-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, FMMRxGEeAloTbYFXkuz42F3o7AGflIY2+p+NpMbuB9ls1k2wa0BhV0n+mCSlyP85 fVH8snJwDkqtLSiDIJ1pAQ== 0000711642-04-000197.txt : 20040813 0000711642-04-000197.hdr.sgml : 20040813 20040813114133 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000711642-04-000197 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10QSB PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20040630 FILED AS OF DATE: 20040813 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS LTD CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000759198 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE [6500] IRS NUMBER: 330068732 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10QSB SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-14570 FILM NUMBER: 04972503 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1873 SOUTH BELLAIRE STREET 17TH FLOOR CITY: DENVER STATE: CO ZIP: 80222 BUSINESS PHONE: 3037578101 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1873 SOUTH BELLAIRE STREET 17TH FLOOR CITY: DENVER STATE: CO ZIP: 80222 10QSB 1 mcrp.txt MCRP UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 10-QSB (Mark One) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT For the transition period from _________to _________ Commission file number 0-14570 MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS (Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter) California 33-0068732 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089 Greenville, South Carolina 29602 (Address of principal executive offices) (864) 239-1000 (Issuer's telephone number) Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___ PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited) (in thousands, except unit data) June 30, 2004
Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 84 Receivables and deposits 59 Restricted escrow 137 Other assets 83 Investment property: Land $ 499 Buildings and related personal property 6,217 6,716 Less accumulated depreciation (4,936) 1,780 $ 2,143 Liabilities and Partners' Deficit Liabilities Accounts payable $ 45 Tenant security deposit liabilities 33 Accrued property taxes 54 Other liabilities 58 Due to affiliates (Note C) 240 Mortgage note payable 5,249 Partners' Deficit General partner $ (1) Limited partners (17,172.43 units issued and outstanding) (3,535) (3,536) $ 2,143 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) (in thousands, except per unit data)
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2004 2003 2004 2003 Revenues: Rental income $ 310 $ 305 $ 646 $ 603 Other income 44 46 83 83 Casualty gain (Note D) 16 -- 16 15 Total revenues 370 351 745 701 Expenses: Operating 206 146 391 293 General and administrative 29 28 61 59 Depreciation 70 69 138 136 Interest 113 113 226 227 Property taxes 28 25 55 50 Total expenses 446 381 871 765 Net loss $ (76) $ (30) $ (126) $ (64) Net loss allocated to general partner $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net loss allocated to limited partners (76) (30) (126) (64) $ (76) $ (30) $ (126) $ (64) Net loss per limited partnership unit $ (4.43) $ (1.75) $ (7.34) $ (3.73) See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT (Unaudited) (in thousands, except unit data)
Limited Partnership General Limited Units Partner Partners Total Partners' deficit at December 31, 2003 17,172.43 $ (1) $ (3,409) $ (3,410) Net loss for the six months Ended June 30, 2004 -- -- (126) (126) Partners' deficit at June 30, 2004 17,172.43 $ (1) $ (3,535) $ (3,536) See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 2003 Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $ (126) $ (64) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: Depreciation 138 136 Amortization of loan costs 10 10 Bad debt expense 22 31 Casualty gain (16) (15) Change in accounts: Receivables and deposits (22) (35) Other assets (33) (33) Accounts payable (29) 51 Tenant security deposit liabilities (1) 10 Accrued property taxes (52) 50 Due to affiliates 41 24 Other liabilities (6) 28 Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (74) 193 Cash flows from investing activities: Insurance proceeds received 16 26 Property improvements and replacements (45) (132) Net deposits to restricted escrows (18) (33) Net cash used in investing activities (47) (139) Cash flows from financing activities: Payments on mortgage note payable (47) (43) Advances from affiliate 120 -- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 73 (43) Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (48) 11 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 132 82 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 84 $ 93 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest $ 214 $ 217 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Note A - Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of McCombs Realty Partners (the "Partnership" or "Registrant"), a California limited partnership, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The Partnership's general partner is CRPTEX, Inc. (the "General Partner"). In the opinion of the General Partner, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. Note B - Plan of Reorganization On March 9, 1987, the original general partners of the Partnership, on behalf of the Partnership, filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California ("Court"). The Partnership continued as Debtor-In-Possession to operate its business in the ordinary course until the Court confirmed the Partnership's Plan effective October 25, 1988. The Plan was approved by all required classes of creditors. The Plan required that the Partnership make certain payments to its secured creditors and others on or before October 20, 1995. These payments were made on or about June 25, 1995, when the Partnership refinanced the outstanding mortgages encumbering the property. The Plan also required that the Partnership make the following distributions on October 20, 1998, from available cash: 1) First, Limited Partners, both original and substitute, who made additional