XML 197 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to the CD&A beginning on page 61 of this Proxy Statement.
Year
Summary
 Compensation
Table Total for
PEO
($)(1)
Compensation
Actually Paid
 to PEO
 ($)(2)
Average
Summary
 Compensation
 Table Total for
 Non-PEO NEOs
 ($)(3)
Average
 Compensation
 Actually Paid
 to Non-PEO
 NEOs
 ($)(4)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
 Investment Based on:
Total
Shareholder
Return ($)(5)
Peer Group
 Total
Shareholder
Return ($)(6)
Net Income
(millions)(7)
APS Adjusted
 Earnings
 (millions)(8)
20239,322,192 10,889,494 2,944,101 3,263,608 95 107 519 556 
20228,358,317 9,453,300 2,542,827 2,749,796 96 117 501 525 
20218,100,157 5,532,436 2,842,352 2,219,429 85 116 636 632 
20206,849,455 5,416,048 2,619,339 1,926,894 92 99 570 588 
     
Company Selected Measure Name APS Adjusted Earnings      
Named Executive Officers, Footnote The dollar amounts reported in this column are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Guldner (our CEO also known as the Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”)) for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table.The dollar amounts reported in this column represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner, who has served as our CEO since 2019) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding Mr. Guldner) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2023, Andrew D. Cooper, Theodore N. Geisler, Adam C. Heflin, and Robert E. Smith (ii) for 2022, Theodore N. Geisler, Andrew D. Cooper, Adam C. Heflin, Maria L. Lacal, Robert E. Smith, and Jacob Tetlow; (iii) for 2021, Theodore N. Geisler, James R. Hatfield, Maria L. Lacal, and Robert E. Smith; and (iv) for 2020, James R. Hatfield, Theodore N. Geisler, Daniel T. Froetscher, Maria L. Lacal, and Robert E. Smith.      
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote Cumulative peer group TSR, as required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, is calculated using the same methodology used in calculating the Company’s cumulative TSR. Further, in calculating the peer group cumulative TSR, the returns of each component issuer is weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: EEI Index.      
PEO Total Compensation Amount $ 9,322,192 $ 8,358,317 $ 8,100,157 $ 6,849,455
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount $ 10,889,494 9,453,300 5,532,436 5,416,048
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote The dollar amounts reported in this column represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Guldner, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Guldner during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Guldner’s total compensation for each year to determine the compensation actually paid:
YearReported Summary
Compensation
Table Total for PEO
($)
Reported Value of
 Equity Awards
 ($)(a)
Equity Award
 Adjustments
 ($)(b)
Reported Change
 in the Actuarial
 Present Value of
 Pension Benefits
 ($)(c)
Pension Benefit
 Adjustments
 ($)(d)
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO
($)
20239,322,192 (5,028,405)7,440,754 (1,223,951)378,904 10,889,494 
20228,358,317 (4,577,787)6,135,632 (890,667)427,805 9,453,300 
20218,100,157 (4,079,762)2,111,502 (1,021,838)422,377 5,532,436 
20206,849,455 (3,316,740)2,281,910 (782,970)384,393 5,416,048 
(a)The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the amount reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(b)The equity award adjustments for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the year; (ii) the amount of change as of the end of the applicable year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in the fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in same applicable year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the applicable year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on stock awards in the applicable year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other component of total compensation for the applicable year. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments are as follows:
YearYear-End Fair
Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During the
Covered Fiscal
Year that are
Outstanding
and Unvested
as of the End
of the Covered
Fiscal Year
Year over Year
Change in Fair
Value as of the End of the Covered Fiscal Year of
Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years
Fair Value as
of Vesting
Date of Equity
Awards
Granted and
Vested in the
Same Covered
Fiscal Year
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date
of Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
that Vested in
the Covered
Fiscal Year
Fair Value at
the End of the
Prior Fiscal
Year of Equity
Awards that
Failed to Meet
Vesting
Conditions in
the Covered
Fiscal Year
Value of Dividends
or other Earnings
Paid on Stock
Awards in the
Covered Fiscal Year
Not Otherwise
Reflected in Fair
Value or Total
Compensation
Total Equity
Award
Adjustments
20235,041,324 961,712 840,730 596,988 7,440,754 
20225,292,090 102,694 303,819 437,029 6,135,632 
20212,680,491 (646,196)(184,196)261,403 2,111,502 
20202,138,995 (93,395)80,020 156,290 2,281,910 
(c)The amounts included in this column are the amounts reported in the “Change in Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year.
