed on July 18, 1986. ** Incorporated by reference from the like-numbered exhibit to Form S-3/A Registration Statement, SEC. File No. 33-77066 filed on March 30, 1994. *** Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report and Definitive Proxy Materials for the 1999 Annual Shareholders Meeting for fiscal year ended November 30, 1999 filed with the SEC on October 7, 2000. **** Incorporated by reference from the Definitive Proxy Materials for the 2001 Special Meeting of Shareholders filed with the SEC on March 3, 2001. ***** Incorporated by reference from the 8-K filed with the SEC on October 11, 2001. 26 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 ****** Incorporated by reference from the Annual Report and Definitive Proxy Materials for the 2000 Annual Shareholders Meeting for fiscal year ended November 30, 2000 filed with the SEC on October 4, 2001. Reports on Form 8-K filed during the last quarter of the period covered by this report are as follows: 8-K/A filed on September 5, 2001 - Changes in Company's certifying accountants 8-K filed on October 11, 2001 - On September 28, 2001, the Company executed a Stock Purchase Agreement and effectuated a Closing with Ceridian Corporation to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of User Technology Services Inc. from Ceridian. 8-K/A filed on December 12, 2001 - financial statements for October 11, 2001 8-K Filing 27 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 SIGNATURES ---------- Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC. --------------------------------- Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Kevin J. McAndrew ------- --------------------- Kevin J. McAndrew, President; Chief Executive Officer; Treasurer Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Kevin J. McAndrew ------- --------------------- Kevin J. McAndrew, Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on behalf of Canterbury Consulting group, inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Stanton M. Pikus ------- -------------------- Stanton M. Pikus, Director; Chairman of the Board of Directors Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Kevin J. McAndrew ------- --------------------- Kevin J. McAndrew, President, Chief Executive Officer; Executive Vice President; Chief Financial Officer; Director Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Jean Zwerlein Pikus ------- ----------------------- Jean Zwerlein Pikus, Vice President - Operations; Secretary; Director Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Alan Manin ------- -------------- Alan Manin, Director Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Stephen M. Vineberg ------- --------------------- Stephen M. Vineberg, Director Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Paul L. Shapiro ------- ------------------- Paul L. Shapiro, Director Dated: 2/28/02 By /s/ Frank A. Cappiello ------- --------------------- Frank A. Cappiello, Director 28 Report of Independent Auditors - 2001 ------------------------------------- The Board of Directors and Stockholders Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. Medford, New Jersey We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. as of November 30, 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc. at November 30, 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective December 1, 2000, the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue recognition in accordance with guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements." Baratz & Associates, P.A. Marlton, New Jersey February 22, 2002 Report of Independent Auditors 2000 and 2001 -------------------------------------------- The Board of Directors and Stockholders Canterbury Information Technology, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Canterbury Information Technology, Inc. as of November 30, 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended November 30, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Canterbury Information Technology, Inc. at November 30, 2000, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended November 30, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Ernst & Young LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania February 23, 2001 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS November 30, 2001 and 2000 ASSETS - ------ 2001 2000 ---- ---- Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 664,850 $ 885,479 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $452,000 and $194,000 5,728,970 4,864,456 Notes receivable - current portion 459,029 393,597 Prepaid expenses and other assets 239,470 652,319 Inventory, principally finished goods, at cost 826,851 202,032 Deferred income tax benefit 149,011 91,412 ----------- ----------- Total Current Assets 8,068,181 7,089,295 Property and equipment at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,038,000 and $5,886,000 1,315,942 1,989,650 Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $1,234,000 and $2,816,000 4,162,604 9,330,435 Deferred income tax benefit 4,323,105 1,508,251 Notes receivable 6,966,743 7,237,239 Investments, at market - 3,315,878 Other assets 207,547 713,664 ----------- ----------- Total Assets $25,044,122 $31,184,412 =========== =========== Continued See Accompanying Notes F-2 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS November 30, 2001 and 2000 Continued LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY - ------------------------------------ 2001 2000 ---- ---- Current Liabilities: Accounts payable - trade $ 1,776,326 $ 2,277,446 Accrued expenses 1,014,302 655,204 Unearned revenue 1,943,240 860,295 Income taxes payable 18,540 129,833 Current portion, long-term debt 873,439 1,346,112 ----------- ----------- Total Current Liabilities 5,625,847 5,268,890 Long-term debt 2,145,183 678,303 Deferred income tax 2,947,131 3,157,118 ----------- ----------- Total Liabilities 10,718,161 9,104,311 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' Equity: Common stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 12,469,000 and 10,685,000 issued 12,469 10,685 Additional paid-in capital 24,232,735 22,456,731 Accumulated other comprehensive income - 779,244 Retained earnings (deficit) (5,916,972) 1,242,883 Notes receivable for capital stock - related parties (4,002,271) (2,002,142) Less treasury shares, at cost - (407,300) ----------- ----------- Total Stockholders' Equity 14,325,961 22,080,101 ----------- ----------- Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $25,044,122 $31,184,412 =========== =========== See Accompanying Notes F-3 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Years