UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-04400
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund |
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
David Oestreicher |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrants telephone number, including area
code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end: December
31
Date of reporting period: December 31,
2016
Item 1. Report to Shareholders
Equity
Income Fund |
December
31, 2016 |
The views and opinions in this report were current as of December 31, 2016. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the funds future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.
REPORTS ON THE WEB
Sign up for our Email Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.
Managers Letter
Fellow Shareholders
U.S. stocks rose in 2016, a particularly tumultuous year for investors. After one of the worst starts to a new year, stocks turned a corner in February as China-focused fears receded, oil prices rebounded, and the Federal Reserve signaled that it would proceed cautiously in raising interest rates. Two political upsets rocked global markets in the ensuing months: the UKs vote to leave the European Union in June and Donald Trumps win in the U.S. presidential election in November. After a bout of volatility accompanying both events, global stock markets resumed their upswing as investors digested the longer-term implications of Brexit and a Trump presidency. By year-end, the major U.S. stock indexes ended near record highs as investors anticipated that the new administration would implement policies spurring faster growth and inflation. Against this volatile backdrop, the Equity Income Fund posted a double-digit return in 2016 and outpaced its benchmark.
The Equity Income Fund returned 11.71% and 19.28% for the six and 12 months ended December 31, 2016, respectively, versus 7.82% and 11.96% for the Standard & Poors 500 Index over the same periods. The fund also outpaced the returns of its peer group, the Lipper Equity Income Funds Index, for both periods. (Returns for the Advisor, R, and I Class shares reflect their different fee structures.)
Every sector except real estate contributed to the funds absolute performance. Stock selection in information technology lifted returns thanks to several semiconductor holdings that generated double-digit returns on buoyant chip demand. Our energy sector holdings also helped performance, driven by positions in several oil and gas producers whose shares rallied as oil prices sharply rebounded from historic lows in early 2016. On the other hand, our selection in the telecommunication services sector proved less helpful. We held a few European telecom companies whose shares sank after Brexit, which triggered deep uncertainty across the Continent and big losses in the euro and pound, eroding the returns from European companies in dollar terms.
MARKET ENVIRONMENT
U.S. stocks plummeted at the start of 2016 as worries about Chinas economic slowdown and collapsing oil prices spurred fears of a worldwide recession. Sentiment began to turn in mid-February as concerns about a global oversupply in oil abated and the Fed held back on raising interest rates. The markets advance was curtailed in June by Brexit, which sparked a two-day global stock sell-off and upheaval in foreign currencies. However, U.S. stocks proved resilient and resumed their ascent over the summer, aided by improving economic data and a stabilization in corporate earnings. Stocks drifted lower in the weeks preceding the U.S. elections in November but rallied after the outcome as investors bet that the new president and a Republican-controlled Congress would cut taxes, loosen regulations, and step up infrastructure spending.
Value stocks outpaced growth across the capitalization spectrum. Large-cap stocks lagged mid- and small-cap stocks as investors deemed that smaller companies with greater exposure to the domestic economy would benefit more from Trumps homeward-focused policies and a strong dollar than larger, more globally exposed companies.
Nine of 11 sectors in the S&P 500 advanced, led by energy and financials, which both returned more than 20%. Energy stocks rallied as U.S. oil prices climbed from decade lows and ended the year above the $50 per barrel threshold, lifted by an unexpected deal among the worlds leading oil producers last November to reduce oil output starting in 2017. Financial stocks advanced as the prospect of rising interest rates and relaxed banking regulations under the new administration lifted their earnings outlook. The real estate and health care sectors posted modest declines.
PORTFOLIO REVIEW
The Equity Income Fund seeks to buy well-established, large-cap companies that typically have a strong record of paying dividends and that appear to be undervalued by the market. The funds holdings tend to be solid, higher-quality companies going through a period of underperformance, reflecting our dual focus on valuation and dividend yield.
As of December 31, 2016, the dividend yield of the Equity Income Fund was 2.78% versus the 2.11% dividend yield of the S&P 500. All but four companies in your fund paid a dividend over the past 12 months. Most of our holdings are U.S. companies, though we will invest in opportunities overseas if they meet our investment criteria. We are bottom-up investors, meaning that we select stocks based on their individual merits as opposed to broader market or economic trends.
Energy stocks contributed significantly to the funds performance in 2016, a stark turnaround from the prior year when concerns over excess supply and slowing global growth caused oil and natural gas prices to plummet. Oil and gas exploration and production companies Apache and Canadian Natural Resources and global oil majors ExxonMobil, Total, and Royal Dutch Shell were sizable contributors as oil prices climbed 45% over the year, lifted by a deal among the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to cut output for the first time since 2008. While it is difficult to predict oil prices with any certainty, we take solace in knowing that our holdings have solid balance sheets, access to low-cost sources of oil and natural gas, and lower cost structuresattributes that we believe will allow them to hold up well even if oil prices come under pressure. (Please refer to the funds portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)
Strong stock selection in the information technology sector also helped returns. Significant contributors included semiconductor manufacturing equipment maker Applied Materials, which reported a string of surprisingly strong earnings and surging orders throughout 2016, and mobile phone chipmaker Qualcomm, whose shares rallied last fall on news that it was in talks to acquire rival chipmaker NXP Semiconductors. In the past two years, semiconductor companies have undergone a wave of consolidation that has lifted valuations, and we have recently trimmed our exposure to the industry. Elsewhere in the tech sector, we reduced our position in computer disk-drive maker Western Digital after strong performance.
Financials, the funds largest sector allocation, contributed to performance through good stock selection. After struggling with ultralow interest rates since the 20072008 global financial crisis, financial stocks soared after the election as investors anticipated that the new administrations fiscal policies would lead to a faster pace of interest rate increases, corporate tax cuts, and less regulatory oversightall of which would boost profitability for banks. Our positions in JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley participated in the postelection rally and were the funds biggest and second-biggest contributors, respectively. We took profits in some of our strong performers in financials to increase our position in Wells Fargo, whose shares dropped to multiyear lows in September after reports surfaced of a fraudulent customer accounts scandal at its retail banks. Despite Wells Fargos well-publicized troubles, we believe that its shares represented a good buying opportunity and that the bank will move past the crisis after abandoning its retail banks sales goals and appointing a new and more transparent chief executive.
Not all of our financials holdings participated in the post-U.S. election rally, however. Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) shares slumped as it contended with a host of problems ranging from low interest rates, Brexit-induced uncertainty, investigations into its mortgage securitizations by U.S. authorities, and, most recently, failure to pass the annual stress test required by the UK banking regulator. RBS shares lost more than a third of their value in 2016, making the bank the funds top detractor. RBS is in the midst of a five-year restructuring program, and we believe that managements ongoing efforts to cut expenses and sell non-core assets will benefit shareholders over the long term.
