XML 53 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
FAIR VALUE [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE
9. FAIR VALUE
Fair value measurement is determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability in an exchange. The definition of fair value includes the exchange price which is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell an asset or transfer a liability in the principal market for the asset or liability. Market participant assumptions include assumptions about risk, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value and/or the risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique, as well as the effect of credit risk on the fair value of liabilities. The Company uses three levels of the fair value inputs to measure assets, as described below.
 
Basis of Fair Value Measurement:

Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.

Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: (i) quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, (ii) quoted prices for identical investments traded in non-active markets (i.e., dealer or broker markets) and (iii) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or inputs derived from or corroborated by market data for substantially the full term of the investment.

Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity, and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include most U.S. Treasury securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company does not adjust the quoted price for such instruments.

The types of instruments valued based on quoted prices in markets that are not active, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency include U.S. Government agency securities, state and municipal obligations, MBS, CMOs and corporate bonds. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The types of instruments valued based on significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability are generally classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments (in thousands).

  
Level in
  
March 31, 2015
  
December 31, 2014
 
  
Fair Value
Hierarchy
  
Carrying
Amount
  
Fair
Value
  
Carrying
Amount
  
Fair
Value
 
           
Financial Assets:
          
Cash and due from banks
 
Level 1
  
$
59,024
  
$
59,024
  
$
54,516
  
$
54,516
 
Federal funds sold
 
Level 2
   
-
   
-
   
1,000
   
1,000
 
Interest-bearing time deposits in other banks
 
Level 2
   
10,000
   
10,009
   
10,000
   
10,017
 
Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank and other stock
 
N/A
  
6,800
   
N/A
 
  
8,600
   
N/A
 
Investment securities held to maturity
 
Level 2
   
62,191
   
65,414
   
62,270
   
64,796
 
Investment securities available for sale
 
Level 2
   
291,557
   
291,557
   
298,670
   
298,670
 
Loans held for sale
 
Level 2
   
2,836
   
2,836
   
26,495
   
26,495
 
Loans, net of allowance
 
Level 2, 3 (1)
   
1,362,835
   
1,364,305
   
1,336,227
   
1,329,041
 
Accrued interest and loan fees receivable
 
Level 2
   
6,482
   
6,482
   
5,676
   
5,676
 
                     
Financial Liabilities:
                    
Non-maturity deposits
 
Level 2
   
1,368,484
   
1,368,484
   
1,337,301
   
1,337,301
 
Time deposits
 
Level 2
   
223,188
   
223,570
   
218,759
   
219,089
 
Borrowings
 
Level 2
   
90,000
   
90,003
   
130,000
   
130,004
 
Accrued interest payable
 
Level 2
   
131
   
131
   
136
   
136
 
Derivatives
 
Level 3
   
752
   
752
   
752
   
752
 

(1)Impaired loans are generally classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time and may be based on judgments regarding losses expected in the future, risk, and other factors that are subjective in nature. The methods and assumptions used to produce the fair value estimates follow.
 
For securities held to maturity and securities available for sale, the fair value equals quoted market price if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using a quoted market price for similar securities. For cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, accrued interest and loan fees receivable, non-maturity deposits and accrued interest payable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. Determining the fair value of Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank and other stock is not practicable due to restrictions placed on its transferability. Interest-bearing time deposits in other banks, time deposits and borrowings are valued using a replacement cost of funds approach.

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar characteristics. The fair value of performing loans was calculated by discounting projected cash flows through their estimated maturity using market discount rates that reflect the general credit and interest rate characteristics of the loan category. The maturity horizon is based on the Bank’s history of repayments for each type of loan and an estimate of the effect of current economic conditions. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discount rates are made using available market information and specific borrower information.

Loans identified as impaired are measured using one of three methods: the fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell, the present value of expected future cash flows or the loan’s observable market price. Those measured using the fair value of collateral or the loan’s observable market price are recorded at fair value. For each period presented, no impaired loans were measured using the loan’s observable market price. If an impaired loan has had a charge-off or if the fair value of the collateral is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the Company establishes a specific reserve and reports the loan as non-recurring Level 3. The fair value of collateral of impaired loans is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

For the periods presented, loans held for sale were performing and carried at cost. The carrying cost is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to their short-term nature.

