10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2005

Commission File Number 1-8803

MATERIAL SCIENCES CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	95-2673173
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS employer identification number)

2200 East Pratt Boulevard Elk Grove Village, Illinois	60007
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (847) 439-2210

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of January 3, 2006, there were 14,682,766 outstanding shares of common stock, $.02 par value.

MATERIAL SCIENCES CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

For The Quarter Ended November 30, 2005

(In thousands, except per share data)

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

(a) Financial statements of Material Sciences Corporation and Subsidiaries

2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

Material Sciences Corporation and Subsidiaries

	Three Months Ended November 30,						Nine Months Ended November 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net Sales	$	74,836		$	66,991		$	222,239		$	199,386
Cost of Sales		61,741			52,131			181,056			156,508
Gross Profit		13,095			14,860			41,183			42,878
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses		9,357			8,587			27,362			27,203
Restructuring Expenses		—			439			248			2,650
Income from Operations		3,738			5,834			13,573			13,025
Other (Income) and Expense:
Interest (Income) Expense, Net		(37	)		101			8			806
Equity in Results of Joint Venture		(53	)		(49	)		(171	)		(121	)
Loss on Early Retirement of Debt		—			—			—			4,205
Total Other (Income) Expense, Net		(90	)		52			(163	)		4,890
Income from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income Taxes		3,828			5,782			13,736			8,135
Provision for Income Taxes		1,548			2,426			5,872			3,763
Income from Continuing Operations		2,280			3,356			7,864			4,372
Discontinued Operations:
Loss on Discontinued Operations - EMD (Net of Benefit for Income Taxes of $5, $549, $335 and $1,684, Respectively)		(8	)		(848	)		(538	)		(2,596	)
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations - EMD (Net of Benefit for Income Taxes of $0, $0, $898 and $0, Respectively)		—			—			(1,470	)		—
Income (Loss) on Discontinued Operations - Pinole Point Steel (Net of Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes of $(17), $(44), $7 and $(132), Respectively)		(27	)		(70	)		13			(205	)
Net Income	$	2,245		$	2,438		$	5,869		$	1,571
Basic Net Income Per Share:
Income from Continuing Operations	$	0.16		$	0.23		$	0.54		$	0.31
Loss on Discontinued Operations - EMD		—			(0.06	)		(0.04	)		(0.19	)
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations - EMD		—			—			(0.10	)		—
Loss on Discontinued Operations - Pinole Point Steel		(0.01	)		—			—			(0.01	)
Basic Net Income Per Share	$	0.15		$	0.17		$	0.40		$	0.11
Diluted Net Income Per Share:
Income from Continuing Operations	$	0.16		$	0.23		$	0.54		$	0.30
Loss on Discontinued Operations - EMD		—			(0.06	)		(0.04	)		(0.18	)
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations - EMD		—			—			(0.10	)		—
Loss on Discontinued Operations - Pinole Point Steel		(0.01	)		—			—			(0.01	)
Diluted Net Income Per Share	$	0.15		$	0.17		$	0.40		$	0.11
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding Used for Basic Net Income Per Share		14,672			14,363			14,646			14,281
Dilutive Shares		33			85			33			54
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding Plus Dilutive Shares		14,705			14,448			14,679			14,335
Outstanding Common Stock Options Having No Dilutive Effect		77			307			77			307

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

Material Sciences Corporation and Subsidiaries

(In thousands)	November 30, 2005			February 28, 2005
Assets:
Current Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	13,228		$	1,774
Receivables, Less Reserves of $6,980 and $5,945, Respectively		38,472			39,713
Income Taxes Receivable		270			134
Prepaid Expenses		2,148			1,211
Inventories		43,645			41,541
Current Assets of Discontinued Operations - EMD		116			—
Deferred Income Taxes		2,784			2,727
Total Current Assets		100,663			87,100
Property, Plant and Equipment		228,946			224,388
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization		(157,572	)		(149,828	)
Net Property, Plant and Equipment		71,374			74,560
Other Assets:
Investment in Joint Venture		2,088			1,694
Goodwill		1,319			1,319
Deferred Income Taxes		1,982			3,496
Other		667			1,058
Total Other Assets		6,056			7,567
Total Assets	$	178,093		$	169,227
Liabilities:
Current Liabilities:
Accounts Payable	$	35,314		$	25,938
Accrued Payroll Related Expenses		5,830			10,355
Accrued Expenses		4,548			5,753
Current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations - EMD		596			—
Current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations - Pinole Point Steel		365			366
Total Current Liabilities		46,653			42,412
Long-Term Liabilities:
Long-Term Debt, Less Current Portion		—			1,100
Other		9,072			9,473
Total Long-Term Liabilities		9,072			10,573
Shareowners’ Equity:
Preferred Stock		—			—
Common Stock		377			377
Additional Paid-In Capital		77,938			77,402
Treasury Stock at Cost		(46,528	)		(46,528	)
Retained Earnings		88,796			82,927
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		1,785			2,064
Total Shareowners’ Equity		122,368			116,242
Total Liabilities and Shareowners’ Equity	$	178,093		$	169,227

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Material Sciences Corporation and Subsidiaries

	Nine Months Ended November 30,
(In thousands)	2005			2004
Cash Flows From:
Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	5,869		$	1,571
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization		8,627			9,040
Provision / (Benefit) for Deferred Income Taxes		2,355			1,654
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations - EMD		1,470			—
Compensatory Effect of Stock Plans		(67	)		179
(Gain) Loss on Disposal of Asset		56			(409	)
Other, Net		(171	)		183
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
Receivables		652			(1,154	)
Income Taxes Receivable		(136	)		1
Prepaid Expenses		(954	)		(546	)
Inventories		(2,451	)		(8,923	)
Accounts Payable		9,433			3,732
Accrued Expenses		(6,407	)		(2,606	)
Assets of Discontinued Operations		499			—
Liabilities of Discontinued Operations		(321	)		36
Other, Net		(50	)		62
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		18,404			2,820
Investing Activities:
Capital Expenditures		(6,507	)		(4,098	)
Proceeds from Sale of Asset		—			1,137
Change in Restricted Cash Related to Letters of Credit		—			3,357
Other		—			(113	)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities		(6,507	)		283
Financing Activities:
Payments of Debt		(20,100	)		(97,162	)
Proceeds under Line of Credit		19,000			60,218
Issuance of Common Stock		603			2,487
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities		(497	)		(34,457	)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash		54			—
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash		11,454			(31,354	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		1,774			33,483
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	13,228		$	2,129
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures:
Interest Paid	$	91		$	1,608
Income Taxes Paid		3,328			89

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MATERIAL SCIENCES CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES

(In thousands, except per share data)

The data for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 and 2004 has not been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. In the opinion of Material Sciences Corporation (the “Company” or “MSC”), the data reflects all adjustments (consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the information at those dates and for those periods. The financial information contained in this report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2005 filed in January 2006.

