þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Maryland | 42-1241468 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
8-39 | ||||
40-56 | ||||
57 | ||||
58 | ||||
59 | ||||
59 | ||||
2
3
June 30 | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 337,810,000 | $ | 325,138,000 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
1,296,924,000 | 1,246,979,000 | ||||||
1,634,734,000 | 1,572,117,000 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(207,895,000 | ) | (188,233,000 | ) | ||||
Real estate, net |
1,426,839,000 | 1,383,884,000 | ||||||
Real estate held for sale/conveyance |
51,175,000 | 88,348,000 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
46,060,000 | 52,466,000 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
13,426,000 | 14,166,000 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
14,340,000 | 12,493,000 | ||||||
Receivables: |
||||||||
Rents and other tenant receivables, net |
8,914,000 | 7,048,000 | ||||||
Straight-line rents |
16,546,000 | 15,669,000 | ||||||
Loans and other receivables ($8.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively) and
joint venture settlements |
10,968,000 | 8,599,000 | ||||||
Other assets |
8,925,000 | 9,676,000 | ||||||
Deferred charges, net |
25,900,000 | 28,086,000 | ||||||
Assets relating to real estate held for sale/conveyance |
2,322,000 | 2,052,000 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,625,415,000 | $ | 1,622,487,000 | ||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
$ | 684,118,000 | $ | 659,203,000 | ||||
Mortgage loans payable real estate held for sale/conveyance |
42,951,000 | 48,313,000 | ||||||
Secured revolving credit facilities |
167,097,000 | 132,597,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
30,446,000 | 29,026,000 | ||||||
Unamortized intangible lease liabilities |
44,092,000 | 46,453,000 | ||||||
Liabilities relating to real estate held for sale/conveyance |
1,416,000 | 1,371,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
970,120,000 | 916,963,000 | ||||||
Limited partners interest in Operating Partnership |
5,325,000 | 7,053,000 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock ($.01 par value, $25.00 per share
liquidation value, 12,500,000 shares authorized, 6,400,000 shares
issued and outstanding) |
158,575,000 | 158,575,000 | ||||||
Common stock ($.06 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized
68,002,000 and 66,520,000 shares, respectively, issued and
outstanding) |
4,080,000 | 3,991,000 | ||||||
Treasury stock (1,336,000 and 1,120,000 shares, respectively, at cost) |
(10,856,000 | ) | (10,367,000 | ) | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
718,015,000 | 712,548,000 | ||||||
Cumulative distributions in excess of net income |
(283,400,000 | ) | (231,275,000 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(2,997,000 | ) | (3,406,000 | ) | ||||
Total Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. shareholders equity |
583,417,000 | 630,066,000 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests: |
||||||||
Minority interests in consolidated joint ventures |
60,299,000 | 62,050,000 | ||||||
Limited partners interest in Operating Partnership |
6,254,000 | 6,355,000 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
66,553,000 | 68,405,000 | ||||||
Total equity |
649,970,000 | 698,471,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,625,415,000 | $ | 1,622,487,000 | ||||
4
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Rents |
$ | 30,730,000 | $ | 30,988,000 | $ | 61,495,000 | $ | 63,240,000 | ||||||||
Expense recoveries |
6,776,000 | 6,718,000 | 16,232,000 | 16,150,000 | ||||||||||||
Other |
793,000 | 283,000 | 1,499,000 | 382,000 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
38,299,000 | 37,989,000 | 79,226,000 | 79,772,000 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating, maintenance and management |
7,035,000 | 6,840,000 | 17,620,000 | 16,315,000 | ||||||||||||
Real estate and other property-related taxes |
4,849,000 | 4,844,000 | 9,811,000 | 9,736,000 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,691,000 | 2,106,000 | 5,216,000 | 4,317,000 | ||||||||||||
Management transition charges |
6,350,000 | | 6,530,000 | | ||||||||||||
Impairments |
| 562,000 | | 2,117,000 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition transaction costs and terminated projects |
73,000 | 2,000 | 1,242,000 | 1,322,000 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,917,000 | 11,222,000 | 21,250,000 | 21,370,000 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses |
31,915,000 | 25,576,000 | 61,669,000 | 55,177,000 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
6,384,000 | 12,413,000 | 17,557,000 | 24,595,000 | ||||||||||||
Non-operating income and expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization of
deferred financing costs |
(11,773,000 | ) | (12,292,000 | ) | (23,863,000 | ) | (25,574,000 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
106,000 | 5,000 | 184,000 | 19,000 | ||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity in income |
34,000 | 479,000 | 825,000 | 835,000 | ||||||||||||
Write-off of investment |
(7,961,000 | ) | | (7,961,000 | ) | | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of land parcel |
| | 28,000 | | ||||||||||||
Total non-operating income and expense |
(19,594,000 | ) | (11,808,000 | ) | (30,787,000 | ) | (24,720,000 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income before discontinued operations |
(13,210,000 | ) | 605,000 | (13,230,000 | ) | (125,000 | ) | |||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
265,000 | (157,000 | ) | 1,478,000 | (514,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(12,258,000 | ) | (2,990,000 | ) | (22,544,000 | ) | (3,238,000 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sales |
474,000 | (5,000 | ) | 474,000 | 170,000 | |||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(11,519,000 | ) | (3,152,000 | ) | (20,592,000 | ) | (3,582,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
(24,729,000 | ) | (2,547,000 | ) | (33,822,000 | ) | (3,707,000 | ) | ||||||||
Less, net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests: |
||||||||||||||||
Minority interests in consolidated joint ventures |
22,000 | 87,000 | 47,000 | (388,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Limited partners interest in Operating Partnership |
579,000 | 178,000 | 839,000 | 292,000 | ||||||||||||
Total net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
601,000 | 265,000 | 886,000 | (96,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Net loss attributable to Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. |
(24,128,000 | ) | (2,282,000 | ) | (32,936,000 | ) | (3,803,000 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred distribution requirements |
(3,540,000 | ) | (1,969,000 | ) | (7,041,000 | ) | (3,938,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (27,668,000 | ) | $ | (4,251,000 | ) | $ | (39,977,000 | ) | $ | (7,741,000 | ) | ||||
Per common share attributable to common shareholders (basic
and diluted): |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations |
(0.17 | ) | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | (0.06 | ) | |||||||
$ | (0.41 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.59 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||||
Amounts attributable to Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.
common shareholders, net of limited partners interest: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
$ | (16,380,000 | ) | $ | (1,190,000 | ) | $ | (19,797,000 | ) | $ | (4,263,000 | ) | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
(11,753,000 | ) | (3,056,000 | ) | (20,645,000 | ) | (3,643,000 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sales of discontinued operations |
465,000 | (5,000 | ) | 465,000 | 165,000 | |||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (27,668,000 | ) | $ | (4,251,000 | ) | $ | (39,977,000 | ) | $ | (7,741,000 | ) | ||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
68,099,000 | 64,434,000 | 67,664,000 | 61,581,000 | ||||||||||||
5
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock | Cumulative | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$25.00 | Common stock | Treasury | Additional | distributions | other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liquidation | $0.06 | stock, | paid-in | in excess of | comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | value | Shares | Par value | at cost | capital | net income | (loss) income | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
6,400,000 | $ | 158,575,000 | 66,520,000 | $ | 3,991,000 | $ | (10,367,000 | ) | $ | 712,548,000 | $ | (231,275,000 | ) | $ | (3,406,000 | ) | $ | 630,066,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | (32,936,000 | ) | | (32,936,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on change in
fair value
of cash flow hedges |
| | | | | | | 409,000 | 409,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss |
$ | (32,527,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation
activity, net |
| | 759,000 | 46,000 | (489,000 | ) | 471,000 | | | 28,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of
common stock |
| | 39,000 | 2,000 | | 223,000 | | | 225,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from dividend
reinvestment and
direct stock purchase plan |
| | 684,000 | 41,000 | | 4,034,000 | | 4,075,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred distribution
requirements |
| | | | | | (7,041,000 | ) | | (7,041,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to common
shareholders/
noncontrolling interests |
| | | | | | (12,148,000 | ) | | (12,148,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from minority
interest partners |
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reallocation adjustment of
limited
partners interest |
| | | | | 739,000 | | | 739,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
6,400,000 | $ | 158,575,000 | 68,002,000 | $ | 4,080,000 | $ | (10,856,000 | ) | $ | 718,015,000 | $ | (283,400,000 | ) | $ | (2,997,000 | ) | $ | 583,417,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interests | ||||||||||||||||
Limited | ||||||||||||||||
Minority | partners | |||||||||||||||
interests in | interest in | |||||||||||||||
consolidated | Operating | Total | ||||||||||||||
joint ventures | Partnership | Total | equity | |||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 62,050,000 | $ | 6,355,000 | $ | 68,405,000 | $ | 698,471,000 | ||||||||
Net loss |
(47,000 | ) | (452,000 | ) | (499,000 | ) | (33,435,000 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized gain on change in fair value
of cash flow hedges |
| 2,000 | 2,000 | 411,000 | ||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss |
(47,000 | ) | (450,000 | ) | (497,000 | ) | (33,024,000 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred compensation activity, net |
| | | 28,000 | ||||||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of common stock |
| | | 225,000 | ||||||||||||
Net proceeds from dividend reinvestment and
direct stock purchase plan |
| | | 4,075,000 | ||||||||||||
Preferred distribution requirements |
| | | (7,041,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Distributions to common shareholders/
noncontrolling interests |
(1,973,000 | ) | (139,000 | ) | (2,112,000 | ) | (14,260,000 | ) | ||||||||
Contribution from minority interest partners |
269,000 | | 269,000 | 269,000 | ||||||||||||
Reallocation adjustment of limited
partners interest |
| 488,000 | 488,000 | 1,227,000 | ||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
$ | 60,299,000 | $ | 6,254,000 | $ | 66,553,000 | $ | 649,970,000 | ||||||||
6
Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flow from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (33,822,000 | ) | $ | (3,707,000 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
(825,000 | ) | (835,000 | ) | ||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
557,000 | 548,000 | ||||||
Write-off of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
7,961,000 | | ||||||
Impairments |
| 2,117,000 | ||||||
Acquisition transaction costs and terminated projects |
1,242,000 | 1,273,000 | ||||||
Impairments discontinued operations |
22,544,000 | 3,238,000 | ||||||
Gain on sales of real estate |
(502,000 | ) | (170,000 | ) | ||||
Straight-line rents |
(998,000 | ) | (1,424,000 | ) | ||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
1,765,000 | 1,518,000 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
21,466,000 | 23,753,000 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible lease liabilities |
(2,995,000 | ) | (5,427,000 | ) | ||||
Amortization (including accelerated write-off) and market price adjustments
relating to stock-based compensation |
3,128,000 | 1,236,000 | ||||||
Amortization (including accelerated write-off of deferred financing costs) |
2,143,000 | 2,493,000 | ||||||
Increases/decreases in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Rents and other receivables, net |
(4,405,000 | ) | (2,875,000 | ) | ||||
Joint venture settlements |
126,000 | (2,426,000 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
(383,000 | ) | 1,340,000 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(3,436,000 | ) | (3,894,000 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
13,566,000 | 16,758,000 | ||||||
Cash flow from investing activities: |
||||||||
Expenditures for real estate and improvements |
(63,158,000 | ) | (15,512,000 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from sales of real estate |
11,577,000 | 2,056,000 | ||||||
Net proceeds from transfers to unconsolidated Cedar/RioCan joint venture, less
cash at dates of transfer |
2,894,000 | 31,513,000 | ||||||
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures |
(4,183,000 | ) | (4,302,000 | ) | ||||
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures |
2,996,000 | 1,559,000 | ||||||
Increase in loans and other receivables |
(4,729,000 | ) | | |||||
Construction escrows and other |
