XML 36 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 29, 2019
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting Policy

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Arrow Electronics, Inc. (the “company”) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and results of operations at and for the periods presented.  The consolidated results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

These consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information or notes necessary for a complete presentation and, accordingly, should be read in conjunction with the company’s audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Fiscal Period Policy
The company operates on a quarterly calendar that closes on the Saturday closest to the end of the calendar quarter.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Policy

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. The company tests goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually as of the first day of the fourth quarter, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist.

During the second quarter of 2019, as a result of the company’s downward revision of forecasted future earnings previously disclosed in Item 2.02 Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2019 and the decision to wind down the company’s personal computer and mobility asset disposition business, the company determined that it was more likely than not that an impairment may exist within the Americas components and Asia-Pacific components reporting units. The company evaluated its other four reporting units and concluded an interim impairment analysis was not required based on the results of those reporting units and historical levels of headroom in each of those reporting units. The interim goodwill impairment analysis related to the Americas components reporting
unit resulted in partial goodwill impairment charge of $509,000 ($457,806 net of tax) with $601,336 of goodwill remaining in the reporting unit and full impairment of $61,175 ($61,175 net of tax) within the Asia-Pacific reporting unit.
The company estimated the fair value of these reporting units using the income approach. For the purposes of the income approach, fair value was determined based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at an appropriate risk adjusted rate. The fair value conclusion as of June 29, 2019 for the Americas components reporting unit is highly sensitive to changes in the assumptions used in the income approach which include forecasted revenues, gross profit margins, operating income margins, working capital cash flow, forecasted capital expenditures, perpetual growth rates, and long-term discount rates, among others, all of which require significant judgments by management. As the Americas components reporting unit has 0% excess fair value over the carrying value of the reporting unit, the remaining $601,336 of goodwill is susceptible to future period impairments. For example, a 100 basis point decrease in forecasted gross profit margin could result in a full impairment of the remaining $601,336 of goodwill, absent other inputs improving. The company has used recent historical performance, current forecasted financial information, and broad-based industry and economic statistics as a basis to estimate the key assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow model. These key assumptions are inherently uncertain and require a high degree of estimation and judgment based on an evaluation of historical performance, current industry and global economic and geo-political conditions, and the timing and success of the implementation of current strategic initiatives.
Receivables, Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Policy [Policy Text Block] The company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments.  The allowances for doubtful accounts are determined using a combination of factors, including the length of time the receivables are outstanding, the current business environment, and historical experience. The company also has notes receivables with certain customers, which are included in “Accounts receivable, net” in the company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Fair Value of Debt Policy
The carrying amount of the company’s short-term borrowings in various countries, revolving credit facility, asset securitization program, commercial paper, and other obligations approximate their fair value.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Policy
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  The company utilizes a fair value hierarchy, which maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  The fair value hierarchy has three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2
Quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
Leases of Lessee Disclosure
The company determines if a contract contains a lease at inception based on whether it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset. Substantially all of the company’s leases are classified as operating leases. The company has determined that operating lease right-of-use assets will be recorded to “Other assets” and lease liabilities will be recorded to “Other liabilities” and “Accrued expenses” in the consolidated balance sheets. Lease expense will be recorded to “Selling, general, and administrative expenses” in the consolidated statements of operations. Operating lease payments will be recorded to “Operating cash flows” in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments over the lease term starting on the commencement date. The company generally is not able to determine the rate implicit in its leases and, as such, will apply an incremental borrowing rate based on the company’s cost of borrowing for the relevant terms of each lease. Lease expense for minimum lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease terms may include an option to extend or terminate a lease if it is reasonably certain that the company will exercise such options. The company has elected the practical expedient to not separate lease components from non-lease components, and also has elected not to record a right-of-use asset or lease liability for leases which, at inception, have a term of twelve months or less. Variable lease payments are recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred.