10-Q 1 usrp908a_10q.htm 10Q FORM 10-QSB—QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

 

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

 

Commission file number 0-15656

 

 

U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

   Delaware                                                 57-0814502

(State or other jurisdiction of                                (I.R.S. Employer

 incorporation or organization)                               Identification No.)

 

55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

[X] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer [ ]

Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [ ]

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No

 


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

BALANCE SHEETS

 (in thousands, except unit data)

 

 

 

September 30,

December 31,

 

2008

2007

 

(Unaudited)

(Note)

Assets

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $    82

 $   105

Receivables and deposits

      100 

     106

Other assets

      367

     367

Restricted escrow

      106

     152

Investment property:

 

 

Land

    1,700

   1,700

Buildings and related personal property

   13,082

  12,389

 

   14,782

  14,089

Less accumulated depreciation

   (7,583)

  (7,144)

 

    7,199

   6,945

 

  $ 7,854

 $ 7,675

 

 

 

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

Accounts payable

  $    22

 $   273

Tenant security deposit liabilities

       68

      58

Accrued property taxes

      188

      --

Other liabilities

      144

     152

Due to affiliates (Note B)

    1,031

     316

Mortgage notes payable

   10,757

  10,841

 

   12,210

  11,640

 

 

 

Partners' Deficit

 

 

General partners

       (7)

      (3)

Depositary unit certificate holders (2,440,000

 

 

units authorized; 1,222,000 units issued and outstanding)

   (4,349)

  (3,962)

 

   (4,356)

  (3,965)

 

  $ 7,854

 $ 7,675

 

Note: The balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per unit data)

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

 

September 30,

September 30,

 

2008

2007

2008

2007

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

Rental income

$   568

$   544

$ 1,717

$ 1,647

Other income

     76

     62

    202

    229

Total revenues

    644

    606

  1,919

  1,876

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

Operating

    320

    309

    924

    875

General and administrative

     29

     22

     83

     89

Depreciation

    162

    120

    468

    345

Interest

    221

    191

    650

    564

Property taxes

     62

     46

    187

    196

Total expenses

    794

    688

  2,312

  2,069

 

 

 

 

 

Casualty gain

     16

     --

      2

     --

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

   (134)

    (82)

   (391)

   (193)

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

  (Note A)

     --

     --

     --

     41

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 $ (134)

 $  (82)

$  (391)

$  (152)

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss allocated to general

 

 

 

 

  partners (1%)

$    (2)

$    (1)

$    (4)

$    (2)

Net loss allocated to depositary

 

 

 

 

unit certificate holders (99%)

   (132)

    (81)

   (387)

   (150)

 

$  (134)

$   (82)

$  (391)

$  (152)

 

 

 

 

 

Per depository unit certificate:

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

$  (.11)

$  (.06)

$  (.32)

$  (.15)

Income from discontinued operations

     --

     --

     --

    .03

Net loss per depositary unit

  certificate

$  (.11)

$  (.06)

$  (.32)

$  (.12)

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions per depositary unit

 

 

 

 

certificate

$    --

$   .76

$    --

$  3.55

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except unit data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depositary

 

 

Depositary

 

Unit

 

 

Unit

General

Certificate

 

 

Certificates

Partners

Holders

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Original capital

  contributions

 1,222,000

  $     2

$30,550

 $30,552

 

 

 

 

 

Partners' deficit at

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2007

 1,222,000

  $    (3)

  $(3,962)

 $(3,965)

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss for the nine

 

 

 

 

months ended

 

    September 30, 2008

        --

       (4)

     (387)

       (391)

 

 

 

 

 

Partners' deficit at

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2008

 1,222,000

  $    (7)

  $(4,349)

 $(4,356)

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements


U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

Nine Months Ended

 

September 30,

 

2008

2007

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

Net loss

$  (391)

$  (152)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided

 

 

by operating activities:

 

 

Depreciation

    468

    345

Amortization of loan costs

     27

     21

Casualty gain

     (2)

     --

Change in accounts:

 

 

Receivables and deposits

      6

     18

Other assets

    (27)

    (69)

Accounts payable

    (15)

    (80)

Tenant security deposit liabilities

     10

      8

Accrued property taxes

    188

    197

Other liabilities

     (8)

    (22)

Due to affiliates

     73

     --

Net cash provided by operating activities

    329

    266

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

Property improvements and replacements

   (978)

