10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to

Commission file number 0-14625

TECH DATA CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida	No. 59-1578329
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
5350 Tech Data Drive, Clearwater, Florida	33760
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (727) 539-7429

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated Filer	¨
Non-accelerated Filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at November 16, 2012
Common stock, par value $.0015 per share	37,760,565

TECH DATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Form 10-Q for the Three and Nine Months Ended October 31, 2012

INDEX

	PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements		3
Consolidated Balance Sheet		3
Consolidated Statement of Income		4
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income		5
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows		6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		26
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		26
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		26
Item 1A. Risk Factors		27
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		28
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		28
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		28
Item 5. Other Information		28
Item 6. Exhibits		28
SIGNATURES		29
EXHIBITS
CERTIFICATIONS

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

TECH DATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(In thousands, except share amounts)

	October 31, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	515,788		$	505,178
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $54,294 and $52,713		2,781,490			2,871,243
Inventories		2,025,424			1,802,976
Prepaid expenses and other assets		206,095			202,505
Total current assets		5,528,797			5,381,902
Property and equipment, net		83,049			88,595
Other assets, net		310,471			314,921
Total assets	$	5,922,317		$	5,785,418
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	3,111,391		$	3,042,809
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		469,171			551,280
Revolving credit loans and current maturities of long-term debt		65,848			48,490
Total current liabilities		3,646,410			3,642,579
Long-term debt, less current maturities		354,267			57,253
Other long-term liabilities		86,780			83,438
Total liabilities		4,087,457			3,783,270
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $.0015; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 59,239,085 shares issued at October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012		89			89
Additional paid-in capital		670,346			769,826
Treasury stock, 21,478,520 and 18,166,761 shares at October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012		(907,533	)		(739,614	)
Retained earnings		1,791,815			1,659,767
Accumulated other comprehensive income		280,143			283,755
Equity attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation		1,834,860			1,973,823
Noncontrolling interest		0			28,325
Total equity		1,834,860			2,002,148
Total liabilities and equity	$	5,922,317		$	5,785,418

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

TECH DATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended October 31,						Nine months ended October 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net sales	$	6,040,556		$	6,593,983		$	17,897,617		$	19,375,572
Cost of products sold		5,732,295			6,249,236			16,967,895			18,356,525
Gross profit		308,261			344,747			929,722			1,019,047
Selling, general and administrative expenses		238,715			255,178			720,027			775,020
Operating income		69,546			89,569			209,695			244,027
Interest expense		4,359			8,378			10,850			25,108
Other expense, net		2,044			428			4,566			882
Income before income taxes		63,143			80,763			194,279			218,037
Provision for income taxes		16,122			23,600			55,446			60,398
Consolidated net income		47,021			57,163			138,833			157,639
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,123	)		(3,644	)		(6,785	)		(5,312	)
Net income attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation	$	45,898		$	53,519		$	132,048		$	152,327
Net income per share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation:
Basic	$	1.22		$	1.27		$	3.37		$	3.42
Diluted	$	1.21		$	1.26		$	3.34		$	3.37
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		37,765			42,104			39,234			44,602
Diluted		38,025			42,554			39,546			45,157

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

TECH DATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended October 31,					Nine months ended October 31,
	2012		2011			2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Comprehensive income:
Consolidated net income	$	47,021	$	57,163		$	138,833		$	157,639
Change in consolidated cumulative translation adjustments (“CTA”)		81,127		(75,171	)		(2,134	)		13,211
Total comprehensive income (loss)		128,148		(18,008	)		136,699			170,850
Less—comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		1,795		2,859			5,736			5,764
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation	$	126,353	$	(20,867	)	$	130,963		$	165,086

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

TECH DATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Nine months ended October 31,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash received from customers	$	17,996,786		$	19,369,881
Cash paid to vendors and employees		(17,875,711	)		(18,901,115	)
Interest paid, net		(8,238	)		(11,644	)
Income taxes paid		(75,629	)		(61,700	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		37,208			395,422
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired		(8,782	)		(16,626	)
Expenditures for property and equipment		(10,512	)		(9,449	)
Software and software development costs		(18,097	)		(22,727	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(37,391	)		(48,802	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from the reissuance of treasury stock		3,172			31,768
Cash paid for purchase of treasury stock		(180,781	)		(300,000	)
(Repayments) borrowings on long-term loans from joint venture partner		(49,549	)		460
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in joint venture		(117,220	)		0
Return of capital to joint venture partner		(9,074	)		0
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of expenses		345,810			0
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit loans		17,412			(29,454	)
Principal payments on long-term debt		(372	)		(2,192	)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		5,229			1,870
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		14,627			(297,548	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(3,834	)		12,361
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		10,610			61,433
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		505,178			763,725
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	515,788		$	825,158
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation	$	132,048		$	152,327
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		6,785			5,312
Consolidated net income		138,833			157,639
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		40,114			42,794
Provision for losses on accounts receivable		9,346			8,962
Stock-based compensation expense		10,328			7,969
Accretion of debt discount on Senior notes and convertible senior debentures		22			7,709
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation		(5,229	)		(1,870	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		95,330			(7,639	)
Inventories		(218,175	)		272,445
Prepaid expenses and other assets		15,817			(36,981	)
Accounts payable		53,352			33,522
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(102,530	)		(89,128)
Total adjustments		(101,625	)		237,783
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	37,208		$	395,422

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

TECH DATA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

Tech Data Corporation (“Tech Data” or the “Company”) is one of the world’s largest wholesale distributors of technology products. The Company serves as an indispensable link in the technology supply chain by bringing products from the world’s leading technology vendors to market, as well as providing customers with advanced logistics capabilities and value added services. Tech Data’s customers include value-added resellers, direct marketers, retailers and corporate resellers who support the diverse technology needs of end users. The Company is managed in two geographic segments: the Americas (including North America and South America) and Europe.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tech Data and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Noncontrolling interest is recognized for the portion of a consolidated joint venture not owned by the Company. The Company operates on a fiscal year that ends on January 31.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of October 31, 2012 and its statements of income, comprehensive income and cash flows for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we prospectively revised our presentation of sales of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts to present these revenues on an agency basis as net fees, as compared to presenting gross revenues and costs of sales in prior periods. This change had no impact on gross profit dollars, operating income dollars, net income dollars or earnings per share for any fiscal periods reported. Prior to this prospective revision, these contracts approximated three percent of the Company’s net sales for both the three and nine month periods in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Management believes the impact of this revised presentation is not material and, therefore, prior periods have not been adjusted.

Seasonality

The Company’s quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and will likely continue to do so in the future as a result of currency fluctuations and seasonal variations in the demand for the products and services offered. Narrow operating margins may magnify the impact of these factors on our operating results. Recent historical seasonal variations have included an increase in European demand during the Company’s fiscal fourth quarter and decreased demand in other fiscal quarters, particularly quarters that include summer months. Given that more than one half of the Company’s revenues are derived from Europe, the worldwide results closely follow the seasonality trends in Europe. Additionally, the life cycles of major products, as well as the impact of future acquisitions and dispositions, may also materially impact the Company’s business, financial condition, or consolidated results of operations. Therefore, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire fiscal year ending January 31, 2013.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard which simplifies how entities test goodwill for impairment. The accounting standard permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described below. The accounting standard was effective for the Company beginning February 1, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this standard as of February 1, 2012, which had no impact on its consolidated financial position, income, comprehensive income or cash flows.

7

In May 2011, the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) issued a new accounting standard that amends the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This accounting standard does not extend the use of fair value accounting, but provides guidance on how it should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards within U.S. GAAP or International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). This accounting standard is effective for the Company beginning with the quarter ended April 30, 2012. The Company adopted this standard for the quarter ended April 30, 2012, which had no impact on its consolidated financial position, income, comprehensive income or cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In October 2012, the FASB clarified the scope of the accounting standard related to enhanced disclosures on offsetting (netting) of assets and liabilities in the financial statements issued in December 2011. The FASB has limited the scope of the accounting standard to the items identified in the standard’s implementation guidance. As a result of the FASB’s scope clarification, the Company has concluded that this accounting standard will have no impact on our financial statement disclosures.

In July 2012, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets. The accounting standard states that an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. This standard is effective for the Company beginning February 1, 2013, and early adoption is permitted. As the Company currently does not have any indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, this standard currently will have no impact on our consolidated financial position, income, comprehensive income and cash flows.

NOTE 2 — EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)

The Company reports a dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reported period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution related to equity-based incentives (as further discussed in Note 6 — Stock-Based Compensation) using the if-converted and treasury stock methods, where applicable. The composition of basic and diluted EPS is as follows:

	Three months ended October 31,
	2012						2011
	Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount		Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—basic	$	45,898		37,765	$	1.22	$	53,519		42,104	$	1.27
Effect of dilutive securities:
Equity-based awards				260						450
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—diluted	$	45,898		38,025	$	1.21	$	53,519		42,554	$	1.26

	Nine months ended October 31,
	2012						2011
	Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount		Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—basic	$	132,048		39,234	$	3.37	$	152,327		44,602	$	3.42
Effect of dilutive securities:
Equity-based awards				312						555

8

	Nine months ended October 31,
	2012						2011
	Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount		Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—diluted	$	132,048		39,546	$	3.34	$	152,327		45,157	$	3.37

At October 31, 2012 and 2011, there were 9,456 and 35,181 equity-based compensation awards, respectively, excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price, thereby resulting in an antidilutive effect.

The Company’s $350.0 million convertible senior debentures issued in December 2006 were repaid during December 2011. The $350.0 million convertible senior debentures did not impact earnings per share at October 31, 2011, as the conditions for the contingent conversion feature had not been met.

NOTE 3 — ACQUISITION

In September 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Brightstar Corp.’s fifty percent ownership interest in Brightstar Europe Limited, which was a consolidated joint venture between Tech Data and Brightstar Corp., (“the joint venture”). The terms of the agreement included a payment of $165.9 million in cash for Brightstar Corp’s equity in the joint venture (reflected as “noncontrolling interest” within the Company’s consolidated balance sheet) and the repayment of all loans advanced by Brightstar Corp. to the joint venture. Upon the closing of the transaction, the Company recorded a decrease of approximately $85.9 million to additional paid-in capital within shareholders’ equity, comprised of a purchase price premium of approximately $85.0 million paid to Brightstar Corp. for its share of the joint venture and approximately $0.9 million of direct costs incurred with the transaction (based on the foreign currency exchange rates on the date of acquisition). The acquisition of Brightstar Corp’s fifty percent interest in the joint venture, the repayment of all loans advanced by Brightstar Corp to the joint venture and transaction costs were funded with the Company’s available cash.

NOTE 4 — DEBT

	October 31, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Senior notes, interest at 3.75% payable semi-annually, due September 21, 2017	$	350,000		$	0
Less—unamortized debt discount		(1,304	)		0
Senior notes, net		348,696			0
Capital leases		6,088			6,512
Loan payable to Brightstar Corp.		0			14,940
Interest-free revolving credit loan payable to Brightstar Corp.		0			36,306
Other committed and uncommitted revolving credit facilities, average interest rate of 4.37% and 6.27% at October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012, expiring on various dates through fiscal 2015		65,331			47,985
		420,115			105,743
Less—current maturities (included as “revolving credit loans and current portion of long-term debt, net”)		(65,848	)		(48,490	)
Total Long-term debt	$	354,267		$	57,253

Senior Notes

In September 2012, the Company issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Senior Notes in a public offering, resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $345.8 million, net of debt discount and debt issuance costs of approximately $1.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively (the “Senior Notes”). The debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the public offering will be amortized over the life of the Senior Notes as additional interest expense using the effective interest method. The Company will pay interest on the Senior Notes semi-annually in arrears on March 21 and September 21 of each year, beginning on March 21, 2013. The Company, at its option, may redeem the Senior Notes at any

9

time in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Senior Notes being redeemed, discounted at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the date of redemption. The Senior Notes are senior, unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company’s other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.

Loans Payable to Brightstar Corp.

In October 2010, Brightstar Corp. entered into an agreement to loan Brightstar Europe Limited, which was a consolidated joint venture between Tech Data and Brightstar Corp. (“the joint venture”), its share of the funding requirements for an acquisition by the the joint venture (the “Acquisition Loan”). The Acquisition Loan from Brightstar, plus any accrued interest, had a repayment date of September 2015, or earlier if agreed between the two parties, and interest at the applicable LIBOR rate plus 4.0% per year, to be paid annually on October 1.

The Company also had an interest-free revolving credit loan from Brightstar that was issued in connection with the operations of the joint venture (the “Brightstar Revolver”). The terms of the Brightstar Revolver included no contractual repayment date and allowed for the revolving credit loan to increase or decrease in accordance with the working capital requirements of the joint venture, as determined by the Company. Effective October 2010, a resolution of the joint venture’s board was approved stating that the Brightstar Revolver will not be repaid for the foreseeable future and therefore the revolving credit loan had been classified as long-term debt in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 31, 2012.

As discussed in Note 3 above, in September 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Brightstar Corp.’s fifty percent ownership interest in the joint venture and in accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement, the Company repaid both the Acquisition Loan and the Brightstar Revolver.

NOTE 5 — INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate was 25.5% in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 and 29.2% in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company’s effective tax rate was 28.5% in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 27.7% in the same period of the prior fiscal year. The fluctuations in the effective rate for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to the same periods of the prior year are primarily the result of the relative mix of earnings and losses within the tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The effective tax rate during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 was most significantly affected by the decline in projected fiscal 2013 taxable income within the United States as compared to fiscal 2012.

On an absolute dollar basis, the provision for income taxes decreased 31.7% to $16.1 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $23.6 million in the same period of fiscal 2012 and decreased 8.2% to $55.4 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to $60.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. The decrease in the provision for income taxes for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 is primarily due to the Company’s lower taxable income for these periods in comparison with the same periods of the prior fiscal year, primarily within the United States.

The effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0% during these periods primarily due to the relative mix of earnings or losses within the tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates such as: i) losses in tax jurisdictions where the Company is not able to record a tax benefit; ii) earnings in tax jurisdictions where the Company has previously recorded a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets; and iii) earnings in lower-tax jurisdictions for which no U.S. taxes have been provided because such earnings are planned to be reinvested indefinitely outside the United States.

The overall effective tax rate will continue to be dependent upon the geographic distribution of the Company’s earnings or losses, changes in tax laws, or interpretations of these laws in the Company’s operating jurisdictions. The Company monitors the assumptions used in estimating the annual effective tax rate and makes adjustments, if required, throughout the year. If actual results differ from the assumptions used in estimating the Company’s annual effective income tax rates, future income tax expense could be materially affected.

The Company’s future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by lower earnings than anticipated in countries with lower statutory rates, changes in the relative mix of taxable income and taxable loss jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. The Company considers all positive and negative evidence available in determining the potential realization of deferred tax assets, including the scheduled reversal of temporary differences, recent cumulative losses, recent and future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In making this determination, the Company places greater emphasis on recent cumulative losses and recent taxable income due to the inherent lack of subjectivity associated with these factors. In addition, the Company’s income tax returns are subject to continuous examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of adverse outcomes from these examinations to determine the adequacy of the provision for income taxes. To the extent the Company prevails in matters for which accruals have been established or the Company is required to pay amounts in excess of such accruals, the Company’s effective tax rate could be materially affected.

10

NOTE 6 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

For the nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded $10.3 million and $8.0 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense, which is included in “selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

At October 31, 2012, the Company had awards outstanding from four equity-based compensation plans, only one of which is currently active. The active plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders in June 2009 and includes 4.0 million shares available for grant of which approximately 3.0 million shares remain available for future grant at October 31, 2012. Under the active plan, the Company is authorized to award officers, employees, and non-employee members of the Board of Directors restricted stock, options to purchase common stock, maximum value stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“MV Stock-settled SARs”), maximum value options (“MVOs”), and performance awards that are dependent upon achievement of specified performance goals. Equity-based compensation awards have a maximum term of 10 years, unless a shorter period is specified by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or is required under local law. Awards under the plans are priced as determined by the Compensation Committee, and under the terms of the Company’s active equity-based compensation plan, are required to be priced at, or above, the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Awards generally vest between one and four years from the date of grant.

