N-CSR

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-4395

Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

125 Broad Street, New York, NY	10004
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Robert I. Frenkel, Esq.

Legg Mason & Co., LLC

300 First Stamford Place, 4^th Fl.

Stamford, CT 06902

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 451-2010

Date of fiscal year end: March 31

Date of reporting period: March 31, 2006

ITEM 1. REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS.

The Annual Report to Stockholders is filed herewith.

ANNUAL REPORT

MARCH 31, 2006

Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds

New York Money Market Portfolio

INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE

Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds

New York Money Market Portfolio

Annual Report  •  March 31, 2006

What’s

Inside

Fund Objective

The Fund seeks to provide income exempt from both regular federal income taxes* and New York State and New York City personal income taxes from a portfolio of high quality short-term municipal obligations selected for liquidity and stability of principal.

* Certain investors may be subject to the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax and state and local taxes will apply. Capital gains, if any, are fully taxable. Please consult your personal tax adviser.

Letter from the Chairman	I
Manager Overview	1
Fund at a Glance	4
Fund Expenses	5
Schedule of Investments	7
Statement of Assets and Liabilities	19
Statement of Operations	20
Statements of Changes in Net Assets	21
Financial Highlights	22
Notes to Financial Statements	24
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	32
Board Approval of Management Agreement	33
Additional Information	36
Additional Shareholder Information	40
Important Tax Information	41

“Smith Barney” and “Salomon Brothers” are service marks of Citigroup, licensed for use by Legg Mason as the names of funds and investment managers. Legg Mason and its affiliates, as well as the fund’s investment manager, are not affiliated with Citigroup.

R. JAY GERKEN, CFA

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Letter from the Chairman

Dear Shareholder,

Despite a temporary setback at the end of 2005, the U.S. economy was strong during the reporting period. After advancing 3.3% and 4.1% in the second and third quarters of 2005, respectively, fourth quarter gross domestic product (“GDP”)ⁱ growth slipped to 1.7%. This marked the first quarter in which GDP growth did not surpass 3.0% since the first three months of 2003. However, as expected, the economy rebounded sharply in the first quarter of 2006, with a preliminary estimate of 4.8% GDP growth. The economic turnaround was prompted by both strong consumer and business spending. In addition, the U.S. Labor Department reported that unemployment hit a five-year low in March.

As expected, the Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)ⁱⁱ continued to raise interest rates during the reporting period. Despite the changing of the guard from Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan to Ben Bernanke in early 2006, it was “business as usual” for the Fed, as it raised short-term interest rates eight times during the period. Since it began its tightening campaign in June 2004, the Fed has raised rates 15 consecutive times, bringing the federal funds rateⁱⁱⁱ from 1.00% to 4.75%—its highest level since April 2001. After the end of the Fund’s reporting period, at its May meeting, the Fed once again raised the federal funds rates by an additional 0.25% to 5.00%.

As expected, both short- and long-term yields rose over the reporting period. During the one-year ended March 31, 2006, two-year Treasury yields increased from 3.75% to 4.82%. Over the same period, 10-year Treasury yields moved from 4.46% to 4.86%. During most of the last three months the yield curve was inverted, with the yield on two-year Treasuries surpassing that of 10-year Treasuries. This anomaly has historically foreshadowed an economic slowdown or recession. However, some experts, including new Chairman Bernanke, believe the inverted yield curve is

New York Money Market Portfolio          I

largely a function of strong foreign demand for longer-term bonds. Looking at the municipal market, yields of both short- and longer-term securities also rose over the reporting period. However, unlike the Treasury curve, the municipal bond curve retained a positive slope.

Given the sharp increase in short-term rates, the yields available from money market instruments steadily rose over the one-year reporting period.

Please read on for a more detailed look at prevailing economic and market conditions during the Fund’s fiscal year and to learn how those conditions have affected Fund performance.

Special Shareholder Notice

On December 1, 2005, Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) completed the sale of substantially all of its asset management business to Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”). As a result, the Fund’s investment adviser (the “Manager”), previously an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Legg Mason. Completion of the sale caused the Fund’s investment management contract to terminate. The Fund’s shareholders previously approved a new investment management contract between the Fund and the Manager, which became effective on December 1, 2005.

Information About Your Fund

As you may be aware, several issues in the mutual fund industry have recently come under the scrutiny of federal and state regulators. The Fund’s Manager and some of its affiliates have received requests for information from various government regulators regarding market timing, late trading, fees, and other mutual fund issues in connection with various investigations. The regulators appear to be examining, among other things, the Fund’s response to market timing and shareholder exchange activity, including compliance with prospectus disclosure related to these subjects. The Fund has been informed that the Manager and its affiliates are responding to those information requests, but are not in a position to predict the outcome of these requests and investigations.

II         New York Money Market Portfolio

Important information concerning the Fund and its Manager with regard to recent regulatory developments is contained in the Notes to Financial Statements included in this report.

As always, thank you for your confidence in our stewardship of your assets. We look forward to helping you continue to meet your financial goals.

Sincerely,

R. Jay Gerken, CFA

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

May 10, 2006

ⁱ Gross domestic product is a market value of goods and services produced by labor and property in a given country.

ⁱⁱ The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for the formulation of a policy designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments.

ⁱⁱⁱ The federal funds rate is the interest rate that banks with excess reserves at a Federal Reserve district bank charge other banks that need overnight loans.

New York Money Market Portfolio         III

Manager Overview

Joseph P. Deane Vice President and
Investment Officer Julie P. Callahan, CFA Vice President and
Investment Officer

Q. What were the overall market conditions during the Fund’s reporting period?

A. Overall, it was a positive environment for money market investors, as yields from these securities rose in concert with rising short-term interest rates. To gain some perspective on how far we’ve come, consider the following. In May 2004, a barometer of short-term interest rates, in this case the federal funds rate,ⁱ was a mere 1.00%, its lowest level in more than 40 years. This was due, in part, to the Federal Reserve Board’s (“Fed”)ⁱⁱ attempt to stimulate the economy in the aftermath of September 11th.

Then, in June 2004, the economy appeared to be on solid footing and the Fed officially ended its accommodative monetary policy by instituting its first rate hike in four years, bringing the federal funds rate from 1.00% to 1.25%. At that time, the Fed telegraphed what it had in mind for short-term rates as it said, “policy accommodation can be removed at a pace that is likely to be measured.” The Fed certainly has been true to its word, as it has now instituted 15 straight 0.25% rate hikes through the end of March 2006 and the federal funds rate now stands at 4.75%. Money market yields have also risen sharply over this period. After the end of the Fund’s reporting period, at its May meeting, the Fed once again raised the federal funds rates by an additional 0.25% to 5.00%.

Performance Review

As of March 31, 2006, the seven-day current yield for Class A shares of the New York Money Market Portfolio was 2.62% and its seven-day effective yield, which reflects compounding, was 2.65%.¹

Certain investors may be subject to the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax, and state and local taxes may apply. Capital gains, if any, are fully taxable. Please consult your personal tax or legal adviser.

¹ The seven-day current yield reflects the amount of income generated by the investment during that seven-day period and assumes that the income is generated each week over a 365-day period. The yield is shown as a percentage of the investment. The seven-day effective yield is calculated similarly to the seven-day current yield but, when annualized, the income earned by an investment in the Fund is assumed to be reinvested. The effective yield typically will be slightly higher than the current yield because of the compounding effect of the assumed reinvestment.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         1

New York Money Market Portfolio

Yields as of March 31, 2006

	Seven-Day Current Yield1	Seven-Day Effective Yield1
Class A Shares	2.62%	2.65%
Class Y Shares	2.72%	2.75%

The performance shown represents past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown above.

Yields will fluctuate.

An investment in the Fund is neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.

Q. What were the most significant factors affecting Fund performance?

What were the leading contributors to performance?

A. For the New York Money Market Portfolio, based on our belief that the Fed would continue to raise short-term interest rates during the reporting period, the Fund’s weighted average maturity (WAM) was maintained at the lower end of our allowable range. While the Fund’s maturity can be as high as 90 days, it was below 30 days throughout the reporting period. As a result, when the Fund’s shorter-term securities matured, we were able to reinvest the proceeds and capture higher yields when the Fed raised interest rates.

What were the leading detractors from performance?

A. For the New York Money Market Portfolio, there were no detractors to performance over the period.

Q. Were there any significant changes to the Fund during the reporting period?

A. There were no significant changes to the New York Money Market Portfolio during the period. We continued to emphasize a high quality portfolio and maintain a shorter WAM to generate incremental yields in the rising interest rate environment

¹ The seven-day current yield reflects the amount of income generated by the investment during that seven-day period and assumes that the income is generated each week over a 365-day period. The yield is shown as a percentage of the investment. The seven-day effective yield is calculated similarly to the seven-day current yield but, when annualized, the income earned by an investment in the Fund is assumed to be reinvested. The effective yield typically will be slightly higher than the current yield because of the compounding effect of the assumed reinvestment.

2         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Thank you for your investment in the New York Money Market Portfolio. As ever, we appreciate that you have chosen us to manage your assets and we remain focused on achieving the Fund’s investment goals.

Sincerely,

Joseph P. Deane	Julie P. Callahan, CFA
Vice President and Investment Officer	Vice President and Investment Officer

May 10, 2006

The information provided is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Views expressed may differ from those of the firm as a whole.

RISKS: Certain Investors may be subject to the federal Alternative Minimum Tax, and state and local taxes may apply. Capital gains, if any, are fully taxable. An investment in a money market fund is neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund. Please see the Fund’s prospectus for more information on these and other risks.

ⁱ The federal funds rate is the interest rate that banks with excess reserves at a Federal Reserve district bank charge other banks that need overnight loans.

ⁱⁱ The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for the formulation of a policy designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices, and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         3

Fund at a Glance (unaudited)

4         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Fund Expenses (unaudited)

Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and/or service (12b-1) fees; and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

This example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested on October 1, 2005 and held for the six months ended March 31, 2006.

Actual Expenses

The table below titled “Based on Actual Total Return” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information provided in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. To estimate the expenses you paid on your account, divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 ending account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During the Period”.

Based on Actual Total Return(1)
	Actual Total Return(2)		Beginning Account Value		Ending Account Value		Annualized Expense Ratio		Expenses Paid During the Period(3)
Class A	1.20	%	$	1,000.00	$	1,012.00	0.55	%	$	2.76
Class Y	1.26			1,000.00		1,012.60	0.44			2.21

⁽¹⁾ For the six months ended March 31, 2006.

⁽²⁾ Assumes reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. Total return is not annualized, as it may not be representative of the total return for the year. Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower.

⁽³⁾ Expenses (net of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements) are equal to each class’ respective annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, then divided by 365.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         5

Fund Expenses (unaudited) (continued)

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table below titled “Based on Hypothetical Total Return” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use the information provided in this table to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare the 5.00% hypothetical example relating to the Fund with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table below are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as front-end or back-end sales charges (loads). Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

Based on Hypothetical Total Return(1)
	Hypothetical Annualized Total Return		Beginning Account Value		Ending Account Value		Annualized Expense Ratio		Expenses Paid During the Period(2)
Class A	5.00	%	$	1,000.00	$	1,022.19	0.55	%	$	2.77
Class Y	5.00			1,000.00		1,022.74	0.44			2.22

⁽¹⁾ For the six months ended March 31, 2006.

⁽²⁾ Expenses (net of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements) are equal to each class’ respective annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year, then divided by 365.

