UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

Commission File Number: 001-34084

POPULAR, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Puerto Rico	66-0667416
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)
Popular Center Building
209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue
Hato Rey, Puerto Rico	00918
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

(787) 765-9800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NOT APPLICABLE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 103,499,210 shares outstanding as of May 5, 2015.

POPULAR, INC.

INDEX

	Page
Part I – Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014		4
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014		5
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014		6
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the quarters ended March  31, 2015 and 2014		7
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014		8
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		129
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		186
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		186
Part II – Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		186
Item 1A. Risk Factors		186
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		189
Item 6. Exhibits		189
Signatures		191

2

Forward-Looking Information

The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may relate to Popular, Inc.’s (the “Corporation”, “Popular”, “we”, “us”, “our”) financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, delinquency trends, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “continues”, “expect”, “estimate”, “intend”, “project” and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “would”, “should”, “could”, “might”, “can”, “may” or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict.

Various factors, some of which are beyond Popular’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:

• the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic conditions;

• changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes;

• the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies;

• changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels of capital and the impact of proposed capital standards on our capital ratios;

• the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on our businesses, business practices and cost of operations;

• regulatory approvals that may be necessary to undertake certain actions or consummate strategic transactions such as acquisitions and dispositions;

• the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are located;

• the performance of the stock and bond markets;

• competition in the financial services industry;

• additional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessments;

• possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes; and

• risks related to the Doral Transaction, including (a) our ability to maintain customer relationships, including managing any potential customer confusion caused by the alliance structure, (b) risks associated with the limited amount of diligence able to be conducted by a buyer in an FDIC transaction and (c) difficulties in converting or integrating the Doral branches or difficulties in providing transition support to alliance co-bidders.

Other possible events or factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following: negative economic conditions that adversely affect housing prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provision expense; changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect our ability to originate and distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial assets and liabilities; liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory investigations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations; our ability to grow our core businesses; decisions to downsize, sell or close units or otherwise change our business mix; and management’s ability to identify and manage these and other risks. Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in “Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,” is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of regulators, judges and juries. Investors should refer to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as well as “Part II, Item 1A” of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.

All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available to the Corporation as of the date of this document, and other than as required by law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

3

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(UNAUDITED)

	March 31,			December 31,
(In thousands, except share information)	2015			2014
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	495,776		$	381,095
Money market investments:
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		139,422			151,134
Time deposits with other banks		2,167,793			1,671,252
Total money market investments		2,307,215			1,822,386
Trading account securities, at fair value:
Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge		62,923			80,945
Other trading securities		71,371			57,582
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value:
Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge		1,016,574			1,020,529
Other investment securities available-for-sale		4,532,129			4,294,630
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value 2015 - $89,304; 2014 - $94,199)		101,595			103,170
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value 2015 - $164,387; 2014 - $165,024)		163,038			161,906
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value		160,602			106,104
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		21,110,147			19,498,286
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		2,456,552			2,542,662
Less – Unearned income		97,217			93,835
Allowance for loan losses		588,697			601,792
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net		22,880,785			21,345,321
FDIC loss share asset		409,844			542,454
Premises and equipment, net		492,291			494,581
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		128,170			135,500
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		113,557			130,266
Accrued income receivable		129,639			121,818
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value		149,024			148,694
Other assets		1,842,934			1,646,443
Goodwill		508,310			465,676
Other intangible assets		59,063			37,595
Total assets	$	35,624,840		$	33,096,695
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	6,285,202		$	5,783,748
Interest bearing		20,988,487			19,023,787
Total deposits		27,273,689			24,807,535
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase		1,132,643			1,271,657
Other short-term borrowings		1,200			21,200
Notes payable		1,757,313			1,711,828
Other liabilities		1,080,945			1,012,029
Liabilities from discontinued operations (Refer to Note 5)		1,930			5,064
Total liabilities		31,247,720			28,829,313
Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 26)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391 shares issued and outstanding		50,160			50,160
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 170,000,000 shares authorized; 103,657,174 shares issued (2014 – 103,614,553) and 103,486,927 shares outstanding (2014 – 103,476,847)		1,037			1,036
Surplus		4,197,932			4,196,458
Retained earnings		327,613			253,717
Treasury stock – at cost, 170,247 shares (2014 – 137,706)		(5,222	)		(4,117	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(194,400	)		(229,872	)
Total stockholders’ equity		4,377,120			4,267,382
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	35,624,840		$	33,096,695

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands, except per share information)	2015			2014
Interest income:
Loans	$	355,631		$	377,602
Money market investments		1,446			973
Investment securities		30,301			35,127
Trading account securities		2,696			5,257
Total interest income		390,074			418,959
Interest expense:
Deposits		25,864			26,858
Short-term borrowings		1,734			9,040
Long-term debt		19,281			31,890
Total interest expense		46,879			67,788
Net interest income		343,195			351,171
Provision for loan losses - non-covered loans		29,711			54,122
Provision for loan losses - covered loans		10,324			25,714
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		303,160			271,335
Service charges on deposit accounts		39,017			39,359
Other service fees (Refer to Note 32)		53,626			52,818
Mortgage banking activities (Refer to Note 14)		12,852			3,678
Trading account profit		414			1,977
Net (loss) gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale		(79	)		4,393
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold		(4,526	)		(10,347	)
FDIC loss share income (expense) (Refer to Note 33)		4,139			(24,206	)
Other operating income		9,792			28,360
Total non-interest income		115,235			96,032
Operating expenses:
Personnel costs		116,458			104,301
Net occupancy expenses		21,709			21,360
Equipment expenses		13,411			11,412
Other taxes		8,574			13,663
Professional fees		75,528			66,999
Communications		6,176			6,685
Business promotion		10,813			11,386
FDIC deposit insurance		6,398			10,978
Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses		23,069			6,440
Other operating expenses		17,349			22,349
Amortization of intangibles		2,104			2,026
Restructuring costs		10,753			—
Total operating expenses		312,342			277,599
Income from continuing operations before income tax		106,053			89,768
Income tax expense		32,568			23,264
Income from continuing operations		73,485			66,504
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		1,341			19,905
Net Income	$	74,826		$	86,409
Net Income Applicable to Common Stock	$	73,896		$	85,478
Net Income per Common Share – Basic
Net income from continuing operations		0.71			0.64
Net income from discontinued operations		0.01			0.19
Net Income per Common Share – Basic	$	0.72		$	0.83
Net Income per Common Share – Diluted
Net income from continuing operations		0.71			0.64
Net income from discontinued operations		0.01			0.19
Net Income per Common Share – Diluted	$	0.72		$	0.83

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Net income	$	74,826		$	86,409
Other comprehensive income before tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(581	)		(2,115	)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income		—			7,718
Amortization of net losses on pension and postretirement benefit plans		5,025			2,126
Amortization of prior service cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans		(950	)		(950	)
Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the period		35,342			27,582
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges		(2,535	)		(1,725	)
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income		1,358			1,824
Other comprehensive income before tax		37,659			34,460
Income tax expense		(2,187	)		(1,990	)
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax		35,472			32,470
Comprehensive income, net of tax	$	110,298		$	118,879
Tax effect allocated to each component of other comprehensive income:	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Amortization of net losses on pension and postretirement benefit plans		(1,960	)		(829	)
Amortization of prior service cost of pension and postretirement benefit plans		371			371
Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the period		(1,057	)		(1,493	)
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges		989			672
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income		(530	)		(711	)
Income tax expense	$	(2,187	)	$	(1,990	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)	Common stock		Preferred stock		Surplus		Retained earnings			Treasury stock			Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Total
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	1,034	$	50,160	$	4,170,152	$	594,430		$	(881	)	$	(188,745	)	$	4,626,150
Net income								86,409									86,409
Issuance of stock		1				1,665											1,666
Dividends declared:
Preferred stock								(931	)								(931	)
Common stock purchases											(17	)					(17	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax														32,470			32,470
Balance at March 31, 2014	$	1,035	$	50,160	$	4,171,817	$	679,908		$	(898	)	$	(156,275	)	$	4,745,747
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	1,036	$	50,160	$	4,196,458	$	253,717		$	(4,117	)	$	(229,872	)	$	4,267,382
Net income								74,826									74,826
Issuance of stock		1				1,405											1,406
Tax windfall benefit on vesting of restricted stock						69											69
Common stock purchases																	—
Dividends declared:
Preferred stock								(930	)								(930	)
Common stock purchases											(1,123	)					(1,123	)
Common stock reissuance											18						18
Other comprehensive income, net of tax														35,472			35,472
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	1,037	$	50,160	$	4,197,932	$	327,613		$	(5,222	)	$	(194,400	)	$	4,377,120

Disclosure of changes in number of shares:	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Preferred Stock:
Balance at beginning and end of period		2,006,391			2,006,391
Common Stock – Issued:
Balance at beginning of period		103,614,553			103,435,967
Issuance of stock		42,621			58,463
Balance at end of the period		103,657,174			103,494,430
Treasury stock		(170,247	)		(38,895	)
Common Stock – Outstanding		103,486,927			103,455,535

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Quarter ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	74,826		$	86,409
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		40,035			73,072
Amortization of intangibles		2,104			2,504
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		11,919			11,965
Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees		(19,100	)		(39,571	)
Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights		4,929			8,096
FDIC loss share (income) expense		(4,139	)		24,206
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold		4,526			10,347
Earnings from investments under the equity method		(2,301	)		(16,930	)
Deferred income tax expense		23,380			13,898
(Gain) loss on:
Disposition of premises and equipment		(978	)		(1,671	)
Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale and mortgage banking activities		(7,222	)		(18,953	)
Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs		14,851			(1,199	)
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale		(121,929	)		(76,125	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale		27,547			45,115
Net originations on loans held-for-sale		(179,604	)		(179,057	)
Net (increase) decrease in:
Trading securities		177,942			218,997
Accrued income receivable		(13	)		5,641
Other assets		(28,027	)		(1,463	)
Net increase (decrease) in:
Interest payable		(10,216	)		(2,680	)
Pension and other postretirement benefits obligation		1,019			(1,562	)
Other liabilities		(19,377	)		(1,193	)
Total adjustments		(84,654	)		73,437
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(9,828	)		159,846
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net increase in money market investments		(484,829	)		(763,980	)
Purchases of investment securities:
Available-for-sale		(411,189	)		(436,233	)
Held-to-maturity		(250	)		—
Other		(2,520	)		(34,768	)
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:
Available-for-sale		385,672			194,949
Held-to-maturity		2,231			1,888
Other		30,785			49,964
Proceeds from sale of investment securities:
Other		1,388			—
Net repayments on loans		154,794			205,660
Proceeds from sale of loans		19,127			42,238
Acquisition of loan portfolios		(49,510	)		(201,385	)
Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements		132,265			81,327
Net cash received and acquired from business combination		711,051			—
Mortgage servicing rights purchased		(2,400	)		—
Acquisition of premises and equipment		(10,231	)		(11,017	)
Proceeds from sale of:
Premises and equipment		3,093			6,385
Foreclosed assets		40,161			38,830
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		519,638			(826,142	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in:
Deposits		265,906			559,972
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase		(139,013	)		548,921
Other short-term borrowings		(148,215	)		(400,000	)
Payments of notes payable		(419,487	)		(110,514	)
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable		46,000			31,905
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,405			1,666
Dividends paid		(620	)		(931	)
Net payments for repurchase of common stock		(1,105	)		(17	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(395,129	)		631,002
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks		114,681			(35,294	)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		381,095			423,211
Cash and due from banks at the end of the period	$	495,776		$	387,917

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

8

Notes to Consolidated Financial

Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 -	Nature of operations	10
Note 2 -	Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies	11
Note 3 -	New accounting pronouncements	12
Note 4 -	Business combination	18
Note 5 -	Discontinued operations	21
Note 6 -	Restructuring plan	22
Note 7 -	Restrictions on cash and due from banks and certain securities	23
Note 8 -	Pledged assets	24
Note 9 -	Investment securities available-for-sale	25
Note 10 -	Investment securities held-to-maturity	29
Note 11 -	Loans	31
Note 12 -	Allowance for loan losses	41
Note 13 -	FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation	60
Note 14 -	Mortgage banking activities	62
Note 15 -	Transfers of financial assets and mortgage servicing assets	63
Note 16 -	Other real estate owned	66
Note 17 -	Other assets	67
Note 18 -	Goodwill and other intangible assets	68
Note 19 -	Deposits	70
Note 20 -	Borrowings	71
Note 21 -	Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities	73
Note 22 -	Trust preferred securities	75
Note 23 -	Stockholders’ equity	76
Note 24 -	Other comprehensive loss	77
Note 25 -	Guarantees	79
Note 26 -	Commitments and contingencies	82
Note 27 -	Non-consolidated variable interest entities	88
Note 28 -	Related party transactions with affiliated company / joint venture	92
Note 29 -	Fair value measurement	95
Note 30 -	Fair value of financial instruments	100
Note 31 -	Net income per common share	107
Note 32 -	Other service fees	108
Note 33 -	FDIC loss share income (expense)	109
Note 34 -	Pension and postretirement benefits	110
Note 35 -	Stock-based compensation	111
Note 36 -	Income taxes	113
Note 37 -	Supplemental disclosure on the consolidated statements of cash flows	116
Note 38 -	Segment reporting	117
Note 39 -	Subsequent events	121
Note 40 -	Condensed consolidating financial information of guarantor and issuers of registered guaranteed securities	122

9

Note 1 – Nature of Operations

Popular, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the Caribbean. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail, including mortgage loan originations, and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as investment banking, broker-dealer, auto and equipment leasing and financing, and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA operates branches in New York, New Jersey and South Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The BPNA branches operate under the name of Popular Community Bank (“PCB”). Refer to Note 5 for discussion of the sales of the California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations during 2014. Note 38 to the consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporation’s business segments.

On February 27, 2015, BPPR, in an alliance with co-bidders, including PCB, acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank (“Doral”) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as receiver (the “Doral Bank transaction”). Under the FDIC’s bidding format, BPPR was the lead bidder and party to the purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC covering all assets and deposits acquired by it and its alliance co-bidders. BPPR entered into back to back purchase and assumption agreements with the alliance co-bidders for the transferred assets and deposits. The other co-bidders which formed part of the alliance led by BPPR were First Bank Puerto Rico, Centennial Bank, and a vehicle formed by J.C. Flowers III L.P. BPPR has entered into transition service agreements with each of the alliance co-bidders. Refer to Note 4 for further details on the Doral Bank transaction.

10

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. The consolidated statement of financial condition data at December 31, 2014 was derived from audited financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair statement of the results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a normal recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2014 consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements to conform with the 2015 presentation. As discussed in Note 5, current and prior periods presented in the consolidated statement of operations as well as the related note disclosures covering income and expense amounts have been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The consolidated statement of financial condition and related note disclosure for prior periods do not reflect the reclassification of BPNA’s assets and liabilities to discontinued operations.

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from the unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014, included in the Corporation’s 2014 Annual Report (the “2014 Annual Report”). Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Business Combination

The Corporation determined that the acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities in connection with the Doral Bank Transaction constitutes a business combination as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805 “Business Combinations”. The assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were initially recorded at their estimated fair values. Fair values were determined based on the requirements of FASB Codification Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements”. These fair value estimates are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair value becomes available. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. Refer to Note 4, Business Combination, for additional information of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with this transaction.

Loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction

Loans acquired in a business acquisition are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded at the acquisition date.

Approximately $162 million of residential mortgage loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction were considered impaired. Accordingly, the Corporation applied the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under this guidance, the loans acquired from the FDIC were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics, including factors such as loan type, interest rate type, accruing status, and amortization type. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the fair value in the loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non-accretable difference represents the difference between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses.

11

Note 3 – New accounting pronouncements

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement – (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) (“ASU 2015-07”)

The FASB issued ASU 2015-07 in May 2015, which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Currently, investments valued using the practical expedient are categorized within the fair value hierarchy on the basis of whether the investment is redeemable with the investee at net asset value on the measurement date, never redeemable with the investee at net asset value, or redeemable with the investee at a future date. For investments that are redeemable with the investee at a future date, a reporting entity must take into account the length of time until those investments become redeemable to determine the classification within the fair value hierarchy. There is diversity in practice related to how certain investment measured at net asset value with redemption dates in the future are categorized within the fair value hierarchy.

The amendments also remove the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Those disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient.

The amendments of this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 31, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. A reporting entity should apply the amendments retrospectively to all periods presented. The retrospective approach requires that an investment for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient be removed from the fair value hierarchy in all periods presented in an entity’s financial statements.

The adoption of this guidance impacts presentation disclosures only and will not have an impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-05, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement (“ASU 2015-05”)

The FASB issued ASU 2015-05 in April 2015, which provides guidance about a customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The amendments in this ASU provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. This guidance will not change the accounting for service contracts. All software licenses within the scope of ASC Subtopic 350-40 will be accounted for consistent with other licenses of intangible assets.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 31, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. An entity can adopt the amendments either prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date, or retrospectively.

The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-04, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets (“ASU 2015-04”)

The FASB issued ASU 2015-04 in April 2015, which simplifies the measurement of benefit plan assets and obligations. For an entity with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end, the amendments in this ASU provides a practical expedient that permits the entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient from year to year. The practical expedient should be applied consistently to all plans if an entity has more than one plan.

For an entity that has a significant event in an interim period that calls for a remeasurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligation, the amendments in this ASU also provide a practical expedient that permits the entity to remeasure define plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the date of the significant event.

An entity is required to disclose the accounting policy election and the date used to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations in accordance with the amendments of this ASU. Employee benefit plans are not within the scope of these amendments.

12

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 31, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively.

The Corporation does not expect that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a significant impact on its financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”)

The FASB issued ASU 2015-03 in April 2015, which simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. Having different balance sheet presentation requirements for debt issuance costs and debt discount and premium creates unnecessary complexity. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments of this Update.

The amendments of this Update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued.

An entity should apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented should be adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, an entity is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle.

The Corporation’s current policy is to record debt issuance costs as a deferred asset, and accordingly, it will need to reclassify this balance upon adoption. However, this balance sheet reclassification is not expected to have a material impact in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendment to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”)

The FASB issued ASU 2015-02 in February 2015, which changes the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:

1) Modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities

2) Eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership

3) Affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships

4) Provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interest in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 31, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts in an interim period, any adjustment should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of that includes that interim period.

The amendments may be applied using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity may also apply the amendments of this ASU retrospectively.

The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-01, Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”)

The FASB issued ASU 2015-01 in January 2015, which eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports the classification as an extraordinary item. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity is also required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item.

13

Eliminating the concept of extraordinary items will save time and reduce costs for preparers because they will not have to assess whether a particular event or transaction event is extraordinary. This will alleviate uncertainty for preparers, auditors, and regulators because auditors and regulators no longer will need to evaluate whether a preparer treated an unusual and/or infrequent item appropriately.

The presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature and occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 31, 2015. The amendments may be applied prospectively or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or presentation and disclosures.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share is more Akin to Debt or to Equity (“ASU 2014-16”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-16 in November 2014, which intends to eliminate the use of different methods in practice and thereby reduce existing diversity under GAAP in the accounting for hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share. An entity should determine the nature of the host contract by considering the economic characteristics and risks of the entire hybrid financial instrument, including the embedded derivative feature that is being evaluated for separate accounting from the host contract. In evaluating the stated and implied substantive terms and features, the existence or omission of any single term or feature does not necessarily determine the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract. Although an individual term or feature may weigh more heavily in the evaluation on the basis of facts and circumstances, an entity should use judgment based on an evaluation of all relevant terms and features.

The amendment in this ASU does not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. An entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria.

The amendments in the ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning in the first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The effects of initially adopting the amendments of this ASU should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-15 in August 2014, which provides guidance in GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide the related footnote disclosures. These amendments should reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures.

In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable).

When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

14

The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or presentation and disclosures.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-14, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (“ASU 2014-14”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-14 in August 2014, which intends to resolve the diversity in practice related to how creditors classify government-guaranteed mortgage loans, including FHA or VA guaranteed loans, upon foreclosure. Some creditors reclassify those loans to real estate consistent with other foreclosed loans that do not have guarantees; others reclassify the loans to receivables. This ASU address the classification of certain foreclosed mortgage loans held by creditors that are either fully or partially guaranteed under government programs.

The amendments of the ASU require that a mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met:

1- The loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure.

2- At the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under that claim.

3- At the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed.

Upon foreclosure, the separate other receivable should be measured based on the amount of the loan balance expected to be recovered from the guarantor.

The amendments in the ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning in the first quarter of 2015. The amendments of this ASU can be applied using either a prospective transition method or a modified retrospective transition method. For prospective transition, an entity should apply the amendments in this Update to foreclosures that occur after the date of adoption. For modified retrospective transition, an entity should apply the amendments in this Update by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the annual period of adoption. Prior periods should not be adjusted. However, a reporting entity must apply the same method of transition as elected under ASU 2014-04.

The Corporation adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2015 and it did not have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-13, Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financial Entity (“ASU 2014-13”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-13 in August 2014, which intends to clarify that when a reporting entity that consolidates a collateralized financing entity may elect to measure the financial assets and the financial liabilities of that collateralized financing entity using either the measurement alternative included in this Update or Topic 820 on fair value measurement. When the measurement alternative is not elected, the amendments of this Update clarify that the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities of the consolidated collateralized financing entity should be measured using the requirements of Topic 820 and any differences in the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities of that entity should be reflected in earnings and attributed to the reporting entity in the consolidated statement of income.

When a reporting entity elects the measurement alternative included in this Update for a collateralized financing entity, the reporting entity should measure both the financial assets and the financial liabilities of that entity in its consolidated financial statements using the more observable of the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities.

The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period. The amendments of this ASU can be applied using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the annual period of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively to all relevant prior periods beginning with the annual period in which the amendments of ASU 2009-17 were initially adopted.

15

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-12 in June 2014, which intends to resolve the diverse accounting treatment of awards with a performance target that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period. That is, the employee would be eligible to vest in the award regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date the performance target is achieved.

The amendments of the ASU require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award.

Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period.

The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments of this ASU can be applied (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets outstanding at the beginning of the period of adoption and to all new or modified awards thereafter.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures (“ASU 2014-11”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-11 in June 2014, which requires two accounting changes. First, the amendments in this Update change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. Second, for repurchase financing arrangements, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement.

The amendments in this Update require disclosures for certain transactions comprising (1) a transfer of a financial asset accounted for as a sale and (2) an agreement with the same transferee entered into in contemplation of the initial transfer that results in the transferor retaining substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction.

The accounting changes in this ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2015. Early adoption is prohibited. An entity is required to present changes in accounting for transactions outstanding on the effective date as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.

The Corporation adopted this guidance on the first quarter of 2015 and did not have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations. Refer to note 20, Borrowings, for additional disclosures provided upon the adoption of this accounting pronouncement.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606); (“ASU 2014-09”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 in May 2014, which clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develop a common revenue standard that would (1) remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements, (2) provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, (3) improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets, (4) provide more useful information to users of financial statement through improved disclosure requirements and (5) simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. ASU 2014-09 amends the ASC Codification and creates a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

16

The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

In addition, the new guidance requires disclosures to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about contract with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the cost to obtain or fulfill a contract.

The amendments in this ASU were originally effective in the first quarter of 2017, however, on April 1, 2015, the FASB voted to propose a deferral of the effective date of this new revenue standard by one year until January 1, 2018, but to permit entities to adopt the standard as of the original effective date.

The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on the presentation and disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposal of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-08 in April 2014, which changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity investment.

In addition, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will include more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations.

The new guidance also requires disclosure of the pre-tax income attributable to a disposal of a significant part of an organization that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. This disclosure will provide information about the ongoing trends in the reporting organization’s results from continuing operations.

The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2015.

The Corporation adopted the provisions of this guidance in the first quarter of 2015 and its adoption did not have a material effect on its consolidated statement of financial condition or result of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-04, Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors (SubTopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (“ASU 2014-04”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-04 in January 2014 which clarifies when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of a residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized.

The amendments of this ASU clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either: a) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure; or b) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement.

The amendment of this guidance requires interim and annual disclosures of both the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction.

ASU 2014-04 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. The amendments in this ASU can be elected using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. Early adoption is permitted.

The Corporation adopted this guidance on the first quarter of 2015 and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

17

Note 4 – Business combination

On February 27, 2015, the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), in an alliance with co-bidders, including the Corporation’s U.S. mainland banking subsidiary, Banco Popular North America, doing business as Popular Community Bank (“PCB”), had acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver.

Under the FDIC’s bidding format, BPPR was the lead bidder and party to the purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC covering all assets and deposits to be acquired by it and its alliance co-bidders. BPPR entered into back to back purchase and assumption agreements with the alliance co-bidders for the transferred assets and deposits. The other co-bidders that formed part of the alliance led by BPPR are FirstBank Puerto Rico, Centennial Bank, and a vehicle formed by J.C. Flowers III LP. BPPR has entered into transition service agreements with each of the alliance co-bidders.

After taking into account the transfers to the unaffiliated alliance co-bidders, BPPR and PCB together assumed approximately $2.2 billion in deposits and acquired approximately $1.7 billion in commercial and residential loans.

BPPR assumed approximately $574 million in deposits associated with eight Puerto Rico branches of Doral Bank and approximately $425 million from its online deposit platform, and approximately $827 million in Puerto Rico residential and commercial loans.

PCB assumed approximately $1.2 billion in deposits in three New York branches of Doral Bank, and acquired approximately $891 million in commercial loans primarily in the New York metropolitan area.

On February 27, 2015, the FDIC, as receiver for Doral Bank, accepted BPPR’s bid for the purchase of the mortgage servicing rights on three pools of residential mortgage loans of approximately $5.0 billion in unpaid principal balance, for a purchase price currently estimated at $48.6 million. The transfers of the mortgage servicing rights are subject to a number of specified closing conditions, including the consent of each of Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a form acceptable to BPPR, and other customary closing conditions.

There is no loss-sharing arrangement with the FDIC on the acquired assets.

The following table presents the fair values of major classes of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Corporation as of the February 27, 2015 acquisition date.

(In thousands)	Book value prior to purchase accounting adjustments		Fair value adjustments			Additional consideration[1]		As recorded by Popular, Inc. on February 27, 2015
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	339,633	$	—		$	—	$	339,633
Investment in available-for-sale securities		172,706		—			—		172,706
Investments in FHLB stock		30,785		—			—		30,785
Loans		1,718,208		(52,452	)		—		1,665,756
Accrued income receivable		7,808		—			—		7,808
Receivable from the FDIC		—		—			439,112		439,112
Core deposit intangible		23,572		—			—		23,572
Other assets		67,676		9,688			—		77,364
Total assets	$	2,360,388	$	(42,764	)	$	439,112	$	2,756,736
Liabilities:
Deposits	$	2,193,404	$	8,051		$	—	$	2,201,455
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		542,000		5,187			—		547,187
Other liabilities		50,728		—			—		50,728
Total liabilities	$	2,786,132	$	13,238		$	—	$	2,799,370
Excess of liabilities assumed over assets acquired	$	425,744
Aggregate fair value adjustments			$	(56,002	)
Additional consideration						$	439,112
Goodwill on acquisition								$	42,634

[1] The additional consideration represents the cash to be received from the FDIC for the difference between the net liabilities assumed and the net premium paid on the transaction.

18

Other assets recorded as part of the Doral Bank Transaction include the fair value estimate of the contingent asset for the probable acquisition of approximately $57.6 million from the FDIC of mortgage servicing rights on three pools of residential mortgage loans of approximately $5.0 billion in unpaid principal balance. As discussed above, at March 31, 2015, these mortgage servicing rights were subject to a number of closing conditions. On April 23, 2015, BPPR closed the acquisition of Ginnie Mae mortgage servicing rights for a loan portfolio of approximately $2.7 billion in unpaid principal balance. BPPR is in negotiations for the transfers of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage servicing rights which are expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2015.

The fair values initially assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes available. Because of the short time period between the February 27, 2015 closing of the transaction and the March 31, 2015 reporting date, the Corporation continues to analyze its estimates of fair value on loans and other assets acquired as well as the deposits and other liabilities assumed. As the Corporation finalizes its analyses of these assets and liabilities, there may be adjustments to the recorded carrying values, and thus the recognized goodwill may increase or decrease.

The following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the Doral Bank Transaction:

Loans

Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology. Certain loans were valued individually, while other loans were valued as pools. Aggregation into pools considered characteristics such as loan type, payment term, rate type and accruing status. Principal and interest projections considered prepayment rates and credit loss expectations. The discount rates were developed based on the relative risk of the cash flows, taking into account principally the loan type, market rates as of the valuation date, liquidity expectations, and the expected life of the loans.

Goodwill

The amount of goodwill is the residual difference in the fair value of liabilities assumed and net consideration paid to the FDIC over the fair value of the assets acquired. The goodwill created by this transaction is driven by the deployment of capital with meaningful earnings accretion and significant cost savings opportunities. In addition to strengthening the Corporation’s Puerto Rico franchise, the transaction grows the U.S. business through the addition of an attractive commercial platform. The goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill from the Doral Bank Transaction was assigned to the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments based on the relative fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

Core deposit intangible

This intangible asset represents the value of the relationships that Doral Bank had with its deposit customers. The fair value of this intangible asset was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology that gave appropriate consideration to expected customer attrition rates, cost of the core deposit base, interest costs, and the net maintenance cost attributable to customer deposits, and the cost of alternative funds. The core deposit intangible asset will be amortized over a period of fifteen years.

Deposits

The fair values used for the demand deposits that comprise the transaction accounts acquired, which have no stated maturity and include non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts, by definition equal the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values for time deposits were estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently offered to comparable time deposits with similar maturities, and also accounts for the non-performance risk by using internally-developed models that consider, where applicable, the remaining term and the credit premium of the institution.

19

Deferred taxes

Deferred taxes relate to a difference between the financial statement and tax basis of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction. Deferred taxes were reported based upon the principles in ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”, and were measured using the enacted statutory income tax rate to be in effect for BPPR and BPNA at the time the deferred tax is expected to reverse.

For income tax purposes, the Doral Bank Transaction was accounted for as an asset purchase and the tax bases of assets acquired were allocated based on fair values using a modified residual method. Under this method, the purchase price was allocated among the assets in order of liquidity (the most liquid first) up to its fair market value.

The operating results of the Corporation for the quarter March 31, 2015 include the operating results produced by the acquired assets and liabilities assumed for the period of February 28, 2015 to March 31, 2015. This includes approximately $14.0 million in gross revenues and approximately $14.5 million in operating expenses. The Corporation believes that given the amount of assets and liabilities assumed, the size of the operations acquired in relation to Popular’s operations and the significant amount of fair value adjustments, the historical results of Doral Bank are not meaningful to Popular’s results, and thus no pro forma information is presented.

20

Note 5 – Discontinued operations

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of its California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations to three different buyers.

In connection with these transactions, the Corporation is relocating certain back office operations to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation incurred restructuring charges of $10.8 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2015. Additional restructuring charges amounting to approximately $12.6 million are expected to be incurred in the year 2015. Refer to Note 6, for restructuring charges incurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

The regional operations sold constituted a business, as defined in ASC 805-10-55. Accordingly, the decision to sell these businesses resulted in the discontinuance of each of these respective operations and classification as held-for-sale. For financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations are presented as “Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statement of condition and “(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax” in the consolidated statement of operations. As required by ASC 205-20, current and prior periods presented in the consolidated statement of operations as well as the related note disclosures covering income and expense amounts have been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The consolidated statement of financial condition and related note disclosure for prior periods do not reflect the reclassification of these assets and liabilities to discontinued operations.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded non-cash impairment charge of $187 million related to the goodwill allocated, on a relative fair value basis, to these operations. However, this non-cash charge had no impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios.

After the sale of these three regions, at March 31, 2015, there were no assets held within the discontinued operations. Liabilities within discontinued operations amounted to approximately $1.9 million, mainly comprised of the indemnity reserve related to the California regional sale.

The following table provides the components of net income from the discontinued operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Net interest income	$	—		$	21,797
Provision (reversal) for loan losses		—			(6,764	)
Other non-interest income		—			10,533
Total non-interest income		—			10,533
Operating expenses:
Personnel costs		—			8,852
Net occupancy expenses		—			4,331
Professional fees (reversal)		(1,341	)		2,793
Goodwill impairment charge		—			—
Other operating expenses		—			3,213
Total operating expenses		(1,341	)		19,189
Net income from discontinued operations	$	1,341		$	19,905

21

Note 6 – Restructuring plan

As discussed in Note 5, in connection with the sale of the operations of the California, Illinois and Central Florida regions, the Corporation is relocating certain back office operations, previously conducted in these regions, to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation has undertaken a restructuring plan (the “PCB Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate and re-locate employment positions, terminate contracts and incur other costs associated with moving the operations to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation estimates that it will incur restructuring charges of approximately $50.1 million, of which approximately $26.7 million were incurred during 2014; $10.8 million during the first quarter of 2015 and the remaining $12.6 million are expected to be incurred during 2015. The remaining costs for 2015 are primarily related to $10.6 million in personnel related costs and $2.0 million in lease cancellations and other restructuring costs.

The following table details the expenses recorded by the Corporation that were associated with the PCB Restructuring Plan:

(In thousands)	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
Personnel costs	$	9,366
Net occupancy expenses		386
Equipment expenses		158
Professional fees		466
Other operating expenses		377
Total restructuring costs	$	10,753

The following table presents the activity in the reserve for the restructuring costs associated with the PCB Restructuring Plan:

(In thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2015	$	13,536
Charges expensed during the period		6,297
Payments made during the period		(9,030	)
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	10,803

22

Note 7 - Restrictions on cash and due from banks and certain securities

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries, BPPR and BPNA, are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Fed”) or other banks. Those required average reserve balances amounted to $ 1.1 billion at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $ 1.0 billion). Cash and due from banks, as well as other short-term, highly liquid securities, are used to cover the required average reserve balances.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation held $42 million in restricted assets in the form of funds deposited in money market accounts, trading account securities and investment securities available for sale (December 31, 2014 - $45 million). The amounts held in trading account securities and investment securities available for sale consist primarily of restricted assets held for the Corporation’s non-qualified retirement plans and fund deposits guaranteeing possible liens or encumbrances over the title of insured properties.

23

Note 8 – Pledged assets

Certain securities and loans were pledged to secure public and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities available, derivative positions, and loan servicing agreements. The classification and carrying amount of the Corporation’s pledged assets, in which the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, were as follows:

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value	$	1,835,849	$	1,700,820
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost		58,660		60,515
Loans held-in-portfolio covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		459,577		480,441
Loans held-in-portfolio not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		8,908,657		8,820,204
Total pledged assets	$	11,262,743	$	11,061,980

Pledged securities that the creditor has the right by custom or contract to repledge are presented separately on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation had $ 0.8 billion in investment securities available-for-sale and $ 0.7 billion in loans that served as collateral to secure public funds (December 31, 2014 - $ 0.7 billion and $ 0.7 billion, respectively).

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the Federal Home Loan Bank system (the “FHLB”) aggregating to $3.6 billion (December 31, 2014 - $3.7 billion). Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. At March 31, 2015, the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $ 4.5 billion in loans held-in-portfolio (December 31, 2014 - $ 4.5 billion). Also, at March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) discount window of $2.1 billion, which remained unused as of such date (December 31, 2014 - $2.1 billion). The amount available under these credit facilities with the Fed is dependent upon the balance of loans and securities pledged as collateral. At March 31, 2015, the credit facilities with the Fed discount window were collateralized by $ 4.2 billion in loans held-in-portfolio (December 31, 2014 - $ 4.1 billion). These pledged assets are included in the above table and were not reclassified and separately reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

24

Note 9 – Investment securities available-for-sale

The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available-for-sale at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

	At March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Weighted average yield
U.S. Treasury securities
After 1 to 5 years	$	777,468	$	6,806	$	—	$	784,274		1.12	%
Total U.S. Treasury securities		777,468		6,806		—		784,274		1.12
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities
Within 1 year		35,160		254		—		35,414		1.87
After 1 to 5 years		1,412,508		3,965		2,168		1,414,305		1.25
After 5 to 10 years		30,115		52		818		29,349		1.98
After 10 years		23,000		66		—		23,066		3.19
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities		1,500,783		4,337		2,986		1,502,134		1.31
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions
Within 1 year		2,758		—		1		2,757		3.83
After 1 to 5 years		7,036		—		189		6,847		4.10
After 5 to 10 years		16,662		—		3,075		13,587		6.68
After 10 years		48,843		2		14,672		34,173		6.22
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		75,299		2		17,937		57,364		6.04
Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies
After 1 to 5 years		18,943		889		—		19,832		2.95
After 5 to 10 years		52,779		1,269		—		54,048		2.72
After 10 years		1,782,504		14,440		21,798		1,775,146		2.01
Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies		1,854,226		16,598		21,798		1,849,026		2.03
Mortgage-backed securities
After 1 to 5 years		24,869		1,318		—		26,187		4.68
After 5 to 10 years		140,493		7,319		3		147,809		3.51
After 10 years		1,120,062		49,715		1,400		1,168,377		3.37
Total mortgage-backed securities		1,285,424		58,352		1,403		1,342,373		3.41
Equity securities (without contractual maturity)		1,350		1,284		3		2,631		1.37
Other
After 1 to 5 years		9,187		12		—		9,199		1.69
After 5 to 10 years		1,658		44		—		1,702		3.62
Total other		10,845		56		—		10,901		1.99
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	5,505,395	$	87,435	$	44,127	$	5,548,703		2.08	%

25

	At December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Weighted average yield
U.S. Treasury securities
After 1 to 5 years	$	698,003	$	2,226	$	75	$	700,154		1.14	%
Total U.S. Treasury securities		698,003		2,226		75		700,154		1.14
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities
Within 1 year		42,140		380		—		42,520		1.61
After 1 to 5 years		1,603,245		1,168		9,936		1,594,477		1.26
After 5 to 10 years		67,373		58		2,271		65,160		1.72
After 10 years		23,000		—		184		22,816		3.18
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities		1,735,758		1,606		12,391		1,724,973		1.31
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions
Within 1 year		2,765		17		—		2,782		3.83
After 1 to 5 years		1,024		38		—		1,062		8.40
After 5 to 10 years		22,552		2		2,331		20,223		5.82
After 10 years		48,823		40		11,218		37,645		6.22
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		75,164		97		13,549		61,712		6.04
Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies
After 1 to 5 years		3,687		87		—		3,774		2.66
After 5 to 10 years		25,202		985		—		26,187		2.93
After 10 years		1,905,763		13,109		38,803		1,880,069		2.03
Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies		1,934,652		14,181		38,803		1,910,030		2.04
Mortgage-backed securities
After 1 to 5 years		27,339		1,597		—		28,936		4.68
After 5 to 10 years		147,182		7,314		1		154,495		3.51
After 10 years		676,567		45,047		683		720,931		3.93
Total mortgage-backed securities		851,088		53,958		684		904,362		3.88
Equity securities (without contractual maturity)		1,351		1,271		—		2,622		5.03
Other
After 1 to 5 years		9,277		10		—		9,287		1.69
After 5 to 10 years		1,957		62		—		2,019		3.63
Total other		11,234		72		—		11,306		2.03
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	5,307,250	$	73,411	$	65,502	$	5,315,159		2.04	%

The weighted average yield on investment securities available-for-sale is based on amortized cost; therefore, it does not give effect to changes in fair value.

Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.

There were no securities sold during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

26

The following tables present the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

	At March 31, 2015
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(In thousands)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities		195,562		706		272,535		2,280		468,097		2,986
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		16,408		4,104		37,885		13,833		54,293		17,937
Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies		137,117		988		967,570		20,810		1,104,687		21,798
Mortgage-backed securities		238,052		1,016		24,720		387		262,772		1,403
Equity securities		47		3		—		—		47		3
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position	$	587,186	$	6,817	$	1,302,710	$	37,310	$	1,889,896	$	44,127

	At December 31, 2014
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(In thousands)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
U.S. Treasury securities	$	49,465	$	75	$	—	$	—	$	49,465	$	75
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities		888,325		6,866		429,835		5,525		1,318,160		12,391
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		14,419		3,031		41,084		10,518		55,503		13,549
Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies		539,658		13,774		733,814		25,029		1,273,472		38,803
Mortgage-backed securities		457		4		25,486		680		25,943		684
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position	$	1,492,324	$	23,750	$	1,230,219	$	41,752	$	2,722,543	$	65,502

As of March 31, 2015, the available-for-sale investment portfolio reflects gross unrealized losses of approximately $44 million, driven by U.S. Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations and obligations of the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions. As part of its analysis for all US Agencies’ securities, management considers the U.S. Agency guarantee.

In February 2014, the three principal nationally recognized rating agencies (Moody’s Investor Services, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings) downgraded the general-obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and other obligations of Puerto Rico instrumentalities to non-investment grade categories, citing concerns about financial flexibility and a reduced capacity to borrow in the financial markets. In July 2014, the Puerto Rico general obligations were further downgraded by the rating agencies, after the Commonwealth enacted a law that allowed certain Puerto Rico public corporations to restructure their debt.

On February 12, 2015, S&P further downgraded the debt rating of the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities. S&P stated that, in their view, Puerto Rico’s current economic and financial trajectory is now more susceptible to adverse financial, economic and market conditions that could ultimately impair the Commonwealth’s ability to fund services and its debt commitments. S&P also cited implementation risk with respect to the value-added tax and expressed concern that, while higher taxes could improve the budget balance, there could be potential negative economic implications. On February 19, 2015, Moody’s also downgraded its debt ratings for the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities, citing similar concerns as S&P. On April 27, 2015, S&P cut General Obligation ratings to CCC+ from B with negative implications. The ratings firm attributed the downgrade to a reduced possibility of the Commonwealth accessing the bond markets and heightened budget pressures exacerbated by current weak economic trends and high debt levels. The portfolio of obligations of the Puerto Rico Government is mostly comprised of securities with specific sources of income or revenues identified for repayments. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers.

27

Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (“OTTI”) declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired, the excess of the security’s carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area, and (7) management’s intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the debt security before a forecasted recovery occurs.

At March 31, 2015, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. However, further negative evidence impacting the liquidity and sources of repayment of the “Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions”, could result in a charge to earnings to recognize estimated credit losses determined to be other-than-temporary. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation did not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.

The following table states the name of issuers, and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders’ equity. This information excludes securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Investments in obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S. Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.

	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Amortized cost		Fair value		Amortized cost		Fair value
FNMA	$	2,008,358	$	2,015,810	$	1,746,807	$	1,736,987
FHLB		538,493		538,874		737,149		732,894
Freddie Mac		1,161,089		1,163,815		1,117,865		1,112,485

28

Note 10 – Investment securities held-to-maturity

The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

	At March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Weighted average yield
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions
Within 1 year	$	2,865	$	—	$	106	$	2,759		5.88	%
After 1 to 5 years		13,400		—		2,296		11,104		5.97
After 5 to 10 years		20,310		—		6,400		13,910		6.12
After 10 years		63,429		3,906		7,400		59,935		2.14
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		100,004		3,906		16,202		87,708		3.57
Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies
After 5 to 10 years		91		5		—		96		5.45
Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies		91		5		—		96		5.45
Other
After 1 to 5 years		1,500		—		—		1,500		1.16
Total other		1,500		—		—		1,500		1.16
Total investment securities held-to-maturity	$	101,595	$	3,911	$	16,202	$	89,304		3.54	%

	At December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Weighted average yield
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions
Within 1 year	$	2,740	$	—	$	8	$	2,732		5.84	%
After 1 to 5 years		12,830		—		764		12,066		5.95
After 5 to 10 years		21,325		—		6,003		15,322		6.09
After 10 years		64,678		3,342		5,543		62,477		2.22
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		101,573		3,342		12,318		92,597		3.60
Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies
After 5 to 10 years		97		5		—		102		5.45
Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies		97		5		—		102		5.45
Other
Within 1 year		250		—		—		250		1.33
After 1 to 5 years		1,250		—		—		1,250		1.10
Total other		1,500		—		—		1,500		1.14
Total investment securities held-to-maturity	$	103,170	$	3,347	$	12,318	$	94,199		3.57	%

Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.

The following tables present the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

29

	At March 31, 2015
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(In thousands)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions	$	619	$	6	$	42,089	$	16,196	$	42,708	$	16,202
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss position	$	619	$	6	$	42,089	$	16,196	$	42,708	$	16,202

	At December 31, 2014
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(In thousands)	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions	$	373	$	2	$	45,969	$	12,316	$	46,342	$	12,318
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss position	$	373	$	2	$	45,969	$	12,316	$	46,342	$	12,318

As indicated in Note 9 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates investment securities for OTTI declines in fair value on a quarterly basis.

The “Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions” classified as held-to-maturity at March 31, 2015 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of Puerto Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. This includes $59 million of securities issued by three municipalities of Puerto Rico that are payable from the real and personal property taxes collected within such municipalities. These bonds have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality. The portfolio also includes approximately $41 million in securities for which the underlying source of payment is not the central government, but in which it provides a guarantee in the event of default. In February 2014, the three principal nationally recognized rating agencies (Moody’s Investor Services, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings) downgraded the general-obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and other obligations of Puerto Rico instrumentalities to non-investment grade categories, citing concerns about financial flexibility and a reduced capacity to borrow in the financial markets. In July 2014, the Puerto Rico general obligations were further downgraded by the rating agencies, after the Commonwealth enacted a law that allowed certain Puerto Rico public corporations to restructure their debt.

On February 12, 2015, S&P further downgraded the debt rating of the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities. S&P stated that, in their view, Puerto Rico’s current economic and financial trajectory is now more susceptible to adverse financial, economic and market conditions that could ultimately impair the Commonwealth’s ability to fund services and its debt commitments. S&P also cited implementation risk with respect to the value-added tax and expressed concern that, while higher taxes could improve the budget balance, there could be potential negative economic implications. On February 19, 2015, Moody’s also downgraded its debt ratings for the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities, citing similar concerns as S&P. On April 27, 2015, S&P cut General Obligation ratings to CCC+ from B with negative implications. The ratings firm attributed the downgrade to a reduced possibility of the Commonwealth accessing the bond markets and heightened budget pressures exacerbated by current weak economic trends and high debt levels.

The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. The Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell these investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.

30

Note 11 – Loans

Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of credit with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. The Corporation measures additional losses for this portfolio when it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all cash flows expected at acquisition plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition. Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted for under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the Corporation’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income. Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed in non-accrual status when past due in accordance with the Corporation’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued.

The risks on loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction are significantly different from the risks on loans not covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC. Accordingly, the Corporation presents loans subject to the loss sharing agreements as “covered loans” in the information below and loans that are not subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements as “non-covered loans”. The FDIC loss sharing agreements expires at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2015 for commercial (including construction) and consumer loans, and at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2020 for single-family residential mortgage loans, as explained in Note 13.

For a summary of the accounting policy related to loans, interest recognition and allowance for loan losses refer to the summary of significant accounting policies included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in 2014 Annual Report.

The following table presents the composition of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”), net of unearned income, at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Commercial multi-family	$	565,736	$	487,280
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		2,800,673		2,526,146
Commercial real estate owner occupied		1,643,186		1,667,267
Commercial and industrial		3,643,966		3,453,574
Construction		690,728		251,820
Mortgage		7,189,227		6,502,886
Leasing		581,119		564,389
Legacy[2]		77,675		80,818
Consumer:
Credit cards		1,128,611		1,155,229
Home equity lines of credit		357,508		366,162
Personal		1,353,594		1,375,452
Auto		782,635		767,369
Other		198,272		206,059
Total loans held-in-portfolio[1]	$	21,012,930	$	19,404,451

[1] Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2015 are net of $97 million in unearned income and exclude $161 million in loans held-for-sale (December 31, 2014 - $94 million in unearned income and $106 million in loans held-for-sale).

[2] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

31

The following table presents the composition of covered loans at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Commercial real estate	$	1,470,575	$	1,511,472
Commercial and industrial		100,572		103,309
Construction		57,825		70,336
Mortgage		795,477		822,986
Consumer		32,103		34,559
Total covered loans held-in-portfolio	$	2,456,552	$	2,542,662

The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (“LHFS”) at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 by main categories.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Commercial	$	8,240	$	309
Legacy		—		319
Mortgage		152,362		100,166
Consumer		—		5,310
Total loans held-for-sale	$	160,602	$	106,104

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation recorded purchases (including repurchases) of mortgage loans amounting to $169 million (2014 - $161 million) excluding the impact of the Doral Bank Transaction. Additionally, the Corporation did not purchase consumer and commercial loans during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (March 31, 2014 - $92 million and $21 million, respectively). The Corporation recorded purchases amounting to $164 thousand of lease financing during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (March 31, 2014 - $0 million).

The Corporation performed whole-loan sales involving approximately $39 million of residential mortgage loans during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (March 31, 2014 - $43 million). Also, during the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation securitized approximately $156 million of mortgage loans into Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage-backed securities and $47 million of mortgage loans into Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) mortgage-backed securities, compared to $166 million and $63 million, respectively, during the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The Corporation sold commercial and construction loans with a book value of approximately $1 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (March 31, 2014 - $30 million). In addition, the Corporation sold $5 million in consumer loans during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (March 31, 2014 - $0 million).

