New Accounting Standards

We adopted the following accounting standards, each of which did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements:

•

In 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606),” which is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. We adopted ASC 606 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method of adoption. This guidance did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

We have evaluated our various revenue streams to identify whether they would be subject to the provisions of ASC 606 and any differences in timing, measurement or presentation of revenue recognition. A significant source of our revenue is generated through leasing arrangements, which are specifically excluded from ASC 606. Management contracts are present in our seniors housing operating and outpatient medical segments and represent agreements to provide asset and property management, leasing, marketing and other services. Under ASC 606, the pattern and timing of recognition of income from these contracts is consistent with the prior accounting model.

•

In 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets.” The standard clarifies that a financial asset is within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 if it meets the definition of an in substance nonfinancial asset. The standard also defines the term “in substance nonfinancial asset” and clarifies that an entity should identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize each asset when a counterparty obtains control over it. We adopted Subtopic 610-20 using a modified retrospective approach on January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

•

In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which requires entities to measure their investments at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income unless the investments qualify for the new practicability exception. The practicability exception is available for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values. This standard requires us to recognize gains and losses from changes in the fair value of our available-for-sale equity securities through the consolidated statement of comprehensive income rather than through accumulated other comprehensive income. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we recognized a gain of $5,642,000 in loss (gain) on derivatives and financial instruments, net on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income. There was no adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income upon adoption at January 1, 2018 as accumulated losses were recognized as other-than-temporary impairment during the year ended December 31, 2017.

•

As of December 31, 2017, we adopted ASU No. 2016-18, “Restricted Cash,” and ASU No. 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU No. 2016-18 requires an entity to reconcile and explain the period over period change in total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash within its consolidated statement of cash flows and ASU 2016-15 provides guidance clarifying how certain cash receipts and cash payments should be classified. We adopted these accounting standards retrospectively and, accordingly, certain line items in the consolidated statement of cash flows have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The following table summarizes the change in cash flows as reported and as previously reported prior to the adoption of these standards for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 (in thousands):



	As Reported			As Previously Reported
Cash disbursed for acquisitions	$	(574,002	)	$	(575,694	)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash	—			130,470
Net cash provided from (used in) investing activities	400,418			529,196
Increase (decrease) in balance⁽¹⁾	(311,909		)	(183,131		)
Balance at beginning of period⁽¹⁾	607,220			419,378
Balance at end of period⁽¹⁾	295,311			236,247

(1) Amounts in As Reported column include cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as required. Amounts in the As Previously Reported column reflect only cash and cash equivalents.

•

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities,” which expands and refines hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and aligns the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. It also includes certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of current guidance related to hedge accounting. The early adoption of this standard on April 1, 2018, did not result in a cumulative effect adjustment and all applicable changes for the company were prospectively made. Please refer to Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements for additional detail on this adoption.

The following ASUs have been issued but not yet adopted:

•

In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities on their consolidated balance sheet related to the rights and obligations created by most leases, while continuing to recognize expenses on their consolidated statements of comprehensive income over the lease term. It will also require disclosures designed to give financial statement users information regarding amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The FASB issued ASU 2018-11, "Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements" in July 2018, which provides lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying assets, to not separate non-lease components from the related lease components, and, instead, to account for those components as a single lease component, if certain criteria are met. ASU 2016-02 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the consolidated financial statements. ASU 2018-11 also provides a practical expedient that allows companies to use an optional transition method. Under the optional transition method, a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings during the period of adoption is recorded and prior periods would not require restatement. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements from both the lessee and lessor perspective. We believe that adoption will likely have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements for the recognition of certain operating leases as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities and related amortization. We expect to utilize the practical expedients in ASU 2018-11 as part of our adoption of this guidance.

•

In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” This standard requires a new forward-looking “expected loss” model to be used for receivables, held-to-maturity debt, loans, and other instruments. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact that the standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.