(1,825,000 | ) | 1,156,000 | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(56,428,000 | ) | 16,470,000 | |||||
Cash flow from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net advances/(repayments) from/(to) revolving credit facilities |
34,500,000 | (89,844,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from mortgage financings |
29,291,000 | 16,242,000 | ||||||
Mortgage repayments |
(4,762,000 | ) | (16,457,000 | ) | ||||
Payments of debt financing costs |
| (998,000 | ) | |||||
Termination payment related to interest rate swaps |
| (5,476,000 | ) | |||||
Noncontrolling interests: |
||||||||
Contribution from consolidated joint venture minority interests |
269,000 | | ||||||
Distributions to consolidated joint venture minority interests |
(1,973,000 | ) | (660,000 | ) | ||||
Redemptions of Operating Partnership Units |
| (485,000 | ) | |||||
Distributions to limited partners |
(255,000 | ) | (353,000 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from the sales of common stock |
4,299,000 | 65,913,000 | ||||||
Exercise of warrant |
| 10,000,000 | ||||||
Preferred stock distributions |
(7,099,000 | ) | (3,938,000 | ) | ||||
Distributions to common shareholders |
(12,148,000 | ) | (10,542,000 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
42,122,000 | (36,598,000 | ) | |||||
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(740,000 | ) | (3,370,000 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
14,166,000 | 17,164,000 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 13,426,000 | $ | 13,794,000 | ||||
7
8
9
10
11
12
| Level 1 Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
||
| Level 2 Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the
financial instrument. |
||
| Level 3 Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to
the fair value measurement. |
13
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a | ||||||||||||||||
Non Recurring Basis | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset Description | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Real estate held for sale |
$ | | $ | 5,316,000 | $ | 45,859,000 | $ | 51,175,000 | ||||||||
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a | ||||||||||||||||
Non Recurring Basis | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset Description | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
Real estate held for sale |
$ | | $ | 22,773,000 | $ | 47,186,000 | $ | 69,959,000 | (a) | |||||||
(a) | Excludes net book value of $18.4 million relating to properties subsequently treated as
held for sale during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and recorded at fair value as of
that date. |
14
15
16
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Investments and cumulative mark-to-market adjustments
related to stock-based compensation |
$ | 3,607,000 | $ | 2,101,000 | ||||
Prepaid expenses |
2,678,000 | 5,258,000 | ||||||
Intangible lease assets (i) |
877,000 | | ||||||
Property deposits |
751,000 | 1,792,000 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements and other |
1,012,000 | 525,000 | ||||||
$ | 8,925,000 | $ | 9,676,000 | |||||
(i) | Represents unamortized balances relating to above-market leases resulting from
purchase accounting allocations. |
17
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Lease origination costs (i) |
$ | 16,632,000 | $ | 16,101,000 | ||||
Financing costs (ii) |
8,309,000 | 10,434,000 | ||||||
Other |
959,000 | 1,551,000 | ||||||
$ | 25,900,000 | $ | 28,086,000 | |||||
(i) | Includes unamortized balances of intangible lease assets ($7.6 million and $7.7 million,
respectively) resulting from purchase accounting allocations. |
|
(ii) | Represents costs incurred in connection with the Companys credit facilities and other
long-term debt. |
18
19
Notional values | Balance | Fair value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Designation/ | June 30, | December 31, | Expiration | sheet | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow | Derivative | Count | 2011 | Count | 2010 | dates | location | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying |
rate swaps | 2 | $ | 19,896,000 | 2 | $ | 20,094,000 | 2011 2020 | accrued expenses | $ | 1,441,000 | $ | 1,642,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other | Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other | |||||||||||||||||||
comprehensive (loss) income (effective portion) | comprehensive (loss) income (effective portion) | |||||||||||||||||||
Designation/ | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow | Derivative | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Qualifying |
swaps | $ | 115,000 | $ | (94,000 | ) | $ | 411,000 | $ | (1,093,000 | ) | |||||||||
20
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 7,053,000 | ||
Net loss |
(387,000 | ) | ||
Unrealized gain on change in fair value
of cash flow hedges |
2,000 | |||
Total other comprehensive loss |
(385,000 | ) | ||
Distributions |
(116,000 | ) | ||
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners interest |
(1,227,000 | ) | ||
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
$ | 5,325,000 | ||
21
22
23
24
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Restricted share grants (a) |
387,000 | 4,000 | 961,000 | 505,000 | ||||||||||||
Average per-share value |
$ | 4.96 | $ | 6.52 | $ | 5.40 | $ | 6.55 | ||||||||
Grant date values of restricted stock awards: |
||||||||||||||||
Restricted share grants |
$ | 1,921,000 | $ | 30,000 | $ | 5,192,000 | $ | 3,308,000 | ||||||||
Equity award |
$ | 8,198,000 | $ | | $ | 8,198,000 | $ | | ||||||||
Liability award |
$ | 2,342,000 | $ | | $ | 2,342,000 | $ | | ||||||||
Charged to operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Expense relating to stock-based compensation |
$ | 2,816,000 | $ | 884,000 | $ | 3,796,000 | $ | 1,590,000 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reflect changes in market price of
Companys common stock |
(518,000 | ) | (884,000 | ) | (668,000 | ) | (375,000 | ) | ||||||||
Total charged to operations (b) |
$ | 2,298,000 | $ | | $ | 3,128,000 | $ | 1,215,000 | ||||||||
Non-vested shares (a): |
||||||||||||||||
Non-vested, beginning of period |
1,548,000 | 1,368,000 | 1,280,000 | 980,000 | ||||||||||||
Grants |
387,000 | 4,000 | 961,000 | 505,000 | ||||||||||||
Vested during period |
(726,000 | ) | (28,000 | ) | (1,017,000 | ) | (141,000 | ) | ||||||||
Forfeitures/cancellations |
| | (15,000 | ) | | |||||||||||
Non-vested, end of period |
1,209,000 | 1,344,000 | 1,209,000 | 1,344,000 | ||||||||||||
Average value of non-vested shares (based on
valuation at date of grant) |
$ | 5.36 | $ | 6.33 | $ | 5.36 | $ | 6.33 | ||||||||
Weighted average value of shares forfeited |
$ | | $ | | $ | 5.66 | $ | | ||||||||
Value of shares vested during the
period (based on valuation at date of grant) (c) |
$ | 4,017,000 | $ | 397,000 | $ | 6,611,000 | $ | 2,189,000 | ||||||||
(a) | Does not include the equity and liability award shares. |
|
(b) | The 2011 amounts include $1,980,000 applicable to the accelerated vestings. |
|
(c) | The 2011 amounts include $3,775,000 applicable to the accelerated vestings. |
25
Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash activities: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 24,160,000 | $ | 25,714,000 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
||||||||
Assumption of mortgage loans payable upon disposition |
| (7,740,000 | ) | |||||
Conversion of OP Units into common stock |
| 163,000 | ||||||
Purchase accounting allocations: |
||||||||
Intangible lease assets |
(5,764,000 | ) | (2,901,000 | ) | ||||
Intangible lease liabilities |
753,000 | | ||||||
Other non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Accrued interest rate swap liabilities |
(202,000 | ) | (1,307,000 | ) | ||||
Accrued real estate improvements and construction escrows |
1,241,000 | 357,000 | ||||||
Capitalization of deferred financing costs |
400,000 | 495,000 | ||||||
Deconsolidation of properties transferred to joint venture: |
||||||||
Real estate, net |
| 139,745,000 | ||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
| (94,058,000 | ) | |||||
Other assets/liabilities, net |
| (3,574,000 | ) | |||||
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture |
| 9,423,000 | ||||||
Settlement receivable from unconsolidated joint venture |
| 3,824,000 |
26
27
28
29
Mortgage loans payable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property carrying value | Maturity | Int. | Financial statement carrying value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property Description | State | Jun. 30, 2011 | Dec. 31, 2010 | date | rate | Jun. 30, 2011 | Dec. 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carrolton Discount Drug Mart Plaza (a) |
OH | $ | | $ | | | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||||||||
Centerville Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 2,382,000 | 2,481,000 | May 2015 | 5.2 | % | 2,716,000 | 2,743,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Clyde Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 2,196,000 | 2,287,000 | May 2015 | 5.2 | % | 1,884,000 | 1,903,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia Mall |
PA | 10,175,000 | 10,774,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Enon Discount Drug Mart Plaza (b) |
OH | | 4,598,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Family Dollar at Zanesville (a) |
OH | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fairfield Plaza (b) |
CT | | 10,150,000 | July 2015 | 5.0 | % | | 5,009,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
FirstMerit Bank at Akron |
OH | 693,000 | 760,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
FirstMerit Bank at Cuyahoga Falls |
OH | 546,000 | 569,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gahanna Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 5,316,000 | 7,103,000 | Nov 2016 | 5.8 | % | 4,886,000 | 4,924,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grove City Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 1,893,000 | 2,911,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hilliard Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 1,472,000 | 2,627,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hills & Dales Discount Drug Mart Plaza (b) |
OH | | 3,263,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lodi Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 2,346,000 | 2,550,000 | May 2015 | 5.2 | % | 2,295,000 | 2,319,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long Reach Village (a) |
MD | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mason Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 4,319,000 | 4,499,000 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
McCormick Place |
OH | 1,796,000 | 3,942,000 | Aug 2017 | 6.1 | % | 2,568,000 | 2,587,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ontario Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 2,315,000 | 2,534,000 | May 2015 | 5.2 | % | 2,120,000 | 2,141,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pickerington Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 3,391,000 | 3,532,000 | Jul 2015 | 5.0 | % | 4,031,000 | 4,072,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Polaris Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 4,453,000 | 4,640,000 | May 2015 | 5.2 | % | 4,327,000 | 4,369,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pondside Plaza (a) |
NY | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Powell Discount Drug Mart Plaza (a) |
OH | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Roosevelt II |
PA | 4,600,000 | 13,687,000 | Mar 2012 | 6.5 | % | 12,865,000 | 12,940,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shelby Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 1,848,000 | 1,925,000 | May 2015 | 5.2 | % | 2,120,000 | 2,141,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Westlake Discount Drug Mart Plaza |
OH | 1,434,000 | 1,667,000 | Dec 2016 | 5.6 | % | 3,139,000 | 3,165,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
51,175,000 | 86,499,000 | 42,951,000 | 48,313,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Land Parcel (b) |
PA | | 1,849,000 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 51,175,000 | $ | 88,348,000 | $ | 42,951,000 | $ | 48,313,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Property sold during 2010. |
|
(b) | Property sold during 2011. |
30
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Rents |
$ | 1,735,000 | $ | 2,364,000 | $ | 4,418,000 | $ | 5,046,000 | ||||||||
Expense recoveries |
540,000 | 672,000 | 1,302,000 | 1,386,000 | ||||||||||||
Other |
6,000 | 18,000 | 311,000 | 46,000 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
2,281,000 | 3,054,000 | 6,031,000 | 6,478,000 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Operating, maintenance and management |
781,000 | 960,000 | 1,804,000 | 2,318,000 | ||||||||||||
Real estate and other property-related taxes |
546,000 | 535,000 | 1,145,000 | 1,115,000 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
162,000 | 1,155,000 | 384,000 | 2,387,000 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
527,000 | 561,000 | 1,220,000 | 1,172,000 | ||||||||||||
2,016,000 | 3,211,000 | 4,553,000 | 6,992,000 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before
impairment charges |
265,000 | (157,000 | ) | 1,478,000 | (514,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(12,258,000 | ) | (2,990,000 | ) | (22,544,000 | ) | (3,238,000 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) from discontinued operations |
$ | (11,993,000 | ) | $ | (3,147,000 | ) | $ | (21,066,000 | ) | $ | (3,752,000 | ) | ||||
Gain (loss) on sales of discontinued operations |
$ | 474,000 | $ | (5,000 | ) | $ | 474,000 | $ | 170,000 | |||||||
31
32
Date of | Transfer | |||||||||||||||||||
transfer | or | Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||
or | purchase | Loans | Int. | |||||||||||||||||
Property Description | State | acquisition | price | Payable (b) | rate | |||||||||||||||
Blue Mountain Commons |
PA | 12/10/2009 | (a) | $ | 32,150,000 | $ | 17,500,000 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||
