-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, SVhGFZ1VyO5oOyACtEaQDR2GJjyNgvSNdtkId29UCH53KMECfHdxhvnaKdunUgFj 8v77uanuzH/MPP1m2qeXcg== 0000793307-99-000013.txt : 19990817 0000793307-99-000013.hdr.sgml : 19990817 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000793307-99-000013 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19990630 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990816 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI LP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000793307 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE [6500] IRS NUMBER: 330168395 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-15460 FILM NUMBER: 99690744 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 13760 NOEL RD STE 700 LB70 CITY: DALLAS STATE: TX ZIP: 75240 BUSINESS PHONE: 2144485800 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 2: 13760 NOEL ROAD SUITE 700 LB 70 CITY: DALLAS STATE: TX ZIP: 75240 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: SOUTHMARK EQUITY PARTNERS III LTD DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19920413 10-Q 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999 ------------------------------------------ OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ______________ to_____________ Commission file number 0-15460 ---------- MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) California 33-0168395 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 13760 Noel Road, Suite 600, LB70, Dallas, Texas, 75240 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (972) 448-5800 ----------------------------- Indicate by check mark whether the registrant, (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No --- --- PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - ------- -------------------- MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
June 30, December 31, 1999 1998 ------------- ------------- ASSETS - ------ Real estate investments: Land .................................................. $ 6,750,456 $ 6,750,456 Buildings and improvements ............................ 56,029,546 55,757,865 ------------ ------------ 62,780,002 62,508,321 Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization ...... (28,203,968) (26,899,633) ------------ ------------ 34,576,034 35,608,688 Cash and cash equivalents ................................ 2,671,375 2,256,842 Cash segregated for security deposits .................... 236,701 232,083 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $78,539 and $203,657 at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively ................... 1,133,657 1,123,136 Prepaid commissions ...................................... 357,605 387,092 Prepaid expenses and other assets ........................ 400,844 254,614 Deferred borrowing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $277,364 and $255,443 at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively .......................................... 173,797 186,238 ------------ ------------ $ 39,550,013 $ 40,048,693 ============ ============ LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) - ------------------------------------------ Mortgage notes payable ................................... $ 18,821,130 $ 18,981,387 Accounts payable and accrued expenses .................... 402,863 247,764 Accrued property taxes ................................... 309,581 40,161 Payable to affiliates - General Partner .................. 1,213,050 931,891 Security deposits and deferred rental revenue ............ 299,965 219,345 ------------ ------------ 21,046,589 20,420,548 ------------ ------------ Partners' equity (deficit): Limited Partners - 90,000,000 Units authorized; 86,530,671 Units issued and outstanding at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998 .............. 18,927,538 20,046,031 General Partner ....................................... (424,114) (417,886) ------------ ------------ 18,503,424 19,628,145 ------------ ------------ $ 39,550,013 $ 40,048,693 ============ ============
The financial information included herein has been prepared by management without audit by independent public accountants. See accompanying notes to financial statements. McNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, ------------------------------- ------------------------------- 1999 1998 1999 1998 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Revenue: Rental revenue ..................... $ 2,121,614 $ 2,099,774 $ 4,289,308 $ 4,405,034 Interest ........................... 24,806 44,667 47,141 74,555 Gain on sale of real estate ........ -- 116,297 -- 116,297 Other income ....................... 23,128 -- 23,128 -- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total revenue .................... 2,169,548 2,260,738 4,359,577 4,595,886 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Expenses: Interest ........................... 368,698 429,606 738,917 861,114 Depreciation and amortization ..................... 652,944 632,028 1,304,335 1,249,118 Property taxes ..................... 238,303 177,985 426,894 368,218 Personnel expenses ................. 197,614 178,080 390,119 404,874 Utilities .......................... 234,318 236,319 478,994 470,160 Repairs and maintenance ............ 248,331 247,405 482,096 478,907 Property management fees - affiliates ................ 131,286 137,215 259,780 268,253 Other property operating expenses ......................... 111,580 109,459 223,303 231,257 General and administrative ......... 290,611 108,716 346,701 231,442 General and administrative - affiliates ....................... 159,912 201,892 331,281 394,584 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total expenses ................... 2,633,597 2,458,705 4,982,420 4,957,927 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net loss .............................. $ (464,049) $ (197,967) $ (622,843) $ (362,041) =========== =========== =========== =========== Net loss allocable to limited partners ................ $ (459,409) $ (195,987) $ (616,615) $ (358,421) Net loss allocable to General Partner ................. (4,640) (1,980) (6,228) (3,620) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net loss .............................. $ (464,049) $ (197,967) $ (622,843) $ (362,041) =========== =========== =========== =========== Net loss per thousand limited partnership units .......... $ (5.31) $ (2.30) $ (7.13) $ (4.14) =========== =========== =========== =========== Distribution per thousand limited partnership units .......... $ -- $ -- $ 5.80 $ 17.33 =========== =========== =========== ===========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by management without audit by independent public accountants. See accompanying notes to financial statements. McNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Unaudited) For the Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 and 1998
Total Partners' General Limited Equity Partner Partners (Deficit) ------------- ------------ ------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 ............ $ (410,929) $ 23,273,176 $ 22,862,247 Net loss ................................ (3,620) (358,421) (362,041) Distributions to limited partners........ -- (1,499,992) (1,499,992) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance at June 30, 1998 ................ $ (414,549) $ 21,414,763 $ 21,000,214 ============ ============ ============ Balance at December 31, 1998 ............ $ (417,886) $ 20,046,031 $ 19,628,145 Net loss ................................ (6,228) (616,615) (622,843) Distributions to limited partners ....... -- (501,878) (501,878) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance at June 30, 1999 ................ $ (424,114) $ 18,927,538 $ 18,503,424 ============ ============ ============
The financial information included herein has been prepared by management without audit by independent public accountants. See accompanying notes to financial statements. McNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Six Months Ended June 30, -------------------------------- 1999 1998 ------------ ------------ Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received from tenants ...................... $ 4,349,795 $ 4,470,362 Cash paid to suppliers .......................... (1,876,852) (2,091,567) Cash paid to affiliates ......................... (309,902) (231,205) Interest received ............................... 47,141 74,555 Interest paid ................................... (718,007) (815,153) Property taxes paid ............................. (157,474) (228,610) Property tax refund ............................. 23,128 -- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities .......... 1,357,829 1,178,382 ----------- ----------- Cash flows from investing activities: Additions to real estate investments and asset held for sale ........................... (271,681) (218,305) Proceeds from sale of real estate ............... -- 3,324,955 ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ...................................... (271,681) 3,106,650 ----------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Principal payments on mortgage notes payable .... (160,257) (197,853) Deferred borrowing costs paid ................... (9,480) -- Distributions to limited partners ............... (501,878) (1,499,992) ----------- ----------- Net cash used in financing activities .............. (671,615) (1,697,845) ----------- ----------- Net increase in cash and cash equivalents .......... 414,533 2,587,187 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period .......................................... 2,256,842 2,823,216 ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period ......... $ 2,671,375 $ 5,410,403 =========== ===========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by management without audit by independent public accountants. See accompanying notes to financial statements. McNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) Reconciliation of Net Loss to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 1998 ------------ ------------ Net loss ............................................ $ (622,843) $ (362,041) ----------- ----------- Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization .................... 1,304,335 1,249,118 Amortization of deferred borrowing costs ......... 21,921 46,898 Gain on sale of real estate ...................... -- (116,297) Changes in assets and liabilities: Cash segregated for security deposits .......... (4,618) (5,055) Accounts receivable ............................ (10,521) 59,218 Prepaid commissions ............................ 29,487 9,982 Prepaid expenses and other assets .............. (146,230) (70,859) Accounts payable and accrued expenses .......... 155,099 (206,943) Accrued property taxes ......................... 269,420 139,608 Payable to affiliates - General Partner ........ 281,159 431,632 Security deposits and deferred rental revenue ...................................... 80,620 3,121 ----------- ----------- Total adjustments ............................ 1,980,672 1,540,423 ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities ........... $ 1,357,829 $ 1,178,382 =========== ===========
