XML 58 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
ETE Merger and Holdco Transaction
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Business Combinations [Abstract]  
ETE Merger and ETP Merger
ETE MERGER AND HOLDCO TRANSACTION:
Description of Merger
On March 26, 2012, Southern Union, ETE, and Sigma Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ETE (Merger Sub), completed their previously announced merger transaction.  Pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 19, 2011, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of September 14, 2011 (as amended, the Merger Agreement), among Southern Union, ETE and Merger Sub, Merger Sub was merged with and into Southern Union, with Southern Union continuing as the surviving corporation as an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ETE (the Merger).  The Merger became effective on March 26, 2012 at 12:59 p.m., Eastern Time (the Effective Time).
In connection with, and immediately prior to the Effective Time of the Merger, CrossCountry Energy, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Union (CrossCountry Energy), ETP, Citrus ETP Acquisition, L.L.C. (ETP Merger Sub), Citrus ETP Finance LLC, ETE, PEPL Holdings, LLC, a newly created indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Southern Union (PEPL Holdings), and Southern Union consummated the transactions contemplated by that certain Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 19, 2011, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of September 14, 2011 and Amendment No. 2 thereto dated as of March 23, 2012 (as amended, the Citrus Merger Agreement) by and among ETP, ETP Merger Sub and Citrus ETP Finance LLC, on the one hand, and ETE, CrossCountry Energy, PEPL Holdings and Southern Union, on the other hand.
Immediately prior to the Effective Time, Southern Union, CrossCountry Energy and PEPL Holdings became parties to the Citrus Merger Agreement by joinder to, and Southern Union assumed the obligations and rights of ETE thereunder.  Southern Union made certain customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities in the Citrus Merger Agreement.  Pursuant to the Citrus Merger Agreement, ETP Merger Sub was merged with and into CrossCountry Energy (the Citrus Merger), with CrossCountry Energy continuing as the surviving entity in the Citrus Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ETP and, as a result thereof, ETP, through its subsidiaries, indirectly owns 50% of the outstanding capital stock of Citrus Corp. (Citrus).  As consideration for the Citrus Merger, Southern Union received from ETP $2.0 billion, consisting of approximately $1.9 billion in cash and $105 million of common units representing limited partner interests in ETP.
Immediately prior to the Effective Time, $1.45 billion of the total cash consideration received in respect of the Citrus Merger was contributed to Merger Sub in exchange for an equity interest in Merger Sub.  In connection with the Merger, at the Effective Time, such equity interest in Merger Sub held by CCE Holdings was cancelled and retired.
Pursuant to the Citrus Merger Agreement, immediately prior to the Effective Time, (i) Southern Union contributed its ownership interests in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP and Southern Union Panhandle, LLC (collectively, the Panhandle Interests) to PEPL Holdings (the Panhandle Contribution); and (ii) following the Panhandle Contribution, Southern Union entered into a contingent residual support agreement (the Support Agreement) with ETP and Citrus ETP Finance LLC, pursuant to which Southern Union agreed to provide contingent, residual support to Citrus ETP Finance LLC (on a non-recourse basis to Southern Union) with respect to Citrus ETP Finance LLC’s obligations to ETP to support the payment of $2.0 billion in principal amount of senior notes issued by ETP on January 17, 2012.
Expenses Related to the Merger
Merger-related expenses of $43.8 million include charges related to employment agreements with certain executives that provide for compensation when their employment was terminated and severance costs associated with administrative headcount reductions, as well as an allocation of such charges for Southern Union employees. These expenses were included in Operating, maintenance, and general expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations.
The Company also recognized a $10.5 million net gain due to the curtailment of certain other postretirement employee benefit plans.  See Note 8 – Benefits for more information on the curtailment.
Allocation of Consideration Transferred
The Merger was accounted for using business combination accounting under applicable accounting principles.  Business combination accounting requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized on the balance sheet at their fair values as of the acquisition date.  The table below represents the amounts allocated to Panhandle’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as of March 26, 2012 based upon management’s estimate of their respective fair values. Certain amounts included in the preliminary purchase price allocation as of September 30, 2012 may have been changed from amounts previously reflected based on management's review of the valuation. Management is continuing to validate certain assumptions made in connection with the purchase price allocation. The goodwill resulting from the Merger is primarily due to expected commercial and operational synergies and is not deductible for tax purposes.
Cash and cash equivalents
$
79

Other current assets
230,466

Property and equipment
4,097,840

Goodwill
938,438

Identified intangibles (1)
55,000

Other noncurrent assets
782,942

Long-term debt, including current portion
(1,780,268
)
Deferred income taxes
(777,861
)
Other liabilities
(425,151
)
Total fair value of partners' capital
$
3,121,485

(1) 
Identified intangibles will be amortized over a life of approximately 17.5 years and are included in Other non-current assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Holdco Transaction
On October 5, 2012, ETE and ETP completed the Holdco Transaction, immediately following the closing of ETP's acquisition of Sunoco whereby, (i) ETE contributed its interest in Southern Union into an ETP-controlled entity in exchange for a 60% equity interest in the new entity, Holdco, and (ii) ETP contributed its interest in Sunoco to Holdco and retained a 40% equity interest in Holdco. Pursuant to a stockholders agreement between ETE and ETP, ETP will control Holdco. This transaction did not result in a new basis of accounting for Southern Union.