Non-covered loans

The following tables present non-covered loans held-in-portfolio by loan class that are in non-performing status or are accruing interest but are past due 90 days or more at March 31, 2015 and 2014. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more consist primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA, and other insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans which are included in the Corporation’s financial statements pursuant to GNMA’s buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the option (but not the obligation) to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more also include reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets. In addition, at December 31, 2014 accruing loans past due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from another financial institution that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from the seller / servicer, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under recourse agreements. However, residential conventional loans purchased from another financial institution, which are in the process of foreclosure, are classified as non-performing mortgage loans.

32

At March 31, 2015
	Puerto Rico				U.S. mainland				Popular, Inc.
(In thousands)	Non-accrual loans [1]		Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more		Non-accrual loans		Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more		Non-accrual loans		Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more
Commercial multi-family	$	2,040	$	—	$	249	$	—	$	2,289	$	—
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		38,888		—		—		—		38,888		—
Commercial real estate owner occupied		91,762		—		778		—		92,540		—
Commercial and industrial		131,941		466		8,780		—		140,721		466
Construction		13,214		—		—		—		13,214		—
Mortgage[3]		320,154		428,827		8,461		—		328,615		428,827
Leasing		2,506		—		—		—		2,506		—
Legacy		—		—		2,288		—		2,288		—
Consumer:
Credit cards		—		20,570		477		—		477		20,570
Home equity lines of credit		—		195		4,653		—		4,653		195
Personal		23,843		—		1,246		—		25,089		—
Auto		11,108		—		—		—		11,108		—
Other		2,561		952		4		—		2,565		952
Total[2]	$	638,017	$	451,010	$	26,936	$	—	$	664,953	$	451,010

[1] Non-covered loans of $58 million accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analysis.

[2] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $ 8 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.

[3] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $134 million of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of March 31, 2015. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $69 million in reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets.

At December 31, 2014
	Puerto Rico				U.S. mainland				Popular, Inc.
(In thousands)	Non-accrual loans [1]		Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more		Non-accrual loans		Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more		Non-accrual loans		Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more
Commercial multi-family	$	2,199	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,199	$	—
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		33,452		—		—		—		33,452		—
Commercial real estate owner occupied		92,648		—		805		—		93,453		—
Commercial and industrial		129,611		494		1,510		—		131,121		494
Construction		13,812		—		—		—		13,812		—
Mortgage[3]		295,629		426,387		9,284		—		304,913		426,387
Leasing		3,102		—		—		—		3,102		—
Legacy		—		—		1,545		—		1,545		—
Consumer:
Credit cards		—		20,368		449		—		449		20,368
Home equity lines of credit		—		21		4,090		—		4,090		21
Personal		25,678		10		1,410		—		27,088		10
Auto		11,387		—		—		—		11,387		—
Other		3,865		682		7		—		3,872		682
Total[2]	$	611,383	$	447,962	$	19,100	$	—	$	630,483	$	447,962

[1] Non-covered loans by $59 million accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analysis.

[2] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $ 19 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.

[3] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $125 million of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of December 31, 2014. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $66 million in reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets.

33

The following tables present loans by past due status at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 for non-covered loans held-in-portfolio (net of unearned income).

March 31, 2015
Puerto Rico
	Past due										Non-covered
(In thousands)	30-59 days		60-89 days		90 days or more		Total past due		Current		loans HIP Puerto Rico
Commercial multi-family	$	—	$	—	$	2,040	$	2,040	$	87,493	$	89,533
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		44,939		2,193		39,002		86,134		2,056,220		2,142,354
Commercial real estate owner occupied		11,716		2,765		91,762		106,243		1,323,446		1,429,689
Commercial and industrial		15,412		1,651		132,407		149,470		2,590,463		2,739,933
Construction		608		—		13,214		13,822		84,884		98,706
Mortgage		334,537		167,235		807,018		1,308,790		4,862,457		6,171,247
Leasing		7,570		1,518		2,506		11,594		569,525		581,119
Consumer:
Credit cards		12,504		9,359		20,570		42,433		1,072,071		1,114,504
Home equity lines of credit		—		—		195		195		11,968		12,163
Personal		13,132		6,974		24,083		44,189		1,200,892		1,245,081
Auto		31,933		7,325		11,108		50,366		732,182		782,548
Other		678		300		3,520		4,498		193,412		197,910
Total	$	473,029	$	199,320	$	1,147,425	$	1,819,774	$	14,785,013	$	16,604,787

March 31, 2015
U.S. mainland
	Past due
(In thousands)	30-59 days		60-89 days		90 days or more		Total past due		Current		Loans HIP U.S. mainland
Commercial multi-family	$	204	$	—	$	249	$	453	$	475,750	$	476,203
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		50		—		—		50		658,269		658,319
Commercial real estate owner occupied		3,599		—		778		4,377		209,120		213,497
Commercial and industrial		1,276		236		8,780		10,292		893,741		904,033
Construction		671		—		—		671		591,351		592,022
Mortgage		27,211		5,043		8,461		40,715		977,265		1,017,980
Legacy		3,713		594		2,288		6,595		71,080		77,675
Consumer:
Credit cards		267		119		477		863		13,244		14,107
Home equity lines of credit		3,858		1,081		4,653		9,592		335,753		345,345
Personal		2,008		659		1,246		3,913		104,600		108,513
Auto		—		—		—		—		87		87
Other		—		—		4		4		358		362
Total	$	42,857	$	7,732	$	26,936	$	77,525	$	4,330,618	$	4,408,143

34

March 31, 2015
Popular, Inc.
	Past due										Non-covered
(In thousands)	30-59 days		60-89 days		90 days or more		Total past due		Current		loans HIP Popular, Inc.
Commercial multi-family	$	204	$	—	$	2,289	$	2,493	$	563,243	$	565,736
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		44,989		2,193		39,002		86,184		2,714,489		2,800,673
Commercial real estate owner occupied		15,315		2,765		92,540		110,620		1,532,566		1,643,186
Commercial and industrial		16,688		1,887		141,187		159,762		3,484,204		3,643,966
Construction		1,279		—		13,214		14,493		676,235		690,728
Mortgage		361,748		172,278		815,479		1,349,505		5,839,722		7,189,227
Leasing		7,570		1,518		2,506		11,594		569,525		581,119
Legacy		3,713		594		2,288		6,595		71,080		77,675
Consumer:
Credit cards		12,771		9,478		21,047		43,296		1,085,315		1,128,611
Home equity lines of credit		3,858		1,081		4,848		9,787		347,721		357,508
Personal		15,140		7,633		25,329		48,102		1,305,492		1,353,594
Auto		31,933		7,325		11,108		50,366		732,269		782,635
Other		678		300		3,524		4,502		193,770		198,272
Total	$	515,886	$	207,052	$	1,174,361	$	1,897,299	$	19,115,631	$	21,012,930

December 31, 2014
Puerto Rico
	Past due										Non-covered
(In thousands)	30-59 days		60-89 days		90 days or more		Total past due		Current		loans HIP Puerto Rico
Commercial multi-family	$	221	$	69	$	2,199	$	2,489	$	77,588	$	80,077
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		9,828		121		33,452		43,401		1,970,178		2,013,579
Commercial real estate owner occupied		8,954		7,709		92,648		109,311		1,364,051		1,473,362
Commercial and industrial		18,498		5,269		130,105		153,872		2,653,913		2,807,785
Construction		2,497		—		13,812		16,309		143,075		159,384
Mortgage		304,319		167,219		780,678		1,252,216		4,198,285		5,450,501
Leasing		6,779		1,246		3,102		11,127		553,262		564,389
Consumer:
Credit cards		13,715		9,290		20,368		43,373		1,096,791		1,140,164
Home equity lines of credit		137		159		21		317		13,083		13,400
Personal		13,479		6,646		25,688		45,813		1,216,720		1,262,533
Auto		34,238		8,397		11,387		54,022		713,274		767,296
Other		1,009		209		4,547		5,765		199,879		205,644
Total	$	413,674	$	206,334	$	1,118,007	$	1,738,015	$	14,200,099	$	15,938,114

35

December 31, 2014
U.S. mainland
	Past due
(In thousands)	30-59 days		60-89 days		90 days or more		Total past due		Current		Loans HIP U.S. mainland
Commercial multi-family	$	87	$	376	$	—	$	463	$	406,740	$	407,203
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		1,478		—		—		1,478		511,089		512,567
Commercial real estate owner occupied		45		3,631		805		4,481		189,424		193,905
Commercial and industrial		1,133		123		1,510		2,766		643,023		645,789
Construction		810		—		—		810		91,626		92,436
Mortgage		29,582		8,646		9,284		47,512		1,004,873		1,052,385
Legacy		929		1,931		1,545		4,405		76,413		80,818
Consumer:
Credit cards		314		246		449		1,009		14,056		15,065
Home equity lines of credit		5,036		1,025		4,090		10,151		342,611		352,762
Personal		2,476		893		1,410		4,779		108,140		112,919
Auto		—		—		—		—		73		73
Other		10		4		7		21		394		415
Total	$	41,900	$	16,875	$	19,100	$	77,875	$	3,388,462	$	3,466,337

December 31, 2014
Popular, Inc.
	Past due										Non-covered
(In thousands)	30-59 days		60-89 days		90 days or more		Total past due		Current		loans HIP Popular, Inc.
Commercial multi-family	$	308	$	445	$	2,199	$	2,952	$	484,328	$	487,280
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		11,306		121		33,452		44,879		2,481,267		2,526,146
Commercial real estate owner occupied		8,999		11,340		93,453		113,792		1,553,475		1,667,267
Commercial and industrial		19,631		5,392		131,615		156,638		3,296,936		3,453,574
Construction		3,307		—		13,812		17,119		234,701		251,820
Mortgage		333,901		175,865		789,962		1,299,728		5,203,158		6,502,886
Leasing		6,779		1,246		3,102		11,127		553,262		564,389
Legacy		929		1,931		1,545		4,405		76,413		80,818
Consumer:
Credit cards		14,029		9,536		20,817		44,382		1,110,847		1,155,229
Home equity lines of credit		5,173		1,184		4,111		10,468		355,694		366,162
Personal		15,955		7,539		27,098		50,592		1,324,860		1,375,452
Auto		34,238		8,397		11,387		54,022		713,347		767,369
Other		1,019		213		4,554		5,786		200,273		206,059
Total	$	455,574	$	223,209	$	1,137,107	$	1,815,890	$	17,588,561	$	19,404,451

The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (“LHFS”) in non-performing status at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 by main categories.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Commercial	$	8,179	$	309
Mortgage		225		14,041
Consumer		—		4,549
Total	$	8,404	$	18,899

36

The following table presents loans acquired as part of the Doral transaction accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 at the February 27, 2015 acquisition date.

(In thousands)
Contractually-required principal and interest	$	233,987
Non-accretable difference		43,904
Cash flows expected to be collected		190,083
Accretable yield		46,150
Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30	$	143,933

The following table presents acquired loans accounted for under ASC subtopic 310-20 as of the February 27, 2015 acquisition date:

(In thousands)
Fair value of loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-20	$	1,521,524
Gross contractual amounts receivable (principal and interest)	$	2,014,755
Estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected	$	39,348

The outstanding principal balance of non-covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, amounted to $413 million at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $243 million). At March 31, 2015, none of the acquired non-covered loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans.

Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the non-covered loans accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

Activity in the accretable yield - Non-covered loans ASC 310-30
	For the quarters ended
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015 [1]			March 31, 2014
Beginning balance	$	116,304		$	49,398
Additions		50,662			7,084
Accretion		(3,223	)		(2,374	)
Change in expected cash flows		(5,319	)		13,177
Ending balance	$	158,424		$	67,285

[1] Includes loans acquired in the Doral Bank transaction.

Carrying amount of non-covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30
	For the quarters ended
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015 [1]			March 31, 2014
Beginning balance	$	212,763		$	173,659
Additions		157,091			20,042
Accretion		3,223			2,374
Collections and charge-offs		(9,980	)		(5,859	)
Ending balance	$	363,097		$	190,216
Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 non-covered loans		(16,092	)		(15,078	)
Ending balance, net of allowance for loan losses	$	347,005		$	175,138

[1] Includes loans acquired in the Doral Bank transaction.

37

Covered loans

The following table presents covered loans in non-performing status and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more by loan class at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Non-accrual loans		Accruing loans past due 90 days or more		Non-accrual loans		Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
Commercial real estate	$	7,375	$	—	$	8,810	$	—
Commercial and industrial		4,179		—		1,142		—
Construction		2,627		—		2,770		—
Mortgage		5,075		25		4,376		28
Consumer		398		—		735		—
Total[1]	$	19,654	$	25	$	17,833	$	28

[1] Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.

The following tables present loans by past due status at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 for covered loans held-in-portfolio. The information considers covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and ASC Subtopic 310-30.

March 31, 2015
	Past due
(In thousands)	30-59 days		60-89 days		90 days or more		Total past due		Current		Covered loans HIP
Commercial real estate	$	48,825	$	3,666	$	255,571	$	308,062	$	1,162,513	$	1,470,575
Commercial and industrial		515		211		9,045		9,771		90,801		100,572
Construction		—		2,420		46,517		48,937		8,888		57,825
Mortgage		41,509		24,033		131,139		196,681		598,796		795,477
Consumer		1,720		1,058		2,039		4,817		27,286		32,103
Total covered loans	$	92,569	$	31,388	$	444,311	$	568,268	$	1,888,284	$	2,456,552

December 31, 2014
	Past due
(In thousands)	30-59 days		60-89 days		90 days or more		Total past due		Current		Covered loans HIP
Commercial real estate	$	98,559	$	12,597	$	291,010	$	402,166	$	1,109,306	$	1,511,472
Commercial and industrial		512		7		7,756		8,275		95,034		103,309
Construction		—		384		58,665		59,049		11,287		70,336
Mortgage		45,764		23,531		143,140		212,435		610,551		822,986
Consumer		1,884		747		2,532		5,163		29,396		34,559
Total covered loans	$	146,719	$	37,266	$	503,103	$	687,088	$	1,855,574	$	2,542,662

The carrying amount of the covered loans consisted of loans determined to be impaired at the time of acquisition, which are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30 (“credit impaired loans”), and loans that were considered to be performing at the acquisition date, accounted for by analogy to ASC Subtopic 310-30 (“non-credit impaired loans”), as detailed in the following table.

38

	March 31, 2015									December 31, 2014
	Carrying amount									Carrying amount
(In thousands)	Non-credit impaired loans			Credit impaired loans			Total			Non-credit impaired loans			Credit impaired loans			Total
Commercial real estate	$	1,367,926		$	80,924		$	1,448,850		$	1,392,482		$	90,202		$	1,482,684
Commercial and industrial		54,709			1,788			56,497			57,059			2,197			59,256
Construction		24,252			28,574			52,826			32,836			32,409			65,245
Mortgage		740,653			42,795			783,448			764,148			45,829			809,977
Consumer		24,241			1,234			25,475			25,617			1,393			27,010
Carrying amount		2,211,781			155,315			2,367,096			2,272,142			172,030			2,444,172
Allowance for loan losses		(49,750	)		(18,636	)		(68,386	)		(52,798	)		(26,048	)		(78,846	)
Carrying amount, net of allowance	$	2,162,031		$	136,679		$	2,298,710		$	2,219,344		$	145,982		$	2,365,326

The outstanding principal balance of covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, amounted to $2.9 billion at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $3.1 billion). At March 31, 2015, none of the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans.

Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the covered loans accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, were as follows:

	Activity in the accretable yield
	Covered loans ASC 310-30
	For the quarters ended
	March 31, 2015									March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Non-credit impaired loans			Credit impaired loans			Total			Non-credit impaired loans			Credit impaired loans			Total
Beginning balance	$	1,265,752		$	5,585		$	1,271,337		$	1,297,725		$	11,480		$	1,309,205
Accretion		(53,776	)		(1,921	)		(55,697	)		(72,552	)		(6,566	)		(79,118	)
Change in expected cash flows		42,273			1,035			43,308			(12,467	)		592			(11,875	)
Ending balance	$	1,254,249		$	4,699		$	1,258,948		$	1,212,706		$	5,506		$	1,218,212

	Carrying amount of covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30
	For the quarters ended
	March 31, 2015 [1]									March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Non-credit impaired loans			Credit impaired loans			Total			Non-credit impaired loans			Credit impaired loans			Total
Beginning balance	$	2,272,142		$	172,030		$	2,444,172		$	2,509,075		$	318,872		$	2,827,947
Accretion		53,776			1,921			55,697			72,552			6,566			79,118
Collections and charge-offs		(114,137	)		(18,636	)		(132,773	)		(112,174	)		(61,769	)		(173,943	)
Ending balance	$	2,211,781		$	155,315		$	2,367,096		$	2,469,453		$	263,669		$	2,733,122
Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 covered loans		(49,750	)		(18,636	)		(68,386	)		(56,953	)		(33,418	)		(90,371	)
Ending balance, net of ALLL	$	2,162,031		$	136,679		$	2,298,710		$	2,412,500		$	230,251		$	2,642,751

[1] Includes $64 million of non-covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30.

39

The Corporation accounts for lines of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loans payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the loans, if the loan is accruing interest. Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 amounted to $0.1 billion at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $0.1 billion).

40

Note 12 – Allowance for loan losses

The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology includes the consideration of factors such as current economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this methodology. Loan losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35. Also, the Corporation determines the allowance for loan losses on purchased impaired loans and purchased loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by analogy, by evaluating decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date.

The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors:

• Base net loss rates, which are based on the moving average of annualized net loss rates computed over a 3-year historical loss period for the commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios. The base net loss rates are applied by loan type and by legal entity.

• Recent loss trend adjustment, which replaces the base loss rate with a 12-month average loss rate, when these trends are higher than the respective base loss rates. The objective of this adjustment is to allow for a more recent loss trend to be captured and reflected in the ALLL estimation process. As part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models, as discussed in the following paragraphs and implemented as of June 30, 2014, the Corporation eliminated the use of caps in the recent loss trend adjustment for the consumer and mortgage portfolios, among other enhancements. For the period ended December 31, 2013, the recent loss trend adjustment caps for the consumer and mortgage portfolios were triggered in only one portfolio segment within the Puerto Rico consumer portfolio. Management assessed the impact of the applicable cap through a review of qualitative factors that specifically considered the drivers of recent loss trends and changes to the portfolio composition. The related effect of the aforementioned cap was immaterial for the overall level of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses for the Puerto Rico Consumer portfolio.

For the period ended March 31, 2015, 59% (March 31, 2014 - 34%) of the ALLL for BPPR non-covered loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the mortgage, leasing, credit cards, personal loans and revolving loan portfolio for 2015, and in the commercial multi-family, mortgage, personal and auto loan portfolios for 2014.

For the period ended March 31, 2015, 13% (March 31, 2014 - 23%) of the ALLL for BPNA loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the consumer loan portfolios for 2015 and in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial, construction and legacy loan portfolios for 2014.

• Environmental factors, which include credit and macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rate, economic activity index and delinquency rates, adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical losses. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental factors on each loan group as an adjustment that, as appropriate, increases the historical loss rate applied to each group. Environmental factors provide updated perspective on credit and economic conditions. Regression analysis is used to select these indicators and quantify the effect on the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses.

41

The following tables present the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Leasing			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	201,589		$	5,483		$	120,860		$	7,131		$	154,072		$	489,135
Provision (reversal of provision)		(1,321	)		(6,813	)		16,192			846			23,009			31,913
Charge-offs		(9,572	)		—			(10,973	)		(1,237	)		(29,699	)		(51,481	)
Recoveries		4,770			2,925			500			468			6,046			14,709
Ending balance	$	195,466		$	1,595		$	126,579		$	7,208		$	153,428		$	484,276

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
Puerto Rico - Covered loans
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Leasing		Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	30,871		$	7,202		$	40,948		$	—	$	3,052		$	82,073
Provision (reversal of provision)		1,995			6,276			2,802			—		(749	)		10,324
Charge-offs		(14,239	)		(9,046	)		(3,386	)		—		—			(26,671	)
Recoveries		2,640			3,275			105			—		727			6,747
Ending balance	$	21,267		$	7,707		$	40,469		$	—	$	3,030		$	72,473

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
U.S. Mainland
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction		Mortgage			Legacy			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	9,648		$	1,187	$	2,462		$	2,944		$	14,343		$	30,584
Provision (reversal of provision)		299			662		(6,127	)		(1,810	)		4,774			(2,202	)
Charge-offs		(450	)		—		(221	)		(474	)		(2,518	)		(3,663	)
Recoveries		929			—		67			2,302			1,251			4,549
Net recoveries (write-down)		—			—		6,081			—			(3,401	)		2,680
Ending balance	$	10,426		$	1,849	$	2,262		$	2,962		$	14,449		$	31,948

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
Popular, Inc.
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Legacy			Leasing			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	242,108		$	13,872		$	164,270		$	2,944		$	7,131		$	171,467		$	601,792
Provision (reversal of provision)		973			125			12,867			(1,810	)		846			27,034			40,035
Charge-offs		(24,261	)		(9,046	)		(14,580	)		(474	)		(1,237	)		(32,217	)		(81,815	)
Recoveries		8,339			6,200			672			2,302			468			8,024			26,005
Net recoveries (write-down)		—			—			6,081			—			—			(3,401	)		2,680
Ending balance	$	227,159		$	11,151		$	169,310		$	2,962		$	7,208		$	170,907		$	588,697

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Leasing			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	128,150		$	5,095		$	130,330		$	10,622		$	152,578		$	426,775
Provision (reversal of provision)		11,157			(1,394	)		15,982			517			27,653			53,915
Charge-offs		(22,117	)		(416	)		(8,726	)		(967	)		(29,196	)		(61,422	)
Recoveries		6,944			1,794			210			311			6,213			15,472
Ending balance	$	124,134		$	5,079		$	137,796		$	10,483		$	157,248		$	434,740

42

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
Puerto Rico - Covered Loans
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Leasing		Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	42,198		$	19,491		$	36,006		$	—	$	4,397		$	102,092
Provision (reversal of provision)		4,039			17,567			4,498			—		(390	)		25,714
Charge-offs		(7,968	)		(22,981	)		(1,656	)		—		295			(32,310	)
Recoveries		320			1,889			—			—		68			2,277
Ending balance	$	38,589		$	15,966		$	38,848		$	—	$	4,370		$	97,773

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
U.S. Mainland - Continuing Operations
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Legacy			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	24,930		$	214		$	26,599		$	11,335		$	19,205		$	82,283
Allowance transferred from discontinued operations		7,984			—			—			—			—			7,984
Provision (reversal of provision)		578			(194	)		(562	)		(3,672	)		4,057			207
Charge-offs		(4,991	)		—			(1,538	)		(2,984	)		(5,076	)		(14,589	)
Recoveries		3,004			176			668			7,193			707			11,748
Ending balance	$	31,505		$	196		$	25,167		$	11,872		$	18,893		$	87,633
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
U.S. Mainland - Discontinued Operations
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Legacy			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	21,902		$	33		$	—		$	2,369		$	5,101		$	29,405
Allowance transferred to continuing operations		(7,984	)		—			—			—			—			(7,984	)
Provision (reversal of provision)		(2,831	)		(226	)		—			(1,812	)		(1,895	)		(6,764	)
Charge-offs		(2,995	)		—			—			(557	)		(900	)		(4,452	)
Recoveries		8,283			220			—			1,400			94			9,997
Ending balance	$	16,375		$	27		$	—		$	1,400		$	2,400		$	20,202

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
Popular, Inc.
(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Legacy			Leasing			Consumer			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	217,180		$	24,833		$	192,935		$	13,704		$	10,622		$	181,281		$	640,555
Provision (reversal of provision)		12,943			15,753			19,918			(5,484	)		517			29,425			73,072
Charge-offs		(38,071	)		(23,397	)		(11,920	)		(3,541	)		(967	)		(34,877	)		(112,773	)
Recoveries		18,551			4,079			878			8,593			311			7,082			39,494
Ending balance	$	210,603		$	21,268		$	201,811		$	13,272		$	10,483		$	182,911		$	640,348

43

The following table provides the activity in the allowance for loan losses related to covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30.

	ASC 310-30 Covered loans
	For the quarters ended
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Balance at beginning of period	$	78,846		$	93,915
Provision for loan losses		8,601			24,555
Net charge-offs		(19,061	)		(28,099	)
Balance at end of period	$	68,386		$	90,371

The following tables present information at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 regarding loan ending balances and the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and whether such loans and the allowance pertains to loans individually or collectively evaluated for impairment.

At March 31, 2015
Puerto Rico
(In thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Mortgage		Leasing		Consumer		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific ALLL non-covered loans	$	69,946	$	158	$	42,229	$	687	$	25,223	$	138,243
General ALLL non-covered loans		125,520		1,437		84,350		6,521		128,205		346,033
ALLL - non-covered loans		195,466		1,595		126,579		7,208		153,428		484,276
Specific ALLL covered loans		1,473		—		—		—		—		1,473
General ALLL covered loans		19,794		7,707		40,469		—		3,030		71,000
ALLL - covered loans		21,267		7,707		40,469		—		3,030		72,473
Total ALLL	$	216,733	$	9,302	$	167,048	$	7,208	$	156,458	$	556,749
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Impaired non-covered loans	$	417,377	$	9,838	$	445,506	$	2,924	$	114,416	$	990,061
Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans		5,984,132		88,868		5,725,741		578,195		3,237,790		15,614,726
Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio		6,401,509		98,706		6,171,247		581,119		3,352,206		16,604,787
Impaired covered loans		8,394		2,336		—		—		—		10,730
Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans		1,562,753		55,489		795,477		—		32,103		2,445,822
Covered loans held-in-portfolio		1,571,147		57,825		795,477		—		32,103		2,456,552
Total loans held-in-portfolio	$	7,972,656	$	156,531	$	6,966,724	$	581,119	$	3,384,309	$	19,061,339

At March 31, 2015
U.S. Mainland
(In thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Mortgage		Legacy		Consumer		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific ALLL	$	—	$	—	$	341	$	—	$	381	$	722
General ALLL		10,426		1,849		1,921		2,962		14,068		31,226
Total ALLL	$	10,426	$	1,849	$	2,262	$	2,962	$	14,449	$	31,948
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	5,106	$	—	$	2,048	$	7,154
Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans		2,252,052		592,022		1,012,874		77,675		466,366		4,400,989
Total loans held-in-portfolio	$	2,252,052	$	592,022	$	1,017,980	$	77,675	$	468,414	$	4,408,143

44

At March 31, 2015
Popular, Inc.
(In thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Mortgage		Legacy		Leasing		Consumer		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific ALLL non-covered loans	$	69,946	$	158	$	42,570	$	—	$	687	$	25,604	$	138,965
General ALLL non-covered loans		135,946		3,286		86,271		2,962		6,521		142,273		377,259
ALLL - non-covered loans		205,892		3,444		128,841		2,962		7,208		167,877		516,224
Specific ALLL covered loans		1,473		—		—		—		—		—		1,473
General ALLL covered loans		19,794		7,707		40,469		—		—		3,030		71,000
ALLL - covered loans		21,267		7,707		40,469		—		—		3,030		72,473
Total ALLL	$	227,159	$	11,151	$	169,310	$	2,962	$	7,208	$	170,907	$	588,697
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Impaired non-covered loans	$	417,377	$	9,838	$	450,612	$	—	$	2,924	$	116,464	$	997,215
Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans		8,236,184		680,890		6,738,615		77,675		578,195		3,704,156		20,015,715
Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio		8,653,561		690,728		7,189,227		77,675		581,119		3,820,620		21,012,930
Impaired covered loans		8,394		2,336		—		—		—		—		10,730
Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans		1,562,753		55,489		795,477		—		—		32,103		2,445,822
Covered loans held-in-portfolio		1,571,147		57,825		795,477		—		—		32,103		2,456,552
Total loans held-in-portfolio	$	10,224,708	$	748,553	$	7,984,704	$	77,675	$	581,119	$	3,852,723	$	23,469,482

At December 31, 2014
Puerto Rico
(In thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Mortgage		Leasing		Consumer		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific ALLL non-covered loans	$	64,736	$	363	$	45,838	$	770	$	27,796	$	139,503
General ALLL non-covered loans		136,853		5,120		75,022		6,361		126,276		349,632
ALLL - non-covered loans		201,589		5,483		120,860		7,131		154,072		489,135
Specific ALLL covered loans		5		—		—		—		—		5
General ALLL covered loans		30,866		7,202		40,948		—		3,052		82,068
ALLL - covered loans		30,871		7,202		40,948		—		3,052		82,073
Total ALLL	$	232,460	$	12,685	$	161,808	$	7,131	$	157,124	$	571,208
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Impaired non-covered loans	$	356,911	$	13,268	$	431,569	$	3,023	$	115,759	$	920,530
Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans		6,017,892		146,116		5,018,932		561,366		3,273,278		15,017,584
Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio		6,374,803		159,384		5,450,501		564,389		3,389,037		15,938,114
Impaired covered loans		4,487		2,419		—		—		—		6,906
Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans		1,610,294		67,917		822,986		—		34,559		2,535,756
Covered loans held-in-portfolio		1,614,781		70,336		822,986		—		34,559		2,542,662
Total loans held-in-portfolio	$	7,989,584	$	229,720	$	6,273,487	$	564,389	$	3,423,596	$	18,480,776

45

At December 31, 2014
U.S. Mainland
(In thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Mortgage		Legacy		Consumer		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific ALLL	$	—	$	—	$	273	$	—	$	365	$	638
General ALLL		9,648		1,187		2,189		2,944		13,978		29,946
Total ALLL	$	9,648	$	1,187	$	2,462	$	2,944	$	14,343	$	30,584
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Impaired loans	$	250	$	—	$	4,255	$	—	$	1,973	$	6,478
Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans		1,759,214		92,436		1,048,130		80,818		479,261		3,459,859
Total loans held-in-portfolio	$	1,759,464	$	92,436	$	1,052,385	$	80,818	$	481,234	$	3,466,337

At December 31, 2014
Popular, Inc.
(In thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Mortgage		Legacy		Leasing		Consumer		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Specific ALLL non-covered loans	$	64,736	$	363	$	46,111	$	—	$	770	$	28,161	$	140,141
General ALLL non-covered loans		146,501		6,307		77,211		2,944		6,361		140,254		379,578
ALLL - non-covered loans		211,237		6,670		123,322		2,944		7,131		168,415		519,719
Specific ALLL covered loans		5		—		—		—		—		—		5
General ALLL covered loans		30,866		7,202		40,948		—		—		3,052		82,068
ALLL - covered loans		30,871		7,202		40,948		—		—		3,052		82,073
Total ALLL	$	242,108	$	13,872	$	164,270	$	2,944	$	7,131	$	171,467	$	601,792
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Impaired non-covered loans	$	357,161	$	13,268	$	435,824	$	—	$	3,023	$	117,732	$	927,008
Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans		7,777,106		238,552		6,067,062		80,818		561,366		3,752,539		18,477,443
Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio		8,134,267		251,820		6,502,886		80,818		564,389		3,870,271		19,404,451
Impaired covered loans		4,487		2,419		—		—		—		—		6,906
Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans		1,610,294		67,917		822,986		—		—		34,559		2,535,756
Covered loans held-in-portfolio		1,614,781		70,336		822,986		—		—		34,559		2,542,662
Total loans held-in-portfolio	$	9,749,048	$	322,156	$	7,325,872	$	80,818	$	564,389	$	3,904,830	$	21,947,113

Impaired loans

The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

March 31, 2015
Puerto Rico
	Impaired Loans – With an Allowance						Impaired Loans With No Allowance				Impaired Loans - Total
(In thousands)	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance
Commercial multi-family	$	551	$	551	$	18	$	—	$	—	$	551	$	551	$	18
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		109,064		109,727		18,309		10,229		10,229		119,293		119,956		18,309
Commercial real estate owner occupied		109,604		127,531		11,902		17,274		20,884		126,878		148,415		11,902
Commercial and industrial		151,667		153,758		39,717		18,988		27,760		170,655		181,518		39,717
Construction		2,763		8,513		158		7,075		20,092		9,838		28,605		158
Mortgage		404,802		438,401		42,229		40,704		45,074		445,506		483,475		42,229
Leasing		2,924		2,924		687		—		—		2,924		2,924		687
Consumer:
Credit cards		41,197		41,197		7,756		—		—		41,197		41,197		7,756
Personal		70,657		70,657		17,054		—		—		70,657		70,657		17,054
Auto		2,036		2,036		314		—		—		2,036		2,036		314
Other		526		526		99		—		—		526		526		99
Covered loans		5,663		5,663		1,473		5,067		10,231		10,730		15,894		1,473
Total Puerto Rico	$	901,454	$	961,484	$	139,716	$	99,337	$	134,270	$	1,000,791	$	1,095,754	$	139,716

46

March 31, 2015
U.S. mainland
	Impaired Loans – With an Allowance						Impaired Loans With No Allowance				Impaired Loans - Total
(In thousands)	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance
Mortgage	$	3,628	$	4,202	$	341	$	1,478	$	2,245	$	5,106	$	6,447	$	341
Consumer:
HELOCs		847		863		229		790		790		1,637		1,653		229
Personal		327		327		152		84		84		411		411		152
Total U.S. mainland	$	4,802	$	5,392	$	722	$	2,352	$	3,119	$	7,154	$	8,511	$	722

March 31, 2015
Popular, Inc.
	Impaired Loans – With an Allowance						Impaired Loans With No Allowance				Impaired Loans - Total
(In thousands)	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance
Commercial multi-family	$	551	$	551	$	18	$	—	$	—	$	551	$	551	$	18
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		109,064		109,727		18,309		10,229		10,229		119,293		119,956		18,309
Commercial real estate owner occupied		109,604		127,531		11,902		17,274		20,884		126,878		148,415		11,902
Commercial and industrial		151,667		153,758		39,717		18,988		27,760		170,655		181,518		39,717
Construction		2,763		8,513		158		7,075		20,092		9,838		28,605		158
Mortgage		408,430		442,603		42,570		42,182		47,319		450,612		489,922		42,570
Leasing		2,924		2,924		687		—		—		2,924		2,924		687
Consumer:
Credit cards		41,197		41,197		7,756		—		—		41,197		41,197		7,756
HELOCs		847		863		229		790		790		1,637		1,653		229
Personal		70,984		70,984		17,206		84		84		71,068		71,068		17,206
Auto		2,036		2,036		314		—		—		2,036		2,036		314
Other		526		526		99		—		—		526		526		99
Covered loans		5,663		5,663		1,473		5,067		10,231		10,730		15,894		1,473
Total Popular, Inc.	$	906,256	$	966,876	$	140,438	$	101,689	$	137,389	$	1,007,945	$	1,104,265	$	140,438

December 31, 2014
Puerto Rico
	Impaired Loans – With an Allowance						Impaired Loans With No Allowance				Impaired Loans - Total
(In thousands)	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied	$	50,324	$	53,154	$	5,182	$	7,929	$	7,929	$	58,253	$	61,083	$	5,182
Commercial real estate owner occupied		114,163		127,855		16,770		14,897		16,110		129,060		143,965		16,770
Commercial and industrial		145,633		148,204		42,784		23,965		31,722		169,598		179,926		42,784
Construction		2,575		7,980		363		10,693		28,994		13,268		36,974		363
Mortgage		395,911		426,502		45,838		35,658		39,248		431,569		465,750		45,838
Leasing		3,023		3,023		770		—		—		3,023		3,023		770
Consumer:
Credit cards		41,477		41,477		8,023		—		—		41,477		41,477		8,023
Personal		71,825		71,825		19,410		—		—		71,825		71,825		19,410
Auto		1,932		1,932		262		—		—		1,932		1,932		262
Other		525		525		101		—		—		525		525		101
Covered loans		2,419		7,500		5		4,487		4,487		6,906		11,987		5
Total Puerto Rico	$	829,807	$	889,977	$	139,508	$	97,629	$	128,490	$	927,436	$	1,018,467	$	139,508

47

December 31, 2014
U.S. mainland
	Impaired Loans – With an Allowance						Impaired Loans With No Allowance				Impaired Loans - Total
(In thousands)	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	250	$	250	$	250	$	250	$	—
Mortgage		3,049		3,443		273		1,206		2,306		4,255		5,749		273
Consumer:
HELOCs		1,095		1,095		362		791		791		1,886		1,886		362
Other		3		3		3		84		—		87		3		3
Total U.S. mainland	$	4,147	$	4,541	$	638	$	2,331	$	3,347	$	6,478	$	7,888	$	638

December 31, 2014
Popular, Inc.
	Impaired Loans – With an Allowance						Impaired Loans With No Allowance				Impaired Loans - Total
(In thousands)	Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Recorded investment		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied	$	50,324	$	53,154	$	5,182	$	7,929	$	7,929	$	58,253	$	61,083	$	5,182
Commercial real estate owner occupied		114,163		127,855		16,770		14,897		16,110		129,060		143,965		16,770
Commercial and industrial		145,633		148,204		42,784		24,215		31,972		169,848		180,176		42,784
Construction		2,575		7,980		363		10,693		28,994		13,268		36,974		363
Mortgage		398,960		429,945		46,111		36,864		41,554		435,824		471,499		46,111
Leasing		3,023		3,023		770		—		—		3,023		3,023		770
Consumer:
Credit cards		41,477		41,477		8,023		—		—		41,477		41,477		8,023
HELOCs		1,095		1,095		362		791		791		1,886		1,886		362
Personal		71,825		71,825		19,410		—		—		71,825		71,825		19,410
Auto		1,932		1,932		262		—		—		1,932		1,932		262
Other		528		528		104		84		—		612		528		104
Covered loans		2,419		7,500		5		4,487		4,487		6,906		11,987		5
Total Popular, Inc.	$	833,954	$	894,518	$	140,146	$	99,960	$	131,837	$	933,914	$	1,026,355	$	140,146

The following tables present the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
	Puerto Rico				U.S. Mainland				Popular, Inc.
(In thousands)	Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
Commercial multi-family	$	276	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	276	$	—
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		88,773		1,140		—		—		88,773		1,140
Commercial real estate owner occupied		127,969		2,166		—		—		127,969		2,166
Commercial and industrial		170,127		4,432		125		—		170,252		4,432
Construction		11,553		—		—		—		11,553		—
Mortgage		438,538		4,453		4,681		13		443,219		4,466
Leasing		2,974		—		—		—		2,974		—
Consumer:
Credit cards		41,337		—		—		—		41,337		—
Helocs		—		—		1,762		—		1,762		—
Personal		71,241		—		206		—		71,447		—
Auto		1,984		—		—		—		1,984		—
Other		526		—		44		—		570		—
Covered loans		8,818		35		—		—		8,818		35
Total Popular, Inc.	$	964,116	$	12,226	$	6,818	$	13	$	970,934	$	12,239

48

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
	Puerto Rico				U.S. Mainland				Popular, Inc.
(In thousands)	Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
Commercial multi-family	$	3,194	$	8	$	5,662	$	—	$	8,856	$	8
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		71,167		483		20,247		—		91,414		483
Commercial real estate owner occupied		98,389		608		13,673		—		112,062		608
Commercial and industrial		102,206		742		1,709		—		103,915		742
Construction		19,417		—		2,832		—		22,249		—
Mortgage		402,700		5,183		52,593		507		455,293		5,690
Legacy		—		—		4,878		—		4,878		—
Leasing		2,674		—		—		—		2,674		—
Consumer:
Credit cards		44,458		—		—		—		44,458		—
Helocs		—		—		1,325		—		1,325		—
Personal		77,032		—		—		—		77,032		—
Auto		1,441		—		88		—		1,529		—
Other		887		—		1,041		—		1,928		—
Covered loans		13,243		140		—		—		13,243		140
Total Popular, Inc.	$	836,808	$	7,164	$	104,048	$	507	$	940,856	$	7,671

Modifications

Troubled debt restructurings related to non-covered loan portfolios amounted to $ 1.2 billion at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $ 1.1 billion). The amount of outstanding commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing receivables whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings amounted $4 million related to the commercial loan portfolio and $1 million related to the construction loan portfolio at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $5 million and $1 million, respectively).

A modification of a loan constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the modification constitutes a concession.

Commercial and industrial loans modified in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, term extensions, and converting evergreen revolving credit lines to long-term loans. Commercial real estate (“CRE”), which includes multifamily, owner-occupied and non-owner occupied CRE, and construction loans modified in a TDR often involve reducing the interest rate for a limited period of time or the remaining term of the loan, extending the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or reductions in the payment plan. Construction loans modified in a TDR may also involve extending the interest-only payment period.

Residential mortgage loans modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where monthly payments are lowered to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs for a period of time, normally five years to ten years. After the lowered monthly payment period ends, the borrower reverts back to paying principal and interest per the original terms with the maturity date adjusted accordingly.

Home equity loans modifications are made infrequently and are not offered if the Corporation also holds the first mortgage. Home equity loans modifications are uniquely designed to meet the specific needs of each borrower. Automobile loans modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where the Corporation has lowered monthly payments by extending the term. Credit cards modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where monthly payments are lowered to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs for a period of time, normally up to 24 months.

As part of its NPL reduction strategy and in order to expedite the resolution of delinquent construction and commercial loans, commencing in 2012, the Corporation routinely enters into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors through the regular legal process, bankruptcy procedures and in certain occasions, out of court transactions. These liquidation agreements, in general, contemplate the following conditions: (1) consent to judgment by the borrowers and guarantors; (2) acknowledgement by the borrower of the debt, its liquidity and maturity; and (3) acknowledgment of the default in payments. The contractual interest rate is not reduced and continues to accrue during the term of the agreement. At the end of the period, the borrower is obligated to remit all amounts due or be subject to the Corporation’s exercise of its foreclosure rights and further collection efforts. Likewise, the borrower’s failure to make stipulated payments will grant the Corporation the ability to exercise its foreclosure rights. This strategy tends to expedite the foreclosure process, resulting in a more effective and efficient collection process. Although in general, these liquidation agreements do not contemplate the forgiveness of principal or interest as debtor is required to cover all outstanding

49

amounts when the agreement becomes due, it could be construed that the Corporation has granted a concession by temporarily accepting a payment schedule that is different from the contractual payment schedule. Accordingly, loans under these program agreements are considered TDRs.

Loans modified in a TDR that are not accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 are typically already in non-accrual status at the time of the modification and partial charge-offs have in some cases already been taken against the outstanding loan balance. The TDR loan continues in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (generally at least six months of sustained performance after the modification (or one year for loans providing for quarterly or semi-annual payments)) and management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower would not be in payment default in the foreseeable future.

Loans modified in a TDR may have the financial effect to the Corporation of increasing the specific allowance for loan losses associated with the loan. Consumer and residential mortgage loans modified under the Corporation’s loss mitigation programs that are determined to be TDRs are individually evaluated for impairment based on an analysis of discounted cash flows.

For consumer and mortgage loans that are modified with regard to payment terms and which constitute TDRs, the discounted cash flow value method is used as the impairment valuation is more appropriately calculated based on the ongoing cash flow from the individuals rather than the liquidation of the asset. The computations give consideration to probability of defaults and loss-given-foreclosure on the related estimated cash flows.

Commercial and construction loans that have been modified as part of loss mitigation efforts are evaluated individually for impairment. The vast majority of the Corporation’s modified commercial loans are measured for impairment using the estimated fair value of the collateral, as these are normally considered as collateral dependent loans. The Corporation may also measure commercial loans at their estimated realizable values determined by discounting the expected future cash flows. Construction loans that have been modified are also accounted for as collateral dependent loans. The Corporation determines the fair value measurement dependent upon its exit strategy for the particular asset(s) acquired in foreclosure.

The following tables present the non-covered and covered loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

	Popular, Inc.
	Non-Covered Loans
	March 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Accruing		Non-Accruing		Total		Accruing		Non-Accruing		Total
Commercial	$	169,883	$	153,122	$	323,005	$	153,380	$	150,069	$	303,449
Construction		309		4,919		5,228		453		5,488		5,941
Mortgage		578,709		122,674		701,383		556,346		116,465		672,811
Leases		2,125		799		2,924		775		2,248		3,023
Consumer		106,574		14,610		121,184		107,530		14,848		122,378
Total	$	857,600	$	296,124	$	1,153,724	$	818,484	$	289,118	$	1,107,602

	Popular, Inc.
	Covered Loans
	March 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Accruing		Non-Accruing		Total		Accruing		Non-Accruing		Total
Commercial	$	2,632	$	2,877	$	5,509	$	1,689	$	3,257	$	4,946
Construction		—		2,336		2,336		—		2,419		2,419
Mortgage		4,174		5,195		9,369		3,629		3,990		7,619
Consumer		15		6		21		26		5		31
Total	$	6,821	$	10,414	$	17,235	$	5,344	$	9,671	$	15,015

50

The following tables present the loan count by type of modification for those loans modified in a TDR during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Puerto Rico
For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
	Reduction in interest rate		Extension of maturity date		Combination of reduction in interest rate and extension of maturity date		Other
Commercial multi-family		—		2		—		—
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		2		1		—		—
Commercial real estate owner occupied		2		3		—		—
Commercial and industrial		5		5		—		—
Construction		1		—		—		—
Mortgage		13		19		98		15
Leasing		—		1		12		—
Consumer:
Credit cards		228		—		—		187
Personal		228		14		—		—
Auto		—		2		2		—
Other		11		—		—		—
Total		490		47		112		202

U.S. mainland
For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
	Reduction in interest rate		Extension of maturity date		Combination of reduction in interest rate and extension of maturity date		Other
Mortgage		—		1		8		—
Consumer:
HELOCs		—		—		—		1
Total		—		1		8		1

Popular, Inc.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
	Reduction in interest rate		Extension of maturity date		Combination of reduction in interest rate and extension of maturity date		Other
Commercial multi-family		—		2		—		—
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		2		1		—		—
Commercial real estate owner occupied		2		3		—		—
Commercial and industrial		5		5		—		—
Construction		1		—		—		—
Mortgage		13		20		106		15
Leasing		—		1		12		—
Consumer:
Credit cards		228		—		—		187
HELOCs		—		—		—		1
Personal		228		14		—		—
Auto		—		2		2		—
Other		11		—		—		—
Total		490		48		120		203

51

Puerto Rico
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
	Reduction in interest rate		Extension of maturity date		Combination of reduction in interest rate and extension of maturity date		Other
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		2		1		—		—
Commercial real estate owner occupied		9		2		—		—
Commercial and industrial		9		—		—		—
Construction		—		3		—		—
Mortgage		13		14		80		24
Leasing		—		4		6		—
Consumer:
Credit cards		274		—		—		155
Personal		216		17		—		1
Auto		—		2		—		—
Other		18		—		—		1
Total		541		43		86		181
U.S. mainland
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
	Reduction in interest rate		Extension of maturity date		Combination of reduction in interest rate and extension of maturity date		Other
Mortgage		—		—		6		—
Total		—		—		6		—
Popular, Inc.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
	Reduction in interest rate		Extension of maturity date		Combination of reduction in interest rate and extension of maturity date		Other
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		2		1		—		—
Commercial real estate owner occupied		9		2		—		—
Commercial and industrial		9		—		—		—
Construction		—		3		—		—
Mortgage		13		14		86		24
Leasing		—		4		6		—
Consumer:
Credit cards		274		—		—		155
Personal		216		17		—		1
Auto		—		2		—		—
Other		18		—		—		1
Total		541		43		92		181

52

The following tables present by class, quantitative information related to loans modified as TDRs during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Puerto Rico
For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	Loan count		Pre-modification outstanding recorded investment		Post-modification outstanding recorded investment		Increase (decrease) in the allowance for loan losses as a result of modification
Commercial multi-family		2	$	551	$	551	$	2
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		3		18,000		17,998		2,986
Commercial real estate owner occupied		5		4,759		4,552		171
Commercial and industrial		10		5,534		5,889		224
Construction		1		268		259		(166	)
Mortgage		145		15,902		16,766		1,339
Leasing		13		323		325		73
Consumer:
Credit cards		415		3,617		4,066		629
Personal		242		4,502		4,500		967
Auto		4		—		51		8
Other		11		29		29		5
Total		851	$	53,485	$	54,986	$	6,238
U.S. Mainland
For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	Loan count		Pre-modification outstanding recorded investment		Post-modification outstanding recorded investment		Increase (decrease) in the allowance for loan losses as a result of modification
Mortgage		9	$	468	$	1,465	$	82
Consumer:
HELOCs		1		—		92		9
Total		10	$	468	$	1,557	$	91
Popular, Inc.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	Loan count		Pre-modification outstanding recorded investment		Post-modification outstanding recorded investment		Increase (decrease) in the allowance for loan losses as a result of modification
Commercial multi-family		2	$	551	$	551	$	2
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		3		18,000		17,998		2,986
Commercial real estate owner occupied		5		4,759		4,552		171
Commercial and industrial		10		5,534		5,889		224
Construction		1		268		259		(166	)
Mortgage		154		16,370		18,231		1,421
Leasing		13		323		325		73
Consumer:
Credit cards		415		3,617		4,066		629
HELOCs		1		—		92		9
Personal		242		4,502		4,500		967
Auto		4		—		51		8
Other		11		29		29		5
Total		861	$	53,953	$	56,543	$	6,329

53

Puerto Rico
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	Loan count		Pre-modification outstanding recorded investment		Post-modification outstanding recorded investment		Increase (decrease) in the allowance for loan losses as a result of modification
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		3	$	1,376	$	1,454	$	(63	)
Commercial real estate owner occupied		11		1,629		1,617		(26	)
Commercial and industrial		9		773		770		9
Construction		3		11,358		11,358		(570	)
Mortgage		131		19,386		20,525		1,138
Leasing		10		206		207		63
Consumer:
Credit cards		429		3,583		4,091		627
Personal		234		4,075		4,074		912
Auto		2		32		33		1
Other		19		37		37		6
Total		851	$	42,455	$	44,166	$	2,097
U.S. Mainland
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	Loan count		Pre-modification outstanding recorded investment		Post-modification outstanding recorded investment		Increase (decrease) in the allowance for loan losses as a result of modification
Mortgage		6	$	925	$	1,064	$	(5	)
Total		6	$	925	$	1,064	$	(5	)
Popular, Inc.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	Loan count		Pre-modification outstanding recorded investment		Post-modification outstanding recorded investment		Increase (decrease) in the allowance for loan losses as a result of modification
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		3	$	1,376	$	1,454	$	(63	)
Commercial real estate owner occupied		11		1,629		1,617		(26	)
Commercial and industrial		9		773		770		9
Construction		3		11,358		11,358		(570	)
Mortgage		137		20,311		21,589		1,133
Leasing		10		206		207		63
Consumer:
Credit cards		429		3,583		4,091		627
Personal		234		4,075		4,074		912
Auto		2		32		33		1
Other		19		37		37		6
Total		857	$	43,380	$	45,230	$	2,092

During the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, one loan with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $883 thousand and one loan of $1.0 million, respectively, were restructured into multiple notes (“Note A / B split”). The Corporation recorded $173 thousand charge-offs as part of those loan restructurings during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (March 31, 2014 - $0 million). The restructuring of those loans was made after analyzing the borrowers’ capacity to repay the debt, collateral and ability to perform under the modified terms. The recorded investment on those commercial TDRs amounted to approximately $707 thousand at March 31, 2015 (March 31, 2014 - $1.1 million) with a related allowance for loan losses amounting to approximately $62 thousand (March 31, 2014 - $0 million).