Columbus Crossing |
PA | 2/23/2010 | (a) | 24,538,000 | 16,880,000 | 6.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Creekview Plaza |
PA | 9/29/2010 | 26,240,000 | 14,432,000 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Cross Keys Place |
NJ | 10/13/2010 | 26,336,000 | 14,600,000 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Exeter Commons |
PA | 8/3/2010 | 53,000,000 | 30,000,000 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Franklin Village Plaza |
MA | 2/4/2010 | (a) | 54,656,000 | 43,500,000 | 4.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Gettysburg Marketplace |
PA | 10/21/2010 | 19,850,000 | 10,918,000 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Loyal Plaza |
PA | 5/26/2010 | (a) | 26,950,000 | 12,615,000 | 7.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Marlboro Crossroads |
MD | 10/21/2010 | 12,500,000 | 6,875,000 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Monroe Marketplace |
PA | 9/29/2010 | 41,990,000 | 23,095,000 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Montville Commons |
CT | 9/29/2010 | 18,900,000 | 10,500,000 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
New River Valley |
VA | 9/29/2010 | 27,970,000 | 15,163,000 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Northland Center |
PA | 10/21/2010 | 10,248,000 | 6,298,000 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Northwoods Crossing |
MA | 4/15/2011 | 23,448,000 | 14,429,000 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Pitney Road Plaza |
PA | 9/29/2010 | 11,060,000 | 6,083,000 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Shaws Plaza |
MA | 4/27/2010 | (a) | 20,363,000 | 14,200,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Stop & Shop Plaza |
CT | 4/27/2010 | (a) | 8,974,000 | 7,000,000 | 6.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Sunset Crossing |
PA | 12/10/2009 | (a) | 9,850,000 | 4,500,000 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Sunrise Plaza |
NJ | 9/29/2010 | 26,460,000 | 13,728,000 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Town Square Plaza |
PA | 1/26/2010 | 18,854,000 | 11,000,000 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Towne Crossings |
VA | 10/21/2010 | 19,000,000 | 10,450,000 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
York Marketplace |
PA | 10/21/2010 | 29,200,000 | 16,060,000 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
$ | 542,537,000 | $ | 319,826,000 | |||||||||||||||||
(a) | Initial seven properties previously owned by the Company that were transferred to the Cedar/RioCan joint venture. |
|
(b) | Mortgage loans payable represent either (i) the outstanding balance at the date of transfer, excluding any mortgage discount or (ii) the loan amount on the dates of borrowing and/or assumption. |
33
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Real estate, net (a) |
$ | 538,948,000 | $ | 524,447,000 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
11,535,000 | 5,934,000 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
5,802,000 | 4,464,000 | ||||||
Rent and other receivables |
3,369,000 | 2,074,000 | ||||||
Straight-line rent |
1,876,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||
Deferred charges, net |
4,425,000 | 13,269,000 | ||||||
Other assets |
13,351,000 | 8,514,000 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 579,306,000 | $ | 559,702,000 | ||||
Liabilities and partners capital: |
||||||||
Mortgage loans payable (a) |
$ | 319,295,000 | $ | 293,400,000 | ||||
Due to the Company |
3,016,000 | 6,036,000 | ||||||
Unamortized lease liability |
23,155,000 | 24,573,000 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
5,316,000 | 7,738,000 | ||||||
Preferred stock |
97,000 | 97,000 | ||||||
Partners capital: |
||||||||
RioCan |
182,367,000 | 181,239,000 | ||||||
The Company |
46,060,000 | 46,619,000 | ||||||
Total partners capital |
228,427,000 | 227,858,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities and partners capital |
$ | 579,306,000 | $ | 559,702,000 | ||||
(a) | The joint ventures property-specific mortgage loans payable are collateralized by
all of the joint ventures real estate, and bear interest at rates ranging from 4.8% to
7.2% per annum |
34
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 15,296,000 | $ | 5,161,000 | $ | 31,289,000 | $ | 8,246,000 | ||||||||
Property operating and other expenses |
1,307,000 | 761,000 | 3,966,000 | 1,220,000 | ||||||||||||
Management fees to the Company |
483,000 | 176,000 | 950,000 | 275,000 | ||||||||||||
Real estate taxes |
1,819,000 | 517,000 | 3,551,000 | 818,000 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition transaction costs |
790,000 | | 858,000 | 594,000 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
61,000 | 51,000 | 132,000 | 102,000 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,177,000 | 1,283,000 | 10,140,000 | 1,795,000 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other non-operating expenses, net |
4,684,000 | 1,353,000 | 9,079,000 | 1,831,000 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 975,000 | $ | 1,020,000 | $ | 2,613,000 | $ | 1,611,000 | ||||||||
RioCan |
780,000 | 827,000 | 2,090,000 | 1,322,000 | ||||||||||||
The Company |
195,000 | 193,000 | 523,000 | 289,000 | ||||||||||||
$ | 975,000 | $ | 1,020,000 | $ | 2,613,000 | $ | 1,611,000 | |||||||||
35
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rates | Interest rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Weighted | Balance | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||
Description | outstanding | average | Range | outstanding | average | Range | ||||||||||||||||||
Fixed-rate mortgages (a) |
$ | 599,350,000 | 5.8 | % | 5.0% 7.6% | $ | 575,635,000 | 5.8 | % | 5.0% 7.6% | ||||||||||||||
Variable-rate mortgages |
84,768,000 | 4.1 | % | 3.5% and 5.9% | 83,568,000 | 4.1 | % | 2.5% and 5.9% | ||||||||||||||||
Total property-specific mortgages |
684,118,000 | 5.6 | % | 659,203,000 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Stabilized property credit facility |
64,035,000 | 5.5 | % | 29,535,000 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Development property credit facility |
103,062,000 | 2.5 | % | 103,062,000 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 851,215,000 | 5.2 | % | $ | 791,800,000 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Fixed-rate mortgages related to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate held for sale discontinued
operations (a) |
$ | 42,951,000 | 5.7 | % | 5.0% 6.5% | $ | 48,313,000 | 5.6 | % | 5.0% 6.5% | ||||||||||||||
(a) | Restated to reflect the reclassifications of properties treated
as discontinued operations. |
36
37
38
39
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
40
41
42
43
44
Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | Percent | held in | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | (decrease) | change | Other | both periods | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 38,299,000 | $ | 37,989,000 | $ | 310,000 | 1 | % | $ | 553,000 | $ | (243,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
11,884,000 | 11,684,000 | 200,000 | 2 | % | 129,000 | 71,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,917,000 | 11,222,000 | (305,000 | ) | -3 | % | 543,000 | (848,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,691,000 | 2,106,000 | 585,000 | 28 | % | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
Management transition charges |
6,350,000 | | 6,350,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairments |
| 562,000 | (562,000 | ) | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisition transaction costs and
terminated projects |
73,000 | 2,000 | 71,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-operating income and
expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense and financing cost
amortization |
11,773,000 | 12,292,000 | (519,000 | ) | -4 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in income |
34,000 | 479,000 | (445,000 | ) | -93 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Write off of investment |
7,961,000 | | 7,961,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
106,000 | 5,000 | 101,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
265,000 | (157,000 | ) | 422,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
12,258,000 | 2,990,000 | 9,268,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sales |
474,000 | (5,000 | ) | 479,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
45
46
Cedar/RioCan joint venture properties |
$ | (663,000 | ) | |
Fees earned by the Company and other |
41,000 | |||
Property acquisitions |
1,292,000 | |||
Development and redevelopment properties |
(117,000 | ) | ||
$ | 553,000 | |||
Cedar/RioCan joint venture properties |
$ | (105,000 | ) | |
Unallocated compensation and benefits |
790,000 | |||
Property acquisitions |
369,000 | |||
Development and redevelopment properties |
(925,000 | ) | ||
$ | 129,000 | |||
Property acquisitions |
$ | 830,000 | ||
Development and redevelopment properties |
(287,000 | ) | ||
$ | 543,000 | |||
47
Properties | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Decrease) | Percent | held in | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | increase | change | Other | both years | |||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 79,226,000 | $ | 79,772,000 | $ | (546,000 | ) | -1 | % | $ | (378,000 | ) | (168,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
27,431,000 | 26,051,000 | 1,380,000 | 5 | % | 329,000 | 1,051,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
21,250,000 | 21,370,000 | (120,000 | ) | -1 | % | 639,000 | (759,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
5,216,000 | 4,317,000 | 899,000 | 21 | % | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
Management transition charges |
6,530,000 | | 6,530,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairments |
| 2,117,000 | (2,117,000 | ) | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisition transaction costs and
terminated projects, net |
1,242,000 | 1,322,000 | (80,000 | ) | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
Non-operating income and
expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense and financing cost
amortization |
23,863,000 | 25,574,000 | (1,711,000 | ) | -7 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity in income |
825,000 | 835,000 | (10,000 | ) | -1 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Write off of investment |
7,961,000 | | 7,961,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
212,000 | 19,000 | 193,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
1,478,000 | (514,000 | ) | 1,992,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
22,544,000 | 3,238,000 | 19,306,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sales |
474,000 | 170,000 | 304,000 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
48
49
Cedar/RioCan joint venture properties |
$ | (3,272,000 | ) | |
Fees earned by the Company and other |
$ | 574,000 | ||
Property acquisitions |
2,639,000 | |||
Development and redevelopment properties |
(319,000 | ) | ||
$ | (378,000 | ) | ||
Cedar/RioCan joint venture properties |
$ | (809,000 | ) | |
Unallocated compensation and benefits |
643,000 | |||
Property acquisitions |
665,000 | |||
Development and redevelopment properties |
(170,000 | ) | ||
$ | 329,000 | |||
Cedar/RioCan joint venture properties |
$ | (1,000 | ) | |
Property acquisitions |
1,076,000 | |||
Development and redevelopment properties |
(436,000 | ) | ||
$ | 639,000 | |||
50
51
52
53
54
55
Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
$ | (27,668,000 | ) | $ | (4,251,000 | ) | $ | (39,977,000 | ) | $ | (7,741,000 | ) | ||||
Add (deduct): |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
10,903,000 | 12,327,000 | 21,313,000 | 23,655,000 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests: |
||||||||||||||||
Limited partners interest |
(579,000 | ) | (178,000 | ) | (839,000 | ) | (292,000 | ) | ||||||||
Minority interests in consolidated joint ventures |
(22,000 | ) | (87,000 | ) | (47,000 | ) | 388,000 | |||||||||
Minority interests share of FFO applicable to
consolidated joint ventures |
(1,237,000 | ) | (1,686,000 | ) | (2,573,000 | ) | (3,377,000 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
(34,000 | ) | (479,000 | ) | (825,000 | ) | (835,000 | ) | ||||||||
FFO from unconsolidated joint ventures |
1,182,000 | 834,000 | 3,064,000 | 1,420,000 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of land parcel |
| | (28,000 | ) | | |||||||||||
Gain on sales of discontinued operations |
(474,000 | ) | 5,000 | (474,000 | ) | (170,000 | ) | |||||||||
Funds (Used in) From Operations |
$ | (17,929,000 | ) | $ | 6,485,000 | $ | (20,386,000 | ) | $ | 13,048,000 | ||||||
FFO per common share (assuming conversion of OP Units) |
||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.10 | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | 0.21 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares (basic): |
||||||||||||||||
Shares used in determination of basic earnings per share |
68,099,000 | 64,434,000 | 67,664,000 | 61,581,000 | ||||||||||||
Additional shares assuming conversion of OP Units |
1,415,000 | 1,945,000 | 1,415,000 | 1,965,000 | ||||||||||||
Shares used in determination of basic FFO per share |
69,514,000 | 66,379,000 | 69,079,000 | 63,546,000 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares (dilutive): |
||||||||||||||||
Shares used in determination of diluted earnings per share |
68,099,000 | 64,486,000 | 67,664,000 | 61,620,000 | ||||||||||||
Additional shares assuming conversion of OP Units |
1,415,000 | 1,945,000 | 1,415,000 | 1,965,000 | ||||||||||||
Shares used in determination of diluted FFO per share |
69,514,000 | 66,431,000 | 69,079,000 | 63,585,000 | ||||||||||||
56
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
57
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
58
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit 10.1 | Employment Agreement between Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.
