XML 28 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Finance Receivables
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2019
Receivables [Abstract]  
Finance Receivables Finance Receivables
The Company provides retail financial services to customers of the Company’s independent dealers in the United States and Canada. The origination of retail loans is a separate and distinct transaction between the Company and the retail customer, unrelated to the Company’s sale of product to its dealers. Retail finance receivables consist of secured promissory notes and secured installment sales contracts and are primarily related to sales of motorcycles to the dealers' customers. The Company holds either titles or liens on titles to vehicles financed by promissory notes and installment sales contracts.
The Company offers wholesale financing to the Company’s independent dealers. Wholesale loans to dealers are generally secured by financed inventory or property and are originated in the U.S. and Canada. Wholesale finance receivables are related primarily to sales of motorcycles and related parts and accessories to dealers.
Finance receivables, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
June 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
July 1,
2018
Retail
$
6,549,707

 
$
6,328,201

 
$
6,373,926

Wholesale
1,239,694

 
1,083,615

 
1,133,206

Total finance receivables
7,789,401

 
7,411,816

 
7,507,132

Allowance for credit losses
(194,996
)
 
(189,885
)
 
(193,930
)
Finance receivables, net
$
7,594,405

 
$
7,221,931

 
$
7,313,202


A provision for credit losses on finance receivables is charged or credited to earnings in amounts that the Company believes are sufficient to maintain the allowance for credit losses at a level that is adequate to cover losses inherent in the existing portfolio. The allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the finance receivable portfolio as of the balance sheet date. However, due to the use of projections and assumptions in estimating the losses, the amount of losses actually incurred by the Company could differ from the amounts estimated.
Changes in the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables by portfolio were as follows (in thousands):
 
Three months ended June 30, 2019
 
Retail
 
Wholesale
 
Total
Balance, beginning of period
$
181,426

 
$
9,446

 
$
190,872

Provision for credit losses
27,555

 
(1,172
)
 
26,383

Charge-offs
(35,741
)
 

 
(35,741
)
Recoveries
13,482

 

 
13,482

Balance, end of period
$
186,722

 
$
8,274

 
$
194,996

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three months ended July 1, 2018
 
Retail
 
Wholesale
 
Total
Balance, beginning of period
$
182,150

 
$
8,200

 
$
190,350

Provision for credit losses
20,652

 
(1,772
)
 
18,880

Charge-offs
(28,947
)
 

 
(28,947
)
Recoveries
13,647

 

 
13,647

Balance, end of period
$
187,502

 
$
6,428

 
$
193,930

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six months ended June 30, 2019
 
Retail
 
Wholesale
 
Total
Balance, beginning of period
$
182,098

 
$
7,787

 
$
189,885

Provision for credit losses
60,387

 
487

 
60,874

Charge-offs
(80,462
)
 

 
(80,462
)
Recoveries
24,699

 

 
24,699

Balance, end of period
$
186,722

 
$
8,274

 
$
194,996

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six months ended July 1, 2018
 
Retail
 
Wholesale
 
Total
Balance, beginning of period
$
186,254

 
$
6,217

 
$
192,471

Provision for credit losses
48,721

 
211

 
48,932

Charge-offs
(74,028
)
 

 
(74,028
)
Recoveries
26,555

 

 
26,555

Balance, end of period
$
187,502

 
$
6,428

 
$
193,930


Finance receivables are considered impaired when management determines it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the terms of the loan agreement. Portions of the allowance for credit losses are established to cover estimated losses on finance receivables specifically identified for impairment. The unspecified portion of the allowance for credit losses covers estimated losses on finance receivables which are collectively reviewed for impairment.
The retail portfolio primarily consists of a large number of small balance, homogeneous finance receivables. The Company performs a periodic and systematic collective evaluation of the adequacy of the retail allowance for credit losses. The Company utilizes loss forecast models which consider a variety of factors including, but not limited to, historical loss trends, origination or vintage analysis, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, the value of the underlying collateral, recovery rates, and current economic conditions including items such as unemployment rates. Retail finance receivables are not evaluated individually for impairment prior to charge-off and, therefore, are not reported as impaired loans.
The wholesale portfolio is primarily composed of large balance, non-homogeneous loans. The Company’s evaluation for the wholesale allowance for credit losses is first based on a loan-by-loan review. A specific allowance for credit losses is established for wholesale finance receivables determined to be individually impaired when management concludes that the borrower will not be able to make full payment of the contractual amounts due based on the original terms of the loan agreement. The impairment is determined based on the cash that the Company expects to receive discounted at the loan’s original interest rate or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral-dependent. Finance receivables in the wholesale portfolio that are not considered impaired on an individual basis are segregated, based on similar risk characteristics, according to the Company’s internal risk rating system and collectively evaluated for impairment. The related allowance for credit losses is based on factors such as the specific borrower’s financial performance and ability to repay, the Company’s past loan loss experience, current economic conditions, and the value of the underlying collateral.
Generally, it is the Company’s policy not to change the terms and conditions of finance receivables. However, to minimize the economic loss, the Company may modify certain finance receivables in troubled debt restructurings. Total restructured finance receivables are not significant.
The allowance for credit losses and finance receivables by portfolio, segregated by those amounts that are individually evaluated for impairment and those that are collectively evaluated for impairment, was as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2019
 
