NOTE 12: Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities

The Corporation utilizes a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers and to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include lending-related and other commitments (see below) and derivative instruments (see Note 10). The following is a summary of lending-related commitments.

			March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
			($ in Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit, excluding commitments to originate residential
	mortgage loans held for sale⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	$	5,504,835	$	5,526,326
Commercial letters of credit ⁽¹⁾			131,905		85,689
Standby letters of credit ⁽³⁾			276,978		303,705

(1) These off-balance sheet financial instruments are exercisable at the market rate prevailing at the date the underlying transaction will be completed and, thus, are deemed to have no current fair value, or the fair value is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements and is not material at March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

(2) Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale are considered derivative instruments and are disclosed in Note 10.

(3) The Corporation has established a liability of $4 million at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as an estimate of the fair value of these financial instruments.

As a financial services provider, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments to extend credit. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans made by the Corporation, with each customer's creditworthiness evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. The Corporation's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer. Since a significant portion of commitments to extend credit are subject to specific restrictive loan covenants or may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Corporation had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments totaling $21 million and $22 million, respectively, included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

Lending-related commitments include commitments to extend credit, commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers at predetermined interest rates, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contracts. Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments, and the fair value of these commitments is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation's derivative and hedging activity is further described in Note 10. Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and the third party, while standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party.

The Corporation has principal investment commitments to provide capital-based financing to private and public companies through either direct investments in specific companies or through investment funds and partnerships. The timing of future cash requirements to fund such commitments is generally dependent on the investment cycle, whereby privately held companies are funded by private equity investors and ultimately sold, merged, or taken public through an initial offering, which can vary based on overall market conditions, as well as the nature and type of industry in which the companies operate. The Corporation also invests in low-income housing, small-business commercial real estate, new market tax credit projects, and historic tax credit projects to promote the revitalization of low-to-moderate-income neighborhoods throughout the local communities of its bank subsidiary. As a limited partner in these unconsolidated projects, the Corporation is allocated tax credits and deductions associated with the underlying projects. The aggregate carrying value of these investments at March 31, 2013 was $34 million, included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets, compared to $35 million at December 31, 2012. Related to these investments, the Corporation had remaining commitments to fund of $17 million at March 31, 2013 and $18 million at December 31, 2012, respectively.

The Corporation is party to various pending and threatened claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business activities, some of which involve claims for substantial amounts. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcomes, the Corporation believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding matters, including the matters described below, and with respect to such legal proceedings, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously. The Corporation will consider settlement of cases when, in management's judgment, it is in the best interests of both the Corporation and its shareholders.

On at least a quarterly basis, the Corporation assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with all pending or threatened claims and litigation, utilizing the most recent information available. On a matter by matter basis, an accrual for loss is established for those matters which the Corporation believes it is probable that a loss may be incurred and that the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, each accrual is adjusted as appropriate to reflect any subsequent developments. Accordingly, management's estimate will change from time to time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate. For matters where a loss is not probable, or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.

Resolution of legal claims are inherently unpredictable, and in many legal proceedings various factors exacerbate this inherent unpredictability, including where the damages sought are unsubstantiated or indeterminate, it is unclear whether a case brought as a class action will be allowed to proceed on that basis, discovery is not complete, the proceeding is not yet in its final stages, the matters present legal uncertainties, there are significant facts in dispute, there are a large number of parties (including where it is uncertain how liability, if any, will be shared among multiple defendants), or there is a wide range of potential results.

A putative class action lawsuit, Harris v. Associated Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in April 2010, alleging that the Bank unfairly assessed and collected overdraft fees and seeking restitution of the overdraft fees, compensatory, consequential and punitive damages, and costs. The case was subsequently consolidated into the Multi District Litigation (“MDL”), In re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation MDL No. 2036 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. A settlement agreement which requires payment by the Bank of $13 million for a full and complete release of all claims brought against the Bank received preliminary approval from the court on July 26, 2012. In the second quarter of 2012, the Bank settled with an insurer for $2.5 million as contribution to the settlement amount and received approximately $1.5 million as partial reimbursement for defense costs. By entering into such an agreement, we have not admitted any liability with respect to the lawsuit. The settlement amount was previously accrued for in the financial statements.

