-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, QghKm7eHDlpDaPBv1H6PMrUVa1CMtHihdcPDCJuqUAGJV2sqicJp9j59L9BDtdxb QYvjttK71anWRtLa7smfzw== 0001067621-07-000007.txt : 20070323 0001067621-07-000007.hdr.sgml : 20070323 20070323141544 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001067621-07-000007 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: SC 13D/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 FILED AS OF DATE: 20070323 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20070323 GROUP MEMBERS: ANDREW DAKOS GROUP MEMBERS: BULLDOG INVESTORS GROUP MEMBERS: JAMES CHADWICK GROUP MEMBERS: LAWRENCE GOLDSTEIN GROUP MEMBERS: PHILLIP GOLDSTEIN GROUP MEMBERS: SOHAIL MALAD SUBJECT COMPANY: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000764765 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS (NO RADIO TELEPHONE) [4813] IRS NUMBER: 251485389 STATE OF INCORPORATION: PA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SC 13D/A SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 005-32402 FILM NUMBER: 07714871 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4008 GIBSONIA RD CITY: GIBSONIA STATE: PA ZIP: 15044-9311 BUSINESS PHONE: 7244439600 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4008 GIBSONIA ROAD CITY: GIBSONIA STATE: PA ZIP: 15044-9311 FILED BY: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: GOLDSTEIN PHILLIP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001067621 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: SC 13D/A BUSINESS ADDRESS: BUSINESS PHONE: 9147475262 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 60 HERITAGE DRIVE CITY: PLEASANTVILLE STATE: NY ZIP: 10570 SC 13D/A 1 npsithirdamdletter.txt DATE OF EVENT WHICH REQUIRES FILING OF THIS STATEMENT 3/23/07 1. NAME OF REPORTING PERSON Bulldog Investors, Phillip Goldstein, Andrew Dakos, Santa Monica Partners Opportunity Fund, L.P., Santa Monica Partners L.P., Santa Monica Partners II L.P., Lawrence J. Goldstein, Monarch Activist Partners L.P., James Chadwick, Sohail Malad, Nadel and Gussman Funds LLC. 2. CHECK THE BOX IF MEMBER OF A GROUP a[X] b[ ] 3. SEC USE ONLY 4. SOURCE OF FUNDS WC 5. CHECK BOX IF DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ITEMS 2(d) AND 2(e) [] 6. CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION USA 7. SOLE VOTING POWER NA 8. SHARED VOTING POWER NA 9. SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER NA 10. SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER NA 11. AGGREGATE AMOUNT OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON 987,791 12. CHECK IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT EXCLUDES CERTAIN SHARES [] 13. PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY ROW 11 6.58% 14. TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON NA 1. NAME OF REPORTING PERSON Phillip Goldstein, Andrew Dakos, Bulldog Investors 2. CHECK THE BOX IF MEMBER OF A GROUP a[X] b[ ] 3. SEC USE ONLY 4. SOURCE OF FUNDS WC 5. CHECK BOX IF DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ITEMS 2(d) AND 2(e) [] 6. CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION USA 7. SOLE VOTING POWER 494,122 8. SHARED VOTING POWER 0 9. SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER 494,122 10. SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER 0 11. AGGREGATE AMOUNT OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON 494,122 12. CHECK IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT EXCLUDES CERTAIN SHARES [] 13. PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY ROW 11 3.29% 14. TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON IA 1. NAME OF REPORTING PERSON Santa Monica Partners Opportunity Fund, L.P., Santa Monica Partners L.P., Santa Monica Partners II L.P., Lawrence J. Goldstein 2. CHECK THE BOX IF MEMBER OF A GROUP a[X] b[ ] 3. SEC USE ONLY 4. SOURCE OF FUNDS WC 5. CHECK BOX IF DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ITEMS 2(d) AND 2(e) [] 6. CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION USA 7. SOLE VOTING POWER 351,491 8. SHARED VOTING POWER 0 9. SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER 351,491 10. SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER 0 11. AGGREGATE AMOUNT OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON 351,491 12. CHECK IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT EXCLUDES CERTAIN SHARES [] 13. PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY ROW 11 2.34% 14. TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON IA 1. NAME OF REPORTING PERSON Monarch Activist Partners L.P., James Chadwick, Sohail Malad, Nadel and Gussman Funds LLC 2. CHECK THE BOX IF MEMBER OF A GROUP a[X] b[ ] 3. SEC USE ONLY 4. SOURCE OF FUNDS WC 5. CHECK BOX IF DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ITEMS 2(d) AND 2(e) [] 6. CITIZENSHIP OR PLACE OF ORGANIZATION USA 7. SOLE VOTING POWER 142,178 8. SHARED VOTING POWER 0 9. SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER 142,178 10. SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER 0 11. AGGREGATE AMOUNT OWNED BY EACH REPORTING PERSON 142,178 12. CHECK IF THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT EXCLUDES CERTAIN SHARES [] 13. PERCENT OF CLASS REPRESENTED BY ROW 11 ..95% 14. TYPE OF REPORTING PERSON IA This statement constitutes amendment No.5 to the Schedule 13D filed on April 4, 2006. Except as specifically set forth herein, the Schedule 13D remains unmodified. Item 4 is amended as follows: ITEM 4. PURPOSE OF TRANSACTION The reporting persons have sent the attached letter (Exhibit 1) to the Issuer?s shareholders. Item 7 is amended as follows: ITEM 7. MATERIAL TO BE FILED AS EXHIBITS Exhibit 1. Letter to the Issuers Shareholders After reasonable inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct. Dated: 3/23/07 By: /s/ Phillip Goldstein Name: Phillip Goldstein By: /s/ Andrew Dakos Name: Andrew Dakos By: /s/ Lawrence J. Goldstein Name: Lawrence J. Goldstein By: /s/ James Chadwick Name: James Chadwick By: /s/ Sohail Malad Name: Sohail Malad Exhibit 1. The North Pittsburgh Systems Shareholder Committee Park 80 West ? Plaza Two, Suite C04 Saddle Brook, NJ 07663 Ph 201-556-0092 Fx 201-556-0097 Email: adakos@bulldoginvestors.com March 15, 2007 Dear Fellow North Pittsburgh Systems Shareholders: As one of the largest shareholders of North Pittsburgh Systems (?NPSI?), we are concerned about the recent deterioration of NPSI?s business. If management continues along its current course, we foresee a continuing decline in our Company?s value. In a few short months, you will have a chance to vote on the single most important decision in the 101 year history of North Pittsburgh Systems. At the 2007 annual meeting, shareholders will determine whether NPSI will continue to plod along as its telephone customers and subscriber base wither away and shareholder value declines or whether to endorse a better alternative,i.e., to sell the Company at a premium to the current share price. We believe a sale of the Company now is clearly in the best interest of NPSI?s shareholders, customers, and employees. The traditional telecommunications world in which there were many small telephone companies is vanishing. Every day well-funded cable and internet competitors are taking market share from the smaller traditional landline companies like NPSI. We have tried to tell NPSI management it is futile to compete with companies that have much greater economies of scale and offer more services at lower prices. But don?t take our word for it. The stock graph on the next page illustrates what happened to two comparable stand alone local telephone companies,Warwick Valley Telephone Company and Hector Communications that faced a problem very similar to that which NPSI is facing today. Like NPSI, Warwick Valley Telephone stuck to its business plan by pouring millions of dollars into technologies in a futile effort to compete in video and internet services. That strategy did not work; senior management has turned over, more than 20% of the employees have been laid off and the formerly profitable Warwick Valley Telephone is now incurring operating losses. Its stock price, which reached $34 per share in November 2003, has declined steadily to $17.10. By contrast, Hector Communications astutely recognized the competitive threat it faced. It put itself up for sale to the highest bidder and in November, 2006 the company was sold for $36.40 in cash,a gain of 160% from the $14 per share level at which the company?s stock was trading at in November 2003. (Insert: Chart illustrating stock price of Warwick and Hector) HOW DO YOU WANT NPSI TO END UP - LIKE WARWICK VALLEY TELEPHONE OR HECTOR COMMUNICATIONS? And remember, in case you are an employee of NPSI, management?s decision to remain independent could well cost you your job. At Warwick Valley Telephone, not only did shareholders lose but employees suffered massive layoffs,layoffs far greater than if the company had been sold to a larger telecom provider. Why, you may wonder, would management of NPSI not support a sale? Are they looking out for their own welfare even though shareholders and employees will suffer from their reluctance to face reality? Certainly, NPSI?s senior managers stand to lose the most if the Company is sold. For example, in 2005 CEO and President Harry Brown collected a salary and bonus of $326,000 but owned just a tiny amount of NPSI stock. Chairman Charles E. Thomas Jr.?s law firm ?earned? $313,000 in legal fees from NPSI during 2005 but he owned just 0.4% of NPSI stock. It is easy to see why management may be more concerned with their pay and their perks than with NPSI?s stock performance. As we said, we have been seeking to have a productive dialogue with management for nearly a year but unfortunately we have nothing to show for our efforts. That is why we cannot stress enough the importance of the upcoming annual meeting to the shareholders of NPSI. Take another look at the graph above and ask yourself this question: Which is the direction I want for my investment in NPSI?At the annual meeting, you can make that decision. Sincerely, The North Pittsburgh Systems Shareholder Committee Phillip Goldstein Bulldog Investors Andrew Dakos Bulldog Investors Lawrence Goldstein Santa Monica Partners LP James Chadwick Monarch Activist Partners LP -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----