6         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006)

NEW YORK MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS — 98.1%
	Education — 7.8%
			Albany, NY, IDA, Civic Facilities University at Albany:
$	4,860,000	A-1	Series A, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Key Bank N.A., 3.180%, 4/6/06 (a)	$	4,860,000
	13,640,000	A-1	Series B, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Key Bank N.A., 3.180%, 4/6/06 (a)		13,640,000
	10,830,000	A-1	Series C, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Key Bank N.A., 3.180%, 4/6/06 (a)		10,830,000
	15,470,000	A-1	Series D, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Key Bank N.A., 3.180%, 4/6/06 (a)		15,470,000
	5,525,000	A-1+	Dutchess County, NY, IDA, Marist College, Series A, LOC-Bank of New York, 3.170%, 4/6/06 (a)		5,525,000
	4,170,000	A-1+	New York City, NY, IDA, Ethical Culture School Project Series A, XLCA-Insured, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.190%, 4/6/06 (a)		4,170,000
			New York State Dormitory Authority Revenue:
			Columbia University:
	2,000,000	A-1+	MSTC, SGA 132, PART, LIQ-Societe Generale, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(b)		2,000,000
	18,700,000	A-1+	Series B, 3.130%, 4/6/06 (a)		18,700,000
			Cornell University:
	9,835,000	A-1+	Series B, SPA-JPMorgan Chase, 3.130%, 4/6/06 (a)		9,835,000
			TECP:
	2,600,000	A-1+	3.080% due 4/7/06		2,600,000
	16,000,000	A-1+	3.270% due 5/22/06		16,000,000
	10,500,000	VMIG1(c)	Oxford University Press Inc. LOC-Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, 3.100%, 4/5/06 (a)		10,500,000
	3,700,000	A-1+	Rockefeller University, Series A, 3.120%, 4/5/06 (a)		3,700,000
	7,842,500	VMIG1(c)	State Personal Income Tax Revenue, Series 821, PART, FGIC-Insured, LIQ-Morgan Stanley, 3.190%, 4/6/06 (a)(b)		7,842,500
	9,945,000	A-1	State University, Series PA-622, PART, SPA-Merrill Lynch Capital Services Inc., 3.230%, 4/6/06 (a)		9,945,000
	4,330,000	VMIG1(c)	Oneida County, NY, IDA, Civic Facility, Hamilton College, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Bank of New York, 3.170%, 4/5/06 (a)(b)		4,330,000
	2,000,000	A-1+	Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational, Medical & Environmental Cultural Facilities, Series 235, PART, MBIA-Insured, LIQ-JPMorgan Chase, 3.160%, 4/6/06 (a)(b)		2,000,000
	11,890,000	VMIG1(c)	Tompkins County, NY, IDA Revenue, Civic Facilities, Ithaca College, Series B, XLCA-Insured, SPA-HSBC Bank USA, 3.160%, 4/6/06 (a)		11,890,000
			Total Education		153,837,500
	Escrowed to Maturity — 0.5%
	9,170,000	A-1	New York State Environmental Facilities Clean Water MSTC, Series 9040, Class A, PART, 3.200%, 4/6/06 (a)(d)		9,170,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         7

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	Finance — 10.2%
$	4,500,000	MIG1(c)	Buffalo, NY, Fiscal Stability Authority, BAN, Series A-1, 4.000% due 8/14/06	$	4,513,249
			Nassau County, NY, Interim Finance Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, FSA-Insured:
	14,250,000	A-1+	Series A, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.120%, 4/5/06 (a)		14,250,000
	7,065,000	A-1+	Series B, SPA-BNP Paribas, 3.110%, 4/5/06 (a)		7,065,000
			New York City, NY, TFA:
			Future Tax Secured:
	7,800,000	A-1+	Series C, SPA-Bayerische Landesbank, 3.110%, 4/3/06 (a)		7,800,000
	14,400,000	A-1+	Sub-Series C2, SPA-Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, 3.180%, 4/3/06 (a)		14,400,000
			New York City Recovery Project, Revenue:
	1,415,000	A-1+	Series 1, Sub-Series 1-C, LIQ-JPMorgan Chase, 3.110%, 4/3/06 (a)		1,415,000
	26,550,000	A-1+	Series 3, Sub-Series 3-H, SPA-Royal Bank of Canada, 3.110%, 4/3/06 (a)		26,550,000
	11,355,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series, 2-F, LIQ-Bayerische Landesbank, 3.180%, 4/3/06 (a)		11,355,000
			New York City, NY, TFA Revenue:
	5,300,000	A-1+	Future Tax Secured, Series B, SPA-Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, 3.160%, 4/3/06 (a)		5,300,000
			New York City Recovery Project, Series 3:
	6,300,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series 3-E, SPA-Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, 3.160%, 4/3/06 (a)		6,300,000
	10,600,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series 3-F, SPA-Royal Bank of Canada, 3.180%, 4/3/06 (a)		10,600,000
	33,340,000	A-1+	New York State, Series A, LOC-Bayerische Landesbank & Westdeutsche Landesbank, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		33,340,000
			New York State LGAC:
	13,225,000	A-1+	Refunding, Subordinated Lien, Series 4V, FSA-Insured, SPA-Westdeustche Landesbank, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		13,225,000
	26,025,000	A-1+	Series 3V, Refunding, FGIC-Insured, SPA-Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		26,025,000
	276,000	A-1+	Series B, LOC-Bank of Nova Scotia, 3.100%, 4/5/06 (a)		276,000
	200,000	A-1+	Series E, LOC-Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		200,000
	350,000	A-1+	Series SGA 59, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Societe Generale, 3.180%, 4/3/06 (a)(b)		350,000
	11,100,000	A-1+	New York State Local Government Assistance Corp., Revenue, Series C, LOC-Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, 3.100%, 4/5/06 (a)(b)		11,100,000
	6,345,000	VMIG1(c)	Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., CTFS, Series 520, PART, MBIA-Insured, LIQ-Morgan Stanley, 3.180%, 4/6/06 (a)(b)		6,345,000
			Total Finance		200,409,249

See Notes to Financial Statements.

8         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	General Obligation — 11.4%
$	21,000,000	MIG1(c)	Brookhaven & Smithtown, NY, Three Village Central School District, TAN, 4.000% due 6/30/06	$	21,069,122
	1,750,000	Aa2(c)	East Williston, NY, Union Free School District, TAN, 3.750% due 6/28/06		1,754,602
	28,000,000	MIG1(c)	Half Hollow Hills, NY, Central School District, TAN, 4.000% due 6/30/06		28,082,268
			New York City, NY:
			GO:
	2,400,000	A-1+	A-4, LOC-Bayerische Landesbank, 3.160%, 4/3/06 (a)		2,400,000
	600,000	A-1+	MSTC, Series SGB 35, AMBAC-Insured, LOC-Societe Generale, 3.170%, 4/6/06 (a)(b)		600,000
	36,570,000	A-1+	Series A, Sub-Series A-3, LOC-BNP Paribas, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		36,570,000
	200,000	A-1+	Series B2, Sub-Series B5, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, 3.090%, 4/3/06 (a)		200,000
	600,000	A-1+	Series F-6, LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		600,000
	2,830,000	A-1+	Series H, Sub-Series H-2, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Wachovia Bank, 3.090%, 4/3/06 (a)		2,830,000
	19,250,000	A-1+	Series J, Sub-Series J-2, LOC-Westdeutsche Landesbank, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		19,250,000
	3,800,000	A-1	Series B2, Sub-Series B5, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Bank of Nova Scotia, 3.090%, 4/3/06 (a)		3,800,000
	4,000,000	A-1+	Series H-5, MBIA-Insured, LIQ-Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, TECP, 3.130% due 5/16/06		4,000,000
			Subordinated:
	1,500,000	A-1+	Series A-9, LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		1,500,000
	13,045,000	A-1+	Series H-1, LOC-Bank of New York, 3.160%, 4/3/06 (a)		13,045,000
			New York State:
	9,380,000	A-1+	Series A, LOC-Dexia Credit Local, 3.150% due 8/3/06		9,380,000
	47,800,000	A-1+	TECP, Series 98A, LOC-Bayerische Landesbank, JPMorgan Chase & Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, 3.200% due 5/1/06		47,800,000
	17,014,936	Aa2(c)	Pittsford, NY, Central School District, BAN, 4.000% due 6/20/06		17,041,020
	15,000,000	MIG1(c)	Syracuse City, NY, RAN, Series D, LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 4.000% due 6/30/06		15,039,896
			Total General Obligation		224,961,908
	Government Facilities — 9.8%
			Jay Street Development Corp.:
	12,095,000	A-1+	Court Facilities Lease Revenue: Series A, LOC-Depfa Bank PLC, 3.130%, 4/3/06 (a)		12,095,000
	30,895,000	A-1+	Series A-1, LOC-Bank of America, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		30,895,000
	6,070,000	A-1+	Series A-2, LOC-Depfa Bank PLC, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		6,070,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         9

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	Government Facilities — 9.8% (continued)
$	33,430,000	A-1+	Series A-3, LOC-Depfa Bank PLC, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)	$	33,430,000
	1,700,000	A-1+	Series A-4, LOC-Depfa Bank PLC, 3.130%, 4/3/06 (a)		1,700,000
	77,030,000	A-1+	New York State Dormitory Authority Revenue, Court Facilities Lease, Series B, LOC-Bayerische Landesbank, 3.130%, 4/5/06 (a)		77,030,000
			New York State Urban Development Corp.:
	21,105,000	A-1+	Putters Series 313, PART, SPA-JPMorgan Chase, 3.210%, 4/6/06 (a)(b)		21,105,000
	11,170,000	VMIG1(c)	Revenue, MERLOT, Series N, PART, SPA-Wachovia Bank, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(b)		11,170,000
			Total Government Facilities		193,495,000
	Hospitals — 8.0%
			Nassau Health Care Corp.:
	17,430,000	A-1+	Sub-Series 2004-C1, Refunding, FSA-Insured, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.130%, 4/6/06 (a)		17,430,000
	2,880,000	A-1+	Sub-Series 2004-C2, FSA-Insured, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.090%, 4/6/06 (a)		2,880,000
	20,400,000	A-1+	Sub-Series 2004-C3, FSA-Insured, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.140%, 4/6/06 (a)		20,400,000
	2,195,000	VMIG1(c)	New York City, NY, IDA, Peninsula Hospital Center Project, LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 3.450%, 4/6/06 (a)		2,195,000
			New York State Dormitory Authority Revenue:
	2,280,000	AAA	Long Island Jewish Medical Center, MBIA-Insured, 5.000% due 7/1/06		2,290,631
	13,050,000	A-1+	Mental Health Facilities Improvement, Series F-2A, FSA-Insured, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.160%, 4/6/06 (a)		13,050,000
	4,325,000	A-1+	Mental Health Services Facilities, Series F-2C, FSA Insured, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.170%, 4/6/06 (a)		4,325,000
			Mental Health Services:
	38,000,000	A-1+	Sub-Series D-2A, MBIA-Insured, SPA-JPMorgan Chase, 3.160%, 4/6/06 (a)		38,000,000
	10,600,000	A-1+	Sub-Series D-2B, FSA-Insured, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.130%, 4/6/06 (a)		10,600,000
	10,300,000	A-1+	Sub-Series D-2C, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, 3.120%, 4/6/06 (a)		10,300,000
	12,910,000	A-1+	Sub-Series D-2D, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, 3.120%, 4/6/06 (a)		12,910,000
	8,000,000	VMIG1(c)	Ontario County, NY, IDA Revenue, Frederick Ferris Thompson Hospital, Series B, LOC-Key Bank of New York, 3.180%, 4/5/06 (a)		8,000,000
			Orange County, NY, IDA:
	9,520,000	A-1+	Civic Facility Revenue, Arden Hill Hospital Project, FSA-Insured, SPA-Morgan Stanley, 3.150%, 4/6/06 (a)		9,520,000
	4,840,000	A-1+	Civic Faciltiy Revenue, Horton Medical Center, Series A, FSA-Insured, SPA-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/6/06 (a)		4,840,000
	1,335,000	A-1+	Revenue, Horton Medical Center Project, FSA-Insured, SPA-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/6/06 (a)		1,335,000
			Total Hospitals		158,075,631

See Notes to Financial Statements.