54

The following tables present by class, TDRs that were subject to payment default and that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months preceding the default date. Payment default is defined as a restructured loan becoming 90 days past due after being modified, foreclosed or charged-off, whichever occurs first. The recorded investment at March 31, 2015 is inclusive of all partial paydowns and charge-offs since the modification date. Loans modified as a TDR that were fully paid down, charged-off or foreclosed upon by period end are not reported.

Puerto Rico
Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	Loan count		Recorded investment as of first default date
Commercial real estate owner occupied		1	$	291
Commercial and industrial		1		90
Construction		2		1,192
Mortgage		22		1,695
Consumer:
Credit cards		153		1,792
Personal		22		178
Auto		5		96
Other		2		2
Total [1]		208	$	5,336

[1] Excludes loans for which the Corporation has entered into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors and is accepting payments which differ from the contractual payment schedule. The Corporation considers these as defaulted loans and does not intent to return them to accrual status.

For U.S. mainland for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 there were no TDRs that were subject to payment default and that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months preceding the default date.

Popular, Inc.
Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(Dollars In thousands)	Loan count		Recorded investment as of first default date
Commercial real estate owner occupied		1	$	291
Commercial and industrial		1		90
Construction		2		1,192
Mortgage		22		1,695
Consumer:
Credit cards		153		1,792
Personal		22		178
Auto		5		96
Other		2		2
Total		208	$	5,336
Puerto Rico
Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars In thousands)	Loan count		Recorded investment as of first default date
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		1	$	30
Commercial real estate owner occupied		2		333
Commercial and industrial		3		171
Mortgage		19		4,445
Leasing		2		64
Consumer:
Credit cards		178		1,642
Personal		37		443
Auto		5		118
Other		2		4
Total [1]		249	$	7,250

[1] Exclude loans for which the Corporation has entered into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors and is accepting payments which differ from the contractual payment schedule. The Corporation considers these as defaulted loans and does not intent to return them to accrual status.

U.S. mainland
Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars In thousands)	Loan count		Recorded investment as of first default date
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		1	$	907
Total		1	$	907

55

Popular, Inc.
Defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars In thousands)	Loan count		Recorded investment as of first default date
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		2	$	937
Commercial real estate owner occupied		2		333
Commercial and industrial		3		171
Mortgage		19		4,445
Leasing		2		64
Consumer:
Credit cards		178		1,642
Personal		37		443
Auto		5		118
Other		2		4
Total		250	$	8,157

Commercial, consumer and mortgage loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Corporation evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance for loan losses may be increased or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.

56

Credit Quality

The following table presents the outstanding balance, net of unearned income, of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio based on the Corporation’s assignment of obligor risk ratings as defined at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Sub-total		Pass/ Unrated		Total
Puerto Rico[1]
Commercial multi-family	$	4,840	$	1,137	$	3,892	$	—	$	—	$	9,869	$	79,664	$	89,533
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		285,351		76,707		197,037		—		—		559,095		1,583,259		2,142,354
Commercial real estate owner occupied		170,835		146,356		301,616		3,904		—		622,711		806,978		1,429,689
Commercial and industrial		290,077		325,137		308,298		711		237		924,460		1,815,473		2,739,933
Total Commercial		751,103		549,337		810,843		4,615		237		2,116,135		4,285,374		6,401,509
Construction		29		6,080		13,164		—		—		19,273		79,433		98,706
Mortgage		704,588		—		230,199		—		—		934,787		5,236,460		6,171,247
Leasing		—		—		2,507		—		—		2,507		578,612		581,119
Consumer:
Credit cards		3,327		—		21,334		—		—		24,661		1,089,843		1,114,504
HELOCs		—		—		10,527		—		—		10,527		1,636		12,163
Personal		322		—		3,999		—		163		4,484		1,240,597		1,245,081
Auto		—		—		11,003		—		105		11,108		771,440		782,548
Other		1,634		—		1,507		—		1,055		4,196		193,714		197,910
Total Consumer		5,283		—		48,370		—		1,323		54,976		3,297,230		3,352,206
Total Puerto Rico	$	1,461,003	$	555,417	$	1,105,083	$	4,615	$	1,560	$	3,127,678	$	13,477,109	$	16,604,787
U.S. mainland
Commercial multi-family	$	10,705	$	7,303	$	11,373	$	—	$	—	$	29,381	$	446,822	$	476,203
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		20,198		6,971		13,601		—		—		40,770		617,549		658,319
Commercial real estate owner occupied		24,986		4,671		4,348		—		—		34,005		179,492		213,497
Commercial and industrial		67,028		2,567		15,677		—		—		85,272		818,761		904,033
Total Commercial		122,917		21,512		44,999		—		—		189,428		2,062,624		2,252,052
Construction		—		—		7,798		—		—		7,798		584,224		592,022
Mortgage		—		—		8,462		—		—		8,462		1,009,518		1,017,980
Legacy		7,457		2,385		8,780		—		—		18,622		59,053		77,675
Consumer:
Credit cards		—		—		—		—		—		—		14,107		14,107
HELOCs		—		—		1,938		—		2,714		4,652		340,693		345,345
Personal		—		—		304		—		936		1,240		107,273		108,513
Auto		—		—		—		—		—		—		87		87
Other		—		—		—		—		4		4		358		362
Total Consumer		—		—		2,242		—		3,654		5,896		462,518		468,414
Total U.S. mainland	$	130,374	$	23,897	$	72,281	$	—	$	3,654	$	230,206	$	4,177,937	$	4,408,143
Popular, Inc.
Commercial multi-family	$	15,545	$	8,440	$	15,265	$	—	$	—	$	39,250	$	526,486	$	565,736
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		305,549		83,678		210,638		—		—		599,865		2,200,808		2,800,673
Commercial real estate owner occupied		195,821		151,027		305,964		3,904		—		656,716		986,470		1,643,186
Commercial and industrial		357,105		327,704		323,975		711		237		1,009,732		2,634,234		3,643,966
Total Commercial		874,020		570,849		855,842		4,615		237		2,305,563		6,347,998		8,653,561
Construction		29		6,080		20,962		—		—		27,071		663,657		690,728
Mortgage		704,588		—		238,661		—		—		943,249		6,245,978		7,189,227
Legacy		7,457		2,385		8,780		—		—		18,622		59,053		77,675
Leasing		—		—		2,507		—		—		2,507		578,612		581,119
Consumer:
Credit cards		3,327		—		21,334		—		—		24,661		1,103,950		1,128,611
HELOCs		—		—		12,465		—		2,714		15,179		342,329		357,508
Personal		322		—		4,303		—		1,099		5,724		1,347,870		1,353,594
Auto		—		—		11,003		—		105		11,108		771,527		782,635
Other		1,634		—		1,507		—		1,059		4,200		194,072		198,272
Total Consumer		5,283		—		50,612		—		4,977		60,872		3,759,748		3,820,620
Total Popular, Inc.	$	1,591,377	$	579,314	$	1,177,364	$	4,615	$	5,214	$	3,357,884	$	17,655,046	$	21,012,930

The following table presents the weighted average obligor risk rating at March 31, 2015 for those classifications that consider a range of rating scales.

Weighted average obligor risk rating	(Scales 11 and 12)		(Scales 1 through 8)
Puerto Rico:[1]	Substandard		Pass
Commercial multi-family		11.52		5.66
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		11.40		6.82
Commercial real estate owner occupied		11.28		6.95
Commercial and industrial		11.43		6.99
Total Commercial		11.37		6.91
Construction		11.80		7.56

U.S. mainland:	Substandard		Pass
Commercial multi-family		11.02		7.18
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		11.00		6.87
Commercial real estate owner occupied		11.18		7.08
Commercial and industrial		11.52		6.26
Total Commercial		11.20		6.72
Construction		11.00		7.09
Legacy		11.12		7.71

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

57

December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Sub-total		Pass/ Unrated		Total
Puerto Rico[1]
Commercial multi-family	$	2,306	$	5,021	$	3,186	$	—	$	—	$	10,513	$	69,564	$	80,077
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		171,771		144,104		169,900		—		—		485,775		1,527,804		2,013,579
Commercial real estate owner occupied		212,236		144,536		306,014		3,595		—		666,381		806,981		1,473,362
Commercial and industrial		421,332		367,834		272,880		849		255		1,063,150		1,744,635		2,807,785
Total Commercial		807,645		661,495		751,980		4,444		255		2,225,819		4,148,984		6,374,803
Construction		4,612		6,204		16,908		—		—		27,724		131,660		159,384
Mortgage		—		—		218,680		—		—		218,680		5,231,821		5,450,501
Leasing		—		—		3,102		—		—		3,102		561,287		564,389
Consumer:
Credit cards		—		—		21,070		—		—		21,070		1,119,094		1,140,164
HELOCs		—		—		8,186		—		7		8,193		5,207		13,400
Personal		—		—		8,380		—		77		8,457		1,254,076		1,262,533
Auto		—		—		11,348		—		40		11,388		755,908		767,296
Other		—		—		2,130		—		1,735		3,865		201,779		205,644
Total Consumer		—		—		51,114		—		1,859		52,973		3,336,064		3,389,037
Total Puerto Rico	$	812,257	$	667,699	$	1,041,784	$	4,444	$	2,114	$	2,528,298	$	13,409,816	$	15,938,114
U.S. mainland
Commercial multi-family	$	11,283	$	6,818	$	13,653	$	—	$	—	$	31,754	$	375,449	$	407,203
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		17,424		8,745		13,446		—		—		39,615		472,952		512,567
Commercial real estate owner occupied		24,284		4,707		4,672		—		—		33,663		160,242		193,905
Commercial and industrial		5,357		2,548		7,988		—		—		15,893		629,896		645,789
Total Commercial		58,348		22,818		39,759		—		—		120,925		1,638,539		1,759,464
Construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		92,436		92,436
Mortgage		—		—		23,100		—		—		23,100		1,029,285		1,052,385
Legacy		7,902		2,491		9,204		—		—		19,597		61,221		80,818
Consumer:
Credit cards		—		—		—		—		—		—		15,065		15,065
HELOCs		—		—		2,457		—		1,632		4,089		348,673		352,762
Personal		—		—		571		—		835		1,406		111,513		112,919
Auto		—		—		—		—		—		—		73		73
Other		—		—		7		—		—		7		408		415
Total Consumer		—		—		3,035		—		2,467		5,502		475,732		481,234
Total U.S. mainland	$	66,250	$	25,309	$	75,098	$	—	$	2,467	$	169,124	$	3,297,213	$	3,466,337
Popular, Inc.
Commercial multi-family	$	13,589	$	11,839	$	16,839	$	—	$	—	$	42,267	$	445,013	$	487,280
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		189,195		152,849		183,346		—		—		525,390		2,000,756		2,526,146
Commercial real estate owner occupied		236,520		149,243		310,686		3,595		—		700,044		967,223		1,667,267
Commercial and industrial		426,689		370,382		280,868		849		255		1,079,043		2,374,531		3,453,574
Total Commercial		865,993		684,313		791,739		4,444		255		2,346,744		5,787,523		8,134,267
Construction		4,612		6,204		16,908		—		—		27,724		224,096		251,820
Mortgage		—		—		241,780		—		—		241,780		6,261,106		6,502,886
Legacy		7,902		2,491		9,204		—		—		19,597		61,221		80,818
Leasing		—		—		3,102		—		—		3,102		561,287		564,389
Consumer:
Credit cards		—		—		21,070		—		—		21,070		1,134,159		1,155,229
HELOCs		—		—		10,643		—		1,639		12,282		353,880		366,162
Personal		—		—		8,951		—		912		9,863		1,365,589		1,375,452
Auto		—		—		11,348		—		40		11,388		755,981		767,369
Other		—		—		2,137		—		1,735		3,872		202,187		206,059
Total Consumer		—		—		54,149		—		4,326		58,475		3,811,796		3,870,271
Total Popular, Inc.	$	878,507	$	693,008	$	1,116,882	$	4,444	$	4,581	$	2,697,422	$	16,707,029	$	19,404,451

58

The following table presents the weighted average obligor risk rating at December 31, 2014 for those classifications that consider a range of rating scales.

Weighted average obligor risk rating	(Scales 11 and 12)		(Scales 1 through 8)
Puerto Rico:[1]	Substandard		Pass
Commercial multi-family		11.69		5.63
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		11.20		6.83
Commercial real estate owner occupied		11.28		6.96
Commercial and industrial		11.48		6.89
Total Commercial		11.33		6.87
Construction		11.82		7.43

U.S. mainland:	Substandard		Pass
Commercial multi-family		11.00		7.24
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied		11.00		6.83
Commercial real estate owner occupied		11.17		7.04
Commercial and industrial		11.09		6.29
Total Commercial		11.04		6.74
Construction		—		7.76
Legacy		11.11		7.70

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

59

Note 13 – FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation

In connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned. Pursuant to the terms of the loss share agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC reimburses BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR reimburses the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid 80% reimbursement under loss share agreements. The loss share agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss and recoveries sharing for ten years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2020. The loss share agreement applicable to commercial (including construction) and consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2015 and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for eight years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2018, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as described above.

The following table sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share asset for the periods presented.

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance at beginning of period	$	542,454		$	909,414
Amortization of loss share indemnification asset		(27,316	)		(48,946	)
Credit impairment losses to be covered under loss sharing agreements		8,246			15,090
Reimbursable expenses		21,545			12,745
Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements		(132,265	)		(81,327	)
Other adjustments attributable to FDIC loss sharing agreements		(2,820	)		(8,516	)
Balance at end of period	$	409,844		$	798,460

The following table presents the estimated weighted average life of the loan portfolios subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreement for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

	Weighted Average Life
	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Commercial		5.94 years		5.87 years
Consumer		5.91		5.76
Construction		1.06		0.99
Mortgage		7.58		7.30

As part of the loss share agreements, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day (such day, the “true-up measurement date”) of the final shared-loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss share agreements, in the event losses on the loss share agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true-up payment obligation is recorded as contingent consideration, which is included in the caption of other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Under the loss sharing agreements, BPPR will pay to the FDIC 50% of the excess, if any, of: (i) 20% of the intrinsic loss estimate of $4.6 billion (or $925 million) (as determined by the FDIC) less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid) (or ($1.1 billion)); plus (B) 25% of the cumulative shared-loss payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to BPPR minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C) the sum of the period servicing amounts for every consecutive twelve-month period prior to and ending on the true-up measurement date in respect of each of the loss sharing agreements during which the loss sharing provisions of the applicable loss sharing agreement is in effect (defined as the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss assets at the beginning and end of such period times 1%).

60

The following table provides the fair value and the undiscounted amount of the true-up payment obligation at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Carrying amount (fair value)	$	125,140	$	129,304
Undiscounted amount	$	177,998	$	187,238

The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow in order to receive reimbursement on losses from the FDIC. Under the loss share agreements, BPPR must:

• manage and administer the covered assets and collect and effect charge-offs and recoveries with respect to such covered assets in a manner consistent with its usual and prudent business and banking practices and, with respect to single family shared-loss loans, the procedures (including collection procedures) customarily employed by BPPR in servicing and administering mortgage loans for its own account and the servicing procedures established by FNMA or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), as in effect from time to time, and in accordance with accepted mortgage servicing practices of prudent lending institutions;

• exercise its best judgment in managing, administering and collecting amounts on covered assets and effecting charge-offs with respect to the covered assets;

• use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize recoveries with respect to losses on single family shared-loss assets and best efforts to maximize collections with respect to commercial shared-loss assets;

• retain sufficient staff to perform the duties under the loss share agreements;

• adopt and implement accounting, reporting, record-keeping and similar systems with respect to the commercial shared-loss assets;

• comply with the terms of the modification guidelines approved by the FDIC or another federal agency for any single-family shared-loss loan;

• provide notice with respect to proposed transactions pursuant to which a third party or affiliate will manage, administer or collect any commercial shared-loss assets;

• file monthly and quarterly certificates with the FDIC specifying the amount of losses, charge-offs and recoveries; and

• maintain books and records sufficient to ensure and document compliance with the terms of the loss share agreements.

Refer to Note 26, Commitment and Contingencies, for additional information on the settlement of the arbitration proceedings with the FDIC regarding the commercial loss share agreement.

61

Note 14 – Mortgage banking activities

Income from mortgage banking activities includes mortgage servicing fees earned in connection with administering residential mortgage loans and valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights. It also includes gain on sales and securitizations of residential mortgage loans and trading gains and losses on derivative contracts used to hedge the Corporation’s securitization activities. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments to residential mortgage loans held for sale, if any, are recorded as part of the mortgage banking activities.

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking activities:

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments:
Mortgage servicing fees	$	12,248		$	10,748
Mortgage servicing rights fair value adjustments		(4,929	)		(8,096	)
Total mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments		7,319			2,652
Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation on loans		7,280			7,176
Trading account (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses) on outstanding derivative positions		17			(760	)
Realized (losses) on closed derivative positions		(1,764	)		(5,390	)
Total trading account (loss) profit		(1,747	)		(6,150	)
Total mortgage banking activities	$	12,852		$	3,678

62

Note 15 – Transfers of financial assets and mortgage servicing assets

The Corporation typically transfers conforming residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the corresponding agency and, as such, under seller/service agreements the Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the agencies’ servicing guidelines and standards. Substantially all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC securities have fixed rates and represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain representations and warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in some instances, has sold loans with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer to Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of such arrangements.

No liabilities were incurred as a result of these securitizations during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 because they did not contain any credit recourse arrangements. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015 the Corporation recorded a net gain of $6.4 million (March 31, 2014 - $7.8 million) related to the residential mortgage loans securitized.

The following tables present the initial fair value of the assets obtained as proceeds from residential mortgage loans securitized during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Initial Fair Value
Assets
Trading account securities:
Mortgage-backed securities - GNMA	$	—	$	156,456	$	—	$	156,456
Mortgage-backed securities - FNMA		—		46,958		—		46,958
Total trading account securities	$	—	$	203,414	$	—	$	203,414
Mortgage servicing rights		—		—		2,562		2,562
Total	$	—	$	203,414	$	2,562	$	205,976

	Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Initial Fair Value
Assets
Trading account securities:
Mortgage-backed securities - GNMA	$	—	$	165,932	$	—	$	165,932
Mortgage-backed securities - FNMA		—		62,583		—		62,583
Total trading account securities	$	—	$	228,515	$	—	$	228,515
Mortgage servicing rights		—		—		3,198		3,198
Total	$	—	$	228,515	$	3,198	$	231,713

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation retained servicing rights on whole loan sales involving approximately $22 million in principal balance outstanding (March 31, 2014 - $32 million), with realized gains of approximately $1.0 million (March 31, 2014 - gains of $1.1 million). All loan sales performed during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were without credit recourse agreements.

The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations.

The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior.

63

The following table presents the changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Residential MSRs
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Fair value at beginning of period	$	148,694		$	161,099
Purchases		2,400			—
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers		2,859			3,528
Changes due to payments on loans[1]		(3,789	)		(4,151	)
Reduction due to loan repurchases		(456	)		(922	)
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions		(684	)		(3,023	)
Other disposals		—			(2	)
Fair value at end of period	$	149,024		$	156,529

[1] Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time.

The table above excludes the estimated fair value of $57.6 million of the contingent asset for the probable acquisition from the FDIC of mortgage servicing rights for a portfolio of approximately $5.0 billion in unpaid principal balance as part of the Doral Bank Transaction. Refer to Note 4 for additional information.

Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $15.6 billion at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $15.6 billion).

Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statements of operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, including changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value adjustments, for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 amounted to $12.2 million (March 31, 2014 - $10.8 million). The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan balance. At March 31, 2015, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.26% (March 31, 2014 – 0.26%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not generally earn significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.

The section below includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the MSRs, originated and purchased.

Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights derived from loans securitized or sold by the Corporation during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

	Quarters ended
	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Prepayment speed		7.3	%		6.2	%
Weighted average life		13.7 years			16.1 years
Discount rate (annual rate)		10.9	%		10.7	%

Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions were as follows as of the end of the periods reported:

Originated MSRs
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Fair value of servicing rights	$	104,060		$	110,534
Weighted average life		12.4 years			11.7 years
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)		8.1	%		8.6	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(2,914	)	$	(4,089	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(6,502	)	$	(7,995	)
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)		11.5	%		11.5	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(3,487	)	$	(4,492	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(7,491	)	$	(8,701	)

64

The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions were as follows as of the end of the periods reported:

Purchased MSRs
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Fair value of servicing rights	$	44,964		$	38,160
Weighted average life		12.4 years			11.0 years
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)		8.1	%		9.1	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(2,504	)	$	(1,620	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(3,863	)	$	(2,924	)
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)		10.8	%		10.7	%
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change	$	(2,703	)	$	(1,603	)
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change	$	(4,224	)	$	(2,877	)

The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation serviced $2.1 billion (December 31, 2014 - $2.1 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation.

Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation, as servicer, has the right to repurchase (but not the obligation), at its option and without GNMA’s prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual loans meet GNMA’s specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans if the Corporation was the pool issuer. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation had recorded $111 million in mortgage loans on its consolidated statements of financial condition related to this buy-back option program (December 31, 2014 - $81 million). As long as the Corporation continues to service the loans that continue to be collateral in a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security, the MSR is recognized by the Corporation. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation repurchased approximately $ 24 million (year ended December 31, 2014 - $145 million) of mortgage loans under the GNMA buy-back option program. The determination to repurchase these loans was based on the economic benefits of the transaction, which results in a reduction of the servicing costs for these severely delinquent loans, mostly related to principal and interest advances. Furthermore, due to their guaranteed nature, the risk associated with the loans is minimal. The Corporation places these loans under its loss mitigation programs and once brought back to current status, these may be either retained in portfolio or re-sold in the secondary market.

65

Note 16 – Other real estate owned

The following tables present the Other Real Estate Owned Activity, for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Non-covered OREO Commercial/Construction			Non-covered OREO Mortgage			Covered OREO Commercial/Construction			Covered OREO Mortgage			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	38,983		$	96,517		$	85,394		$	44,872		$	265,766
Write-downs in value		(5,887	)		(1,372	)		(9,395	)		(1,282	)		(17,936	)
Additions		2,035			21,075			4,038			5,381			32,529
Sales		(9,427	)		(13,086	)		(9,464	)		(5,822	)		(37,799	)
Other adjustments		(96	)		(572	)		—			(165	)		(833	)
Ending balance	$	25,608		$	102,562		$	70,573		$	42,984		$	241,727

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Non-covered OREO Commercial/Construction			Non-covered OREO Mortgage			Covered OREO Commercial/Construction			Covered OREO Mortgage			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	48,649		$	86,852		$	120,215		$	47,792		$	303,508
Write-downs in value		(214	)		(669	)		(4,563	)		(207	)		(5,653	)
Additions		4,668			14,883			13,194			4,491			37,236
Sales		(4,962	)		(12,063	)		(18,421	)		(2,377	)		(37,823	)
Other adjustments		—			(179	)		(92	)		(1,285	)		(1,556	)
Ending balance	$	48,141		$	88,824		$	110,333		$	48,414		$	295,712

66

Note 17 – Other assets

The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition consists of the following major categories:

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance)	$	788,105	$	812,819
Investments under the equity method		226,124		225,625
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment		359		360
Prepaid taxes		186,173		198,120
Other prepaid expenses		82,926		83,719
Derivative assets		22,485		25,362
Trades receivable from brokers and counterparties		112,287		66,949
Contingent asset		57,643		—
Others		366,832		233,489
Total other assets	$	1,842,934	$	1,646,443

Prepaid taxes at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 includes a payment of $45 million in income taxes in connection with the Closing Agreement signed with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury on June 30, 2014.

Other assets include the fair value estimate of a contingent asset for the probable acquisition of approximately $57.6 million of mortgage servicing rights from the FDIC on three pools of residential mortgage loans of approximately $5.0 billion in unpaid principal balance as part of the Doral Bank Transaction. As indicated in Note 4, at March 31, 2015, these mortgage servicing rights were subject to a number of closing conditions.

67

Note 18 – Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, allocated by reportable segments, were as follows (refer to Note 38 for the definition of the Corporation’s reportable segments):

2015
(In thousands)	Balance at January 1, 2015		Goodwill on acquisition		Purchase accounting adjustments		Other		Balance at March 31, 2015
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico	$	250,109	$	3,899	$	—	$	—	$	254,008
Banco Popular North America		215,567		38,735		—		—		254,302
Total Popular, Inc.	$	465,676	$	42,634	$	—	$	—	$	508,310

2014
(In thousands)	Balance at January 1, 2014		Goodwill on acquisition		Purchase accounting adjustments		Other		Balance at March 31, 2014
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico	$	245,679	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	245,679
Banco Popular North America		402,078		—		—		—		402,078
Total Popular, Inc.	$	647,757	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	647,757

The goodwill acquired during 2015 in the reportable segments of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America of $3.9 million and $38.7 million, respectively, was related to the Doral Bank Transaction. Refer to note 4, Business Combination, for additional information.

The following table presents the gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses by reportable segments.

March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Balance at January 1, 2015 (gross amounts)		Accumulated impairment losses		Balance at January 1, 2015 (net amounts)		Balance at March 31, 2015 (gross amounts)		Accumulated impairment losses		Balance at March 31, 2015 (net amounts)
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico	$	250,109	$	—	$	250,109	$	254,008	$	—	$	254,008
Banco Popular North America		379,978		164,411		215,567		418,713		164,411		254,302
Total Popular, Inc.	$	630,087	$	164,411	$	465,676	$	672,721	$	164,411	$	508,310

December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Balance at January 1, 2014 (gross amounts)		Accumulated impairment losses		Balance at January 1, 2014 (net amounts)		Balance at December 31, 2014 (gross amounts)		Accumulated impairment losses		Balance at December 31, 2014 (net amounts)
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico	$	245,679	$	—	$	245,679	$	250,109	$	—	$	250,109
Banco Popular North America		566,489		164,411		402,078		379,978		164,411		215,567
Total Popular, Inc.	$	812,168	$	164,411	$	647,757	$	630,087	$	164,411	$	465,676

68

Other Intangible Assets

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Corporation had $ 6 million of identifiable intangible assets, with indefinite useful lives, mostly associated with E-LOAN’s trademark.

The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:

(In thousands)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
March 31, 2015
Core deposits	$	74,252	$	33,550	$	40,702
Other customer relationships		19,203		6,955		12,248
Total other intangible assets	$	93,455	$	40,505	$	52,950
December 31, 2014
Core deposits	$	50,679	$	32,006	$	18,673
Other customer relationships		19,452		6,644		12,808
Total other intangible assets	$	70,131	$	38,650	$	31,481

During the first quarter of 2015, the Corporation also acquired $23.6 million in core deposits intangibles related to the Doral Bank Transaction.

There were $249 thousand in other customer relationships intangibles that became fully amortized during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation recognized $ 2.1 million in amortization expense related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (March 31, 2014 - $ 2.0 million).

The following table presents the estimated amortization of the intangible assets with definite useful lives for each of the following periods:

(In thousands)
Remaining 2015	$	7,467
Year 2016		9,679
Year 2017		6,931
Year 2018		6,838
Year 2019		6,642
Year 2020		4,694

69

Note 19 – Deposits

Total interest bearing deposits as of the end of the periods presented consisted of:

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Savings accounts	$	6,969,101	$	6,737,370
NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits		5,251,314		4,811,972
Total savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits		12,220,415		11,549,342
Certificates of deposit:
Under $100,000		4,532,314		4,211,180
$100,000 and over		4,235,758		3,263,265
Total certificates of deposit		8,768,072		7,474,445
Total interest bearing deposits	$	20,988,487	$	19,023,787

A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity at March 31, 2015 follows:

(In thousands)
2015	$	4,762,004
2016		1,909,397
2017		769,086
2018		474,511
2019		472,085
2020 and thereafter		380,989
Total certificates of deposit	$	8,768,072

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation had brokered deposits amounting to $ 1.9 billion (December 31, 2014 - $ 1.9 billion).

The aggregate amount of overdrafts in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans was $8 million at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $9 million).

70

Note 20 – Borrowings

The following table presents the composition of fed funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Federal funds purchased	$	—	$	100,000
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase		1,132,643		1,171,657
Total federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase	$	1,132,643	$	1,271,657

The following table presents information related to the Corporation’s repurchase transactions accounted for as secured borrowings that are collateralized with investment securities available-for-sale, other assets held-for-trading purposes or which have been obtained under agreements to resell. It is the Corporation’s policy to maintain effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Repurchase agreements accounted for as secured borrowings

	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	Repurchase liability		Repurchase liability
Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities
Overnight	$	8,150	$	—
Within 30 days		220,664		289,545
After 30 to 90 days		113,779		25,761
After 90 days		140,320		420,176
Total obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities		482,913		735,482
Obligations of Puerto Rico, states and political subdivisions
Overnight		93		23,397
Within 30 days		2,954		5,199
Total Obligations of Puerto Rico, states and political subdivisions		3,047		28,596
Mortgage-backed securities
Overnight		6,071		4,850
Within 30 days		96,791		54,311
After 30 to 90 days		83,206		—
After 90 days		291,315		195,629
Total mortgage-backed securities		477,383		254,790
Collateralized mortgage obligations
Overnight		219		—
Within 30 days		37,682		16,700
After 30 to 90 days		48,650		55,338
After 90 days		72,079		71,281
Total collateralized mortgage obligations		158,630		143,319
Other
Overnight		2,489		1,353
Within 30 days		8,181		8,117
Total other		10,670		9,470
Total	$	1,132,643	$	1,171,657

Repurchase agreements in portfolio are generally short-term, often overnight and Popular acts as borrowers transferring assets to the counterparty. As such our risk is very limited. We manage the liquidity risks arising from secured funding by sourcing funding globally from a diverse group of counterparties, providing a range of securities collateral and pursuing longer durations, when appropriate.

71

The following table presents the composition of other short-term borrowings at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Advances with the FHLB paying interest at maturity	$	—	$	20,000
Others		1,200		1,200
Total other short-term borrowings	$	1,200	$	21,200

Note: Refer to the Corporation’s 2014 Annual Report for rates information at December 31, 2014.

The following table presents the composition of notes payable at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Advances with the FHLB with maturities ranging from 2015 through 2025 paying interest at monthly fixed rates ranging from 0.41% to 4.19 %	$	847,884	$	802,198
Unsecured senior debt securities maturing on 2019 paying interest semiannually at a fixed rate of 7.00%		450,000		450,000
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities) with maturities ranging from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327% (Refer to Note 22)		439,800		439,800
Others		19,629		19,830
Total notes payable	$	1,757,313	$	1,711,828

Note: Refer to the Corporation’s 2014 Annual Report for rates information at December 31, 2014.

A breakdown of borrowings by contractual maturities at March 31, 2015 is included in the table below.

(In thousands)	Assets sold under agreements to repurchase		Short-term borrowings		Notes payable		Total
Year
2015	$	963,092	$	1,200	$	328,716	$	1,293,008
2016		169,551		—		251,966		421,517
2017		—		—		83,983		83,983
2018		—		—		107,840		107,840
2019		—		—		464,121		464,121
Later years		—		—		520,687		520,687
Total borrowings	$	1,132,643	$	1,200	$	1,757,313	$	2,891,156

72

Note 21 – Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities

The following tables present the potential effect of rights of setoff associated with the Corporation’s recognized financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

As of March 31, 2015
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
(In thousands)	Gross Amount of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position		Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Statement of Financial Position		Financial Instruments		Securities Collateral Received		Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Derivatives	$	22,485	$	—	$	22,485	$	224	$	—	$	—	$	22,261
Reverse repurchase agreements		139,422		—		139,422		—		139,422		—		—
Total	$	161,907	$	—	$	161,907	$	224	$	139,422	$	—	$	22,261

As of March 31, 2015
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
(In thousands)	Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position		Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Statement of Financial Position		Financial Instruments		Securities Collateral Pledged		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
Derivatives	$	21,376	$	—	$	21,376	$	224	$	7,953	$	—	$	13,199
Repurchase agreements		1,132,643		—		1,132,643		—		1,132,643		—		—
Total	$	1,154,019	$	—	$	1,154,019	$	224	$	1,140,596	$	—	$	13,199

As of December 31, 2014
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
(In thousands)	Gross Amount of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position		Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Statement of Financial Position		Financial Instruments		Securities Collateral Received		Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Derivatives	$	25,361	$	—	$	25,361	$	320	$	—	$	—	$	25,041
Reverse repurchase agreements		151,134		—		151,134		—		151,134		—		—
Total	$	176,495	$	—	$	176,495	$	320	$	151,134	$	—	$	25,041

73

As of December 31, 2014
							Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
(In thousands)	Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position		Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Statement of Financial Position		Financial Instruments		Securities Collateral Pledged		Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Derivatives	$	23,032	$	—	$	23,032	$	320	$	8,781	$	—	$	13,931
Repurchase agreements		1,171,657		—		1,171,657		—		1,171,657		—		—
Total	$	1,194,689	$	—	$	1,194,689	$	320	$	1,180,438	$	—	$	13,931

The Corporation’s derivatives are subject to agreements which allow a right of set-off with each respective counterparty. In addition, the Corporation’s Repurchase Agreements and Reverse Repurchase Agreements have a right of set-off with the respective counterparty under the supplemental terms of the Master Repurchase Agreements. In an event of default each party has a right of set-off against the other party for amounts owed in the related agreement and any other amount or obligation owed in respect of any other agreement or transaction between them.

74

Note 22 – Trust preferred securities

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, statutory trusts established by the Corporation (BanPonce Trust I, Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and Popular Capital Trust II) had issued trust preferred securities (also referred to as “capital securities”) to the public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the proceeds of the related issuances of common securities of the trusts (the “common securities”), were used by the trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the “junior subordinated debentures”) issued by the Corporation.

The sole assets of the trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the Corporation pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the consolidated statements of financial condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.

The following table presents financial data pertaining to the different trusts at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(Dollars in thousands)
Issuer	BanPonce Trust I			Popular Capital Trust I			Popular North America Capital Trust I			Popular Capital Trust II
Capital securities	$	52,865		$	181,063		$	91,651		$	101,023
Distribution rate		8.327	%		6.700	%		6.564	%		6.125	%
Common securities	$	1,637		$	5,601		$	2,835		$	3,125
Junior subordinated debentures aggregate liquidation amount	$	54,502		$	186,664		$	94,486		$	104,148
Stated maturity date		February 2027			November 2033			September 2034			December 2034
Reference notes		[1],[3],[6	]		[2],[4],[5	]		[1],[3],[5	]		[2],[4],[5	]

[1] Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America and indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation.

[2] Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation.

[3] The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement.

[4] These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement.

[5] The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below, the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval.

[6] Same as [5] above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early redemption.

The Basel III Capital Rules require that capital instruments such as trust preferred securities be phased-out of Tier 1 capital. The Corporation’s Tier I capital level at March 31, 2015 included $ 427 million of trust preferred securities that are subject to the phase-out provisions of the Basel III Capital Rules. The Corporation is allowed to include only 25% of such trust preferred securities in Tier I capital as of January 1, 2015 and would be allowed 0% as of January 1, 2016 and thereafter. The Basel III Capital Rules also permanently grandfathers as Tier 2 capital such trust preferred securities.

75

Note 23 – Stockholders’ equity

BPPR statutory reserve

The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPR’s net income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPR’s statutory reserve fund amounted to $469 million at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $469 million). There were no transfers between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014.

76

Note 24 – Other comprehensive loss

The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss by Component [1]
		Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)		2015			2014
Foreign currency translation	Beginning Balance	$	(32,832	)	$	(36,099	)
	Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		(581	)		(2,115	)
	Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		—			7,718
	Net change		(581	)		5,603
	Ending balance	$	(33,413	)	$	(30,496	)
Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans	Beginning Balance	$	(205,187	)	$	(104,302	)
	Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for amortization of net losses		3,065			1,298
	Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for amortization of prior service cost		(579	)		(580	)
	Net change		2,486			718
	Ending balance	$	(202,701	)	$	(103,584	)
Unrealized net holding gains (losses) on investments	Beginning Balance	$	8,465		$	(48,344	)
	Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		34,285			26,089
	Net change		34,285			26,089
	Ending balance	$	42,750		$	(22,255	)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges	Beginning Balance	$	(318	)	$	—
	Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		(1,546	)		(1,053	)
	Amounts reclassified from other accumulated other comprehensive loss		828			1,113
	Net change		(718	)		60
	Ending balance	$	(1,036	)	$	60
	Total	$	(194,400	)	$	(156,275	)

[1] All amounts presented are net of tax.

77

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	Affected Line Item in the	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	Consolidated Statements of Operations	2015			2014
Foreign Currency Translation
Cumulative translation adjustment reclassified into earnings	Other operating income	$	—		$	(7,718	)
	Total net of tax	$	—		$	(7,718	)
Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans
Amortization of net losses	Personnel costs	$	(5,025	)	$	(2,126	)
Amortization of prior service cost	Personnel costs		950			950
	Total before tax		(4,075	)		(1,176	)
	Income tax (expense) benefit		1,589			458
	Total net of tax	$	(2,486	)	$	(718	)
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges
Forward contracts	Mortgage banking activities	$	(1,358	)	$	(1,824	)
	Total before tax		(1,358	)		(1,824	)
	Income tax (expense) benefit		530			711
	Total net of tax	$	(828	)	$	(1,113	)
	Total reclassification adjustments, net of tax	$	(3,314	)	$	(9,549	)

78

Note 25 – Guarantees

At March 31, 2015 the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.9 million (December 31, 2014 - $0.4 million), which represents the unamortized balance of the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these instruments.

From time to time, the Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed securities. The Corporation has not sold any mortgage loans subject to credit recourse since 2009. At March 31, 2015 the Corporation serviced $ 2.1 billion (December 31, 2014 - $ 2.1 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage loan securitization programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation repurchased approximately $ 16 million of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions (March 31, 2014 - $ 27 million). In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers ultimate losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. At March 31, 2015 the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $ 59 million (December 31, 2014 - $ 59 million).

The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability of estimated losses related to loans serviced with credit recourse provisions during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance as of beginning of period	$	59,438		$	41,463
Provision for recourse liability		6,500			11,042
Net charge-offs		(6,553	)		(6,697	)
Balance as of end of period	$	59,385		$	45,808

The probable losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold or credit recourse is assumed as part of acquired servicing rights, and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item “adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold” in the consolidated statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period. Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value ratios, and loan aging, among others.

When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporation’s mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or are sold directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses and bear any subsequent loss related to the loans. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, BPPR did not repurchase loans under representation and warranty arrangements, compared to $2.1 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2014. A substantial amount of these loans reinstate to performing status or have mortgage insurance, and thus the ultimate losses on the loans are not deemed significant.

79

As discussed on Note 5 – Discontinued operations, on November 8, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of the California regional operations. In connection with this transaction, the Corporation agreed to provide, subject to certain limitations, customary indemnification to the purchaser, including with respect to certain pre-closing liabilities and violations of representations and warranties. The Corporation also agreed to indemnify the purchaser for up to 1.5% of credit losses on transferred loans for a period of two years after the closing. Pursuant to this indemnification provision, the Corporation’s maximum exposure is approximately $16.0 million. The Corporation recognized a reserve of approximately $2.2 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. This reserve is included within the liabilities from discontinued operations.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of non-performing mortgage loans. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $16.3 million. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $3.0 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. BPPR’s obligations under this clause end one year after the closing except to any claim asserted prior to such termination date. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation has a reserve balance of $2.8 million to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representations and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $18.0 million. BPPR is not required to repurchase any of the assets. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $10.7 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. During the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, the Corporation released $ 3.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, based on an evaluation of claims received under this clause. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation has a reserve balance of $4.2 million to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated with indemnifications and representations and warranties related to loans sold by BPPR for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance as of beginning of period	$	15,959		$	19,277
Additions for new sales		—			—
Net reversal of provision for representation and warranties		(1,901	)		(1,064	)
Net charge-offs		(14	)		(1,389	)
Balance as of end of period	$	14,044		$	16,824

In addition, at March 31, 2015, the Corporation has reserves for customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. These loans were sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representation and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation made certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated with these loans. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $ 5 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition (December 31, 2014 - $ 5 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008 and most of the outstanding agreements with major counterparties were settled during 2010 and 2011.

Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation serviced $ 15.6 billion in mortgage loans for third-parties, including the loans serviced with credit recourse (December 31, 2014 - $ 15.6 billion). The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage

80

owner, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantees programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At March 31, 2015, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $31 million (December 31, 2014 - $36 million). To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporation’s servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.

Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries amounting to $ 0.2 billion at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $ 0.2 billion). In addition, at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.4 billion, respectively, of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the trust preferred securities.

81

Note 26 – Commitments and contingencies

Off-balance sheet risk

The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan commitments, letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amounts of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for those reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk, whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk as of the end of the periods presented were as follows:

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Commitments to extend credit:
Credit card lines	$	4,658,206	$	4,450,284
Commercial lines of credit		2,259,044		2,415,843
Other unused credit commitments		390,351		269,225
Commercial letters of credit		2,278		2,820
Standby letters of credit		65,849		46,362
Commitments to originate or fund mortgage loans		26,860		25,919

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $11 million for potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit, as compared to $13 million at December 31, 2014.

Other commitments

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation also maintained other non-credit commitments for approximately $9 million, primarily for the acquisition of other investments, as compared to $9 million at December 31, 2014.

Business concentration

Since the Corporation’s business activities are currently concentrated primarily in Puerto Rico, its results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends of the Puerto Rico economy and, in particular, the residential and commercial real estate markets. The concentration of the Corporation’s operations in Puerto Rico exposes it to greater risk than other banking companies with a wider geographic base. Its asset and revenue composition by geographical area is presented in Note 38 to the consolidated financial statements.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $ 995 million, of which approximately $ 813 million is outstanding ($ 1.0 billion and $ 811 million at December 31, 2014). Of the amount outstanding, $ 698 million consists of loans and $ 115 million are securities ($ 689 million and $ 122 million at December 31, 2014). Of this amount, $ 336 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($ 336 million at December 31, 2014). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $ 477 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($ 475 million at December 31, 2014). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality.

82

In addition, at March 31, 2015, the Corporation had $376 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($370 million at December 31, 2014). These included $296 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2014 - $289 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Also, the Corporation had $49 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $31 million of industrial development notes ($49 million and $32 million at December 31, 2014, respectively).

Other contingencies

As indicated in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the loss sharing agreements related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The fair value of the true-up payment obligation was estimated at $ 125 million at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $ 129 million).

Legal Proceedings

The nature of Popular’s business ordinarily results in a certain number of claims, litigation, investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings. When the Corporation determines it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Corporation will consider the settlement of cases (including cases where it has meritorious defenses) when, in management’s judgment, it is in the best interest of both the Corporation and its shareholders to do so.

On at least a quarterly basis, Popular assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For matters where it is probable that the Corporation will incur a material loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the Corporation establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted on at least a quarterly basis as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a material loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.

In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes and estimates that the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses (with respect to those matters where such limits may be determined, in excess of amounts accrued), for current legal proceedings ranges from $0 to approximately $35 million as of March 31, 2015. For certain other cases, management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants in several of the current proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the numerous unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, management’s estimate will change from time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.

While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, management believes that the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the Corporation’s legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporation’s consolidated financial position in a particular period.

Ongoing Class Action Litigation

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”) and Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”) are currently defendants in various class action lawsuits:

On November 21, 2012, BPNA was served with a putative class action complaint captioned Josefina Valle, et al. v. Popular Community Bank, filed in the New York State Supreme Court (New York County). Plaintiffs, existing BPNA customers, allege among other things that BPNA has engaged in unfair and deceptive acts and trade practices in connection with the assessment of overdraft fees and payment processing on consumer deposit accounts. The complaint further alleges that BPNA improperly disclosed its consumer overdraft policies and, additionally, that the overdraft rates and fees assessed by BPNA violate New York’s usury laws. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, including punitive damages, interest, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

83

BPNA removed the case to federal court (S.D.N.Y.) and plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion to remand the action to state court, which the Court granted on August 6, 2013. A motion to dismiss was filed on September 9, 2013. On October 25, 2013, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint seeking to limit the putative class to New York account holders. A motion to dismiss the amended complaint was filed in February 2014. In August 2014, the Court entered an order granting in part BPNA’s motion to dismiss. The sole surviving claim relates to BPNA’s item processing policy. On September 10, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint to correct certain deficiencies noted in the court’s decision and order. BPNA subsequently filed a motion in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend and further sought to compel arbitration. The matter has been stayed pending a ruling on such motions.

Between December 2013 and January 2014, BPPR, BPNA and Popular, Inc., along with two executive officers, were served with a putative class action complaint captioned Neysha Quiles et al. v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico et al. Plaintiffs essentially alleged that they and others, who have been employed by the Defendants as “bank tellers” and other similarly titled positions, were generally paid only for scheduled work time, rather than time actually worked. The Complaint sought to maintain a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) on behalf of all individuals who were employed or were currently employed by the Defendants in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, New York, New Jersey, Florida, California, and Illinois as hourly paid, non-exempt, bank tellers or other similarly titled positions at any time during the past three years and alleged the following claims under the FLSA against all Defendants: (i) failure to pay overtime premiums; and (ii) that the failure to pay was willful. Similar claims were brought under Puerto Rico law on behalf of all individuals who were employed or are currently employed by BPPR in Puerto Rico as hourly paid, non-exempt, bank tellers or other similarly titled positions at any time during the past three years. On January 31, 2014, the Popular defendants filed an answer to the complaint. On February 24, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to dismiss the complaint against BPNA and the named BPNA executive officer without prejudice. On January 9, 2015, plaintiffs submitted a motion for conditional class certification, which BPPR opposed. On February 18, 2015, the Court entered an order whereby it granted plaintiffs’ request for conditional certification of the FLSA action.

On May 5, 2014, a putative class action captioned Nora Fernandez, et al. v. UBS, et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors in 23 Puerto Rico closed-end investment companies against various UBS entities, BPPR and Popular Securities. UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico is the sponsor and co-sponsor of all 23 funds, while BPPR was co-sponsor, together with UBS, of nine (9) of those funds. The plaintiffs allege breach of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract against all defendants. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, including disgorgement of fees and attorneys’ fees. On May 30, 2014, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their class action in the SDNY and on that same date, they filed a virtually identical complaint in the US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (USDC-PR) and requested that the case be consolidated with the matter of In re: UBS Financial Services Securities Litigation, a class action currently pending before the USDC-PR in which neither BPPR nor Popular Securities are parties. The UBS defendants filed an opposition to the consolidation request and moved to transfer the case back to the SDNY on the ground that the relevant agreements between the parties contain a choice of forum clause, with New York as the selected forum. The Popular defendants joined this motion. By order dated January 30, 2015, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate. By order dated March 30, 2015, the court granted defendants’ motion to transfer. The case currently remains pending in the SDNY.

On May 6, 2014, a putative class action captioned David Alvarez, et al. v. Banco Popular North America was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiffs generally assert that BPNA has engaged in purported violations of §2954.8(a) of the California Civil Code and §17200 et seq. of the California Business Professions Code, which allegedly require financial institutions that make loans secured by certain types of real property located within the state of California to pay interest to borrowers on impound account deposits at a statutory rate of not less than two percent (2%). Plaintiffs maintain that BPNA has not paid interest on such deposits and demand that BPNA be enjoined from engaging in further violations of these provisions and pay an unspecified amount of damages sufficient to repay the unpaid interest on these deposits. PHH Corporation, which acquired the loans at issue in this complaint, has agreed to indemnify and tender a defense on behalf of BPNA. On March 11, 2015, the parties executed a settlement agreement and release to fully and finally resolve the litigation and dismiss the case in its entirety and on March 24, 2015, the court approved the dismissal of the case. The terms of the settlement do not require that BPNA make any payment in connection thereof.