ended November 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Service revenue $12,618,210 $12,587,921 $11,665,394 Product revenue 16,425,632 17,146,668 2,544,132 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total net revenue 29,043,842 29,734,589 14,209,526 Service costs and expenses 7,658,539 7,195,514 6,657,385 Product costs and expenses 12,892,888 14,633,006 1,810,926 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total costs and expenses 20,551,427 21,828,520 8,468,311 Gross profit 8,492,415 7,906,069 5,741,215 Selling 2,939,810 2,377,340 1,808,601 General and administrative 6,236,047 4,486,552 3,645,673 Goodwill impairment 5,957,753 - - ----------- ----------- ----------- Total operating expenses 15,133,610 6,863,892 5,454,274 Other income/(expenses) Interest income 689,723 715,829 705,959 Interest expense (186,348) (346,457) (390,453) Other (251,538) 510,014 18,321 Investment impairment (2,637,285) (165,000) - ----------- ----------- ----------- Total other income/(expense) (2,385,448) 714,386 333,827 Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (9,026,643) 1,756,563 620,768 Income tax provision (benefit) (2,079,876) 698,348 - ----------- ----------- ----------- Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (6,946,767) 1,058,215 620,768 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (213,088) - - ----------- ----------- ----------- Net income (loss) $ (7,159,855) $ 1,058,215 $ 620,768 ============ =========== ============ Continued See Accompanying Notes F-4 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Years ended November 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 Continued 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Net income (loss) per share and common share equivalents Net income (loss) $(7,159,855) $1,058,215 $620,768 Basic: Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $(.59) $.11 $.08 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (.02) - - ----- ---- ---- Net income (loss) $(.61) $.11 $.08 ===== ==== ==== Diluted: Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $(.59) $.10 $.08 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (.02) - - ----- ---- ---- Net income (loss) $(.61) $.10 $.08 ===== ==== ==== Weighted average number of common shares - basic 11,779,300 10,027,700 8,008,800 ========== ========== ========= Weighted average number of common shares -diluted 11,779,300 11,028,500 8,276,800 ========== ========== ========= See Accompanying Notes F-5 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Years Ended November 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 Accumulated Notes Total Common Common Additional Retained Other Receivable Stock- Stock Stock Paid-in- Earnings Treasury Comprehensive for Capital holders' Shares Amount Capital (Deficit) Stock Income/(Loss) Stock Equity Balance, ------ ------ ------- ------- ----- ------ ----- ------ November 30, 1998 6,420,893 $6,421 $17,580,522 $ (436,100) $(407,300) $(143,757) $(370,518) $16,229,268 Net income 620,768 620,768 Unrealized loss on available for sale securities (328,458) (328,458) Total comprehensive ---------- income 292,310 401(k) Company match 77,129 77 48,115 48,192 Additional issuance of common stock for acquisitions 292,468 292 849,707 849,999 Private Placements of common stock, net of expenses 2,717,648 2,718 1,468,504 1,471,222 Notes receivable for capital stock (18,178) (18,178) Balance, --------- ------ ----------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------- November 30, 1999 9,508,138 9,508 19,946,848 184,668 (407,300) (472,215) (388,696) 18,872,813 Net income 1,058,215 1,058,215 Unrealized gain on available for sale securities 1,251,459 1,251,459 Total comprehensive ---------- income 2,309,674 401(k) Company match 16,149 16 59,482 59,498 Additional issuance of common stock for acquisitions 411,420 411 899,151 899,562 Issuance of common shares to employees, directors and consultants for notes 800,000 800 1,551,200 (1,552,000) - Contributed common shares (50,000) (50) 50 - Notes receivable for capital stock (61,446) (61,446) Balance, ---------- ------- ----------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------- ----------- November 30, 2000 10,685,707 10,685 22,456,731 1,242,883 (407,300) 779,244 (2,002,142) 22,080,101 Net loss (7,159,855) (7,159,855) Unrealized loss on available for sale securities (779,244) (779,244) Total comprehensive ---------- loss (7,939,099) 401(k) Company match 40,659 41 83,322 83,363 Issuance of common shares to employees, directors and consultants for notes 1,777,500 1,778 2,099,947 (2,101,725) - Retirement of treasury shares (35,317) (35) (407,265) 407,300 - Reserve for interest on notes receivable for capital stock 101,596 101,596 Balance, ---------- ------- ----------- ----------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- November 30, 2001 12,468,549 $12,469 $24,232,735 $(5,916,972) $ - $ - $(4,002,271) $14,325,961 ========== ======= =========== =========== ======== ========== =========== ===========
F-6 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years ended November 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 2001 2000 1999 Operating activities: ---- ---- ---- Net income (loss) $(7,159,855) $1,058,215 $ 620,768 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 969,959 1,036,748 1,040,952 Provision for losses on accounts receivable 433,214 75,409 89,773 Goodwill impairment 5,957,753 - - Investment impairment 2,562,284 - - Deferred income taxes (2,162,905) 588,000 - Loss on sale of land and vehicles 326,176 - - 401(k) contributions issued in stock 83,363 59,498 48,192 Receipt of stock for services (793,240) (1,108,250) (240,000) Other assets 288,337 140,642 (561,067) Changes in operating assets, net of acquisitions Accounts receivable 1,221,448 (2,053,971) (1,306,811) Inventory (624,820) (3,268) - Prepaid expenses and other assets 495,255 152,965 5,945 Income taxes (111,293) 129,833 - Accounts payable (501,120) 1,015,021 787,822 Accrued expenses (73,142) 35,572 53,251 Unearned revenue 1,029,565 (251,035) 120,495 ---------- ---------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities 1,940,979 875,379 659,320 ---------- ---------- ----------- Investing activities: Cash paid for acquisition (2,350,334) - - Proceeds from sale of land 399,734 - - Capital expenditures (75,920) (110,969) (431,809) ---------- ---------- ----------- Net cash used in investing activities (2,026,520) (110,969) (431,809) ---------- ---------- ----------- Financing activities: Principal payments on long term debt (3,540,152) (1,253,170) (1,256,532) Proceeds from long term debt 3,000,000 - - Proceeds from