N-CSRS 1 srcaf.htm T. ROWE PRICE CAPITAL APPRECIATION FUND T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund - June 30, 2008


UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Washington, D.C. 20549 
 
FORM N-CSR 
 
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED 
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES 
 
 
 
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-4519 
 
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) 
 
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 

(Address of principal executive offices) 
 
David Oestreicher 
 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 

 (Name and address of agent for service) 
 
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 345-2000 
 
 
Date of fiscal year end: December 31 
 
 
Date of reporting period: June 30, 2008 




Item 1: Report to Shareholders

T. Rowe Price Annual Report
 Capital Appreciation Fund June 30, 2008 

The views and opinions in this report were current as of June 30, 2008. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the fund’s future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.

REPORTS ON THE WEB

Sign up for our E-mail Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.

Manager’s Letter

Fellow Shareholders

The first six months of 2008 will go down in history as a period of significant capital market and global economic stress caused by the worst U.S. housing downturn in more than a generation and the aftermath of poor lending standards prior to its collapse. The direct impact has cascaded throughout the global financial system with higher credit losses, dilutive capital raisings, and tighter lending standards. To make matters worse, global commodity prices have soared due to continued strong emerging market demand and investor demand for real assets during a period of rising inflation. U.S. consumers have been at the epicenter of these twin challenges, pressured by higher unemployment, higher gas prices, and, in some cases, homes that they can no longer afford.

Against this difficult backdrop, equity markets struggled in the first half of 2008, with the broad S&P 500 down nearly 12%. Your fund performed considerably better during this period, declining only 3.42% despite some considerable headwinds. (Returns for Advisor Class shares reflect a different fee structure.)


HIGHLIGHTS

• Equity markets struggled while fixed-income investments held up better in the first half of 2008—a period of significant capital market and global economic stress.

• Your fund declined but outperformed the equity market by a considerable margin, helped by our focus on capital preservation and pursuit of strong risk-adjusted returns.

• In the last six months, we upgraded the quality of the portfolio; moved into new, attractive asset classes; reduced risk by selling covered calls; and increased our exposure to high-quality financials through convertible securities.

• We are attempting to position your fund for a market rebound while remaining very mindful of risk to minimize losses if difficult market conditions persist.

We significantly outperformed the S&P 500 with roughly two-thirds of the equity market’s risk, as measured by volatility relative to the S&P 500. We also outperformed our Lipper and Morningstar benchmarks by a considerable margin, as shown in the Performance Comparison table on page 1. However, I would emphasize that these benchmarks are imperfect at best since your fund’s strategy of capital preservation, value investing, and seeking strong risk-adjusted returns is not necessarily consistent with these benchmarks. For better or worse, Capital Appreciation is a unique fund with a unique mission that does not fit neatly into benchmarks, and we do not manage the portfolio to these benchmarks.

Your fund’s attention to risk and capital preservation led us away from many of the most credit-sensitive financials, risky consumer stocks, and equities with high price/earnings (P/E) multiples that corrected in the first half of the year. Because of our risk-aware focus, our stocks held up much better than the broad equity market, and our bond holdings returned more than double the returns of the bond market.

We were able to achieve these results despite some very considerable headwinds to our investment philosophy. Our value-oriented and contrarian investing strategies were very much out of favor in the first half of the year, with growth and momentum strategies significantly outperforming traditional value strategies. Again, good stock selection, attention to risk, and strong bond selection more than overcame these considerable headwinds.

We used market weakness in the second half of last year and in the first half of 2008 to upgrade the quality of the portfolio and, in doing so, reduce risk without sacrificing the potential for future gains. We believe this strategy materially boosted returns in the last six months. At our core, we prefer to make investments in companies with solid management teams, strong balance sheets, better-than-average businesses, and attractive capital redeployment strategies that are trading at attractive valuations. Unfortunately, in most market environments, companies with those characteristics tend to trade for lofty valuations. However, the deep correction in the market has given us the opportunity to invest in several high-quality firms that have those attractive characteristics at very reasonable valuations. We used market weakness to add to or initiate positions in a number of high-quality names such as Danaher, Ameriprise Financial, Time Warner, Lazard, ExxonMobil, Marriott, ITT, Baxter International, Henry Schein, State Street, Xilinx, Millipore, and a number of utilities. We feel these securities have limited downside from current levels and strong appreciation potential over the next two to three years. (Please refer to the fund’s portfolio of investments for a complete listing of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)

In addition, the recent wave of capital raisings by financial institutions has created an attractive way to invest in beaten-down financials without sacrificing our focus on downside risk. We have invested in a series of convertible instruments in some of the largest financial institutions. These convertibles should limit our downside, provide attractive yields, and allow us to participate in the recovery of their stock prices.