(d)The total pension benefit adjustments for each applicable year include the aggregate of two components: (i) the actuarially determined service cost for services rendered by Mr. Guldner during the applicable year (the “service cost”); and (ii) the entire cost of benefits granted (or credit for benefits reduced) in a plan amendment (or initiation) during the applicable year that are attributed by the benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment or initiation (the “prior service cost”), in each case, calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The amounts deducted or added in calculating the pension benefit adjustments are as follows:
YearService CostPrior Service CostTotal Pension
Benefit Adjustments
2023378,9040378,904
2022427,8050427,805
2021422,3770422,377
2020384,3930384,393
     
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount $ 2,944,101 2,542,827 2,842,352 2,619,339
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount $ 3,263,608 2,749,796 2,219,429 1,926,894
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote The dollar amounts reported in this column represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner) during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner) for each year to determine the compensation actually paid, using the same methodology described above in footnote 2:
YearAverage Reported
Summary
Compensation Table
Total for Non-PEO
NEOs
Average
Reported Value
of Equity Awards
Average Equity
Award
Adjustments(a)
Average Reported
Change in the
Actuarial Present
Value of Pension
Benefits
Average Pension
Benefit
Adjustments(b)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs
20232,944,101 (1,282,494)1,687,847 (229,852)144,005 3,263,608 
20222,542,827 (1,239,053)1,333,714 (6,888)119,197 2,749,796 
20212,842,352 (977,983)522,865 (360,916)193,111 2,219,429 
20202,619,339 (878,815)625,410 (571,556)132,516 1,926,894 
(a)The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are as follows:
YearAverage Year End
Fair Value of
Equity Awards
Granted During
the Covered Fiscal
Year that are
Outstanding and
Unvested as of the
End of the
Covered Fiscal
Year
Year over Year
Average
Change in Fair
Value as of the End of the Covered Fiscal Year of
Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years
Average Fair
Value as of
Vesting Date
of Equity
Awards
Granted and
Vested in the
Same Covered
Fiscal Year
Year over Year
Average
Change in Fair
Value as of the
Vesting Date
of Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
that Vested in
the Covered
Fiscal Year
Average Fair
Value at the
End of the
Prior Year of
Equity Awards
that Failed to
Meet Vesting
Conditions in
the Covered
Fiscal Year
Average Value of
Dividends or Other
Earnings Paid on
Stock Awards in the
Covered Fiscal Year
not Otherwise
Reflected in Fair
Value or Total
Compensation
Total
Average
Equity
Award
Adjustments
20231,284,440 190,416 84,720 128,271 1,687,847 
20221,214,197 17,094 31,981 70,442 1,333,714 
2021657,909 (157,946)(49,765)72,667 522,865 
2020571,275 (54,641)55,533 53,243 625,410 
(b)The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total pension benefit adjustments are as follows:
YearAverage
 Service Cost
Average Prior
 Service Cost
Total Average Pension
 Benefit Adjustments
2023144,005 144,005 
2022119,197 119,197 
2021193,111 193,111 
2020132,516 132,516 
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return
Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative TSR
As demonstrated by the following graph, the calculated amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Guldner and the average of the calculated amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner) is reflective of increases in the calculation of compensation actually paid for Mr. Guldner, which in turn reflects increases of certain compensation components tied to his growth into the position of Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and modest increases year-over-year in the calculation of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner) as compared to year-over-year changes in the Company’s TSR. With respect to the year-over-year changes in the TSR, we note that the 2021 TSR was adversely impacted by the 2019 rate case decision and the 2023 TSR was affected in part by market dynamics. As discussed in the CD&A, coming out of our 2019 rate case decision, we took action to recover from the impacts of that decision and are making solid progress on our strategic plan. Although our TSR went down between 2022 and 2023, we outperformed the EEI Index performance. The Company believes that the negative TSR was attributable in part to the fact that utilities were the worst performing sector in 2023, largely due to negative sentiment associated with rising interest rates and inflationary pressures. The Company does not use cumulative TSR in its executive compensation program, but does use relative TSR in the performance share grants as discussed in more detail in the CD&A. TSR impacts our compensation program in two ways — the actual stock price increases and decreases impacts the value of the equity awards and the relative TSR performance metric drives whether a portion of the overall equity grant pays out and to what degree.