10         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	Housing: Multi-Family — 8.8%
$	15,000,000	A-1+	New York City Housing Development Corp., MFH Revenue, Series A, LIQ-FNMA, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)	$	15,000,000
			New York City, NY, HDC:
	26,910,000	A-1+	2 Gold Series A, LOC-Bank of America, 3.190%, 4/5/06 (a)		26,910,000
	16,150,000	A-1+	Multi-Family Rent Housing Revenue, Lyric Development, Series A, FNMA-Insured LIQ-FNMA, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		16,150,000
			MFH Rent Revenue:
	5,000,000	A-1+	100 Jane Street Development, Series A, FNMA-Insured, 3.190%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		5,000,000
	13,500,000	A-1+	One Columbus Place Development, Series A, FNMA-Collateralized, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		13,500,000
	8,000,000	A-1+	Related Sierra Development, Series A, LIQ-FNMA, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		8,000,000
	3,120,000	A-1+	Related Monterey, Series A, LIQ-FNMA, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		3,120,000
			New York State HFA:
	10,000,000	VMIG1(b)	20 River Terrace Housing, Series A, FNMA-Insured, LIQ-FNMA, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		10,000,000
	3,000,000	VMIG1(b)	240 East 39th Street Housing, Series A, LIQ-FNMA, 3.210%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		3,000,000
	3,000,000	VMIG1(b)	Chelsea Arms Housing, Series A, FNMA-Collateralized, 3.180%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		3,000,000
	2,300,000	VMIG1(b)	Historic Front Street, Series A, LOC-Bank of New York, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		2,300,000
			Revenue:
	4,550,000	VMIG1(b)	350 West 43rd Street, Series A, LOC-Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, 3.190%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		4,550,000
	9,100,000	A-1+	Normandie Court I Project, LOC-Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen Girozentrale, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		9,100,000
			Service Contract Revenue:
	22,500,000	A-1+	Series A, LOC-Westdeutsche Landesbank, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		22,500,000
	6,500,000	A-1+	Series B, LOC-BNP Paribas, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		6,500,000
	11,200,000	A-1+	Series E, LOC-BNP Paribas, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		11,200,000
	10,400,000	VMIG1(b)	Union Square South Housing, FNMA-Collateralized, 3.180%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		10,400,000
	2,000,000	VMIG1(b)	Victory Housing, Series 2002-A, FHLMC-Insured LIQ-FHLMC, 3.180%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		2,000,000
	2,000,000	VMIG1(b)	Worth Street, Series A, FNMA-Insured LIQ-FNMA, 3.180%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		2,000,000
			Total Housing: Multi-Family		174,230,000
	Housing: Single Family — 3.1%
			New York State Mortgage Agency Revenue:
	20,000,000	VMIG1(c)	37th Series, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		20,000,000
			Homeowner Mortgage:
	9,975,000	A-1+	Series 115, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.210%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		9,975,000
	26,400,000	VMIG1(c)	Series 122, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.180%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		26,400,000
	5,000,000	VMIG1(c)	Series 132, SPA-Dexia Credit Local, 3.180%, 4/3/06 (a)		5,000,000
			Total Housing: Single Family		61,375,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         11

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	Industrial Development — 3.6%
$	1,315,000	VMIG1(c)	Erie County, NY, IDA, IDR, Rosina Food Products, Inc., LOC-HSBC Bank USA, 3.300%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)	$	1,315,000
	2,505,000	A-1+	Lancaster, NY, IDA, IDR, Sealing Devices, Inc. Facility, LOC-HSBC Bank USA, 3.300%, 4/6/06 (a)(e)		2,505,000
	2,750,000	VMIG1(c)	Liberty, NY, Development Corp. Revenue, 377 Greenwich LLC, LOC-Wells Fargo Bank NA, 3.140%, 4/6/06 (a)		2,750,000
	205,000	A-1+	Monroe County, NY, IDA, JADA Precision, LOC-Bank of America, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		205,000
	2,620,000	A-1+	Nassau County, NY, IDA, IDR, Rubies Costume Co. Project, LOC-Bank of America, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)		2,620,000
			New York City, NY, IDA Revenue:
	4,965,000	VMIG1(c)	Center For Jewish History Project, LOC-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/6/06 (a)		4,965,000
	5,300,000	A-1+	Children’s Oncology Society, LOC-Bank of New York, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		5,300,000
	2,700,000	A-1+	NY Stock Exchange Project, Series B, LOC-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/6/06 (a)		2,700,000
	1,600,000	F-1+(f)	Planned Parenthood Project, LOC-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/6/06 (a)		1,600,000
			New York City, NY, IDA, IDR:
	3,760,000	VMIG1(c)	Ahava Food Corp. Project, LOC-Bank of America, 3.250%, 4/6/06 (a)(e)		3,760,000
	4,300,000	A-1+	Gary Plastic Packaging Corp., LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 3.300%, 4/6/06 (a)(e)		4,300,000
	1,770,000	A-1+	PS Bibbs Inc., LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 3.300%, 4/6/06 (a)(e)		1,770,000
	3,500,000	VMIG1(c)	Newburgh, NY, IDA Revenue, Community Development Properties Project, Series A, LOC-KeyBank NA, 3.190%, 4/6/06 (a)		3,500,000
	1,125,000	A-1+	Oneida County, NY, IDA Revenue, Harden Furniture, LOC-Bank of America, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		1,125,000
	3,300,000	A-1+	Onondaga County, NY, IDA Revenue, Syracuse Executive Air Service, Series A, LOC-Bank of America, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		3,300,000
	1,575,000	A-1+	Ontario County, NY, IDA, IDR, Dixit Enterprises, Series B, LOC-HSBC Bank USA, 3.300%, 4/6/06 (a)(e)		1,575,000
	2,210,000	A-1+	Oswego County, NY, IDR Revenue, Fulton Thermal Project Corp., LOC-Bank of America, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		2,210,000
	12,000,000	A-1+	Rensselaer County, NY, IDA Revenue, Hawthorne Ridge Project, LOC-Royal Bank of Scotland, 3.130%, 4/6/06 (a)		12,000,000
	1,330,000	P-1(c)	Schenectady County, NY, IDA, IDR, Refunding, Scotia Industrial Park Project, Series 98-A, LOC-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		1,330,000
	3,265,000	A-1+	St. Lawrence County, NY, IDA, Civic Facilities Revenue, United Helpers Independent Living Corp., LOC-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		3,265,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

12         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	Industrial Development — 3.6% (continued)
$	3,690,000	A-1+	Suffolk County, NY, IDA, IDR, JBC Realty LLC, LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)	$	3,690,000
	4,725,000	A-1+	Westchester County, NY, IDA, Boys & Girls Club Project, LOC-Bank of New York, 3.170%, 4/5/06 (a)		4,725,000
			Total Industrial Development		70,510,000
	Life Care Systems — 0.6%
	11,200,000	VMIG1(c)	Monroe County, NY, IDA, Civic Facilities Revenue, St. Anns Home For Aged Project, LOC-HSBC Bank USA, 3.180%, 4/5/06 (a)		11,200,000
	Miscellaneous — 2.7%
	40,905,000	A-1+	Oneida Indian Nation, GO, Series 2002, LOC-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		40,905,000
	3,825,000	A-1+	Onondaga County, NY, IDA, Community College Housing, Series A, LOC-Royal Bank of Scotland, 3.190%, 4/6/06 (a)		3,825,000
	9,320,000	VMIG1(c)	Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational, Medical & Environmental Cultural Facilities Revenue, Floater Certificates, Series 464, PART, MBIA-Insured, LIQ-Morgan Stanley, 3.180%, 4/6/06 (a)(b)		9,320,000
			Total Miscellaneous		54,050,000
	Pollution Control — 0.0%
	750,000	AAA	New York State Environmental Facilities Corp., PCR, Refunding, Street Water Revolving Fund E, MBIA-Insured, 5.500% due 6/15/06		753,579
	Public Facilities — 2.7%
			New York City, NY, Trust for Cultural Resources Revenue:
	3,035,000	VMIG1(c)	American Museum of Natural History, Series 162, AMBAC-Insured, LIQ-Morgan Stanley, 3.190%, 4/6/06 (a)		3,035,000
	12,000,000	A-1+	Pierpont Morgan Library, LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 3.160%, 4/6/06 (a)		12,000,000
	2,400,000	A-1	New York City, NY, Trust for Cultural Resources, Museum of Broadcasting, LOC-KBC Bank NV, 3.130%, 4/5/06 (a)		2,400,000
			New York State Dormitory Authority Revenue:
			Metropolitan Museum of Art:
	12,440,000	A-1+	Series A, 3.120%, 4/5/06 (a)		12,440,000
	4,240,000	A-1+	Series B, 3.120%, 4/5/06 (a)		4,240,000
			New York Public Library:
	9,510,000	A-1+	Series A, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Wachovia Bank, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		9,510,000
	9,060,000	A-1+	Series B, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Wachovia Bank, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		9,060,000
			Total Public Facilities		52,685,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         13

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	Solid Waste — 2.7%
			New York State Environmental Facilities Corp.:
			Series 97A, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, TECP, LOC-Bayerische Landesbank & Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen:
$	9,700,000	A-1+	3.160% due 5/15/06	$	9,700,000
	8,000,000	A-1+	3.130% due 5/16/06		8,000,000
	6,200,000	A-1+	3.080% due 5/18/06		6,200,000
	5,000,000	A-1+	3.180% due 6/2/06		5,000,000
	5,000,000	A-1+	Seneca County, NY, IDA, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, Seneca Meadows Inc. Project, LOC-Bank of America, 3.200%, 4/6/06 (a)		5,000,000
	19,450,000	A-1+	Solid Waste Disposal Revenue, Waste Management Inc., Series B, LOC-JPMorgan Chase, 3.230%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		19,450,000
			Total Solid Waste		53,350,000
	Transportation — 10.5%
			Metropolitan Transportation Authority of New York Revenue:
	16,055,000	A-1+	Dedicated Tax Fund, Series D-1, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Wachovia Bank, 3.180%, 4/6/06 (a)		16,055,000
	10,975,000	A-1+	Revenue, Refunding, Series D-1, FSA-Insured, SPA-Westdeutsche Landesbank, 3.130%, 4/6/06 (a)		10,975,000
	33,800,000	A-1+	Series D-2, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Wachovia Bank, 3.160%, 4/6/06 (a)		33,800,000
	8,000,000	A-1+	Sub-Series E-1, LOC-Fortis Bank NY, 3.140%, 4/6/06 (a)		8,000,000
	9,830,000	A-1+	Sub-Series E-2, LOC-Fortis Bank SA, 3.170%, 4/6/06 (a)		9,830,000
	6,000,000	A-1+	TECP, LOC-ABN AMRO Bank N.V., 3.470% due 6/12/06		6,000,000
			New York State Thruway Authority, MSTC:
	5,000,000	A-1+	Class A, Series 2001-120, FGIC-Insured, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)		5,000,000
	8,845,000	A-1	Series 2001-120, Class A, FGIC-Insured, LIQ-Bear Stearns, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(b)		8,845,000
			Port Authority of New York & New Jersey:
	7,860,000	A-1+	Putters Series 177Z, PART, LIQ-JPMorgan Chase, 3.240%, 4/6/06 (a)		7,860,000
	4,755,000	A-1+	Series 646, FSA-Insured, LIQ-Morgan Stanley, 3.190%, 4/6/06 (a)(b)		4,755,000
	3,465,000	VMIG1(c)	Puerto Rico Commonwealth Highway & Transportation Authority Revenue, MERLOT, Series FFF, PART, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Wachovia Bank, 3.180%, 4/5/06 (a)(b)		3,465,000
			Puerto Rico Commonwealth Highway & Transportation Authority, Highway Revenue:
	1,760,000	A-1+	Floats PA 472, FSA-Insured, LIQ-Merrill Lynch, 3.160%, 4/6/06 (a)		1,760,000
	1,000,000	A-1	Series A, AMBAC-Insured, SPA-Bank of Nova Scotia, 3.130%, 4/5/06 (a)		1,000,000
			Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority:
			MSTC:
	5,135,000	VMIG1(c)	Class A Series 2000-109, PART, LIQ-Bear Stearns, 3.180%, 4/3/06 (a)(b)		5,135,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