capital contributions under the plan would receive a repayment of the additional contributions totaling approximately $730,000; if sufficient funds were unavailable to fully satisfy this amount then a pro-rata portion would be paid based upon available funds; 2) Second, Class 12 unsecured creditors ($23,100) would be paid on their claims; 3) Third, Limited Partners who made additional capital contributions and were original Limited Partners would receive a repayment of their original capital contributions totaling approximately $9,818,000; if sufficient funds were unavailable to fully satisfy this amount then a pro-rata portion of available cash less a pro-rata portion reserved for one third of the existing capital contributions of non-contributing Limited Partners would be paid based upon available funds; 4) Fourth, Limited Partners who did not make additional capital contributions would receive a repayment of one-third of their original capital contributions (i.e., one-third of $1,200,000); if sufficient funds were unavailable to fully satisfy this amount then a pro-rata portion would be paid based upon available funds. Additionally, the Plan required CRPTEX, Inc. to make a capital contribution of $14,500 and loan an additional $117,500 on behalf of the Partnership. The Partnership received the $14,500 capital contribution but did not receive or require the additional $117,500 to be loaned. The payments required by number 2 above were timely made. With respect to the amounts due to the Limited Partners under numbers 1, 3, and 4 above, there were not sufficient funds available to completely satisfy these obligations at October 20, 1998. It was not anticipated that at October 20, 1998, there would be available funds to fully satisfy the unsecured claims of the Limited Partners, as indicated under the Plan. The limited partners were approached in August 1998 and asked to either approve a sale of the Partnership's sole investment property or for the General Partner to petition the Bankruptcy Court for an extension of the settlement date. The required fifty-one percent response was not received. As a result, the Partnership did not make any payments to the Limited Partners on October 20, 1998, as required by the Plan from available funds. There is no requirement, however, that the Partnership sell or again refinance the property in order to pay in part or in whole, the payments to the Limited Partners referred to above. The General Partner has determined that although all of the required payments due under the Plan to the Limited Partners were not made, that the Partnership is not in any material financial default in connection with its prior bankruptcy. In addition, the General Partner believes that it is proper for the Partnership to continue operating under the terms of its Partnership Agreement as modified by the Plan. Since the expiration of the Plan on October 20, 1998, the General Partner had reserved all excess cash to ensure that the Partnership would be able to meet its operating and capital improvement needs rather than making pro-rata payments to the limited partners in accordance with numbers 1, 3, and 4 above. During the fourth quarter of 2001, the General Partner determined that the Partnership had accumulated approximately $562,000 in excess funds. Approximately $530,000, which had been reserved since 1998 to ensure that the property was fully able to meet its operating and capital improvement needs with existing operating funds, was distributed during the year ended December 31, 2002 in accordance with number 1 above. In addition, approximately $32,000 was distributed from operations during the year ended December 31, 2002. Any additional funds will be distributed in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement as modified by the Plan. Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties The Partnership has no employees and is dependent on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and for reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership. Affiliates of the General Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's investment property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $36,000 and $33,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which are included in operating expenses. Affiliates of the General Partner were eligible to receive reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $38,000 and $30,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which are included in general and administrative expenses. Approximately $119,000 in reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses was owed at June 30, 2004 and is included in due to affiliates. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, an affiliate of the General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $120,000 to fund operating expenses and audit fees. This advance bears interest at the prime rate plus 2% (6.00% at June 30, 2004). Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately $1,000. At June 30, 2004, the total outstanding advances and accrued interest was approximately $121,000 and is included in due to affiliates. There were no such advances made by the General Partner to the Partnership during the six months ended June 30, 2003. The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers' compensation, property casualty and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General Partner. During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $15,000 and $23,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. Note D - Casualty Event In October 2002, a fire occurred at Lakewood at Pelham, which resulted in damage to the laundry area. The property incurred damages of approximately $52,000. Insurance proceeds of approximately $26,000 were received during the six months ended June 30, 2003 to partially cover the damages. After writing off the undepreciated cost of the damaged asset of approximately $11,000, the Partnership realized a casualty gain of approximately $15,000 from this event during the six months ended June 30, 2003. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, the Partnership received additional proceeds of approximately $16,000, resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $16,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. Note E - Contingencies On August 8, 2003 AIMCO Properties L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, was served with a complaint in the United States District Court, District of Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P. willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. On March 5, 2004 Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company, which is also an affiliate of the General Partner. The complaint is styled as a Collective Action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call". Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in responding to a call while "on-call". The defendants have filed an answer to the amended complaint denying the substantive allegations. Some discovery has taken place and settlement negotiations continue. Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. Similarly, the General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business. As previously disclosed, the Central Regional Office of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission is conducting an investigation relating to certain matters. AIMCO believes the areas of investigation include AIMCO's miscalculated monthly net rental income figures in third quarter 2003, forecasted guidance, accounts payable, rent concessions, vendor rebates, and capitalization of expenses and payroll. AIMCO is cooperating fully. AIMCO does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. Similarly, the General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Registrant operates; financing risks, including the risk that cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting and defending claims and any adverse outcomes, and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the documents the Registrant files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Partnership's investment property consists of one apartment complex. The following table sets forth the average occupancy of the property for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003: Average Occupancy Property 2004 2003 Lakewood at Pelham 95% 87% Greenville, South Carolina The General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at Lakewood at Pelham to resident retention efforts and new marketing strategies. The Partnership's financial results are dependent upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment property, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors which are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively impact the Partnership's financial results. Results of Operations The Partnership's net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately $76,000 and $126,000, respectively, as compared to approximately $30,000 and $64,000, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase in net loss for both periods is due to an increase in total expenses, partially offset by an increase in total revenues. The increase in total expenses for both periods is primarily due to an increase in operating expenses. General and administrative, depreciation, interest, and property tax expenses remained relatively constant for the comparable periods. The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to increases in contract maintenance and payroll related expenses at the Partnership's investment property. Included in general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are management reimbursements to the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement. In addition, costs associated with quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included in general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. The increase in total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2004 is primarily due to the recognition of a casualty gain during the three months ended June 30, 2004 (as discussed below). The increase in total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is due to an increase in rental income. Rental income remained relatively constant for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Other income remained relatively constant for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. The increase in rental income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is due to the increase in occupancy, partially offset by a decrease in the average rental rate, at Lakewood at Pelham. In October 2002, a fire occurred at Lakewood at Pelham, which resulted in damage to the laundry area. The property incurred damages of approximately $52,000. Insurance proceeds of approximately $26,000 were received during the six months ended June 30, 2003 to partially cover the damages. After writing off the undepreciated cost of the damaged asset of approximately $11,000, the Partnership realized a casualty gain of approximately $15,000 from this event during the six months ended June 30, 2003. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, the Partnership received additional proceeds of approximately $16,000, resulting in a casualty gain of approximately $16,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. Liquidity and Capital Resources At June 30, 2004, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $84,000, compared to approximately $93,000 at June 30, 2003. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $48,000, from December 31, 2003, is due to approximately $74,000 of cash used in operating activities and approximately $47,000 of cash used in investing activities, partially offset by approximately $73,000 of cash provided by financing activities. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements and net deposits to an escrow account maintained by the mortgage lender, partially offset by insurance proceeds received. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of advances from an affiliate of the General Partner, partially offset by payments of principal made on the mortgage encumbering the Partnership's investment property. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts. The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. The General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests additional compliance measures with regard to governance, disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these changes, the Partnership expects that it will incur higher expenses related to compliance, including increased legal and audit fees. Capital improvements planned at the Partnership's investment property are detailed below. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Partnership completed approximately $45,000 of capital improvements at Lakewood at Pelham, consisting primarily of appliance and floor covering replacements. These improvements were funded from operations, replacement reserves, and insurance proceeds. The Partnership evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property during the year and currently expects to complete an additional $104,000 in capital improvements during the remainder of 2004. Additional capital improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property and replacement reserves. The additional capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from Partnership reserves. To the extent that such budgeted capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering Lakewood at Pelham of approximately $5,249,000 is being amortized over 30 years with a balloon payment of approximately $5,151,000 due July 2005. The General Partner will attempt to refinance such indebtedness and/or sell the property prior to such maturity date. If the property cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the Partnership will risk losing such property through foreclosure. On March 9, 1987, the original general partners of the Partnership, on behalf of the Partnership, filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California ("Court"). The Partnership continued as Debtor-In-Possession to operate its business in the ordinary course until the Court confirmed the Partnership's Plan of Reorganization (The "Plan") effective October 25, 1988. The Plan was approved by all required classes of creditors. The Plan required that the Partnership make certain payments to its secured creditors and others on or before October 20, 1995. These payments were made on or about June 25, 1995, when the Partnership refinanced the outstanding mortgages encumbering the property. The Plan also required that the Partnership make the following distributions on October 20, 1998, from available cash: 1) First, Limited Partners, both original and substitute, who made additional capital contributions under the plan would receive a repayment of the additional contributions totaling approximately $730,000; if sufficient funds were unavailable to fully satisfy this amount then a pro-rata portion would be paid based upon available funds; 2) Second, Class 12 unsecured creditors ($23,100) would be paid on their claims; 3) Third, Limited Partners who made additional capital contributions and were original Limited Partners would receive a repayment of their original capital contributions totaling approximately $9,818,000; if sufficient funds were unavailable to fully satisfy this amount then a pro-rata portion of available cash less a pro-rata portion reserved for one third of the existing capital contributions of non-contributing Limited Partners would be paid based upon available funds; 4) Fourth, Limited Partners who did not make additional capital contributions would receive a repayment of one-third of their original capital contributions (i.e., one-third of $1,200,000); if sufficient funds were unavailable to fully satisfy this amount then a pro-rata portion would be paid based upon available funds. Additionally, the Plan required CRPTEX, Inc. to make a capital contribution of $14,500 and loan an additional $117,500 on behalf of the Partnership. The Partnership received the $14,500 capital contribution but did not receive or require the additional $117,500 to be loaned. The payments required by number 2 above were timely made. With respect to the amounts due to the Limited Partners under numbers 1, 3, and 4 above, there were not sufficient funds available to completely satisfy these obligations at October 20, 1998. It was not anticipated that at October 20, 1998, there would be available funds to fully satisfy the unsecured claims of the Limited Partners, as indicated under the Plan. The limited partners were approached in August 1998 and asked to either approve a sale of the Partnership's sole investment property or for the General Partner to petition the Bankruptcy Court for an extension of the settlement date. The required fifty-one percent response was not received. As a result, the Partnership did not make any payments to the Limited Partners on October 20, 1998, as required by the Plan from available funds. There is no requirement, however, that the Partnership sell or again refinance the property in order to pay in part or in whole, the payments to the Limited Partners referred to above. The General Partner has determined that although all of the required payments due under the Plan to the Limited Partners were not made, that the Partnership is not in any material financial default in connection with its prior bankruptcy. In addition, the General Partner believes that it is proper for the Partnership to continue operating under the terms of its Partnership Agreement as modified by the Plan. Since the expiration of the Plan on October 20, 1998, the General Partner had reserved all excess cash to ensure that the Partnership would be able to meet its operating and capital improvement needs rather than making pro-rata payments to the limited partners in accordance with numbers 1, 3, and 4 above. During the fourth quarter of 2001, the General Partner determined that the Partnership had accumulated approximately $562,000 in excess funds. Approximately $530,000 which had been reserved since 1998 to ensure that the property was fully able to meet its operating and capital improvement needs with existing operating funds, was distributed during the year ended December 31, 2002 in accordance with number 1 above. In addition, approximately $32,000 was distributed from operations during the year ended December 31, 2002. Any additional funds will be distributed in accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement as modified by the Plan. Other In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 4,558.50 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 26.55% of the outstanding Units at June 30, 2004. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO, as its sole stockholder. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States which require the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Partnership's investment property is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless considered impaired. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may be impaired, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by estimating the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the property. Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnership's investment property. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the national, regional and local economic climate; local conditions, such as an oversupply of multifamily properties; competition from other available multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates. Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership's asset. Revenue Recognition The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less. Rental income attributable to leases is recognized monthly as it is earned. The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants. The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area. Any concessions given at the inception of the lease are amortized over the life of the lease. ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnership's management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures are effective. (b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS On August 8, 2003 AIMCO Properties L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, was served with a complaint in the United States District Court, District of Columbia alleging that AIMCO Properties L.P. willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. On March 5, 2004 Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint also naming NHP Management Company, which is also an affiliate of the General Partner. The complaint is styled as a Collective Action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call". Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties L.P. failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in responding to a call while "on-call". The defendants have filed an answer to the amended complaint denying the substantive allegations. Some discovery has taken place and settlement negotiations continue. Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. Similarly, the General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K a) Exhibits: See Exhibit Index. b) Reports on Form 8-K: None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2004. SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. MCCOMBS REALTY PARTNERS By: CRPTEX, INC. General Partner By: /s/Martha L. Long Martha L. Long Senior Vice President By: /s/Stephen B. Waters Stephen B. Waters Vice President Date: August 12, 2004 EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit 3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partners of McCombs Realty Partners, a California Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registrant's Annual Report filed on Form 10-K, filed on April 13, 1990. 3.2 Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership, incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registrant's Annual Report filed on Form 10-K, filed on April 13, 1990. 10(a) Mortgage and Security Agreement dated June 29, 1995 between Pelham Place, L.P. and First Union National Bank of North Carolina, securing Pelham Place Apartments, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10JJ(a) of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 1995. (b) Promissory Note dated June 29, 1995 between Pelham Place, L.P., a South Carolina limited partnership, and First Union National Bank of North Carolina, a national banking association, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10JJ(b) to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 1995. (c) Assignment of Leases and Rents dated June 29, 1995 between Pelham Place, L.P., and First Union National Bank of North Carolina, securing Pelham Place Apartments, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10JJ(c) to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 1995. (d) Agreement of Limited Partnership for Pelham Place, L.P., between Pelham Place, GP, a South Carolina limited partnership, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28A to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Current Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter ended June 30, 1995. 31.1 Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Martha L. Long, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of McCombs Realty Partners; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 12, 2004 /s/Martha L. Long Martha L. Long Senior Vice President of CRPTEX, Inc., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of McCombs Realty Partners; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 12, 2004 /s/Stephen B. Waters Stephen B. Waters Vice President of CRPTEX, Inc., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of McCombs Realty Partners (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. /s/Martha L. Long Name: Martha L. Long Date: August 12, 2004 /s/Stephen B. Waters Name: Stephen B. Waters Date: August 12, 2004 This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----