The financial information included herein has been prepared by management without audit by independent public accountants. See accompanying notes to financial statements. MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 1999 (Unaudited) NOTE 1. - ------- McNeil Real Estate Partners XXVI, L.P., (the "Partnership"), formerly known as Southmark Equity Partners III, Ltd. was organized on March 4, 1985 as a limited partnership under the provisions of the California Revised Limited Partnership Act to acquire and operate residential and commercial properties. The General Partner of the Partnership is McNeil Partners, L.P. (the "General Partner"), a Delaware limited partnership, an affiliate of Robert A. McNeil ("McNeil"). The principal place of business for the Partnership and the General Partner is 13760 Noel Road, Suite 600, LB70, Dallas, Texas 75240. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership's financial position and results of operations. All adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. However, the results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 1999 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 1999. NOTE 2. - ------- The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements contained in the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and the notes thereto, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is available upon request by writing to McNeil Real Estate Fund XXVI, L.P., c/o McNeil Real Estate Management, Inc., Investor Services, 13760 Noel Road, Suite 600, LB70, Dallas, Texas 75240. NOTE 3. - ------- The Partnership pays property management fees equal to 5% of gross rental receipts for its residential property and 6% of gross rental receipts for its commercial properties to McNeil Real Estate Management, Inc., ("McREMI"), an affiliate of the General Partner, for providing property management services for the Partnership's residential and commercial properties and leasing services for its residential property. McREMI may also choose to provide leasing services for the Partnership's commercial properties, in which case McREMI will receive property management fees from such commercial properties equal to 3% of the property's gross rental receipts plus leasing commissions based on the prevailing market rate for such services where the property is located. The Partnership reimburses McREMI for its costs, including overhead, of administering the Partnership's affairs. The Partnership is incurring an asset management fee which is payable to the General Partner. Through 1999, the Asset Management Fee is calculated as 1% of the Partnership's tangible asset value. Tangible asset value is determined by using the greater of (i) an amount calculated by applying a capitalization rate of 9% to the annualized net operating income of each property or (ii) a value of $10,000 per apartment unit for residential property and $50 per gross square foot for commercial property to arrive at the property tangible asset value. The property tangible asset value is then added to the book value of all other assets excluding intangible items. The fee percentage decreases to .75% in 2000, .50% in 2001 and .25% thereafter. Total accrued but unpaid asset management fees of $931,866 were outstanding at June 30, 1999. Compensation and reimbursements paid to or accrued for the benefit of the General Partner and its affiliates are as follows: Six Months Ended June 30, ----------------------- 1999 1998 --------- --------- Property management fees - affiliates................ $ 259,780 $ 268,253 Charged to gain on sale of real estate: Disposition fee................................... -- 106,500 Charged to general and administrative - affiliates: Partnership administration........................ 83,497 92,905 Asset management fee.............................. 247,784 301,679 --------- --------- $ 591,061 $ 769,337 ========= ========= The total payable to affiliates - General Partner at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998 consisted primarily of unpaid asset management fees, property management fees and partnership general and administrative expenses and are due and payable from current operations. NOTE 4. - ------- On April 28, 1998, the Partnership sold to an unaffiliated buyer, Edison Ford Square, an 145,417 square foot shopping center located in Fort Myers, Florida, for a cash purchase price of $3,550,000. Cash proceeds from this transaction, as well as the gain on sale is detailed below:
Gain on Sale Cash Proceeds ------------ ------------- Cash sales price ........................... $ 3,550,000 $ 3,550,000 Selling costs .............................. (225,045) (225,045) Basis of real estate sold .................. (3,208,658) ----------- Gain on sale of real estate ................ $ 116,297 =========== ----------- Proceeds from sale of real estate........... $ 3,324,955 ===========
The selling costs above include a disposition fee at 3% of the gross sales price paid to the General Partner in the amount of $106,500. The disposition fee was paid in December 1998. NOTE 5. - ------- On June 24, 1999, the Partnership and 18 affiliated partnerships, collectively, (the "Partnerships"),the General Partner, McNeil Investors, Inc., McNeil Real Estate Management, Inc. ("McREMI"), McNeil Summerhill, Inc. and Robert A. McNeil entered into a definitive acquisition agreement (the "Master Agreement") with WXI/McN Realty L.L.C. ("Newco"), an affiliate of Whitehall Street Real Estate Limited Partnership XI, a real estate investment fund managed by Goldman, Sachs & Co., whereby Newco and its subsidiaries will acquire the Partnerships. The Master Agreement provides that the Partnerships will be merged with subsidiaries of Newco. The Master Agreement also provides for the acquisition by Newco and its subsidiaries of the assets of McREMI. The aggregate consideration in the transaction, including the assumption or prepayment of all outstanding mortgage debt of the Partnerships, is approximately $644,440,000. Pursuant to the terms of the Master Agreement, the limited partners in the Partnership will receive cash on the closing date of the transaction (the "Closing Date") in exchange for their limited partnership interests. In addition, the Partnership will declare a special distribution to its limited partners on the Closing Date equal to its then positive net working capital balance, if any. The estimated aggregate consideration and net working capital distribution to be received per unit of limited partnership interest in the Partnership is currently estimated