Item 1: Report to Shareholders

 Small-Cap Stock Fund December 31, 2005

The views and opinions in this report were current as of December 31, 2005. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the fund’s future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.

REPORTS ON THE WEB

Sign up for our E-mail Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.

Fellow Shareholders

Small-cap stocks rebounded from a weak first half to generate modest gains for the year ended December 31, 2005. Equities generally sagged through April amid concerns about inflation and rising short-term interest rates. Despite soaring energy costs, most major indexes gradually worked their way higher as the year progressed—supported by firm economic and corporate earnings growth and merger activity—and finished near their highest levels of the year amid hopes that the Federal Reserve would soon stop raising short-term rates. After six straight years of outperformance, the small-cap Russell 2000 Index lagged the large-cap S&P 500 by a narrow margin.

We are pleased to report that your fund returned 9.54% during the second half of 2005 and 8.44% for the year, significantly outperforming the unmanaged Russell 2000 Index and its Lipper peer group for both periods. (Returns for Advisor Class shares were slightly lower, reflecting their higher expenses.) Effective stock selection was the primary driver of the fund’s strong relative performance, but sector weightings also proved advantageous.

ENVIRONMENT

Although our Small-Cap Stock Fund continued to outperform the S&P 500, and some small-cap indices—most notably the S&P SmallCap 600—continued their winning ways, the Russell 2000, the “gold standard” of small-cap indices, finally underperformed. In the last several shareholder letters, we wrote that we thought large-caps could outperform small-caps and that growth would begin to outperform value, and we may finally have seen this shift. As the table on page 2 shows, the relative performance of small-cap growth stocks improved notably in the second half of the year.

A premium went to active managers in the most recent six months as the average small-cap manager, as defined by the Lipper Small-Cap Core Funds Index, returned 7.73%, handily topping the Russell 2000’s return. During this second-half rally, growth beat value, larger small-caps outperformed, and lower-quality names lagged. As the market transitions to larger-cap outperformance, the smallest of small-caps tend to underperform. Over the last 12 months, stocks under $250 million in market capitalization were actually down 9.2%. On the quality side, stocks in the lowest quintile for return on equity (ROE) also lost money in 2005.

INVESTMENT REVIEW

Though stock selection primarily drove our relative performance advantage, sector weightings did play a significant role in both the index and our small-cap portfolio. Four sectors had strong absolute returns in the second half. Energy, industrials and business services, information technology, and materials were strong, with energy rising more than 20% in the Russell 2000 Index, and we were overweight in all these sectors. On the negative side, consumer discretionary, consumer staples, and utilities all declined in the second half. Fortunately, we were underweight these poorer-performing sectors, and moreover, we had positive returns in every category.

We added the most value in the consumer discretionary sector, where our holdings significantly outperformed the index. Our leading winner here, AnnTaylor Stores, rose sharply as comparable-store sales began to improve. This specialty retailer of women’s apparel surged in the second half as business improved at both its Loft and Ann Taylor stores. The company also announced the elevation of Kay Krill, the highly successful head of its high-performance Loft division, to chief executive officer. In addition, the firm brought in another strong executive, Laura Weil from American Eagle Outfitters, as chief operating officer. We are excited about this management change and believe AnnTaylor can realize a significant increase in shareholder value. Another solid performer in the segment was children’s clothing retailer Gymboree, which has reported strong recent sales gains. (Please see the portfolio of investments for a complete listing of the fund’s holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)

Other top performers in the sector included Warnaco, which rose on the heels of its decision to acquire the license rights to Calvin Klein jeans in Europe and Asia. J. Jill performed strongly after Liz Claiborne made an unsolicited bid for the shares at a 40% premium to its then-current share price.

The health care sector was a source of significant added value for us in 2005. Returns in the second half were paced by Advanced Neuromodulation Systems after the manufacturer of spinal stimulation devices for pain management agreed to be acquired by St. Jude Medical. Biotech company Vertex Pharmaceuticals rose strongly as the FDA granted fast-track status to its hepatitis C treatment following data that highlighted strong potency versus existing treatments. One of our largest holdings, Sunrise Senior Living, continued its strong performance in the second half. Amylin Pharmaceuticals surged as the firm now has two approved diabetes treatments in Symlin and Byetta.

