-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, NttySqCP0MZtWIMl7eh15Zkc+8A7hqESctNzuL8mrvrc7Qq0f5/YS0ZHC33twxut oB+SpcnletTC08PeJnnF4g== 0000790362-09-000025.txt : 20090327 0000790362-09-000025.hdr.sgml : 20090327 20090327134858 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000790362-09-000025 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 7 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20081231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20090327 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20090327 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORP /OH/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000790362 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS [6021] IRS NUMBER: 341518564 STATE OF INCORPORATION: OH FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-14773 FILM NUMBER: 09709420 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 112 W MARKET ST CITY: ORRVILLE STATE: OH ZIP: 44667 BUSINESS PHONE: 330-682-1010 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: PO BOX 57 CITY: ORRVILLE STATE: OH ZIP: 44667 10-K 1 f10k-123108.txt 10-K UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2008 Commission File Number: 0-14773 National Bancshares Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Ohio 34-1518564 (State or other jurisdiction (IRS Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 112 West Market Street, Orrville, Ohio 44667 (330) 682-1010 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant`s principal executive offices) Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act: none Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: common stock, without par value Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant`s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of `large accelerated filer, accelerated filed and smaller reporting company` in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X] State the aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant`s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: based on the average of the bid and asked prices on June 30, 2008, the aggregate market value of National Bancshares Corporation stock held by non-affiliates was $27,578,991. Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant`s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: National Bancshares Corporation`s only class is common stock, without par value, of which 2,202,368 shares were outstanding on March 13, 2009. Documents Incorporated by Reference Portions of the registrant`s annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 are incorporated by reference in Part II. Portions of the registrant`s definitive proxy statements for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report. Table of Contents Part I Page Item 1 Business 2 Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments 15 Item 2 Properties 16 Item 3 Legal Proceedings 17 Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 17 Part II Item 5 Market for Registrant`s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 19 Item 6 Selected Financial Data 19 Item 7 Management`s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 19 Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 19 Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 19 Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 19 Item 9A Controls and Procedures 19 Item 9B Other Information 20 Part III Item 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 21 Item 11 Executive Compensation 22 Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 22 Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 22 Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services 22 Part IV Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 23 Signatures 25 ITEM 1 BUSINESS Forward-looking Statements. This document contains forward-looking statements `as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995` about National Bancshares Corporation (`National Bancshares`) and its subsidiary First National Bank. Information incorporated in this document by reference, future filings by National Bancshares on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, and future oral and written statements by National Bancshares and its management may also contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements about anticipated operating and financial performance, such as loan originations, operating efficiencies, loan sales, charge-offs and loan loss provisions, growth opportunities, interest rates and deposit growth. Words such as `may,``could,``should,` `would,``believe,``anticipate,``estimate,``expect,``intend,``project,``plan,` and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to many risks and uncertainties. A number of things could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. These include the factors we discuss immediately below, those addressed under the caption `Financial Review,` other factors discussed elsewhere in this document or identified in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and those presented elsewhere by our management from time to time. Many of the risks and uncertainties are beyond our control. The following factors could cause our operating and financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, assumptions, expectations, estimates, and intentions expressed in the forward-looking statements: ~ the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct our operations; general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, may be less favorable than we expect, resulting in a deterioration in the credit quality of our loan assets, among other things ~ the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest-rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board ~ inflation, interest rate, market, and monetary fluctuations ~ the development and acceptance of new products and services of National Bancshares and its subsidiary and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing, and quality compared to competitors` products and services ~ the willingness of users to substitute our products and services for those of competitors ~ the impact of changes in financial services laws and regulations (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities, and insurance) ~ changes in consumer spending and saving habits Forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, assumptions, expectations, estimates, and intentions as of the date the statements are made. Investors should exercise caution because we cannot give any assurance that our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, assumptions, expectations, estimates, and intentions will be realized. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information, or otherwise. Company Milestones. National Bancshares and First National Bank`s history spans more than 125 years. Some of the milestones are: 1881 First National Bank is chartered under the name `Orrville Banking Company` 1902 the Bank`s name is changed to `Orrville National Bank` 1933 the Bank is reorganized and renamed once again, the `National Bank of Orrville` 1965 on May 12 the Bank opens its first branch, on West High Street 1968 on February 1 the Bank merges with the First National Bank of Dalton, becoming the `First National Bank Orrville-Dalton` 1969 on November 1 the Bank merges with the Bank of Mt. Eaton Company 1972 on January 1 the Farmers and Merchants Bank Company of Smithville merges with the Bank, and changes its name to `First National Bank` 1975 on July 5 the Bank opens its Midway office in Apple Creek 1986 National Bancshares Corporation becomes the holding company for First National Bank on June 2 1989 the Bank enters Medina County with the purchase of its Lodi office on April 14 1994 on December 16 the Bank establishes its second Medina County office with the purchase of the Seville branch 1999 the Bank opens its Cleveland Road office in the city of Wooster on April 19 2002 the acquisition of Peoples Financial Corporation and its subsidiary, Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association of Massillon, is completed on April 3, adding three more banking offices, our first offices in Stark County 2005 the Bank closes its MarketPlace office in the city of Massillon on May 31 and opens its Burbank Road office in the city of Wooster on June 30 2006 First National Bank celebrates its 125 year anniversary Market Area. National Bancshares` sole banking subsidiary is First National Bank (`Bank`). The Bank operates 13 offices in Wayne, Medina, and Stark Counties. Wayne County generally, and more specifically the city of Orrville and its other municipalities in the northeastern quadrant of Wayne County, constitutes the center of the Bank`s market, extending from there to most of Wayne County, the southern portion of Medina County to the north, western Stark County to the east, and the northeastern portion of Holmes County to the south. With their dense urban populations and wide-ranging industries, including many service, manufacturing, retail and other establishments of all sizes, the cities of Cleveland in Cuyahoga County, Akron in Summit County, and Canton in Stark County lie in a crescent just beyond the northern and eastern ends of the Bank`s market area. The Bank occupies a much more rural area with a significantly lower population density and less industrial diversity, and with a significantly higher proportion of small farm and related agricultural enterprises. Wayne County is largely rural. Holmes County is virtually entirely rural, with a large percentage of Amish and Mennonite inhabitants. The portions of Stark and Medina Counties occupied by the Bank are somewhat less urban than the remainder of the historically urban and industrial Stark County and the remainder of Medina County, which has been growing very rapidly for many years because of its increasingly close association with urban centers in Cleveland and Akron. The April 2002 merger with Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association of Massillon added three offices in western Stark County ~ all located in Massillon ~ to the Bank`s 11 offices in Wayne and Medina Counties. First National Bank had already been serving western Stark County, but without a branch presence. Massillon is the largest urban center in the Bank`s market, with a population of slightly more than 32,100 according to the 2004 estimate by Ohio Department of Development (www.odod.state.oh.us/research) data, followed by Wooster in Wayne County, with a population of approximately 25,600, and the city of Orrville in Wayne County, with a population just under 9,000. The total population of the Bank`s market area is estimated to be between 175,000 and 225,000, but a more precise figure is difficult to determine because the Bank`s market area does not necessarily correspond with the geographic and political boundaries employed when population data are compiled and reported. Of the counties that make up the Bank`s market area, Holmes, Medina and Wayne benefit from an unemployment rate that is less than the state average, which was 7.8% according to 2008 Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (available at lmi.state.oh.us). The unemployment rates at December 2008 are 7.1% in Wayne County, 6.6% in Medina County, and 5.9% in Holmes County. Meanwhile, Stark County had an unemployment rate of 8.0% at December 2008.Major employers in the four counties include various hospitals, the College of Wooster, JM Smucker Company, and LuK USA, LLC in Wayne County, Diebold Inc., Timken, and various hospitals in Stark and Wayne Counties, as well as local and county government employers throughout the four counties. According to the Ohio Department of Development, manufacturing industries are the dominant employers in Wayne and Holmes Counties, dominated only slightly by the services and trade industries in Stark and Medina Counties. (Ohio County Profiles, Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research, available at www.odod.state.oh.us/research). In summary, First National Bank believes the market area it has defined as its own generates economic activity and has demographic trends that should sustain the Bank for the indefinite future. The Bank is open to the prospect of expansion beyond its current market area, particularly if a suitable opportunity arises for expansion either by acquisition or by internal growth. For purposes of potential expansion either by acquisition or by internal growth, the more urban and industrial crescent at the northern and eastern edge of the Bank`s market area offers more competitive resistance. The Bank`s immediate goal is to achieve a broader and deeper penetration of its existing market area. We believe that the banking needs within our market have not been exhausted and that opportunities exist for a local community bank to achieve market-share gains at the expense of more distant and larger institutions whose organization-wide profit goals and credit standards leave less room for flexibility to adjust to local borrowers and other customers` circumstances. Competition. The market in which we operate is intensely competitive. Offering checking and savings accounts, certificates of deposit, personal loans, loans to businesses and professionals, installment loans, safety deposit boxes, and credit cards, we compete with other banks and savings institutions, many of which are significantly larger than First National Bank and have greater financial, staff, and other resources and higher lending limits. Insurance companies, consumer finance companies, credit unions, mortgage banking companies, commercial finance and leasing companies, money market mutual funds, and securities firms also provide many of the financial services we offer. We face competition both in making loans and in attracting deposits. Competition generally is based on interest rates and other credit and service charges, the quality of services rendered, the ability to react and respond to customer requirements, the convenience of banking hours and branch locations, the range and type of products offered and, in the case of loans to larger commercial borrowers, lending limits, among other factors. We do not have trust powers and therefore do not offer trust services. We seek to take competitive advantage of First National Bank`s local orientation and community banking profile, competing for loans principally through our responsiveness to customers, our ability to communicate effectively with them, and our ability to understand and address their needs. We compete for deposits principally by offering customers personal attention, a variety of banking services, attractive rates, and strategically located banking facilities. Our goal is to provide high quality banking service to professionals, small and mid-sized businesses and individuals, emphasizing quick and flexible responses to customer demands, while providing a personalized touch. The dominant institutions in Wayne, Stark, and Medina Counties are offices of significantly larger banking institutions, some of which have a statewide, multi-state, and even national presence. These competitors are more geographically diversified than First National Bank, meaning they are less vulnerable to adverse changes in our local economy. And many of these institutions offer services that we do not or cannot provide in a cost-effective manner. Likewise, some competitors are not subject to the same kind and amount of regulatory restrictions and supervision to which a national bank is subject. Because First National Bank is smaller than many commercial lenders in its market, occasionally, we are prevented from making commercial loans in amounts competitors can offer. First National Bank accommodates loan volumes in excess of its lending limits from time to time through the sale of loan participations to other banks. The share of deposits held by a particular banking institution relative to all other banking institutions in a particular market is not the only, but it is perhaps the most readily identifiable, indicator of a bank`s market share.As a percent of all deposits held by FDIC-insured banks and savings associations in the county, according to FDIC data available on the FDIC`s website (www.fdic.gov) one institution had a market share exceeding 18% in all three counties as of June 30, 2008. Based on the FDIC`s June 30, 2008 deposit data, First National Bank had a 11.84% share of deposits in Wayne County (ranking 4th of 12 FDIC-insured institutions), 0.84% in Stark County (11th of 16), and 1.19% in Medina County (13th of 18). We have no offices in Holmes County. The banking industry has been changing for many reasons, including continued consolidation within the banking industry, legislative and regulatory changes, and advances in technology. Congress` elimination in 1994 of many restrictions on interstate branching could increase competition from large banks headquartered outside of our market. Congress` repeal in late 1999 of much of the Glass-Steagall Act (which had separated the commercial and investment banking industries) and elimination of the barriers between the banking and insurance industries could make competition even more intense. Because of our smaller size, we may have less opportunity to take advantage of the flexibility offered by that new legislation. With frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, the banking industry is undergoing rapid technological changes. To deliver banking products and services more effectively and efficiently, banking institutions are opening in-store branches, installing more automated teller machines (ATMs), and investing in technology to permit telephone, personal computer, and internet banking. In addition to enhancing customer service, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. A financial institution`s success is increasingly dependent upon use of technology to provide products and services that satisfy customer demands and to create additional operating efficiencies. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements, which could enable them to perform various banking functions at lower costs than First National Bank, or to provide products and services that we are not able to provide economically. Although all banks are experiencing the effects of the changing competitive and technological environment, the manner in which banks choose to compete is increasing the gap between large national and super-regional banks, on one hand, and community banks on the other. Large institutions are committed to becoming national or regional `brand names,` providing a broad selection of products at low cost and with advanced technology, while community banks provide most of the same products but with a commitment to personal service and with local ties to the customers and communities they serve. Because of the demand for technology-driven products, banks rely increasingly on unaffiliated vendors to provide data processing services and other core banking functions. The use of technology-related products, services, delivery channels, and processes exposes banks to various risks, particularly transaction, strategic, reputation, and compliance risk. Lending. Lending practices are governed by the Bank`s Credit Policy, which is approved annually by the board of directors, and by regulations and policies of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (`OCC`), the principal federal regulator of national banks. The Credit Policy delegates lending authority to the President & Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President & Senior Loan Officer, and all loan officers. The Credit Policy also establishes guidelines for credit types, loan mix, concentration of credit, and credit standards. First National Bank makes commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, residential mortgage and home equity loans, and secured and unsecured consumer installment loans. A substantial portion of our commercial loans is designated as real estate loans for regulatory reporting purposes because they are secured by mortgages on real property. Loans of that type may be made for the purpose of financing commercial activities, such as accounts receivable, equipment purchases and leasing, but they are secured by real estate to provide the Bank with an extra measure of security. Although these loans might be secured in whole or in part by real estate, they are treated in the discussions to follow as commercial loans. Our consumer installment loans include secured and unsecured loans to individual borrowers for a variety of purposes, including personal, home improvements, and revolving credit lines. A significant portion of the Bank`s lending consists of origination of conventional loans secured by 1-4 family real estate located in Wayne, Medina, Stark, and Holmes Counties. The Bank`s residential mortgage loans generally are originated with loan documentation permitting sale to Freddie Mac. The Bank`s commercial loan services include ~ ~ accounts receivable, inventory and working capital loans ~ renewable operating lines of credit ~ loans to finance capital equipment ~ term business loans ~ short-term notes ~ selected guaranteed or subsidized loan programs for small businesses ~ loans to professionals ~ commercial real estate loans, including agricultural loans secured by farmland ~ loans for agricultural production and other loans to farmers Commercial real estate loans include commercial properties occupied by the proprietor of the business conducted on the premises and income-producing or farm properties. Agricultural loans secured by farmland are a subset of our commercial real estate loan products, whereas we also categorize loans for agricultural production and other loans to farmers as commercial loans (not secured by real estate). The primary risk of commercial real estate loans is loss of income of the owner or occupier of the property or the inability of the market to sustain rent levels. Although commercial and commercial real estate loans generally bear somewhat more credit risk than single-family residential mortgage loans, commercial and commercial real estate loans tend to be higher yielding, tend to have shorter terms, and commonly provide for interest-rate adjustments as prevailing rates change. Accordingly, commercial and commercial real estate loans enhance a lender`s interest rate risk management and, in management`s opinion, promote more rapid asset and income growth than a loan portfolio comprised strictly of residential real estate mortgage loans. Although a risk of nonpayment exists for all loans, certain specific types of risks are associated with various kinds of loans. One of the primary risks associated with commercial loans is the possibility that the commercial borrower will not generate income sufficient to repay the loan. The Bank`s loan policy provides that commercial loan applications must be supported by documentation indicating that there will be cash flow sufficient for the borrower to service the proposed loan. Financial statements or tax returns must be submitted, and annual reviews are undertaken. The fair market value of collateral for collateralized commercial loans must exceed the Bank`s loan exposure. For this purpose fair market value is determined by independent appraisal. Real estate is commonly a material component of collateral for our loans, including commercial loans. Although the expected source of repayment of these loans is generally the operations of the borrower`s business or personal income, real estate collateral provides an additional measure of security. Risks associated with loans secured by real estate include fluctuating land values, changing local economic conditions, changes in tax policies, and a concentration of loans within a limited geographic area. First National Bank originates several different types of loans that it categorizes as construction loans, including ~ ~ residential construction loans to borrowers who will occupy the premises upon completion of construction, ~ residential construction loans to builders, ~ commercial construction loans, and ~ real estate acquisition and development loans. Because of the complex nature of construction lending, these loans are generally recognized as having a higher degree of risk than other forms of real estate lending, including credit risk. The Bank`s fixed-rate and adjustable-rate construction loans may not provide for the same interest rate terms on the construction loan and on the permanent mortgage loan that follows completion of the construction phase of the loan. It is the norm for the Bank to make residential construction loans with an existing written commitment for permanent financing. Our consumer loans include secured and unsecured loans to individual borrowers for a variety of purposes, including personal, home improvement, revolving credit lines, autos, boats, and recreational vehicles. Historically, we have had minimal indirect lending activity, however over the past two years we have become more involved and are looking to increase our involvement in the indirect lending line of business. Unsecured consumer loans generally carry significantly higher interest rates than secured loans. Loans and extensions of credit to a single borrower may not exceed 15% of capital, often referred to as the `legal lending limit` or `loans-to-one-borrower limit.` But an additional margin of 10% of capital is permitted for loans fully secured by readily marketable collateral. The Bank can accommodate loan volumes exceeding the legal lending limit by selling participation interests in loans to other banks. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank`s legal lending limit for loans to a single borrower was approximately $4.0 million. Loan Solicitation and Processing. Loan originations are developed from a number of sources, including continuing business with depositors, other borrowers and real estate builders, solicitations by bank personnel and walk-in customers. When a loan request is made, the Bank reviews the application, credit bureau reports, property appraisals or evaluations, financial information, verifications of income, and other documentation concerning the creditworthiness of the borrower, as applicable to each loan type. The Bank`s underwriting guidelines are set by senior management and approved by the board. The loan policy specifies officers` loan approval authority, requiring approval by the board`s Executive Committee or the full board for any aggregate borrowing to one customer or related customers of $3.0 million or more or if a loan is rated substandard or below. Income from Lending Activities. The Bank earns interest and fee income from its lending activities. Net of origination costs, loan origination fees are amortized over the life of a loan. The Bank also receives loan fees related to existing loans, including late charges. Income from loan origination and commitment fees and discounts varies with the volume and type of loans and commitments made and with competitive and economic conditions. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein contains a discussion of the manner in which loan fees and income are recognized for financial reporting purposes. Delinquent Loans ~ Late charges on residential mortgages and consumer loans are assessed if a payment is not received by the due date plus a grace period. When an advanced stage of delinquency appears on a single-family loan and if repayment cannot be expected within a reasonable time or a repayment agreement is not entered into, a required notice of foreclosure or repossession proceedings may be prepared by the Bank`s attorney and delivered to the borrower so that foreclosure proceedings may be initiated promptly, if necessary. The Bank also collects late charges on commercial loans. When the Bank acquires real estate through foreclosure, voluntary deed, or similar means, it is classified as `other real estate owned` until it is sold. When property is acquired in this manner, it is recorded at the lower of cost (the unpaid principal balance at the date of acquisition) or fair value. Any subsequent write-down is charged to expense. All costs incurred from the date of acquisition to maintain the property are expensed. `Other real estate owned` is appraised during the foreclosure process, before acquisition. Losses are recognized for the amount by which the book value of the related mortgage loan exceeds the estimated net realizable value of the property. Investments ~ Investment securities provide a return on residual funds after lending activities. Investments may be in corporate securities, U.S. Government and agency obligations, state and local government obligations and mortgage-backed securities. The Bank generally does not invest in securities that are rated less than investment grade by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. All securities-related activity is reported to the Bank`s board of directors. General changes in investment strategy are required to be reviewed and approved by the board. The President & Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer can purchase and sell securities in accordance with the Bank`s stated investment policy. Sources of Funds ~ Deposit Accounts. Deposit accounts are a major source of funds for the Bank. The Bank offers a number of deposit products to attract both commercial and regular consumer checking and savings customers, including regular and money market savings accounts, NOW accounts, and a variety of fixed-maturity, fixed-rate certificates with maturities ranging from seven days to 60 months. These accounts earn interest at rates established by management based on competitive market factors and management`s desire to increase certain types or maturities of deposit liabilities. The Bank also provides debit cards, gift cards, travel cards, travelers` checks, official checks, money orders, ATM services, and IRA accounts. Borrowings. Deposits and repayment of loan principal are the Bank`s primary sources of funds for lending activities and other general business purposes. However, when the supply of lendable funds or funds available for general business purposes cannot satisfy the demand for loans or general business purposes, the Bank can obtain funds from the Cincinnati Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). In addition to borrowing from the FHLB on a term-loan basis, the Bank has a line of credit with the FHLB that allows the Bank to borrow in an amount based on a percentage of the Bank`s pledged eligible mortgages. All or substantially all of the Bank`s entire mortgage loans are pledged to the FHLB. