EX-99.K-1 3 c81655exv99wkv1.txt COMPARISON OF ALLOCATION EXHIBIT K-1 SCANA CORPORATION Consolidated Federal Income Tax Calendar Year 2002 (Dollars in Thousands)
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Difference between Separate Return Current Alloc. Proposed Alloc. Current Alloc. Method (Section 45C) Method Method and Proposed Alloc. Method --------------- ------------------- --------------- ------------------- SCANA $(9,161) - $(9,161) $(9,161) SCE&G 61,764 59,016 61,764 2,748 S.C. Generating Co. 4,422 4,225 4,422 197 S.C. Fuel Co. (2,873) (2,873) (2,873) - S.C. Pipeline SubConsolidated Group 186 178 186 8 SCANA Communications SubConsolidated 125,134 119,566 125,134 5,568 Group SCANA Petroleum (938) (938) (938) - SCANA Development 72 68 72 3 SCANA EM SubConsolidated Group 2,044 1,953 2,044 91 Primesouth SubConsolidated Group 4,222 4,034 4,222 188 PSNC SubConsolidated Group 7,273 6,950 7,273 324 Service Care 760 726 760 34 SCANA Resources (85) (85) (85) - SCG Pipeline - - - - SCANA Services Co. (509) (509) (509) - Total $192,310 $192,310 $192,310 -
NOTE 1: Tax allocations not performed below subconsolidated group levels. NOTE 2: The effect on 2002 of the proposed allocation method would have resulted in no allocation of tax benefits from SCANA to its subsidiaries. The tax benefit of $9.0 million arising from the interest expense on the Acquisition Debt discussed previously would eliminate SCANA's tax expense reflected above. 1