XML 23 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVES
9 Months Ended
Oct. 29, 2011
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVES  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVES

NOTE 14FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVES

 

The Company’s fair value measurements consist of (a) non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Company’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) and (b) all financial assets and liabilities.

 

Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. There is a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

The following table provides information by level for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, on a recurring basis:

 

(dollar amounts in thousands)

 

Fair Value
at

 

Fair Value Measurements
Using Inputs Considered as

 

Description

 

October 29, 2011

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

80,716

 

$

80,716

 

$

 

$

 

Collateral investments (1)

 

14,400

 

14,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative liability (3)

 

13,963

 

 

13,963

 

 

 

(dollar amounts in thousands)

 

Fair Value
at

 

Fair Value Measurements
Using Inputs Considered as

 

Description

 

January 29, 2011

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

90,240

 

$

90,240

 

$

 

$

 

Collateral investments (1)

 

9,638

 

9,638

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration (2)

 

288

 

 

 

288

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative liability (3)

 

16,424

 

 

16,424

 

 

Contingent consideration (3)

 

1,224

 

 

 

1,224

 

 

(1) included in other long-term assets

(2) included in accrued liabilities

(3) included in other long-term liabilities

 

During fiscal 2010, the Company invested $9.6 million in restricted accounts as collateral for its retained liabilities included within existing insurance programs in lieu of previously outstanding letters of credit. During the thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2011, the company invested an additional $4.8 million. The collateral investment is included in other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

The Company has one interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge on $145.0 million of the Company’s Senior Secured Term Loan that is due in October 2013. The swap is used to minimize interest rate exposure and overall interest costs by converting the variable component of the total interest rate to a fixed rate of 5.036%. Since February 1, 2008, this swap was deemed to be fully effective and all adjustments in the interest rate swap’s fair value have been recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

 

The table below shows the effect of the Company’s interest rate swap on the consolidated financial statements for the periods indicated:

 

(dollar amounts in thousands)

 

Amount of Gain in
Other Comprehensive
Income/ (Loss)
(Effective Portion)

 

Earnings Statement
Classification

 

Amount of Loss
Recognized in Earnings
(Effective Portion) (a)

 

Thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2011

 

$

890

 

Interest expense

 

$

(1,751

)

Thirteen weeks ended October 30, 2010

 

$

(256

)

Interest expense

 

$

(1,721

)

Thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011

 

$

1,538

 

Interest expense

 

$

(5,242

)

Thirty-nine weeks ended October 30, 2010

 

$

(1,877

)

Interest expense

 

$

(5,169

)

 

 

(a) represents the effective portion of the loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

The fair value of the derivative was $14.0 million and $16.4 million payable at October 29, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively. Of the $2.4 million decrease in the fair value during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 29, 2011, $1.5 million net of tax was recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

 

Certain assets, such as goodwill and long-lived assets, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, that is, the assets are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances such as when there is evidence of impairment. These measures of fair value, and related inputs, are considered level 2 or level 3 measures under the fair value hierarchy.