A summary of the activity of the Company’s restricted stock activity for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 is as follows:

	Shares
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		568,498
Granted		279,652
Vested		(224,038	)
Canceled		(33,331	)
Outstanding at October 31, 2012		590,781

A summary of the activity of the Company’s MV Stock-settled SARs, MVOs and stock options for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 is as follows:

	Shares
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		1,651,400
Granted		6,236
Exercised		(1,007,906	)
Canceled		(44,898	)
Outstanding at October 31, 2012		604,832

The Company’s policy is to utilize shares of its treasury stock, to the extent available, for the exercise or vesting of equity awards (see further discussion of the Company’s share repurchase program in Note7 — Shareholders’ Equity).

NOTE 7 — SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company’s common share repurchases and issuance activity for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 is summarized as follows:

	Shares			Weighted- average price per share
Treasury stock held at January 31, 2012		18,166,761		$	40.71
Shares of common stock repurchased under share repurchase programs and other shares acquired		3,823,217		$	49.40
Shares of treasury stock reissued		(511,458	)
Treasury stock held at October 31, 2012		21,478,520		$	42.25

There were no common shares repurchased by the Company during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. During the first semester of fiscal 2013, the Company completed each of the $100.0 million share repurchase programs approved by the Board of Directors in May 2012 and November 2011. In conjunction with the Company’s share repurchase programs, 10b5-1 plans were executed that instruct the brokers selected by the Company to repurchase shares on behalf of the Company. The amount of common stock repurchased in accordance with the 10b5-1 plans on any given trading day is determined by a formula in the plan, which is based on the market price of the Company’s common stock. Shares repurchased by the

11

Company are held in treasury for general corporate purposes, including issuances under equity incentive and benefit plans. The reissuance of shares from treasury stock is based on the weighted average purchase price of the shares.

NOTE 8 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s assets and liabilities carried or disclosed at fair value are classified in one of the following three categories: Level 1 — quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2 — inputs other than quoted market prices included in level 1 above that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, and Level 3 — unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are measured on a recurring basis based on foreign currency spot rates and forward rates quoted by banks or foreign currency dealers (level 2 criteria) and are marked-to-market each period with gains and losses on these contracts recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income on a basis consistent with the classification of the change in the fair value of the underlying transactions giving rise to these foreign currency exchange gains and losses in the period in which their value changes, with the offsetting amount for unsettled positions being included in either other current assets or other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at October 31, 2012 and 2011 was an unrealized gain of $3.3 million and $8.6 million, respectively, included in other current assets and an unrealized loss of $4.4 million and $11.9 million, respectively, included in other current liabilities (see further discussion below in Note 9 — Derivative Instruments).

The Company utilizes life insurance policies to fund the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The investments contained within the life insurance policies are marked-to-market each period by analyzing the change in the underlying value of the invested assets (level 2 criteria) and the gains and losses are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. The related deferred compensation liability is also marked-to-market each period based upon the various investment return alternatives selected by the plan participants (level 2 criteria) and the gains and losses are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. The fair value of the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan investments and related liability at October 31, 2012 is $33.9 million and $31.6 million, respectively.

The $350 million of Senior Notes discussed in Note 4 are carried at cost, less unamortized debt discount. The estimated fair value of the Senior Notes was approximately $356.7 million at October 31, 2012, based upon quoted market information (level 1 criteria).

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these items. The carrying amount of debt outstanding pursuant to revolving credit facilities and loans payable approximates fair value as the majority of these instruments have variable interest rates which approximate current market rates (level 2 criteria).

NOTE 9 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s foreign currency risk management objective is to protect earnings and cash flows from the impact of exchange rate changes primarily through the use of foreign currency forward contracts to hedge both intercompany and third party loans, accounts receivable and accounts payable. These derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments.

The Company employs established policies and procedures to manage the exposure to fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies. It is the Company’s policy to utilize financial instruments to reduce risks where internal netting cannot be effectively employed. Additionally, the Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

The Company’s foreign currency exposure relates to international transactions in Europe, Canada and Latin America, where the currency collected from customers can be different from the currency used to purchase the product. The Company’s transactions in its foreign operations are denominated primarily in the following currencies: U.S. dollar, British pound, Canadian dollar, Chilean peso, Czech koruna, Danish krone, euro, Mexican peso, Norwegian krone, Peruvian nuevo sol, Polish zloty, Romanian leu, Swedish krona and Swiss franc.

The Company considers inventory as an economic hedge against foreign currency exposure in accounts payable in certain circumstances. This practice offsets such inventory against corresponding accounts payable denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the subsidiary buying the inventory, when determining the net exposure to be hedged using traditional forward contracts. Under this strategy, the Company would expect to increase or decrease selling prices for product purchased in foreign currencies based on fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affecting the underlying accounts payable. To the extent the Company incurs a foreign currency exchange loss (gain) on the underlying accounts

12

payable denominated in the foreign currency, a corresponding increase (decrease) in gross profit would be expected as the related inventory is sold. This strategy can result in a certain degree of quarterly earnings volatility as the underlying accounts payable is remeasured using the foreign currency exchange rate prevailing at the end of each period, or settlement date if earlier, whereas the corresponding increase (decrease) in gross profit is not realized until the related inventory is sold.

The Company classifies gains and losses on its foreign currency derivative instruments used to manage its exposures to foreign currency denominated accounts receivable and accounts payable as a component of “cost of products sold” which is consistent with the classification of the change in fair value upon remeasurement of the underlying hedged accounts receivable or accounts payable. The Company classifies gains and losses on its foreign currency derivative instruments used to manage its exposures to foreign currency denominated financing transactions as a component of “other expense, net” which is consistent with the classification of the change in fair value upon remeasurement of the underlying hedged loans. The total amount recognized in earnings on the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts, which is included as a component of either “cost of products sold” or “other expense, net”, was a net foreign currency exchange loss of $9.8 million and $10.0 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The gains and losses on the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are largely offset by the change in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets or liabilities.

The notional amount of forward exchange contracts is the amount of foreign currency to be bought or sold at maturity. Notional amounts are indicative of the extent of the Company’s involvement in the various types and uses of derivative financial instruments and are not a measure of the Company’s exposure to credit or market risks through its use of derivatives. The estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments represents the amount required to enter into similar offsetting contracts with similar remaining maturities based on quoted market prices.

The Company’s monthly average notional amounts of derivative financial instruments outstanding during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were $1.8 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively, with average maturities of 28 days and 22 days, respectively. As discussed above, under the Company’s hedging policies, gains and losses on the derivative financial instruments would be expected to be largely offset by the gains and losses on the underlying assets or liabilities being hedged. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are also discussed in Note 8 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments.

NOTE 10 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees

As is customary in the technology industry, to encourage certain customers to purchase products from Tech Data, the Company has arrangements with certain finance companies that provide inventory financing facilities to the Company’s customers. In conjunction with certain of these arrangements, the Company would be required to purchase certain inventory in the event the inventory is repossessed from the customers by the finance companies. As the Company does not have access to information regarding the amount of inventory purchased from the Company still on hand with the customer at any point in time, the Company’s repurchase obligations relating to inventory cannot be reasonably estimated. Repurchases of inventory by the Company under these arrangements have been insignificant to date. The Company believes that, based on historical experience, the likelihood of a material loss pursuant to these inventory repurchase obligations is remote.

The Company provides additional financial guarantees to finance companies on behalf of certain customers. The majority of these guarantees are for an indefinite period of time, where the Company would be required to perform if the customer is in default with the finance company related to purchases made from the Company. The Company reviews the underlying credit for these guarantees on at least an annual basis. As of October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of guarantees under these arrangements totaled $47.9 million and $65.4 million, respectively, of which $30.9 million and $28.4 million, respectively, was outstanding. The Company believes that, based on historical experience, the likelihood of a material loss pursuant to the above guarantees is remote.

Contingencies

Prior to fiscal 2004, one of the Company’s European subsidiaries was audited in relation to various value-added tax (“VAT”) matters. As a result of those audits, the subsidiary received notices of assessment that allege the subsidiary did not properly collect and remit VAT. Management has concluded, based upon the opinion of outside legal counsel, that the risk of loss for a significant portion of these assessments is remote and has therefore not accrued any amount on that portion of the claim. The Company’s financial statements include an accrual for the remaining exposure related to these assessments for which a loss is considered probable. Although the Company is vigorously pursuing administrative and judicial action to challenge the assessments, the ultimate outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with absolute certainty. If the courts were

13

to reach a ruling that is adverse to the Company on the entire claim, a significant portion of the claim would be in excess of the amounts accrued, and while such ruling would not be material to the Company’s consolidated net assets or liquidity, it could be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular period, depending upon the level of income for such period.

In December 2010, in a non-unanimous decision, a Brazilian appellate court overturned a 2003 trial court which had previously ruled in favor of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary related to the imposition of certain taxes on payments abroad related to the licensing of commercial software products, commonly referred to as “CIDE tax”. The Company estimates the total exposure where the CIDE tax, including interest, may be considered due to be approximately $28.8 million at October 31, 2012. The Brazilian subsidiary has moved for clarification of the ruling and intends to appeal if the court does not rule in its favor. However, in order to pursue the next level of appeal, the Brazilian subsidiary may be required to make a deposit or to provide a guarantee to the courts for the payment of the CIDE tax pending the outcome of the appeal. Based on the legal opinion of outside counsel, the Company believes that the chances of success on appeal of this matter are favorable and the Brazilian subsidiary intends to vigorously defend its position that the CIDE tax is not due. However, due to the lack of the predictability of the Brazilian court system, the Company has concluded that it is reasonably possible that the Brazilian subsidiary may incur a loss up to the total exposure described above. The Company believes the resolution of this litigation will not be material to the Company’s consolidated net assets or liquidity; however, it could be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular period, depending upon the level of income for such period. In addition to the discussion regarding the CIDE tax above, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary has been undergoing several examinations of non-income related taxes. Given the complexity and lack of predictability of the Brazilian tax system, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that a loss may have been incurred. However, due to the early stages of the examination, the complex nature of the Brazilian tax system and the absence of communication from the local tax authorities regarding these examinations, the Company is currently unable to determine the likelihood of these examinations resulting in assessments nor estimate the amount of loss, if any, that may be reasonably possible if such assessment were to be made.

The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s management does not expect that the outcome in any of these other legal proceedings, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

NOTE 11 — SEGMENT INFORMATION

Tech Data operates predominately in a single industry segment as a distributor of technology products, logistics management, and other value-added services. While the Company operates primarily in one industry, it is managed based on geographic segments: the Americas (including North America and South America) and Europe. The Company assesses performance of and makes decisions on how to allocate resources to its operating segments based on multiple factors including current and projected operating income and market opportunities. The Company does not consider stock-based compensation expense in assessing the performance of its operating segments, and therefore the Company is reporting stock-based compensation expense as a separate amount. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

	Three months ended October 31,						Nine months ended October 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net sales to unaffiliated customers:
Americas	$	2,367,743		$	2,781,263		$	7,221,953		$	8,094,723
Europe		3,672,813			3,812,720			10,675,664			11,280,849
Total	$	6,040,556		$	6,593,983		$	17,897,617		$	19,375,572
Operating income:
Americas	$	33,747		$	52,638		$	114,346		$	148,146
Europe		39,445			39,718			105,677			103,850
Stock-based compensation expense		(3,646	)		(2,787	)		(10,328	)		(7,969	)
Total	$	69,546		$	89,569		$	209,695		$	244,027
Depreciation and amortization:
Americas	$	4,079		$	3,798		$	11,900		$	11,567
Europe		9,445			10,053			28,214			31,227
Total	$	13,524		$	13,851		$	40,114		$	42,794
Capital expenditures:
Americas	$	2,420		$	10,085		$	15,111		$	21,340

14

	Three months ended October 31,				Nine months ended October 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Europe		5,861		3,044		13,498		10,836
Total	$	8,281	$	13,129	$	28,609	$	32,176
Identifiable assets:
Americas	$	1,870,735	$	2,063,622	$	1,870,735	$	2,063,622
Europe		4,051,582		4,272,503		4,051,582		4,272,503
Total	$	5,922,317	$	6,336,125	$	5,922,317	$	6,336,125
Goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets, net:
Americas	$	2,966	$	2,966	$	2,966	$	2,966
Europe		150,903		152,553		150,903		152,553
Total	$	153,869	$	155,519	$	153,869	$	155,519

NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On November 1, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of several distribution companies of Specialist Distribution Group, the distribution arm of Specialist Computer Holdings PLC (“SCH”), a privately-held IT services company headquartered in the United Kingdom, for a purchase price of approximately $365 million, subject to customary adjustments. The Company used the proceeds from the $350 million of Senior Notes issued in September 2012 and available cash to fund the acquisition. The acquired distribution companies are Specialist Distribution Group (SDG) Limited; ETC Metrologie SARL; Best’Ware France SA; ETC Africa SAS and SDG BV (collectively “SDG”). SDG is a leading distributor of enterprise and broadline IT products in the UK, France and the Netherlands. For its fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, SDG generated third-party sales of approximately $1.75 billion. Management believes the acquisition of SDG supports the Company’s diversification strategy by strengthening its European enterprise business and broadline offerings in key markets and expanding the Company’s vendor and customer portfolios, while leveraging the Company’s existing pan-European infrastructure. Simultaneously with the acquisition of SDG, the Company entered into a preferred supplier agreement whereby SCH, through its IT reseller business, will have annual purchase commitments through Tech Data for a period of five years, which the company estimates will add incremental annual sales of approximately $500 million.

The Company has accounted for the SDG acquisition as a business combination and the purchase price will be assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. The preliminary purchase price allocation, which will be completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, was based on estimated net assets acquired of approximately $143 million (based on the foreign currency exchange rates on date of acquisition). The preliminary allocation of identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, also subject to final purchase price adjustments, is comprised of approximately $104 million related to customer and vendor relationship assets with an estimated useful life of ten years and approximately $78 million of goodwill (based on the foreign currency exchange rates on the date of acquisition). The goodwill related to the acquisition is largely attributable to strategic factors previously discussed, as well as the growth potential of SDG’s enterprise business and broadline offerings. In addition, the Company has preliminarily allocated approximately $40 million of the purchase price premium to the preferred supplier agreement to be amortized over the five year life of the agreement. The Company is in the process of determining the amount of the identified intangible assets and goodwill that are deductible for tax purposes in the Company’s foreign tax jurisdictions.

The results of SDG’s operations will be included in the Company’s results of operations subsequent to the date of acquisition. Based on the timing of the acquisition and lack of available information, the Company has determined it to be impracticable to disclose proforma financial information at this time.

15

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), contains forward-looking statements, as described in the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those projected. These forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future results of Tech Data Corporation are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Readers are referred to the cautionary statements and important factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2012 for further information. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following:

• global economic and political instability

• competition

• narrow margins

• dependence on information systems

• acquisitions and divestitures

• exposure to natural disasters, war and terrorism

• dependence on independent shipping companies

• impact of policy changes

• labor strikes

• risk of declines in inventory value

• product availability

• vendor terms and conditions

• loss of significant customers

• customer credit exposure

• need for liquidity and capital resources; fluctuations in interest rates

• foreign currency exchange rates; exposure to foreign markets

• international operations

• changes in income tax and other regulatory legislation

• potential adverse effects of litigation or regulatory enforcement actions

• changes in accounting rules

• volatility of common stock price

Overview

Tech Data is one of the world’s largest wholesale distributors of technology products. We serve as an indispensable link in the technology supply chain by bringing products from the world’s leading technology vendors to market, as well as providing our customers with advanced logistics capabilities and value-added services. Our customers include value-added resellers (“VARs”) direct marketers, retailers and corporate resellers who support the diverse technology needs of end users. We manage our business in two geographic segments: the Americas (including North America and South America) and Europe.

16

Our financial objectives are to grow sales at or above the market rate of growth for technology products, gain share in select markets, improve profitability, generate positive cash flow, and earn a return on invested capital above our weighted average cost of capital. To achieve this, we are focused on a strategy of execution, diversification and innovation that we believe differentiates our business in the marketplace.

