XML 28 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Debt
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]  
Debt
Debt
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, total debt consisted of the following:


Interest rate
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Commercial paper
1.13%
 
$
269,550

 
$
90,000

Notes due January 2016
4.75%
 

 
370,914

Notes due September 2017
5.75%
 
385,109

 
385,109

Notes due March 2018
5.6%
 
250,000

 
250,000

Notes due May 2018
4.75%
 
350,000

 
350,000

Notes due March 2019
6.25%
 
300,000

 
300,000

Notes due March 2024
4.625%
 
500,000

 
500,000

Notes due January 2037
5.25%
 
115,041

 
115,041

Notes due March 2043
6.7%
 
425,000

 
425,000

Term loans
Variable
 
450,000

 
150,000

Other debt
 
 
5,770

 
15,758

Principal amount
 
 
3,050,470

 
2,951,822

Less: unamortized discount and debt issuance costs
 
 
25,630

 
23,617

Plus: unamortized interest rate swap proceeds
 
 
20,105

 
22,463

Total debt
 
 
3,044,945

 
2,950,668

Less: current portion long-term debt and notes payable
 
 
269,732

 
461,085

Long-term debt
 
 
$
2,775,213

 
$
2,489,583



In January 2016, we borrowed $300 million under a term loan and used the proceeds to repay a portion of the $371 million, 4.75% notes due January 15, 2016. The remaining portion of the loan was repaid using cash from operations. The new term loan bears interest at the applicable Eurodollar Rate plus 1.25% and matures in December 2020. The applicable Eurodollar Rate at March 31, 2016 was .62%.

In October 2014, we received a loan from the State of Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development (CDECD). The loan consisted of a $15 million development loan and $1 million jobs-training grant that was subject to certain conditions being met. We satisfied the conditions related to the $1 million jobs-training grant during 2015. The loan agreement provided that $10 million of the loan would be forgiven if we satisfied certain employment obligations. In March 2016, we satisfied all criteria to receive the $10 million of loan forgiveness and, as a result, recorded the loan forgiveness as reductions of long-term debt and selling, general and administrative expenses.