On October 7, 2014, BPNA was served with a putative class action complaint captioned Josefina Valle, et al. v. BPNA, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint names the same plaintiffs who filed the above-described overdraft fee class action suit. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that BPNA engages in unfair and deceptive acts and trade practices relative to the assessment of ATM fees on ATM transactions initialed at Allpoint branded ATMs. The complaint further alleges that BPNA is in violation of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E with respect to ATM fees. On December 2, 2014, BPNA filed a motion to compel arbitration, which plaintiffs opposed. On February 2, 2015, the court entered an

84

opinion and order granting defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. On February 23, 2015, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit demanding that the court reverse the district court’s ruling. On April 17, 2015, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle this matter for approximately $25,000. This settlement is not yet final.

On October 3, 2014, BPNA received notice of a potential class action submitted by two former assistant branch managers. The purported action alleges various wage and hour violations arising from what they contend is an improper job classification under the FLSA and applicable state law equivalents. In December 2014, BPNA accepted plaintiffs’ offer to mediate this dispute, and mediation took place on February 19, 2015. As a result of the mediation, the parties entered into an agreement in principle to settle this claim. Under the terms of the agreement in principle, subject to certain customary conditions including court approval of a final settlement agreement in consideration for the full settlement and release of all defendants, defendant will pay the amount of $800,000.

On March 20, 2015, BPPR was served with a class action complaint titled In re 2014 RadioShack ERISA Litigation, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleges that certain employees of RadioShack incurred losses in their 401(k) plans because various fiduciaries elected to retain RadioShack’s company stock in the portfolio of potential investment options. The complaint further asserts that once RadioShack’s financial situation began to deteriorate in 2011, the fiduciaries of the RadioShack 401(k) Plan and the RadioShack Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan (collectively, “the Plans”) should have removed RadioShack company stock from the portfolio of potential investment options.

Popular was a directed trustee, and therefore a fiduciary, of the RadioShack Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan (“P.R. Plan”). Even though the P.R. Plan directed Popular to retain RadioShack company stock within the portfolio of investment options, the complaint alleges that a trustee’s duty of prudence requires it to disregard plan documents or directives that it knows or reasonably should know would lead to an imprudent result or would otherwise harm plan participants or beneficiaries. It further alleges that Popular breached its fiduciary duties by (i) failing to take any meaningful steps to protect plan participants from losses that it knew would occur; (ii) failing to divest the P.R. Plan of Company Stock; and (iii) participating in the decisions of another trustee (Wells Fargo) to protect the Plans from inevitable losses.

Other Matters

The volatility in prices and declines in value that Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end investment companies that invest primarily in Puerto Rico municipal bonds have experienced since August 2013 have led to regulatory inquiries, customer complaints and arbitrations for most broker-dealers in Puerto Rico, including Popular Securities LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation (“Popular Securities”). Popular Securities has received customer complaints and is named as a respondent (among other broker-dealers) in 41 arbitration proceedings with aggregate claimed damages of approximately $99 million, including one arbitration with claimed damages of $78 million in which two other Puerto Rico broker-dealers are co-defendants. The proceedings are in their early stages and it is the view of the Corporation that Popular Securities has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted. An adverse result in the matters described above could have a material and adverse effect on Popular Securities.

Other Significant Proceedings

As described under “Note 13 – FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation”, in connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, on April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned that it acquired in the transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the loss share agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC reimburses BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR reimburses the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid 80% reimbursement under those loss share agreements. The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow in order to receive reimbursement for losses from the FDIC. BPPR believes that it has complied with such terms and conditions. The loss share agreement applicable to the commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans described below provides for loss sharing by the FDIC through the quarter ending June 30, 2015 and for reimbursement to the FDIC through the quarter ending June 30, 2018.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2010 through March 31, 2012, BPPR received reimbursement for loss-share claims submitted to the FDIC, including charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. When BPPR submitted its shared-loss claim in connection with the June 30, 2012 quarter, however, the FDIC refused to reimburse BPPR for a portion of the claim because of a difference related

85

to the methodology for the computation of charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO. In accordance with the terms of the commercial loss share agreement, BPPR applied a methodology for charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans that conforms to its regulatory supervisory criteria and is calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. The FDIC stated that it believed that BPPR should use a different methodology for those charge-offs. Notwithstanding the FDIC’s refusal to reimburse BPPR for certain shared-loss claims, BPPR had continued to calculate shared-loss claims for quarters subsequent to June 30, 2012 in accordance with its charge-off policy for non-covered assets.

BPPR’s loss share agreements with the FDIC specify that disputes can be submitted to arbitration before a review board under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On July 31, 2013, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that the review board determine certain matters relating to the loss-share claims under its commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC, including that the review board award BPPR the amounts owed under its unpaid quarterly certificates. The statement of claim also included requests for reimbursement of certain valuation adjustments for discounts to appraised values, costs to sell troubled assets and other items. The review board was comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators.

On October 17, 2014, BPPR and the FDIC settled all claims and counterclaims that had been submitted to the review board. The settlement provides for an agreed valuation methodology for reimbursement of charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and resulting OREO. Although the terms of the settlement could delay the timing of reimbursement of certain loss-share claims from the FDIC, the settlement is not expected to have a material adverse impact on BPPR’s current estimate of expected reimbursable losses for the covered portfolio through the end of the commercial loss share agreement in the quarter ending June 30, 2015.

As of March 31, 2015, BPPR had unreimbursed losses and expenses of $243.2 million under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC. On April 9, 2015, BPPR received reimbursement of $27.9 million from the FDIC covering claims filed prior to March 31, 2015. Taking into consideration this payment and claims submitted through that date, the total unreimbursed losses totaled $215.3 million, of which $80.1 million was submitted to the FDIC on April 30, 2015. BPPR continues to work on processing claims, including those which had previously not been reimbursed by the FDIC and expects to complete this process before the expiration of BPPR’s ability to submit claims under the commercial loss share agreement in the quarter ending June 30, 2015. After giving effect to the claim submitted on April 30, 2015, the amount of claims pending to be submitted for reimbursement to the FDIC amounted to $135.2 million.

On November 25, 2014, the FDIC notified BPPR that it (a) would not reimburse BPPR under the commercial loss share agreement for a $66.6 million loss claim on eight related real estate loans that BPPR restructured and consolidated (collectively, the “Disputed Asset”), and (b) would no longer treat the Disputed Asset as a “Shared-Loss Asset” under the commercial loss share agreement. The FDIC alleged that BPPR’s restructure and modification of the underlying loans did not constitute a “Permitted Amendment” under the commercial loss share agreement, thereby causing the bank to breach Article III of the commercial loss share agreement.

BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s determinations relating to the Disputed Asset, and accordingly, on December 19, 2014, delivered to the FDIC a notice of dispute under the commercial loss share agreement.

The commercial loss share agreement provides that certain disputes be submitted to arbitration before a review board, to include two party-appointed members, under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On March 19, 2015, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that a review board determine BPPR and the FDIC’s disputes concerning the Disputed Asset. The statement of claim requests a declaration that the Disputed Asset is a “Shared-Loss Asset” under the commercial loss share agreement, a declaration that the restructuring is a “Permitted Amendment” under the commercial shared loss agreement, and an order that the FDIC reimburse the Bank for approximately $53.3 million for the Charge-Off of the Disputed Asset, plus interest at the applicable rate. On April 1, 2015, the FDIC-R notified BPPR that it is clawing back approximately $1.7 million in reimbursable expenses relating to the Disputed Asset that the FDIC-R had previously paid to BPPR. Thus, on April 13, 2015, BPPR notified the American Arbitration Association and the FDIC of an increase in the amount of its damages by approximately $1.7 million.

To the extent we are not able to successfully resolve this matter through negotiation or the arbitration process described above, a write-off in the amount of approximately $53.3 million plus expenses incurred in connection with the Disputed Asset, which at March 31, 2015 amounted to $1.4 million of the aforementioned pending claims would be recorded.

86

In addition, in November and December 2014, BPPR proposed separate portfolio sales to the FDIC. The FDIC has refused to consent to either sale, stating that those sales did not represent best efforts to maximize collections on Shared-Loss Assets under the commercial loss share agreement. In March 2015, BPPR proposed a third portfolio sale to the FDIC. The FDIC has not yet responded to that proposal.

BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s characterization of the November and December 2014 portfolio sale proposals and with the FDIC’s interpretation of the commercial shared loss agreement provision governing portfolio sales. Accordingly, BPPR has informed the FDIC of the existence of a dispute, and negotiations are continuing.

No assurance can be given that we will receive reimbursement from the FDIC with respect to the foregoing items, which could require us to make a material adjustment to the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for ten years (ending on June 30, 2020), and the loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and other assets provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for five years (ending on June 30, 2015), with additional recovery sharing for three years thereafter. As of March 31, 2015, the carrying value of covered loans approximated $2.5 billion, of which approximately 64% pertained to commercial loans, 3% to construction loans, 32% to mortgage loans and 1% to consumer loans. To the extent that estimated losses on covered loans are not realized before the expiration of the applicable loss sharing agreement, such losses would not be subject to reimbursement from the FDIC and, accordingly, would require us to make a material reduction in the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

87

Note 27 – Non-consolidated variable interest entities

The Corporation is involved with four statutory trusts which it established to issue trust preferred securities to the public. These trusts are deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) since the equity investors at risk have no substantial decision-making rights. The Corporation does not hold any variable interest in the trusts, and therefore, cannot be the trusts’ primary beneficiary. Furthermore, the Corporation concluded that it did not hold a controlling financial interest in these trusts since the decisions of the trusts are predetermined through the trust documents and the guarantee of the trust preferred securities is irrelevant since in substance the sponsor is guaranteeing its own debt.

Also, the Corporation is involved with various special purpose entities mainly in guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions, including GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC. These special purpose entities are deemed to be VIEs since they lack equity investments at risk. The Corporation’s continuing involvement in these guaranteed loan securitizations includes owning certain beneficial interests in the form of securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is not required to provide additional financial support to any of the variable interest entities to which it has transferred the financial assets. The mortgage-backed securities, to the extent retained, are classified in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition as available-for-sale or trading securities. The Corporation concluded that, essentially, these entities (FNMA, GNMA, and FHLMC) control the design of their respective VIEs, dictate the quality and nature of the collateral, require the underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides and can change them at will, and can remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the case of FNMA and FHLMC. Moreover, through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA, GNMA, and FHLMC) have the obligation to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the VIE.

ASU 2009-17 requires that an ongoing primary beneficiary assessment should be made to determine whether the Corporation is the primary beneficiary of any of the VIEs it is involved with. The conclusion on the assessment of these trusts and guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions has not changed since their initial evaluation. The Corporation concluded that it is still not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore, these VIEs are not required to be consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements at March 31, 2015.

The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those securities originated by the Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the Corporation holds agency mortgage-backed securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and private label collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in which it has no other form of continuing involvement. Refer to Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the debt securities outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading securities in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition. In addition, the Corporation may retain the right to service the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose entities (“SPEs”) and may also purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored SPEs that were transferred to those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the servicing fees that the Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable interests in the VIEs since the servicing fees are subordinated to the principal and interest that first needs to be paid to the mortgage-backed securities’ investors and to the guaranty fees that need to be paid to the federal agencies.

88

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the Corporation’s variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Corporation’s involvement as servicer with non-consolidated VIEs at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Assets
Servicing assets:
Mortgage servicing rights	$	102,301	$	103,828
Total servicing assets	$	102,301	$	103,828
Other assets:
Servicing advances	$	2,253	$	8,974
Total other assets	$	2,253	$	8,974
Total assets	$	104,554	$	112,802
Maximum exposure to loss	$	104,554	$	112,802

The size of the non-consolidated VIEs, in which the Corporation has a variable interest in the form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to $8.9 billion at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $9 billion).

Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all loans serviced are delinquent and that the value of the Corporation’s interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are not included as part of the maximum exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related agencies.

In September of 2011, BPPR sold construction and commercial real estate loans with a fair value of $148 million, and most of which were non-performing, to a newly created joint venture, PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC. The joint venture is majority owned by Caribbean Property Group (“CPG”), Goldman Sachs & Co. and East Rock Capital LLC. The joint venture was created for the limited purpose of acquiring the loans from BPPR; servicing the loans through a third-party servicer; ultimately working out, resolving and/or foreclosing the loans; and indirectly owning, operating, constructing, developing, leasing and selling any real properties acquired by the joint venture through deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure, or by resolution of any loan.

BPPR provided financing to the joint venture for the acquisition of the loans in an amount equal to the sum of 57% of the purchase price of the loans, or $84 million, and $2 million of closing costs, for a total acquisition loan of $86 million (the “acquisition loan”). The acquisition loan has a 5-year maturity and bears a variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. In addition, BPPR provided the joint venture with a non-revolving advance facility (the “advance facility”) of $68.5 million to cover unfunded commitments and costs-to-complete related to certain construction projects, and a revolving working capital line (the “working capital line”) of $20 million to fund certain operating expenses of the joint venture. Cash proceeds received by the joint venture are first used to cover debt service payments for the acquisition loan, advance facility, and the working capital line described above which must be paid in full before proceeds can be used for other purposes. The distributable cash proceeds are determined based on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the respective equity ownership percentages. BPPR’s equity interest in the joint venture ranks pari-passu with those of other parties involved. As part of the transaction executed in September 2011, BPPR received $ 48 million in cash and a 24.9% equity interest in the joint venture. The Corporation is not required to provide any other financial support to the joint venture.

BPPR accounted for this transaction as a true sale pursuant to ASC Subtopic 860-10 and thus recognized the cash received, its equity investment in the joint venture, and the acquisition loan provided to the joint venture and derecognized the loans sold.

The Corporation has determined that PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is a VIE but the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary. All decisions are made by CPG (or an affiliate thereof) (the “Manager”), except for certain limited material decisions which would require the unanimous consent of all members. The Manager is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the joint venture any and all documents, contracts, certificates, agreements and instruments, and to take any action deemed necessary in the benefit of the joint venture.

89

The Corporation holds variable interests in this VIE in the form of the 24.9% equity interest (the “Investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC”) and the financing provided to the joint venture. The equity interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC Subtopic 323-10.

The initial fair value of the Corporation’s equity interest in the joint venture was determined based on the fair value of the loans and real estate owned transferred to the joint venture of $148 million which represented the purchase price of the loans agreed by the parties and was an arm’s-length transaction between market participants in accordance with ASC Topic 820, reduced by the acquisition loan provided by BPPR to the joint venture, for a total net equity of $63 million. Accordingly, the 24.9% equity interest held by the Corporation was valued at $16 million. Thus, the fair value of the equity interest is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement since the inputs were based on observable market inputs.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets and liabilities related to the Corporation’s variable interests in the non-consolidated VIE, PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC, and its maximum exposure to loss at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Assets
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Advances under the working capital line	$	752		$	426
Advances under the advance facility		2,525			4,226
Total loans held-in-portfolio	$	3,277		$	4,652
Accrued interest receivable	$	19		$	22
Other assets:
Investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings LLC	$	24,683		$	23,650
Total assets	$	27,979		$	28,324
Deposits	$	(3,171	)	$	(2,685	)
Total liabilities	$	(3,171	)	$	(2,685	)
Total net assets	$	24,808		$	25,639
Maximum exposure to loss	$	24,808		$	25,639

The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss under a worst case scenario at March 31, 2015 would be not recovering the carrying amount of the acquisition loan, the advances on the advance facility and working capital line, if any, and the equity interest held by the Corporation, net of the deposits.

On March 25, 2013, BPPR completed a sale of assets with a book value of $509.0 million, of which $500.6 million were in non-performing status, comprised of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned, with a combined unpaid principal balance on loans and appraised value of other real estate owned of approximately $987.0 million to a newly created joint venture, PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC. The joint venture is majority owned by Caribbean Property Group LLC (“CPG”) and certain affiliates of Perella Weinberg Partners’ Asset Based Value Strategy. The joint venture was created for the limited purpose of acquiring the loans from BPPR; servicing the loans through a third-party servicer; ultimately working out, resolving and/or foreclosing the loans; and indirectly owning, operating, constructing, developing, leasing and selling any real properties acquired by the joint venture through deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure, or by resolution of any loan.

BPPR provided financing to the joint venture for the acquisition of the assets in an amount equal to the sum of 57% of the purchase price of the assets, and closing costs, for a total acquisition loan of $182.4 million (the “acquisition loan”). The acquisition loan has a 5-year maturity and bears a variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. In addition, BPPR provided the joint venture with a non-revolving advance facility (the “advance facility”) of $35.0 million to cover unfunded commitments and costs-to-complete related to certain construction projects, and a revolving working capital line (the “working capital line”) of $30.0 million to fund certain operating expenses of the joint venture. Cash proceeds received by the joint venture are first used to cover debt service payments for the acquisition loan, advance facility, and the working capital line described above which must be paid in full before proceeds can be used for other purposes. The distributable cash proceeds are determined based on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the respective equity ownership percentages. BPPR’s equity

90

interest in the joint venture ranks pari-passu with those of other parties involved. As part of the transaction executed in March 2013, BPPR received $92.3 million in cash and a 24.9% equity interest in the joint venture. The Corporation is not required to provide any other financial support to the joint venture.

BPPR accounted for this transaction as a true sale pursuant to ASC Subtopic 860-10 and thus recognized the cash received, its equity investment in the joint venture, and the acquisition loan provided to the joint venture and derecognized the loans and real estate owned sold.

The Corporation has determined that PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is a VIE but the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary. All decisions are made by CPG (or an affiliate thereof) (the “Manager”), except for certain limited material decisions which would require the unanimous consent of all members. The Manager is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the joint venture any and all documents, contracts, certificates, agreements and instruments, and to take any action deemed necessary in the benefit of the joint venture. Also, the Manager delegates the day-to-day management and servicing of the loans to PR Asset Portfolio Servicing International, LLC, an affiliate of CPG.

The initial fair value of the Corporation’s equity interest in the joint venture was determined based on the fair value of the loans and real estate owned transferred to the joint venture of $306 million which represented the purchase price of the loans agreed by the parties and was an arm’s-length transaction between market participants in accordance with ASC Topic 820, reduced by the acquisition loan provided by BPPR to the joint venture, for a total net equity of $124 million. Accordingly, the 24.9% equity interest held by the Corporation was valued at $31 million. Thus, the fair value of the equity interest is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement since the inputs were based on observable market inputs.

The Corporation holds variable interests in this VIE in the form of the 24.9% equity interest (the “Investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC”) and the financing provided to the joint venture. The equity interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC Subtopic 323-10.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets and liabilities related to the Corporation’s variable interests in the non-consolidated VIE, PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC, and its maximum exposure to loss at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Assets
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Acquisition loan	$	78,582		$	97,193
Advances under the working capital line		1,618			990
Advances under the advance facility		15,319			12,460
Total loans held-in-portfolio	$	95,519		$	110,643
Accrued interest receivable	$	274		$	314
Other assets:
Investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC	$	27,039		$	31,374
Total assets	$	122,832		$	142,331
Deposits	$	(10,685	)	$	(12,960	)
Total liabilities	$	(10,685	)	$	(12,960	)
Total net assets	$	112,147		$	129,371
Maximum exposure to loss	$	112,147		$	129,371

The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss under a worst case scenario at March 31, 2015 would be not recovering the carrying amount of the acquisition loan, the advances on the advance facility and working capital line, if any, and the equity interest held by the Corporation, net of the deposits.

91

Note 28 – Related party transactions with affiliated company / joint venture

EVERTEC

The Corporation has an investment in EVERTEC, Inc. (“EVERTEC”), which provides various processing and information technology services to the Corporation and its subsidiaries and gives BPPR access to the ATH network owned and operated by EVERTEC. As of March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s stake in EVERTEC was 15.05%. The Corporation continues to have significant influence over EVERTEC. Accordingly, the investment in EVERTEC is accounted for under the equity method and is evaluated for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has occurred that is other than temporary. Refer to Note 34 “Related party transactions” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Corporation’s 2014 Annual Report for details.

The Corporation received $ 1.2 million in dividend distributions during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 from its investments in EVERTEC’s holding company (March 31, 2014 - $ 1.2 million). The Corporation’s equity in EVERTEC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Equity investment in EVERTEC	$	27,329	$	25,146

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with EVERTEC at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Items that represent liabilities to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Accounts receivable (Other assets)	$	2,825		$	5,065
Deposits		(16,146	)		(15,481	)
Accounts payable (Other liabilities)		(17,214	)		(15,511	)
Net total	$	(30,535	)	$	(25,927	)

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from EVERTEC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of EVERTEC’s income (loss) and changes in stockholders’ equity for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Quarter ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015		2014
Share of income from investment in EVERTEC	$	2,869	$	2,779
Share of other changes in EVERTEC’s stockholders’ equity		351		238
Share of EVERTEC’s changes in equity recognized in income	$	3,220	$	3,017

The following tables present the impact of transactions and service payments between the Corporation and EVERTEC (as an affiliate) and their impact on the results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. Items that represent expenses to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.

	Quarter ended
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			Category
Interest expense on deposits	$	(11	)	$	(20	)		Interest expense
ATH and credit cards interchange income from services to EVERTEC		6,487			6,419			Other service fees
Rental income charged to EVERTEC		1,724			1,677			Net occupancy
Processing fees on services provided by EVERTEC		(39,504	)		(38,762	)		Professional fees
Other services provided to EVERTEC		324			221			Other operating expenses
Total	$	(30,980	)	$	(30,465	)

92

EVERTEC has a letter of credit issued by BPPR, for an amount of $ 3.6 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The Corporation also agreed to maintain outstanding this letter of credit for a 5-year period which expires on September 30, 2015. EVERTEC and the Corporation entered into a Reimbursement Agreement, in which EVERTEC will reimburse the Corporation for any losses incurred by the Corporation in connection with the performance bonds and the letter of credit. Possible losses resulting from these agreements are considered insignificant.

PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

As indicated in Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation holds a 24.9% equity interest in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC and currently provides certain financing to the joint venture as well as holds certain deposits from the entity.

The Corporation’s equity in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC	$	24,683	$	23,650

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Loans	$	3,277		$	4,652
Accrued interest receivable		19			22
Deposits (non-interest bearing)		(3,171	)		(2,685	)
Net total	$	125		$	1,989

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of income (loss) from PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015		2014
Share of income (loss) from the equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC	$	1,033	$	(1,746	)

The following table presents transactions between the Corporation and PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC and their impact on the Corporation’s results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014		Category
Interest (loss) income on loan to PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC	$	(62	)	$	172		Interest income

PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

As indicated in Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements, effective March 2013 the Corporation holds a 24.9% equity interest in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and currently provides certain financing to the joint venture as well as holds certain deposits from the entity.

93

The Corporation’s equity in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC	$	27,039	$	31,374

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC, at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Loans	$	95,519		$	110,643
Accrued interest receivable		274			314
Deposits		(10,685	)		(12,960	)
Net total	$	85,108		$	97,997

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of income (loss) from PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC for quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Share of (loss) income from the equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC	$	(4,335	)	$	1,288

The following table presents transactions between the Corporation and PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and their impact on the Corporation’s results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015		2014		Category
Interest income on loan to PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC	$	866	$	1,262		Interest income
Servicing fee paid by PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC		—		70		Other service fees
Total	$	866	$	1,332

94

Note 29 – Fair value measurement

ASC Subtopic 820-10 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

• Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market.

• Level 2 - Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

• Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporation’s own assumptions about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value is adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporation’s credit standing, constraints on liquidity and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently. There have been no changes in the Corporation’s methodologies used to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities since December 31, 2014.

The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results.

Fair Value on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis

The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporation’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition at March 31, 2015 and 2014:

At March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total
RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Assets
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	—	$	784,274		$	—		$	784,274
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities		—		1,502,134			—			1,502,134
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		—		57,364			—			57,364
Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies		—		1,849,026			—			1,849,026
Mortgage-backed securities		—		1,340,938			1,435			1,342,373
Equity securities		325		2,306			—			2,631
Other		—		10,901			—			10,901
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	325	$	5,546,943		$	1,435		$	5,548,703
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives:
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions	$	—	$	6,766		$	—		$	6,766
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—		244			1,242			1,486
Mortgage-backed securities - federal agencies		—		102,836			6,221			109,057
Other		—		15,441			1,544			16,985
Total trading account securities	$	—	$	125,287		$	9,007		$	134,294
Mortgage servicing rights	$	—	$	—		$	149,024		$	149,024
Derivatives		—		22,485			—			22,485
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	325	$	5,694,715		$	159,466		$	5,854,506
Liabilities
Derivatives	$	—	$	(21,376	)	$	—		$	(21,376	)
Contingent consideration		—		—			(129,470	)		(129,470	)
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	—	$	(21,376	)	$	(129,470	)	$	(150,846	)

95

At December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total
RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Assets
Investment securities available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	—	$	700,154		$	—		$	700,154
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities		—		1,724,973			—			1,724,973
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		—		61,712			—			61,712
Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies		—		1,910,030			—			1,910,030
Mortgage-backed securities		—		903,037			1,325			904,362
Equity securities		323		2,299			—			2,622
Other		—		11,306			—			11,306
Total investment securities available-for-sale	$	323	$	5,313,511		$	1,325		$	5,315,159
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives:
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions	$	—	$	7,954		$	—		$	7,954
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—		261			1,375			1,636
Mortgage-backed securities - federal agencies		—		104,463			6,229			110,692
Other		—		16,682			1,563			18,245
Total trading account securities	$	—	$	129,360		$	9,167		$	138,527
Mortgage servicing rights	$	—	$	—		$	148,694		$	148,694
Derivatives		—		25,362			—			25,362
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	323	$	5,468,233		$	159,186		$	5,627,742
Liabilities
Derivatives	$	—	$	(23,032	)	$	—		$	(23,032	)
Contingent consideration		—		—			(133,634	)		(133,634	)
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	—	$	(23,032	)	$	(133,634	)	$	(156,666	)

96

Quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Assets									Write- downs
Loans[1]	$	—	$	—	$	132,007	$	132,007	$	(26,817	)
Other real estate owned[3]		—		6,098		30,304		36,402		(17,936	)
Other foreclosed assets[3]		—		20		131		151		(608	)
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$	—	$	6,118	$	162,442	$	168,560	$	(45,361	)

[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

Quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Assets									Write- downs
Loans[1]	$	—	$	—	$	66,189	$	66,189	$	(11,680	)
Loans held-for-sale[2]		—		—		—		—		(2,176	)
Other real estate owned[3]		—		—		17,295		17,295		(5,598	)
Other foreclosed assets[3]		—		—		533		533		(271	)
Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis	$	—	$	—	$	84,017	$	84,017	$	(19,725	)

[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	MBS classified as investment securities available- for-sale			CMOs classified as trading account securities			MBS classified as trading account securities			Other securities classified as trading account securities			Mortgage servicing rights			Total assets			Contingent consideration			Total liabilities
Balance at January 1, 2015	$	1,325		$	1,375		$	6,229		$	1,563		$	148,694		$	159,186		$	(133,634	)	$	(133,634	)
Gains (losses) included in earnings		(8	)		(2	)		16			(19	)		(4,929	)		(4,942	)		4,164			4,164
Additions		118			—			130			—			5,259			5,507			—			—
Sales		—			(44	)		(80	)		—			—			(124	)		—			—
Settlements		—			(87	)		(74	)		—			—			(161	)		—			—
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	1,435		$	1,242		$	6,221		$	1,544		$	149,024		$	159,466		$	(129,470	)	$	(129,470	)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at March 31, 2015	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18		$	23		$	(684	)	$	(645	)	$	4,164		$	4,164

97

Quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	MBS classified as investment securities available- for-sale			CMOs classified as trading account securities			MBS classified as trading account securities			Other securities classified as trading account securities			Mortgage servicing rights			Total assets			Contingent consideration			Total liabilities
Balance at January 1, 2014	$	6,523		$	1,423		$	9,799		$	1,929		$	161,099		$	180,773		$	(128,299	)	$	(128,299	)
Gains (losses) included in earnings		(2	)		(10	)		(39	)		(214	)		(8,096	)		(8,361	)		1,168			1,168
Gains (losses) included in OCI		(42	)		—			—			—			—			(42	)		—			—
Additions		—			263			150			—			3,528			3,941			—			—
Sales		—			—			(1,109	)		—			—			(1,109	)		—			—
Settlements		(100	)		(115	)		(500	)		—			(2	)		(717	)		786			786
Balance at March 31, 2014	$	6,379		$	1,561		$	8,301		$	1,715		$	156,529		$	174,485		$	(126,345	)	$	(126,345	)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at March 31, 2014	$	—		$	(6	)	$	(25	)	$	(136	)	$	(3,023	)	$	(3,190	)	$	1,168		$	1,168

There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous tables are reported in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:

	Quarter ended March 31, 2015						Quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Total gains (losses) included in earnings			Changes in unrealized to gains (losses) relating assets still held at reporting date			Total gains (losses) included in earnings			Changes in unrealized to gains (losses) relating assets still held at reporting date
Interest income	$	(8	)	$	—		$	(2	)	$	—
FDIC loss share (expense) income		4,164			4,164			1,168			1,168
Other service fees		(4,929	)		(684	)		(8,096	)		(3,023	)
Trading account loss		(5	)		39			(263	)		(167	)
Total	$	(778	)	$	3,519		$	(7,193	)	$	(2,022	)

98

The following table includes quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used to derive the fair value of Level 3 instruments, excluding those instruments for which the unobservable inputs were not developed by the Corporation such as prices of prior transactions and/or unadjusted third-party pricing sources.

(In thousands)	Fair value at March 31, 2015			Valuation technique	Unobservable inputs	Weighted average (range)
CMO’s - trading	$	1,242		Discounted cash flow model	Weighted average life	2.2 years (0.6 - 2.6 years)
					Yield	4.0% (1.3% - 4.7%)
					Constant prepayment rate	23.6% (19.5% - 26.1%)
Other - trading	$	740		Discounted cash flow model	Weighted average life	5.5 years
					Yield	12.1%
					Constant prepayment rate	10.8%
Mortgage servicing rights	$	149,024		Discounted cash flow model	Prepayment speed	8.1% (4.8% - 22.8%)
					Weighted average life	12.4 years (4.4 - 20.8 years)
					Discount rate	11.3% (9.5% - 15.0%)
Contingent consideration	$	(129,470	)	Discounted cash flow model	Credit loss rate on covered loans	5.1% (0.0% - 100.0%)
					Risk premium component of discount rate	5.3%
Loans held-in-portfolio	$	132,007	[1]	External appraisal	Haircut applied on external appraisals	26.3% (25.0% - 35.0%)
Other real estate owned	$	15,945	[2]	External appraisal	Haircut applied on external appraisals	18.4% (12.0% - 30.0%)
Other foreclosed assets	$	131	[3]	External appraisal	Haircut applied on external appraisals	1.00%

[1] Loans held-in-portfolio in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.

[2] Other real estate owned in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.

[3] Other foreclosed assets in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s collateralized mortgage obligations and interest-only collateralized mortgage obligation (reported as “other”), which are classified in the “trading” category, are yield, constant prepayment rate, and weighted average life. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the constant prepayment rate will generate a directionally opposite change in the weighted average life. For example, as the average life is reduced by a higher constant prepayment rate, a lower yield will be realized, and when there is a reduction in the constant prepayment rate, the average life of these collateralized mortgage obligations will extend, thus resulting in a higher yield. These particular financial instruments are valued internally by the Corporation’s investment banking and broker-dealer unit utilizing internal valuation techniques. The unobservable inputs incorporated into the internal discounted cash flow models used to derive the fair value of collateralized mortgage obligations and interest-only collateralized mortgage obligation (reported as “other”), which are classified in the “trading” category, are reviewed by the Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit on a quarterly basis. In the case of Level 3 financial instruments which fair value is based on broker quotes, the Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit reviews the inputs used by the broker-dealers for reasonableness utilizing information available from other published sources and validates that the fair value measurements were developed in accordance with ASC Topic 820. The Corporate Treasury unit also substantiates the inputs used by validating the prices with other broker-dealers, whenever possible.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights are constant prepayment rates and discount rates. Increases in interest rates may result in lower prepayments. Discount rates vary according to products and / or portfolios depending on the perceived risk. Increases in discount rates result in a lower fair value measurement. The Corporation’s Corporate Comptroller’s unit is responsible for determining the fair value of MSRs, which is based on discounted cash flow methods based on assumptions developed by an external service provider, except for prepayment speeds, which are adjusted internally for the local market based on historical experience. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit validates the economic assumptions developed by the external service provider on a quarterly basis. In addition, an analytical review of prepayment speeds is performed quarterly by the Corporate Comptroller’s unit. Significant variances in prepayment speeds are investigated by the Corporate Treasury unit. The Corporation’s MSR Committee analyzes changes in fair value measurements of MSRs and approves the valuation assumptions at each reporting period. Changes in valuation assumptions must also be approved by the MSR Committee. The fair value of MSRs are compared with those of the external service provider on a quarterly basis in order to validate if the fair values are within the materiality thresholds established by management to monitor and investigate material deviations. Back-testing is performed to compare projected cash flows with actual historical data to ascertain the reasonability of the projected net cash flow results.

99

Note 30 – Fair value of financial instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.

The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.

For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as management’s best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.

The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate environment at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, as applicable. In different interest rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value of the Corporation’s fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is, they do not represent the Corporation’s value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation.

Following is a description of the Corporation’s valuation methodologies and inputs used to estimate the fair values for each class of financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value, but for which the fair value is disclosed. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of the financial instruments disclosed do not represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation. For a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used to estimate the fair value for each class of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, refer to Note 29.

Cash and due from banks

Cash and due from banks include cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, and non-interest bearing deposits due from other financial institutions. The carrying amount of cash and due from banks is a reasonable estimate of its fair value. Cash and due from banks are classified as Level 1.

Money market investments

Investments in money market instruments include highly liquid instruments with an average maturity of three months or less. For this reason, they carry a low risk of changes in value as a result of changes in interest rates, and the carrying amount approximates their fair value. Money market investments include federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, and cash balances, including those held at the Federal Reserve. These money market investments are classified as Level 2, except for cash balances which generate interest, including those held at the Federal Reserve, which are classified as Level 1.

Investment securities held-to-maturity

• Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Municipal bonds include Puerto Rico public municipalities debt and bonds collateralized by second mortgages under the Home Purchase Stimulus Program. Puerto Rico public municipalities debt was valued internally based on benchmark treasury notes and a credit spread derived from comparable Puerto Rico government trades and recent issuances. Puerto Rico public municipalities debt is classified as Level 3. Given that the fair value of municipal bonds collateralized by second mortgages was based on internal yield and prepayment speed assumptions, these municipal bonds are classified as Level 3.

• Agency collateralized mortgage obligation: The fair value of the agency collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”), which is guaranteed by GNMA, was based on internal yield and prepayment speed assumptions. This agency CMO is classified as Level 3.

• Other: Other securities include foreign and corporate debt. Given that the fair value was based on quoted prices for similar instruments, foreign debt is classified as Level 2. The fair value of corporate debt, which is collateralized by municipal bonds of Puerto Rico, was internally derived from benchmark treasury notes and a credit spread based on comparable Puerto Rico government trades, similar securities, and/or recent issuances. Corporate debt is classified as Level 3.

100

Other investment securities

• Federal Home Loan Bank capital stock: Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) capital stock represents an equity interest in the FHLB of New York. It does not have a readily determinable fair value because its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. Since the excess stock is repurchased by the FHLB at its par value, the carrying amount of FHLB capital stock approximates fair value. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 2.

• Federal Reserve Bank capital stock: Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) capital stock represents an equity interest in the FRB of New York. It does not have a readily determinable fair value because its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. Since the canceled stock is repurchased by the FRB for the amount of the cash subscription paid, the carrying amount of FRB capital stock approximates fair value. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 2.

• Trust preferred securities: These securities represent the equity-method investment in the common stock of these trusts. Book value is the same as fair value for these securities since the fair value of the junior subordinated debentures is the same amount as the fair value of the trust preferred securities issued to the public. The equity-method investment in the common stock of these trusts is classified as Level 2, except for that of Popular Capital Trust III (Troubled Asset Relief Program) which is classified as Level 3. Refer to Note 22 for additional information on these trust preferred securities.

• Other investments: Other investments include private equity method investments and Visa Class B common stock held by the Corporation. Since there are no observable market values, private equity method investments are classified as Level 3. The Visa Class B common stock was priced by applying the quoted price of Visa Class A common stock, net of a liquidity adjustment, to the as converted number of Class A common shares since these Class B common shares are restricted and not convertible to Class A common shares until pending litigation is resolved. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 3.

Loans held-for-sale

The fair value of certain impaired loans held-for-sale was based on a discounted cash flow model that assumes that no principal payments are received prior to the effective average maturity date, that the outstanding unpaid principal balance is reduced by a monthly net loss rate, and that the remaining unpaid principal balance is received as a lump sum principal payment at the effective average maturity date. The remaining unpaid principal balance expected to be received, which is based on the prior 12-month cash payment experience of these loans and their expected collateral recovery, was discounted using the interest rate currently offered to clients for the origination of comparable loans. These loans were classified as Level 3. As of March 31, 2015, no loans were valued under this methodology. For loans held-for-sale originated with the intent to sell in the secondary market, its fair value was determined using similar characteristics of loans and secondary market prices assuming the conversion to mortgage-backed securities. Given that the valuation methodology uses internal assumptions based on loan level data, these loans are classified as Level 3. The fair value of certain other loans held-for-sale is based on bids received from potential buyers; binding offers; or external appraisals, net of internal adjustments and estimated costs to sell. Loans held-for-sale based on binding offers are classified as Level 2. Loans held-for-sale based on indicative offers and/or external appraisals are classified as Level 3.

Loans held-in-portfolio

The fair values of the loans held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential mortgage, consumer, and credit cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit price by discounting expected cash flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate that considers interest, credit and expected return by market participant under current market conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its carrying amount. Loans held-in-portfolio are classified as Level 3.

101

FDIC loss share asset

Fair value of the FDIC loss share asset was estimated using projected net losses related to the loss sharing agreements, which are expected to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The projected net losses were discounted using the U.S. Government agency curve. The loss share asset is classified as Level 3.

Deposits

• Demand deposits: The fair value of demand deposits, which have no stated maturity, was calculated based on the amount payable on demand as of the respective dates. These demand deposits include non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts. Thus, these deposits are classified as Level 2.

• Time deposits: The fair value of time deposits was calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on time deposits with similar maturities. The non-performance risk was determined using internally-developed models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term, and the credit premium of the institution. For certain 5-year certificates of deposit in which customers may withdraw their money anytime with no penalties or charges, the fair value of these certificates of deposit incorporate an early cancellation estimate based on historical experience. Time deposits are classified as Level 2.

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

• Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (structured and non-structured): Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with short-term maturities approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of those instruments. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities were valued using discounted cash flows based on the three-month LIBOR. In determining the non-performance credit risk valuation adjustment, the collateralization levels of these long-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase were considered. In the case of callable structured repurchase agreements, the callable feature is not considered when determining the fair value of those repurchase agreements, since there is a remote possibility, based on forward rates, that the investor will call back these agreements before maturity since it is not expected that the interest rates would rise more than the specified interest rate of these agreements. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (structured and non-structured) are classified as Level 2.

Other short-term borrowings

The carrying amount of other short-term borrowings approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Thus, these other short-term borrowings are classified as Level 2.

Notes payable

• FHLB advances: The fair value of FHLB advances was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows over their contractual term. In determining the non-performance credit risk valuation adjustment, the collateralization levels of these advances were considered. These advances are classified as Level 2.

• Medium-term notes: The fair value of publicly-traded medium-term notes was determined using recent trades of similar transactions. Publicly-traded medium-term notes are classified as Level 2. The fair value of non-publicly traded debt was based on remaining contractual cash outflows, discounted at a rate commensurate with the non-performance credit risk of the Corporation, which is subjective in nature. Non-publicly traded debt is classified as Level 3.

• Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities): The fair value of junior subordinated interest debentures was determined using recent trades of similar transactions. Thus, these junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures are classified as Level 2.

• Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (Troubled Asset Relief Program): The fair value of junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows over their contractual term. The discount rate was based on the rate at which a similar security was priced in the open market. Thus, these junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures are classified as Level 3.

• Others: The other category includes capital lease obligations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of capital lease obligations, therefore; it is included at its carrying amount. Capital lease obligations are classified as Level 3.

102

Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit

Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. Since the fair value of commitments to extend credit varies depending on the undrawn amount of the credit facility, fees are subject to constant change, and cash flows are dependent on the creditworthiness of borrowers, commitments to extend credit are classified as Level 3. The fair value of letters of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements. Given that the fair value of letters of credit constantly vary due to fees being subject to constant change and whether the fees are received depends on the creditworthiness of the account parties, letters of credit are classified as Level 3.

The following tables present the carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments with their corresponding level in the fair value hierarchy.

	March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Carrying amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	495,776	$	495,776	$	—	$	—	$	495,776
Money market investments		2,307,215		2,167,930		139,285		—		2,307,215
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives[1]		134,294		—		125,287		9,007		134,294
Investment securities available-for-sale[1]		5,548,703		325		5,546,943		1,435		5,548,703
Investment securities held-to-maturity:
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		100,004		—		—		87,708		87,708
Collateralized mortgage obligation-federal agency		91		—		—		96		96
Other		1,500		—		1,500		—		1,500
Total investment securities held-to-maturity	$	101,595	$	—	$	1,500	$	87,804	$	89,304
Other investment securities:
FHLB stock	$	67,929	$	—	$	67,929	$	—	$	67,929
FRB stock		80,001		—		80,001		—		80,001
Trust preferred securities		13,197		—		12,197		1,000		13,197
Other investments		1,911		—		—		3,260		3,260
Total other investment securities	$	163,038	$	—	$	160,127	$	4,260	$	164,387
Loans held-for-sale	$	160,602	$	—	$	9,335	$	158,544	$	167,879
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC		20,496,706		—		—		19,760,668		19,760,668
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		2,384,079		—		—		2,853,801		2,853,801
FDIC loss share asset		409,844		—		—		404,735		404,735
Mortgage servicing rights		149,024		—		—		149,024		149,024
Derivatives		22,485		—		22,485		—		22,485

103

	March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Carrying amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand deposits	$	18,505,618	$	—	$	18,505,618	$	—	$	18,505,618
Time deposits		8,768,071		—		8,801,498		—		8,801,498
Total deposits	$	27,273,689	$	—	$	27,307,116	$	—	$	27,307,116
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	1,132,643	$	—	$	1,136,302	$	—	$	1,136,302
Total assets sold under agreements to repurchase	$	1,132,643	$	—	$	1,136,302	$	—	$	1,136,302
Other short-term borrowings[2]	$	1,200	$	—	$	1,200	$	—	$	1,200
Notes payable:
FHLB advances		847,884		—		864,038		—		864,038
Unsecured senior debt securities		450,000		—		454,122		—		454,122
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities)		439,800		—		381,302		—		381,302
Others		19,629		—		—		19,629		19,629
Total notes payable	$	1,757,313	$	—	$	1,699,462	$	19,629	$	1,719,091
Derivatives	$	21,376	$	—	$	21,376	$	—	$	21,376
Contingent consideration	$	129,470	$	—	$	—	$	129,470	$	129,470
(In thousands)	Notional amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value
Commitments to extend credit	$	7,307,601	$	—	$	—	$	1,073	$	1,073
Letters of credit		68,127		—		—		976		976

[1] Refer to Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements for the fair value by class of financial asset and its hierarchy level.

[2] Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of short-term borrowings.

104

	December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Carrying amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value
Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	381,095	$	381,095	$	—	$	—	$	381,095
Money market investments		1,822,386		1,671,477		150,909		—		1,822,386
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives[1]		138,527		—		129,360		9,167		138,527
Investment securities available-for-sale[1]		5,315,159		323		5,313,511		1,325		5,315,159
Investment securities held-to-maturity:
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		101,573		—		—		92,597		92,597
Collateralized mortgage obligation-federal agency		97		—		—		102		102
Other		1,500		—		1,500		—		1,500
Total investment securities held-to-maturity	$	103,170	$	—	$	1,500	$	92,699	$	94,199
Other investment securities:
FHLB stock	$	66,773	$	—	$	66,773	$	—	$	66,773
FRB stock		80,025		—		80,025		—		80,025
Trust preferred securities		13,197		—		12,197		1,000		13,197
Other investments		1,911		—		—		5,028		5,028
Total other investment securities	$	161,906	$	—	$	158,995	$	6,028	$	165,023
Loans held-for-sale	$	106,104	$	—	$	27,074	$	87,862	$	114,936
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC		18,884,732		—		—		18,079,609		18,079,609
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		2,460,589		—		—		2,947,909		2,947,909
FDIC loss share asset		542,454		—		—		481,420		481,420
Mortgage servicing rights		148,694		—		—		148,694		148,694
Derivatives		25,362		—		25,362		—		25,362

105

	December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Carrying amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand deposits	$	17,333,090	$	—	$	17,333,090	$	—	$	17,333,090
Time deposits		7,474,445		—		7,512,683		—		7,512,683
Total deposits	$	24,807,535	$	—	$	24,845,773	$	—	$	24,845,773
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	1,271,657	$	—	$	1,269,398	$	—	$	1,269,398
Total assets sold under agreements to repurchase	$	1,271,657	$	—	$	1,269,398	$	—	$	1,269,398
Other short-term borrowings[2]	$	21,200	$	—	$	20,200	$	1,000	$	21,200
Notes payable:
FHLB advances		802,198		—		814,877		—		814,877
Unsecured senior debt		450,000		—		460,530		—		460,530
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities)		439,800		—		379,400		—		379,400
Others		19,830		—		—		19,830		19,830
Total notes payable	$	1,711,828	$	—	$	1,654,807	$	19,830	$	1,674,637
Derivatives	$	23,032	$	—	$	23,032	$	—	$	23,032
Contingent consideration	$	133,634	$	—	$	—	$	133,634	$	133,634
(In thousands)	Notional amount		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair value
Commitments to extend credit	$	7,135,352	$	—	$	—	$	1,716	$	1,716
Letters of credit		49,182		—		—		486		486

[1] Refer to Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements for the fair value by class of financial asset and its hierarchy level.

[2] Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of short-term borrowings.

106

Note 31 – Net income per common share

The following table sets forth the computation of net income per common share (“EPS”), basic and diluted, for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands, except per share information)	2015			2014
Net income from continuing operations	$	73,485		$	66,504
Net income from discontinued operations		1,341			19,905
Preferred stock dividends		(930	)		(931	)
Net income applicable to common stock	$	73,896		$	85,478
Average common shares outstanding		102,939,928			102,799,752
Average potential dilutive common shares		196,381			398,350
Average common shares outstanding - assuming dilution		103,136,309			103,198,102
Basic EPS from continuing operations	$	0.71		$	0.64
Basic EPS from discontinued operations	$	0.01		$	0.19
Total Basic EPS	$	0.72		$	0.83
Diluted EPS from continuing operations	$	0.71		$	0.64
Diluted EPS from discontinued operations	$	0.01		$	0.19
Total Diluted EPS	$	0.72		$	0.83

Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Warrants, stock options, and restricted stock awards that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect in earnings per common share.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, there were no antidilutive stock options outstanding (March 31, 2014 – 46,453).

107

Note 32 – Other service fees

The caption of other services fees in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following major categories:

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015		2014
Insurance fees	$	12,041	$	11,719
Credit card fees		16,149		16,083
Debit card fees		11,125		10,544
Sale and administration of investment products		5,930		6,457
Trust fees		4,602		4,463
Other fees		3,779		3,552
Total other service fees	$	53,626	$	52,818

108

Note 33 – FDIC loss share income (expense)

The caption of FDIC loss share income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following major categories:

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Amortization of loss share indemnification asset	$	(27,316	)	$	(48,946	)
80% mirror accounting on credit impairment losses[1]		8,246			15,090
80% mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses		21,545			12,745
80% mirror accounting on recoveries on covered assets, including rental income on OREOs, subject to reimbursement to the FDIC		(2,619	)		(4,392	)
Change in true-up payment obligation		4,164			1,168
Other		119			129
Total FDIC loss share income (expense)	$	4,139		$	(24,206	)

[1] Reductions in expected cash flows for ASC 310-30 loans, which may impact the provision for loan losses, may consider reductions in both principal and interest cash flow expectations. The amount covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements for interest not collected from borrowers is limited under the agreements (approximately 90 days); accordingly, these amounts are not subject fully to the 80% mirror accounting.

109

Note 34 – Pension and postretirement benefits

The Corporation has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan and supplementary pension benefit restoration plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries. The accrual of benefits under the plans is frozen to all participants.

The components of net periodic pension cost for the periods presented were as follows:

	Pension Plan Quarters ended March 31,						Benefit Restoration Plans Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014			2015			2014
Interest cost	$	7,403		$	7,461		$	407		$	415
Expected return on plan assets		(11,056	)		(11,630	)		(589	)		(606	)
Amortization of net loss		4,465			2,018			311			108
Total net periodic pension cost (benefit)	$	812		$	(2,151	)	$	129		$	(83	)

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015 the Corporation made a contribution to the benefit restoration plans of $43 thousand. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year 2015 for the pension and benefit restoration plans amount to approximately $173 thousand.

The Corporation also provides certain postretirement health care benefits for retired employees of certain subsidiaries. The table that follows presents the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost.

