XML 35 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We apply the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”) for our financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value each reporting period and our nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis. Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. ASC 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. Financial assets and liabilities are categorized within the valuation hierarchy based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
Level 1—Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs.
Level 3—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on management’s best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk.
The following tables represent the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, for those assets and liabilities that we measure at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using:
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
4,591

 
$
4,591

 
$

 
$

Corporate debt securities
116,152

 

 
116,152

 

U.S. treasury and government agency securities
9,291

 

 
9,291

 

Commercial paper
1,999

 

 
1,999

 

Certificates of deposit
9,151

 

 
9,151

 

Total Assets
$
141,184

 
$
4,591

 
$
136,593

 
$

Liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Contingent consideration - Lumara Health
$
49,187

 
$

 
$

 
$
49,187

Contingent consideration - MuGard
898

 

 

 
898

Total Liabilities
$
50,085

 
$

 
$

 
$
50,085

 
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using:
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
9,951

 
$
9,951

 
$

 
$

Corporate debt securities
245,857

 

 
245,857

 

U.S. treasury and government agency securities
12,364

 

 
12,364

 

Commercial paper
40,560

 

 
40,560

 

Certificates of deposit
6,000

 

 
6,000

 

Total Assets
$
314,732

 
$
9,951

 
$
304,781

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration - Lumara Health
145,974

 
$

 
$

 
$
145,974

Contingent consideration - MuGard
2,021

 

 

 
2,021

Total Liabilities
$
147,995

 
$

 
$

 
$
147,995


 
Marketable securities
Our cash equivalents are classified as Level 1 assets under the fair value hierarchy as these assets have been valued using quoted market prices in active markets and do not have any restrictions on redemption. Our marketable securities are classified as Level 2 assets under the fair value hierarchy as these assets were primarily determined from independent pricing services, which normally derive security prices from recently reported trades for identical or similar securities, making adjustments based upon other significant observable market transactions. At the end of each reporting period, we perform quantitative and qualitative analysis of prices received from third parties to determine whether prices are reasonable estimates of fair value. After completing our analysis, we did not adjust or override any fair value measurements provided by our pricing services as of December 31, 2017 or 2016. In addition, there were no transfers or reclassifications of any securities between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2017 or 2016.
Contingent consideration
In accordance with GAAP, for asset acquisitions, such as Intrarosa, we record contingent consideration for obligations we consider to be probable and estimable and these liabilities are not adjusted to fair value. As of December 31, 2017, $10.0 million of contingent consideration was recorded in accrued expenses and is required to be paid to Endoceutics, Inc. (“Endoceutics”) in April 2018 on the first anniversary of the closing of a license agreement we entered into with Endoceutics (the “Endoceutics License Agreement”). We recorded contingent consideration related to the November 2014 acquisition of Lumara Health and related to our June 2013 license agreement for MuGard® Mucoadhesive Oral Wound Rinse (the “MuGard License Agreement”) with Abeona Therapeutics, Inc. (“Abeona”), under which we acquired the U.S. commercial rights for the management of oral mucositis and stomatitis (the “MuGard Rights”). There were no contingent consideration obligations related to the CBR acquisition.
The fair value measurements of contingent consideration obligations and the related intangible assets arising from business combinations are classified as Level 3 assets under the fair value hierarchy as these assets have been valued using unobservable inputs. These inputs include: (a) the estimated amount and timing of projected cash flows; (b) the probability of the achievement of the factors on which the contingency is based; and (c) the risk-adjusted discount rate used to present value the probability-weighted cash flows. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement.
The following table presents a reconciliation of contingent consideration obligations related to the acquisition of Lumara Health and the MuGard Rights (in thousands):
Balance as of January 1, 2016
$
222,559

Payments made
(100,246
)
Adjustments to fair value of contingent consideration
25,682

Balance as of December 31, 2016
$
147,995

Payments made
(50,224
)
Adjustments to fair value of contingent consideration
(47,686
)
Balance as of December 31, 2017
$
50,085


 
During 2017, we adjusted the fair value of our contingent consideration liability by approximately $47.7 million, primarily due to a decrease to the Makena contingent consideration based on a revision of our long-term forecast of total projected net Makena sales, which impacted both the amount and timing of future milestone payments. In addition, during 2017 we paid a $50.0 million sales milestone to the former stockholders of Lumara Health and a $0.2 million royalty payment for MuGard. We have classified $49.2 million of the Makena contingent consideration and $0.2 million of the MuGard contingent consideration as short-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
The $25.7 million adjustment to the fair value of the contingent consideration liability in 2016 was due to a $31.1 million increase to the Makena contingent consideration and a $5.4 million decrease to the MuGard contingent consideration. During the second quarter of 2016, we revised our forecast of total projected net sales for MuGard and reassessed the fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to the MuGard Rights. As a result, we reduced our MuGard-related contingent consideration liability by $5.6 million during the second quarter of 2016. In addition, during 2016 we made a $100.0 million sales milestone payment to the former stockholders of Lumara Health.
The fair value of the contingent milestone payments payable by us to the former stockholders of Lumara Health was determined based on our probability-adjusted discounted cash flows estimated to be realized from the net sales of Makena from December 1, 2014 through December 31, 2019. The cash flows were discounted at a rate of 5.0%, which we believe is reasonable given the estimated likelihood of the pay-out. As of December 31, 2017, the total undiscounted milestone payment amounts we could pay in connection with the Lumara Health acquisition was $200.0 million through December 31, 2019.
The fair value of the contingent royalty payments payable by us to Abeona under the MuGard License Agreement was determined based on various market factors, including an analysis of estimated sales using a discount rate of approximately 14% as of December 31, 2017. In addition, as of December 31, 2017, we estimated that the undiscounted royalty amounts we could pay under the MuGard License Agreement, based on current projections, may range from $2.0 million to $6.0 million over the remainder of the ten year period, which commenced on June 6, 2013, the acquisition date, which is our best estimate of the period over which we expect the majority of the asset’s cash flows to be derived.  
We believe the estimated fair values of Lumara Health and the MuGard Rights are based on reasonable assumptions, however, our actual results may vary significantly from the estimated results.
Debt
We estimate the fair value of our debt obligations by using quoted market prices obtained from third-party pricing services, which is classified as a Level 2 input. As of December 31, 2017, the estimated fair value of our 2023 Senior Notes (as defined below), the 2022 Convertible Notes and the 2019 Convertible Notes was $463.7 million, $282.9 million and $21.6 million, respectively, which differed from their carrying values. See Note Q, “Debt, for additional information on our debt obligations.