as $0.27. On the Closing Date, the General Partner of the Partnership, will receive an equity interest in Newco in exchange for its contribution to Newco of the general partnership interests in the Partnerships, the limited partnership interests in Fairfax Associates II L.P. and McNeil Summerhill Associates and the assets of McREMI. The Partnership's participation in the transaction is subject to, among other conditions, the approval by a majority of the limited partners of the Partnership. In some circumstances, as defined in the Master Agreement, the Partnerships may be subject to a break-up fee, up to an aggregate maximum of $18,000,000, if the Master Agreement is terminated with respect to one or more of the Partnerships. In the case of termination of the Master Agreement in these circumstances, each of the Partnerships with respect to which the Master Agreement has been terminated will be severally, but not jointly, liable for payment to Newco of its respective break-up fee. The break-up fee ratably calculated for the Partnership is $1,251,306. All previous costs associated with this transaction had been allocated among the Partnerships and McREMI based on the relative number of properties contained therein. On June 24, 1999, a fairness opinion (the "Fairness Opinion") was rendered by Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc., an independent financial advisor, to the effect that the aggregate consideration to be paid for the general partnership interests and limited partnership interests in all of the Partnerships and the assets of McREMI is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of each class of limited partnership. Based on the relative values as set forth in the Fairness Opinion, the Partnership recorded an adjustment to general and administrative expenses and accounts payable and accrued expenses during the second quarter of 1999 in the amount of $73,860 to reflect the reallocation of previously paid transaction costs among the Partnerships and McREMI. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND - ------- --------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS --------------------- FINANCIAL CONDITION - ------------------- The Partnership is engaged in diversified real estate activities, including the ownership, operation and management of residential and commercial real estate and other real estate related assets. At June 30, 1999, the Partnership owned one apartment property, two office buildings and one retail center. Two of the Partnership's four properties are subject to mortgage notes. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS - ------------------- On June 24, 1999, McNeil Partners, L.P. (the General Partner of the Partnership) and WXI/McN Realty L.L.C., an affiliate of Whitehall Street Real Estate Limited Partnership XI ("Whitehall"), a real estate investment fund managed by Goldman, Sachs & Co., announced that they have entered into a definitive acquisition agreement whereby the Whitehall affiliate will acquire by merger nineteen real estate limited partnerships operated by McNeil Partners, L.P. and Robert A. McNeil. The limited partnerships involved are the Partnership and McNeil Real Estate Funds IX, X, XI, XII, XIV, XV, XX, XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV and XXVII, Hearth Hollow Associates, McNeil Midwest Properties I, L.P., Regency North Associates, Fairfax Associates and McNeil Summerhill (collectively, the "Partnerships"). The Partnerships (other than Fairfax Associates and McNeil Summerhill which are wholly-owned by Robert A. McNeil and related parties) will be merged with subsidiaries of WXI/McN Realty L.L.C. The acquisition agreement also provides for the acquisition by WXI/McN Realty L.L.C. of the assets of McNeil Real Estate Management, Inc. ("McREMI"). The aggregate consideration in the transaction, including all outstanding mortgage debt of the Partnerships, is approximately $644,440,000. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement, the limited partners in each of the Partnerships (other than those wholly-owned by Robert A. McNeil) will receive cash on the closing date of the transaction in exchange for their limited partnership interests. In addition, each Partnership will make a special distribution to its limited partners on the closing date of the transaction equal to its then net positive working capital balance. McNeil Partners, L.P. will receive an equity interest in WXI/McN Realty L.L.C. in exchange for its contribution of its general partnership interests in the Partnerships, the limited partnership interests in its wholly-owned Partnerships and the assets of McREMI. The proposed transaction follows an extensive marketing effort by PaineWebber Incorporated, exclusive financial advisor to the Partnerships. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of McNeil Investors, Inc., the general partner of McNeil Partners, L.P., the general partner of each of the Partnerships other than Regency North Associates, Fairfax Associates and McNeil Summerhill. The respective general partners of Regency North Associates, Fairfax Associates and McNeil Summerhill also have approved the transaction. The Board of Directors of McNeil Investors based its approval upon, among other things, the recommendation of a Special Committee of the Board, appointed at the beginning of the discussions with Whitehall to represent the interests of holders of limited partnership interests in each of the Partnerships. In addition, the Special Committee and the Board relied upon fairness opinions given by Robert A. Stanger & Co., Inc. ("Stanger & Co."), an independent financial advisor to the Partnerships, to the effect that the aggregate consideration is fair to the holders of each class of limited partnership interests in each of the Partnerships. The Special Committee's recommendation was also based upon the separate opinions of Eastdil Realty Company ("Eastdil"), the