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Service cost	$	368		$	364
Interest cost		1,589			1,712
Amortization of prior service cost		(950	)		(950	)
Amortization of net loss		249			—
Total postretirement cost	$	1,256		$	1,126

Contributions made to the postretirement benefit plan for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 amounted to approximately $1.2 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year 2015 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $5.8 million.

110

Note 35 – Stock-based compensation

The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”), which permitted the granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporation’s shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which replaced and superseded the Stock Option Plan. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not alter the original terms of the grants made under the Stock Option Plan prior to the adoption of the Incentive Plan.

Stock Option Plan

Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.’s common stock at a price equal to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The Corporation’s policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional 20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of employment due to retirement.

There was no intrinsic value of options outstanding at March 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2015 all options outstanding expired.

The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:

(Not in thousands)	Options Outstanding			Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		100,437		$	253.64
Granted		—			—
Exercised		—			—
Forfeited		—			—
Expired		(55,640	)		238.85
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		44,797		$	272.00
Granted		—			—
Exercised		—			—
Forfeited		—			—
Expired		(44,797	)		272.00
Outstanding at March 31, 2015		—		$	—

There was no stock option expense recognized for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Incentive Plan

The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards, Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board). Employees and directors of the Corporation and/or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan.

Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based on the employees’ continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The vesting schedule for restricted shares granted on 2014 was modified as follows, the first part ratably over four years commencing at the date of the grant and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of the earlier of 55 years of age and 10 years of service or 60 years of age and 5 years of service. The four year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining the earlier of 55 years of age and 10 years of service or 60 years of age and 5 years of service. The restricted shares granted consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule vest in two years from grant date.

111

The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of management.

(Not in thousands)	Restricted Stock			Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2013		585,247		$	21.16
Granted		365,831			29.86
Vested		(311,078	)		19.02
Forfeited		(11,991	)		29.33
Non-vested at December 31, 2014		628,009		$	27.13
Granted		—			—
Vested		(105,874	)		28.01
Forfeited		(19,305	)		28.41
Non-vested at March 31, 2015		502,830		$	26.90

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, no shares of restricted stock (March 31, 2014 – 105,783) were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan. For 2014 all shares were awarded consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation recognized $ 2.0 million of restricted stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $ 0.3 million (March 31, 2014 - $ 1.3 million, with a tax benefit of $ 0.4 million). For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the fair market value of the restricted stock vested was $2.9 million at grant date and $3.5 million at vesting date. This triggers a windfall, net of shortfalls, of $0.2 million of which $69 thousand was recorded as a windfall pool in additional paid in capital. No windfall pool was recorded for the remaining $0.1 million due to the valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards and performance shares to members of management at March 31, 2015 was $ 11.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of the Board of Directors:

(Not in thousands)	Restricted Stock			Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2013		—		$	—
Granted		23,135			30.43
Vested		(23,135	)		30.43
Forfeited		—			—
Non-vested at December 31, 2014		—		$	—
Granted		2,643			32.16
Vested		(2,643	)		32.16
Forfeited		—			—
Non-vested at March 31, 2015		—		$	—

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation granted 2,643 shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc., which became vested at grant date (March 31, 2014 – 3,085). During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.1 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $16 thousand (March 31, 2014 - $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $49 thousand). The fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 for directors was $ 85 thousand.

112

Note 36 – Income taxes

The reason for the difference between the income tax expense applicable to income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico, were as follows:

	Quarters ended
	March 31, 2015						March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Amount			% of pre-tax income			Amount			% of pre-tax income
Computed income tax expense at statutory rates	$	41,361			39	%	$	35,010			39	%
Net benefit of tax exempt interest income		(13,693	)		(12	)		(11,386	)		(13	)
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		5,639			5			(6,972	)		(8	)
Non-deductible expenses		—			—			8,319			9
Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions		(1,609	)		(3	)		(6,195	)		(7	)
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate		(2,471	)		(1	)		2,278			3
Others		3,341			3			2,210			3
Income tax expense	$	32,568			31	%	$	23,264			26	%

The following table presents a breakdown of the significant components of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Deferred tax assets:
Tax credits available for carryforward	$	12,730	$	12,056
Net operating loss and other carryforward available		1,268,170		1,261,413
Postretirement and pension benefits		109,958		111,677
Deferred loan origination fees		7,396		7,720
Allowance for loan losses		696,577		710,666
Deferred gains		7,012		7,500
Accelerated depreciation		7,590		7,915
Intercompany deferred gains		2,707		2,988
Other temporary differences		25,519		27,755
Total gross deferred tax assets		2,137,659		2,149,690
Deferred tax liabilities:
Differences between the assigned values and the tax basis of assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations		38,877		37,804
FDIC-assisted transaction		83,380		81,335
Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities		28,376		20,817
Other temporary differences		21,639		18,093
Total gross deferred tax liabilities		172,272		158,049
Valuation allowance		1,212,085		1,212,748
Net deferred tax asset	$	753,302	$	778,893

The net deferred tax asset shown in the table above at March 31, 2015 is reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition as $788 million in net deferred tax assets in the “Other assets” caption (December 31, 2014 - $813 million) and $35 million in deferred tax liabilities in the “Other liabilities” caption (December 31, 2014 - $34 million), reflecting the aggregate deferred tax assets or liabilities of individual tax-paying subsidiaries of the Corporation.

A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The

113

determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies.

The Corporations maintains a valuation allowance on its deferred tax asset for the U.S. operations, since in consideration of the requirement of ASC 740 management considered that it is more likely than not that all of this deferred tax asset will not be realized. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in the U.S. mainland management evaluates and weights all available positive and negative evidence. The Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations are no longer in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended March 31, 2015 taking into account taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences (“adjusted book income”). This represents positive evidence within management’s evaluation. The book income for the years 2013, 2014 and for the quarter ended March 31,2015 was significantly impacted by a reversal of the loan loss provision due to the improved credit quality of the loan portfolios. In addition, the adjusted book income for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 was also significantly impacted by the incremental income resulting from the Doral Bank Transaction, which was effective as of February 27, 2015. This incremental income is considered additional positive evidence for management’s evaluation of the realization of the deferred tax asset. However this incremental income only reflected one month of operations, which is not enough data to create a trend in order to be considered objectively verifiable evidence. Also, the U.S. mainland operations did not report taxable income for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, although it did report taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2014. Future realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character within the carryforward period available under the tax law. The lack of a sustained level of taxable income together with the uncertainties regarding the estimated future normalized level of profitability including the Doral Bank Transaction incremental earnings and the impact of the restructuring plan represent strong negative evidence within management’s evaluation. This determination is updated each quarter and adjusted as any changes arise. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets related to the U.S. mainland operations, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. If the Corporation is able to meet its operating targets in the U.S. including the incremental earnings associated with the Doral Bank Transaction it would be considered additional positive evidence within management’s evaluation which could outweigh the negative evidence and result in the realization of a portion of the fully reserved deferred tax asset recorded at PCB.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s net deferred tax assets related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to $787 million net of the valuation allowance recorded in the Holding Company.

The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is not in a cumulative loss position for the three year period ended March 31, 2015. This is considered a strong piece of objectively verifiable positive evidence that out weights any negative evidence considered by management in the evaluation of the realization of the deferred tax asset. Based on this evidence and management’s estimate of future taxable income, the Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico Banking operations will be realized.

The Holding Company operation is not in a cumulative loss position for the three year period ended March 31, 2015. However, after the payment of TARP, the interest expense that will be paid on the $450 million subordinated notes which partially funded the repayment of TARP funds in 2014, bearing interest at 7%, is tax deductible contrary to the interest expense payable on the note issued to the U.S. Treasury under TARP. Based on this fact pattern the Holding Company is expecting to have losses for income tax purposes exclusive of reversing temporary differences. Since as required by ASC 740 the historical information should be supplemented by all currently available information about future years, the expected losses in future years is considered by management a strong negative evidence that will suggest that income in future years will be insufficient to support the realization of all deferred tax asset. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Holding Company will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. Accordingly, a valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset was recorded during the year 2014.

114

The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:

(In millions)	2015			2014
Balance at January 1	$	8.0		$	9.8
Additions for tax positions -January through March		0.3			0.3
Reduction as a result of settlements - January through March		(0.5	)		—
Balance at March 31	$	7.8		$	10.1

At March 31, 2015, the total amount of interest recognized in the statement of financial condition approximated $2.7 million (December 31, 2014 - $3.1 million). The total interest expense recognized at March 2015 was $143 thousand (December 31, 2014 - $540 thousand). Management determined that at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 there was no need to accrue for the payment of penalties. The Corporation’s policy is to report interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, whiles the penalties, if any, are reported in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized, would affect the Corporation’s effective tax rate, was approximately $9.6 million at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $9.8 million).

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statutes of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.

The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. At March 31, 2015, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction: 2011 and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction, 2010 and thereafter. The Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $5.8 million.

115

Note 37 – Supplemental disclosure on the consolidated statements of cash flows

Additional disclosures on cash flow information and non-cash activities for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 are listed in the following table:

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		March 31, 2014
Non-cash activities:
Loans transferred to other real estate	$	30,802	$	35,272
Loans transferred to other property		8,979		10,538
Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets		39,781		45,810
Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale		10,839		29,896
Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-in-portfolio		4,858		1,919
Loans securitized into investment securities[1]		203,414		228,515
Trades receivable from brokers and counterparties		112,287		74,603
Trades payable to brokers and counterparties		19,097		222,297
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on securitizations or asset transfers		2,859		3,528

[1] Includes loans securitized into trading securities and subsequently sold before quarter end.

As previously disclosed in Note 4, Business Combination, on February 27, 2015, the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, BPPR, in an alliance with co-bidders, including the Corporation’s U.S. mainland banking subsidiary, PCB, acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the FDIC as receiver. As part of this transaction, BPPR received net cash proceeds of approximately $711 million for consideration of the assets and liabilities acquired.

116

Note 38 – Segment reporting

The Corporation’s corporate structure consists of two reportable segments – Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida were classified as discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2014, and the assets and liabilities of these regions were subsequently sold during the third and fourth quarters of 2014.

As indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, Business Combination, on February 27, 2015, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, in an alliance with co-bidders, including BPNA, acquired certain assets and all deposits of Doral Bank from the FDIC as receiver. The financial results for the first quarter of 2015 of both reportable segments include the results from the operations acquired as part of the Doral Bank transaction.

Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on the products and services offered by the segments.

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:

Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporation’s results of operations and total assets at March 31, 2015, additional disclosures are provided for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:

• Commercial banking represents the Corporation’s banking operations conducted at BPPR, which are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.

• Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally on residential mortgage loan originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.

• Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries generate profits based on fee income.

Banco Popular North America:

Banco Popular North America’s reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA, E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates through a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland under the name of Popular Community Bank, while E-LOAN supports BPNA’s deposit gathering through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth quarter of 2008. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment and insurance services across the BPNA branch network.

The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North America, Popular International Bank and certain of the Corporation’s investments accounted for under the equity method, including EVERTEC and Centro Financiero BHD, S.A. The Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain corporate areas that are identified as critical to the organization: Finance, Risk Management and Legal.

The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates, resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.

117

The tables that follow present the results of operations and total assets by reportable segments:

2015

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Banco Popular de Puerto Rico		Banco Popular North America			Intersegment Eliminations
Net interest income	$	306,611	$	52,101		$	—
Provision for loan losses		42,237		(2,202	)		—
Non-interest income		103,529		6,167			—
Amortization of intangibles		1,998		106			—
Depreciation expense		10,108		1,617			—
Other operating expenses		227,576		54,484			—
Income tax expense		37,448		937			—
Net income (loss)	$	90,773	$	3,326		$	—
Segment assets	$	28,803,521	$	6,717,758		$	(128,481	)

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Reportable Segments		Corporate			Eliminations			Total Popular, Inc.
Net interest income (expense)	$	358,712	$	(15,517	)	$	—		$	343,195
Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses		40,035		—			—			40,035
Non-interest income		109,696		5,643			(104	)		115,235
Amortization of intangibles		2,104		—			—			2,104
Depreciation expense		11,725		194			—			11,919
Other operating expenses		282,061		16,990			(732	)		298,319
Income tax expense (benefit)		38,385		(6,062	)		245			32,568
Net income (loss)	$	94,098	$	(20,996	)	$	383		$	73,485
Segment assets	$	35,392,798	$	4,905,585		$	(4,673,543	)	$	35,624,840

2014

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Banco Popular de Puerto Rico		Banco Popular North America		Intersegment Eliminations
Net interest income	$	327,870	$	51,431	$	—
Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses		79,837		207		—
Non-interest income		68,089		10,602		—
Amortization of intangibles		1,824		202		—
Depreciation expense		9,498		1,721		—
Other operating expenses		209,839		37,992		—
Income tax expense		29,943		846		—
Net income	$	65,018	$	21,065	$	—

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Reportable Segments		Corporate			Eliminations			Total Popular, Inc.
Net interest income (expense)	$	379,301	$	(28,130	)	$	—		$	351,171
Provision for loan losses		80,044		(208	)		—			79,836
Non-interest income		78,691		17,408			(67	)		96,032
Amortization of intangibles		2,026		—			—			2,026
Depreciation expense		11,219		157			—			11,376
Other operating expenses		247,831		17,076			(710	)		264,197
Income tax expense (benefit)		30,789		(7,776	)		251			23,264
Net income	$	86,083	$	(19,971	)	$	392		$	66,504

118

Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment are as follows:

2015

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
(In thousands)	Commercial Banking			Consumer and Retail Banking		Other Financial Services		Eliminations			Total Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Net interest income	$	118,475		$	186,252	$	1,880	$	4		$	306,611
Provision for loan losses		(3,556	)		45,793		—		—			42,237
Non-interest (expense) income		27,150			56,004		20,470		(95	)		103,529
Amortization of intangibles		29			1,772		197		—			1,998
Depreciation expense		4,320			5,512		276		—			10,108
Other operating expenses		65,856			145,068		16,747		(95	)		227,576
Income tax expense		26,053			9,778		1,617		—			37,448
Net income	$	52,923		$	34,333	$	3,513	$	4		$	90,773
Segment assets	$	10,056,505		$	20,053,145	$	486,998	$	(1,793,127	)	$	28,803,521

2014

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
(In thousands)	Commercial Banking		Consumer and Retail Banking		Other Financial Services		Eliminations			Total Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Net interest income	$	136,460	$	188,677	$	2,733	$	—		$	327,870
Provision for loan losses		31,189		48,648		—		—			79,837
Non-interest income		7,684		37,979		22,444		(18	)		68,089
Amortization of intangibles		1		1,709		114		—			1,824
Depreciation expense		3,899		5,312		287		—			9,498
Other operating expenses		56,439		137,601		15,817		(18	)		209,839
Income tax expense		18,008		8,828		3,107		—			29,943
Net income	$	34,608	$	24,558	$	5,852	$	—		$	65,018

Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segments are as follows:

2015

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
Banco Popular North America
(In thousands)	Banco Popular North America			E-LOAN			Eliminations			Total Banco Popular North America
Net interest income	$	51,441		$	660		$	—		$	52,101
Provision for loan losses		(1,655	)		(547	)		—			(2,202	)
Non-interest income		5,813			354			—			6,167
Amortization of intangibles		106			—			—			106
Depreciation expense		1,617			—			—			1,617
Other operating expenses		53,912			572			—			54,484
Income tax expense		937			—			—			937
Net (loss) income	$	2,337		$	989		$	—		$	3,326
Segment assets	$	7,432,512		$	241,561		$	(956,315	)	$	6,717,758

119

2014

For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
Banco Popular North America
(In thousands)	Banco Popular North America			E-LOAN		Eliminations		Total Banco Popular North America
Net interest income	$	50,746		$	685	$	—	$	51,431
Reversal of provision for loan losses		(8	)		215		—		207
Non-interest income		10,493			109		—		10,602
Amortization of intangibles		202			—		—		202
Depreciation expense		1,721			—		—		1,721
Other operating expenses		37,458			534		—		37,992
Income tax expense		846			—		—		846
Net income	$	21,020		$	45	$	—	$	21,065

Geographic Information

	Quarter ended
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		March 31, 2014
Revenues:[1]
Puerto Rico	$	385,054	$	357,037
United States		56,710		62,483
Other		16,666		27,683
Total consolidated revenues	$	458,430	$	447,203

[1] Total revenues include net interest income (expense), service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, mortgage banking activities, net gain (loss) and valuation adjustments on investment securities, trading account (loss) profit, net (loss) gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans sold, FDIC loss share (expense) income and other operating income.

Selected Balance Sheet Information:

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Puerto Rico
Total assets	$	27,646,641	$	26,276,561
Loans		18,349,897		17,704,170
Deposits		21,395,931		20,365,445
United States
Total assets	$	6,850,262	$	5,689,604
Loans		4,504,157		3,568,564
Deposits		4,836,699		3,442,084
Other
Total assets	$	1,127,937	$	1,130,530
Loans		776,030		780,483
Deposits [1]		1,041,059		1,000,006

[1] Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands.

120

Note 39 – Subsequent events

Subsequent events are events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. The effects of subsequent events and transactions are recognized in the financial statements when they provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date. The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to March 31, 2015.

As discussed in Note 4, on April 23, 2015, BPPR closed the acquisition of Ginnie Mae mortgage servicing rights, for a loan portfolio of approximately $2.7 billion in unpaid principal balance in connection with the Doral Bank Transaction. BPPR is in negotiations for the transfers of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage servicing rights which are expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2015.

121

Note 40 – Condensed consolidating financial information of guarantor and issuers of registered guaranteed securities

The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) (parent only), Popular North America, Inc. (“PNA”) and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and the results of their operations and cash flows for periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

PNA is an operating, wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Equity One, Inc. and Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including BPNA’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc.

PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.

Popular International Bank, Inc. (“PIBI”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular Insurance V.I., Inc. In July 2013, the Corporation completed the sale of Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A., which was a wholly owned subsidiary of PIBI prior to that date, became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC after an internal reorganization. Since the internal reorganization, PIBI is no longer a bank holding company and is no longer a potential issuer of the Corporation’s debt securities. PIBI has no outstanding registered debt securities that would also be guaranteed by PIHC.

A potential source of income for PIHC consists of dividends from BPPR and BPNA. Under existing federal banking regulations any dividend from BPPR or BPNA to the PIHC could be made if the total of all dividends declared by each entity during the calendar year would not exceed the total of its net income for that year, as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. At March 31, 2015, BPPR could have declared a dividend of approximately $402 million (December 31, 2014 - $542 million).

122

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Condition (Unaudited)

	At March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Popular Inc. Holding Co.			PNA Holding Co.			All other subsidiaries and eliminations			Elimination entries			Popular, Inc. Consolidated
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	3,573		$	606		$	495,667		$	(4,070	)	$	495,776
Money market investments		19,785			1,814			2,288,430			(2,814	)		2,307,215
Trading account securities, at fair value		1,766			—			132,528			—			134,294
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value		239			—			5,548,464			—			5,548,703
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost		—			—			101,595			—			101,595
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value		9,850			4,492			148,696			—			163,038
Investment in subsidiaries		4,995,835			1,369,517			—			(6,365,352	)		—
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value		—			—			160,602			—			160,602
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		45,093			—			21,108,438			(43,384	)		21,110,147
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		—			—			2,456,552			—			2,456,552
Less - Unearned income		—			—			97,217			—			97,217
Allowance for loan losses		49			—			588,648			—			588,697
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net		45,044			—			22,879,125			(43,384	)		22,880,785
FDIC loss share asset		—			—			409,844			—			409,844
Premises and equipment, net		2,558			—			489,733			—			492,291
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		98			—			128,072			—			128,170
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		—			—			113,557			—			113,557
Accrued income receivable		132			31			129,558			(82	)		129,639
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value		—			—			149,024			—			149,024
Other assets		67,342			25,657			1,764,436			(14,501	)		1,842,934
Goodwill		—			—			508,311			(1	)		508,310
Other intangible assets		554			—			58,509			—			59,063
Total assets	$	5,146,776		$	1,402,117		$	35,506,151		$	(6,430,204	)	$	35,624,840
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	—		$	—		$	6,289,272		$	(4,070	)	$	6,285,202
Interest bearing		—			—			20,991,301			(2,814	)		20,988,487
Total deposits		—			—			27,280,573			(6,884	)		27,273,689
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase		—			—			1,132,643			—			1,132,643
Other short-term borrowings		—			15,384			29,200			(43,384	)		1,200
Notes payable		740,812			148,988			867,513			—			1,757,313
Other liabilities		28,844			4,235			1,062,895			(15,029	)		1,080,945
Liabilities from discontinued operations		—			—			1,930			—			1,930
Total liabilities		769,656			168,607			30,374,754			(65,297	)		31,247,720
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock		50,160			—			—			—			50,160
Common stock		1,037			2			56,307			(56,309	)		1,037
Surplus		4,189,405			4,269,208			5,931,230			(10,191,911	)		4,197,932
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		336,140			(3,044,927	)		(662,460	)		3,698,860			327,613
Treasury stock, at cost		(5,222	)		—			—			—			(5,222	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(194,400	)		9,227			(193,680	)		184,453			(194,400	)
Total stockholders’ equity		4,377,120			1,233,510			5,131,397			(6,364,907	)		4,377,120
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	5,146,776		$	1,402,117		$	35,506,151		$	(6,430,204	)	$	35,624,840

123

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Condition (Unaudited)

	At December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Popular, Inc. Holding Co.			PNA Holding Co.			All other subsidiaries and eliminations			Elimination entries			Popular, Inc. Consolidated
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	20,448		$	608		$	380,890		$	(20,851	)	$	381,095
Money market investments		19,747			357			1,803,639			(1,357	)		1,822,386
Trading account securities, at fair value		1,640			—			136,887			—			138,527
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value		231			—			5,314,928			—			5,315,159
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost		—			—			103,170			—			103,170
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value		9,850			4,492			147,564			—			161,906
Investment in subsidiaries		4,878,866			1,353,616			—			(6,232,482	)		—
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value		—			—			106,104			—			106,104
Loans held-in-portfolio:
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		55,486			—			19,496,569			(53,769	)		19,498,286
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		—			—			2,542,662			—			2,542,662
Less - Unearned income		—			—			93,835			—			93,835
Allowance for loan losses		41			—			601,751			—			601,792
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net		55,445			—			21,343,645			(53,769	)		21,345,321
FDIC loss share asset		—			—			542,454			—			542,454
Premises and equipment, net		2,512			—			492,069			—			494,581
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		90			—			135,410			—			135,500
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC		—			—			130,266			—			130,266
Accrued income receivable		75			112			121,657			(26	)		121,818
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value		—			—			148,694			—			148,694
Other assets		67,962			26,514			1,570,094			(18,127	)		1,646,443
Goodwill		—			—			465,677			(1	)		465,676
Other intangible assets		555			—			37,040			—			37,595
Total assets	$	5,057,421		$	1,385,699		$	32,980,188		$	(6,326,613	)	$	33,096,695
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	—		$	—		$	5,804,599		$	(20,851	)	$	5,783,748
Interest bearing		—			—			19,025,144			(1,357	)		19,023,787
Total deposits		—			—			24,829,743			(22,208	)		24,807,535
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase		—			—			1,271,657			—			1,271,657
Other short-term borrowings		—			8,169			66,800			(53,769	)		21,200
Notes payable		740,812			148,988			822,028			—			1,711,828
Other liabilities		49,226			6,872			974,147			(18,216	)		1,012,029
Liabilities from discontinued operations		—			—			5,064			—			5,064
Total liabilities		790,038			164,029			27,969,439			(94,193	)		28,829,313
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock		50,160			—			—			—			50,160
Common stock		1,036			2			56,307			(56,309	)		1,036
Surplus		4,187,931			4,269,208			5,931,161			(10,191,842	)		4,196,458
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		262,244			(3,043,476	)		(747,702	)		3,782,651			253,717
Treasury stock, at cost		(4,116	)		—			(1	)		—			(4,117	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(229,872	)		(4,064	)		(229,016	)		233,080			(229,872	)
Total stockholders’ equity		4,267,383			1,221,670			5,010,749			(6,232,420	)		4,267,382
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	5,057,421		$	1,385,699		$	32,980,188		$	(6,326,613	)	$	33,096,695

124

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Popular, Inc. Holding Co.			PNA Holding Co.			All other subsidiaries and eliminations			Elimination entries			Popular, Inc. Consolidated
Interest income:
Dividend income from subsidiaries	$	1,500		$	—		$	—		$	(1,500	)	$	—
Loans		140			—			355,613			(122	)		355,631
Money market investments		2			2			1,444			(2	)		1,446
Investment securities		143			81			30,077			—			30,301
Trading account securities		—			—			2,696			—			2,696
Total interest income		1,785			83			389,830			(1,624	)		390,074
Interest expense:
Deposits		—			—			25,866			(2	)		25,864
Short-term borrowings		—			101			1,755			(122	)		1,734
Long-term debt		13,118			2,695			3,468			—			19,281
Total interest expense		13,118			2,796			31,089			(124	)		46,879
Net interest (expense) income		(11,333	)		(2,713	)		358,741			(1,500	)		343,195
Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans		—			—			29,711			—			29,711
Provision for loan losses- covered loans		—			—			10,324			—			10,324
Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses		(11,333	)		(2,713	)		318,706			(1,500	)		303,160
Service charges on deposit accounts		—			—			39,017			—			39,017
Other service fees		—			—			53,714			(88	)		53,626
Mortgage banking activities		—			—			12,852			—			12,852
Trading account profit		40			—			374			—			414
Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale		—			—			(79	)		—			(79	)
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold		—			—			(4,526	)		—			(4,526	)
FDIC loss share income		—			—			4,139			—			4,139
Other operating income		2,968			(828	)		7,668			(16	)		9,792
Total non-interest income (expense)		3,008			(828	)		113,159			(104	)		115,235
Operating expenses:
Personnel costs		11,908			—			104,550			—			116,458
Net occupancy expenses		980			—			20,729			—			21,709
Equipment expenses		545			—			12,866			—			13,411
Other taxes		(1,458	)		—			10,032			—			8,574
Professional fees		2,774			410			72,432			(88	)		75,528
Communications		117			—			6,059			—			6,176
Business promotion		436			—			10,377			—			10,813
FDIC deposit insurance		—			—			6,398			—			6,398
Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses		—			—			23,069			—			23,069
Other operating expenses		(16,935	)		109			34,819			(644	)		17,349
Amortization of intangibles		—			—			2,104			—			2,104
Restructuring cost		—			—			10,753			—			10,753
Total operating expenses		(1,633	)		519			314,188			(732	)		312,342
(Loss) income before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(6,692	)		(4,060	)		117,677			(872	)		106,053
Income tax expense		47			—			32,276			245			32,568
(Loss) income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(6,739	)		(4,060	)		85,401			(1,117	)		73,485
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		80,224			1,269			—			(81,493	)		—
Income (loss) from continuing operations		73,485			(2,791	)		85,401			(82,610	)		73,485
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—			1,341			—			1,341
Equity in undistributed income of discontinued operations		1,341			1,341			—			(2,682	)		—
Net income (loss)	$	74,826		$	(1,450	)	$	86,742		$	(85,292	)	$	74,826
Comprehensive income, net of tax	$	110,298		$	11,841		$	122,078		$	(133,919	)	$	110,298

125

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (Unaudited)

	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Popular, Inc. Holding Co.			PNA Holding Co.			All other subsidiaries and eliminations			Elimination entries			Popular, Inc. Consolidated
Interest income:
Loans	$	562		$	—		$	377,581		$	(541	)	$	377,602
Money market investments		7			3			972			(9	)		973
Investment securities		166			80			34,881			—			35,127
Trading account securities		—			—			5,257			—			5,257
Total interest income		735			83			418,691			(550	)		418,959
Interest expense:
Deposits		—			—			26,860			(2	)		26,858
Short-term borrowings		—			217			9,371			(548	)		9,040
Long-term debt		26,054			2,707			3,129			—			31,890
Total interest expense		26,054			2,924			39,360			(550	)		67,788
Net interest (expense) income		(25,319	)		(2,841	)		379,331			—			351,171
Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans		(208	)		—			54,330			—			54,122
Provision for loan losses- covered loans		—			—			25,714			—			25,714
Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses		(25,111	)		(2,841	)		299,287			—			271,335
Service charges on deposit accounts		—			—			39,359			—			39,359
Other service fees		—			—			52,885			(67	)		52,818
Mortgage banking activities		—			—			3,678			—			3,678
Trading account loss		21			—			1,956			—			1,977
Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale		—			—			4,393			—			4,393
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold		—			—			(10,347	)		—			(10,347	)
FDIC loss share expense		—			—			(24,206	)		—			(24,206	)
Other operating income		3,401			661			24,298			—			28,360
Total non-interest income		3,422			661			92,016			(67	)		96,032
Operating expenses:
Personnel costs		8,309			—			95,992			—			104,301
Net occupancy expenses		932			—			20,428			—			21,360
Equipment expenses		941			—			10,471			—			11,412
Other taxes		184			—			13,479			—			13,663
Professional fees		3,046			1,004			63,016			(67	)		66,999
Communications		127			—			6,558			—			6,685
Business promotion		411			—			10,975			—			11,386
FDIC deposit insurance		—			—			10,978			—			10,978
Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses		—			—			6,440			—			6,440
Other operating expenses		(13,768	)		109			36,651			(643	)		22,349
Amortization of intangibles		—			—			2,026			—			2,026
Total operating expenses		182			1,113			277,014			(710	)		277,599
(Loss) income before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(21,871	)		(3,293	)		114,289			643			89,768
Income tax (benefit) expense		(834	)		—			23,847			251			23,264
(Loss) income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries		(21,037	)		(3,293	)		90,442			392			66,504
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		87,541			17,692			—			(105,233	)		—
Income from continuing operations		66,504			14,399			90,442			(104,841	)		66,504
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		—			—			19,905			—			19,905
Equity in undistributed earnings of discontinued operations		19,905			19,905			—			(39,810	)		—
Net Income	$	86,409		$	34,304		$	110,347		$	(144,651	)	$	86,409
Comprehensive income, net of tax	$	118,879		$	45,871		$	144,132		$	(190,003	)	$	118,879

126

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (UNAUDITED)

	Quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Popular, Inc. Holding Co.			PNA Holding Co.			All other subsidiaries and eliminations			Elimination entries			Popular, Inc. Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	74,826		$	(1,450	)	$	86,742		$	(85,292	)	$	74,826
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed (earnings) losses of subsidiaries		(81,565	)		(2,610	)		—			84,175			—
Provision for loan losses		—			—			40,035			—			40,035
Amortization of intangibles		—			—			2,104			—			2,104
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		194			—			11,725			—			11,919
Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees		—			—			(19,100	)		—			(19,100	)
Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights		—			—			4,929			—			4,929
FDIC loss share income		—			—			(4,139	)		—			(4,139	)
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold		—			—			4,526			—			4,526
Earnings from investments under the equity method		(2,968	)		828			(161	)		—			(2,301	)
Deferred income tax expense		—			—			23,135			245			23,380
Loss (gain) on:
Disposition of premises and equipment		—			—			(978	)		—			(978	)
Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities		—			—			(7,222	)		—			(7,222	)
Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs		—			—			14,851			—			14,851
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale		—			—			(121,929	)		—			(121,929	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale		—			—			27,547			—			27,547
Net originations on loans held-for-sale		—			—			(179,604	)		—			(179,604	)
Net (increase) decrease in:
Trading securities		(126	)		—			178,068			—			177,942
Accrued income receivable		(56	)		81			(94	)		56			(13	)
Other assets		3,716			28			(27,900	)		(3,871	)		(28,027	)
Net (decrease) increase in:
Interest payable		(7,875	)		(2,629	)		344			(56	)		(10,216	)
Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations		—			—			1,019			—			1,019
Other liabilities		(12,816	)		(7	)		(9,797	)		3,243			(19,377	)
Total adjustments		(101,496	)		(4,309	)		(62,641	)		83,792			(84,654	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(26,670	)		(5,759	)		24,101			(1,500	)		(9,828	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net (increase) decrease in money market investments		(38	)		(1,457	)		(484,791	)		1,457			(484,829	)
Purchases of investment securities:
Available-for-sale		—			—			(411,189	)		—			(411,189	)
Held-to-maturity		—			—			(250	)		—			(250	)
Other		—			—			(2,520	)		—			(2,520	)
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:
Available-for-sale		—			—			385,672			—			385,672
Held-to-maturity		—			—			2,231			—			2,231
Other		—			—			30,785			—			30,785
Proceeds from sale of investment securities:
Other		—			—			1,388			—			1,388
Net repayments on loans		10,392			—			154,788			(10,386	)		154,794
Proceeds from sale of loans		—			—			19,127			—			19,127
Acquisition of loan portfolios		—			—			(49,510	)		—			(49,510	)
Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements		—			—			132,265			—			132,265
Net cash received and acquired from business combination		—			—			711,051			—			711,051
Mortgage servicing rights purchased		—			—			(2,400	)		—			(2,400	)
Acquisition of premises and equipment		(242	)		—			(9,989	)		—			(10,231	)
Proceeds from sale of:
Premises and equipment		3			—			3,090			—			3,093
Foreclosed assets		—			—			40,161			—			40,161
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		10,115			(1,457	)		519,909			(8,929	)		519,638
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in:
Deposits		—			—			250,582			15,324			265,906
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase		—			—			(139,013	)		—			(139,013	)
Other short-term borrowings		—			7,214			(165,815	)		10,386			(148,215	)
Payments of notes payable		—			—			(419,487	)		—			(419,487	)
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable		—			—			46,000			—			46,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,405			—			—			—			1,405
Dividends paid to parent company		—			—			(1,500	)		1,500			—
Dividends paid		(620	)		—			—			—			(620	)
Net payments for repurchase of common stock		(1,105	)		—			—			—			(1,105	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(320	)		7,214			(429,233	)		27,210			(395,129	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and due from banks		(16,875	)		(2	)		114,777			16,781			114,681
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		20,448			608			380,890			(20,851	)		381,095
Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	3,573		$	606		$	495,667		$	(4,070	)	$	495,776

The Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

127

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (UNAUDITED)

	Quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Popular, Inc. Holding Co.			PNA Holding Co.			All other subsidiaries and eliminations			Elimination entries			Popular, Inc. Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	86,409		$	34,304		$	110,347		$	(144,651	)	$	86,409
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries		(107,446	)		(37,597	)		—			145,043			—
Provision for loan losses		(208	)		—			73,280			—			73,072
Amortization of intangibles		—			—			2,504			—			2,504
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		157			—			11,808			—			11,965
Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees		265			—			(39,836	)		—			(39,571	)
Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights		—			—			8,096			—			8,096
FDIC loss share expense		—			—			24,206			—			24,206
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold		—			—			10,347			—			10,347
Earnings from investments under the equity method		(3,401	)		(661	)		(12,868	)		—			(16,930	)
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(1,577	)		—			15,224			251			13,898
Loss (gain) on:
Disposition of premises and equipment		—			—			(1,671	)		—			(1,671	)
Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities		—			—			(18,953	)		—			(18,953	)
Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs		—			—			(1,199	)		—			(1,199	)
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale		—			—			(76,125	)		—			(76,125	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale		—			—			45,115			—			45,115
Net originations on loans held-for-sale		—			—			(179,057	)		—			(179,057	)
Net (increase) decrease in:
Trading securities		(107	)		—			219,104			—			218,997
Accrued income receivable		(58	)		83			5,564			52			5,641
Other assets		1,488			(7,096	)		30,505			(26,360	)		(1,463	)
Net increase (decrease) in:
Interest payable		2,080			(2,632	)		(2,076	)		(52	)		(2,680	)
Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations		—			—			(1,562	)		—			(1,562	)
Other liabilities		(3,245	)		(31,708	)		8,043			25,717			(1,193	)
Total adjustments		(112,052	)		(79,611	)		120,449			144,651			73,437
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(25,643	)		(45,307	)		230,796			—			159,846
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net (increase) decrease in money market investments		(11,192	)		3,986			(763,988	)		7,214			(763,980	)
Purchases of investment securities:
Available-for-sale		—			—			(436,233	)		—			(436,233	)
Other		—			—			(34,768	)		—			(34,768	)
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:
Available-for-sale		—			—			194,949			—			194,949
Held-to-maturity		—			—			1,888			—			1,888
Other		—			—			49,964			—			49,964
Net repayments on loans		27,886			—			205,955			(28,181	)		205,660
Proceeds from sale of loans		—			—			42,238			—			42,238
Acquisition of loan portfolios		—			—			(201,385	)		—			(201,385	)
Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements		—			—			81,327			—			81,327
Acquisition of premises and equipment		(72	)		—			(10,945	)		—			(11,017	)
Proceeds from sale of:
Premises and equipment		13			—			6,372			—			6,385
Foreclosed assets		—			—			38,830			—			38,830
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		16,635			3,986			(825,796	)		(20,967	)		(826,142	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in:
Deposits		—			—			547,943			12,029			559,972
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase		—			—			560,121			(11,200	)		548,921
Other short-term borrowings		—			41,319			(469,500	)		28,181			(400,000	)
Payments of notes payable		—			—			(110,514	)		—			(110,514	)
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable		—			—			31,905			—			31,905
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,666			—			—			—			1,666
Dividends paid		(931	)		—			—			—			(931	)
Net payments for repurchase of common stock		(17	)		—			—			—			(17	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		718			41,319			559,955			29,010			631,002
Net decrease in cash and due from banks		(8,290	)		(2	)		(35,045	)		8,043			(35,294	)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		10,595			616			422,967			(10,967	)		423,211
Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	2,305		$	614		$	387,922		$	(2,924	)	$	387,917

The Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

128

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report includes management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) of the consolidated financial position and financial performance of Popular, Inc. (the “Corporation” or “Popular”). All accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report should be considered an integral part of this analysis.

The Corporation is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States (“U.S.”) mainland, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail, including residential mortgage loan originations, and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as investment banking, broker-dealer, auto and equipment leasing and financing, and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA, under the name Popular Community Bank (“PCB”), operates branches in New York, New Jersey and Southern Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. Note 38 to the consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporation’s business segments. As of March 31, 2015, the Corporation had a 15.05% interest in the holding company of EVERTEC, which provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, including servicing many of the Corporation’s system infrastructures and transaction processing businesses. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation recorded $3.2 million in earnings from its investment in EVERTEC, which had a carrying amount of $27.3 million as of the end of the quarter. Also, the Corporation had a 15.82% stake in Centro Financiero BHD Leon, S.A. (“BHD Leon”), one of the largest banking and financial services groups in the Dominican Republic. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015 the Corporation recorded $3.5 million in earnings from its investment in BHD Leon, which had a carrying amount of $110.6 million, as of the end of the quarter.

OVERVIEW

Recent significant events

• On February 27, 2015, BPPR, in an alliance with co-bidders, including BPNA, acquired certain assets and assumed all non-brokered deposits of Doral Bank (“Doral”) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as receiver (the “Doral Bank Transaction”).

Under the FDIC’s bidding format, BPPR was the lead bidder and party to the purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC covering all assets and deposits acquired by it and its alliance co-bidders. BPPR entered into back to back purchase and assumption agreements with the alliance co-bidders for the transferred assets and deposits that were not retained by BPPR. The other co-bidders other than PCB which formed part of the alliance led by BPPR were First Bank Puerto Rico, Centennial Bank, and a vehicle formed by J.C. Flowers III L.P. BPPR has entered into transition service agreements with each of the alliance co-bidders.

129

After taking into account the transfers to the unaffiliated alliance co-bidders, BPPR and PCB assumed deposits amounting to approximately $2.2 billion and acquired commercial and residential loans amounting to approximately $1.7 billion, substantially all of which were in performing status. Additionally, the acquisition included approximately $0.6 billion in investment securities, cash and other assets. There is no loss-sharing arrangement with the FDIC on the acquired assets.

On February 27, 2015, the FDIC, as receiver for Doral Bank, accepted BPPR’s bid for the purchase of the mortgage servicing rights related to approximately $5.0 billion in unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans, for a purchase price currently estimated at $48.6 million. The transfers of the mortgage servicing rights are subject to a number of specified closing conditions, including the consent of each of Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a form acceptable to BPPR, and other customary closing conditions. On April 23, 2015, BPPR closed the acquisition of approximately $2.7 billion in Ginnie Mae mortgage servicing rights. BPPR is in negotiations for the transfers of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage servicing rights which are expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2015.

As a result of the Doral Bank Transaction, the Corporation recorded preliminary goodwill of approximately $43 million and a core deposit intangible asset of approximately $24 million. Refer to the statement of condition section of this MD&A for a detail of the assets and liabilities of the business acquired from Doral Bank, as part of the FDIC assisted transaction, as of March 31, 2015. Refer to Note 4, Business Combination, to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the initial fair value estimates and goodwill recorded in connection with the Doral Bank Transaction.

• The Corporation continues its centralization of certain back office operations of PCB in Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation incurred $10.7 million in restructuring charges during the first quarter of 2015. The Corporation expect to incur an additional $12.7 million in restructuring charges during the year 2015.

As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, during the year 2014 the Company completed the sale of its U.S. regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida. Current and prior periods’ financial information covering income and expense amounts presented in this MD&A has been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations of the U.S. operations for comparative purposes.

Financial highlights for the quarter ended March 31, 2015

• For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation recorded net income of $74.8 million. Excluding the impact of certain revenue and expense items directly associated with the Doral Bank Transaction, restructuring charges incurred related to the reorganization of the U.S. operations and the impact of discontinued operations the adjusted net income for the quarter was $90.3 million, compared to a net income of $86.4 million for the same quarter of the previous year. In connection with the Doral Bank Transaction the Corporation incurred in professional services, which were partially offset by fees charged for services provided to the alliance co-bidders, resulting in a net negative impact of $6.0 million in the results for the quarter. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation incurred $10.7 million in restructuring charges related to the reorganization of its U.S. operations and reflected income from its discontinued operations of $1.3 million.

• Taxable equivalent net interest income was $364.2 million for the first quarter of 2015, compared to $369.3 million for the same quarter of the previous year. Net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the first quarter of 2015 was 4.85% compared to 4.94% in the same quarter of 2014, a decrease of 9 basis points or approximately $5.0 million in net interest income. The decrease in net interest income and margin is mostly related to lower volume of covered loans and lower income from investment securities, partially offset by lower cost of borrowings due to the repayment of TARP funds during the third quarter of 2014, higher yield from commercial and construction loans and higher yield from consumer loans. Refer to the Net Interest Income section of this MD&A for a discussion of the major variances in net interest income, including yields and costs.

130

• The provision for loan losses for the non-covered portfolio totaled $29.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to $54.1 million for the same quarter of the previous year, a decrease of $24.4 million, reflecting improvements in credit quality. The provision for the covered portfolio amounted to $10.3 million for the first quarter of 2015, compared to $25.7 million for the same quarter of the previous year, a decrease of $15.4 million.

Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, increased by $34.5 million during the first quarter of 2015 driven by $27.9 million from the failure and acquisition of Doral Bank. The annualized net charge-off ratio for the first quarter of 2015 was 0.72%, compared to 0.80% for the same quarter of the previous year. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for an explanation of the main factors impacting the provision for loan losses and a detailed analysis of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics.

• Non-interest income increased by $19.2 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with the same quarter of the previous year. Excluding the impact of the $1.1 million in other income related to servicing the Doral Bank Transaction’s co-bidders assets during this quarter, non-interest income increased $18.1 million. The increase in adjusted non-interest income was principally due to:

• a positive variance in the FDIC loss share income (expense) of $28.3 million

• higher mortgage banking activities revenues by $9.2 million and

• lower provision for loans sold with credit recourse by $5.8 million, partially offset by,

• lower other operating income by $17.4 million driven by lower aggregated net earnings from investments accounted under the equity method

• a negative variance in net gains (loss) on sale of loans by $4.5 million principally at the BPNA segment; and

• lower trading account profit by $1.6 million mainly at the broker dealer business in Puerto Rico.

Refer to the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A for additional information on the main variances that affected the non-interest income categories.

• Operating expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 increased by $ 34.7 million when compared with the same quarter of 2014. Excluding the impact of the Doral Transaction, described in the Operating Expenses section of this MD&A and the BPNA restructuring charges amounting to $10.7 million, operating expenses increased by $13.9 million. The increase was mainly due to:

• Higher OREO expenses by $16.6 million due to higher write-downs and lower gains on sales of commercial properties at BPPR

• Higher personnel cost by $9.7 million due to higher incentive compensation at BPPR and BPNA and higher pension costs at BPPR related to adjustments in actuarial assumptions, partially offset by

• lower FDIC deposit insurance expense due to improvements in asset quality and earnings trends

• lower other taxes due to the elimination of the Puerto Rico gross receipts tax and

• lower sundry losses at BPPR and BPNA.

Refer to the Operating Expenses section of this MD&A for additional information.

• Income tax expense amounted to $32.6 million for the quarter ended March 31,2015, compared with an income tax expense of $23.3 million for the same quarter of 2014. The increase in income tax expense was primarily due to higher income before tax on the Puerto Rico operations partially offset by higher net exempt interest income. As a result of the Doral Bank Transaction, the Corporation incurred expenses and recorded revenues, which resulted in a net decrease in the income tax expense of approximately $2.9 million. On an adjusted basis, the income tax expense for the first quarter of 2015 was $35.5 million.

• Total assets were $35.6 billion at March 31, 2015 and $33.1 billion at December 31, 2014. Excluding the impact of the Doral Bank Transaction, total assets increased by approximately $0.3 million due to:

• An increase of $485 million in money market investments due mostly to increases in liquidity at BPPR of $256 million and BPNA of $229 million.

• An increase of $63 million in investment securities available-for-sale mainly due to a $125 million increase at BPPR mostly from MBS and government securities, which were partially offset by a decrease of $62 million at BPNA due to sales of agency securities and CMOs.

131

These increases were partially offset by:

• A decrease of $133 million in the FDIC loss share asset mainly due to amortization, collections from the FDIC and recoveries on covered assets subject to reimbursement to the FDIC. Refer to Table O for the activity in the carrying amount of the FDIC indemnity asset

• A decrease of $86 million in loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC due to the normal run-off of the portfolio.

• Excluding approximately $2.1 billion in liabilities acquired from Doral, total liabilities increased by $319 million from the fourth quarter of 2014, driven by:

• An increase of $439 million in deposits from both BPPR and BPNA.

offset by:

• A decrease of $139 million in federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase, largely at BPNA by $215 million, which was partially offset by an increase at BPPR of $76 million.

• Stockholders’ equity increased by $110 million from the fourth quarter of 2014, mainly as a result of net income for the quarter of $75 million, and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $35 million. Capital ratios continued to be strong. The Corporation’s Common equity Tier 1 Capital ratio stood at 15.74% at March 31, 2015, while the tangible common equity ratio at March 31, 2015 was 10.72%. Refer to Table 18 for capital ratios and Table 19 for Non-GAAP reconciliations.

Table 1 provides selected financial data and performance indicators for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

As a financial services company, the Corporation’s earnings are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation are influenced by the level of business spending and investment, consumer income, spending and savings, capital market activities, competition, customer preferences, interest rate conditions and prevailing market rates on competing products.

The Corporation continuously monitors general business and economic conditions, industry-related indicators and trends, competition, interest rate volatility, credit quality indicators, loan and deposit demand, operational and systems efficiencies, revenue enhancements and changes in the regulation of financial services companies.

The Corporation operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and local laws and regulations. Also, competition with other financial institutions could adversely affect its profitability.

The description of the Corporation’s business contained in Item 1 of the Corporation’s 2014 Annual Report, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information about the business of the Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the Corporation’s control that, in addition to the other information in this Form 10-Q, readers should consider.

132

The Corporation’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol BPOP.

Table 1 - Financial highlights

Financial Condition Highlights								Average for the First Quarter
(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		Variance			March 31, 2015		March 31, 2014		Variance
Money market investments	$	2,307,215	$	1,822,386	$	484,829		$	1,930,393	$	1,314,838	$	615,555
Investment and trading securities		5,947,630		5,718,762		228,868			5,836,371		6,251,167		(414,796	)
Loans		23,630,084		22,053,217		1,576,867			22,504,974		22,603,530		(98,556	)
Earning assets		31,884,929		29,594,365		2,290,564			30,271,738		30,169,535		102,203
Assets from discontinued operations		—		—		—			10		1,954,755		(1,954,745	)
Total assets		35,624,840		33,096,695		2,528,145			33,806,058		36,196,323		(2,390,265	)
Deposits*		27,273,689		24,807,535		2,466,154			25,585,108		24,549,507		1,035,601
Borrowings		2,891,156		3,004,685		(113,529	)		2,876,718		3,867,834		(991,116	)
Stockholders’ equity		4,377,120		4,267,382		109,738			4,321,095		4,739,141		(418,046	)
Liabilities from discontinued operations		1,930		5,064		(3,134	)		2,894		2,145,887		(2,142,993	)

* Average deposits exclude average derivatives.