(1) On June 20, 2005, the Company completed a transaction for the sale of substantially all of the assets (including fixed assets, intellectual property and other assets) of its Electronic Materials and Devices Group (“EMD”) to TouchSensor Technologies, LLC (“TST”) in consideration of the release from current and future contractual commitments to TST and the assumption of certain contractual obligations of EMD. As a result of the transaction, the Company was relieved of the fee obligations under the license agreement with TST in fiscal 2006 of $2,750 as well as approximately $825 of obligations related to certain cost sharing agreements between the Company and TST projected for the 18 months ending in November 2006. The Company no longer reports EMD as a separate segment, rather it reports EMD as a discontinued operation with all prior period results of operations set forth herein reclassified to reflect that presentation. The Company, however, has not reclassified prior period amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company recorded a loss on the sale of EMD assets of $1,470 (or $0.10 per diluted common share), net of income tax benefit of $898, in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The loss included approximately $2.1 million of severance and severance-related costs and $0.2 million in deal costs and asset write-offs, net of the cost sharing liabilities that were forgiven as part of the deal. The Company has paid approximately $1.5 million of the severance and severance-related costs as of November 30, 2005. The remaining $0.6 million is recorded as Current Liabilities of Discontinued Operations – EMD in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The Company recorded losses of $8 and $538, net of income taxes, on discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005, respectively, compared to losses of $848 and $2,596, net of income taxes, for the same periods last year.

6

The following table shows the results of operations of EMD for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 and 2004:

	Three Months Ending November 30,						Nine Months Ending November 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net Sales	$	—		$	372		$	1,132		$	1,095
Gross Profit		—			235			890			640
SG&A and Other Expenses		13			1,632			1,763			4,920
Loss Before Income Taxes		(13	)		(1,397	)		(873	)		(4,280	)
Benefit for Income Taxes		(5	)		(549	)		(335	)		(1,684	)
Loss on Discontinued Operations - EMD	$	(8	)	$	(848	)	$	(538	)	$	(2,596	)

(2) In November 2000, a subsidiary of MSC formed a joint venture partnership with Tekno S.A. (“Tekno”) for the manufacture and sale of Quiet Steel^® and disc brake noise damper material for the South American market. The Company includes its portion of Tekno’s results in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income under Equity in Results of Joint Venture. The Equity in Results of Joint Venture was income of $53 and $171 for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005, respectively, compared to income of $49 and $121 for the comparable periods of fiscal 2005.

(3) Preferred Stock, $1.00 Par Value; 10,000,000 Shares Authorized; 1,000,000 Designated Series B Junior Participating Preferred; None Issued.

(4) Common Stock, $.02 Par Value; 40,000,000 Shares Authorized; 18,871,414 Shares Issued and 14,682,766 Shares Outstanding as of November 30, 2005 and 18,827,944 Shares Issued and 14,639,296 Shares Outstanding as of February 28, 2005.

(5) Treasury Stock at Cost; 4,188,648 Shares as of November 30, 2005 and February 28, 2005. No share repurchase programs are in effect at this time.

(6) Comprehensive Income:

	Three Months Ended November 30,					Nine Months Ended November 30,
	2005			2004		2005			2004
Net Income	$	2,245		$	2,438	$	5,869		$	1,571
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		(77	)		441		(279	)		356
Comprehensive Income	$	2,168		$	2,879	$	5,590		$	1,927

(7) The Company entered into an amended and restated $30,000 committed line of credit (“New Line”) on April 30, 2004. The agreement expires on October 11, 2007. There were no borrowings outstanding under the New Line as of November 30, 2005. Borrowing capacity reserved for the Company’s outstanding letters of credit was $1,864, and the amount remaining available to be borrowed was $28,136 as of November 30, 2005. At the Company’s option, interest is at the bank’s prime rate (7.0% as of

7

November 30, 2005) or at LIBOR plus a margin based on the ratio of funded debt to EBITDA (as defined in the agreement). The financial covenants include a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 commencing May 31, 2004; a maximum leverage ratio (3.0 to 1.0); and minimum net worth of $80,000 plus 50% of positive consolidated net income ending on or after May 31, 2004, or $84,449, on November 30, 2005. As of November 30, 2005, the Company was in violation of certain reporting covenants required under the New Line due solely to the failure to timely file and deliver the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005. On December 14, 2005, the lenders under the New Line waived the Company’s breach of such reporting covenants. There are restrictions on the Company’s use of its cash and cash equivalents related to repurchase of stock, dividends and acquisitions. The New Line is secured by specific personal property (including receivables, inventory and property, plant and equipment) of the Company.

In March 2004, one of the Company’s letters of credit for $275 was canceled and the related cash collateral was released to the Company. On May 11, 2004, the remaining cash collateral ($3,082) was released to the Company upon the effective date of the new revolving line of credit agreement.

In May 2004, the Company redeemed all of its 1998 Senior Notes. The debt prepayment consisted of principal ($43,944), interest ($1,346) and a contractual prepayment penalty ($4,051). The Company recorded a loss on the early retirement of debt of $4,205 which included the contractual prepayment penalty and the write-off of previously capitalized financing charges.

(8) Inventories consist of the following:

	November 30, 2005		February 28, 2005
Raw Materials	$	16,701	$	17,904
Finished Goods		26,944		23,637
Total Inventories	$	43,645	$	41,541

(9) Due to the concentration in the automotive industry, sales to individual automotive customers, including indirect sales, are significant. Sales to one end user of the Company’s acoustical solutions (DaimlerChrysler) accounted for approximately 14.9% and 14.5% of net sales during the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 compared to approximately 12.3% and 11.3% for the same periods last year. Sales to another end user of the Company’s acoustical solutions (General Motors) have increased to approximately 14.1% and 11.0% of net sales during the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 compared to 5.7% and 2.7% of net sales for the comparable periods of last year.

(10) In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets that are not amortized are subject to assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment. The Company intends to perform its required annual impairment assessment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.

8

Apart from goodwill, the Company has no other material, identified intangible assets resulting from acquisitions recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. There was no change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended November 30, 2005.

(11) The table presented below analyzes the components of interest (income) expense, net.

	Three Months Ended November 30,						Nine Months Ended November 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Interest Expense	$	24		$	103		$	94		$	873
Interest Income		(61	)		(2	)		(86	)		(67	)
Interest (Income)Expense, Net	$	(37	)	$	101		$	8		$	806

(12) During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company announced the closing of its Middletown, Ohio coil coating facility. In conjunction with this announcement and other restructuring actions, MSC recorded restructuring expenses of $2,650 during the first nine months of fiscal 2005. A total of 97 employees were affected by this restructuring. Of the total amount recorded, $1,763 related to the Middletown closing ($748 in severance, $566 in severance-related expense and $449 in shut-down costs related to the closing of the facility) and $887 related to other restructuring actions ($617 in severance and $270 in severance-related expense). The Company recorded an additional $7 in restructuring expenses in fiscal 2005, subsequent to the end of the first nine months. The Company also recorded $269 in expenses for these restructuring plans during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 primarily to cover medical-related expenses that were higher than originally planned. During the first nine months of fiscal 2006, $514 was paid related to these restructuring plans. A total of $57 is recorded as Accrued Payroll Related Expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of November 30, 2005.

