1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Formation of the Company	*Formation of the Company* On December 31, 2013, Energie Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “Holdings”) entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with OELC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Energie LLC (hereinafter referred to as, “Energie”). The Share Exchange Agreement was not effective until July 2, 2014, due to a variety of conditions subsequent that needed to be met which were met or waived. Upon effectiveness, Holdings issued 33,000,000 “restricted” shares of its common stock, representing approximately 65% of the then issued and outstanding voting securities, in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding member interests of Energie. This transaction is considered to be a capital transaction, rather than a business combination, equivalent to the issuance of ownership interests by Energie for the net assets of Holdings, accompanied by a recapitalization (the “Share Exchange”). The accounting is identical to that resulting from a reverse acquisition, except that no goodwill or other intangible is recorded. Thereafter, on January 27, 2014, Holdings entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with two of its then wholly owned subsidiaries, Energie Holdings and Alas Acquisition Company (“Alas”). The Merger Agreement effectively merged Alas with and into Holdings, with Holdings being the surviving corporation. The net effect of the Merger Agreement was to effectuate a name change from Alas Aviation Corp., to Energie Holdings, Inc. in order to provide a better understanding to investors of the Company’s entry into the LED lighting industry. The Company’s management also changed.
Description of Business	*Description of Business* We are focused on acquiring and growing specialized LED lighting companies for the architecture and interior design markets for both commercial and residential applications. The lighting products include both conventional fixtures and advanced solid-state technology that can integrate with digital controls and day-lighting to create energy efficiencies and a better visual environment. Our objective is to grow, innovate, and fully capture the rapidly growing lighting market opportunities associated with solid state lighting. Énergie was founded in 2001 and is engaged in the import and sale of specialized interior lighting solutions to the architecture and interior design markets in North America. Our headquarters is located in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and we also maintain a production and assembly facility in Zeeland, Michigan.
Basis of Presentation	*Basis of Presentation* As a result of the Share Exchange, Energie is considered to be the “accounting acquirer” and, accordingly, is treated as the predecessor company. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations and financial position of Energie for all periods, and the results of operations and financial position of Holdings as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and as of December 31, 2014. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014, has been derived from audited financial statements. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual audited financial statements and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, such unaudited information includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of this interim information. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the entire year. The information included in this report should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014.
Going Concern	*Going Concern* As shown in the accompanying financial statements, we had an equity deficit of $9,326,330 and a working capital deficit of $7,504,325 as of September 30, 2015, and have reported net losses of $2,026,403 and $1,720,932 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to further implement our business plan, attract additional capital and, ultimately, upon our ability to develop future profitable operations. We intend to fund our business development, acquisition endeavors and operations through equity and debt financing arrangements. However, there can be no assurance that these arrangements will be sufficient to fund our ongoing capital expenditures, working capital, and other cash requirements. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time. These matters raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.
Reclassifications	*Reclassifications* Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	*Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements* In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 (ASU 2015-11), Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU 2015-11 more closely aligns the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). As such, an entity should measure inventory that is within the scope of this ASU at the lower of cost and net realizable value. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-11 to be material to our consolidated financial statements. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-12 (ASU 2015-12), Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965): (Part I) Fully Benefit-Responsive Investment Contracts, (Part II) Plan Investment Disclosures, (Part III) Measurement Date Practical Expedient (consensuses of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2015-12 (1) requires a pension plan to use contract value as the only measure for fully benefit-responsive investment contracts, (2) simplifies and increases the effectiveness of the investment disclosure requirements for employee benefit plans, and (3) provides benefit plans with a measurement-date practical expedient similar to the practical expedient provided to employers in ASU 2015-04, Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-12 to be material to our consolidated financial statements. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-13 (ASU 2015-13), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Application of the Normal Purchases and Normal Sales Scope Exception to Certain Electricity Contracts within Nodal Energy Markets (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2015-13 clarifies guidance regarding the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, for certain electricity contracts. Guidance was amended to specify that certain electricity contracts that use locational marginal pricing by an independent system operator do not fail the physical delivery criterion relating to the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-13 to be material to our consolidated financial statements. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14 (ASU 2015-14), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. ASU 2015-14 defers by one year the effective date of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-14 to be material to our consolidated financial statements. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15 (ASU 2015-15), Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements—Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting (SEC Update). ASU 2015-15 amends subtopic 835-30 to include the SEC Staff Announcement at the 18 June 2015 EITF meeting regarding the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-15 to be material to our consolidated financial statements. In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16 (ASU 2015-16), Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. ASU 2015-16 requires an acquirer to “recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined.” Further, the acquirer must record, in the financial statements for the same period, “the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date.” We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-16 to be material to our consolidated financial statements.