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank had additional borrowing capacity of approximately $20 million from the FHLB. Interest is payable monthly, and the line of credit is secured by a blanket pledge collateral agreement. First National Bank also has access to credit through the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and other funding sources. Personnel ~ As of December 31, 2008, First National Bank had 108 full-time equivalent employees. A collective bargaining group represents none of the employees. Management considers its relations with employees to be excellent. Minority Ownership of a Title Insurance Agency ~ First National Bank owns 49% of the stock of First Kropf Title, L.L.C., a title insurance agency whose majority owner is Kropf, Wagner, Lutz & VanSickle L.L.P., a law firm in which a director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of National Bancshares and the Bank ~ Mr. John W. Kropf ~ is an owner. In many mortgage transactions, the Bank selects the firm that will provide title insurance services, but the mortgage borrower ordinarily pays the costs. First Kropf Title, L.L.C. is not the only title insurance agency used by the Bank, but First Kropf Title, L.L.C. derives all or substantially all of its business through referrals from the Bank. Available Information ~ The Company makes available, free of charge, through the Investor Relations section of its Internet website at www.fnborrville.com, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such reports with or furnishes them to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also the Company`s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter and Audit Committee Charter are available under the Investor Relations section on its website. Supervision and Regulation The following discussion of bank supervision and regulation is qualified in its entirety by reference to the statutory and regulatory provisions discussed. Changes in applicable law or in the policies of various regulatory authorities could affect materially the business and prospects of National Bancshares and the Bank. National Bancshares Corporation is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. As such, National Bancshares is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, acting primarily through the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. National Bancshares is required to file annual reports and other information with the Federal Reserve. First National Bank is a national bank, regulated primarily by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (`OCC`) and secondarily by the FDIC. National Bancshares and the Bank are subject to federal banking laws intended to protect depositors, not shareholders. Federal and state laws applicable to holding companies and their financial institution subsidiaries regulate the range of permissible business activities, investments, reserves against deposits, capital levels, lending activities and practices, the nature and amount of collateral for loans, establishment of branches, mergers, dividends, and a variety of other important matters. The Bank is subject to detailed, complex, and sometimes overlapping federal and state statutes and regulations affecting routine banking operations. These statutes and regulations include but are not limited to state consumer credit laws, the Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Savings Act, and the Community Reinvestment Act. The Bank must comply with Federal Reserve Board regulations requiring depository institutions to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts (principally NOW and regular checking accounts). Because required reserves are commonly maintained in the form of vault cash or in a noninterest-bearing account (or pass-through account) at a Federal Reserve Bank, the effect of the reserve requirement is to reduce an institution`s earning assets. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 expanded significantly the authority of federal agencies to regulate the activities of federally chartered and state-chartered financial institutions and their holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have extensive authority to prevent and to remedy unsafe and unsound practices and violations of applicable laws and regulations by institutions and holding companies. The agencies may assess civil money penalties, issue cease-and-desist or removal orders, seek injunctions, and publicly disclose those actions. Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. On October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced a new program ~ the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (`TLGP`) that provides unlimited deposit insurance on funds in non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts not otherwise covered by the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000. Such non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts are initially insured at no cost to the institution for 30 days, with coverage continuing through December 31, 2009 at a 10 bps fee on deposit amounts in excess of $250,000. Eligible institutions were able to opt-out on or before December 5, 2008. The Bank did not elect to opt-out of the unlimited deposit insurance provided under the TLGP. Also under TLGP, newly issued senior unsecured debt issued on or before June 30, 2009 will be fully insured in the event the issuing institution subsequently fails, or its holding company files for bankruptcy. The Bank has elected not to participate in the debt guarantee portion of this program. Regulation of Bank Holding Companies ~ Bank and Bank Holding Company Acquisitions. The Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain approval of the Federal Reserve before ~ ~ directly or indirectly acquiring ownership or control of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding company, if after the acquisition the acquiring company would own or control more than 5% of the shares of the other bank or bank holding company (unless the acquiring company already owns or controls a majority of the shares), ~ acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank, or ~ merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. The Federal Reserve will not approve an acquisition, merger, or consolidation that would have a substantially anticompetitive result unless the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by a greater public interest in satisfying the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve also considers capital adequacy and other financial and managerial factors in its review of acquisitions and mergers. Additionally, the Bank Holding Company Act, the Change in Bank Control Act and the Federal Reserve Board`s Regulation Y require advance approval of the Federal Reserve to acquire `control` of a bank holding company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of a class of voting securities of the bank holding company. If the holding company has securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as National Bancshares does, or if no other person owns a greater percentage of the class of voting securities, control is rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of voting securities. Nonbanking Activities. With some exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act has for many years also prohibited a bank holding company from acquiring or retaining direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company, or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve non-bank activities that, by statute or by Federal Reserve Board regulation or order, are held to be closely related to the business of banking or of managing or controlling banks. In making its determination that a particular activity is closely related to the business of banking, the Federal Reserve considers whether the performance of the activities by a bank holding company can be expected to produce benefits to the public ~ such as greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency in resources ~ that will outweigh the risks of possible adverse effects such as decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, or unsound banking practices. Some of the activities determined by Federal Reserve Board regulation to be closely related to the business of banking are: making or servicing loans or leases; engaging in insurance and discount brokerage activities; owning thrift institutions; performing data processing services; acting as a fiduciary or investment or financial advisor; and making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare. Financial Holding Companies. On November 12, 1999 the Gramm Leach Bliley Act became law, repealing much of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act`s separation of the commercial and investment banking industries and permitting bank holding companies to become financial holding companies and affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies, as well as engage in other activities that are financial in nature. The Gramm Leach Bliley Act expands the range of nonbanking activities a bank holding company may engage in, while preserving existing authority for bank holding companies to engage in activities that are closely related to banking. The new legislation creates a new category of holding company called a `financial holding company.` If each of a bank holding company`s subsidiary banks is well capitalized under regulatory prompt corrective action provisions, is well managed, and has at least a satisfactory rating under the Community Reinvestment Act, the bank holding company may become a financial holding company by filing a declaration that the bank holding company wishes to become a financial holding company. No regulatory approval is necessary for a financial holding company to acquire a company ~ other than a bank or savings association ~ engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board. Financial holding companies may engage in any activity that is ~ ~ financial in nature or incidental to that financial activity, or ~ complementary to a financial activity and that does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. Activities that are financial in nature include ~ ~ acting as principal, agent, or broker for insurance, ~ underwriting, dealing in, or making a market in securities, and ~ providing financial and investment advice. The Federal Reserve Board and the Secretary of the Treasury have authority to decide that other activities are also financial in nature or incidental to financial activity, taking into account changes in technology, changes in the banking marketplace, competition for banking services, and so on. The Federal Reserve Board has authority under Rule 225.83 (12 CFR 225.83) to prohibit a company from exercising the enhanced powers of a financial holding company if the Federal Reserve Board determines that the company`s bank subsidiary is not well capitalized or well managed. National Bancshares Corporation is and has been engaged solely in activities that were permissible for a bank holding company before enactment of the Gramm Leach Bliley Act. Holding Company Capital and Source of Strength. The Federal Reserve considers the adequacy of a bank holding company`s capital on essentially the same risk-adjusted basis as capital adequacy is determined by the FDIC at the bank subsidiary level. It is also Federal Reserve Board policy that bank holding companies serve as a source of strength for their subsidiary banking institutions, committing resources to subsidiary banks when necessary. A holding company might be compelled to provide support to a subsidiary bank when the holding company does not have the resources to provide it. Additionally, the National Bank Act gives the OCC authority to assess a national bank`s stockholders (or the bank`s holding company) if the bank`s capital becomes impaired. 12 U.S.C. 55. If the stockholders (or holding company) fail to pay the assessment within three months, the OCC could order the sale of the bank`s stock to cover the deficiency. Under Bank Holding Company Act section 5(e), the Federal Reserve Board may require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or relinquish control of a nonbank subsidiary if the Federal Reserve Board determines that the activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of a subsidiary bank. And with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991`s addition of the prompt corrective action provisions to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, section 38(f)(2)(I) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act now provides that a federal bank regulatory authority may require a bank holding company to divest itself of an undercapitalized bank subsidiary if the agency determines that divestiture will improve the bank`s financial condition and prospects. Deposit Insurance. The FDIC insures the deposits of the Bank to the extent provided by law. Prior to 2007, under the FDIC`s risk-based insurance system, depository institutions were assessed premiums based upon the institution`s capital position and other supervisory factors. Effective January 1, 2007, the FDIC began using a new approach to assess premiums. The FDIC places each depository institution in one of four risk categories using a two-step process based first on capital ratios (the capital group assignment) and then on other relevant information (the supervisory group assignment). Within the lowest risk category, known as Risk Category I, rates will vary based on each institution`s CAMELS component ratings, certain financial ratios (for most institutions), and long-term debt issuer ratings (for large institutions that have such a rating). In 2008, rates ranged between 5 and 43 cents per $100 in assessable deposits depending on the risk category to which an insured depository institution was assigned. Institutions in Risk Category I were charged a rate between 5 and 7 cents per $100 in assessable deposits. However, as discussed below, rates have dramatically increased for the first quarter of 2009 and are anticipated to remain at increased levels for the next several years. On February 8, 2006, the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the `Reform Act`) was signed into law as part of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. Among other provisions, the Reform Act provided for the merger of the two insurance funds, BIF and SAIF, into a new single deposit insurance fund, DIF. Prior to the merger of BIF and SAIF, the Bank`s primary insurance fund for deposits was BIF. Among other things, the Reform Act provides for the (i) modification of assessments under the risk-based assessment system, (ii) replacement of a fixed designated reserve ratio with a reserve range between 1.15% of estimated insured deposits and 1.5% of estimated insured deposits, and (iii) payment by the FDIC of dividends when certain reserve ratios exceed certain thresholds. Because of recent depository institution failures, the DIF reserve ratio fell significantly below 1.15%. The Reform Act requires that the FDIC create and implement a plan to restore the reserve ratio to at least 1.15% within five years. On October 16, 2008, the FDIC published a notice in the Federal Register concerning its establishment of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Restoration Plan (the `Restoration Plan`). The Restoration Plan is a five year recapitalization plan for the DIF (subsequently amended to cover a seven-year time frame, as discussed below) based, in part, on significantly higher assessed DIF rates. Concurrent with the publication of the Restoration Plan, the FDIC issued a proposed rule to increase the DIF assessed rates for the first quarter of 2009 by 7 bps and, effective April 1, 2009, to make certain other changes regarding risk-based assessment and to set new deposit insurance rates. On December 22, 2008, the FDIC issued a final rule in which it invoked the `good cause` exception of the Administrative Procedures Act to waive the requirement that once finalized a rule must have a delayed effective date of 30 days from the publication date and, effective January 1, 2009, raised the first quarter 2009 DIF assessed rates by 7 bps. Under the final rule, for the first quarter of 2009, the new rates were expressed to range between 12 and 50 cents per $100 in assessable deposits depending on the risk category to which an insured depository institution was assigned. Institutions in Risk Category I were charged a rate between 12 and 14 cents per $100 in assessable deposits for the first quarter of 2009. Such an increase in the DIF assessed rates more than doubles the previous applicable rates for Tier I institutions. On February 27, 2009 the FDIC amended the Restoration Plan for the DIF. Under the amended Restoration Plan, the FDIC extended the horizon from five years to seven years to raise the DIF reserve ratio to 1.15 percent, in recognition of the current significant strains on banks and the financial system and the likelihood of a severe recession. The amended Restoration Plan was accompanied by a final rule that sets assessment rates and makes adjustments to recognize how the assessment system differentiates for risk. Currently, most banks are in the best risk category and pay anywhere from 12 cents per $100 of deposits to 14 cents per $100 for insurance. Under the final rule, banks in this category will pay initial base rates ranging from 12 cents per $100 to 16 cents per $100 on an annual basis, beginning on April 1, 2009. Changes to the assessment system include higher rates for institutions that rely significantly on secured liabilities, which would increase the FDIC`s loss in the event of institutional failure, without providing additional assessment revenue. Under the final rule, assessments will be higher for institutions that rely significantly on brokered deposits but, for well-managed and well-capitalized institutions, only when accompanied by rapid asset growth. The final rule also provides incentives in the form of a reduction in assessment rates for institutions to hold long-term unsecured debt and, for smaller institutions, high levels of Tier 1 capital. On February 27, 2009 the FDIC adopted an interim rule imposing a 20 basis point emergency special assessment on the industry on June 30, 2009. The assessment is to be collected on September 30, 2009. The interim rule would also permit the FDIC to impose an emergency special assessment after June 30, 2009, of up to 10 basis points if necessary to maintain public confidence in federal deposit insurance. However, the status of this emergency assessment is not currently clear. On March 5, 2009, FDIC Chairman Shelia Bair indicated that if Congress significantly expands the FDIC`s borrowing authority with Treasury, the FDIC would have flexibility to reduce the size of the emergency special assessment. Legislation has also been introduced and is pending in Congress to increase the FDIC`s borrowing authority from $30 billion to $100 billion. Chairman Bair has indicated in recent news reports that if this pending legislation is adopted, it would relieve the FDIC from imposing the full emergency special assessment and would allow a lowering of the assessment from the proposed 20 basis points to 10 basis points. At this time, however, the Company is unable to predict whether the proposed one time special assessment will be decreased or when any further developments concerning such assessment might occur. On February 27, 2009 the FDIC also modified the debt guarantee component of the TLGP to allow participating entities, with the FDIC`s permission, to issue mandatory convertible debt. This change would provide institutions additional options for raising capital and reduce the concentration of FDIC-guaranteed debt maturing in mid-2012. Insured depository institutions are further assessed premiums for Financing Corporation (`FICO`) bond debt service. The FICO assessment rate for DIF ranged between a high of 1.14 bps for the first quarter of 2008 to a low of 1.10 for the fourth quarter of 2008. For the first quarter of 2009, the FICO assessment rate for DIF is 1.14 bps resulting in a premium of $0.0114 per $100 of DIF-eligible deposits. Interstate Banking and Branching. In 1994 the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act eased restrictions on interstate banking. The Riegle-Neal Act allows the Federal Reserve to approve an application by an adequately capitalized and adequately managed bank holding company to acquire a bank located in a state other than the acquiring company`s home state, without regard to whether the transaction is prohibited by the laws of any state. The Federal Reserve may not approve the acquisition of a bank that has not been in existence for the minimum time period (up to five years) specified by the statutory law of the acquired, or `target,` bank`s state. The Riegle-Neal Act also prohibits the Federal Reserve from approving an application if the applicant (and its depository institution affiliates) controls or would control more than 10% of the insured deposits in the United States or 30% or more of the deposits in the target bank`s home state or in any state in which the target bank maintains a branch. The Riegle-Neal Act does not affect the authority of states to limit the percentage of total insured deposits in the state that may be held or controlled by a bank or bank holding company if the limitation does not discriminate against out-of-state banks or bank holding companies. Individual states may also waive the 30% statewide concentration limit contained in the Riegle-Neal Act. Branching between states may be accomplished by merging commonly controlled banks located in different states into one legal entity. Branching may also be accomplished by establishing de novo branches or acquiring branches in another state. Under section 24(j) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, a branch of a bank operating out-of-state ~ in a `host state` in other words ~ is subject to the law of the host state regarding community reinvestment, fair lending, consumer protection, and establishment of branches. The Riegle-Neal Act authorizes the FDIC to approve interstate branching de novo by state-chartered banks solely in states that specifically allow it. Ohio bank law allows de novo branching in Ohio by an out-of-state bank. The FDIC has adopted regulations under the Riegle-Neal Act to prohibit an out-of-state bank from using the new interstate branching authority primarily for the purpose of deposit production. These regulations include guidelines to ensure that interstate branches operated by an out-of-state bank in a host state are reasonably helping to satisfy the credit needs of the communities served by the out-of-state bank. Capital ~ Risk-Based Capital Requirements. The Federal Reserve Board and the OCC employ similar risk-based capital guidelines in their examination and regulation of bank holding companies and national banks. If capital falls below the minimum levels established by the guidelines, the bank holding company or bank may be denied approval to acquire or establish additional banks or non-bank businesses or to open new facilities. Failure to satisfy capital guidelines could subject a banking institution to a variety of enforcement actions by federal bank regulatory authorities, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC and a prohibition on the acceptance of `brokered deposits.` In the calculation of risk-based capital, assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with an assigned weighting (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%). Most loans are assigned to the 100% risk category, except for first mortgage loans fully secured by residential property, which carry a 50% rating. Direct obligations of or obligations guaranteed by the United States Treasury or United States Government agencies have a 0% risk-weight. Off-balance sheet items are also taken into account in the calculation of risk-based capital, with each class of off-balance sheet item being converted to a balance sheet equivalent according to established `conversion factors.` From these computations, the total of risk-weighted assets is derived. Risk-based capital ratios therefore state capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items. The ratios established by guideline are minimums only. Current risk-based capital guidelines require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a minimum risk-based total capital ratio equal to 8% and a Tier 1 capital ratio of 4%. Intangibles other than readily marketable mortgage servicing rights are generally deducted from capital. Tier 1 capital includes stockholders` equity, qualifying perpetual preferred stock (within limits and subject to conditions, particularly if the preferred stock is cumulative preferred stock), and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles, identified losses, investments in securities subsidiaries, and certain other assets. Tier 2 capital includes the allowance for loan losses, up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, any qualifying perpetual preferred stock exceeding the amount includable in Tier 1 capital, mandatory convertible securities, and subordinated debt and intermediate term preferred stock, up to 50% of Tier 1 capital. The OCC`s evaluation of an institution`s capital adequacy takes into account a variety of other factors as well, including interest rate risks to which the institution is subject, the level and quality of an institution`s earnings, loan and investment portfolio characteristics and risks, risks arising from the conduct of nontraditional activities, and a variety of other factors. Accordingly, the OCC`s final supervisory judgment concerning an institution`s capital adequacy could differ significantly from the conclusions that might be derived from the absolute level of an institution`s risk-based capital ratios. Therefore, institutions generally are expected to maintain risk-based capital ratios that exceed the minimum ratios discussed above. This is particularly true for institutions contemplating significant expansion plans and institutions that are subject to high or inordinate levels of risk. The banking agencies have also established a minimum leverage ratio of 3%, which represents Tier 1 capital as a percentage of total assets, less intangibles. However, for all but the most highly rated banks and bank holding companies, the banking agencies expect an additional margin of at least 100 to 200 basis points. At December 31, 2008, the bank was in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements. Actual and required capital amounts and ratios are presented elsewhere, specifically in Note 14 of National Bancshares Corporation`s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. Prompt Corrective Action. To resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions and to prevent a recurrence of the banking crisis of the 1980s and early 1990s, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 established a system known as `prompt corrective action.` Under the prompt corrective action provisions and implementing regulations, every institution is classified into one of five categories, depending on its total risk-based capital ratio, its Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, its leverage ratio, and subjective factors. The categories are `well capitalized,` `adequately capitalized,` `undercapitalized,` significantly undercapitalized` and `critically undercapitalized.` A financial institution`s operations can be significantly affected by its capital classification. For example, an institution that is not `well capitalized` generally is prohibited from accepting brokered deposits and offering interest rates on deposits higher than the prevailing rate in its market, and the holding company of any undercapitalized institution must guarantee, in part, aspects of the institution`s capital plan. Financial institution regulatory agencies generally are required to appoint a receiver or conservator shortly after an institution enters the category of weakest capitalization. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 also authorizes the regulatory agencies to reclassify an institution from one category into a lower category if the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice. Undercapitalized institutions are required to take specified actions to increase their capital or otherwise decrease the risks to the federal deposit insurance funds. Limits on Bank Dividends to the Holding Company. National Bancshares Corporation`s ability to obtain funds for the payment of dividends and for other cash requirements depends on the amount of dividends that may be paid to it by the Bank. Under the National Bank Act and OCC Rule 5.64, without OCC approval a national bank may not pay a cash dividend if the amount of the dividend exceeds retained net income for the year and for the two preceding years (after any required transfers to surplus). A national bank`s ability to pay dividends may be affected also by the OCC`s capital maintenance requirements. Moreover, regulatory authorities may prohibit banks and bank holding companies from paying dividends if payment of dividends would constitute an unsafe and unsound banking practice. A 1985 policy statement of the Federal Reserve Board declares that a bank holding company should not pay cash dividends on common stock unless the organization`s net income for the past year is sufficient to fully fund the dividends and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization`s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. Transactions with Affiliates. The Bank must comply with section 23A and section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, pertaining to transactions with affiliates. These statutes are intended to protect banks from abuse in financial transactions with affiliates, preventing federally insured deposits from being diverted to support the activities of unregulated entities engaged in nonbanking businesses. An affiliate of a bank includes any company or entity that controls or is under common control with the bank. Generally, section 23A and section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act ~ ~ limit the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may lend to or engage in various other kinds of transactions with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of the bank`s capital and surplus, limiting the aggregate of covered transactions with all affiliates to 20% of capital and surplus, ~ impose restrictions on investments by a subsidiary bank in the stock or securities of its holding company, ~ impose restrictions on the use of a holding company`s stock as collateral for loans by the subsidiary bank, and ~ require that affiliate transactions be on terms substantially the same or at least as favorable to the institution or subsidiary as those provided to a non-affiliate. The Bank`s authority to extend credit to insiders ~ meaning executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders ~ or to entities those persons control, is subject to section 22(g) and section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board. Among other things, these laws require insider loans to be made on terms substantially similar to those offered to unaffiliated individuals, place limits on the amount of loans a bank may make to insiders based in part on the Bank`s capital position, and require that specified approval procedures be followed. Loans to an individual insider may not exceed the legal limit on loans to any one borrower, which in general terms is 15% of capital but can be higher in some circumstances. And the aggregate of all loans to all insiders may not exceed the Bank`s unimpaired capital and surplus. Insider loans exceeding the greater of 5% of capital or $25,000 must be approved in advance by a majority of the board, with any `interested` director not participating in the voting. Lastly, loans to executive officers are subject to special limitations. Executive officers may borrow in unlimited amounts to finance their children`s education or to finance the purchase or improvement of their residence, and they may borrow no more than $100,000 for most other purposes. But loans to executive officers exceeding $100,000 may be allowed if the loan is fully secured by government securities or a segregated deposit account. Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (`CRA`) and implementing regulations of the banking agencies, a financial institution has a continuing and affirmative obligation ~ consistent with safe and sound operation ~ to respond to the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions, nor does it limit an institution`s discretion to develop the types of products and services it believes are best suited to its particular community. The CRA requires that bank regulatory agencies conduct regular CRA examinations and provide written evaluations of institutions` CRA performance. The CRA also requires that an institution`s CRA performance rating be made public. CRA performance evaluations are based on a four-tiered rating system: Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve and Substantial Noncompliance. Over the 27 years that the CRA has existed, banking institutions ~ particularly the largest banks and savings associations ~ have faced increasingly difficult regulatory obstacles and public interest group objections in connection with their regulatory applications, including institutions that have received the highest possible CRA ratings. Although CRA examinations occur on a regular basis, CRA performance evaluations have been used principally in the evaluation of regulatory applications submitted by an institution. CRA performance evaluations are considered in evaluating applications for such things as mergers, acquisitions, and applications to open branches. A bank holding company cannot elect to be a `financial holding company` ~ with the expanded securities, insurance and other powers that designation entails ~ unless all of the depository institutions owned by the holding company have a CRA rating of satisfactory or better. Following a CRA examination as of December 31, 2006, the Bank`s most recent examination, the Bank received a rating of `Satisfactory.` Monetary Policy. The earnings of financial institutions are affected by the policies of regulatory authorities, including monetary policy of the Federal Reserve Board. An important function of the Federal Reserve System is regulation of aggregate national credit and money supply. The Federal Reserve Board accomplishes these goals with measures such as open market transactions in securities, establishment of the discount rate on bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These methods are used in varying combinations to influence overall growth and distribution of financial institutions` loans, investments and deposits, and they also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. Monetary policy is influenced by many factors, including inflation, unemployment, short-term and long-term changes in the international trade balance, and fiscal policies of the United States government. Federal Reserve Board monetary policy has had a significant effect on the operating results of financial institutions in the past, and it can be expected to influence operating results in the future. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses accounting oversight and corporate governance matters, and, among other things: (a) required executive certification of financial presentations, (b) increased requirements for board audit committees and their members, (c) enhanced disclosure of controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, (d) enhanced controls on, and reporting of, insider trading and (e) increased penalties for financial crimes and forfeiture of executive bonuses in certain circumstances. The legislation and its implementing regulations have resulted in increased costs of compliance, including certain outside professional costs. To date these costs have had a significant impact on our operations, which have included costs to add regulatory support personnel and costs to ensure effectiveness of internal controls and testing. ITEM 1B ~ UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS We have not received any comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission about our periodic and current reports within the last 180 days and, accordingly, we do not have any unresolved comments from the staff. ITEM 2 ~ PROPERTIES First National Bank operates thirteen full service offices and one limited service office in a market area comprising most of Wayne County, western Stark County, northeastern Holmes County and southern Medina County. The Bank`s offices, all of which are owned by First National Bank except as indicated, are ~
Net Book Value Location County (Dollars in Thousands) Main Office: 112 West Market Street Wayne $335 Orrville, Ohio 44667 Other Offices: 12 West Main Street Wayne $151 Dalton, Ohio 44618 1320 West High Street Wayne $137 Orrville, Ohio 44667 4934 Kidron Road Wayne $835 Kidron, Ohio 44636 153 East Main Street Wayne $105 Smithville, Ohio 44677 15974 East Main Street Wayne $61 Mt. Eaton, Ohio 44659 U.S. Route 30 at County Road 44 Wayne $134 7227 Lincoln Way East Apple Creek, Ohio 44606 1720 North Main Street Wayne $49 Orrville, Ohio 44667 (cash ATM only) 1725 Cleveland Road Wayne $542 Wooster, Ohio 44691 4192 Burbank Road Wayne $1,251 Wooster, Ohio 44691 211 Lincoln Way East Stark $652 Massillon, Ohio 44646 2312 Lincoln Way N.W. Stark $394 Massillon, Ohio 44647 51 Massillon Marketplace Drive S.W. Stark $0 Massillon, Ohio 44646 (cash ATM only) (leased location) 106 Ainsworth Street Medina $318 Lodi, Ohio 44254 121 Greenwich Road Medina $22 Seville, Ohio 44667 (leased facility)
At December 31, 2008 the net book value of the Bank`s investment in premises and equipment totaled $6.2 million. The Bank`s electronic data processing functions are performed under contract with an electronic data processing services firm that performs services for financial institutions throughout the Midwest. ITEM 3 ~ LEGAL PROCEEDINGS From time to time the Bank is involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to its business. In the opinion of management, based upon information currently available to us, no current legal proceedings are material to the financial condition of National Bancshares or the Bank, either individually or in the aggregate and are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. This statement represents a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from management`s opinion based on a variety of factors, including the uncertainties involved in the proof of legal and factual matters in legal proceedings. ITEM 4 ~ SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted to a vote of National Bancshares` shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2008. Part II ITEM 5 ~ MARKET FOR REGISTRANT`S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Incorporated by reference to `Price Range of Common Stock` appearing on page 51 of National Bancshares Corporation`s Annual Report 2008. National Bancshares had 888 shareholders of record as of March 13, 2009. Because National Bancshares Corporation is dependent on its Bank subsidiary for earnings and funds necessary to pay dividends, the ability of National Bancshares to pay dividends to its shareholders is subject to bank regulatory restrictions. See, `Supervision and Regulation ~ Limits on Bank Dividends to the Holding Company.` Incorporated by reference to `Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return Of National Bancshares Corporation, S&P 500 Stock Index, and S&P 500 Bank Index` appearing on page 50 of National Bancshares Corporation`s Annual Report 2008. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Plan Category Number of securities to Weighted-average exercise Number of securities be issued upon exercise price of outstanding remaining available for of outstanding options, options, warrants future issuance under warrants and rights and rights equity compensation plans Equity compensation plans approved by the security holders 58,000 $18.03 165,448 Equity compensation plans not approved by the security holders - - - Total 58,000 $18.03 165,448
A description of the equity compensation plan is incorporated by reference to `Note 13 ~ Stock-Based Compensation` appearing on page 41 of National Bancshares Corporation`s Annual Report 2008. Issuer Purchase and Sales of Equity Securities We repurchased 5,017 shares of our common stock during the year ended December 31, 2008. No equity securities of National Bancshares were sold by it during 2008. ITEM 6 ~ SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Incorporated by reference to `Selected Financial Data` appearing on pages 5 and 6 of National Bancshares Corporation`s Annual Report 2008. ITEM 7 ~ MANAGEMENT`S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Incorporated by reference appearing on pages 7 through 24 of National Bancshares Corporation`s Annual Report 2008. ITEM 7A ~ QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Information concerning the interest-rate risks to which First National Bank`s assets and liabilities are exposed is contained in `Management`s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations` appearing on pages 19 and 20 of National Bancshares Corporation`s Annual Report 2008. ITEM 8 ~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The Consolidated Financial Statements and the Report of Independent Auditors are incorporated by reference from pages 25 through 46 of National Bancshares Corporation`s Annual Report 2008. ITEM 9 ~ CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE No changes in or disagreements with the independent accountants have occurred in the two most recent fiscal years or since the end of December 31, 2008. ITEM 9AT ~ CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES With the participation of the President and the Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer, management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of National Bancshares Corporation`s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of 2008. Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2008 National Bancshares Corporation`s disclosure controls and procedures were effective (1) to ensure that information required to be disclosed by National Bancshares in reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (2) in timely alerting them to material information of National Bancshares (including First National Bank) required to be included in this annual report on Form 10-K. During the fourth quarter of 2008 there were no changes in National Bancshares Corporation`s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to affect National Bancshares Corporation`s internal controls over financial reporting. The report of Management on the Company`s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is incorporated by reference on page 47 of National Bancshares Corporation`s Annual Report 2008. ITEM 9B ~ OTHER INFORMATION None Part III ITEM 10 ~ DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Information concerning the directors of National Bancshares is incorporated by reference from pages 4 and 5 of the definitive proxy statement for the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, filed or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2008. Disclosure by National Bancshares about directors` and executive officers` compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 appears on pages 14 and 15 of the proxy statement for the 2009 annual meeting, and it is incorporated herein by reference. The executive officers of National Bancshares are ~
Name Age Position David C. Vernon 68 President and Chief Executive Officer of National Bancshares Corporation and First National Bank. He serves as Chairman Emeritus of Central Federal Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary CFBank, a federally chartered savings association headquartered in Fairlawn in Summit County, Ohio since February 28, 2008. He served as a director and Vice-Chairman of Central Federal Corporation and CFBank from January 1, 2006 until February 28, 2008. He served as Chairman of Central Federal Corporation and CFBank from January 2003 until January 1, 2006. He also served as Central Federal Corporation`s and CFBank`s Chief Executive Officer in 2003 and 2004 and as President of both companies from March 2003 to January 2005. Before joining Central Federal and CFBank, he was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Founders Capital Corporation in Akron, Ohio from September 2002 to February 2003; a Strategic Planning Consultant to Westfield Bank in Westfield, Ohio from May 2000 to July 2002; a Consultant to Champaign National Bank in Urbana, Ohio from July 1999 to April 2002; and a Consultant to First Place Bank in Warren, Ohio from April 1999 to February 2001. In February 1999, Mr. Vernon retired as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Summit Bank, an Akron-area community bank he founded in January 1991. James R. VanSickle 38 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of National Bancshares Corporation and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First National Bank since June 2007. Mr. VanSickle is the principal financial and accounting officer. Prior to joining First National Bank, he worked with Crowe Chizek and Company LLC as and Executive in the firm`s Financial Institutions Group. He joined Crowe in 1992 and was promoted to Executive in 2003. Thomas M. Fast 47 Senior Vice President and Senior Loan Officer of First National Bank since July 2007. Mr. Fast has worked for Wayne County National Bank, KeyBank and First Chicago National Bank. He has over 18 years experience in banking focusing on commercial and real estate lending. Steven L. Riddick 60 Vice President and Senior Credit Officer of First National Bank since October 2006. Previously, Mr. Riddick served as Vice President, Commercial Banking and Branch Manager, Seville Office of First National Bank. Paul G. Kubiak 48 Vice President of Client Services and Operations for First National Bank since April 2007. Prior to this, Mr. Kubiak was Vice President of Client Services and a business development officer for the Bank since March 2004. Prior to joining the Bank, he served as Manager of Customer Service for Bekaert Contours and Contours, Ltd., a manufacturing firm in Orrville, Ohio.
There are no family relationships among any of the executive officers. National Bancshares has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors and employees, including the principal executive officer. We have also adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct for the Finance Officers and Finance Department Personnel applicable to all finance department personnel, including our principal executive, financial and accounting officers. National Bancshares Corporation`s board of directors has determined that it has at least one `audit committee financial expert` serving on the Audit Committee. National Bancshares considers Director John Cook, CPA, Ph.D. to be an audit committee financial expert, based on his experience as partner in an accounting firm. Information regarding the Audit Committee is incorporated by reference to pages 8 through 10 of National Bancshares` Proxy Statement for the 2009 annual meeting, under the caption `Audit Committee` and `Audit Committee Report.` ITEM 11 ~ EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Incorporated by reference from pages 12 through 15 of the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, filed or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2008. ITEM 12 ~ SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Incorporated by reference from page 3 of the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, filed or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2008. ITEM 13 ~ CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE Incorporated by reference from page 15 of the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, filed or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2008. ITEM 14 ~ PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Incorporated by reference from page 7 of the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders, filed or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2008. PART IV ITEM 15 ~ EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a)(1) Financial Statements The following financial statements are included in this document in Item 8: ~ Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ~ Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 ~ Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 ~ Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders` Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 ~ Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 ~ Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown elsewhere in the document in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto, or in the Management`s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section. (a)(3) Exhibits See the list of exhibits below (b) Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
Exhibit Number Description Location 3.1 Amended Articles of Incorporation Incorporated by reference to the identically numbered exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed on March 26, 2004 3. Amended By-Laws Incorporated by reference to the identically numbered exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 28, 2008 10.1* Directors` Defined Benefit Plan Agreement Incorporated by reference to the identically numbered exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, filed on March 29, 2001 10.2* Employment Agreement entered into by Incorporated by reference on Form 8-K dated David C. Vernon and National Bancshares November 27, 2007. and First National Bank 10.3* Employment Agreement entered into by Incorporated by reference on Form 8-K dated James R. VanSickle and National Bancshares June 19, 2007. and First National Bank 10.4* Employment Agreement entered into by Incorporated by reference to the identically numbered Thomas M. Fast and National Bancshares exhibit to the Annual Report on 10-K for the fiscal and First National Bank year ended December 31, 2007, filed on March 28, 2008. 13 2008 Annual Report to Security Holders Filed herewith 14.1 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Incorporated by reference to the identically numbered exhibit to the Annual Report Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed on March 24, 2007 14.2 Code of Ethical Conduct for the Finance Incorporated by reference to the identically numbered Officers And Finance Department exhibit to the Annual Report Form 10-K for the fiscal Personnel year ended December 31, 2006 filed on March 24, 2007 21 Subsidiaries Filed herewith 23 Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP Filed herewith 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Filed herewith Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Filed herewith Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 32 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Filed herewith Section 1350,as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. National Bancshares Corporation By:/s/ David C. Vernon David C. Vernon President and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 27, 2009 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ David C. Vernon March 27, 2009 David C. Vernon President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director /s/ James R. VanSickle March 27, 2009 James R. VanSickle, Sr. Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) /s/ Sara E Steinbrenner Balzarini March 27, 2009 Sara E. Steinbrenner Balzarini, Director /s/ John Cook, CPA, Ph. D. March 27, 2009 John Cook, CPA, Ph. D., Director /s/ Bobbi E. Douglas March 27, 2009 Bobbi E. Douglas, Director /s/ John W. Kropf March 27, 2009 John W. Kropf, Director /s/ John L. Muhlbach, Jr March 27, 2009 John L. Muhlbach, Jr., Director /s/ Victor B. Schantz March 27, 2009 Victor B. Schantz, Director /s/ Stephen W. Schmid March 27, 2009 Stephen W. Schmid, Director /s/ Howard J. Wenger March 27, 2009 Howard J. Wenger, Director /s/ Albert W. Yeagley March 27, 2009 Albert W. Yeagley, Director
EX-13 2 f10-ex13.txt ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Message to Shareholders 4 Financial Highlights 5 Selected Financial Data 7 Management`s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 25 Consolidated Balance Sheets 26 Consolidated Statements of Income 27 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders` Equity 28 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 29 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 47 Report of Management on the Company`s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 48 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 49 Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return of National Bancshares Corporation, S&P 500 Stock Index, and S&P 500 Bank Index 50 Price Range of Common Stock 50 Shareholder Information 51 Officers 52 Directors 52 First National Bank Offices MESSAGE TO SHAREHOLDERS Dear Shareholders: We made significant progress in 2008 as we continued our efforts to move National Bancshares Corporation to a higher level of profitability. Net income this past year increased 28% to $2.194 million from $1.711 million for 2007.Net interest income before the provision for loan losses increased $422 thousand or 4%. Noninterest income increased $343 thousand or 17%. Noninterest expense decreased $327 thousand or 3%. Over the past two years since we began our efforts to achieve improved results, noninterest income has increased $680 thousand and noninterest expense has decreased $1.181 million. Earnings per basic and diluted common share have improved from $.52 in 2006 to $.77 or 48% in 2007 and $1.00 or 30% in 2008. For more details on our 2008 financial results, please review the financial statements and footnotes contained in this Annual Report. In addition to the improvement in our financial results, positive change has taken place in other areas. All of the work required to comply with the Sarbanes Oxley act was completed in 2008. Our Business Continuity Plan was completely rewritten and implemented. All policies have been reviewed, rewritten and updated. Credit quality has been maintained and problem loan administration has been improved. Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual and nonaccrual loans declined from $2.8 million at year-end 2007 to $2 million at year-end 2008. Compliance and Audit has been significantly improved. Twenty members of the Bank`s staff have completed a one year sales training course. We added the following Bank services: Business Internet Banking and remote capture, all bank clients can now apply for a loan 24 hours each day 7 days each week. We introduced Platinum Checking, a high interest checking account for clients with balances above $10,000. We introduced Bonus Checking, an account that pays bonus interest to clients that use our Visa debit card, use bill pay, receive their statement electronically and make at least one electronic direct deposit. All of the bank`s ATMs have been replaced and updated. The bank`s website www.fnborrville.com has been completely redesigned. We installed a new Cisco internet based VOIP telephone system which has made it possible for us to hold company wide meetings and conference calls. We implemented branch capture which transforms checks to electronic media and eliminates the need to move checks by messenger for central processing. Our Burbank Road office in Wooster became the first office to be remodeled to incorporate all of the design elements of our office rebranding project. The results for 2008 represent great progress and we continue to take advantage of opportunities for improvement. We are a strong Bank because we are blessed with loyal clients and friends. We are not burdened with any sub-prime loans our asset quality is strong and our allowance for loan losses is adequate. We are well-positioned. Despite our positioning however, 2009 will not be an easy year. We have already been notified that our 2009 cost for FDIC insurance is going to increase by nearly $1 million. However painful, that`s how the system works. The healthy banks like First National Bank are required to pay for the cost of working out the issues that have been caused by the problem banks. There will likely be more surprises in 2009 which we cannot predict since we are currently in a horrific economic malaise. There are several reasons, however, for believing that we will successfully navigate our way through this turbulence. First, we are well-capitalized and our asset quality is strong. Second, we have an outstanding Board of Directors. Third, we have a dedicated staff of banking professionals. Fourth, we have loyal clients and friends. Fifth, we have the support of you, our shareholders. Even though we are faced with a challenging economic environment we intend to distinguish ourselves by making progress as we work to improve our community financial services business. We are determined to make every effort to improve this wonderful company. Thank you for your interest in National Bancshares Corporation and First National Bank. We appreciate your support. David C. Vernon President and CEO FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS These financial highlights are excerpts of and are not a substitute for National Bancshares Corporation`s consolidated financial statements, including notes, and other detailed financial information we provide elsewhere in this document. You should read the entire document, including the Financial Review and the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Financial Position (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) Percentage At December 31, 2008 2007 Change Total assets $338,002 $306,651 10.2 % Deposits 263,642 242,523 8.7 % Loans - net 179,831 191,488 (6.1)% Securities 127,248 84,514 50.6 % Shareholders` equity 36,881 34,991 5.4 % Book value per share 16.75 15.85 5.7 % Year ended December 31, Net interest income $ 11,286 $ 10,864 3.9 % Income before income taxes 2,964 2,207 34.3 % Net income 2,194 1,711 28.2 % Cash dividends declared 1,404 1,430 (1.8)% Net income per share 1.00 0.77 29.9 % Cash dividends per share 0.64 0.64 --
National Bancshares Corporation is the holding company for First National Bank, a federally chartered national bank formed in Ohio in 1881. First National Bank has thirteen offices in Orrville, Wooster, Massillon, Apple Creek, Dalton, Kidron, Lodi, Mt. Eaton, Seville and Smithville. Additional information is available at www.fnborrville.com. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
As of or for the years ended December 31, 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 Income statement data: Interest income $17,071 $17,832 $17,157 $16,075 $15,312 Interest expense 5,785 6,968 5,995 4,128 3,346 Net interest income 11,286 10,864 11,162 11,947 11,966 Provision for loan losses 482 147 160 159 178 Net interest income after provision for loan losses 10,804 10,717 11,002 11,788 11,788 Noninterest income 2,333 1,990 1,653 1,801 1,895 Noninterest expense 10,173 10,500 11,354 10,986 9,897 Income before income taxes 2,964 2,207 1,301 2,603 3,786 Income taxes 770 496 137 503 875 Net income 2,194 1,711 1,164 2,100 2,911 Balance sheet data: Cash and due from banks $11,001 $11,842 $ 8,955 $10,985 $11,756 Federal funds sold -- 443 9,820 8,780 6,070 Securities 127,248 84,514 86,000 77,009 76,327 Loans, net 179,831 191,488 184,481 191,538 196,725 Deposits 263,642 242,523 247,681 249,488 248,522 Borrowings 34,285 26,374 22,744 19,952 21,679 Shareholders` equity 36,881 34,991 34,680 34,653 35,319 Total assets 338,002 306,651 308,358 306,881 308,425 Share and per share data: Net income $ 1.00 $ 0.77 $ 0.52 $ 0.94 $ 1.30 Cash dividends 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.61 Book value at period end 16.75 15.85 15.52 15.51 15.81 Weighted average number of shares outstanding 2,203,218 2,231,369 2,234,488 2,234,488 2,234,488 Performance ratios: Return on average equity 6.20% 4.94% 3.29% 5.90% 8.29% Return on average assets 0.70% 0.56% 0.38% 0.70% 0.97% Dividend payout percentage 64.00% 83.58% 122.87% 68.10% 46.83% Efficiency ratio (1) 74.70% 81.69% 88.60% 79.91% 71.41% Full time equivalent staff 108 105 132 135 136 Average total assets to full time equivalent staff $2,916 $2,903 $2,296 $2,234 $2,214 Asset quality ratios: Allowance for loan losses to ending total loans 0.95% 1.05% 1.07% 0.98% 0.89% Net loan charge-offs to average loans 0.41% 0.06% 0.03% 0.01% 0.01% Capital ratios: Average equity to average assets 11.24% 11.35% 11.66% 11.81% 11.65% Leverage ratio (2) 7.78% 8.26% 8.57% 9.76% 9.41% Total risk-based capital ratio (2) 12.60% 12.78% 13.26% 14.45% 13.73% (1) The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expenses by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income. (2) Computed in accordance with Comptroller of the Currency and FDIC guidelines.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following table shows quarterly results of operations for 2008 and 2007.