9406
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income
Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
As demonstrated by the following graph, the calculated amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Guldner and the average of the calculated amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner) is reflective of increases in the calculation of compensation actually paid for Mr. Guldner, which in turn reflects increases of certain compensation components tied to his growth into the position of Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and modest increases year-over-year in the calculation of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner) as compared to year-over-year changes in the Company’s net income. The decline in net income in 2022 is primarily due to no longer deferring costs relating to our Four Corners selective catalytic reduction equipment and the Ocotillo Power Plant modernization project as a result of the unfavorable 2019 rate case decision. Net income in 2023 was favorably impacted in part by warmer than expected weather and an appellate court decision that reversed recovery of a portion of the deferred cost referenced above. However, net income in 2023 continued to be impacted by the 2019 rate case decision. Although we don’t use net income in our executive compensation program, we do use earnings in the 2023 Incentive Plans, as discussed below.
10167
icon_PEO.jpg 
Compensation Actually Paid (PEO)
icon_average.jpg 
Compensation Actually Paid (Average for Non-PEO NEOs)
icon_TSR.jpg
Net Income (millions)
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure
Compensation Actually Paid and APS Adjusted Earnings
As demonstrated by the following graph, the calculated amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Guldner and the average of the calculated amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner) is reflective of increases in the calculation of compensation actually paid for Mr. Guldner, which in turn reflects increases of certain compensation components tied to his growth into the position of Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and modest increases year-over-year in the calculation of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Guldner) as compared to year-over-year changes in APS Adjusted Earnings. With respect to APS Adjusted Earnings we note that the 2022 earnings were reflective of the decrease in APS rates as a result of the 2019 rate case, and the impacts of the disallowance described on page 5 of this Proxy Statement. APS Adjusted Earnings for 2023 reflect higher revenues from warmer than expected weather, including record-breaking temperatures with 55 days over 100 degrees and also reflect in part the appellate court decision that reversed recovery of a portion of the disallowance. APS Adjusted Earnings is used in the 2023 Incentive Plans and represents 50% of the payout opportunity under those plans. Although Mr. Guldner’s payout opportunity is tied to Pinnacle West earnings, APS earnings account for a significant portion of Pinnacle West earnings, and is therefore a significant part of Mr. Guldner’s opportunity.
10902
icon_PEO.jpg 
Compensation Actually Paid (PEO)
icon_average.jpg
Compensation Actually paid (Average for Non-PEO NEOs)
 icon_TSR.jpg
APS Adjusted Earnings (millions)
     
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group
Cumulative TSR of the Company and Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group
The Company believes the decline in the cumulative TSRs was due in part to the fact that utilities were the worst performing sector in 2023; however, as demonstrated by the chart below, our 2023 TSR only declined by approximately 1.2% compared to the cumulative TSR of the EEI peer group, which declined by 10.2%. Pinnacle West’s TSR from 2019 through 2021, compared to the EEI, declined largely due to investor concerns over the regulatory climate in Arizona while an APS rate case was pending. For more information regarding the Company’s performance and the companies that the Human Resources Committee considers when determining compensation, refer to the CD&A.
11664
icon_companyTSR.jpg
Company TSR
icon_TSR.jpg
Peer Group TSR (EEI Index TSR)
Value of $100 Invested as of December 31, 2019, with Dividends Reinvested
     
Tabular List, Table
Financial Performance Measures
As described in greater detail in the CD&A, the Company’s executive compensation program is designed to be transparent with a clear emphasis on putting pay at risk and retaining key executives. The metrics that the Company uses for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards emphasize putting pay at risk and aligning our executives interests with those of our shareholders. The most important performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance, are as follows:
APS Adjusted Earnings
Relative TSR
Stock price
Capital spend
Operations and maintenance spend
Customer satisfaction
Safety
     
Total Shareholder Return Amount $ 95 96 85 92
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount 107 117 116 99
Net Income (Loss) $ 519,000,000 $ 501,000,000 $ 636,000,000 $ 570,000,000
Company Selected Measure Amount 555,600,000 525,000,000 632,000,000 587,700,000
PEO Name Mr. Guldner      
Additional 402(v) Disclosure Cumulative TSR, as required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period. The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in PNW’s audited financial statements for the applicable year, as required. For further details, see Consolidated Statements of Income in the Pinnacle West/APS Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.Adjusted APS earnings (“APS Adjusted Earnings”) is APS earnings calculated in accordance with GAAP, as adjusted for purposes of the annual incentive plans, as follows: (i) for the APS 2020 Annual Incentive Award Plan and the APS 2020 Annual Incentive Award Plan for Palo Verde Employees, APS earnings were adjusted from $568.0 million to $587.7 million due to an accrual for the Coal Communities Transition Plan that was required under the accounting rules but that related to a future expense; (ii) for the APS 2021 Annual Incentive Award Plan and the APS 2021 Annual Incentive Award Plan for Palo Verde Employees, APS earnings were not adjusted; (iii) for the APS 2022 Annual Incentive Award Plan and the APS 2022 Annual Incentive Award Plan for Palo Verde Employees, APS earnings were not adjusted; and (iv) for the APS 2023 Annual Incentive Award Plan and the APS 2023 Annual Incentive Award Plan for Palo Verde Employees, APS earnings were adjusted from $547.3 million to $555.6 million due to a budget correction to a tax allocation that was made within the Pinnacle West consolidated group of companies.      
