XML 70 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases  
Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases

(5)         Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases

 

The components of net investment in direct financing leases (“DFLs”) consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Minimum lease payments receivable(1) 

 

$

24,811,003

 

$

25,217,520

 

Estimated residual values

 

4,010,514

 

4,010,514

 

Less unearned income

 

(21,828,165

)

(22,346,641

)

Net investment in direct financing leases

 

$

6,993,352

 

$

6,881,393

 

Properties subject to direct financing leases

 

361

 

361

 

 

(1)          The minimum lease payments receivable are primarily attributable to HCR ManorCare, Inc. (“HCR ManorCare”) ($23.7 billion and $24.0 billion at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively). The triple-net master lease with HCR ManorCare provides for annual rent of $506 million beginning April 1, 2013 (prior to April 1, 2013, annual rent was $489 million). The rent increases by 3.5% per year over the next three years and by 3% for the remaining portion of the initial lease term. The properties are grouped into four pools, and HCR ManorCare has a one-time extension option for each pool with rent increased for the first year of the extension option to the greater of fair market rent or a 3% increase over the rent for the prior year. Including the extension options, which the Company determined to be bargain renewal options, the four leased pools had total initial available terms ranging from 23 to 35 years.

 

Certain leases contain provisions that allow the tenants to elect to purchase the properties during or at the end of the lease terms for the aggregate initial investment amount plus adjustments, if any, as defined in the lease agreements. Certain leases also permit the Company to require the tenants to purchase the properties at the end of the lease terms.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company placed a 14-property senior housing DFL (the “DFL Portfolio”) on non-accrual status. Based on the Company’s determination that the collection of all rental payments is no longer reasonably assured, rental revenue for the DFL Portfolio will be recognized on a cash basis. Furthermore, the Company assessed the DFL Portfolio for impairment. The Company determined that the DFL Portfolio was not impaired at September 30, 2013, based on its belief that: (i) it is not probable that it will not collect all of the rental payments under the terms of the lease; and (ii) the fair value of the underlying collateral exceeds the DFL Portfolio’s $376 million carrying amount. The fair value of the DFL Portfolio was estimated based on a discounted cash flow model, which inputs are considered to be a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. Inputs to this valuation model include real estate capitalization rates, industry growth rates and operating margins, some of which influence the Company’s expectation of future cash flows from the DFL Portfolio and, accordingly, the fair value of its investment. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized DFL income of $5.1 million and $7.0 million, respectively, and received cash payments of $6.1 million and $5.6 million, respectively, from the DFL Portfolio. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized DFL income of $19.1 million and $20.8 million, respectively, and received cash payments of $17.6 million and $17.3 million, respectively, from the DFL Portfolio.