14         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	Transportation — 10.5% (continued)
$	27,000,000	A-1+	Gem Subordinated Series B-3, SPA-Bank of America, 3.150%, 4/6/06 (a)	$	27,000,000
	28,150,000	A-1+	Refunding, Series F, SPA-ABN AMRO Bank N.V., 3.160%, 4/6/06 (a)		28,150,000
	14,475,000	AAA	Series 1992-72, Class A, PART, MBIA-Insured, LIQ-Bear Stearns, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(b)		14,475,000
	2,040,000	A-1+	Series B, FSA-Insured, SPA-Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, 3.150%, 4/5/06 (a)		2,040,000
	13,000,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series B-4, SPA-Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, 3.140%, 4/6/06 (a)		13,000,000
			Total Transportation		207,145,000
	Utilities — 10.6%
			Long Island Power Authority, NY, Electric System Revenue:
			Series 1:
	7,950,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series 1A, LOC-Bayerische Landesbank & Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		7,950,000
	9,640,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series 1B, LOC-State Street Bank & Trust Co., 3.180%, 4/3/06 (a)		9,640,000
	15,050,000	A-1+	Series 2, Subordinated Series 2A, LOC-Westdeutsche Landesbank, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		15,050,000
	400,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series 2, Sub-Series 2B, LOC-Bayerische Landesbank, 3.130%, 4/3/06 (a)		400,000
	5,000,000	A-1+	Series 7, Subordinated Series 7-A, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Fortis Bank SA/NV, 3.100%, 4/5/06 (a)		5,000,000
	34,400,000	A-1+	Series 7, Subordinated Series 7-B, MBIA-Insured, SPA-Fortis Bank NY, 3.140%, 4/5/06 (a)		34,400,000
			New York State Energy Research & Development Authority:
			Consolidated Edison Co.:
	9,400,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series A-2, LOC-Wachovia Bank, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		9,400,000
	13,280,000	VMIG1(c)	Long Island Lighting Co., Series A, LOC-Royal Bank of Scotland, 3.210%, 4/5/06 (a)(e)		13,280,000
	23,000,000	A-1+	Subordinated Series A-3, LOC-Wachovia Bank, 3.160%, 4/5/06 (a)		23,000,000
			New York State Power Authority, TECP:
			Series 1, LIQ-Bank of New York, Bank of Nova Scotia, Bayerische Landesbank, JP Morgan Chase, Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen, State Street Bank & Trust Co. & Wachovia Bank:
	10,000,000	A-1+	3.110% due 4/4/06		10,000,000
	10,000,000	A-1+	3.230% due 5/4/06		10,000,000
	5,931,000	A-1+	3.250% due 5/4/06		5,931,000

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         15

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Face Amount		Rating‡	Security	Value
	Utilities — 10.6% (continued)
			Series 2, LIQ-Bank of New York, Bank of Nova Scotia, Bayerische Landesbank, Dexia Credit Local & JPMorgan Chase, Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg, State Street Bank & Trust Co. & Wachovia Bank:
$	30,000,000	A-1+	3.100% due 4/3/06	$	30,000,000
	33,800,000	A-1+	3.220% due 5/2/06		33,800,000
			Total Utilities		207,851,000
	Water and Sewer — 5.1%
			New York City, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority:
	23,000,000	A-1+	Series A, FGIC-Insured, SPA-FGIC, 3.160%, 4/3/06 (a)		23,000,000
	2,500,000	A-1+	Sub-Series C-2, SPA-Depfa Bank PLC, 3.140%, 4/6/06 (a)		2,500,000
			TECP:
	10,000,000	A-1+	Series 1, LIN-Dexia Credit Local & JPMorgan Chase, 3.110% due 4/10/06		10,000,000
	10,000,000	A-1+	Series 5B, LIQ-Bayerische Landesbank & Westdeutsche Landesbank, 3.180% due 4/3/06		10,000,000
	5,000,000	A-1+	Series 7, 3.470% due 6/1/06		5,000,000
			Water & Sewer System Revenue:
			Fiscal 2003:
	15,800,000	A-1+	Sub-Series C-1, SPA-Depfa Bank PLC, 3.180%, 4/3/06 (a)		15,800,000
	19,310,000	A-1+	Sub-Series C-3, SPA-Bank of New York, 3.130%, 4/3/06 (a)		19,310,000
	5,500,000	A-1+	Series G, FGIC-Insured, SPA-FGIC, 3.130%, 4/3/06 (a)		5,500,000
	9,990,000	A-1	New York State Environmental Facilities Clean Water (MSTC), PART, Series 9040, Class A, LIQ-Bear Stearns, 3.200%, 4/5/06 (a)(b)		9,990,000
			Total Water and Sewer		101,100,000
			TOTAL INVESTMENTS — 98.1% (Cost — $1,934,198,867#)		1,934,198,867
			Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 1.9%		36,748,524
			TOTAL NET ASSETS — 100.0%	$	1,970,947,391

‡ All ratings are by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service, unless otherwise noted. All ratings are unaudited.

(a) Variable rate demand obligations have a demand feature under which the Fund can tender them back to the issuer on no more than 7 days notice. Date shown is the date of the next interest rate change.

(b) Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This security may be resold in transactions that are exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. This security has been deemed liquid pursuant to guidelines approved by the Board of Trustees, unless otherwise noted.

(c) Rating by Moody’s Investors Service.

(d) Bonds are escrowed to maturity by government securities and/or U.S. government agency securities and are considered by the Manager to be triple-A rated even if issuer has not applied for new ratings.

(e) Income from this issue is considered a preference item for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax (“AMT”).

(f) Rating by Fitch Ratings Service.

# Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is substantially the same.

See page 18 for definitions of ratings.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

16         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Schedule of Investments (March 31, 2006) (continued)

Abbreviations used in this schedule:
AMBAC	— Ambac Assurance Corporation
BAN	— Bond Anticipation Notes
CTFS	— Certificates
FGIC	— Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHLMC	— Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA	— Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA	— Financial Security Assurance
GO	— General Obligation
HDC	— Housing Development Corporation
HFA	— Housing Finance Authority
IDA	— Industrial Development Authority
IDR	— Industrial Development Revenue
LGAC	— Local Government Assistance Corporation
LIN	— Line of Credit
LIQ	— Liquidity Facility
LOC	— Letter of Credit
MBIA	— Municipal Bond Investors Assurance Corporation
MERLOT	— Municipal Exempt Receipts Liquidity Option Tender
MFH	— Multi-Family Housing
MSTC	— Municipal Securities Trust Certificates
PART	— Partnership Structure
PCR	— Pollution Control Revenue
RAN	— Revenue Anticipation Notes
SPA	— Standby Bond Purchase Agreement
TAN	— Tax Anticipation Notes
TECP	— Tax Exempt Commercial Paper
TFA	— Transitional Finance Authority
XLCA	— XL Capital Assurance Inc.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         17

Bond Ratings (unaudited)

The definitions of the applicable rating symbols are set forth below:

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service (“Standard & Poor’s”) — Ratings of “AA” may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standings within the major rating categories.

AAA — Bonds rated “AAA” have the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor’s. Capacity to pay interest and repay principal is extremely strong.

AA — Bonds rated “AA” have a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differ from the highest rated issues only in a small degree.

Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”)—Numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 may be applied to each generic rating of “Aa” where 1 is the highest and 3 the lowest ranking within its generic category.

Aaa — Bonds rated “Aaa” are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as “gilt edge.” Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues.

Aa — Bonds rated “Aa” are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the “Aaa” group they comprise what are generally known as high grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large as in “Aaa” securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in “Aaa” securities.

Fitch Rating Service (“Fitch”) — Rating of “AA” may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standings within the major rating categories.

AAA — Bonds rated “AAA” have the highest rating assigned by Fitch. Capacity to pay interest and repay principal is extremely strong.

AA — Bonds rated “AA” have a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differ from the highest rated issues only in a small degree.

Short-Term Security Ratings (unaudited)

SP-1 — Standard & Poor’s highest rating indicating very strong or strong capacity to pay principal and interest; those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are denoted with a plus (+) sign.

A-1 — Standard & Poor’s highest commercial paper and variable-rate demand obligation (VRDO) rating indicating that the degree of safety regarding timely payment is either overwhelming or very strong; those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are denoted with a plus (+) sign.

VMIG 1 — Moody’s highest rating for issues having a demand feature — VRDO.

P-1 — Moody’s highest rating for commercial paper and for VRDO prior to the advent of the VMIG 1 rating.

F-1 — Fitch’s highest rating indicating the strongest capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; those issues determined to possess overwhelming strong credit feature are denoted with a plus (+) sign.

NR — Indicates that the bond is not rated by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s or Fitch.

18         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Statement of Assets and Liabilities (March 31, 2006)

ASSETS:
Investments, at amortized cost	$	1,934,198,867
Cash		13,331
Receivable for Fund shares sold		44,803,346
Receivable for securities sold		14,810,996
Interest receivable		9,460,576
Deferred compensation		29,041
Prepaid expenses		21,684
Total Assets		2,003,337,841
LIABILITIES:
Payable for Fund shares repurchased		31,228,367
Investment management fee payable		733,310
Distributions payable		240,270
Distribution fees payable		54,530
Deferred compensation payable		29,041
Trustees’ fees payable		2,129
Accrued expenses		102,803
Total Liabilities		32,390,450
Total Net Assets	$	1,970,947,391
NET ASSETS:
Par value (Note 5)	$	1,970,898
Paid-in capital in excess of par value		1,968,976,445
Undistributed net investment income		48
Total Net Assets	$	1,970,947,391
Shares Outstanding:
Class A		1,805,536,421
Class Y		165,361,404
Net Asset Value:
Class A (and redemption price)		$1.00
Class Y (and redemption price)		$1.00

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         19

Statement of Operations (For the year ended March 31, 2006)

INVESTMENT INCOME:
Interest	$	50,228,474
EXPENSES:
Investment management fee (Note 2)		8,380,602
Distribution fees (Notes 2 and 3)		1,718,805
Transfer agent fees (Notes 2 and 3)		383,801
Custody fees		89,532
Shareholder reports (Note 3)		70,406
Registration fees		49,173
Insurance		44,931
Audit and tax		29,500
Legal fees		19,320
Trustees’ fees		12,537
Miscellaneous expenses		14,899
Total Expenses		10,813,506
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursement (Note 2)		(39,577	)
Net Expenses		10,773,929
Net Investment Income		39,454,545
Net Realized Gain on Investments		11,801
Increase in Net Assets From Operations	$	39,466,346

See Notes to Financial Statements.