The fundamental element of our strategy is superior execution. Our execution strategy is supported by our highly efficient logistics infrastructure, combined with our multiple service offerings, to generate demand, develop markets and provide supply chain services for our vendors and customers. The technology distribution industry in which we operate is characterized by narrow gross profit as a percentage of sales (“gross margin”) and narrow income from operations as a percentage of sales (“operating margin”). Historically, our gross and operating margins have been impacted by intense price competition and declining average selling prices per unit, as well as changes in terms and conditions with our vendors, including those terms related to rebates, price protection, product returns and other incentives. We expect these conditions to continue in the foreseeable future and, therefore, we will continue to proactively evaluate our pricing policies and inventory management practices in response to potential changes in our vendor terms and conditions and the general market environment. As further discussed below, during the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we implemented the sales, inventory and credit management modules of SAP in the United States (“U.S.”), which substantially completed the U.S. implementation of essentially the same SAP systems used in our European operations. While the system conversion and overall implementation went well, our execution in the U.S. was negatively impacted, as the changes in the flow of information impacted our service levels with certain customers as well as our productivity and ability to make critical margin management decisions during both the second and third quarters. While we saw an improvement in our operating income in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net sales from the second quarter of fiscal 2013 to the third quarter, we nevertheless continued to see year-over-year declines in net sales, gross profit and operating income within our U.S. operations. As discussed further below, we have made improvements to our information flow and processes within our U.S. business during the third quarter, and we will continue to work diligently to return our U.S. business to acceptable levels of performance.

In addition to superior execution, our strategy includes continuing diversification and realignment of our customer and product portfolios to improve long-term profitability throughout our operations. Our broadline distribution business, characterized as high volume, more commoditized offerings, and comprised primarily of personal computer systems, peripherals, supplies and other similar products, remains a core part of our business and represents a significant percentage of our revenue. However, as technology advances, we have continued to evolve our business model, product mix, and value-added offerings in order to provide our vendors with the most efficient distribution channel for their products, and our customers with a broad array of innovative solutions to sell. We have responded to a changing IT landscape with investments in higher growth specialty areas, including the data center, software, consumer electronics and mobility, all of which now contribute significantly to our financial results.

Our European mobility business continues to be one of our strongest operations, posting double digit sales growth during the current quarter, adding new vendors in several countries and expanding our third party logistics services to new customers. In addition, during the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we completed the acquisition of Brightstar Corp.’s fifty percent ownership interest in Brightstar Europe Limited, which was a consolidated joint venture between Tech Data and Brightstar Corp. (“the joint venture”).The terms of the acquisition agreement included a payment of $165.9 million in cash for Brightstar Corp’s equity in the joint venture and the repayment of all loans advanced by Brightstar Corp. to the joint venture. We funded the acquisition, repayment of the loans advanced by Brightstar Corp. and transaction costs with our available cash.

On November 1, 2012, we completed the acquisition of several distribution companies of Specialist Distribution Group, the distribution arm of Specialist Computer Holdings PLC (“SCH”), a privately-held IT services company headquartered in the United Kingdom, for a purchase price of approximately $365 million, subject to customary adjustments. We used the proceeds from the $350 million of Senior Notes issued in September 2012 and available cash to fund the acquisition. The acquired distribution companies are Specialist Distribution Group (SDG) Limited; ETC Metrologie SARL; Best’Ware France SA; ETC Africa SAS and SDG BV. (collectively “SDG”). SDG is a leading distributor of enterprise and broadline IT products in the UK, France and the Netherlands. For its fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, SDG generated third-party sales of approximately $1.75 billion. We believe the acquisition of SDG supports our diversification strategy by strengthening our European enterprise business and broadline offerings in key markets and expanding our vendor and customer portfolios, while leveraging our existing pan-European infrastructure. Simultaneously with the acquisition of SDG, the Company entered into a preferred supplier agreement whereby SCH, through its IT reseller business, will have annual purchase commitments through Tech Data for a period of five years, which the company estimates will add incremental

17

annual sales of approximately $500 million. The results of SDG’s operations will be included in the Company’s results of operations subsequent to the date of acquisition.

Another strategic area of investment is our integrated supply chain services designed to provide innovative third party logistics and other offerings to our business partners. We have seen these offerings grow not only within our European mobility business, as mentioned above, but also within our consumer electronics and other businesses in both geographies. Our evolving mix of products, services, customers and geographies are important factors in achieving our strategic financial goals. As we execute our diversification strategy we continuously monitor the extension of credit and other terms and conditions offered to our customers to prudently balance risk, profitability and return on invested capital.

The final tenet of our strategy is innovation. Our IT systems and e-business tools and programs have provided our business with the flexibility to effectively navigate fluctuations in market conditions, structural changes in the technology industry, as well as changes created by products we sell. An example of our investment in innovation and one that we believe is providing us with the flexibility to meet the demands of the ever-evolving technology market, is our continued deployment of internal IT systems across both the Americas and Europe. We believe our pan-European IT systems provide us with a competitive advantage allowing us to drive efficiencies throughout our business while delivering innovative solutions for our business partners. In the past, we have implemented several components of our European IT systems into our North American IT infrastructure, including standardizing our North American financial systems and logistics network on SAP. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we implemented the sales, inventory and credit management modules of SAP within our U.S. operations, which substantially completed the implementation of the enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) systems used in our European operations. As a result of our extensive experience installing essentially the same ERP systems in Europe, systemically the conversion and implementation went well. However, the changes to processes and the flow of information within Tech Data and with certain customers negatively impacted our service levels with a subset of our customers as well as our internal productivity. This degradation resulted in a loss of market share and operating leverage, and therefore, lower operating profits within the United States during the second and third quarter of fiscal 2013 as compared to the prior year. While the Company is in the process of improving the service levels utilizing the new ERP modules, there can be no absolute assurances that there will be no further disruption, delays and/or negative operational impact.

We believe our strategy of execution, diversification and innovation has differentiated us in the markets we serve and has delivered solid operating results and returns on invested capital in both the Americas and Europe for several years. We continue to believe that in the long-term our U.S. implementation of SAP will provide us with a competitive advantage, giving us greater flexibility to meet the demands of our customers and vendors, and the ability to expand our reach into new markets and services. We believe our efforts will enable us to resume solid sales growth, select market share gains, higher earnings per share, positive operating cash flow, and industry-leading returns on invested capital.

In addition to the above, we diligently monitor the factors that we can control, including our management of costs, working capital and capital spending. We also continually evaluate the current and potential profitability and return on our investments in all geographies and consider changes in current and future investments based on risks, opportunities and current and anticipated market conditions. In connection with these evaluations, we may incur additional costs to the extent we decide to increase or decrease our investments in certain geographies. We will also continue to evaluate targeted strategic investments across our operations and new business opportunities and to invest in those markets and product segments we believe provide us with the greatest opportunities for profitable growth. Finally, from a balance sheet perspective, we require working capital primarily to finance accounts receivable and inventory. We have historically relied upon debt, trade credit from our vendors, and accounts receivable financing programs for our working capital needs. At October 31, 2012, we had a debt to total capital ratio (calculated as total debt divided by the aggregate of total debt and total equity) of 19.0%.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Legislation

Refer to Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the discussion on recent accounting pronouncements.

Results of Operations

We do not consider stock-based compensation expense in assessing the performance of our operating segments, and therefore the Company reports stock-based compensation expense separately. The following table summarizes our net sales, change in net sales and operating income by geographic region for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011:

18

	Three months ended October 31, 2012				Three months ended October 31, 2011
	$		% of net sales		$		% of net sales
Net sales by geographic region ($ in thousands):
Americas	$	2,367,743		39.2 %	$	2,781,263		42.2 %
Europe		3,672,813		60.8 %		3,812,720		57.8 %
Worldwide	$	6,040,556		100.0 %	$	6,593,983		100.0 %
	Nine months ended October 31, 2012				Nine months ended October 31, 2011
	$		% of net sales		$		% of net sales
Net sales by geographic region ($ in thousands):
Americas	$	7,221,953		40.4 %	$	8,094,723		41.8 %
Europe		10,675,664		59.6 %		11,280,849		58.2 %
Worldwide	$	17,897,617		100.0 %	$	19,375,572		100.0 %
	Three months ended October 31,				Nine months ended October 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Year-over-year (decrease) increase in net sales (%):
Americas		(14.9)%		3.1 %		(10.8)%		4.3 %
Europe (US$)		(3.7)%		10.0 %		(5.4)%		18.8 %
Europe (euro)		4.9 %		5.6 %		4.0 %		10.8 %
Worldwide		(8.4)%		7.0 %		(7.6)%		12.3 %
	Three months ended October 31, 2012				Three months ended October 31, 2011
	$		% of net sales		$		% of net sales
Operating income ($ in thousands):
Americas	$	33,747		1.43 %	$	52,638		1.89 %
Europe		39,445		1.07 %		39,718		1.04 %
Stock-based compensation expense		(3,646)		(0.06)%		(2,787)		(0.04)%
Worldwide	$	69,546		1.15 %	$	89,569		1.36 %
	Nine months ended October 31, 2012				Nine months ended October 31, 2011
	$		% of net sales		$		% of net sales
Operating income ($ in thousands):
Americas	$	114,346		1.58 %	$	148,146		1.83 %
Europe		105,677		0.99 %		103,850		0.92 %
Stock-based compensation expense		(10,328)		(0.06)%		(7,969)		(0.04)%
Worldwide	$	209,695		1.16 %	$	244,027		1.26 %

We sell products purchased from the world’s leading peripheral, system, software and networking vendors. Products purchased from Hewlett Packard Company and Apple Inc. approximated 21% and 12%, respectively, of our sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2013. There were no other vendors or any customers that exceeded 10% of our consolidated sales over the past four fiscal quarters.

The following table sets forth our Consolidated Statement of Income as a percentage of net sales for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, as follows:

	Three months ended October 31,						Nine months ended October 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net sales		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%
Cost of products sold		94.90			94.77			94.81			94.74

19

	Three months ended October 31,						Nine months ended October 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Gross profit		5.10			5.23			5.19			5.26
Selling, general and administrative expenses		3.95			3.87			4.03			4.00
Operating income		1.15			1.36			1.16			1.26
Interest expense		0.07			0.13			0.06			0.13
Other expense, net		0.03			(0	)		0.01			(0	)
Income before income taxes		1.05			1.23			1.09			1.13
Provision for income taxes		0.27			0.36			0.31			0.31
Consolidated net income		0.78			0.87			0.78			0.82
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(0.02	)		(0.06	)		(0.04	)		(0.03	)
Net income attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation		0.76	%		0.81	%		0.74	%		0.79	%

Three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011

Net Sales

Our consolidated net sales were $6.0 billion in the third quarter of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 8.4% when compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The weakening of certain foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar negatively impacted our year-over-year net sales comparison by approximately five percentage points. On a regional basis, during the third quarter of fiscal 2013, net sales in the Americas decreased by 14.9% when compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and decreased by 3.7% in Europe (an increase of 4.9% on a euro basis). On a year-to-date basis, net sales were $17.9 billion during the first nine months of fiscal 2013, a decrease of 7.6% when compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2012. The weakening of certain foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar negatively impacted our year-over-year net sales comparison by approximately six percentage points.

Beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we prospectively revised our presentation of sales of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts such that these revenues are now being presented on an agency basis as net fees, as compared to presenting gross revenues and costs of sales in prior periods. On a gross basis, these contracts would have contributed approximately $214.5 million and $605.8 million, respectively, to our net sales in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013, which negatively impacted both the quarterly and first nine months year-over-year consolidated net sales growth comparison by approximately three percentage points. This change had no impact on gross profit dollars, operating income dollars, net income dollars or earnings per share for any fiscal periods reported, but positively impacted the gross margin and operating income margin by 17 basis points and four basis points, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013. Also included in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2012, are net sales of approximately $51.7 million and $253.9 million, respectively, related to the in-country operations of Brazil and Colombia, which we exited at the end of fiscal 2012. We continue to serve both the Brazilian and Colombian markets through our Miami-based export business. Excluding the impact of the prospective presentation of sales of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts, the closure of our in-country operations in Brazil and Colombia and the negative impact of the weakening of certain foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013, consolidated net sales increased by approximately one percent and two percent, respectively, in comparison with the same periods of the prior fiscal year.

During the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013, net sales in the Americas were $2.4 billion and $7.2 billion respectively, representing a decrease of 14.9% and 10.8%, when compared to the same periods of the prior year. The prospective revision in presentation of sales of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts negatively impacted both the Americas’ third quarter and first nine months fiscal 2013 net sales growth by four percentage points. Excluding the impact of the prospective presentation of sales of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts, the closure of our in-country operations in Brazil and Colombia and the impact of certain foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013, year-over-year net sales in the Americas decreased by approximately ten and four percent, respectively, in comparison with the same periods of the prior fiscal year, primarily due to lower sales in the U.S. resulting from weak market conditions and a loss of market share following the implementation of certain modules of SAP in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, as previously discussed in this MD&A.

During the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013, net sales in Europe were $3.7 billion and $10.7 billion, respectively, a decrease of 3.7% and 5.4% when compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal year (an increase of 4.9% and 4.0%, respectively, on a euro basis). Excluding the impact of the prospective presentation of sales of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013, year-over-year net sales in

20

Europe increased eight percent and seven percent, respectively, on a euro basis. This increase is due to strong demand for mobility products and growth in certain European markets, such as U.K., France and Germany.

Gross Profit

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales (“gross margin”) during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 was 5.10%, compared to a 5.23% gross margin in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. On a year-to-date basis, gross margin decreased to 5.19% in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to 5.26% in the comparable period of the prior fiscal year. As discussed above, the prospective revision of the presentation of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts had no impact on gross profit dollars but positively impacted the gross margin percentage by approximately 17 basis points for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013. Excluding the impact of the revision of the presentation of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts, the decline in our gross margin for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 is attributable to competitive pricing, changes in our product mix and aggressive vendor rebate goals in both regions, as well as the implementation of the sales, inventory and credit management modules of SAP in the U.S. during the second quarter of fiscal 2013. As discussed previously, implementation of the aforementioned modules of SAP impacted our productivity and ability to make critical margin management decisions during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2013, resulting in lower gross profit earned in the U.S. during both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”)

SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 3.95% for the third quarter of fiscal 2013, compared to 3.87% in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. On a year-to-date basis, SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 4.03% for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to 4.00% in the comparable period of the prior fiscal year. The change in our presentation of sales of vendor warranty service and certain fulfillment contracts discussed above negatively impacted our SG&A as a percentage of net sales by approximately 13 basis points for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013. Excluding this impact, our year-over-year improvement in operating leverage was primarily driven by our ability to manage costs while delivering strong sales growth in Europe, offset by a decline in operating leverage in the United States in both the second and third quarters of fiscal 2013 due to the implementation of certain modules of SAP in the U.S., as previously discussed above.

In absolute dollars, SG&A decreased by $16.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2012 and by $55.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. The year-over-year decrease in SG&A during both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal year is primarily attributable to the weakening of certain foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar and, to a much lesser extent, lower expense resulting from the closure of our in-country operations in Brazil and Colombia at the end of fiscal 2012.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased 48.0% to $4.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $8.4 million in the third quarter of the prior year. On a year-to-date basis, interest expense decreased 56.8% to $10.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 from $25.1 million in the first nine months of the prior year. The decrease in interest expense for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 is primarily attributable to the repayment of the $350.0 million, 2.75%, convertible senior debentures in December 2011 and use of the Company’s available cash and revolving credit facilities at lower rates of interest to fund our working capital requirements.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net, consists primarily of interest income, discounts on the sale of accounts receivable and net foreign currency exchange gains and losses on certain financing transactions and the related derivative instruments used to hedge such financing transactions. Other expense, net, approximated $2.0 million of expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $0.4 million of expense in the third quarter of the prior year. On a year-to-date basis, other expense, net was $4.6 million of expense compared to $0.9 million of expense in the same period of the prior fiscal year. The change in other expense, net, during both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to the same periods of the prior year is primarily attributable to an increase in the premiums associated with foreign currency forward contracts, a greater discount expense on the sale of accounts receivable, and a decrease in interest income, resulting from a decrease in both the average short-term cash investment balances and interest rates as compared to the same periods of the prior year.

Provision for Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate was 25.5% in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 and 29.2% in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. Our effective tax rate was 28.5% in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 27.7% in the same period of the prior fiscal year.

21

The fluctuations in the effective rate for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to the same periods of the prior year are primarily the result of the relative mix of earnings and losses within the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. The effective tax rate during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 was most significantly affected by the decline in projected fiscal 2013 taxable income within the United States as compared to fiscal 2012.

