XML 52 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
9 Months Ended
Oct. 28, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements [Abstract]  
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company grants stock-based awards under its 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan replaced the Company’s 1997, 2000 and 2003 Stock Option Plans. The 1997, 2000 and 2003 Stock Option Plans terminated upon the 2006 Plan’s initial stockholder approval in June 2006, other than with respect to outstanding options under the terminated plans, which continue to be governed by the respective plan under which they were granted. Shares issued as a result of stock-based compensation transactions generally have been funded with the issuance of new shares of the Company’s common stock.

The Company may grant the following types of incentive awards under the 2006 Plan: (i) non-qualified stock options (“NQs”); (ii) incentive stock options (“ISOs”); (iii) stock appreciation rights; (iv) restricted stock; (v) restricted stock units (“RSUs”); (vi) performance shares; and (vii) other stock-based awards. Each award granted under the 2006 Plan is subject to an award agreement that incorporates, as applicable, the exercise price, the term of the award, the periods of restriction, the number of shares to which the award pertains, applicable performance period(s) and performance measure(s) and such other terms and conditions as the plan committee determines.

Through October 28, 2012, the Company has granted under the 2006 Plan: (i) service-based NQs and RSUs; (ii) contingently issuable performance shares; and (iii) RSUs that are intended to satisfy the performance-based condition for deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. According to the terms of the 2006 Plan, for purposes of determining the number of shares available for grant, each share underlying a stock option award reduces the number available by one share and each share underlying an RSU or performance share award reduces the number available by three shares for awards made before April 29, 2009 and by two shares for awards made on or after April 29, 2009. The per share exercise price of options granted under the 2006 Plan cannot be less than the closing price of the common stock on the date of grant (the business day prior to the date of grant for awards granted prior to September 21, 2006).

The Company currently has service-based NQs and ISOs outstanding under its 1997, 2000 and 2003 Stock Option Plans. Such options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the business day immediately preceding the date of grant.

Net income for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 and October 30, 2011 included $26,372 and $31,118, respectively, of pre-tax expense related to stock-based compensation.

Options currently outstanding are generally cumulatively exercisable in four equal annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant. The vesting of options outstanding is also generally accelerated upon retirement (as defined in the applicable plan). Options are generally granted with a 10-year term.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. The estimated fair value of the options, net of estimated forfeitures, is expensed on a straight-line basis over the options’ vesting periods.

The following summarizes the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of service-based stock options granted during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 and October 30, 2011:
 
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
 
10/28/12
 
10/30/11
Weighted average risk‑free interest rate
1.20
%
 
2.62
%
Weighted average expected option term (in years)
6.25

 
6.25

Weighted average expected volatility
45.16
%
 
44.35
%
Expected annual dividends per share
$
0.15

 
$
0.15

Weighted average estimated fair value per option
$
40.59

 
$
29.81


The Company has continued to utilize the simplified method to estimate the expected term for its “plain vanilla” stock options granted due to a lack of relevant historical data resulting, in part, from changes in the pool of employees receiving option grants. The Company will continue to evaluate the appropriateness of utilizing such method.

Service-based stock option activity for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 was as follows:
 
Options
 
Weighted Average Price Per Option
Outstanding at January 29, 2012
2,189

 
$
37.77

  Granted
187

 
91.88

  Exercised
224

 
31.19

  Cancelled
7

 
41.92

Outstanding at October 28, 2012
2,145

 
$
43.17

Exercisable at October 28, 2012
1,456

 
$
36.63



RSUs granted to employees generally vest in three annual installments of 25%, 25% and 50% commencing two years after the date of grant. Service-based RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest in four equal annual installments commencing one year after the date of grant for awards granted prior to 2010 and vest in full one year after the date of grant for awards granted during or after 2010. The underlying RSU award agreements (excluding agreements for non-employee director awards made during or after 2010) generally provide for accelerated vesting upon the award recipient’s retirement (as defined in the 2006 Plan). The fair value of service-based RSUs is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and is expensed, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the RSUs’ vesting periods.

RSU activity for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 was as follows:
 
RSUs
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 29, 2012
820

 
$
48.28

  Granted
192

 
89.43

  Vested
320

 
42.92

  Cancelled
16

 
61.50

Non-vested at October 28, 2012
676

 
$
62.15



The Company granted restricted stock to certain of Tommy Hilfiger’s management employees in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Tommy Hilfiger on May 6, 2010. The restricted stock was not subject to the 2006 Plan but its grant was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The shares of restricted stock were registered in the names of each such employee and were held in a third-party escrow account until they vested, at which time the stock was delivered to the applicable employee. All such restricted stock was vested as of October 28, 2012.

The fair value of restricted stock was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on May 6, 2010 and was expensed, net of forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the restricted stock’s vesting period.

Restricted stock activity for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 was as follows:
 
Restricted Stock  
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 29, 2012
333

 
$
60.41

  Granted

 

  Vested
333

 
60.41

  Cancelled

 

Non-vested at October 28, 2012

 
$



The Company granted contingently issuable performance share awards to certain of the Company’s senior executives during 2012 subject to a performance period of two years and a service period of three years. The Company granted contingently issuable performance share awards to certain of the Company’s senior executives during 2011 subject to a performance period of two years. The Company granted contingently issuable performance share awards to all of the Company’s senior executives (other than senior executives of Tommy Hilfiger) on May 6, 2010 subject to a performance period of three years. The final number of shares that will be earned, if any, is contingent upon the Company’s achievement of goals for each of the performance periods based on both earnings per share growth and return on equity for the awards granted in the first quarter of 2012 and 2011 and earnings per share growth for the awards granted in 2010 and the third quarter of 2011 during the applicable performance cycle. The Company records expense for the contingently issuable performance shares ratably over each applicable vesting period based on fair value and the Company’s current expectations of the probable number of shares that will ultimately be issued. The fair value of the contingently issuable performance shares is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, reduced for the present value of any dividends expected to be paid on the Company’s common stock during the performance cycle, as these contingently issuable performance shares do not accrue dividends prior to the completion of the performance cycle.

Performance share activity for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 was as follows:
 
     Performance Shares
 
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 29, 2012
590

 
$
53.96

  Granted
96

 
88.52

  Vested

 

  Cancelled
8

 
50.73

Non-vested at October 28, 2012
678

 
$
58.86



The Company receives a tax deduction for certain transactions associated with its stock plan awards. The actual income tax benefits realized from these transactions for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 and October 30, 2011 were $14,324 and $8,298, respectively. Of those amounts, $8,327 and $4,560, respectively, were reported as excess tax benefits. Excess tax benefits arise when the actual tax benefit resulting from a stock plan award transaction exceeds the tax benefit associated with the grant date fair value of the related stock award.