20         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Statements of Changes in Net Assets (For the years ended March 31,)

	2006			2005
OPERATIONS:
Net investment income	$	39,454,545		$	16,630,680
Net realized gain		11,801			233,628
Increase in Net Assets From Operations		39,466,346			16,864,308
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM (NOTES 1 AND 4):
Net investment income		(39,454,547	)		(16,630,680	)
Net realized gains		(32,395	)		(280,057	)
Decrease in Net Assets From Distributions to Shareholders		(39,486,942	)		(16,910,737	)
FUND SHARE TRANSACTIONS (NOTE 5):
Net proceeds from sale of shares		8,051,658,283			7,091,323,350
Reinvestment of distributions		38,610,638			15,678,727
Cost of shares repurchased		(8,055,072,422	)		(7,138,637,708	)
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Fund Share Transactions		35,196,499			(31,635,631	)
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets		35,175,903			(31,682,060	)
NET ASSETS:
Beginning of year		1,935,771,488			1,967,453,548
End of year*	$	1,970,947,391		$	1,935,771,488
* Includes undistributed net investment income of:		$48			$50

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         21

Financial Highlights

For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended March 31:

Class A Shares	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year	$	1.000		$	1.000		$	1.000		$	1.000		$	1.000
Income From Operations:
Net investment income and net realized gain		0.021			0.008			0.004			0.007			0.017
Total Income From Operations		0.021			0.008			0.004			0.007			0.017
Less Distributions From:
Net investment income and net realized gains		(0.021	)		(0.008	)		(0.004	)		(0.007	)		(0.017	)
Total Distributions		(0.021	)		(0.008	)		(0.004	)		(0.007	)		(0.017	)
Net Asset Value, End of Year	$	1.000		$	1.000		$	1.000		$	1.000		$	1.000
Total Return(1)		2.13	%		0.86	%		0.42	%		0.74	%		1.67	%
Net Assets, End of Year (millions)		$1,806			$1,810			$1,915			$1,828			$2,044
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Gross expenses		0.59	%		0.60	%		0.60	%		0.64	%		0.64	%
Net expenses(2)		0.59	(3)		0.59	(3)		0.60			0.64			0.64
Net investment income		2.11			0.84			0.41			0.74			1.65

⁽¹⁾ Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower.

⁽²⁾ As a result of a voluntary expense limitation, the ratio of expenses to average net assets of Class A will not exceed 0.80%.

⁽³⁾ The investment manager voluntarily waived a portion of its fees.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

22         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Financial Highlights (continued)

For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended March 31, unless otherwise noted:

Class Y Shares	2006			2005			2004(1)
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Year	$	1.000		$	1.000		$	1.000
Income From Operations:
Net investment income and net realized gain		0.022			0.010			0.002
Total Income From Operations		0.022			0.010			0.002
Less Distributions From:
Net investment income and net realized gains		(0.022	)		(0.010	)		(0.002	)
Total Distributions		(0.022	)		(0.010	)		(0.002	)
Net Asset Value, End of Year	$	1.000		$	1.000		$	1.000
Total Return(2)		2.26	%		0.98	%		0.17	%
Net Assets, End of Year (millions)		$165			$126			$52
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
Gross expenses		0.46	%		0.48	%		0.47	%(3)
Net expenses(4)		0.46	(5)		0.47	(5)		0.47	(3)
Net investment income		2.27			1.00			0.51	(3)

⁽¹⁾ For the period December 3, 2003 (inception date) to March 31, 2004.

⁽²⁾ Performance figures may reflect voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. In the absence of voluntary fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized.

⁽³⁾ Annualized.

⁽⁴⁾ As a result of a voluntary expense limitation, the ratio of expenses to average net assets of Class Y will not exceed 0.70%.

⁽⁵⁾ The investment manager voluntarily waived a portion of its fees.

See Notes to Financial Statements.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         23

Notes to Financial Statements

1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

New York Money Market Portfolio (the “Fund”) is a separate non-diversified investment fund of Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds (formerly known as Smith Barney Muni Funds) (“Trust”). The Trust, a Massachusetts business trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company.

The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Estimates and assumptions are required to be made regarding assets, liabilities and changes in net assets resulting from operations when financial statements are prepared. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ.

(a) Investment Valuation. Money Market instruments are valued at amortized cost, in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, which approximates market value. This method involves valuing portfolio securities at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. The Fund’s use of amortized cost is subject to their compliance with certain conditions as specified under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act.

(b) Security Transactions and Investment Income. Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on the accrual basis. The cost of investments sold is determined by use of the specific identification method.

(c) Distributions to Shareholders. Distributions from net investment income on the shares of the Fund are declared each business day to shareholders of record and are paid monthly. The Fund intends to satisfy conditions that will enable interest from municipal securities, which is exempt from federal and certain state income taxes, to retain such tax-exempt status when distributed to the shareholders of the Fund. Distributions of net realized gains, if any, are taxable and are declared at least annually. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.

(d) Class Accounting. Investment income, common expenses and realized/unrealized gain (loss) on investments are allocated to the various classes of the Fund on the basis of daily net assets of each class. Fees relating to a specific class are charged directly to that class.

(e) Federal and Other Taxes. It is the Fund’s policy to comply with the federal income and excise tax requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies. Accordingly, the Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net realized gains on investments, if any, to shareholders each year. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required in the Fund’s financial statements.

24         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

(f) Reclassification. GAAP requires that certain components of net assets be adjusted to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. During the current year, the following reclassifications have been made:

	Accumulated Net Realized Losses			Paid-in-Capital
(a)	$	(1,574	)	$	1,574

(a) Reclassifications are primarily due to book/tax differences in the treatment of various items.

2. Investment Management Agreement and Other Transactions with Affiliates

On December 1, 2005, Citigroup Inc. (“Citigroup”) completed the sale of substantially all of its asset management business, Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), to Legg Mason, Inc. (“Legg Mason”). As a result, the Fund’s investment manager, Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (the “Manager”), previously an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup, has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Legg Mason. Completion of the sale caused the Fund’s existing investment management contract to terminate. The Fund’s shareholders approved a new investment management contract between the Fund and the Manager, which became effective on December 1, 2005.

Legg Mason, whose principal executive offices are in Baltimore, Maryland, is a financial services holding company.

Prior to October 1, 2005, the Fund paid the Manager an investment management fee, which was calculated daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of the Fund’s average net assets as follows:

Average Daily Net Assets	Annual Rate
First $1 billion	0.475	%
Next $1 billion	0.450
Next $3 billion	0.425
Next $5 billion	0.400
Over $10 billion	0.375

Effective October 1, 2005, the investment management fee payable by the Fund was changed to the following:

Average Daily Net Assets	Annual Rate
First $1 billion	0.450	%
Next $1 billion	0.425
Next $3 billion	0.400
Next $5 billion	0.375
Over $10 billion	0.350

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         25

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

Under the new Investment Management agreement, effective December 1, 2005, the Fund will continue to pay the Manager a management fee calculated at an annual rate of the Fund’s average daily net assets shown in the table above.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Fund’s Class A and Y shares had voluntary expense limitations in place of 0.80% and 0.70%, respectively.

During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Manager reimbursed expenses in the amount of $39,577.

The Fund’s Board has approved PFPC Inc. (“PFPC”) to serve as transfer agent for the Fund, effective January 1, 2006. The principal business office of PFPC is located at 4400 Computer Drive Westborough, MA 01581. Prior to January 1, 2006, Citicorp Trust Bank, fsb. (“CTB”), a subsidiary of Citigroup, acted as the Fund’s transfer agent. PFPC acted as the Fund’s sub-transfer agent. CTB received account fees and asset-based fees that varied according to the size and type of account. PFPC was responsible for shareholder recordkeeping and financial processing for all shareholder accounts and were paid by CTB. For the period ended March 31, 2006, the Fund paid transfer agent fees of $345,336 to CTB.

The Fund’s Board has appointed the Fund’s current distributor, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”) and Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC (“LMIS”), a wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary of Legg Mason, as co-distributors of the Fund. The Fund’s Board has also approved amended and restated Rule 12b-1 Plans. CGM and other broker-dealers, financial intermediaries and financial institutions (each called a “Service Agent”) that currently offer Fund shares will continue to make the Fund’s shares available to their clients. Additional Service Agents may offer Fund shares in the future.

The Fund has adopted an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “Plan”) which allows non-interested trustees (“Trustees”) to defer the receipt of all or a portion of the Trustees’ fees earned until a later date specified by the Trustees. The deferred fees earn a return based on notional investments selected by the Trustees. The balance of the deferred fees payable may change depending upon the investment performance. Any gains or losses incurred in the deferred balances are reported in the Statements of Operations under Trustees’ fees. Under the Plan, deferred fees are considered a general obligation of the Fund and any payments made pursuant to the Plan will be made from the Fund’s general assets. Effective January 1, 2006, the Board of Trustees voted to discontinue offering the Plan to its members. This change will have no effect on fees previously deferred. As of March 31, 2006, the Fund had accrued $29,041 as deferred compensation payable under the plan.

Certain officers and one Trustee of the Trust are employees of Legg Mason or its affiliates and do not receive compensation from the Trust.

3. Class Specific Expenses

The Fund has adopted a Rule 12b-1 distribution plan under which the Fund pays a distribution fee calculated at the annual rate of 0.10% of the average daily net assets of its Class A shares. Distribution fees are accrued daily and paid monthly.

26         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

For the year ended March 31, 2006, class specific expenses were as follows:

	Distribution Fees		Transfer Agent Fees		Shareholder Reports Expenses
Class A	$	1,718,805	$	383,725	$	68,801
Class Y		—		76		1,605
Total	$	1,718,805	$	383,801	$	70,406

4. Distributions to Shareholders by Class

	Year Ended March 31, 2006		Year Ended March 31, 2005
Net Investment Income
Class A	$	36,271,743	$	15,496,627
Class Y		3,182,804		1,134,053
Total	$	39,454,547	$	16,630,680
Net Realized Gains
Class A	$	29,451	$	264,710
Class Y		2,944		15,347
Total	$	32,395	$	280,057

5. Shares of Beneficial Interest

At March 31, 2006, the Trust had an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized with a par value of $0.001 per share. The Fund has the ability to issue multiple classes of shares. Each share of a class represents an identical interest and has the same rights, except that each class bears certain direct expenses specifically related to the distribution of its shares.

Transactions in shares of each class were as follows:

	Year Ended March 31, 2006		Year Ended March 31, 2005
Class A
Shares sold	7,769,251,783		6,841,586,850
Shares issued on reinvestment	36,817,690		14,619,721
Shares repurchased	(7,809,906,378	)	(6,961,485,202	)
Net Decrease	(3,836,905	)	(105,278,631	)
Class Y
Shares sold	282,406,500		249,736,500
Shares issued on reinvestment	1,792,948		1,059,006
Shares repurchased	(245,166,044	)	(177,152,506	)
Net Increase	39,033,404		73,643,000

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         27

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

6. Income Tax Information and Distributions to Shareholders

Subsequent to the fiscal year end, the Fund has made the following distributions:

Record Date Payable Date	Class A		Class Y
Daily
4/28/2006	$	0.002213	$	0.002237

The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended March 31 was as follows:

	2006		2005
Distributions paid from:
Tax-Exempt Income	$	39,454,547	$	16,630,680
Ordinary Income		9,365		88,911
Net Long-term Capital Gains		23,030		191,146
Total Taxable Distributions	$	32,395	$	280,057
Total Distributions Paid	$	39,486,942	$	16,910,737

As of March 31, 2006, there were no significant differences between the book and tax components of net assets.

7. Regulatory Matters

On May 31, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an order in connection with the settlement of an administrative proceeding against SBFM and CGM relating to the appointment of an affiliated transfer agent for the Smith Barney family of mutual funds (the “Funds”).