payments on notes receivable 405,064 363,805 330,961 Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net - - 1,471,220 Deferred finance costs - (50,000) - Net cash provided by/(used in) ---------- ---------- ----------- financing activities (135,088) (939,365) 545,649 ---------- ---------- ----------- Net increase/(decrease) in cash (220,629) (174,955) 773,160 Cash, beginning of year 885,479 1,060,434 287,274 ---------- ---------- ----------- Cash, end of year $ 664,850 $ 885,479 $ 1,060,434 ========== ========== =========== Continued, See Accompanying Notes F-7 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years Ended November 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 (Continued) Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: As a subsequent event, in January, 2002 46,875 shares of restricted common stock were issued as a private placement at fair market value. As a subsequent event, in December, 2001 180,000 shares of restricted stock tied to the stock issued in February and April 2001 were cancelled and then added to the authorized but unissued stock total. In November, 2001 the Company issued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock to a consultant of the Company for a note receivable at fair market value. In September 2001, the Company issued a $1,200,000 note payable to the seller as part of the purchase price of Usertech as described in Note 2. In September 2001, in conjunction with the purchase of 100% of the stock of Usertech, the Company purchased computer equipment from the seller valued at $364,000 through issuance of a note payable. In July, 2001 the Company cancelled 23,195 shares of restricted common stock and then added that amount to the authorized but unissued shares total. In May, 2001 the Company received 421,684 shares of common stock from an affiliated third party valued at a fair market value of $793,240 for services provided. In May, 2001 the Company issued 750,000 shares of restricted common stock to Officers, Directors and consultants of the Company for notes receivable at fair market value. In May, 2001 the Company converted a $200,000 miscellaneous receivable from a related party into a six-year term note with interest accruing at 4.8% on the unpaid balance. In April, 2001 the Company issued 685,000 shares of restricted common stock to Officers, Directors and consultants of the Company for notes receivable at fair market value. In February, 2001 the Company issued 292,500 shares of restricted common stock to Officers, Directors and consultants of the Company for notes receivable at fair market value. During February and March 2001 the Company issued 247 and 40,412 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, to its defined contribution plan to fulfill its matching contribution requirement at fair market value. In August, 2000 the Company issued 221,420 shares of its common stock for the purchase of certain assets of DataMosaic International, Inc. at fair market value. In July, 2000 the Company issued 800,000 shares of restricted common stock to Officers, Directors and consultants of the Company for notes receivable at fair market value. In March, 2000 the Company issued 20,000 shares of restricted common stock as an adjustment to the purchase price of certain assets of U.S. Communications, Inc. purchase at fair market value. During March, 2000 the Company issued 16,149 shares of restricted common stock to its defined contribution plan to fulfill its matching contribution requirement at fair market value. During 2000, the unrealized gain on investments increased by $1,251,000. During 2000, the Company received 660,000 shares of common stock from an affiliated third party valued at a market value of $1,257,750 for services provided at fair market value. In October, 1999 the Company issued 292,468 shares of its common stock for the purchase of certain assets of U.S. Communications, Inc. at fair market value. During March, 1999 the Company issued 77,129 shares of restricted common stock to its defined contribution plan to fulfill its matching contribution requirement at fair market value. The income taxes paid for Fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999 were as follows: $194,300, $35,700, and $38,900 respectively. Interest paid during Fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999 were as follows: $186,348, $346,457, and $390,453 respectively. F-8 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 1. Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Description of Business ----------------------- Canterbury Consulting Group, Inc., formerly Canterbury Information Technology, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as "the Registrant" or "the Company") is engaged in the business of providing information technology products and services to both commercial and government clients. Canterbury is comprised of six operating subsidiaries with offices located in New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Maryland, Ohio, Minnesota, Georgia and Texas. The focus of the Canterbury companies is to become an integral part of our clients IT solution, designing and applying the best products and services to help them achieve a competitive advantage and helping their employees to succeed. Our subsidiaries offer the following technology solutions: * distance learning solutions * hardware sales and support * customized learning solutions * software development for ERP and CRM * web development * systems engineering and * technical and desktop applications consulting training * IT contractors and permanent * records and asset management systems staffing * industry specific portals * management training programs * help desk and service center support Principles of Consolidation --------------------------- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Stock Based Compensation ------------------------ The Company accounts for stock options under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25- Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Company discloses the pro forma net income and earnings per share effect as if the Company had used the fair value method prescribed under SFAS No.123-Accounting for Stock Based Compensation (see Note 12). Use of Estimates ---------------- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The ultimate outcome and actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used. Revenue Recognition ------------------- Product Revenue Product revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been delivered, the sales price is fixed or F-9 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The