-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, FNOBfl0EihrC1lDIFxpe6DafJlF1rl87Pcfg1brQG0YAxQQJwIyRk3alH4otK3Ai YeMUz+fdMoN2brZwGA0wLg== 0001019687-09-002894.txt : 20090814 0001019687-09-002894.hdr.sgml : 20090814 20090814121738 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001019687-09-002894 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20090630 FILED AS OF DATE: 20090814 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20090814 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000763950 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: INDUSTRIAL INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASUREMENT, DISPLAY, AND CONTROL [3823] IRS NUMBER: 952746949 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-09327 FILM NUMBER: 091013684 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 700 CITY: BEVERLY HILLS STATE: CA ZIP: 90212 BUSINESS PHONE: 3102483655 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 9595 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 700 CITY: BEVERLY HILLS STATE: CA ZIP: 90212 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: POLLUTION RESEARCH & CONTROL CORP /CA/ DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19920703 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: DASIBI ENVIRONMENTAL CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19900529 10-Q 1 udt_10q-063009.txt UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ---------------------------- FORM 10-Q [X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended: JUNE 30, 2009 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___ to ____ Commission File Number 0-31012 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY (NAME OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) CALIFORNIA 95-2746949 - ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 340 NORTH CAMDEN DRIVE, SUITE 302 BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210 - --------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Issuer's telephone number: (310) 248-3655 Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X] Check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X] Number of shares outstanding as of August 15, 2009: 639,641,678 common shares. Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes [ ] No [X] FORM 10-Q INDEX PAGE NO. ---------- PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) : 3 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition 16 and Results of Operations. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 25 Item 4T. Controls and Procedures. 25 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings 26 Item 1A Risk Factors 26 Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 27 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 27 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 27 Item 5. Other Information 27 Item 6. Exhibits 29 SIGNATURES 2 PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008 (UNAUDITED) ASSETS JUNE 30, 2009 DECEMBER 31, 2008 ------------- --------------- CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents $ 5,456 $ 1,910 Restricted cash -- 10,477 Accounts Receivable, net 234 1,058 Inventory 5,852 -- Prepaid expenses 7,100 3,666 ------------- --------------- Total current assets 18,642 17,111 Deposits 21,300 10,226 Equipment, net 20,583 32,946 Patent, net 81,305 84,008 ------------- --------------- Total assets $ 141,830 $ 144,291 ============= =============== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable, trade $ 1,084,414 $ 1,030,865 Accrued liabilities 494,966 480,126 Accrued payroll - officers 403,422 809,136 Notes payable - related party 19,647 10,325 Notes payable 1,569,383 1,630,711 Accrued interest expense 671,508 657,110 ------------- --------------- Total current liabilities 4,243,340 4,618,273 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT: Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, -0- issued and outstanding Common stock, no par value, 20,000,000,000 shares authorized, 435,144,101 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and 35,286,671 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2008 30,232,193 28,823,641 Additional paid-in-capital 5,313,089 5,313,089 Accumulated deficit (39,646,792) (38,610,712) ------------- --------------- Total stockholders' deficit (4,101,510) (4,473,982) ------------- --------------- Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $ 141,830 $ 144,291 ============= =============== See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 3 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008 (UNAUDITED) 2009 2008 ------------- ------------- REVENUE, NET $ 15,482 $ 62,570 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,868 18,205 ------------- ------------- GROSS PROFIT 13,614 44,365 ------------- ------------- OPERATING EXPENSES: Selling, general and administrative 475,192 743,649 Marketing 54,925 7,936 Depreciation and amortization 15,067 15,066 ------------- ------------- Total expenses 545,184 766,651 ------------- ------------- LOSS FROM OPERATIONS (531,570) (722,286) OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): Interest income 12 102 Interest expense (77,281) (90,637) Penalties -- (10) Loss on settlement of debt (427,241) (420,575) ------------- ------------- Total other expenses (504,510) (511,120) ------------- ------------- NET LOSS $ (1,036,080) $ (1,233,407) ============= ============= NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED: $ (0.007) $ (0.154) ============= ============= WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING 157,374,747 8,018,377 ============= ============= Weighted average number of dilutive securities has no been calculated as the effect of dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 4 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008 (UNAUDITED) 2009 2008 ------------- ------------- REVENUE, NET $ -- $ 2,194 COST OF GOODS SOLD -- 1,952 ------------- ------------- GROSS PROFIT -- 242 ------------- ------------- OPERATING EXPENSES: Selling, general and administrative 291,692 433,949 Marketing 42,500 3,514 Depreciation and amortization 7,533 7,533 ------------- ------------- Total expenses 341,725 444,996 ------------- ------------- LOSS FROM OPERATIONS (341,725) (444,754) OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): Interest income -- 43 Interest expense (24,906) (48,065) Penalties -- (10) Loss on settlement of debt (390,184) (203,095) ------------- ------------- Total other expenses (415,090) (251,127) ------------- ------------- NET LOSS $ (756,815) $ (695,881) ============= ============= NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED: $ (0.003) $ (0.069) ============= ============= WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING 260,634,355 10,105,873 ============= ============= Weighted average number of dilutive securities has no been calculated as the effect of dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 5 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008 (UNAUDITED) 2009 2008 ----------- ----------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net loss $(1,036,080) $(1,233,407) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations: Stocks issued for services 472,212 445,075 Loss on settlement of debt 427,241 420,575 Depreciation and amortization 15,067 15,066 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Deposits (11,074) -- Patent costs -- -- Accounts receivable 824 (50,293) Prepaid expenses (3,434) (15,000) Assets held for sale (5,852) -- Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (260,044) 126,457 ----------- ----------- Net cash used in operating activities (401,140) (291,528) ----------- ----------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: (Increase)/Decrease in restricted cash 10,477 (98) ----------- ----------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from notes payable-related party 32,492 9,600 Proceeds from notes payable 384,887 322,000 Payments on notes payable - related party (23,170) (38,057) Payments on notes payable -- (9,620) ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by financing activities 394,209 283,923 ----------- ----------- NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 3,546 (7,702) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD 1,910 9,555 ----------- ----------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD $ 5,456 $ 1,853 =========== =========== SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Income tax $ -- $ -- =========== =========== Interest Paid $ -- $ 1,273 =========== =========== SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES FOR NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Shares issued for settlement of debt and accrued interest $ 936,338 $ 622,306 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 6
UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Universal Detection Technology and Subsidiaries., pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") Form 10-Q and Item 310 of Regulation S-K, and generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial reporting. The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2009. NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES STOCK SPLIT On July 25, 2008, the Company effected a reverse stock split of their common stock. The reverse split was effected on a one-for-two hundred basis, resulting in 14,211,953 shares outstanding immediately following the stock split. All common stock numbers in this Current Report on Form 10-Q, have been retroactively restated for the effect of the reverse split. GOING CONCERN As of June 30, 2009, the Company had a working capital deficit of $4,230,550 and an accumulated deficit of $39,646,792. The Company incurred a net loss of $1,036,080 for the six month period ended June 30, 2009. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to develop additional sources of capital and ultimately achieve profitable operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. During the first six months of 2009, the Company sold detection kits under various purchase agreements and had consulting revenue for $15,482. The Company also entered into various agreements to issue 250,805,180 shares of its common stock to a third parties in order to convert outstanding debt to the respective parties. The value of the stock issued in consideration for the debt conversion was $936,338. 7 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 RECLASSIFICATION Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year balances to conform to the current year presentation. REVENUE RECOGNITION The Company's revenue recognition policies are in compliance with Staff accounting bulletin (SAB) 104. Sales revenue is recognized at the date of shipment to customers when a formal arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectibility is reasonably assured. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied are recorded as unearned revenue. USE OF ESTIMATES IN THE PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include collectibility of accounts receivable, accounts payable, sales returns and recoverability of long-term assets. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS On December 30, 2008 FASB issued FIN 48-3, "Effective Date of FASB Interpretation No. 48 for Certain Nonpublic Enterprises". This FSP defers the effective date of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, for certain non-public enterprises as defined in paragraph 289, as amended, of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, including non-public not-for-profit organizations. However, non-public consolidated entities of public enterprises that apply U. S. GAAP are not eligible for the deferral. Nonpublic enterprises that have applied the recognition, measurement, and disclosure provisions of Interpretation 48 in a full set of annual financial statements issued prior to the issuance of this FSP also are not eligible for the deferral. This FSP shall be effective upon issuance. The Company does not believe this pronouncement will impact its financial statements. On January 12, 2009 FASB issued EITF 99-20-01, "AMENDMENT TO THE IMPAIRMENT GUIDANCE OF EITF ISSUE NO. 99-20." This FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No.99-20, "RECOGNITION OF INTEREST INCOME AND IMPAIRMENT ON PURCHASED BENEFICIAL INTERESTS AND BENEFICIAL INTERESTS THAT CONTINUE TO BE HELD BY A TRANSFEROR IN SECURITIZED FINANCIAL ASSETS," to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and other related guidance. The FSP shall be effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008, and shall be applied prospectively. Retrospective application to a prior interim or annual reporting period is not permitted. The Company does not believe this pronouncement will impact its financial statements. 8 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 NOTE 3 - PATENTS As of June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, the patent value is as follows: June 30, December 31, 2009 2008 --------- --------- Patent Costs $ 117,341 $ 117,341 Accumulated Amortization (36,036) (33,333) --------- --------- Patent, Net $ 81,305 $ 84,008 ========= ========= Total amortization expense was $2,704 and $2,704 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively. NOTE 4 - NOTES PAYABLE During the first quarter of 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $92,000 from third parties under various promissory note agreements. The promissory notes all bear interest at 12.0% per annum, and are due on or before February 11, 2011. No interest or principal payments have been made on the notes. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $318,887 from third parties under various promissory note agreements. The promissory notes all bear interest at 12.0% per annum, and are due on or before June 29, 2011. No principal or interest payments have been made on these notes. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had total notes payable of $1,569,383 and $1,630,711. NOTE 5 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company was involved in the following litigations: 9 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 a) A. Sean Rose, Claire F. Rose and Mark Rose v. Universal Detection Technology, fka Pollution Research and Control Corporation (Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, North Central District, Case No. EC042040) On or about April 16, 2004, Plaintiffs commenced an action against the Company (Case No. EC 038824) for amounts allegedly due pursuant to four unpaid promissory notes. On August 2, 2004, the parties executed a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (the "AGREEMENT"). On December 30, 2005, Plaintiffs commenced the above-referenced action against the Company, alleging the Company breached the Agreement and seeking approximately $205,000 in damages. A judgment was entered on April 11, 2006. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company has accrued $482,281 and $456,607 respectively for this settlement including principal and interest. b) On June 2, 2006, Plaintiff Trilogy Capital Partners instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (TRILOGY CAPITAL PARTNERS V. UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, ET. AL., Case No. SC089929) against the Company. Plaintiff's Complaint alleged damages against UDT for breach of an engagement letter in the amount of $93,449. Also, Plaintiff alleged that UDT had failed to issue warrants to it pursuant to a written agreement. After completing the initial stages of litigation and conducting extensive mediation, Plaintiff and UDT reached a settlement wherein commencing December 15, 2006, UDT would make monthly payments to Plaintiff of $2,000 until a debt of $90,000 plus accrued interest at six percent per annum was fully paid. In exchange, Plaintiff would release all of its claims against UDT. UDT has been current on all of its agreed payments to Plaintiff. As of June 30, 2009, $48,357 was due under the agreement. c) On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff NBGI, Inc. instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (NBGI, Inc. v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. BC361979) against the Company. NBGI, Inc.'s Complaint alleged breach of contract, and requested damages in the amount of $111,014 plus interest at the legal rate and for costs of suit. UDT strongly disputes and shall vigorously defend against the allegations of the Complaint. To date, discovery has commenced, and trial has been set for October 29, 2007. There is also a Motion for Summary Judgment set for September 11, 2007. The Summary Judgment was granted in NBGI's favor, and Judgment has been entered. From time to time, the Company is a party to a number of lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations, cash flows or financial position. 10 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 NOTE 6- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 138,031,826 shares of common stock to employees for services rendered to the Company. The Company recorded the expense at the fair market value of the shares of $427,233. During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 7,832,924 shares of common stock as payment for consulting or other professional fees for an aggregate amount of $32,329. During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company entered various agreements to convert $356,699 of indebtedness into 210,073,930 shares of common stock. The fair market value of the stock on the date of agreement and issuances was $746,882. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $390,185. During the three month period ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 3,187,500 shares of common stock as payment for consulting or other professional fees for an aggregate amount of $12,451. During the three month period ended March 31, 2009, the Company entered various agreements to convert $152,400 of indebtedness into 40,731,250 shares of common stock The fair market value of the stock on the date of agreement & issuance was $189,456. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $37,056. COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS AND OPTIONS From time to time, the Company issues options and warrants as incentives to employees, officers and directors, as well as to non-employees. STOCK OPTION PLAN On February 11, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company reserved 1,500,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 1,499,955 shares reserved under this plan have been issued. On April 29, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-2 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to our employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 1,650,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 1,634,270 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued. 11 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 On July 1, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-3 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 2,500,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 2,500,000 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued. On September 2, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted the 2008-4 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs). Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service provider, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transactions. The company initially reserved 3,800,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 3,800,000 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued. On February 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan.") The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are no it connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transactions. The company initially reserved 10,000,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 10,000,000 of the shares reserved under this plan have been issued. On May 15, 2009, the Board of Directors adopted the 2009-2 Equity Incentive Plan (The "Plan".) The Plan provides for the granting of the nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights (or SARs), Restricted Stock, Performance Units, and Performance Shares, to their employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, or other service providers, provided that such services are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital raising transaction. The Company initially reserved 60,000,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be made under the Plan. 20,457,250 of the share under this plan have been issued. 12 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 Warrants: There were no warrants granted during the three month period ended June 30, 2009. Common stock purchase options and warrants consisted of the following as of June 30, 2009. Aggregated Exercise Intrinsic # shares Price Value ----------- --------- ----------- OPTIONS: Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2008 539,750 $2 to $66 $ -- Granted -- -- Exercised -- -- Expired -- -- ----------- ----------- Outstanding and exercisable, June 30, 2009 539,750 $2 to $66 $ -- WARRANTS: Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2008 53,000 $2 to $140 $ -- Granted -- -- Exercised -- -- Expired (41,640) -- ----------- ----------- Outstanding and exercisable, June 30, 2009 11,360 $2 to $140 $ --
Options: Prior to July 1, 2006, the Company measured stock compensation expense using the intrinsic value method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES," and related interpretations (APB No. 25). The Company adopted SFAS No. 123-R effective July 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. Under this transition method, stock compensation expense recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards vested during the six months ended June 30, 2009, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123-R. As there were no options granted or vested since the implementation of SFAS 123-R, no expense has been recorded during the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Methods of estimating fair value Under both SFAS No. 123-R and under the fair value method of accounting under SFAS No. 123 (i.e., SFAS No. 123 Pro Forma), the fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes model. Under SFAS No. 123-R, the Company's expected volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock. The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical exercise patterns and employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. 13 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 SFAS No. 123-R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised in subsequent periods, if necessary, if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $17,371 in principal with interest rates of 12.0% and repaid $17,371 in principal payments under various promissory note agreements to its president and CEO. No interest has been paid under these agreements. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 12,000,000 shares of common stock directly to its Vice President of Global Strategies, in connection with the satisfaction of third party debt as instructed by the note holder. The value of the common stock on the days of issuance was $35,600. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 the Company issued an aggregate of 117,386,666 shares of common stock to its president and CEO, in connection with payment for accrued salary. The value of the common stock on the day of issuance was $352,160. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $4,300 in principal with interest rates of 12.0% and repaid $4,300 in principal payments under various promissory note agreements to its president and CEO. No interest has been paid under these agreements During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $12,998 in principal with interest rates of 12.0% under various promissory note agreements to its Vice President of Global Strategies. No principal or interest has been paid on these notes. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 11,800,000 shares of common stock directly to its Vice President of Global Strategies, in connection with the satisfaction of third party debt as instructed by the note holder. The value of the common stock on the days of issuance was $46,820. NOTE 8 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS During July 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 7,291,666 shares of common stock to employees for services rendered valued at approximately $72,200. 14 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2009 During July 2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,500,000 shares of common stock to various consultants for services rendered valued at approximately $18,550. During July and August 2009, the Company entered in various agreements to covert outstanding debt to 152,715,279 shares of common stock valued at approximately $529,902. The shares were issued in July and August. During July 2009, the Company borrowed an aggregate of $25,000 from third parties under various promissory note agreements. The notes carry interest at 12%. The notes are due on or before July 2010. 15 ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THIS QUARTERLY REPORT OF FORM 10-Q, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, AND OTHER REPORTS FILED BY THE REGISTRANT FROM TIME TO TIME WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (COLLECTIVELY THE "FILINGS") CONTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WHICH ARE INTENDED TO CONVEY OUR EXPECTATIONS OR PREDICTIONS REGARDING THE OCCURRENCE OF POSSIBLE FUTURE EVENTS OR THE EXISTENCE OF TRENDS AND FACTORS THAT MAY IMPACT OUR FUTURE PLANS AND OPERATING RESULTS. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE DERIVED, IN PART, FROM VARIOUS ASSUMPTIONS AND ANALYSES WE HAVE MADE IN THE CONTEXT OF OUR CURRENT BUSINESS PLAN AND INFORMATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO US AND IN LIGHT OF OUR EXPERIENCE AND PERCEPTIONS OF HISTORICAL TRENDS, CURRENT CONDITIONS AND EXPECTED FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AND OTHER FACTORS WE BELIEVE TO BE APPROPRIATE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES. YOU CAN GENERALLY IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THROUGH WORDS AND PHRASES SUCH AS "SEEK", "ANTICIPATE", "BELIEVE", "ESTIMATE", "EXPECT", "INTEND", "PLAN", "BUDGET", "PROJECT", "MAY BE", "MAY CONTINUE", "MAY LIKELY RESULT", AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS. WHEN READING ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT YOU SHOULD REMAIN MINDFUL THAT ALL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE INHERENTLY UNCERTAIN AS THEY ARE BASED ON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS CONCERNING FUTURE EVENTS OR FUTURE PERFORMANCE OF OUR COMPANY, AND ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES, ASSUMPTIONS AND OTHER FACTORS RELATING TO OUR INDUSTRY AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. EACH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT SHOULD BE READ IN CONTEXT WITH, AND WITH AN UNDERSTANDING OF, THE VARIOUS OTHER DISCLOSURES CONCERNING OUR COMPANY AND OUR BUSINESS MADE IN OUR FILINGS. YOU SHOULD NOT PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT AS A PREDICTION OF ACTUAL RESULTS OR DEVELOPMENTS. WE ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO UPDATE OR REVISE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT TO REFLECT NEW EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES UNLESS AND TO THE EXTENT REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW. OVERVIEW We are engaged in the research, development, and marketing of bioterrorism detection devices, radiation detectors, and counter terrorism training references. In August 2002, we entered into a Technology Affiliates Agreement with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, commonly referred to as JPL, to develop technology for our bioterrorism detection equipment. Under the Technology Affiliates Agreement, JPL developed its proprietary bacterial spore detection technology and integrated it into our existing aerosol monitoring system, resulting in a product named BSM-2000. BSM-2000 is designed to provide continuous unattended monitoring of airborne bacterial spores in large public places, with real-time automated alert functionality. The device is designed to detect an increase in the concentration of bacterial spores, which is indicative of a potential presence of Anthrax. Our management continues to gain expertise in anti-terrorism techniques and solutions. Through partnerships with various third parties, we have commenced sales and marketing of bioterrorism hand held assays, radiation detection systems, surveillance cameras, and training references. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 we spent an aggregate of $530,117 on selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses and marketing expenses. This amount represents a 30% decrease over the comparable year-ago period. The decrease is principally attributable to a reduction in compensation expenses and professional fees. 16 Our working capital deficit at June 30, 2009, was $4,230,550. Our independent auditors' report, dated April 14, 2009 includes an explanatory paragraph relating to substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, due to our working capital deficit at December 31, 2008. We require approximately $2.25 million to repay indebtedness in the next 12 months. We plan to engage more in value added services to complement our bioterrorism detection technologies. We now supply our proprietary bacterial spore detection system (BSM-2000), bioterrorism detection kits capable of detecting anthrax, ricin, botulinum, plague, and SEBs, surveillance cameras, radiation detection systems, and counter-terrorism training references. We plan to continue expanding our product base and to sell our products to more users inside and outside the U.S. There is no guarantee that we will succeed in implementing this strategy or if implemented, that this strategy will be successful. We plan to seek and find third parties interested in collaborating on further research and development on BSM-2000. Such research shall be aimed at making BSM-2000 more user-friendly, developing a less complicated interface and software, and designing a lighter casing. The ideal third party collaborator would also assist us in marketing BSM-2000 more aggressively. There is no guarantee that any such collaborators will be found and, if found, that this strategy will be successful. The current version of BSM-2000 is functional and available for sale. To date, we have sold two units to the Government of the United Kingdom and we intend to develop a more wide-spread use for BSM-2000 through our planned collaborative research, development, sales, and marketing efforts. On July 28, 2009 we announced that we have been granted a patent from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for BSM-2000. The patent is the second for the technology licensed from the California Institute of Technology. On July 25, 2008, we effected a reverse stock split of our common