The SEC order finds that SBFM and CGM willfully violated Section 206(1) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”). Specifically, the order finds that SBFM and CGM knowingly or recklessly failed to disclose to the boards of the Funds in 1999 when proposing a new transfer agent arrangement with an affiliated transfer agent that: First Data Investors Services Group (“First Data”), the Funds’ then-existing transfer agent, had offered to continue as transfer agent and do the same work for substantially less money than before; and that Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), the Citigroup business unit that, at the time, included the Fund’s investment manager and other investment advisory companies, had entered into a side letter with First Data under which CAM agreed to recommend the appointment of First Data as sub-transfer agent to the affiliated transfer agent in exchange for, among other things, a guarantee by First Data of specified amounts of asset management and investment banking fees to CAM and CGM. The order also finds that SBFM and CGM willfully violated Section 206(2) of the Advisers Act by virtue of the omissions discussed above and other misrepresentations and omissions in the materials provided to the Funds’ boards, including the failure to make clear that the affiliated transfer agent would earn a high profit for performing limited functions while First Data continued to perform almost all of the transfer agent functions, and the suggestion

28         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

that the proposed arrangement was in the Funds’ best interests and that no viable alternatives existed. SBFM and CGM do not admit or deny any wrongdoing or liability. The settlement does not establish wrongdoing or liability for purposes of any other proceeding. The SEC censured SBFM and CGM and ordered them to cease and desist from violations of Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act. The order requires Citigroup to pay $208.1 million, including $109 million in disgorgement of profits, $19.1 million in interest, and a civil money penalty of $80 million. Approximately $24.4 million has already been paid to the Funds, primarily through fee waivers. The remaining $183.7 million, including the penalty, has been paid to the U.S. Treasury and will be distributed pursuant to a plan submitted for the approval of the SEC. At this time, there is no certainty as to how the above-described proceeds of the settlement will be distributed, to whom such distributions will be made, the methodology by which such distributions will be allocated, and when such distributions will be made. The order also required that transfer agency fees received from the Funds since December 1, 2004, less certain expenses, be placed in escrow and provided that a portion of such fees might be subsequently distributed in accordance with the terms of the order. On April 3, 2006, an aggregate amount of approximately $9 million was distributed to the affected Funds.

The order required SBFM to recommend a new transfer agent contract to the Fund boards within 180 days of the entry of the order; if a Citigroup affiliate submitted a proposal to serve as transfer agent or sub-transfer agent, SBFM and CGM would have been required, at their expense, to engage an independent monitor to oversee a competitive bidding process. On November 21, 2005, and within the specified timeframe, the Fund’s Board selected a new transfer agent for the Fund. No Citigroup affiliate submitted a proposal to serve as transfer agent. Under the order, SBFM also must comply with an amended version of a vendor policy that Citigroup instituted in August 2004.

Although there can be no assurance, SBFM does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Funds.

On December 1, 2005, Citigroup completed the sale of substantially all of its global asset management business, including SBFM, to Legg Mason.

8. Legal Matters

Beginning in August 2005, five class action lawsuits alleging violations of federal securities laws and state law were filed against CGM and SBFM (collectively, the “Defendants”) based on the May 31, 2005 settlement order issued against the Defendants by the SEC described in Note 7. The complaints seek injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, removal of SBFM as the investment manager for the Smith Barney family of funds, rescission of the Funds’ management and other contracts with SBFM, recovery of all fees paid to SBFM pursuant to such contracts, and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.

On October 5, 2005, a motion to consolidate the five actions and any subsequently filed, related action was filed. That motion contemplates that a consolidated amended complaint alleging substantially similar causes of action will be filed in the future.

As of the date of this report, SBFM believes that resolution of the pending lawsuit will not have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Funds or

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         29

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

the ability of SBFM and its affiliates to continue to render services to the Funds under their respective contracts.

* * *

Beginning in June 2004, class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed against CGM and a number of its affiliates, including SBFM and Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc. (“SBAM”) (the “Advisers”), substantially all of the mutual funds managed by the Advisers, including the Fund (the “Funds”), and directors or trustees of the Funds (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaints alleged, among other things, that CGM created various undisclosed incentives for its brokers to sell Smith Barney and Salomon Brothers funds. In addition, according to the complaints, the Advisers caused the Funds to pay excessive brokerage commissions to CGM for steering clients towards proprietary funds. The complaints also alleged that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duty to the Funds by improperly charging Rule 12b-1 fees and by drawing on fund assets to make undisclosed payments of soft dollars and excessive brokerage commissions. The complaints also alleged that the Funds failed to adequately disclose certain aspects of the allegedly wrongful conduct. The complaints sought injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the Funds’ contracts with the Advisers, recovery of all fees paid to the Advisers pursuant to such contracts and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.

On December 15, 2004, a consolidated amended complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed alleging substantially similar causes of action. While the lawsuit is in its earliest stages, to the extent that the Complaint purports to state causes of action against the Funds, the Fund’s investment manager believes the Funds have significant defenses to such allegations, which the Funds intend to vigorously assert in responding to the Complaint.

Additional lawsuits arising out of theses circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed against the Defendants in the future.

As of the date of this report, the Fund’s investment manager and the Funds believe that the resolution of the pending lawsuit will not have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Funds or the ability of the Advisers and their affiliates to continue to render services to the Funds under their respective contracts.

The Defendants have moved to dismiss the Complaint. Those motions are pending before the court.

9. Other Matters

On September 16, 2005, the staff of the SEC informed SBFM and SBAM that the staff is considering recommending that the SEC institute administrative proceedings against SBFM and SBAM for alleged violations of Section 19(a) and 34(b) of the Investment Company Act (and related Rule 19a-1). The notification is a result of an industry wide inspection by the SEC and is based upon alleged deficiencies in disclosures regarding dividends and distributions paid to shareholders of certain funds. Section 19(a) and related Rule 19a-1 of the Investment Company Act generally require funds that are making dividend and distribution payments to provide shareholders with a written statement disclosing the source of the dividends and distributions, and, in particular, the portion of the

30         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

payments made from each of net investment income, undistributed net profits and/or paid-in capital. In connection with the contemplated proceedings, the staff may seek a cease and desist order and/or monetary damages from SBFM or SBAM. Although there can be no assurance, SBAM believes that this matter is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Fund or SBAM’s ability to perform investment management services relating to the Fund.

New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report         31

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders

Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds (formerly Smith Barney Muni Funds):

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of New York Money Market Portfolio Fund, a series of Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds as of March 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of March 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positions of New York Money Market Portfolio, as of March 31, 2006, and the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

New York, New York

May 24, 2006

32         New York Money Market Portfolio 2006 Annual Report

Board Approval of Management Agreement (unaudited)

Additional Information

On June 23, 2005, Citigroup Inc. entered into a definitive agreement (the “Transaction Agreement”) with Legg Mason, Inc. under which Citigroup agreed to sell substantially all of its asset management business, Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), which includes the Adviser, to Legg Mason in exchange for the broker-dealer and investment banking businesses of Legg Mason and certain other considerations (the “Transaction”). The Transaction closed on December 1, 2005.

The consummation of the Transaction resulted in the automatic termination of the Fund’s current management agreement in accordance with the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Prior to the closing of the Transaction, the Fund’s Board approved a new management agreement between the Fund and the Adviser (the “New Management Agreement”).

On July 11, 2005, members of the Board discussed with CAM management and certain Legg Mason representatives the Transaction and Legg Mason’s general plans and intentions regarding CAM’s business and its combination with Legg Mason’s business. The Board Members also inquired about the plans for and anticipated roles and responsibilities of certain CAM employees and officers after the Transaction.

At a meeting held on August 1, 2005, the Fund’s Board, including a majority of the Board Members who are not “interested persons” of the Fund or the Adviser as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Board Members”), approved the New Management Agreement. To assist the Board in its consideration of the New Management Agreement, Legg Mason provided materials and information about Legg Mason, including its financial condition and asset management capabilities and organization, and CAM provided materials and information about the Transaction between Legg Mason and Citigroup. Representatives of CAM and Legg Mason also made presentations to and responded to questions from the Board. The Independent Board Members, through their independent legal counsel, also requested and received additional information from CAM and Legg Mason in connection with their consideration of the New Management Agreement. The additional information was provided in advance of and at the August meeting. After the presentations and after reviewing the written materials provided, the Independent Board Members met in executive session with their counsel to consider the New Management Agreement. The Independent Board Members of the Board also conferred separately and with their counsel about the Transaction on a number of occasions, including in connection with the July and August meetings.

In their deliberations concerning the New Management Agreement, among other things, the Board Members considered:

(i) the reputation, financial strength and resources of Legg Mason and its investment advisory subsidiaries;

(ii) that Legg Mason and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Western Asset Management Company and its affiliates (“Western Asset”), are experienced and respected asset management firms, and that Legg Mason has advised the Board Members that (a) it intends to combine the fixed income investment operations (including money market fund operations) of CAM with those of Western Asset and may also wish to combine

New York Money Market Portfolio          33

Board Approval of Management Agreement (unaudited) (continued)

other CAM operations with those of other Legg Mason subsidiaries; (b) after the closing of the Transaction, it will take steps to combine the investment management operations of Western Asset with the fixed income operations of the Adviser, which, among other things, may involve Western Asset and the Adviser sharing common systems and procedures, employees (including portfolio managers), investment and trading platforms, and other resources; (c) it is expected that these combination processes will result in changes to portfolio managers or portfolio management teams for a number of the CAM funds, subject to Board oversight and appropriate notice to shareholders, and that, in other cases, the current portfolio managers or portfolio management teams will remain in place; and (d) in the future, it may recommend that Western Asset or other Legg Mason subsidiaries be appointed as the adviser or subadviser to some or all of the CAM funds, subject to applicable regulatory requirements;

(iii) that CAM management had advised the Board that a number of portfolio managers and other key CAM personnel would be retained after the closing of the Transaction;

(iv) that, following the Transaction, CAM will be part of an organization focused on the asset management business;

(v) that CAM management and Legg Mason have advised the Board that following the Transaction, there is not expected to be any diminution in the nature, quality and extent of services provided to the Fund and their shareholders by the Adviser, including compliance services;

(vi) that Legg Mason has advised the Board that it has no present intention to alter the expense waivers and reimbursements currently in effect and, while it reserves the right to do so in the future, it would consult with the Board before making any changes;

(vii) that under the Transaction Agreement, Citigroup and Legg Mason have agreed not to take any action that is not contemplated by the Transaction or fail to take any action that to their respective knowledge would cause any of the requirements of Section 15(f) of the 1940 Act not to be met;

(viii) the assurances from Citigroup and Legg Mason that, for a three year period following the closing of the Transaction, Citigroup-affiliated broker-dealers will continue to offer the Fund as an investment product, and the potential benefits to Fund shareholders from this and other third-party distribution access;

(ix) the potential benefits to Fund shareholders from being part of a combined fund family with Legg Mason sponsored funds;

(x) that Citigroup and Legg Mason would derive benefits from the Transaction and that, as a result, they have a financial interest in the matters that were being considered;

(xi) the potential effects of regulatory restrictions on the Fund if Citigroup-affiliated broker-dealers remain principal underwriters of the Fund after the closing of the Transaction;

(xii) the fact that the Fund’s total advisory and administrative fees will not increase by virtue of the New Management Agreement, but will remain the same;

34         New York Money Market Portfolio

Board Approval of Management Agreement (unaudited) (continued)

(xiii) the terms and conditions of the New Management Agreement, including the differences from the current management agreement, and the benefits of a single, uniform form of agreement covering these services;

(xiv) that the Fund would not bear the costs of obtaining shareholder approval of the New Management Agreement;

(xv) that the Fund would avail itself of permissions granted under certain licensing arrangements between Citigroup and Legg Mason that would permit the Fund (including any share classes thereof) to maintain its current name, as well as all logos, trademarks and service marks, related to Citigroup or any of its affiliates for some agreed upon time period after the closing of the Transaction; and

(xvi) that, as discussed in detail above, within the past year the Board had performed a full annual review of the current management agreement as required by the 1940 Act. In that regard, the Board, in its deliberations concerning the New Management Agreement, considered the same factors regarding the nature, quality and extent of services provided, costs of services provided, profitability, fall out benefits, fees and economies of scale and investment performance as it did when it renewed the current management agreement, and reached substantially the same conclusions.