On an absolute dollar basis, the provision for income taxes decreased 31.7% to $16.1 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $23.6 million in the same period of fiscal 2012 and decreased 8.2% to $55.4 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to $60.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. The decrease in the provision for income taxes for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 is primarily due to our lower taxable income for these periods in comparison with the same periods of the prior fiscal year, primarily within the United States.

The effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0% during these periods primarily due to the relative mix of earnings or losses within the tax jurisdictions in which we operate such as: i) losses in tax jurisdictions where we are not able to record a tax benefit; ii) earnings in tax jurisdictions where we have previously recorded a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets; and iii) earnings in lower-tax jurisdictions for which no U.S. taxes have been provided because such earnings are planned to be reinvested indefinitely outside the United States.

The overall effective tax rate will continue to be dependent upon the geographic distribution of our earnings or losses, changes in tax laws, or interpretations of these laws in our operating jurisdictions. We monitor the assumptions used in estimating the annual effective tax rate and makes adjustments, if required, throughout the year. If actual results differ from the assumptions used in estimating our annual effective income tax rates, future income tax expense could be materially affected.

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by lower earnings than anticipated in countries with lower statutory rates, changes in the relative mix of taxable income and taxable loss jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. We consider all positive and negative evidence available in determining the potential realization of deferred tax assets, including the scheduled reversal of temporary differences, recent cumulative losses, recent and future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In making this determination, we place greater emphasis on recent cumulative losses and recent taxable income due to the inherent lack of subjectivity associated with these factors. In addition, our income tax returns are subject to continuous examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes from these examinations to determine the adequacy of the provision for income taxes. To the extent we prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or we are required to pay amounts in excess of such accruals, our effective tax rate could be materially affected.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest was $1.1 million and $6.8 million, respectively, for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to $3.6 million and $5.3 million, respectively, for the same periods of the prior fiscal year. As discussed above, in September 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Brightstar Corp.’s fifty percent ownership interest in Brightstar Europe Limited, which was a consolidated joint venture between Tech Data and Brightstar Corp. (“the joint venture”). Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest represents Brightstar Corp’s portion of the operating results of the joint venture prior to the Company’s acquisition in September 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our discussion of liquidity and capital resources includes an analysis of our cash flows and capital structure for all periods presented.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Nine months ended October 31,
	2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	37,208		$	395,422
Investing activities		(37,391	)		(48,802	)
Financing activities		14,627			(297,548	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(3,834	)		12,361
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	10,610		$	61,433

22

As a distribution company, our business requires significant investment in working capital, particularly accounts receivable and inventory, partially financed through our accounts payable to vendors. Overall, as our sales volume increases, our net investment in working capital typically increases, which, in general, results in decreased cash flow from operating activities. Conversely, when sales volume decreases, our net investment in working capital typically decreases, which, in general, results in increased cash flow from operating activities.

Another important driver to our operating cash flows is our cash conversion cycle (also referred to as “net cash days”). Our net cash days are defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable (“DSO”) plus days of supply on hand in inventory (“DOS”), less days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable (“DPO”). We manage our cash conversion cycle on a daily basis and our reported financial results reflect that cash conversion cycle at the balance sheet date.

The following table presents the components of our cash conversion cycle, in days, as of October 31, 2012 and 2011:

	As of October 31,
	2012			2011
Days of sales outstanding		42			40
Days of supply in inventory		32			29
Days of purchases outstanding		(49	)		(47	)
Cash conversion cycle (days)		25			22

Net cash provided by operating activities was $37.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to $395.4 million of cash provided by operating activities for the same period of the prior year. The change in cash resulting from operating activities during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to the same period of the prior year can be attributed primarily to the realization of cash in the first nine months of fiscal 2012 through the sale of higher than normal inventory levels in Europe that were on hand at the end fiscal 2011 and the timing of cash receipts from our customers and payments to our vendors. Income taxes paid during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 includes payment of a $28.7 million deferred tax liability related to the $350 million convertible senior debentures repaid in December 2011. Although our cash conversion cycle of 25 days as of October 31, 2012, increased from 20 days as of January 31, 2012 and 22 days as of October 31, 2011, it remains within our acceptable range of 24 to 26 days.

Net cash used in investing activities of $37.4 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 is the result of $28.6 million of expenditures for the continuing expansion and upgrading of our IT systems, office facilities and equipment for our logistics centers and $8.8 million for earnout and installment payments on acquisitions made in the prior fiscal year. We expect to make total capital expenditures of approximately $40.0 million during fiscal 2013 for equipment and machinery in our logistics centers, office facilities and IT systems.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $14.6 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 primarily includes $345.8 million in net proceeds from issuance of Senior Notes, offset by $180.8 million of cash used for the repurchase of shares of our common stock under our share repurchase program and other share repurchases, $117.2 million of cash used for the acquisition of the noncontrolling interest in our joint venture, and $32.5 million of net repayments on our revolving credit lines and long-term debt (which includes $49.5 million for repayment of loans due to our former joint venture partner) and $9.1 million, representing a return of capital to our joint venture partner.

Capital Resources and Debt Compliance

Our debt to total capital ratio was 19% at October 31, 2012. We believe a conservative approach to our capital structure will continue to support us in a global economic environment that remains uncertain. Within our capital structure, we have a range of financing facilities, which are diversified by type and geographic region with various financial institutions. A significant portion of our cash and cash equivalents balance generally resides in our operations outside of the United States and are deposited and/or invested with various financial institutions which we monitor regularly for credit quality. However, we are exposed to risk of loss on funds deposited with the various financial institutions and we may experience significant disruptions in our liquidity needs if one or more of these financial institutions were to declare bankruptcy or other similar restructuring. We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, including cash resources and cash provided by operating activities, supplemented as necessary with funds available under our credit arrangements, will provide sufficient resources to meet our working capital and cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. Changes in our credit rating or other market factors may increase our interest expense or other costs of capital or capital may no longer be available to us on acceptable terms to fund our working capital needs. The inability to obtain sufficient capital could have an adverse effect on our business. Our credit facilities contain various financial and other covenants that may limit our ability to borrow or limit our flexibility in responding to business conditions.

23

At October 31, 2012, we had approximately $515.8 million in cash and cash equivalents, of which $501.9 million was held in our foreign subsidiaries. A significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents held in our foreign subsidiaries at October 31, 2012 was used to find our acquisition of SDG in November 2012, as previously discussed in this MD&A. As discussed above, the Company currently has sufficient resources, cash flows and liquidity within the United States to fund current and expected future working capital requirements. Historically, the Company has utilized and reinvested cash earned outside the United States to fund foreign operations and expansion and plans to continue reinvesting such earnings and future earnings indefinitely outside of the United States. If the Company’s plans for the use of cash earned outside of the United States change in the future, cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries could not be repatriated to the United States without potential negative income tax consequences.

The following is a detailed discussion of our various financing facilities.

Senior Notes

In September 2012, the Company issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Senior Notes in a public offering, resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $345.8 million, net of debt discount and debt issuance costs of approximately $1.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively (the “Senior Notes”). The debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the public offering will be amortized over the life of the Senior Notes as additional interest expense using the effective interest method. We will pay interest on the Senior Notes semi-annually in arrears on March 21 and September 21 of each year, beginning on March 21, 2013. We may, at our option, redeem the Senior Notes at any time in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Senior Notes being redeemed, discounted at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the date of redemption. The Senior Notes are senior, unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company.

Convertible Senior Debentures

In December 2006, we issued $350.0 million of 2.75% convertible senior debentures due 2026. In accordance with the terms of the debentures, in November 2011, we announced our election to fully redeem the debentures on December 20, 2011, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the debentures plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.

As of January 31, 2012, all of the debentures had either been redeemed by us or put to us and there were no debentures outstanding. We funded the repayment of the debentures with available cash and our $500.0 million Credit Agreement, discussed below.

Loans Payable to Brightstar Corp.

In October 2010, Brightstar Corp. entered into an agreement to loan Brightstar Europe Limited, which was a consolidated joint venture between Tech Data and Brightstar Corp. (“the joint venture”), its share of the funding requirements for an acquisition by the joint venture (the “Acquisition Loan”). The Acquisition Loan from Brightstar, plus any accrued interest, had a repayment date of September 2015, or earlier if agreed between the two parties, and interest at the applicable LIBOR rate plus 4.0% per year, to be paid annually on October 1.

We also had an interest-free revolving credit loan from Brightstar that was issued in connection with the operations of the joint venture (the “Brightstar Revolver”). The terms of the Brightstar Revolver included no contractual repayment date and allowed for the revolving credit loan to increase or decrease in accordance with the working capital requirements of the joint venture, as determined by the Company. Effective October 2010, a resolution of the joint venture’s board was approved stating that the Brightstar Revolver will not be repaid for the foreseeable future and therefore the revolving credit loan had been classified as long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 31, 2012.

As discussed previously in this MD&A, in September 2012, we completed the acquisition of Brightstar Corp.’s fifty percent ownership interest in the joint venture and in accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement, we repaid both the Acquisition Loan and the Brightstar Revolver.

Other Credit Facilities

In September 2011, we entered into a $500.0 million Credit Agreement with a syndicate of banks (the “Credit Agreement”), which, among other things, i) provides for a maturity date of September 27, 2016, ii) provides for an interest rate on borrowings, facility fees and letter of credit fees based on our non-credit enhanced senior unsecured debt rating as determined by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service and Moody’s Investor Service, and iii) may be increased up to $750.0 million, subject to certain conditions. The Credit Agreement includes various covenants, limitations and events of default customary for similar facilities for similarly rated borrowers, including a maximum debt to capitalization ratio and minimum

24

interest coverage. We have also provided a guarantee of certain of our significant subsidiaries. We pay interest on advances under the Credit Agreement at the applicable LIBOR rate plus a predetermined margin that is based on our debt rating. There were no amounts outstanding under this facility at either October 31, 2012 or January 31, 2012.

As of October 31, 2012, we maintained a Receivables Securitization Program with a syndicate of banks that allows us to transfer an undivided interest in a designated pool of U.S. accounts receivable, on an ongoing basis, to provide security or collateral for borrowings up to a maximum of $400.0 million. This program was renewed in October 2012 for a period of two years and interest is to be paid on advances under the Receivables Securitization Program at the applicable commercial paper or LIBOR rate plus an agreed-upon margin. There were no amounts outstanding under this program at either October 31, 2012 or January 31, 2012.

In addition to the facilities described above, we have various other committed and uncommitted lines of credit and overdraft facilities totaling approximately $495.9 million at October 31, 2012 to support our operations. Most of these facilities are provided on an unsecured, short-term basis and are reviewed periodically for renewal. There was $65.3 million outstanding on these facilities at October 31, 2012.

In consideration of the financial covenants discussed below, our maximum borrowing availability on the credit facilities is approximately $754.4 million, of which $65.3 million was outstanding at October 31, 2012. Our credit facilities contain limitations on the amounts of annual dividends and repurchases of common stock. Additionally, the credit facilities require compliance with certain warranties and covenants. The financial ratio covenants contained within the credit facilities include a debt to capitalization ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. At October 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all such covenants. The ability to draw funds under these credit facilities is dependent upon sufficient collateral (in the case of the Receivables Securitization Program) and meeting the aforementioned financial covenants, which may limit our ability to draw the full amount of these facilities.

At October 31, 2012, we had also issued standby letters of credit of $73.8 million. These letters of credit typically act as a guarantee of payment to certain third parties in accordance with specified terms and conditions. The issuance of these letters of credit reduced our available capacity under the above-mentioned facilities by the same amount.

In September 2011, we filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the issuance of debt securities. The net proceeds from any issuance of debt securities are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment or refinancing of debt, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and to meet working capital needs. During September 2012, we issued the Senior Notes discussed above, under this shelf registration statement.

Share Repurchase Programs

There were no repurchases of our common stock during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. During the first semester of 2013, we repurchased 3,752,939 shares of our common stock in connection with the our $100.0 million share repurchase programs authorized by the Board of Directors in May 2012 and the $100.0 million share repurchase program authorized by the Board of Directors in November 2011. Both repurchase programs were completed as of July 31, 2012. In addition, 70,278 shares were purchased outside of the stock repurchase programs related to the exercise of an employee’s equity incentive grants.

In conjunction with our share repurchase programs authorized by the Board of Directors, 10b5-1 plans were executed that instruct the broker selected by us to repurchase shares on our behalf. The amount of common stock repurchased in accordance with the 10b5-1 plans on any given trading day is determined by a formula in the plans, which is based on the market price of our common stock. Shares repurchased by us are held in treasury for general corporate purposes, including issuances under equity incentive and benefit plans.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Synthetic Lease Facility

We have a synthetic lease facility (the “Synthetic Lease”) with a group of financial institutions under which we lease certain logistics centers and office facilities from a third-party lessor, which expires in June 2013. Properties leased under the Synthetic Lease are located in Clearwater and Miami, Florida; Fort Worth, Texas; Fontana, California; Suwanee, Georgia; Swedesboro, New Jersey; and South Bend, Indiana. The Synthetic Lease has been accounted for as an operating lease and rental payments are calculated at the applicable LIBOR rate plus a margin based on our credit ratings.

For the remainder of the lease term, until 180 days prior to the lease expiration, we may at our option, i) purchase a minimum of two of the seven properties, at an amount equal to each of the property’s cost, ii) exercise the option to renew the lease for a minimum of two of the seven properties or iii) exercise the option to remarket a minimum of two of the seven properties and cause a sale of the properties. If we elect to remarket the properties, we have guaranteed the lessor a

25

percentage of the cost of each property, in the aggregate amount of approximately $107.4 million (the “residual value”). We are currently in the process of determining which of these options we may exercise. We have also provided a residual value guarantee related to the Synthetic Lease, which has been recorded at the estimated fair value of the residual guarantee.

The sum of future minimum lease payments under the Synthetic Lease is approximately $1.3 million at October 31, 2012. The Synthetic Lease contains covenants, which must be complied with, similar to the covenants described in certain of the credit facilities. As of October 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

Guarantees

As is customary in the technology industry, to encourage certain customers to purchase product from us, we have arrangements with certain finance companies that provide inventory-financing facilities for our customers. In conjunction with certain of these arrangements, we have agreements with the finance companies that would require us to repurchase certain inventory, which might be repossessed from the customers by the finance companies. Due to various reasons, including among other items, the lack of information regarding the amount of saleable inventory purchased from us still on hand with the customer at any point in time, our repurchase obligations relating to inventory cannot be reasonably estimated. Repurchases of inventory by us under these arrangements have been insignificant to date. We also provide additional financial guarantees to finance companies on behalf of certain customers. The majority of these guarantees are for an indefinite period of time, where we would be required to perform if the customer is in default with the finance company related to purchases made from us. We review the underlying credit for these guarantees on at least an annual basis. As of October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of guarantees under these arrangements totaled $47.9 million and $65.4 million, respectively, of which $30.9 million and $28.4 million, respectively, was outstanding. We believe that, based on historical experience, the likelihood of a material loss pursuant to the above guarantees is remote.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For a description of the Company’s market risks, see “Item 7a. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012. No material changes have occurred in our market risks since January 31, 2012.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of October 31, 2012. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no material changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company implemented the sales, inventory and credit management modules of SAP within our U.S. operations, which substantially completed the implementation of essentially the same enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) systems used in our European operations. This implementation has resulted in changes to certain internal controls over financial reporting. The Company performed pre- and post-implementation procedures to ensure the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting. There were no other changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

Prior to fiscal 2004, one of the Company’s European subsidiaries was audited in relation to various value-added tax (“VAT”) matters. As a result of those audits, the subsidiary received notices of assessment that allege the subsidiary did not properly collect and remit VAT. Management has concluded, based upon the opinion of outside legal counsel, that the risk of loss for a significant portion of these assessments is remote and has therefore not accrued any amount on that portion of the claim. The Company’s financial statements include an accrual for the remaining exposure related to these assessments for which a loss is considered probable. Although the Company is vigorously pursuing administrative and judicial action to challenge the assessments, the ultimate outcome of litigation can not be predicted with absolute certainty. If the courts were to reach a ruling that is adverse to the Company on the entire claim, a significant portion of the claim would be in

26

excess of the amounts accrued, and while such ruling would not be material to the Company’s consolidated net assets or liquidity, it could be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular period, depending upon the level of income for such period.