Operating Highlights	First Quarter
(In thousands, except per share information)	2015		2014		Variance
Net interest income	$	343,195	$	351,171	$	(7,976	)
Provision for loan losses - non-covered loans		29,711		54,122		(24,411	)
Provision for loan losses - covered loans		10,324		25,714		(15,390	)
Non-interest income		115,235		96,032		19,203
Operating expenses		312,342		277,599		34,743
Income from continuing operations before income tax		106,053		89,768		16,285
Income tax expense		32,568		23,264		9,304
Income from continuing operations	$	73,485	$	66,504	$	6,981
Income from discontinued operation, net of tax	$	1,341	$	19,905	$	(18,564	)
Net income	$	74,826	$	86,409	$	(11,583	)
Net income applicable to common stock	$	73,896	$	85,478	$	(11,582	)
Net income from continuing operations	$	0.71	$	0.64	$	0.07
Net income from discontinued operations	$	0.01	$	0.19	$	(0.18	)
Net income per common share - Basic	$	0.72	$	0.83	$	(0.11	)
Net income from continuing operations	$	0.71	$	0.64	$	0.07
Net income from discontinued operations	$	0.01	$	0.19	$	(0.18	)
Net income per common share - Diluted	$	0.72	$	0.83	$	(0.11	)

	First Quarter
Selected Statistical Information	2015			2014
Common Stock Data
Market price
High	$	35.58		$	31.50
Low		30.52			25.50
End		34.39			30.99
Book value per common share at period end		41.81			45.39
Profitability Ratios
Return on assets		0.90	%		0.97	%
Return on common equity		7.02			7.39
Net interest spread (taxable equivalent)		4.64			4.65
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent)		4.85			4.94
Capitalization Ratios
Average equity to average assets		12.78	%		13.09	%
Tier I capital		16.11			19.35
Total capital		18.71			20.62
Tier 1 leverage		11.80			13.07

133

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and general practices within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Corporation’s accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those estimates.

Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and estimates with the Corporation’s Audit Committee. The Corporation has identified as critical accounting policies those related to: (i) Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments; (ii) Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses; (iii) Acquisition Accounting for Loans and Related Indemnification Asset; (iv) Income Taxes; (v) Goodwill, and (vi) Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations. For a summary of these critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to that particular section in the MD&A included in Popular, Inc.’s 2014 Financial Review and Supplementary Information to Stockholders, incorporated by reference in Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “2014 Annual Report”). Also, refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2014 Annual Report for a summary of the Corporation’s significant accounting policies.

Business Combination

The Corporation determined that the acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities in connection with the Doral Bank Transaction constitutes a business combination as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805 “Business Combinations”. The assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were initially recorded at their estimated fair values. Fair values were determined based on the requirements of FASB Codification Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements”. These fair value estimates are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair value becomes available. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. Refer to Note 3, Business Combination, for additional information of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with this transaction.

Loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction

Loans acquired in a business acquisition are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded at the acquisition date.

Approximately $162 million in unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction were considered impaired. Accordingly, the Corporation applied the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under this guidance, the loans acquired from the FDIC were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics, including factors such as loan type, interest rate type, accruing status, and amortization type. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the fair value in the loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non-accretable difference represents the difference between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses.

134

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis-Non-GAAP financial measure

Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented with its different components on Table 2 for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 as compared with the same period in 2014, segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.

The interest earning assets include investment securities and loans that are exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are certain investments in obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies and sponsored entities, and certain obligations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies and assets held by the Corporation’s international banking entities. To facilitate the comparison of all interest related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis, using the applicable statutory income tax rates for each period. The taxable equivalent computation considers the interest expense and other related expense disallowances required by the Puerto Rico tax law. Under this law, the exempt interest can be deducted up to the amount of taxable income. Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes that this presentation provides meaningful information since it facilitates the comparison of revenues arising from taxable and exempt sources. The increase in the taxable equivalent adjustment in the quarter ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the same quarter in 2014 is mainly due to a higher yield on loans to the Puerto Rico Public Sector, higher volume of US Treasury securities higher taxable equivalent yield on US Agency securities and higher exempt income from investments at the International Banking entities.

Average outstanding securities balances are based on amortized cost excluding any unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield. Prepayment penalties, late fees collected and the amortization of premiums / discounts on purchased loans are also included as part of the loan yield. Interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 included a favorable impact, excluding the discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under Subtopic ASC 310-30, of $1.6 million, related to those items, compared with a favorable impact of $2.0 million in the same period in 2014.

Net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the first quarter of 2015 was 4.85% compared to 4.94% in the same quarter of 2014, a decrease of 9 basis points or $5 million in net interest income. The decrease in net interest income/margin is mostly related to:

Negative variances:

• Lower volume of covered loans as part of the normal portfolio run-off and lower yields, reflecting the impact on the quarterly recast process.

• Lower interest income from investment and trading securities due to a decreased volume of collateralized mortgage obligations and lower mortgage backed securities related to a decline in mortgage loan origination activity.

Positive variances:

• Lower cost of borrowings due to the early repayment of TARP funds, on July 2014, and the refinancing of US structured repos, partially offset by the issuance of $450 million Senior notes with an average cost of 7%, which were used to partially fund the repayment of TARP.

• Higher yield from commercial loans due to new or repriced loans given at higher yields, particularly loans to the Puerto Rico Public Sector and the impact of interest income on loans acquired from Doral that carry a higher yield.

• Higher interest income from consumer loans related to purchased loans at the end of the first quarter 2014 and higher volume of auto loans due to improved lending activity at Popular Auto.

• A lower average cost of interest bearing deposits by four basis points, mainly from lower cost certificates on deposits and Individual Retirement Accounts as these mature and are renewed and substituted by lower rates; also lower volume of brokered CDs due to lower funding needs. Partially offsetting these positive impacts to interest expense is the increase in deposits at higher costs acquired from Doral.

135

Table 2 - Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations

Quarters ended March 31,

Average Volume							Average Yields / Costs										Interest							Variance Attributable to
2015		2014		Variance			2015			2014			Variance				2015		2014		Variance			Rate			Volume
($ in millions)																	(In thousands)
$	1,930	$	1,315	$	615			0.30	%		0.30	%		—	%	Money market investments	$	1,447	$	973	$	474		$	122		$	352
	5,637		5,837		(200	)		2.67			2.82			(0.15	)	Investment securities		37,643		41,117		(3,474	)		(352	)		(3,122	)
	200		414		(214	)		6.77			5.88			0.89		Trading securities		3,344		5,998		(2,654	)		799			(3,453	)
	7,767		7,566		201			2.19			2.55			(0.36	)	Total money market, investment and trading securities		42,434		48,088		(5,654	)		569			(6,223	)
																Loans:
	8,383		8,487		(104	)		5.17			5.02			0.15		Commercial		106,887		105,129		1,758			3,053			(1,295	)
	435		186		249			5.67			10.54			(4.87	)	Construction		6,076		4,837		1,239			(3,005	)		4,244
	569		544		25			7.01			7.57			(0.56	)	Leasing		9,974		10,305		(331	)		(792	)		461
	6,733		6,691		42			5.35			5.45			(0.10	)	Mortgage		90,042		91,183		(1,141	)		(1,709	)		568
	3,845		3,761		84			10.36			10.40			(0.04	)	Consumer		98,249		96,433		1,816			287			1,529
	19,965		19,669		296			6.29			6.32			(0.03	)	Sub-total loans		311,228		307,887		3,341			(2,166	)		5,507
	2,540		2,934		(394	)		9.14			11.18			(2.04	)	Covered loans		57,431		81,098		(23,667	)		(14,306	)		(9,361	)
	22,505		22,603		(98	)		6.62			6.95			(0.33	)	Total loans		368,659		388,985		(20,326	)		(16,472	)		(3,854	)
$	30,272	$	30,169	$	103			5.48	%		5.85	%		(0.37	)%	Total earning assets	$	411,093	$	437,073	$	(25,980	)	$	(15,903	)	$	(10,077	)
																Interest bearing deposits:
$	4,983	$	4,736	$	247			0.34	%		0.32	%		0.02	%	NOW and money market [1]	$	4,219	$	3,779	$	440		$	327		$	113
	6,892		6,691		201			0.23			0.22			0.01		Savings		3,924		3,559		365			270			95
	7,747		7,538		209			0.93			1.05			(0.12	)	Time deposits		17,721		19,520		(1,799	)		(1,771	)		(28	)
	19,622		18,965		657			0.53			0.57			(0.04	)	Total deposits		25,864		26,858		(994	)		(1,174	)		180
	1,114		2,306		(1,192	)		0.63			1.59			(0.96	)	Short-term borrowings		1,734		9,040		(7,306	)		(4,363	)		(2,943	)
	—		532		(532	)		—			16.05			(16.05	)	TARP funds [2]		—		21,331		(21,331	)		—			(21,331	)
	1,763		1,030		733			4.39			4.12			0.27		Other medium and long-term debt		19,281		10,559		8,722			(985	)		9,707
	22,499		22,833		(334	)		0.84			1.20			(0.36	)	Total interest bearing liabilities		46,879		67,788		(20,909	)		(6,522	)		(14,387	)
	5,963		5,584		379											Non-interest bearing demand deposits
	1,810		1,752		58											Other sources of funds
$	30,272	$	30,169	$	103			0.63	%		0.91	%		(0.28	)%	Total source of funds		46,879		67,788		(20,909	)		(6,522	)		(14,387	)
								4.85	%		4.94	%		(0.09	)%	Net interest margin
																Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis		364,214		369,285		(5,071	)	$	(9,381	)	$	4,310
								4.64	%		4.65	%		(0.01	)%	Net interest spread
																Taxable equivalent adjustment		21,019		18,114		2,905
																Net interest income	$	343,195	$	351,171	$	(7,976	)

Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based on the proportion of the change in each category.

[1] Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto Rico.

[2] Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures.

136

Provision for Loan Losses

The Corporation’s total provision for loan losses was $40.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with $79.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

The provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio totaled $29.7 million, compared to $54.1 million for the same quarter in 2014, a decrease of $24.4 million. The provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio at the BPPR segment decreased by $22.0 million mainly due to lower net charge-offs in the commercial and construction loan portfolios, partially offset by higher provision for the mortgage portfolio, reflective of the risk profile of this particular portfolio.

The provision for covered loan portfolio totaled $10.3 million in the first quarter of 2015, compared to $25.7 million for the same quarter in 2014, reflecting a decrease of $15.4 million mainly due to lower net charge-offs in the construction loan covered portfolio.

Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality sections of this MD&A for a detailed analysis of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics.

NON-INTEREST INCOME

Refer to Table 3 for a breakdown on non-interest income by major categories for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Table 3 - Non-interest income

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014			Variance
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	39,017		$	39,359		$	(342	)
Other service fees:
Insurance fees		12,041			11,719			322
Credit card fees		16,149			16,083			66
Debit card fees		11,125			10,544			581
Sale and administration of investment products		5,930			6,457			(527	)
Trust fees		4,602			4,463			139
Other fees		3,779			3,552			227
Total other service fees		53,626			52,818			808
Mortgage banking activities		12,852			3,678			9,174
Trading account profit (loss)		414			1,977			(1,563	)
Net (loss) gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustment on loans held-for-sale		(79	)		4,393			(4,472	)
Adjustment (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold		(4,526	)		(10,347	)		5,821
FDIC loss share expense		4,139			(24,206	)		28,345
Other operating income		9,792			28,360			(18,568	)
Total non-interest income	$	115,235		$	96,032		$	19,203

137

Table 4 - Mortgage Banking Activities

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014			Variance
Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments:
Mortgage servicing fees	$	12,248		$	10,748		$	1,500
Mortgage servicing rights fair value adjustments		(4,929	)		(8,096	)		3,167
Total mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments		7,319			2,652			4,667
Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation on loans		7,280			7,176			104
Trading account (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses) on outstanding derivative positions		17			(760	)		777
Realized (losses) on closed derivative positions		(1,764	)		(5,390	)		3,626
Total trading account (loss) profit		(1,747	)		(6,150	)		4,403
Total mortgage banking activities	$	12,852		$	3,678		$	9,174

Non-interest income increased by $19.2 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with the same quarter of the previous year. Excluding the impact of the $1.1 million in other income related to servicing the Doral Acquisition‘s co-bidders assets during this quarter, non-interest income increased $18.1 million. The increase in adjusted non-interest income was principally due to:

• Positive variance in the FDIC loss share income (expense) of $28.3 million mostly due to lower amortization of the indemnification asset of $21.6 million and higher mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses, partially offset by lower mirror accounting on credit impairment losses expenses. Refer to Table 6 for a breakdown of FDIC loss share income (expenses) by major categories;

• Higher mortgage banking activities revenues by $9.2 million due to a favorable variance in realized gains/(losses) on closed derivative positions, a favorable variance in the valuation adjustment on mortgage servicing rights at the BPPR segment and higher mortgage servicing fees. Refer to Table 5 for details of mortgage banking activities; and

• Positive variance in the adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans sold by $5.8 million mainly due to the reversal of $3.2 million in the indemnity reserve related to the bulk sale of non-performing assets completed during the first quarter of 2013 and lower provision on loans previously sold with recourse.

These favorable variances were partially offset by:

• Lower other operating income by $19.7 million due to lower aggregated net earnings from investments accounted under the equity method, including a net gain of $6.5 million recorded during the first quarter of 2014 as a result of the acquisition of another financial institution completed by Centro Financiero BHD, the Corporation’s equity method investee based in the Dominican Republic;

• Negative variance in net gains (loss) on sale of loans by $4.5 million principally at the BPNA segment primarily due to gains realized from individual commercial loan sales during the first quarter of 2014; and

• Lower trading account profit by $1.6 million mainly at the broker dealer business in Puerto Rico mostly due to the unrealized losses on Puerto Rico municipalities obligations held in the trading account.

138

The following table provides a summary of the revenues and expenses derived from the assets acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Table 5 - Financial Information - Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Interest income on covered loans		57,431			81,098
FDIC loss share income (expense):
Amortization of loss share indemnification asset		(27,316	)		(48,946	)
80% mirror accounting on credit impairment losses[1]		8,246			15,090
80% mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses		21,545			12,745
80% mirror accounting on recoveries on covered assets, including rental income on OREOs, subject to reimbursement to the FDIC		(2,619	)		(4,392	)
Change in true-up payment obligation		4,164			1,168
Other		119			129
Total FDIC loss share income (expense)		4,139			(24,206	)
Total revenues		61,570			56,892
Provision for loan losses		10,324			25,714
Total revenues less provision for loan losses	$	51,246		$	31,178

[1] Reductions in expected cash flows for ASC 310-30 loans, which may impact the provision for loan losses, may consider reductions in both principal and interest cash flow expectations. The amount covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements for interest not collected from borrowers is limited under the agreements (approximately 90 days); accordingly, these amounts are not subject fully to the 80% mirror accounting.

Average balances
	Quarters ended March 31,
(In millions)	2015		2014
Covered loans	$	2,540	$	2,934
FDIC loss share asset		429		899

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 increased by $ 34.7 million when compared with the same quarter of 2014. Excluding the impact of the Doral Transaction, which included $1.1 million on fees charged for services provided to the alliance co-bidders, personnel cost of $2.4 million, building rent expense of $0.6 million and professional services of approximately $7.0 million and the BPNA restructuring charges amounting to $10.7 million, operating expenses increased by $13.9 million due to the following main factors:

• Higher other real estate owned expenses by $16.6 million due to higher write-downs on commercial properties and lower gains on sale of commercial OREOs, mainly at BPPR.

• Higher personnel cost by $9.7 million due to higher incentive compensation at BPPR and BPNA and higher pension costs at BPPR related to adjustments to the mortality table and discount rate used for actuarial assumptions.

These increases were partially offset by the following decreases:

• Lower other taxes by $5.1 million due to the elimination of the Puerto Rico gross receipts tax.

• Lower other operating expenses by $5.0 million due to lower sundry losses, at BPPR and BPNA.

• Lower FDIC deposit insurance by $4.6 million mainly driven by improvements in the asset quality and earnings trends.

139

Table 6 - Operating Expenses

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015		2014		Variance
Personnel costs:
Salaries	$	72,394	$	69,038	$	3,356
Commissions, incentives and other bonuses		18,458		13,099		5,359
Pension, postretirement and medical insurance		12,013		8,701		3,312
Other personnel costs, including payroll taxes		13,593		13,463		130
Total personnel costs		116,458		104,301		12,157
Net occupancy expenses		21,709		21,360		349
Equipment expenses		13,411		11,412		1,999
Other taxes		8,574		13,663		(5,089	)
Professional fees:
Collections, appraisals and other credit related fees		5,923		6,320		(397	)
Programming, processing and other technology services		45,161		42,685		2,476
Other professional fees		24,444		17,994		6,450
Total professional fees		75,528		66,999		8,529
Communications		6,176		6,685		(509	)
Business promotion		10,813		11,386		(573	)
FDIC deposit insurance		6,398		10,978		(4,580	)
Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses		23,069		6,440		16,629
Other operating expenses:
Credit and debit card processing, volume and interchange expenses		4,821		5,196		(375	)
Transportation and travel		1,739		1,590		149
Printing and supplies		819		690		129
Operational losses		3,249		5,535		(2,286	)
All other		6,721		9,338		(2,617	)
Total other operating expenses		17,349		22,349		(5,000	)
Amortization of intangibles		2,104		2,026		78
Restructuring Cost		10,753		—		10,753
Total operating expenses	$	312,342	$	277,599	$	34,743

INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense amounted to $32.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with an income tax expense of $23.3 million for the same quarter of 2014. The increase in income tax expense was primarily due to higher income before tax on the Puerto Rico operations partially offset by higher net exempt interest income. As a result of the Doral Bank Transaction, the Corporation incurred expenses and recorded revenues, which resulted in a net decrease in the income tax expense of approximately $2.9 million. On an adjusted basis, the income tax expense for the first quarter of 2015 was $35.5 million.

140

The components of income tax expense for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 are included in the following table:

Table 7 – Components of Income Tax Expense

	Quarters ended
	March 31, 2015						March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Amount			% of pre-tax income			Amount			% of pre-tax income
Computed income tax expense at statutory rates	$	41,361			39	%	$	35,010			39	%
Net benefit of tax exempt interest income		(13,693	)		(12	)		(11,386	)		(13	)
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		5,639			5			(6,972	)		(8	)
Non-deductible expenses		—			—			8,319			9
Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions		(1,609	)		(3	)		(6,195	)		(7	)
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate		(2,471	)		(1	)		2,278			3
Others		3,341			3			2,210			3
Income tax expense	$	32,568			31	%	$	23,264			26	%

Refer to Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2015.

REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS

The Corporation’s reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida were classified as discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2014, and the assets and liabilities of these regions were subsequently sold during the third and fourth quarters of 2014.

As indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, Business Combination, on February 27, 2015, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, in an alliance with co-bidders, including BPNA, acquired certain assets and all deposits of Doral Bank from the FDIC as receiver. The financial results for the first quarter of 2015 of both reportable segments include the results from the operations acquired as part of the Doral Bank transaction.

A Corporate group has been defined to support the reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the Corporate group are not allocated to the reportable segments.

For a description of the Corporation’s reportable segments, including additional financial information and the underlying management accounting process, refer to Note 38 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Corporate group reported a net loss of $21.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with a net loss of $20.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The unfavorable variance was in part due to lower other operating income by $11.8 million, which was mainly driven by the net pre-tax gain of $6.5 million recorded during the first quarter of 2014 as a result of the acquisition completed by BHD, and higher personnel costs by $2.8 million due to executive incentive accruals, which was partially offset by lower long-term debt interest expense by $12.9 million as the March 31, 2014 results include interest expense from the TARP funds that were repaid in July 2014, which carried a yield of 16%, as compared to the interest of 7% from the Senior Notes issued in July 2014, issued to partially fund the repayment of TARP.

141

Highlights on the earnings results for the reportable segments are discussed below:

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment’s net income amounted to $90.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with a net income of $65.0 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

• lower net interest income by $21.3 million mostly due to:

• a decrease of $23.7 million, or 204 basis points in income from loans mainly due to lower average balances of covered loans as part of the normal portfolio run-off and lower yields; and

• a decrease of $2.6 million in income from trading account securities due mainly to lower levels by $214 million;

partially offset by:

• an increase of $4.3 million in income from non-covered loans mainly from commercial, mortgage and consumer loans, largely due to higher volume of loans by $254 million.

The unfavorable net interest income variance was partially offset by a reduction of approximately $0.9 million in interest expense, mainly from short term borrowings due to lower average balances by $1.2 billion. The net interest margin was 5.00% for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to 5.49% for the same period in 2014.

• lower provision for loan losses by $37.4 million, $22.0 million from the non-covered portfolio and $15.4 million from the covered loans portfolio. The declines were predominantly driven by net charge-offs activity from the commercial and construction loan portfolios;

• higher non-interest income by $35.4 million mainly due to:

• positive variance in the FDIC loss share income (expense) of $28.3 million mostly due to lower amortization of the indemnification asset of $21.6 million and higher mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses, partially offset by lower mirror accounting on credit impairment losses expenses. Refer to Table 5 for a breakdown of FDIC loss share income (expenses) by major categories;

• higher mortgage banking activities revenues by $9.3 million mainly due to lower realized losses on closed derivative positions by $3.6 million, a positive variance in the valuation adjustments for mortgage servicing rights by $3.2 million, and higher servicing fees by $1.5 million; and

• positive variance in the adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans sold by $5.6 million mainly due to the reversal of $3.2 million in the indemnity reserve related to the bulk sale of non-performing assets completed during the first quarter of 2013 and lower provision on loans previously sold with recourse;

partially offset by:

• lower other operating income by $6.7 million mainly due to a decrease of $5.6 million from net earnings from the equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013.

• higher operating expenses by $18.5 million mainly due to:

• higher OREO expenses by $12.7 million due to higher write-downs on commercial properties and lower gains on sale of commercial OREOs;

• higher personnel costs by $9.8 million due to incentive compensation and higher pension costs related to adjustments to the mortality table and discount rate used for actuarial assumptions; and

• higher professional fees by $6.5 million largely due to costs incurred as part of the Doral Bank Transaction.

The negative variances in operating expenses detailed above were partially offset by:

• lower FDIC deposit insurances expenses by $4.2 million resulting from improvements in assets quality and earnings trends;

• lower other operating expenses by $4.7 million mainly due to lower sundry losses; and

• lower other operating taxes by $3.5 million mainly due to the elimination of the Puerto Rico gross receipts tax.

• higher income tax expense of $7.5 million due mainly to higher taxable income.

142

Banco Popular North America

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the reportable segment of Banco Popular North America reported net income from continuing operations of $3.3 million, compared with a net income $21.1 million for the same quarter of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

• net interest income improved by $0.7 million, mainly due to lower interest expense from repos by $6.8 million as $638 million in high cost structured repos were cancelled in late 2014 and lower interest expense from deposits by $0.4 million, which was partially offset by lower interest income from MBS and CMOs by $4.1 million due to portfolio sales in 2014 following the sale of the regions classified as discontinued operations in 2014, and lower interest income from mortgage loans by $2.6 million due to lower average balances as a result of loan sales in late 2014 which included $40 million in non-conventional mortgage TDRs. Net interest margin was 3.82% compared to 3.41% for the same quarter of the previous year;

• a favorable variance in the provision for loan losses by $2.4 million principally as a result of improved credit performance, which yielded $0.9 million in net recoveries during the first quarter of 2015 compared to net charge-offs of $2.8 million in the first quarter of 2014. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for certain quality indicators and further explanations corresponding to the BPNA reportable segment;

• lower non-interest income by $4.4 million, mostly due to lower gains on sale of loans by $4.5 million due to lower volume of sales of non-performing commercial loans; and

• higher operating expenses by $16.3 million, mainly due to $10.8 million in restructuring costs incurred during the first quarter of 2015, higher OREO expenses by $3.9 million mainly due to a write-down of $4.0 million from a commercial property, and higher professional fees by $3.0 million due in part to the Doral Bank Transaction.

FINANCIAL CONDITION ANALYSIS

Assets

The Corporation’s total assets were $35.6 billion at March 31, 2015 and $33.1 billion at December 31, 2014. Refer to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition as of such dates.

Money market investments, trading and investment securities

Money market investments totaled $2.3 billion at March 31, 2015, compared to $1.8 billion at December 31, 2014. The increase in liquidity was at BPPR by $256 million and BPNA by $229 million.

Trading account securities amounted to $134 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $139 million at December 31, 2014. Refer to the Market Risk section of this MD&A for a table that provides a breakdown of the trading portfolio by security type.

Investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity amounted to $5.6 billion at March 31, 2015, compared with $5.4 billion at December 31, 2014. The increase in investment securities available-for-sale is mainly due to $170 million in securities acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction. Excluding the impact from the Doral Bank Transaction, investment securities available-for-sale increased by $63 million due to a $125 million increase at BPPR mostly from MBS and government securities, which were partially offset by a decrease of $62 million at BPNA due mainly to pay downs and maturities.

Table 8 provides a breakdown of the Corporation’s portfolio of investment securities available-for-sale (“AFS”) and held-to-maturity (“HTM”) on a combined basis. Also, Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements provide additional information with respect to the Corporation’s investment securities AFS and HTM. The portfolio of Obligations of the Puerto Rico Government is comprised of securities with specific sources of income or revenues identified for repayments. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality review on these issuers.

143

Table 8 - Breakdown of Investment Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		Variance
U.S. Treasury securities	$	784,274	$	700,154	$	84,120
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities		1,502,134		1,724,973		(222,839	)
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions		157,368		163,285		(5,917	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1,849,117		1,910,127		(61,010	)
Mortgage-backed securities		1,342,373		904,362		438,011
Equity securities		2,631		2,622		9
Others		12,401		12,806		(405	)
Total investment securities AFS and HTM	$	5,650,298	$	5,418,329	$	231,969

Loans

Refer to Table 9, for a breakdown of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, the principal category of earning assets. Loans covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements are presented separately in Table 9. The risks on covered loans are significantly different as a result of the loss protection provided by the FDIC. The loss share agreement applicable to commercial (including construction) and consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years expiring at the end of the quarter ended June 30, 2015. Also, refer to Note 11 for detailed information about the Corporation’s loan portfolio composition and loan purchases and sales.

The Corporation’s total loan portfolio amounted to $23.6 billion at March 31, 2015, compared to $22.1 billion at December 31, 2014. Excluding the balance at March 31, 2015 of $1.6 billion in loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction, the total loan portfolio decreased by $113 million mainly in the covered loan portfolio which decreased by $86 million due to the continuation of loan resolutions and the normal portfolio run-off.

Table 9 - Loans Ending Balances

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		Variance
Loans not covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements:
Commercial	$	8,653,561	$	8,134,267	$	519,294
Construction		690,728		251,820		438,908
Legacy[1]		77,675		80,818		(3,143	)
Lease financing		581,119		564,389		16,730
Mortgage		7,189,227		6,502,886		686,341
Consumer		3,820,620		3,870,271		(49,651	)
Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio		21,012,930		19,404,451		1,608,479
Loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements:
Commercial		1,571,147		1,614,781		(43,634	)
Construction		57,825		70,336		(12,511	)
Mortgage		795,477		822,986		(27,509	)
Consumer		32,103		34,559		(2,456	)
Total covered loans held-in-portfolio		2,456,552		2,542,662		(86,110	)
Total loans held-in-portfolio		23,469,482		21,947,113		1,522,369
Loans held-for-sale:
Commercial		8,240		309		7,931
Legacy[1]		—		319		(319	)
Mortgage		152,362		100,166		52,196
Consumer		—		5,310		(5,310	)
Total loans held-for-sale		160,602		106,104		54,498
Total loans	$	23,630,084	$	22,053,217	$	1,576,867

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

144

Non-covered loans

The non-covered loans held-in-portfolio increased by $1.6 billion to $21.0 billion at March 31, 2015. Excluding the balance at March 31, 2015 of $1.6 billion loans acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction, non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased by $27 million, driven by a decrease of $110 million at BPPR, partially offset by an increase in BPNA of $83 million, driven by commercial loans which grew by $107 million, or 6%.

The loans held-for-sale portfolio reflected an increase of $54 million from December 31, 2014 to March 31, 2015; the increase was reflective of a higher volume of originations during the quarter from branches acquired from Doral Bank by approximately $17 million.

Covered loans

The covered loans portfolio amounted to $2.4 billion at March 31, 2015, compared to $2.5 billion at December 31, 2014. The decrease of $86 million was mainly due to loan resolutions and the normal portfolio run-off. Refer to Table 9 for a breakdown of the covered loans by major loan type categories. Tables 10 and 11 provide the activity in the carrying amount and outstanding discount on the covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. The outstanding accretable discount is impacted by increases in cash flow expectations on the loan pool based on quarterly revisions of the portfolio. The increase in the accretable discount is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of each applicable loan pool.

Table 10 - Activity in the Carrying Amount of Covered Loans Accounted for Under ASC 310-30

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Beginning balance	$	2,444,172		$	2,827,947
Accretion		55,697			79,118
Collections / charge-offs		(132,773	)		(173,943	)
Ending balance	$	2,367,096		$	2,733,122
Allowance for loan losses (ALLL)		(68,386	)		(90,371	)
Ending balance, net of ALLL	$	2,298,710		$	2,642,751

Table 11 - Activity in the Accretable Yield on Covered Loans Accounted for Under ASC 310-30

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Beginning balance	$	1,271,337		$	1,309,205
Accretion [1]		(55,697	)		(79,118	)
Change in expected cash flows		43,308			(11,875	)
Ending balance	$	1,258,948		$	1,218,212

[1] Positive to earnings, which is included in interest income.

FDIC loss share asset

Table 12 sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share asset for the quarters and three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Table 12 – Activity of Loss Share Asset

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance at beginning of period	$	542,454		$	909,414
Amortization of loss share indemnification asset		(27,316	)		(48,946	)
Credit impairment losses to be covered under loss sharing agreements		8,246			15,090
Reimbursable expenses		21,545			12,745
Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements		(132,265	)		(81,327	)
Other adjustments attributable to FDIC loss sharing agreements		(2,820	)		(8,516	)
Balance at end of period	$	409,844		$	798,460

145

The FDIC loss share indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to the loss share protection from the FDIC, except that the amortization / accretion terms differ. Decreases in expected reimbursements from the FDIC due to improvements in expected cash flows to be received from borrowers, as compared with the initial estimates, are recognized as a reduction to non-interest income prospectively over the life of the loss share agreements. This is because the indemnification asset balance is being reduced to the expected reimbursement amount from the FDIC. Table 13 presents the activity associated with the outstanding balance of the FDIC loss share asset amortization (or negative discount) for the periods presented.

Table 13 - Activity in the Remaining FDIC Loss Share Asset Discount

	Quarters ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance at beginning of period[1]	$	53,095		$	103,691
Amortization of negative discount[2]		(27,316	)		(48,946	)
Impact of lower projected losses		12,908			16,889
Balance at end of period	$	38,687		$	71,634

[1] Positive balance represents negative discount (debit to assets), while a negative balance represents a discount (credit to assets).

[2] Amortization results in a negative impact to non-interest income, while a positive balance results in a positive impact to non-interest income, particularly FDIC loss share income / expense.

The Corporation revises its expected cash flows and estimated credit losses on a quarterly basis. The lowered loss estimates requires the Corporation to amortize the loss share asset to its currently lower expected collectible balance, thus resulting in negative accretion. Due to the shorter life of the indemnity asset compared with the expected life of the covered loans, this negative accretion temporarily offsets the benefit of higher cash flows accounted through the accretable yield on the loans.

Other real estate owned

Other real estate owned represents real estate property received in satisfaction of debt. At March 31, 2015, OREO decreased to $242 million from $266 million at December 31, 2014. Refer to Table 14 for the activity in other real estate owned. The amounts included as “covered other real estate” are subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements.

Table 14 - Other Real Estate Owned Activity

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Non-covered OREO Commercial/Construction			Non-covered OREO Mortgage			Covered OREO Commercial/Construction			Covered OREO Mortgage			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	38,983		$	96,517		$	85,394		$	44,872		$	265,766
Write-downs in value		(5,887	)		(1,372	)		(9,395	)		(1,282	)		(17,936	)
Additions		2,035			21,075			4,038			5,381			32,529
Sales		(9,427	)		(13,086	)		(9,464	)		(5,822	)		(37,799	)
Other adjustments		(96	)		(572	)		—			(165	)		(833	)
Ending balance	$	25,608		$	102,562		$	70,573		$	42,984		$	241,727
	For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Non-covered OREO Commercial/Construction			Non-covered OREO Mortgage			Covered OREO Commercial/Construction			Covered OREO Mortgage			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	48,649		$	86,852		$	120,215		$	47,792		$	303,508
Write-downs in value		(214	)		(669	)		(4,563	)		(207	)		(5,653	)
Additions		4,668			14,883			13,194			4,491			37,236
Sales		(4,962	)		(12,063	)		(18,421	)		(2,377	)		(37,823	)
Other adjustments		—			(179	)		(92	)		(1,285	)		(1,556	)
Ending balance	$	48,141		$	88,824		$	110,333		$	48,414		$	295,712

146

Other assets

Table 15 provides a breakdown of the principal categories that comprise the caption of “Other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Table 15 - Breakdown of Other Assets

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		Variance
Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance)	$	788,105	$	812,819	$	(24,714	)
Investments under the equity method		226,124		225,625		499
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment		359		360		(1	)
Prepaid taxes		186,173		198,120		(11,947	)
Other prepaid expenses		82,926		83,719		(793	)
Derivative assets		22,485		25,362		(2,877	)
Trades receivable from brokers and counterparties		112,287		66,949		45,338
Contingent asset		57,643		—		57,643
Others		366,832		233,489		133,343
Total other assets	$	1,842,934	$	1,646,443	$	196,491

Other assets include the estimated fair value of the contingent asset for the probable acquisition from the FDIC of approximately $57.6 million of mortgage servicing rights on three pools of residential mortgage loans of approximately $5 billion in unpaid principal balance. At March 31, 2015, these MSRs were subject to certain closing conditions, as indicated in Note 4, Business Combination, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Excluding the balance at March 31, 2015 of $183 million in other assets acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction, other assets increased by $13 million mainly due to a $45 million increase in trades receivables from brokers and counterparties, partially offset by decreases in net deferred tax asset of $25 million and prepaid taxes of $12 million.

Goodwill

Goodwill increased by $43 million from December 31, 2014 to March 31, 2015, due to the goodwill recorded as part of the Doral Bank Transaction.

Deposits and Borrowings

The composition of the Corporation’s financing sources to total assets at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is included in Table 16.

Table 16 - Financing to Total Assets

	March 31,		December 31,		% increase (decrease)			% of total assets
(In millions)	2015		2014		from 2014 to 2015			2015			2014
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	6,285	$	5,784		8.7	%		17.7	%		17.5	%
Interest-bearing core deposits		16,809		14,775		13.8			47.2			44.6
Other interest-bearing deposits		4,180		4,249		(1.6	)		11.7			12.8
Fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements		1,133		1,272		(10.9	)		3.2			3.8
Other short-term borrowings		1		21		(95.2	)		—			0.1
Notes payable		1,757		1,712		2.6			4.9			5.2
Other liabilities		1,081		1,012		6.8			3.0			3.1
Liabilities from discontinued operations		2		5		(60.0	)		—			—
Stockholders’ equity		4,377		4,267		2.6			12.3			12.9

147

Deposits

The Corporation’s deposits totaled $27.3 billion at March 31, 2015 compared to $24.8 billion at December 31, 2014. Excluding the balance at March 31, 2015 of $2.0 billion in deposits acquired as part of the Doral Bank Transaction, deposits increased by $439 million due to increases of $220 million at BPPR largely due to higher commercial time deposits, government deposits and private management accounts, and of $219 million at BPNA mainly due to higher brokered deposits and government deposits. Refer to Table 17 for a breakdown of the Corporation’s deposits at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Table 17 - Deposits Ending Balances

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		Variance
Demand deposits [1]	$	7,163,635	$	6,606,060	$	557,575
Savings, NOW and money market deposits (non-brokered)		10,932,870		10,320,782		612,088
Savings, NOW and money market deposits (brokered)		409,113		406,248		2,865
Time deposits (non-brokered)		7,243,414		5,960,401		1,283,013
Time deposits (brokered CDs)		1,524,657		1,514,044		10,613
Total deposits	$	27,273,689	$	24,807,535	$	2,466,154

[1] Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits.

Borrowings

The Corporation’s borrowings amounted to $2.9 billion at March 31, 2015, compared to $3.0 billion at December 31, 2014. The decrease is mainly due to lower federal funds purchased by $100 million and lower repos by $39 million, offset by an increase in notes payable of $45 million due to advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the Corporation’s borrowings. Also, refer to the Liquidity section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporation’s funding sources.

Other liabilities

Other liabilities increased from $1.0 billion at December 31, 2014 to $1.1 billion at March 31, 2015 largely due to $73 million in other liabilities related to the Doral Bank Transaction, of which approximately $48 million related to the probable acquisition of mortgage servicing rights, as discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity totaled $4.4 billion at March 31, 2015, compared with $4.3 billion at December 31, 2014. The increase resulted from the Corporation’s net income of $75 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $35 million. Refer to the consolidated statements of financial condition, comprehensive income and of changes in stockholders’ equity for information on the composition of stockholders’ equity.

REGULATORY CAPITAL

On January 1, 2015, the Corporation, BPPR and BPNA became subject to Basel III capital requirements, including also revised minimum and well capitalized regulatory capital ratios and compliance with the standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets. As of March 31, 2015, the Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized adequacy requirements promulgated by the U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies.

Basel III capital rules require the phase out of non-qualifying Tier 1 capital instruments such as trust preferred securities. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred securities outstanding, of which $320 million no longer qualify for Tier 1 capital treatment, but instead qualify for Tier 2 capital treatment. By January 1, 2016, all $427 million of its outstanding trust preferred securities will lose Tier 1 capital treatment, and will be reclassified to Tier 2 capital.

148

On January 1, 2015, the Corporation, as well as its banking subsidiaries, made the one-time permanent election to exclude the effects on regulatory capital computations of certain accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) items as permitted under the Basel III capital rules.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) requires banking institutions with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion to conduct annual stress tests. Accordingly, on March 30, 2015, the Corporation submitted its annual stress test based on the scenarios prescribed by the Federal Reserve Board. The results of the stress test under the severely adverse scenario will be made public by June 30, 2015, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act.

Risk-based capital ratios presented in Table 18, which include common equity tier 1, Tier 1 capital, total capital and leverage capital as of March 31, 2015, are calculated based on the Basel III regulatory transitional guidance related to the measurement of capital, risk-weighted assets and average assets. Capital ratios for December 31, 2014 were calculated based on the then applicable Basel I rules. Common equity tier 1 capital was not formally codified in the federal banking regulations in effect as of December 31, 2014; thus, common equity tier 1 capital presented in the table below as of year-end 2014 is considered a management internally-defined measurement. Since common equity tier 1 capital was not defined by GAAP or, unlike Tier 1 capital, codified in the Basel I federal banking regulations, it was considered a non-GAAP financial measure as of December 31, 2014.

Table 18 - Capital Adequacy Data

(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Common equity tier 1 capital:
Common stockholders equity - GAAP basis	$	4,326,960		$	4,217,222
AOCI related adjustments due to opt-out election		160,987			197,040
Goodwill, net of associated deferred tax liability (DTL)		(454,288	)		(412,455	)
Intangible assets, net of associated DTLs		(22,713	)		(35,315	)
Deferred tax assets and other deductions		(184,491	)		(593,363	)
Common equity tier 1 capital	$	3,826,455		$	3,373,129
Additional tier 1 capital:
Preferred stock		50,160			50,160
Trust preferred securities subject to phase out of additional tier 1		106,651			426,602
Other additional tier 1 capital deductions		(67,652	)		—
Additional tier 1 capital	$	89,159		$	476,762
Tier 1 capital	$	3,915,614		$	3,849,891
Tier 2 capital:
Trust preferred securities subject to phase in as tier 2	$	319,952		$	—
Other inclusions (deductions), net		311,409			272,347
Tier 2 capital	$	631,361		$	272,347
Total risk-based capital	$	4,546,975		$	4,122,238
Minimum total capital requirement to be well capitalized	$	2,430,773		$	2,123,390
Excess total capital over minimum well capitalized	$	2,116,202		$	1,998,848
Total risk-weighted assets	$	24,307,729		$	21,233,902
Total assets for leverage ratio	$	33,177,714		$	32,250,173
Risk-based capital ratios:
Common equity tier 1 capital		15.74	%		15.89	%
Tier 1 capital		16.11			18.13
Total capital		18.71			19.41
Tier 1 leverage		11.80			11.94

Rules adopted by the federal banking agencies, as applicable to the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries as of March 31, 2015, provide that a depository institution will be deemed to be well capitalized under prompt corrective action if it maintains a leverage ratio of at least 5%, a common equity Tier 1 ratio of at least 6.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 8% and a total risk-based ratio of at least 10%. Management has determined that as of March 31, 2015, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.

The increase in total capital was mostly due to a favorable impact in the deferred tax asset deduction under the transitional Basel III capital rules as compared to the previous Basel I rules, which generally limited the amount allowed as capital for deferred tax assets that were dependable upon future taxable income. Also, the increase in total risk-based capital was due to earnings for the quarter and a reduction in the deduction for other intangible assets due to the Basel III transitional rules and despite the core deposit intangible booked for the Doral Bank acquisition. The favorable impact of these items was partially offset by a higher goodwill deduction as it relates to the Doral Bank acquisition.

149

The regulatory capital ratios declined despite the increase in regulatory capital mostly because of the increase in risk-weighted assets driven by the Doral Bank acquired assets and to particular assets and off-balance sheet items which are assigned a higher-risk-weight percentage under the Basel III rules, including, for example, certain exposures past due 90 days or more, high volatility commercial real estate loans and unused commitments with an original maturity of one year or less.

Non-GAAP financial measures

The tangible common equity ratio, tangible assets and tangible book value per common share, which are presented in the table that follows, are non-GAAP measures. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names.

Table 19 provides a reconciliation of total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and total assets to tangible assets at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Table 19 - Reconciliation of Tangible Common Equity and Tangible Assets

(In thousands, except share or per share information)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Total stockholders’ equity	$	4,377,120		$	4,267,382
Less: Preferred stock		(50,160	)		(50,160	)
Less: Goodwill		(508,310	)		(465,676	)
Less: Other intangibles		(59,063	)		(37,595	)
Total tangible common equity	$	3,759,587		$	3,713,951
Total assets	$	35,624,840		$	33,096,695
Less: Goodwill		(508,310	)		(465,676	)
Less: Other intangibles		(59,063	)		(37,595	)
Total tangible assets	$	35,057,467		$	32,593,424
Tangible common equity to tangible assets		10.72	%		11.39	%
Common shares outstanding at end of period		103,486,927			103,476,847
Tangible book value per common share	$	36.33		$	35.89

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial commitments, which require future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into contractual arrangements whereby it commits to future purchases of products or services from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding agreements, whereby the Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum quantity defined at a fixed, minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined as purchase obligations.

Purchase obligations include major legal and binding contractual obligations outstanding at March 31, 2015, primarily for services, equipment and real estate construction projects. Services include software licensing and maintenance, facilities maintenance, supplies purchasing, and other goods or services used in the operation of the business. Generally, these contracts are renewable or cancelable at least annually, although in some cases the Corporation has committed to contracts that may extend for several years to secure favorable pricing concessions. Purchase obligations amounted to $192 million at March 31, 2015 of which approximately 58% matures in 2015, 21% in 2016, 8% in 2017 and 13% thereafter.

150

The Corporation also enters into derivative contracts under which it is required either to receive or pay cash, depending on changes in interest rates. These contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated statement of financial condition with the fair value representing the net present value of the expected future cash receipts and payments based on market rates of interest as of the statement of condition date. The fair value of the contract changes daily as interest rates change. The Corporation may also be required to post additional collateral on margin calls on the derivatives and repurchase transactions.

Refer to Note 20 for a breakdown of long-term borrowings by maturity.

The Corporation utilizes lending-related financial instruments in the normal course of business to accommodate the financial needs of its customers. The Corporation’s exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses credit procedures and policies in making those commitments and conditional obligations as it does in extending loans to customers. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual amounts are not representative of the Corporation’s actual future credit exposure or liquidity requirements for these commitments.

Table 20 presents the contractual amounts related to the Corporation’s off-balance sheet lending and other activities at March 31, 2015.

Table 20 - Off-Balance Sheet Lending and Other Activities

	Amount of commitment - Expiration Period
(In millions)	Remaining 2015		Years 2016 - 2017		Years 2018 - 2019		Years 2020 - thereafter		Total
Commitments to extend credit	$	6,206	$	875	$	170	$	57	$	7,308
Commercial letters of credit		2		—		—		—		2
Standby letters of credit		49		17		—		—		66
Commitments to originate or fund mortgage loans		20		7		—		—		27
Unfunded investment obligations		—		9		—		—		9
Total	$	6,277	$	908	$	170	$	57	$	7,412

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $11 million and $13 million, respectively, for probable losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit. The estimated reserve is principally based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and the application of the corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology. This reserve for unfunded loan commitments remains separate and distinct from the allowance for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition.

Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on credit commitments and contingencies.

Guarantees associated with loans sold / serviced

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation serviced $2.1 billion in residential mortgage loans subject to lifetime credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage loan securitization programs, compared with $2.1 billion at December 31, 2014. The Corporation has not sold any mortgage loan subject to credit recourse since 2010.

In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property.

151

In the case of Puerto Rico, most claims are settled by repurchases of delinquent loans, the majority of which are greater than 90 days past due. The average time period to prepare an initial response to a repurchase request is from 30 to 120 days from the initial written notice depending on the type of repurchase request. Failure by the Corporation to respond to a request for repurchase on a timely basis could result in a deterioration of the seller/servicer relationship and the seller/servicer’s overall standing. In certain instances, investors could require additional collateral to ensure compliance with the servicer’s repurchase obligation or cancel the seller/servicer license and exercise their rights to transfer the servicing to an eligible seller/servicer.

The following table presents the delinquency status of the residential mortgage loans serviced by the Corporation that are subject to lifetime credit recourse provisions.

Table 21 - Delinquency of Residential Mortgage Loans Subject to Lifetime Credit Recourse

(In thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Total portfolio	$	2,070,587		$	2,138,705
Days past due:
30 days and over	$	274,633		$	302,992
90 days and over	$	118,517		$	129,590
As a percentage of total portfolio:
30 days past due or more		13.26	%		14.17	%
90 days past due or more		5.72	%		6.06	%

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation repurchased approximately $16 million, (unpaid principal balance) in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions, compared with $27 million, during the same period of 2014. There are no particular loan characteristics, such as loan vintages, loan type, loan-to-value ratio, or other criteria that denote any specific trend or concentration of repurchases on any particular segment. Based on historical repurchase experience, the loan delinquency status is the main factor which causes the repurchase request. Once the loans are repurchased, they are put through the Corporation’s loss mitigation programs.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $59 million, compared with $59 million at December 31, 2014.

The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses related to loans serviced with credit recourse provisions for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Table 22 – Changes in Liability of Estimated Losses from Credit Recourse Agreements

	March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance as of beginning of period	$	59,438		$	41,463
Provision for recourse liability		6,500			11,042
Net charge-offs		(6,553	)		(6,697	)
Balance as of end of period	$	59,385		$	45,808

The provision for credit recourse liability decreased by $4.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, when compared with the same period in 2014, due to certain enhancements in the estimated losses for credit recourse methodology at BPPR.

The estimated losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold or credit recourse is assumed as part of acquired servicing rights and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item “adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold” in the consolidated statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults

152

and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period. Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value ratios and loan aging, among others.

Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation serviced $15.6 billion in mortgage loans for third-parties, including the loans serviced with credit recourse, compared with $15.6 billion at December 31, 2014. The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage borrower, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantees programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At March 31, 2015, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $31 million, compared with $23 million at March 31, 2014. To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporation’s servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.

When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporation’s mortgage operations in Puerto Rico conform mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or are sold directly to FNMA for cash. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses and bear any subsequent loss related to the loans. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, there were no repurchases under representation and warranty arrangements. A substantial amount of these loans reinstate to performing status or have mortgage insurance, and thus the ultimate losses on the loans are not deemed significant.

As discussed on Note 5 – Discontinued operations, on November 8, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of the California regional operations. In connection with this transaction, the Corporation agreed to provide, subject to certain limitations, customary indemnification to the purchaser, including with respect to certain pre-closing liabilities and violations of representations and warranties. The Corporation also agreed to indemnify the purchaser for up to 1.5% of credit losses on transferred loans for a period of two years after the closing. Pursuant to this indemnification provision, the Corporation’s maximum exposure is approximately $16.0 million. The Corporation recognized a reserve of approximately $2.2 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. This reserve is included within the liabilities from discontinued operations.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of non-performing mortgage loans. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $16.3 million. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $3.0 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. BPPR’s obligations under this clause end one year after the closing except with respect to any claim asserted prior to such termination date. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation has a reserve balance of $2.8 million to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $18.0 million. BPPR is not required to repurchase any of the assets. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $10.7 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation released $3.2 million of this reserve based on an evaluation of claims received under this clause. At March 31, 2015, the Corporation has a reserve balance of $4.2 million to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently evaluated.

153

The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated with indemnifications and customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by BPPR during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Table 23 – Changes in Liability of Estimated Losses from Indemnifications and Customary Representations and Warranties Agreements

	March 31,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Balance as of beginning of period	$	15,959		$	19,277
Additions for new sales		—			—
Net reversal of provision for representation and warranties		(1,901	)		(1,064	)
Net charge-offs		(14	)		(1,389	)
Balance as of end of period	$	14,044		$	16,824

In addition, at March 31, 2015, the Corporation has reserves for customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. Loans were sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representations and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation made certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated with these loans. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $5 million. E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008 and most of the outstanding agreements with major counterparties were settled during 2010 and 2011.

MARKET RISK

The financial results and capital levels of the Corporation are constantly exposed to market risk. Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or financial asset prices, which include interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and bond and equity security prices; the failure to meet financial obligations coming due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding; and the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering prices because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.