Basic and Interest Net interest Provision for Income before diluted earnings income income loan losses income taxes Net income per share (Dollar amounts in thousands) 2008 First quarter $4,270 $2,744 $187 $660 $491 $0.22 Second quarter 4,196 2,763 71 685 514 0.23 Third quarter 4,294 2,843 126 778 574 0.26 Fourth quarter 4,311 2,936 98 841 615 0.28 2007 First quarter $4,352 $2,642 $27 $354 $287 $0.13 Second quarter 4,542 2,758 -- 361 314 0.14 Third quarter 4,497 2,741 -- 674 507 0.23 Fourth quarter 4,441 2,723 120 818 603 0.27
MANAGEMENT`S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS This section of the annual report is intended to assist the reader in evaluating the performance of National Bancshares Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the financial statements. Forward Looking Statement The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains safe harbor provisions regarding forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as `believes,` `expects,` `anticipates,` `estimates,` `intends,` `should,` `will,` `plans,` `potential` and similar words. Forward-looking statements are also statements that are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties. They are merely predictive or statements of probabilities, involving known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties occurs or if the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results in 2009 and beyond could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon a variety of estimates and assumptions. The estimates and assumptions involve judgments about a number of things, including future economic, competitive, and financial market conditions and future business decisions. These matters are inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond National Bancshares Corporation`s control. Although we believe the estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results could vary materially from those shown. Inclusion of forward-looking information does not constitute a representation by National Bancshares Corporation or any other person that the indicated results will be achieved. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Management Strategy The Company is a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities it serves. The Company attracts deposits from the general public and uses such deposits, together with borrowings and other funds, primarily to originate commercial and commercial real estate loans, single-family and multi-family residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and lines of credit and consumer loans. During 2008, the Company continued to execute a plan, which was implemented in December 2006. The plan focuses on four critical areas. These areas are first; enhancing services for depositor clients, second; strengthening regulatory compliance, third; enhancing the Company`s ability to originate loan assets and fourth; reducing costs and increasing noninterest income. In the first half of 2008, the company introduced `Platinum Checking`, a high-interest checking account for clients with balances above $10 thousand. The Platinum Checking account product accounted for $25.4 million or 9.6% of total deposits at December 31, 2008. In November 2008, the Company introduced `Bonus Checking`, an account that pays bonus interest to clients that use our Visa debit card, bill pay services, receive their account statement online, and make at least one electronic direct deposit. In the first quarter of 2008, the Company hired a new Compliance Officer and Internal Auditor. Each of these new officers has at least twenty years of banking industry experience. In 2008, these officers conducted a comprehensive review of our Compliance and Internal Audit risk assessments and programs to ensure an effective risk-based approach is utilized. Loans, net of allowance for loan losses decreased $11.7 million or 6.1% from 2007 to 2008. The change in loans was significantly impacted by a $20.9 million mortgage loan securitization transaction in December 2008. Most of the loan growth, net of the securitization, has occurred through loan participations purchased from other Ohio financial institutions. The Bank announced a new senior loan officer in January 2009. The new senior loan officer has 27 years of banking experience and is responsible for business development and management of all Bank lending activities. Checking account fees, Visa check card interchange fees and income from mortgage banking activities have significantly increased since the implementation of this plan. In July 2008, the Bank sold its $1.5 million credit card portfolio and generated a $435 thousand gain on the transaction. Cost reductions have been realized in 2008 through reduced salaries and wages and marketing expenses. Salaries and employee benefits were $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $0.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. Nearly thirty full-time equivalent positions have been eliminated since 2006 almost entirely through attrition. Marketing expenses were $144 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $272 thousand compared to the same period in 2006. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (`OCC`) regulations requires banks to maintain certain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Additionally, the regulations establish a framework for the classification of banks into five categories: well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is considered well-capitalized if it has a core (Tier 1) capital ratio of at least 5.0% (based on adjusted total assets); a core (Tier 1) risk-based capital ratio of a least 6.0%; and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0%. The Bank had capital ratios above the well-capitalized levels at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The Company is not aware of any market or institutional trends, events or uncertainties that are expected to have a material effect on liquidity, capital resources or operations or any current recommendations by its regulators which would have a material effect if implemented. The Company has not engaged in sub-prime lending activities and does not plan to engage in those activities in the future. Financial Condition Total assets increased 10.2% to $338.0 million as of December 31, 2008, from $306.7 million at December 31, 2007. Securities available for sale totaled $127.2 million as of December 31, 2008, compared to $84.5 million at December 31, 2007. Loans, net of allowance for loan losses decreased $11.7 million to $179.8 million as of December 31, 2008, compared to $191.5 million at December 31, 2007. The increase in securities available for sale and the decrease in the loan portfolio were significantly impacted by a $20.9 million mortgage loan securitization transaction with the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation in December 2008. The Bank has recorded the securities as available for sale and continues to service the loans. Deposits increased 8.7% to $263.6 million as of December 31, 2008, compared to $242.5 million at December 31, 2007. Shareholders` equity increased 5.4% to $36.9 million at the end of 2008, from $35.0 million at the end of 2007. Accumulated other comprehensive income increased to $1.5 million as of December 31, 2008, compared to $295,000 as of Dec. 31, 2007. The change in accumulated other comprehensive income was a result of an increase in unrealized gains on securities. Loans: Net loans decreased by $11.7 million or 6.1% from 2007 to 2008. The change in net loans was significantly impacted by the aforementioned securitization transaction. The loan demand in the Bank`s primary market remains soft. However, the Bank is focusing its efforts on aggressively attracting commercial loan business and continuing to buy loan participations from other Ohio banks (commercial and commercial real estate and consumer loans.) Real estate loans decreased by $20.6 million or 12.8%. Home equity loans increased $3.6 million or 17.2% from 2007 to 2008 as a result of increased marketing efforts by the Bank`s mortgage banking department. The Bank`s loan portfolio consists of $140.2 million loans secured by real estate, which represents 77.1% of total loans as of December 31, 2008. First National Bank`s loan policy provides for a loan mix up to 60% of total loans for commercial loans, up to 40% of total loans for consumer loans, up to 60% of total loans for residential real estate loans and up to 200% of total capital for commercial real estate loans. The loan to deposit ratio will not exceed 90%. Consumer loans increased $2.4 million as of December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007. Consumer loans increased due to the purchase of automobile loans from another Ohio bank. The purchased loans are subject to the same underwriting standards as loans generated in our offices. Loan portfolio composition at December 31,
2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % (Dollar amounts in thousands) Real estate: Commercial $48,034 27% $51,463 27% $45,737 25% $47,638 25% $47,081 24% Residential 54,924 30% 80,113 41% 86,652 46% 91,592 47% 97,694 49% Home equity 24,442 13% 20,857 11% 19,383 10% 19,045 10% 18,272 9% Construction 12,846 7% 8,367 4% 6,079 3% 6,440 3% 6,327 3% 140,246 77% 160,800 83% 157,851 84% 164,715 85% 169,374 85% Consumer 14,354 8% 11,988 6% 7,522 4% 6,205 3% 5,386 3% Commercial 25,583 14% 17,552 9% 18,519 10% 20,046 10% 21,197 10% Credit cards -- 0% 1,614 1% 1,521 1% 1,406 1% 1,362 1% Other 1,658 1% 1,987 1% 1,609 1% 1,566 1% 1,675 1% Total Loans 181,841 100% 193,941 100% 187,022 100% 193,938 100% 198,994 100% Less: Unearned and deferred income (292) (425) (548) (496) (505) Allowance for loan losses (1,718) (2,028) (1,993) (1,903) (1,763) Net loans $179,831 $191,488 $184,481 $191,539 $196,726 Net loans as a percent of total assets 53.20% 62.45% 59.83% 62.41% 63.78%
In 2008, total agricultural loans decreased by $1.4 million to $2.9 million. $2.4 million of the principal outstanding consists of loans collateralized by farmland, which is included in the $48.0 million commercial loans secured by real estate. The remainder, $500 thousand, consists of loans for agricultural production and other loans to farmers, and that figure is included in the $25.6 million figure for commercial loans (not collateralized by real estate). Ranked by North American Industry Classification System ~ or NAICS ~ codes, the industries most represented by First National Bank`s commercial borrowers includes lessors of residential buildings and dwellings and lessors of non-residential buildings, in that order, accounting for 3.8% and 1.3% of the total loans at year-end 2008, respectively. Approximately 46% of the conventional mortgage loans secured by 1-4 family real estate are long term fixed interest rate loans. The majority of loans added to First National Bank`s portfolio, by the 2002 acquisition of Peoples Federal, were fixed- rate residential mortgage loans, but the number of such loans has declined since the merger as the fixed-rate mortgages have been refinanced or paid off. Approximately 54% of the portfolio of conventional mortgage loans secured by 1-4 family and multifamily real estate at year-end 2008 consisted of adjustable rate loans. First National Bank`s fixed-rate conventional mortgage loans are originated with loan documentation that permits their sale in the secondary market. The Bank`s policy is to classify all fixed-rate mortgage loans as `Held for Sale` or `Held for Portfolio` at the time the loans are originated within various scenarios and classifications set by the Bank. The classification is based upon several factors such as the Bank`s interest rate risk position, the loan`s interest rate and term, the Bank` liquidity position, the interest rate environment and general economic conditions. First National Bank has not engaged in the practice of originating sub-prime loans. As of December 31, 2008, the Bank does not have a single variable-rate loan on which the interest is scheduled to increase. Allowance for Loan Losses As explained in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, the allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and recoveries, and decreased by charge-offs. The allowance for loan losses is the sum of components recognized and measured either: (1) according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 5, `Accounting for Contingencies,` for pools of homogenous loans, or (2) according to SFAS 114, `Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,` for loans the Bank considers impaired based upon individual loan review. Management determines the necessary allowance balance using the Bank`s loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Loans Analyzed Individually. Determining the loan loss allowance begins with the Bank`s assessment of credit risk for loans analyzed individually. Individual loans are assigned credit-risk grades based on the Bank`s assessment of conditions affecting a borrower`s ability to satisfy its contractual obligation under the loan agreement. The assessment process includes reviewing a borrower`s current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and other information specific to each borrower. Loans reviewed individually are reviewed at least annually or more frequently if management becomes aware of information affecting a borrower`s ability to fulfill its obligation. All loans over $250 thousand or to customers whose aggregate total borrowing exceeds $250 thousand are reviewed individually, except for first mortgage loans on a borrower`s personal residence. Loans or customers with balances under $250 thousand may also be reviewed individually if considered necessary by the board and management. All commercial lending relationships over $100 thousand are ranked according to risk at least annually. Risk rankings also change at any point during the year if the creditworthiness of a borrower changes. In addition, risk ratings are reviewed annually by a qualified independent third party. The independent third party reviews all aggregate loan relationships of $250 thousand or greater along with a sampling of loan relationships between $100 thousand and $250 thousand. Loans analyzed individually are ranked as follows: Loans Graded 1, 2, 3 and 4 are loans that are considered satisfactory, with lower than average risk and low probability of serious financial deterioration on the borrower`s part. Loans Graded 5 (`Watch`) are performing according to the terms of the loan agreement but that nevertheless require enhanced management supervision because of factors such as an unusual payment history or a deterioration in the borrower`s financial condition. Loans Graded 6 (`Special-Mention`) have more than average risk, with identified potential weaknesses that deserve management`s close attention. Left uncorrected, the potential weaknesses could result in deterioration of repayment prospects. In the case of a commercial borrower, for example, potential weaknesses could include adverse trends in the borrower`s operations or adverse economic or market conditions that could affect the borrower in the future. Loans Graded 7 (`Substandard`) are inadequately protected by the current financial condition and paying capacity of the borrower or by the collateral securing the loan. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses jeopardizing collection of the debt in full, with a distinct possibility of loss if the weakness or weaknesses are not corrected. Loans may be classified substandard even if payments are not 90 days or more past due. Loans 90 days or more past due are classified as substandard or lower unless the loan is adequately collateralized and in the process of collection. Loans Graded 8 (`Doubtful`) have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that existing facts, conditions and values make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of factors that could work to the borrower`s advantage classification of the `doubtful` loan as `loss` is deferred. Loans Graded 9 (`Loss`) are those considered uncollectible or portions of loans that are considered uncollectable. Loans in this category are charged-off by management. If it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest due on a commercial or non-loan then that loan is considered impaired. Management measures the amount of impairment using the loan`s expected future cash flows (discounted at the loan`s effective interest rate), or the fair value of the underlying collateral if loan repayment is expected to come from the sale or operation of the collateral. First National Bank considers commercial or non-loans graded doubtful or loss to be impaired. Some loans graded substandard are considered impaired. Special mention and watch loans are not considered to be impaired. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of similar type and purpose ~ such as residential mortgage and consumer, ~ and on an individual loan basis for other loans (other loans consists of loans to non-profit organizations and loans collateralized with cash). If a loan is impaired, a portion of the loan loss allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan`s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Increases in the allowance for loan losses are made by expensing a provision for loan losses. No specific provision for loan losses expense would result if an individually reviewed loan is graded higher than `watch`, but such loans are included in the pools of loans analyzed under SFAS 5. Loans classified `special mention` or `substandard`, and smaller-balance loans classified `doubtful` are assigned a provision based upon a historical migration analysis performed on classified loans. The migration analysis identifies the percentage of classified loans by category that has historically been ultimately charged-off. The migration percentages are reviewed and adjusted by management to reflect various factors such as the growth and change in mix of the loan portfolio and the regulator`s guidelines. Loans ranked `loss` are charged off in their entirety because at that point the unconfirmed loss that the loan loss allowance is intended to approximate is considered to be confirmed. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 classified assets were as follows: Classified assets at December 31,
2008 2007 2006 Percent of Percent of Percent of Amount total loans Amount total loans Amount total loans (Dollar amounts in thousands) Classified Loans: Special mention $3,294 1.8% $ 401 0.2% $6,476 3.5% Substandard 3,874 2.1% 4,839 2.5% 5,350 2.9% Doubtful -- 0.0% 79 0.0% 161 0.0% Loss -- 0.0% -- 0.0% 152 0.0% Total classified loans 7,168 3.9% 5,319 2.7% 12,139 6.5% Other classified assets -- 0.0% -- 0.0% -- 0.0% Total classified assets 7,168 3.9% 5,319 2.7% 12,139 6.5%
Pools of Loans Analyzed under SFAS 5 The total loan loss allowance is derived both from analysis of individual impaired loans under SFAS 114 and analysis of aggregated pools of loans under SFAS 5. Smaller balance loans (such as automobile or home equity loans, for example), groups of loans (such as residential mortgage loans), and less severely classified loans reviewed individually may be analyzed on an aggregated or pooled basis under SFAS 5. Under SFAS 5, loans are segmented into groups of loans having similar risk characteristics based on purpose, loan type, and collateral, for example residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, and consumer loans. Losses inherent in pools of loans are estimated using average historical losses over a period of years for loans of those types, but with adjustments to account for changes in loan policies, changes in underwriting or loan recovery practices, changes in prevailing economic conditions, changes in the nature or volume of the loan portfolio, and changes in other internal and external factors. Loans secured by real estate ~ particularly residential mortgage loans ~ generally have less credit risk than other types of loans. Changes in the Allowance for Loan Losses and Classified Assets A proper loan review function is vital to establishment of an appropriate loan loss allowance. Loan officers and the Bank`s credit analysts are responsible for the assignment of risk ratings for loans reviewed individually. Each quarter, a committee consisting of the Bank`s Chief Financial Officer and Senior Credit Officer evaluates the loan loss allowance and reports the results of its evaluation to senior management and the Bank`s board. The Bank adjusts its loan loss allowance methodologies retrospectively as well, making adjustments in its estimates and assumptions as necessary to account for variances of estimated loan losses from actual loan loss experience. The Bank`s determination about classification of its assets and the amount of its allowances is subject to review by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which may order the establishment of additional loss allowances. First National Bank`s allowance for loan losses to total loans was 0.95% for 2008. This is a decrease of 0.10% when compared to 2007. In 2007, the percentage of the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.05%. This represents a 0.02% decrease over 2006. Total nonperforming loans have decreased from $2.8 million as of December 31, 2007 to $2.0 million at December 31, 2008. In 2008, total classified loans increased from $5,319 to $7,168 or 34.8%. A stagnant local economy and marginal deterioration of the financial position of some of the Bank`s commercial borrowers led to more loans being classified. Loan review and monitoring is vital to establishment of an appropriate loan loss allowance and to proper credit administration and risk management. In order to minimize the credit risk inherent in the lending process, management and the Board has adopted a more formal and systematic approach with credit administration and loan review. As part of this systematic approach, in both 2007 and 2008, a qualified independent third party was engaged to perform loan reviews. Management intends to continue this practice on an annual basis. Loans deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses. After a loan is charged off, the Bank continues to recover the loss. Recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to the allowance for loan losses. The Bank recorded a $676 thousand partial charge-off of a $1.7 million Summit County commercial real estate loan in 2008. Transactions in the allowance for loan losses are summarized in following table: Year ended December 31,
2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 (Dollar amounts in thousands) Balance, beginning of period $2,028 $1,993 $1,903 $1,763 $1,604 Loans charged off: Collateralized by real estate: Commercial 688 -- 39 -- -- Residential 16 12 42 -- 24 Home equity 9 -- -- -- -- Construction -- -- -- -- -- Consumer 69 72 43 8 25 Commercial 32 67 17 33 -- Credit cards 21 -- 21 16 20 Other 10 -- -- -- -- Total loans charged off 845 151 162 57 69 Recoveries of loans previously charged off: Collateralized by real estate: Commercial 5 -- -- -- -- Residential 14 1 14 -- -- Home equity 2 -- -- -- -- Construction -- -- 55 32 -- Consumer 11 37 16 5 1 Commercial -- -- 1 1 41 Credit cards 1 1 6 -- 8 Other 20 -- -- -- -- Total recoveries 53 39 92 38 50 Net loans charged off (792) (112) (70) (19) (19) Provision charged to operations 482 147 160 159 178 Balance, end of period $1,718 $2,028 $1,993 $1,903 $1,763 Loans outstanding: Average $192,472 $187,888 $186,146 $197,064 $194,032 End of period 181,549 193,941 187,022 193,937 198,993 Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of period 0.95% 1.05% 1.07% 0.98% 0.89% Net charge offs to average loans 0.41% 0.06% 0.04% 0.01% 0.01%
The allowance for loan losses is allocated among loan categories as shown in the following table. Although the Bank considers inherent losses in individual loans and categories of similar loans when it establishes the loan loss allowance, the allowance is a general reserve available to absorb all credit losses in the portfolio. No part of the allowance is segregated for or dedicated to any particular asset or group of assets.