In December 2010, in a non-unanimous decision, a Brazilian appellate court overturned a 2003 trial court which had previously ruled in favor of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary related to the imposition of certain taxes on payments abroad related to the licensing of commercial software products, commonly referred to as “CIDE tax”. The Company estimates the total exposure where the CIDE tax, including interest, may be considered due to be approximately $28.8 million at October 31, 2012. The Brazilian subsidiary has moved for clarification of the ruling and intends to appeal if the court does not rule in its favor. However, in order to pursue the next level of appeal, the Brazilian subsidiary may be required to make a deposit or to provide a guarantee to the courts for the payment of the CIDE tax pending the outcome of the appeal. Based on the legal opinion of outside counsel, the Company believes that the chances of success on appeal of this matter are favorable and the Brazilian subsidiary intends to vigorously defend its position that the CIDE tax is not due. However, due to the lack of the predictability of the Brazilian court system, the Company has concluded that it is reasonably possible that the Brazilian Subsidiary may incur a loss up to the total exposure described above. The Company believes the resolution of this litigation will not be material to the Company’s consolidated net assets or liquidity; however, it could be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular period, depending upon the level of income for such period. In addition to the discussion regarding the CIDE tax above, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary has been undergoing several examinations of non-income related taxes. Given the complexity and lack of predictability of the Brazilian tax system, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that a loss may have been incurred. However, due to the early stages of the examination, the complex nature of the Brazilian tax system and the absence of communication from the local tax authorities regarding these examinations, the Company is currently unable to determine the likelihood of these examinations resulting in assessments nor estimate the amount of loss, if any, that may be reasonably possible if such assessment were to be made.

The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s management does not expect that the outcome in any of these other legal proceedings, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I. Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2012, and in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter end July 31, 2012, which could materially affect our business, financial position and results of operations. Risk factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by forward-looking statements include but are not limited to those discussed or identified in this document, in our public filings with the SEC and those set out in such Annual and Quarterly Reports.

27

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. Other Information

On November 27, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors (“Board”) appointed Patrick Sayer as a director to fill the vacancy on the board left by the retirement of Maximilian Ardelt in June 2012. Mr. Sayer will serve as an independent director and will also serve on the Audit Committee of the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee. Mr. Sayer will receive compensation consistent with that provided to the other non-employee directors, as described in the Company’s 2012 Proxy Statement, including an initial grant of restricted stock units of $190,000 in value, which will vest equally over three years from the grant date.

ITEM 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

10-BBo	Amendment No. 18 to Transfer and Administration Agreement dated as of October 31, 2012
10-BBp	Consent for Third Amended and Restated Participation Agreement (dated as of June 27, 2008), dated September 26, 2011
31-A	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31-B	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32-A	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32-B	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012; (ii) Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 ; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 ; (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 ; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, detail tagged.

28

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TECH DATA CORPORATION

              (Registrant)

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ ROBERT M. DUTKOWSKY Robert M. Dutkowsky	Chief Executive Officer; Director	Date: November 28, 2012
/s/ JEFFERY P. HOWELLS Jeffery P. Howells	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Director (principal financial officer)	Date: November 28, 2012
/s/ JOSEPH B. TREPANI Joseph B. Trepani	Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (principal accounting officer)	Date: November 28, 2012

29

EX-10.BBO

Exhibit 10-BBo

AMENDMENT NUMBER 18 TO

TRANSFER AND ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT NUMBER 18 TO TRANSFER AND ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of October 31, 2012 among TECH DATA CORPORATION, a Florida corporation (“Tech Data”), as collection agent (in such capacity, the “Collection Agent”), TECH DATA FINANCE SPV, INC., a Delaware corporation, as transferor (in such capacity, the “Transferor”), LIBERTY STREET FUNDING CORP., a Delaware corporation, (“Liberty”), CHARIOT FUNDING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as successor by merger to Falcon Asset Securitization Company LLC (“Falcon” and collectively with Liberty, the “Class Conduits”), THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, a banking corporation organized and existing under the laws of Canada, acting through its New York Agency (“Scotia Bank”), as a Liberty Bank Investor and as agent for Liberty and the Liberty Bank Investors (in such capacity, the “Liberty Agent”), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (successor by merger to Bank One, N.A.), a national banking association (“JPMorgan Chase”), as a Falcon Bank Investor and as agent for Falcon and the Falcon Bank Investors (in such capacity, the “Falcon Agent”) and BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association (“Bank of America”), as agent for Liberty, Falcon, the Liberty Bank Investors, and the Falcon Bank Investors (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”), and as a SUSI Issuer Bank Investor and Lead Arranger, amending that certain Transfer and Administration Agreement dated as of May 19, 2000, among the Transferor, the Collection Agent, the Class Conduits (as defined thereunder) and the Bank Investors (as amended to the date hereof, the “Original Agreement” and said agreement as amended hereby, the “Agreement”).

WHEREAS, the Transferor has requested that the term of the Original Agreement be extended;

WHEREAS, the Agent, the Class Conduits, the Class Agents and the Bank Investors on the terms and conditions set forth herein, consent to such extension;

WHEREAS, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Original Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

SECTION 1. Amendment to Original Agreement. The Original Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of the Effective Date, to incorporate the changes set forth below:

(a) The definition of “Commitment Termination Date” in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

““Commitment Termination Date” means, with respect to each Class, the earlier of (i) the date on or after the Termination Date which the Transferor has designated in a written notice to the Administrative Agent as the “Commitment Termination Date” provided that all Aggregate Unpaids have been paid on or prior to such date or (ii) October 31, 2014, or such later date to which such Commitment Termination Date may be extended by Transferor, the related Class Agent and the related Bank Investors not later than 30 days prior to the then current Commitment Termination Date for such Class, provided, however, that the Transferor hereby agrees that unless it notifies each Class Agent and all related Bank Investors to the contrary prior to the commencement of such 30-day period in each year, it shall automatically be deemed to have requested an extension of the then current Commitment Termination Date to the date 364 days following the then current Commitment Termination Date, and if such consent is given and acknowledged in writing by all relevant parties, the Transferor shall be deemed to have agreed, without any further acts or amendments, to an extension of the Commitment Termination Date to the date 364 days from the then current Commitment Termination Date.”

(b) The definition of “Dilution Horizon Ratio” in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

““Dilution Horizon Ratio” means, at any time, the result of (I) the quotient, expressed as a percentage, of (a) the aggregate amount of sales by the Seller giving rise to Receivables in the two month period ending on the last day of the most recent month, divided by (b) the aggregate initial Outstanding Balance of Eligible Receivables at the last day of the most recent month, multiplied by (II) (a) prior to the audit of agreed upon procedures to be conducted and provided in the 2013 calendar year (the “2013 AUP”), 0.75, and (b) from and after the 2013 AUP, the greater of (i) 0.75 and (ii) the weighted average days lag (or weighted average dilution horizon, as applicable) for all credit memos (excluding Receivables owed by Dell Inc. or its consolidated subsidiaries) as most recently noted in such calendar year’s audit of agreed upon procedures divided by 60. For the avoidance of doubt, any change to the Dilution Horizon Ratio as a result of this clause (II)(b) will be effective as of the last day of the month in which such final audit of agreed upon procedures report is delivered.”

(c) The definition of “Facility Fee” in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.

(d) The definition of “Fee Letter” in Section 1.1 of the Original

Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

““Fee Letter” means the fee letter dated October 31, 2012 among the Transferor, the Collection Agent, the Class Investors, the Administrative Agent and the Class Agents with respect to the fees to be paid by the Transferor hereunder, as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time.”

(e) The definition of “Program Fee” in Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety.

(f) The following definition is hereby added to Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement immediately following the definition of “Related Security”:

““Replacement Person” has the meaning specified in Section 8.2(d) hereof.”

(g) The following definitions are hereby added to Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement immediately following the definition of “Unpaid Balance”:

““Unused Fee” means, with respect to each Class, the fee payable by the Transferor to the Administrative Agent, for distribution to the Class Investors, pursuant to Section 2.7 hereof, the terms of which are set forth in the Fee Letter.”

““Used Fee” means, with respect to each Class, the fee payable by the Transferor to the Administrative Agent, for distribution to the Class Investors, pursuant to Section 2.7 hereof, the terms of which are set forth in the Fee Letter.”

(h) Section 2.7 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

“Section 2.7 Fees. Notwithstanding any limitation on recourse contained in this Agreement, the Transferor shall pay, on the last day of each month, to the Administrative Agent, for distribution to the Class Investors, in each case as agreed between themselves, all of the applicable Used Fee and the applicable Unused Fee. In addition, the Transferor shall pay to the Administrative Agent an administrative fee as set forth in the Supplemental Fee Letter. The Transferor acknowledges that the foregoing fees are non-refundable.”

(i) The following is added as a new Section 8.2(d):

“(d) Upon the receipt by the Transferor of a claim for reimbursement or compensation under Section 8.2(c) by any Class Investor, if payment thereof shall not be waived by such Class Investor, the Transferor may, at any

time, request one or more of the other Class Investors in such first Class Investor’s Class, with the consent of the related Class Agent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld), to acquire and assume all or a part of such first Class Investor’s rights and obligations (if any) hereunder (a “Replacement Person”) and if no such other related Class Investor shall become the Replacement Person, the Transferor shall request such claiming Class Investor (or, in the case of a Class Conduit, its related Class Agent) to use its commercially reasonable efforts to assist the Transferor in its attempt to obtain a replacement bank, financial institution or commercial paper conduit, as applicable, satisfactory to the Transferor and consented to by the Class Agent for the applicable Class (which consents shall not be unreasonably withheld), to become the Replacement Person. In addition, upon the receipt by the Transferor of a claim for reimbursement or compensation under Section 8.2(c) by an Indemnified Party other than a Class Investor or a Class Agent, if payment thereof shall not be waived by such Indemnified Party, the Transferor may, at any time, request the Class Agent for such Indemnified Party to obtain a replacement bank or financial institution for such Indemnified Party, and if such Indemnified Party has not been replaced within a reasonable period, such Indemnified Party shall be subject to replacement upon request of the Transferor as provided in the preceding sentence. Upon notice from the Transferor, a Class Investor being replaced hereunder shall assign, without recourse, its rights and obligations (if any) hereunder, or a ratable share thereof, to the Replacement Person or Replacement Persons designated and consented to as provided in this Section 8.2(d) for a purchase price equal to the portion of the Aggregate Unpaids so assigned (including fees and any amounts owing under this Section 8.2) to which such Class Investor is entitled hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) no Class Investor which is a Class Agent may be replaced pursuant to this Section 8.2(d) unless (A) it has consented to such replacement or (B) a successor for such Class Agent has been duly appointed in accordance with this Agreement and such Class Agent shall have received payment of all amounts to which it is entitled hereunder; and (ii) the Transferor need not make any request under this clause (d) if the replacement of any claiming Class Investor or Indemnified Party would be more economically or administratively burdensome on the Transferor than not replacing such Class Investor or Indemnified Party or if such replacement would be unlawful.”

SECTION 2. Affirmations. All parties hereto agree and acknowledge that with respect to each Bank Investor party hereto, each Bank Investor has a Commitment and such Commitment of such Bank Investor shall be the dollar amount set forth opposite such Bank Investor’s signature on the signature page hereto, which may be different from the Original Agreement.

SECTION 3. Conditions Precedent. This Amendment shall not become effective until the later of (i) October 31, 2012 and (ii) the day on which the Administrative Agent shall have received the following:

(a) A copy of this Amendment executed by each party hereto;

(b) A copy of the Resolutions of the Board of Directors of each of the Transferor and Tech Data certified by its Secretary approving this Amendment and the other documents to be delivered by the Transferor and Tech Data, as applicable, hereunder;

(c) A Certificate of the Secretary of each of the Transferor and Tech Data certifying (i) the names and signatures of the officers authorized on its behalf to execute this Amendment and any other documents to be delivered by it hereunder (on which Certificates the Class Conduits, the Class Agents, the Administrative Agent and the Bank Investors may conclusively rely until such time as the Administrative Agent shall receive from the Transferor or Tech Data, as the case may be, a revised Certificate meeting the requirements of this clause (c)(i)) and (ii) a copy of each of the Transferor’s and Tech Data’s By-Laws; and

(d) The Renewal Fee shall have been received by each Class Agent pursuant to the Fee Letter, dated as of October 31, 2012, among the parties hereto.

SECTION 4. Representations and Warranties. The Transferor hereby makes to the Class Investors, the Class Agents and the Administrative Agent, on and as of the date hereof, all of the representations and warranties set forth in Section 3.1 of the Original Agreement. In addition, the Collection Agent hereby makes to the Class Investors, the Class Agents and the Administrative Agent, on the date hereof, all the representations and warranties set forth in Section 3.3 of the Original Agreement.

SECTION 5. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment shall bind, and the benefits hereof shall inure to the parties hereof and their respective successors and permitted assigns;

SECTION 6. Governing Law. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. THE TRANSFEROR HEREBY SUBMITS TO THE NONEXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND OF ANY NEW YORK STATE COURT SITTING IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK FOR PURPOSES OF ALL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AMENDMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

SECTION 7. Severability; Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Any

provisions of this Amendment which are prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction.

SECTION 8. Captions. The captions in this Amendment are for convenience of reference only and shall not define or limit any of the terms or provisions hereof.

SECTION 9. Ratification. Except as expressly affected by the provisions hereof, the Original Agreement as amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto. On and after the date hereof, each reference in the Original Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereunder”, “herein” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Original Agreement as amended by this Amendment.

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date first written above.

TECH DATA FINANCE SPV, INC.,     as Transferor
By:	/s/ CHARLES V. DANNEWITZ
Name:	Charles V. Dannewitz
Title:	Senior Vice President & Treasurer
TECH DATA CORPORATION,     as Collection Agent
By:	/s/ CHARLES V. DANNEWITZ
Name:	Charles V. Dannewitz
Title:	Senior Vice President & Treasurer

Amendment No. 18 to Transfer and Administration Agreement

	LIBERTY STREET FUNDNG CORP.
	By:	/s/ Jill A. Russo
	Name:	Jill A. Russo
	Title:	Vice President
	CHARIOT FUNDING LLC
	By:	/s/ Corina Mills
	Name:	Corina Mills
	Title:	Executive Director
Commitment	BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
$136,680,000	Administrative Agent and as a SUSI Issuer Bank Investor
	By:	/s/ Steven Maysonet
		Name:  Steven Maysonet
		Title:    Vice President
Commitment	THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, as Liberty
$135,660,000	Agent and as a Liberty Bank Investor
	By:	/s/ Diane Emanuel
		Name:  Diane Emanuel
		Title:    Managing Director
Commitment	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, as Falcon Agent
$135,660,000	and as a Falcon Bank Investor
	By:	/s/ Corina Mills
		Name:  Corina Mills
		Title:    Executive Director

Amendment No. 18 to Transfer and Administration Agreement

EX-10.BBP

Exhibit 10-BBp

CONSENT FOR THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

Reference is hereby made to that certain Third Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2008 (as heretofore amended, the “Participation Agreement”), among Tech Data Corporation, as Lessee, SunTrust Bank, as Lessor, the various banks and other lending institutions which are parties thereto from time to time, as the Lenders, and SunTrust Equity Funding, LLC, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned thereto in the Participation Agreement. The Lessee has requested that the Amended Tech Data Credit Agreement be replaced by a New Facility and that the covenants set forth in Articles VII and VIII, and the definitions related thereto, of such New Facility become the Incorporated Covenants from and after the date hereof. Pursuant to Section 7.3A(a) of the Participation Agreement, the undersigned hereby agree that (i) the covenants set forth in Articles VII and VIII, and the definitions related thereto, set forth in that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2011, among Tech Data Corporation, as borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and an LC issuer, the other lenders party thereto, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Citibank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as co-syndication agents, and SunTrust Bank, The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, U.S. Bank National Association and Unicredit Bank AG, as co-documentation agents (the “Replacement Credit Agreement”) shall be the Incorporated Covenants for all purposes of the Participation Agreement and the other Operative Agreements and (ii) any reference in the Participation Agreement or any other Operative Agreement to the Amended Tech Data Credit Agreement shall be replaced with a reference to the Replacement Credit Agreement. This Consent shall become effective upon the execution hereof by the Agent and the Majority Financing Parties.

The Lessee, by its acknowledgement hereof, (i) agrees to promptly pay, or reimburse the Agent for, all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by the Agent in connection with this Consent and (ii) represents and warrants that, after giving effect to this Consent, no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing. This Consent shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the state of Florida. This Consent may be executed by the parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute an executed original of this Consent; this Consent may be executed by facsimile or electronic copy, each of which shall constitute an original executed copy hereof for all purposes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Consent to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of this 26th day of September, 2011.

[signature pages begin on the following page]

SUNTRUST BANK, as Lessor
By:	/s/ Shawn Wilson
Name:	Shawn Wilson
Title:	Vice President
SUNTRUST EQUITY FUNDING, LLC, as Administrative Agent
By:	/s/ R. Todd Shutley
Name:	R. Todd Shutley
Title:	Senior Vice President and Manager
BNP PARIBAS LEASING CORPORATION, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Lloyd G. Cox
Name:	Lloyd G. Cox
Title:	Managing Director
SCOTIABANC INC., as a Lender
By:	/s/ J.F. Todd
Name:	J.F. Todd
Title:	Managing Director
FIFTH THIRD BANK, an Ohio Banking Corporation, as a Lender
By:	/s/ John A. Marian
Name:	John A. Marian
Title:	Vice President

S-1 CONSENT TO REPLACEMENT CREDIT AGREEMENT

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as a Lender
By:	/s/ Karen McClain
Name:	Karen McClain
Title:	Managing Director
U.S. BANK, N.A., as a Lender
By:	/s/ Kenneth R. Fieler
Name:	Kenneth R. Fieler
Title:	Vice President
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
TECH DATA CORPORATION, as the Lessee
By:	/s/ Charles V. Dannewitz
Name:	Charles V. Dannewitz
Title:	Senior Vice President, Treasurer

S-2 CONSENT TO REPLACEMENT CREDIT AGREEMENT

EX-31.A

Exhibit 31-A

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert M. Dutkowsky, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tech Data Corporation (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 28, 2012

/S/ ROBERT M. DUTKOWSKY

Robert M. Dutkowsky

Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.B

Exhibit 31-B

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jeffery P. Howells, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tech Data Corporation (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 28, 2012

/S/ JEFFERY P. HOWELLS

Jeffery P. Howells

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.A

Exhibit 32-A

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert M. Dutkowsky, Chief Executive Officer of Tech Data Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

(i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tech Data Corporation for the quarter ended October 31, 2012, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 28, 2012

/S/ ROBERT M. DUTKOWSKY

Robert M. Dutkowsky

Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.B

Exhibit 32-B

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jeffery P. Howells, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tech Data Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

(i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tech Data Corporation for the quarter ended October 31, 2012, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 28, 2012

/S/ JEFFERY P. HOWELLS

Jeffery P. Howells

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

XML

Commitments and Contingencies - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	Oct. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
Guarantor Obligations [Line Items]
Aggregate amount of guarantees	$ 47.9	$ 65.4
Aggregate amount of guarantees, outstanding	30.9	28.4
CIDE tax	$ 28.8

XML

Stock-Based Compensation - Schedule of Restricted Stock Activity (Detail) (Restricted Stock [Member])	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012
Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Outstanding at January 31, 2012	568,498
Granted	279,652
Vested	(224,038)
Canceled	(33,331)
Outstanding at October 31, 2012	590,781

XML

Earnings Per Share ("EPS") - Earnings Per Share Basic and Diluted (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation-basic, Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation	$ 45,898	$ 53,519	$ 132,048	$ 152,327
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation-diluted, Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation	$ 45,898	$ 53,519	$ 132,048	$ 152,327
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation-basic, Weighted average shares	37,765	42,104	39,234	44,602
Effect of dilutive securities: Equity-based awards, Weighted average shares	260	450	312	555
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation-diluted, Weighted average shares	38,025	42,554	39,546	45,157
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation-basic, Per share amount	$ 1.22	$ 1.27	$ 3.37	$ 3.42
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation-diluted, Per share amount	$ 1.21	$ 1.26	$ 3.34	$ 3.37

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012
Fair Value Measurements [Line Items]
Net unrealized gain on foreign currency forward contracts	$ 3.3	$ 8.6
Net unrealized loss on foreign currency forward contracts	4.4	11.9
Fair value of the Company's nonqualified deferred compensation plan investments	33.9
Fair value of the Company's nonqualified deferred compensation plan related liability	31.6
Senior Notes carried at cost	350		350
Estimated fair value of the Senior Notes	$ 356.7

XML

ACQUISITION

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

ACQUISITION

NOTE 3 — ACQUISITION

In September 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Brightstar Corp.’s fifty percent ownership interest in Brightstar Europe Limited, which was a consolidated joint venture between Tech Data and Brightstar Corp., (“the joint venture”). The terms of the agreement included a payment of $165.9 million in cash for Brightstar Corp’s equity in the joint venture (reflected as “noncontrolling interest” within the Company’s consolidated balance sheet) and the repayment of all loans advanced by Brightstar Corp. to the joint venture. Upon the closing of the transaction, the Company recorded a decrease of approximately $85.9 million to additional paid-in capital within shareholders’ equity, comprised of a purchase price premium of approximately $85.0 million paid to Brightstar Corp. for its share of the joint venture and approximately $0.9 million of direct costs incurred with the transaction (based on the foreign currency exchange rates on the date of acquisition). The acquisition of Brightstar Corp’s fifty percent interest in the joint venture the repayment of all loans advanced by Brightstar Corp to the joint venture and transaction costs were funded with the Company’s available cash.

XML

Debt - Schedule of Debt (Parenthetical) (Detail)	1 Months Ended		1 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012 Senior notes [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Senior notes [Member]	Oct. 31, 2012 Other committed and uncommitted revolving credit facilities, expiring on various dates through fiscal 2013 [Member]	Jan. 31, 2012 Other committed and uncommitted revolving credit facilities, expiring on various dates through fiscal 2013 [Member]
Debt Disclosure [Line Items]
Revolving credit loans, interest rateat the bottom	3.75%	3.75%	4.37%	6.27%
Debt maturity date	Sep. 21, 2017
Debt instrument expiration year			2015

XML

Debt - Schedule of Debt (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Oct. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
Debt Disclosure [Line Items]
Senior Notes	$ 350,000	$ 350,000
Less-unamortized debt discount		(1,300)
Capital leases	6,088		6,512
Long-term debt	420,115		105,743
Less-current maturities (included as "Revolving credit loans and current portion of long-term debt, net")	(65,848)		(48,490)
Total Long-term debt	354,267		57,253
Senior notes [Member]
Debt Disclosure [Line Items]
Senior Notes	350,000	350,000	0
Less-unamortized debt discount	(1,304)		0
Senior Notes, net	348,696		0
Loan payable to Brightstar Corp., interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% payable annually, due September 2015 [Member]
Debt Disclosure [Line Items]
Loan payable to Brightstar Corp.	0		14,940
Interest-free revolving credit loan payable to Brightstar Corp. [Member]
Debt Disclosure [Line Items]
Revolving credit loan	0		36,306
Other committed and uncommitted revolving credit facilities, expiring on various dates through fiscal 2013 [Member]
Debt Disclosure [Line Items]
Revolving credit loan	$ 65,331		$ 47,985

XML

Debt - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	9 Months Ended			1 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012 Brightstar Corp. [Member]	Oct. 31, 2012 Loan payable to Brightstar Corp., interest at LIBOR plus 4.0% payable annually, due September 2015 [Member]	Sep. 30, 2012 Senior notes [Member]	Oct. 31, 2012 Senior notes [Member]	Jan. 31, 2012 Senior notes [Member]
Debt Disclosure [Line Items]
Senior notes, face value	$ 350,000,000	$ 350,000,000				$ 350,000,000	$ 350,000,000	$ 0
Senior notes, annual interest rate						3.75%	3.75%
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net	345,800,000	345,810,000	0
Debt discount	1,300,000						1,304,000	0
Debt issuance costs	$ 2,900,000
Senior notes redemption percentage						100.00%
Redemption options of senior notes						The greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Senior Notes being redeemed (exclusive of interest accrued to the date of redemption), discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis (assuming a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the date of redemption.
Number of basis points to be added to the discounted present value of remaining scheduled payments						50 basis points
Debt, maturity date					September 2015
Annual interest rate on loans payable in addition to LIBOR					4.00%
Percentage of ownership interest acquired				50.00%

XML

Income Taxes - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Income Taxes [Line Items]
Effective tax rate	25.50%	29.20%	28.50%	27.70%
Increase (decrease) in provision for income taxes, percentage	(31.70%)		(8.20%)
Provision for income taxes	$ 16,122	$ 23,600	$ 55,446	$ 60,398
Federal statutory rate	35.00%

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS")

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS")

NOTE 2 — EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)

The Company reports a dual presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reported period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution related to equity-based incentives (as further discussed in Note 6 — Stock-Based Compensation) using the if-converted and treasury stock methods, where applicable. The composition of basic and diluted EPS is as follows:

	Three months ended October 31,
	2012						2011
	Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount		Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—basic	$	45,898		37,765	$	1.22	$	53,519		42,104	$	1.27
Effect of dilutive securities:
Equity-based awards				260						450
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—diluted	$	45,898		38,025	$	1.21	$	53,519		42,554	$	1.26

	Nine months ended October 31,
	2012						2011
	Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount		Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—basic	$	132,048		39,234	$	3.37	$	152,327		44,602	$	3.42
Effect of dilutive securities:
Equity-based awards				312						555
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—diluted	$	132,048		39,546	$	3.34	$	152,327		45,157	$	3.37

At October 31, 2012 and 2011, there were 9,456 and 35,181 equity-based compensation awards, respectively, excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price was greater than the average market price, thereby resulting in an antidilutive effect.

The Company’s $350.0 million convertible senior debentures issued in December 2006 were repaid during December 2011. The $350.0 million convertible senior debentures did not impact earnings per share at October 31, 2011, as the conditions for the contingent conversion feature had not been met.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data in Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2009
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ 3,646	$ 2,787	$ 10,328	$ 7,969
Number of shares authorized for grant					4.0
Number of shares available for grant	3.0		3.0
Maximum term of equity-based compensation awards, years			10 years
Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Awards vesting period, maximum (in years)			4 years
Minimum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Awards vesting period, maximum (in years)			1 year

XML

Segment Information - Financial Information by Geographic Segment (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Jan. 31, 2012
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Stock-based compensation expense	$ (3,646)	$ (2,787)	$ (10,328)	$ (7,969)
Net sales to unaffiliated customers	6,040,556	6,593,983	17,897,617	19,375,572
Operating income	69,546	89,569	209,695	244,027
Depreciation and amortization	13,524	13,851	40,114	42,794
Capital expenditures	8,281	13,129	28,609	32,176
Identifiable assets	5,922,317	6,336,125	5,922,317	6,336,125	5,785,418
Goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets, net	153,869	155,519	153,869	155,519
Americas [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales to unaffiliated customers	2,367,743	2,781,263	7,221,953	8,094,723
Operating income	33,747	52,638	114,346	148,146
Depreciation and amortization	4,079	3,798	11,900	11,567
Capital expenditures	2,420	10,085	15,111	21,340
Identifiable assets	1,870,735	2,063,622	1,870,735	2,063,622
Goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets, net	2,966	2,966	2,966	2,966
Europe [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net sales to unaffiliated customers	3,672,813	3,812,720	10,675,664	11,280,849
Operating income	39,445	39,718	105,677	103,850
Depreciation and amortization	9,445	10,053	28,214	31,227
Capital expenditures	5,861	3,044	13,498	10,836
Identifiable assets	4,051,582	4,272,503	4,051,582	4,272,503
Goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets, net	$ 150,903	$ 152,553	$ 150,903	$ 152,553

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Oct. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 515,788	$ 505,178
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $54,294 and $52,713	2,781,490	2,871,243
Inventories	2,025,424	1,802,976
Prepaid expenses and other assets	206,095	202,505
Total current assets	5,528,797	5,381,902
Property and equipment, net	83,049	88,595
Other assets, net	310,471	314,921
Total assets	5,922,317	5,785,418
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	3,111,391	3,042,809
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	469,171	551,280
Revolving credit loans and current maturities of long-term debt	65,848	48,490
Total current liabilities	3,646,410	3,642,579
Long-term debt, less current maturities	354,267	57,253
Other long-term liabilities	86,780	83,438
Total liabilities	4,087,457	3,783,270
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock, par value $.0015; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 59,239,085 shares issued at October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012	89	89
Additional paid-in capital	670,346	769,826
Treasury stock, 21,478,520 and 18,166,761 shares at October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012	(907,533)	(739,614)
Retained earnings	1,791,815	1,659,767
Accumulated other comprehensive income	280,143	283,755
Equity attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation	1,834,860	1,973,823
Noncontrolling interest	0	28,325
Total equity	1,834,860	2,002,148
Total liabilities and equity	$ 5,922,317	$ 5,785,418

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash received from customers	$ 17,996,786	$ 19,369,881
Cash paid to vendors and employees	(17,875,711)	(18,901,115)
Interest paid, net	(8,238)	(11,644)
Income taxes paid	(75,629)	(61,700)
Net cash provided by operating activities	37,208	395,422
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired	(8,782)	(16,626)
Expenditures for property and equipment	(10,512)	(9,449)
Software and software development costs	(18,097)	(22,727)
Net cash used in investing activities	(37,391)	(48,802)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from the reissuance of treasury stock	3,172	31,768
Cash paid for purchase of treasury stock	(180,781)	(300,000)
(Repayments) borrowings on long-term loans from joint venture partner	(49,549)	460
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in joint venture	(117,220)	0
Return of capital to joint venture partner	(9,074)	0
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of expenses	345,810	0
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit loans	17,412	(29,454)
Principal payments on long-term debt	(372)	(2,192)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	5,229	1,870
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	14,627	(297,548)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(3,834)	12,361
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	10,610	61,433
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	505,178	763,725
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	515,788	825,158
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation	132,048	152,327
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	6,785	5,312
Consolidated net income	138,833	157,639
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	40,114	42,794
Provision for losses on accounts receivable	9,346	8,962
Stock-based compensation expense	10,328	7,969
Accretion of debt discount on Senior notes and convertible senior debentures	22	7,709
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation	(5,229)	(1,870)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	95,330	(7,639)
Inventories	(218,175)	272,445
Prepaid expenses and other assets	15,817	(36,981)
Accounts payable	53,352	33,522
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(102,530)	(89,128)
Total adjustments	(101,625)	237,783
Net cash provided by operating activities	$ 37,208	$ 395,422

XML

Shareholders' Equity - Common Share Repurchases and Issuance Activity (Detail) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012
Stockholders Equity [Line Items]
Treasury stock held at January 31, 2012	18,166,761
Shares of common stock repurchased under share repurchase programs and other shares acquired	3,823,217
Shares of treasury stock reissued	(511,458)
Treasury stock held at October 31, 2012	21,478,520
Treasury stock held at January 31, 2012, Weighted-average price per share	$ 40.71
Shares of common stock repurchased under share repurchase program, Weighted-average price per share	$ 49.40
Treasury stock held at October 31, 2012, Weighted-average price per share	$ 42.25

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

Schedule of Restricted Stock Activity

	Shares
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		568,498
Granted		279,652
Vested		(224,038	)
Canceled		(33,331	)
Outstanding at October 31, 2012		590,781

Schedule of Stock Options Activity

	Shares
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		1,651,400
Granted		6,236
Exercised		(1,007,906	)
Canceled		(44,898	)
Outstanding at October 31, 2012		604,832

XML

Shareholders' Equity - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended
	May 31, 2012	Nov. 30, 2011
Stockholders Equity [Line Items]
Share repurchase authorized amount	$ 100.0	$ 100.0

XML

SEGMENT INFORMATION (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

Financial Information by Geographic Segment

	Three months ended October 31,						Nine months ended October 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net sales to unaffiliated customers:
Americas	$	2,367,743		$	2,781,263		$	7,221,953		$	8,094,723
Europe		3,672,813			3,812,720			10,675,664			11,280,849
Total	$	6,040,556		$	6,593,983		$	17,897,617		$	19,375,572
Operating income:
Americas	$	33,747		$	52,638		$	114,346		$	148,146
Europe		39,445			39,718			105,677			103,850
Stock-based compensation expense		(3,646	)		(2,787	)		(10,328	)		(7,969	)
Total	$	69,546		$	89,569		$	209,695		$	244,027
Depreciation and amortization:
Americas	$	4,079		$	3,798		$	11,900		$	11,567
Europe		9,445			10,053			28,214			31,227
Total	$	13,524		$	13,851		$	40,114		$	42,794
Capital expenditures:
Americas	$	2,420		$	10,085		$	15,111		$	21,340
Europe		5,861			3,044			13,498			10,836
Total	$	8,281		$	13,129		$	28,609		$	32,176
Identifiable assets:
Americas	$	1,870,735		$	2,063,622		$	1,870,735		$	2,063,622
Europe		4,051,582			4,272,503			4,051,582			4,272,503
Total	$	5,922,317		$	6,336,125		$	5,922,317		$	6,336,125
Goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets, net:
Americas	$	2,966		$	2,966		$	2,966		$	2,966
Europe		150,903			152,553			150,903			152,553
Total	$	153,869		$	155,519		$	153,869		$	155,519

XML

BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1 — BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

Tech Data Corporation (“Tech Data” or the “Company”) is one of the world’s largest wholesale distributors of technology products. The Company serves as an indispensable link in the technology supply chain by bringing products from the world’s leading technology vendors to market, as well as providing customers with advanced logistics capabilities and value added services. Tech Data’s customers include value-added resellers, direct marketers, retailers and corporate resellers who support the diverse technology needs of end users. The Company is managed in two geographic segments: the Americas (including North America and South America) and Europe.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tech Data and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Noncontrolling interest is recognized for the portion of a consolidated joint venture not owned by the Company. The Company operates on a fiscal year that ends on January 31.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of October 31, 2012 and its statements of income, comprehensive income and cash flows for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we prospectively revised our presentation of sales of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts to present these revenues on an agency basis as net fees, as compared to presenting gross revenues and costs of sales in prior periods. This change had no impact on gross profit dollars, operating income dollars, net income dollars or earnings per share for any fiscal periods reported. Prior to this prospective revision, these contracts approximated three percent of the Company’s net sales for both the three and nine month periods in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Management believes the impact of this revised presentation is not material and, therefore, prior periods have not been adjusted.