   (342)

Net withdrawals from (deposits to) restricted escrow

     46

     (1)

Insurance proceeds received

     22

     --

Net cash used in investing activities

   (910)

   (343)

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

Distributions to partners

     --

 (4,337)

Loan costs paid

     --

    (56)

Payments on mortgage notes payable

    (84)

    (69)

Proceeds from mortgage note payable

     --

  1,110

Advances from affiliates

    642

     --

Net cash provided by (used in) financing

 

 

  activities

    558

 (3,352)

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

    (23)

 (3,429)

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

    105

  3,816

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$    82

$   387

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

Cash paid for interest

$   586

$   546

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:

 

 

Property improvements and replacements in accounts

 

 

  payable

$     7

$   122

 

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $245,000 and $30,000 of property improvements and replacements were included in accounts payable and are included in property improvements and replacements at September 30, 2008 and 2007.

 

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements


U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Note A - Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  The general partner responsible for management of the Partnership's business is U.S. Realty I Corporation, a South Carolina corporation (the "Corporate General Partner"). In the opinion of the Corporate General Partner, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.  For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The Corporate General Partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. 

 

On December 20, 2006, the Partnership sold Governor’s Park Apartments to a third party. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the operations of Governor’s Park Apartments are classified as discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The income from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is a result of the reversal of an accrual for operating costs accrued at the time of the December 20, 2006 sale.

 

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

 

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Corporate General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for (i) certain payments to affiliates for services and (ii) reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

 

Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $94,000 and $92,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which is included in operating expenses.

 

Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner charged the Partnership reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $148,000 and $77,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property.  The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner of approximately $114,000 and $31,000, respectively.  At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, approximately $38,000 and $3,000, respectively, of reimbursements were owed and are included in due to affiliates.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $642,000 to fund capital improvements at Twin Lake Apartments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Partnership accrued interest of approximately $39,000. There were no such advances made or interest incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, interest was charged at prime plus 2% (7.00% at September 30, 2008). At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the total outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. was approximately $993,000 and $313,000, respectively, and is included in due to affiliates. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Subsequent to September 30, 2008, additional advances of approximately $168,000 were received from AIMCO Properties, L.P. to fund operating expenses.

 

The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Corporate General Partner.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $55,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by the Partnership during 2008 as other insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $71,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration during the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Note C – Casualty Events

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Twin Lakes Apartments suffered water damage as a result of water pipe breaks in several of the Partnership’s apartment units. As of September 30, 2008, the Partnership had incurred approximately $60,000 in capitalizable costs and approximately $17,000 in clean up costs to repair the water damage. It is not anticipated that the Partnership will receive any insurance proceeds as the damages do not exceed the Partnership’s insurance deductible. The Partnership recognized a casualty loss of approximately $14,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the write off of approximately $14,000 of undepreciated property improvements and replacements.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, Twin Lakes Apartments suffered water damage as a result of a water pipe break in additional apartment units. The Partnership incurred approximately $32,000 in capitalizable costs related to this damage. The Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $27,000 for damages which includes approximately $5,000 for lost rental income. The Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $16,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the write off of approximately $6,000 of undepreciated property improvements and replacements.

 

Note D – Mortgage Financing

 

On September 14, 2007, the Partnership obtained a third mortgage loan in the principal amount of $1,110,000 on its sole investment property, Twin Lakes Apartments, located in Palm Harbor, Florida. The third mortgage bears interest at 5.56% per annum and requires monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $6,300 beginning November 1, 2007 through the December 1, 2015 maturity date.  In addition, the terms of the new mortgage debt require monthly escrow deposits for replacement reserves of approximately $5,000. The third mortgage has a balloon payment of approximately $963,000 due at maturity.  If no event of default exists at maturity, the maturity date will automatically be extended for one additional year, to December 1, 2016, during which period the third mortgage would bear interest at the one-month LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points and would require monthly payments of principal and interest.   The Partnership may prepay the third mortgage at any time with 30 days written notice to the lender subject to a prepayment penalty.  As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Partnership, to guarantee certain obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing. In connection with the new loan, loan costs of approximately $66,000, $56,000 of which were recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, were capitalized and are included in other assets.

 

In accordance with the terms of the third loan agreement, payment of the loan may be accelerated at the option of the lender if an event of default, as defined in the loan agreement, occurs.  Events of default include, but are not limited to: nonpayment of monthly principal and interest by the due date; nonpayment of the matured balance of the loan on the maturity date; and the occurrence of any breach or default in the performance of any of the covenants or agreements made by the Partnership.