On April 17, 2003, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer resigned and was replaced by a non-executive Chairman of the Board and a President and Chief Executive Officer. A separation arrangement was entered into resulting in a pretax charge to earnings of $1,821 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Of this amount, $1,543 was scheduled to be paid out over two years and the remainder related to the executive’s non-contributory supplemental pension plan to be paid out in accordance with the plan. The Company recorded additional restructuring expenses of $143 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Total restructuring expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 were $1,964. The Company reduced these restructuring reserves by $21 during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 based on a revision to the total amounts expected to be paid out for these plans. Cash of $81 was paid during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 related to these restructuring plans. A total of $5 is recorded as Accrued Expenses and $23 is recorded as Other Long-Term Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of November 30, 2005.

9

The Company recorded $142 in restructuring charges related to the disposition of the EMD assets during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. These charges have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 (see Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Consequently, they are excluded from the table below.

The restructuring reserve as of November 30, 2005 is presented in the chart below (which includes the fiscal 2004 and 2005 restructuring plans):

	Severance			Other			Total
Restructuring Reserve as of February 28, 2005	$	304		$	128		$	432
Restructuring Reserve Recorded During the Nine Months Ended November 30, 2005		(51	)		299			248
Cash Payments		(223	)		(372	)		(595	)
Restructuring Reserve as of November 30, 2005	$	30		$	55		$	85

(13) MSC’s effective tax rate for continuing operations was 40.4% and 42.7%, respectively, for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 compared to 42.0% and 46.3% for the same periods last year. The variance in the effective rate compared to the statutory rate for both fiscal 2006 and 2005 was due to valuation allowances for net operating losses (particularly related to our foreign subsidiary in Germany), state income taxes (including the effect of a change in Ohio tax law in the second quarter of fiscal 2006) and other differences between book and tax income.

(14) MSC has qualified and nonqualified defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans and other postretirement plans for certain of its employees. The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for its defined benefit plans and other postretirement plans.

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Three Months Ended November 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Service Cost	$	42		$	41		$	18		$	17
Interest Cost		125			169			30			29
Expected Return on Plan Assets		(56	)		(112	)		(1	)		(2	)
Amortization of Net (Gain) or Loss		6			6			2			—
Amortization of Prior Service Cost		22			23			—			—
Amortization of Transition Obligation		1			1			—			—
Total Net Periodic Benefit Cost	$	140		$	128		$	49		$	44

10

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Nine Months Ended November 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Service Cost	$	126		$	123		$	54		$	51
Interest Cost		375			510			90			86
Expected Return on Plan Assets		(168	)		(335	)		(3	)		(5	)
Amortization of Net (Gain) or Loss		17			18			7			—
Amortization of Prior Service Cost		66			70			—			—
Amortization of Transition Obligation		3			3			—			—
Total Net Periodic Benefit Cost	$	419		$	389		$	148		$	132

MSC previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2005, that it expected to contribute $558 towards its qualified and nonqualified pension plans and $95 toward its postretirement benefit plans other than pensions in fiscal 2006. Based on revised estimates, MSC now expects to contribute approximately $750 toward its qualified and non-qualified pension plans and $155 toward its other postretirement benefit plan in fiscal 2006. As of November 30, 2005, $550 of contributions/payments have been made toward its qualified and non-qualified pension plans and $115 toward its other postretirement benefit plan.

(15) On May 31, 2002, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of its Pinole Point Steel business. The Company is in the process of settling the current liabilities of the business. As of November 30, 2005, there were $365 in current liabilities remaining. The net liabilities consist primarily of accrued expenses not assumed by Grupo IMSA S.A. de C.V. Pinole Point Steel is reported as a discontinued operation, and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have segregated the net liabilities and operating results of the business.

The Company recorded a loss on discontinued operations, net of income taxes, of $27 and income on discontinued operations, net of taxes, of $13 for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005, compared to losses on discontinued operations, net of income taxes, of $70 and $205, respectively, for the same periods last year. The gain in the current year is the result of the recovery of a previously written-off receivable balance partially offset by workers compensation expenses.

(16) The Company has four stock option plans: the Material Sciences Corporation 1985 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees (“1985 Plan”), the Material Sciences Corporation 1992 Omnibus Awards Plan for Key Employees (“1992 Plan”), the Material Sciences Corporation Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“1996 Directors Plan”), and the Material Sciences Corporation 2001 Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“2001 Directors Plan”). MSC accounts for all plans in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, under which no compensation cost has been recognized. Had compensation cost for employee stock purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and for stock options awarded under the stock option plans been determined using the fair market value-based accounting method, the Company’s net income and basic and diluted net income per share would have been as shown in the following pro forma amounts:

11

	Three Months Ended November 30,						Nine Months Ended November 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net Income:
As Reported	$	2,245		$	2,438		$	5,869		$	1,571
Add: Stock-Based Compensation Expense (Income) Included in Reported Net Income, Net of Income Taxes		(167	)		34			(41	)		109
Deduct: Total Stock-Based Employee Compensation (Expense) Income as Determined Under Fair Value Based Method for All Awards, Net of Income Taxes		166			(267	)		26			(725	)
Pro Forma	$	2,244		$	2,205		$	5,854		$	955
Basic Net Income Per Share:
As Reported	$	0.15		$	0.17		$	0.40		$	0.11
Pro Forma	$	0.15		$	0.15		$	0.40		$	0.07
Diluted Net Income Per Share:
As Reported	$	0.15		$	0.17		$	0.40		$	0.11
Pro Forma	$	0.15		$	0.15		$	0.40		$	0.07

The net income reported for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 includes a reduction of expense of $167 and $41, respectively, net of income taxes, for expenses related to the Company’s restricted stock plans. The net income reported for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2004 includes restricted stock expense, net of income taxes, of $34 and $109, respectively.

(17) MSC operates in one segment based on how management views its business for evaluating performance and making operating decisions. MSC focuses on providing material-based solutions for acoustical, coated metal and electronic applications. The acoustical material-based solutions include multilayer composites consisting of metals, polymeric coatings and other materials used to manage noise and vibration. The coated metal material-based solutions include coil coated and EG protective and decorative coatings applied to coils of metal in a continuous, high-speed, roll-to-roll process. The electronic material-based solutions primarily include coated and laminated noise reducing materials used in electronic applications to solve customer specific problems and enhance performance. The Company’s material-based solutions are designed to meet specific customer requirements for the automotive, building and construction, electronics, lighting and appliance markets. MSC’s domestic and foreign sales are presented in the chart below.

