| FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
NOTE 16 - DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Fair Value Measurements. The Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("FASB ASC") defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC Topic 820-10-20 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820-10-55 establishes a fair value hierarchy that emphasizes use of observable inputs and minimizes use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | | | Level 2 | Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities | | | Level 3 | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities |
Recurring Measurements
The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the FASB ASC fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements were classified at December 31, 2012 and 2011, in thousands of dollars:
Thousands of dollars | | | | | Fair Value Measurements Using | | December 31, 2012 | | Fair Value | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | Available for sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. Treasury and agency securities | | $ | 27,316 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 27,316 | | | $ | - | | Mortgage-backed agency securities | | | 160,499 | | | | - | | | | 160,499 | | | | - | | Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 18,286 | | | | - | | | | 18,286 | | | | - | | Equity securities | | | 28 | | | | 28 | | | | - | | | | - | | Total available for sale securities | | $ | 206,129 | | | $ | 28 | | | $ | 206,101 | | | $ | - | |
December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Available for sale securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. Treasury and agency securities | | $ | 49,366 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 49,366 | | | $ | - | | Mortgage-backed agency securities | | | 102,697 | | | | - | | | | 102,697 | | | | - | | Obligations of states and political subdivisions | | | 20,977 | | | | - | | | | 20,977 | | | | - | | Corporate, asset backed and other debt securities | | | 126 | | | | - | | | | 126 | | | | - | | Equity securities | | | 31 | | | | 31 | | | | - | | | | - | | Total available for sale securities | | $ | 173,197 | | | $ | 31 | | | $ | 173,166 | | | $ | - | |
Following is a description of the inputs and valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of those instruments under the valuation hierarchy.
| Available-for-sale Securities | | Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include U.S. Government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and municipalities, and certain corporate securities. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique widely used in the banking industry to value investment securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for specific investment securities, but rather, relying on the investment securities' relationship to other benchmark quoted investment securities. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. The Company has no Level 3 securities. |
Transfers between Levels There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 in 2012 or 2011 of assets recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Nonrecurring Measurements
The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and the level within the FASB ASC fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2012 and 2011:
In thousands of dollars | | | | | Fair Value Measurements Using | | Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent): | | Fair Value | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | December 31, 2012 | | $ | 21,866 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 21,866 | | December 31, 2011 | | | 39,438 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 39,438 | |
Significant Unobservable Inputs The following is a discussion of the significant unobservable inputs, the interrelationships between those inputs and other unobservable inputs used in recurring fair value measurement and of how those inputs might magnify or mitigate the effect of changes in the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurement.
| Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent) | | Loans for which it is believed to be probable that the Company will not collect all principal and interest due according to contractual terms are measured for impairment. Allowable methods for determining the amount of impairment include estimating fair value using the fair value of the collateral for collateral-dependent loans, based on current appraisals. If the impaired loan is identified as collateral dependent, the fair value of collateral method of measuring the amount of impairment is utilized. The Company considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value. The Company's practice is to obtain new or updated appraisals on the loans subject to the initial impairment review and then to generally update on an annual basis thereafter. The Company discounts the appraisal amount as necessary for selling costs and past due real estate taxes. If a new or updated appraisal is not available at the time of a loan's impairment review, the Company typically applies a discount to the value of an old appraisal to reflect the property's current estimated value if there is believed to be deterioration in either (i) the physical or economic aspects of the subject property or (ii) any market conditions. These discounts and estimates are developed by the Company's Credit Department, and are reviewed by the Chief Credit Officer and the CFO. The results of the impairment review results in an increase in the allowance for loan loss or in a partial charge-off of the loan, if warranted. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when impairment is determined using the fair value method based on current appraisals. |
Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements.
As of December 31, 2012 | | Fair Value ($000) | | Valuation Technique | | Unobservable Inputs | | Range (Weighted Average) | | Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent): | | $ | 21,866 | | Market comparable properties | | Marketability discount | | | 7.5% – 49.5% (14.0%) | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair value of principal financial assets and liabilities, in thousands of dollars, at December 31, 2012 and 2011, were as follows:
| | December 31, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | | | | Carrying | | | Fair Value Measurements Using | | | Carrying | | | | | | | Amount | | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Amount | | | Fair Value | | Financial Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 70,612 | | | $ | 70,612 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 107,592 | | | $ | 107,592 | | Securities available for sale | | | 206,129 | | | | 28 | | | | 206,101 | | | | - | | | | 173,197 | | | | 173,197 | | FHLB Stock | | | 2,571 | | | | - | | | | 2,571 | | | | - | | | | 2,571 | | | | 2,571 | | Loans held for sale | | | 13,380 | | | | - | | | | 13,380 | | | | - | | | | 8,290 | | | | 8,290 | | Net portfolio loans | | | 564,135 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 574,137 | | | | 543,069 | | | | 551,616 | | Accrued interest receivable | | | 2,620 | | | | - | | | | 2,620 | | | | - | | | | 2,772 | | | | 2,772 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Financial Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total deposits | | $ | (784,643 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (787,015 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (764,856 | ) | | $ | (768,783 | ) | FHLB advances | | | (21,999 | ) | | | - | | | | (23,007 | ) | | | - | | | | (24,035 | ) | | | (25,475 | ) | Accrued interest payable | | | (354 | ) | | | - | | | | (354 | ) | | | - | | | | (491 | ) | | | (491 | ) |
Estimated fair values require subjective judgments and are approximate. The above estimates of fair value are not necessarily representative of amounts that could be realized in actual market transactions, or of the underlying value of the Company. Changes in the following methodologies and assumptions could significantly affect the estimated fair value: | Cash and cash equivalents, FHLB stock, loans held for sale, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable – The carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of the fair values of these instruments at the respective balance sheet dates. | | | | Net portfolio loans – The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value for personal loans for which rates adjust quarterly or more frequently, and for business and tax-exempt loans that are prime related and for which rates adjust immediately or quarterly. The fair value of all other loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates for loans with similar characteristics and maturities. The Bank's current loan rates are comparable with rates offered by other financial institutions. The allowance for loan losses is considered to be a reasonable estimate of discount for credit quality concerns | | | | Total deposits – With the exception of certificates of deposit, the carrying value is deemed to be the fair value due to the demand nature of the deposits. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the current rates paid on certificates of deposit with similar maturities. The Bank's current deposit rates are comparable with rates offered by other financial institutions. | | | | FHLB advances – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates on advances with similar maturities. | | |
| Off-balance-sheet financial instruments – Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and undisbursed loans are deemed to have no material fair value as such commitments are generally fulfilled at current market rates. |
|