EX-99.2
Exhibit 99.2
PG&E Corporation
SECOND QUARTER EARNINGS CALL
July 27, 2017
Forward Looking Statements Statements contained in this presentation about future performance, including
forecasts and estimates of PG&E Corporation’s 2017 financial results, 2017 items impacting comparability, 2017 equity issuance, 2017-2019 capital expenditures and rate base, dividend policy, general earnings sensitivities, and other
statements that are not purely historical, are forward-looking statements. These forecasts, estimates and statements are based on our current assumptions, including but not limited to those relating to capital expenditures, authorized rate base and
rate base growth assumptions, authorized cost of capital, and certain other factors affecting earnings from operations, and also are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to various risks and uncertainties
and actual results may differ materially. PG&E Corporation and the Utility are not able to predict all the factors that may affect future results. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to:
• the timing and outcomes of the two TO rate cases pending before the FERC, and other ratemaking and regulatory proceedings; • the timing and outcome of the Butte fire litigation; whether insurance is sufficient to cover the Utility’s
liability resulting therefrom; the timing and outcome of any proceeding to recover costs in excess of insurance from customers, if any; the effect, if any, of the SED’s $8.3 million citations issued in connection with the Butte fire may have on
the Butte fire litigation; and whether additional investigations and proceedings in connection with the Butte fire will be opened and any additional fines or penalties imposed on the Utility; • the outcome of the probation and the monitorship,
the timing and outcomes of the debarment proceeding, the SED’s unresolved enforcement matters relating to the Utility’s compliance with natural gas-related law s and regulations, and other investigations that have been or may be commenced,
and the ultimate amount of fines, penalties, and remedial and other costs that the Utility may incur as a result; • the timing and outcomes of the ex parte OII and the safety culture OII; • the Utility’s ability to control its costs
within the authorized levels of spending and the extent to which the Utility incurs unrecoverable costs that are higher than the forecasts of such costs; • the impact that reductions in customer demand for electricity and natural gas have on
the Utility’s ability to make and recover its investments through rates and earn its authorized return on equity; whether the Utility is successful in addressing the changing industry landscape, including the impact of growing distributed and
renew able generation resources, changing customer demand for natural gas and electric services, and an increasing number of customers departing for community choice aggregators; • the impact of the increasing cost of natural gas regulations;
• whether the Utility can continue to obtain insurance and whether insurance coverage is adequate for future losses or claims, especially following a major event that causes widespread third-party losses; • changes in estimated
environmental remediation costs, including costs associated with the Utility’s natural gas compressor sites; • the ability of PG&E Corporation and the Utility to access capital markets and other sources of debt and equity financing in
a timely manner on acceptable terms, and the amount and timing of additional common stock and debt issuances by PG&E Corporation; • the outcomes of current and future self-reports, investigations or other enforcement proceedings that could
be commenced or notices of violation that could be issued relating to the Utility’s compliance with law s, rules, regulations, or orders applicable to its operations; • the outcome of federal or state tax audits and the impact of any
changes in federal or state tax law s, policies, regulations, or their interpretation, including as a result of the recent changes in the federal government; • the impact of changes in GAAP, standards, rules, or policies, including those
related to regulatory accounting, and the impact of changes in their interpretation or application; and • the other factors disclosed in PG&E Corporation and the Utility’s joint annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2016, their joint quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2017, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This presentation is not complete without the
accompanying statements made by management during the webcast conference call held on July 27, 2017. The statements in this presentation are made as of July 27, 2017. PG&E Corporation undertakes no obligation to update information
contained herein. This presentation, including Appendices, and the accompanying press release were attached to PG&E Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K that was furnished to the SEC on July 27, 2017 and, along with the replay of
the conference call, is also available on PG&E Corporation’s website at www.pgecorp.com. 2
Well-positioned to Deliver Strong Returns Building on Safety and Operational Performance • Continuing
focus on public, employee, and contractor safety • Delivering reliable gas and electric service Delivering on Customer Expectations • Improving customer service through continuous innovation • Focusing on maintaining affordable
service Positioning PG&E for Success • Enabling California’s clean energy economy • Building coalitions Healthy 3-year growth profile • ~6.5-7% ratebase growth • Above average dividend growth See the Forward Looking
Statements for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the guidance presented and underlying assumptions. 3
Q2 2017 Earnings Results Q2 2017 Earnings Earnings EPS EPS (millions) (millions) Earnings on a GAAP basis $ 406
$ 0.79 $ 982 $ 1.92 Items Impacting Comparability Pipeline related expenses 17 0.03 33 0.06 Legal and regulatory related expenses 2 0.01 4 0.01 Fines and penalties — — 36 0.07 Butte fire-related insurance recoveries, (17) (0.03)
(15) (0.03) net of legal costs GT&S revenue timing impact — — (88) (0.17) Diablo Canyon settlement-related disallowance 32 0.06 32 0.06 Earnings from Operations $ 440 $ 0.86 $ 984 $ 1.92 Items Impacting Comparability
(millions, pre-tax) Q2 2017 Pipeline related expenses $ 29 $ 56 Legal and regulatory related expenses 3 7 Fines and penalties — 60 Butte fire-related insurance recoveries, (29) (26) net of legal costs GT&S revenue timing impact