and Philip R. Mays, dated as of May 24, 2011 |
|
Exhibit 10.2 | Employment Agreement between Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc.
and Bruce J. Schanzer, dated as of May 31, 2011 |
|
Exhibit 10.3 | Letter Agreement between Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. and
Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr., dated as of June 1, 2011 |
|
Exhibit 10.4 | Letter Agreement between Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. and
Leo S. Ullman, dated as of June 9, 2011 |
|
Exhibit 31 | Section 302 Certifications |
|
Exhibit 32 | Section 906 Certifications |
|
Exhibit 101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
|
Exhibit 101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
Exhibit 101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
Exhibit 101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
Exhibit 101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
Exhibit 101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
By: /s/ BRUCE J. SCHANZER
|
By: /s/ PHILIP R. MAYS | |
Bruce J. Schanzer
|
Philip R. Mays | |
President and Chief
|
Chief Financial Officer | |
Executive Officer
|
(Principal financial officer) | |
(Principal executive officer) |
59
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
To the Corporation | ||||
or the Partnership: | ||||
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | ||||
44 South Bayles Avenue | ||||
Port Washington, NY 11050 | ||||
Attn: President | ||||
To the Executive: | ||||
Philip Mays |
14
15
16
17
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | ||||||
By: | /s/ Brenda J. Walker
|
|||||
Cedar Shopping Centers Partnership, L.P. | ||||||
By: | Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc., General Partner |
|||||
By: | /s/ Brenda J. Walker | |||||
Title: Vice President | ||||||
/s/ Philip Mays | ||||||
Philip Mays |
18
| Preparation and filing of Companys and, where appropriate, joint venture financial statements, reports and tax returns, in accordance with GAAP, SEC, NYSE, Internal Revenue Code and other applicable state or federal requirements and in compliance with REIT tax requirements. |
| Supervision of financial corporate, property accounting and bookkeeping staff. |
| Preparation of consolidated cash flow budgets and analyses. |
| Preparation, review and monitoring of budgets for properties, joint ventures and the Company. |
| Preparation of supporting materials for FFO guidance, where applicable, and AFFO analysis; forecasting and ability to communicate bases and support for forecasting in the context of potential guidance. |
| Representing the Company as CFO in investor relations matters. |
| Review of financial and financial reporting implications of proposed purchase, sale, joint venture and financing of properties, or of the Company itself, as well as other strategic initiatives and transactions. |
| Review of financial materials sent to Board of Directors. |
| Interactions with Board and Board Committees on financial matters and presentations to the Board. |
| Review of financial aspects of press releases. |
| Review and sign off for certifications under Sarbanes Oxley requirements and on the Companys internal control system. |
| Maintaining compliance with loan agreement and credit facility terms and covenants. |
| To commit to work habits and energy levels equivalent to those of key management personnel in our office. |
| To establish, maintain and manage excellent relationships with investors and analysts. |
| To establish confidence in our numbers with our investors, and both our buy- and sell-side analysts; this, in turn, will require an ability to analyze our performance figures, to have those quickly and comfortably at-hand; and to communicate with investors, analysts and others, effectively both verbally and in writing. |
| To spend the requisite time and effort to become fully familiar with all of our operations and all of our properties, including a level of familiarity with leases, tenancies, properties, competition, and the like. |
| To effectively formulate earnings and cash flow estimates, an understanding of key financial metrics, capital markets experience and specific REIT issues; also, to create effective financial models and projections, return analyses, net asset value computations, and the like. |
| An understanding of FFO, AFFO, FAD and NOI (GAAP and cash) computations; familiarity with accounting treatment of interest, capitalized development and leasing costs, FAS 141 adjustments, financial and real estate-related issues and the like. |
| Familiarity with other accounting issues particularly relevant to the real estate business and to the REIT business, including, for example, proposed accounting rules changes, such as lease accounting and effect thereof on Cedar, IFRS and financial statement format, treatment of various reserves and inter-relationship of reporting requirements with certain tax considerations, as well as monitoring non-qualifying REIT income or assets. |
| Familiarity with, and understanding of, various available equity offerings, debt obligations and line of credit arrangements. |
| To create and make effective presentations to institutional investors, the Audit Committee, the Companys auditors and its Board. |
| To be, and to keep, up-to-date on developments in the REIT world and in the Companys competitive landscape. |
| To fit in our management team; ability to get along; honesty, integrity, reliability, trustworthiness and loyalty; to communicate thoughts and comments effectively; respect for ideas of others, a balance of life in the office and outside the office; suppressed levels of ego and arrogance; ability to work under pressure and to retain equanimity under trying circumstances. |
| Coordination and supervision of MIS, comprehensive risk analyses, financial public relations, financial, compensation and employee benefit matters, and the like. |
| To build a succession team within his staff. |
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
To the Corporation | ||||
or the Partnership: | ||||
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | ||||
44 South Bayles Avenue | ||||
Port Washington, NY 11050 | ||||
Attn: Chairman of the Board | ||||
To the Executive: | ||||
Bruce J. Schanzer | ||||
22 Bayeau Road | ||||
New Rochelle, NY 10804 |
15
16
17
18
19
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | ||||||
By: | /s/ Brenda J. Walker
|
|||||
Cedar Shopping Centers Partnership, L.P. | ||||||
By: | Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. General Partner |
|||||
By: | /s/ Brenda J. Walker
|
|||||
/s/ Bruce J. Schanzer | ||||||
Bruce J. Schanzer |
20
2
3
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | ||||
By:
|
/s/ Brenda J. Walker
|
|||
/s/ Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr. | ||||
Lawrence E. Kreider, Jr. |
4
2
3
4
| You have read this Agreement in its entirety and understand all of its terms, including that it constitutes a complete general release of all claims against the Company and other Released Parties; |
| You have been advised, in writing, to review this Agreement with an attorney before signing it; |
| You have had a sufficient period of time of up to 21 days within which to review this Agreement, including, without limitation, with your attorney, and that you did so to the extent you desired; |
| You may not sign this Agreement until on or after the Separation Date; |
| The payments of the amounts set forth in this Agreement are the only consideration for your signing this Agreement; |
| The payments are provided at the Companys sole and absolute discretion and on a non-precedential basis and that you would not have received all such payments if you did not sign this Agreement; |
| The headings used in this Agreement are intended solely for convenience of reference and shall not be used to amplify, limit, modify (or otherwise be used in the interpretation of) the terms of this Agreement; |
| You knowingly and voluntarily agree to all the terms and conditions in this Agreement; and |
| This Agreement shall not become effective until the 8th day after you sign it and you may at any time before the effective date revoke this Agreement by hand delivering, sending via overnight mail or e-mailing a written notice of revocation to the Company to its General Counsel at the Companys principal executive offices. |
5
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | ||||
By:
|
/s/ Brenda J. Walker
|
|||
Voluntarily Agreed to and Accepted | ||||
This 9th day of June, 2011 | ||||
/s/ Leo S. Ullman | ||||
Leo S. Ullman |
6
STATE OF NEW YORK
|
) | |||
:ss. | ||||
COUNTY OF NASSAU
|
) |
/s/ Lisa Greenbaum | ||||
Notary Public | ||||
/s/ BRUCE J. SCHANZER
|
/s/ PHILIP R. MAYS
|
/s/ BRUCE J. SCHANZER
|
/s/ PHILIP R. MAYS
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)
In Millions, except Share data |
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2010
|
---|---|---|
Consolidated Balance Sheets | Â | Â |
Loans receivable | $ 8.0 | $ 2.6 |
Preferred stock, shares par value | $ 0.01 | $ 0.01 |
Preferred stock, shares liquidation par value | $ 25 | $ 25 |
Preferred stock, shares authorized | 12,500,000 | 12,500,000 |
Preferred stock, shares issued | 6,400,000 | 6,400,000 |
Preferred stock, shares outstanding | 6,400,000 | 6,400,000 |
Common stock, shares par value | $ 0.06 | $ 0.06 |
Common stock, shares authorized | 150,000,000 | 150,000,000 |
Common stock, shares issued | 68,002,000 | 66,520,000 |
Common stock, shares outstanding | 68,002,000 | 66,520,000 |
Treasury stock, shares | 1,336,000 | 1,120,000 |
Consolidated Statements Of Operations (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
|
Revenues: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Rents | $ 30,730,000 | $ 30,988,000 | $ 61,495,000 | $ 63,240,000 |
Expense recoveries | 6,776,000 | 6,718,000 | 16,232,000 | 16,150,000 |
Other | 793,000 | 283,000 | 1,499,000 | 382,000 |
Total revenues | 38,299,000 | 37,989,000 | 79,226,000 | 79,772,000 |
Expenses: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Operating, maintenance and management | 7,035,000 | 6,840,000 | 17,620,000 | 16,315,000 |
Real estate and other property-related taxes | 4,849,000 | 4,844,000 | 9,811,000 | 9,736,000 |
General and administrative | 2,691,000 | 2,106,000 | 5,216,000 | 4,317,000 |
Management transition charges | 6,350,000 | Â | 6,530,000 | Â |
Impairments | Â | 562,000 | Â | 2,117,000 |
Acquisition transaction costs and terminated projects | 73,000 | 2,000 | 1,242,000 | 1,322,000 |
Depreciation and amortization | 10,917,000 | 11,222,000 | 21,250,000 | 21,370,000 |
Total expenses | 31,915,000 | 25,576,000 | 61,669,000 | 55,177,000 |
Operating income | 6,384,000 | 12,413,000 | 17,557,000 | 24,595,000 |
Non-operating income and expense: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs | (11,773,000) | (12,292,000) | (23,863,000) | (25,574,000) |
Interest income | 106,000 | 5,000 | 184,000 | 19,000 |
Unconsolidated joint ventures: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Equity in income | 34,000 | 479,000 | 825,000 | 835,000 |
Write-off of investment | (7,961,000) | Â | (7,961,000) | Â |
Gain on sale of land parcel | Â | Â | 28,000 | Â |
Total non-operating income and expense | (19,594,000) | (11,808,000) | (30,787,000) | (24,720,000) |
(Loss) income before discontinued operations | (13,210,000) | 605,000 | (13,230,000) | (125,000) |
Discontinued operations: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Income (loss) from operations | 265,000 | (157,000) | 1,478,000 | (514,000) |
Impairment charges | (12,258,000) | (2,990,000) | (22,544,000) | (3,238,000) |
Gain on sales | 474,000 | (5,000) | 474,000 | 170,000 |
Total discontinued operations | (11,519,000) | (3,152,000) | (20,592,000) | (3,582,000) |
Net loss | (24,729,000) | (2,547,000) | (33,822,000) | (3,707,000) |
Less, net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Minority interests in consolidated joint ventures | 22,000 | 87,000 | 47,000 | (388,000) |
Limited partners' interest in Operating Partnership | 579,000 | 178,000 | 839,000 | 292,000 |
Total net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 601,000 | 265,000 | 886,000 | (96,000) |
Net loss attributable to Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. | (24,128,000) | (2,282,000) | (32,936,000) | (3,803,000) |
Preferred distribution requirements | (3,540,000) | (1,969,000) | (7,041,000) | (3,938,000) |
Net loss attributable to common shareholders | (27,668,000) | (4,251,000) | (39,977,000) | (7,741,000) |
Per common share attributable to common shareholders (basic and diluted): | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Continuing operations | $ (0.24) | $ (0.02) | $ (0.29) | $ (0.07) |
Discontinued operations | $ (0.17) | $ (0.05) | $ (0.30) | $ (0.06) |
Per common share attributable to common shareholders (basic and diluted) | $ (0.41) | $ (0.07) | $ (0.59) | $ (0.13) |
Amounts attributable to Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. common shareholders, net of limited partners' interest: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Loss from continuing operations | (16,380,000) | (1,190,000) | (19,797,000) | (4,263,000) |
Loss from discontinued operations | (11,753,000) | (3,056,000) | (20,645,000) | (3,643,000) |
Gain on sales of discontinued operations | 465,000 | (5,000) | 465,000 | 165,000 |
Net loss | $ (27,668,000) | $ (4,251,000) | $ (39,977,000) | $ (7,741,000) |
Dividends declared per common share | $ 0.09 | $ 0.09 | $ 0.18 | $ 0.09 |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 68,099,000 | 64,434,000 | 67,664,000 | 61,581,000 |
Document And Entity Information
|
6 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
Jul. 29, 2011
|
|
Document And Entity Information | Â | Â |
Document type | 10-Q | Â |
Amendment Flag | false | Â |
Document Period End Date | Jun. 30, 2011 | |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q2 | Â |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2011 | Â |
Entity Registrant Name | CEDAR SHOPPING CENTERS INC | Â |
Entity Central Index Key | 0000761648 | Â |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | Â |
Entity Filer Category | Accelerated Filer | Â |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | Â | 68,009,319 |
"+ text.join( "
\n" ) +"
" + text[p] + "
\n"; } } }else{ formatted = '' + raw + '
'; } html = ''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+' formatted: '+ ( this.Default == 'raw' ? 'as Filed' : 'with Text Wrapped' ) +''+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
Subsequent Events
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Subsequent Events | Â |
Subsequent Events | Note 6. Subsequent Events
In determining subsequent events, management reviewed all activity from July 1, 2011 through the date of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
On July 28, 2011, the Company's Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.09 per share with respect to its common stock as well as an equal distribution per unit on its outstanding OP Units. At the same time, the Board declared a dividend of $0.5546875 per share with respect to the Company's 8-7/8% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The distributions are payable on August 22, 2011 to shareholders of record on August 12, 2011.