stock. The reverse split was effected on a one-for-200 basis, resulting in 14,211,953 number of shares outstanding immediately following the stock split. All common stock numbers in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, reflect the implementation of the reverse split. Results of Operations The following discussion is included to describe our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contain detailed information that should be referred to in conjunction with this discussion. SIX MONTHS ENDED June 30, 2009 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED June 30, 2008 REVENUE. Total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $ 15,482, as compared to revenue of $62,570 for the same period in the prior fiscal year, a decrease of $47,088. The decrease is primarily due to a reduction in consulting services. OPERATING EXPENSES. Total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $545,184 representing a decrease of $221,467. Total selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $475,192 representing a decrease of $268,457 (36%) as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. These decreases are principally attributable to a decrease in professional fees and in stock based compensation. 17 OTHER INCOME(EXPENSE). Other income (expense) amounted to ($504,510) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to ($511,120) for the corresponding period of the prior year. The change is principally related to interest accrued on the outstanding notes payable and the loss recognized on the settlement of shares issued for debt. NET LOSS. Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $1,036,080, as compared to a net loss of $1,233,406 for the same period in the prior fiscal year, representing a decrease of $197,326. The primary reason for this is a decrease in compensation related expenses. LIQUITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES We require approximately $2.2 million to repay debt and $300,000 to execute our business plan in the next twelve months. We do not anticipate that our cash on hand is adequate to meet our operating expenses over the next 12 months. Also, we do not believe we have adequate capital to repay all of our debt currently due and becoming due in the next 12 months. We anticipate that uses of our available capital during the next 12 months principally will be for: o administrative expenses, including salaries of officers and other employees we plan to hire; o repayment of debt; o sales and marketing; o product testing and manufacturing; and o expenses of professionals, including accountants and attorneys. Our working capital deficit at June 30, 2009 was $4,230,550. Our independent auditors' report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern, due to our working capital deficit at December 31, 2008. We require approximately $2.2 million to repay indebtedness including interest in the next 12 months. The following provides principal terms of our outstanding debt as of June 30, 2009: o One loan from three family members, each of whom is an unaffiliated party, evidenced by four promissory notes in the aggregate principal amounts of $100,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $100,000, each due June 24, 2001 with interest rates ranging from 11% to 12%. We entered into a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, we were required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our obligations. We did not make this payment and are in default of these notes. As of June 30, 2009, we have $482,280 accrued for including interest relating to this matter. o One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $195,000 with interest at a rate of 12% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated as of August 10, 2004, we entered into a settlement with this party and agreed to pay a total of $261,000 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. Additionally, the Company, in September 2004, issued 206,250 shares of common stock upon the conversion of unpaid interest in the aggregate amount of $33,000. At June 30, 2009, there was $161,000 principal amount (and $74,383 in interest) remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payment under this note in July 2005, and are in default of this note. 18 o One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $98,500, due July 31, 2005, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between this third party and us, we agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. At June 30, 2009, there was $71,500 principal amount (and $34,709 in interest) remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payment under this note in July 2005, and are in default of this note. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 due on March 31, 2006 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $40,500 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 31, 2006. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $14,975 due on August 31, 2006 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 due on February 14, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $24,798 in principal and $12,981 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on February 14, 2007. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on March 20, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on April 5, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $44,550 in principal and $9,034 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on April 5, 2007. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on April 13, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $8,910 in principal and $7,498 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on April 13, 2007. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on November 1, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on December 7, 2007 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $21,408 in principal. We did not make our scheduled payment on December 7, 2007. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on January 11, 2008 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $3,000 in principal and $180 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on January 11, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on February 13, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. 19 o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $25,000 due on March 6, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on March 12, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $10,000 in principal and $8,063 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on March 12, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $25,000 due on October 3, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on April 11, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $40,000 in principal and $8,333 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on April 11, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $60,000 due on May 30, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $60,000 in principal and $11,875 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on May 30, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being negotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on November 2, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $20,000 due on January 11, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $20,000 due on July 8, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $20,000 in principal and $3,750 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on July 8, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $15,000 due on August 4, 2008 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of March 31, 2009, we owed $7,500 in principal and $2,325 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on August 4, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $17,000 due on August 11, 2008 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $20,000 due on August 13, 2008 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we paid off the remaining principal balance. 