Allocation of the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 Amount Percent(1) Amount Percent(1) Amount Percent(1) Amount Percent(1) Amount Percent(1) (Dollar amounts in thousands) Real estate: Commercial $ 501 27% $ 779 27% $ 654 25% $ 720 25% $ 373 24% Residential 169 30% 321 41% 88 46% 186 47% 114 49% Home equity 121 13% 115 11% 9 10% 8 10% 13 9% Construction 26 7% -- 4% -- 3% -- 3% -- 3% Consumer 280 8% 116 6% 89 4% 40 3% 16 3% Commercial 579 14% 552 9% 1,064 10% 826 10% 1,226 10% Credit cards -- 0% 48 1% 31 1% 47 1% 21 1% Other 10 1% -- 1% 58 1% 76 1% -- 1% Unallocated 32 n/a 97 n/a -- n/a -- n/a -- n/a Total $1,718 100% $2,028 100% $1,993 100% $1,903 100% $1,763 100% (1) - Percent of loans in each category to total loans.
Management reviews nonperforming assets on a regular basis and assesses the requirement for specific reserves on those assets. Any loan past due 90 days or more and any loan on non-accrual is considered to be a nonperforming asset. Any loan 90 days or more past due that is not both adequately collateralized and in a positive cash-flow position and any loan to a borrower experiencing serious financial deterioration may be placed on non-accrual by the Senior Credit Officer with the concurrence of senior management. Interest received on non-accrual loans ~ also referred to as nonperforming loans ~ is recorded as a reduction of principal. The table to follow summarizes nonperforming assets and other nonperforming assets by category. Problem assets at December 31, 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
(Dollar amounts in thousands) Real estate: Commercial: Non-accrual $ 1,306 $ 2,106 $ 454 $ -- $ -- Past due 90 days or more -- -- -- -- -- Residential: Non-accrual 60 209 223 599 395 Past due 90 days or more 173 142 217 198 52 Home equity: Non-accrual 386 -- 8 5 -- Past due 90 days or more 34 9 -- -- -- Construction: Non-accrual -- -- 276 -- 125 Past due 90 days or more -- -- -- -- -- Not collateralized by real estate: Consumer: Non-accrual -- -- -- 4 8 Past due 90 days or more 24 1 8 5 4 Commercial: Non-accrual -- 330 1,100 1,472 899 Past due 90 days or more 30 -- 22 36 -- Credit cards: Non-accrual -- -- -- -- -- Past due 90 days or more -- 6 -- 6 -- Total nonperforming loans 2,013 2,803 2,308 2,325 1,483 Other real estate owned 354 194 103 103 46 Total nonperforming assets $ 2,367 $ 2,997 $ 2,411 $ 2,428 $ 1,529 Loans outstanding, net $179,831 $191,488 $184,481 $191,538 $196,725 Nonperforming loans to total net loans 1.12% 1.46% 1.25% 1.21% 0.75% Nonperforming assets to total assets 0.70% 0.98% 0.78% 0.79% 0.50% Allowance for loan losses to total loans 0.95% 1.05% 1.07% 0.98% 0.89% Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans 85.35% 72.35% 86.38% 81.86% 118.88%
Securities Total securities increased $42.7 million or 50.6% at December 31, 2008 when compared to December 31, 2007. The Bank actively purchases bonds issued by local municipalities, school systems and other public entities when opportunities arise. Other securities are primarily comprised of mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities and securities issued by corporations. Securities are classified either as held to maturity or as available for sale. The Bank does not hold any securities for trading purposes. If management has the intent and the Bank has the ability at the time of purchase to hold a security until maturity, the security is classified as held-to-maturity and it is reflected on the balance sheet at amortized cost. Securities to be held for indefinite periods and not intended to be held to maturity or on a long-term basis are classified as available-for-sale, and they are reflected on the balance sheet at their market value. Management generally believes that all securities should be classified as available-for-sale but makes that determination at the time of purchase. In order to more effectively manage securities and to be in a better position to react to market conditions, at December 31, 2008, all securities were classified as available for sale. At year-end 2008 and 2007 there was no single issuer of securities where the total book value of such securities exceeded 10% of shareholders` equity except for U.S. government and agency obligations. The following table shows the amortized cost and estimated fair values of the corporation`s securities portfolio at the date indicated.
Gross Gross Amortized unrealized unrealized Fair cost gains losses value (Dollar amounts in thousands) December 31, 2008 Available for sale: State and municipal $ 16,173 $ 234 $ (193) $ 16,214 Corporate bonds and notes 7,630 5 (453) 7,182 Mortgage-backed 101,220 2,616 -- 103,836 Equity Securities 23 -- (7) 16 Total securities $125,046 $ 2,855 $ (653) $127,248 December 31, 2007 Available for sale: U.S. Government and federal agency $ 10,107 $ 161 $ -- $ 10,268 State and municipal 15,786 295 (13) 16,068 Corporate bonds and notes 17,864 26 (295) 17,595 Mortgage-backed 40,310 294 (21) 40,583 Total securities $ 84,067 $ 776 $ (329) $ 84,514 December 31, 2006 Available for sale: U.S. Government and federal agency $ 29,537 $ 69 $ (226) $ 29,380 State and municipal 17,110 330 (45) 17,395 Corporate bonds and notes 27,579 132 (441) 27,270 Mortgage-backed 12,030 4 (79) 11,955 Total securities $ 86,256 $ 535 $ (791) $ 86,000
The contractual maturity of securities available for sale at December 31, 2008 is shown below.
One year More than one More than five More than or less to five years to ten years ten years Total securities Carrying value Carrying value Carrying value Carrying value Carrying value Market Average yield Average yield Average yield Average yield Average yield value (Dollar amounts in thousands) State and municipal $ 297 $ 4,465 $ 6,593 $ 4,859 $ 16,214 $ 16,214 4.89% 3.91% 4.10% 4.03% 4.04% Corporate bonds and notes 3,884 3,298 -- -- 7,182 7,182 6.91% 5.68% -- -- 6.34% Mortgage-backed 3 -- 30,315 73,518 103,836 103,836 9.57% -- 4.86% 5.26% 5.14% Total securities $ 4,184 $ 7,763 $ 36,908 $ 78,377 $127,232 $127,232 6.77% 4.66% 4.72% 5.19% 5.07%
Restricted Equity Securities As of December 31, 2008, the Bank held 24,855 shares of $100 par value Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati stock, which are restricted-equity securities. FHLB stock represents an equity interest in the FHLB, but it does not have a readily determinable market value. The stock can be sold at its par value only, and only to the FHLB or to another member institution. Member institutions are required to maintain a minimum stock investment in the FHLB, based on total assets, total mortgages, and total mortgage-backed securities. Total Liabilities Total liabilities increased by $29.5 million or 10.8% from 2007 to 2008. This increase is primarily a result of a $19.5 million increase in interest-bearing deposits and an increase of $4.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Deposits Deposits increased during 2008 by $21.1 million or 8.7%. The increase is primarily attributed to a growth in interest-bearing demand deposits of $27.9 million. This increase was partially offset by decreases in savings and time deposits. First National Bank`s savings accounts include passbook and statement savings, as well as preferred savings accounts, which are tiered to pay higher rates for higher balances. First National Bank has not solicited brokered deposits. Savings accounts decreased by $3.9 million or 7.3% from the end of 2007 to the end of 2008. This was primarily due to customer fund movement to higher yielding money market type demand accounts. Time deposits decreased by $4.6 million or 5.7%. This decrease is a result of the success of our premium money market demand and checking accounts, and management`s decision to maintain a reasonable time deposit rate structure. Interest-bearing demand deposits, which include negotiable order of withdrawal accounts and money market demand accounts, increased $27.9 million or 43.2% during 2008. Much of the increase in this category is attributed to the Bank`s success in marketing our `Platinum Checking` account. Maturity of time deposits of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2008
(Dollar amounts in thousands) Time Remaining to Maturity Amount Percent of Total Three months or less $ 4,303 33.3% Over three through 12 months 5,601 43.3% Over one year through 3 years 3,033 23.4% Over 3 years -- --% Total $12,937 100.0%
Liquidity and Capital Resources A Bank`s liquidity risk is the risk associated with having to satisfy current and future financial obligations in a timely manner. Both short- and long-term liquidity needs are addressed by maturities and sales of unpledged securities, loan repayments and maturities, sales of loans that are not pledged as security for FHLB borrowings, and transactions in cash and cash equivalents, such as federal funds purchased. The use of these resources, combined with access to credit, provide funds for satisfying depositor and borrower needs. Management considers the Bank to have satisfactory liquidity, with the ability to satisfy the demands of customers and the local economy. Liquidity may be adversely affected by unexpected deposit outflows, which can be caused by higher interest rates paid by competitors. Management continually monitors projected liquidity needs and establishes a desirable level based in part on the Bank`s commitment to make loans as well as management`s assessment of the Bank`s ability to generate funds. The most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, which at year-end 2008 consisted of $11.0 million in cash and due from banks. At year-end 2007 cash and cash equivalents consisted of $11.8 million in cash and due from banks and $0.4 million in federal funds sold. Federal funds sold are overnight investments with correspondent banks, an investment and liquidity tool used to maximize earning assets. Securities classified as available for sale that are not pledged are another source of liquidity. We consider the Bank`s loans-to-deposits ratio to assess liquidity, seeking to cap the ratio of loans to deposits at 100%. The ratio of total loans to deposits at year-end 2008 was 68.9%. At the end of 2008 the fair value of securities available for sale was approximately $127.2 million, while the total carrying value of securities pledged was approximately $30.7 million, representing securities pledged to secure public deposits and repurchase agreements. Operating activities, as described in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the attached consolidated financial statements, shows net cash provided of $2.9 million in 2008, $1.8 million in 2007 and $2.4 million in 2006, generated principally from net income in those years. The Bank reported $7.1 million in originations and proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale as operating activities in 2008. Investing activities, as described in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the attached consolidated financial statements, consist primarily of loan originations and repayments, along with securities purchases, sales and maturities. In 2008, net cash used in investing activities was $31.8 million. The increase in loans over the year and the purchase of loans utilized $11.3 million of cash. Net cash used from activity in securities available for sale totaled $21.0 million in 2008. Management continued the reallocation of the investment portfolio started in 2007 by primarily purchasing seasoned 15 and 20 year discount agency mortgage-backed securities in 2008. In 2007, net cash used in investing activities was $4.9 million. The increase in loans over the year and the purchase of loans generated a $7.2 million use of cash. Net proceeds from activity in securities available for sale was $2.3 million in 2007. During 2007, management sold $22.7 million of callable securities and corporate bonds. The proceeds from those sales were used to purchase `bullet substitute` discount agency mortgage-backed securities with shorter duration than the securities sold and seasoned 15 and 20 year discount agency mortgage-backed securities. A `bullet substitute` is a collateralized mortgage obligation whose structure and price lends itself to perform well in a declining rate environment like a bullet bond of a similar duration. Three characteristics that contribute to a bullet like performance are discount coupon, prepayment accretion and structure (e.g. principal lock-out and prepayment protection.) Duration is a weighted-average term-to-maturity of a security`s cash flows, the weights being the present value of each cash flow as a percentage of the security`s full price. In 2006, as interest rates continued to increase we experienced a decline in loans. Overall, net cash used in investing activities was $2.9 million, as net loan pay downs resulted in a $6.7 million source of cash and net securities purchased resulted in an $8.8 million use of cash. Additionally, capital expenditures resulted in a use of cash, in the amount of $918 thousand, primarily for the cost associated with replacing our Kidron, Ohio, office with a new office. Financing activities, as described in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the attached consolidated financial statements, includes the solicitation and repayment of customer deposits, borrowings and repayments, treasury stock activity, and the payment of dividends. In 2008, net cash provided by financing activities was $27.5 million. The increase in deposits and short-term borrowings over the year provided $25.0 million of cash. At December 31, 2008, the Bank had $21 million of borrowings outstanding with FHLB, maturing in the years 2009, 2010 and 2011. This amount represents a $4.0 million increase from the $17.0 million that was owed at the end of 2007. First National Bank has approximately $45.6 million available in short-term funding arrangements with its correspondent banks and the FHLB. Additional information concerning FHLB borrowings and bank obligations under repurchase agreements is contained in Notes 8 and 9 of the consolidated financial statements of National Bancshares Corporation. The outstanding balances and related information about short-term borrowings, which consists almost entirely of securities sold under agreements to repurchase are summarized as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2008 2007 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands) Balance at year-end $10,469 $ 8,831 $ 7,902 Average balance outstanding 10,134 8,642 6,008 Maximum month-end balance 11,136 10,956 7,902 Weighted-average rate at year-end 0.50% 2.85% 3.63% Weighted-average rate during the year 1.43% 3.86% 3.48%
The Bank is subject to federal regulations imposing minimum capital requirements. Total risk-based capital, tier I risk-based capital, and tier I leverage capital ratios are monitored to assure compliance with regulatory capital requirements. At December 31, 2008, the Bank exceeded minimum risk-based and leverage capital ratio requirements. The Bank`s ratio of total capital to risk-based assets was 12.60% on December 31, 2008. The minimum required ratio is 8%. Additional information concerning capital ratios at year-end 2008 and 2007 is contained in Note 14 of the consolidated financial statements. Contractual Obligations As discussed in the notes to National Bancshares Corporation`s consolidated financial statements, obligations exist to make payments under contracts, including borrowings. At December 31, 2008, the aggregate contractual obligations are outlined below: Payment due by period
(Dollar amounts in thousands) One year More than one More than three More than Contractual Obligations Total or less to three years to five years five years Time deposits $75,326 $51,744 $21,813 $ 1,763 $ 6 Long-term obligations 21,000 3,000 18,000 -- -- Information system contract obligations 3,409 632 1,147 1,073 557 Operating lease obligations 36 26 10 -- -- Total $99,771 $55,402 $40,970 $ 2,836 $ 563
Off-Balance Sheet and Contingent Liabilities Financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, and letters of credit are issued to satisfy customers` financing needs. Ordinarily having fixed expiration dates, these commitments are agreements to provide credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contracts are satisfied. Off-balance-sheet risk in the form of potential credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although we do not expect losses. Since these commitments are viewed as loans, the same credit policies used for loans are used to evaluate making the commitments. These funding commitments by expiration period were as follows at year-end 2008: Expiration of funding commitments
One year More than or less one year Total (Dollar amounts in thousands) Unused loan commitments $26,454 $22,935 $49,389 Commitment to make loans 2,382 -- 2,382 Letters of credit 109 -- 109 Total $28,945 $22,935 $51,880
Of the unused loan commitments, $10,065 are fixed-rate commitments and $39,324 are variable-rate commitments. Rates on unused fixed-rate loan commitments range from 6.25% to 19.80%. The funding commitments shown in the table above do not necessarily represent future cash requirements since experience demonstrates that a large percentage of funding commitments expire unused or partially used. The Bank is required by regulations of the Federal Reserve Board to maintain cash reserves on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. Reserve requirements vary according to the amount of a Bank`s transaction accounts, checking accounts principally. Reserve balances do not earn interest. First National Bank was required to maintain cash reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of $100 thousand at year-end 2008 and $3.5 million at year-end 2007. The Bank sells some of the loans it originates, particularly conventional fixed-rate residential mortgage loans. The loans are sold without recourse. The Bank has retained mortgage-servicing rights on approximately $38.0 million of residential mortgage loans sold. Shareholders` Equity The $1.9 million or 5.4% increase in shareholders` equity from year-end 2007 to year-end 2008 was caused by an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, which results from improvement in the market value of securities available for sale and earnings greater than the dividend payout. These increases were partially offset by the purchase of 5,017 shares of National Bancshares Corporation common stock for $86 thousand in 2008. Accumulated other comprehensive income represents the unrealized appreciation or depreciation (net of taxes) in the market value of securities available for sale. Interest rate volatility, economic and interest rate conditions could cause material fluctuations in accumulated other comprehensive income. The dividend payout ratio for 2008 is 64.00% versus 83.58% in 2007. National Bancshares Corporation is dependent on the Bank for earnings and funds necessary to pay dividends, and the payment of dividends, by the Bank to National Bancshares Corporation, is subject to bank regulatory restrictions. According to the National Bank Act and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Rule 5.64, a national bank may never pay a cash dividend without advance OCC approval if the amount of the dividend exceeds retained net income for the year and for the two preceding years (after any required transfers to surplus). In December 2008, the Bank paid a dividend to National Bancshares Corporation in the amount of $2.5 million. During 2009, the Bank must obtain regulatory approval to pay dividends to the holding company until 2009 net income exceeds $1,210. Interest Rate Sensitivity Asset-liability management is the active management of a bank`s balance sheet to maintain a mix of loans and deposits consistent with its goals for long-term growth and risk management. Banks, in the normal course of business, assume financial risk by making loans at interest rates that differ from rates paid on deposits. Deposits often have shorter maturities than loans and adjust to current market rates faster than loans. The result is a balance sheet mismatch between assets (loans) and liabilities (deposits). The function of asset-liability management is to measure and control three levels of financial risk: interest rate risk (the pricing difference between loans and deposits), credit risk (the probability of default), and liquidity risk (occurring when loans and deposits have different maturities). A primary objective in asset-liability management is managing net interest margin, that is, the net difference between interest earning assets (loans) and interest paying liabilities (deposits) to produce consistent growth in the loan portfolio and shareholder earnings, regardless of short-term movement in interest rates. The dollar difference between assets (loans) maturing or repricing and liabilities (deposits) is known as the rate sensitivity gap (or maturity gap). Banks attempt to manage this asset-liability gap by pricing some of their loans at variable interest rates. A more precise measure of interest rate risk is duration, which measures the impact of changes in interest rates on the expected maturities of both assets and liabilities. In essence, duration takes the gap report data and converts that information into present-value worth of deposits and loans, which is more meaningful in estimating maturities and the probability that either assets or liabilities will reprice during the period under review. Interest rate risk is the result of such risks as repricing risk, option risk and basis risk. Repricing risk is caused by the differences in the maturity, or repricing, of assets and liabilities. Most residential mortgage and consumer loans give consumers the right to prepay with little or no prepayment penalty, and because of competitive pressures, it may not be advisable to enforce prepayment penalties on commercial loans. First National Bank`s fixed-rate conventional mortgage loans are originated with loan documentation that permits such loans to be sold in the secondary market. The Bank`s policy is to classify these loans as `Held for Sale` or `Held in Portfolio` at the time the loans are originated based on such factors as the Bank`s liquidity position, interest rate environment and general economic conditions. Option is the risk that a change in prevailing interest rates will lead to an adverse impact on earnings or capital caused by changes in the timing of cash flows from investments. Cash flows may be received earlier than expected as a result of the exercise of options or of embedded options in financial contracts. The option a borrower has to prepay a loan is similar to the option a depositor has to make an early withdrawal from a deposit account. This form of embedded option, which gives the customer the opportunity to benefit when interest rates change in their favor, ordinarily occurs at the Bank`s expense in the form of higher interest expense or lower interest income. Although residential mortgage loans tend to have lower credit risk than other types of loans, they tend also to have higher option risk because of the borrower`s option to prepay the loan and interest rate risk because of the longer term associated with residential mortgage loans. Option risk in the form of prepayments also affects the value of mortgage-backed securities. Basis risk is the risk that changes in interest rates will cause interest-bearing deposit liabilities to reprice at a different rate than interest-bearing assets, creating an asset-liability mismatch. If a bank lends at prime rate and finances itself at Libor rates, it faces basis risk due to the possibility that the prime-to-Libor spread might narrow. Economic Value of Equity The economic value of equity (EVE) is the difference between the net present value of the assets and the net present value of liabilities. EVE can be thought of as the liquidation value of the Bank on the date the calculation is made. Calculating EVE involves using a discount rate to calculate the net present value of assets and liabilities after making assumptions about the duration of assets and liabilities. As interest rates change, the discount rate changes and the change in interest rates effects the duration of assets and liabilities. If interest rates fall, for example, the duration of loans shortens since borrowers tend to prepay by refinancing their loan. Conversely, the duration of loans increases if interest rates rise since borrowers are inclined to hold on to the favorable rate they were able to obtain in the lower interest rate environment. In 2007, the Board of Directors adopted revised limits on a decline in EVE and EAR given changes in interest rates. These limits are that EVE shall not decline by more than 10%, 20% and 30% given a 1%, 2% and 3% increase or decrease in interest rates respectively and that EAR shall not be greater than 8%, 16% or 24% given a 1%, 2% or 3% increase or decrease in interest rates respectively. The following illustrates our equity at risk in the economic value of equity model: December 31, 2008
Basis Point Change in Rates +300 bp +200 bp +100 bp -100 bp -200 bp -300 bp Increase (decrease) in EVE (11.0)% (4.3)% (0.5)% (1.8)% (15.5)% (28.6)%
The Bank is in compliance with the interest rate risk policy limits related to EVE as of December 31, 2008. Earnings at Risk Earnings at risk, is the amount by which net interest income will be affected given a change in interest rates. The interest income and interest expense for each category of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities is recalculated after making up and down assumptions about the change in interest rates. Changes In prepayment speeds and repricing speeds are also taken into account when computing earnings at risk, given a change in interest rates. The following illustrates the effect on earnings or EAR, given rate increases of 100 to 300 basis points and decreases in interest rates of 100 to 300 basis points. December 31, 2008
Basis Point Change in Rates +300 bp +200 bp +100 bp -100 bp -200 bp -300 bp Increase (decrease) in Earnings (19.0)% (12.1)% (5.7)% 7.8% 1.4% (5.5)%
