XML 19 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies
2. Significant Accounting Policies

A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company’s fiscal 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements –

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes and replaces nearly all currently-existing U.S. GAAP revenue recognition guidance including related disclosure requirements. This guidance, including any clarification guidance thereon, will be effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2018 (fiscal 2019). The Company has prepared an inventory of its existing revenue streams and a preliminary analysis of the revenue recognition criteria applying ASU 2014-09. This analysis is preliminary and our overall assessment is not yet complete. However, based on the analysis completed to date, the Company does not currently anticipate that adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which amends the accounting guidance related to leases. These changes, which are designed to increase transparency and comparability among organizations for both lessees and lessors, include, among other things, requiring recognition of lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Adoption and implementation of the guidance is not required by the Company until the beginning of fiscal 2020, although early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to begin its assessment of the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements in fiscal 2018.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which amends the accounting for share-based payment transactions. These changes, which are designed for simplification, involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Adoption and implementation of the guidance is not required by the Company until the beginning of fiscal 2018, although early adoption is permitted. The Company has assessed the impact that adoption of this guidance will have, and believes that the impact will primarily relate to the treatment of the differences between stock compensation expense recorded in the Company’s financial statements and the stock compensation ultimately deducted on its tax returns. The tax effect of such differences is currently recorded in additional paid-in capital and reflected within the financing activities section of the statement of cash flows. Upon adoption of this guidance, these tax effects will be required to be recorded directly to income tax expense and reflected within the operating activities section of the statement of cash flows. While the impact of this guidance, which the Company plans to adopt on a prospective basis at the beginning of fiscal 2018, is dependent on numerous factors (e.g., the market price of the Company’s common stock on the equity award grant date, the exercise/lapse dates of equity awards, and the market price of the Company’s common stock on such exercise/lapse dates), based on currently outstanding awards and the current market price of the Company’s common stock, the effect on the Company’s annual tax provision is not expected to be material.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The update addresses certain specific cash flows and their treatment, with the objective being to reduce the existing diversity in how the items are presented and classified within the statement of cash flows. Adoption and implementation of the guidance is not required by the Company until the beginning of fiscal 2019, although early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statement of cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which intends to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Adoption and implementation of the guidance is not required by the Company until the beginning of fiscal 2019, although early adoption is permitted. While the Company has not yet begun its assessment of the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements, in light of the levels of such transfer activity within the Company, adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which serves to simplify the process of testing for goodwill impairment by eliminating the “Step 2” comparison of a reporting unit’s implied fair value to its carrying amount. The guidance requires an entity to compare a reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying amount, and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment equal to the excess carrying amount is recorded; no Step 2 implied fair value comparison is required. The Company early adopted this guidance during the third quarter of fiscal 2017, as permitted. See Note 6 for discussion of Magellan’s goodwill impairment.