Note 1-Organization and Basis of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2012

Note 1-Organization and Basis of Presentation:

Note 1-Organization and Basis of Presentation

NOTE 1–ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Organization – On October 16, 2000, iShopper.com, Inc. changed its name to Ensurge, Inc., which is referred to herein as the Company.  On January 1, 2002, the Company began liquidation of its assets.  During 2009, the Company started a new phase of operations.  Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements are presented on a GAAP basis of accounting rather than on a liquidation basis of accounting.

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q.  Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, especially the information included in Note 1 to those financial statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”  In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly present the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2012, and its results of operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.  The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012, may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Business Condition – The Company has suffered losses from operations, and the Company had a working capital deficit in the amount $4,615,275 at June 30, 2012. A large part of the deficit is due to outstanding warrants and warrant derivatives. Without the warrant derivatives the adjusted working capital deficit is $2,542,251. 

During 2010, the Company sold an aggregate of 3,100,000 shares of common stock shares to investors for an aggregate purchase price of $894,900 in a private placement.  The Company received $1,360,000 for exercise of warrants to purchase 5,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  In August 2011 the Company entered into a 90 day note payable in the amount of $500,000.

During the month of October 2011 the Company entered into two twelve month convertible Notes Payable for $605,000 each, for a total funding of $1,210,000, with an initial issue discount of 10% and total proceeds of $1,100,000, which are collateralized by all the assets of the Company.  Half of the proceeds were used to repay the $500,000 August 2011 note. These notes may be converted at a fixed price of $1.50 per share of the Company’s common stock, which may be converted at the option of the lender.  These notes also include 950,000 warrants each for a total of 1,900,000 warrants at an exercise price of $1.00 per share and have a cashless exercise provision.  The warrants have a 5 year term.  In case of default, the Notes may be converted into common stock at $1.50 per share or 80% of the current market bid price, whichever is lower.

Effective March 2, 2012, the Company accepted $380,000 in private placement funds from accredited investors in exchange for units consisting of seven hundred sixty thousand (760,000) shares of the Company’s common stock, plus three hundred eighty thousand (380,000) warrants with an exercise price of $1.00.  The proceeds of the financing are being used by the Company to fund the exploration for gold mines or to acquire relating mining assets, either directly or through one or more partnerships or joint ventures, in Brazil or elsewhere in South America. 

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share – Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is calculated to give effect to potentially issuable common shares which include stock options and stock warrants except during loss periods when those potentially issuable common shares would decrease loss per share.  As of June 30, 2012, the Company had 8,330,000 warrants outstanding which all have a 5 year term.  As of June 30, 2012, the Company had a total of 7,500,000 options of which 5,925,000 have vested and none have been exercised.  The options are all 10 year options with an exercise price ranging from $0.14 to $0.50.

Warrants:

The Company has granted warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock. 

Warrants outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2012 are as follows:

Range of exercise price	Number Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$0.14 to $1.00	8,330,000	3.87 years	$           0.49	$  4,081,700

Options:

The Company has granted options to purchase shares of Common Stock. 

Options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2012 are as follows:

Range of exercise price	Number Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Number Exercisable
$0.14 to $0.50	7,500,000	7.13 years	$           0.25	5,925,000

Recently Enacted Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-05 (ASC Topic 820), which amends Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, ASU No. 2009-13 (ASC Topic 605), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, ASU No. 2009-14 (ASC Topic 985), Certain Revenue Arrangements that include Software Elements, and various other ASU’s No. 2009-2 through ASU No. 2011-12, which contain technical corrections to existing guidance or affect guidance to specialized industries or entities were recently issued.  These updates have no current applicability to the Company or their effect on the financial statements would not have been significant.