The Bank is in compliance with the interest rate risk policy limits related to EAR as of December 31, 2008. One way to minimize interest rate risk is to maintain a balanced or matched interest-rate sensitivity position. However, matched funding does not generally maximize profits. To increase net interest income, the Bank mismatches asset and liability repricing to take advantage of interest rate conditions. The magnitude of the mismatch depends on management`s assessment of the risks presented by the interest rate environment. Interest rate risk can significantly affect income and expense on interest sensitive assets and liabilities, and can also affect the underlying value of the Bank`s assets. The goal in managing interest rate sensitivity is to maintain an appropriate balance between interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to minimize the impact of volatility in market interest rates. Management of maturity distributions of assets and liabilities between the most and least sensitive extremes is as important as the balances on hand. Management of maturity distributions involves matching interest rate maturities as well as principal maturities, which can influence net interest income significantly. In periods of rapidly changing interest rates, a negative or positive gap can cause major fluctuations in net interest income and earnings. Managing asset and liability sensitivities, and insulating net interest income from changes in market and interest rate conditions is one of the objectives of the Bank`s asset/liability management strategy. Management attempts to maintain consistent net interest income and net income while managing interest rate risk within Board approved policy limits. Evaluating the Bank`s exposure to changes in interest rates is the responsibility of Bank management which reports directly to the Board of Directors. Bank management assesses both the adequacy of the management process used to control interest rate risk and the quantitative level of exposure, monitoring and managing interest rate risk to control the effect of changing interest rates on net interest income and net income. Evaluating the quantitative level of interest rate risk exposure requires assessment of existing and potential effects of changes in interest rates on the Bank`s financial condition, including capital adequacy, earnings, liquidity and asset quality. Bank management also monitors the Bank`s liquidity levels. Interest rate risk exposure is reviewed quarterly with the Board of Directors. Risk is mitigated by matching maturities or repricing opportunities. MANAGEMENT`S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Results of Operations First National Bank derives substantially all of its income from banking and bank-related services, including interest earnings on residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial and consumer loans and investment securities along with fee income from deposit services. National Bancshares Corporation`s business consists almost exclusively of acting as holding company for the Bank. First National Bank`s business is not complex: the Bank gathers deposits and it makes loans, principally in Wayne, Stark, Medina and Holmes counties, Ohio. Average Balances, Interest Rates and Yields The average balances of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, interest earned on assets and interest cost of liabilities for the periods indicated, and the average yields earned and rates paid are presented in the following table. Yields are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Average balances are daily averages. Year ended December 31,
(Dollars amounts in thousands) 2008 2007 2006 Average Yield/ Average Yield/ Average Yield/ Balance Interest Cost Balance Interest Cost Balance Interest Cost Assets Interest earning assets: Securities: Taxable $ 79,522 4,095 5.14% $ 68,787 3,585 5.18% $ 65,044 3,299 5.07% Nontaxable (1) 16,491 991 6.07% 16,757 1,059 6.39% 18,820 1,209 6.45% Federal funds sold 3,353 63 1.88% 6,447 335 5.20% 8,816 440 4.99% Interest bearing deposits 1,019 18 1.77% 1,319 69 5.23% -- -- -- Net loans (including nonaccrual loans) 192,472 12,241 6.36% 187,888 13,144 7.00% 186,146 12,620 6.78% Total interest-earning assets 292,857 17,408 5.94% 281,198 18,192 6.34% 278,826 17,568 6.30% All other assets 22,059 23,645 24,215 Total assets $314,916 $304,843 $303,041 Liabilities and Shareholder`s Equity Interest-bearing liabilities: Interest-bearing checking $ 73,243 1,342 1.83% $ 58,148 1,341 2.31% $ 42,342 908 2.14% Savings 51,963 291 0.56% 56,690 615 1.08% 64,979 721 1.11% Time, $100,000 and over 13,197 497 3.77% 14,087 641 4.55% 14,168 584 4.12% Time, other 65,248 2,527 3.87% 72,584 3,231 4.45% 71,593 2,754 3.85% Other funds purchased 31,138 1,128 3.62% 23,838 1,140 4.78% 21,319 1,028 4.82% Total interest-bearing liabilities 234,789 5,785 2.46% 225,347 6,968 3.09% 214,401 5,995 2.80% Demand deposits 42,004 42,225 51,078 Other liabilities 2,741 2,666 2,221 Shareholders` equity 35,382 34,605 35,341 Total liabilities and shareholders` equity $314,916 $304,843 $303,041 Net interest income (1) $11,623 $11,224 $11,573 Interest rate spread (2) 3.48% 3.25% 3.50% Net yield on interest- earning assets (3) 3.97% 3.99% 4.15% Ratio of average interest- earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities 124.73% 124.78% 130.05% (1) Tax-equivalent basis (2) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. (3) Net yield on interest-earning assets represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
Rate/Volume Analysis Changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to (1) changes in volume (changes in average volume multiplied by prior year rate), and (2) changes in rates (changes in rate multiplied by prior year average volume) are shown in the table to follow. Increases and decreases have been allocated proportionally to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.
2008 over 2007 2007 over 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands) Volume Rate Net change Volume Rate Net change Interest Income Securities: Taxable $ 557 $ (47) $ 510 $ 214 $ 72 $ 286 Nontaxable (27) (41) (68) (144) (6) (150) (tax-equivalent basis) Federal funds sold (58) (214) (272) (123) 18 (105) Interest bearing deposits (5) (46) (51) 69 -- 69 Loans (including nonaccrual loans) 292 (1,195) (903) 122 402 524 Total interest income (tax-equivalent basis) $ 759 $(1,543) $ (784) $ 138 $ 486 $ 624 Interest Expense Deposits Interest bearing checking $ 277 $ (276) $ 1 $ 365 $ 68 $ 433 Savings (26) (298) (324) (90) (16) (106) Time, $100,000 and over (34) (110) (144) (4) 61 57 Time, other (284) (420) (704) 44 433 477 Other funds purchased 264 (276) (12) 120 (8) 112 Total interest expense $ 197 $(1,380) $(1,183) $ 435 $ 538 $ 973 Change in net interest income (tax-equivalent basis)* $ 562 $ (163) $ 399 $ (297) $ (52) $ (349) *Tax equivalence based on highest statutory tax rates of 34%.
2008 versus 2007 During 2008, net income increased $483 thousand or 28.2% to $2.2 million. Accordingly, basic and diluted earnings per share increased from $0.77 per share in 2007 to $1.00 per share in 2008. The increase in net income is the result of a relatively stable net interest margin, an increase in noninterest income and a decrease in noninterest expenses. Returns on average equity (ROE) and average assets (ROAA) for the year ending December 31, 2008, were 6.20% and 0.70%, respectively, compared to 4.94% and 0.56% for the year ending December 31, 2007. Total interest and dividend income decreased $761 thousand or 4.3% in 2008. Interest and fees on loans decreased $903 thousand or 6.9%, due primarily to the decrease in interest rates during the year, partially offset by the $4.6 million increase in average loans. Management has focused on aggressively attracting commercial loan business and purchasing loan participations from other Ohio banks (commercial real estate and consumer loans). Securities interest and dividend income increased $465 thousand or 10.9% over 2007. Much of this increase is attributable to an increase in the average balance of securities. Interest expense decreased by $1.2 million or 17.0% during 2008, as the Bank`s deposits and short-term borrowings were affected by the falling interest rate environment. Interest expense on deposits decreased $1.2 million or 20.1% in 2008. Deposit customers continued moving funds from lower-rate deposit accounts to higher-yielding accounts, such as premium money market accounts and high interest checking accounts during 2008. Interest expense for short-term borrowings decreased by $196 thousand or 54.4%, primarily due to the significant decrease in short-term market interest rates during 2008. Federal Home Loan Bank advances interest expense increased $184 thousand or 23.6% as the amount of advances increased from $17 million to $21 million during 2008. The provision for loan losses was $482 thousand in 2008, compared to $147 thousand in 2007. The allowance for loan losses and the related provision for loan losses is based on management`s judgment and evaluation of the loan portfolio. Net charge-offs were $792 thousand for 2008, compared to $112 thousand for 2007. The increase in 2008 charge-offs were primarily related to a $676 thousand partial charge-off of a $1.7 million Summit County commercial real estate loan. The allowance as a percentage of loans declined from 1.05% at December 31, 2007 to 0.95% at December 31, 2008. Classified loans have increased from $5.3 million as of December 31, 2007 to $7.2 million as of December 31, 2008. Total nonperforming loans have decreased from $2.8 million as of December 31, 2007 to $2.0 million as of December 31, 2008, a decrease of 28.2%. Management believes the current allowance for loan losses is adequate, however changing economic and other conditions may require future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses. Noninterest income increased $343 thousand or 17.2% during 2008. The increase is related to the Bank`s enhancement of the deposit and service charge fee structure, improvements in mortgage banking operations and marketing activities and an increase in customer utilization of Visa check card transactions. The Bank sold its $1.5 million credit card portfolio in July 2008. The transaction generated a $435 thousand gain on sale. During 2008, the Company recorded an other than temporary impairment of $444 thousand for the FHLMC preferred stock owned by the holding company. Noninterest expense was $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $10.5 million for 2007, a decrease of 3.1%. The decrease is primarily due to lower data processing expenses, professional and consulting fees and maintenance and repairs expense. Data processing expense decreased $158 thousand during 2008 as a result of a new contract entered into in January of 2008 with the provider of the Bank`s core processing solution. The decrease in professional and consulting fees was the result of a higher level of services utilized in 2007. The Company engaged a consulting firm to review the key business processes and procedures of First National Bank in 2007. Income tax expense was $770 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $274 thousand or 55.2%. 2007 versus 2006 During 2007, net income increased $547 thousand or 47.0%. Accordingly, basic and diluted earnings per share increased from $0.52 per share in 2006 to $0.77 per share in 2007. The increase in net income is the result of a relatively stable net interest margin, an increase in noninterest income and a decrease in noninterest expenses. Returns on average equity (ROE) and average assets (ROAA) for the year ending December 31, 2007 were 4.94% and 0.56%, respectively, compared to 3.29% and 0.38% for the year ending December 31, 2006. Total interest and dividend income increased $675 thousand or 3.9% in 2007. Interest and fees on loans increased $524 thousand or 4.2%, due primarily to the $7.0 million increase in loans. Management has focused on aggressively attracting commercial loan business and purchasing loan participations from other Ohio banks (commercial real estate and consumer loans). Securities interest and dividend income increased $187 thousand or 4.6% over 2006. Much of this increase is attributable to an increase in the average balance of securities. Interest expense increased by $1.0 million or 16.2% during 2007, as the Bank continued to experience a shift from lower interest rate deposits to higher paying interest rate deposits. Interest expense on deposits increased $861 thousand or 17.3% in 2007. Deposit customers continued moving funds from lower rate deposit accounts to higher yielding certificates of deposit and premium money market accounts during 2007. Short-term borrowings increased by $135 thousand or 60.0%, primarily due to the increase in repurchase agreements. The provision for loan losses was $147 thousand in 2007, compared to $160 thousand in 2006. The allowance for loan losses and the related provision for loan losses is based on the management`s judgment and evaluation of the loan portfolio. Net charge-offs have been relatively low in recent years. Classified loans have decreased from $12.1 million as of December 31, 2006 to $5.3 million as of December 31, 2007, a decrease of 56.2%. The decrease in classified loans is the primary reason the allowance as a percentage of loans declined from 1.07% at December 31, 2006, to 1.05% at December 31, 2007. Total nonperforming loans have increased from $2.3 million as of December 31, 2006, to $2.8 million as of December 31, 2007, an increase of 21.7%. Management believes the current allowance for loan losses is adequate, however changing economic and other conditions may require future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses. Noninterest income increased $337 thousand or 20.4% during 2007. The increase is related to the Bank`s enhancement of the deposit and service charge fee structure effective July 1, 2007. The Bank hired two mortgage-banking specialists and reorganized mortgage loan operations in the fourth quarter of 2007. The Bank is in the process of enhancing its residential mortgage product and service offerings in an effort to improve noninterest income in 2008 and beyond. Noninterest expense was $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $11.4 million for 2006, a decrease of 7.9%. The decrease is primarily due to lower salaries and employee benefits due to lower staff levels and a reduction in marketing expenses. Salaries and employee benefits decreased $678 thousand in 2007 as the Bank reduced the number of full-time equivalent employees from 132 at December 31, 2006 to 105 at December 31, 2007. Marketing expenses decreased $289 thousand to $127 thousand in 2007, compared to $416 thousand in 2006. Management has focused on efficient and effective marketing solutions in an effort to reduce unnecessary marketing costs in 2007. Offsetting the decrease in noninterest expense for 2007 were increases in professional and consulting fees of $344 thousand and data processing of $102 thousand. In the first half of 2007, the Company engaged a consulting firm to review key business processes and procedures for the Bank. The consulting firm identified opportunities to improve operational efficiency and enhance the deposit and service charge fee structure. Income tax expense was $496 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2007, representing an increase of $359 thousand or 262.0%. Critical Accounting Policies National Bancshares Corporation`s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ~ GAAP ~ and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, affecting the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain policies necessarily require greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the consolidated financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available. When third-party information is not available, valuation adjustments are estimated in good faith by management, including the use of internal cash-flow modeling techniques. National Bancshares Corporation`s most significant accounting policies are presented in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements. Management considers the allowance for loan losses, valuation of securities and goodwill and other intangible assets to be the most subjective and the most susceptible to change as circumstances and economic conditions change. Allowance for Loan Losses An allowance for loan losses recorded under generally accepted accounting principles is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, based on current information and events, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. The amount of the allowance is a product of management`s judgment and it is inevitably imprecise. Estimating the allowance requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to many factors, including the amount and timing of future cash flows on problem loans, estimated losses on pools of loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which are susceptible to significant change. Although management believes that the allowance for loan losses was adequate at December 31, 2008, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy and employment could result in increased levels of non-performing assets and charge-offs, increased loan loss provisions, and reductions in income. Additionally, as an integral part of the examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review a bank`s loan loss allowance. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) could require the recognition of additions to the loan loss allowance based on the OCC`s judgment of information available to it at the time of its examination of First National Bank. Valuation of Securities The portfolio of available-for- sale securities is reported at fair value. The fair value of a security is determined based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined based on quoted prices of similar instruments. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are reviewed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances of each individual investment, such as the length of time the fair value has been below cost, the expectation for that security`s performance, the credit worthiness of the issuer, and the bank`s ability to hold the security to maturity. A decline in value that is considered to be other-than-temporary would be recorded as a loss within noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment will be recognized in the period identified. Other intangible assets consist of core deposit and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from whole bank and branch acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized on a straight line or accelerated method over their estimated useful lives, which is 7 to 10 years. New Accounting Pronouncements See Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements for details on new accounting pronouncements. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS December 31, 2008 and 2007 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
2008 2007 ASSETS Cash and due from banks $ 11,001 $ 11,842 Federal funds sold -- 443 Total cash and cash equivalents 11,001 12,285 Securities available for sale 127,248 84,514 Restricted equity securities 3,217 3,121 Loans, net of allowance for loan losses: 2008 ~ $1,718 2007 ~ $2,028 179,831 191,488 Premises and equipment, net 6,197 5,206 Goodwill 4,723 4,723 Identified intangible assets 422 654 Accrued interest receivable 1,230 1,502 Cash surrender value of life insurance 2,677 2,587 Other assets 1,456 571 $338,002 $306,651 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS` EQUITY Liabilities Deposits Non interest bearing $ 46,159 $ 44,492 Interest bearing 217,483 198,031 Total deposits 263,642 242,523 Repurchase agreements 10,469 8,831 Federal funds purchased 1,830 -- Federal Reserve note account 986 543 Federal Home Loan Bank advances 21,000 17,000 Accrued interest payable 690 975 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 2,504 1,788 Total liabilities 301,121 271,660 Shareholders` equity Common stock, no par value; 6,000,000 shares authorized; 2,289,528 shares issued 11,447 11,447 Additional paid in capital 4,718 4,690 Retained earnings 20,972 20,182 Treasury stock, at cost (87,160 and 82,143 shares) (1,709) (1,623) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 1,453 295 Total shareholders` equity 36,881 34,991 $338,002 $306,651
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
2008 2007 2006 Interest and dividend income Loans, including fees $ 12,241 $ 13,144 $ 12,620 Securities: Taxable 4,095 3,585 3,299 Nontaxable 654 699 798 Federal funds sold and other 81 404 440 Total interest and dividend income 17,071 17,832 17,157 Interest expense Deposits 4,657 5,828 4,967 Short-term borrowings 164 360 225 Federal Home Loan Bank advances 964 780 803 Total interest expense 5,785 6,968 5,995 Net interest income 11,286 10,864 11,162 Provision for loan losses 482 147 160 Net interest income after provision for loan losses 10,804 10,717 11,002 Noninterest income Checking account fees 1,218 1,191 985 Visa check card interchange fees 326 269 205 Deposit and miscellaneous service fees 171 176 170 Mortgage banking activities 126 19 17 Gain on sale of credit card portfolio 435 -- -- Gain (loss) on sales or write-down of other real estate owned (15) (33) (29) Securities gains (losses), net (344) 14 44 Other 416 354 261 Total noninterest income 2,333 1,990 1,653 Noninterest expense Salaries and employee benefits 5,118 5,182 5,860 Data processing 947 1,105 1,003 Net occupancy 915 859 826 Professional and consulting fees 412 593 249 Franchise tax 326 336 362 Maintenance and repairs 212 327 294 Amortization of intangibles 232 237 246 Telephone 194 243 263 Marketing 144 127 416 Director fees and pension 312 212 380 Other 1,361 1,279 1,455 Total noninterest expense 10,173 10,500 11,354 Income before income taxes 2,964 2,207 1,301 Income tax expense 770 496 137 Net income $ 2,194 $ 1,711 $ 1,164 Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 2,203,218 2,231,369 2,234,488 Basic and diluted earnings per common share $ 1.00 $ 0.77 $ 0.52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS` EQUITY Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Accumulated Additional Other Total Common Paid In Retained Treasury Comprehensive Shareholders` Stock Capital Earnings Stock Income (Loss) Equity Balance at January 1, 2006 $11,447 $4,690 $20,167 $(1,189) $ (362) $34,753 Comprehensive income: Net income 1,164 1,164 Other comprehensive income (loss) 193 193 Total comprehensive income 1,357 Cash dividends declared ($.64 per share) (1,430) (1,430) Balance at December 31, 2006 11,447 4,690 19,901 (1,189) (169) 34,680 Comprehensive income: Net income 1,711 1,711 Other comprehensive income (loss) 464 464 Total comprehensive income 2,175 Cash dividends declared ($.64 per share) (1,430) (1,430) Purchase of 27,103 common stock (434) (434) Balance at December 31, 2007 11,447 4,690 20,182 (1,623) 295 34,991 Comprehensive income Net income 2,194 2,194 Other comprehensive income (loss) 1,158 1,158 Total comprehensive income 3,352 Cash dividends declared ($.64 per share) (1,404) (1,404) Purchase of 5,017 common stock (86) (86) Compensation expense under stock-based compensation plans 28 28 Balance at December 31, 2008 $11,447 $4,718 $20,972 $(1,709) $1,453 $36,881
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data)
2008 2007 2006 Cash flows from operating activities Net income $2,194 $ 1,711 $ 1,164 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities Provision for loan losses 482 147 160 Deferred income taxes 40 (19) (310) Depreciation, amortization and accretion 271 442 944 Earnings on Bank owned life insurance (90) (88) (83) Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividend (96) -- (134) Origination of mortgage loans held for sale (7,080) (1,826) (3,834) Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale 7,187 1,826 3,812 Gain on sale of loans (114) (19) (17) Net security (gains) losses 344 (14) (43) Gain on sale of credit card portfolio (435) -- -- Impairment charge for property -- -- 124 (Gain) loss on sales or write-down of other real estate owned and property and equipment 24 33 29 Compensation expense under stock-based compensation plans 28 -- -- Change in other assets and liabilities (498) (353) 562 Net cash from operating activities 2,257 1,840 2,374 Cash flows from investing activities Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity -- -- 50 Securities available for sale Proceeds from maturities and repayments 28,426 15,753 8,795 Proceeds from sales 25,417 22,662 278 Purchases (74,179) (36,083) (17,906) Purchases of property and equipment (1,462) (325) (918) Proceeds from sale of credit card portfolio 1,871 -- -- Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 13 211 -- Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned 179 -- 105 Purchase of loans (6,130) (6,408) -- Net change in loans to customers (5,210) (747) 6,677 Net cash from investing activities (31,075) (4,937) (2,919) Cash flows from financing activities Net change in deposits 21,119 (5,158) (1,807) Net change in short-term borrowings 3,911 629 5,792 Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances 4,000 3,000 -- Repayments Federal Home Loan Bank advances -- -- (3,000) Dividends paid (1,410) (1,430) (1,430) Purchase of common stock (86) (434) -- Net cash from financing activities 27,534 (3,393) (445) Net change in cash and cash equivalents (1,284) (6,490) (990) Beginning cash and cash equivalents 12,285 18,775 19,765 Ending cash and cash equivalents $11,001 $12,285 $18,775 Supplemental cash flow information: Interest paid $ 6,070 $ 7,022 $ 5,671 Income taxes paid 970 662 375 Supplemental noncash disclosures: Transfer from loans to securities available for sale $20,810 $ -- $ -- Transfer from loans to other real estate owned 354 124 134 Transfer securities from held to maturity to available for sale -- -- 16,831