 

Note E – Contingencies
 

As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the Corporate General Partner, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective action in August 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in excess of 40 hours per week (“overtime claims”). The plaintiffs also contended that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call" (“on-call claims”). In March 2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the collective action.  In July 2007, plaintiffs’ counsel filed individual cases in Federal court in 22 jurisdictions.  In the second quarter 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P. settled the overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a framework for resolving the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal courts will be dismissed. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Partnership was charged approximately $12,000 for settlement amounts for alleged unpaid overtime to employees who had worked at the Partnership’s investment property.  At this time, the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel are not resolved. The Corporate General Partner is uncertain as to the amount of any additional loss that may be allocable to the Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership cannot estimate whether any additional loss will occur or a potential range of loss.

 

The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

 

Environmental

 

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its property, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its property. 

 

Mold

 

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements.  The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.  Affiliates of the Corporate General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the Corporate General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents.  To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.  Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the Corporate General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.

 


Item 2.     Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking, including, without limitation, statements regarding the effect of redevelopments, the Partnership’s future financial performance, including the Partnership’s ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy and rent levels, and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors that are beyond the Partnership’s control including, without limitation: natural disasters such as hurricanes; national and local economic conditions; the general level of interest rates; energy costs; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Partnership’s property and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; financing risks, including the risk that the Partnership’s cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; insurance risks; development risks; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by the Partnership.   Readers should carefully review the Partnership’s financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the documents the Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

The Partnership's investment property consists of one apartment complex.  The following table sets forth the average occupancy of the property for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:

 

 

Average

 

Occupancy

Property

2008

2007

 

 

 

TwinLakesApartments

 

 

Palm Harbor, Florida

94%

91%

 

The Corporate General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at Twin Lakes Apartments to increased marketing to attract potential residents and increased concessions offered to new residents.

 

The Partnership’s financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment property, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the Corporate General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the Corporate General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Corporate General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnership’s financial results.

 

Results of Operations

 

The Partnership’s net loss was approximately $134,000 and $391,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to net loss of approximately $82,000 and $152,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The increase in net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2008 is due to an increase in total expenses, partially offset by an increase in total revenues and the recognition of a casualty gain. The increase in net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is due to an increase in total expenses and a decrease in income from discontinued operations, partially offset by an increase in total revenues and the recognition of a casualty gain.

 

On December 20, 2006, the Partnership sold Governor’s Park Apartments to a third party. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the operations of Governor’s Park Apartments are classified as discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The income from discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is a result of the reversal of an accrual for operating costs accrued at the time of the December 20, 2006 sale.

 

Excluding the income from discontinued operations, the Partnership’s loss from continuing operations was approximately $134,000 and $391,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, compared to loss from continuing operations of approximately $82,000 and $193,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The increase in loss from continuing operations for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 is due to an increase in total expenses, partially offset by an increase in total revenues and the recognition of a casualty gain.

 

Total expenses increased for both periods due to increases in operating, depreciation, and interest expenses. Property tax expense increased for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. General and administrative expense remained relatively constant for the comparable periods. Operating expense increased for the three months ended September 30, 2008 due to an increase in maintenance expense partially offset by a decrease in insurance expense. Operating expense increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to increases in maintenance and property expenses partially offset by a decrease in insurance expense. Maintenance expense increased for both periods primarily due to water damage at Twin Lakes Apartments, as discussed below. Insurance expense decreased for both periods primarily due to a decrease in insurance premiums. Property expense increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to an increase in salaries and related benefits. Depreciation expense increased for both periods due to capital improvements and replacements placed into service during the year.  Interest expense increased for both periods due to an increase in interest on advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner, and due to the third mortgage obtained on the investment property in the third quarter of 2007. Property tax expense increased for the three months ended September 30, 2008 due to a tax adjustment recorded during the third quarter of 2007 to reflect a reduction in the tax rate at Twin Lakes Apartments. Property tax expense decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to a decrease in the tax rate at Twin Lakes Apartments.