In addition, we also realized good value in the financials sector as strong performance by Piper Jaffray, Ohio Casualty, Arden Realty, and Affiliated Managers Group enabled our holdings to appreciate over 6% versus 2.7% for the index’s sector holdings. Piper Jaffray rebounded from the poor fixed-income trading results reported earlier in 2005. Piper benefited from strong merger and acquisition activity and capital markets results, coupled with cost reductions, which led to better-than-expected earnings. The second anniversary of its spin-off from U.S. Bancorp was undoubtedly also on investors’ minds. For a spin-off to remain tax-free, the firm must stay independent for two years. As this anniversary hit late in the year, perhaps a bit of takeover speculation also came into play. Ohio Casualty rose as the firm is now well along on its multiyear turnaround. CEO Dan Carmichael and his team have done an excellent job, and the shares, which used to trade below book value, are now beginning to approach the industry’s average premium. The company is well positioned and does not write a significant amount of wind coverage in the Gulf, which may have attracted a few hurricane-weary insurance investors. Arden Realty posted a solid gain after agreeing to be acquired by a division of General Electric. Finally, money manager Affiliated Managers rose as its acquisition strategy is driving significantly faster growth than the industry average, yet it still sells at a discount to the typical money management firm.

Energy was a big story in 2005 with the dramatic increase in oil and gas prices following Hurricane Katrina. We remain overweighted, and our holdings outperformed the sector, rising 29%, led by strong returns by Grant Prideco. The company reported excellent quarterly results in October as volume and pricing increases generated strong earnings gains. This drill pipe manufacturer noted its order backlog was up 74%. CEO Mike McShane’s disciplined strategy of focusing on both revenues and margin enhancement is paying great dividends.

In general, the utilities sector detracted from the Russell 2000, but our holdings actually rose nearly 5%. Two notable gainers included Southwest Gas and Pike Electric. Natural gas provider Southwest Gas, which reported better-than-expected earnings, is blessed with an excellent high-growth service territory, including Las Vegas, one of the fastest-growing cities in the country. While this will require significant investment by the company, we believe it should also help drive industry-leading growth.

Another relatively recent purchase, Pike Electric, also had a solid second half. Pike is the nation’s second-largest provider of outsourced electric transmission and distribution construction and maintenance services. The firm has a heavy presence in the Gulf, thus it is well positioned to benefit from the work generated by last year’s active hurricane season.

Other strong contributors included Airgas, which gained on strong same-store revenue growth. Airgas is a good indicator of the industrial economy, and the firm is currently prospering. Payment processing firm Global Payments continues to beat expectations, and the shares rose strongly in the back half of 2005. Finally, EGL Logistics recovered its earlier losses and surged in the second half as strong demand and cost reduction programs are driving solid results.

Our materials holdings detracted relative to the index, rising 11.5% versus the Russell components’ 14.7% return. Our largest detractor in the sector, Minerals Technologies, fell after the firm cut estimates for 2005 in September. The company noted that surging energy costs, lowered steel production, and start-up expenses for two plants in China conspired to cut earnings. Specialty materials company Ferro declined modestly as the firm is still working to restate financial results; it also recently reported the death of its longtime chairman.

Other significant detractors included Scholastic, Martek Biosciences, Jarden, and Hot Topic. Scholastic declined on disappointing results. In December, Scholastic noted weakness in its book club business and relatively ho-hum results in its trade business—excluding the Harry Potter series. This is a very strong franchise company, and we remain hopeful it can realize improved shareholder value through either better execution or another Potter- or Goosebumps-type success. Martek fell sharply after reporting disappointing results and failing to give guidance. Martek has seen a delay in large food companies adopting its DHA-based food additives, and the shares have languished. DHA, an omega-3 fatty acid, shows great promise in both brain development and function, and we believe Martek will be able to replicate its infant formula success in a broader market. Jarden declined in the second half of 2005 as investors seemed to fret that rising raw material prices and lackluster consumer demand could crimp fourth-quarter growth. Finally, Hot Topic fell after the firm preannounced quarterly results at the low end of guidance. Fall results have remained poor as the firm hasn’t been positioned to benefit from the denim and “preppy-look” fashions currently driving the teen apparel market.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