product is considered delivered to the customer once it has been shipped, and title and risk of loss have transferred. The Company defers revenue if there is uncertainty about customer acceptance. Product revenue represents sales of computer hardware and software. Generally, the Company is involved in determining the nature, type, and specifications of the products ordered by the customer. Service Revenue Service revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Service revenues represent training, consulting and technical staffing services provided to customers under separate consulting and service contracts. Revenues from these contracts are recognized as services are rendered. Change in Accounting -------------------- The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements," which provides additional guidance in applying generally accepted accounting principles for revenue recognition. The Company implemented the provisions of SAB 101 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001, retroactive to December 1, 2000. The implementation of SAB 101 resulted in a change in accounting for certain product shipments where title did not transfer to the customer until delivery occurred. The cumulative effect of the change for implementation of SAB 101 resulted in a charge to fiscal 2001 income of $213,088 (net of income taxes of $109,773). For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2001, the Company recognized $1,560,000 of revenue which was included in the cumulative effect adjustment. The effect of that revenue on fiscal 2001 was to increase income by $213,088 (net of income taxes of $109,773) during that period. Had SAB 101 been effective for all prior fiscal years presented and the first three quarters of fiscal 2001, the pro forma results and earnings per share would not have been materially different from the previously reported results. Statement of Cash Flows ----------------------- For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, cash refers solely to demand deposits with banks and cash on hand. Depreciation and Amortization ----------------------------- The Company depreciates and amortizes its property and equipment for financial statement purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the property and equipment (useful lives of leases or lives of leasehold improvements and leased property under capital leases, whichever is shorter). For income tax purposes, the Company uses accelerated methods of depreciation. The following estimated useful lives are used: F-10 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Building and improvements 7 years Equipment 5 years Furniture and fixture 5 to 7 years Intangible Assets ----------------- Goodwill is being amortized over periods ranging from twenty to twenty- five years using the straight-line method. The Company periodically evaluates whether the remaining estimated useful life of intangibles may warrant revision or the remaining balance of intangibles may require adjustment generally based upon expectations of nondiscounted cash flows and operating income. During Fiscal 2001 the Company recorded $5,958,000 of goodwill impairment charges. $500,000 of this charge was reflected in the second quarter of the year and the balance was recorded in the fourth quarter. Management made the decision to treat the carrying value of goodwill conservatively. DMI/Canterbury goodwill was written down to $0 (total charge of $843,000) due to the uncertainty in the technical staffing marketplace caused by the dot com bust and the softening of spending in this business segment. The net goodwill related to the 1994 acquisition of CALC/Canterbury (Training and Consulting Segment) totaling $4,397,000 was also written off. The lingering current effects of September 11, as well as the uncertainty of future business growth due to the change in business climate surrounding New York City are the major reasons for this impairment charge. Finally the net goodwill of $718,000 resulting from the 1997 acquisition of ATM/Canterbury (Software Development Segment) was also written off. Recent operating results may be indicative that the book value of the goodwill may not be recoverable. Management believes that these impairment charges reflect the net carrying value of goodwill on the November 30, 2001 Balance Sheet under a conservative valuation approach due to the current operating losses and uncertain business environment of CALC/Canterbury, DMI/Canterbury and ATM/Canterbury. All goodwill impairment expense is reflected under Corporate in the segment reporting footnote. Inventories ----------- Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market utilizing a first- in, first-out method of determining cost. Earnings Per Share ------------------ Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share considers the dilutive effect, if any, of common stock equivalents (options). Concentration of Risk --------------------- As previously discussed, the Company is in the business of providing information technology services. These services are provided to a large number of customers in various industries in the United States. The Company's trade accounts receivable are exposed to credit risk, but the risk is limited due to F-11 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 the diversity of the customer base and the customers wide geographic dispersion. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition. The Company maintains reserves for potential bad debt losses and such bad debt losses have been within the Company's expectations. During Fiscal 2001, the Company had one customer who accounted for 32% of the revenue in the Value Added Hardware Reseller segment, and 18% of consolidated revenues for the year. Also during 2001, the Company had one vendor who accounted for approximately 64% of product purchases in the Value Added Hardware Reseller segment. The Company maintains cash balances at a creditworthy bank located in the United States. Accounts at the institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. The Company does not believe that it has significant credit risk related to its cash balance. Reclassifications ----------------- Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years balances in order to conform to current presentations. Comprehensive Income (Loss) --------------------------- For the twelve months ended November 30, 2001 and November 30, 2000, net comprehensive income/(loss) amounted to ($7,939,099) and $2,309,675, respectively. Comprehensive income consists of net income/(loss) and net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, and is adjusted quarterly to reflect current market value of these securities. Recent Accounting Pronouncement ------------------------------- The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") recently issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 141 ("SFAS 141"), "Business Combinations", and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142 ("SFAS No. 142"), "Goodwill and Intangible Assets". SFAS No. 141 is effective for all business combinations completed after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after March 15, 2001. However, certain provisions of SFAS 142 apply to goodwill and other intangible assets acquired between July 1, 2001 and the effective date of SFAS 142. Major provisions of these Statements are as follows: 1) All business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 must use the purchase method of accounting. The pooling of interest method of accounting is prohibited except for transactions initiated before July 1, 2001. 