On July 6, 2011, the Company refinanced a property that had collateralized the development property revolving credit facility. The new fixed-rate mortgage, aggregating $16.5 million, bears interest at 5.2% per annum, with the principal payable on a 25-year amortization schedule, and the balance due in July 2021. The proceeds reduced the balances under the development property revolving credit facility and the stabilized property revolving credit facility by $10.8 million and $5.7 million, respectively.
On August 1, 2011, the Company refinanced a fixed-rate mortgage collateralized by a property owned by the Cedar/RioCan joint venture. The existing $43.3 million mortgage bore interest at 4.8% per annum, with the balance due in November 2011. The new fixed-rate mortgage, aggregating $44.0 million, bears interest at 4.1% per annum, with principal and interest payments on a 30-year amortization schedule, and the balance due in August 2016. |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | Â | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation (including normal recurring accruals) have been included. The consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The consolidated financial statements reflect certain reclassifications of prior period amounts to conform to the 2011 presentation, principally to reflect the sale and/or treatment as "held for sale/conveyance" of certain operating properties and the treatment thereof as "discontinued operations". The reclassifications had no impact on previously-reported net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders or earnings per share.
Real Estate Investments
Real estate investments are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. The provision for depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective assets of between 3 and 40 years. Depreciation expense amounted to $10.1 million and $10.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $19.7 million and $20.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Expenditures for betterments that substantially extend the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs, and betterments that do not substantially prolong the normal useful life of an asset are charged to operations as incurred.
Upon the sale (or treatment as "held for sale/conveyance") or other disposition of assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or impairment loss, if any, is reflected as discontinued operations. In addition, prior periods' financial statements would be reclassified to reflect the sold properties' operations as discontinued. Real estate investments include costs of development and redevelopment activities, and construction in progress. Capitalized costs, including interest and other carrying costs during the construction and/or renovation periods, are included in the cost of the related asset and charged to operations through depreciation over the asset's estimated useful life. Interest and financing costs capitalized amounted to $0.8 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $1.1 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. A variety of costs are incurred in the acquisition, development and leasing of a property, such as pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs, and other costs incurred during the period of development. After a determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. The Company ceases capitalization on the portions substantially completed and occupied, or held available for occupancy, and capitalizes only those costs associated with the portions under development. The Company considers a construction project to be substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but not later than one year from cessation of major construction activity.
Management reviews each real estate investment for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a real estate investment may not be recoverable. The review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the future cash flows that are expected to result from the real estate investment's use and eventual disposition. These cash flows consider factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If an impairment event exists due to the projected inability to recover the carrying value of a real estate investment, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value. Real estate investments held for sale/conveyance are carried at the lower of their respective carrying amounts or estimated fair values, less costs to sell. Depreciation and amortization are suspended during the periods held for sale/conveyance.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company wrote-off approximately $1.3 million of costs incurred in prior years for a potential development project in Williamsport, Pennsylvania that the Company determined would not go forward. Conditional asset retirement obligation A conditional asset retirement obligation is a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement is conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the Company. The Company would record a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. Environmental studies conducted at the time of acquisition with respect to all of the Company's properties did not reveal any material environmental liabilities, and the Company is unaware of any subsequent environmental matters that would have created a material liability. The Company believes that its properties are currently in material compliance with applicable environmental, as well as non-environmental, statutory and regulatory requirements. There were no conditional asset retirement obligation liabilities recorded by the Company during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Fair Value Measurements The fair value measurement accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels:
·Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. ·Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. ·Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible while also considering counterparty credit risk in the assessment of fair value. Financial liabilities measured at fair value in the consolidated financial statements consist of interest rate swaps. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis, on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The analysis reflects the contractual terms of the swaps, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves ("significant other observable inputs"). The fair value calculation also includes an amount for risk of non-performance using "significant unobservable inputs" such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default. The Company has concluded, as of June 30, 2011, that the fair value associated with the "significant unobservable inputs" relating to the Company's risk of non-performance was insignificant to the overall fair value of the interest rate swap agreements and, as a result, the Company has determined that the relevant inputs for purposes of calculating the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements, in their entirety, were based upon "significant other observable inputs". Nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the consolidated financial statements consists of real estate held for sale/conveyance- discontinued operations.
The following tables show the hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, rents and other receivables, certain other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value. The fair value of the Company's investments ($3.6 million and $0 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) and liabilities related to deferred compensation plans ($3.7 million and $0 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) were determined to be a Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy, and were based on independent values provided by financial institutions. The valuation of the liability for the Company's interest rate swaps ($1.4 million and $1.6 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively), which is measured on a recurring basis, was determined to be a Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy, and was based on independent values provided by financial institutions. The valuation of the assets for the Company's real estate held for sale/conveyance – discontinued operations, which is measured on a nonrecurring basis, have been determined to be (i) a Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy, based on the respective contracts of sale or (ii) Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy, where applicable, based on estimated sales prices determined by discounted cash flow analyses if no contract amounts were as yet being negotiated. The discounted cash flow analyses included all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specific holding period and where applicable, any estimated debt premiums. These cash flows were comprised of unobservable inputs which included contractual rental revenues and forecasted rental revenues and expenses based upon market conditions and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these analyses were based upon observable rates that the Company believed to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective properties.
The fair value of the Company's fixed rate mortgage loans was estimated using available market information and discounted cash flows analyses based on borrowing rates the Company believes it could obtain with similar terms and maturities. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the aggregate fair values of the Company's fixed rate mortgage loans were approximately $620.4 million and $579.4 million, respectively; the carrying values of such loans were $599.4 million and $575.6 million, respectively, at those dates.
Intangible Lease Asset/Liability
The Company allocates the fair value of real estate acquired to land, buildings and improvements. In addition, the fair value of in-place leases is allocated to intangible lease assets and liabilities.
The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management's determination of the relative fair values of these assets. In valuing an acquired property's intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, such as real estate taxes, insurance, other operating expenses, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on its evaluation of current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs.
The values of acquired above-market and below-market leases are recorded based on the present values (using discount rates which reflect the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between the contractual amounts to be received and management's estimate of market lease rates, measured over the terms of the respective leases that management deemed appropriate at the time of the acquisitions. Such valuations include a consideration of the non-cancellable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal period(s). The fair values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company's experience and the relevant facts and circumstances that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The values of above-market leases are amortized to rental income over the terms of the respective non-cancelable lease periods. The portion of the values of below-market leases associated with the original non-cancelable lease terms are amortized to rental income over the terms of the respective non-cancelable lease periods. The portion of the values of the leases associated with below-market renewal options that are likely of exercise are amortized to rental income over the respective renewal periods. The value of other intangible assets (including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, etc.) is amortized to expense over the applicable terms of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration or not renewed, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recognized in operations at that time.
With respect to the Company's acquisitions, the fair values of in-place leases and other intangibles have been allocated to the intangible asset and liability accounts. Such allocations are preliminary and are based on information and estimates available as of the respective dates of acquisition. As final information becomes available and is refined, appropriate adjustments are made to the purchase price allocations, which are finalized within twelve months of the respective dates of acquisition.
Unamortized intangible lease liabilities that relate to below-market leases amounted to $44.1 million and $46.5 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Unamortized intangible lease assets that relate to above-market leases amounted to $0.9 million and $0 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
As a result of recording the intangible lease assets and liabilities, (i) revenues were increased by $1.5 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $2.9 million and $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, relating to the amortization of intangible lease liabilities, and (ii) depreciation and amortization expense was increased correspondingly by $2.4 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4.4 million and $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks and short-term investments with original maturities of less than ninety days, and include cash at consolidated joint ventures of $9.6 million and $6.7 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Restricted Cash
The terms of several of the Company's mortgage loans payable require the Company to deposit certain replacement and other reserves with its lenders. Such "restricted cash" is generally available only for property-level requirements for which the reserves have been established, and is not available to fund other property-level or Company-level obligations.
Rents and Other Receivables
Management has determined that all of the Company's leases with its various tenants are operating leases. Rental income with scheduled rent increases is recognized using the straight-line method over the respective non-cancelable terms of the leases. The aggregate excess of rental revenue recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual base rents is included in straight-line rents on the consolidated balance sheet. Leases also generally contain provisions under which the tenants reimburse the Company for a portion of property operating expenses and real estate taxes incurred, generally attributable to their respective allocable portions of GLA. Such income is recognized in the periods earned. In addition, a limited number of operating leases contain contingent rent provisions under which tenants are required to pay, as additional rent, a percentage of their sales in excess of a specified amount. The Company defers recognition of contingent rental income until those specified sales targets are met. Other contingent fees are recognized when earned.
The Company must make estimates as to the collectability of its accounts receivable related to base rent, straight-line rent, percentage rent, expense reimbursements and other revenues. When management analyzes accounts receivable and evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, it considers such things as historical bad debts, tenant creditworthiness, current economic trends, current developments relevant to a tenant's business specifically and to its business category generally, and changes in tenants' payment patterns. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $6.1 million and $5.4 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The provision for doubtful accounts (included in operating, maintenance and management expenses) was $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $1.6 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents in excess of insured amounts and tenant receivables. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions. Management performs ongoing credit evaluations of its tenants and requires certain tenants to provide security deposits and/or suitable guarantees.
Other Assets
Other assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are comprised of the following:
Deferred Charges, Net
Deferred charges at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are net of accumulated amortization and are comprised of the following:
Deferred charges are amortized over the terms of the related agreements. Amortization expense related to deferred charges (including amortization of deferred financing costs included in non-operating income and expense) amounted to $2.0 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $3.9 million and $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). A REIT will generally not be subject to federal income taxation on that portion of its income that qualifies as REIT taxable income, to the extent that it distributes at least 90% of such REIT taxable income to its shareholders and complies with certain other requirements. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all REIT requirements.