	Three Months Ended November 30,				Nine Months Ended November 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Net Sales
Net Sales – Domestic	$	71,737	$	64,075	$	213,661	$	191,455
Net Sales – Foreign		3,099		2,916		8,578		7,931
Total	$	74,836	$	66,991	$	222,239	$	199,386

12

(18) In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs – an amendment of ARB No. 43,” which requires abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage) to be recognized as current period charges. In addition, it requires that allocation of fixed production overhead costs to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facility. The provisions of this standard apply prospectively and are effective for the Company beginning March 1, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be measured at grant date fair value and the expense to be recognized in the financial statements. Additionally, SFAS No. 123(R) amends the presentation of the statement of cash flows and requires additional annual disclosures. SFAS No. 123(R) will be effective for the Company’s first quarter of fiscal 2007.

(19) MSC is a party to various legal proceedings in connection with the remediation of certain environmental matters. The most significant proceeding relates to the Company’s involvement in a Superfund site in Gary, Indiana. MSC has been named as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for the surface, soil and ground water contamination at this site.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana has entered a Consent Decree between the government and certain PRPs on the scope of the remediation work at the Gary site. The Company receives periodic updates on the projected costs of the remediation work from the environmental consultant employed by certain PRP’s (including the Company) to manage the remediation project. In late December 2005, the Company received an update indicating that the projected remediation costs would increase significantly due primarily to additional efforts required to complete the remediation project, higher energy costs associated with certain remediation techniques employed and increased oversight costs of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Accordingly, the Company has treated the cost update as a change in estimate and increased its reserves related to this matter by approximately $500 in the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2005 to reflect the Company’s share of the increased remediation costs. This charge was recorded in Selling, General, and Administrative expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. The estimated range of the Company’s remaining liability for this site is $990 to $1,030 Remediation work is ongoing and MSC maintains a letter of credit for approximately $1,200 to secure its obligation to pay its currently estimated share of the remediation expenses at this site.

In November 2003, the Company received notice of a potential liability from the United States EPA regarding a Lake Calumet Cluster Site in Chicago, Illinois. The information regarding contributors to this site has been limited at this point in time. To date, the Company has been unable to estimate the liability for this site due to the early stage of the proceeding and the limited information that has been provided. The Company has reserved $25 for its share of the costs of the investigation phase of the remediation.

On February 27, 2002, the Company received a notice of alleged violations of environmental laws, regulations or permits from the Illinois EPA related to volatile organic matter (“VOM”) air emissions and other permitting issues at its Elk Grove

13

Village, Illinois (“Elk Grove Village”) facility. The Company filed a response and performed stack testing for one of its production lines (“Tested Line”) under the supervision of the Illinois EPA. Those stack test results, when considered with stack test results from the facility’s other production lines taken in the past, indicated the Company’s Elk Grove Village facility is in compliance with the overall VOM emission limitations in its Clean Air Act permit. However, the Company’s VOM coating application volume on its Tested Line was in excess of the permit limit. To address that issue, the Company filed a permit modification request to reflect the current VOM application rates on the facility’s production lines, which the Illinois EPA granted. The Illinois EPA indicated that resolution of the matters alleged in the February 27, 2002 Notice of Violation would be referred to the office of the Illinois Attorney General for potential enforcement action, which could lead to the imposition of penalties on the Company. On December 22, 2003, the Company received a notice from the office of the Illinois Attorney General of their intent to file an enforcement action regarding the alleged violations. The Illinois Attorney General filed a complaint on April 8, 2004. In response to a request from the Illinois EPA and the Attorney General, the Company performed additional stack tests on production lines that were not tested in 2002. The results from those tests indicated that one incinerator may be out of compliance, depending on the applicable test method. The Company made a submission to the Illinois EPA in August 2004 explaining why it believes the incinerator is in compliance. The Illinois EPA informed the Company in writing, in October 2004, that it accepts the rationale for use of the alternative test method, and agrees that the incinerator is currently in compliance. The Illinois Attorney General’s office informed the Company verbally that it also agrees that the plant is currently in compliance. In August 2005, MSC and the State of Illinois entered into a Consent Order whereby MSC agreed to pay a $188 civil penalty (for which the Company had accrued $250 in a prior period) to settle this issue. The Company reduced its accrual in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 and made this payment on September 12, 2005.

In May 2002, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of its Pinole Point Steel business. In December 2004, the purchaser of the facility received a letter from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board requesting a work plan and timetable for the investigation of the contamination of the soil and groundwater at the facility. Depending on the results of the investigation, remediation efforts may be required. The Company believes that the contamination occurred prior to its acquisition of the Pinole Point Steel facility in 1997, and that the sellers of the facility in the 1997 transaction are responsible for the funding of any necessary remediation. In the event that the sellers fail to fund the remediation, the Company may be required to do so. The Company is unable to estimate the potential liability, if any, in this matter due to the limited information provided to date.

The Company’s environmental reserves were approximately $1,160 as of November 30, 2005. The Company does not believe the outcome of its environmental legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements, given the reserves recorded as of November 30, 2005 and, where applicable, taking into account contributions from other PRPs. There are, however, a number of uncertainties, including without limitation, the costs of site cleanup, the discretionary authority of federal and state regulatory authorities in bringing enforcement actions and other

14

factors, which affect the Company’s range of exposure. MSC believes its range of exposure for all known and quantifiable environmental exposures, based on allocations of liability among PRPs and the most recent estimate of remedial work and other information available, is $1,160 to $1,600 as of November 30, 2005.

The Company also is party to various legal actions and customer disputes arising in the ordinary course of its business. These legal actions and customer disputes cover a broad variety of claims spanning the Company’s entire business. The Company believes that the resolution of these legal actions and customer disputes will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

15

MATERIAL SCIENCES CORPORATION and SUBSIDIARIES

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (in thousands)

The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto and the MD&A included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended February 28, 2005 (“Form 10-K/A”) filed in January 2006, as well as the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Executive Summary

On June 20, 2005, Material Sciences Corporation (“MSC” or the “Company”) completed a transaction for the sale of substantially all of the assets (including fixed assets, intellectual property and other assets) of its Electronic Materials and Devices Group (“EMD”) to TouchSensor Technologies, LLC (“TST”) in consideration of the release from current and future contractual commitments to TST and the assumption of certain contractual obligations of EMD. As a result of the transaction, the Company was relieved of the fee obligations under the license agreement with TST in fiscal 2006 of $2,750 as well as approximately $825 of obligations related to certain cost sharing agreements between the Company and TST projected for the 18 months ending in November 2006.

