XML 49 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair value is determined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. This topic also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires classification based on observable and unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

 

Level one — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

 

Level two — Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

 

Level three — Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

 

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:

 

   Fair value measurement using inputs   Carrying amount at 
Financial instruments  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   12/31/2012 
                 
Liabilities:                    
Derivative instruments  $   $1,016,341   $   $1,016,341 
Total  $   $1,016,341   $   $1,016,341 

 

   Fair value measurement using inputs   Carrying amount at 
Financial instruments  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   12/31/2011 
                 
Liabilities:                    
Derivative instruments  $   $1,043,639   $   $1,043,639 
Total  $   $1,043,639   $   $1,043,639 

  

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company entered into various note agreements. At the option of the holder, these notes are convertible into the Company’s shares of common stock at various conversion prices.

 

     
Issue Date   Conversion Price Clause
01/26/12   Lower of (i) $2.00 or (ii) 50% of lowest closing bid price 30 trading days preceding conversion date
1/31/12   Lower of (i) $2.00 or (ii) 50% of lowest closing bid price 30 trading days preceding conversion date
2/16/12   Lower of (i) $2.00 or (ii) 50% of lowest closing bid price 30 trading days preceding conversion date
2/21/12   Lower of (i) $2.00 or (ii) 50% of lowest closing bid price 30 trading days preceding conversion date
6/6/12   Lower of (i) $0.50 or (ii) 50% of average closing bid price 3 trading days preceding conversion date
7/20/12   55% of Market Price / average of the lowest 3 trading prices, 10 trading days preceding conversion date
8/23/12   55% of Market Price / average of the lowest 3 trading prices, 10 trading days preceding conversion date
11/12/12   31% of Market Price / lowest trading price, 120 days preceding conversion date
12/24/12   55% of Market Price / lowest trading price, 120 days preceding conversion date

 

As per ASC 815 Derivatives & Hedging, these convertible notes payable do not meet the definition of a “conventional convertible debt instrument” since the debt is not convertible into a fixed number of shares. The debt can be converted into common stock at a conversions price that is a percentage of the market price; therefore the number of shares that could be required to be delivered upon “net-share settlement” is essentially indeterminate. Therefore, the convertible debenture is considered “non-conventional,” which means that the conversion feature must be bifurcated from the debt and shown as a separate derivative liability.

 

The fair value of the conversion liability will be adjusted to fair value each balance sheet date with the change being shown as a component of net income.

 

The fair value of the derivative liability at the inception of these convertible notes payable were shown as a debt discount with any discount greater than the face amount of the debt being as financing costs in the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

Funding Date   Amount of Debt    Fair Value of Derivative Liability    Amount Applied to Debt Discount    Recorded as Debt Issuance Cost 
01/26/12   50,000    199,842    50,000    149,842 
1/31/12   50,000    99,901    50,000    49,901 
2/16/12   60,000    239,871    60,000    179,871 
2/21/12   40,000    79,937    40,000    39,937 
6/6/12   30,000    93,875    30,000    63,875 
7/20/12   27,500    212,706    27,500    185,206 
8/23/12   32,500    53,870    32,500    21,370 
11/12/12   16,000    195,202    16,000    179,202 
12/24/12   22,500    272,976    22,500    250,476 
    328,500    1,448,180    328,500    1,119,680 

 

At December 31, 2012, the fair value of the conversion liabilities was $1,016,341. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the gain due to the change in the fair value of these derivative liabilities was recorded as $1,475,481.

 

At December 31, 2011, the fair value of the conversion liabilities was $1,043,639. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the loss due to the change in the fair value of these derivative liabilities was recorded as $284,378.