XML 50 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
9 Months Ended
Oct. 28, 2012
Notes to Financial Statements [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also establishes a three level hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions about inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available.

In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
October 28, 2012
 
January 29, 2012
 
October 30, 2011
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts    
N/A
 
$
3,725

 
N/A
 
$
3,725

 
N/A
 
$
13,581

 
N/A
 
$
13,581

 
N/A
 
$
1,724

 
N/A
 
$
1,724

Interest rate contracts
N/A
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
211

 
N/A
 
211

 
N/A
 
281

 
N/A
 
281

Total Assets
N/A
 
$
3,725

 
N/A
 
$
3,725

 
N/A
 
$
13,792

 
N/A
 
$
13,792

 
N/A
 
$
2,005

 
N/A
 
$
2,005

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts    
N/A
 
$
2,687

 
N/A
 
$
2,687

 
N/A
 
$
2,855

 
N/A
 
$
2,855

 
N/A
 
$
10,621

 
N/A
 
$
10,621

Interest rate contracts
N/A
 
6,066

 
N/A
 
6,066

 
N/A
 
7,907

 
N/A
 
7,907

 
N/A
 
8,106

 
N/A
 
8,106

Contingent purchase price payments related to reacquisition of the perpetual rights to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks in India    
N/A
 
N/A
 
$
9,639

 
9,639

 
N/A
 
N/A
 
$
9,559

 
9,559

 
N/A
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
N/A
Total Liabilities
N/A
 
$
8,753

 
$
9,639

 
$
18,392

 
N/A
 
$
10,762

 
$
9,559

 
$
20,321

 
N/A
 
$
18,727

 
N/A
 
$
18,727



The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts related to inventory purchases is measured as the total amount of currency to be purchased, multiplied by the difference between (i) the forward rate as of the period end and (ii) the settlement rate specified in each contract. The fair values of the interest rate contracts are based on observable interest rate yield curves and represent the expected discounted cash flows underlying the financial instruments.

In relation to the reacquisition of the rights in India to the Tommy Hilfiger trademarks during 2011, the Company is required to make annual contingent purchase price payments based on a percentage of annual sales in excess of an agreed upon threshold of Tommy Hilfiger products in India for a period of five years (or, under certain circumstances, a period of six years) following the acquisition date. Such payments are subject to a $25,000 aggregate maximum and are due within 60 days following each one year period. The first one year period commenced on July 1, 2011. During the third quarter of 2012, the Company made a contingent purchase price payment of $185 for the first one year period. The Company is required to remeasure this liability at fair value on a recurring basis and classifies this as a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of such contingent purchase price payments was determined using the discounted cash flow method, based on net sales projections for the Tommy Hilfiger apparel and accessories businesses in India, and was discounted using rates of return that account for the relative risks of the estimated future cash flows. Excluding the initial recognition of the liability for the contingent purchase price payments and payments made to reduce the liability, changes in the fair value are included within selling, general and administrative expenses.

The following table presents the change in the Level 3 contingent purchase price payment liability for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012:                
Balance as of January 29, 2012
$
9,559

Payments
(185
)
Adjustments included in earnings
265

Balance as of October 28, 2012
$
9,639



Additional information with respect to assumptions used to value the contingent purchase price payment liability is as follows:
Unobservable Inputs
 
Amount
Approximate compounded annual net sales growth rate
 
36.0
%
Approximate
discount rate
 
20.0
%

A five percentage point decrease in the discount rate would increase the liability by approximately $1,500, while a five percentage point increase in the discount rate would decrease the liability by approximately $1,000.

A five percentage point increase or decrease in the compounded annual net sales growth rate would change the liability by approximately $1,500.

There were no transfers between any levels of the fair value hierarchy for any of the Company’s fair value measurements.

The following table shows the fair value of the Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities that were required to be remeasured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (consisting of property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets) during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 and the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2011, and the total impairments recorded as a result of the remeasurement process:

 
 
     Fair Value Measurement Using      
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Fair Value As Of Impairment Date
 
Total Impairments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thirty-nine weeks ended 10/28/12
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
$

 
$

 
$
259

Thirty-nine weeks ended 10/30/11
 
N/A
 
N/A
 
$

 
$

 
$
2,213


Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $259 were written down to a fair value of zero during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 28, 2012 in connection with the exit of a facility as part of the Company’s integration of Tommy Hilfiger. Such assets were deemed to have no future use or economic benefit based on the Company’s analysis using market participant assumptions, and therefore no expected future cash flows. The impairment charge was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment.

Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $1,151 were written down to a fair value of zero during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2011 as a result of management’s decision to permanently discontinue the use of one of its software systems. The Company ceased use of the software during the third quarter of 2011. Such assets were deemed to have no future use or economic benefit based on the Company’s analysis using market participant assumptions, and therefore no expected future cash flows. The impairment charge was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in corporate expenses not allocated to any reportable segment.

Long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $1,062 were written down to a fair value of zero during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2011 in connection with the Company’s negotiated early termination of its license to market sportswear under the Timberland brand. Such assets were deemed to have no future use or economic benefit based on the Company’s analysis using market participant assumptions, and therefore no expected future cash flows. The impairment charge was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Heritage Brand Wholesale Sportswear segment.

The carrying amounts and the fair values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term borrowings and long-term debt as of October 28, 2012 and October 30, 2011 were as follows:

 
10/28/12
 
10/30/11
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
276,630

 
$
276,630

 
$
159,981

 
$
159,981

Short-term borrowings
142,514

 
142,514

 
12,820

 
12,820

Long-term debt (including portion classified as current)
1,731,596

 
1,831,695

 
2,091,556

 
2,142,679


The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company estimates the fair value of its long-term debt using quoted market prices as of the last business day of the applicable quarter. The Company classifies the measurement of its long-term debt as a Level 1 measurement.