— (150) Diablo Canyon settlement-related disallowance 47 47 Total $ 50 $ (6) Earnings from Operations is not calculated in accordance with GAAP and excludes items impacting comparability. See Appendix, Exhibit A for a reconciliation
of Earnings per Share (“EPS”) on a GAAP basis to Earnings from Operations and Exhibit G for the use of non-GAAP financial measures. 4
Q2 2017: Quarter over Quarter Comparison Earnings per Share from Operations $1.00 $0.04 $0.90 $0.07 $0.15
($0.04) ($0.02) $0.80 $0.70 $0.60 $0.50 $0.86 $0.40 $0.66 $0.30 $0.20 $0.10 $0.00 Q2 2016 EPS from Timing of 2015 GT&S Growth in Rate Base Miscellaneous Impact of 2017 GRC Increase in Q2 2017 EPS from Operations Revenue Impact Earnings Decision
Shares Outstanding Operations Earnings from Operations is not calculated in accordance with GAAP and excludes items impacting comparability. See Appendix, Exhibit A for a reconciliation of Earnings per Share (“EPS”) on a GAAP basis to
Earnings from Operations and Exhibit G for the use of non-GAAP financial measures. 5
2017 Earnings Per Share Guidance Low High Estimated EPS on a GAAP Basis $ 3.54 $ 3.79 Estimated Items Impacting
Comparability Pipeline related expenses 0.14 0.09 Legal and regulatory related expenses ~ 0.01 ~ 0.01 Fines and penalties ~ 0.07 ~ 0.07 Butte fire-related insurance recoveries, net of legal costs (0.03) (0.03) GT&S revenue timing impact (0.17)
(0.17) Net benefit from derivative litigation settlement (0.07) (0.07) Diablo Canyon settlement-related disallowance ~ 0.06 ~ 0.06 Estimated EPS on an Earnings from Operations Basis $ 3.55 $ 3.75 Changes from prior quarter noted in blue See the
Forward Looking Statements for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the guidance presented and underlying assumptions. See Appendix, Exhibit E for PG&E Corporation’s 2017 Earnings per Share Guidance and Exhibit
G for the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. 6
2017 Assumptions Capital Expenditures ($ millions) 2017 General Rate Case 3,850 Gas Transmission and Storage
950 Transmission Owner 18 1,100 Total Cap Ex ~$5.9 billion Authorized Ratebase (weighted average) ($ billions) 2017 General Rate Case 24.6 Gas Transmission and Storage 3.0 Transmission Owner 6.8 Total Ratebase ~$34.4 billion Authorized Cost of
Capital* Return on Equity: 10.4% Equity Ratio: 52% *CPUC authorized Other Factors Affecting Earnings from Operations — GT&S amounts not requested + Incentive revenues and other benefits CWIP earnings: offset by below-the-line costs Changes
from prior quarter noted in blue See the Forward Looking Statements for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the guidance presented and underlying assumptions. 7
2017 Items Impacting Comparability ($ millions, pre-tax) 2017 Pipeline related expenses (1) 80—125
Legal and regulatory related expenses ~ 10 Fines and penalties (2) ~ 60 Butte fire-related insurance recoveries, net of legal costs (26) GT&S revenue timing impact (150) Net benefit from derivative litigation settlement
(65) Diablo Canyon settlement-related disallowance ~ 47 2017 Items Impacting Comparability Total ~ $1—(44) Fines and Penalties ($ in millions, pre-tax) (2) Charge for disallowed expense 32 GT&S ex parte penalty 15 Ex parte
OII settlement ~ 13 Total ~ $60 (1) Total cost of rights-of-w ay program expected to range from $425 million to $475 million (2) Fines and penalties range excludes any additional potential future fines or penalties beyond those outlined
above Changes from prior quarter noted in blue See the Forward Looking Statements for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the guidance presented and underlying assumptions. See Appendix, Exhibit E for PG&E
Corporation’s 2017 Earnings per Share Guidance and Exhibit G for Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. 8
2017 Equity Issuance $400—600M $400—500M 2017 2017 As of Q1 As of Q2 June 30, 2017 shares
outstanding: ~512 million Changes from prior quarter noted in blue See the Forward Looking Statements for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the guidance presented and underlying assumptions. 9
Robust Cap Ex Supports Strong Returns
Capital Expenditures ($ in B) 2017-2019
~$5.9B ~$6.1B ~$6B
2017 2018
2019
General Rate Case Gas Transmission & Storage
Electric Transmission Owner Range
Changes from prior quarter noted in
blue
See the Forward Looking Statements for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the guidance presented and
underlying assumptions. 10
Ratebase Supports Strong Returns
Weighted Average Ratebase ($ in B)
2017-2019 ~6.5-7%
CAGR ~$39B ~$34.4B ~$37B 2017 2018 2019
General Rate Case Gas Transmission & Storage Electric Transmission Owner Range
Base Case Assumptions:
2017 General Rate Case through 2019
2015 Gas Transmission & Storage rate case
Phase 2 decision through 2018; flat in 2019
~$400M for 2011-2014 spend subject to audit added in 2018
Transmission Owner
rate case:
High end: TO19 filing held flat through 2019
Low end: TO17
settlement held flat through 2019
Electric Vehicle Infrastructure decision in December 2016
Potential Future Updates:
2019 Gas Transmission & Storage rate case
2019 Transmission Owner rate cases
Future competitive transmission opportunities
State infrastructure modernization (e.g., rail and water projects)
Future storage
opportunities
Future transportation electrification (e.g., January 2017 medium and heavy duty vehicle filing)
New gas storage regulations
Changes from prior quarter noted in blue
See the Forward Looking Statements for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the guidance presented and underlying
assumptions. 11
Dividend Policy Supports Strong Total Shareholder Return + ~8% + ~8% Payout ~60% Ratio $2.12 $1.96 $1.82 2015
2016 2017 2019 Targeting 55-65% payout ratio over time Changes from prior quarter noted in blue See the Forward Looking Statements for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the guidance presented and underlying
assumptions. 12
PG&E Corporation
Appendix
Appendix – Supplemental Earnings Materials Exhibit A: Reconciliation of PG&E Corporation’s
Consolidated Income Available Slides 15-16 for Common Shareholders in Accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to Earnings from Operations Exhibit B: Key Drivers of PG&E Corporation’s Earnings per Common Share Slide 17 from
Operations Exhibit C: Operational Performance Metrics Slides 18-19 Exhibit D: Sales and Sources Summary Slide 20 Exhibit E: PG&E Corporation’s 2017 Earnings Per Share Guidance Slides 21-22 Exhibit F: 2017 General Earnings Sensitivities