As for our fixed-income investments, we eliminated positions in Treasury securities in the last six months. We are concerned that the very low “real” (inflation-adjusted) yields on Treasuries are unsustainable, given the elevated levels of inflation and rising government budget deficits.

Your fund, along with a number of other T. Rowe Price value funds, has taken advantage of the dislocation in the fixed-income markets to invest in bank debt at very distressed prices. Today, bank debt is very much like traditional bonds, is publicly traded, and is currently owned by various T. Rowe Price fixed-income funds. Bank debt is not financial-institution debt, but it is the most senior debt of firms, in various sectors, that banks originate but syndicate out to institutional investors. Bank debt has two very attractive features relative to most traditional bonds. First, bank debt has the most senior claim on a firm’s assets and cash flows. As a result, in a bankruptcy scenario, the recovery value on bank debt tends to be very high when compared with a conventional bond. Second, the interest rate on bank debt is floating, not fixed. This means we will earn more income to compensate us if interest rates rise. Most traditional bonds are fixed-rate instruments that decline in value when interest rates rise. We have roughly 4% of your fund in bank debt (through the T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund and individual bank debt names), and we view this asset class as having, by far, the best risk/reward profile within the bond market today.

In our financial statements following this letter, you may see that we have sold some covered calls against a number of equity positions in the fund. When we write a call against a position, we are essentially sacrificing some of the upside in a stock above a certain level (usually 10% to 15% from current levels) in return for current income. This helps to limit our downside since the extra income generated can cushion the declines in the underlying stock in difficult market environments. This strategy generated positive returns through the first half of the year and is very consistent with our focus on capital preservation.

To summarize, we have taken several measures to meet the fund’s short-and long-term investment objectives in the last six months: We upgraded the quality of our holdings, moved into attractive new asset classes, reduced risk by selling covered calls, and increased our exposure to financials through convertible securities with an attractive risk/reward tradeoff. Now, let me share a few observations on the current economic and stock market environment.

While the current consumer-led downturn in the U.S. feels unprecedented in its magnitude, it is not too dissimilar to what the U.S. went through in 1990. At that time, the U.S. was in a recession, oil was spiking, unemployment and inflation were high, the budget deficit was growing, geopolitical tensions had risen following Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, banks were stretched from the savings and loan (S&L) crisis and would soon start failing in droves, and consumer confidence was low. The stock market was under considerable pressure throughout much of 1990, and investor sentiment was very bearish. However, buying stocks during the height of the market panic and fear in October 1990 would have generated returns exceeding 30% over the next 12 months.

Simply put, the greatest returns come out of periods of the greatest uncertainty. History demonstrates that buying stocks during recessions generates two to three times normalized returns in the following year. Buying when others are fearful and scared is not easy, but it can be very rewarding if done with careful attention to risk and reward—which is what we attempt to do every day. Broadly speaking, we think stock market valuations today are very attractive.

While I cannot tell you when the economic environment will improve, I can tell you that we are buying a host of stocks, bonds, and convertible securities with exceptional risk/reward characteristics that should generate solid returns on the other side of this challenging economic environment—all the while maintaining our focus on downside risk and capital preservation.

PORTFOLIO REVIEW

The energy sector was the greatest contributor to your fund’s performance in the first half of 2008. Booming oil and natural gas prices driven by strong emerging markets demand and weak supply growth drove sector returns. Our investments in BJ Services, CNX Gas, and an Oil States International convertible security did quite well and were the fund’s top performance contributors. Despite this, our modest underweight in energy and large positions in some of the less risky major integrated oil giants, such as ExxonMobil and Total, hurt relative performance.