Our fund has been underweight the financials sector for the past several years, and our largest underweight remains real estate investment trusts (REITs). We believe that a hot real estate market and yield-hungry investors have driven prices to an unsustainable level. We remain cautious, and we’ve been extremely selective for the past several years. We did, however, find an interesting investment opportunity in PS Business Parks, a nationwide flexible and industrial property REIT with a portfolio largely concentrated in markets that we feel show healthy supply/demand dynamics. We think the shares trade at an attractive valuation relative to its peers. Occupancy and same-store net operating income have shown improvement over the past several quarters, and PS is well positioned, with a balance sheet that could offer several opportunities to put cash to good use.

We’ve also been underweight the mortgage and thrift industry. Investors typically avoid thrifts while the Fed is raising interest rates. We are moving closer to the point where the Fed will stop raising rates, and as it does, thrifts typically begin to perform better. With this in mind, we have found an excellent opportunity in New Alliance Bancshares, a converted mutual thrift savings institution based in Connecticut. New management has been taking steps to grow the deposit franchise and improve profitability, including implementing a significant share repurchase program in the second half of 2005. We think the stock trades at an attractive valuation relative to deposits, and we believe there is room for earnings improvement over time.

Mergers and acquisitions picked up significantly in the portfolio during 2005. One of our largest bank investments, Amegy Bancorp—which long-term shareholders will remember as the fast-growing Houston bank, Southwest Bank of Texas—agreed to be acquired by Zions Bank. We love the Texas market and were fortunate to find an intriguing investment in Prosperity Bancshares, which focuses on growing core deposits in some of Texas’s fastest-growing markets, such as Dallas and Houston. In fact, the population growth rate within the bank’s footprint is projected to be about twice the national average over the next five years. To mitigate the risk associated with this growth, Prosperity maintains a culture that is focused on asset quality, which results in a significantly lower percentage of nonperforming assets compared with peers. Prosperity is also well positioned to ease the margin pressure affecting the industry as it reduces its oversized securities portfolio to fund high-yielding loans.

Conventional wisdom also holds that investors should avoid consumer stocks as the Fed completes its rate hikes. However, such a herd mentality can result in stocks being unnecessarily oversold. We think two such stocks were Petco and THQ. We like the pet retailing business and believe Petco’s current execution problems are fixable. It is extensively remodeling its stores—which is disrupting same-store sales, of course—but this, too, shall pass, and it seems shortsighted to overly penalize the stock. We believe the shares are cheap and note that insiders are currently buying.

One of the hottest gifts this past Christmas was the Microsoft Xbox 360, which was in short supply, and many gamers are waiting to purchase either the Xbox 360 or the new Sony PlayStation 3 expected out by next fall. When the gaming market goes through a transition like this, interesting investment opportunities sometimes arise. Gamers often defer new game purchases while waiting for the new technology, and software gaming companies face slowing revenues while simultaneously raising expense levels to develop the next generation of games. Margins suffer and earnings fall, creating buying opportunities. We’ve seen and profited from this cycle in the past, and we believe THQ can benefit from a new video game hardware cycle. It is a game developer and publisher that has an opportunity to expand its operating margin and grow with the expansion of consoles in households around the world. THQ has strong kids-based licenses and an opportunity to build offerings to older demographics through a much-expanded internal development staff.

In the industrials sector, the market gave us an opportunity to invest in two attractive companies at discounted prices, ESCO Electronics and Moog. ESCO produces automated meter reading equipment, among other things. This unique technology allows a utility to send signals over the electric grid to ping each individual meter and receive live information. This can be used to read meters and monitor usage by time of day, allowing sophisticated pricing programs and the monitoring of power outages. This exciting technology has been adopted by PP&L, Texas Utilities, and more recently, PG&E. The PG&E deployment appears to be a bit behind Wall Street’s timeline, and the shares of ESCO fell to bargain prices. Similarly, Moog, which makes aerospace components such as motion-control actuators, declined in the second half as investors fretted that Boeing’s strike could hurt business. Moog is a quality company with strong free cash flow generation and a dominant market position in niche areas. We believe earnings will accelerate in 2007 and find the stock a great value today.