 

Included in general and administrative expense for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are management reimbursements to the Corporate General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement.  Also included in general and administrative expense are costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Twin Lakes Apartments suffered water damage as a result of water pipe breaks in several of the Partnership’s apartment units. As of September 30, 2008, the Partnership had incurred approximately $60,000 in capitalizable costs and approximately $17,000 in clean up costs to repair the water damage. It is not anticipated that the Partnership will receive any insurance proceeds as the damages do not exceed the Partnership’s insurance deductible. The Partnership recognized a casualty loss of approximately $14,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the write off of approximately $14,000 of undepreciated property improvements and replacements.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, Twin Lakes Apartments suffered water damage as a result of a water pipe break in additional apartment units. The Partnership incurred approximately $32,000 in capitalizable costs related to this damage. The Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $27,000 for damages which includes approximately $5,000 for lost rental income. The Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $16,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the write off of approximately $6,000 of undepreciated property improvements and replacements.

 

Total revenues increased for the three month period due to increases in both rental and other income. Total revenues increased for the nine month period due to an increase in rental income, partially offset by a decrease in other income. Rental income increased for both periods due to an increase in occupancy and a decrease in bad debt expense, partially offset by a decrease in the average rental rate at the Partnership’s investment property. Other income increased during the three months ended September 30, 2008 due to an increase in ancillary services provided to tenants. Other income decreased during the nine month period due to a decrease in utility reimbursements and interest income as a result of lower average cash balances when compared to 2007.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

At September 30, 2008 the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $82,000 compared to approximately $387,000 at September 30, 2007.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $23,000 from December 31, 2007 due to approximately $910,000 of cash used in investing activities, partially offset by approximately $558,000 and $329,000 of cash provided by financing and operating activities, respectively. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements partially offset by net withdrawals from restricted escrow and insurance proceeds received. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner, partially offset by payments on the mortgages encumbering the investment property. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

 

The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Corporate General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. Capital improvements planned for the Partnership’s property are detailed below.

 

Twin Lakes Apartments

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Partnership completed approximately $740,000 of capital expenditures at Twin Lakes Apartments, consisting primarily of floor covering replacements, appliance replacements, recreational facility replacements, kitchen and bath upgrades, air conditioning replacements, major landscaping and water/sewer upgrades.  These improvements were funded from operating cash flow, insurance proceeds, replacement reserves and advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Corporate General Partner.  The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during the remainder of 2008.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

 

Additional capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations, Partnership reserves or advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances.  To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership’s distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

 

The Partnership's assets are thought to be sufficient for any near term needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership. At September 30, 2008, the first, second and third mortgage indebtedness on Twin Lakes Apartments of approximately $6,189,000, $3,472,000 and $1,096,000, respectively, require monthly payments of principal and interest until December 1, 2015 when balloon payments of approximately $5,672,000, $3,017,000 and $963,000, respectively, are due.  The Partnership has the option of extending the maturity date on both the first and second mortgages for one additional year, to December 1, 2016.  With respect to the third mortgage, the maturity date will automatically be extended for one year, to December 1, 2016, if no event of default exists at its original maturity date of December 1, 2015.

 

The Partnership distributed the following amounts during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except per unit data):

 

 

Nine Months

 

Nine Months

 

 

Ended

Per Depository

Ended

Per Depository

 

September 30,

Unit

September 30,

Unit

 

2008

Certificate

2007

Certificate

 

 

 

 

 

Sale(1)

 $  --

  $  --

$3,942

   $ 3.23

Financing (2)

    --

     --

   395

      .32

 

 $  --

  $  --

$4,337

   $ 3.55

 

(1)   Distribution consists of sale proceeds from the December 2006 sale of Governor’s Park Apartments.

     

(2)   Distribution consists of financing proceeds from the September 2007 financing of a third mortgage at Twin Lakes Apartments.

 

Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations, the timing of the debt maturities, refinancings, and/or property sale. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations after capital expenditures to permit additional distributions to its partners during 2008 or subsequent periods.


The Partnership Agreement provides for partners to receive distributions from the net proceeds of the sales of properties, the net proceeds from refinancings and net cash from operations as those terms are defined in the Partnership Agreement. The Partnership Agreement requires that the limited partners be furnished with a statement of Net Cash from Operations as such term is defined in the Partnership Agreement. Net Cash from Operations should not be considered an alternative to net loss as an indicator of the Partnership's operating performance or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Below is a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities as disclosed in the statements of cash flows, included in “Item 1. Financial Statements”, to Net Cash from Operations as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

 

 

For the nine months ended

 

September 30,

 

2008

2007

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

    $   329

   $    266

Payments on mortgage notes payable

        (84)

        (69)

Property improvements and replacements

       (978)

       (342)

Advances from affiliates

        642

         --

Net decrease (increase) in restricted escrows

         46

         (1)

Changes in reserves for net operating

        

        

liabilities

       (227)

        (52)

 

 

 

Net cash used in operations

    $  (272)

    $  (198)

 

Distributions made from reserves no longer considered necessary by the Corporate General Partner are considered net cash from operations for allocation purposes.