Not surprisingly, the financials sector fared worst and had the largest negative impact on fund performance. Investments in Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Ameriprise Financial, and Genworth Financial materially detracted from our results as they fell far below our sum-of-the-parts and other downside valuation targets. In spite of these challenges, being materially underweight in credit-sensitive banks significantly helped our relative performance. Our stock selection within financials was the best of any sector and helped mitigate overall fund losses.

The consumer staples sector was the second-largest contributor to performance in the first half. Anheuser-Busch received a hostile takeover offer from Belgian-based brewer InBev, at a price well above where it was trading at the beginning of the year. After our reporting period ended, Anheuser-Busch and InBev agreed to merge at $70 per share. Wal-Mart was a very strong contributor, as the company slowed the pace of new store openings—thereby increasing free cash flow—and benefited from consumers eating out less and shopping more at discount retailers.

Our bonds did well and outperformed the overall bond market, as mentioned earlier. When government bond yields were very low in early 2008, we sold the last of our Treasuries at very advantageous prices. Our investments in bank debt and short-term, higher-yielding bonds drove most of our fixed-income portfolio’s performance. Also, our large cash position outperformed the bond market.

We used unexpected weakness early in the first quarter to purchase a number of high-quality utilities at attractive prices. Companies such as PG&E, Sempra Energy, and Xcel Energy were added to the portfolio or became larger positions; as a result, our underweighting in utilities became a significant overweighting. Utilities was the third-strongest sector in the first half, trailing only materials and energy. Moving to an overweight position in this sector contributed positively to the fund’s absolute and relative returns.


PORTFOLIO STRATEGY AND OUTLOOK

We do not see the economic environment improving materially until sometime in 2009, as home price declines should continue through at least the middle of next year, banks will continue raising capital and incurring losses on bad loans, and inflation and higher unemployment will depress consumer spending. However, an unexpected decline in the prices of oil and other commodities could have a decidedly positive impact on the consumer and potentially result in the economic environment improving sooner.

While we are not in the latter stages of this economic downturn, we are no longer in the early innings. Many subprime-related mortgage-backed securities have been already written down closer to fair value. Large and mid-size U.S. banks are probably more than halfway through their capital raisings, and balance sheets are starting to improve. New residential construction and automotive sales are nearing all-time lows as a percentage of GDP. With the rest of world starting to slow, it is likely, but not certain, that reduced demand for oil at the same time OPEC supply is starting to grow will reduce oil prices.

In terms of portfolio strategy, we are continuing to add to higher-quality, higher-conviction investments with less downside risk that meet most, if not all, of our criteria. We are still seeking attractively valued convertible instruments, particularly in the financials sector. Also, the bank debt market appears quite attractive. We are attempting to position your fund for a market rebound while remaining very mindful of risk to minimize losses if difficult market conditions persist.

IN CLOSING

I would like to thank the members of the Investment Advisory Committee responsible for the oversight of your fund for their valuable input, suggestions, and dialogue over the last six months. This team, which comprises portfolio managers, quantitative analysts, fixed-income analysts, and equity analysts with many decades of combined investment experience, is supported by a strong global equity and fixed-income platform of more than 140 analysts.

Thank you for the confidence that you have placed in us.

Respectfully submitted,


David R. Giroux
Chairman of the fund’s Investment Advisory Committee

July 24, 2008

The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee members in developing and executing the fund’s investment program.


RISKS OF INVESTING

As with all stock and bond mutual funds, the fund’s share price can fall because of weakness in the stock or bond markets, a particular industry, or specific holdings. Stock markets can decline for many reasons, including adverse political or economic developments, changes in investor psychology, or heavy institutional selling. The prospects for an industry or company may deteriorate because of a variety of factors, including disappointing earnings or changes in the competitive environment. In addition, the investment manager’s assessment of companies held in a fund may prove incorrect, resulting in losses or poor performance even in rising markets. A sizable cash or fixed-income position may hinder the fund from participating fully in a strong, rapidly rising bull market. In addition, significant exposure to bonds increases the risk that the fund’s share value could be hurt by rising interest rates or credit downgrades or defaults. Convertible securities are also exposed to price fluctuations of the company’s stock.