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 1 ~ SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include National Bancshares Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, First National Bank, Orrville, Ohio (Bank), together referred to as `the Corporation.` The Bank has a minority interest in First Kropf Title, LLC. The Bank`s investment in First Kropf Title, LLC is immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. The Corporation provides financial services through its main and branch offices in Orrville, Ohio, and branch offices in surrounding communities in Wayne, Medina and Stark counties. Its primary deposit products are checking, savings, and term certificate accounts, and its primary lending products are commercial and residential mortgage, commercial and consumer installment loans. Most loans are secured by specific items of collateral including business assets, consumer assets and real estate. Commercial loans are expected to be repaid from cash flow from operations of businesses. Real estate loans are secured by both residential and commercial real estate. Other financial instruments, which potentially represent concentrations of credit risk, include deposit accounts in other financial institutions and federal funds sold. There are no significant concentrations of loans to any one industry or customer. However, the customer`s ability to repay their loans is dependent on the real estate and general economic conditions of this area. Segments: As noted above, the Corporation provides a broad range of financial services to individuals and companies in northern Ohio. While the Corporation`s chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Corporation-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the Corporation`s financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment. Use of Estimates: To prepare financial statements in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, fair values of financial instruments and carrying value of intangible assets are particularly subject to change. Cash Flows: Cash and cash equivalents include cash, deposits with other banks with original maturities under 90 days, and federal funds sold. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest bearing deposits with other banks, repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings. Securities: Securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities are classified as available for sale when they might be sold before maturity. Equity securities with readily determinable fair values are classified as available for sale. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax. Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method. Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are other than temporary are reflected as realized losses. In estimating other than temporary losses, management considers the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and the Company`s ability and intent to hold the security for a period sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Loans Held for Sale: Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market, as determined by outstanding commitments from investors. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recorded as a valuation allowance and charged to earnings. Mortgage loans held for sale may be sold with servicing rights retained or released. The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the amount allocated to the servicing right for loans sold with servicing retained. Gains and losses on sales of mortgage loans are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands except per share data) NOTE 1 ~ SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) Loans: Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned and deferred income and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments. Interest income on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. Concentration of Credit Risk: Most of the Company`s business activity is with customers located within Wayne, Stark, Holmes and Medina Counties. Therefore, the Company`s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in the economy in the Wayne, Stark, Holmes and Medina County area. Purchased Loans: The Company purchases individual loans and groups of loans. Purchased loans that show evidence of credit deterioration at the time of purchase are recorded at the amount paid, such that there is no carryover of the seller`s allowance for loan losses. After acquisition, incurred losses are recognized by an increase in the allowance for loan losses. Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management`s judgment, should be charged-off. The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired or loans otherwise classified as substandard or doubtful. The general component covers non classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. A loan is impaired when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Commercial and commercial real estate loans are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan`s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures. Servicing Rights: Servicing rights are recognized separately when they are acquired through sales of loans. For sales of mortgage loans prior to January 1, 2007, a portion of the cost of the loan was allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair values. The Company adopted SFAS No. 156 on January 1, 2007, and for sales of mortgage loans beginning in 2007, servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value with the income statement effect recorded in gains on sales of loans. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. The Company compares the valuation model inputs and results to published industry data in order to validate the model results and assumptions. All classes of servicing assets are subsequently measured using the amortization method which requires servicing rights to be amortized into non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying loans. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 1 ~ SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the servicing assets of the Corporation totaled $173 and $67, respectively, and is included with other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. Any impairment is reported as a valuation allowance, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for a grouping. Servicing fee income is recorded when earned for servicing loans based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal or a fixed amount per loan. The amortization of mortgage servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income. Other Real Estate Owned: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Operating costs after acquisition are expensed. Premises and Equipment: Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 7 to 39 years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 7 years. Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) Stock: The Bank is a member of the FHLB and FRB systems. FHLB members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. The stocks are carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income. Bank Owned Life Insurance: The Corporation has purchased life insurance policies on its directors. Life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other amounts due that are probable at settlement. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment will be recognized in the period identified. Other intangible assets consist of core deposit and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from whole bank and branch acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized on an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives, which range from 7 to 10 years. The Corporation also has intangible assets associated with a prior branch acquisition, including unidentified intangibles of approximately $27 and $56 at year-end 2008 and 2007. Management does not believe that this purchase constituted a business combination and therefore is continuing to amortize the unidentified intangible asset. Long-term Assets: These assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value. Repurchase Agreements: Substantially all repurchase agreement liabilities represent amounts advanced by various customers. Securities are pledged to cover these liabilities, which are not covered by federal deposit insurance. Benefit Plans: Retirement plan expense is the amount of required matching contributions plus any discretionary contributions to the Corporation`s 401(k) plan as determined by Board decision. Director retirement plan expense allocates the benefits over the estimated years of service. Stock-Based Compensation: Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock awards issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the market price of the Corporation`s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period, on an accelerated basis. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 1 ~ SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) Income Taxes: Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company adopted FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (`FIN 48`), as of January 1, 2007. A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is `more likely than not` that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the `more likely than not` test, no tax benefit is recorded. The adoption had no affect on the Company`s financial statements. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. Transfers of Financial Assets: Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments: Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer-financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. Earnings Per Common Share: Earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options. 58,000 stock options were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for 2008 because they were antidilutive. No options were outstanding prior to 2008. Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, which is also recognized as a separate component of equity. Loss Contingencies: Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there now are such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements. Restrictions on Cash: Cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of $100 and $3,527 was required to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements at year-end 2008 and 2007. These balances do not earn interest. Dividend Restriction: Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and limit the dividends paid by the Bank to the holding company or by the holding company to shareholders. Dividends paid by the Bank to the holding company are the primary source of funds for dividends by the holding company to its shareholders. Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. Reclassifications: Certain items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Adoption of New Accounting Standards: In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 1 ~ SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy about the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. The standard was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This FSP delays the effective date of FAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The impact of adoption was not material. In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset when the Market for That Asset Is Not Active. This FSP clarifies the application of FAS 157 in a market that is not active. The impact of adoption was not material. In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The standard provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The new standard was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any financial assets or financial liabilities as of January 1, 2008. Effect on Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards: In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (`FAS 141(R)`), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. FAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this standard will not have a material effect on the Corporation`s results of operations or financial position. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, `Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51` (`SFAS No. 160`), which will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity within the consolidated balance sheets. FAS No. 160 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this standard will not have a material effect on the Corporation`s results of operations or financial position In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, `Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133`. FAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133 for derivative instruments and hedging activities. FAS No. 161 requires qualitative disclosure about objectives and strategies for using derivative and hedging instruments, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of the instruments and gains and losses on such instruments, as well as disclosures about credit-risk features in derivative agreements. FAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The adoption of this standard will not have a material effect on the Corporation`s results of operations or financial position. NOTE 2 ~ SECURITIES The fair value of available for sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
Gross Gross Fair Unrealized Unrealized Value Gains Losses 2008 State and municipal $ 16,214 $ 234 $(193) Corporate bond and notes 7,182 5 (453) Mortgage backed 103,836 2,616 -- Equity securities 16 -- (7) Total debt securities $127,248 $2,855 $(653)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 2 ~ SECURITIES (Continued)
Gross Gross Fair Unrealized Unrealized Value Gains Losses 2007 U.S. Treasury and federal agency $10,268 $161 $ -- State and municipal 16,068 295 (13) Corporate bond and notes 17,595 26 (295) Mortgage-backed 40,583 294 (21) Total debt securities $84,514 $776 $(329)
Sales of available for sale securities were as follows:
2008 2007 2006 Proceeds $25,471 $22,662 $278 Gross gains 330 132 38 Gross losses (230) (121) -- Gross gains from calls -- 3 6 Other than temporary impairment loss (444) -- --
The tax provision (benefit) related to these net realized gains and losses was $(34), $5, and $15, respectively. The fair value of debt securities at year-end 2008 by contractual maturity were as follows. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage backed securities, are shown separately.
Fair Value Due in one year or less $ 4,181 Due from one to five years 7,763 Due from five to ten years 6,593 Due after ten years 4,859 Mortgage backed 103,836 Equity securities 16 Total $127,248
Securities pledged at year-end 2008 and 2007 had a carrying amount of $30,679 and $24,668 and were pledged to secure public deposits and repurchase agreements. At year-end 2008 and 2007, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders` equity. Securities with unrealized losses at year end 2008 and 2007, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows:
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized 2008 Value Loss Value Loss Value Loss State and municipal $3,406 $(193) $ -- $ -- $3,406 $(193) Corporate bonds and notes 5,166 (453) -- -- 5,166 (453) Mortgage-backed -- -- -- -- -- -- Equity securities 23 (7) -- -- 23 (7) Total temporarily impaired $8,595 $(653) $ -- $ -- $8,595 $(653)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 2 ~ SECURITIES (Continued)
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Value Loss Value Loss Value Loss 2007 U.S. Government and federal agency $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- State and municipal 486 (8) 1,969 (5) 2,455 (13) Corporate bonds and notes 1,181 (17) 12,156 (278) 13,337 (295) Mortgage-backed 6,246 (9) 1,269 (12) 7,515 (21) Total temporarily impaired $7,913 $ (34) $15,394 $(295) $23,307 $(329)
Unrealized losses have not been recognized into income because the securities are of high credit quality, management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, and the decline in fair value is largely due to increases in market interest rates or normally expected market pricing fluctuations. The fair value of debt securities is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date and/or market rates decline. National Bancshares Corporation purchased $467 of FHLMC preferred stock in the first quarter of 2008. During 2008, management determined this preferred stock was other than temporarily impaired. Management recorded $84 and $360 of other than temporary impairment write-downs in the second and third quarter of 2008 related to this investment security. The loss has been recorded in Securities gains (losses), net in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The market value of these securities at December 31, 2008 was $16 compared to an adjusted cost basis of $23. The Bank holds a senior corporate bond issued by American International Group, Inc. (`AIG`) maturing May 2013, which was purchased in October, 2003. At December 31, 2008, the bond had an amortized cost of $982 and a market value of $701. Based on management`s evaluation of this AIG security bond, it is believed the decline in market value is temporary due to current market conditions and negative press primarily centering around capital contributions in consideration of the financial support of AIG so far from the U.S. Treasury Department. The Bank has the intent and ability to hold this security until the fair value is recovered, which may be at maturity. Management will continue to monitor this security for impairment. NOTE 3 ~ LOANS Loans at year-end were as follows:
2008 2007 Collateralized by real estate: Commercial $ 48,034 $ 51,463 Residential 54,924 80,113 Home equity 24,442 20,857 Construction 12,846 8,367 140,246 160,800 Other: Consumer 14,354 11,988 Commercial 25,583 17,552 Credit card -- 1,614 Other 1,658 1,987 181,841 193,941 Unearned and deferred income (292) (425) Allowance for loan losses (1,718) (2,028) Total $179,831 $191,488
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 3 ~ LOANS (Continued) Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows:
2008 2007 2006 Beginning balance $2,028 $1,993 $1,903 Provision for loan losses 482 147 160 Loans charged-off (845) (151) (162) Recoveries 53 39 92 Ending balance $1,718 $2,028 $1,993
Individually impaired loans were as follows:
2008 2007 Year end loans with no allocated allowance for loan losses $ 396 $ -- Year end loans with allocated allowance for loan losses 940 2,702 Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated 75 629
2008 2007 2006 Average of individually impaired loans during year $1,846 $2,500 $ 584
The impact on interest income of impaired loans was not significant to the consolidated statements of income. Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual were as follows:
2008 2007 Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual $ 261 $ 158 Nonaccrual loans 1,752 2,645
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. The Bank sold its $1,486 credit card portfolio to Elan Financial Services (Elan), a subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ND in July, 2008. Under the agreement, Elan purchased the Bank`s existing credit card portfolio, and subsequently will issue credit cards for the Bank utilizing the First National Bank name and logo. First National Bank will continue to earn certain fees from ongoing portfolio activity and new accounts. The transaction generated a $435 gain recorded in the third quarter of 2008. The Bank securitized $20,897 single-family residential mortgage loans formerly held in its mortgage loan portfolio, with Freddie Mac in December, 2008. The Bank has recorded the securities as available for sale and continues to service the loans. The securitization increased the Bank`s liquidity as the securities are readily marketable, eliminated credit risk on the loans and increased the Bank`s risk-based capital ratio. Since the Bank cannot de-securitize the securities to get back the loans, the securitization is not considered a sale or transfer under SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, but an exchange of loans for securities under SFAS No. 134, Accounting for Mortgage-Backed Securities Retained after the Securitization of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale by a Mortgage Banking Enterprise, and SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities because the Bank received the beneficial interest in the loans it transferred to Freddie Mac. As a result of the securitization, single-family residential mortgage loan balances net of unamortized loan origination fees declined $20,810, the loan servicing asset increased $132 and securities available for sale increased $21,532. The unrealized gain on the securities at December 31, 2008 was $840 which increased the Bank`s capital by $554. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 4 ~ LOAN SERVICING Mortgage loans serviced for others are not reported as assets. The principal balances of these loans at year-end are as follows:
2008 2007 Mortgage loan portfolios serviced for: FHLMC $38,011 $17,597
There were no custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with serviced loans at year end 2008 and 2007. Activity for mortgage servicing rights and the related valuation allowance follows:
2008 2007 2006 Servicing rights: Beginning balance $ 67 $ 86 $ 84 Additions 139 19 40 Amortized to expense (33) (38) (38) Ending balance $173 $ 67 $ 86
NOTE 5 ~ PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT Year end premises and equipment were as follows:
2008 2007 Land $ 1,528 $ 1,378 Buildings 6,380 6,096 Furniture, fixtures and equipment 4,764 4,536 Construction in progress 275 -- 12,947 12,010 Less: Accumulated depreciation (6,750) (6,804) $ 6,197 $ 5,206
Depreciation expense was $442, $457 and $446 in 2008, 2007 and 2006. Rent expense under operating leases included in occupancy was $39, $38 and $47 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. Future lease payments are not material. NOTE 6 ~ INTANGIBLE ASSETS During 2002, the Corporation acquired Peoples Financial Corporation and merged the Company`s banking operations into the Bank. Identified intangible assets totaling $1,791 were recognized and have useful lives of 7 to 10 years. Goodwill of $4,723 was realized from this transaction. Identified intangible assets at year-end were as follows:
2008 2007 Gross Gross Carrying Accumulated Carrying Accumulated Amount Amortization Amount Amortization Amortized intangible assets: Core deposit intangibles $1,063 $ 772 $1,063 $ 673 Branch acquisition intangible 760 733 760 704 Customer relationship intangibles 728 624 728 520 Total $2,551 $2,129 $2,551 $1,897
Aggregate amortization expense was $232, $237 and $246 for 2008, 2007 and 2006. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 6 ~ INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued) Estimated amortization expense for the next four years:
2009 $224 2010 90 2011 86 2012 22
NOTE 7 ~ DEPOSITS 2008 2007 Demand, noninterest-bearing $ 46,159 $ 44,492 Demand, interest-bearing 92,515 64,594 Savings 49,642 53,545 Time, $100,000 and over 12,937 12,725 Time, other 62,389 67,167 $263,642 $242,523
A summary of time deposits at year-end 2008 by maturity follows:
2009 $51,744 2010 17,941 2011 3,872 2012 1,181 2013 and thereafter 588 $75,326
NOTE 8 ~ FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES At year-end, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were as follows:
2008 2007 Maturity in 2010, fixed rate at 6.26%, $ 1,000 $ 1,000 onvertible to variable rate if 3-month LIBOR is at or above predetermined conversion rate level Maturities in 2010 and 2011, fixed rate at 4.93% 13,000 13,000 to 5.79% at December 31, 2008 and 2007, convertible to variable if 1-month LIBOR is at or above fixed rate Maturities in 2009, fixed rate at 3.95% to 4.10% 3,000 3,000 Maturities in 2010, fixed rate at 3.19% 1,000 -- Maturities in 2011, fixed rate at 2.88% 3,000 -- Total $21,000 $17,000
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 8 ~ FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES (Continued) Each advance is payable at its maturity date; advances may be paid prior to maturity subject to a prepayment penalty. As collateral for the advances, the Bank has approximately $49,769 and $76,395 of first mortgage loans available under a blanket lien arrangement at year-end 2008 and 2007. Required payments over the next three years are:
2009 3.95 to 4.10% $ 3,000 2010 3.19 to 6.26% 12,000 2011 2.88 to 5.12% 6,000
NOTE 9 - REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS Repurchase agreements generally mature within 30 days from the transaction date. Information concerning repurchase agreements is summarized as follows:
2008 2007 2006 Average balance during the year $10,134 $ 8,642 $ 6,008 Average interest rate during the year 1.42% 3.86% 3.48% Maximum month-end balance during the year $11,136 $10,956 $ 7,902 Weighted-average rate at year end 0.50% 2.85% 3.63%
NOTE 10 ~ BENEFIT PLANS The Corporation has a 401(k) retirement plan that covers substantially all employees. The plan allows employees to contribute up to a predetermined amount, subject to certain limitations, with the Corporation matching 50% of contributions up to 6% of the employee`s pay. Discretionary contributions may also be made to the plan. Total matching and discretionary contributions made by the Corporation during 2008, 2007 and 2006 amounted to $81, $83 and $142. The Corporation has an Employee Stock Purchase Incentive Plan for full-time and most part-time employees. Under the Plan, each employee is entitled to receive a cash payment equal to 20% of the purchase price of Corporation common stock acquired by the employee on the open market, up to a maximum of 100 shares per calendar year. Expenses recognized in 2008, 2007 and 2006 amounted to $1, $2, and $3. The Corporation has a director retirement and death benefit plan for the benefit of all members of the Board of Directors. The plan is designed to provide an annual retirement benefit to be paid to each director upon retirement from the Board and attaining age 70. The retirement benefit provided to each director is an annual benefit equal to $1 for each year of service on the Board from and after August 24, 1994 until August 2007, when the Board voted to cease further benefits. In addition, each director has the option of deferring any portion of directors` fees to a maximum of $5 per month until retirement. Interest credited to participant accounts associated with the deferrals was $12, $29 and $45 in 2008, 2007 and 2006. The deferred directors` fee liability was $374 at December 31, 2008 and $414 at December 31, 2007. Expense recognized in 2008, 2007 and 2006 for the director retirement and death benefit plan was $117, $59 and $167. The liability related to the plan was $680 at December 31, 2008 and $599 at December 31, 2007. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 11 ~ INCOME TAXES The components of deferred taxes were as follows:
2008 2007 Deferred tax assets: Bad debts $ 424 $ 529 Deferred compensation 382 363 Deferred loan fees 192 190 FHLMC preferred stock impairment loss 151 -- Non-accrual loan interest income 45 78 Stock-based compensation 10 -- Core deposit intangibles 7 14 Other 5 -- Real estate owned write-down -- 11 Total $1,216 $1,185 2008 2007 Deferred tax liabilities: Unrealized security gains, net $ 749 $ 152 Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends 542 509 Depreciation 321 203 Purchase accounting adjustments 206 283 Mortgage servicing rights 59 23 Prepaid expenses 44 26 Securities accretion 31 87 Partnership income 1 2 Total 1,953 1,285 Net deferred tax asset (liability) $ (737) $ (100)
Federal income tax laws provided that the 2002 acquired entity could claim additional bad debt deductions through 1987, totaling $1,864. Accounting standards do not require a deferred tax liability to be recorded on this amount, which liability otherwise would total $634 at December 31, 2008. If the Bank were liquidated or otherwise ceases to be a bank or if tax laws were to change, this amount would be expensed. The components of income tax expense are as follows:
2008 2007 2006 Currently payable $ 730 $ 515 $ 447 Deferred 40 (19) (310) Total $ 770 $ 496 $ 137
The following is a reconciliation of income tax at the federal statutory rate to the effective rate of tax on the financial statements:
2008 2007 2006 Rate Amount Rate Amount Rate Amount Tax at federal statutory rate 34% $1,008 34% $ 750 34% $ 442 Tax-exempt income (7) (214) (10) (228) (20) (261) Other (1) (24) (2) (26) (3) (44) Income tax expense 26% $ 770 22% $ 496 11% $ 137
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 12 ~ RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS Loans to principal officers, directors, and their affiliates during 2008 were as follows:
Beginning balance $3,324 Effect of changes in composition of related parties -- New loans 1,233 Repayments 781 Ending balance $3,776
Unused commitments to these related parties totaled $969 and $1,088 at year-end 2008 and 2007. Related party deposits totaled $2,050 and $2,758 at year-end 2008 and 2007. The Corporation has minority ownership in a title agency affiliated with a Director resulting in fee income to the Corporation of $11, $16 and $20 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. NOTE 13 ~ STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company`s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (`the Plan`), which is shareholder-approved, permits the grant of stock options to its officers, employees, consultants and non-employee directors for up to 223,448 shares of common stock. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company`s common stock at the date of grant; those option awards have vesting periods determined by the Company`s compensation committee and have terms that shall not exceed 10 years. On May 20, 2008, the Company granted options to purchase 58,000 shares of stock to directors and certain key officers, all of which remain outstanding at December 31, 2008. The exercise price of the options is $18.03 per share. The options vest in five equal installments over a five-year period and have a term of 10 years. As of December 31, 2008 none of the options had been forfeited. All options are expected to vest. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company`s common stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferrable. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The fair value of options granted of $1.83 per option was determined using the following weighted-average assumptions as of grant date.
