Other (Income)/Deductions—Net

The following table provides components of Other (income)/deductions––net:



	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)	September 29, 2013			September 30, 2012			September 29, 2013			September 30, 2012
Interest income^(a)	$	(94	)	$	(109	)	$	(291	)	$	(275	)
Interest expense^(a)	340			381			1,067			1,149
Net interest expense	246			272			776			874
Royalty-related income	(122		)	(149		)	(305		)	(343		)
Patent litigation settlement income^(b)	9			—			(1,342		)	—
Other legal matters, net^(c)	1			727			(94		)	2,014
Gain associated with the transfer of certain product rights to an equity-method investment^(d)	—			—			(459		)	—
Net gain on asset disposals	(46		)	(21		)	(100		)	(45		)
Certain asset impairments and related charges^(e)	443			14			968			524
Costs associated with the Zoetis IPO^(f)	—			32			18			93
Other, net^(g)	(120		)	62			24			147
Other (income)/deductions––net	$	411		$	937		$	(514	)	$	3,264

^(a)

Interest income decreased in the third quarter of 2013 as portfolio maturities were invested at lower rates; however, during the first nine months of 2013, interest income increased due to higher cash and investment balances. Interest expense decreased in the third quarter and first nine months of 2013 due to lower outstanding debt, refinancings and lower rates, and the benefit of the conversion of some fixed-rate liabilities to floating-rate liabilities.

^(b)

In the first nine months of 2013, reflects income from a litigation settlement with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Teva) and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Sun) for patent-infringement damages resulting from their "at-risk" launches of generic Protonix in the United States. As of September 29, 2013, the remaining receivables from Teva are included in Taxes and other current assets ($474 million) and Taxes and other noncurrent assets ($128 million). For additional information, see Note 12A5. Commitments and Contingencies: Legal Proceedings––Certain Matters Resolved During the First Nine Months of 2013.

^(c)

In the first nine months of 2013, primarily includes an $80 million insurance recovery related to a certain litigation matter. In the third quarter of 2012, primarily includes a $491 million charge relating to the resolution of an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) into Wyeth's historical promotional practices in connection with Rapamune. In the first nine months of 2012, primarily includes the aforementioned $491 million charge related to Rapamune, a $450 million settlement of a lawsuit by Brigham Young University related to Celebrex, and charges for hormone-replacement therapy litigation. For additional information, see Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies.


^(d)	In the first nine months of 2013, represents the gain associated with the transfer of certain product rights to Hisun Pfizer, our equity-method investment in China. For additional information, see Note 2D. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Collaborative Arrangement and Equity-Method Investments: Equity-Method Investments.

^(e)

In the third quarter of 2013, includes intangible asset impairment charges of $185 million, primarily reflecting (i) $95 million of indefinite lived brands, primarily related to our biopharmaceutical indefinite-lived brand, Xanax, and (ii) $90 million related to one IPR&D compound (full write-off), as well as a loss of $223 million related to an option to acquire the remaining interest in Laboratório Teuto Brasileiro S.A. (Teuto), a 40%-owned generics company in Brazil (an equity-method investment). In addition, the third quarter of 2013 includes an impairment charge of approximately $32 million related to the aforementioned equity-method investment in Brazil.

In the first nine months of 2013, includes intangible asset impairment charges of $674 million, primarily reflecting (i) $394 million of developed technology rights (for use in the development of bone and cartilage) acquired in connection with our acquisition of Wyeth, (ii) $171 million related to three IPR&D compounds, and (iii) $109 million of indefinite lived brands, primarily related to our biopharmaceutical indefinite-lived brand, Xanax. The intangible asset impairment charges for 2013 reflect, among other things, updated commercial forecasts and, with regard to IPR&D, the impact of new scientific findings. The intangible asset impairment charges for the first nine months of 2013 are associated with the following: Specialty Care ($394 million), Established Products ($185 million), Worldwide Research and Development ($43 million), Primary Care ($38 million), and Consumer Healthcare ($14 million). In addition, the first nine months of 2013 include a loss of $223 million related to an option to acquire the remaining interest Teuto, a 40%-owned generics company in Brazil (an equity-method investment), an impairment charge of approximately $39 million for certain private company investments and an impairment charge of $32 million related to the aforementioned equity-method investment in Brazil, Teuto.

In the first nine months of 2012, includes intangible asset impairment charges of $457 million reflecting (i) $314 million of IPR&D, substantially all related to assets that targeted autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (full write-off), (ii) $45 million related to our Consumer Healthcare indefinite-lived brand, Robitussin, a cough suppressant, and (iii) $98 million related to three developed technology rights. The intangible asset impairment charges for 2012 reflect, among other things, the impact of new scientific findings, updated commercial forecasts and an increased competitive environment. The impairment charges for the first nine months of 2012 are associated with the following: Worldwide Research and Development ($297 million); Consumer Healthcare ($45 million); Established Products ($44 million); Primary Care ($52 million) and Specialty Care ($19 million). In addition, the first nine months of 2012 includes charges of approximately $67 million for certain investments. These investment impairment charges reflect the difficult global economic environment.


^(f)	Costs incurred in connection with the IPO of an approximate 19.8% ownership interest in Zoetis. Includes expenditures for banking, legal, accounting and similar services. For additional information, see Note 2B. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Collaborative Arrangement and Equity-Method Investments: Divestitures.

^(g) In the third quarter and first nine months of 2013, includes the gain of approximately $128 million and $109 million, respectively, reflecting the change in the fair value of the contingent consideration associated with our acquisition of NextWave. For additional information, see Note 2A. Acquisitions, Divestitures, Collaborative Arrangement and Equity-Method Investments: Acquisitions.

The asset impairment charges included in Other (income)/deductions––net for the first nine months of 2013 primarily relate to identifiable intangible assets and are based on estimates of fair value.

The following table provides additional information about the intangible assets that were impaired during the first nine months of 2013 in Other (income)/deductions––net:



	Fair Value^(a)								Nine Months Ended September 29, 2013
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)	Amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment
Intangible assets––Developed technology rights^(b)	$	564	$	—	$	—	$	564	$	394
Intangible assets––Brands^(b)	1,499		—		—		1,499		109
Intangible assets––IPR&D^(b)	220		—		—		220		171
Total	$	2,283	$	—	$	—	$	2,283	$	674


^(a)	The fair value amount is presented as of the date of impairment, as these assets are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. See also Note 1C. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies: Fair Value.

^(b)

Reflects intangible assets written down to their fair value in the first nine months of 2013. Fair value was determined using the income approach, specifically the multi-period excess earnings method, also known as the discounted cash flow method. We started with a forecast of all the expected net cash flows associated with the asset and then we applied an asset-specific discount rate to arrive at a net present value amount. Some of the more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in this approach include: the amount and timing of the projected net cash flows, which includes the expected impact of competitive, legal and/or regulatory forces on the product and the impact of technological risk associated with IPR&D assets; the discount rate, which seeks to reflect the various risks inherent in the projected cash flows; and the tax rate, which seeks to incorporate the geographic diversity of the projected cash flows.