Retail
 
Wholesale
 
Total
Allowance for credit losses, ending balance:
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
$

 
$

 
$

Collectively evaluated for impairment
186,722

 
8,274

 
194,996

Total allowance for credit losses
$
186,722

 
$
8,274

 
$
194,996

Finance receivables, ending balance:
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
$

 
$

 
$

Collectively evaluated for impairment
6,549,707

 
1,239,694

 
7,789,401

Total finance receivables
$
6,549,707

 
$
1,239,694

 
$
7,789,401

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2018
 
Retail
 
Wholesale
 
Total
Allowance for credit losses, ending balance:
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
$

 
$

 
$

Collectively evaluated for impairment
182,098

 
7,787

 
189,885

Total allowance for credit losses
$
182,098

 
$
7,787

 
$
189,885

Finance receivables, ending balance:
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
$

 
$

 
$

Collectively evaluated for impairment
6,328,201

 
1,083,615

 
7,411,816

Total finance receivables
$
6,328,201

 
$
1,083,615

 
$
7,411,816

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
July 1, 2018
 
Retail
 
Wholesale
 
Total
Allowance for credit losses, ending balance:
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
$

 
$
184

 
$
184

Collectively evaluated for impairment
187,502

 
6,244

 
193,746

Total allowance for credit losses
$
187,502

 
$
6,428

 
$
193,930

Finance receivables, ending balance:
 
 
 
 
 
Individually evaluated for impairment
$

 
$
220

 
$
220

Collectively evaluated for impairment
6,373,926

 
1,132,986

 
7,506,912

Total finance receivables
$
6,373,926

 
$
1,133,206

 
$
7,507,132


There were no wholesale finance receivables at June 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018 that were individually deemed to be impaired under ASC Topic 310, "Receivables". Additional information related to the wholesale finance receivables that were individually deemed to be impaired at July 1, 2018 includes (in thousands):
 
July 1, 2018
 
Three months ended
July 1, 2018
 
Six months ended
July 1, 2018
 
Recorded
Investment
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
 
Related
Allowance
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
 
Interest
Income
Recognized
Wholesale:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No related allowance recorded
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Related allowance recorded
251

 
220

 
184

 
251

 

 
251

 

Total
$
251

 
$
220

 
$
184

 
$
251

 
$

 
$
251

 
$

Retail finance receivables are contractually delinquent if the minimum payment is not received by the specified due date. Retail finance receivables are generally charged-off when the receivable is 120 days or more delinquent, the related asset is repossessed, or the receivable is otherwise deemed uncollectible. All retail finance receivables accrue interest until either collected or charged-off. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2019December 31, 2018 and July 1, 2018, all retail finance receivables were accounted for as interest-earning receivables, of which $30.4 million, $41.2 million and $22.4 million, respectively, were 90 days or more past due.
Wholesale finance receivables are delinquent if the minimum payment is not received by the contractual due date. Wholesale finance receivables are written down once management determines that the specific borrower does not have the ability to repay the loan in full. Interest continues to accrue on past due finance receivables until the date the finance receivable becomes uncollectible and the finance receivable is placed on non-accrual status. The Company will resume accruing interest on these accounts when payments are current according to the terms of the loans and future payments are reasonably assured. While on non-accrual status, all cash received is applied to principal or interest as appropriate. There were no wholesale receivables on non-accrual status at June 30, 2019 or December 31, 2018. The recorded investment in non-accrual status wholesale finance receivables at July 1, 2018 was $0.2 million. At June 30, 2019December 31, 2018 and July 1, 2018, $2.1 million, $1.1 million, and $0.1 million of wholesale finance receivables were 90 days or more past due and accruing interest, respectively.
An analysis of the aging of past due finance receivables was as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2019
 