Brexit-related concerns also drove declines in our European holdings in the telecommunication services sector. Telefonica and Vodafone, the dominant providers in Spain and the UK, respectively, ranked among the funds largest detractors. Besides unleashing widespread economic and political uncertainty across Europe, Brexit also spurred steep declines in the euro and the pound against the dollar, which contributed to both companies weak performance. We continue to hold Telefonica for its attractive valuation, growing free cash flow, and margin improvement potential. We added to our position in Vodafone, which recently concluded a two-year upgrade of its mobile infrastructure worldwide that is starting to pay off in the form of improved mobile service revenue in Europe, where the company generates most of its business.
OUTLOOK
Much of the U.S. stock market rally since Election Day has been driven by speculation about the incoming presidents fiscal policies. However, predicting the near-term direction of the economy, stock market, or individual companies is a difficult exercise made more challenging by the high level of unknowns about Donald Trumps first year as president. While there will be winners and losers under the new administration, much is uncertain about the timing and scope of the policies espoused by the new administration and their effect on the economy, taxation, trade, and other areas. Valuations are generally less attractive as a result of the past years advance. We have recently added to select consumer staples and health care companies whose shares fell to what we believed were compelling levels, reflecting our more defensive positioning as we anticipate greater volatility in the coming months.
The combination of U.S. policy instability and less appealing valuations will likely generate heightened stock market volatility in the near term, in our view. Last year ranked among the most volatile years for the stock market since the 20072008 global financial crisis, and we see little indication that volatility will subside in the coming months. Additionally, correlations between individual stocksa gauge of their tendency to move in lockstep, regardless of their underlying fundamentalssank to multiyear lows at the end of 2016. We are encouraged by the combination of elevated volatility and falling correlations, which favors our style of active management by increasing the number of opportunities to buy and sell companies at more attractive prices.
In this uncertain environment, we believe that sticking to our strategy of using T. Rowe Prices considerable strengths in fundamental research to identify companies with compelling valuations, attractive fundamentals, and strong dividend yields represents the best way to generate solid returns for our shareholders over the long term.
Thank you for investing with T. Rowe Price.
Respectfully submitted,
John D. Linehan
President of the fund and
chairman of its Investment Advisory Committee
Heather McPherson
Associate portfolio manager
January 14, 2017
The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee members in developing and executing the funds investment program.
RISKS OF INVESTING IN THE FUND
Value investors seek to invest in companies whose stock prices are low in relation to their real worth or future prospects. By identifying companies whose stocks are currently out of favor or misunderstood, value investors hope to realize significant appreciation as other investors recognize the stocks intrinsic value and the price rises accordingly. The value approach carries the risk that the market will not recognize a securitys intrinsic value for a long time or that a stock judged to be undervalued may actually be appropriately priced.
GLOSSARY
Beta: A measure of a funds historical volatility relative to the overall market. For example, a fund with a beta of 1.5 over the past year would have experienced swings in its net asset value 50% greater than those of its benchmark, while a fund with a beta of 0.5 would have been 50% less volatile.
Dividend yield: The annual dividend of a stock divided by the stocks price.
Earnings growth rate current fiscal year: Measures the annualized percent change in earnings per share from the prior fiscal year to the current fiscal year.
Lipper indexes: Fund benchmarks that consist of a small number (10 to 30) of the largest mutual funds in a particular category as tracked by Lipper Inc.
Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio current fiscal year: A valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by its reported earnings per share from the latest fiscal year. The ratio is a measure of how much investors are willing to pay for the companys earnings. The higher the P/E, the more investors are paying for the companys current earnings.
Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio next fiscal year: A valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by its estimated earnings for the next fiscal year. The ratio is a measure of how much investors are willing to pay for the companys future earnings. The higher the P/E, the more investors are paying for the companys expected earnings growth in the next fiscal year.
Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio 12 months forward: A valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by the analysts forecast of the next 12 months expected earnings. The ratio is a measure of how much investors are willing to pay for the companys future earnings. The higher the P/E, the more investors are paying for the companys earnings growth in the next 12 months.
Projected earnings growth rate (IBES): A companys expected earnings per share growth rate for a given time period based on the forecast from the Institutional Brokers Estimate System, which is commonly referred to as IBES.
S&P 500 Index: An unmanaged index that tracks the stocks of 500 primarily large-cap U.S. companies.
Performance and Expenses
Growth of $10,000 |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
Fund Expense Example |
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Please note that the fund has four share classes: The original share class (Investor Class) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee, Advisor Class shares are offered only through unaffiliated brokers and other financial intermediaries and charge a 0.25% 12b-1 fee, R Class shares are available to retirement plans serviced by intermediaries and charge a 0.50% 12b-1 fee, and I Class shares are available to institutionally oriented clients and impose no 12b-1 or administrative fee payment. Each share class is presented separately in the table.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides
information about actual account values and expenses based on the funds actual
returns. You may use the information on this line, together with your account
balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide
your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by
$1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first line under
the heading Expenses Paid During Period to estimate the expenses you paid on
your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison
Purposes
The information on the second
line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and
expenses derived from the funds actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year
rate of return before expenses (not the funds actual return). You may compare
the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this
5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the
shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and
expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or
expenses you paid for the period.
Note: T. Rowe Price charges an annual account service fee of $20, generally for accounts with less than $10,000. The fee is waived for any investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $50,000 or more; accounts electing to receive electronic delivery of account statements, transaction confirmations, prospectuses, and shareholder reports; or accounts of an investor who is a T. Rowe Price Preferred Services, Personal Services, or Enhanced Personal Services client (enrollment in these programs generally requires T. Rowe Price assets of at least $100,000). This fee is not included in the accompanying table. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to Financial Statements |
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (the fund), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The fund seeks a high level of dividend income and long-term capital growth primarily through investments in stocks. The fund has four classes of shares: the Equity Income Fund (Investor Class), the Equity Income FundAdvisor Class (Advisor Class), the Equity Income FundR Class (R Class), and the Equity Income FundI Class (I Class). Advisor Class shares are sold only through unaffiliated brokers and other unaffiliated financial intermediaries, and R Class shares are available to retirement plans serviced by intermediaries. I Class shares generally are available only to investors meeting a $1,000,000 minimum investment or certain other criteria. The Advisor Class and R Class each operate under separate Board-approved Rule 12b-1 plans, pursuant to which each class compensates financial intermediaries for distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative services; the Investor and I Classes do not pay Rule 12b-1 fees. Each class has exclusive voting rights on matters related solely to that class; separate voting rights on matters that relate to all classes; and, in all other respects, the same rights and obligations as the other classes.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Preparation The fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including, but not limited to, ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Earnings on investments recognized as partnerships for federal income tax purposes reflect the tax character of such earnings. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Distributions from REITs are initially recorded as dividend income and, to the extent such represent a return of capital or capital gain for tax purposes, are reclassified when such information becomes available. Income distributions are declared and paid by each class quarterly. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions, if any, are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.
Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.
Class Accounting Shareholder servicing, prospectus, and shareholder report expenses incurred by each class are charged directly to the class to which they relate. Expenses common to all classes, investment income, and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based upon the relative daily net assets of each class. The Advisor Class and R Class each pay Rule 12b-1 fees, in an amount not exceeding 0.25% and 0.50%, respectively, of the classs average daily net.
Rebates Subject to best execution, the fund may direct certain security trades to brokers who have agreed to rebate a portion of the related brokerage commission to the fund in cash. Commission rebates are reflected as realized gain on securities in the accompanying financial statements and totaled $204,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
In-Kind Redemptions In accordance with guidelines described in the funds prospectus, and when considered to be in the best interest of all shareholders, the fund may distribute portfolio securities rather than cash as payment for a redemption of fund shares (in-kind redemption). Gains and losses realized on in-kind redemptions are not recognized for tax purposes and are reclassified from undistributed realized gain (loss) to paid-in capital. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the fund realized $54,125,000 of net gain on $126,391,000 of in-kind redemptions.
New Accounting Guidance In October 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a new rule, Investment Company Reporting Modernization, which, among other provisions, amends Regulation S-X to require standardized, enhanced disclosures, particularly related to derivatives, in investment company financial statements. Compliance with the guidance is effective for financial statements filed with the SEC on or after August 1, 2017; adoption will have no effect on the funds net assets or results of operations.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The funds financial instruments are valued and each classs net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business. However, the NAV per share may be calculated at a time other than the normal close of the NYSE if trading on the NYSE is restricted, if the NYSE closes earlier, or as may be permitted by the SEC.
Fair Value The funds financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) is an internal committee that has been delegated certain responsibilities by the funds Board of Trustees (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair value determinations. Specifically, the Valuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, and persons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions; oversees the selection, services, and performance of pricing vendors; oversees valuation-related business continuity practices; and provides guidance on internal controls and valuation-related matters. The Valuation Committee reports to the Board and has representation from legal, portfolio management and trading, operations, risk management, and the funds treasurer.
Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:
Level 1 quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date
Level 2 inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)
Level 3 unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When multiple inputs are used to derive fair value, the financial instrument is assigned to the level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values.
Valuation Techniques Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made. OTC Bulletin Board securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale or closing price for international securities.
For valuation purposes, the last quoted prices of non-U.S. equity securities may be adjusted to reflect the fair value of such securities at the close of the NYSE. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment, materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fund will adjust the previous quoted prices to reflect what it believes to be the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE. In deciding whether it is necessary to adjust quoted prices to reflect fair value, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. The fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with quoted prices and information to evaluate or adjust those prices. The fund cannot predict how often it will use quoted prices and how often it will determine it necessary to adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its security valuation process, the fund routinely compares quoted prices, the next days opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices.
Actively traded equity securities listed on a domestic exchange generally are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Non-U.S. equity securities generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy despite the availability of quoted prices because, as described above, the fund evaluates and determines whether those quoted prices reflect fair value at the close of the NYSE or require adjustment. OTC Bulletin Board securities, certain preferred securities, and equity securities traded in inactive markets generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Debt securities generally are traded in the OTC market. Securities with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of acquisition are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which considers the yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Generally, debt securities are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual funds closing NAV per share on the day of valuation and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities other than financial instruments, including short-term receivables and payables, are carried at cost, or estimated realizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.
Thinly traded financial instruments and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricing determination is to arrive at a price that could reasonably be expected from a current sale. Financial instruments fair valued by the Valuation Committee are primarily private placements, restricted securities, warrants, rights, and other securities that are not publicly traded.
Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments to establish and adjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of an equity investment with limited market activity, such as a private placement or a thinly traded public company stock, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the issuers business prospects, its financial standing and performance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, new rounds of financing, negotiated transactions of significant size between other investors in the company, relevant market valuations of peer companies, strategic events affecting the company, market liquidity for the issuer, and general economic conditions and events. In consultation with the investment and pricing teams, the Valuation Committee will determine an appropriate valuation technique based on available information, which may include both observable and unobservable inputs. The Valuation Committee typically will afford greatest weight to actual prices in arms length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions between market participants, transaction information can be reliably obtained, and prices are deemed representative of fair value. However, the Valuation Committee may also consider other valuation methods such as market-based valuation multiples; a discount or premium from market value of a similar, freely traded security of the same issuer; or some combination. Fair value determinations are reviewed on a regular basis and updated as information becomes available, including actual purchase and sale transactions of the issue. Because any fair value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions, and fair value prices determined by the Valuation Committee could differ from those of other market participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valued securities may be categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation Inputs The following table summarizes the funds financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their fair values on December 31, 2016:
There were no material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Following is a reconciliation of the funds Level 3 holdings for the year ended December 31, 2016. Gain (loss) reflects both realized and change in unrealized gain/loss on Level 3 holdings during the period, if any, and is included on the accompanying Statement of Operations.
NOTE 3 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the fund invested in derivative instruments. As defined by GAAP, a derivative is a financial instrument whose value is derived from an underlying security price, foreign exchange rate, interest rate, index of prices or rates, or other variable; it requires little or no initial investment and permits or requires net settlement. The fund invests in derivatives only if the expected risks and rewards are consistent with its investment objectives, policies, and overall risk profile, as described in its prospectus and Statement of Additional Information. The fund may use derivatives for a variety of purposes, such as seeking to hedge against declines in principal value, increase yield, invest in an asset with greater efficiency and at a lower cost than is possible through direct investment, or to adjust credit exposure. The risks associated with the use of derivatives are different from, and potentially much greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in the instruments on which the derivatives are based. The fund at all times maintains sufficient cash reserves, liquid assets, or other SEC-permitted asset types to cover its settlement obligations under open derivative contracts.
The fund values its derivatives at fair value and recognizes changes in fair value currently in its results of operations. Accordingly, the fund does not follow hedge accounting, even for derivatives employed as economic hedges. Generally, the fund accounts for its derivatives on a gross basis. It does not offset the fair value of derivative liabilities against the fair value of derivative assets on its financial statements, nor does it offset the fair value of derivative instruments against the right to reclaim or obligation to return collateral. As of December 31, 2016, the fund held no derivative instruments.
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the fund recognized $80,000 of gain on equity derivatives, included in realized gain (loss) on Futures on the accompanying Statement of Operations.