Major Sales

Four of our top 10 sales in the second half were related to mergers and acquisitions. Indeed, during 2005 more than 18 of our holdings were acquired or received takeover offers. American Tower agreed to acquire SpectraSite, a wireless tower operator, and we eliminated American Tower after the merger. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems received an attractive bid from St. Jude Medical. As noted earlier, Amegy Bancorp was acquired by Zions Bank. Finally, our HMO holding, New York Blue Cross and Blue Shield provider WellChoice, agreed to be acquired by WellPoint in a stock swap. We eliminated WellPoint after the deal.

Ordinarily, we are low-turnover, patient investors, so it is highly unusual for us to buy and sell a stock within the same six-month period. Consequently, an explanation is in order for First Marblehead, a fast-growing third-party provider of student loans. When we bought the stock, we believed it was very inexpensive relative to its growth prospects and intrinsic value. We eliminated the shares after First Marblehead’s largest customer, J.P. Morgan Chase, acquired a principal competitor of the firm. Thus, with huge customer concentration risk and the possibility that Morgan could someday become a competitor, we decided to pocket a nice profit and move on to better investment possibilities.

F5 Networks, a fast-growing provider of networking technology, hit a home run with its most recent new product, BIG-IP. This strong product cycle drove the shares to what we believed to be an unsustainable valuation level, so we happily exited our position. One idea that did not work out as well was Woodhead Industries, an electronics manufacturer that failed to generate the earnings we expected in this robust economy. Three years into a strong upturn, it is clear to us that Woodhead is no longer the specialty niche company in which we first invested in the late 1990s. After assessing recent underwhelming results, we eliminated the position.

OUTLOOK

During the past year, we witnessed a change in performance leadership, as we predicted a year ago. After six consecutive years of small-caps beating large-caps, the bigger stocks finally trumped their smaller counterparts. At the same time, it appears the long-awaited shift from value to growth is finally taking place.

As we have noted in our last several shareholder letters, small-caps are no longer offering the relative bargain prices we saw earlier in the cycle. We also previously noted that we believed it was possible to witness a late-cycle surge in emerging growth shares, and this certainly occurred in the second half. What remains to be seen is whether small growth can outperform large-caps in the months ahead.

In general, we believe large will outperform small, but we don’t believe the level of small-cap underperformance will be severe as long as the markets move higher. However, if the market moves into a corrective phase, small-caps are likely to underperform large, perhaps by a significant margin. At this writing, we don’t believe we are on the verge of a bear market. Nevertheless, we continue to recommend that investors who are overweight in small-caps consider reducing holdings and that cautious investors underweight the asset class.

We remain convinced that our durable blend of growth and value will continue to add value versus the Russell 2000. As always, we thank you for your continued support.

Respectfully submitted,

Greg A. McCrickard
President of the fund and chairman of its Investment Advisory Committee

January 18, 2006

The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee members in developing and executing the fund’s investment program.

RISKS OF STOCK INVESTING

As with all stock and bond mutual funds, the fund’s share price can fall because of weakness in the stock or bond markets, a particular industry, or specific holdings. The financial markets can decline for many reasons, including adverse political or economic developments, changes in investor psychology, or heavy institutional selling. The prospects for an industry or company may deteriorate because of a variety of factors, including disappointing earnings or changes in the competitive environment. In addition, the investment manager’s assessment of companies held in a fund may prove incorrect, resulting in losses or poor performance even in rising markets. Investing in small companies involves greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies. Stocks of small companies are subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than larger-company stocks. Small companies often have limited product lines, markets, or financial resources, and their managements may lack depth and experience. Such companies seldom pay significant dividends that could cushion returns in a falling market.

GLOSSARY

Lipper indexes: Fund benchmarks that consist of a small number of the largest mutual funds in a particular category as tracked by Lipper Inc.