The Company recorded a loss on the sale of EMD assets of $1,470 (or $0.10 per diluted common share), net of income tax benefit of $898, in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The Company no longer reports EMD as a separate segment, rather it reports EMD as a discontinued operation with all prior period results of operations set forth herein reclassified to reflect that presentation. The Company, however, has not reclassified prior period amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company reports segment information based on how management views its business for evaluating performance and making operating decisions. For the periods discussed in this Item 2, MSC reports results on the basis of one business segment. MSC’s one segment focuses on providing material-based solutions for acoustical, coated metal and electronic applications. MSC’s acoustical material-based solutions consist of layers of metal and other materials used to manage noise and vibration for the automotive, lighting and appliance markets. MSC’s coated metal material-based solutions include coil coated and electrogalvanized (“EG”) products primarily used in the automotive, building and construction, appliance and lighting markets. MSC’s electronic material-based solutions consist primarily of coated metal and laminated noise and vibration reducing materials used in the electronics market.

As discussed in more detail in the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed in January 2006, the general state of the principal industries in which the Company operates presents the following risks: overcapacity, pricing and availability of materials (including the recent rapid increases in energy costs), changes in market conditions, and shifts in the supply models of the Company’s products. Overcapacity in the coil coating industry continues to have an impact on pricing,

16

facility utilization and the need for competitive terms of sale. The pricing of materials includes the cost of steel as well as, but not limited to, the cost of energy and the cost of petroleum-based products. In particular, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and the flooding and other damage in the Gulf Coast region of the United States has limited the supply and distribution of oil and petroleum-based products, which has resulted in higher prices for these materials. As market conditions change and shifts in the supply model for certain products occur, the Company must adapt its pricing strategy accordingly. Consequently, changes in the supply model may affect the comparability of the revenues, operating margins and working capital for the fiscal periods presented.

The Company continues to focus on the execution of its action plan to: improve operating effectiveness; review the performance, direction and prospects of its remaining product offerings; and consider a range of alternatives with respect to such product offerings in order to achieve greater shareowner value. However, there can be no assurance that the exploration of alternatives will achieve such results.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company completed the sale of the real estate associated with the Elk Grove Village facility idled in 2001. The Company ceased production at the Middletown facility location on June 30, 2004 and the assets are currently idled. The Company also entered into a business arrangement on June 30, 2004 related to the expansion of noise, vibration and harshness (“NVH”) solutions in Europe.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

A summary of the Company’s consolidated financial performance is as follows:

	Three Months Ended November 30,								Nine Months Ended November 30,
	2005			2004			% Fav(Unfav) Variance		2005			2004			% Fav(Unfav) Variance
Net Sales	$	74,836		$	66,991		11.7	%	$	222,239		$	199,386		11.5	%
Gross Profit Margin	$	13,095		$	14,860		(11.9	)%	$	41,183		$	42,878		(4.0	)%
% of Net Sales		17.5	%		22.2	%				18.5	%		21.5	%
Selling, General and Administrative	$	9,357		$	8,587		(9.0	)%	$	27,362		$	27,203		(0.06	)%
% of Net Sales		12.5	%		12.8	%				12.3	%		13.6	%

Net sales for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 increased 11.7% and 11.5% to $74,836 and $222,239, respectively, from $66,991 and $199,386 in the same periods last year.

17

“Other” sales listed in the various markets below include the Company’s less significant products as well as the net impact of scrap sales, customer claims and returns and allowances. Scrap metal sales in the first nine months of fiscal 2006 were $1,513 lower than the comparable period of fiscal 2005 as the price of scrap metal decreased. Customer claim issues recorded during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 increased $3,357 from the comparable period of fiscal 2005 primarily due to manufacturing quality issues that arose in the production of new products. Management believes the majority of these production issues have been addressed and future customer claims will be closer to historical levels.

Acoustical materials sales for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 were $38,089 and $109,352, respectively compared to $28,968 and $82,765 in the comparable periods of last year. There were increased sales of body panel laminate (Quiet Steel®) and a continued acceptance of the Company’s NVH solutions as well as increased sales in the OE brake market. The increase in Quiet Steel® sales resulted from the introduction of this product into new vehicle models and an increase in the unit volume sales of these models. Sales in the OE brake market continued to grow as a result of the Company’s continued investment in technology for these products resulting in sales to new customers. These increases were partially offset by lower sales of aftermarket brakes due, in part, to the high volume of shipments of a new brake shim in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 that was not repeated in fiscal 2006. The decline in aftermarket brake sales in fiscal 2006 was also due, in part, to a softening of the market following the hurricanes in the Gulf region. The following tables summarize variances within MSC’s acoustical material-based solutions which lead to the increase in net sales for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005:

	Net Sales for the Three Months Ended November 30,
Market	2005			2004		$ Variance			% Variance
Body Panel Laminate	$	23,088		$	14,871	$	8,217		55.3	%
Engine		6,471			5,453		1,018		18.7	%
OE Brakes		5,728			4,061		1,667		41.4	%
Aftermarket Brakes		2,868			3,458		(590	)	(17.1	)%
Other		(66	)		1,125		(1,191	)	(107.1	)%
Total	$	38,089		$	28,968	$	9,121		31.5	%

	Net Sales for the Nine Months Ended November 30,
Market	2005		2004		$ Variance			% Variance
Body Panel Laminate	$	61,306	$	34,686	$	26,620		76.7	%
Engine		18,415		17,317		1,098		6.3	%
OE Brakes		15,681		13,016		2,665		20.6	%
Aftermarket Brakes		13,619		14,940		(1,321	)	(8.8	)%
Other		331		2,806		(2,475	)	(88.7	)%
Total	$	109,352	$	82,765	$	26,587		32.1	%

Sales of coated metal materials for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 were $34,483 and $105,861, respectively, compared to $32,338 and $101,141 in the same periods

18

last year. Lower sales of electrogalvanized materials, lighting materials, building products and other products were more than offset by a significant increase in gas tank sales. The increase in gas tank sales is principally due to a change in the pricing model to a package basis from a toll basis whereby the cost of metal is now included in the sales price. The inclusion of the metal cost in the sales price increased sales for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 by $5,918 and $16,179, respectively. The increase in the appliance/HVAC market sales was primarily due to new business for both new and existing customers. The decrease in building product sales was primarily due to lower overall customer demand in this market and the decision not to renew a contract for the production of a low-margin product. The decrease in EG sales is primarily due to the loss of a customer who exited this market. Sales of coated metal materials were also influenced by the closing of the Company’s Middletown facility in the summer of 2004. The closing of this facility decreased sales for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 by $176 and $4,869, respectively. The following tables summarize the variances within MSC’s coated metal material-based solutions which lead to the increase in net sales for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005:

	Net Sales for the Three Months Ended November 30,
Market	2005		2004		$ Variance			% Variance
Appliance/HVAC	$	13,006	$	11,721	$	1,285		11.0	%
Gas Tank		9,022		2,259		6,763		299.4	%
Building Products		6,751		7,703		(952	)	(12.4	)%
Clutch Plate		1,416		1,612		(196	)	(12.2	)%
Body Panel EG		942		2,879		(1,937	)	(67.3	)%
Lighting		930		1,185		(255	)	(21.5	)%
Other Automotive		878		1,048		(170	)	(16.2	)%
Swimming Pools		585		1,022		(437	)	(42.8	)%
Furniture/Fixtures		564		1,101		(537	)	(48.8	)%
Other		389		1,808		(1,419	)	(78.5	)%
Total	$	34,483	$	32,338	$	2,145		6.6	%
	Net Sales for the Nine Months Ended November 30,
Market	2005		2004		$ Variance			% Variance
Appliance/HVAC	$	37,071	$	35,450	$	1,621		4.6	%
Gas Tank		26,328		6,203		20,125		324.4	%
Building Products		20,670		25,403		(4,733	)	(18.6	)%
Clutch Plate		4,267		4,223		44		1.0	%
Body Panel EG		3,850		9,054		(5,204	)	(57.5	)%
Lighting		3,007		4,596		(1,589	)	(34.6	)%
Other Automotive		2,968		2,917		51		1.7	%
Swimming Pools		2,941		3,165		(224	)	(7.1	)%
Furniture/Fixtures		2,641		4,128		(1,487	)	(36.0	)%
Other		2,118		6,002		(3,884	)	(64.7	)%
Total	$	105,861	$	101,141	$	4,720		4.7	%

19

Sales of electronic-based materials for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 were $2,264 and $7,026, respectively, compared to $5,685 and $15,480 in the comparable periods of fiscal 2005. The decrease was mainly due to the shift of the Company’s supply model for the hard disk drive market to a toll processing program (whereby the cost of metal is no longer reflected in the sales price). The change in supply model reduced sales for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 by $3,167 and $8,898, respectively. The decrease in sales was partially offset by an increase in the volume of disk drive sales of 42% during the nine months ended November 30, 2005, from the comparable period of last year. The following tables summarize the variances within MSC’s electronic material-based solutions which lead to the decrease in net sales for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005:

	Net Sales for the Three Months Ended November 30,
Market	2005		2004		$ Variance			% Variance
Disk Drive	$	1,808	$	5,107	$	(3,299	)	(64.6	)%
Other		456		578		(122	)	(21.1	)%
Total	$	2,264	$	5,685	$	(3,421	)	(60.2	)%
	Net Sales for the Nine Months Ended November 30,
Market	2005		2004		$ Variance			% Variance
Disk Drive	$	5,232	$	13,528	$	(8,296	)	(61.3	)%
Other		1,794		1,952		(158	)	(8.1	)%
Total	$	7,026	$	15,480	$	(8,454	)	(54.6	)%

MSC’s gross profit margin for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 was $13,095 (17.5% of net sales) and $41,183 (18.5%), respectively, compared with $14,860 (22.2%) and $42,878 (21.5%) in the same periods last year. Although sales have increased, the gross margin dollars and the gross margin percentage have decreased. Gross margin dollars were basically flat for the three months ended November 30, 2005 as it relates to changes in the product mix and sales volume compared to the same period last year. Changes in the product mix and sales volume have increased the gross margin dollars by $3,586 for the nine months ended November 30, 2005 from the comparable period last year with the majority of the increase due to volume increases in sales of body panel laminate products. The margins were negatively affected by an increase in customer claims ($361 and $3,357), an increase in inventory quality issues ($359 and $1,583), a decrease in scrap sales ($949 and $1,513) due to lower scrap prices and an increase in energy costs ($791 and $2,093) during the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the same periods of last year. The increase in customer claims, as previously discussed, was primarily due to manufacturing issues that arose during the production of new products, especially in the appliance market, which the Company believes have been corrected. The Company was able to reduce production costs, mainly associated with wages, incentives and health care costs, by $744 and $3,154 for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 compared to the same periods last year. The Company continues to implement and accelerate an operational improvement plan that includes stronger supply chain management, Six Sigma and lean manufacturing to help offset the margin effects noted above.

20

SG&A expenses for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 were $9,357 and $27,362, or 12.5% and 12.3% of net sales, respectively, compared with $8,587 and $27,203, or 12.8% and 13.6% of net sales, respectively, in the same periods last year. SG&A expenses include amounts previously reported as “Corporate” expenses since the Company is now operating as one business segment. The increase in SG&A expenses in the third quarter resulted from higher professional fees associated with various projects including fees for tax consulting related to the amendment of the Company’s fiscal 2005 Form 10-K and first quarter fiscal 2006 Form 10-Q and the remediation of a material weakness in the accounting for income taxes. The continuing audit and assessment costs in complying with the rules and regulations related to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 were $1,111 in the first nine months of fiscal 2006 compared to $844 in the same period of fiscal 2005.

In the first nine months of fiscal 2005, MSC recorded $2,650 in restructuring expenses, primarily due to the closing of the Middletown facility. MSC recorded $248 of restructuring expenses in the first nine months of fiscal 2006.

Restructuring

During the first fiscal quarter of 2005, the Company announced the closing of its Middletown coil coating facility. In conjunction with this announcement and other restructuring actions, MSC recorded restructuring expenses of $2,650 during the first nine months of fiscal 2005. A total of 97 employees were affected by this restructuring. Of the total amount recorded, $1,763 related to the Middletown closing ($748 in severance, $566 in severance-related expenses and $449 in shut-down costs related to the closing of the facility) and $887 related to other restructuring actions ($617 in severance and $270 in severance-related expenses). The Company recorded an additional $7 in restructuring expenses in fiscal 2005, subsequent to the end of the first nine months. The Company also recorded $269 in expenses for these restructuring plans during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 primarily to cover medical-related expenses that were higher than originally planned. During the first nine months of fiscal 2006, $514 was paid related to these restructuring plans. A total of $57 is recorded as Accrued Payroll Related Expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of November 30, 2005.

On April 17, 2003, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer resigned and was replaced by a non-executive Chairman of the Board and a President and Chief Executive Officer. A separation agreement was entered into resulting in a pretax charge to earnings of $1,821 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company recorded additional restructuring charges of $143 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company reduced these restructuring reserves by $21 during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 based on a revision to the total amounts expected to be paid out for these plans. A total of $81 was paid during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 related to these plans. A total of $5 is recorded as Accrued Payroll Related Expenses and $23 is recorded as Other Long-Term Liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of November 30, 2005.

The Company recorded $142 in restructuring charges related to the disposition of the EMD assets during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. These charges have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 (see Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Consequently, they are excluded from the table below.