Futures Contracts The fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses futures contracts to help manage such risk. The fund may enter into futures contracts to manage exposure to interest rates, security prices, foreign currencies, and credit quality; as an efficient means of adjusting exposure to all or part of a target market; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; or to adjust credit exposure. A futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific underlying financial instrument at an agreed-upon price, date, time, and place. The fund currently invests only in exchange-traded futures, which generally are standardized as to maturity date, underlying financial instrument, and other contract terms. Payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle daily fluctuations in the value of the contract (variation margin), which reflect changes in the value of the underlying financial instrument. Variation margin is recorded as unrealized gain or loss until the contract is closed. The value of a futures contract included in net assets is the amount of unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset, and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of futures contracts include possible illiquidity of the futures markets, contract prices that can be highly volatile and imperfectly correlated to movements in hedged security values, and potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in futures, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally less than 1% of net assets.
NOTE 4 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the funds prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial delays and additional costs.
Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term securities aggregated $4,169,926,000 and $7,458,320,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016.
NOTE 5 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences.
The fund files U.S. federal, state, and local tax returns as required. The funds tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years after the filing of the tax return but which can be extended to six years in certain circumstances. Tax returns for open years have incorporated no uncertain tax positions that require a provision for income taxes.
Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to redemptions in kind and a tax practice that treats a portion of the proceeds from each redemption of capital shares as a distribution of taxable net investment income or realized capital gain. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the following reclassifications were recorded to reflect tax character (there was no impact on results of operations or net assets):
Distributions during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, were characterized for tax purposes as follows:
At December 31, 2016, the tax-basis cost of investments and components of net assets were as follows:
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable to the deferral of losses from wash sales for tax purposes.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). The investment management agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an annual investment management fee, which is computed daily and paid monthly. The fee consists of an individual fund fee and a group fee. The individual fund fee is equal to 0.25% of the funds average daily net assets up to $15 billion and 0.21% of the funds average daily net assets in excess of $15 billion. The group fee rate is calculated based on the combined net assets of certain mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (the group) applied to a graduated fee schedule, with rates ranging from 0.48% for the first $1 billion of assets to 0.270% for assets in excess of $500 billion. The funds group fee is determined by applying the group fee rate to the funds average daily net assets. At December 31, 2016, the effective annual group fee rate was 0.29%.
The I Class is subject to an operating expense limitation (I Class limit) pursuant to which Price Associates is contractually required to pay all operating expenses of the I Class, excluding management fees, interest, expenses related to borrowings, taxes, and brokerage, and other non-recurring expenses permitted by the investment management agreement, to the extent such operating expenses, on an annualized basis, exceed 0.05% of average net assets. This agreement will continue until April 30, 2018, and may be renewed, revised, or revoked only with approval of the funds Board. The I Class is required to repay Price Associates for expenses previously paid to the extent the classs net assets grow or expenses decline sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the classs operating expenses to exceed the I Class limit in effect at the time of the waiver. However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the date of a payment or waiver. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the I Class operated below its expense limitation.
Pursuant to this agreement, less than $1,000 of expenses were repaid to Price Associates during the year ended December 31, 2016.
In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and two wholly owned subsidiaries of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates provides certain accounting and administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the funds transfer and dividend-disbursing agent. T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., provides subaccounting and recordkeeping services for certain retirement accounts invested in the Investor Class, R Class and I Class. For the year ended December 31, 2016, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $67,000 for Price Associates; $5,222,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; and $4,331,000 for T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.
Additionally, the fund is one of several mutual funds in which certain college savings plans managed by Price Associates may invest. As approved by the funds Board of Trustees, shareholder servicing costs associated with each college savings plan are borne by the fund in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the college savings plan. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the fund was charged $446,000 for shareholder servicing costs related to the college savings plans, of which $231,000 was for services provided by Price. The amount payable at period-end pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At December 31, 2016, approximately 2% of the outstanding shares of the Investor Class were held by college savings plans.
The fund is also one of several mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (underlying Price funds) in which the T. Rowe Price Spectrum Funds (Spectrum Funds) may invest. The Spectrum Funds do not invest in the underlying Price funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. Pursuant to a special servicing agreement, expenses associated with the operation of the Spectrum Funds are borne by each underlying Price fund to the extent of estimated savings to it and in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the Spectrum Funds. Expenses allocated under this agreement are reflected as shareholder servicing expense in the accompanying financial statements. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the fund was allocated $1,519,000 of Spectrum Funds expenses, of which $1,039,000 related to services provided by Price. At period-end, the amount payable to Price pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At December 31, 2016, approximately 7% of the outstanding shares of the Investor Class were held by the Spectrum Funds.
The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Fund, the T. Rowe Price Treasury Reserve Fund, or the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Fund (collectively, the Price Reserve Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The Price Reserve Funds are offered as short-term investment options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Price Reserve Funds pay no investment management fees.
The fund may also invest in certain other T. Rowe Price funds (Price Funds) as a means of gaining efficient and cost-effective exposure to certain markets. The fund does not invest for the purpose of exercising management or control; however, investments by the fund may represent a significant portion of an underlying Price Funds net assets. Each underlying Price Fund is an open-end management investment company managed by Price Associates and is considered an affiliate of the fund. To ensure that the fund does not incur duplicate management fees (paid by the underlying Price Fund(s) and the fund), Price Associates has agreed to permanently waive a portion of its management fee charged to the fund in an amount sufficient to fully offset that portion of management fees paid by each underlying Price Fund related to the funds investment therein. Annual management fee rates and amounts waived related to investments in the underlying Price Fund(s) for the year ended December 31, 2016, are as follows:
The fund may participate in securities purchase and sale transactions with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates (cross trades), in accordance with procedures adopted by the funds Board and Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which require, among other things, that such purchase and sale cross trades be effected at the independent current market price of the security. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the aggregate value of purchases and sales cross trades with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates was less than 1% of the funds net assets as of December 31, 2016.
On June 6, 2016, Price Associates offered, and the funds Board of Directors accepted, a voluntary payment to compensate the fund for a loss of value on its investment in Dell as a result of the funds ineligibility to pursue an appraisal action in Delaware court due to a proxy voting error in 2013 (the Offer). The payment from Price Associates was received in cash on June 10, 2016. Subsequently, a final settlement to the appraisal action was negotiated with Dell, pursuant to which the fund received the original merger consideration plus negotiated interest. The negotiated interest, net of contingent legal fees, approximated $0.75 per Dell share and was received by the fund on June 30; the original merger consideration was received on July 1. The settlement from Dell is reflected as realized gain/loss on securities in the accompanying financial statements. The payment from Price Associates, reduced by the settlement from Dell in accordance with the terms of the Offer, was $86,642,000 and increased the total return by 0.48%, 0.48%, 0.44%, and 0.45% for the Investor Class, Advisor Class, R Class, and I Class, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2016. An appeal is currently pending; the amount paid by Price Associates may be further increased or decreased in the future, in the event there is a court-determined change in the fair valuation of Dell shares on appeal, or payment is received by the fund from any other source to compensate for the loss of value on its Dell shares.