The Company follows a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. The use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for derecognition of tax positions is prohibited. The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions which would require an accrual.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company occasionally utilizes derivative financial instruments, principally interest rate swaps, to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. The Company has established policies and procedures for risk assessment, and the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments must be effective in reducing the Company's interest rate risk exposure in order to qualify for hedge accounting. When the terms of an underlying transaction are modified, or when the underlying hedged item ceases to exist, all changes in the fair value of the instrument are marked-to-market with changes in value included in net income for each period until the derivative financial instrument matures or is settled. Any derivative financial instrument used for risk management that does not meet the hedging criteria is marked-to-market with the changes in value included in net income. The Company has not entered into, and does not plan to enter into, derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Additionally, the Company has a policy of entering into derivative contracts only with major financial institutions. On January 20, 2010, the Company paid approximately $5.5 million to terminate interest rate swaps applicable to the financing for its development joint venture project in Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company believes it has no significant risk associated with non-performance of the financial institutions which are the counterparties to its derivative contracts. Additionally, based on the rates in effect as of June 30, 2011, if a counterparty were to default, the Company would receive a net interest benefit. At June 30, 2011, the Company had approximately $19.9 million of mortgage loans payable subject to interest rate swaps. Such interest rate swaps converted LIBOR-based variable rates to fixed annual rates of 5.4% and 6.5% per annum. At that date, the Company had accrued liabilities of $1.4 million (included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet) relating to the fair value of interest rate swaps applicable to existing mortgage loans payable. Charges and/or credits relating to the changes in fair values of such interest rate swaps are made to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, noncontrolling interests (minority interests in consolidated joint ventures and limited partners' interest), or operations (included in interest expense), as appropriate.
The following is a summary of the derivative financial instruments held by the Company at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
The following presents the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
There was no ineffectiveness recorded in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Limited Partners Interest In Operating Partnership (Mezz OP Units)
The Company follows the accounting guidance related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements, which clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (minority interests or certain limited partners' interest, in the case of the Company), subject to the classification and measurement of redeemable securities, is an ownership interest in a consolidated entity which should be reported as equity in the parent company's consolidated financial statements. The guidance requires a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of equity attributable to noncontrolling interests and disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of those amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests. The Company classifies the balances related to minority interests in consolidated joint ventures and limited partners' interest in the Operating Partnership into the consolidated equity accounts, as appropriate (certain non-controlling interests of the Company are classified in the mezzanine section of the balance sheet (the "Mezz OP Units") as such Mezz OP Units do not meet the requirements for equity classification, as certain of the holders of OP Units have registration rights that provide such holders with the right to demand registration under the federal securities laws of the common stock of the Company issuable upon conversion of such OP Units). The Company adjusts the carrying value of the Mezz OP Units each period to equal the greater of its historical carrying value or its redemption value. Through June 30, 2011, there have been no cumulative net adjustments recorded to the carrying amounts of the Mezz OP Units.
The following is an analysis of the activity relating to the Mezz OP units:
Earnings/ Dividends Per Share
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing net (loss) attributable to the Company's common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, including (a) restricted shares and shares held by Rabbi Trusts, as these are participating securities, and (b) shares attributable to the equity award discussed in "Stock-Based Compensation" below.
Fully-diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into shares of common stock. The calculations of additional shares were anti-dilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The calculations of additional shares were 52,000 and 39,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and related to the warrants issued to RioCan prior to their exercise; however, such amounts were anti-dilutive as the Company reported net losses for those periods. Accordingly, fully-diluted EPS are the same as basic EPS for all periods presented.
Dividends to common shareholders declared were $6,097,000 ($0.09 per share) and $5,845,000 ($0.09 per share) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $12,148,000 ($0.18 per share) and $5,845,000 ($0.09 per share) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Management Transition Charges
In June 2011, the Company's Chairman of the Board, CEO and President retired, and the employment of the Company's Chief Financial Officer ended. Pursuant to their respective employment and/or separation agreements, (a) they are to receive an aggregate of approximately $3.7 million in cash severance payments (including the cost of related payroll taxes and benefits), and (b) all of their unvested restricted share grants became vested and all related unamortized deferred compensation was written off (an aggregate of approximately $2.0 million – see "Stock-Based Compensation" below). Together with approximately $0.8 million of other costs, primarily professional fees and expenses related to the hiring of a new President/CEO and Chief Financial Officer (including $0.2 million recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2011), the Company recorded an aggregate of approximately $6.5 million as "management transition charges" during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company's 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") establishes the procedures for the granting of incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, performance units and performance shares. The maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock that may be issued pursuant to the Incentive Plan is 4,850,000 (including a 2,100,000 share increase approved by shareholders on June 15, 2011), and the maximum number of shares that may be granted to a participant in any calendar year may not exceed 250,000. All grants issued pursuant to the Incentive Plan are "restricted stock grants" which generally vest (i) at the end of designated time periods for time-based grants, or (ii) upon the completion of a designated period of performance for performance-based grants and satisfaction of performance criteria. Time–based grants are valued according to the market price for the Company's common stock at the date of grant. The value of all grants is being expensed on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting periods (irrespective of achievement of the performance grants) adjusted, as applicable, for fluctuations in the market value of the Company's common stock and forfeiture assumptions. Those grants of restricted shares that are transferred to Rabbi Trusts are classified as treasury stock on the Company's consolidated balance sheet. For performance-based grants, the Company generally engages an independent appraisal company to determine the value of the shares at the date of grant, taking into account the underlying contingency risks associated with the performance criteria.
In January 2009, the Company issued 218,000 shares of common stock as performance-based grants, based on the total annual return on an investment in the Company's common stock ("TSR") over the three-year period ending December 31, 2011, with 75% to vest if such TSR is equal to, or greater than an average of 6% TSR per year on the Company's common stock, and 25% to vest based on a comparison of TSR for such three years to the Company's peer group. The independent appraisal determined the values of the performance-based shares to be $5.44 and $6.48 per share, respectively, compared to a market price at the date of grant of $7.02 per share. After the accelerated vesting in June 2011 of certain of these shares, as discussed below, 82,000 shares remain of the 2009 performance-based award.
In January 2010, the Company issued 227,000 shares of common stock as performance-based grants. As modified in September 2010, one-half of these amounts will vest upon the satisfaction of the following conditions: (a) if the TSR on the Company's common stock is at least an average of 6% per year for the three years ending December 31, 2012, and (b) if there is a positive comparison of TSR on the Company's common stock to the median of the TSR for the Company's peer group for the three years ending December 31, 2012. The independent appraisal determined the values of the category (a) and (b) performance-based shares to be $4.56 per share and $6.00 per share, respectively, compared to a market price at the date of grant of $6.70 per share. After the accelerated vesting in June 2011 of certain of these shares, as discussed below, 84,000 shares remain of the 2010 performance-based award.
In January 2011, the Company issued 275,000 shares of common stock as performance-based grants. One-half of these amounts will vest upon the satisfaction of the following conditions: (a) if the TSR on the Company's common stock is at least an average of 8% per year for the three years ending December 31, 2013, and (b) if there is a positive comparison of TSR on the Company's common stock to the median of the TSR for the Company's peer group for the three years ending December 31, 2013. The independent appraisal determined the values of the category (a) and (b) performance-based shares to be $4.40 per share and $5.91 per share, respectively, compared to a market price at the date of grant of $6.54 per share. After the accelerated vesting in June 2011 of certain of these shares, as discussed below, 123,000 shares remain of the 2011 performance-based award.
In connection with the retirement of the Company's Chairman of the Board, CEO and President, and the end of the employment of the Company's Chief Financial Officer (see "Management Transition Charges" above), all of their outstanding restricted share grants, consisting of time-based grants (284,000 shares) and performance-based grants (422,000 shares) became vested (an aggregate of 706,000 shares), and were expensed in full at the then market value of the shares (an aggregate of approximately $2.0 million).
The Company's new President and CEO is to receive restricted share grants totaling 2.5 million shares, one-half of which are to be time-based, vesting upon the seventh anniversary of the date of grant (vesting on June 15, 2018), and the other half to be performance-based, to be earned if the TSR on the Company's common stock is at least an average of 6.5% per year for the seven years ending June 15, 2018. The independent appraiser has initially estimated the value of the performance-based award to be $4.39 per share compared to a market price at the date of grant of $4.98 per share. As a result of existing limitations within the Incentive Plan, only 250,000 shares have been issued, 1,750,000 shares are being accounted for as an "equity award", and 500,000 shares are being accounted for as a "liability award". The values of the equity and liability awards are being expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Consistent with such awards to other recipients, dividends will be paid on all the shares, including the equity and liability award shares, with the dividends paid on the equity award shares treated as distributions to common shareholders and included in the statement of equity, and the dividends paid on the liability award shares treated as compensation and included in the statement of operations. In addition, with respect to the liability award, adjustments to reflect changes in the fair value of the award will also be charged to operations. It is the Company's intention to seek a modification of the terms of the Incentive Plan (or to adopt a new stock incentive plan) so as to permit the grant of the entire 2.5 million shares. Until such changes are effectuated, the Company will issue 250,000 shares each calendar year, thereby reducing the liability established for the equity award. If, by June 15, 2018, the entire 2.5 million shares have not been issued, the parties have agreed to satisfy any remaining Company obligations on a mutually-agreeable economic basis.
The Company's new Chief Financial Officer received a time-based restricted share grant totaling 137,000 shares, vesting 25% annually on each of the next four anniversary dates of June 7, 2011.
In addition to the above, there were other time-based restricted shares issued, which amounted to 0 shares and 4,000 shares for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 299,000 shares and 278,000 shares for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table sets forth certain stock-based compensation information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively:
At June 30, 2011, 2.3 million shares remained available for grants pursuant to the Incentive Plan (including the 2.1 million shares approved by shareholders), and $14.7 million remains to be expensed over various periods ending in June 2018.
During 2001, pursuant to the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan"), the Company granted to the then directors options to purchase an aggregate of approximately 13,000 shares of common stock at $10.50 per share, the market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. The options were fully exercisable and expired on July 11, 2011. The Option Plan has expired and is no longer in effect.
In connection with an acquisition of a shopping center in 2002, the Operating Partnership issued warrants to purchase approximately 83,000 OP Units to a then minority interest partner in the property. Such warrants have an exercise price of $13.50 per unit, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments, are fully vested, and expire on May 31, 2012.
Supplemental consolidated statements of cash flows information
Recently-Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S GAAP and IFRS". This update defines fair value, clarifies a framework to measure fair value, and requires specific disclosures of fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2012 and is required to be applied retrospectively. The Company does not expect adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations. In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income". This standard eliminates the current requirement to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of equity and instead requires the components of other comprehensive income to be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2012 and is required to be applied retrospectively. Other than presentation in the financial statements, the adoption of this guidance will have no effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. |
Real Estate/Discontinued Operations/Investment In Cedar/RioCan Joint Venture
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate/Discontinued Operations/Investment In Cedar/RioCan Joint Venture | Â | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate/Discontinued Operations/Investment In Cedar/RioCan Joint Venture | Note 3. Real Estate/Discontinued Operations/Investment in Cedar/RioCan Joint Venture
At June 30, 2011 a substantial portion of the Company's real estate was pledged as collateral for mortgage loans payable and the revolving credit facilities. The following are the significant real estate transactions that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Wholly-owned properties
On January 14, 2011, the Company acquired Colonial Commons, a shopping center located in Lower Paxton Township, Pennsylvania. The purchase price for the property was approximately $49.1 million. At closing, the Company entered into a first mortgage in the amount of $28.1 million, which bears interest at 5.55% per annum.
On February 14, 2011, the Company completed the sale of a development land parcel, located near Ephrata, Pennsylvania for approximately $1.9 million, which approximated the property's carrying value at December 31, 2010.
On April 29, 2011, the Company acquired, for future development (and which is substantially pre-leased), a vacant land parcel in Kutztown (Township of Maxatawny), Pennsylvania for a purchase price of approximately $1.6 million.