2) Intangible assets acquired in a business combination must be recorded separately from goodwill if they arise from contractual or other legal rights or are separable from the acquired entity and can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, either individually or as part of a related contract, asset, or liability. F-12 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 3) Goodwill, as well as intangible assets with indefinite lives, acquired after June 30, 2001, will not be amortized. Effective with the adoption of SFAS 142, all previously recognized goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will no longer be subject to amortization. 4) Effective with the adoption of SFAS 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will be tested for impairment annually and whenever there is an impairment indicator. 5) All acquired goodwill must be assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing and segment reporting. The Company has adopted SFAS 142 effective at December 1, 2001. Goodwill has been amortized at approximately $480,000 annually. 2. Acquisitions ------------ In September 28, 2001, the Company completed the acquisition of User Technology Services, Inc. ("Usertech") with an effective date of September 1, 2001. The purchase of 100% of the outstanding shares of Usertech common stock was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The Company paid $2,350,000 in cash; $1,200,000 in notes payable over three years, plus the assumption of $851,000 in liabilities. Usertech provides e-learning support, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) planning, implementation and training, as well as post implementation support, for clients who have installed Peoplesoft, SAP and Oracle software. Proprietary software packages are also supported through a national network of skilled consultants. 3. Segment Reporting ----------------- The Company is organized into four operating segments and the corporate office. The operating segments are: training and consulting, value added hardware reseller, technical staffing and software development. The Company accounts for goodwill and any related amortization expense or impairment charges at the corporate level. Summarized financial information for each segment is as follows: Training Value Added and Hardware Technical Software 2001 Consulting Reseller Staffing Development Corporate Total - ---- ---------- -------- --------- ----------- --------- ----- Revenues $11,143,355 $16,207,436 $1,474,855 $218,196 $ - $29,043,842 Income before taxes 72,513 2,009,880 (258,438) (9,209) (10,841,389) (9,026,643) Assets 8,512,706 6,354,918 231,276 101,028 9,844,194 25,044,122 Interest income - 7,244 - - 682,479 689,723 Interest expense 37,188 691 1,113 2,078 145,278 186,348 Depreciation and amortization 388,944 67,535 22,167 19,949 471,364 969,959
F-13 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Training Value Added and Hardware Technical Software 2000 Consulting Reseller Staffing Development Corporate Total - ---- ---------- -------- --------- ----------- --------- ----- Revenues $11,635,568 $16,911,400 $ 952,353 $235,268 $ - $29,734,589 Income before taxes 1,589,818 1,078,438 53,291 (17,342) (947,642) 1,756,563 Assets 9,391,462 4,336,849 1,280,657 393,073 15,782,371 31,184,412 Interest income - - - - 715,829 715,829 Interest expense 45,252 14,651 - - 286,554 346,457 Depreciation and amortization 487,654 39,661 27,276 22,310 459,847 1,036,748 Training Value Added and Hardware Technical Software 1999 Consulting Reseller Staffing Development Corporate Total - ---- ---------- -------- --------- ----------- --------- ----- Revenues $11,665,394 $2,058,870 $ - $ 485,262 $ - $14,209,526 Income before taxes 1,404,468 317,843 - 104,339 (1,205,882) 620,768 Assets 10,703,017 1,754,118 - 1,047,171 14,307,666 27,811,972 Interest income - - - - 705,959 705,959 Interest expense 30,384 - - - 360,069 390,453 Depreciation and amortization 555,339 36,845 - 15,534 432,478 1,040,196
4. Property and Equipment ---------------------- Property and equipment, which is recorded at cost, consists of the following: 2001 2000 ---- ---- Land, buildings and improvements $ - $ 725,910 Machinery and equipment 2,253,787 5,085,176 Furniture and fixtures 566,576 1,413,289 Leased property under capital leases and leasehold improvements 533,834 651,089 ----------- ----------- 3,354,197 7,875,464 Less: Accumulated depreciation (2,038,255) (5,885,814) ----------- ----------- Net property and equipment $ 1,315,942 $ 1,989,650 =========== =========== F-14 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Accumulated depreciation of leased property under capital leases totaled $244,000 in 2001. Depreciation expense for 2001, 2000, and 1999 was $471,000, $565,000, and $603,000, respectively. During Fiscal 2001, the Company wrote off approximately $4,300,000 worth of fully depreciated fixed assets. Also during 2001, the Company sold non- operating land and a building with a carrying value of $725,910. The net proceeds from the sale were $399,734. The loss on the sale totaling $326,176 was recorded in other expenses on the income statement for Fiscal 2001. 5. Notes Receivable ---------------- The Company holds a note receivable with a remaining balance in the amount of $2,651,503 at November 30, 2001. This note was received in November 1995 as part of the consideration for the sale of a former subsidiary. The Company is scheduled to receive monthly payments of $33,975 inclusive of interest at 7.79% per year through November 2010. In addition, the Company held notes receivable assets from related parties in the aggregate amount of $4,774,269 at November 30, 2001. These notes have interest terms that average 8.5% per year and are scheduled to mature at various dates through December 2006. 