Slide 23 Exhibit G: Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures Slide 24 Exhibit H: Expected Timelines of Selected Regulatory Cases Slides 25-29 14
Exhibit A: Reconciliation of PG&E Corporation’s Consolidated Income Available for Common Shareholders
in Accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) to Earnings from Operations Page 1 of 2 Second Quarter and Year to Date, 2017 vs. 2016 Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (in millions,
except per share amounts) Earnings per Earnings per Earnings Common Share Earnings Common Share (Diluted) (Diluted) 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 PG&E Corporation’s Earnings on a GAAP basis $ 406 $ 206 $ 0.79 $ 0.41 $ 982 $ 313 $
1.92 $ 0.63 Items Impacting Comparability: (1) Pipeline related expenses (2) 17 16 0.03 0.03 33 29 0.06 0.06 Legal and regulatory related expenses (3) 2 8 0.01 0.02 4 18 0.01 0.04 Fines and penalties (4) — 112 — 0.22 36
163 0.07 0.32 Butte fire-related insurance recoveries, net of legal costs (5) (17) (125) (0.03) (0.25) (15) 101 (0.03) 0.20 GT&S revenue timing impact (6) — — — — (88) — (0.17) -Diablo
Canyon settlement-related disallowance (7) 32 — 0.06 — 32 — 0.06 -GT&S capital disallowance — 113 — 0.23 — 113 — 0.23 PG&E Corporation’s Earnings from Operations (8) $ 440 $ 330 $ 0.86 $ 0.66
$ 984 $ 737 $ 1.92 $ 1.48 All amounts presented in the table above are tax adjusted at PG&E Corporation’s statutory tax rate of 40.75 percent, except as indicated below. (1) “Items impacting comparability” represent items
that management does not consider part of the normal course of operations and affect comparability of financial results between periods. See Exhibit G: Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. (2) The Utility incurred costs of $29 million (before
the tax impact of $12 million) and $56 million (before the tax impact of $23 million) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, for pipeline related expenses incurred in connection with the multi-year effort to identify
and remove encroachments from transmission pipeline rights-of-way. (3) The Utility incurred costs of $3 million (before the tax impact of $1 million) and $7 million (before the tax impact of $3 million) during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017, respectively, for legal and regulatory related expenses incurred in connection with various enforcement, regulatory, and litigation activities regarding natural gas matters and regulatory communications. (4) The Utility
incurred costs of $60 million (before the tax impact of $24 million) during the six months ended June 30, 2017, for fines and penalties. This includes costs of $32 million (before the tax impact of $13 million) during the six months ended
June 30, 2017, associated with safety-related cost disallowances imposed by the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) in its April 9, 2015 decision (“San Bruno Penalty Decision”) in the gas transmission
pipeline investigations. The Utility also recorded $15 million (before the tax impact of $6 million) during the six months ended June 30, 2017, for disallowances imposed by the CPUC in its final phase two decision of the 2015 Gas Transmission
and Storage (“GT&S”) rate case for prohibited ex parte communications. In addition, the Utility recorded $12 million (before the tax impact of $5 million) and $1 million (which is not tax deductible) during the six months ended
June 30, 2017, for financial remedies in connection with the settlement filed with the CPUC on March 28, 2017, related to the Order Instituting an Investigation into Compliance with Ex Parte Communication Rules (“ex parte OII”).
15
Exhibit A: Reconciliation of PG&E Corporation’s Consolidated Income Available for Common Shareholders
in Accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) to Earnings from Operations Page 2 of 2 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended (in millions, pre-tax) June 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 Charge for disallowed
expense $ —$ 32 GT&S ex parte penalty — 15 Ex parte OII settlement — 13 Fines and penalties $ —$ 60 Future fines or penalties may be imposed in connection with other enforcement, regulatory, and litigation activities
regarding regulatory communications. (5) The Utility recorded insurance recoveries, net of legal costs, of $29 million (before the tax impact of $12 million) and $26 million (before the tax impact of $11 million) during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2017, respectively, associated with the Butte fire. This includes $46 million (before the tax impact of $19 million) and $53 million (before the tax impact of $22 million) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,
respectively, for insurance recoveries partially offset by $17 million (before the tax impact of $7 million) and $27 million (before the tax impact of $11 million) recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, for
legal costs associated with the Butte fire. Three Months Ended Six Months Ended (in millions, pre-tax) June 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 Legal costs $ 17 $ 27 Insurance (46) (53) Butte fire-related insurance recoveries, net of
legal costs $ (29) $ (26) (6) As a result of the CPUC’s final phase two decision in the 2015 GT&S rate case, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Utility recorded revenues of $150 million (before the tax impact
of $62 million) in excess of the 2017 authorized revenue requirement, which includes the final component of under-collected revenues retroactive to January 1, 2015. (7) As a result of the settlement agreement submitted to the CPUC in
connection with the Utility’s pending joint proposal to retire the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, the Utility recorded a total disallowance of $47 million (before the tax impact of $15 million) during the three and six months ended June 30,
2017, comprised of cancelled projects of $24 million (before the tax impact of $6 million) and disallowed license renewal costs of $23 million (before the tax impact of $9 million), with no corresponding charges during the same periods in 2016. A
portion of the cancelled projects and disallowed license renewal costs currently is not tax deductible. (8) “Earnings from operations” is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Exhibit G: Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. 16