While the Corporation is exposed to various business risks, the risks relating to interest rate risk and liquidity are major risks that can materially impact future results of operations and financial condition due to their complexity and dynamic nature.

The Asset Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) and the Corporate Finance Group are responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s market, interest rate risk, funding activities and strategy, and for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Corporation’s Risk Management Committee. In addition, the Risk Management Group independently monitors and reports adherence with established market and liquidity policies and recommends actions to enhance and strengthen controls surrounding interest, liquidity, and market risks. The ALCO meets mostly on a weekly basis and reviews the Corporation’s current and forecasted asset and liability levels as well as desired pricing strategies and other relevant financial management and interest rate and risks topics. Also, on a monthly basis the ALCO reviews various interest rate risk sensitivity metrics, ratios and portfolio information, including but not limited to, the Corporation’s liquidity positions, projected sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic conditions.

Interest rate risk (“IRR”), a component of market risk, is considered by management as a predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. Management utilizes various tools to assess IRR, including simulation modeling, static gap analysis, and Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”). The three methodologies complement each other and are used jointly in the evaluation of the Corporation’s IRR. Simulation modeling is prepared for a five year period, which in conjunction with the EVE analysis, provides Management a better view of long term IRR.

Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in net interest income resulting from hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated using a simulation model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and interest yields or costs.

154

It also incorporates assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected changes in its composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates, pricing and maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. It is a dynamic process, emphasizing future performance under diverse economic conditions.

Management assesses interest rate risk by comparing various net interest income simulations under different interest rate scenarios that differ in direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. For example, the types of rate scenarios processed during the year included economic most likely scenarios, flat rates, yield curve twists, + 200 and + 400 basis points parallel ramps and + 200 basis points parallel shocks. Management also performs analyses to isolate and measure basis and prepayment risk exposures.

The asset and liability management group performs validation procedures on various assumptions used as part of the sensitivity analysis as well as validations of results on a monthly basis. In addition, the model and processes used to assess IRR are subject to third-party validations according to the guidelines established in the Model Governance and Validation policy. Due to the importance of critical assumptions in measuring market risk, the risk models incorporate third-party developed data for critical assumptions such as prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, estimates on the duration of the Corporation’s deposits and interest rate scenarios. These interest rate simulations exclude the impact on loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, whose yields are based on management’s current expectation of future cash flows.

The Corporation processes net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in which the yield curve is assumed to rise and decline gradually by the same amount. The rising rate scenarios considered in these market risk simulations reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and 400 basis points during the twelve-month period ending March 31, 2016. Under a 200 basis points rising rate scenario, 2015 projected net interest income increases by $57 million, while under a 400 basis points rising rate scenario, 2015 projected net interest income increases by $101 million. These scenarios were compared against the Corporation’s flat or unchanged interest rates forecast scenario. Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. Thus, they should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that management could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these forward-looking computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur in the future.

The Corporation estimates the sensitivity of economic value of equity (“EVE”) to changes in interest rates. EVE is equal to the estimated present value of the Corporation’s assets minus the estimated present value of the liabilities. This sensitivity analysis is a useful tool to measure long-term IRR because it captures the impact of up or down rate changes in expected cash flows, including principal and interest, from all future periods.

EVE sensitivity calculated using interest rate shock scenarios is estimated on a quarterly basis. The shock scenarios consist of a +/- 200 and 400 basis point parallel shocks. Management has defined limits for the increases/decreases in EVE sensitivity resulting from the shock scenarios.

The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income or market value that are caused by interest rate volatility. The market value of these derivatives is subject to interest rate fluctuations and counterparty credit risk adjustments which could have a positive or negative effect in the Corporation’s earnings.

The Corporation’s loan and investment portfolios are subject to prepayment risk, which results from the ability of a third-party to repay debt obligations prior to maturity. Prepayment risk also could have a significant impact on the duration of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, since prepayments could shorten (or lower prepayments could extend) the weighted average life of these portfolios.

Trading

The Corporation engages in trading activities in the ordinary course of business at its subsidiaries, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”) and Popular Securities. Popular Securities’ trading activities consist primarily of market-making activities to meet expected customers’ needs related to its retail securities brokerage business and purchases and sales of U.S. Government and government sponsored securities with the objective of realizing gains from expected short-term price movements. BPPR’s trading activities consist primarily of holding U.S. Government sponsored mortgage-backed securities classified as “trading” and hedging the related market risk with “TBA” (to-be-announced) market transactions. The objective is to derive spread income from the portfolio and not to benefit from short-term market movements. In addition, BPPR uses forward contracts or TBAs to hedge its securitization pipeline. Risks related to variations in interest rates and market volatility is hedged with TBAs that have characteristics similar to that of the forecasted security and its conversion timeline.

155

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation held trading securities with a fair value of $134 million, representing approximately 0.4% of the Corporation’s total assets, compared with $139 million and 0.4% at December 31, 2014. As shown in Table 24, the trading portfolio consists principally of mortgage-backed securities relating to BPPR’s mortgage activities described above, which at March 31, 2015 were investment grade securities. As of March 31, 2015, the trading portfolio also included $8.6 million in Puerto Rico government obligations and shares of Closed-end funds that invest primarily in Puerto Rico government obligations (December 31, 2014 - $9.9 million). Trading instruments are recognized at fair value, with changes resulting from fluctuations in market prices, interest rates or exchange rates reported in current period earnings. The Corporation recognized a net trading account gain of $0.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and a trading account gain of $2.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Table 24 provides the composition of the trading portfolio at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Table 24 - Trading Portfolio

	March 31, 2015					December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Weighted Average Yield [1]			Amount		Weighted Average Yield [1]
Mortgage-backed securities	$	109,057		6.16	%	$	110,692		6.19	%
Collateralized mortgage obligations		1,486		5.01			1,636		5.01
Puerto Rico government obligations		6,766		5.32			7,954		5.23
Interest-only strips		740		12.15			769		12.11
Other		16,245		2.24			17,476		3.26
Total	$	134,294		5.66	%	$	138,527		5.78	%

[1] Not on a taxable equivalent basis.

The Corporation’s trading activities are limited by internal policies. For each of the two subsidiaries, the market risk assumed under trading activities is measured by the 5-day net value-at-risk (“VAR”), with a confidence level of 99%. The VAR measures the maximum estimated loss that may occur over a 5-day holding period, given a 99% probability.

The Corporation’s trading portfolio had a 5-day VAR of approximately $1.6 million for the last week in March 2015. There are numerous assumptions and estimates associated with VAR modeling, and actual results could differ from these assumptions and estimates. Backtesting is performed to compare actual results against maximum estimated losses, in order to evaluate model and assumptions accuracy.

In the opinion of management, the size and composition of the trading portfolio does not represent a significant source of market risk for the Corporation.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets, available-for-sale securities, derivatives, mortgage servicing rights and contingent consideration. Occasionally, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are collateral dependent and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the three-level hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for fair value measurement are observable.

Refer to Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporation’s fair value measurement disclosures required by the applicable accounting standard. At March 31, 2015, approximately $ 5.7 billion, or 97%, of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis used market-based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation methodology and, therefore,

156

were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments measured at fair value were classified as Level 2, including U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions, most mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), and derivative instruments.

At March 31, 2015, the remaining 3% of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were classified as Level 3 since their valuation methodology considered significant unobservable inputs. The financial assets measured as Level 3 included mostly tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”). Additionally, the Corporation reported $ 132 million of financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2015, all of which were classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.

Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants. Financial assets that were fair valued using broker quotes amounted to $ 21 million at March 31, 2015, of which $ 9 million were Level 3 assets and $ 12 million were Level 2 assets. Level 3 assets consisted principally of tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Fair value for these securities was based on an internally-prepared matrix derived from an average of two indicative local broker quotes. The main input used in the matrix pricing was non-binding local broker quotes obtained from limited trade activity. Therefore, these securities were classified as Level 3.

There were no transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 and no transfers from Level 3 to Level 2 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the quarter ended March 31, 2015. There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1 during the quarter ended March 31, 2015. Refer to Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the Corporation’s valuation methodologies used for the assets and liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2015. Also, refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates in the 2014 Annual Report for additional information on the accounting guidance and the Corporation’s policies or procedures related to fair value measurements.

Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

The majority of the values for trading account securities and investment securities available-for-sale are obtained from third-party pricing services and are validated with alternate pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented and validated internally according to their significance to the Corporation’s financial statements. Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation results. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing service providers or broker dealers.

Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market conditions, including the relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument, such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific information including dialogue with brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established benchmarks and transactions on similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the evaluated instrument. If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it discontinues pricing the instrument. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, none of the Corporation’s investment securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the pricing service providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service providers is concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement guidance.

Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees.

Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics and market liquidity. At the end of each period, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. The fair value measurement analysis performed by the Corporation includes validation procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology, assumption and level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s portfolio of trading and investment securities available-for-sale amounted to $ 5.7 billion and represented 97% of the Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. At March 31, 2015, net unrealized gains

157

on the trading securities approximated $6 million and net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities portfolios approximated $ 43 million. Fair values for most of the Corporation’s trading and investment securities available-for-sale were classified as Level 2. Trading and investment securities available-for-sale classified as Level 3, which were the securities that involved the highest degree of judgment, represented less than 1% of the Corporation’s total portfolio of trading and investment securities available-for-sale.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), which amounted to $ 149 million at March 31, 2015, do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Fair value is estimated based upon discounted net cash flows calculated from a combination of loan level data and market assumptions. The valuation model combines loans with common characteristics that impact servicing cash flows (e.g. investor, remittance cycle, interest rate, product type, etc.) in order to project net cash flows. Market valuation assumptions include prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, and contractual servicing fee income, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are derived from market data that is more relevant to the U.S. mainland loan portfolios and, thus, are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior since prepayment rates in Puerto Rico have been historically lower. Other assumptions are, in the most part, directly obtained from third-party providers. Disclosure of two of the key economic assumptions used to measure MSRs, which are prepayment speed and discount rate, and a sensitivity analysis to adverse changes to these assumptions, is included in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.

Derivatives

Derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options, are traded in over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or “to be announced securities” (“TBAs”). All of these derivatives held by the Corporation were classified as Level 2. Valuations of derivative assets and liabilities reflect the values associated with counterparty risk and nonperformance risk, respectively. The non-performance risk, which measures the Corporation’s own credit risk, is determined using internally-developed models that consider the net realizable value of the collateral posted, remaining term, and the creditworthiness or credit standing of the Corporation. The counterparty risk is also determined using internally-developed models which incorporate the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, net realizable value of the collateral received, and available public data or internally-developed data to determine their probability of default. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation employs procedures for credit approvals and credit limits, monitors the counterparties’ credit condition, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, requests additional collateral. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in a net loss of $0.1 million recorded in the other operating income and interest expense captions of the consolidated statement of operations, which consisted of a loss of $0.1 million resulting from the Corporation’s own credit standing adjustment and a gain of $31 thousand from the assessment of the counterparties’ credit risk.

Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral dependent

The impairment is based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, size and supply and demand. Continued deterioration of the housing markets and the economy in general have adversely impacted and continue to affect the market activity related to real estate properties. These collateral dependent impaired loans are classified as Level 3 and are reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement.

LIQUIDITY

The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has sufficient liquidity to meet all of its financial obligations, finance expected future growth and maintain a reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market conditions. The Board is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s tolerance for liquidity risk, including approving relevant risk limits and policies. The Board has delegated the monitoring of these risks to the RMC and the ALCO. The management of liquidity risk, on a long-term and day-to-day basis, is the responsibility of the Corporate Treasury Division. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasurer is responsible for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Board and for monitoring the Corporation’s liquidity position on an ongoing basis. Also, the Corporate Treasury Division coordinates corporate wide liquidity management strategies and activities with the reportable segments, oversees policy breaches and manages the escalation process. The Financial and Operational Risk Management Division is responsible for the independent monitoring and reporting of adherence with established policies.

158

An institution’s liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating is downgraded, it experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event causes counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook, adverse ratings of its principal markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding.

Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. It is also managed at the level of the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The Corporation has adopted policies and limits to monitor more effectively the Corporation’s liquidity position and that of the banking subsidiaries. Additionally, contingency funding plans are used to model various stress events of different magnitudes and affecting different time horizons that assist management in evaluating the size of the liquidity buffers needed if those stress events occur. However, such models may not predict accurately how the market and customers might react to every event, and are dependent on many assumptions.

As discussed in Note 4 - Business Combinations, on February 27, 2015 the Corporation acquired certain assets and all deposits (except brokered deposits) from Doral Bank. This included approximately $ 1.7 billion in loans, approximately $ 173 million in securities available for sale and $ 2.2 billion in deposits.

Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered deposits and public funds deposits, continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, funding 77% of the Corporation’s total assets at March 31, 2015, compared with 75% at December 31, 2014. The ratio of total ending loans to deposits was 87% at March 31, 2015, compared to 89% at December 31, 2014. In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. At March 31, 2015, these borrowings consisted primarily of $ 1.1 billion in assets sold under agreement to repurchase, $848 million in advances with the FHLB, $440 million in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures related to trust preferred securities and $450 million in term notes issued to partially fund the repayment of TARP funds. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings, including their terms, is included in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows.

The following sections provide further information on the Corporation’s major funding activities and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings and available lines of credit, including its terms, is included in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows.

Banking Subsidiaries

Primary sources of funding for the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or “the banking subsidiaries,” include retail and commercial deposits, brokered deposits, unpledged investment securities, and, to a lesser extent, loan sales. In addition, the Corporation maintains borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the discount window of the Fed, and has a considerable amount of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds under these facilities.

The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan originations, investment portfolio purchases, loan purchases and repurchases, repayment of outstanding obligations (including deposits), and operational expenses. Also, the banking subsidiaries assume liquidity risk related to collateral posting requirements for certain activities mainly in connection with contractual commitments, recourse provisions, servicing advances, derivatives, credit card licensing agreements and support to several mutual funds administered by BPPR.

Note 40 to the consolidated financial statements provides a consolidating statement of cash flows which includes the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries as part of the “All other subsidiaries and eliminations” column.

The banking subsidiaries maintain sufficient funding capacity to address large increases in funding requirements such as deposit outflows. This capacity is comprised mainly of available liquidity derived from secured funding sources, as well as on-balance sheet liquidity in the form of cash balances maintained at the Fed and unused secured lines held at the Fed and FHLB, in addition to liquid unpledged securities. The Corporation has established liquidity guidelines that require the banking subsidiaries to have sufficient liquidity to cover all short-term borrowings and a portion of deposits.

The Corporation’s ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits, excluding brokered deposits, depends on various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and financial stability as reflected by operating results, credit ratings (by nationally recognized credit rating agencies), and importantly, FDIC deposit insurance. Although a downgrade in the credit ratings of the

159

Corporation’s banking subsidiaries may impact their ability to raise retail and commercial deposits or the rate that it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact should be material. Deposits at all of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries are federally insured (subject to FDIC limits) and this is expected to mitigate the potential effect of a downgrade in the credit ratings.

Deposits are a key source of funding as they tend to be less volatile than institutional borrowings and their cost is less sensitive to changes in market rates. Refer to Table 17 for a breakdown of deposits by major types. Core deposits are generated from a large base of consumer, corporate and institutional customers. Core deposits include all non-interest bearing deposits, savings deposits and certificates of deposit under $100,000, excluding brokered deposits with denominations under $100,000. Core deposits have historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. Core deposits totaled $ 23.1 billion, or 85% of total deposits, at March 31, 2015, compared with $20.6 billion, or 83% of total deposits, at December 31, 2014. Core deposits financed 72% of the Corporation’s earning assets at March 31, 2015, compared with 69% at December 31, 2014.

Certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over at March 31, 2015 totaled $4.2 billion, or 16% of total deposits (December 31, 2014 - $3.3 billion, or 13% of total deposits). Their distribution by maturity at March 31, 2015 is presented in the table that follows:

Table 25 - Distribution by Maturity of Certificate of Deposits of $100,000 and Over

(In thousands)
3 months or less	$	1,755,664
3 to 6 months		512,514
6 to 12 months		920,570
Over 12 months		1,047,010
Total	$	4,235,758

At March 31, 2015 approximately 5% of the Corporation’s assets were financed by brokered deposits, as compared to 6% at December 31, 2014. The Corporation had $ 1.9 billion in brokered deposits at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. In the event that any of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries’ regulatory capital ratios fall below those required by a well-capitalized institution or are subject to capital restrictions by the regulators, that banking subsidiary faces the risk of not being able to raise or maintain brokered deposits and faces limitations on the rate paid on deposits, which may hinder the Corporation’s ability to effectively compete in its retail markets and could affect its deposit raising efforts.

To the extent that the banking subsidiaries are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, the Corporation may meet its liquidity needs through short-term borrowings by pledging securities for borrowings under repurchase agreements, by pledging additional loans and securities through the available secured lending facilities, or by selling liquid assets. These measures are subject to availability of collateral.

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the banking subsidiaries had credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating to $3.6 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively, based on assets pledged with the FHLB at those dates. Outstanding borrowings under these credit facilities totaled $848 million at March 31, 2015 and $822 million at December 31, 2014. Such advances are collateralized by loans held-in-portfolio, do not have restrictive covenants and do not have any callable features. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $ 4.5 billion in loans held-in-portfolio. Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the terms of FHLB advances outstanding.

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s borrowing capacity at the Fed’s Discount Window amounted to approximately $2.1 billion which remained unused as of both dates. This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult market conditions. The amount available under this borrowing facility is dependent upon the balance of performing loans, securities pledged as collateral and the haircuts assigned to such collateral. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, this credit facility with the Fed was collateralized by $ 4.2 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively, in loans held-in-portfolio.

At March 31, 2015, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current and projected liquidity sources to meet their anticipated cash flow obligations, as well as special needs and off-balance sheet commitments, in the ordinary course of business and have sufficient liquidity resources to address a stress event. Although the banking subsidiaries have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that they would be able to replace those

160

funds in the future if the Corporation’s financial condition or general market conditions were to deteriorate. The Corporation’s financial flexibility will be severely constrained if its banking subsidiaries are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future financing needs at acceptable interest rates. The banking subsidiaries also are required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of market changes, the Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity. Finally, if management is required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to meet its future growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected.

Westernbank FDIC-assisted Transaction and Impact on Liquidity

The effects of the loss sharing agreements on cash flows and operating results will depend primarily on the ability of the borrowers whose loans are covered by the loss sharing agreements to make payments over time and our ability to receive reimbursements for losses from the FDIC. As the loss sharing agreements are in effect for a period of ten years for one-to-four family loans and five years for commercial, construction and consumer loans (with periods commencing on April 30, 2010), changing economic conditions will likely impact the timing of future charge-offs and the resulting reimbursements from the FDIC. Management believes that any recapture of interest income and recognition of cash flows from the borrowers or received from the FDIC on the claims filed may be recognized unevenly over this period, as management exhausts its collection efforts under the Corporation’s normal practices.

BPPR’s liquidity may also be impacted by the loan payment performance and timing of claims made and receipt of reimbursements under the FDIC loss sharing agreements. Please refer to the Legal Proceedings section of Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements and to Part II, Item 1A- Risk factors herein for a discussion of the settlement of a contractual dispute between BPPR and the FDIC which has impacted the timing of the payment of claims under the loss share agreements.

Bank Holding Companies

The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment securities, dividends received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory limits and authorizations) asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds from potential securities offerings.

The principal use of these funds include the repayment of debt, and interest payments to holders of senior debt and junior subordinated deferrable interest (related to trust preferred securities) and capitalizing its banking subsidiaries.

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, PIHC received $ 1.2 million in dividends from EVERTEC’s parent company. PIHC received $1.5 million in dividends from its non-banking subsidiaries.

Another use of liquidity at the parent holding company is the payment of dividends on preferred stock. At the end of 2010, the Corporation resumed paying dividends on its Series A and B preferred stock. The preferred stock dividends amounted to $930 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The preferred stock dividends paid were financed by issuing new shares of common stock to the participants of the Corporation’s qualified employee savings plans. The Corporation anticipates that any future preferred stock dividend payments would continue to be financed with the issuance of new common stock in connection with its qualified employee savings plans. The Corporation is not paying dividends to holders of its common stock.

The BHC’s have in the past borrowed in the money markets and in the corporate debt market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries, however, the cash needs of the Corporation’s non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay indebtedness and interest are now minimal. These sources of funding have become more costly due to the reductions in the Corporation’s credit ratings. The Corporation’s principal credit ratings are below “investment grade” which affects the Corporation’s ability to raise funds in the capital markets. The Corporation has an automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which permits the Corporation to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities.

Note 40 to the consolidated financial statements provides a statement of condition, of operations and of cash flows for the two BHC’s. The loans held-in-portfolio in such financial statements is principally associated with intercompany transactions.

The outstanding balance of notes payable at the BHC’s amounted to $890 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The repayment of the BHC’s obligations represents a potential cash need which is expected to be met with a combination of internal liquidity resources stemming mainly from future dividend receipts and new borrowings.

161

The contractual maturities of the BHC’s notes payable at March 31, 2015 are presented in Table 26.

Table 26 - Distribution of BHC’s Notes Payable by Contractual Maturity

Year	(In thousands)
2015	$	—
2016		—
2017		—
2018		—
2019		450,000
Later years		439,800
Total		889,800

As indicated previously, the BHC did not issue new registered debt in the capital markets during the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

The BHCs liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, investments and other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs obligations during the foreseeable future.

Non-banking subsidiaries

The principal sources of funding for the non-banking subsidiaries include internally generated cash flows from operations, loan sales, repurchase agreements, and borrowed funds from their direct parent companies or the holding companies. The principal uses of funds for the non-banking subsidiaries include repayment of maturing debt, operational expenses and payment of dividends to the BHCs. The liquidity needs of the non-banking subsidiaries are minimal since most of them are funded internally from operating cash flows or from intercompany borrowings from their holding companies, BPPR or BPNA.

Other Funding Sources and Capital

The investment securities portfolio provides an additional source of liquidity, which may be realized through either securities sales or repurchase agreements. The Corporation’s investment securities portfolio consists primarily of liquid U.S. government investment securities, sponsored U.S. agency securities, government sponsored mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations that can be used to raise funds in the repo markets. The availability of the repurchase agreement would be subject to having sufficient unpledged collateral available at the time the transactions are to be consummated, in addition to overall liquidity and risk appetite of the various counterparties. The Corporation’s unpledged investment and trading securities, excluding other investment securities, amounted to $ 2.8 billion at March 31, 2015 and $2.7 billion at December 31, 2014. A substantial portion of these securities could be used to raise financing quickly in the U.S. money markets or from secured lending sources.

Additional liquidity may be provided through loan maturities, prepayments and sales. The loan portfolio can also be used to obtain funding in the capital markets. In particular, mortgage loans and some types of consumer loans, have secondary markets which the Corporation could use.

Risks to Liquidity

Total lines of credit outstanding are not necessarily a measure of the total credit available on a continuing basis. Some of these lines could be subject to collateral requirements, standards of creditworthiness, leverage ratios and other regulatory requirements, among other factors. Derivatives, such as those embedded in long-term repurchase transactions or interest rate swaps, and off-balance sheet exposures, such as recourse, performance bonds or credit card arrangements, are subject to collateral requirements. As their fair value increases, the collateral requirements may increase, thereby reducing the balance of unpledged securities.

The importance of the Puerto Rico market for the Corporation is an additional risk factor that could affect its financing activities. In the case of a deterioration in economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the credit quality of the Corporation could be affected and result in higher credit costs. The Puerto Rico economy continues to face various challenges, including significant pressures in some sectors of the residential real estate market. Refer to the Geographic and Government Risk section of this MD&A for some highlights on the current status of the Puerto Rico economy.

Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook and credit ratings of its principal markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to prepare for the possibility of such scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising financing under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available are temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms, such as the pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in place with the FHLB and the Fed.

The credit ratings of Popular’s debt obligations are a relevant factor for liquidity because they impact the Corporation’s ability to borrow in the capital markets, its cost and access to funding sources. Credit ratings are based on the financial strength, credit

162

quality and concentrations in the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core retail and commercial deposits, and the Corporation’s ability to access a broad array of wholesale funding sources, among other factors.

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have historically not used unsecured capital market borrowings to finance its operations, and therefore are less sensitive to the level and changes in the Corporation’s overall credit ratings. At the BHCs, the volume of capital market borrowings has declined substantially, as the non-banking lending businesses that it had historically funded have been shut down and the need to raise unsecured senior debt has been substantially reduced.

Obligations Subject to Rating Triggers or Collateral Requirements

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured borrowings. The banking subsidiaries had $20 million in deposits at March 31, 2015 that are subject to rating triggers.

Some of the Corporation’s derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the bank’s well-capitalized status and certain formal regulatory actions. These agreements could require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $8 million at March 31, 2015, with the Corporation providing collateral totaling $15 million to cover the net liability position with counterparties on these derivative instruments.

In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties include rating covenants. In the event of a credit rating downgrade, the third parties have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute cash custodian for escrow deposits and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, as discussed in the Guarantees section of this MD&A, the Corporation services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain contractual agreements require the Corporation to post collateral to secure such recourse obligations if the institution’s required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by the Corporation to secure recourse obligations amounted to approximately $87 million at March 31, 2015. The Corporation could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management expects that it would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of escrow deposits could reduce the Corporation’s liquidity resources and impact its operating results.

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND LOAN QUALITY

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets include primarily past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest, renegotiated loans, and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table 27.

The Corporation’s non-accruing and charge-off policies by major categories of loan portfolios are as follows:

• Commercial and construction loans - recognition of interest income on commercial and construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions of secured loans past due as to principal and interest is charged-off not later than 365 days past due. However, in the case of collateral dependent loans individually evaluated for impairment, the excess of the recorded investment over the fair value of the collateral (portion deemed uncollectible) is generally promptly charged-off, but in any event, not later than the quarter following the quarter in which such excess was first recognized. Commercial unsecured loans are charged-off no later than 180 days past due. Overdrafts are generally charged-off no later than 60 days past their due date.

• Lease financing - recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears.

• Mortgage loans - recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is generally discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. The impaired portion of a mortgage loan is charged-off when the loan is 180 days past due. The Corporation discontinues the recognition of interest income on residential mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) or guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) when 18 months delinquent as to principal or interest. The principal repayment on these loans is insured.

163

• Consumer loans - recognition of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and home-equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Closed-end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 180 days in arrears. Overdrafts in excess of 60 days are generally charged-off no later than 60 days past their due date.

• Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) - loans classified as TDRs are typically in non-accrual status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan continues in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (generally at least six months of sustained performance after the modification (or one year for loans providing for quarterly or semi-annual payments)) and management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower would not be in payment default in the foreseeable future.

• Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation, are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected.

• Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for revolving lines of credit, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans, which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation, are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. Also, loans charged-off against the non-accretable difference established in purchase accounting are not reported as charge-offs. Charge-offs will be recorded only to the extent that losses exceed the purchase accounting estimates.

Because of the application of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to the Westernbank acquired loans and the loss protection provided by the FDIC which limits the risks on the covered loans, the Corporation has determined to provide certain quality metrics in this MD&A that exclude such covered loans to facilitate the comparison between loan portfolios and across periods. Given the significant amount of covered loans that are past due but still accruing due to the accounting under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation believes the inclusion of these loans in certain asset quality ratios in the numerator or denominator (or both) would result in a significant distortion to these ratios. In addition, because charge-offs related to the acquired loans are recorded against the non-accretable balance, the net charge-off ratio including the acquired loans is lower for portfolios that have significant amounts of covered loans. The inclusion of these loans in the asset quality ratios could result in a lack of comparability across periods, and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios that were not impacted by acquisition accounting. The Corporation believes that the presentation of asset quality measures, excluding covered loans and related amounts from both the numerator and denominator, provides a better perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of its loan portfolio.

Total non-performing non-covered assets were $802 million at March 31, 2015, increasing by $17 million, or 2% from December 31, 2014. Non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio stand at $665 million, increasing by $34 million, or 5%, from December 31, 2014. The increase includes $28 million attributable to Doral Bank’s failure and acquisition, mostly comprised of $17 million of mortgage loans previously serviced by Doral under a servicing agreement that required Doral to advance principal and interest payments irrespective of borrower delinquencies, and $7 million of acquired commercial loans placed in NPL status following the acquisition. The ratio of non-performing loans to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, decreased to 3.16% at March 31, 2015 from 3.25% at December 31, 2014. The decrease in the ratio was primarily due to the impact of the Doral portfolio on the total loans base.

At March 31, 2015, non-performing loans secured by real estate held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $511 million in the Puerto Rico operations and $25 million in the U.S. mainland operations. These figures compare to $482 million in the Puerto Rico operations and $35 million in the U.S. mainland operations at December 31, 2014. In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table 27, at March 31, 2015, there were $200 million of non-covered performing loans, mostly commercial loans, which in management’s opinion, are currently subject to potential future classification as non-performing and are considered impaired, compared with $146 million at December 31, 2014.

164

Table 27 - Non-Performing Assets

(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			As a % of loans HIP by category [4]			December 31, 2014			As a % of loans HIP by category [4]
Commercial	$	274,438			3.2	%	$	260,225			3.2	%
Construction		13,214			1.9			13,812			5.5
Legacy [1]		2,288			2.9			1,545			1.9
Leasing		2,506			0.4			3,102			0.5
Mortgage		328,615			4.6			304,913			4.7
Consumer		43,892			1.1			46,886			1.2
Total non-performing loans held-in- portfolio, excluding covered loans		664,953			3.2	%		630,483			3.3	%
Non-performing loans held-for-sale [2]		8,404						18,899
Other real estate owned (“OREO”), excluding covered OREO		128,170						135,500
Total non-performing assets, excluding covered assets	$	801,527					$	784,882
Covered loans and OREO [3]		133,211						148,099
Total non-performing assets	$	934,738					$	932,981
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more[5] [6]	$	451,035					$	447,990
Ratios excluding covered loans:[7]
Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-in-portfolio		3.16	%					3.25	%
Allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio		2.46						2.68
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans, excluding held-for-sale		77.63						82.43
Ratios including covered loans:
Non-performing assets to total assets		2.62	%					2.82	%
Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-in-portfolio		2.92						2.95
Allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio		2.51						2.74
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans, excluding held-for-sale		85.99						92.82

HIP = “held-in-portfolio”

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

[2] Non-performing loans held-for-sale consist $225 thousand in mortgage loans and $8.2 million in commercial loans as of March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $14.0 million in mortgage loans, $309 thousand in commercial loans and $4.5 million in consumer loans).

[3] The amount consists of $20 million in non-performing covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and $114 million in covered OREO as of March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $18 million and $130 million, respectively). It excludes covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.

[4] Loans held-in-portfolio used in the computation exclude $2.5 billion in covered loans at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - 2.5 billion).

[5] The carrying value of covered loans accounted for under ASC Sub-topic 310-30 that are contractually 90 days or more past due was $0.5 billion at March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $0.5 billion). This amount is excluded from the above table as the covered loans’ accretable yield interest recognition is independent from the underlying contractual loan delinquency status.

[6] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $134 million of residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of March 31, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $125 million). Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $69 million in reverse mortgage loans which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets (December 31, 2014 - $66 million).

[7] These asset quality ratios have been adjusted to remove the impact of covered loans and covered foreclosed property. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected in the calculation of these ratios. Management believes the inclusion of acquired loans in certain asset quality ratios that include non-performing assets, past due loans or net charge-offs in the numerator and denominator results in distortions of these ratios and they may not be comparable to other periods presented or to other portfolios that were not impacted by purchase accounting.

165

Table 28 - Activity in Non-Performing Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Consumer and Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	BPPR			BPNA
Beginning balance	$	567,351		$	13,144
Plus:
New non-performing loans		135,267			15,262
Advances on existing non-performing loans		—			33
Less:
Non-performing loans transferred to OREO		(5,914	)		—
Non-performing loans charged-off		(16,533	)		(690	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(82,172	)		(9,231	)
Loans transferred to held-for-sale		—			2,038
Ending balance NPLs	$	597,999		$	20,556

Table 29 - Activity in Non-Performing Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Consumer and Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	BPPR			BPNA
Beginning balance	$	410,594		$	139,961
Plus:
New non-performing loans		183,147			22,814
Advances on existing non-performing loans		—			11
Less:
Non-performing loans transferred to OREO		(5,451	)		(1,195	)
Non-performing loans charged-off		(17,387	)		(7,527	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(72,707	)		(29,144	)
Loans transferred to held-for-sale		—			(30,094	)
Ending balance NPLs	$	498,196		$	94,826

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, total non-performing loan inflows, excluding consumer loans, amounted to $151 million, a decrease of $55 million, or 27%, when compared to the inflows for the same quarter in 2014. Inflows of non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $135 million, a decrease of $48 million, or 26%, compared to the inflows for the first quarter of 2014. Inflows of non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $15 million, a decrease of $8 million, or 33%, compared to the inflows for the first quarter of 2014. These reductions were mostly concentrated in the commercial portfolios. Refer to the following table for more information on non-performing held-in-portfolio inflows, excluding consumer loans.

Refer to Table 30 for a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

166

Table 30 - Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics - Quarterly Activity

	Quarters ended March 31,
	2015			2015			2015			2014			2014			2014
(Dollars in thousands)	Non-covered loans			Covered loans			Total			Non-covered loans			Covered loans			Total
Balance at beginning of period	$	519,719		$	82,073		$	601,792		$	538,463		$	102,092		$	640,555
Provision for loan losses - Continuing operations		29,711			10,324			40,035			54,122			25,714			79,836
Provision for loan losses - Discontinued operations		—			—			—			(6,764	)		—			(6,764	)
		549,430			92,397			641,827			585,821			127,806			713,627
Charged-offs:
Commercial		10,022			14,239			24,261			27,108			7,968			35,076
Construction		—			9,046			9,046			416			22,981			23,397
Leases		1,237			—			1,237			967			—			967
Legacy[1]		474			—			474			2,984			—			2,984
Mortgage		11,194			3,385			14,579			10,264			1,656			11,920
Consumer		32,217			—			32,217			34,272			(295	)		33,977
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			4,452			—			4,452
		55,144			26,670			81,814			80,463			32,310			112,773
Recoveries:
Commercial		5,699			2,640			8,339			9,948			320			10,268
Construction		2,925			3,275			6,200			1,970			1,889			3,859
Leases		468			—			468			311			—			311
Legacy[1]		2,302			—			2,302			7,193			—			7,193
Mortgage		567			104			671			878			—			878
Consumer		7,297			727			8,024			6,920			68			6,988
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			9,997			—			9,997
		19,258			6,746			26,004			37,217			2,277			39,494
Net loans charged-offs (recovered):
Commercial		4,323			11,599			15,922			17,160			7,648			24,808
Construction		(2,925	)		5,771			2,846			(1,554	)		21,092			19,538
Leases		769			—			769			656			—			656
Legacy[1]		(1,828	)		—			(1,828	)		(4,209	)		—			(4,209	)
Mortgage		10,627			3,281			13,908			9,386			1,656			11,042
Consumer		24,920			(727	)		24,193			27,352			(363	)		26,989
Discontinued operations		—			—			—			(5,545	)		—			(5,545	)
		35,886			19,924			55,810			43,246			30,033			73,279
Net recoveries (write-downs)		2,680			—			2,680			—			—			—
Balance at end of period	$	516,224		$	72,473		$	588,697		$	542,575		$	97,773		$	640,348
Ratios:
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio[2]		0.72	%					1.00	%		0.80	%					1.20	%
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs[2]		0.83x						0.72x			1.10x						1.00x

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

[2] Excluding provision for loan losses and net recoveries (write-down) related to loans sold during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

Refer to the “Allowance for Loan Losses” subsection in this MD&A for tables detailing the composition of the allowance for loan losses between general and specific reserves, and for qualitative information on the main factors driving the variances.

167

The following table presents annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”) for the non-covered portfolio by loan category for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Table 31 - Annualized Net Charge-offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Non-Covered Loans)

	Quarters ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Commercial		0.21	%		0.46	%
Construction		(2.79	)		(3.58	)
Leases		0.54			0.48
Legacy		(9.23	)		(9.50	)
Mortgage		0.64			0.57
Consumer		2.59			2.87
Total annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio		0.72	%		0.80	%

Average loans held-in-portfolio excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction which were recorded at fair value on date of acquisition, and thus, considered a credit discount component.

The Corporation’s annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio ratio was 0.72% for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, down from 0.80% for the same period in 2014. Net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, decreased by $7.4 million, compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2014, mostly driven by the commercial portfolio in the BPPR segment.

The Corporation maintained stable credit quality during the first quarter of 2015, in spite of the challenging economic conditions that persist in Puerto Rico, reflective of the improved risk profile of the loan portfolios and the result of strategic initiatives to reduce high risk assets executed by the Corporation over the past several years. These results were impacted by the addition of certain non-performing loans related to the failure and loan acquisition of Doral Bank. The US region continued to exhibit strong asset quality, with low levels of delinquencies and charge-offs.

The discussions in the sections that follow assess credit quality performance for the first quarter of 2015 for each of the Corporation’s non-covered loan portfolios, including $1.6 billion of Doral Bank acquired loans.

Commercial loans

Non-covered non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio were $274 million at March 31, 2015, compared with $260 million at December 31, 2014. The increase of $14 million, or 5%, from December 31, 2014 includes $9 million attributable to Doral Bank’s failure and loan acquisition. The percentage of non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio to commercial loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 3.17% at March 31, 2015 from 3.20% at December 31, 2014, primarily due to the impact of the Doral portfolio on the total loan base.

Commercial non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment increased by $7 million from December 31, 2014, of which $1 million were related to commercial loans acquired in the Doral acquisition. Commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment increased by $7 million from December 31, 2014, which stemmed from $7 million of acquired commercial loans placed in NPL status following the acquisition.

Tables 32 and 33 present the changes in the non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments.

168

Table 32 - Activity in Non-Performing Commercial Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	BPPR			BPNA			Popular, Inc.
Beginning Balance - NPLs	$	257,910		$	2,315		$	260,225
Plus:
New non-performing loans[1]		27,426			8,030			35,456
Less:
Non-performing loans transferred to OREO		(1,069	)		—			(1,069	)
Non-performing loans charged-off		(8,375	)		(426	)		(8,801	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(11,261	)		(112	)		(11,373	)
Ending balance - NPLs	$	264,631		$	9,807		$	274,438

[1] New non-performing loans includes $1.2 million at BPPR and $7.4 million at BPNA from Doral Acquisition.

Table 33 - Activity in Non-Performing Commercial Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	BPPR			BPNA			Popular, Inc.
Beginning Balance - NPLs	$	186,097		$	92,956		$	279,053
Plus:
New non-performing loans		86,045			17,156			103,201
Advances on existing non-performing loans		—			6			6
Less:
Non-performing loans transferred to OREO		(3,700	)		—			(3,700	)
Non-performing loans charged-off		(10,278	)		(4,092	)		(14,370	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(12,233	)		(14,934	)		(27,167	)
Loans in accrual status transfer to held-for-sale		—			(30,094	)		(30,094	)
Ending balance - NPLs	$	245,931		$	60,998		$	306,929

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, inflows of commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $27 million, a decrease of $59 million, or 68%, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2014. The first quarter of 2014 included the addition of a $52 million single borrower which returned to accrual status during the fourth quarter of 2014. Inflows of commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $8 million, a decrease of $9 million, or 53%, compared to inflows for the same quarter in 2014. The reduction was driven by improvements in the underlying quality of the loan portfolio, in part offset by $7 million of Doral Bank loans placed in NPL status following the acquisition.

Table 34 provides information on commercial non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR (excluding the Westernbank covered loan portfolio) and BPNA segments.

169

Table 34 - Non-Performing Commercial Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

	BPPR						BPNA						Popular, Inc.
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Non-performing commercial loans	$	264,631		$	257,910		$	9,807		$	2,315		$	274,438		$	260,225
Non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans HIP		4.13	%		4.05	%		0.44	%		0.13	%		3.17	%		3.20	%
	BPPR						BPNA						Popular, Inc.
	For the quarters ended						For the quarters ended						For the quarters ended
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries)	$	4,802		$	15,173		$	(479	)	$	(3,691	)	$	4,323		$	11,482
Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries) (annualized) to average commercial loans HIP		0.30	%		0.94	%		(0.10	)%		(0.41	)%		0.21	%		0.46	%

There are two commercial loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual status with an outstanding aggregate balance of $87 million at March 31, 2015, compared with two commercial loan relationships with an outstanding aggregate balance of $88 million at December 31, 2014.

Commercial loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to $4.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to $11.5 million for the same period in 2014. The decline of $7.2 million, or 62%, for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, when compared with the same quarter in 2014, primarily reflects improvements in the risk profile of the portfolio and the result of initiatives taken by the Corporation to address problem loans. Commercial loans annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.21% for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 from 0.46% for the quarter ended March 31, 2014.

Commercial loan net charge-offs in the BPPR segment amounted to $4.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to $15.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The decline of $10.4 million for the for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, when compared with the same period in 2014 was mainly reflective of the improved risk profile of the portfolio. Notwithstanding, Puerto Rico’s fiscal and economic conditions continue to present a challenging operating environment. Commercial loans annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.30% for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 from 0.94% for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the charge-offs associated with collateral dependent impaired commercial loans amounted to approximately $4.3 million at the BPPR segment.

Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries) in the BPNA segment amounted to recoveries of $0.5 million for quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to recoveries of $3.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Commercial loans annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio was (0.10%) for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, and (0.41%) for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Low levels of net charge-offs reflect improvements in credit quality, further strengthened by the divestiture of its regional operations in California, Illinois, and Florida in the second half of 2014. For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, there were no charge-offs associated with collateral dependent impaired commercial loans from continuing operations at the BPNA segment.

The Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (“CRE”), excluding covered loans, amounted to $5.0 billion at March 31, 2015, of which $1.6 billion was secured with owner occupied properties, compared with $4.7 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2014. CRE non-performing loans, excluding covered loans, amounted to $134 million at March 31, 2015, compared with $129 million at December 31, 2014. The CRE non-performing loans ratios for the BPPR and BPNA segments were 3.62% and 0.08%, respectively, at March 31, 2015, compared with 3.60% and 0.07%, respectively, at December 31, 2014.

Construction loans

Non-covered non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $13 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $14 million at December 31, 2014, concentrated in the BPPR segment. Stable credit trends in the construction portfolio were the result of de-risking strategies executed by the Corporation over the past several years. The ratio of non-performing construction loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, decreased to 1.91% at March 31, 2015 from 5.48% at December 31, 2014. The decrease was due mainly to the impact of $475 million of the Doral acquired construction portfolio on the total loan base.

170

Tables 35 and 36 present changes in non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments.

Table 35 - Activity in Non-Performing Construction Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	BPPR			BPNA		Popular, Inc.
Beginning Balance - NPLs	$	13,812		$	—	$	13,812
Plus:
New non-performing loans		456			—		456
Less:
Non-performing loans charged-off		—			—		—
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(1,054	)		—		(1,054	)
Ending balance - NPLs	$	13,214		$	—	$	13,214

Table 36 - Activity in Non-Performing Construction Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)	BPPR			BPNA			Popular, Inc.
Beginning Balance - NPLs	$	18,108		$	5,663		$	23,771
Plus:
New non-performing loans		7,960			—			7,960
Less:
Non-performing loans charged-off		(416	)		—			(416	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(3,188	)		(5,663	)		(8,851	)
Ending balance - NPLs	$	22,464		$	—		$	22,464

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, inflows of construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment were minimal, amounting to $0.5 million, decreasing by $8 million when compared to additions for the quarter in 2014. There were no additions of construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment during the first quarter of 2015.

There are no construction loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-performing status at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries), excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to recoveries of $2.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to recoveries of $1.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Construction loans annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio resulted in (2.79%) for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to (3.58%) for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. For quarter ended March 31, 2015, there were no charge-offs associated with collateral dependent impaired construction loans in the BPPR and BPNA segments.

Table 37 provides information on construction non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR and BPNA (excluding the covered loan portfolio) segments.

171

Table 37 - Non-Performing Construction Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

	BPPR						BPNA						Popular, Inc.
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Non-performing construction loans	$	13,214		$	13,812		$	—		$	—		$	13,214		$	13,812
Non-performing construction loans to construction loans HIP		13.39	%		8.67	%		—	%		—	%		1.91	%		5.48	%
	BPPR						BPNA						Popular, Inc.
	For the quarters ended						For the quarters ended						For the quarters ended
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries)	$	(2,925	)	$	(1,378	)	$	—		$	(176	)	$	(2,925	)	$	(1,554	)
Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries) (annualized) to average construction loans HIP		(7.76	)%		(3.78	)%		—	%		(2.56	)%		(2.79	)%		(3.58	)%

Legacy loans

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

Legacy non-performing loans held-in-portfolio remained flat at $2 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The percentage of non-performing legacy loans held-in-portfolio to legacy loans held-in-portfolio increased to 2.95% at March 31, 2015 from 1.91% at December 31, 2014. This increase in the ratio was mostly related to the continued run-off of the legacy portfolio.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, additions to legacy loans in non-performing status amounted to $1 million, relatively flat when compared to the same period in 2014.

Tables 38 and 39 present the changes in non-performing legacy loans held in-portfolio.

Table 38 - Activity in Non-Performing Legacy Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	BPNA
Beginning balance - NPLs	$	1,545
Plus:
New non-performing loans		1,000
Advances on existing non-performing loans		33
Less:
Non-performing loans charged-off		(141	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(149	)
Ending balance - NPLs	$	2,288

172

Table 39 - Activity in Non-Performing Legacy Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	BPNA
Beginning balance - NPLs	$	15,050
Plus:
New non-performing loans		1,738
Advances on existing non-performing loans		5
Less:
Non-performing loans charged-off		(2,568	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(2,617	)
Ending balance - NPLs	$	11,608

In the loans held-in-portfolio, there was no legacy loan relationship greater than $10 million in non-accrual status at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) amounted to recoveries of $1.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to recoveries of $4.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio was (9.23%) for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to (9.50%) for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, there were no charge-offs associated with collateral dependent legacy loans from continuing operations.

Low level of delinquencies and charge-offs was mainly driven by lower level of problem loans and the continued run-off of the portfolio.

Table 40 provides information on legacy non-performing loans and net charge-offs.

Table 40 - Non-Performing Legacy Loans and Net Charge-Offs

	BPNA
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Non-performing legacy loans	$	2,288		$	1,545
Non-performing legacy loans to legacy loans HIP		2.95	%		1.91	%
	BPNA
	For the quarters ended
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries)	$	(1,828	)	$	(4,882	)
Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) (annualized) to average legacy loans HIP		(9.23	)%		(9.50	)%

Mortgage loans

Non-covered non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio were $329 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $305 million at December 31, 2014. The increase of $24 million was mainly driven by an increase of $25 million in the BPPR segment, which included the addition of $17 million of loans previously serviced by Doral under servicing agreement that required Doral to advance principal and interest payments irrespective of borrower delinquencies. In addition Doral was required to repurchase or substitute delinquent loans. The percentage of non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio to mortgage loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 4.57% at March 31, 2015 from 4.69% at December 31, 2014. The decrease was due mainly to the impact of the Doral portfolio on the total loan base.

Tables 41 and 42 present changes in non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments.

173

Table 41 - Activity in Non-Performing Mortgage Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	BPPR			BPNA			Popular, Inc.
Beginning balance - NPLs	$	295,629			9,284			304,913
Plus:
New non-performing loans[1]		107,385			6,232			113,617
Less:
Non-performing loans transferred to OREO		(4,845	)		—			(4,845	)
Non-performing loans charged-off		(8,158	)		(123	)		(8,281	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(69,857	)		(8,970	)		(78,827	)
Loans transferred to held-for-sale		—			2,038			2,038
Ending balance - NPLs	$	320,154		$	8,461		$	328,615

[1] New non-performing loans includes $16.6 million of loans previous serviced by Doral.

Table 42 - Activity in Non-Performing Mortgage Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

	For the quarter ended March 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	BPPR			BPNA			Popular, Inc.
Beginning balance - NPLs	$	206,389			26,292			232,681
Plus:
New non-performing loans		89,142			3,920			93,062
Less:
Non-performing loans transferred to OREO		(1,751	)		(1,195	)		(2,946	)
Non-performing loans charged-off		(6,693	)		(867	)		(7,560	)
Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections		(57,286	)		(5,930	)		(63,216	)
Ending balance - NPLs	$	229,801		$	22,220		$	252,021

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, inflows of mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $107 million, an increase of $18 million, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2014, mainly driven by the aforementioned addition of $17 million of loans previously serviced by Doral. Inflows of mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $6 million, an increase of $2 million, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2014.

Mortgage loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, remained stable at $10.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to $9.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage non-covered loans held-in-portfolio was 0.64% in the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to 0.57% for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Net charge-off activity derived mainly from loans in the BPPR segment. Mortgage loan net charge-offs at the BPNA segment amounted to $0.2 million, or 0.06% of average mortgage loans held-in-portfolio on an annualized basis for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, reflective of the improved risk profile of the portfolio, further strengthened by the sale of certain non-performing and classified assets. For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, charge-offs associated with mortgage loans individually evaluated for impairment amounted to $2.2 million in the BPPR segment.

Table 43 provides information on mortgage non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR and BPNA (excluding the covered loan portfolio).