21

The restructuring reserve as of November 30, 2005 is presented in the chart below (which includes the 2004 and 2005 restructuring plans):

	Severance			Other			Total
Restructuring Reserve as of February 28, 2005	$	304		$	128		$	432
Restructuring Reserve Recorded During the Nine Months Ended November 30, 2005		(51	)		299			248
Cash Payments		(223	)		(372	)		(595	)
Restructuring Reserve as of November 30, 2005	$	30		$	55		$	85

Total Other (Income) and Expense, Net

Total other income, net for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 was $90 and $163, respectively, compared with $52 and $4,890 of expense in the same periods last year. The expense in fiscal 2005 was mainly due to a loss on the early retirement of debt of $4,205 which included a contractual prepayment penalty and the write-off of previously capitalized financing charges.

Income Taxes

MSC’s effective tax rate for continuing operations was 40.4% and 42.7%, respectively, for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 compared to 42.0% and 46.3% for the same periods last year. The variance in the effective tax rate compared to the statutory rate for both fiscal 2006 and 2005 was due to valuation allowances for net operating losses (particularly related to our foreign subsidiary in Germany), state income taxes (including the effect of a change in Ohio tax law in the second quarter of fiscal 2006) and other differences between book and tax income.

RESULTS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Electronic Materials and Devices Group

On June 20, 2005, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of its EMD business. The Company is now reporting EMD as a discontinued operation and all prior period results of operations have been reclassified to reflect that presentation. Since the assets, liabilities and cash flows of EMD are insignificant to the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and cash flows, the Company has elected not to reclassify prior period amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company is in the process of settling the net assets and liabilities of the business including accounts receivable, inventories and severance-related liabilities among other items.

The Company recorded losses of $8 and $538 ($.04 per diluted share), net of income taxes, on discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 compared to losses on discontinued operations of $848 ($.06 per diluted share), net of income taxes, and $2,596 ($.18 per diluted share), net of income taxes, for the same periods last year.

22

The following table shows the results of operations of EMD for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005 and 2004:

	Three Months Ending November 30,						Nine Months Ending November 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net Sales	$	—		$	372		$	1,132		$	1,095
Gross Profit		—			137			890			455
SG&A and Other Expenses		13			1,632			1,763			4,920
Loss Before Income Taxes		(13	)		(1,397	)		(873	)		(4,280	)
Benefit for Income Taxes		(5	)		(549	)		(335	)		(1,684	)
Loss on Discontinued Operations – EMD	$	(8	)	$	(848	)	$	(538	)	$	(2,596	)

The Company also recorded a loss on the sale of EMD assets of $1,470 (or $.10 per diluted common share), net of income tax benefit of $898, in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The loss included approximately $2.1 million of severance and severance-related costs and $0.2 million in deal costs and asset write-offs, net of the cost-sharing liabilities that were forgiven as part of the deal.

Pinole Point Steel

On May 31, 2002, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of its Pinole Point Steel business. Since such date, the Company continues to settle the net liabilities of the business. The Company recorded a loss on discontinued operations, net of income taxes, of $27 and income on discontinued operations, net of taxes, of $13 for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2005, respectively, compared to losses on discontinued operations, net of income taxes, of $70 and $205 for the same periods last year. As of November 30, 2005, there were $365 in net liabilities remaining. The remaining net liabilities primarily relate to workers compensation exposure not assumed by Grupo IMSA S.A. de C.V. Since such date, the Pinole Point Steel business has been reported as a discontinued operation.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company has historically financed its operations with funds generated from operating activities, borrowings under credit facilities and long-term debt instruments and sales of various assets. The Company believes that its cash on hand, cash generated from operations and potential divestures and availability under its credit facility will be sufficient to fund its operations and meet its working capital needs.

During the first nine months of fiscal 2006, MSC generated $18,404 of cash from operating activities. The generation of cash was due primarily to net income plus depreciation and amortization, increased accounts payable balances and an increase in deferred tax assets. This positive cash flow was partially offset by a significant decrease in accrued expenses and an increase in inventory. The increase in inventory was due primarily to increased production as well as purchasing steel at prices deemed favorable. The increase in accounts payable was due primarily to liabilities for those steel inventory purchases, capital expenditures and professional services the Company has purchased. The decrease in accrued expenses

23

primarily relates to the payment of accrued incentive compensation. The Company generated $2,820 of cash from operating activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2005. The generation of cash was due primarily to net income plus depreciation and amortization partially offset by increases in raw materials in an attempt to address metal availability and pricing issues and the payment of the contractual prepayment penalty on the 1998 Senior Notes.

In the first nine months of fiscal 2006, MSC invested $6,507 in capital improvement projects, compared to $4,098 in the same period last year. The Company received $3,357 in proceeds from the release of restricted cash in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 due to the cancellation of letters of credit that were no longer required. The Company has no restricted cash in fiscal 2006.

The Company entered into an amended and restated $30,000 committed line of credit (“New Line”) on April 30, 2004. The agreement expires on October 11, 2007. There were no borrowings outstanding under the New Line as of November 30, 2005. Borrowing capacity reserved for the Company’s outstanding letters of credit was $1,864, and the amount remaining available to be borrowed was $28,136 as of November 30, 2005. At the Company’s option, interest is at the bank’s prime rate (7.0% as of November 30, 2005) or at LIBOR plus a margin based on the ratio of funded debt to EBITDA (as defined in the agreement). The financial covenants include a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 commencing May 31, 2004; a maximum leverage ratio (3.0 to 1.0); and minimum net worth of $80,000 plus 50% of positive consolidated net income ending on or after May 31, 2004, or $84,449, on November 30, 2005. As of November 30, 2005, the Company was in violation of certain reporting covenants required under the New Line due solely to the failure to timely file and deliver the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005. On December 14, 2005, the lenders under the New Line waived the Company’s breach of such reporting covenants. There are restrictions on the Company’s use of its cash and cash equivalents related to repurchase of stock, dividends and acquisitions. The New Line is secured by specific personal property (including receivables, inventory and property, plant and equipment) of the Company.

In May 2004, the Company redeemed all of its 1998 Senior Notes. The debt prepayment consisted of principal ($43,944), interest ($1,346) and a contractual prepayment penalty ($4,051). The Company recorded a loss on the early retirement of debt of $4,205 which included the contractual prepayment penalty and the expense of previously capitalized financing charges.

On December 15, 2003, the Company entered into a definitive agreement for the sale of the idled coil coating equipment, located in Elk Grove Village, for $1,400 (net of commission) which was recorded as a sale of assets when the title transferred to the buyer and the assets were shipped overseas in fiscal 2005.

On June 10, 2004, the Company entered into a definitive agreement for the sale of the real estate associated with the idled coil coating line in Elk Grove Village for $1,401 (net of commission). The sale was completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

The Company is party to various legal proceedings in connection with the remediation of certain environmental matters. MSC believes its range of exposure for all known and quantifiable environmental exposures, based on allocations of liability among potentially responsible parties, the most recent estimate of remedial work and other information available, is $1,160 to $1.600 as of November 30, 2005. Refer to Note 19 for additional information.