New York Money Market Portfolio         35

Additional Information (unaudited)

Information about Directors and Officers

The business and affairs of the New York Money Market (“Fund”) is managed under the direction of the Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds’ (formerly known as Smith Barney Muni Funds) (“Trust”) Board of Trustees. Information pertaining to the Trustees and Officers of the Trust is set forth below. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request by calling Shareholder Services at 1-800-451-2010.

Name, Address and Birth Year	Position(s) Held with Fund	Term of Office* and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen By Trustee	Other Board Memberships Held by Trustee
Non-Interested Trustees:
Lee Abraham 13732 LeHavre Drive Frenchman’s Creek Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Birth Year: 1927	Trustee	Since 1999	Retired; Former Director of Signet Group PLC	27	None
Jane F. Dasher Korsant Partners 283 Greenwich Avenue 3rd Floor Greenwich, CT 06830 Birth Year: 1949	Trustee	Since 1999	Controller of PBK Holdings Inc., a family investment company	27	None
Donald R. Foley 3668 Freshwater Drive Jupiter, FL 33477 Birth Year: 1922	Trustee	Since 1985	Retired	18	None
Richard E. Hanson, Jr. 2751 Vermont Route 140 Poultney, VT 05764 Birth Year: 1941	Trustee	Since 1999	Retired; Former Head of the New Atlanta Jewish Community High School	27	None
Paul Hardin 12083 Morehead Chapel Hill, NC 27514-8426 Birth Year: 1931	Trustee	Since 1994	Professor of Law & Chancellor Emeritus at the University of North Carolina	34	None
Roderick C. Rasmussen 9 Cadence Court Morristown, NJ 07960 Birth Year: 1926	Trustee	Since 1985	Investment Counselor	27	None
John P. Toolan 7202 Southeast Golf Ridge Way Hobe Sound, FL 33455 Birth Year: 1930	Trustee	Since 1985	Retired	27	None

36         New York Money Market Portfolio

Additional Information (unaudited) (continued)

Name, Address and Birth Year	Position(s) Held with Fund	Term of Office* and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen By Trustee	Other Board Memberships Held by Trustee
Interested Trustee:
R. Jay Gerken, CFA** Legg Mason & Co., LLC (“Legg Mason”) 399 Park Avenue, 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1951	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer	Since 2002	Managing Director of Legg Mason; President and Chief Executive Officer of Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”), and Citi Fund Management Inc. (“CFM”); President and Chief Executive Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason; Formerly, Chairman of SBFM and CFM (from 2002 to 2006); Formerly, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Travelers Investment Advisers, Inc. (from 2002 to 2005)	169	Trustee, Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds
Officers:
Andrew B. Shoup Legg Mason 125 Broad Street, 11th Floor New York, NY 10004 Birth Year: 1956	Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer	Since 2003	Director of Legg Mason; Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason; Formerly Head of International Funds Administration of Legg Mason or its predecessors (from 2001 to 2003)	N/A	N/A

New York Money Market Portfolio         37

Additional Information (unaudited) (continued)

Name, Address and Birth Year	Position(s) Held with Fund	Term of Office* and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen By Trustee	Other Board Memberships Held by Trustee
Officers:
Robert J. Brault Legg Mason 125 Broad Street, 11th Floor New York, NY 10004 Birth Year: 1965	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer	Since 2004	Director of Legg Mason; Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason; Director of Internal Control for CAM U.S. Mutual Fund Administration (from 2002 to 2004); Director of Project Management & Information Systems for CAM U.S. Mutual Fund Administration (from 2000 to 2002)	N/A	N/A
Julie P. Callahan, CFA Legg Mason 399 Park Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1972	Vice President and Investment Officer	Since 2002	Managing Director of Legg Mason; Investment Officer of the Manager or its affiliates	N/A	N/A
Joseph P. Deane Legg Mason 399 Park Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1947	Vice President and Investment Officer	Since 1999	Managing Director of Legg Mason; Investment Officer of the Manager or its affiliates	N/A	N/A
Ted P. Becker Legg Mason 399 Park Avenue, 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 Birth Year: 1951	Chief Compliance Officer	Since 2006	Managing Director of Compliance at Legg Mason, (2005-Present); Chief Compliance Officer with certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason (since 2006); Managing Director of Compliance at Legg Mason or its predecessors (2002-2005). Prior to 2002, Managing Director-Internal Audit & Risk Review at Citigroup, Inc.	N/A	N/A

38         New York Money Market Portfolio

Additional Information (unaudited) (continued)

Name, Address and Birth Year	Position(s) Held with Fund	Term of Office* and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years	Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen By Trustee	Other Board Memberships Held by Trustee
Officers:
John Chiota Legg Mason 300 First Stamford Place, 4th Floor Stamford, CT 06902 Birth Year: 1968	Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer	Since 2006	Vice President of Legg Mason or its predecessors (since 2004); Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer with certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason (since 2006); prior to August 2004, Chief AML Compliance Officer with TD Waterhouse	N/A	N/A
Robert I. Frenkel Legg Mason 300 First Stamford Place 4th Floor Stamford, CT 06902 Birth Year: 1954	Secretary and Chief Legal Officer	Since 2003	Managing Director and General Counsel of Global Mutual Funds for Legg Mason or its predecessors (since 1994); Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason (since 2003); Formerly Secretary of CFM (from 2001 to 2004)	N/A	N/A

* Each Trustee and Officer serves until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified.

** Mr. Gerken is an “interested person” of the Trust as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, because Mr. Gerken is an officer of SBFM and certain of its affiliates.

New York Money Market Portfolio         39

Additional Shareholder Information (unaudited)

Results of a Special Meeting of Shareholders

On November 29, 2005, a Special Meeting of Shareholders was held for the following purposes: 1) to approve a new management agreement and 2) to elect Trustees. The following table provides the number of votes cast for, against or withheld, as well as the number of abstentions and broker non-votes as to each matter voted on at the Special Meeting of Shareholders.

1. Approval of New Management Agreement

Item Voted On	Votes For	Votes Against	Abstentions	Broker Non-Votes
New Management Agreement	864,567,441.610	52,412,610.420	32,312,983.490	0.000

2. Election of Trustees¹

Nominees:	Votes For	Authority Withheld	Abstentions	Broker Non-Votes
Lee Abraham	2,329,588,005.613	149,321,576.243	0.000	0.000
Jane F. Dasher	2,332,650,753.697	146,258,828.159	0.000	0.000
Donald R. Foley	2,329,893,384.968	149,016,196.888	0.000	0.000
Richard E. Hanson, Jr.	2,331,776,035.764	147,133,546.092	0.000	0.000
Paul Hardin	2,329,386,986.327	149,522,595.529	0.000	0.000
Roderick C. Ramussen	2,330,770,995.850	148,138,586.006	0.000	0.000
John P. Toolan	2,328,703,793.287	150,205,788.569	0.000	0.000
R. Jay Gerken	2,327,542,856.282	151,366,725.574	0.000	0.000

¹ Trustees are elected by the shareholders of all of the Series of the Trust of which the Fund is a series.

40         New York Money Market Portfolio

Important Tax Information (unaudited)

All of the net investment income distributions paid monthly by the Fund qualify as tax-exempt interest dividends for Federal income tax purposes.

Additionally, the Fund paid an ordinary income distribution of $0.000005 and a long-term capital gain distribution of $0.000012 to shareholders of record on December 09, 2005.

Please retain this information for your records.

New York Money Market Portfolio         41

Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds

New York Money Market Portfolio

TRUSTEES Lee Abraham Jane F. Dasher Donald R. Foley R. Jay Gerken, CFA
Chairman Richard E. Hanson, Jr. Paul Hardin Roderick C. Rasmussen John P. Toolan OFFICERS R. Jay Gerken, CFA President and Chief
Executive Officer Andrew B. Shoup Senior Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer Robert J. Brault Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer Julie P. Callahan, CFA Vice President and Investment Officer Joseph P. Deane Vice President and Investment Officer Ted P. Becker Chief Compliance Officer OFFICERS (continued) John Chiota Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer Robert I. Frenkel Secretary and Chief Legal Officer INVESTMENT MANAGER Smith Barney Fund
Management LLC DISTRIBUTORS Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC CUSTODIAN State Street Bank and Trust Company TRANSFER AGENT PFPC Inc. 4400 Computer Drive Westborough, Massachusetts 01581 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM KPMG LLP 345 Park Avenue New York, NY 10154

This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds — New York Money Market Portfolio.

This report must be preceded or accompanied by a free prospectus. Investors should consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the Fund. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.

www.leggmason.com/InvestorServices

©2006 Legg Mason Investor Services LLC

Member NASD, SIPC

FD02397 5/06 SR06-33

Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds

New York Money Market Portfolio

The Funds are separate investment funds of the Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds, a Massachusetts business trust.

LEGG MASON PARTNERS MUNICIPAL FUNDS

Legg Mason Partners Mutual Funds

125 Broad Street

10th Floor, MF-2

New York, New York 10004

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C., and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. To obtain information on Form N-Q from the Fund, shareholders can call 1-800-451-2010.

Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the prior 12-month period ended June 30th of each year and a description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies related to portfolio transactions is available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-451-2010, (2) on the Fund’s website at www.leggmason.com/InvestorServices and (3) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Proxy voting reports for the period ending June 30, 2005 will continue to be listed under the Fund’s former Smith Barney Muni Funds — New York Money Market Portfolio name.

ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller.

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

The Board of Trustees of the registrant has determined that Jane F. Dasher, the Chairperson of the Board’s Audit Committee, possesses the technical attributes identified in Instruction 2(b) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” and has designated Ms. Dasher as the Audit Committee’s financial expert. Ms. Dasher is an “independent” Trustee pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR.

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the last two fiscal years ending March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 (the “Reporting Periods”) for professional services rendered by the Registrant’s principal accountant (the “Auditor”) for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $170,500 in 2005 and $182,500 in 2006.

b) Audit-Related Fees. There were no fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4.

In addition, there were no Audit-Related Fees billed in the Reporting Period for assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds (“service affiliates”), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the service affiliates. Accordingly, there were no such fees that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee for the Reporting Periods (prior to May 6, 2003 services provided by the Auditor were not required to be pre-approved).

(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning (“Tax Services”) were $38,600 in 2005 and $0 in 2006. These services consisted of (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, and (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held.

There were no fees billed for tax services by the Auditors to service affiliates during the Reporting Periods that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

d) All Other Fees. There were no other fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item for the Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds.

All Other Fees. There were no other non-audit services rendered by the Auditor to Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with SBFM that provided ongoing services to Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee in the Reporting Period.

(e) Audit Committee’s pre–approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c) (7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation

S-X.

(1) The Charter for the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of each registered investment company (the “Fund”) advised by Smith Barney Fund Management LLC or Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc. or one of their affiliates (each, an “Adviser”) requires that the Committee shall approve (a) all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided to the Fund and (b) all permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Fund’s independent auditors to the Adviser and any Covered Service Providers if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. The Committee may implement policies and procedures by which such services are approved other than by the full Committee.