Company Selected Measure, Prior To Adjustment 547,300,000     568,000,000
Measure:: 1        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name APS Adjusted Earnings      
Measure:: 2        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Relative TSR      
Measure:: 3        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Stock price      
Measure:: 4        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Capital spend      
Measure:: 5        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Operations and maintenance spend      
Measure:: 6        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Customer satisfaction      
Measure:: 7        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Name Safety      
PEO | Reported Value of Equity Awards        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount $ (5,028,405) $ (4,577,787) $ (4,079,762) $ (3,316,740)
PEO | Equity Award Adjustments        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 7,440,754 6,135,632 2,111,502 2,281,910
PEO | Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (1,223,951) (890,667) (1,021,838) (782,970)
PEO | Pension Benefit Adjustments        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 378,904 427,805 422,377 384,393
PEO | Equity Awards Granted During the Year, Unvested [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 5,041,324 5,292,090 2,680,491 2,138,995
PEO | Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 961,712 102,694 (646,196) (93,395)
PEO | Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Same Covered Fiscal Year        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 0 0 0 0
PEO | Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 840,730 303,819 (184,196) 80,020
PEO | Fair Value at the End of the Prior Fiscal Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Covered Fiscal Year        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 0 0 0 0
PEO | Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards in the Covered Fiscal Year not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 596,988 437,029 261,403 156,290
PEO | Service Cost Pension Benefit Adjustment [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Pension Benefit Award Adjustments 378,904 427,805 422,377 384,393
PEO | Prior Service Cost Pension Benefit Adjustment [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Pension Benefit Award Adjustments 0 0 0 0
PEO | Pension Benefit Award Adjustments [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 378,904 427,805 422,377 384,393
PEO | Average Service Cost Pension Benefit Adjustment [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Pension Benefit Award Adjustments 144,005 119,197 193,111 132,516
PEO | Average Prior Service Cost Pension Benefit Adjustment [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Pension Benefit Award Adjustments 0 0 0 0
PEO | Average Pension Benefit Award Adjustments [Member]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 144,005 119,197 193,111 132,516
Non-PEO NEO | Reported Value of Equity Awards [Default Label]        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (1,282,494) (1,239,053) (977,983) (878,815)
Non-PEO NEO | Average Equity Award Adjustments        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 1,687,847 1,333,714 522,865 625,410
Non-PEO NEO | Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount (229,852) (6,888) (360,916) (571,556)
Non-PEO NEO | Average Pension Benefit Adjustments        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount 144,005 119,197 193,111 132,516
Non-PEO NEO | Average Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During the Covered Fiscal Year that are Outstanding and Unvested as of the end of the Covered Fiscal Year        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 1,284,440 1,214,197 657,909 571,275
Non-PEO NEO | Year over Year Average Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 190,416 17,094 (157,946) (54,641)
Non-PEO NEO | Average Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Same Covered Fiscal Year        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 0 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Year over Year Average Change in Fair Value as of the Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Covered Fiscal Year        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 84,720 31,981 (49,765) 55,533
Non-PEO NEO | Average Fair Value at the End of the Prior Fiscal Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Covered Fiscal Year        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards 0 0 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Average Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards in the Covered Fiscal Year not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation        
Pay vs Performance Disclosure        
Adjustment to Compensation Amount, Equity Awards $ 128,271 $ 70,442 $ 72,667 $ 53,243