6. Income Taxes ------------ The provision/(benefit) for income taxes for the years ended November 30, 2001, 2000, and 1999 is as follows: 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Current: Federal $ - $ 26,000 $ - State 83,000 84,000 - ----------- -------- -------- 83,000 110,000 - Deferred: Federal (2,099,000) 443,000 (59,000) State (64,000) 145,000 59,000 ----------- -------- -------- Total $(2,080,000) $698,000 $ - =========== ======== ======== The reconciliation of the expected provision/(benefit) at the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate to the actual provision (benefit) recorded for the years ended November 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 is as follows: F-15 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Expected tax (benefit) at statutory rates $(3,069,000) $597,000 $211,000 Effect of state taxes, net 201,000 151,000 39,000 Permanent differences 788,000 10,000 2,000 Miscellaneous - - - Utilization of net operating losses - (60,000) (252,000) ----------- -------- -------- Total $(2,080,000) $698,000 $ - =========== ======== ======== Significant components of the Company's tax liabilities and assets as of November 30, 2001 and 2000 are as follows: November 30, 2001 2000 Deferred tax liabilities: ---- ---- Gain recognized in financial statements deferred for income tax purposes $2,084,000 $1,686,000 Tax depreciation in excess of book depreciation - 103,000 Tax amortization in excess of book amortization 735,000 660,000 Unrealized gain - 609,000 Other 128,000 99,000 ---------- ---------- Total deferred tax liabilities $2,947,000 $3,157,000 ========== ========== November 30, 2001 2000 Deferred tax assets: ---- ---- Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 108,000 $ 78,000 Expenses deductible for financial reporting purposes but deferred for tax reporting purposes 99,000 13,000 Book depreciation in excess of tax depreciation 256,000 - Impairment losses 2,134,000 67,000 Net operating loss carryover (net of valuation allowance) 1,875,000 1,442,000 ---------- ---------- Total deferred tax assets $4,472,000 $1,600,000 ========== ========== The Company increased the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets to $960,000 at November 30, 2001 from $126,000 at November 30, 2000 to account for the potential future expiration of state net operating losses before realization of tax benefits. At November 30, 2001, the Company had a tax loss carryforward for federal income tax reporting purposes of $4,395,000 and $6,845,000 for 2001 state income tax purposes. Net operating losses for federal tax purposes will begin to expire in 2010. Net operating losses for state tax purposes will expire at various dates through 2006. F-16 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 7. Long-Term Debt -------------- November 30, 2001 2000 Long-term obligations consist of: ---- ---- Term loan $1,325,000 $ - Revolving credit line 100,000 1,859,620 Note payable for acquisition 1,169,656 - Capital lease obligations 81,743 164,795 Notes payable - equipment 342,223 - ---------- ----------- 3,018,622 2,024,415 Less: Current maturities (873,439) (1,346,112) ---------- ----------- $2,145,183 $ 678,303 ========= ========== The Company's outstanding amount owed under the revolving credit line with Chase Bank was refinanced in May, 2001 by establishing a commercial lending relationship with Commerce Bank, N.A. (the Bank). As of the date of the refinancing, approximately $883,000 was paid to Chase in full satisfaction of the Company's outstanding obligations, out of the proceeds of a $1,500,000 five-year term loan from Commerce. As part of the refinancing, the Company also secured a two-year $2,500,000 working capital line of credit with the Bank collateralized by trade accounts receivable and inventory. $1,500,000 was borrowed in conjunction with the acquisition of User Technology Services, Inc. ("Usertech") on September 28, 2001 and through the date of this filing has been repaid in full. Both loans carry an interest rate of the prime rate plus 1%. The Bank's long term debt is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and requires compliance with covenants which include the maintenance of certain financial ratios and amounts. The Company is restricted by its bank from paying cash dividends on its common stock. The Company remains in full compliance with all of the financial covenants of its loan agreement with the Bank. As part of the purchase price paid for the acquisition of Usertech in September, 2001, the Company agreed to pay $1,200,000 to the seller over the next three years at an annual amount of $400,000 plus accrued interest at 7% per annum on the outstanding balance. Also as part of the purchase agreement, the seller agreed to guarantee the collection of the acquired accounts receivable with a 10% risk sharing threshold by Canterbury. The Company has the right in the first year after the acquisition to offset the guaranteed portion of any uncollectible receivable against the first $400,000 payment scheduled to be made during September, 2002. As of February 22, 2002 the Company has notified the seller and put back $30,344 against the note payment. The Company has until February 28, 2002 to finalize the total amount of the receivable "put backs". In conjunction with the purchase of 100% of the stock of Usertech, the Company purchased computer equipment from the seller valued at $364,000 F-17 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 through issuance of a note payable over three years with interest at an annual rate of 3.75%. At November 30, 2001, the note payable had an outstanding balance of $342,223. Aggregate fiscal maturities on long-term debt, exclusive of obligations under capital leases, are approximately $908,000 in 2002; $843,000 in 2003; $761,000 in 2004; 300,000 in 2005; and $125,000 thereafter. The carrying value of the long-term debt approximates its fair value. 8. Capital Leases -------------- Capital lease obligations are for certain equipment leases which expire through Fiscal year 2004. Future required payments under capitalized leases together with the present value, calculated at the respective leases' implicit interest rate of approximately 10.5% to 14.3% at their inception. Year ending November 30, 2002 $68,625 Year ending November 30, 2003 and 21,377 thereafter ------- Total minimum lease payments 90,002 Less amount representing interest (8,259) Present value of long-term obligations ------- under capital leases $81,743 ======= 9. Leases ------ The Company leases office space for training center locations and administration purposes under various noncancelable operating leases at thirteen different locations. All of the leases have options to renew. Future minimum rental payments under the leases are $1,372,000 in 2002; $1,149,000 in 2003; $1,072,000 in 2004; $1,015,000 in 2005; $763,000 in 2006; $462,000 in 2007; and $116,000 in 2008. Rent expense for the years ended November 30, 2001, 2000 and 1999 was $1,303,000, $1,276,000, and $1,266,000, respectively. 