independent financial advisor to the Special Committee. Stanger & Co. and Eastdil have each also rendered an opinion that the aggregate consideration to be paid for the general partnership interests and limited partnership interests in all of the Partnerships and the assets of McREMI is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of each class of limited partnership interests in each of the Partnerships. Each of the Partnerships' participation in the transaction is subject to, among other conditions, the approval by a majority of the limited partners of the respective Partnerships. The approval of the limited partners of the Partnerships will be sought at meetings to be held in the coming months after the filing of proxy statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the publicly traded Partnerships, and the subsequent mailing of proxy statements to the limited partners. Preliminary proxy statements were filed with the SEC on August 3, 1999. The aggregate consideration in the transaction has been allocated preliminarily among the general partnership interests and the limited partnership interests in each of the Partnerships and McREMI, based upon an allocation analysis prepared by Stanger & Co. and confirmed by Eastdil. Based upon this allocation analysis and the fairness opinions rendered by Stanger & Co. and Eastdil, the Special Committee, the Board of Directors of McNeil Investors, Inc., the respective general partners of Regency North Associates, Fairfax Associates and McNeil Summerhill have each unanimously approved the allocation of the aggregate consideration. The estimated aggregate consideration and working capital distribution to be received per unit of limited partnership interest of the Partnership is currently estimated as $0.27. McNeil Partners, L.P. will contribute its real estate investment and management company business to a subsidiary of WXI/McN Realty, L.L.C., along with its general partnership interests in the Partnerships and its limited partnership interests in the wholly-owned Partnerships, having an aggregate allocated value, as determined by Stanger & Co., of approximately $58,640,000, of which approximately $29,400,000 reflects balances due to McNeil Partners, L.P. and McREMI as reflected on the Partnerships' financial statements as of March 31, 1999. The above estimates of the Partnership per unit estimated merger consideration and working capital distribution and the interest of McNeil Partners, L.P. are based upon, among other things, the balance sheet of the Partnership as of March 31, 1999, adjusted for intangible assets, non-cash liabilities, transaction expenses and the McNeil Partners, L.P. interest in the Partnership. Actual amounts, including the estimate allocable to McNeil Partners, L.P., will vary with the performance of the Partnership and McNeil Partners, L.P. through the closing date. The above estimated merger consideration and special working capital distribution will be adjusted at closing to reflect the then working capital position of the Partnership. Whitehall is a $2.26 billion equity fund and is the seventh in a series of funds sponsored and capitalized by Goldman, Sachs & Co. and its affiliates, along with public and private investors, to acquire real estate worldwide. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - --------------------- Revenue: Total Partnership revenue decreased by $91,190 or 4% and $236,309 or 5% for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 as compared to the same period in 1998. Excluding the effects of the sale of Edison Ford Square in April 1998, Partnership revenue increased $68,368 for the six months ended June 30, 1999 as compared to the same period last year. In 1999, the Partnership recorded other income of $23,128 due to a property tax refund on Amargosa Creek. Interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 decreased by $19,861 and $27,414 as compared to the same period last year due to an decrease in the average cash balance being invested in interest bearing accounts. Expenses: Total expenses increased by $174,892 and $24,493 for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 as compared to the same period of 1998. Excluding the effects of the sale of Edison Ford Square, Partnership expenses increased $205,892 and $131,274 for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999. Interest expense decreased by $60,908 and $122,197 or 14% for the three and six months June 30, 1999 as compared to the same period in 1998 due to the payoff of the mortgage note payable on Westwood Center. For the three and six months ended June 30, 1999, property taxes increased by $62,320 or 36% and $74,928 or 21%, excluding Edison Ford Square, as compared to the same period in 1998. This increase is due to an increase in the estimated tax liability at Northway Mall, Continental Plaza and Westwood Center. General and administrative expense increased by $181,895 and $115,259 for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999. The increase was mainly due to increased costs incurred to explore alternatives to maximize the value of the Partnership (see Recent Developments) and due to a $73,860 reallocation of previously paid transaction costs among the Partnerships and McREMI in the second quarter of 1999 (see Note 5). General and administrative - affiliate expenses decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 by $41,980 and $63,303, respectively, as compared to the same period in 1998. The decrease was mainly due to a decrease in overhead expenses allocated to the Partnership by McREMI. All other remaining expenses, excluding Edison Ford Square, remained comparable to the same period last year. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - ------------------------------- The Partnership generated $1,357,829 of cash through operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 1999 as compared to $1,178,382 for the same period in 1998. The $179,447 increase is primarily due to the decrease in cash paid to suppliers. The Partnership expended $271,681 and $218,305 in capital improvements to its properties for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. In 1998, the Partnership received proceeds of $3,324,955 from the sale of Edison Ford Square. Total principal payments on mortgage notes payable were $160,257 for the six months ended June 30, 1999 as compared to $197,853 for the same period of 1998. The Partnership also distributed $501,878 to the limited partners during 1999, while $1,499,992 was paid during the same period in 1998. The Partnership also paid $9,480 in deferred borrowing costs for the six months ended June 30, 1999 due to the two year extension on Amargosa Creek's mortgage note payable. Short-term liquidity: At June 30, 1999, the Partnership held cash and cash equivalents of $2,671,375. The present cash balance plus cash to be provided by operating activities is considered adequate to meet the Partnership's needs for debt service, normal amounts of repairs and maintenance and capital improvements to preserve and enhance the value of the properties. The Partnership has budgeted $1.3 million for necessary capital improvements for all properties in 1999. Long-term liquidity: While the present outlook for the Partnership's liquidity is favorable, market conditions may change and property operations could deteriorate. In that event, the Partnership would require other sources of working capital. No such other sources have been identified, and the Partnership has no established lines of credit. Other possible actions to resolve working capital deficiencies include refinancing or renegotiating terms of existing loans, deferring major capital expenditures on Partnership properties except where improvements are expected to enhance the competitiveness or marketability of the properties, or arranging working capital support from affiliates. There is no assurance that affiliate support could be arranged, since neither the General Partner nor any affiliates have any obligation in this regard. See "Recent Developments" above. Forward-Looking Information: Within this document, certain statements are made as to the expected occupancy trends, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Partnership for periods after June 30, 1999. All of these statements are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not historical and involve risks and uncertainties. The Partnership's actual occupancy trends, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for future periods may differ materially due to several factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the Partnership's ability to control costs, make necessary capital improvements, negotiate sales or refinancings of its properties, and respond to changing economic and competitive factors. YEAR 2000 DISCLOSURE - -------------------- State of readiness - ------------------ The year 2000 problem is the result of computer programs being written using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Any programs that have time-sensitive software may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This could result in major systems failure or miscalculations. Management has assessed its information technology ("IT") infrastructure to identify any systems that could be affected by the year 2000 problem. The IT used by the Partnership for financial reporting and significant accounting functions was made year 2000 compliant during recent systems conversions. The software utilized for these functions is licensed by third party vendors who have warranted that their systems are year 2000 compliant. Management is in the process of evaluating the mechanical and embedded technological systems at the various properties. Management has inventoried all such systems and queried suppliers, vendors and manufacturers to determine year 2000 compliance. Based on this review, management believes these systems are substantially compliant. In circumstances of non-compliance management will work with the vendor to remedy the problem or seek alternative suppliers who will be in compliance. Management believes that the remediation of any outstanding year 2000 conversion issues will not have a material or adverse effect on the Partnership's operations. However, no estimates can be made as to the potential adverse impact resulting from the failure of third party service providers and vendors to be year 2000 compliant. Cost - ---- The cost of IT and embedded technology systems testing and upgrades is not expected to be material to the Partnership. Because all the IT systems have been upgraded over the last three years, all such systems were compliant, or made compliant at no additional cost by third party vendors. Management anticipates the costs of assessing, testing, and if necessary replacing embedded technology components will be less than $50,000. Such costs will be funded from operations of the Partnership. Risks - ----- Ultimately, the potential impact of the year 2000 issue will depend not only on the corrective measures the Partnership undertakes, but also on the way in which the year 2000 issue is addressed by government agencies and entities that provide services or supplies to the Partnership. Management has not determined the most likely worst case scenario to the Partnership. As management studies the findings of its property systems assessment and testing, management will develop a better understanding of what would be the worst case scenario. Management believes that progress on all areas is proceeding and that the Partnership will experience no adverse effect as a result of the year 2000 issue. However, there is no assurance that this will be the case. Contingency plans - ----------------- Management is developing contingency plans to address potential year 2000 non-compliance of IT and embedded technology systems. Management believes that failure of any IT system could have an adverse impact on operations. However, management believes that alternative systems are available that could be utilized to minimize such impact. Management believes that any failure in the embedded technology systems could have an adverse impact on that property's performance. Management has assessed these risks and expects to have contingency plans in place by December 31, 1999 for any material potential failures. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - ------- ----------------- 1) James F. Schofield, Gerald C. Gillett, Donna S. Gillett, Jeffrey Homburger, Elizabeth Jung, Robert Lewis, and Warren Heller et al. v. McNeil Partners L.P., McNeil Investors, Inc., McNeil Real Estate Management, Inc., Robert A. McNeil, Carole J. McNeil, McNeil Pacific Investors Fund 1972, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund IX, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund X, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund XI, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund XII, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund XIV, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund XV, Ltd., McNeil Real Estate Fund XX, L.P., McNeil Real Estate Fund XXI, L.P., McNeil Real Estate Fund XXII, L.P., McNeil Real Estate Fund XXIII, L.P., McNeil Real Estate Fund XXIV, L.P., McNeil Real Estate Fund XXV, L.P., McNeil Real Estate Fund XXVI, L.P., and McNeil Real Estate Fund XXVII, L.P., Hearth Hollow Associates, McNeil Midwest Properties I, L.P. and Regency North Associates, L.P., - Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC133799 (Class and Derivative Action Complaint). The action involves purported class and derivative actions brought by limited partners of each of the limited partnerships that were named as nominal defendants as listed above (the "Partnerships"). Plaintiffs allege that McNeil Investors, Inc., its affiliate McNeil Real Estate Management, Inc. ("McREMI") and three of their senior officers and/or directors (collectively, the "Defendants") breached their fiduciary duties and certain obligations under the respective Amended Partnership Agreement. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have rendered such Units highly illiquid and artificially depressed the prices that are available for Units on the resale market. Plaintiffs also allege that Defendants engaged in a course of conduct to prevent the acquisition of Units by an affiliate of Carl Icahn by disseminating purportedly false, misleading and inadequate information. Plaintiffs further allege that Defendants acted to advance their own personal interests at the expense of the Partnerships' public unit holders by failing to sell Partnership properties and failing to make distributions to unitholders. On December 16, 1996, the Plaintiffs filed a consolidated and amended complaint. Plaintiffs are suing for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract and an accounting, alleging, among other things, that the management fees paid to the McNeil affiliates over the last six years are excessive, that these fees should be reduced retroactively and that the respective Amended Partnership Agreements governing the Partnerships are invalid. Defendants filed a demurrer to the consolidated and amended complaint and a motion to strike on February 14, 1997, seeking to dismiss the consolidated and amended complaint in all respects. The Court granted Defendants' demurrer, dismissing the consolidated and amended complaint with leave to amend. On October 31, 1997, the Plaintiffs filed a second consolidated and amended complaint. The case was stayed pending settlement discussions. Because the settlement contemplated a transaction which included all of the Partnerships and plaintiffs claimed that an effort should be made to sell all of the Partnerships, in or around September 1998, plaintiffs filed a third consolidated and amended complaint which included allegations with respect to the Partnerships which had not been named in previously filed complaints. On September 15, 1998, the parties signed a Stipulation of Settlement. For purposes of settlement, the parties stipulated to a class comprised of all owners of limited partner units in the Partnerships during the period beginning June 21, 1991, the earliest date that proxy materials began to be issued in connection with the restructuring of the Partnerships, through September 15, 1998. As structured, the Stipulation of Settlement provided for the payment of over $35 million in distributions and the commitment to market the Partnerships for sale, together with McREMI, through a fair and impartial bidding process overseen by a national investment banking firm. To ensure the integrity of that process, defendants agreed, among other things, to involve plaintiffs' counsel in oversight of that process, and plaintiffs' counsel retained an independent advisor to represent the interests of limited partners of the Partnerships in the event of a transaction. The transaction described in Item 2 - Recent Developments is a result of that process. The settlement was not conditioned on the consummation of this transaction. On October 6, 1998, the court gave preliminary approval to the settlement. It granted final approval to the settlement on July 8, 1999 and entered a Final Order and Judgment dismissing the consolidated action with prejudice. As a condition of final approval, the court requested, and the parties agreed to, a slight modification of the release in the Stipulation of Settlement with respect to future claims. Plaintiffs' counsel intends to seek an order awarding attorneys' fees and reimbursing their out-of-pocket expenses in an amount which is as yet undetermined. Fees and expenses shall be allocated amongst the Partnerships on a pro rata basis, based upon tangible asset value of each such partnership, less total liabilities, calculated in accordance with the Amended Partnership Agreements for the quarter most recently ended. 