Exhibit B: Key Drivers of PG&E Corporation’s Earnings per Common Share (“EPS”) from
Operations Second Quarter and Year to Date, 2017 vs. 2016 (in millions, except per share amounts) Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Earnings per Earnings per Common Common Earnings Earnings Share Share
(Diluted) (Diluted) 2016 Earnings from Operations (1) $ 330 $ 0.66 $ 737 $ 1.48 Timing of 2015 GT&S revenue impact (2) $ 75 $ 0.15 $ 150 $ 0.29 Growth in rate base earnings (3) $ 34 $ 0.07 $ 51 $ 0.10 Miscellaneous $ 22 $ 0.04 $
51 $ 0.10 Tax benefit on stock compensation (4) $ —$ —$ 31 $ 0.06 Impact of 2017 GRC decision (5) $ (21) $ (0.04) $ (36) $ (0.07) Increase in shares outstanding $ —$ (0.02) $ —$ (0.04) 2017 Earnings from
Operations (1) $ 440 $ 0.86 $ 984 $ 1.92 (1) See Exhibit A for a reconciliation of EPS on a GAAP basis to EPS from Operations. All amounts presented in the table above are tax adjusted at PG&E Corporation’s statutory tax rate of
40.75 percent, except for tax benefits on stock compensation. See Footnote 4 below. (2) Represents the impact in 2016 of the delay in the Utility’s 2015 GT&S rate case. The CPUC issued its final phase two decision on December 1,
2016, delaying recognition of the full 2016 revenue increase until the fourth quarter of 2016. (3) Represents the impact of the increase in rate base as authorized in various rate cases, including the 2017 GRC, during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same periods in 2016. As the final decision in the 2017 GRC was approved by the CPUC in May 2017, this amount includes revenues authorized for the three months ended March 31, 2017 that were not
recorded until the second quarter of 2017. (4) Represents the incremental tax benefit related to share-based compensation awards that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Pursuant to ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock
Compensation (Topic 718), which PG&E Corporation and the Utility adopted in 2016, excess tax benefits associated with vested awards are reflected in net income. (5) Represents the impact of lower tax repair benefits as a result of the
CPUC’s final decision in the 2017 General Rate Case (“GRC”) proceeding, partially offset by the delayed revenue recognition of 2017 GRC-related capital costs (depreciation and interest) until the second quarter of 2017 when the CPUC
issued its final decision in the 2017 GRC. 17
Exhibit C: Operational Performance Metrics Meets YTD 2017 Year to Date Q2 Actual EOY Target Target
(1) Safety (includes both public and employee safety metrics) Nuclear Operations Safety Unit 1 Performance Indicator 97.1 90.5 Unit 2 Performance Indicator 90.0 87.6 Electric Operations Safety Electric Overhead Conductor Index 0.492
1.000—911 Emergency Response 96.0% 97.5%— Gas Operations Safety Gas In-Line Inspection and Upgrade Index 1.3 1.0 Gas Dig-ins Reduction 1.73 1.92 Gas Emergency Response 20.0 21.0 Employee Safety SIF Corrective Action Index 2.0 1.0 Serious
Preventable Motor Vehicle Incident Rate 0.218 0.239 Timely Reporting of Injuries 66.3% 71.3%— Customer Customer Satisfaction Score 75.2 76.4— System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) 58.2 107.0— Financial Earnings from
Operations $948.0 See note (1) See note (1) See following page for definitions of the operational performance metrics. The operational performance goals set under the PG&E Corporation 2017 Short Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”)
are based on the same operational metrics and targets. (1) The 2017 target for earnings from operations is not publicly reported but is consistent with the guidance range provided for 2017 EPS from operations of $3.55 to $3.75. 18
Definitions of 2017 Operational Performance Metrics from Exhibit C Safety Public and employee safety are
measured in four areas: (1) Nuclear Operations Safety, (2) Electric Operations Safety, (3) Gas Operations Safety, and (4) Employee Safety. 1. The safety of the Utility’s nuclear power operations, Unit 1 and Unit 2, is an
index comprised of 11 performance indicators for nuclear power generation that are regularly benchmarked against other nuclear power generators. 2. The safety of the Utility’s electric operations is represented by (a) work that supports
the safe reliable operations of the overhead electric system, and (b) the percentage of time that Utility personnel are on site within 60 minutes after receiving a 911 call of a potential Utility electric hazard. 3. The safety of the
Utility’s natural gas operations is represented by (a) the ability to complete planned in-line inspections and pipeline retrofit projects, measured by two equally weighted components of In-Line Inspections and In-Line Upgrades;
(b) the number of third party “dig-ins” (i.e., damage resulting in repair or replacement of underground facility) to Utility gas assets per 1,000 Underground Service Alert tickets; and (c) the timeliness (measured in minutes) of
on-site response to gas emergency service calls. 4. The safety of the Utility’s employees is represented by (a) measuring the timely and quality completion of planned actions in response to Serious Injuries and Fatalities (SIF),
(b) the number of serious preventable motor vehicle incidents that the driver could have reasonably avoided, per one million miles driven, and (c) the percentage of work-related injuries reported to the 24/7 Nurse Report Line within one
day of the incident. Customer Customer satisfaction and service reliability are measured by: 1. The overall satisfaction (measured as a score of zero to 100) of customers with the products and services offered by the Utility, as measured through a
quarterly survey performed by an independent third-party research firm. 2. The total time (measured in minutes) the average customer is without electric power during a given time period. Financial Earnings from Operations (shown in millions of
dollars) measures PG&E Corporation’s earnings power from ongoing core operations. They allow investors to compare the underlying financial performance of the business from one period to another, exclusive of items that management believes
do not reflect the normal course of operations (items impacting comparability). Earnings from Operations are not calculated in accordance with GAAP. For a reconciliation of Consolidated Income Available for Common Shareholders as reported in
accordance with GAAP to Earnings from Operations, see Exhibit A. 19
Exhibit D: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Sales and Sources Summary Second Quarter and Year to Date, 2017 vs.
