XML 109 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
Certain assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value in the financial statements; some of these are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis. Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis are those that are adjusted to fair value each time a financial statement is prepared. Assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis are those that are adjusted to fair value when a significant event occurs. In determining fair value of assets and liabilities, the Company uses various valuation techniques. The availability of inputs observable in the market varies from instrument to instrument and depends on a variety of factors including the type of instrument, whether the instrument is actively traded, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. For many financial instruments, pricing inputs are readily observable in the market, the valuation methodology used is widely accepted by market participants, and the valuation does not require significant management discretion. For other financial instruments, pricing inputs are less observable in the market and may require management judgment.
The Company assesses the inputs used to measure fair value using a three-tier hierarchy. The hierarchy indicates the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Level 1 inputs include quoted prices for identical instruments and are the most observable.
Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and observable inputs such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity rates and yield curves. The Company uses the market approach to derive the fair value for its level 2 fair value measurements. Foreign currency exchange contracts are valued using publicly quoted spot and forward prices; commodity contracts are valued using publicly quoted prices, where available, or dealer quotes; interest rate swaps are valued using publicized swap curves; and investments in marketable debt and equity securities are valued using publicly quoted prices.
Level 3 inputs are not observable in the market and include management's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable and unobservable inputs is reflected in the hierarchy assessment disclosed in the following tables.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31 (in thousands):  
 
 
Balance as of 2013
 
Quoted Prices  in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
 
$
836,387

 
$
516,173

 
$
320,214

 
$

Marketable securities
 
129,181

 
30,172

 
99,009

 

Derivatives
 
1,932

 

 
1,932

 

 
 
$
967,500

 
$
546,345

 
$
421,155

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
$
3,925

 
$

 
$
3,925

 
$



 
 
Balance as of 2012
 
Quoted Prices  in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
 
$
834,562

 
$
672,274

 
$
162,288

 
$

Marketable securities
 
154,051

 
18,417

 
135,634

 

Derivatives
 
317

 

 
317

 

 
 
$
988,930

 
$
690,691

 
$
298,239

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
$
7,920

 
$

 
$
7,920

 
$

 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade receivables, finance receivables, net, trade payables, debt, foreign currency contracts and interest rate swaps (derivative instruments are discussed further in Note 10). Under U.S. GAAP certain of these items are required to be recorded in the financial statements at fair value, while others are required to be recorded at historical cost.
The following table summarizes the fair value and carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31 (in thousands):  
 
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
1,066,612

 
$
1,066,612

 
$
1,068,138

 
$
1,068,138

Marketable securities
 
$
129,181

 
$
129,181

 
$
154,051

 
$
154,051

Accounts receivable, net
 
$
261,065

 
$
261,065

 
$
230,079

 
$
230,079

Derivatives
 
$
1,932

 
$
1,932

 
$
317

 
$
317

Finance receivables, net
 
$
6,086,441

 
$
5,999,563

 
$
5,861,442

 
$
5,781,852

Restricted cash
 
$
144,807

 
$
144,807

 
$
188,008

 
$
188,008

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
 
$
239,794

 
$
239,794

 
$
257,386

 
$
257,386

Derivatives
 
$
3,925

 
$
3,925

 
$
7,920

 
$
7,920

Unsecured commercial paper
 
$
666,317

 
$
666,317

 
$
294,943

 
$
294,943

Asset-backed Canadian commercial paper conduit facility
 
$
174,241

 
$
174,241

 
$
175,658

 
$
175,658

Medium-term notes
 
$
3,087,852

 
$
2,858,980

 
$
3,199,548

 
$
2,881,272

Senior unsecured notes
 
$
305,958

 
$
303,000

 
$
338,594

 
$
303,000

Term asset-backed securitization debt
 
$
1,259,314

 
$
1,256,632

 
$
1,457,807

 
$
1,447,776


Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Net and Accounts Payable – With the exception of certain cash equivalents, the carrying value of these items in the financial statements is based on historical cost. The historical cost basis for these amounts is estimated to approximate their respective fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments. Fair value is based on Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.
Marketable Securities – The carrying value of marketable securities in the financial statements is based on fair value. The fair value of marketable securities is determined primarily based quoted prices for identical instruments or on quoted market prices of similar financial assets. Fair value is based on Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.
Finance Receivables, Net – The carrying value of retail and wholesale finance receivables in the financial statements is amortized cost less an allowance for credit losses. The fair value of retail finance receivables is generally calculated by discounting future cash flows using an estimated discount rate that reflects current credit, interest rate and prepayment risks associated with similar types of instruments. Fair value is determined based on Level 3 inputs. The amortized cost basis of wholesale finance receivables approximates fair value because they either are short-term or have interest rates that adjust with changes in market interest rates.
Derivatives – Interest rate swaps, foreign currency exchange contracts and commodity contracts are derivative financial instruments and are carried at fair value on the balance sheet. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined using pricing models that incorporate quoted prices for similar assets and observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves. The fair value of foreign currency exchange and commodity contracts is determined using publicly quoted prices. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
Debt – The carrying value of debt in the financial statements is generally amortized cost. The carrying value of unsecured commercial paper approximates fair value due to its short maturity. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.

The carrying value of debt provided under the Canadian Conduit approximates fair value since the interest rates charged under the facility are tied directly to market rates and fluctuate as market rates change. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
The fair values of the medium-term notes are estimated based upon rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
The fair value of the senior unsecured notes is estimated based upon rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
The fair value of the debt related to term asset-backed securitization transactions is estimated based on pricing currently available for transactions with similar terms and maturities. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.