Seasonality

The Company’s quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and will likely continue to do so in the future as a result of currency fluctuations and seasonal variations in the demand for the products and services offered. Narrow operating margins may magnify the impact of these factors on our operating results. Recent historical seasonal variations have included an increase in European demand during the Company’s fiscal fourth quarter and decreased demand in other fiscal quarters, particularly quarters that include summer months. Given that more than one half of the Company’s revenues are derived from Europe, the worldwide results closely follow the seasonality trends in Europe. Additionally, the life cycles of major products, as well as the impact of future acquisitions and dispositions, may also materially impact the Company’s business, financial condition, or consolidated results of operations. Therefore, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire fiscal year ending January 31, 2013.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard which simplifies how entities test goodwill for impairment. The accounting standard permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described below. The accounting standard was effective for the Company beginning February 1, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this standard as of February 1, 2012, which had no impact on its consolidated financial position, income, comprehensive income or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) issued a new accounting standard that amends the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This accounting standard does not extend the use of fair value accounting, but provides guidance on how it should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards within U.S. GAAP or International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). This accounting standard is effective for the Company beginning with the quarter ended April 30, 2012. The Company adopted this standard for the quarter ended April 30, 2012, which had no impact on its consolidated financial position, income, comprehensive income or cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In October 2012, the FASB clarified the scope of the accounting standard related to enhanced disclosures on offsetting (netting) of assets and liabilities in the financial statements issued in December 2011. The FASB has limited the scope of the accounting standard to the items identified in the standard’s implementation guidance. As a result of the FASB’s scope clarification, the Company has concluded that this accounting standard will have no impact on our financial statement disclosures.

In July 2012, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets. The accounting standard states that an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. This standard is effective for the Company beginning February 1, 2013, and early adoption is permitted. As the Company currently does not have any indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, this standard currently will have no impact on our consolidated financial position, income, comprehensive income and cash flows.

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Oct. 31, 2012	Jan. 31, 2012
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 54,294	$ 52,713
Common stock, par value	$ 0.0015	$ 0.0015
Common stock ,Shares authorized	200,000,000	200,000,000
Common stock Shares issued	59,239,085	59,239,085
Treasury stock ,shares	21,478,520	18,166,761

XML

SEGMENT INFORMATION

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

SEGMENT INFORMATION

NOTE 11 — SEGMENT INFORMATION

Tech Data operates predominately in a single industry segment as a distributor of technology products, logistics management, and other value-added services. While the Company operates primarily in one industry, it is managed based on geographic segments: the Americas (including North America and South America) and Europe. The Company assesses performance of and makes decisions on how to allocate resources to its operating segments based on multiple factors including current and projected operating income and market opportunities. The Company does not consider stock-based compensation expense in assessing the performance of its operating segments, and therefore the Company is reporting stock-based compensation expense as a separate amount. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

	Three months ended October 31,						Nine months ended October 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Net sales to unaffiliated customers:
Americas	$	2,367,743		$	2,781,263		$	7,221,953		$	8,094,723
Europe		3,672,813			3,812,720			10,675,664			11,280,849
Total	$	6,040,556		$	6,593,983		$	17,897,617		$	19,375,572
Operating income:
Americas	$	33,747		$	52,638		$	114,346		$	148,146
Europe		39,445			39,718			105,677			103,850
Stock-based compensation expense		(3,646	)		(2,787	)		(10,328	)		(7,969	)
Total	$	69,546		$	89,569		$	209,695		$	244,027
Depreciation and amortization:
Americas	$	4,079		$	3,798		$	11,900		$	11,567
Europe		9,445			10,053			28,214			31,227
Total	$	13,524		$	13,851		$	40,114		$	42,794
Capital expenditures:
Americas	$	2,420		$	10,085		$	15,111		$	21,340
Europe		5,861			3,044			13,498			10,836
Total	$	8,281		$	13,129		$	28,609		$	32,176
Identifiable assets:
Americas	$	1,870,735		$	2,063,622		$	1,870,735		$	2,063,622
Europe		4,051,582			4,272,503			4,051,582			4,272,503
Total	$	5,922,317		$	6,336,125		$	5,922,317		$	6,336,125
Goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets, net:
Americas	$	2,966		$	2,966		$	2,966		$	2,966
Europe		150,903			152,553			150,903			152,553
Total	$	153,869		$	155,519		$	153,869		$	155,519

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Nov. 16, 2012
Entity Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Oct. 31, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Trading Symbol	TECD
Entity Registrant Name	TECH DATA CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0000790703
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--01-31
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		37,760,565

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENT

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

SUBSEQUENT EVENT

NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On November 1, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of several distribution companies of Specialist Distribution Group, the distribution arm of Specialist Computer Holdings PLC (“SCH”), a privately-held IT services company headquartered in the United Kingdom, for a purchase price of approximately $365 million, subject to customary adjustments. The Company used the proceeds from the $350 million of Senior Notes issued in September 2012 and available cash to fund the acquisition. The acquired distribution companies are Specialist Distribution Group (SDG) Limited; ETC Metrologie SARL; Best’Ware France SA; ETC Africa SAS and SDG BV (collectively “SDG”). SDG is a leading distributor of enterprise and broadline IT products in the UK, France and the Netherlands. For its fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, SDG generated third-party sales of approximately $1.75 billion. Management believes the acquisition of SDG supports the Company’s diversification strategy by strengthening its European enterprise business and broadline offerings in key markets and expanding the Company’s vendor and customer portfolios, while leveraging the Company’s existing pan-European infrastructure. Simultaneously with the acquisition of SDG, the Company entered into a preferred supplier agreement whereby SCH, through its IT reseller business, will have annual purchase commitments through Tech Data for a period of five years, which the company estimates will add incremental annual sales of approximately $500 million.

The Company has accounted for the SDG acquisition as a business combination and the purchase price will be assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. The preliminary purchase price allocation, which will be completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, was based on estimated net assets acquired of approximately $143 million (based on the foreign currency exchange rates on date of acquisition). The preliminary allocation of identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, also subject to final purchase price adjustments, is comprised of approximately $104 million related to customer and vendor relationship assets with an estimated useful life of ten years and approximately $78 million of goodwill (based on the foreign currency exchange rates on the date of acquisition). The goodwill related to the acquisition is largely attributable to strategic factors previously discussed, as well as the growth potential of SDG’s enterprise business and broadline offerings. In addition, the Company has preliminarily allocated approximately $40 million of the purchase price premium to the preferred supplier agreement to be amortized over the five year life of the agreement. The Company is in the process of determining the amount of the identified intangible assets and goodwill that are deductible for tax purposes in the Company’s foreign tax jurisdictions.

The results of SDG’s operations will be included in the Company’s results of operations subsequent to the date of acquisition. Based on the timing of the acquisition and lack of available information, the Company has determined it to be impracticable to disclose proforma financial information at this time.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Net sales	$ 6,040,556	$ 6,593,983	$ 17,897,617	$ 19,375,572
Cost of products sold	5,732,295	6,249,236	16,967,895	18,356,525
Gross profit	308,261	344,747	929,722	1,019,047
Selling, general and administrative expenses	238,715	255,178	720,027	775,020
Operating income	69,546	89,569	209,695	244,027
Interest expense	4,359	8,378	10,850	25,108
Other expense, net	2,044	428	4,566	882
Income before income taxes	63,143	80,763	194,279	218,037
Provision for income taxes	16,122	23,600	55,446	60,398
Consolidated net income	47,021	57,163	138,833	157,639
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	(1,123)	(3,644)	(6,785)	(5,312)
Net income attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation	$ 45,898	$ 53,519	$ 132,048	$ 152,327
Net income per share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation:
Basic	$ 1.22	$ 1.27	$ 3.37	$ 3.42
Diluted	$ 1.21	$ 1.26	$ 3.34	$ 3.37
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic	37,765	42,104	39,234	44,602
Diluted	38,025	42,554	39,546	45,157

XML

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

NOTE 6 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

For the nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded $10.3 million and $8.0 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense, which is included in “selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

At October 31, 2012, the Company had awards outstanding from four equity-based compensation plans, only one of which is currently active. The active plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders in June 2009 and includes 4.0 million shares available for grant of which approximately 3.0 million shares remain available for future grant at October 31, 2012. Under the active plan, the Company is authorized to award officers, employees, and non-employee members of the Board of Directors restricted stock, options to purchase common stock, maximum value stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“MV Stock-settled SARs”), maximum value options (“MVOs”), and performance awards that are dependent upon achievement of specified performance goals. Equity-based compensation awards have a maximum term of 10 years, unless a shorter period is specified by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or is required under local law. Awards under the plans are priced as determined by the Compensation Committee, and under the terms of the Company’s active equity-based compensation plan, are required to be priced at, or above, the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Awards generally vest between one and four years from the date of grant.

A summary of the activity of the Company’s restricted stock activity for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 is as follows:

	Shares
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		568,498
Granted		279,652
Vested		(224,038	)
Canceled		(33,331	)
Outstanding at October 31, 2012		590,781

A summary of the activity of the Company’s MV Stock-settled SARs, MVOs and stock options for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 is as follows:

	Shares
Outstanding at January 31, 2012		1,651,400
Granted		6,236
Exercised		(1,007,906	)
Canceled		(44,898	)
Outstanding at October 31, 2012		604,832

The Company’s policy is to utilize shares of its treasury stock, to the extent available, for the exercise or vesting of equity awards (see further discussion of the Company’s share repurchase program in Note7 — Shareholders’ Equity).

XML

INCOME TAXES

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

INCOME TAXES

NOTE 5 — INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate was 25.5% in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 and 29.2% in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company’s effective tax rate was 28.5% in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 27.7% in the same period of the prior fiscal year. The fluctuations in the effective rate for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to the same periods of the prior year are primarily the result of the relative mix of earnings and losses within the tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The effective tax rate during the third quarter of fiscal 2013 was most significantly affected by the decline in projected fiscal 2013 taxable income within the United States as compared to fiscal 2012.

On an absolute dollar basis, the provision for income taxes decreased 31.7% to $16.1 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to $23.6 million in the same period of fiscal 2012 and decreased 8.2% to $55.4 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 compared to $60.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2012. The decrease in the provision for income taxes for both the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2013 is primarily due to the Company’s lower taxable income for these periods in comparison with the same periods of the prior fiscal year, primarily within the United States.

The effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0% during these periods primarily due to the relative mix of earnings or losses within the tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates such as: i) losses in tax jurisdictions where the Company is not able to record a tax benefit; ii) earnings in tax jurisdictions where the Company has previously recorded a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets; and iii) earnings in lower-tax jurisdictions for which no U.S. taxes have been provided because such earnings are planned to be reinvested indefinitely outside the United States.

The overall effective tax rate will continue to be dependent upon the geographic distribution of the Company’s earnings or losses, changes in tax laws, or interpretations of these laws in the Company’s operating jurisdictions. The Company monitors the assumptions used in estimating the annual effective tax rate and makes adjustments, if required, throughout the year. If actual results differ from the assumptions used in estimating the Company’s annual effective income tax rates, future income tax expense could be materially affected.

The Company’s future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by lower earnings than anticipated in countries with lower statutory rates, changes in the relative mix of taxable income and taxable loss jurisdictions, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. The Company considers all positive and negative evidence available in determining the potential realization of deferred tax assets, including the scheduled reversal of temporary differences, recent cumulative losses, recent and future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. In making this determination, the Company places greater emphasis on recent cumulative losses and recent taxable income due to the inherent lack of subjectivity associated with these factors. In addition, the Company’s income tax returns are subject to continuous examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of adverse outcomes from these examinations to determine the adequacy of the provision for income taxes. To the extent the Company prevails in matters for which accruals have been established or the Company is required to pay amounts in excess of such accruals, the Company’s effective tax rate could be materially affected.

XML

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

Company's Common Share Repurchases and Issuance Activity

	Shares			Weighted- average price per share
Treasury stock held at January 31, 2012		18,166,761		$	40.71
Shares of common stock repurchased under share repurchase programs and other shares acquired		3,823,217		$	49.40
Shares of treasury stock reissued		(511,458	)
Treasury stock held at October 31, 2012		21,478,520		$	42.25

XML

BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

Description of Business

Description of Business

Tech Data Corporation (“Tech Data” or the “Company”) is one of the world’s largest wholesale distributors of technology products. The Company serves as an indispensable link in the technology supply chain by bringing products from the world’s leading technology vendors to market, as well as providing customers with advanced logistics capabilities and value added services. Tech Data’s customers include value-added resellers, direct marketers, retailers and corporate resellers who support the diverse technology needs of end users. The Company is managed in two geographic segments: the Americas (including North America and South America) and Europe.

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tech Data and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Noncontrolling interest is recognized for the portion of a consolidated joint venture not owned by the Company. The Company operates on a fiscal year that ends on January 31.

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of October 31, 2012 and its statements of income, comprehensive income and cash flows for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we prospectively revised our presentation of sales of vendor warranty services and certain fulfillment contracts to present these revenues on an agency basis as net fees, as compared to presenting gross revenues and costs of sales in prior periods. This change had no impact on gross profit dollars, operating income dollars, net income dollars or earnings per share for any fiscal periods reported. Prior to this prospective revision, these contracts approximated three percent of the Company’s net sales for both the three and nine month periods in fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Management believes the impact of this revised presentation is not material and, therefore, prior periods have not been adjusted.

Seasonality

Seasonality

The Company’s quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and will likely continue to do so in the future as a result of currency fluctuations and seasonal variations in the demand for the products and services offered. Narrow operating margins may magnify the impact of these factors on our operating results. Recent historical seasonal variations have included an increase in European demand during the Company’s fiscal fourth quarter and decreased demand in other fiscal quarters, particularly quarters that include summer months. Given that more than one half of the Company’s revenues are derived from Europe, the worldwide results closely follow the seasonality trends in Europe. Additionally, the life cycles of major products, as well as the impact of future acquisitions and dispositions, may also materially impact the Company’s business, financial condition, or consolidated results of operations. Therefore, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire fiscal year ending January 31, 2013.