2016 Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 2016 2017 2016 Sales from Energy Deliveries (in millions kWh) 19,216 19,879 38,754 39,419 Total Electric Customers at June 30 5,376,949 5,340,013 Total Gas Sales (in Bcf)
150 167 377 393 Total Gas Customers at June 30 4,464,296 4,437,073 Sources of Electric Energy (in millions kWh) Total Utility Generation 7,205 7,070 15,829 15,687 Total Purchased Power 9,425 11,228 16,716 19,767 Total Electric Energy Delivered
(1) 19,216 19,879 38,754 39,419 Diablo Canyon Performance Overall Capacity Factor (including refuelings) 66% 82% 82% 92% Refueling Outage Period 4/23-6/23 4/30-6/2 4/23-6/23 4/30-6/2 Refueling Outage Duration during the Period 61 33 61 33
(1) Includes other sources of electric energy totaling 2,586 million kWh and 1,581 million kWh for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and 6,209 million kWh and 3,965 million kWh for the six
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Please see the 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information about operating statistics. 20
Exhibit E: PG&E Corporation’s 2017 Earnings per Share Guidance Page 1 of 2 2017 EPS Guidance Low High
Estimated EPS on a GAAP Basis $ 3.54 $ 3.79 Estimated Items Impacting Comparability: (1) Pipeline related expenses (2) 0.14 0.09 Legal and regulatory related expenses (3) ~ 0.01 ~ 0.01 Fines and penalties (4) ~ 0.07 ~ 0.07 Butte
fire-related insurance recoveries, net of legal costs (5) (0.03) (0.03) GT&S revenue timing impact (6) (0.17) (0.17) Net benefit from derivative litigation settlement (7) (0.07) (0.07) Diablo Canyon settlement-related disallowance
(8) ~ 0.06 ~ 0.06 Estimated EPS on an Earnings from Operations Basis (9) $ 3.55 $ 3.75 All amounts presented in the table above are tax adjusted at PG&E Corporation’s statutory tax rate of 40.75 percent, except as indicated below.
(1) “ Items impacting comparability” represent items that management does not consider part of the normal course of operations and affect comparability of financial results between periods. See Exhibit G: Use of Non-GAAP Financial
Measures. (2) “ Pipeline related expenses” includes costs incurred to identify and remove encroachments from transmission pipeline rights-of-way. The pre-tax range of estimated costs is shown below. The offsetting tax impacts for the
low and high EPS guidance range are $51 million and $33 million, respectively. 2017 Low EPS High EPS (in millions, pre-tax) guidance guidance Pipeline related expenses $ 125 $ 80 (3) “ Legal and regulatory related expenses” includes
costs incurred in connection with various enforcement, regulatory, and litigation activities regarding natural gas matters and regulatory communications. The pre-tax range of estimated costs is shown below. The offsetting tax impact for the low and
high EPS guidance range is $4 million. 2017 Low EPS High EPS (in millions, pre-tax) guidance guidance Legal and regulatory related expenses ~ 10 ~ 10 (4) “ Fines and penalties” includes fines and penalties resulting from various
enforcement, regulatory, and litigation activities regarding natural gas matters and regulatory communications. Guidance is consistent with the 2017 components of the $1.6 billion San Bruno Penalty Decision in the gas transmission pipeline
investigations, the disallowances imposed by the CPUC in its final phase two decision in the 2015 GT&S rate case for prohibited ex parte communications, and the settlement filed with the CPUC in connection with the ex parte OII. Guidance does
not include amounts for other potential future fines and penalties. The pre-tax range of estimated costs is shown below. The offsetting tax impact for the low and high EPS guidance range is $24 million. 2017 Low EPS High EPS (in millions, pre-tax)
guidance guidance Charge for disallowed expense $ 32 $ 32 GT&S ex parte disallowance 15 15 Ex parte OII settlement ~ 13 ~ 13 Fines and penalties ~ 60 ~ 60 21
Exhibit E: PG&E Corporation’s 2017 Earnings per Share Guidance Page 2 of 2 (5) “ Butte
fire-related insurance recoveries, net of legal costs” refers to the insurance recoveries associated with the Butte fire, net of legal costs. The Utility currently is unable to estimate the low and high end of the guidance range of Butte
fire-related third-party claims and legal costs for 2017. The offsetting tax impact is $11 million. 2017 Low EPS High EPS (in millions, pre-tax) guidance guidance Butte fire-related insurance recoveries, net of legal costs $ (26) $
(26) (6) “ GT&S revenue timing impact” refers to the revenues recorded in excess of the 2017 authorized revenue requirements as a result of the CPUC’s final phase two decision issued on December 1, 2016 in the 2015
GT&S rate case. Accounting rules allow the Utility to recognize revenues in a given year only if they will be collected from customers within 24 months of the end of that year. Because the phase one decision issued by the CPUC directed the
Utility to collect the difference between the adopted “ interim” revenue requirements and the amounts previously collected in rates, retroactive to January 1, 2015, over a 36-month period, the Utility was not able to complete
recording the full true-up of under-collected revenues until the first quarter of 2017. The pre-tax range of the recorded revenues is shown below. The offsetting tax impact for the low and high EPS guidance range is $62 million. Low EPS High EPS (in
millions, pre-tax) guidance guidance GT&S revenue timing impact $ (150) $ (150) (7) “ Net benefit from derivative litigation settlement” refers to the settlement agreement in connection with the shareholder derivative
litigation that was approved by the court on July 18, 2017. This amount includes insurance recoveries net of plaintiff costs. The offsetting tax impact for the low and high EPS guidance range is $26 million. 2017 Low EPS High EPS (in millions,