NOTE 7 - LITIGATION
The fund is a named defendant or in a class of defendants in a lawsuit that the Unsecured Creditors Committee (the Committee) of the Tribune Company has filed in Delaware bankruptcy court. The Committee is seeking to recover all payments made to beneficial owners of common stock in connection with a leveraged buyout (LBO) of Tribune, including those made in connection with a 2007 tender offer in which the fund participated. A motion to dismiss was filed in this case and the district court granted the motion on January 9, 2017. The fund was named, also, as a defendant or included in a class of defendants in parallel litigation, which was dismissed by district court and affirmed on appeal by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. This second action asserted state law constructive fraudulent transfer claims in an attempt to recover stock redemption payments made to shareholders at the time of the LBO. The plaintiffs in this second action filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court removed the petition from its December 9, 2016 calendar and the matter has not yet been rescheduled. The complaints allege no misconduct by the fund, and management has vigorously defended the lawsuits. The value of the proceeds received by the fund is $312,460,000 (1.38% of net assets), and the fund will incur legal expenses. Management is currently assessing the case and has not yet determined the effect, if any, on the funds net assets and results of operations.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
To the Board of Trustees and
Shareholders of
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (the Fund) as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities as of December 31, 2016 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, and confirmation of the underlying funds by correspondence with the transfer agent, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
February 16, 2017
Tax Information (Unaudited) for the Tax Year Ended 12/31/16 |
We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.
The funds distributions to shareholders included:
● | $92,964,000 from short-term capital gains, |
● | $1,366,087,000 from long-term capital gains, of which $1,365,807,000 was subject to a long-term capital gains tax rate of not greater than 20%, and $280,000 to a long-term capital gains tax rate of not greater than 25%. |
For taxable non-corporate shareholders, $647,016,000 of the funds income represents qualified dividend income subject to a long-term capital gains tax rate of not greater than 20%.
For corporate shareholders, $522,320,000 of the funds income qualifies for the dividends-received deduction.
Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Records |
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each funds Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SECs website, sec.gov.
The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our corporate website. To access it, please visit the following Web page:
https://www3.troweprice.com/usis/corporate/en/utility/policies.html
Scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, Proxy Voting Policies. Click on the Proxy Voting Policies link in the shaded box.
Each funds most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SECs website. To access it through T. Rowe Price, visit the website location shown above, and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, Proxy Voting Records. Click on the Proxy Voting Records link in the shaded box.
How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio Holdings |
The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q is available electronically on the SECs website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.
About the Funds Trustees and Officers |
Your fund is overseen by a Board of Trustees (Board) that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters affecting or potentially affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and business and regulatory affairs. The Board elects the funds officers, who are listed in the final table. At least 75% of the Boards members are independent of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and its affiliates; inside or interested Trustees are employees or officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the fund Trustees and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-638-5660.
Independent Trustees
Name | ||
(Year of Birth) | ||
Year Elected* | ||
[Number of T. Rowe Price | Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and | |
Portfolios Overseen] | Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years | |
William R. Brody, M.D., Ph.D. | President and Trustee, Salk Institute for Biological Studies (2009 | |
(1944) | to present); Director, BioMed Realty Trust (2013 to 2016); Chairman | |
2009 | of the Board, Mesa Biotech, a molecular diagnostic company | |
[187] | (March 2016 to present); Director, Radiology Partners, an integrated | |
radiology practice management company (June 2016 to present); | ||
Director, Novartis, Inc. (2009 to 2014); Director, IBM (2007 | ||
to present) | ||
Anthony W. Deering | Chairman, Exeter Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 to | |
(1945) | present); Director, Brixmor Real Estate Investment Trust (2012 to | |
2001 | present); Director and Advisory Board Member, Deutsche Bank | |
[187] | North America (2004 to present); Director, Under Armour (2008 | |
to present); Director, Vornado Real Estate Investment Trust (2004 | ||
to 2012) | ||
Bruce W. Duncan | Chief Executive Officer and Director (2009 to present), Chairman | |
(1951) | of the Board (January 2016 to present), and President (2009 | |
2013 | to September 2016), First Industrial Realty Trust, an owner and | |
[187] | operator of industrial properties; Chairman of the Board (2005 to | |
May 2016) and Director (1999 to May 2016), Starwood Hotels & | ||
Resorts, a hotel and leisure company; Director, Boston Properties | ||
(May 2016 to present) | ||
Robert J. Gerrard, Jr. | Advisory Board Member, Pipeline Crisis/Winning Strategies, a | |
(1952) | collaborative working to improve opportunities for young African | |
2012 | Americans (1997 to present) | |
[187] | ||
Paul F. McBride | Advisory Board Member, Vizzia Technologies (2015 to present) | |
(1956) | ||
2013 | ||
[187] | ||
Cecilia E. Rouse, Ph.D. | Dean, Woodrow Wilson School (2012 to present); Professor and | |
(1963) | Researcher, Princeton University (1992 to present); Director, MDRC, | |
2012 | a nonprofit education and social policy research organization (2011 | |
[187] | to present); Member of National Academy of Education (2010 to | |
present); Research Associate of Labor Program (2011 to present) | ||
and Board Member (2015 to present), National Bureau of Economic | ||
Research (2011 to present); Chair of Committee on the Status of | ||
Minority Groups in the Economic Profession (2012 to present) and | ||
Vice President (2015 to present), American Economic Association | ||
John G. Schreiber | Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate | |
(1946) | investment company (1991 to present); Cofounder, Partner, and | |
2001 | Cochairman of the Investment Committee, Blackstone Real Estate | |
[187] | Advisors, L.P. (1992 to 2015); Director, General Growth Properties, | |
Inc. (2010 to 2013); Director, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, a real | ||
estate finance company (2012 to 2016); Director and Chairman of | ||
the Board, Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (2013 to present); Director, | ||
Hilton Worldwide (2013 to present); Director, Hudson Pacific | ||
Properties (2014 to 2016) | ||
Mark R. Tercek | President and Chief Executive Officer, The Nature Conservancy (2008 | |
(1957) | to present) | |
2009 | ||
[187] |
*Each independent trustee serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.
Inside Trustees
Name | ||
(Year of Birth) | ||
Year Elected* | ||
[Number of T. Rowe Price | Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and | |
Portfolios Overseen] | Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years | |
Edward C. Bernard | Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice Chairman of the | |
(1956) | Board, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; | |
2006 | Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price | |
[187] | Investment Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board and Director, | |
T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price | ||
Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, | ||
Director, and President, T. Rowe Price International and T. Rowe | ||
Price Trust Company; Chairman of the Board, all funds | ||
Brian C. Rogers, CFA, CIC | Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; | |
(1955) | Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice | |
2006 | President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice President, T. Rowe Price | |
[131] | Trust Company; Director, United Technologies (January 2016 to | |
present); Vice President, Equity Income Fund |
*Each inside trustee serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.
