-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, QySMOtK283b+aF9WCZy+7rdWgkzpx33lOIpV5bPTSulwn8W6uvUs9vIgporgMxPG vOj+h2JhP/ebwhC7ZqMaQw== 0000075527-98-000012.txt : 19980317 0000075527-98-000012.hdr.sgml : 19980317 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000075527-98-000012 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19980313 ITEM INFORMATION: ITEM INFORMATION: FILED AS OF DATE: 19980313 SROS: AMEX SROS: NYSE SROS: PCX FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: PACIFIC ENTERPRISES INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000075527 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION [4924] IRS NUMBER: 940743670 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-00040 FILM NUMBER: 98565144 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 555 WEST 5TH ST STREET 2: STE 2900 CITY: LOS ANGELES STATE: CA ZIP: 90013 BUSINESS PHONE: 2138955000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 555 WEST 5TH STREET STREET 2: SUITE 2900 CITY: LOS ANGELES STATE: CA ZIP: 90013 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: PACIFIC LIGHTING CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19880224 8-K 1 PAGE 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) March 13, 1998 (March 11, 1998) ------------------------- Pacific Enterprises ------------------------------------------------------ (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) California --------------------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation 1-40 94-0743670 ---------------------- ------------------------------------ Commission File Number (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 555 West Fifth Street, Los Angeles, California 90013-1011 --------------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (213) 895-5000 ---------------------------------------------------- (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) PAGE 2 ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS On March 11, 1998, Commissioner Neeper of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) issued an alternate proposed CPUC decision with respect to the proposed business combination of Pacific Enterprises and Enova Corporation. Commissioner Neeper's proposed decision is an alternate to the proposed CPUC decision issued by a CPUC Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) on February 23, 1998. Both proposed decisions would approve the proposed business combination but with differing time frames for sharing synergy savings between utility customers and shareholders. A Reply to Media Inquiry to be used by Pacific Enterprises in responding to media and other inquiries concerning Commissioner Neeper's alternate proposed decision is attached to this Current Report as Exhibit 99.1. ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS ( c ) Exhibits 99.1 Reply to Media Inquiry of Pacific Enterprises SIGNATURE - --------- Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. PACIFIC ENTERPRISES - --------------------- (Registrant) - ----------------------------- Ralph Todaro Vice President and Controller (Chief Accounting Officer and duly authorized signatory) Date: March 13, 1998 PAGE 3 Reply to Media Inquiry (The attached statement may be used to respond to inquiries concerning the alternate decision issued by CPUC Commissioner Neeper on the Pacific Enterprises - Enova Corporation merger.) On Wednesday, March 11, Commissioner Neeper issued an alternate decision on the Pacific Enterprises - Enova Corporation merger, calling for a 10-year timeline for sharing net merger synergy savings with customers and shareholders. Both companies are pleased with this alternate, as it addresses our only major concern over the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) proposed decision, which recommends a five-year time period for sharing of synergy savings. In the merger case that we filed at the Commission, we proposed a 50/50 sharing of the projected $1.1 billion in net savings or cost avoidances from the merger over 10 years. This is, in essence, what the alternate decision would deliver, although because of adjustments, customers would receive $557 million over 10 years ($212 million in the first five years) and shareholders would receive $531 million over 10 years ($199 million in the first five years). Commissioner Neeper's alternate doesn't preclude other commissioners from issuing their own alternate decisions. The CPUC schedule calls for a final decision on March 26, which may be the ALJ proposed decision, the Neeper alternate, or another decision. -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----