pre-tax) guidance guidance Net benefit from derivative litigation settlement $ (65) $ (65) (8) “ Diablo Canyon settlement-related disallowance” refers to the settlement agreement submitted to the CPUC in connection with the
Utility’s pending joint proposal to retire the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, comprised of cancelled projects and disallowed license renewal costs. The offsetting tax impact for the low and high EPS guidance range is $15 million. A portion of the
cancelled projects and disallowed license renewal costs currently is not tax deductible. 2017 2017 Low EPS High EPS (in millions, pre-tax) guidance guidance Diablo Canyon settlement-related disallowance ~ 47 ~ 47 (9) “ Earnings from
operations” is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Exhibit G: Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Actual financial results for 2017 may differ materially from the guidance provided. For a discussion of the factors that may affect future results,
see the Forward-Looking Statements. 22
Exhibit F: 2017 General Earnings Sensitivities PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Variable Description of Change Estimated 2017 Earnings Impact Rate base +/- $100 million change in allowed rate base +/- $5 million Return on equity (ROE) +/- 0.1% change in allowed ROE +/- $18 million Share count +/- 1% change in average shares +/-
$0.04 per share +/- $9 million change in at-risk revenue (pre-tax), including Revenues +/- $0.01 per share Electric Transmission and Gas Transmission and Storage These general earnings sensitivities on factors that may affect 2017 earnings are
forward-looking statements that are based on various assumptions. Actual results may differ materially. For a discussion of the factors that may affect future results, see the Forward-Looking Statements. 23
Exhibit G: Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Use of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures PG&E Corporation discloses historical financial results and provides guidance based on “earnings from operations” in order to provide a measure that allows investors to compare the underlying financial
performance of the business from one period to another, exclusive of items impacting comparability. “Earnings from operations” is a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated as income available for common shareholders less items
impacting comparability. “Items impacting comparability” represent items that management does not consider part of the normal course of operations and affect comparability of financial results between periods, including certain pipeline
related expenses, certain legal and regulatory related expenses, fines and penalties, Butte fire-related insurance recoveries and costs, impacts of the 2015 GT&S rate case, and the Diablo Canyon settlement-related disallowance. PG&E
Corporation uses earnings from operations to understand and compare operating results across reporting periods for various purposes including internal budgeting and forecasting, short- and long-term operating planning, and employee incentive
compensation. PG&E Corporation believes that earnings from operations provide additional insight into the underlying trends of the business allowing for a better comparison against historical results and expectations for future performance.
Earnings from operations are not a substitute or alternative for GAAP measures such as consolidated income available for common shareholders and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. 24
Exhibit H: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Expected Timelines of Selected Regulatory Cases Regulatory Case
Docket # Key Dates 2017 General Rate Case (Phase I) A. 15-09-001 Sep 1, 2015 – Application Filed Sep 29, 2015 – Application Workshop Oct 29, 2015 – Prehearing conference Jan 22, 2016 – PG&E Supplemental Testimony on gas
distribution recordkeeping Feb 22, 2016 – PG&E Supplemental Testimony on updated tax forecast, labor escalation Apr 8, 2016 – ORA testimony Apr 29, 2016 – Intervenor testimony May-Jun, 2016 – Settlement discussions May 2016
– Public participation hearings May 27, 2016 – Rebuttal testimony Aug 3, 2016 – Settlement with all parties that filed testimony submitted Feb 27, 2017 – Proposed decision issued May, 2017 – Final decision issued
Transmission Owner Rate Case (TO19) ERxx-xx Jul 26, 2017 – PG&E filed TO19 rate case seeking an annual revenue requirement for 2018 3Q 2017 – Anticipate that FERC will accept TO19 making rates effective Mar 1, 2018 and establishing
settlement process 4Q 2017 – FERC settlement conference anticipated 2018 – FERC settlement conference anticipated Transmission Owner Rate Case (TO18) ER16-2320 Jul 29, 2016 – PG&E filed TO18 rate case seeking an annual revenue
requirement for 2017 Sep 30, 2016 – FERC accepted TO18 making rates effective Mar 1, 2017 and establishing settlement process Oct 19, 2016 – FERC settlement conference Oct 30, 2016 – CPUC seeks rehearing of FERC’s grant of 50 bp
ROE adder for CAISO participation Feb 7-8, 2017 – FERC settlement conference Mar 16, 2017 – Parties reached impasse in settlement discussions Jan 2018 – Hearings scheduled Jun 1, 2018 – Initial decision expected Safety Culture
and Governance Order I.15-08-019 Sep 2, 2015 – OII issued Instituting Investigation Oct 30, 2015 – PG&E submits discovery responses to SED Dec 15, 2015 – PG&E submits discovery responses to SED Jan 25, 2016 – PG&E
submits discovery responses to SED Apr 2016 – CPUC hires NorthStar as consultant for investigation Apr 26-27, May 10-12, 2016 – Orientation presentations with SED and NorthStar staff May 2016-Mar 2017 – Ongoing discovery
(data requests, interviews, site visits, and demos) from NorthStar May 8, 2017 – President Picker Phase II Scoping Memo and NorthStar Assessment Report Issued Aug 1, 2017 – Prehearing Conference Scheduled 4Q 2017 – PG&E
Testimony Due 1Q 2018 – Party Testimony Due 1Q 2018 – Evidentiary Hearings 25
Exhibit H: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Expected Timelines of Selected Regulatory Cases Regulatory Case
