XML 59 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
New And Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
New And Significant Accounting Policies
 
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
      The significant accounting policies used by PG&E Corporation and the Utility are discussed in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2012 Annual Report.
 
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
 
PG&E Corporation and the Utility provide a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan for eligible employees, as well as contributory postretirement medical plans for retirees and their eligible dependents, and non-contributory postretirement life insurance plans for eligible employees and retirees.
 
The net periodic benefit costs reflected in PG&E Corporation's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
 
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other Benefits
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost for benefits earned
$
115
 
$
98
 
$
13
 
$
11
Interest cost
 
156
 
 
165
 
 
18
 
 
21
Expected return on plan assets
 
(163
 
(150
 
(20
 
(20
)
Amortization of transition obligation
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
6
Amortization of prior service cost
 
5
 
 
5
 
 
5
 
 
6
Amortization of unrecognized loss
 
28
 
 
32
 
 
2
 
 
2
Net periodic benefit cost
 
141
 
 
150
 
 
18
 
 
26
Less: transfer to regulatory account (1)
 
(56
 
(75
 
-
 
 
-
Total
$
85
 
$
75
 
$
18
 
$
26
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) The Utility recorded these amounts to a regulatory account since they are probable of recovery from customers in futures rates.
 
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other Benefits
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Service cost for benefits earned
$
230
 
$
197
 
$
26
 
$
23
Interest cost
 
312
 
 
329
 
 
37
 
 
42
Expected return on plan assets
 
(325
 
(299
 
(40
 
(39
)
Amortization of transition obligation
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
12
Amortization of prior service cost
 
10
 
 
10
 
 
11
 
 
12
Amortization of unrecognized loss
 
55
 
 
63
 
 
3
 
 
3
Net periodic benefit cost
 
282
 
 
300
 
 
37
 
 
53
Less: transfer to regulatory account (1)
 
(113
 
(150
 
-
 
 
-
Total
$
169
 
$
150
 
$
37
 
$
53
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) The Utility recorded these amounts to a regulatory account since they are probable of recovery from customers in future rates.
 
There was no material difference between PG&E Corporation and the Utility for the information disclosed above.
 
Variable Interest Entities
 
A VIE is an entity that does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or whose equity investors lack any characteristics of a controlling financial interest.  An enterprise that has a controlling financial interest in a VIE is known as the VIE's primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate the VIE.  In determining whether consolidation of a particular entity is required, PG&E Corporation and the Utility first evaluate whether the entity is a VIE.  If the entity is a VIE, PG&E Corporation and the Utility use a qualitative approach to determine if either is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
 
Some of the counterparties to the Utility's power purchase agreements are considered VIEs.  Each of these VIEs was designed to own a power plant that would generate electricity for sale to the Utility.  To determine whether the Utility was the primary beneficiary of any of these VIEs at June 30, 2013, it assessed whether it absorbs any of the VIE's expected losses or receives any portion of the VIE's expected residual returns under the terms of the power purchase agreement, analyzed the variability in the VIE's gross margin, and considered whether it had any decision-making rights associated with the activities that are most significant to the VIE's performance, such as dispatch rights and operating and maintenance activities.  The Utility's financial exposure is limited to the amount the Utility pays for delivered electricity and capacity.  The Utility did not have any decision-making rights associated with any of the activities that are most significant to the economic performance of any of these VIEs.  Since the Utility was not the primary beneficiary of any of these VIEs at June 30, 2013, it did not consolidate any of them.
 
PG&E Corporation affiliates have entered into four tax equity agreements to fund residential and commercial retail solar energy installations with two privately held companies that are considered VIEs.  Under these agreements, PG&E Corporation has made cumulative lease payments and investment contributions of $363 million to these companies in exchange for the right to receive benefits from local rebates, federal grants, and a share of the customer payments made to these companies.  At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the carrying amount of PG&E Corporation's investment in these agreements was $143 million and $166 million, respectively.  PG&E Corporation determined that it does not have control over the companies' significant economic activities, such as the design of the companies, vendor selection, construction, and the ongoing operations of the companies.  PG&E Corporation has no material remaining commitment to fund these agreements.  Since PG&E Corporation was not the primary beneficiary of any of these VIEs at June 30, 2013, it did not consolidate any of them.  
 
 
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
 
Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
 
In January 2013, the FASB issued an ASU that clarifies the scope of disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities.  The guidance requires an entity to disclose gross and net information about derivatives that are offset in the balance sheet or subject to an enforceable master-netting arrangement or similar agreement.  The ASU became effective for PG&E Corporation and the Utility on January 1, 2013.  (See Note 7 below.)
 
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
 
In February 2013, the FASB issued an ASU that requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income.  The ASU became effective for PG&E Corporation and the Utility on January 1, 2013. 
 
The changes, net of income tax, in PG&E Corporation's other comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 consist of the following:
 
 
 
Pension and
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Postretirement
 
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 Benefit Plans
 
Investments
 
Total
(in millions, net of income tax)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
Beginning balance
$
(101
$
10
 
$
(91
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
 
(19
 
16
 
 
(3
)
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Amortization of prior service cost (1)
 
6
 
 
-
 
 
6
      Amortization of actuarial gains (1)
 
17
 
 
-
 
 
17
Net current period other comprehensive income
 
4
 
 
16
 
 
20
Ending balance
$
(97)
 
$
26
 
$
(71)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) These other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement costs.  (See the “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits” table above for additional details.)
      
 
 
Pension and
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Postretirement
 
Other
 
 
 
 
 
 Benefit Plans
 
Investments
 
Total
(in millions, net of income tax)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
Beginning balance
$
(105
$
4
 
$
(101
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
 
(38
 
22
 
 
(16
)
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      Amortization of prior service cost  (1)
 
12
 
 
-
 
 
12
      Amortization of actuarial gains (1)
 
34
 
 
-
 
 
34
Net current period other comprehensive income
 
8
 
 
22
 
 
30
Ending balance
$
(97)
 
$
26
 
$
(71)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) These other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and other postretirement costs.  (See the “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits” table above for additional details.)
 
There was no material difference between PG&E Corporation and the Utility for the information disclosed above, with the exception of other investments which are held by PG&E Corporation.