24

Contractual Obligations

The only material changes to the contractual obligations table, outside the ordinary course of business, presented in the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed in January 2006 were that the Company had no long-term debt as of November 30, 2005 and the minimum royalty payments were forgiven as part of the sale of the EMD assets.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company has identified significant accounting policies that, as a result of the judgments, uncertainties, uniqueness and complexities of the underlying accounting standards and operations involved could result in material changes to its financial condition or results of operations under different conditions or using different assumptions. The Company’s most critical accounting policies are related to the following areas: revenue recognition, long-lived assets, goodwill, income taxes, environmental reserves and defined benefit retirement plans. Details regarding the Company’s application of these policies and the related estimates are described fully in MSC’s Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies that affected MSC’s financial condition or results of operations in the first nine months of fiscal 2006.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

The Securities and Exchange Commission encourages companies to disclose forward-looking information so that investors and shareowners can better understand a company’s future prospects and make informed investment decisions. This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which include, without limitation, those statements regarding our estimated loss and proceeds from the disposition of discontinued operations that set out anticipated results based on management’s plans and assumptions. MSC has tried, wherever possible, to identify such statements by using words such as “anticipates”, “estimates”, “expects”, “projects”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes” and words and terms of similar substance in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance.

Achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Many factors could also cause actual results to be materially different from any future results that may be expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q, including, among others:

• Impact of changes in the overall economy;

• Changes in the business environment, including the transportation, building and construction, electronics and durable goods industries;

• Domestic and foreign competition for both acoustical and coated metal applications;

25

• Changes in laws, regulations, policies or other activities of governments, agencies and similar organizations;

• The Company’s ability to satisfy in a timely manner the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations adopted under them;

• The stability of governments and business conditions inside and outside the U.S., which may affect a successful penetration of the Company’s products;

• Acts of war or terrorism;

• Acceptance of brake damping materials, engine components and body panel laminate parts by customers in North America, Europe and Asia;

• Proceeds and potential impact from the potential sale or closing of facilities or other assets;

• Increases in the prices as well as availability of raw and other material inputs used by the Company, especially steel and energy;

• The loss, or changes in the operations, financial condition or results of operations, of one or more significant customers of the Company;

• The risk of the successful development, introduction and marketing of new products and technologies;

• Facility utilization and product mix at the Company’s facilities;

• Realization of the tax credit carryforward generated from the sale of Pinole Point Steel and other net operating loss carryforwards;

• Environmental risks, costs, recoveries and penalties associated with the Company’s past and present manufacturing operations;

• Expected results of operations from foreign operations;

• The ability to recover material cost increases in the market place;

• The acquisition of a competitor by a financially sound third party;

• The continued deterioration of the financial condition of the U.S. automotive market;

• Effect of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the U.S. economy and the cost and availability of materials;

• The ability to attract and retain key employees; and

• Other factors, risks and uncertainties identified in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Form 10-K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

MSC undertakes no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. This discussion of potential risks and uncertainties is by no means complete but is designed to highlight important factors that may impact the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Other sections of this Form 10-Q may include additional factors which could adversely effect the Company’s business and financial performance. Moreover, the Company operates in a competitive environment. New risks emerge from time to time and it is not always possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on the Company’s business or to which any factor or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, shareowners should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

26

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There has been no material change in the Company’s assessment of its sensitivity to market risk since its presentation set forth in Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended February 28, 2005.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company periodically reviews the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting. The Company makes modifications to improve the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, and may take other corrective action, if its reviews identify a need for such modifications or actions.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A as filed with the SEC on January 9, 2006, as of February 28, 2005 (“Form 10-K/A”), an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Management concluded that control deficiencies in its internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2005 constituted material weaknesses within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements.” The material weaknesses identified by management were disclosed in Item 9A of the Form 10-K/A. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of February 28, 2005. As part of its evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report, management has (i) identified no material weaknesses other than those described in the Form 10-K/A and (ii) evaluated whether the material weaknesses described above continue to exist. Management believes that the Company has made progress in addressing these material weaknesses. As part of these efforts, additional internal and external resources have been employed, certain internal control procedures have been put in place and other control procedures have been enhanced or are in the process of being implemented. However, the improvements in controls have not been in place for a sufficient period of time nor has management completed testing of the controls to determine whether or not the controls are operating effectively to ensure remediation of the material weaknesses. Accordingly, management has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of November 30, 2005.

27

Management has performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The required certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are included as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The disclosures set forth in this Item 4 contain information concerning the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures and changes in internal control over financial reporting referred to in those certifications. Those certifications should be read in conjunction with this Item 4 and Item 9 of the Company’s Form 10-K/A for a more complete understanding of the matters covered by the certifications.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. Management, with oversight from the Audit Committee, continues to focus on timely addressing the material weaknesses disclosed in its Form 10-K/A and is committed to remediate the material weaknesses as expeditiously as possible. Although the Company’s remediation efforts are underway, control weaknesses will not be considered remediated until new internal controls over financial reporting: (i) are implemented and operational for a period of time; (ii) are tested; and (iii) management concludes that these controls are operating effectively.

During the quarter ended November 30, 2005, the Company’s tax manager resigned and the Company engaged additional external resources to assist in the accounting for income taxes and to help remediate the material weakness noted above. In addition, the Company utilized consulting resources to provide support in creating and documenting strengthened policies and procedures primarily related to the assessment of inventory values. The Company also continues to improve the number and qualifications of its accounting staff.

28

MATERIAL SCIENCES CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended November 30, 2005

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of its business. These legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning the Company’s entire business. The Company believes that the resolution of these legal actions will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Item 6. Exhibits

Reference is made to the attached Index to Exhibits.

29

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Elk Grove Village, State of Illinois, on the 9th day of January 2006.

MATERIAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
By:	/s/ Clifford D. Nastas
	Clifford D. Nastas
	Chief Executive Officer and Director
By:	/s/ Jeffrey J. Siemers
	Jeffrey J. Siemers
	Executive Vice President, Chief
	Administrative and Financial Officer
	and Secretary

30

MATERIAL SCIENCES CORPORATION

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended November 30, 2005

Index to Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32	Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

31

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Clifford D. Nastas, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Material Sciences Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

32

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

January 9, 2006

/s/ Clifford D. Nastas

Clifford D. Nastas

Chief Executive Officer and Director

33

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Jeffrey J. Siemers, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Financial Officer and Secretary, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Material Sciences Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

34

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

January 9, 2006

/s/ Jeffrey J. Siemers

Jeffrey J. Siemers

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Financial Officer and Secretary

35

EX-32

Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Report of Material Sciences Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clifford D. Nastas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

January 9, 2006
By:	/s/ Clifford D. Nastas
	Clifford D. Nastas
	Chief Executive Officer and Director

In connection with the Report, I, Jeffrey J. Siemers, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

January 9, 2006
By:	/s/ Jeffrey J. Siemers
	Jeffrey J. Siemers
	Executive Vice President, Chief
	Administrative and Financial Officer
	and Secretary

36