A lawsuit, R.J. ZAYED v. Associated Bank, N.A., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota on January 29, 2013. The lawsuit relates to a Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Oxford Global Partners and related entities (“Oxford”) and individuals and was brought by the receiver for Oxford. Oxford was a depository customer of the Bank. The lawsuit claims that the Bank is liable for failing to uncover the Oxford Ponzi scheme, and specifically alleges the Bank aided and abetted (1) the fraudulent scheme; (2) a breach of fiduciary duty; (3) conversion; and (4) false representations and omissions. The lawsuit seeks unspecified consequential and punitive damages. At this early stage of the lawsuit, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of a material adverse outcome or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss at this time. The Bank intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. A lawsuit by investors in the same Ponzi scheme, Herman Grad, et al v. Associated Bank, N.A., brought in Brown County, Wisconsin in October 2009 was dismissed by the circuit court, and the dismissal was affirmed by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals in June 2011 in an unpublished opinion.

Residential mortgage loans sold to others are predominantly conventional residential first lien mortgages originated under our usual underwriting procedures, and are most often sold on a nonrecourse basis, primarily to the government-sponsored enterprises ("GSEs"). The Corporation's agreements to sell residential mortgage loans in the normal course of business usually require certain representations and warranties on the underlying loans sold, related to credit information, loan documentation, collateral, and insurability. Subsequent to being sold, if a material underwriting deficiency or documentation defect is discovered, the Corporation may be obligated to repurchase the loan or reimburse the GSE's for losses incurred (collectively, "make whole requests"). The make whole requests and any related risk of loss under the representations and warranties are largely driven by borrower performance. As a result of make whole requests, the Corporation has repurchased loans with principal balances of $2 million and $3 million and paid loss reimbursement claims of $2 million and $4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, respectively. Make whole requests and claims had been relatively modest prior to 2012; however, similar to other banks, this activity steadily increased during the second half of 2012 and into the first quarter of 2013, and therefore, the Corporation had a repurchase reserve for potential claims on loans previously sold of $4 million at March 31, 2013, compared to $3 million at December 31, 2012. Make whole requests during 2012 and the first quarter of 2013 generally arose from loans sold during the period January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2013, which totaled $15.9 billion at the time of sale, and consisted primarily of loans sold to GSE's. As of March 31, 2013, approximately $6.9 billion of these sold loans remain outstanding. Management will continue to monitor this activity in 2013 and its impact on the reserve. The following summarizes the changes in the mortgage repurchase reserve.

		For the Three
		Months Ended		For the Year Ended
		March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
		($ in Thousands)

Balance at beginning of period	$	3,300	$	0
Repurchase provision expense		2,985		7,109
Charge offs		(1,885)		(3,809)
Balance at end of period	$	4,400	$	3,300

The Corporation may sell residential mortgage loans with limited recourse (limited in that the recourse period ends prior to the loan's maturity, usually after certain time and/or loan paydown criteria have been met), whereby repurchase could be required if the loan had defined delinquency issues during the limited recourse periods. At March 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, there were approximately $61 million and $79 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans sold with such recourse risk. There have been limited instances of repurchase for recourse under the limited recourse criteria.

In October 2004, the Corporation acquired a thrift. Prior to the acquisition, this thrift retained a subordinate position to the FHLB in the credit risk on the underlying residential mortgage loans it sold to the FHLB in exchange for a monthly credit enhancement fee. The Corporation has not sold loans to the FHLB with such credit risk retention since February 2005. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were $295 million and $321 million, respectively, of such residential mortgage loans with credit risk recourse, upon which there have been negligible historical losses to the Corporation.

For certain mortgage loans originated by the Corporation, borrowers may be required to obtain Private Mortgage Insurance (“PMI”) provided by third-party insurers. The Corporation entered into reinsurance treaties with certain PMI carriers which provided, among other things, for a sharing of losses within a specified range of the total PMI coverage in exchange for a portion of the PMI premiums. The Corporation's reinsurance treaties typically provide that the Corporation will assume liability for losses once they exceed 5% of the aggregate risk exposure up to a maximum of 10% of the aggregate risk exposure. As of January 1, 2009, the Corporation discontinued providing reinsurance coverage for new loans in exchange for a portion of the PMI premium. During the first quarter of 2013, the Corporation terminated its reinsurance treaties with two of the three PMI mortgage reinsurance carriers. As a result, the Corporation's estimated liability for reinsurance losses declined to $1 million at March 31, 2013, compared to $8 million at December 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013, the Corporation's potential risk exposure was approximately $2 million.

During the first quarter of 2012, the Bank entered into a Consent Order with the OCC regarding its BSA compliance. The Consent Order required the Bank to create a BSA-focused action plan, supplement existing customer due diligence policies and procedures, perform a BSA risk assessment and complete independent testing. The Bank has been working cooperatively with the OCC, and management believes it is in compliance with the Consent Order. In connection with this matter, the Bank may be subject to civil money penalties.