Organization and Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2015

New Accounting Pronouncements or Change in Accounting Principle [Line Items]

Use of Estimates

In preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of Assets and Liabilities, as well as contingent Assets and Liabilities as of the dates of the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Revenue and Expenses for the years then ended. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions.

Stock Based Compensation

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for awards of stock options and restricted stock in accordance with ASC 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation. ASC 718-10 requires that compensation cost for all stock awards be calculated and amortized over the service period (generally equal to the vesting period). The compensation cost for stock option grants is determined using option pricing models, intended to estimate the fair value of the awards at the grant date less estimated forfeitures. The compensation expense for restricted stock is recognized based on the fair value of the restricted stock awards less estimated forfeitures. The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the fair value of the Company’s stock on the grant date. Compensation costs of $275,877 and $453,678 have been recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively and $339,099 and $562,896 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

On February 2, 2015, the Company awarded to Samuel A. Landy a restricted stock award of 25,000 shares in accordance with his employment agreement. The grant date fair value of this restricted stock grant was $243,250. This grant vests ratably over 5 years.

On June 24, 2015, the Company granted options to purchase 425,000 shares of common stock to twenty-four participants in the Plan, including an option to purchase 100,000 shares to Eugene W. Landy. The exercise price is $9.82 and the expiration date is June 24, 2023. The grant date fair value of these options amounted to $393,265. These grants vest over 1 year. Compensation costs for grants issued to a participant who is of retirement age were recognized at the time of the grant.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:

	2015	2014

Dividend yield	7.37%	7.14%
Expected volatility	27.17%	27.12%
Risk-free interest rate	2.12%	2.23%
Expected lives	8	8
Estimated forfeitures	-0-	-0-

The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $0.93 and $0.98, respectively.

As of June 30, 2015, there were options outstanding to purchase 1,620,000 shares. There were 1,832,000 shares available for grant under the 2013 Stock Option and Stock Award Plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, options to five participants to purchase a total of 20,000 shares were exercised. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, options to two participants to purchase a total of 86,000 shares expired or forfeited. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of June 30, 2015 was $394,443. As of June 30, 2014, there were options outstanding to purchase 1,355,000 shares and 2,254,000 shares were available for grant under the Company’s 2013 Stock Option and Stock Award Plan.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to financial market risks, including interest rate risk on its variable rate debt. The Company attempts to limit these risks by following established risk management policies, procedures and strategies, including the use of derivative financial instruments. The Company's primary strategy in entering into derivative contracts is to minimize the variability that changes in interest rates could have on its future cash flows. The Company generally employs derivative instruments that effectively convert a portion of its variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The Company does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company had entered into various interest rate swap agreements that had the effect of fixing interest rates relative to specific mortgage loans.

During 2012, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements that have the effect of fixing interest rates relative to specific mortgage loans as follows:

Mortgage	Due Date	Mortgage Interest Rate	Effective Fixed Rate	Balance 6/30/15

Allentown/Clinton	2/1/2017	LIBOR + 3.25%	4.39%	$10,329,367
Various – 11 properties	8/1/2017	LIBOR + 3.00%	3.89%	$11,797,017

The Company's interest rate swap agreements are based upon 30-day LIBOR. The re-pricing and scheduled maturity dates, payment dates, index and the notional amounts of the interest rate swap agreements coincide with those of the underlying mortgage. The interest rate swap agreements are net settled monthly. The Company has designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges and has recorded the fair value on the balance sheet in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (See Note 7 for information on the determination of fair value). The effective portion of the gain or loss on these hedges will be reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. To the extent that the hedging relationships are not effective or do not qualify as cash flow hedges, the ineffective portion is recorded in Interest Expense. Hedges that received designated hedge accounting treatment are evaluated for effectiveness at the time that they are designated as well as through the hedging period. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company has determined that these interest rate swap agreements are highly effective as cash flow hedges. As a result, the fair value of these derivatives of $(111,805) and $(39,685), respectively, was recorded as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, with the corresponding liability included in Accrued Liabilities and Deposits.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the financial statements for the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the statement presentation for the current periods.

ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" as a new Topic, Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 606 [Member]

New Accounting Pronouncements or Change in Accounting Principle [Line Items]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” as a new Topic, Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 606. The objective of ASU 2014-09 is to establish a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying the new standard, companies will perform a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. ASU 2014-09 applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB ASC. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (including interim reporting periods within those periods). Early adoption is permitted to the original effective date of December 15, 2016 (including interim reporting periods within those periods). The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements and the method of adoption.

ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" [Member]

New Accounting Pronouncements or Change in Accounting Principle [Line Items]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs," ("ASU 2015-03"). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory [Member]

New Accounting Pronouncements or Change in Accounting Principle [Line Items]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU 2015-11 applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost. An entity should measure inventory within the scope of ASU 2015-11 at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonable predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The amendments in ASU 2015-11 more closely align the measurement of inventory in US GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). ASU 2015-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of impact this standard may have on the consolidated financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.