Market capitalization: The total value of a company’s publicly traded shares.

Price/earnings ratio (P/E): A valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by its current or projected (forward) earnings per share. This ratio gives investors an idea of how much they are paying for current or future earnings power.

Price/sales ratio: A valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by its current or projected (forward) sales (or revenues) per share.

Price/book value ratio: A valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by a company’s book value per share. Book value is the net worth, or liquidating value, of a business and is calculated by subtracting all liabilities, including debt and preferred stocks, from total assets, and dividing by the number of shares of common stock outstanding.

Russell 2000 Index: Consists of the smallest 2,000 companies in the Russell 3000 Index. Performance is reported on a total-return basis.

Russell 2000 Value Index: A market-weighted total return index that measures the performance of companies within the Russell 2000 Index having lower price/book value ratios and lower forecasted growth rates.

Russell 2000 Growth Index: A market-weighted total return index that measures the performance of companies within the Russell 2000 Index having higher price/book value ratios and higher forecasted growth rates.

S&P 500 Stock Index: An unmanaged index that tracks the stocks of 500 primarily large-cap U.S. companies.

S&P SmallCap 600 Stock Index: An unmanaged index that tracks the stocks of 600 small-cap U.S. stocks.

GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.

AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns had been earned at a constant rate.

FUND EXPENSE EXAMPLE 

As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs such as redemption fees or sales loads and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.

Please note that the fund has two share classes: The original share class (“investor class”) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee. Advisor Class shares are offered only through unaffiliated brokers and other financial intermediaries and charge a 0.25% 12b-1 fee. Each share class is presented separately in the table.

Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (“Actual”) provides information about actual account values and expenses based on the fund’s actual returns. You may use the information in this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (“Hypothetical”) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

Note: T. Rowe Price charges an annual small-account maintenance fee of $10, generally for accounts with less than $2,000 ($500 for UGMA/UTMA). The fee is waived for any investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $25,000 or more, accounts employing automatic investing, and IRAs and other retirement plan accounts that utilize a prototype plan sponsored by T. Rowe Price (although a separate custodial or administrative fee may apply to such accounts). This fee is not included in the accompanying table. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.

You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund, Inc. (the fund) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The fund seeks to provide long-term capital growth by investing primarily in stocks of small companies. The fund has two classes of shares: the Small-Cap Stock Fund original share class, referred to in this report as the Investor Class, offered since June 1, 1956, and Small-Cap Stock Fund—Advisor Class (Advisor Class), offered since March 31, 2000. Advisor Class shares are sold only through unaffiliated brokers and other unaffiliated financial intermediaries that are compensated by the class for distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative services under a Board-approved Rule 12b-1 plan. Each class has exclusive voting rights on matters related solely to that class, separate voting rights on matters that relate to both classes, and, in all other respects, the same rights and obligations as the other class.

The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates made by fund management. Fund management believes that estimates and security valuations are appropriate; however actual results may differ from those estimates, and the security valuations reflected in the financial statements may differ from the value the fund ultimately realizes upon sale of the securities.

Valuation The fund values its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day that the NYSE is open for business. Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made, except for OTC Bulletin Board securities, which are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale price for international securities.

Debt securities with original maturities of less than one year are valued at amortized cost in local currency, which approximates fair value when combined with accrued interest.

Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing net asset value per share on the day of valuation. Financial futures contracts are valued at closing settlement prices.

Other investments, including restricted securities, and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the fund’s Board of Directors.

Most foreign markets close before the close of trading on the NYSE. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment, materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, which in turn will affect the fund’s share price, the fund will adjust the previous closing prices to reflect the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE, as determined in good faith by the T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the fund’s Board of Directors. A fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. In deciding whether to make fair value adjustments, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with closing market prices and information used for adjusting those prices. The fund cannot predict when and how often it will use closing prices and when it will adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its fair value process, the fund routinely compares closing market prices, the next day’s opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices.

Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.

Class Accounting The Advisor Class pays distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative expenses in the form of Rule 12b-1 fees, in an amount not exceeding 0.25% of the class’s average daily net assets. Shareholder servicing, prospectus, and shareholder report expenses incurred by each class are charged directly to the class to which they relate. Expenses common to both classes, investment income, and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based upon the relative daily net assets of each class.