20 o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on August 27, 2008 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $30,000 in principal and $4,800 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on August 27, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $13,000 due on August 28, 2008 with an interest rate of 12% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $13,000 in principal and $2,080 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on August 28, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $13,000 due on September 6, 2008 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $5,500 in principal and $1,906 in interest. We did not make our scheduled payment on September 6, 2008. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $20,000 due on April 2, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $20,000 in principal and $3,125 in interest. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $19,000 due on April 2, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009 we owed $19,000 in principal and $2,969 in interest. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on May 2, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $30,000 in principal and $4,375 in interest. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $35,000 due on May 6, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $35,000 in principal and $5,104 in interest. We have verbally extended the unpaid note and the due date and other terms are being renegotiated so the note is not considered in default. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 due on June 13, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $19,090 in principal and $3,490 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on December 24, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $40,000 in principal and $5,000 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $35,000 due on July 15, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $35,000 in principal and $4,025 in interest. 21 o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $15,000 due on July 17, 2009 with an interest rate of 13.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $15,000 in principal and $1,869 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $34,000 due on July 22, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $34,000 in principal and $3,740 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $17,000 due on August 5, 2009 with an interest rate of 10.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $17,000 in principal and $1,813 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $23,500 due on August 27, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $23,500 in principal and $2,350 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $55,000 due on August 28, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $55,000 in principal and $5,500 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $25,000 due on November 13, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $25,000 in principal and $2,000 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $18,000 due on November 18, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $18,000 in principal and $1,260 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $27,000 due on December 2, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $27,000 in principal and $1,890 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $30,000 due on December 15, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $30,000 in principal and $1,800 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $25,000 due on October 9, 2009 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $25,000 in principal and $2,250 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $4,000 due on January 9, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $4,000 in principal and $240 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $8,000 due on January 13, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $8,000 in principal and $480 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $5,000 due on January 16, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $5,000 in principal and $300 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $33,000 due on January 22, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $33,000 in principal and $1,650 in interest. 22 o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $13,000 due on February 11, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $13,000 in principal and $650 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $12,000 due on February 20, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $12,000 in principal and $480 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $17,000 due on February 11, 2010 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $17,000 in principal and $850 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on May 15, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $14,000 in principal. We did not make our scheduled payment on May 15, 2009. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $12,500 due on April 16, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $12,500 in principal and $313 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $4,475 due on April 23, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $4,475 in principal and $90 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $9,000 due on May 1, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $9,000 in principal and $180 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $40,000 due on May 6, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $40,000 in principal and $800 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $41,000 due on May 13, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $41,000 in principal and $615 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $52,941 due on May 28, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $52,941 in principal and $529 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $17,450 due on June 4, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $17,450 in principal and $175 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $13,677 due on June 16, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $13,677 in principal and $68 in interest. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $23,000 due on June 29, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $23,000 in principal. o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $18,940 due on June 9, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $18,940 in principal and $189 in interest. 23 o One loan from an unaffiliated party evidenced by a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $45,904 due on June 19, 2011 with an interest rate of 12.0% per annum. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $45,904 in principal and $230 in interest. Management continues to take steps to address the Company's liquidity needs. In the past, management has entered into agreements with some of our note holders to amend the terms of our notes to provide for extended scheduled payment arrangements. Management is engaged in discussions with each holder of debt that is in default and continues to seek extensions with respect to our debt that is past due. In addition, management may endeavor to convert some portion of the principal amount and interest on our debt into shares of common stock. Since June 2009 we have converted certain debt into 152,715,279 shares of common stock valued at $529,902. Historically, we have financed operations through private debt and equity financings. In recent years, financial institutions have been unwilling to lend to us and the cost of obtaining working capital from investors has been expensive. We principally expect to raise funds through the sale of equity or debt securities. The more recent price and volume volatility in the common stock has made it more difficult for management to negotiate sales of its securities at a price it believes to be fair to the Company. The Company actively continues to pursue additional equity or debt financings, but cannot provide any assurance that it will be successful. If we are unable to pay our debt as it becomes due and are unable to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, we will not be able to accomplish any or all of our initiatives and will be forced to consider steps that would protect our assets against our creditors. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, and that would be considered material to investors. 24 ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLSOURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. Not Applicable ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Disclosure Controls and Procedures Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE CONCERNING CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. We currently believe that the Company has material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures. We will continue to work in the coming weeks and months to address such weaknesses. We believe that the out-of-pocket costs, the diversion of management's attention from running the day-to-day operations and operational changes caused by the need to make changes in our internal control and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) could be significant and still we may not achieve significant improvements in our internal controls and procedures. If the time and costs associated with such compliance exceed our current expectations, our results of operations and the accuracy and timeliness of the filing of our annual and periodic reports may be materially adversely affected and could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative affect on the trading price of our common stock. 25 PART II OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On or about April 16, 2004, Plaintiffs A. Sean Rose, Claire F. Rose, and Mark Rose commenced an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Company (A. SEAN ROSE, CLAIRE F. ROSE AND MARK ROSE V. UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, FKA POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORPORATION) for amounts allegedly due pursuant to four unpaid promissory notes. On August 2, 2004, the parties executed a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Releases (the "Agreement"). On December 30, 2005, Plaintiffs commenced an action against the Company, alleging the Company breached the Agreement and sought approximately $205,000 in damages. A judgment was entered on April 11, 2006 for $209,277.58. The Company has previously accrued for this settlement. As of June 30, 2009, we have accrued $482,280 for this settlement including principal and interest. On June 2, 2006, Plaintiff Trilogy Capital Partners instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (TRILOGY CAPITAL PARTNERS V. UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, ET. AL., Case No. SC089929) against the Company. Plaintiff's Complaint alleged damages against Universal Detection Technology ("UDT")for breach of an engagement letter in the amount of $93,448.54. Also, Plaintiff alleged that UDT had failed to issue warrants to it pursuant to a written agreement. After completing the initial stages of litigation and conducting extensive mediation, Plaintiff and UDT reached a settlement wherein commencing December 15, 2006, UDT would make monthly payments to Plaintiff of $2,000 until a debt of $90,000 plus accrued interest at six percent per annum was fully paid. In exchange, Plaintiff would release all of its claims against UDT. UDT has been current on all of its agreed payments to Plaintiff. As of June 30, 2009, $48,357 was due under the agreement. On November 15, 2006, Plaintiff NBGI, Inc. instituted an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court (NBGI, Inc. v. Universal Detection Technology, et. al., Case No. BC361979) against Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"). NBGI, Inc.'s Complaint alleged breach of contract, and requested damages in the amount of $111,014.34 plus interest at the legal rate and for costs of suit. There is also a Motion for Summary Judgment set for September 11, 2007. The Summary Judgment was granted in NBGI's favor and Judgment has been entered. On June 23, 2009, California Institute of Technology ("Cal Tech") sent a letter to Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"), asserting certain breaches by UDT of that certain License Agreement between Cal Tech and UDT effective September 30, 2009 as amended (the "License Agreement") including nonpayment of royalties, failure to pay certain prosecution and legal costs and failure to fully commercialize the patents and technologies that are licensed to UDT under the License Agreement. Cal Tech is also asserting its right to terminate the License Agreement effective June 4, 2009. UDT disagrees with the various assertions made by Cal Tech in the letter and has requested that Cal Tech submit to arbitration all matters in dispute. To date, no further action has been taken and UDT continues to perform under the License Agreement. However, there can be no assurance that the License Agreement will continue in effect, or that UDT will be able to continue the use, development and commercialization of the underlying patents and technologies. Primarily the License Agreement concerns a group of patents that support UDT's "BSM" technologies and related products. The loss of these licensed technologies would have an adverse effect on UDT's prospects until such time as alternate technologies are licensed or developed. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Not Applicable. 26 ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. During the second quarter of 2009, we issued the following securities which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We did not employ any form of general solicitation or advertising in connection with the offer and sale of the securities described below. In addition, we believe the purchasers of the securities are "ACCREDITED INVESTORS" for the purpose of Rule 501 of the Securities Act. For these reasons, among others, the offer and sale of the following securities were made in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act: o During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we issued 40,731,250 shares of common stock to various notes holders to convert outstanding debt obligations valued at approximately $189,455. o During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we issued 210,073,930 shares of common stock to various notes holders upon the conversion of outstanding debt obligations valued at approximately $312,778. o During July and August 2009, we issued 125,465,279 shares of common stock to various note holders upon conversion of outstanding debt obligations valued at approximately $390,927. ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES We have defaulted upon the following senior securities o One loan from three family members, each of whom is an unaffiliated party, evidenced by four promissory notes in the aggregate principal amounts of $100,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $100,000, each due June 24, 2001 with interest rates ranging from 11% to 12%. We entered into a settlement agreement in the third quarter of 2004 with each of these parties. Pursuant to this agreement, at June 30, 2005, we were required to pay an additional $80,000 as full payment of our obligations. We did not make scheduled payments and are in default of these notes. o One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $195,000 with interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated as of August 10, 2004, we entered into a settlement with this party and agreed to pay a total of $261,000 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. Additionally, the Company, in September 2004, issued 206,250 shares of common stock upon the conversion of unpaid interest in the aggregate amount of $33,000. At June 30, 2009, there was $161,000 principal amount remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payment under this note and are in default. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $74,383 in interest on this note. o One loan from an unaffiliated party in the aggregate principal amount of $98,500, due July 31, 2005 with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 10, 2004, between this third party and us, we agreed to pay a total of $130,800 pursuant to a scheduled payment plan through July 2005. At June 30, 2009, there was $71,500 principal amount remaining on this note. We did not make our scheduled payments under this note and are in default. As of June 30, 2009, we owed $34,709 in interest on this note. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. Not Applicable. ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION. 27 During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we issued 210,073,930 shares of common stock to various notes holders upon the conversion of outstanding debt obligations valued at approximately $312,778. During July and August 2009, we issued 125,465,279 shares of common stock to various note holders upon conversion of outstanding debt obligations valued at approximately $390,927. On June 23, 2009, California Institute of Technology ("Cal Tech") sent a letter to Universal Detection Technology ("UDT"), asserting certain breaches by UDT of that certain License Agreement between Cal Tech and UDT effective September 30, 2009 as amended (the "License Agreement") including nonpayment of royalties, failure to pay certain prosecution and legal costs and failure to fully commercialize the patents and technologies that are licensed to UDT under the License Agreement. Cal Tech is also asserting its right to terminate the License Agreement effective June 4, 2009. UDT disagrees with the various assertions made by Cal Tech in the letter and has requested that Cal Tech submit to arbitration all matters in dispute. To date, no further action has been taken and UDT continues to perform under the License Agreement. However, there can be no assurance that the License Agreement will continue in effect, or that UDT will be able to continue the use, development and commercialization of the underlying patents and technologies. Primarily the License Agreement concerns a group of patents that support UDT's "BSM" technologies and related products. The loss of these licensed technologies would have an adverse effect on UDT's prospects until such time as alternate technologies are licensed or developed. 28 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS. EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit Number Description - -------------- ----------- 10.1 Form of Note Conversion Agreement Exhibit 31 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. 29 SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Dated: August 14, 2009 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY /s/ Jacques Tizabi ------------------------------------ Jacques Tizabi, President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Acting Principal Financial Officer) 30 EX-10.1 2 udt_10q-ex1001.txt DEBT CONVERSION AGREEMENT EXHIBIT 10.1 UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY ------------------------- FORM DEBT CONVERSION AGREEMENT ------------------------- NOTEHOLDER: NOTE AMOUNT: $_____ OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL: $______ INTEREST RATE: __% DATE OF NOTE: _____ MATURITY: _____ ACCRUED INTEREST: $____ ---------------------------------------- [Date] AGREEMENT This Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between Universal Detection Technology (the "Issuer") and [NAME](the "Noteholder") on the date first shown above. The Noteholder confirms that pursuant to the note dated _________ (the "Note") in the principal amount of $_______ with an interest rate of __% per annum and a maturity date of _______, the Issuer owes the Noteholder a balance of $____ including principal and accrued interest as of ____. The Noteholder further agrees to convert the following amount of principal and interest (the "Conversion Amount") due under the Note into shares of common stock of the Issuer ("Shares"), no par value, at the price stated below. The parties anticipate that the Shares will be eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144. PRINCIPAL BEING CONVERTED: $_____ INTEREST BEING CONVERTED: $_____ CONVERSION PRICE: $_____ NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE ISSUED: ______ The Noteholder is surrendering for conversion that portion of the principal and interest due under the Note represented by the Conversion Amount and is not furnishing any other or additional consideration to the Issuer. The Noteholder hereby waives, releases, relinquishes and discharges the Issuer of any and all claims and causes of action it now has or that may hereafter arise with respect to the Conversion Amount and agrees to accept the Shares as full satisfaction thereof. No claims are reserved with respect to the Conversion Amount, and the Noteholder expressly waives any and all rights related thereto, except for those provided for herein, that it may have under the provisions of California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides: "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR." The Noteholder acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement and the waiver set forth herein are valid and binding on the Noteholder in accordance with the terms hereof. The Noteholder represents and warrants that: o It has the requisite authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and that the person executing and delivering this Agreement has been duly authorized by the Noteholder to do so; o It is not, and has not been for the three months preceding the date hereof, an affiliate of the Issuer and will not hold more than 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares upon consummation of the conversion contemplated hereby; and o It has not assigned or transferred, or purported to assign or transfer, the Note or any right or claim in connection therewith to any other person. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement may not be modified or amended except by a writing signed by both parties hereto. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof. Agreed to and accepted by: UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY NOTEHOLDER - ------------------------- ------------------------- By: Jacques Tizabi, CEO EX-31 3 udt_10q-ex31.txt EXHIBIT 31 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jacques Tizabi, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Detection Technology; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Dated: August 14, 2009 /s/ Jacques Tizabi ------------------ Jacques Tizabi Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer EX-32 4 udt_10q-ex32.txt EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Jacques Tizabi ------------------ Dated: August 14, 2009 Jacques Tizabi Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----