The Committee shall not approve non-audit services that the Committee believes may impair the independence of the auditors. As of the date of the approval of this Audit Committee Charter,

permissible non-audit services include any professional services (including tax services), that are not prohibited services as described below, provided to the Fund by the independent auditors, other than those provided to the Fund in connection with an audit or a review of the financial statements of the Fund. Permissible non-audit services may not include: (i) bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Fund; (ii) financial information systems design and implementation; (iii) appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports; (iv) actuarial services; (v) internal audit outsourcing services; (vi) management functions or human resources; (vii) broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services; (viii) legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and (ix) any other service the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible.

Pre-approval by the Committee of any permissible non-audit services is not required so long as: (i) the aggregate amount of all such permissible non-audit services provided to the Fund, the Adviser and any service providers controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“Covered Service Providers”) constitutes not more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid to the independent auditors during the fiscal year in which the permissible non-audit services are provided to (a) the Fund, (b) the Adviser and (c) any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund during the fiscal year in which the services are provided that would have to be approved by the Committee; (ii) the permissible non-audit services were not recognized by the Fund at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved by the Committee (or its delegate(s)) prior to the completion of the audit.

(2) For the Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds, the percentage of fees that were approved by the audit committee, with respect to: Audit-Related Fees were 100% and 0% for 2005 and 2006; Tax Fees were 100% and 0% for 2005 and 2006; and Other Fees were 100% and 0% for 2005 and 2006.

(f) N/A

(g) Non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds and CAM and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with CAM that provides ongoing services to Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds during the reporting period were $0 in 2006 for fees related to the transfer agent matter as fully described in the notes the financial statements titled “additional information” and $75,000 for 2005.

(h) Yes. The Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds’ Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval) is compatible with maintaining the Accountant’s independence. All services provided by the Auditor to the Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds or to Service Affiliates, which were required to be pre-approved, were pre-approved as required.

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.

Included herein under Item 1.

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a- 3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the registrant’s last fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.

(a) Code of Ethics attached hereto.

Exhibit 99.CODE ETH

(b) Attached hereto.

Exhibit 99.CERT	Certifications pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 99.906CERT	Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.

Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds

By:	/s/ R. Jay Gerken
	R. Jay Gerken
	Chief Executive Officer of
	Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds
Date:	June 8, 2006

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:	/s/ R. Jay Gerken
	R. Jay Gerken
	Chief Executive Officer of
	Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds
Date:	June 8, 2006
By:	/s/ Robert J. Brault
	Robert J. Brault
	Chief Financial Officer of
	Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds

Date: June 8, 2006

EX-99.CODE ETH

EX 99.CODE ETH

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT CODE OF ETHICS

FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND

SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS OF CAM/U.S. REGISTERED INVESTMENT

COMPANIES

I. Covered Officers/Purpose of the Code

This code of ethics (the “Code”) for Citigroup Asset Management’s (“CAM’s”) U. S. registered proprietary investment companies (collectively, “Funds” and each a, “Company”) applies to each Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller (the “Covered Officers”) for the purpose of promoting:

• honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

• full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in other public communications made by the Company;

• compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations;

• the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code; and

• accountability for adherence to the Code.

Each Covered Officer should adhere to a high standard of business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest.

II. Administration of Code

The Regional Director of CAM Compliance, North America (“Compliance Officer”) is responsible for administration of this Code, including granting pre-approvals (see Section III below) and waivers (as described in Section VI below), applying this Code in specific situations in which questions are presented under it and interpreting this Code in any particular situation.

III. Covered Officers Should Ethically Handle Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest

Overview. A “conflict of interest” occurs when a Covered Officer’s private interest interferes with the interests of, or his service to, the Company. For example, a conflict of interest would arise if a Covered Officer, or a member of his family, receives improper personal benefits as a result of his position with the Company.

Certain conflicts of interest arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Company and already are subject to conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Investment Advisers Act”). For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property) with the Company because of their status as “affiliated persons” of the Company. The compliance programs and procedures of the Company and its investment adviser are designed to prevent, or identify and correct, violations of these provisions. This Code does not, and is not intended to, repeat or replace these programs and procedures, and such conflicts fall outside of the parameters of this Code (see Section VII below).

Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between a Company and the investment adviser of which the Covered Officers are also officers or employees. As a result, this Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties (whether formally for a Company or for the adviser, or for both), be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions that will have different effects on the adviser and a Company. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between the Company and the adviser and is consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of a Company. Thus, if performed in conformity with the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, such activities will be deemed to have been handled ethically. In addition, it is recognized by the Funds’ Boards of Directors\Trustees (“Boards”) that the Covered Officers may also be officers or employees of one or more other investment companies covered by this or other codes.

Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Code, even if such conflicts of interest are not subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act. The following list provides examples of conflicts of interest under the Code, but Covered Officers should keep in mind that these examples are not exhaustive. The overarching principle is that the personal interest of a Covered Officer should not be placed improperly before the interest of the Company.

*                    *                     *                    *

Each Covered Officer must:

• not use his personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions or financial reporting ( e.g. through fraudulent accounting

practices) by the Company whereby the Covered Officer¹ would benefit personally to the detriment of the Company; or

• not cause the Company to take action, or fail to take action, for the individual personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather than for the benefit of the Company; and

• not use material non-public knowledge of portfolio transactions made or contemplated for the Company to trade personally or cause others to trade personally in contemplation of the market affect of such transactions.

• There are some potential conflict of interest situations that should always be discussed with the Compliance Officer, if material. Examples are as follows:

(1) service as a director on the board of any public or private company;

(2) any ownership interest in, or any consulting or employment relationship with, any of the Company’s service providers, other than its investment adviser,

(3) a direct or indirect financial interest in commissions, transaction charges or spreads paid by the Company for effecting portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest arising from the Covered Officer’s employment, such as compensation or equity ownership; and

(4) the receipt of any gifts or the conveyance of any value (including entertainment ) from any company with which the Company has current or prospective business dealings, except:

(a) any non-cash gifts of nominal value (nominal value is less than $100); and

(b) customary and reasonable meals and entertainment at which the giver is present, such as the occasional business meal or sporting event.

IV. Disclosure and Compliance

Each Covered Officer:

• should be familiar with his or her responsibilities in connection with the disclosure requirements generally applicable to the Company;

¹ Any activity or relationship that would present a conflict for a Covered Officer would also present a conflict for the Covered Officer if a member of a Covered Officer’s family (spouse, minor children and any account over which a Covered Officer is deemed to have beneficial interest) engages in such an activity or has such a relationship.

• should not knowingly misrepresent, or knowingly cause others to misrepresent, facts about the Company to others, whether within or outside the Company, including to the Company’s directors and auditors, and to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations;

• should, to the extent appropriate within his or her area of responsibility, consult with other officers and employees of the Funds and the investment adviser with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Funds file with, or submit to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Funds; and

• is responsible to promote compliance with the standards and restrictions imposed by applicable laws, rules and regulations.

V. Reporting and Accountability

Each Covered Officer must:

• upon adoption of the Code (or thereafter as applicable, upon becoming a Covered Officer), affirm in writing to the Board that the Covered Officer has received, read, and understands the Code;

• annually thereafter affirm to the Board that he or she has complied with the requirements of the Code;

• annually disclose affiliations and other relationships related to conflicts of interest;

• not retaliate against any other Covered Officer or any employee of the Funds or their affiliated persons for reports of potential violations that are made in good faith; and

• notify the Compliance Officer promptly if he knows of any violation of this Code (failure to do so is itself a violation of this Code).

In rendering decisions and interpretations and in conducting investigations of potential violations under the Code, the Compliance Officer may, at his discretion, consult with such persons as he determines to be appropriate, including, but not limited to, a senior legal officer of the Company or its investment adviser or its affiliates, independent auditors or other consultants, subject to any requirement to seek pre-approval from the Company’s audit committee for the retention of independent auditors to perform permissible non-audit services. The Funds will follow these procedures in investigating and enforcing the Code:

• the Compliance Officer will take all appropriate action to investigate any potential violation of which he becomes aware;

• if, after investigation the Compliance Officer believes that no violation has occurred, the Compliance Officer is not required to take any further action;

• any matter that the Compliance Officer believes is a violation will be reported to the Directors of the Fund who are not “interested persons” as defined in the Investment Company Act the (“Non-interested Directors”)

• if the Non-interested Directors of the Board concur that a violation has occurred, it will consider appropriate action, which may include review of, and appropriate modifications to, applicable policies and procedures; notification to appropriate personnel of the investment adviser or its board; or a recommendation to dismiss the Covered Officer; and

• any changes to or waivers of this Code will, to the extent required, be disclosed as provided by SEC rules

The Compliance Officer shall submit an annual report to the Board describing any waivers granted.

VI. Waivers²

A Covered Officer may request a waiver of any of the provisions of the Code by submitting a written request for such waiver to the Compliance Officer, setting forth the basis of such request and explaining how the waiver would be consistent with the standards of conduct described herein. The Compliance Officer shall review such request and make a determination thereon in writing, which shall be binding.

In determining whether to waive any provisions of this Code, the Compliance Officer shall consider whether the proposed waiver is consistent with honest and ethical conduct and other purposes of this Code.

VII. Other Policies and Procedures

This Code shall be the sole code of ethics adopted by the Funds for purposes of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and forms applicable to registered investment companies thereunder. Insofar as other policies or procedures of the Funds, the Funds’ investment advisers, principal underwriters, or other service providers govern or purport to govern the behavior or activities of the Covered Officers who are subject to this Code, they are superseded by this Code to the extent that they overlap or conflict with the provisions of this Code. The codes of ethics of the funds and the investment advisers and principal underwriters under Rule 17j-1 of the Investment Company Act and the Citigroup Code of Conduct and Citigroup Statement of Business Practices as well as other policies of the Fund’s investment advisers or their affiliates are separate requirements applying to the Covered Officers and others, and are not part of this Code.

² For purposes of this Code, Item 2 of Form N-CSR defines “waiver” as “the approval by a Company of a material departure from a provision of the Code” and includes an “implicit waiver,” which means a Company’s failure to take action within a reasonable period of time regarding a material departure from a provision of the Code that has been made known to an executive officer of the Company.

VIII.  Amendments

Any amendments to this Code, other than amendments to Exhibits A, B and C must be approved or ratified by a majority vote of the Board, including a majority of Non-interested Directors.

IX. Confidentiality

All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to this Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law or this Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the appropriate Board and Company and their respective counsel, counsel to the non-Interested Directors or independent auditors or other consultants referred to in Section V above.

X. Internal Use

The Code is intended solely for the internal use by the Funds and does not constitute an admission, by or on behalf of any Company, as to any fact, circumstance, or legal conclusion.

EX-99.CERT

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

EX-99.CERT

CERTIFICATIONS

I, R. Jay Gerken, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds – New York Money Market Portfolio;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 8, 2006	/s/ R. Jay Gerken
	R. Jay Gerken
	Chief Executive Officer

I, Robert J. Brault, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds – New York Money Market Portfolio;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  June 8, 2006	/s/ Robert J. Brault
	Robert J. Brault
	Chief Financial Officer

EX-99.906CERT

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

EX-99.906CERT

CERTIFICATION

R. Jay Gerken, Chief Executive Officer, and Robert J. Brault, Chief Financial Officer of Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds – New York Money Market Portfolio (the “Registrant”), each certify to the best of his knowledge that:

1. The Registrant’s periodic report on Form N-CSR for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Form N-CSR”) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Chief Executive Officer	Chief Financial Officer
Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds –	Legg Mason Partners Municipal Funds –
New York Money Market Portfolio	New York Money Market Portfolio

/s/ R. Jay Gerken	/s/ Robert J. Brault
R. Jay Gerken	Robert J. Brault
Date: June 8, 2006	Date: June 8, 2006

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form N-CSR with the Commission.