10. Commitments and Contingencies ----------------------------- The Company executed new employment agreements dated June 1, 2001 between the Company and Mr. Kevin J. McAndrew and the Company and Mr. Stanton M. Pikus, reflecting their new employment arrangements. Each employment agreement is for a period of five years. Each sets forth various services to be performed. Each employee shall receive an annual salary of $245,000 with annual cost of living increases tied to a nationally recognized index, as set forth by the Board of Directors from time to time. These employment agreements supercede and replace the current employment agreements, including the cancellation of bonus opportunities which were to be payable through December 1, 2003. These agreements also include a non-competition prohibition for a period of three years after employment has been terminated. F-18 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Subsequent to November 30, 2001, the Company executed a five-year employment agreement dated December 1, 2001 between the Company and Mr. Jean Pikus. Ms. Pikus shall receive an annual salary of $150,000 with annual cost of living increases tied to a nationally recognized index, as set forth by the Board of Directors from time to time. The agreement also includes a non- competition prohibition for a period of three years after employment has been terminated. 11. Defined Contribution Plan ------------------------- In 1993, the Company established a 401(k) Plan for its participating employees to supplement their retirement income. Participation in the plan is open to all employees who have completed one year of service (twelve consecutive months). One thousand hours of service is required during the first year of service. By payroll deduction, employees can contribute to the Plan from 1% to 15% of their total gross compensation. The Company matches 50% of the first 8% of employee salary deferrals. This match is made in restricted Company common stock based upon the value of the stock each December 31st. The employee match is completely discretionary and can be changed by the employer in subsequent years to be higher or lower. The value of the employee match expensed in 2001, 2000, and 1999 was: $83,363; $59,498; and $48,192, respectively. 12. Stock Options and Awards ------------------------ The Company has one stock option plan, the 1995 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, covering 2,083,334 shares of common stock ("1995 Plan"). As of November 30, 2001, the Company had issued 2,147,827 shares under the 1995 Plan. There were 64,493 shares remaining for issuance in connection with future stock options that may be granted. Option granted are exercisable immediately and are issued at market price. Subsequently, the Board approved an additional 500,000 shares for issuance and 163,341 stock options were canceled. At this time, there are 598,848 shares remaining for issuance in connection with future stock options that may be granted under the 1995 plan. A summary of Canterbury's stock option activity and related information for the years ended November 30 is as follows: 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Number of shares under stock options: Outstanding at beginning of year 2,178,853 1,488,721 710,866 Granted 607,500 748,250 927,650 Exercised - - - Canceled (638,526) (58,118) (149,795) Outstanding and exercisable at end of year 2,147,827 2,178,853 1,488,721 F-19 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Weighted average exercise price: Granted $1.11 $3.20 $1.50 Exercised $ - $ - $ - Canceled $3.58 $8.87 $9.13 Outstanding and exercisable at end of year $1.96 $2.27 $2.04 Information with respect to stock options outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2001, is as follows: Options Outstanding and Exercisable Range of Number Outstanding Weighted Average Weighted Average Exercise Price at 11/30/01 Remaining Life in Years Exercise Price - -------------- ----------- ----------------------- -------------- $0.53 - $1.56 1,302,000 3.10 $1.07 $2.25 - $3.99 845,827 2.19 $2.76 FASB Statement No. 123 requires pro forma disclosure under the fair value method of net income and income per share. The fair value for options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because Canterbury's stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock options. The fair weighted average value of options granted in each year and assumptions used in estimating fair value under the Black-Scholes model are as follows: 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Estimated fair value of options granted $372,590 $1,094,385 $359,644 ======= ========= ======= Principal assumptions in applying the Black-Scholes valuation model: Expected life, in years 2.50 2.50 2.50 Risk-free interest rate 3.55% 5.80% 6.50% Expected volatility 1.19 .693 .647 Expected dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. Had compensation cost been determined based upon the fair value of stock options at grant date consistent with FASB Statement No. 123, Canterbury's net income and income per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below: F-20 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Pro forma net income (loss) from continuing operations $(7,383,409) $401,584 $261,124 Pro forma income (loss) per share from continuing operations basic and diluted $(.63) $.04 $.03 13. Stockholders' Equity -------------------- Subsequent to November, 2001 the Company sold 46,875 shares of restricted common stock in a private placement to a non-affiliate in February, 2002. Total net proceeds were $15,000. During 1999, the Company successfully completed a series of private placements with non-affiliates. From March, 1999 to October, 1999 a total of four private placements occurred. A total of 2,320,589 restricted common shares of stock were issued. Total net proceeds totaled $1,471,220. The Company also issued a total of 397,059 shares of restricted common stock as finder fees associated with these placements. All private placements had registration rights. The Company used the proceeds to repay amounts under the term loan, for general corporate purposes and for working capital. 