XML 40 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments And Contingent Liabilities  
7 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Operating Leases

 

The Company is a party to a lease agreement for approximately 62,000 square feet of office and storage space with an entity.  The monthly lease rate is $10,671 for years 2014 and 2015 and $11,975 in year 2016.  The Company accounts for rent expense using the straight line method of accounting, deferring the difference between actual rent due and the straight line amount. The lease expires on January 1, 2017. Deferred rent payable of $38,603 and $46,254 as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, has been included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

On June 7, 2013, Pagosa signed a three year lease for $1,000 per month to house an office, pharmacy as well as inventory and is located in Lawrenceburg, IN.  On July 8, 2013, the parties agreed to extend the lease for two additional years, such that the new termination date is now June 7, 2018.  On January 14, 2014, the Company closed Pagosa Health and vacated the Lawrenceburg facility. The Company is currently in discussions with the Landlord regarding termination of the lease related to the building.   The present value of the remaining lease payments of $46,604 was expensed during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, and is reflected as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2014.

 

Future minimum payments, by year and in the aggregate, under operating leases as of September 30, 2014 are as follows:

 

For years ending December 31,   Amount  
         
2014   $ 35,013  
2015     140,052  
2016     155,700  
2017     12,000  
2018     5,000  
Total future minimum lease payments   $ 347,765  

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded aggregate rent expense of $66,820 and $210,140, respectively, and $47,921 and $141,257 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.

 

Shares Issuable

 

As of September 30, 2014, the Company held funds of $350,080 in escrow related to the second phase of a private offering.  Upon the closing of the second phase on October 23, 2014, the Company issued 2,333,333 shares of common stock and 1,166,666 warrants to purchase additional shares of common stock to the new investors and the funds were released from escrow.  See Note 10.

 

Litigation

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to lawsuits and other claims and proceedings that might arise from litigation matters or regulatory audits. Such matters are subject to uncertainty and outcomes are often not predictable with assurance. The Company’s management does not presently expect that any such matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial condition or condensed consolidated results of operations. The Company is not currently involved in any pending or threatened material litigation or other material legal proceedings nor has the Company been made aware of any penalties from regulatory audits, except as described below.

 

On February 9, 2012, two of our former stockholders, Rock Castle Holdings, LLC and Jason Smith (collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed suit against us in the Hamilton County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas, alleging that the Company had breached the terms of certain incentive options the Company granted to the Plaintiffs in connection with our now-terminated oral consulting arrangements with the Plaintiffs, by among other things, refusing Plaintiffs’ purported exercise of options to purchase 233,332 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share in December 2011.  Plaintiffs have requested that, among other things, the court require us to permit the exercise of the 233,332 options.  Plaintiffs have also provided an expert report indicating damages of $2.086 million. Also named as defendants were two individuals, Michael Peppel and Gary Singer, whom Plaintiffs claim acted as agents for us in connection with our purchase of shares of our Common Stock from Plaintiffs in September 2011.  On July 19, 2012, the Company and Mr. Peppel filed an answer and counterclaim for breach of contract, alleging that Plaintiffs breached consulting agreements with the Company and undertook a series of actions that damaged and hurt the Company.  On July 24, 2012, the Company filed a complaint against Dennis Smith for breach of contract in the Hamilton County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas, which action was consolidated with the earlier case.  Plaintiffs filed an answer in response to the counterclaim, and Dennis Smith filed an answer in response to the Company’s complaint.  On April 26, 2013, Plaintiffs dismissed Mr. Singer from the lawsuit.    On March 24, 2014, all parties filed motions for summary judgment: (i) the Company and Mr. Peppel moved for summary judgment on all claims asserted by Plaintiffs, (ii) Dennis B. Smith and Counterclaim Defendants and Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on the Company’s claims for breach of contract, and (iii) Plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment on their claim for declaratory relief that the Company breached the terms of a stock option agreement. Trial of the case is currently scheduled to begin the week of November 17, 2014.  The Company denies all of the Plaintiffs’ claims and intend to contest this matter vigorously.

 

The Company was a party to a putative stockholder derivative action that was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware on May 7, 2013 against certain directors and our chief executive officer and against us, as a nominal defendant.   On January 8, 2014, in a stipulation and order of dismissal, the action was dismissed with prejudice to plaintiff, with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs.

 

On May 15, 2013, a former consultant filed suit in Boone County, Kentucky Circuit Court alleging breach of contract and unjust enrichment for unpaid consulting fees and expenses of approximately $55,000.  On September 29, 2014, the Company executed a settlement agreement with the former consultant for $25,000 which is payable in monthly installments through March 1, 2015.