 

Other

 

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 900,195 depository unit certificates (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 73.67% of the outstanding Units at September 30, 2008.  A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Corporate General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 73.67% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Corporate General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Corporate General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Corporate General Partner, as corporate general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Corporate General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Partnership to make stimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

Investment property is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable.  If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnership’s estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property.   If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

 

Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnership’s investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; and changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing.  Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership’s asset.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

 

ITEM 4T.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a)   Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Corporate General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

 

(b)   Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have been no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the Corporate General Partner, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective action in August 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in excess of 40 hours per week (“overtime claims”). The plaintiffs also contended that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call" (“on-call claims”). In March 2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the collective action.  In July 2007, plaintiffs’ counsel filed individual cases in Federal court in 22 jurisdictions.  In the second quarter 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P. settled the overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a framework for resolving the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal courts will be dismissed. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Partnership was charged approximately $12,000 for settlement amounts for alleged unpaid overtime to employees who had worked at the Partnership’s investment property.  At this time, the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel are not resolved. The Corporate General Partner is uncertain as to the amount of any additional loss that may be allocable to the Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership cannot estimate whether any additional loss will occur or a potential range of loss.

 

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS

 

See Exhibit Index.

 

 


SIGNATURES

 

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

                                

 

U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

 

 

By:   U.S. Realty I Corporation

 

      Corporate General Partner

 

 

Date: November 13, 2008

By:   /s/Martha L. Long

 

      Martha L. Long

 

      Senior Vice President

 

 

Date: November 13, 2008

By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters

 

      Stephen B. Waters

 

      Vice President

 


U.S. REALTY PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

 

 

3           See Exhibit 4(a)

 

4  (a)      Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership (included as Exhibit A to the Prospectus of Registrant dated August 19, 1986 contained in Amendment No. 4 Registration Statement, No. 33-2996, of Registrant filed August 19, 1986 (the "Prospectus") and is incorporated herein by reference).

 

(b)         Subscription Agreement and Signature Page (included as Exhibit B to the Prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference).

 

(c)         Instruments governing the Bonds (filed as Exhibit 10C to Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement, No. 33-2996, of Registrant filed August 19, 1986 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

(d)         First Amendment to U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (dated August 15, 1986) dated October 14, 1993.  [Filed as Exhibit 4(c) to Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference.]

 

(e)         Amendment to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement dated April 12, 2005.

 

10(i)       Contracts related to acquisition of property:

 

(l)         Depositary Agreement dated as of October 15, 1993, among U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, First Union National Bank of South Carolina and Continental Casualty Company. *

 

(m)         Financial Statement - Form UCC-1, State of South Carolina, Office of Secretary of State Jim Miles by US Realty Partners Limited Partnership and Continental Casualty Company. *

 

(n)         Incumbency Certificate by U.S. Realty I Corporation and U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership. *

 

* Filed as Exhibits 10iii (l) through (n) to Form 10QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

10.25       Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.

 

10.26       Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.

 

10.27       Replacement Reserve Agreement dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank.  Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.

 

10.28       Guaranty dated December 1, 2005 between AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank.  Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.

 

10.29       Amended and Restated Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents, and Security Agreement dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.  Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.

 

10.30       Amended and Restated Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005 between U.S. Realty Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.  Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.

 

10.31       Amended and Restated Guaranty dated December 1, 2005 between AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.  Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005.

 

10.33       Form of Multifamily Note between Capmark Bank and U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, dated September 14, 2007. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2007.

 

10.34       Form of Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement between Capmark Bank and U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, dated September 14, 2007. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2007.

 

10.35       Form of Replacement Reserve Agreement between Capmark Bank and U.S. Realty Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, dated September 14, 2007. Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2007.

 

31.1        Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

31.2        Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.1        Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

99          Prospectus of Registrant dated August 19, 1986 (included in Registration Statement, No. 33-2996, of Registrant and incorporated herein by reference).