Discontinued operations
During the period from January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011, the Company sold or treated as "held for sale and/or conveyance", 26 of its properties, including (1) a 100%-owned single-tenant property in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and (2) a number of drug store/convenience centers. The carrying values of the assets and liabilities of these properties, principally the net book values of the real estate and the related mortgage loans payable to be assumed by the buyers (or conveyed to the mortgagee), have been reclassified as "held for sale/conveyance" on the Company's consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. In addition, the properties' results of operations have been classified as "discontinued operations" for all periods presented. In connection therewith, the Company recorded net impairment charges of $12.3 million and $3.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $22.5 million and $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively (such impairment charges aggregated $39.5 million for the entire year ended December 31 2010).
Such charges were based on a comparison of the carrying values of the properties with either (1) the actual sales price less costs to sell for the properties sold or contract amounts for properties in the process of being sold, (2) estimated sales prices based on discounted cash flow analyses if no contract amounts were as yet being negotiated, as discussed in more detail in Note 2 – "Fair Value Measurements", or (3) an "as is" appraisal with respect to the single-tenant property in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to be conveyed to the mortgagee. Prior to the Company's plan to dispose of assets reclassified to "held for sale/conveyance", the Company performed recoverability analyses based on the estimated cash flows that were expected to result from the real estate investments' use and eventual disposal.
The impairment charge recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2011 relates primarily to the 100%-owned single-tenant property in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Similar to the adjacent joint venture property discussed in Note 1 - "Organization and Basis of Preparation", the tenant vacated the premises in April 2011 at which time the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary had a CMBS non-recourse first mortgage loan secured by the property in the amount of $12.9 million maturing in March 2012 (guaranteed by the Company to the extent of $250,000). In May and June 2011, the Company reviewed its investment alternatives and determined that it would not be prudent to proceed with the development, sale or lease of the properties. In addition, it was determined that to advance the funds to repay the mortgages would also not be prudent. Such determination was based on the uncertainty in obtaining favorable revisions to zoning, difficult existing deed restrictions, uncertainty in achieving required economic returns given the extensive additional capital investments required, and uncertain current market conditions for sale or lease. No payments have been made on the 100%-owned property mortgage since May 2011, although the Company has been accruing interest expense and will pay real estate taxes and other property-maintenance expenses as they become due. The carrying value of the property, which is classified as "held for sale/conveyance" was $4.6 million at June 30, 2011, after giving effect to a $9.1 million impairment charge. It is the Company's intention to convey the property to the mortgagee by a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure process, whereby the Company's subsidiary would be released from all obligations, including any unpaid principal (other than the aforementioned $250,000 Company guaranty) and interest. At the time of such conveyance, the Company would recognize a gain (anticipated to approximate $8.3 million) based on the excess of the carrying amount of the liabilities (mortgage principal and accrued interest and real estate taxes) over the carrying amount of the property at June 30, 2011.
As previously disclosed, the Company's properties in Ohio, principally drugstore-anchored centers, were disproportionately impacted, relative to the Company's other properties, by continuing unemployment and adverse economic conditions attributable in large part to the decline in automobile production and sales which, in turn, resulted in factory closings and/or downsizing. This resulted in disproportionately larger vacancies at those properties. As a result of the challenges in maintaining viable tenancies in those areas, the Company developed a strategy to dispose of these and several other properties. Impairment charges related to these properties recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2011 included approximately $2.0 million for two additional properties reclassified to "held for sale/conveyance" during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and additional charges of approximately $7.9 million and $2.6 million for the three month periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2011, respectively, principally representing adjustments to the net realizable values of certain of the properties treated as "held for sale/conveyance" as of December 31, 2010. The additional charges were based principally on changes in the structure of previously-negotiated transactions. In March 2011, the Company terminated a contract to swap three properties for certain land parcels in Ohio and instead entered into a new agreement to sell the properties for cash and assumption of existing debt, and, subsequent to June 30, 2011, the Company was unable to obtain the required lender consents for the sale of 14 additional "held for sale/conveyance" properties, discussed below (the buyers in both cases being members of the group from which the Company originally acquired the drug store/convenience centers).
On April 27, 2011, the Company made a two-year $4.1 million loan to the developers of a site located in Columbus, Ohio (the developers are certain other members of the group from which the Company acquired the drug store/convenience centers). The loan was made in consideration of the borrowers facilitating (but not being parties to) the contract for the sale of the 14 properties. The loan (which may be increased, under certain conditions, by an additional $300,000) bears interest at 6.25% per annum and is collateralized by a first mortgage on the development parcel, which has an appraised value in excess of $8 million.
On April 29, 2011, the Company entered into a contract for the sale of the 14 properties, subject to lenders approvals, with a closing anticipated during the latter part of 2011. The $33.2 million net aggregate sales price for the properties, after reflecting estimated closing costs and expenses, includes approximately $25.3 million of mortgage loans payable to be assumed, and approximates the properties' carrying values as of March 31, 2011. As a result of being unable to obtain lender consents, the Company is in the process of renegotiating the transaction, may not sell all 14 properties at this time, and, accordingly, has revalued the properties on an individual, and not portfolio, basis.
In addition to the three and 14-property transactions noted above, the Company, on March 30, 2011, completed the sale of two of the "held for sale/conveyance" properties for approximately $3.8 million, which approximated their adjusted carrying values. In addition, on April 15, 2011, the Company completed the sale of another "held for sale/conveyance" property for approximately $10.8 million, which approximated $0.5 million in excess of its adjusted carrying value.
The following table summarizes information relating to the Company's properties which were sold or treated as "held for sale and/or conveyance", as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
RioCan Joint Venture
The Company and RioCan have entered into an 80% (RioCan) and 20% (Cedar) joint venture (i) initially for the purchase of seven supermarket-anchored properties previously owned by the Company, and (ii) then to acquire additional primarily supermarket-anchored properties in the Company's primary market areas, in the same joint venture format. The transfers of the initial seven properties, which commenced in December 2009, were completed in May 2010. At June 30, 2011, the Company was owed approximately $3.0 million ($0.7 million related to contingent consideration) relating to post-closing adjustments applicable to properties transferred to or acquired by the joint venture.
On April 15, 2011, the joint venture acquired Northwoods Crossing shopping center, located near Boston, Massachusetts. The purchase price was approximately $23.4 million, including the assumption of a $14.4 million first mortgage maturing in 2016 and bearing interest at 6.4% per annum.
The Company earned fees from the joint venture of approximately $0.7 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $1.2 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, representing accounting fees, management fees, acquisition fees and financing fees. Such fees are included in other revenues in the accompanying statements of operations. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $0.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively, related principally to the remaining completion work at the Blue Mountain Commons property transferred to the joint venture in December 2009. In connection with the joint venture transactions, the Company paid fees to its investment advisor of approximately $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, which are included in transaction costs in the accompanying statement of operations.
The following are the 22 properties owned by the Cedar/RioCan joint venture as of June 30, 2011:
The following summarizes certain financial information related to the Company's investment in the Cedar/RioCan unconsolidated joint venture at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively:
Secured Revolving Credit Facility. On November 15, 2010, the joint venture closed a secured revolving credit facility with TD Bank, National Association as administrative agent and Royal Bank of Canada as syndication agent, with total commitments aggregating $50.0 million. The principal terms of the facility include (i) an availability based primarily on appraisals with a 50% advance rate, (ii) an interest rate based on (a) LIBOR plus 300 basis points ("bps") with a 100 bps floor, or (b) the prime rate, as defined, plus 200 bps, (iii) an unused portion fee of 50 bps, and (iv) a leverage ratio limited to 65%. The facility will expire on November 15, 2012, subject to a one-year extension option. As the joint venture has not pledged any properties as collateral under the facility, there were no amounts outstanding and no amounts available for borrowing at June 30, 2011. The facility may be used to fund acquisitions, capital expenditures, mortgage repayments, partnership distributions, working capital and other general partnership purposes. The facility is subject to customary financial covenants, including limits on leverage, and other financial statement ratios. As of June 30, 2011, the joint venture was in compliance with the financial covenants as required by the terms of the facility. |
Mortgage Loans Payable And Secured Revolving Credit Facilities
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Loans Payable And Secured Revolving Credit Facilities | Â | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Loans Payable And Secured Revolving Credit Facilities | Note 4. Mortgage Loans Payable and Secured Revolving Credit Facilities
Secured debt is comprised of the following at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
Included in variable-rate mortgages is a $70.7 million construction facility, as amended, with Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (as agent) and several other banks, pursuant to which the Company has pledged its joint venture development property in Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania as collateral for borrowings thereunder. The facility is guaranteed by the Company and will expire on September 26, 2011, subject to a one-year extension option. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at the Company's option at either LIBOR plus a spread of 325 bps, or the agent bank's prime rate. Borrowings outstanding under the facility aggregated $63.8 million at June 30, 2011, and such borrowings bore interest at an average rate of 3.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as required by the terms of the construction facility.
Stabilized Property Revolving Credit Facility
The Company has a $185 million stabilized property revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent, together with three other lead lenders and other participating banks (the "stabilized property credit facility"). The facility is expandable to $400 million, subject principally to acceptable collateral and the availability of additional lender commitments, and will expire on January 31, 2012, subject to a one-year extension option. The principal terms of the facility include (i) an availability based primarily on appraisals, with a 67.5% advance rate, (ii) an interest rate based on LIBOR plus 350 bps, with a 200 bps LIBOR floor, (iii) a leverage ratio limited to 67.5%, and (iv) an unused portion fee of 50 bps.
Borrowings outstanding under the facility aggregated $64.0 million at June 30, 2011. Such borrowings bore interest at an average rate of 5.5% per annum, and the Company had pledged 29 of its shopping center properties as collateral for such borrowings, including five properties which are being treated as "real estate held for sale/conveyance".
The stabilized property credit facility has been, and will be, used to fund acquisitions, certain development and redevelopment activities, capital expenditures, mortgage repayments, dividend distributions, working capital and other general corporate purposes. The facility is subject to customary financial covenants, including limits on leverage and distributions (limited to 95% of funds from operations, as defined), and other financial statement ratios. Based on covenant measurements and collateral in place as of June 30, 2011, the Company was permitted to draw up to approximately $140.8 million ($138.0 million if the collateral properties being treated as "held for sale/conveyance" were removed), of which approximately $76.8 million remained available as of that date. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as required by the terms of the stabilized property credit facility.
Development Property Revolving Credit Facility
The Company has a $150 million development property credit facility with KeyBank, National Association (as agent) and several other banks, pursuant to which the Company has pledged certain of its development projects and redevelopment properties as collateral for borrowings thereunder. The facility, as amended, is expandable to $250 million, subject principally to acceptable collateral and the availability of additional lender commitments. In June 2011, the Company exercised its one-year extension option and the loan is now due on June 13, 2012. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at the Company's option at either LIBOR or the agent bank's prime rate, plus a spread of 225 bps or 75 bps, respectively. Advances under the facility are calculated at the least of 70% of aggregate project costs, 70% of "as stabilized" appraised values, or costs incurred in excess of a 30% equity requirement on the part of the Company. The facility also requires an unused portion fee of 15 bps. This facility has been, and will be, used to fund in part the Company's and certain consolidated joint ventures' development activities. In order to draw funds under this construction facility, the Company must meet certain pre-leasing and other conditions. Borrowings outstanding under the facility aggregated $103.1 million at June 30, 2011, and such borrowings bore interest at a rate of 2.5% per annum. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the as financial covenants required by the terms of the development property credit facility. |
Common Stock
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Common Stock | Â |
Common Stock | Note 5. Common Stock
The Company has a Standby Equity Purchase Agreement (the "SEPA Agreement") with an investment company for sales of its shares of common stock aggregating up to $45 million over a commitment period ending in September 2011. Under the terms of the SEPA Agreement, the Company may sell, from time to time, shares of its common stock at a discount to market of 1.75%. The amount of these daily sales is generally limited to the lesser of 20% of the average daily trading volume or $1.0 million. In connection with these sales transactions, the Company agreed to pay an investment advisor a 0.75% placement agent fee. In addition, the Company may require the investment company to advance from time to time up to $5.0 million; provided, however, that the Company may only request these larger advances approximately once a month. With respect to such advances, the common stock sales are at a discount to market of 2.75% and the placement agent fee is 1.25%. As the Company has a conditional obligation to issue a variable number of shares of its common stock, advances are initially recorded as a liability, and as shares are sold on a daily basis and the advance is settled, such liability is reflected in equity. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, there were no shares sold pursuant to the SEPA Agreement.