Rebates and Credits Subject to best execution, the fund may direct certain security trades to brokers who have agreed to rebate a portion of the related brokerage commission to the fund in cash. Commission rebates are reflected as realized gain on securities in the accompanying financial statements and totaled $300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005. Additionally, the fund earns credits on temporarily uninvested cash balances at the custodian that reduce the fund’s custody charges. Custody expense in the accompanying financial statements is presented before reduction for credits, which are reflected as expenses paid indirectly.

Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Payments (“variation margin”) made or received to settle the daily fluctuations in the value of futures contracts are recorded as unrealized gains or losses until the contracts are closed. Unsettled variation margin on futures contracts is reflected as other assets or liabilities, and unrealized gains and losses on futures contracts are reflected as the change in net unrealized gain or loss in the accompanying financial statements. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions are declared and paid by each class on an annual basis. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid by the fund, typically on an annual basis.

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks or enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Although certain of these securities may be readily sold, for example, under Rule 144A, others may be illiquid, their sale may involve substantial delays and additional costs, and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult.

Futures Contracts During the year ended December 31, 2005, the fund was a party to futures contracts, which provide for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific financial instrument at an agreed upon price, date, time, and place. Risks arise from possible illiquidity of the futures market and from movements in security values.

Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities, other than short-term securities, aggregated $1,302,680,000 and $1,352,642,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2005.

NOTE 3 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Federal income tax regulations differ from generally accepted accounting principles; therefore, distributions determined in accordance with tax regulations may differ significantly in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character. Financial records are not adjusted for temporary differences.

Distributions during the year ended December 31, 2005 were characterized as follows for tax purposes:

At December 31, 2005, the tax-basis components of net assets were as follows:

Federal income tax regulations require the fund to treat the gain/loss on certain open futures contracts as realized on the last day of the tax year; accordingly, $3,121,000 of unrealized losses reflected in the accompanying financial statements were realized for tax purposes as of December 31, 2005.

For the year ended December 31, 2005, the fund recorded the following permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character. Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to a tax practice that treats a portion of the proceeds from each redemption of capital shares as a distribution of taxable net investment income and/or realized capital gain. Reclassifications between income and gain relate primarily to the offset of the current net operating loss against realized gains. Results of operations and net assets were not affected by these reclassifications.

At December 31, 2005, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $5,571,566,000.

NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (the manager or Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. The investment management agreement between the fund and the manager provides for an annual investment management fee, which is computed daily and paid monthly. The fee consists of an individual fund fee, equal to 0.45% of the fund’s average daily net assets, and a group fee. The group fee rate is calculated based on the combined net assets of certain mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (the group) applied to a graduated fee schedule, with rates ranging from 0.48% for the first $1 billion of assets to 0.29% for assets in excess of $160 billion. Prior to May 1, 2005, the maximum group fee rate in the graduated fee schedule had been 0.295% for assets in excess of $120 billion. The fund’s group fee is determined by applying the group fee rate to the fund’s average daily net assets. At December 31, 2005, the effective annual group fee rate was 0.31%.

The Advisor Class is also subject to a contractual expense limitation through April 30, 2006. During the limitation period, the manager is required to waive its management fee and reimburse a class for any expenses, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses, that would otherwise cause the class’s ratio of total expenses to average net assets (expense ratio) to exceed its expense limitation of 1.20%. The class is required to repay the manager for expenses previously reimbursed and management fees waived to the extent the class’s net assets have grown or expenses have declined sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the class’s expense ratio to exceed its expense limitation. However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the date of any reimbursement or waiver or later than April 30, 2008. Pursuant to this agreement, at December 31, 2005, there were no amounts subject to repayment. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Advisor Class operated below its expense limitation.

In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and two wholly owned subsidiaries of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates computes the daily share prices and maintains the financial records of the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the fund’s transfer and dividend disbursing agent. T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., provides subaccounting and recordkeeping services for certain retirement accounts invested in the Investor Class. For the year ended December 31, 2005, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $73,000 for Price Associates, $1,587,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and $3,407,000 for T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.