Officers
Name (Year of Birth) | ||
Position Held With Equity Income Fund | Principal Occupation(s) | |
Jason R. Adams (1979) | Vice President T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc.; formerly, Research Analyst, Caxton | |
Associates (to 2015) | ||
Vinit Agrawal (1987) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | ||
Darrell N. Braman (1963) | Vice President, Price Hong Kong, Price | |
Vice President and Secretary | Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, | |
Inc., T. Rowe Price International, T. Rowe Price | ||
Investment Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price | ||
Services, Inc. | ||
Andrew M. Brooks (1956) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA (1963) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
John R. Gilner (1961) | Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President, | |
Chief Compliance Officer | T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price | |
Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment | ||
Services, Inc. | ||
David R. Giroux, CFA (1975) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Ryan S. Hedrick, CFA (1980) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe | |
Vice President | Price Group Inc.; formerly, Analyst, Davidson | |
Kempner Capital Management (to 2013) | ||
Shinwoo Kim (1977) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
Paul J. Krug, CPA (1964) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
John D. Linehan, CFA (1965) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
President | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Daniel Martino, CFA (1974) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
George A. Marzano (1980) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
Catherine D. Mathews (1963) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Treasurer and Vice President | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Heather K. McPherson, CPA (1967) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
David Oestreicher (1967) | Director, Vice President, and Secretary, T. Rowe | |
Vice President | Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price | |
Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe | ||
Price Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust | ||
Company; Chief Legal Officer, Vice President, | ||
and Secretary, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice | ||
President and Secretary, T. Rowe Price and | ||
T. Rowe Price International; Vice President, | ||
Price Hong Kong and Price Singapore | ||
Kyle Rasbach (1980) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price; formerly, Vice | |
Vice President | President, Cowen and Company (to 2013) | |
John W. Ratzesberger (1975) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; | |
formerly, North American Head of Listed | ||
Derivatives Operation, Morgan Stanley (to 2013) | ||
Shannon H. Rauser (1987) | Employee, T. Rowe Price | |
Assistant Secretary | ||
Deborah D. Seidel (1962) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services, | |
Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. | ||
Matthew J. Snowling, CFA (1971) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. |
Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International for at least 5 years.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrants Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Mr. Bruce W. Duncan qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Duncan is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) (d) Aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered to, or on behalf of, the registrant by the registrants principal accountant were as follows:
Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrants annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrants financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls and, if applicable, agreed-upon procedures related to fund acquisitions. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. All other fees include the registrants pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrants Board of Directors/Trustees.
(e)(1) The registrants audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrants principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.
(2) No services included in (b) (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountants engagement to audit the registrants financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountants full-time, permanent employees.
(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrants principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $2,146,000 and $2,158,000, respectively.
(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrants audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrants audit committee in maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrants disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrants code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.
(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date February 16, 2017 |
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date February 16, 2017 | ||
By | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date February 16, 2017 |
Item 12(a)(2).
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Edward C. Bernard, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund; | |||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |||
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |||
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: February 16, 2017 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer |
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Catherine D. Mathews, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund; | |||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |||
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |||
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: February 16, 2017 | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
Item 12(b).
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | ||
Name of Issuer: T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund | ||
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR for the above named Issuer, the undersigned hereby | ||
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that: | ||
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities | |
Exchange Act of 1934; | ||
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial | |
condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
Date: February 16, 2017 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date: February 16, 2017 | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
CODE OF ETHICS FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
AND SENIOR FINANCIAL
OFFICERS OF THE PRICE FUNDS
UNDER THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I. General Statement. This Code of Ethics (the Price Funds S-O Code) has been designed to bring the Price Funds into compliance with the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act) rules promulgated by The Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder (Regulations). The Price Funds S-O Code applies solely to the Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Controller of, or persons performing similar functions for, a Price Fund (whether such persons are employed by a Price Fund or third party) (Covered Officers). The Price Funds shall include each mutual fund that is managed, sponsored and distributed by affiliates of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Group). The investment managers to the Price Funds will be referred to as the Price Fund Advisers. A list of Covered Officers is attached as Exhibit A.
The Price Fund Advisers have, along with their parent, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Group) also maintained a comprehensive Code of Ethics and Conduct (the Group Code) since 1972, which applies to all officers, directors and employees of the Price Funds, Group and its affiliates.
As mandated by the Act, Group has adopted a Code (the Group S-O Code), similar to the Price Funds S-O Code, which applies solely to its principal executive and senior financial officers. The Group S-O Code and the Price Funds S-O Code will be referred to collectively as the S-O Codes.
The Price Funds S-O Code has been adopted by the Price Funds in accordance with the Act and Regulations thereunder and will be administered in conformity with the disclosure requirements of Item 2 of Form N-CSR. The S-O Codes are attachments to the Group Code. In many respects the S-O Codes are supplementary to the Group Code, but the Group Code is administered separately from the S-O Codes, as the S-O Codes are from each other.
II. Purpose of the Price Funds S-O Code. The purpose of the Price Funds S-O Code, as mandated by the Act and the Regulations, is to establish standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
Ethical Conduct. Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships.
Disclosure. Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Price Funds file with, or submit to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Price Funds.
Compliance. Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.
Reporting of Violations. The prompt internal reporting of violations of the Price Funds S-O Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Price Funds S-O Code.
Accountability. Accountability for adherence to the Price Funds S-O Code.
III. Covered Officers Should Handle Ethically Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest.
Overview. Each Covered Officer owes a duty to the Price Funds to adhere to a high standard of honesty and business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest.
A conflict of interest occurs when a Covered Officers private interest interferes with the interests of, or his or her service to, the Price Funds. For example, a conflict of interest would arise if a Covered Officer, or a member of his or her family, receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position with a Price Fund.
Certain conflicts of interest covered by the Price Funds S-O Code arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Price Funds and may already be subject to provisions regulating conflicts of interest in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Investment Company Act), the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Investment Advisers Act) and the Group Code. For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property) with a Price Fund because of their status as affiliated persons of a Price Fund. The compliance programs and procedures of the Price Funds and Price Fund Advisers are designed to prevent, or identify and correct, violations of these provisions.
Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between a Price Fund and its Price Fund Adviser (and its affiliates) of which the Covered Officers may also be officers or employees. As a result, the Price Funds S-O Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties (whether formally for the Price Funds or for the Price Fund Advisers, or for both), be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions which will have different effects on these entities. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between each Price Fund and its respective Price Fund Adviser. Such participation is also consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Price Funds and, if consistent with the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, it will be deemed to have been handled ethically.
Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Price Funds S-O Code, even if these conflicts of interest are not addressed by or subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act.
Whenever a Covered Officer is confronted with a conflict of interest situation where he or she is uncertain as to the appropriate action to be taken, he or she should discuss the matter with the Chairperson of Groups Ethics Committee or another member of the Committee.
Handling of Specific Types of Conflicts. Each Covered Officer (and close family members) must not:
Entertainment. Accept entertainment from any company with which any Price Fund or any Price Fund Adviser has current or prospective business dealings, including portfolio companies, unless such entertainment is in full compliance with the policy on entertainment as set forth in the Group Code.
Gifts. Accept any gifts, except as permitted by the Group Code.
Improper Personal Influence. Use his or her personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions, brokerage allocations or financial reporting by the Price Funds to the detriment of any one or more of the Price Funds.
Taking Action at the Expense of a Price Fund. Cause a Price Fund to take action, or fail to take action, for the personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather than for the benefit of one or more of the Price Funds.
Misuse of Price Funds Transaction Information. Use knowledge of portfolio transactions made or contemplated for a Price Fund or any other clients of the Price Fund Advisers to trade personally or cause others to trade in order to take advantage of or avoid the market impact of such portfolio transactions.
Outside Business Activities. Engage in any outside business activity that detracts from a Covered Officers ability to devote appropriate time and attention to his or her responsibilities to a Price Fund.
Service Providers. Excluding Group and its affiliates, have any ownership interest in, or any consulting or employment relationship with, any of the Price Funds service providers, except that an ownership interest in public companies is permitted
Receipt of Payments. Have a direct or indirect financial interest in commissions, transaction charges, spreads or other payments paid by a Price Fund for effecting portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest (such as compensation or equity ownership) arising from the Covered Officers employment by Group or any of its affiliates.
Service as a Director or Trustee. Serve as a director, trustee or officer of any public or private company or a non-profit organization that issues securities eligible for purchase by any of the Price Funds, unless approval is obtained as required by the Group Code.
IV. Covered Officers Specific Obligations and Accountabilities.
A. Disclosure Requirements and Controls. Each Covered Officer must familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements (Form N-1A registration statement, proxy (Schedule 14A), shareholder reports, Forms N-SAR, N-CSR, etc.) applicable to the Price Funds and the disclosure controls and procedures of the Price Fund and the Price Fund Advisers.
B. Compliance with Applicable Law. It is the responsibility of each Covered Officer to promote compliance with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to the Price Funds and the Price Fund Advisers. Each Covered Officer should, to the extent appropriate within his or her area of responsibility, consult with other officers and employees of the Price Funds and the Price Fund Advisers and take other appropriate steps with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Price Funds file with, or submit to, the SEC, and in other public communications made by the Price Funds.
C. Fair Disclosure. Each Covered Officer must not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about a Price Fund to others, whether within or outside the Price organization, including to the Price Funds directors and auditors, and to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations.
D. Initial and Annual Affirmations. Each Covered Officer must:
1. Upon adoption of the Price Funds S-O Code (or thereafter, as applicable, upon becoming a Covered Officer), affirm in writing that he or she has received, read, and understands the Price Funds S-O Code.
2. Annually affirm that he or she has complied with the requirements of the Price Funds S-O Code.
E. Reporting of Material Violations of the Price Funds S-O Code. If a Covered Officer becomes aware of any material violation of the Price Funds S-O Code or laws and governmental rules and regulations applicable to the operations of the Price Funds, he or she must promptly report the violation (Report) to the Chief Legal Counsel of the Price Funds (CLC). Failure to report a material violation will be considered itself a violation of the Price Funds S-O Code. The CLC is identified in the attached Exhibit B.
It is the Price Funds policy that no retaliation or other adverse action will be taken against any Covered Officer or other employee of a Price Fund, a Price Fund Adviser or their affiliates based upon any lawful actions of the Covered Officer or employee with respect to a Report made in good faith.
F. Annual Disclosures. Each Covered Officer must report, at least annually, all affiliations or other relationships as called for in the Annual Questionnaire for Executive Officers and/or Employee Directors/Trustees of Group and the Price Funds.
V. Administration of the Price Funds S-O Code. The Ethics Committee is responsible for administering the Price Funds S-O Code and applying its provisions to specific situations in which questions are presented.
A. Waivers and Interpretations. The Chairperson of the Ethics Committee has the authority to interpret the Price Funds S-O Code in any particular situation and to grant waivers where justified, subject to the approval of the Joint Audit Committee of the Price Funds. All material interpretations concerning Covered Officers will be reported to the Joint Audit Committee of the Price Funds at its next meeting. Waivers, including implicit waivers, to Covered Officers will be publicly disclosed as required in the Instructions to N-CSR. Pursuant to the definition in the Regulations, an implicit waiver means a Price Funds failure to take action within a reasonable period of time regarding a material departure from a provision of the Price Funds S-O Code that has been made known to an executive officer (as defined in Rule 3b-7 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of a Price Fund. An executive officer of a Price Fund includes its president and any vice-president in charge of a principal business unit, division or function.
B. Violations/Investigations. The following procedures will be followed in investigating and enforcing the Price Funds S-O Code:
1. The CLC will take or cause to be taken appropriate action to investigate any potential or actual violation reported to him or her.
2. The CLC, after consultation if deemed appropriate with Outside Counsel to the Price Funds, will make a recommendation to the appropriate Price Funds Board regarding the action to be taken with regard to each material violation. Such action could include any of the following: a letter of censure or suspension, a fine, a suspension of trading privileges or termination of officership or employment. In addition, the violator may be required to surrender any profit realized (or loss avoided) from any activity that is in violation of the Price Funds S-O Code.
VI. Amendments to the Price Funds S-O Code. Except as to the contents of Exhibit A and Exhibit B, the Price Funds S-O Code may not be materially amended except in written form, which is specifically approved or ratified by a majority vote of each Price Fund Board, including a majority of the independent directors on each Board.
VII. Confidentiality. All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to the Price Funds S-O Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law, the Price Funds S-O Code or as necessary in connection with regulations under the Price Funds S-O Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the directors of the appropriate Price Fund Board, Outside Counsel to the Price Funds, members of the Ethics Committee and the CLC and authorized persons on his or her staff.