The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan ("DRIP") covering up to 5.0 million shares of its common stock. The DRIP offers a convenient method for shareholders to invest cash dividends and/or make optional cash payments to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at 98% of their market value. On March 17, 2011, an amendment to the DRIP became effective to have all stock purchased at 100% of their market value which was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued approximately 684,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of $6.03 per share and realized proceeds after expenses of approximately $4.1 million.
In connection with a litigation settlement in the Company's favor, the Company received a cash payment of $225,000. In addition, in May 2011, the defendants acquired 39,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an average price of $5.78 per share from which the Company realized net proceeds of an additional $225,000.
During 2001, pursuant to the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan"), the Company granted to the then directors options to purchase an aggregate of approximately 13,000 shares of common stock at $10.50 per share, the market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. The options were fully exercisable and expired on July 11, 2011. In connection with the adoption of the Incentive Plan, the Company agreed that it would not grant any more options under the Option Plan. In connection with an acquisition of a shopping center in 2002, the Operating Partnership issued warrants to purchase approximately 83,000 OP Units to a then minority interest partner in the property. Such warrants have an exercise price of $13.50 per unit, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments, are fully vested, and will expire on May 31, 2012. |
Consolidated Statements Of Equity (USD $)
|
Preferred Stock [Member]
|
Common Stock [Member]
|
Treasury Stock At Cost [Member]
|
Additional Paid-In Capital [Member]
|
Cumulative Distributions In Excess Of Net Income [Member]
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)Iincome [Member]
|
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. [Member]
|
Minority Interests in Consolidated Joint Ventures [Member]
|
Limited Partners' Interest in Operating Partnership [Member]
|
Noncontrolling Interest [Member]
|
Total
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010 | $ 158,575,000 | $ 3,991,000 | $ (10,367,000) | $ 712,548,000 | $ (231,275,000) | $ (3,406,000) | $ 630,066,000 | $ 62,050,000 | $ 6,355,000 | $ 68,405,000 | $ 698,471,000 |
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2010 | 6,400,000 | 66,520,000 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Net loss | Â | Â | Â | Â | (32,936,000) | Â | (32,936,000) | Â | Â | Â | (32,936,000) |
Net loss, Noncontrolling Interests | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | (47,000) | (452,000) | (499,000) | (33,435,000) |
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of cash flow hedges | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 409,000 | 409,000 | Â | 2,000 | 2,000 | 411,000 |
Total other comprehensive loss | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | (32,527,000) | (47,000) | (450,000) | (497,000) | (33,024,000) |
Deferred compensation activity, net | Â | 46,000 | (489,000) | 471,000 | Â | Â | 28,000 | Â | Â | Â | 28,000 |
Deferred compensation activity, net, shares | Â | 759,000 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Net proceeds from sales of common stock | Â | 2,000 | Â | 223,000 | Â | Â | 225,000 | Â | Â | Â | 225,000 |
Net proceeds from sales of common stock, shares | Â | 39,000 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Net proceeds from dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan | Â | 41,000 | Â | 4,034,000 | Â | Â | 4,075,000 | Â | Â | Â | 4,075,000 |
Net proceeds from dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan, shares | Â | 684,000 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Preferred distribution requirements | Â | Â | Â | Â | (7,041,000) | Â | (7,041,000) | Â | Â | Â | (7,041,000) |
Distributions to common shareholders/ noncontrolling interests | Â | Â | Â | Â | (12,148,000) | Â | (12,148,000) | (1,973,000) | (139,000) | (2,112,000) | (14,260,000) |
Contribution from minority interest partners | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 269,000 | Â | 269,000 | 269,000 |
Reallocation adjustment of limited partners' interest | Â | Â | Â | 739,000 | Â | Â | 739,000 | Â | 488,000 | 488,000 | 1,227,000 |
Balance at Jun. 30, 2011 | $ 158,575,000 | $ 4,080,000 | $ (10,856,000) | $ 718,015,000 | $ (283,400,000) | $ (2,997,000) | $ 583,417,000 | $ 60,299,000 | $ 6,254,000 | $ 66,553,000 | $ 649,970,000 |
Balance, shares at Jun. 30, 2011 | 6,400,000 | 68,002,000 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Organization And Basis Of Preparation
|
6 Months Ended |
---|---|
Jun. 30, 2011
|
|
Organization And Basis Of Preparation | Â |
Organization And Basis Of Preparation | Note 1. Organization and Basis of Preparation
Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. (the "Company") was organized in 1984 and elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") in 1986. The Company focuses primarily on ownership, operation, development and redevelopment of supermarket-anchored shopping centers predominantly in mid-Atlantic and Northeast coastal states. At June 30, 2011, the Company owned and managed 131 operating properties, including 22 properties in the unconsolidated Cedar/RioCan joint venture, and 17 properties "held for sale/conveyance".
Cedar Shopping Centers Partnership, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") is the entity through which the Company conducts substantially all of its business and owns (either directly or through subsidiaries) substantially all of its assets. At June 30, 2011 the Company owned a 98.0% economic interest in, and was the sole general partner of, the Operating Partnership. The limited partners' interest in the Operating Partnership (2.0% at June 30, 2011) is represented by Operating Partnership Units ("OP Units"). The carrying amount of such interest is adjusted at the end of each reporting period to an amount equal to the limited partners' ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership's net equity. Allocations of amounts between the Company and its limited partners include the impact of the equity award shares discussed in Note 2 – "Stock- Based Compensation". The approximately 1.4 million OP Units outstanding at June 30, 2011 are economically equivalent to the Company's common stock and are convertible into the Company's common stock at the option of the respective holders on a one-to-one basis.
As used herein, the "Company" refers to Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, including the Operating Partnership or, where the context so requires, Cedar Shopping Centers, Inc. only.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company, the Operating Partnership, its subsidiaries, and certain joint venture partnerships in which it participates. The Company consolidates all variable interest entities ("VIEs") for which it is the primary beneficiary. Generally, a VIE is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk (i) lack the power to make decisions about the entity's activities that significantly impacts the entity's performance through voting or similar rights, (ii) have no obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) have no right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity's activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. The Company follows the accounting guidance for determining whether an entity is a VIE, which requires the performance of a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The guidance requires an entity to consolidate a VIE if it has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Significant judgments related to these determinations include estimates about the current and future fair values and performance of real estate held by these VIEs and general market conditions.
With respect to its 12 consolidated operating joint ventures, the Company has general partnership interests of 20% in nine properties, 40% in two properties and 50% in one property. As (i) such entities are not VIEs, and (ii) the Company is the sole general partner and exercises substantial operating control over these entities, the Company has determined that such entities should be consolidated for financial statement purposes. Current accounting guidance provides a framework for determining whether a general partner controls, and should consolidate, a limited partnership or similar entity in which it owns a minority interest.
The Company's three 60%-owned joint ventures originally formed as development projects in Limerick, Pottsgrove and Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, are consolidated as they are deemed to be VIEs and the Company is the primary beneficiary in each case. At June 30, 2011, these VIEs owned real estate with a carrying value of $138.3 million. The assets of the consolidated VIEs can be used to settle obligations other than those of the consolidated VIEs. At that date, one of the VIEs had a property-specific mortgage loan payable aggregating $63.8 million, and the real estate owned by the other two VIEs partially collateralized the secured revolving development property credit facility (the "development property credit facility") to the extent of $28.1 million. Such obligations are guaranteed by, and are recourse to, the Company. For such development projects, the Company reviews the applicable budgets and provides supervisory support.
On February 15, 2011, Homburg Invest Inc. ("HII"), one of the Company's joint venture partners, exercised its buy/sell option pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements for each of the nine properties owned by the venture. The offered values for the properties, in the aggregate, amounted to approximately $55.0 million over existing property-specific financing of approximately $101.6 million and $102.3 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company has elected to purchase HII's 80% interest in one of the nine properties, Meadows Marketplace, located in Hershey, Pennsylvania. The offered purchase price for the 80% interest is approximately $5.3 million, and the outstanding balance of the mortgage loan payable on the property was approximately $10.1 million and $10.2 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company also determined not to meet HII's buy/sell offers for each of the remaining eight properties. Accordingly, at closing, the Company will receive proceeds of approximately $9.7 million from HII for its 20% interest in these properties. The outstanding balances of the mortgage loans payable on the eight properties was approximately $91.5 million and $92.1 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company's property management agreements for the eight properties will terminate upon the closing of the sale. In addition to normal closing conditions, these transactions are subject to the obtaining of approvals of the lenders holding mortgages on the properties, which create significant uncertainties. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any of these transactions will be consummated.
With respect to its unconsolidated joint ventures, the Company has a 20% interest in a joint venture with RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust of Toronto, Canada, a publicly-traded Canadian real estate investment trust ("RioCan") formed initially for the acquisition of seven shopping center properties owned by the Company; all seven properties had been transferred to the joint venture by May 2010 and, as of June 30, 2011, the joint venture owned 22 properties. The accounting treatment presentation on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 is to reflect the results of the properties' operations through the respective dates of transfer in current operations and, prospectively following their transfer to the joint venture, as "equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures". Accordingly, the accompanying statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 includes revenues of $0.7 million and $4.4 million, respectively, applicable to the periods prior to the dates of transfer to the RioCan joint venture. Although the Company provides management and other services, RioCan has significant management participation rights. The Company has determined that this joint venture is not a VIE and, accordingly, the Company accounts for its investment in this joint venture under the equity method.
The Company had an approximate 85% limited partner's interest in an unconsolidated joint venture (increased from approximately 76% in the second quarter of 2011 for a payment of $745,000) which owned a single-tenant property in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Company had determined that this joint venture was not a VIE. In addition, the Company had no control over the entity, did not provide any management or other services to the entity, and had no substantial participating or "kick out" rights. The Company had accounted for its investment in this joint venture under the equity method. The tenant vacated the premises in April 2011 at which time the joint venture had a CMBS non-recourse first mortgage loan secured by the property in the amount of $14.7 million due for payment in May 2011. In May and June 2011, the Company reviewed its investment alternatives and determined that it would not be prudent to proceed with the development, sale or lease of both the joint venture property and an adjacent property 100% owned by the Company (the adjacent property had been leased to the same tenant which also vacated the premises in April 2011). In addition, it was determined that it would also not be prudent to advance the funds necessary to pay off the joint venture's mortgage. Such determination was based on the uncertainty in obtaining favorable revisions to zoning, difficult existing deed restrictions, the uncertainty in achieving required economic returns given the extensive additional capital investments required, and uncertain current market conditions for sale or lease. As a result, in exchange for a payment by the Company of $838,000, the Company (a) obtained appropriate releases, and (b) assigned its limited partnership interest to other partners of the joint venture. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2011, the Company wrote off its investment in the joint venture ($8.0 million) , and recorded an impairment charge, included in discontinued operations, related to the value of the 100%-owned adjacent property ($9.1 million, as more fully discussed in Note 3 - "Discontinued Operations").
At June 30, 2011, the Company had deposits of $0.8 million on four land parcels (which is its maximum exposure) to be purchased for future development. Although each of the entities holding the deposits is considered a VIE, the Company has not consolidated any of them as the Company is not the primary beneficiary in each case. |