Additionally, the fund is one of several mutual funds in which certain college savings plans managed by Price Associates may invest. As approved by the fund’s Board of Directors, shareholder servicing costs associated with each college savings plan are borne by the fund in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the college savings plan. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the fund was charged $191,000 for shareholder servicing costs related to the college savings plans, of which $137,000 was for services provided by Price. The amount payable at period end pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At December 31, 2005, approximately 1% of the outstanding shares of the Investor Class were held by college savings plans.

The fund is also one of several mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (underlying Price funds) in which the T. Rowe Price Retirement Funds (Retirement Funds) may invest. The Retirement Funds do not invest in the underlying Price funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. Pursuant to a special servicing agreement, expenses associated with the operation of the Retirement Funds are borne by each underlying Price fund to the extent of estimated savings to it and in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the Retirement Funds. Expenses allocated under this agreement are reflected as shareholder servicing expense in the accompanying financial statements. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the fund was allocated $1,192,000 of Retirement Funds’ expenses, of which $915,000 related to services provided by Price. The amount payable at period end pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At December 31, 2005, approximately 9% of the outstanding shares of the Investor Class were held by the Retirement Funds.

The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund and the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund (collectively, the T. Rowe Price Reserve Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and affiliates of the fund. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Funds are offered as cash management options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates and/or its affiliates, and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Funds pay no investment management fees.

As of December 31, 2005, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and/or its wholly owned subsidiaries owned 129,672 shares of the Investor Class, representing less than 1% of the fund’s net assets.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund, Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) at December 31, 2005, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the Fund’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2005 by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and by agreement to the underlying ownership records for the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
February 13, 2006

TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) FOR THE TAX YEAR ENDED 12/31/05 

We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.

The fund’s distributions to shareholders included:

$57,342,000 from short-term capital gains,
$349,475,000 from long-term capital gains, subject to the 15% rate gains category.

For taxable non-corporate shareholders, $34,553,000 of the fund’s income represents qualified dividend income subject to the 15% rate category.

For corporate shareholders, $32,282,000 of the fund’s income qualifies for the dividends-received deduction.

INFORMATION ON PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RECORDS 

A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information, which you may request by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our Web site, www.troweprice.com. To access it, click on the words “Company Info” at the top of our homepage for individual investors. Then, in the window that appears, click on the “Proxy Voting Policy” navigation button in the top left corner.

Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our Web site and through the SEC’s Web site. To access it through our Web site, follow the directions above, then click on the words “Proxy Voting Record” at the bottom of the Proxy Voting Policy page.

HOW TO OBTAIN QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS 

The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available electronically on the SEC’s Web site (www.sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.

ABOUT THE FUND’S DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 

Your fund is governed by a Board of Directors that meets regularly to review investments, performance, compliance matters, advisory fees, expenses, and other business affairs, and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders. The majority of the fund’s directors are independent of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price); “inside” directors are officers of T. Rowe Price. The Board of Directors elects the fund’s officers, who are listed in the final table. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the fund directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-225-5132.

Independent Directors
Name
(Year of Birth)
Year Elected *
[Number of T. Rowe Price	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years and Directorships of
Portfolios Overseen]	Other Public Companies
Jeremiah E. Casey **	Director, National Life Insurance (2001 to 8/05); Director, The Rouse
(1940)	Company, real estate developers (1990 to 2004)
2005
[59]
Anthony W. Deering	Chairman, Exeter Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 to present);
(1945)	Director, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer, The
2001	Rouse Company, real estate developers (1997 to 2004); Director,
[113]	Mercantile Bank (4/03 to present)
Donald W. Dick, Jr.	Principal, EuroCapital Advisors, LLC, an acquisition and management
(1943)	advisory firm; Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, The
1992	Haven Group, a custom manufacturer of modular homes (1/04 to present)
[113]
David K. Fagin	Chairman and President, Nye Corporation (6/88 to present); Director,
(1938)	Canyon Resources Corp. and Golden Star Resources Ltd. (5/00 to
1992	present) and Pacific Rim Mining Corp. (2/02 to present)
[113]
Karen N. Horn	Managing Director and President, Global Private Client Services, Marsh
(1943)	Inc. (1999 to 2003); Managing Director and Head of International Private
2003	Banking, Bankers Trust (1996 to 1999); Director, Eli Lilly and Company
[113]	and Georgia Pacific