1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

Formation of the Company

On December 31, 2013, Energie Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “Holdings”) entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with OELC, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Energie LLC (hereinafter referred to as, “Energie”). The Share Exchange Agreement was not effective until July 2, 2014, due to a variety of conditions subsequent that needed to be met which were met or waived. Upon effectiveness, Holdings issued 33,000,000 “restricted” shares of its common stock, representing approximately 65% of the then issued and outstanding voting securities, in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding member interests of Energie. This transaction is considered to be a capital transaction, rather than a business combination, equivalent to the issuance of ownership interests by Energie for the net assets of Holdings, accompanied by a recapitalization (the “Share Exchange”). The accounting is identical to that resulting from a reverse acquisition, except that no goodwill or other intangible is recorded.

Thereafter, on January 27, 2014, Holdings entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with two of its then wholly owned subsidiaries, Energie Holdings and Alas Acquisition Company (“Alas”). The Merger Agreement effectively merged Alas with and into Holdings, with Holdings being the surviving corporation. The net effect of the Merger Agreement was to effectuate a name change from Alas Aviation Corp., to Energie Holdings, Inc. in order to provide a better understanding to investors of the Company’s entry into the LED lighting industry. The Company’s management also changed.

Description of Business

Description of Business

We are focused on acquiring and growing specialized LED lighting companies for the architecture and interior design markets for both commercial and residential applications. The lighting products include both conventional fixtures and advanced solid-state technology that can integrate with digital controls and day-lighting to create energy efficiencies and a better visual environment. Our objective is to grow, innovate, and fully capture the rapidly growing lighting market opportunities associated with solid state lighting.

Énergie was founded in 2001 and is engaged in the import and sale of specialized interior lighting solutions to the architecture and interior design markets in North America. Our headquarters is located in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and we also maintain a production and assembly facility in Zeeland, Michigan.

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

As a result of the Share Exchange, Energie is considered to be the “accounting acquirer” and, accordingly, is treated as the predecessor company. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations and financial position of Energie for all periods, and the results of operations and financial position of Holdings as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and as of December 31, 2014.

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014, has been derived from audited financial statements. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual audited financial statements and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, such unaudited information includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of this interim information. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for the entire year. The information included in this report should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014.

Going Concern

Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, we had an equity deficit of $9,326,330 and a working capital deficit of $7,504,325 as of September 30, 2015, and have reported net losses of $2,026,403 and $1,720,932 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to further implement our business plan, attract additional capital and, ultimately, upon our ability to develop future profitable operations. We intend to fund our business development, acquisition endeavors and operations through equity and debt financing arrangements. However, there can be no assurance that these arrangements will be sufficient to fund our ongoing capital expenditures, working capital, and other cash requirements. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time. These matters raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11 (ASU 2015-11), Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU 2015-11 more closely aligns the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). As such, an entity should measure inventory that is within the scope of this ASU at the lower of cost and net realizable value. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-11 to be material to our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-12 (ASU 2015-12), Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965): (Part I) Fully Benefit-Responsive Investment Contracts, (Part II) Plan Investment Disclosures, (Part III) Measurement Date Practical Expedient (consensuses of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2015-12 (1) requires a pension plan to use contract value as the only measure for fully benefit-responsive investment contracts, (2) simplifies and increases the effectiveness of the investment disclosure requirements for employee benefit plans, and (3) provides benefit plans with a measurement-date practical expedient similar to the practical expedient provided to employers in ASU 2015-04, Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-12 to be material to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-13 (ASU 2015-13), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Application of the Normal Purchases and Normal Sales Scope Exception to Certain Electricity Contracts within Nodal Energy Markets (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2015-13 clarifies guidance regarding the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, for certain electricity contracts. Guidance was amended to specify that certain electricity contracts that use locational marginal pricing by an independent system operator do not fail the physical delivery criterion relating to the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-13 to be material to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14 (ASU 2015-14), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. ASU 2015-14 defers by one year the effective date of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-14 to be material to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15 (ASU 2015-15), Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements—Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting (SEC Update). ASU 2015-15 amends subtopic 835-30 to include the SEC Staff Announcement at the 18 June 2015 EITF meeting regarding the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-15 to be material to our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16 (ASU 2015-16), Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. ASU 2015-16 requires an acquirer to “recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined.” Further, the acquirer must record, in the financial statements for the same period, “the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date.” We do not expect the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-16 to be material to our consolidated financial statements.