XML

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 9 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s foreign currency risk management objective is to protect earnings and cash flows from the impact of exchange rate changes primarily through the use of foreign currency forward contracts to hedge both intercompany and third party loans, accounts receivable and accounts payable. These derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments.

The Company employs established policies and procedures to manage the exposure to fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies. It is the Company’s policy to utilize financial instruments to reduce risks where internal netting cannot be effectively employed. Additionally, the Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

The Company’s foreign currency exposure relates to international transactions in Europe, Canada and Latin America, where the currency collected from customers can be different from the currency used to purchase the product. The Company’s transactions in its foreign operations are denominated primarily in the following currencies: U.S. dollar, British pound, Canadian dollar, Chilean peso, Czech koruna, Danish krone, euro, Mexican peso, Norwegian krone, Peruvian nuevo sol, Polish zloty, Romanian leu, Swedish krona and Swiss franc.

The Company considers inventory as an economic hedge against foreign currency exposure in accounts payable in certain circumstances. This practice offsets such inventory against corresponding accounts payable denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the subsidiary buying the inventory, when determining the net exposure to be hedged using traditional forward contracts. Under this strategy, the Company would expect to increase or decrease selling prices for product purchased in foreign currencies based on fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affecting the underlying accounts payable. To the extent the Company incurs a foreign currency exchange loss (gain) on the underlying accounts payable denominated in the foreign currency, a corresponding increase (decrease) in gross profit would be expected as the related inventory is sold. This strategy can result in a certain degree of quarterly earnings volatility as the underlying accounts payable is remeasured using the foreign currency exchange rate prevailing at the end of each period, or settlement date if earlier, whereas the corresponding increase (decrease) in gross profit is not realized until the related inventory is sold.

The Company classifies gains and losses on its foreign currency derivative instruments used to manage its exposures to foreign currency denominated accounts receivable and accounts payable as a component of “cost of products sold” which is consistent with the classification of the change in fair value upon remeasurement of the underlying hedged accounts receivable or accounts payable. The Company classifies gains and losses on its foreign currency derivative instruments used to manage its exposures to foreign currency denominated financing transactions as a component of “other expense, net” which is consistent with the classification of the change in fair value upon remeasurement of the underlying hedged loans. The total amount recognized in earnings on the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts, which is included as a component of either “cost of products sold” or “other expense, net”, was a net foreign currency exchange loss of $9.8 million and $10.0 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The gains and losses on the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are largely offset by the change in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets or liabilities.

The notional amount of forward exchange contracts is the amount of foreign currency to be bought or sold at maturity. Notional amounts are indicative of the extent of the Company’s involvement in the various types and uses of derivative financial instruments and are not a measure of the Company’s exposure to credit or market risks through its use of derivatives. The estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments represents the amount required to enter into similar offsetting contracts with similar remaining maturities based on quoted market prices.

The Company’s monthly average notional amounts of derivative financial instruments outstanding during the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were $1.8 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively, with average maturities of 28 days and 22 days, respectively. As discussed above, under the Company’s hedging policies, gains and losses on the derivative financial instruments would be expected to be largely offset by the gains and losses on the underlying assets or liabilities being hedged.

The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are also discussed in Note 8 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments.

XML

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

NOTE 7 — SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company’s common share repurchases and issuance activity for the nine months ended October 31, 2012 is summarized as follows:

	Shares			Weighted- average price per share
Treasury stock held at January 31, 2012		18,166,761		$	40.71
Shares of common stock repurchased under share repurchase programs and other shares acquired		3,823,217		$	49.40
Shares of treasury stock reissued		(511,458	)
Treasury stock held at October 31, 2012		21,478,520		$	42.25

There were no common shares repurchased by the Company during the third quarter of fiscal 2013. During the first semester of fiscal 2013, the Company completed each of the $100.0 million share repurchase programs approved by the Board of Directors in May 2012 and November 2011. In conjunction with the Company’s share repurchase programs, 10b5-1 plans were executed that instruct the brokers selected by the Company to repurchase shares on behalf of the Company. The amount of common stock repurchased in accordance with the 10b5-1 plans on any given trading day is determined by a formula in the plan, which is based on the market price of the Company’s common stock. Shares repurchased by the Company are held in treasury for general corporate purposes, including issuances under equity incentive and benefit plans. The reissuance of shares from treasury stock is based on the weighted average purchase price of the shares.

XML

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 8 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s assets and liabilities carried or disclosed at fair value are classified in one of the following three categories: Level 1 — quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; Level 2 — inputs other than quoted market prices included in level 1 above that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, and Level 3 — unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are measured on a recurring basis based on foreign currency spot rates and forward rates quoted by banks or foreign currency dealers (level 2 criteria) and are marked-to-market each period with gains and losses on these contracts recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income on a basis consistent with the classification of the change in the fair value of the underlying transactions giving rise to these foreign currency exchange gains and losses in the period in which their value changes, with the offsetting amount for unsettled positions being included in either other current assets or other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at October 31, 2012 and 2011 was an unrealized gain of $3.3 million and $8.6 million, respectively, included in other current assets and an unrealized loss of $4.4 million and $11.9 million, respectively, included in other current liabilities (see further discussion below in Note 9 — Derivative Instruments).

The Company utilizes life insurance policies to fund the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The investments contained within the life insurance policies are marked-to-market each period by analyzing the change in the underlying value of the invested assets (level 2 criteria) and the gains and losses are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. The related deferred compensation liability is also marked-to-market each period based upon the various investment return alternatives selected by the plan participants (level 2 criteria) and the gains and losses are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. The fair value of the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan investments and related liability at October 31, 2012 is $33.9 million and $31.6 million, respectively.

The $350 million of Senior Notes discussed in Note 4 are carried at cost, less unamortized debt discount. The estimated fair value of the Senior Notes was approximately $356.7 million at October 31, 2012, based upon quoted market information (level 1 criteria).

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these items. The carrying amount of debt outstanding pursuant to revolving credit facilities and loans payable approximates fair value as the majority of these instruments have variable interest rates which approximate current market rates (level 2 criteria).

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 10 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees

As is customary in the technology industry, to encourage certain customers to purchase products from Tech Data, the Company has arrangements with certain finance companies that provide inventory financing facilities to the Company’s customers. In conjunction with certain of these arrangements, the Company would be required to purchase certain inventory in the event the inventory is repossessed from the customers by the finance companies. As the Company does not have access to information regarding the amount of inventory purchased from the Company still on hand with the customer at any point in time, the Company’s repurchase obligations relating to inventory cannot be reasonably estimated. Repurchases of inventory by the Company under these arrangements have been insignificant to date. The Company believes that, based on historical experience, the likelihood of a material loss pursuant to these inventory repurchase obligations is remote.

The Company provides additional financial guarantees to finance companies on behalf of certain customers. The majority of these guarantees are for an indefinite period of time, where the Company would be required to perform if the customer is in default with the finance company related to purchases made from the Company. The Company reviews the underlying credit for these guarantees on at least an annual basis. As of October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of guarantees under these arrangements totaled $47.9 million and $65.4 million, respectively, of which $30.9 million and $28.4 million, respectively, was outstanding. The Company believes that, based on historical experience, the likelihood of a material loss pursuant to the above guarantees is remote.

Contingencies

Prior to fiscal 2004, one of the Company’s European subsidiaries was audited in relation to various value-added tax (“VAT”) matters. As a result of those audits, the subsidiary received notices of assessment that allege the subsidiary did not properly collect and remit VAT. Management has concluded, based upon the opinion of outside legal counsel, that the risk of loss for a significant portion of these assessments is remote and has therefore not accrued any amount on that portion of the claim. The Company’s financial statements include an accrual for the remaining exposure related to these assessments for which a loss is considered probable. Although the Company is vigorously pursuing administrative and judicial action to challenge the assessments, the ultimate outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with absolute certainty. If the courts were to reach a ruling that is adverse to the Company on the entire claim, a significant portion of the claim would be in excess of the amounts accrued, and while such ruling would not be material to the Company’s consolidated net assets or liquidity, it could be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular period, depending upon the level of income for such period.

In December 2010, in a non-unanimous decision, a Brazilian appellate court overturned a 2003 trial court which had previously ruled in favor of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary related to the imposition of certain taxes on payments abroad related to the licensing of commercial software products, commonly referred to as “CIDE tax”. The Company estimates the total exposure where the CIDE tax, including interest, may be considered due to be approximately $28.8 million at October 31, 2012. The Brazilian subsidiary has moved for clarification of the ruling and intends to appeal if the court does not rule in its favor. However, in order to pursue the next level of appeal, the Brazilian subsidiary may be required to make a deposit or to provide a guarantee to the courts for the payment of the CIDE tax pending the outcome of the appeal. Based on the legal opinion of outside counsel, the Company believes that the chances of success on appeal of this matter are favorable and the Brazilian subsidiary intends to vigorously defend its position that the CIDE tax is not due. However, due to the lack of the predictability of the Brazilian court system, the Company has concluded that it is reasonably possible that the Brazilian subsidiary may incur a loss up to the total exposure described above. The Company believes the resolution of this litigation will not be material to the Company’s consolidated net assets or liquidity; however, it could be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular period, depending upon the level of income for such period. In addition to the discussion regarding the CIDE tax above, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary has been undergoing several examinations of non-income related taxes. Given the complexity and lack of predictability of the Brazilian tax system, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that a loss may have been incurred. However, due to the early stages of the examination, the complex nature of the Brazilian tax system and the absence of communication from the local tax authorities regarding these examinations, the Company is currently unable to determine the likelihood of these examinations resulting in assessments nor estimate the amount of loss, if any, that may be reasonably possible if such assessment were to be made.

The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s management does not expect that the outcome in any of these other legal proceedings, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation - Schedule of Stock Options Activity (Detail) (Stock options [Member])	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012
Stock options [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Outstanding at January 31, 2012	1,651,400
Granted	6,236
Exercised	(1,007,906)
Canceled	(44,898)
Outstanding at October 31, 2012	604,832

XML

DEBT (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

Schedule of Debt

	October 31, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Senior notes, interest at 3.75% payable semi-annually, due September 21, 2017	$	350,000		$	0
Less—unamortized debt discount		(1,304	)		0
Senior notes, net		348,696			0
Capital leases		6,088			6,512
Loan payable to Brightstar Corp.		0			14,940
Interest-free revolving credit loan payable to Brightstar Corp.		0			36,306
Other committed and uncommitted revolving credit facilities, average interest rate of 4.37% and 6.27% at October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012, expiring on various dates through fiscal 2015		65,331			47,985
		420,115			105,743
Less—current maturities (included as “revolving credit loans and current portion of long-term debt, net”)		(65,848	)		(48,490	)
Total Long-term debt	$	354,267		$	57,253

XML

Earnings Per Share ("EPS") - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011 Convertible Senior Debentures [Member]
Equity-based compensation awards, excluded from computation of dilutive earnings per share	9,456	35,181
Convertible senior debentures, face value	$ 350,000		$ 350,000	$ 350,000

XML

Subsequent Event - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Nov. 30, 2012 Subsequent Event [Member]	Oct. 31, 2012 SDG [Member]	Oct. 31, 2012 SDG [Member] Subsequent Event [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Business acquisition cost					$ 365,000,000
Senior notes, face value	350,000,000	350,000,000
Third-party sales for previous fiscal year				1,750,000,000
Sale commitment period			5 years
Estimated increment in sale			500,000,000
Purchase price allocated to cash	143,000,000
Acquired intangible assets	104,000,000
Estimated useful life	10 years
Acquired goodwill	78,000,000
Purchase price premium acquired	$ 40,000,000

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Consolidated net income	$ 47,021	$ 57,163	$ 138,833	$ 157,639
Change in consolidated cumulative translation adjustments ("CTA")	81,127	(75,171)	(2,134)	13,211
Total comprehensive income (loss)	128,148	(18,008)	136,699	170,850
Less-comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest	1,795	2,859	5,736	5,764
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation	$ 126,353	$ (20,867)	$ 130,963	$ 165,086

XML

DEBT

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

DEBT

NOTE 4 — DEBT

	October 31, 2012			January 31, 2012
	(In thousands)
Senior notes, interest at 3.75% payable semi-annually, due September 21, 2017	$	350,000		$	0
Less—unamortized debt discount		(1,304	)		0
Senior notes, net		348,696			0
Capital leases		6,088			6,512
Loan payable to Brightstar Corp.		0			14,940
Interest-free revolving credit loan payable to Brightstar Corp.		0			36,306
Other committed and uncommitted revolving credit facilities, average interest rate of 4.37% and 6.27% at October 31, 2012 and January 31, 2012, expiring on various dates through fiscal 2015		65,331			47,985
		420,115			105,743
Less—current maturities (included as “revolving credit loans and current portion of long-term debt, net”)		(65,848	)		(48,490	)
Total Long-term debt	$	354,267		$	57,253

Senior Notes

In September 2012, the Company issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Senior Notes in a public offering, resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $345.8 million, net of debt discount and debt issuance costs of approximately $1.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively (the “Senior Notes”). The debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the public offering will be amortized over the life of the Senior Notes as additional interest expense using the effective interest method. The Company will pay interest on the Senior Notes semi-annually in arrears on March 21 and September 21 of each year, beginning on March 21, 2013. The Company, at its option, may redeem the Senior Notes at any time in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Notes to be redeemed or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Senior Notes being redeemed, discounted at a rate equal to the sum of the applicable Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the date of redemption. The Senior Notes are senior, unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company’s other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.

Loans Payable to Brightstar Corp.

In October 2010, Brightstar Corp. entered into an agreement to loan Brightstar Europe Limited, which was a consolidated joint venture between Tech Data and Brightstar Corp. (“the joint venture”), its share of the funding requirements for an acquisition by the the joint venture (the “Acquisition Loan”). The Acquisition Loan from Brightstar, plus any accrued interest, had a repayment date of September 2015, or earlier if agreed between the two parties, and interest at the applicable LIBOR rate plus 4.0% per year, to be paid annually on October 1.

The Company also had an interest-free revolving credit loan from Brightstar that was issued in connection with the operations of the joint venture (the “Brightstar Revolver”). The terms of the Brightstar Revolver included no contractual repayment date and allowed for the revolving credit loan to increase or decrease in accordance with the working capital requirements of the joint venture, as determined by the Company. Effective October 2010, a resolution of the joint venture’s board was approved stating that the Brightstar Revolver will not be repaid for the foreseeable future and therefore the revolving credit loan had been classified as long-term debt in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 31, 2012.

As discussed in Note 3 above, in September 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Brightstar Corp.’s fifty percent ownership interest in the joint venture and in accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement, the Company repaid both the Acquisition Loan and the Brightstar Revolver.

XML

Acquisition - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	1 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012
Business Acquisition Actual Revenue And Pre Tax Income Loss [Line Items]
Cash paid for acquired entity	$ 85.0
Decrease in additional paid-in capital due to acquisition	85.9
Transaction direct costs	0.9
Brightstar Corp. [Member]
Business Acquisition Actual Revenue And Pre Tax Income Loss [Line Items]
Percentage of ownership interest acquired	50.00%
Cash paid for acquired entity	$ 165.9

XML

Derivative Instruments - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Derivative [Line Items]
Net foreign currency exchange gain (loss)	$ 9,800,000	$ 10,000,000
Average notional amounts of derivative financial instruments outstanding	$ 1,800,000,000	$ 1,400,000,000
Average maturities of derivatives, days	28 days	22 days

XML

EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS") (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Oct. 31, 2012

Earnings Per Share Basic and Diluted

	Three months ended October 31,
	2012						2011
	Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount		Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—basic	$	45,898		37,765	$	1.22	$	53,519		42,104	$	1.27
Effect of dilutive securities:
Equity-based awards				260						450
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—diluted	$	45,898		38,025	$	1.21	$	53,519		42,554	$	1.26

	Nine months ended October 31,
	2012						2011
	Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount		Net income attributable to Tech Data Corporation		Weighted average shares		Per share amount
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—basic	$	132,048		39,234	$	3.37	$	152,327		44,602	$	3.42
Effect of dilutive securities:
Equity-based awards				312						555
Net income per common share attributable to shareholders of Tech Data Corporation—diluted	$	132,048		39,546	$	3.34	$	152,327		45,157	$	3.37