Preparation Date: 9/30/03
Adoption Date: 10/22/03
Exhibit A
Persons Covered by the Price Funds S-O Code of
Ethics
Edward C. Bernard, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
Catherine D. Mathews, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit B
David Oestreicher, Chief Legal Counsel to the Price Funds
'1) DMO4?)^I91[&KQ\&_O'E>S]CY_C^;::+U44EF4W#:W1,210R9><;!#1@)
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M2R5#)C-RR!AM!R007!.X0R$@+*:B V,XA)0K 4SP]H2Q7++F!%
M0IB8NKF"I$#7$R4,@I.EI5-GS"/C81\B4F"JS;NH>-MS?+I-\')0 ).8-^YD)SO)
M.8-^YD)SO).8-^YD)SO).8-^YD)EOT]/P T)8KEES BH4Q,75S!4B!KB9*&04G2TJFSYI'QL(^1*3!59MW
M4G&V\R$R;]P(CC:X?'PFT73OL?4-81 B72"JK(,UDJF&\IGA[0EBN67,"*
MA3$Q=7,%2(&N)DH9!2=+2J;/FD?&PCY$I,%5FW=2<;;S(3)OW B.-KA\?";1
M=.^Q]0UA$")=(*JMP\@S62J8;RF>'M"6*Y9 4SP]H2Q7++F!%0IB8NKF"I$#7$R4,@I.EI5-GS"/C81\B4F"JS;NH>-MS
M?+I-\')0 4SP]H2Q7++F!%0IB8NKF"I$#7$R4,@I.EI5-GS"/C8
M1\B4F$JLV[J,QMN;Y=)O@Y*#F!N'B&\2N?!!P%/D!TTT]3OI%QRVI%NZ;,/:
M'74RYBNJJFZN1\?+OM2R*?;G33X*4T4^FM^)4QW49C; T)8KEES BH4Q,75S!4B!KB9*&04G2TJF
MSYI'QL(^1*3!59MW4G&V\R$R;]P(CC:X?'PFT73OL?4-81 B72"JK(,UDJ
MF&\IGA[0EBN67,"*A3$Q=7,%2(&N)DH9!2=+2J;/FD?&PCY$I,%5FW=2<;;S
M(3)OW B.-KA\?";1=.^Q]0UA$")=(*JMP\@S62J8;RF>'M"6*Y9 4SP]H2Q7++F!%0IB8NKF"I$#7$R4,@I.EI5-GS"/C
M81\B4F"JS;NH>-MS?+I-\')0" _P#\DG_6/&K[G_\ DDE,TE#]8\:ON?\ ^22_6/&K[G_^224S24/U
MCQJ^Y_\ Y)+]8\:ON?\ ^224S24/UCQJ^Y__ ))+]8\:ON?_ .224S24/UCQ
MJ^Y__DDOUCQJ^Y__ )))31ZADV,S*:*LF_&=#!T'^;
M]%*'?OGGP'W?16 ^K#L#6OZ?=#1M8?M-8]I_-?MR/;M^BK5?3>CO:VUQ])[V
M@NJ=<99/TJ3MNV_YJ2M.[J%TYG@@?=]%,'C3]+/R;K_T57Q686(QU>/D,
M:U[S8[=8'$N<&M=[GV._<:C?::O^Y-?G[F_^315;(/;I^EGY#7_HI![=/TLS
MY#7_ **C]IJ_[DU^?N;_ .32^TU?]R:_/W-_\FDJV6\?Z7\&_?\ 12WC_2]O
M!OW_ $5'[35_W)K_ ,YO_DTOM-7_ ')K_P YO_DTE6RWC_2]O ??]%+>/]+V
M\!]_T5'[35_W)K_SF_\ DTOM-7_*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN_\ ^YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^
MY\?N>J[_ /[GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN__
M .YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_P#[GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;G
MZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN__P"YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_\ [GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN_P#^YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[__
M +GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN_\ ^YXK[MN?
MK^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_ /[GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N
M?'[GJN__ .YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_P#[GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN__P"YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_\ [GBONVY^
MOZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN_P#^YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y
M\?N>J[__ +GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN_\
M^YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_ /[GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ
M_IX[-S/N?'[GJN__ .YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_P#[GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN__P"YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_\
M[GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN_P#^YXK[MN?K
M^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[__ +GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?
M'[GJN_\ ^YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?N>J[_ /[GBONVY^OZ>.S*^[;GZ_IX[-S/N?'[GJN__ .YXK[MN?K^GCLW,^Y\?NQ[S-][X^;1]S>XR
MXMVWME:N4NQN%'(7=TJW*185XV!(8;4.ZST\5E)X\$GN]R)BN.L[O__2^J=
MT#0-!.Y]W;_ 7[-6WBD\&BUZG$U0U T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0-
MT#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0- T#0-
MT#0- T&G[H]QLO\ \ZXC_P#R=OK4<)])N1MR)A\MM"#
MWFO:!%>N_=MB;*13I
I-JU
MAUO;6*N<3V_CL9Q\CQ_.=31=:*2O*;AM<(B((I9$H.=PEHD$1YO20HK61=532%U( 'I
MSNB=6R?#F_3T^KMO4?*>F91[&GP<^_O'F^T]CY'C^LQ5F-D@&L4N+@8:(,XY'U K45)B1W"QJ+T=;"F*Y_
M5T$WEQ$A$6+YJ(AF8)&PP+17!3NWPF!3<#347$!5B+Z$GJC.>TI_:%WZ?E^S
M+FOY"JVK]CR_X\U'C^;>/VW5[OY^E%RTX*3>7$2$18OFHB&9@D;# M%<%.[?
M"8%-P--1<0%6(OH2:B9[2G]H7?I^7[,N:_D*K:OV/+_CS4>/YMX_;=7N_GZ4
M7+92;RXB0B+%\P1$,S!(Z8%HK@IW;X3 IN!IJ+B JQ%]"343/:4SR%V*Q*,9
M
MS-EB,BF^>YURVVB^*5DVX43VG-N5W-G
MU-,D>'IN.L?(^<:F*YZ<'0Q>7$R<38OB!(1B9E'5!-)
E 8M4W"!N5-9ZIK;B4<,N6Q:[ 1Z/G-R)J+D_P!H]29U6(T>
MPM:9-44MO>%?QC^W6;N$K'%__]'ZIT#0- T$[GW=O\!?LU;>*3P<^]Z+=#+B
MX8*4)&6-:PH$ 8W(B*?@$1B-YF=>MQ<\_#=IWEYG'7%TM_VW;V^.R=O+@H@
M 8^V6,;;&.8Y'B]LN@/, M3$SAJ([3[1G%/-W<+7N>ZTN(SC;FU)X%CPB]
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M<2P.HP:-N8Q\/PD+S!)1\5IBOQEI23*$SSN$!8L/(6PK-0O Y9S(]W?AW&Y$\0FUQX9"YNTJ2YK">XTJ7'.#5B \+"/HK+HI(.K
M2>)'!"Z[^N+*^
G^6YET>Q]3XM]O=_/_P#)\WP=6E),H4G+8L9"
M)O$1+"):XE@=1@T;