174

Table 43 - Non-Performing Mortgage Loans and Net Charge-Offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

	BPPR						BPNA						Popular, Inc.
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Non-performing mortgage loans	$	320,154		$	295,629		$	8,461		$	9,284		$	328,615		$	304,913
Non-performing mortgage loans to mortgage loans HIP		5.19	%		5.42	%		0.83	%		0.88	%		4.57	%		4.69	%
	BPPR						BPNA						Popular, Inc.
	For the quarters ended						For the quarters ended						For the quarters ended
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Mortgage loan net charge-offs	$	10,473		$	8,516		$	154		$	870		$	10,627		$	9,386
Mortgage loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average mortgage loans HIP		0.75	%		0.63	%		0.06	%		0.28	%		0.64	%		0.57	%

Consumer loans

Non-covered non-performing consumer loans held-in-portfolio were $44 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $47 million at December 31, 2014. Consumer non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio decreased by $3 million when compared to December 31, 2014, primarily as a result of a decrease of $3 million in the BPPR segment, mainly related to personal loans.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the BPPR segment maintained stable inflows of consumer non-performing loans held-in-portfolio, increasing slightly by $0.5 million, or 2%, when compared to inflows for the same period of 2014. Inflows of consumer non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $4 million, a decrease of $2 million, or 32% compared to inflows for 2014.

The Corporation’s consumer loan net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, amounted to $24.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared to $28.2 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2014. The decrease of $3.2 million in consumer net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2015, when compared with the same period in 2014, was driven by a decrease of $3.9 million in the BPNA segment. Consumer loan net charge-offs to average consumer non-covered loans held-in-portfolio was 2.59% for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, compared with 2.87% for the same period in 2014.

Table 44 provides information on consumer non-performing loans and net charge-offs by segments.

Table 44 - Non-Performing Consumer Loans and Net Charge-Offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

	BPPR						BPNA						Popular, Inc.
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Non-performing consumer loans	$	37,512		$	40,930		$	6,380		$	5,956		$	43,892		$	46,886
Non-performing consumer loans to consumer loans HIP		1.12	%		1.21	%		1.36	%		1.24	%		1.15	%		1.21	%
	BPPR						BPNA						Popular, Inc.
	For the quarters ended						For the quarters ended						For the quarters ended
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014			March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Consumer loan net charge-offs	$	23,653		$	22,983		$	1,267		$	5,175		$	24,920		$	28,158
Consumer loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average consumer loans HIP		2.81	%		2.77	%		1.07	%		3.40	%		2.59	%		2.87	%

175

Combined net charge-offs for E-LOAN’s home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages amounted to approximately $82 thousand, or 0.15% of those particular average loan portfolios, at March 31, 2015, compared with $1.8 million, or 2.80%, at March 31, 2014. With the downsizing of E-LOAN, this subsidiary ceased originating these types of loans in 2008. Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines of credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrower’s residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Real estate market values at the time the loan or line is granted directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in addition, changes in these values impact the severity of losses. E-LOAN’s portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding at March 31, 2015 totaled $212 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $6 million, representing 3.04% of that particular portfolio. E-LOAN’s portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding at December 31, 2014 totaled $220 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $6 million, representing 2.53% of that particular portfolio. At March 31, 2015, home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages in which E-LOAN holds both the first and second lien amounted to $47 thousand and $232 thousand, respectively, representing 0.01% and 0.05%, respectively, of the consumer loan portfolio of the BPNA segment. At March 31, 2015, 47% are paying the minimum amount due on the home equity lines of credit. At March 31, 2015, the majority of the closed-end second mortgages in which E-LOAN holds the first lien mortgage were in performing status.

Other real estate

Other real estate represents real estate property acquired through foreclosure, part of the Corporation’s continuous efforts to aggressively resolve non-performing loans. Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC amounted to $128 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $136 million at December 31, 2014. The decrease of $8 million was mainly related to a $12 million reduction in the BPNA segment as a result of a bulk sale.

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, comprised principally of repossessed commercial real estate properties, amounted to $114 million at March 31, 2015, compared with $130 million at December 31, 2014. Generally, 80% of the write-downs taken on these properties based on appraisals or losses on the sale are covered under the loss sharing agreements.

During the first quarter of 2015, the Corporation transferred $33 million of loans to other real estate, sold $38 million of foreclosed properties and recorded write-downs and other adjustments of approximately $19 million.

Updated appraisals or third-party opinions of value (“BPOs”) are obtained to adjust the values of the other real estate assets. Commencing in 2011, the appraisal for a commercial or construction other real estate property with a book value greater than $1 million is updated annually and if lower than $1 million it is updated at least every two years. For residential other real estate property, the Corporation requests third-party BPOs or appraisals generally on an annual basis. Appraisals may be adjusted due to age, collateral inspections and property profiles or due to general marked conditions. The adjustments applied are based upon internal information like other appraisals for the type of properties and loss severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate market, and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

For commercial and construction other real estate properties at the BPPR segment, depending on the type of property and/or the age of the appraisal, downward adjustments currently may range between 25% to 45%, including estimated cost to sell. For commercial and construction properties at the BPNA segment, the most typically applied collateral discount rate currently ranges from 10% to 40%, including cost to sell. This discount was determined based on an analysis of other real estate owned and loan sale transactions during a twelve month period, comparing net proceeds received by the lender relative to the most recent appraised value of the properties. However, additional haircuts can be applied depending upon the age of appraisal, the region and the condition of the property or project.

Currently, in the case of the BPPR segment, appraisals of residential properties were subject to downward adjustments of up to approximately 18%, including cost to sell of 5%. In the case of the U.S. mainland residential properties, the downward adjustment approximated 10%, including cost to sell of 10%.

Troubled debt restructurings

The following tables present the loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

176

The Corporation’s TDR loans, excluding covered loans, totaled $1.2 billion at March 31, 2015, an increase of $46 million, or 4%, from December 31, 2014. TDRs in accruing status increased by $39 million from December 31, 2014, due to sustained borrower performance, while non-accruing TDRs increased by $7 million.

Table 45 - TDRs Non-Covered Loans

	March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Accruing		Non-Accruing		Total
Commercial	$	169,883	$	153,122	$	323,005
Construction		309		4,919		5,228
Mortgage		578,709		122,674		701,383
Leases		2,125		799		2,924
Consumer		106,574		14,610		121,184
Total	$	857,600	$	296,124	$	1,153,724

Table 46 - TDRs Non-Covered Loans

	December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Accruing		Non-Accruing		Total
Commercial	$	153,380	$	150,069	$	303,449
Construction		453		5,488		5,941
Mortgage		556,346		116,465		672,811
Leases		775		2,248		3,023
Consumer		107,530		14,848		122,378
Total	$	818,484	$	289,118	$	1,107,602

Table 47 - TDRs Covered Loans

	March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Accruing		Non-Accruing		Total
Commercial	$	2,632	$	2,877	$	5,509
Construction		—		2,336		2,336
Mortgage		4,174		5,195		9,369
Consumer		15		6		21
Total	$	6,821	$	10,414	$	17,235

Table 48 - TDRs Covered Loans

	December 31, 2014
(In thousands)	Accruing		Non-Accruing		Total
Commercial	$	1,689	$	3,257	$	4,946
Construction		—		2,419		2,419
Mortgage		3,629		3,990		7,619
Consumer		26		5		31
Total	$	5,344	$	9,671	$	15,015

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s commercial loan TDRs, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR amounted to $323 million, of which $153 million were in non-performing status. The BPNA segment had no commercial TDRs as of March 31, 2015. This compares with $303 million for BPPR and $250 thousand for BPNA, respectively, of which $150 million and none were in non-performing status at December 31, 2014. The outstanding commitments for these commercial loan TDRs amounted to $4 million in the BPPR segment at March 31, 2015. Commercial loans that have been modified as part of loss mitigation efforts were evaluated individually for impairment, resulting in a specific reserve of $70 million for the BPPR segment at March 31, 2015, compared with $65 million at December 31, 2014.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s construction loan TDRs, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR segment amounted to $5 million, of which $5 million were in non-performing status. This compares with $6 million, of which $5 million were in non-performing status at December 31, 2014. The BPNA segment had no construction TDRs as of March 31, 2015. The outstanding commitments for these construction loan TDRs amounted to $1 million in the BPPR segment at March 31, 2015. These construction loan TDRs were individually evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific reserve of $158 thousand for the BPPR segment at March 31, 2015, compared with $363 thousand at December 31, 2014.

The Corporation’s had no legacy loans modifications at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

At March 31, 2015, the mortgage loan TDRs for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $696 million (including $369 million guaranteed by U.S. sponsored entities) and $5 million, respectively, of which $121 million and $2 million, respectively, were in non-performing

177

status. This compares with $669 million (including $290 million guaranteed by U.S. sponsored entities) and $4 million, respectively, of which $115 million and $987 thousand were in non-performing status at December 31, 2014. These mortgage loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $42 million and $341 thousand for the BPPR and BPNA segments, respectively, at March 31, 2015, compared to $46 million and $273 thousand, respectively, at December 31, 2014.

At March 31, 2015, the consumer loan TDRs for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $119 million and $2 million, respectively, of which $14 million and $180 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status, compared with $120 million and $2 million, respectively, of which $15 million and $35 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status at December 31, 2014. These consumer loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $25 million and $381 thousand for the BPPR and BPNA segments, respectively, at March 31, 2015, compared with $28 million and $365 thousand, respectively, at December 31, 2014.

Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on modifications considered troubled debt restructurings, including certain qualitative and quantitative data about troubled debt restructurings performed in the past twelve months.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Non-Covered Loan Portfolio

The allowance for loan losses, which represents management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, is maintained at a sufficient level to provide for estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. In this evaluation, management considers current economic conditions and the resulting impact on Popular Inc.’s loan portfolio, the composition of the portfolio by loan type and risk characteristics, historical loss experience, results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans, regulatory requirements and loan impairment measurement, among other factors.

The Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown, such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries or markets. Other factors that can affect management’s estimates are the years of historical data when estimating losses, changes in underwriting standards, financial accounting standards and loan impairment measurements, among others. Changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses. Consequently, the business financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations could also be affected.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 (loans individually assessed for impairment). Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans (pools) accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses in the current period. For purposes of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and new loans originated as a result of loan commitments assumed, the Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A for a description of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology.

The following tables set forth information concerning the composition of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 by loan category and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant to the requirements for specific impairment or through a general valuation allowance.

178

Table 49 - Composition of ALLL

March 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Legacy [3]			Leasing			Mortgage			Consumer			Total[2]
Specific ALLL	$	69,946		$	158		$	—		$	687		$	42,570		$	25,604		$	138,965
Impaired loans [1]	$	417,377		$	9,838		$	—		$	2,924		$	450,612		$	116,464		$	997,215
Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]		16.76	%		1.61	%		—	%		23.50	%		9.45	%		21.98	%		13.94	%
General ALLL	$	135,946		$	3,286		$	2,962		$	6,521		$	86,271		$	142,273		$	377,259
Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]	$	8,236,184		$	680,890		$	77,675		$	578,195		$	6,738,615		$	3,704,156		$	20,015,715
General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]		1.65	%		0.48	%		3.81	%		1.13	%		1.28	%		3.84	%		1.88	%
Total ALLL	$	205,892		$	3,444		$	2,962		$	7,208		$	128,841		$	167,877		$	516,224
Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [1]	$	8,653,561		$	690,728		$	77,675		$	581,119		$	7,189,227		$	3,820,620		$	21,012,930
ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]		2.38	%		0.50	%		3.81	%		1.24	%		1.79	%		4.39	%		2.46	%

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

[2] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At March 31, 2015, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $71.0 million, while specific reserve amounted to $1.5 million.

[3] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

Table 50 - Composition of ALLL

December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Legacy[3]			Leasing			Mortgage			Consumer			Total[2]
Specific ALLL	$	64,736		$	363		$	—		$	770		$	46,111		$	28,161		$	140,141
Impaired loans [1]	$	357,161		$	13,268		$	—		$	3,023		$	435,824		$	117,732		$	927,008
Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]		18.13	%		2.74	%		—	%		25.47	%		10.58	%		23.92	%		15.12	%
General ALLL	$	146,501		$	6,307		$	2,944		$	6,361		$	77,211		$	140,254		$	379,578
Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]	$	7,777,106		$	238,552		$	80,818		$	561,366		$	6,067,062		$	3,752,539		$	18,477,443
General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]		1.88	%		2.64	%		3.64	%		1.13	%		1.27	%		3.74	%		2.05	%
Total ALLL	$	211,237		$	6,670		$	2,944		$	7,131		$	123,322		$	168,415		$	519,719
Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [1]	$	8,134,267		$	251,820		$	80,818		$	564,389		$	6,502,886		$	3,870,271		$	19,404,451
ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]		2.60	%		2.65	%		3.64	%		1.26	%		1.90	%		4.35	%		2.68	%

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

[2] Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At December 31, 2014, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $82.1 million while the specific reserve amounted to $5 thousand.

[3] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

At March 31, 2015, the allowance for loan losses, excluding covered loans, decreased slightly by approximately $4 million when compared with December 31, 2014, mainly driven by the BPPR commercial portfolio. The general and specific reserves related to the non-covered loans totaled $377 million and $139 million, respectively, compared with $380 million and $140 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 2.46% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2015, compared with 2.68% at December 31, 2014, mostly due to impact of the Doral Bank transaction’s acquired portfolio on the total loan base. Excluding the Doral Bank portfolio, the allowance to loans ratio remained stable at 2.66%. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 77.63% at March 31, 2015, compared with 82.43% at December 31, 2014. Excluding the impact of Doral related non-performing loans, the allowance to non-performing loans ratio remained relatively flat at 81.03%.

179

At March 31, 2015, the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans at the BPPR segment totaled $484 million, or 2.92% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $489 million, or 3.07% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2014. The decrease in the allowance was mostly prompted by lower reserves for the commercial and construction portfolios, offset by higher reserves for the mortgage portfolio. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 75.90% at March 31, 2015, compared with 80.00% at December 31, 2014. Excluding the impact of Doral related non-performing loans, the allowance to non-performing loans ratio remained relatively flat at 78.37%.

The allowance for loan losses at the BPNA segment increased slightly to $32 million, or 0.72% of loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $31 million, or 0.88% of loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2014, driven by loan growth. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 118.60% at March 31, 2015, compared with 160.13% at December 31, 2014. The decrease in allowance coverage ratios was mainly related to the impact of the Doral portfolio. Excluding Doral, the previously referred ratios stood at 0.90% and 167.15%, respectively.

The allowance for loan losses for commercial loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $206 million, or 2.38% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $211 million, or 2.60%, at December 31, 2014. The allowance for loan losses for the commercial loan portfolio in the BPPR segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $195 million, or 3.05% of non-covered commercial loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $202 million, or 3.16%, at December 31, 2014. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the commercial loan portfolio remained flat at $10 million at March 31, 2015, when compared to December 31, 2014. The allowance for loan losses for commercial loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment was 0.46% of commercial loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with 0.55%, at December 31, 2014. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio in the commercial loan category was 75.02% at March 31, 2015, compared with 81.18% at December 31, 2014. Excluding Doral non-performing loans, allowance to non-performing loans ratio was 77.45%.

The allowance for loan losses for construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $3 million, or 0.50% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $7 million, or 2.65%, at December 31, 2014. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPPR segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $2 million, or 1.62% of non-covered construction loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $5 million, or 3.44%, at December 31, 2014. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the construction loan portfolio totaled $2 million, or 0.31% of construction loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $1 million, or 1.28%, at December 31, 2014. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in portfolio in the construction loan category was 26.06% at March 31, 2015, compared with 48.29% at December 31, 2014. Stable allowance levels in the construction portfolio result from the de-risking strategies executed by the Corporation over the past several years.

The allowance for loan losses for the legacy loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $3 million, or 3.81% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $3 million, or 3.64%, at December 31, 2014. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in portfolio in the legacy loan category was 129.46% at March 31, 2015, compared with 190.55% at December 31, 2014.

The allowance for loan losses for mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $129 million, or 1.79% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $123 million, or 1.90%, at December 31, 2014. The decrease in the ratio was due to the impact of Doral Bank acquired mortgage loans in the loan base. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio at the BPPR segment totaled $127 million, or 2.05% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, at March 31, 2015, compared with $121 million, or 2.22%, respectively, at December 31, 2014. The increase was consistent with current credit quality trends, including higher non-performing loans. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio was unchanged at $2 million, or 0.22% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $2 million, or 0.23%, at December 31, 2014. Low allowance levels corresponds the sale of certain classified loans, including mortgage TDRs and non-performing loans during 2014. The allowance for loan losses for BPNA’s non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio amounted to $1 million, or 0.43% of that particular loan portfolio, compared with $2 million, or 0.61%, at December 31, 2014. The Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA.

180

The allowance for loan losses for the consumer portfolio, excluding covered loans, was unchanged at $168 million, or 4.39% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared to $168 million, or 4.35%, at December 31, 2014. The allowance for loan losses of the non-covered consumer loan portfolio in the BPPR segment remained stable at $153 million, or 4.58% of that portfolio, at March 31, 2015, compared with $154 million, or 4.55%, at December 31, 2014. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the consumer loan portfolio totaled $14 million, or 3.08% of consumer loans, at March 31, 2015, compared with $14 million, or 2.98%, at December 31, 2014.

The following table presents the Corporation’s recorded investment in non-covered loans that were considered impaired and the related valuation allowance at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Table 51 - Impaired Loans (Non-Covered Loans) and the Related Valuation Allowance

	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
(In millions)	Recorded Investment		Valuation Allowance		Recorded Investment		Valuation Allowance
Impaired loans:
Valuation allowance	$	900.6	$	139.0	$	831.5	$	140.1
No valuation allowance required		96.6		—		95.5		—
Total impaired loans	$	997.2	$	139.0	$	927.0	$	140.1

With respect to the $97 million portfolio of the non-covered impaired loans for which no allowance for loan losses was required at March 31, 2015, management followed the guidance for specific impairment of a loan. When a loan is impaired, the measurement of the impairment may be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired loan discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. A loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. Impaired loans with no valuation allowance were mostly collateral dependent loans for which management charged-off specific reserves based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell.

Average non-covered impaired loans for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 were $962.1 million and $927.6 million, respectively. The Corporation recognized interest income on non-covered impaired loans of $12.2 million and $7.5 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The following tables set forth the activity in the specific reserves for non-covered impaired loans for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Table 52 - Activity in Specific ALLL for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2015

(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Legacy		Consumer			Leasing			Total
Beginning balance	$	64,736		$	363		$	46,111		$	—	$	28,161		$	770		$	140,141
Provision for impaired loans		9,483			(205	)		(1,221	)		—		1,238			(62	)		9,233
Less: Net charge-offs		(4,273	)		—			(2,320	)		—		(3,795	)		(21	)		(10,409	)
Specific allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2015	$	69,946		$	158		$	42,570		$	—	$	25,604		$	687		$	138,965

Table 53 - Activity in Specific ALLL for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014

(In thousands)	Commercial			Construction			Mortgage			Legacy		Consumer			Leasing			Total
Beginning balance	$	16,409		$	177		$	55,667		$	—	$	30,200		$	1,053		$	103,506
Provision for impaired loans		22,424			482			348			—		1,112			(381	)		23,985
Less: Net charge-offs		(7,941	)		(416	)		(2,099	)		—		(1,899	)		—			(12,355	)
Specific allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2014	$	30,892		$	243		$	53,916		$	—	$	29,413		$	672		$	115,136

181

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015, total net charge-offs for individually evaluated impaired loans amounted to approximately $10.4 million, of which $10.3 million pertained to the BPPR segment and $115 thousand to the BPNA segment. Most of these net charge-offs were related to the commercial loan portfolio.

The Corporation requests updated appraisal reports from pre-approved appraisers for loans that are considered impaired, and individually analyzes them following the Corporation’s reappraisal policy. This policy requires updated appraisals for loans secured by real estate (including construction loans) either annually or every two years depending on the total exposure of the borrower. As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered impaired. Generally, the specialized appraisal review unit of the Corporation’s Credit Risk Management Division internally reviews appraisals following certain materiality benchmarks. In addition to evaluating the reasonability of the appraisal reports, these reviews monitor that appraisals are performed following the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”).

Appraisals may be adjusted due to age or general market conditions. The adjustments applied are based upon internal information, like other appraisals and/or loss severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate market. Specifically, in commercial and construction impaired loans for the BPPR segment, and depending on the type of property and/or the age of the appraisal, downward adjustments currently range from 25% to 45% (including costs to sell). At March 31, 2015, the weighted average discount rate for the BPPR segment was 25%.

For commercial and construction loans at the BPNA segment, downward adjustments to the collateral value currently range from 10% to 40% (including costs to sell) depending on the age of the appraisals and the type, location and condition of the property. This discount used was determined based on a study of other real estate owned and loan sale transactions during the past two years, comparing net proceeds received by the bank relative to the most recent appraised value of the properties. However, additional haircuts can be applied depending upon the age of appraisal, the region and the condition of the project. Factors are based on appraisal changes and/or trends in loss severities. Discount rates discussed above include costs to sell and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

For mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties, a current assessment of value is made not later than 180 days past the contractual due date. Any outstanding balance in excess of the estimated value of the collateral property, less estimated costs to sell, is charged-off. For this purpose, the Corporation requests third-party Broker Price Opinion of Value “BPOs” of the subject collateral property at least annually. In the case of the mortgage loan portfolio for the BPPR segment, BPOs of the subject collateral properties are currently subject to downward adjustment of up to approximately 30%, including cost to sell of 5%. In the case of the U.S. mortgage loan portfolio, a 10% haircut is taken, which includes costs to sell.

Discount rates discussed above, including costs to sell, are validated twice a year and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

The table that follows presents the approximate amount and percentage of non-covered impaired loans for which the Corporation relied on appraisals dated more than one year old for purposes of impairment requirements at March 31, 2015.

Table 54 - Non-Covered Impaired Loans with Appraisals Dated 1 year or Older

March 31, 2015
	Total Impaired Loans – Held-in-portfolio  (HIP)
(In thousands)	Loan Count		Outstanding Principal Balance		Impaired Loans with Appraisals Over One-Year Old [1]
Commercial		143	$	361,307		15	%
Construction		5		7,075		68

[1] Based on outstanding balance of total impaired loans.

182

December 31, 2014
	Total Impaired Loans – Held-in-portfolio  (HIP)
(In thousands)	Loan Count		Outstanding Principal Balance		Impaired Loans with Appraisals Over One-Year Old [1]
Commercial		140	$	303,128		12	%
Construction		6		10,693		79

[1] Based on outstanding balance of total impaired loans.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation accounted for $5 million impaired construction loans under the “as developed” value. This approach is used since the current plan is that the project will be completed and it reflects the best strategy to reduce potential losses based on the prospects of the project. The costs to complete the project and the related increase in debt are considered an integral part of the individual reserve determination.

Costs to complete are deducted from the subject “as developed” collateral value on impaired construction loans. Impairment determinations are calculated following the collateral dependent method, comparing the outstanding principal balance of the respective impaired construction loan against the expected realizable value of the subject collateral. Realizable values of subject collaterals have been defined as the “as developed” appraised value less costs to complete, costs to sell and discount factors. Costs to complete represent an estimate of the amount of money to be disbursed to complete a particular phase of a construction project. Costs to sell have been determined as a percentage of the subject collateral value, to cover related collateral disposition costs (e.g. legal and commission fees). As discussed previously, discount factors may be applied to the appraised amounts due to age or general market conditions.

Table 55 - Impaired Construction Loans Relied Upon “As is” or “As Developed”

March 31, 2015
	“As is”							“As developed”
(In thousands)	Loan Count		Outstanding Principal Balance		As a % Of Total Construction Impaired Loans HIP			Loan Count		Outstanding Principal Balance		As a % Of Total Construction Impaired Loans HIP			Average % Of Completion
Loans held-in-portfolio		7	$	5,124		52	%		2	$	4,714		48	%		85	%

December 31, 2014
	“As is”							“As developed”
(In thousands)	Loan Count		Outstanding Principal Balance		As a % Of Total Construction Impaired Loans HIP			Loan Count		Outstanding Principal Balance		As a % Of Total Construction Impaired Loans HIP			Average % Of Completion
Loans held-in-portfolio		7	$	7,653		58	%		2	$	5,616		42	%		87	%

Allowance for loan losses – Covered loan portfolio

The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses for the covered loan portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction amounted to $72 million at March 31, 2015, compared to $82 million at December 31, 2014. This allowance covers the estimated credit loss exposure related to: (i) acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, which required an allowance for loan losses of $68 million at March 31, 2015, compared with $79 million at December 31, 2014; and (ii) acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, which required an allowance for loan losses of $4 million at March 31, 2015 and $3 million at December 31, 2014.

183

Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans (pools) accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses in the current period. For purposes of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and new loans originated as a result of loan commitments assumed, the Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment. Concurrently, the Corporation records an increase in the FDIC loss share asset for the expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements.

Geographic and government risk

The Corporation is exposed to geographic and government risk. The Corporation’s assets and revenue composition by geographical area and by business segment reporting are presented in Note 38 to the consolidated financial statements. A significant portion of our financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico, which entered into a recession in the second quarter of 2006. Puerto Rico’s gross national product contracted in real terms in every year between fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2011 (inclusive), grew by 0.9% in fiscal year 2012 and decreased by 0.2% and 0.9% in fiscal years 2013 and 2014. Although the forecast for fiscal years 2015 and 2016 has not been made public, gross national product for fiscal year 2015 is expected to decrease, based on available monthly economic indicators. The latest Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (“GDB”) Economic Activity Index, which is a coincident indicator of ongoing economic activity, reflected a 1.6% year-over-year reduction for February 2015, after showing a 2.5% year-over-year reduction for January 2015.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”) has experienced and continues to experience significant budget deficits, which have been historically covered with bond financings, loans from GDB and extraordinary one-time revenue measures. Following the downgrades of the Commonwealth and its instrumentalities’ obligations to below investment grade ratings (as described below), the Commonwealth’s ability to finance future budget deficits is expected to be very limited in the near future.

The Government currently projects that fiscal year 2015 will end with a budget deficit of $191 million, as a result of an estimated revenue shortfall of $651 million that it expects to be partially offset by certain one-time revenue and expense measures. There is no assurance, however, that the proposed measures, even if successfully implemented, will generate the increases in revenues or reductions in expenditures that are currently projected. In addition, it is possible that material expenses may have been incurred but not yet identified, thus resulting in additional expenses not considered in current projections. The Executive Branch has said that it continues to evaluate additional measures that may be necessary to cover the budget deficit.

The Commonwealth is currently working on a budget for fiscal year 2016, which, according to information publicly available, will start from a revenue base below that of fiscal year 2015 due to the revenue shortfall described above and the exclusion of various non-recurring items (estimated at approximately $810 million) from fiscal year 2015. In addition to the lower revenue base, the Commonwealth will have to address approximately $1.1 billion in additional expenditures in fiscal year 2016, including additional debt service requirements.

In addition, the Commonwealth’s and GDB’s liquidity is significantly strained. GDB is currently projected to have insufficient liquidity to meet its legal reserve requirement by the first quarter of fiscal year 2016 and may be unable to support the operations and liquidity needs of the Commonwealth, its public corporations and instrumentalities and municipalities. In that scenario, the Commonwealth may also be unable to obtain intra-year short-term financing for fiscal year 2016 through the issuance of Tax Revenue Anticipation Notes (“TRANs”). The Commonwealth currently projects that absent TRANs financing, the Commonwealth would deplete its cash resources in full during the first quarter of fiscal year 2016, even after considering the implementation of extraordinary short-term administrative measures to conserve cash. The Government has stated that the Commonwealth and GDB may be unable to honor all of their obligations as they come due and that the Commonwealth may also be unable to fund all necessary governmental programs and services if it does not have sufficient access to the capital markets or alternative sources of financing to satisfy its liquidity needs, or as a result of its fiscal challenges. Although the Executive Branch continues to consider significant expense reduction measures in addition to those already identified and is evaluating alternate revenue measures in order to submit a balanced budget for fiscal year 2016, the Commonwealth has also indicated that it may need to implement administrative and emergency measures in fiscal year 2016 and thereafter, which may include a moratorium on the payment of debt service, a debt adjustment, or other actions affecting creditors’ rights.

In order to address the fiscal challenges described above, on February 10, 2015, the Governor announced a proposal for a comprehensive tax reform that would include replacing the current 7% sales and use tax with a 16% value-added tax, while significantly lowering income taxes. The proposed bill was introduced on February 11, 2015. The Puerto Rico Treasury Department projected that the tax reform, if approved as proposed, would have generated approximately $1.2 billion in additional recurring revenues to the General Fund. On April 29, 2015, after intense public debate, a substitute bill introduced at the House of Representatives that included, among other things, lower substitute rates for the value added tax, was voted down at the House of Representatives.

Following the failure to approve the proposed tax reform, the Executive Branch has announced that it is considering significant expense reduction measures and is evaluating alternate revenue measures in order to submit a balanced budget for fiscal year 2016. It is currently uncertain whether such measures will be successful.

184

The Commonwealth’s public corporations and instrumentalities are also facing fiscal challenges. On June 28, 2014, Governor Alejandro García Padilla signed into law the Puerto Rico Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (the “Recovery Act”) which provides a framework for certain public corporations, including the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority, to restructure their debt obligations in order to ensure that the services they provide to the public are not interrupted.

In July 2014, certain holders of PREPA bonds and an investment manager, on behalf of funds which hold PREPA bonds, filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (the “District Court”) seeking a declaratory judgment that the Recovery Act violates several provisions of the United States Constitution. The District Court consolidated the actions. On February 6, 2015, the District Court issued an opinion and order declaring the Recovery Act unconstitutional and stating that it was preempted by the federal Bankruptcy Code. The District Court permanently enjoined the Commonwealth officers from enforcing the Recovery Act. The Commonwealth filed an expedited appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Oral arguments were held on May 6, 2015.

On February 11, 2015, the Puerto Rico Resident Commissioner introduced a bill in the U.S. Congress that would empower the government of Puerto Rico to authorize Puerto Rico municipalities and public corporations to restructure their debt obligations under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The Commonwealth and GDB have expressed their support for this amendment to the United States Bankruptcy Code. On February 26, 2015, public hearings were held to consider the bill. At this time it is unclear if and when the bill will be approved and, if it is approved, whether its effects will be retroactive or not.

Since February 2014, the three principal rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) have lowered their ratings on the General Obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and the bonds of several other Commonwealth instrumentalities to non-investment grade ratings. In connection with their rating actions, the rating agencies noted various factors, including high levels of public debt, the lack of a clear economic growth catalyst, recurring fiscal budget deficits, the financial condition of the public sector employee pension plans and, more recently, liquidity concerns regarding the Commonwealth and the GDB and their ability to access the capital markets. Currently, the Commonwealth’s general obligation ratings are as follows: S&P, ‘CCC+’, Moody’s, ‘Caaa1’, and Fitch, ‘B’.

The lingering effects of the prolonged recession are still reflected in limited loan demand, an increase in the rate of foreclosures and delinquencies on mortgage loans granted in Puerto Rico. If global or local economic conditions worsen or the Government is unable to access the capital markets, manage its fiscal problems in an orderly manner and honor its obligations as they come due, those adverse effects could continue or worsen in ways that we are not able to predict. Any reduction in consumer spending as a result of these issues may also adversely impact our non-interest revenues.

At March 31, 2015, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $995 million, of which approximately $813 million is outstanding ($1.0 billion and $811 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014). Of the amount outstanding, $698 million consists of loans and $ 115 million are securities ($ 689 million and $ 122 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014). Of the loans outstanding, $336 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that are either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($ 336 million at December 31, 2014). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $ 477 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($475 million at December 31, 2014). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. Table 56 has a summary of the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities.

Table 56 - Direct Exposure to the Puerto Rico Government

(In thousands)	Investment Portfolio		Loans		Total Outstanding		Total Exposure
Central Government	$	49,286	$	20,000	$	69,286	$	179,559
Government Development Bank (GDB)		6,111		100,000		106,111		106,111
Public Corporations:
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority		487		85,000		85,487		116,177
Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority		20		74,993		75,013		75,013
Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority		4		—		4		4
Other		—		—		—		1,500
Municipalities		58,660		418,405		477,065		516,305
Total Direct Government Exposure	$	114,568	$	698,398	$	812,966	$	994,669

185

In addition, at March 31, 2015, the Corporation had $376 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($370 million at December 31, 2014). These included $296 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2014 - $289 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Also, the Corporation had $49 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $31 million of industrial development notes ($49 million and $32 million, respectively, at December 31, 2014).

On October 10, 2014, GDB entered into a note purchase, revolving credit and term loan agreement with a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions providing for the issuance of up to $900 million of GDB short-term senior notes, guaranteed by the Commonwealth, the proceeds of which will be used to fund the purchase of an equal amount of TRANs of the Commonwealth. The TRANs, which also serve as collateral for the GDB notes, provide intra-year financing to the central Government to address timing differences between expected disbursements and receipts of taxes and revenues for fiscal year 2015. The GDB notes and the related Commonwealth’s tax and revenue anticipation notes mature on June 30, 2015. As of May 1, 2015, $500 million of TRANs remain outstanding, with $55.6 million payable to BPPR. Of the four remaining scheduled principal payments due under the facility, two in the amount of $11.1 million each are payable on May 15, 2015 and June 15, 2015, and two of $16.7 million each on May 29, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively, to BPPR.

As further detailed in Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial portion of the Corporation’s investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in the form of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well as agency mortgage-backed and U.S. Treasury securities. In addition, $903 million of residential mortgages and $116 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies at March 31, 2015. The Corporation does not have any exposure to European sovereign debt.

ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Refer to Note 3, “New Accounting Pronouncements” to the consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures for the current period can be found in the Market Risk section of this report, which includes changes in market risk exposures from disclosures presented in the Corporation’s 2014 Annual Report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Corporation’s management, with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II - Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a discussion of Legal Proceedings, see Note 26, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under “Part I - Item 1A - Risk Factors” in our 2014 Annual Report. These factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to the discussion in “Part I - Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this report for additional information that may supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in our 2014 Annual Report.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A of the Corporation’s 2014 Annual Report, except for the risks described below.

The risks described in our 2014 Annual Report and in this report are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

186

RISKS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY

Weakness in the economy and in the real estate market in our geographic footprint has adversely impacted and may continue to adversely impact us.

Popular is exposed to geographical and government risk. A significant portion of our financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico, which entered into a recession in the second quarter of 2006. Puerto Rico’s gross national product contracted in real terms in every year between fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2011 (inclusive), grew by 0.9% in fiscal year 2012 and decreased by 0.2% and 0.9% in fiscal years 2013 and 2014. Although the forecast for fiscal years 2015 and 2016 has not been made public, gross national product for fiscal year 2015 is expected to decrease, based on available monthly economic indicators. The latest Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (“GDB”) Economic Activity Index, which is a coincident indicator of ongoing economic activity, reflected a 1.6% year-over-year reduction for February 2015, after showing a 2.5% year-over-year reduction for January 2015.

This persistent contraction or minimal growth has had an adverse effect on employment. A reduction in total employment began in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 (ending June 30, 2007) and has continued consistently through fiscal year 2014 (ending June 30, 2014) due to the current recession and contractionary fiscal adjustment measures. According to the Household Survey (conducted by the Puerto Rico Department of Labor and Human Resources), during the first nine months of fiscal year 2015, total employment fell by 0.8% as compared to the same period for the prior fiscal year, and the unemployment rate averaged 13.1% compared to 14.7% for the same period of the prior fiscal year.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth”) has experienced and continues to experience significant budget deficits, which have been historically covered with bond financings, loans from GDB and extraordinary one-time revenue measures. Following the downgrades of the Commonwealth and its instrumentalities’ obligations to below investment grade ratings (as described below), the Commonwealth’s ability to finance future budget deficits is expected to be very limited in the near future.

The Government currently projects that fiscal year 2015 will end with a budget deficit of $191 million, as a result of an estimated revenue shortfall of $651 million that it expects to be partially offset by certain one-time revenue and expense measures. There is no assurance, however, that the proposed measures, even if successfully implemented, will generate the increases in revenues or reductions in expenditures that are currently projected. In addition, it is possible that material expenses may have been incurred but not yet identified, thus resulting in additional expenses not considered in current projections. The Executive Branch has said that it continues to evaluate additional measures that may be necessary to cover the budget deficit.

The Commonwealth is currently working on a budget for fiscal year 2016, which, according to information publicly available, will start from a revenue base below that of fiscal year 2015 due to the revenue shortfall described above and the exclusion of various non-recurring items (estimated at approximately $810 million) from fiscal year 2015. In addition to the lower revenue base, the Commonwealth will have to address approximately $1.1 billion in additional expenditures in fiscal year 2016, including additional debt service requirements.

In addition, the Commonwealth’s and GDB’s liquidity is significantly strained. GDB is currently projected to have insufficient liquidity to meet its legal reserve requirement by the first quarter of fiscal year 2016 and may be unable to support the operations and liquidity needs of the Commonwealth, its public corporations and instrumentalities and municipalities. In that scenario, the Commonwealth may also be unable to obtain intra-year short-term financing for fiscal year 2016 through the issuance of Tax Revenue Anticipation Notes (“TRANs”). The Commonwealth currently projects that absent TRANs financing, the Commonwealth would deplete its cash resources in full during the first quarter of fiscal year 2016, even after considering the implementation of extraordinary short-term administrative measures to conserve cash. The Government has stated that the Commonwealth and GDB may be unable to honor all of their obligations as they come due and that the Commonwealth may also be unable to fund all necessary governmental programs and services if it does not have sufficient access to the capital markets or alternative sources of financing to satisfy its liquidity needs, or as a result of its fiscal challenges. Although the Executive Branch continues to consider significant expense reduction measures in addition to those already identified and is evaluating alternate revenue measures in order to submit a balanced budget for fiscal year 2016, the Commonwealth has also indicated that it may need to implement administrative and emergency measures in fiscal year 2016 and thereafter, which may include a moratorium on the payment of debt service, a debt adjustment, or other actions affecting creditors’ rights.

In order to address the fiscal challenges described above, on February 10, 2015, the Governor announced a proposal for a comprehensive tax reform that would include replacing the current 7% sales and use tax with a 16% value-added tax, while significantly lowering income taxes. The proposed bill was introduced on February 11, 2015. The Puerto Rico Treasury Department projected that the tax reform, if approved as proposed, would have generated approximately $1.2 billion in additional recurring revenues to the General Fund. On April 29, 2015, after intense public debate, a substitute bill introduced at the House of Representatives that included, among other things, lower substitute rates for the value added tax, was voted down at the House of Representatives.

Following the failure to approve the proposed tax reform, the Executive Branch has announced that it is considering significant expense reduction measures and is evaluating alternate revenue measures in order to submit a balanced budget for fiscal year 2016. It is currently uncertain whether such measures will be successful.

The Commonwealth’s public corporations and instrumentalities are also facing fiscal challenges. On June 28, 2014, Governor Alejandro García Padilla signed into law the Puerto Rico Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (the “Recovery Act”) which provides a framework for certain public corporations, including the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority, to restructure their debt obligations in order to ensure that the services they provide to the public are not interrupted. The Recovery Act was challenged in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, which declared the Recovery Act unconstitutional and permanently enjoined the Commonwealth officers from enforcing the Recovery Act. The Commonwealth filed an expedited appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and oral arguments have been held.

187

The Puerto Rico Resident Commissioner has introduced a bill in the U.S. Congress that would empower the Government of Puerto Rico to authorize Puerto Rico municipalities and public corporations to restructure their debt obligations under Chapter 9 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The Commonwealth and GDB have expressed their support for this amendment to the United States Bankruptcy Code. At this time it is unclear if and when the bill will be approved and, if it is approved, whether its effects will be retroactive or not.

Since February 2014, the three principal rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) have lowered their ratings on the General Obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and the bonds of several other Commonwealth instrumentalities to non-investment grade ratings. In connection with their rating actions, the rating agencies noted various factors, including high levels of public debt, the lack of a clear economic growth catalyst, recurring fiscal budget deficits, the financial condition of the public sector employee pension plans and, more recently, liquidity concerns regarding the Commonwealth and the GDB and their ability to access the capital markets. Currently, the Commonwealth’s general obligation ratings are as follows: S&P, ‘CCC+’, Moody’s, ‘Caaa1’, and Fitch, ‘B’.

The lingering effects of the prolonged recession are still reflected in limited loan demand, an increase in the rate of foreclosures and delinquencies on mortgage loans granted in Puerto Rico. If global or local economic conditions worsen or the Government is unable to access the capital markets, manage its fiscal problems in an orderly manner and honor its obligations as they come due, those adverse effects could continue or worsen in ways that we are not able to predict. Any reduction in consumer spending or deterioration in creditworthiness of borrowers or their collateral as a result of these issues may also adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.

For additional information regarding the Puerto Rico economy, refer to “Geographical and government risk” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of this Quarterly Report.

RISKS RELATED TO THE FDIC-ASSISTED TRANSACTION

Our ability to obtain reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements on covered assets depends on our compliance with the terms of the loss sharing agreements.

The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow to receive reimbursement on losses from the FDIC. Under the loss share agreements, BPPR must:

• manage and administer the covered assets and collect and effect charge-offs and recoveries with respect to such covered assets in a manner consistent with its usual and prudent business and banking practices and, with respect to single family shared-loss loans, the procedures (including collection procedures) customarily employed by BPPR in servicing and administering mortgage loans for its own account and the servicing procedures established by FNMA or FHLMC, as in effect from time to time, and in accordance with accepted mortgage servicing practices of prudent lending institutions;

• exercise its best judgment in managing, administering and collecting amounts on covered assets and effecting charge-offs with respect to the covered assets;

• use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize recoveries with respect to losses on single family shared-loss assets and best efforts to maximize collections with respect to commercial shared-loss assets;

• retain sufficient staff to perform the duties under the loss share agreements;

• adopt and implement accounting, reporting, record-keeping and similar systems with respect to the commercial shared-loss assets;

• comply with the terms of the modification guidelines approved by the FDIC or another federal agency for any single-family shared loss loan;

• provide notice with respect to proposed transactions pursuant to which a third party or affiliate will manage, administer or collect any commercial shared-loss assets; and

• file monthly and quarterly certificates with the FDIC specifying the amount of losses, charge-offs and recoveries.

Under the loss share agreements, BPPR is also required to maintain books and records sufficient to ensure and document compliance with the terms of the loss share agreements.

Under the terms of the loss share agreements, BPPR is also required to deliver certain certificates regarding compliance with the terms of each of the loss share agreements and the computations required there under. The required terms of the agreements are extensive and failure to comply with any of the guidelines could result in a specific asset or group of assets permanently losing their loss sharing coverage. BPPR believes that it has complied with the terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets. No assurances can be given that we will manage the covered assets in such a way as to always maintain loss share coverage on all such assets and fully recover the value of our loss share asset.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2010 through March 31, 2012, BPPR received reimbursement for loss-share claims submitted to the FDIC, including charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. When BPPR submitted its shared-loss claim in connection with the June 30, 2012 quarter, however, the FDIC refused to reimburse BPPR for a portion of the claim because of a difference related to the methodology for the computation of charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO. In accordance with the terms of the commercial loss share agreement, BPPR applied a methodology for charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans that conforms to its regulatory supervisory criteria and is calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. The FDIC stated that it believed that BPPR should use a different methodology for those charge-offs. Notwithstanding the FDIC’s refusal to reimburse BPPR for certain shared-loss claims, BPPR had continued to calculate shared-loss claims for quarters subsequent to June 30, 2012 in accordance with its charge-off policy for non-covered assets.

BPPR’s loss share agreements with the FDIC specify that disputes can be submitted to arbitration before a review board under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On July 31, 2013, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that the review board determine certain matters relating to the loss-share claims under its commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC, including that the review board award BPPR the amounts owed under its unpaid quarterly certificates. The statement of claim also included requests for reimbursement of certain valuation adjustments for discounts to appraised values, costs to sell troubled assets and other items. The review board was comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators.

188

On October 17, 2014, BPPR and the FDIC settled all claims and counterclaims that had been submitted to the review board. The settlement provides for an agreed valuation methodology for reimbursement of charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and resulting OREO. Although the terms of the settlement could delay the timing of reimbursement of certain loss-share claims from the FDIC, the settlement is not expected to have a material adverse impact on BPPR’s current estimate of expected reimbursable losses for the covered portfolio through the end of the commercial loss share agreement in the quarter ending June 30, 2015.

As of March 31, 2015, BPPR had unreimbursed losses and expenses of $243.2 million under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC. On April 9, 2015, BPPR received reimbursement of $27.9 million from the FDIC covering claims filed prior to March 31, 2015. Taking into consideration this payment and claims submitted through that date, the total unreimbursed losses totaled $215.3 million, of which $80.1 million was submitted to the FDIC on April 30, 2015. BPPR continues to work on processing claims, including those which had previously not been reimbursed by the FDIC and expects to complete this process before the expiration of BPPR’s ability to submit claims under the commercial loss share agreement in the quarter ending June 30, 2015. After giving effect to the claim submitted on April 30, 2015, the amount of claims pending to be submitted for reimbursement to the FDIC amounted to $135.2 million.

On November 25, 2014, the FDIC notified BPPR that it (a) would not reimburse BPPR under the commercial loss share agreement for a $66.6 million loss claim on eight related real estate loans that BPPR restructured and consolidated (collectively, the “Disputed Asset”), and (b) would no longer treat the Disputed Asset as a “Shared-Loss Asset” under the commercial loss share agreement. The FDIC alleged that BPPR’s restructure and modification of the underlying loans did not constitute a “Permitted Amendment” under the commercial loss share agreement, thereby causing the bank to breach Article III of the commercial loss share agreement.

BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s determinations relating to the Disputed Asset, and accordingly, on December 19, 2014, delivered to the FDIC a notice of dispute under the commercial loss share agreement.

The commercial loss share agreement provides that certain disputes be submitted to arbitration before a review board, to include two party-appointed members, under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On March 19, 2015, BPPR filed a statement of claim with the American Arbitration Association requesting that a review board determine BPPR and the FDIC’s disputes concerning the Disputed Asset. The statement of claim requests a declaration that the Disputed Asset is a “Shared-Loss Asset” under the commercial loss share agreement, a declaration that the restructuring is a “Permitted Amendment” under the commercial shared loss agreement, and an order that the FDIC reimburse the Bank for approximately $53.3 million for the Charge-Off of the Disputed Asset, plus interest at the applicable rate. On April 1, 2015, the FDIC-R notified BPPR that it is clawing back approximately $1.7 million in reimbursable expenses relating to the Disputed Asset that the FDIC-R had previously paid to BPPR. Thus, on April 13, 2015, BPPR notified the American Arbitration Association and the FDIC of an increase in the amount of its damages by approximately $1.7 million.

To the extent we are not able to successfully resolve this matter through negotiation or the arbitration process described above, a write-off in the amount of approximately $53.3 million plus expenses incurred in connection with the Disputed Asset, which at March 31, 2015 amounted to $1.4 million of the aforementioned pending claims would be recorded.

In addition, in November and December 2014, BPPR proposed separate portfolio sales to the FDIC. The FDIC has refused to consent to either sale, stating that those sales did not represent best efforts to maximize collections on Shared-Loss Assets under the commercial loss share agreement. In March 2015, BPPR proposed a third portfolio sale to the FDIC. The FDIC has not yet responded to that proposal.

BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s characterization of the November and December 2014 portfolio sale proposals and with the FDIC’s interpretation of the commercial shared loss agreement provision governing portfolio sales. Accordingly, BPPR has informed the FDIC of the existence of a dispute, and negotiations are continuing.

No assurance can be given that we will receive reimbursement from the FDIC with respect to the foregoing items, which could require us to make a material adjustment to the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for ten years (ending on June 30, 2020), and the loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and other assets provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for five years (ending on June 30, 2015), with additional recovery sharing for three years thereafter. As of March 31, 2015, the carrying value of covered loans approximated $2.5 billion, of which approximately 64% pertained to commercial loans, 3% to construction loans, 32% to mortgage loans and 1% to consumer loans. To the extent that estimated losses on covered loans are not realized before the expiration of the applicable loss sharing agreement, such losses would not be subject to reimbursement from the FDIC and, accordingly, would require us to make a material reduction in the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In April 2004, the Corporation’s shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Corporation has to date used shares purchased in the market to make grants under the Plan. As of March 31, 2015 the maximum number of shares of common stock that may have been granted under this plan was 3,500,000.

In connection with the Corporation’s participation in the Capital Purchase Program under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the consent of the U.S. Department of the Treasury will be required for the Corporation to repurchase its common stock other than in connection with benefit plans consistent with past practice and certain other specified circumstances. The Corporation terminated its participation in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, after the repurchase on July 23, 2014, of the outstanding warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury.

The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Not in thousands
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1 - January 31		—		—		—		—
February 1 - February 28		2,643	$	32.16		—		—
March 1 - March 31		—		—		—		—
Total March 31, 2015		2,643	$	32.16		—		—

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description
10.1	Form of 2015 Long-Term Incentive Equity Incentive Award and Agreement
12.1	Computation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends(1)
31.1	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
31.2	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)

189

32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)
101.INS XBRL Instance Document(1)
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document(1)
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document(1)
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document(1)
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document(1)
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document(1)

⁽¹⁾ Included herewith

190

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		POPULAR, INC.
		(Registrant)
Date: May 11, 2015	By:	/s/ Carlos J. Vázquez
		Carlos J. Vázquez
		Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 11, 2015	By:	/s/ Jorge J. García
		Jorge J. García
		Senior Vice President & Corporate Comptroller

191