2) High River Limited Partnership, Unicorn Associates Corporation and Longacre Corporation, et al. v. McNeil Partners, L.P. ("MPLP"), McNeil Investors, Inc., McNeil Real Estate Management, Inc. (McREMI"), Robert A. McNeil and Carole J. McNeil, - Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, - Index No. 99 603526. On July 23, 1999, High River and two other affiliates of Carl C. Icahn (Unicorn Associates Corporation and Longacre Corporation), filed a complaint for damages in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants improperly interfered with tender offers made by High River for limited partner units in the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships in which MPLP serves as General Partner (the "McNeil Partnerships"), by, among other things, filing purportedly frivolous litigation to delay High River's offers, issuing purportedly false and misleading statements opposing the offers and purportedly forcing High River itself to file litigation to enforce its rights. High River also alleges that as a result the defendants caused High River to incur undue expense and that the defendants ultimately prevented High River from acquiring a greater number of limited partner units. Plaintiffs also allege that the defendants improperly excluded High River from participating in the auction process for the sale of the McNeil Partnerships, and otherwise took steps to prevent its participation in the auction. In addition, plaintiffs, who are limited partners in, among others, McNeil Funds IX, X, XI, XII, XIV, XV, XX, XXIV, XXV, XXVI and XXVII, have also sued the defendants based on their status as opt-outs from the Schofield settlement. Plaintiffs seek undisclosed damages and an accounting. On July 30, 1999, defendants filed an answer to the High River Complaint, denying each and every material allegation contained in the High River Complaint and asserting several affirmative defenses. 3) HCW Pension Real Estate Fund, Ltd. et al. v. Ernst & Young, BDO Seidman et al. (Case #92-06560-A). This suit was filed on behalf of the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships (as defined in this Section 3, the "Affiliated Partnerships") on May 26, 1992, in the 14th Judicial District Court of Dallas County. The petition sought recovery against the Partnership's former auditors, Ernst & Young, for negligence and fraud in failing to detect and/or report overcharges of fees/expenses by Southmark, the former general partner. The former auditors initially asserted counterclaims against the Affiliated Partnerships based on alleged fraudulent misrepresentations made to the auditors by the former management of the Affiliated Partnerships (Southmark) in the form of client representation letters executed and delivered to the auditors by Southmark management. The counterclaims sought recovery of attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defending this action. The counterclaims were later dismissed on appeal, as discussed below. The trial court granted summary judgment against the Affiliated Partnerships based on the statute of limitations; however, on appeal, the Dallas Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and remanded for trial the Affiliated Partnerships' fraud claims against Ernst & Young. The Texas Supreme Court denied Ernst & Young's application for writ of error on January 11, 1996. Shortly before trial, the district court judge once again granted summary judgment against the Affiliated Partnerships on December 2, 1996. Hearing and oral argument before the Court of Appeals was heard on January 26, 1999. Judgment was entered in favor of the partnerships on June 25, 1999 and the case was once again remanded to the Trial Court. The General Partner is investigating whether it is in the limited partners' best interest to continue to pursue this case. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K - ------- -------------------------------- (a) Exhibits. Exhibit Number Description ------- ----------- 4. Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement dated March 30, 1992. (Incorporated by reference to Current Report of the Registrant on Form 8-K dated March 30, 1992, as filed on April 10, 1992). 4.1 Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of McNeil Real Estate Fund XXVI, L.P. dated June 1995. 11. Statement regarding computation of Net Loss per Thousand Limited Partnership Units: Net loss per thousand limited partnership units is computed by dividing net loss allocated to the limited partners by the weighted average number of limited partnership units outstanding expressed in thousands. Per unit information has been computed based on 86,531 limited partnership units (in thousands) outstanding in 1999 and 1998, respectively. 27. Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended June 30, 1999. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. A Report on Form 8-K dated June 24, 1999 was filed on June 29, 1999 regarding the transaction detailed in Note 5. MCNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized: McNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND XXVI, L.P. By: McNeil Partners, L.P., General Partner By: McNeil Investors, Inc., General Partner August 16, 1999 By: /s/ Ron K. Taylor - --------------- ----------------------------------------- Date Ron K. Taylor President and Director of McNeil Investors, Inc. (Principal Financial Officer) August 16, 1999 By: /s/ Carol A. Fahs - --------------- ----------------------------------------- Date Carol A. Fahs Vice President of McNeil Investors, Inc. (Principal Accounting Officer) EX-27 2
5 6-MOS DEC-31-1999 JUN-30-1999 2,671,375 0 1,212,196 (78,539) 0 0 62,780,002 (28,203,968) 39,550,013 0 18,821,130 0 0 0 0 39,550,013 4,289,308 4,359,577 0 0 4,243,503 0 738,917 0 0 (622,843) 0 0 0 (622,843) 0 0
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----