Docket # Key Dates 2015 Electric Distribution Resources Plan A.15-07-006, Aug 13, 2014 – Commission issues OIR directing utilities to file Electric Distribution Resources Plans (DRP) R.14-08-013 Sep 5, 2014 – Comments on OIR Sep 17, 2014
– Workshop I Sep 22, 2014 – Reply Comments on OIR Nov 17, 2014 – Draft Guidance Issued Dec 12, 2014 – Comments on Draft Guidance Jan 8, 2015 – Workshop II Feb 6, 2015 – Final Guidance Ruling issued Apr 13, 2015 –
Workshop III Jul 1, 2015 – PG&E files Electric Distribution Resources Plan Aug 31, 2015 – Protests/comments due Sep 15, 2015 – Replies to protests due Sep 30, 2015 – Prehearing Conference Nov 6, 2015 – Joint IOU/CAISO
Workshop Nov 9-10, 2015 – Integration Capacity Analysis (ICA) Workshop Dec 3, 2015 – ICA Workshop Report filed Jan 8, 2016 – ALJ Ruling inviting pre-workshop comments to Locational Net Benefits Analysis (LNBA) methodologies and
Demonstration Project (Demo) B Jan 26, 2016 – Pre-LNBA Workshop Comments Filed Jan 27, 2016 – ACR/ALJ Ruling issuing Scope and Schedule Feb 1, 2016 – LNBA, Alternate Proposal and Related Demo B Workshop Feb 4, 2016 – Case
reassigned to ALJ Kelly Mar 2016 – Workshop on Field Demos C-F Apr 2016 – DRP/IDER workshop to discuss sourcing mechanisms in Field Demos C-F May 2016 – Comments on Field Demos C-F and alternatives Jul 2016 – Proposed Decision on
Field Demos C-F Aug 2016 – Final Decision on Field Demos C-F Sep 2016 – Begin Field Demos C-F Jan 24, 2017 – Grid Modernization Workshop Feb 9, 2017 – Decision on Field Demos C and D Feb 27, 2017 – Decision on DER Growth
Scenarion and Distribution Load Forecasting schedule Mar 4, 2017 – PG&E filed updated Demo C project Mar 8, 2017 – LNBA Working Group Final Report issued Mar 15, 2017 – ICA Working Group Final Report issued Apr 7, 2017 –
PG&E filed DER forecasting methodology and assumptions Apr 19, 2017 – Decision on scope of long–term refinements to ICA and LNBA May 15, 2017 – Working group on ICA and LNBA long–term refinements May 16, 2017 –
CPUC Staff whitepaper on Grid Modernization Jun 5, 2017 – Grid Modernization workshop Jun 15, 2017 – Decision on PG&E’s revised Field Demo D 26
Exhibit H: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Expected Timelines of Selected Regulatory Cases Regulatory Case
Docket # Key Dates 2015 Electric Distribution Resources Plan A.15-07-006, Jun 19, 2017 – PG&E filed comments on CPUC Staff’s Grid Modernization Whitepaper (DRP) R.14-08-013 Jun 22, 2017 – Decision requiring IOUs to file
assumptions and framework details on DER growth forecasting and disaggregation Jun 28, 2017 – PG&E filed assumptions and framework details on DER growth forecasting and disaggregation Jun 30, 2017 – Decision requesting IOU comments on
Energy Division staff proposal on the Distribution Investment Deferral Framework Mid Jul, 2017 – Comments on CPUC Decision approving Field Demo C Late Jul 2017 – Decision on IOU DER Growth Scenarios for distribution planning Late Jul 2017
– Comments due on Energy Division’s Distribution Investment Deferral Framework whitepaper Aug 2017 – Reply Comments on Energy Division’s Distribution Investment Deferral Framework whitepaper Aug 2017 – Reply Comments on CPUC
Decision approving Field Demo C Q3 2017 – Proposed Decision on DER Growth scenarios assumptions and framework Nov 2017 – ICA and LNBA Long–term refinements report due Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account A. 16-10-019 Oct 31, 2016
– Application filed and testimony served (CEMA) 2016 Dec 5, 2016 – Protests or responses Dec 12, 2016 – Reply to protests or responses Dec 19, 2016 – Prehearing conference Oct 3, 2017 – Intervenor testimony Oct 24, 2017
– Rebuttal testimony Nov 6-9 , 2017 – Hearings Dec 5, 2017 – Opening Briefs Dec 22, 2017 – Reply Briefs Q1, 2018 – Proposed Decision Q2, 2018 – Final Decision 2017 Integrated Resource Plan / Long Term R.16-02-007 Feb
11, 2016 – CPUC opens Order Instituting Rulemaking Procurement Plan Mar 14, 2016 – Comments due on OIR May 26, 2016 – Scoping Memo Issued Jun 14, 2016 – Workshop on E3’s Pathways Study hosted by State Agencies Jun 23,
2016 – CPUC transfers significant modeling issues from legacy LTPP proceeding to R.16-02-007 proceeding (D.16-06-042) Aug 11, 2016 – Staff Preliminary Proposal for an Integreated Resource Plan (IRP) Process Issued Aug 23, 2016 –
California Air Resources Board and CPUC Joint Workshop on ARB’s 2030 Scoping Plan Update for the Energy Sector Aug 31, 2016 – Parties submit comments on Staff’s Preliminary Proposal for an IRP Process Sep 26, 2016 – Workshop on
Staff’s Preliminary Proposal for an IRP Process Oct 5, 2016 – Technical Advisory Group formed on modeling-related activities Dec 2016 – Final Proposal for an IRP Process Issued by Staff Winter 2017 – Workshop presenting modeling
results utilizing 2016 Assumptions and Scenarios Winter 2017 – Decision adopting 2017 Assumptions and Scenarios issued Spring 2017 – Proposed decision issued on guidance for IRPs Spring 2017 – ARB finalizes 2030 Scoping Plan Update
for the Energy Sector May 2017 – Decision adopting guidance for IRPs issued Sep 2017 – Parties file Integrated Resource Plans 27
Exhibit H: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Expected Timelines of Selected Regulatory Cases Regulatory Case
Docket # Key Dates Integration of Distributed Energy R.14-10-003 Sep 22, 2015 – Decision to expand scope to include distributed energy resources (DERs) on system side of customer’s meter Resources Mar 24, 2016 – Working Group
established to focus on contracting of DER products and services Apr 4, 2016 – Assigned Commissioner Ruling (ACR) introducing a regulatory incentive proposal for DER deployment Sep 1, 2016 – Amended Scoping Memo and Ruling re-categorizing
all activities as rate-setting Sep 22, 2016 – Workshop to begin considering societal cost test for DERs, including values of avoided societal costs Dec, 2016 – Final Decision on competitive solicitation framework and regulatory incentives.