During 2013, the Company entered into derivative swap contracts with the purchaser of its Visa Class B shares. The fair value of these derivatives is measured using an internal model that includes the use of probability weighted scenarios for estimates of Visa’s aggregate exposure to the litigation matters, with consideration of amounts funded by Visa into its escrow account for this litigation. At March 31, 2015, the Company estimates a fair value for these derivatives at approximately 10% of the net proceeds from the Company’s sale of the related Visa Class B shares. Since this estimation process requires application of judgment in developing significant unobservable inputs used to determine the possible outcomes and the probability weighting assigned to each scenario, these derivatives have been classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy. (See also Note 3. Investment Securities contained herein.)

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated by either discounting cash flows or using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the current creditworthiness of the counter-parties. The estimated fair value of written financial guarantees and letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements. The fees charged for the commitments were not material in amount.

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are as follows (in thousands):

Assets:
 
March 31, 2015
  
Fair Value
Measurements Using
Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Impaired loans
 
$
3,338
  
$
3,338
 
Total
 
$
3,338
  
$
3,338
 

Assets:
 
December 31, 2014
  
Fair Value
Measurements Using
Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Impaired loans
 
$
3,333
  
$
3,333
 
Total
 
$
3,333
  
$
3,333
 
 
The Company had no liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

The following presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis (dollars in thousands):

  
Fair Value at
     
Assets:
 
March 31,
2015
  
December 31,
2014
 
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable
Inputs
 
Discount
 
Impaired loans:
        
         
Commercial and industrial
 
$
31
  
$
40
 
Third party appraisal and/or internal evaluation
Discount to appraised value (1); estimated selling costs
 
5.6% to 50%
 
             
Residential mortgages
  
3,107
   
3,097
 
Third party appraisal
Discount to appraised value
 
25%
               
Home equity
  
104
   
98
 
Third party appraisal
Discount to appraised value
 
25%
               
Consumer
  
96
   
98
 
Third party appraisal
Discount to appraised value
 
25%
Total
 
$
3,338
  
$
3,333
       

(1)The Company also makes adjustments to the appraised value based upon evaluation of corporate assets, such as inventory and accounts receivable, and various other information, such as market conditions and other factors. Higher discounts may be applied to certain assets, such as inventory and accounts receivable.

The following presents fair value measurements on a recurring basis at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

    
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Assets:
 
March 31, 2015
  
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
U.S. Government agency securities
 
$
38,709
  
$
38,709
  
$
-
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  
133,924
   
133,924
   
-
 
Collateralized mortgage obligations
  
21,391
   
21,391
   
-
 
Mortgage-backed securities
  
91,084
   
91,084
   
-
 
Corporate bonds
  
6,449
   
6,449
   
-
 
Total
 
$
291,557
  
$
291,557
  
$
-
 
             
Liabilities:
            
Derivatives
  
752
  
$
-
  
$
752
 
Total
 
$
752
  
$
-
  
$
752
 
 
    
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Assets:
 
December 31, 2014
  
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
U.S. Government agency securities
 
$
41,577
  
$
41,577
  
$
-
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  
137,769
   
137,769
   
-
 
Collateralized mortgage obligations
  
21,997
   
21,997
   
-
 
Mortgage-backed securities
  
90,919
   
90,919
   
-
 
Corporate bonds
  
6,408
   
6,408
   
-
 
Total
 
$
298,670
  
$
298,670
  
$
-
 
             
Liabilities:
            
Derivatives
  
752
  
$
-
  
$
752
 
Total
 
$
752
  
$
-
  
$
752
 
 
Reconciliations for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) follow (in thousands).

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
     
  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
2015
  
2014
 
  
Liabilities
Derivatives
  
Liabilities
Derivatives
 
Balance, January 1
 
$
752
  
$
932
 
Net change
  
-
   
-
 
Balance, March 31
 
$
752
  
$
932