Current
 
31-60 Days
Past Due
 
61-90 Days
Past Due
 
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
 
Total
Past Due
 
Total
Finance
Receivables
Retail
$
6,359,499

 
$
119,770

 
$
40,015

 
$
30,423

 
$
190,208

 
$
6,549,707

Wholesale
1,236,747

 
577

 
320

 
2,050

 
2,947

 
1,239,694

Total
$
7,596,246

 
$
120,347

 
$
40,335

 
$
32,473

 
$
193,155

 
$
7,789,401

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2018
 
Current
 
31-60 Days
Past Due
 
61-90 Days
Past Due
 
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
 
Total
Past Due
 
Total
Finance
Receivables
Retail
$
6,100,186

 
$
136,945

 
$
49,825

 
$
41,245

 
$
228,015

 
$
6,328,201

Wholesale
1,081,729

 
522

 
273

 
1,091

 
1,886

 
1,083,615

Total
$
7,181,915

 
$
137,467

 
$
50,098

 
$
42,336

 
$
229,901

 
$
7,411,816

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
July 1, 2018
 
Current
 
31-60 Days
Past Due
 
61-90 Days
Past Due
 
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
 
Total
Past Due
 
Total
Finance
Receivables
Retail
$
6,198,906

 
$
116,828

 
$
35,763

 
$
22,429

 
$
175,020

 
$
6,373,926

Wholesale
1,132,472

 
516

 
134

 
84

 
734

 
1,133,206

Total
$
7,331,378

 
$
117,344

 
$
35,897

 
$
22,513

 
$
175,754

 
$
7,507,132

A significant part of managing the Company's finance receivable portfolios includes the assessment of credit risk associated with each borrower. As the credit risk varies between the retail and wholesale portfolios, the Company utilizes different credit risk indicators for each portfolio.
The Company manages retail credit risk through its credit approval policy and ongoing collection efforts. The Company uses FICO scores, a standard credit rating measurement, to differentiate the expected default rates of retail credit applicants, enabling the Company to better evaluate credit applicants for approval and to tailor pricing according to this assessment. Retail loans with a FICO score of 640 or above at origination are generally considered prime, and loans with a FICO score below 640 are generally considered sub-prime. These credit quality indicators are determined at the time of loan origination and are not updated subsequent to the loan origination date.
The recorded investment in retail finance receivables, by credit quality indicator, was as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
July 1,
2018
Prime
$
5,372,712

 
$
5,183,754

 
$
5,193,641

Sub-prime
1,176,995

 
1,144,447

 
1,180,285

Total
$
6,549,707

 
$
6,328,201

 
$
6,373,926

The Company's credit risk on the wholesale portfolio is different from that of the retail portfolio. Whereas the retail portfolio represents a relatively homogeneous pool of retail finance receivables that exhibit more consistent loss patterns, the wholesale portfolio exposures are less consistent. The Company utilizes an internal credit risk rating system to manage credit risk exposure consistently across wholesale borrowers and individually evaluates credit risk factors for each borrower. The Company uses the following internal credit quality indicators, based on an internal risk rating system, listed from highest level of risk to lowest level of risk for the wholesale portfolio: Doubtful, Substandard, Special Mention, Medium Risk and Low Risk. Based upon management’s review, the dealers classified in the Doubtful category are the dealers with the greatest likelihood of being charged-off, while the dealers classified as Low Risk are least likely to be charged-off. The internal rating system considers factors such as the specific borrower's ability to repay and the estimated value of any collateral. Dealer risk rating classifications are reviewed and updated on a quarterly basis.
The recorded investment in wholesale finance receivables, by internal credit quality indicator, was as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30,
2019
 
December 31,
2018
 
July 1,
2018
Doubtful
$
6,850

 
$
2,210

 
$
251

Substandard
7,643

 
9,660

 
803

Special Mention
12,642

 
10,299

 
2,154

Medium Risk
6,170

 
25,802

 
37,045

Low Risk
1,206,389

 
1,035,644

 
1,092,953

Total
$
1,239,694

 
$
1,083,615

 
$
1,133,206