Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies	6 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies	2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies A detailed description of the Company's significant accounting policies can be found in the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as described below, there have been no material changes in the Company's significant accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed therein. Change in Accounting Estimate The Company previously announced that, after completion of the TSG sale, it will relocate its corporate headquarters from Solon, Ohio to Alpharetta, Georgia to better align corporate functions with the Company's operating units and reduce costs. This relocation is expected to be completed by March 31, 2012. Therefore, the Company changed the useful life of the leasehold improvements and depreciable property and equipment related to the Solon, Ohio facility such that these assets will be fully depreciated by March 31, 2012. As a result, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense of $1.4 million classified within "Selling, general, and administrative expenses" in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011. This change also reduced the basic and diluted loss per share for each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 by $0.06 per share. Recently Adopted Accounting Standards In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued authoritative guidance regarding fair value measurements. This guidance requires additional disclosure within the rollforward of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of assets and liabilities within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 12 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for definitions of the fair value hierarchy levels). In addition, this guidance requires enhanced disclosures of the valuation techniques and inputs used in the fair value measurements within Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosure requirements are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of Level 3 measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. On April 1, 2010, the Company adopted the required provisions of this guidance (see Note 12 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). On April 1, 2011, the Company adopted the remaining provisions of this authoritative guidance, as required (also see Note 12 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverable elements (e.g., hardware with services), which is effective for the Company on April 1, 2011 for new revenue arrangements or material modifications to existing arrangements. The guidance amends the criteria for separating consideration in arrangements with multiple deliverable elements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable based on: 1) vendor-specific objective evidence; 2) third-party evidence; or 3) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of an arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands the required disclosures related to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverable elements. Entities may elect to adopt the guidance through either prospective application for revenue arrangements entered into, or materially modified, after the effective date, or through retrospective application to all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance on April 1, 2011, as required. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures. In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements that include software elements, which is effective for the Company on April 1, 2011. The guidance changes revenue recognition for tangible products containing software elements and non-software elements as follows: 1) the tangible product element is always excluded from the software revenue recognition guidance even when sold together with the software element; 2) the software element of the tangible product element is also excluded from the software revenue guidance when the software and non-software elements function together to deliver the product's essential functionality; and 3) undelivered elements in a revenue arrangement related to the non-software element are also excluded from the software revenue recognition guidance. Entities must select the same transition method and same period for the adoption of both this guidance and the guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverable elements. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance on April 1, 2011, as required. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In September 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on goodwill impairment that gives companies the option to perform a qualitative assessment that may allow them to skip the annual two-step test and reduce costs. This authoritative guidance gives companies the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If a company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the two-step test. Otherwise, a company can skip the two-step test, which would reduce the cost and complexity of testing goodwill for impairment. The provisions of this authoritative guidance are effective for the Company beginning on April 1, 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance, but does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures. In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income in an entity's financial statements, which is intended to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. This authoritative guidance supersedes the presentation options currently available under GAAP and facilitates convergence of GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and requiring that all nonowner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The provisions of this authoritative guidance are to be applied retrospectively and are effective for the Company beginning on April 1, 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance, but does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures. In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to its authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures, which represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (collectively, the "Boards") on fair value measurements. The collective efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflected in this authoritative guidance, resulted in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including a consistent meaning of the term "fair value." The Boards concluded the common requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and IFRS. The amendments in this authoritative guidance are required to be applied prospectively, and are effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance, but does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures. Management continually evaluates the potential impact, if any, on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, of all recent accounting pronouncements and, if significant, makes the appropriate disclosures required by such new accounting pronouncements.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

A detailed description of the Company's significant accounting policies can be found in the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as described below, there have been no material changes in the Company's significant accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed therein.

Change in Accounting Estimate

The Company previously announced that, after completion of the TSG sale, it will relocate its corporate headquarters from Solon, Ohio to Alpharetta, Georgia to better align corporate functions with the Company's operating units and reduce costs. This relocation is expected to be completed by March 31, 2012. Therefore, the Company changed the useful life of the leasehold improvements and depreciable property and equipment related to the Solon, Ohio facility such that these assets will be fully depreciated by March 31, 2012. As a result, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense of $1.4 million classified within "Selling, general, and administrative expenses" in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended September 30, 2011. This change also reduced the basic and diluted loss per share for each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2011 by $0.06 per share.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued authoritative guidance regarding fair value measurements. This guidance requires additional disclosure within the rollforward of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of assets and liabilities within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 12 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for definitions of the fair value hierarchy levels). In addition, this guidance requires enhanced disclosures of the valuation techniques and inputs used in the fair value measurements within Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosure requirements are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of Level 3 measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. On April 1, 2010, the Company adopted the required provisions of this guidance (see Note 12 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). On April 1, 2011, the Company adopted the remaining provisions of this authoritative guidance, as required (also see Note 12 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverable elements (e.g., hardware with services), which is effective for the Company on April 1, 2011 for new revenue arrangements or material modifications to existing arrangements. The guidance amends the criteria for separating consideration in arrangements with multiple deliverable elements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable based on: 1) vendor-specific objective evidence; 2) third-party evidence; or 3) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of an arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands the required disclosures related to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverable elements. Entities may elect to adopt the guidance through either prospective application for revenue arrangements entered into, or materially modified, after the effective date, or through retrospective application to all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance on April 1, 2011, as required. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures.

In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements that include software elements, which is effective for the Company on April 1, 2011. The guidance changes revenue recognition for tangible products containing software elements and non-software elements as follows: 1) the tangible product element is always excluded from the software revenue recognition guidance even when sold together with the software element; 2) the software element of the tangible product element is also excluded from the software revenue guidance when the software and non-software elements function together to deliver the product's essential functionality; and 3) undelivered elements in a revenue arrangement related to the non-software element are also excluded from the software revenue recognition guidance. Entities must select the same transition method and same period for the adoption of both this guidance and the guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverable elements. The Company adopted the provisions of this guidance on April 1, 2011, as required. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In September 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on goodwill impairment that gives companies the option to perform a qualitative assessment that may allow them to skip the annual two-step test and reduce costs. This authoritative guidance gives companies the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If a company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the two-step test. Otherwise, a company can skip the two-step test, which would reduce the cost and complexity of testing goodwill for impairment. The provisions of this authoritative guidance are effective for the Company beginning on April 1, 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance, but does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income in an entity's financial statements, which is intended to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. This authoritative guidance supersedes the presentation options currently available under GAAP and facilitates convergence of GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and requiring that all nonowner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The provisions of this authoritative guidance are to be applied retrospectively and are effective for the Company beginning on April 1, 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance, but does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures.

In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to its authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures, which represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (collectively, the "Boards") on fair value measurements. The collective efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflected in this authoritative guidance, resulted in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including a consistent meaning of the term "fair value." The Boards concluded the common requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and IFRS. The amendments in this authoritative guidance are required to be applied prospectively, and are effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2012. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance, but does not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures.

Management continually evaluates the potential impact, if any, on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, of all recent accounting pronouncements and, if significant, makes the appropriate disclosures required by such new accounting pronouncements.