Mar 23, 2017 – PG&E and other IOUs filed opening comments on a ruling on Energy Division’s Societal Cost Test (SCT) proposal. Apr 6, 2017 – PG&E filed joint IOU reply comments on Energy Division’s SCT proposal Apr 17,
2017 – PG&E files comments on interim greenhouse gas adder for SCT Apr 24, 2017 – PG&E filed joint IOU reply comments interim greenhouse gas adder for SCT May 16, 2017 – Joint IOUs filed motion for hearing on the SCT
proposals Jun 16, 2017 – Ruling denying IOU’s request for hearings on the SCT proposals and instead establishing a Workshop Jun 22, 2017 – Proposed Decision to allow a 1–year waiver to updating the Avoided Cost Calculator Aug 8,
2017 – Workshop on Energy Division’s SCT proposal Aug 10, 2017 – Expected decision allowing a 1–year waiver to updated the Avoided Cost Calculator Diablo Canyon Retirement Joint Proposal A.16-08-006 Aug 11, 2016 –
Application Filed Application Sep 15, 2016 – Intervenor Protests Oct 6, 2016 – Prehearing Conference Oct 20, 2016 – Public Participation Hearings in San Luis Obispo Dec 8, 2016 – Workshop at CPUC Dec 28, 2016 – Community
Impact Mitigation Settlement Filed with CPUC Jan 27, 2017 – Intervenor Testimony & Comments On CIMP Settlement Mar 17, 2017 – Rebuttal Testimony & PG&E’s Response To Comments On CIMP Settlement Apr 18-28, 2017 –
Evidentiary Hearings May 23, 2017—License Renewal Project and Future Cancelled Project Settlement Agreement Filed May 26, 2017 – Opening Briefs Jun 16, 2017 – Reply Briefs Jun 22, 2017 – Openning Comments on the License
Renewal Project and Future Cancelled Project Settlement Agreement Jul 7, 2017 – Reply Comments on the License Renewal Project and Future Cancelled Project Settlement Agreement 2015 NDCTP A.16-03-006 Mar 1, 2016 – Application Filed Mar 4,
2016 – Protests Received Jun 13, 2016 – Prehearing Conference Aug 9, 2016 – Humboldt Unit 3 Tour/Technical Workshop Aug 25, 2016 – Intervenor Testimony Sep 12, 2016 – PG&E Rebuttal Testimony Sep 19-23, 2016 –
Evidentiary Hearings Oct 14, 2016 – Opening Briefs Oct 31, 2016 – Reply Briefs Apr 20, 2017 – Proposed Decision Issued May 25, 2017 – Final Decision Approved 28
Exhibit H: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Expected Timelines of Selected Regulatory Cases Regulatory Case
Docket # Key Dates Ex Parte Order Instituting Investigation and I.15-11-015 Nov 23, 2015 – OII issued Order to Show Cause Dec 3, 2015 – City of San Bruno, City of San Carlos and TURN comments on need for evidentiary hearings, issues and
schedule in the proceeding Jan 8, 2016 – ALJ Bushey orders meet and confer among parties and sets prehearing conference date Jan 27, 2016 – Parties meet to discuss issues for hearing and briefing Jan 28, 2016 – PG&E (on behalf of
parties) submits joint report on meet and confer to determine hearing issues Feb 26, 2016 – Status report on resolving hearing issues due to Commission Mar 1, 2016 – Prehearing conference Apr 18, 2016 – Joint meet and confer report
filed by parties Apr 20, 2016 – Prehearing conference May 20, 2016 – Opening briefs on inclusion of additional emails (“Category 3”) Jun 10, 2016 – Reply briefs on inclusion of Category 3 emails Jul 12, 2016 –
Revised scoping memo Sep 2016 – Status conference to set schedule for rest of proceeding Jan 2017 – Commission grants two month extension to allow for additional settlement discussions Mar 28, 2017 – PG&E, Cities of San Bruno and
San Carlos, ORA, SED, and TURN submit joint settlement agreement Jun 23, 2017 – Per an ALJ Ruling, PG&E submits supplemental briefing on joint settlement agreement Cost of Capital Petition for Modification A.12-04-018 Feb 10, 2017 –
PG&E, jointly with SCE, SDG&E, SoCalGas, TURN and ORA file a petition for modification (PFM) to defer cost of capital proceeding Apr 14, 2017 – Proposed Decision issued approving PFM in it’s entirety Apr 21, 2017 – PG&E,
jointly with SCE, SDG&E, SoCalGas, TURN and ORA sent a letter to Comissioners acnkowleding a separate Section 8 MOU Apr 24, 2017 – Commission holds a Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting (RDM) to discuss the Proposed Decision Apr 27, 2017
– Proposed Decision is withdrawn Apr 28, 2017 – Commission co-assigns a second ALJ to proceeding May 10, 2017 – New Proposed Decision is issued granting, with certain modifications, the PFM Jun 14, 2017 – Commission holds an
All-Party Meeting Jul 10, 2017 – Commission holds a Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting to discuss the new Proposed Decision Jul 12, 2017 – Revised Proposed Decision is issued granting the PFM in it’s entirety Jul 13, 2017 – Final
Decision Approved Most of these regulatory cases are discussed in PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. 29