GLOSSARY

Lipper indexes: Fund benchmarks that consist of a small number of the largest mutual funds in a particular category as tracked by Lipper Inc.

Morningstar Moderate Allocation Average: Tracks the performance of funds that seek both moderate capital appreciation and income by investing in stocks, bonds, and cash.

S&P 500 Stock Index: An unmanaged index that tracks the stocks of 500 primarily large-cap U.S. companies.










Performance and Expenses

GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.





AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns had been earned at a constant rate.











FUND EXPENSE EXAMPLE 

As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.

Please note that the fund has two share classes: The original share class (“investor class”) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee, and the Advisor Class shares are offered only through unaffiliated brokers and other financial intermediaries and charge a 0.25% 12b-1 fee. Each share class is presented separately in the table.

Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (“Actual”) provides information about actual account values and expenses based on the fund’s actual returns. You may use the information in this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (“Hypothetical”) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

Note: T. Rowe Price charges an annual small-account maintenance fee of $10, generally for accounts with less than $2,000 ($500 for UGMA/UTMA). The fee is waived for any investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $25,000 or more, accounts employing automatic investing, and IRAs and other retirement plan accounts that utilize a prototype plan sponsored by T. Rowe Price (although a separate custodial or administrative fee may apply to such accounts). This fee is not included in the accompanying table. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.

You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.






Unaudited


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Unaudited


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Unaudited



















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Unaudited


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Unaudited



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Unaudited



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Unaudited

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (the fund), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in common stocks. It may also hold fixed-income and other securities to help preserve principal value. The fund has two classes of shares: the Capital Appreciation Fund original share class, referred to in this report as the Investor Class, offered since June 30, 1986, and Capital Appreciation Fund—Advisor Class (Advisor Class), offered since December 31, 2004. Advisor Class shares are sold only through unaffiliated brokers and other unaffiliated financial intermediaries that are compensated by the class for distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative services under a Board-approved Rule 12b-1 plan. Each class has exclusive voting rights on matters related solely to that class, separate voting rights on matters that relate to both classes, and, in all other respects, the same rights and obligations as the other class.

NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Preparation The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates made by fund management. Fund management believes that estimates and security valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the security valuations reflected in the financial statements may differ from the value the fund ultimately realizes upon sale of the securities.

Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions are declared and paid by each class on an annual basis. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid by the fund, typically on an annual basis.

Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.

Class Accounting The Advisor Class pays distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative expenses in the form of Rule 12b-1 fees, in an amount not exceeding 0.25% of the class’s average daily net assets. Shareholder servicing, prospectus, and shareholder report expenses incurred by each class are charged directly to the class to which they relate. Expenses common to both classes, investment income, and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based upon the relative daily net assets of each class.

Rebates and Credits Subject to best execution, the fund may direct certain security trades to brokers who have agreed to rebate a portion of the related brokerage commission to the fund in cash. Commission rebates are reflected as realized gain on securities in the accompanying financial statements and totaled $198,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Additionally, the fund earns credits on temporarily uninvested cash balances at the custodian that reduce the fund’s custody charges. Custody expense in the accompanying financial statements is presented before reduction for credits, which are reflected as expenses paid indirectly.

New Accounting Pronouncement On January 1, 2008, the fund adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), Fair Value Measurements. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes the framework for measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures of fair value measurements in the financial statements. Adoption of FAS 157 did not have a material impact on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“FAS 161”), which is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about derivative and hedging activities, including how such activities are accounted for and their effect on financial position, performance and cash flows. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FAS 161 will have on the fund’s financial statements and related disclosures.

NOTE 2 - VALUATION

The fund’s investments are reported at fair value as defined under FAS 157. The fund values its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day that the NYSE is open for business.

Valuation Methods Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made, except for OTC Bulletin Board securities, which are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale price for international securities.

Debt securities are generally traded in the OTC market. Securities with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of acquisition are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which considers the yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Securities with remaining maturities of less than one year at the time of acquisition generally use amortized cost in local currency to approximate fair value. However, if amortized cost is deemed not to reflect fair value or the fund holds a significant amount of such securities with remaining maturities of more than 60 days, the securities are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service.

Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing net asset value per share on the day of valuation. Purchased and written options are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices.