F. Pierce Linaweaver	President, F. Pierce Linaweaver & Associates, Inc., consulting environmental
(1934)	and civil engineers
2001
[113]
Theo C. Rodgers ***	President, A&R Development Corporation
(1941)
2005
[97]
John G. Schreiber	Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate investment
(1946)	company; Partner, Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, L.P.; Director, AMLI
2001	Residential Properties Trust
[113]

*	Each independent director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.
**	Elected effective October 19, 2005.
***	Elected effective April 1, 2005.

Inside Directors
Name
(Year of Birth)
Year Elected *
[Number of T. Rowe Price	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years and Directorships of
Portfolios Overseen]	Other Public Companies
John H. Laporte, CFA	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
(1945)
1994
[15]
James S. Riepe	Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice Chairman of the Board,
(1943)	Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Chairman of the
1992	Board and Director, T. Rowe Price Global Asset Management Limited,
[113]	T. Rowe Price Global Investment Services Limited, T. Rowe Price
	Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc.,
	and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Director,
	President, and Trust Officer, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director,
	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, all funds
* Each inside director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.

Officers
Name (Year of Birth)
Title and Fund(s) Served	Principal Occupation(s)
Francisco Alonso (1978)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
Preston G. Athey, CFA, CIC (1949)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Brace C. Brooks, CFA (1967)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
Joseph A. Carrier, CPA (1960)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Treasurer, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services,
	Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Hugh M. Evans III, CFA (1966)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
Roger L. Fiery III, CPA (1959)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, Inc.,
	and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
John R. Gilner (1961)	Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President,
Chief Compliance Officer, Small-Cap Stock Fund	T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group,
	Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
Gregory S. Golczewski (1966)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Trust Company
Henry H. Hopkins (1942)	Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services,
	Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Vice
	President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group,
	Inc., T. Rowe Price International, Inc., and T. Rowe
	Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc.
Kris H. Jenner, M.D., D. Phil. (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
Patricia B. Lippert (1953)	Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe Price and
Secretary, Small-Cap Stock Fund	T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
Robert J. Marcotte (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.

Jay S. Markowitz, M.D. (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.; formerly Transplant Surgeon and
	Assistant Professor of Surgery, Johns Hopkins
	University School of Medicine (to 2001)
Gregory A. McCrickard, CFA (1958)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Joseph M. Milano, CFA (1972)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
Curt J. Organt (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
Charles G. Pepin (1966)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
Michael F. Sola, CFA (1969)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
J. David Wagner, CFA (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.
Julie L. Waples (1970)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund
Wenhua Zhang, CFA, CPA (1970)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, Small-Cap Stock Fund	Group, Inc.; formerly student, the Wharton
	School, University of Pennsylvania (to 2001)
Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International for at
least five years.

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Mr. Donald W. Dick Jr. qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Dick is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:

	2005	2004
Audit Fees	$18,399	$16,969
Audit-Related Fees	1,183	2,322
Tax Fees	5,226	4,602
All Other Fees	394	-

Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. All other fees include the registrant’s pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees.

(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.

    (2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $1,008,000 and $903,000, respectively, and were less than the aggregate fees billed for those same periods by the registrant’s principal accountant for audit services rendered to the T. Rowe Price Funds.

(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrant’s audit committee in maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments.

Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.

(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.

    (2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.

    (3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.

(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.

SIGNATURES
	Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment
Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund, Inc.
By	/s/ James S. Riepe
	James S. Riepe
	Principal Executive Officer
Date	February 21, 2006
	Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment
Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By	/s/ James S. Riepe
	James S. Riepe
	Principal Executive Officer
Date	February 21, 2006
By	/s/ Joseph A. Carrier
	Joseph A. Carrier
	Principal Financial Officer
Date	February 21, 2006