Risk-free interest rate 3.19% Expected term (years) 6.5 Expected stock price volatility 13.76% Dividend yield 3.60%
The total compensation cost that has been charged against income for the plan was $28 for 2008. The total income tax benefit was $10 for 2008. As of December 31, 2008, there was $78 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.4 years. At December 31, 2008, no options are vested and the outstanding options have no intrinsic value. The weighted average remaining contractual term is 9.4 years. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 14 ~ REGULATORY CAPITAL MATTERS Banks are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Management believes as of December 31, 2008, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required. At year end 2008 and 2007, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution`s category. Actual and required capital amounts and ratios are presented below at year-end.
To Be Well Required Capitalized Under For Capital Prompt Corrective Actual Adequacy Purposes Action Regulations Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio 2008 Total capital to risk weighted assets $26,730 12.60% $16,971 8.00% $21,213 10.00% Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets 25,012 11.79% 8,485 4.00% 12,728 6.00% Tier 1 capital to average assets 25,012 7.78% 12,853 4.00% 16,066 5.00% 2007 Total capital to risk weighted assets $26,810 12.78% $16,785 8.00% $20,981 10.00% Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets 24,782 11.81% 8,392 4.00% 12,588 6.00% Tier 1 capital to average assets 24,782 8.26% 12,001 4.00% 15,001 5.00%
Dividend Restrictions ~ The Company`s principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from the Bank. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of regulatory agencies. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year`s net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years, subject to the capital requirements described above. During 2009, the Bank must obtain regulatory approval to pay dividends to the holding company until 2009 net income exceeds $1,210. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 15 ~ LOAN COMMITMENTS AND OTHER RELATED ACTIVITIES Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit, and overdraft protection, are issued to meet customer financing needs. These are agreements to provide credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used. Off balance sheet risk to credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of the commitment. The contractual amounts of financial instruments with off balance sheet risk at year-end were as follows:
2008 2007 Commitments to make loans $ 2,382 $ 6,723 Unused lines of credit 49,389 56,077 Letters of credit 109 157
Of the above unused instruments at December 31, 2008, approximately $10,065 pertains to fixed-rate commitments and variable-rate commitments account for approximately $41,815. At year-end 2007, approximately $9,257 of total commitments were fixed-rate and approximately $53,700 were variable rate. Rates on fixed-rate unused lines of credit ranged from 6.25% to 19.80% at December 31, 2008 and 5.75% to 16.90% at December 31, 2007. NOTE 16 - FAIR VALUE Statement 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date. Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity`s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 16 - FAIR VALUE (Continued) Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements At December 31, 2008 Using Quoted Prices in Significant Active Markets Other Significant for Identical Observable Unobservable Assets Inputs Inputs (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Assets: Available for sale securities $16 $127,232 $-- Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below: Fair Value Measurements At December 31, 2008 Using Quoted Prices in Significant Active Markets Other Significant for Identical Observable Unobservable Assets Inputs Inputs (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Assets: Impaired loans $-- $-- $865
Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a principal amount of $940, with a valuation allowance of $75, resulting in an additional provision for loan loss of $75. Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments at year-end were as follows:
2008 2007 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Amount Value Amount Value Financial assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 11,001 $ 11,001 $ 12,285 $ 12,285 Securities available for sale 127,248 127,248 84,514 84,514 Loans, net 179,831 179,586 191,488 193,823 Accrued interest receivable 1,230 1,230 1,502 1,502 Financial liabilities Deposits (263,642) (264,731) (242,523) (242,759) Short-term borrowings (13,285) (13,285) (9,374) (9,374) Federal Home Loan Bank advances (21,000) (21,239) (17,000) (17,060) Accrued interest payable (690) (690) (975) (975)
The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows: Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing deposits, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that reprice frequently and fully. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. It was not praticable to determine the fair value of restricted equity stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The fair value of off balance sheet items is not considered material. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 17 ~ OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) Other comprehensive income (loss) components and related tax effects were as follows:
2008 2007 2006 Unrealized holding gains (loss) on available for sale securities $ 571 $ 717 $ 73 Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) later recognized in income 344 (14) (44) Net unrealized gains (loss) 915 703 29 Initial unrealized gain on mortgage-backed securities received in securitization 840 -- -- Unrealized gains on securities transferred from held to maturity to available for sale -- -- 263 Tax effect (benefit) (597) (239) (99) Other comprehensive income (loss) $1,158 $ 464 $ 193
NOTE 18 ~ PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION Condensed financial statements for National Bancshares Corporation (parent only) are as follows:
BALANCE SHEETS December 31 2008 2007 ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 5,327 $ 4,846 Investment in Bank subsidiary 31,675 30,460 Securities available for sale 16 -- Other assets 215 43 Total assets $37,233 $35,349 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS` EQUITY Dividends payable $ 352 $ 358 Shareholders` equity 36,881 34,991 Total liabilities and shareholders` equity $37,233 $35,349
STATEMENTS OF INCOME Years ended December 31
2008 2007 2006 INCOME Dividends from Bank subsidiary $2,500 $3,000 $3,000 Securities gains (losses), net (444) 1 29 Dividend income 16 -- -- Total Income 2,072 3,001 3,029 EXPENSES Miscellaneous expense (72) (85) (47) Income before income tax and undistributed subsidiary income 2,000 2,916 2,982 Income tax benefit 170 29 9 Undistributed equity in (distributions in excess of) net income of Bank subsidiary 24 (1,234) (1,827) Net income $2,194 $1,711 $1,164
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) NOTE 18 PARENT COMPANY ONLY CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years ended December 31
2008 2007 2006 Cash flows from operating activities Net income $2,194 $1,711 $1,164 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: Distributions in excess of (equity in undistributed net income) of Bank subsidiary (24) 1,234 1,827 Net security (gains) loss 444 (1) (29) Change in other assets and liabilities (170) (14) 76 Net cash from operating activities 2,444 2,930 3,038 Cash flows from investing activities Proceeds from sale of securities -- 1 53 Purchase of security available for sale (467) -- -- Net cash from investing activities (467) 1 53 Cash flows from financing activities Dividends paid (1,410) (1,430) (1,430) Purchase of common stock (86) (434) -- Net cash from financing activities (1,496) (1,864) (1,430) Net change in cash 481 1,067 1,661 Beginning cash and cash equivalents 4,846 3,779 2,118 Ending cash and cash equivalents $5,327 $4,846 $3,779
NOTE 19 ~ QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Basic and Interest Net interest Net diluted earnings income income income per share 2008 First quarter $4,270 $2,744 $491 $0.22 Second quarter 4,196 2,763 514 0.23 Third quarter 4,294 2,843 574 0.26 Fourth quarter 4,311 2,936 615 0.28 2007 First quarter $4,352 $2,642 $287 $0.13 Second quarter 4,542 2,758 314 0.14 Third quarter 4,497 2,741 507 0.23 Fourth quarter 4,441 2,723 603 0.27
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON THE COMPANY`S INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING March 27, 2009 Management of National Bancshares Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. Management of National Bancshares Corporation, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has assessed the Company`s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in `Internal Control ~ Integrated Framework` issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management has concluded that the Company`s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008, based on the specified criteria. This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company`s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management`s report was not subject to attestation by the Company`s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management`s report in this annual report. David C. Vernon Chief Executive Officer James R. VanSickle Chief Financial Officer REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Board of Directors and Shareholders National Bancshares Corporation Orrville, Ohio We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Bancshares Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders` equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation`s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation`s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of National Bancshares Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Crowe Horwath LLP Cleveland, Ohio March 27, 2009 COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN OF NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION, S&P 500 STOCK INDEX, AND S&P 500 BANK INDEX
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 National Bancshares Corp $100.00 130.86 111.78 118.09 84.62 69.16 S&P 500 Stock Index~ $100.00 110.88 116.33 134.70 142.10 89.53 S&P 500 Banks Index~ $100.00 114.42 112.75 130.90 91.91 48.26
~ National Bancshares Corporation is not included in the S&P 500 Bank Index or S&P 500 Stock Index. PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK National Bancshares Corporation common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol `NBOH.` The OTC Bulletin Board is a regulated quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices, and volume information in over-the-counter equity securities. A summary of the high and low prices of and cash dividends paid on National Bancshares Corporation common stock in 2008 and 2007 follows. This information does not reflect retail mark-up, markdown or commissions, and does not necessarily represent actual transactions.
High Low Dividends per share 2008 First Quarter $18.10 $16.20 $.16 Second Quarter 18.50 14.50 .16 Third Quarter 16.69 14.30 .16 Fourth Quarter 16.00 11.60 .16 2007 First Quarter $25.57 $22.50 $.16 Second Quarter 22.80 18.40 .16 Third Quarter 18.50 15.07 .16 Fourth Quarter 17.50 15.11 .16
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION Corporate Office National Bancshares Corporation 112 West Market Street, PO Box 57 Orrville, OH 44667 www.fnborrville.com Stock Trading Information The shares of common stock of National Bancshares Corporation are traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. The ticker symbol for National Bancshares Corporation is `NBOH.` The Corporation had 887 shareholders of Record as of December 31, 2008. Form 10-K A copy of the Corporation`s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC will be furnished free of charge to shareholders upon written request to the Company. Shareholder Assistance National Bancshares Corporation Shareholder Services Department Ellen Gerber, Shareholder Relations 330-765-0609 egerber@fnborrville.com Transfer Agent Registrar and Transfer Company 10 Commerce Drive Cranford, NJ 07016 1-800-368-5948 info@rtco.com www.rtco.com National Bancshares Corporation has a Dividend Reinvestment Plan and a Dividend Direct Deposit Plan available at no cost. Please contact Registrar and Transfer Company for enrollment. OFFICERS NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION David C. Vernon President & Chief Executive Officer James R. VanSickle Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Paul G. Kubiak Senior Vice President & Secretary FIRST NATIONAL BANK David C. Vernon President & Chief Executive Officer Business Banking Thomas R. Poe Senior Vice President, Senior Loan Officer Thomas M. Fast Senior Vice President, Business Banking John D. Shultz, Jr. Vice President, Business Banking Darrell L. Smucker Vice President, Business Banking Laura R. Yoder Assistant Vice President, Business Banking Harold D. Berkey Vice President, Relationship Manager Earl G. Mullet Vice President, Relationship Manager Dean M. Karhan Assistant Vice President, Relationship Manager Steven J. Bodo Vice President, Mortgage Banking Matthew M. Miller Assistant Vice President, Mortgage Banking Credit Administration Steven L. Riddick Vice President, Senior Credit Officer Kathryn J. Barnes Assistant Vice President, Credit Analyst Lisa M. Bryant Loan Operations Officer Mindy L. Henderson Loan Officer Patricia J. Massaro Loan Officer Retail Banking Paul G. Kubiak Senior Vice President, Retail Banking Cindy A. Wagner Assistant Vice President, Retail Banking Amberly M. Wolf Assistant Vice President, Retail Banking Paul J. Bayus Assistant Vice President, Relationship Manager Karen K. Haueter Assistant Vice President, Relationship Manager Heather L. Kiner Assistant Vice President, Relationship Manager Darrell G. Ovak Assistant Vice President, Relationship Manager Jill R. Wachtel Assistant Vice President, Relationship Manager Corporate James R. VanSickle Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer James T. Griffith Vice President, Cashier, Information Technology Pamela S. Null Vice President, Compliance & Security Michael G. Oberhaus Vice President, Financial Analyst Maria A. Roush Vice President, Auditor & Risk Management Angela L. Smith Controller Jodi R. Blair Deposit Operations Officer BOARD OF DIRECTORS FIRST NATIONAL BANK OFFICES NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION & FIRST NATIONAL BANK Sara Steinbrenner Balzarini Orrville Partner, 112 W. Market St. Paramount Tennis, LLC. 330-682-1010 John P. Cook, CPA, Ph.D 1320 W. High St. Shareholder, 330-682-2881 Long, Cook & Samsa, Inc. 1720 N. Main St. Bobbi E. Douglas CASH ATM ONLY Executive Director, STEPS at Liberty Center Apple Creek Every Woman`s House U.S. 30 at Co. Rd. 44 330-264-8070 John W. Kropf Chairman of the Board, Dalton National Bancshares Corporation 12 W. Main St. First National Bank 330-828-2227 Attorney, Kropf, Wagner, Lutz Kidron & VanSickle, L.L.P. 4950 Kidron Rd. 330-857-3101 John L. Muhlbach, Jr. Vice President, Lodi A.A. Hammersmith, Inc. 106 Ainsworth St. 330-948-1414 Victor B. Schantz President, Massillon Schantz Organ Company 211 Lincoln Way E. 330-832-7441 Steve Schmid President, 2312 Lincoln Way N.W. Smith Dairy Products, Inc. 330-833-1622 Schmid Incorporated 51 Massillon Marketplace Dr. S.W. David C. Vernon CASH ONLY ATM President & CEO, National Bancshares Corporation Mt. Eaton First National Bank 15974 E. Main St. 330-857-4301 Howard J. Wenger 330-359-3105 President, Wenger Excavating, Inc. Seville Lake Region Oil, Inc. 4885 Atlantic Dr. Northstar Asphalt, Inc. 330-769-3105 Massillon Materials, Inc. Stark Materials, Inc. Smithville 153 E. Main St. Albert W. Yeagley 330-669-2611 Vice President, Industry & Government Affairs The J. M. Smucker Company Wooster 4192 Burbank Rd. 330-263-5303 1725 Cleveland Rd. 330-263-1725
EX-21 3 f10-ex21.txt SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of National Bancshares Corporation First National Bank, a national bank, is 100% owned by National Bancshares Corporation. First Kropf Title, L.L.C., an Ohio limited liability company, is 49% owned by First National Bank. EX-23 4 f10-ex23.txt CONSENT OF AUDITORS Exhibit 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 033-63005 on Form S-3D of our report dated March 27, 2009, which report is incorporated by reference in Form 10-K for National Bancshares Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008. /s/ Crowe Horwath LLP Crowe Horwath LLP Cleveland, Ohio March 27,2009 EX-31 5 f10-ex311.txt PRESIDENT CEO CERTIFICATION Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, David C. Vernon, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bancshares Corporation (the `registrant`); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant`s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant`s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant`s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant`s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant`s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant`s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant`s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant`s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 27, 2009 /s/ David C. Vernon David C. Vernon President and Chief Executive Officer EX-31 6 f10-ex312.txt SVP CFO CERTIFICATION Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, James R. VanSickle, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bancshares Corporation (the `registrant`); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant`s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant`s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant`s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant`s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant`s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant`s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant`s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant`s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant`s internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 27, 2009 /s/ James R. VanSickle James R. VanSickle Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer EX-32 7 f10-ex32.txt SARBANES-OXLEY CERTIFICATION Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Bancshares Corporation (the `Corporation`) for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the `Report`), we, David C. Vernon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and James R. VanSickle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. This Certification is executed as of March 27, 2009. /s/ David C. Vernon David C. Vernon President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ James R. VanSickle James R. VanSickle Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----