Other investments, including restricted securities, and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the fund’s Board of Trustees.

For valuation purposes, the last quoted prices of non-U.S. equity securities may be adjusted under the circumstances described below. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment, materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fund will adjust the previous closing prices to reflect what it believes to be the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE. In deciding whether it is necessary to adjust closing prices to reflect fair value, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. A fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with closing prices and information to evaluate and/or adjust those prices. The fund cannot predict how often it will use closing prices and how often it will determine it necessary to adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its security valuation process, the fund routinely compares closing prices, the next day’s opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices.

Valuation Inputs Various inputs are used to determine the value of the fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

Level 2 – observable inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk)

Level 3 – unobservable inputs

Observable inputs are those based on market data obtained from sources independent of the fund, and unobservable inputs reflect the fund’s own assumptions based on the best information available. The input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investments at that level. For example, non-U.S. equity securities actively traded in foreign markets generally are reflected in Level 2 despite the availability of closing prices, because the fund evaluates and determines whether those closing prices reflect fair value at the close of the NYSE or require adjustment, as described above. The following table summarizes the fund’s investments, based on the inputs used to determine their values on June 30, 2008:

NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial delays and additional costs.

Options Call and put options give the holder the right to purchase and sell, respectively, a security at a specified price on a certain date. Risks arise from possible illiquidity of the options market and from movements in security values. Purchased options are reflected in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments at market value. Written options are reflected in the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities at market value. Transactions in options written and related premiums received during the six months ended June 30, 2008, were as follows:

Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities, other than short-term securities, aggregated $4,210,603,000 and $3,837,145,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

NOTE 4 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions are determined in accordance with Federal income tax regulations, which differ from generally accepted accounting principles, and, therefore, may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences. The amount and character of tax-basis distributions and composition of net assets are finalized at fiscal year-end; accordingly, tax-basis balances have not been determined as of June 30, 2008.

At June 30, 2008, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $9,807,143,000. Net unrealized gain aggregated $159,689,000 at period-end, of which $760,699,000 related to appreciated investments and $601,010,000 related to depreciated investments.

NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (the manager or Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. The investment management agreement between the fund and the manager provides for an annual investment management fee, which is computed daily and paid monthly. The fee consists of an individual fund fee, equal to 0.30% of the fund’s average daily net assets, and a group fee. The group fee rate is calculated based on the combined net assets of certain mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (the group) applied to a graduated fee schedule, with rates ranging from 0.48% for the first $1 billion of assets to 0.285% for assets in excess of $220 billion. The fund’s group fee is determined by applying the group fee rate to the fund’s average daily net assets. At June 30, 2008, the effective annual group fee rate was 0.30%.

In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and two wholly owned subsidiaries of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates computes the daily share prices and provides certain other administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the fund’s transfer and dividend disbursing agent. T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., provides subaccounting and recordkeeping services for certain retirement accounts invested in the Investor Class. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $77,000 for Price Associates, $2,833,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and $820,000 for T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.

The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund and the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund (collectively, the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds are offered as cash management options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates and/or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds pay no investment management fees.

The fund may also invest in certain T. Rowe Price institutional funds (underlying institutional funds) as a means of gaining efficient and cost-effective exposure to certain markets. The underlying institutional funds are open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and/or T. Rowe Price International, Inc. (collectively, the Price managers) and are considered affiliates of the fund. Each underlying institutional fund pays an all-inclusive management and administrative fee to its Price manager. To ensure that the fund does not incur duplicate fees, each Price manager has agreed to permanently waive a portion of its management fee charged to the fund in an amount sufficient to fully offset the fees paid by the underlying institutional funds related to fund assets invested therein. Accordingly, the accompanying Statement of Operations includes management fees permanently waived pursuant to this agreement. Annual fee rates and amounts waived within the accompanying Statement of Operations related to shares of the underlying institutional funds for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are as follows:





INFORMATION ON PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RECORDS 

A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information, which you may request by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our Web site, www.troweprice.com. To access it, click on the words “Company Info” at the top of our homepage for individual investors. Then, in the window that appears, click on the “Proxy Voting Policy” navigation button in the top left corner.

Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our Web site and through the SEC’s Web site. To access it through our Web site, follow the directions above, then click on the words “Proxy Voting Record” at the bottom of the Proxy Voting Policy page.

HOW TO OBTAIN QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS 

The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available electronically on the SEC’s Web site (www.sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.

APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 

On March 4, 2008, the fund’s Board of Trustees (Board) unanimously approved the investment advisory contract (Contract) between the fund and its investment manager, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Manager). The Board considered a variety of factors in connection with its review of the Contract, also taking into account information provided by the Manager during the course of the year, as discussed below:

Services Provided by the Manager
The Board considered the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Manager. These services included, but were not limited to, management of the fund’s portfolio and a variety of related activities, as well as financial and administrative services, reporting, and communications. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the Manager’s senior management team and investment personnel involved in the management of the fund. The Board concluded that it was satisfied with the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided by the Manager.

Investment Performance of the Fund
The Board reviewed the fund’s average annual total returns over the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods as well as the fund’s year-by-year returns and compared these returns with previously agreed upon comparable performance measures and market data, including those supplied by Lipper and Morningstar, which are independent providers of mutual fund data. On the basis of this evaluation and the Board’s ongoing review of investment results, the Board concluded that the fund’s performance was satisfactory.

Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed detailed information regarding the revenues received by the Manager under the Contract and other benefits that the Manager (and its affiliates) may have realized from its relationship with the fund, including research received under “soft dollar” agreements. The Board noted that soft dollars were not used to pay for third-party, non-broker research. The Board also received information on the estimated costs incurred and profits realized by the Manager and its affiliates from advising T. Rowe Price mutual funds, as well as estimates of the gross profits realized from managing the fund in particular. The Board concluded that the Manager’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the fund. The Board also considered whether the fund or other funds benefit under the fee levels set forth in the Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Manager. Under the Contract, the fund pays a fee to the Manager composed of two components—a group fee rate based on the aggregate assets of certain T. Rowe Price mutual funds (including the fund) that declines at certain asset levels and an individual fund fee rate that is assessed on the assets of the fund. The Board concluded that the advisory fee structure for the fund continued to provide for a reasonable sharing of benefits from any economies of scale with the fund’s investors.

Fees
The Board reviewed the fund’s management fee rate, operating expenses, and total expense ratio (for the Investor Class and Advisor Class) and compared them with fees and expensesof other comparable funds based on information and data supplied by Lipper. The information provided to the Board indicated that the fund’s management fee rate (for both classes) was above the median for certain groups of comparable funds but at or below the median for other groups of comparable funds. The information also indicated that the expense ratio for the Investor Class was above the median for certain groups of comparable funds but below the median for other groups of comparable funds, and that the expense ratio for the Advisor Class was at or below the median for comparable funds. The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for comparable privately managed accounts of the Manager and its affiliates. Management informed the Board that the Manager’s responsibilities for privately managed accounts are more limited than its responsibilities for the fund and other T. Rowe Price mutual funds that it or its affiliates advise. On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Contract were reasonable.

Approval of the Contract
As noted, the Board approved the continuation of the Contract. No single factor was considered in isolation or to be determinative to the decision. Rather, the Board concluded, in light of a weighting and balancing of all factors considered, that it was in the best interests of the fund to approve the continuation of the Contract, including the fees to be charged for services thereunder.

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

A code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions is filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s annual Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Disclosure required in registrant’s annual Form N-CSR.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Disclosure required in registrant’s annual Form N-CSR.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Investments.

(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

(b) Not applicable.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.

(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed with the registrant’s annual Form N-CSR.

    (2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.

    (3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.

(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.

                                                                              
SIGNATURES
 
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment 
Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 
 
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund 
 
 
 
By  /s/ Edward C. Bernard 
  Edward C. Bernard 
  Principal Executive Officer 
 
Date  August 20, 2008 
 
 
 
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment 
Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of 
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 
 
 
By  /s/ Edward C. Bernard 
  Edward C. Bernard 
  Principal Executive Officer 
 
Date  August 20, 2008 
 
 
 
By  /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle 
  Gregory K. Hinkle 
  Principal Financial Officer 
 
Date  August 20, 2008