14. Related Party Transactions -------------------------- During 1999, the Company performed consulting and web development services for a start-up, non-public company in which certain officers are members of the Board of Directors and 18% shareholders. The services billed during the year totaled $521,500. In March, 2000 the company went public through a reverse merger. Settlement of this receivable was subsequently paid during Fiscal 2000 with stock of the public company. During 2000, the Company performed consulting and web development services for the same publicly traded organization. The value of the services provided during the year totaled $1,108,250. These services were paid for with stock of the public company client. As of November 30, 2000 the Company owned 1,013,617 shares of this organization. During 2001, the Company received an additional 233,962 shares in satisfaction of a $372,000 receivable at November 30, 2000 and an additional 187,722 shares for services provided in Fiscal 2001 valued at $421,240. A $2,562,000 impairment charge attributable to the Company's investment in this stock is discussed in Note 16. At November 30, 2001 and 2000, the total notes receivable plus accrued interest for issuances of Company common stock to corporate officers, corporate counsel and certain consultants totaled $4,002,000 and $2,002,000, respectively. The notes are collateralized by common stock of the Company and are reported as a contra-equity account. Interest rates range from 4% to 6.6%. At November 30, 2001, $2,000,000 of the notes are recourse and $2,002,000 are non-recourse. During Fiscal 2001, certain officers and directors of the Company purchased a 33% ownership interest in a corporation which owns 100% of the stock of a corporation which has notes payable to the Company in the amount F-21 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 of $4,774,269 at November 30, 2001 from an owner group who purchased the business from the Company in 1996. The Company maintained the same level of security interest protection and the same debt amortization schedule. The Company earned $408,000 of interest income from these notes in Fiscal 2001. 15. Advertising ----------- The Company expenses advertising as incurred. Total advertising expenses included in the results of operations were $287,000, $301,000, and $347,000 for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. 16. Securities Available for Sale ----------------------------- At November 30, 2001 and 2000, the Company held investment securities in public companies. For one of the public companies certain officers and directors of the Company have an ownership interest in the aggregate of approximately 18%. Management has estimated the fair value of this investment at November 30, 2001 and 2000 at $0 and $3,294,000, respectively, and the cost at November 30, 2001 of $0 after impairment write down. During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2001 the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2,562,000 related to the carrying value of the shares previously received from the public company. The Company's valuation of this investment was based upon the public company's two consecutive years of operating losses and its current lack of liquidity. This impairment charge is recorded in other expenses on the statement of operations. Other equity securities had a fair value of $0 and $22,000 at November 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, after impairment writedown. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2001, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $75,000 to writedown the value of these securities to $0. Management has classified these investments as available for sale and are included in non- current other assets in the accompanying balance sheet. The Company did not sell any available for sale securities during 2001 or 2000. 17. Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information ----------------------------------------- 2001 First Second Third Fourth Total ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- Revenues $5,897,302 $6,432,704 $8,086,635 $8,627,201 $29,043,842 Gross profit 1,947,864 1,617,689 2,170,649 2,756,213 8,492,415 Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 171,326 (1,395,503) 456,215 (6,178,805) (6,946,767) Net income (loss) (41,762) (1,395,503) 456,215 (6,178,805) (7,159,855) F-22 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 Earnings per share: Basic: Income (loss) per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $.02 $(.12) $.04 $(.50) $(.59) Net income (loss) per share` - (.12) .04 (.50) (.61) Diluted: Income (loss) per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle $.02 $(.12) $.04 $(.50) $(.59) Net income (loss) per share - (.12) .04 (.50) (.61) Weighted average shares Basic 10,685,700 11,518,600 12,439,500 12,440,977 11,779,300 Diluted 11,097,200 11,518,600 12,706,700 12,440,977 11,779,300 2000 First Second Third Fourth Total ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- Revenues $5,953,591 $6,009,134 $9,512,377 $8,259,487 $29,734,589 Gross profit 1,637,082 1,655,629 2,407,905 2,205,453 7,906,069 Net income 156,601 371,247 426,100 104,267 1,058,215 Earnings per share: Basic: Net income per share $.02 $.04 $.04 $.01 $.11 Diluted: Net income per share $.02 $.04 $.04 $.00 $.10 Weighted average shares Basic 9,508,100 9,655,800 10,345,400 10,685,700 10,027,700 Diluted 10,295,800 10,418,200 11,320,800 11,686,400 11,028,500 F-23 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (in thousands) Balance at Charged to Balance at Beginning Costs and Deduction/ End of Description of Period Expenses Write-off Period - ----------- --------- -------- --------- ------ Year ended November 30, 1999: Accounts receivable allowances $96 $92 $ - $188 Year ended November 30, 2000: Accounts receivable allowances $188 $118 $112 $194 Year ended November 30, 2001: Accounts receivable allowances $194 $433 $175 $452 F-24 CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC.-FORM 10-K 2001 EXHIBIT LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CANTERBURY CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Canterbury Career Schools, Inc. (inactive) Canterbury Management Group, Inc. Star Label Products, Inc. (shell) MSI/Canterbury Corp. CALC/Canterbury Corp. Prosoft/Canterbury Corp. (inactive) ATM/Canterbury Corp. USC/Canterbury Corp. DMI/Canterbury Corp. DMI-North/Canterbury Corp. Usertech/Canterbury Corp. 29 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----