SCHEDULE 14A

                Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) 
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Filed by the Registrant  [  ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  [ x]

Check the appropriate box:
[  ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[  ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[x ] Definitive Additional Materials
[  ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or 
     Section 240.14a-12

                         Hills Stores Company
                                                  
             (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

                        Dickstein Partners Inc.    
                                         
                (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[  ] $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1),
     or 14a-6(i)(2).
[  ] $500 per each party to the controversy pursuant to Exchange
     Act Rule 14a-6(i)(3).
[  ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a- 6(i)(4)
     and 0-11.

     1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:

                                                                
                             

     2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies:

                                                                  
                                         

     3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11: 1/

                                                                 

     4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:


1/        Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
          calculated and state how it was determined.




                                                                  
                                         

[  ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously.  Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the
date of its filing.

          1)   Amount Previously Paid:

                                                                  
                                     
                                                                  
                                        

          2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

                                                                  
                                     


          3)   Filing Party:

                                                                  
                                     


          4)   Date Filed:

                                                                  
                                     
          


News Release                            MACKENZIE
                                        PARTNERS, INC.
CONTACTS:                               156 FIFTH AVENUE
Jeanne M. Carr                          NEW YORK, NY  10010
212-929-5916                            212 929-5500
                                        FAX 212 929-0308
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

                     DICKSTEIN TO SEEK CASH OPTION FOR
                       PROPOSED HILLS EXCHANGE OFFER

     New York, New York, August 29, 1994 -- Dickstein Partners
Inc. today announced that it intends to begin discussions with
investment banks for the purpose of seeking to arrange for a cash
option for the new Hills Stores bonds which would be issued in
Dickstein's proposed Hills stock buyback.  Dickstein Partners
Inc. has initiated a consent solicitation to remove and replace
four of Hills Department Stores eight directors.  Dickstein
Partners Inc. has proposed that if its nominees are placed on
Hills Department Stores board they will seek to implement an
exchange offer, whereby $27 principal amount per share of a new
12% twelve-year holding company bond is offered for up to 5.5
million shares of Hills stock.

     Although no assurances can be given, Dickstein Partners Inc.
believes that if it is successful in placing its candidates on
the board, it should be feasible for Hills to arrange for a
standby purchaser for the new bond at less than a ten percent
discount to par.  As a result, Dickstein Partners Inc. stated
that if its nominees are placed on the board they will use their
best efforts to arrange for a standby purchaser of the new bonds
subject of course to their fiduciary obligations as directors.

     Notwithstanding this desire to provide a cash option,
Dickstein Partners Inc. believes that the new bonds will trade at
materially less than a ten percent discount to par.

     Dickstein Partners Inc. also announced that as a result of
input from other Hills shareholders its nominees now intend that
the new bonds pay interest only in cash and have covenants
regarding debt incurrence and dividend restrictions similar to
those of the Hills existing public senior debt.

     Dickstein Partners Inc. also reiterated that its current
intention is not to tender any of its shares into the exchange
offer because it believes that the intrinsic value of the Company
is materially in excess of $27 per share.

     Mark Dickstein said "We are seeking to provide a cash option
and we are eliminating the PIK option and would agree to tight
covenants on the new bond in an attempt to be responsive to
the desires of the Hills shareholders."

     Mr. Dickstein further said "We urge each Hills shareholder
to expeditiously sign and return our consent materials.  It seems
that every week the existing Hills board erects another obstacle
to shareholder democracy.  We are particularly outraged that in
response to our consent solicitation the board has announced that
it has changed senior management employment agreements so that if
we are successful in placing our candidates on the board, Hills
senior management, which we highly value, can simply quit, yet
still receive huge golden parachute payments."

     Mr. Dickstein added:  "We believe this act to be an
incredibly abusive entrenchment tactic which appears to be a
classic example of a board of directors forgetting that it is not
they, but the shareholders who own the company.  We believe these
actions to have been a breach of duty by the existing board and a
waste of corporate assets.  We believe that it is in the best
interests of all of Hills shareholders for our nominees to be
placed on the board as soon as possible before the existing board
takes additional steps that might further permanently impair
shareholder value."