Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

A detailed description of our significant accounting policies can be found in the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as described below, there have been no material changes our significant accounting policies and estimates from those disclosed therein.

Use of estimates. Preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications. As a result of our reorganization in fiscal 2012, revenue and cost of goods sold are being reported in three categories: Products, Support, maintenance and subscription services and Professional services. In addition, operating expenses are differentiated in the following subcategories: Product development, Sales and marketing and General and administrative. Prior period presentation has been modified to conform to the current presentation.

Correction of Error. In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we identified errors in the manner in which we recognized revenue for certain software license and professional service arrangements in prior periods. We re-assessed our accounting for contracts relating to such arrangements. Upon completion of such evaluation, it was determined that the previous accounting treatment did not take into account all the necessary revenue recognition criteria related to pricing concessions, implied postcontract support, professional services that were essential to the functionality of the software, application of contract accounting and specified enhancements, and certain billing errors. As a result, we determined that certain previously recognized revenue should instead have been deferred and recognized in future periods when the applicable criteria related to the above considerations have been met.

In accordance with accounting guidance found in ASC 250-10 (SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, Materiality), we assessed the materiality of the errors and concluded that the errors were not material to any of our previously issued financial statements. Correction of the errors was also not material to the fiscal 2012 results. As permitted by the accounting guidance found in ASC 250-10 (SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements), we elected to present revised financial information as of and for the interim periods ended June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011, and revised our previously issued fiscal year 2012 interim financial statements to correct the effect of these errors for when such financial statements are included in future filings. The adjustments to the quarter ended June 30, 2011 are comprised of (a.) the out of period impact for errors accumulated prior to fiscal 2012 of $1.0 million of corrections to revenue from continuing operations and $1.1 million of corrections to the loss from continuing operations and (b.) $0.3 million to revenue from continuing operations and $0.3 million to loss from continuing operations to revise the financial statements for revenue recognized in the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that should have been deferred to future periods. The adjustments to the quarter ended September 30, 2011 represent the revision to the financial statements for similar matters arising in the quarter.

The following tables present the effect of this revision on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods affected:



	Quarter Ended June 30, 2011									Quarter Ended September 30, 2011
(In thousands except per share amounts)	As Previously Reported			Adjustment			As Revised			As Previously Reported			Adjustment			As Revised
Net revenue	$	53,886		$	(1,295	)	$	52,591		$	53,587		$	(902	)	$	52,685
Costs of goods sold	34,359			144			34,503			31,972			(286		)	31,686
Net loss from continued operations	(5,440		)	(1,439		)	(6,879		)	(3,238		)	(316		)	(3,554		)
Loss per share for continuing operations – Basic and diluted	(0.24		)	(0.06		)	(0.30		)	(0.14		)	(0.02		)	(0.16		)

The revision did not have an effect on our operating cash flows for the three months ended June 30, 2011 or the six months ended September 30, 2011.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we recorded out-of-period adjustments to increase revenues, restructuring, severance and other charges and asset impairments and related charges by $0.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The net impact of the adjustments increased our operating loss by $0.6 million and represents a correction of error. In fiscal 2012, we erroneously omitted certain revenue transactions, the costs associated with certain terminated individuals and certain third party development costs for our previously impaired developed technology. Pre-tax loss in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 increased by $0.6 million, or $(0.03) per share, due to these adjustments. Management performed an evaluation under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 and concluded the effect of this adjustment was immaterial to prior year’s financial statements as well as the full-year fiscal 2013 financial statements.

Capitalized Software Development Costs. The capitalization of software development cost begins when a product’s technological feasibility has been established. Capitalization ends when the resulting product is available for general market release. Amortization of the capitalized software is classified within products cost of goods sold in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. For each capitalized software product, the annual amortization is equal to the greater of: (i) the amount computed using the ratio that the software product’s current fiscal year gross revenue bears to the total current fiscal year and anticipated future gross revenues for that product or (ii) the amount computed based on straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product, which is a range between three and eight years. The amount by which unamortized software costs exceeds the net realizable value, if any, is recognized as a charge to income in the period it is determined. We capitalized approximately $1.5 million and $0.4 million during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $3.4 million and $1.4 million during the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization of capitalized software was $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.4 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), issued Accounting Standards Update, ASU, No. 2011-08, Testing for Goodwill Impairment, which modifies the process of testing goodwill for impairment. The update will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. An entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines it is more likely than not, based on a qualitative assessment, the fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying amount. The guidance also includes a number of events and circumstances to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2011. We adopted this guidance as of April 1, 2012 and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which modifies the requirements for presenting net income and other comprehensive income and requires that all non-owner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment requires presentation of each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income and a total amount for comprehensive income. In December 2011, the FASB issued amendments to the guidance to allow the FASB time to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income in all periods presented. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. We adopted this guidance as of April 1, 2012 and it did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, to allow entities to use a qualitative approach to test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. ASU 2012-02 permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is then necessary to perform the currently prescribed quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying value. Otherwise, the quantitative impairment test is not required. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 and early adoption is permitted. ASU No. 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which modifies the disclosure requirements for offsetting financial instruments and derivative instruments. The update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements and the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. This guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.

Management continually evaluates the potential impact, if any, of all recent accounting pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures and, if significant, makes the appropriate disclosures required by such new accounting pronouncements.